1 registered members (Dob_Peppino),
587
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,462
Posts1,061,347
Members10,349
|
Most Online992 Jun 1st, 2024
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202419
05/05/05 04:08 PM
05/05/05 04:08 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156 Canada
SlimTrashman
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
Canada
|
thats exactly what happens in the godfather returns...
You go in alive and you come out dead
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202423
05/05/05 06:29 PM
05/05/05 06:29 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156 Canada
SlimTrashman
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
Canada
|
Well niether Frank Sinatra or the Kennedy family are involved but the similar event happens to two characters.
You go in alive and you come out dead
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202424
05/05/05 08:32 PM
05/05/05 08:32 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,206 Los Angeles
Letizia B.
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,206
Los Angeles
|
I overheard a conversation about this today at Starbucks... the guy in front of me in line was telling his friend, "I wonder if his popularity with his more wholesome fans will go down." Uh... Can you say ridiculous?? Don Cardi, you're so right. I mean most of Frank Sinatra's file has been public for many years anyway. There have been stories about his mob ties forever! And every few years, like you said DC, this thing resurfaces as if it's something new. :rolleyes: And it doesn't change anything. It's not like his popularity was based on his virtue and honest dealings... He had the greatest voice, amazing charisma, good acting, and gorgeous eyes! A confirmation to old rumors doesn't change any of those things, so I don't think it's really that big a deal.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202425
05/05/05 09:33 PM
05/05/05 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
Caporegime
|
Caporegime
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Originally posted by Family Honour: I watched a history channel thing about J.Edgar hoover and his 'files' on stars and suchlike. He had a file on Sinatra which he showed to the kennedys and they distanced themselves from Sinatra because of this at that point. Yes, the Kennedy's did distance themselves from Sinatra, but only after USING him in going to Giancana to have Giancana put pressure on his "union people" to endorse and vote for JFK. Joe Kennedy knew that if the Kennedy's could get the union vote, especially in certain states, then the Presidency would be a lock for his boy John. So Sinatra, on behalf of Joe Kennedy, went to Giancana and asked that Giancana do this favor for him. Giancana obliged and pulled the strings within the unions that were under his control and had them support JFK in the election. After JFK won, Father Joe made sure that John and Bobby distanced themselves from Sinatra, and eventually they cut him off totally. To make matters worse the Kennedys never reciprocated to Giancana, through Sinatra, for what he had done to help them and this made it bad for Sinatra with Giancana. We all know that eventually brother Bobby went on a hunt for the unions and the mob, a hunt against the same people that he and his family needed and used to help JFK get elected President. Giancana was furious, and it has been written that at one point a contract on Sinatra was considered by the mob, and when they went to Giancana for approval, Giancana's decided that he loved Sinatra's voice and music too much, so he spared Sinatra's life. I don't really know how true that is, but it has been shown in a movie, and has been written in several different books. But the point that I am trying to make is that the press continually hounds the memory of Sinatra by writing these mob connected stories, but for some strange reason the same press does NOT have the b*lls to write about how the Kennedy's got to where they wanted to be, from Father Joe's bootlegging days to their dealings with the mob in getting John in the oval office to Teddy's cover up with that young girl in her so called accidental death :rolleyes: car accident/drowning! Don Cardi
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202426
05/06/05 01:46 AM
05/06/05 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058 The Slippery Slope
plawrence
RIP StatMan
|
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: for some strange reason the same press does NOT have the b*lls to write about how the Kennedy's got to where they wanted to be, from Father Joe's bootlegging days to their dealings with the mob in getting John in the oval office to Teddy's cover up with that young girl in her so called accidental death :rolleyes: car accident/drowning! There have been any number of books and articles written about everything you mention about the Kennedys. Way more, I would guess, than what has been written about Sinatra. It's pretty commom knowledge that the Chappaquidick incident is largely what prevented Ted Kennedy from becoming president. And I'm not sure what you mean by calling the incident a "so called accident". Yes, Kennedy attempted to cover it up, but to imply that it was anything but an accident to begin with......
"Difficult....not impossible"
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202428
05/06/05 08:59 AM
05/06/05 08:59 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
Caporegime
|
Caporegime
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Originally posted by plawrence: I'm not sure what you mean by calling the incident a "so called accident".
