So killing children in war is not comparable to abortion?
Not in the way you are stating. You are implying that children die in war purposefully, which, outside of terrorism, is generally not the case.
Abortion, however, is the deliberate murder of a child.
Why is that okay, is it because their DNA is different being from another country?
Oh, yes, pull the race card. Because, after all, I have been advocating abortion across the globe, as long as it isn't in America. :rolleyes:
[/sarcasm]
Collateral damage? Let's see, I just took the fetus out of the womb. Its dying is a collateral damage. That's a good one, thanks for making a way for the bad girl.
That is NOT collateral damage. By definition:
Noun Collateral Damage - (euphemism)
inadvertent casualties and destruction inflicted on civilians in the course of military operations.
Abortion is by no means inadvertant.
So bad girl, go back to the drawing board.
I said they don't like to pay
How do you know?
and try to eliminate the SSO altogether.
Again, this is speculation. Certainly there are some who want to do away with it, but the vast majority of conservatives want reform.
By that same token - there sure are alot of anarchists, radical Muslims, and Philippinos that want to get rid of America... :rolleyes:
can I trust future of a baby on an organization that is going to be non-existent a few years from now?
I didn't know American tax-dollars supported women in Iran?
Regards,
Double-J
