Originally posted by J Geoff: Let's take a look at the Top 3:
Code:
DM 39/89 13 42 .438 - Productive & efficient
PL 42/94 13 31 .447 - Hits worth less to the team?
DJ 34/95 13 43 .358 - Most productive, less efficient
I suppose Efficiency could mean overall production w/ the least amount of work (ABs). OR, what if it meant overall production when one produces (with lesser AVG)?
If the season ended with the stats above, I'd probably declare DMC the winner, even tho in the past I probably would've just looked at it and awarded it to DJ. But it is obvious that 1 RBI difference doesn't make up for .080 less in AVG. Is it? Or isn't it? What about PL's high AVG but 11 fewer RBI?
Seriously...
How can you run a game with no objective criteria for winning?
A game in which "(you'd) probably declare DMC the winner, even tho in the past (you) probably would've just looked at it and awarded it to DJ."
After you said I don't know how many times that the winner has always been the person who won 2 out of 3 categories, and if no one did the tiebreaker would be batting average.
If you're gonna change that, can you decide before Tuesday?
