Hmmm. Very interesting.

I personally think that there is a lot more involved in this than is actually being told. So it is still hard for me to give an opinion on this situation itself either way. But I am a bit confused with some of the arguements that have been presented here by some people.

You say that the government has to solve a situation where a Catholic School, that teaches certain standards and morals, which are based on Christain Biblical teachings, has denied a girl an education in that school because her parents are gay. So in your opinion it is ok for the government to step in and interfere with the church here.

Yet, when people here argued that the words Under God should remain in the pledge, many of you used the Seperation of Church and State arguement.

So let me understand this now. If the religious faction within this country feel that UNDER GOD should remain in the Pledge, asccording to some of you they are wrong because our laws call for seperation of Church and State. That religion and government should not mix. A Fair and valid arguement.

But now that a private religious school has denied an education to a girl because her upbringing does not conform to their religious teaching, several of you who screamed about seperation of church and state now call for state government to come in and intercede on her behalf? The same state government that falls under the law of seperation of church and state?


Don Cardi