2 registered members (DanteMoltisanti, 1 invisible),
808
guests, and 4
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,467
Posts1,061,473
Members10,349
|
Most Online992 Jun 1st, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Brangelina to Tie the Knot When Everyone Else Can
#165099
09/11/06 08:20 PM
09/11/06 08:20 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
Double-J
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
|
Originally posted by klydon1: Wow. And I thought the guy was kind of stupid.
He's refusing to marry the woman he impregnated out of wedlock, but is putting himself on a higher moral ground than the rest of us. Kudos. All I can add is that for someone who divorced his wife of 5-6 years for a fling-and-boot-knocking with Angelina, who also coincidentally left her husband to pursue the life of an alley cat. Yep, talk about a moral compass...heavy on the "ass." :p
|
|
|
Re: Brangelina to Tie the Knot When Everyone Else Can
#165102
09/11/06 09:59 PM
09/11/06 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 485
Mad Johnny
BANNED
|
BANNED
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 485
|
Yeah, its kinda like, not worth my attention? Ya know what I mean? Like I shouldn't even be wasting brain power on this. Damn celebrities
Officially the victim/target of the first and third Non-Aggression Pact attacks #2 is Fathersson # 4 is Double-J
Proud Member of the Gangster BB Bratpack - Fighting Elitism and Ignorance Since 2006
Double-J: may you serve us better from above, smile on from heaven
"Buh-Bye"
|
|
|
Re: Brangelina to Tie the Knot When Everyone Else Can
#165104
09/11/06 10:52 PM
09/11/06 10:52 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145 East Tennessee
ronnierocketAGO
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
|
People, you all seem to not realize that everything in Hollywood...from films to TV appearances to even love...is business-oriented.
If anything, Pitt might be wise to not get married. Why? Because if one has studied the tabloids at the supermarket over the years, one realizes that save for one freak incident, most celebrity marriages collapse under 10 years, with under 5 being the new "breaker".
Unless one has a pre-arranged contract in the case of a marriage breakup, male actors/musicians/execs lose bundles in Hollywood. Pitt lost much, along with potential, millions to Aniston because of that split-owned production company of theirs (which unless I'm mistaken, is a company involved with Scorsese's upcoming THE DEPARTED).
Anyway, the only Brad Pitt that I honestly care about is the actor, when he bothers to act that is.
Sadly, he's like Tom Cruise. No, not in the nutty department. I mean in that for every great turn that Pitt did like say FIGHT CLUB, SE7EN, TRUE ROMANCE, 12 MONKEYS, etc....he does several more movies where he so so so COASTS like a mother fucker. You know, when movie stars don't bother to act and simply "coast"(self-explanatory). Such examples for Pitt include TROY, SPY GAME, THE DEVIL'S OWN, OCEAN'S 11, the sequel, SEVEN YEARS IN TIBET, and so many that I thankfully can't remember.
Other than that, Pitt doesn't matter at all in my radar.
|
|
|
Re: Brangelina to Tie the Knot When Everyone Else Can
#165106
09/12/06 10:24 AM
09/12/06 10:24 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797 Pennsylvania
klydon1
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
|
Originally posted by Enzo Scifo: [quote]Originally posted by klydon1: [b] He's refusing to marry the woman he impregnated out of wedlock And what's wrong with this? He isn't discriminating anyone, not hurting anyone. As Plaw would say, 'As long as it doesn't interfere with my business'. [/b][/quote]I'm not making a judgment -hey, live and let live. If living together is your thing, go for it. I'm also for the states' right to decide whether to acknowledge and allow gay men and women to marry. However, there's no need for him to address publicly the issue of his marital status, but he apparently felt compelled to do so for reasons about which I can only speculate. I just think the guy is completely disengenuous in his statement and reason for not marrying the girl. I don't know if he's incredibly naive and stupid, or just thinks the rest of us are. He didn't express this concern during his first marriage. Are we to believe if he were married at the time he was hit with this epiphany and new concern, he would divorce his wife and not be married since it is so important for him to be single at this time? If he were concerned with the starving children in the Sudan, would he suddenly stop eating? If he were concerned about the paucity of roles for older or minority actors, would he stop making movies? If he were concerned about the quality of films and acting, would he find another job? It's ironic that he is speaking out on the issue of gay marriage at a time when it is personally convenient for him. He is merely exploiting the issue to manufacture a justification for his action, and that is reprehensible.
|
|
|
|