2 registered members (Toodoped, CleanBandit),
371
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,467
Posts1,061,481
Members10,349
|
Most Online998 19 minutes ago
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Irishman12]
#345631
11/26/06 04:35 AM
11/26/06 04:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
ND's last 3 losses -USC -Michigan -Ohio St. ---------- Hey Irish how come you didn't post a picture of the Texas loss this week? Hope you Ohio St fans know why I was not as high on the Buckeyes as some. That win against Texas meant little.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: goombah]
#345832
11/26/06 02:33 PM
11/26/06 02:33 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 400 Detroit
ap_capone48101
Arsenal for the Double
|
Arsenal for the Double
Capo
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 400
Detroit
|
Klydon
You make a good point. After everybody has played their final game by early December, Michigan still may be the #2 team in the country. Regardless, they had their shot and didn't come through. A neutral field for OSU-Michigan defeats the purpose IMO.
I think a great Big 10 BCS bowl matchup of 1 loss teams would be Michigan-Wisconsin. Can't happen, each conference is only allowed 2 BCS berth's.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: goombah]
#346302
11/27/06 09:47 PM
11/27/06 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
The thing I don't get is how Brady Quinn gets so much attention.
He got so much attention AFTER Charlie Weis got ahold of him and completely turned his career around. Quinn is a Willingham recruit, not a Weis recruit. W/O Weis he would never have attained such status, the only reason he is slated as a first round pick is b/c he has spent 2 yrs under Charlie Weis. Some scouts give an awful lot of creedence to who coached the qb, and sometimes overlook the qb's lack of skills, mental or physical. Next yr Weis will have a qb that he recruited, and I expect the ND era of college football will begin again. ND loses almost all it's starters though, so, it may take a cpl of yrs.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: klydon1]
#346406
11/28/06 04:27 AM
11/28/06 04:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
Ya you are right Kly, but again, before Weis came to ND Bradie was a nobody. Pro scouts rate him high NOW, mostly b/c of his association with Weis. If Ty Willingham was still coaching at ND then Bradie Quinn would not be in our discussion, nor would he be a high draft pick..... But I agree, he has good presence and has had some nice comebacks.
I heard Bob Davie during Saturday night's game talk about him as a top 3 pick. Back in June that was a popular notion, not so much anymore. That makes about as much sense as Colt McCoy being a Heisman candidate. But Bradie has been hyped as the number 1 player since last February. However, I will be very interested to see where he actually goes on draft day.
Remember, college sports is a lot like politics. Certain players and certain universities get to have their names plugged into everyone's consiousness. Schools like ND and Texas are two of the bigger spenders. As a Texas fan it was soooo very funny to see my university pop up on espn commercials, or Colt McCoy for Heisman, or analysts picking them to win it all when they knew it could never happen. Some of that was to hype the OSU-Texas game, but bottom line is that $$$ talks in this sport/business. As for Bradie, I figure next season ND will have YET ANOTHER 'Quinn' that they can hype as the next Joe Montana.
Last edited by Ice; 11/28/06 04:38 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Ice]
#346428
11/28/06 09:54 AM
11/28/06 09:54 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 295 Cincinnati, Oh
Don Alessandrio
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 295
Cincinnati, Oh
|
Actually Quinn was a highley recruited player out of High School. I believe his top schools were OSU, Mich, ND, USC, and Florida. He had a pick of any school he wanted. He was talked about as the next(perhaps only) greatest QB to come out of the state of Ohio. And there were talks of him playing on sundays way back in his high school days.
Business bad? Fuck you, pay me. Oh, you had a fire? Fuck you, pay me. Place got hit by lightning huh? Fuck you, pay me.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Don Alessandrio]
#346431
11/28/06 10:26 AM
11/28/06 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797 Pennsylvania
klydon1
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
|
Actually Quinn was a highley recruited player out of High School. I believe his top schools were OSU, Mich, ND, USC, and Florida. He had a pick of any school he wanted. He was talked about as the next(perhaps only) greatest QB to come out of the state of Ohio. And there were talks of him playing on sundays way back in his high school days. As a Notre Dame fan, I remember a buzz about Quinn coming out of Dublin, OH (I believe). He certainly flourished under Weiss. It makes me think...what if Ron Powlus had Weiss as a coach for three years. Lou Holtz was a great coach, but he emphasized a strong ground game and Bob Davie was a defensive whiz, but not much else. While Powlus was a good QB and holds many of the school passing records, he is looked at as a failure because he couldn't live up to the enormous hype. I don't think there was ever as much hype around a high school football player as there was around Powlus.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: klydon1]
#346495
11/28/06 01:59 PM
11/28/06 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
You mean Ron(he's gonna win 3 Heismans) Powlus! There might be a player w/ as much hype if Beno Cook gets a say. There are lots and lots and lots of big time recruits who never even see the field. Ya, Bradie was a big recruit, he went to ND he must have been. But he was nearly run out of town w/ Ty Willingham. Then Charlie Weis comes along with his slip screen passes and super bowl charm. Again, we'll wait for draft day and see who actually picks him and where.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Ice]
#347485
12/03/06 03:23 AM
12/03/06 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 31,286 New Jersey, USA
J Geoff
The Don
|
The Don
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 31,286
New Jersey, USA
|
Triple OT with WV... I'm fucking PROUD of Rutgers for hanging in there! Even tho that butter-fingers couldn't hold on to that TD pass from a QB who just normally can't throw to begin with -- regardless of that -- I'm proud of them for hanging on that long when others said it'd be a romp!