Yes, Kennedy attempted to cover it up, but to imply that it was anything but an accident to begin with...... Are you being serious here Plaw? That family has been full of scandals and coverups for as long as they've existed! Yet there is a faction in this country that continually tries to paint a rosey picture of this clan. I've always been bothered by the sheer hypocricy that has been displayed by that family! That holier than thou attitude! That "do as we say, not as we do" attitude! John Jr. was one of the few Kennedys' that ever showed an ounce of decency and class, and that was because his mother gave him the correct upbringing. I also happen to like Robert Jr. as he seems to be a sincere man who stands by his convictions and I respect him for that. But you'll never be able to convince me that what happened with that girl, who was with Teddy, was merely an accident! :rolleyes: Don Cardi
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202429
05/06/05 09:42 AM
05/06/05 09:42 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,413 UK
Family Honour
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,413
UK
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: [quote]Originally posted by Family Honour: [b] I watched a history channel thing about J.Edgar hoover and his 'files' on stars and suchlike. He had a file on Sinatra which he showed to the kennedys and they distanced themselves from Sinatra because of this at that point. Yes, the Kennedy's did distance themselves from Sinatra, but only after USING him in going to Giancana to have Giancana put pressure on his "union people" to endorse and vote for JFK............ Don Cardi [/b][/quote]Thanks for filling in the story Don Cardi very interesting. I didnt know people had suspicions about that Teddy Kennedy/drowning thing not being an accident tho. Do you mean him leaving her for dead was no accident or the actual accident was no accident Jeesh I'm confusing myself now Thanks
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202431
05/06/05 06:09 PM
05/06/05 06:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058 The Slippery Slope
plawrence
RIP StatMan
|
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: I guess that Plaw was confused by the same thing. To clarify what I've gotten from stories that have been told about that incident, IMHO his leaving her for dead was no accident. Ah.....understood. I was confused. However.....He has said that he made several attempts to dive down and rescue her after the car went off the bridge, but was unsuccessful. And since he was a strong swimmer, as witnessed by the fact that he was able to swim to shore while still, apparently, in a semi-state of shock, I have no reason to not believe him on that point. That said, though, once he reached shore he waited several hours to report the accident, during which time he attempted to concoct a cover-up story that involved having his cousin, Joseph Garghan (sp?), claiming to be the driver. And that I cannot forgive. Originally posted by Don Cardi: That family has been full of scandals and coverups for as long as they've existed! Yet there is a faction in this country that continually tries to paint a rosey picture of this clan. I've always been bothered by the sheer hypocricy that has been displayed by that family! That holier than thou attitude! As far as all of that other stuff goes..... First let me say that although I was only eleven years old at the time of his election, I was politically aware enough to prefer JFK over Nixon. And I would agree that because of his youth, popularity, and untimely death, there was a rather "rosey" picture painted of him and his presidency in the years immediately following his assassination. But I think it's fair to say that as the years have gone by the gloves have come off to a great extent, and, as I said earlier, there have been a great many books and articles that have been extremely critical of him, his familiy, and his administration, scandals and coverups included. There will always be a "faction" that supports him, just as there is and always will be a faction in support of Nixon and his scandals and coverups, and Clinton and his scandals and coverups, and the list goes on .....
"Difficult....not impossible"
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202432
05/06/05 09:30 PM
05/06/05 09:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
Caporegime
|
Caporegime
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Originally posted by plawrence: First let me say that although I was only eleven years old at the time of his election, I was politically aware enough to prefer JFK over Nixon.
There will always be a "faction" that supports him, just as there is and always will be a faction in support of Nixon and his scandals and coverups, and Clinton and his scandals and coverups, and the list goes on ..... Although I was not old enough to remember JFK during his presidency, I do respect him and from what I've read about him I've concluded that he was a decent man. If you go back and read what I wrote about the Kennedys', I do not really say anything negative about JFK himself. I never considered JFK a bad Don, but Bobby was NOT a wartime consigliere! Rest his soul. It was his father, his brother Bobby and his brother Teddy that I actually have the beefs with. Bobby was a scumbag. Probably the son most like his father. Bobby and Joe USED Sinatra and then threw him away like a piece of garbage! Personally I've always concluded that Joseph Sr. really had political aspirations for Joe Jr., but because of his demise, Sr. was crushed! But Sr. wanted to fulfill his dream so he then threw the next best thing in his eyes, John, into the political arena and would do everything to make sure that his son would get to the White House. As for the "factions" that support the various former Presidents, yes, you are right, the list DOES go on and on, and will always continue to do so! Don Cardi
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202433
05/07/05 01:23 AM
05/07/05 01:23 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319 Providence, RI
Moscarelli
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319
Providence, RI
|
But back on topic...
