0 registered members (),
430
guests, and 7
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,433
Posts1,060,899
Members10,349
|
Most Online992 Yesterday at 04:40 PM
|
|
|
Re: how many of you...
#116455
06/23/05 04:39 PM
06/23/05 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Originally posted by Jimmy Buffer: hardcore democrats would really secretly be happy if another terrorist attack hit the us while bush was still in office? reading some of the posts, it would almost seem like a victory to you if the us were to lose the war on terror and everybody died just so you could be proven right. on the other side of the coin, how many hardcore republicans would secretly be happy if another terrorist attack hit the us after bush was out of office and a democrat was in charge? sure your uncle might get killed and your grandma horribly disfigured, but at least you proved the other guys wrong. come on now, i expect some honest answers. you guys are anonymous. i know there's some of you who would gain at least a little satisfaction. So aparently Democrat is synonomous with terrorist now, huh? :rolleyes: Look bud, I think you need to get your head examined. I am a liberal, and in no means anti-American. You're either reading too far into our comments, or not far enough. We are anti-Bush due to his handling of the terrorism. We may not approve with him 100%, but we would never think of a second attack! That's just irrational thinking. Pure out irrational, ignorant thinking.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: how many of you...
#116456
06/23/05 04:42 PM
06/23/05 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,224 New Jersey
AppleOnYa
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,224
New Jersey
|
Originally posted by Snake: ...I just think it's a bit over-the-top in the tactics. ... I would've definitely said it differently. But hey, that's me. Hi, Snake...that's what I meant about his choice of words. He just went about it with way too much of an edge way and managed to freak out the 'thin-skinned' and 'meek of heart'. I can sort of relate... Apple
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
- THOMAS JEFFERSON
|
|
|
Re: how many of you...
#116458
06/23/05 04:45 PM
06/23/05 04:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
Jimmy Buffer
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
|
did i ever say you said anything inflammatory? i have seen posts on this board where people don't seem to realize they're running down the very country they're living in, that's why i posted that question. i didn't post that question thinking, "oh boy i can't wait to see the reaction i get out of goombah." the only thing i posted directed specifically at you was the post about defending your political party because your first response to my question was to immediately begin pleading the case of the democratic party as if i had attacked it, when i posed the same question to republicans. that is why i asked people to re-read the post. they only read what they wanted to read and just assumed that i was attacking democrats since i mentioned them first. by the way, regarding hiding behind another board, since when do you have to explain where every idea for a thread comes from. i've read plenty of thread in the godfather section where the original poster didn't state word for word were he got every piece of information from. in curiousity, i randomly viewed other internet sites to gain a better understanding. i don't really view that as hiding behind another message board. the only reason i mentioned where the idea came from is because people were misreading my original question thinking that was how i felt. i think the few posts i've actually posted in the general discussion forum make that pretty clear.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
|
|
|
Re: how many of you...
#116465
06/23/05 09:43 PM
06/23/05 09:43 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
Jimmy Buffer
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
|
Originally posted by long_lost_corleone: ] So aparently Democrat is synonomous with terrorist now, huh? :rolleyes: [/QUOTE] llc, you make my point for me perfectly. only someone who is completely blinded by their partisanship would think i was somehow blasting democrats exclusively. did you even read anything i've written? notice the next several sentences where i asked the same question to republicans. all i had to do was mention the word democrat and i'm immediately denegrating them. geez, as much as i hate the concept of political parties, all the democrats who have come out accusing me of blasting only their party is making me want to give up and hop on an elephant.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
|
|
|
Re: how many of you...
#116466
06/23/05 09:47 PM
06/23/05 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
Jimmy Buffer
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
|
Originally posted by Mignon: Why would anyone who has an ounce of humanity in them be secretly happy about another(God forbid)terroist attack? i think the key to your response is an ounce of humanity in them. after seeing how some people feel about their own countrymen, i'm definately convinced that there are people who lack this requesite ounce of humanity.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
|
|
|
|