But to suggest that the fact that some people might be offended by such a film's content is a valid reason to not make the film in the first place is ridiculous.
Not as ridiculous as you may think. Do you happen to know what the content of the film really is?
As far as the film itself goes, why don't we wait and see exactly how everything and everyone is depicted before we pass judgement on it.
There's no reason, at least by these widows, to wait and see how everything and everyone is depicted, they already know how it is going to be done, and according to them it is not being done in a truthful or tasteful manner.
No one, not Oliver Stone, not you or I, no one, is under any obligation to adhere to the wishes of the survivors of any of the victims of 9-11.
You way off course with this statement Plaw, because when a movie director and his consultants are telling the story about two men who died that day, who left behind small children and wives, and one of them, Officer Pezzulo, died saving someone who is now a consultant on this movie, and the other one, Officer Christopher Amoroso ( see picture below ) died because after going in and out of the building 6 or 7 times and saving hundreds of people, returned for maybe the 8th time hoping to rescue more, and never made it out on the 8th try, you bet your ass that these two survivors, who were saved by these men, have a life debt obligation to adhere to the wishes of the widows of the two men who gave there own lives so that these guys could go home and hug their children again! It's the least that they can do to honor the memory of those two men who gave their own lives and afforded them the opportunity to go on with theirs!
Taking the feelings of these widows would be the respectful thing to do!
Please see the PM that I sent you.
Don Cardi