I studied Italian for 2 semesters. Not once was a "C" pronounced as a "G", and never was a trailing "I" ignored! And I'm from Jersey! lol Whaddaya want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? --Peter Griffin My DVDs | Facebook | Godfather Filming Locations
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Ice]
#347696
12/04/06 10:30 AM
12/04/06 10:30 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762 Anytown, USA
goombah
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762
Anytown, USA
|
Goombah I don't how you can say this yr's team who lost their entire defense is par with last yr's.
Unless you think Smith and Ginn have improved a great deal then it's illogical. But even then it's illogical b/c last yrs O had Santonio Holmes and Nick Mangold(also first rounders)to go with Smith, Ginn, and Pittman. If this yr's team had to play Vince Young they would lose too(last yrs squad would have beaten him if Tressel had not benched Smith).
You're talking about one side of the ball, I'm talking about the entire team. This year's team at OSU is better overall. The defense last year was very good and better than this year's unit. That said, if they were so great last year, they should have beaten Texas & Penn State. And if Smith hadn't gotten into trouble and was not serving a suspension, he would have played the entire game vs. Texas. The outcome could have easily been different. This year's offense, with Ginn, Smith, Gonzalez, and Pittman is much better than last year. Last year, they struggled at various points to put up points. This year, they have scored at will many times.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: goombah]
#347850
12/04/06 04:38 PM
12/04/06 04:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
I don't why you have such a hard time admitting this. This team is great but WOULD NOT beat Vince Young, and MIGHT lose to last yr's Penn State team if it were in Happy Valley. I know you want to think that since this team is a national champion that it compares to the teams of a yr ago, but it's just not true. They don't compare to last yr's Texas team, they don't compare to last yr's Ohio St team, and they don't compare to last yr's USC team. Have you talked to any other Buckeye fans about this? Do they agree with you? Last yr's team (WITH JUSTIN ZWICK AT QB!!) almost beat Vince Young and national champion Texas!! Tressel is probably about to get his second ring and he deserves it b/c last yr's team should have won it all(if last yr's team won it all you can bet Troy Smith would be in the pros this yr).
Last edited by Ice; 12/04/06 04:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: The Iceman]
#347986
12/05/06 10:26 AM
12/05/06 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
The only good thing that will come about this year is that we are one step closer to a playoff thanks to the newest BCS bs.
Keep dreaming that'll never happen. For one thing university presidents don't want a playoff system. So we're stuck with the current bs, And the endless years of treaking the current system. I don't think it will ever work. However, how f*in sweet would this be!! 1.OSU 8.Boise St. 2.Florida 7.Wisconsin 3.Michigan 6.Louisville 4.LSU 5.USC OMFG!! WE NEED A PLAFOFF
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: Ice]
#347994
12/05/06 11:25 AM
12/05/06 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762 Anytown, USA
goombah
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762
Anytown, USA
|
I don't why you have such a hard time admitting this. This team is great but WOULD NOT beat Vince Young, and MIGHT lose to last yr's Penn State team if it were in Happy Valley. I know you want to think that since this team is a national champion that it compares to the teams of a yr ago, but it's just not true. They don't compare to last yr's Texas team, they don't compare to last yr's Ohio St team, and they don't compare to last yr's USC team. Have you talked to any other Buckeye fans about this? Do they agree with you? Last yr's team (WITH JUSTIN ZWICK AT QB!!) almost beat Vince Young and national champion Texas!! Tressel is probably about to get his second ring and he deserves it b/c last yr's team should have won it all(if last yr's team won it all you can bet Troy Smith would be in the pros this yr). Never did I say that this year's OSU team is better than Texas, USC, prior national champions, or other teams from last year. Never did I say that the 2006 Ohio State team could or could not beat Vince Young. I compared the 2006 Ohio State team to the 2005 Ohio State team. What I actually said was that if Troy Smith had played the entire 2005 game vs. Texas, the result might have very well been different. You are either making shit up or can't comprehend what was written.
|
|
|
Re: 2006 College Football Thread
[Re: goombah]
#347996
12/05/06 12:02 PM
12/05/06 12:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
Ok bud, whatever, take it easy. Its just illogical to say that this yr's OSU team is better than last yrs who had the EXACT offense(in addition to Holmes and Mangold) and one of the best D's the last 10-15 yrs. So you think the offense(despite losing Mangold and Holmes) is actually so much improved this season that they can make up for the loss of that defense? I'm not saying you can't argue that of course, (maybe this years D will turn out to be an incredible unit) but I have not heard this possibility argued by anyone. And wouldn't the 06' D have to be almost as good as 05's D in order compare to 05's team?
You know that this yr's team could not beat Vince, yet your boys last yr almost did just that. I'm lost w/ you there Goomby. If that 05 OSU team is almost as good or better than Vince then they are really, really f*in good(they should have won but Tressel has to be a typical old fu*ck who is going soft in the brain and benches Smith for visiting a booster). That 05 Texas team is a pretty good measure of 'goodness' to measure with I would say.
You are implying that this OSU offense has matured or galvinized some way, or really came to togethor more as a team, or playing w/ more heart, whatever it is.....but they did NOT play a schedule comparible to last yrs.
Last edited by Ice; 12/05/06 02:16 PM.
|
|
|
|