Originally posted by AppleOnYa:
he simply didn't deserve a fair trial and should've been taken out and the day it was discovered he was involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Originally posted by plawrence:
But how did we know that until the trial, counsel?
Originally posted by AppleOnYa:
That's a good way to avoid the question, counselor.
Shall I rephrase that, or is it considered being "argumentative" and "badgering the witness" if I do?