I think that this evidence of Sinatra's involvement in the mob, only downplays his personality. I mean, for the longest time, he was suspected of being connected, but that gave him a sense of mystery and charisma to him. Did he ever kill anyone? Was he still doing jobs for the Mafia? Did he ever meet Al Capone? Absurd questions, yes, but not so absurd to the ignorant public, especially some years ago.
But, the proof that Sinatra was a "bagman", and other incites to Sinatra and his relation to La Cosa Nostra, does two things: erase the mysticism of Sinatra and his mysterious connections, and also proves that Sinatra probably didn't kill anyone, that he had very little to do with the Mafia while he was famous, and that, no, he never met Al Capone.
"The toe you stepped on yesterday may be attached to the ass you have to kiss today." -Former Mayor of Providence, RI, Vincent "Buddy" Cianci
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202436
05/07/05 12:35 PM
05/07/05 12:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539
AZ
|
One of the enduring myths of the JFK assassination is that Giancana raised money for JFK and helped him carry Illinois in 1960, and expected favors in return. When RFK, as JFK's Attorney General, took off after the Mafia, Giancana was outraged, and "ordered" JFK's assassination. I don't think so. Giancana had no reason--none at all--to expect anything from the Kennedy brothers. RFK was chief counsel to the Senate Subcommittee on Labor Racketeerin and JFK was a member of the subcommittee when Giancana was called to testify around 1957. RFK humiliated Giancana:
Mr.KENNEDY: Would you tell us anything about any of your operations or will you just giggle every time I ask you a question? Mr.GIANCANA: I decline to answer because I honestly believe my answer might tend to incriminate me. MR.KENNEDY: I thought only little girls giggled, Mr. Giancana.
Does that exchange suggest that Giancana would be willing to raise money and exert influence for the Kennedys, or to expect favors from them? RFK also attacked Jimmy Hoffa, Giancana's close ally, at those hearings, which led the Teamsters to support Nixon in 1960.
JFK didn't dump Sinatra because Hoover showed him proof of Sinatra's Mob connections. He dumped Sinatra after Hoover showed RFK proof that Judith Exner had been Giancana's mistress. Sinatra had introduced JFK and Exner. JFK liked Sinatra and admired his lifestyle. He probably knew that Sinatra associated with gangsters because JFK was an avid consumer of Hollywood gossip, which he accumulated by befriending show-biz types through his brother in law, Peter Lawford. But he figured out right away that it'd be far, far too dangerous for him to maintain a relationship that connected him with Giancana through Exner with Hoover holding that information as a weapon over him. That's why he dumped Sinatra.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202437
05/07/05 01:47 PM
05/07/05 01:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
Caporegime
|
Caporegime
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Originally posted by Turnbull: One of the enduring myths of the JFK assassination is that Giancana raised money for JFK and helped him carry Illinois in 1960.I don't think so. Giancana had no reason--none at all--to expect anything from the Kennedy brothers. Ahhh Turnbull, you are definately one of my most admired Mob Historians. But with all due RESPECT towards you, I have to disagree with you on part of your statement. I do believe, for many different reasons, and some from personal knowledge that was handed down to me, that Giancana did put the word out to the Unions to support and vote for JFK. While I do agree that Giancana did not raise money for the Presidential race, and did not do this as a personal favor for the Kennedys', I am almost certain that Giancana did it more as a favor to Sinatra, and sent word to his Unions that they were to support JFK. If memory serves me correctly, JFK needed two key states to win that election, ( I could be wrong ), which I know one was Illinois, and I think that the other was West Virginia. I think that it was Sinatra who convinced Sam that by helping JFK win the election, they would have a personal "in" because of Sinatra's so called relationship with the Kennedys. That is why when Bobby eventually went after Giancana, Hoffa and the Teamsters, Giancana held Sinatra personally responsible, but gave him a pass. I do believe, and this is pure speculation on my part, that Giancana's working with the CIA in regards to getting Castro, somehow ties into the eventual killing of JFK. But that part is just pure speculation on my part. Ok, so now this is the second time that we don't agree on something! (I still say that the old man singing at Connie's wedding was Nazorine the Bakers father! ) Don Cardi
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202439
05/07/05 03:15 PM
05/07/05 03:15 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539
AZ
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: While I do agree that Giancana did not raise money for the Presidential race, and did not do this as a personal favor for the Kennedys', I am almost certain that Giancana did it more as a favor to Sinatra, and sent word to his Unions that they were to support JFK. If memory serves me correctly, JFK needed two key states to win that election, ( I could be wrong ), which I know one was Illinois, and I think that the other was West Virginia. I think that it was Sinatra who convinced Sam that by helping JFK win the election, they would have a personal "in" because of Sinatra's so called relationship with the Kennedys. That is why when Bobby eventually went after Giancana, Hoffa and the Teamsters, Giancana held Sinatra personally responsible, but gave him a pass. I do believe, and this is pure speculation on my part, that Giancana's working with the CIA in regards to getting Castro, somehow ties into the eventual killing of JFK. But that part is just pure speculation on my part.
