Originally posted by Don Cardi:
I have to laugh at this. Because over in one thread, an implication was made that because a dress code was put into place by an organization that has an 85% African American membership, it is a racially motivated rule, and that it shouldn't be implemented because of it's possible motives.
But here, a family is singing Nazi songs, dispaying Nazi symbols, preaching hate, but that is not racially motivated or wrong. Give me a break.
I fail to see any inconsistency here.
If you are willing, for the sake of argument, to assume for a moment that the NBS dress code
is discriminatory, then:
NBA Dress Code = Discriminatory = "Morally" Wrong = But the NBA has the right to implement it
Nazi Girls = Hateful = "Morally" Wrong = But they have the right to spew their hate.
