Originally posted by treuth:
KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!KILL!
WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!WAR!
DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!DIE!
Yea man lets keep them bombs comin. Why stop there. Lets drop all the bombs(science has done us so well hasn't it?) we can on all Heathens.
Cus if we want peace the only way we can get it is by warfare
F*ck the human race
Well, that was an epiphany of proportions I can't even fathom. Perhaps next time, you can try to make an argument that makes sense. I'd like to hear the "treuth."
Originally posted by Don Smitty:
The United States is bombing an area of Iraq in hopes that it will take out terrorists that have been trying to start a civil war. It's about time. What has our government been waiting for? How many more soldiers did we have to lose before we woke up and started these bombings? I said this a few months ago that we should be just dropping bombs on these terrorists. Finally someone is using there brains.
DS
As Butters already said, it is not a bombing campaign. It was a massive troop drop.
Originally posted by Enzo Scifo:
In other words; what if, thanks to the bombings, more innocent people die than if there wouldn't have been bombings? Is it then still worth it?
Is it worth it if we do nothing and the enemy kills more civilians and troops alike?
Originally posted by dontomasso:
quote:
Originally posted by Don Jasani:
W wanted this war very badly and like the mental defective he is he declared it over (as has been brought up) 3 years ago.
Again, I'm so tired of these unsubstantiated statements/assumptions. President Bush declared major fighting over (which may have been incorrect) but he never said the war was over; in fact, as I recall, he said we'd be there as long as it takes, and anyone that thought this was going to be a quick battle was mistaken.
Secondly, the "Mission Accomplished" sign was from the troops on the ship, not from the Administration.