Don Cardi DC, I always respect your opinions, even though you weren't at Nazorine's christening and thererore didn't get a good look at his father. JFK needed West Virginia in the Democratic primary, not the general election. He won WVA by outspending his fellow Democrat, Hubert Humphrey, and by dispatching his supporter, FDR Jr., to spread the lie that Humphrey had been a "draft-dodger" in WWII. JFK needed three close-call states to win the 1960 Presidential election: Illinois, Connecticut and Texas. Richard Daley, the all-powerful mayor of Chicago, delivered Illinois through the time-tested tactic of turning out voters "early and often." Nixon lead by a big margin early in the downstate results, but after 10 p.m., the upstate (i.e., Chicago) results put JFK in the lead by 5k votes. Certainly union votes were among them, but Daley, not Giancana, turned out the union votes. As I posted earlier: RFK had declared war on Giancana and Hoffa before the 1960 election, when his brother was a senator. The difference afterward was that his appointment as Attorney General gave him the wherewithal to put Hoffa in prison. It's true that the Mob cooperated with the CIA in some of the harebrained schemes to whack Castro after the Bay of Pigs. It's also true that RFK headed up that effort, called "Operation Mongoose." But there's no evidence that RFK knew that working-level CIA operatives were sounding out their Mob contacts. Mob guys were anxious to cooperate not because they loved the Kennedys or were patriots, but because the plot gave them a chance to restore their holdings in Havana casinos and brothels.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202440
05/07/05 09:40 PM
05/07/05 09:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
Caporegime
|
Caporegime
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Originally posted by Turnbull: DC, I always respect your opinions, even though you weren't at Nazorine's christening and thererore didn't get a good look at his father. JFK needed West Virginia in the Democratic primary, not the general election. He won WVA by outspending his fellow Democrat, Hubert Humphrey, and by dispatching his supporter, FDR Jr., to spread the lie that Humphrey had been a "draft-dodger" in WWII. JFK needed three close-call states to win the 1960 Presidential election: Illinois, Connecticut and Texas. Richard Daley, the all-powerful mayor of Chicago, delivered Illinois through the time-tested tactic of turning out voters "early and often." Nixon lead by a big margin early in the downstate results, but after 10 p.m., the upstate (i.e., Chicago) results put JFK in the lead by 5k votes. Certainly union votes were among them, but Daley, not Giancana, turned out the union votes. As I posted earlier: RFK had declared war on Giancana and Hoffa before the 1960 election, when his brother was a senator. The difference afterward was that his appointment as Attorney General gave him the wherewithal to put Hoffa in prison. It's true that the Mob cooperated with the CIA in some of the harebrained schemes to whack Castro after the Bay of Pigs. It's also true that RFK headed up that effort, called "Operation Mongoose." But there's no evidence that RFK knew that working-level CIA operatives were sounding out their Mob contacts. Mob guys were anxious to cooperate not because they loved the Kennedys or were patriots, but because the plot gave them a chance to restore their holdings in Havana casinos and brothels. You thought that I wasn't at Nazorine's Christening because YOU weren't invited! Well, of course I cannot debate the facts that you provided above because I was not around for that election. You obviously lived through the election so therefore you would know better than I. I always respect your knowledge, and your expertise on these historical matters. Next time we meet, remind me to tell you a story that was passed down to me from a former high ranking official in the Teamsters Union. Turnbull, I am always glad and appreciative when you educate me in things pertaining to these matters. And I always admire your way of disagreeing with someone without EVER offending them! You are a true gentleman! Don Cardi
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: SINATRA WAS A BAGMAN
#202441
05/08/05 01:00 AM
05/08/05 01:00 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539
AZ
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: Well, of course I cannot debate the facts that you provided above because I was not around for that election. You obviously lived through the election so therefore you would know better than I. Don Cardi Yes, DC, I was the Kennedy/Johnson campaign manager for Brownsville, Brooklyn in the 1960 election. JFK carried the neighborhood by a big margin. He was very grateful to me, and asked me to name my reward. I told him I wanted a shot at Judith Exner. Instead, he gave me the url for this website... :rolleyes:
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
|