1 registered members (m2w),
114
guests, and 7
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,954
Posts1,073,781
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Michael and Rosatos
#1086253
03/25/24 11:36 AM
03/25/24 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632
AZ
|
After scaring Pentangeli with his shouting account of the Tahoe shooting, Michael tells Frankie that he .knows Roth was behind it, and asks him to “help me take my revenge.” “Michael, anything…” says the much-relieved Pentangeli. Michael then tells him to “settle these problems with the Rosato brothers.” When Frankie objects, Michael gives him the “keep friends close/enemies closer” rap, then explains that if Roth thinks his relationship with Michael is still good, he’ll be “relaxed…then I’ll find out who the traitor is in my family.” All good, except that the last thing Michael said to Roth in Miami before leaving to visit Pentangeli was: “Frank Pentangeli is a dead man…you don’t object?” But, instead of having Frankie whacked, Michael dispatched him on a peace mission with the Rosatos. That would have told Roth that Michael didn’t suspect Pentangeli in the Tahoe shooting—meaning that he might suspect Roth. It would make Roth feel anything but “relaxed.” Why did Michael send Pentangeli on that mission?
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Turnbull]
#1086571
03/27/24 09:55 PM
03/27/24 09:55 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
All good, except that the last thing Michael said to Roth in Miami before leaving to visit Pentangeli was: “Frank Pentangeli is a dead man…you don’t object?” But, instead of having Frankie whacked, Michael dispatched him on a peace mission with the Rosatos. That would have told Roth that Michael didn’t suspect Pentangeli in the Tahoe shooting—meaning that he might suspect Roth. I haven't made that connection. Saying Frankie's a dead man mustn't mean it's happening on some set timetable. Until it happens, Michael has to appear to be with Frankie.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Turnbull]
#1086711
03/29/24 11:03 PM
03/29/24 11:03 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048
Australia
|
I find, Michael's visits and the sequence of events somewhat bizarre.... Michael didn't seem to suspect / see through Roth as to why Roth in Miami with no business interests of his own in New York was backing up the Rosato brothers in New York against Pentangeli, Michael's [and Vito's] own loyal, good old man for years until the Tahoe bedroom shooting. Ahhh.... Roth fooled a Corleone but Pentangeli was smarter - Michael didn't question -- And what is the interest for Roth, in concocting this Love Triangle?!
- did Roth gamble? on Michael's [the heir-apparent] greed for Roth's business that Michael would “give his loyalty to a Jew before his own blood” Roth was not wrong!
Whilst my take, Michael's “Then Pentangeli is a dead man, you don't object.” was a statement rather than a question and Michael was telling [not asking] Roth what Michael was going to be doing ie: Michael was not seeking Roth's approval nor permission I came here because there is gonna be more blood shed. I want you to know about it before it happens so that there's no danger of starting another war. - why did Michael need to visit Roth at all -- because of....
The important thing? is that nothing interferes with our [Roth and Michael's] plans for the future. - what is the link between Roth and Michael's plans and the Tahoe shooting
- Roth's been flying under the Radar
Hyman Roth always makes money for his partners. One by one, our old friends are gone. Death -- natural or not - prison -- deported. Hyman Roth is the only one left -- because he always made money for his partners. - starting another war by whom
- Roth has never shed any blood never started war/s
- why would the Mighty, Top Don Michael Corleone, visit his subordinate who, according to the Don himself, had just “tried to have Michael killed” In my home! In my bedroom!
- If Pentangeli is small potatoes, how could Pentangeli have engineered such a hit of the Top Don In my home! In my bedroom!
- Did Pentangeli come prepared anticipating Michael's no “to get rid of the Rosato brothers”
After the failed Tahoe shooting and Michael's visit to Roth 1. Neither Michael nor Roth fooled the other 2. Neither was relaxed and confident, in their friendship 3. Both conspiring to get the other killed -- First 4. Both knew the other knew but continued their charade until the First dead man 5. Both underestimated each other, more so Roth: What we'll do together in the next few months will make history, Michael -- history Michael dispatching dead man, Pentangeli on a peace mission with the Rosatos, would make Roth think? his relationship with Michael is still good, he’ll be “relaxed.” Sure thing Tuna sandwich Picnic!
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Turnbull]
#1086712
03/29/24 11:03 PM
03/29/24 11:03 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048
Australia
|
Why would Clemenza promise the Rosato brothers three Corleone territories in the Bronx after he died. Rosato's contract! according to Pentangeli Clemenza promised them nothing. He hated those son of a bitches more than Pentangeli does. and I believe him [Pentangeli] Once a common Mafia hood -- Michael needs Pentangeli as his muscle Otherwise Michael becomes just another casino operator, easy pickings for anyone - What was Michael expecting? to happen at the Pentangeli-Rosatos meeting
- my take, Michael was not expecting Pentangeli to come to any harm other than the humiliating back down, perhaps handing over the three territories and in the process looking weak etc.
- If Pentangeli is killed by the Rosato brothers - Michael can't afford to let his man's murder go unavenged - danger of starting another war
- Besides if Pentangeli is killed and Rosato brothers, Roth's ally take over the Corleone operation then Michael loses his muscle Pretty soon there won't be one place in Nevada Michael can hang his hat!
- Hence Michael would never want to lose his muscle which is the only thing that makes Michael untouchable
So.... - Why would Michael envisage the Rosato brothers would fail Roth
- and How
It was indeed unbecoming of a Don 1. Michael “undercut Pentangeli through his support of the Rosato Brothers” against his own man 2. Michael gave his loyalty to a Jew [Roth] before his own blood 3. Michael asked Pentangeli to lay down - settle these troubles - to the Rosato Brothers who spit right in Pentangeli's face 4. Michael threw Pentangeli [good old man -- who was loyal to Vito, Michael's father and to Michael, for years] under the bus 5. then abandonment of his 'dead' capo's family
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1086715
03/30/24 02:05 AM
03/30/24 02:05 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632
AZ
|
The obvious answer to my question is that it's another of the many director/script "liberties" (or "irrationalities" if you prefer) that FFC and Puzo took to move the film along--in this case to set up Pentangeli's betrayal of Michael, the Senate hearing and all the great drama that followed.
But (and I admit, this is a stretch): Michael, the master manipulator, may have been testing Frankie's loyalty. Sure, he knew Frankie wasn't responsible for the Tahoe shooting. But Michael wanted more: he wanted Pentangeli to put his head into the lion's mouth by meeting with his arch-enemies, the Rosatos. If the mission succeeded, it might have made Roth relax and not get suspicious of why Michael didn't immediately have Pentangeli whacked. Then, as he told Frankie, he'd be able to string Roth along and find out who was the traitor in his family. And then he'd have Roth killed. A very convenient scenario for Michael, but it made Michael relax, and ignore the possibility--perhaps the probability--that the Rosatos would try to kill Pentangeli, leaving his NYC muscle operation in his enemies' hands.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Turnbull]
#1086734
03/30/24 08:02 PM
03/30/24 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 786
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 786
|
He was slippin' why did Michael need to visit Roth at all --
why would the Mighty, Top Don Michael Corleone, visit his subordinate who, according to the Don himself, had just “tried to have Michael killed” In my home! In my bedroom! Turnbull's point raises -- Is this how Michael envisaged the Rosato brothers would fail Roth? Then the possibility--perhaps the probability--that the Rosatos would try to kill Pentangeli, didn't escape his eye If the mission failed, leaving his NYC muscle operation in his enemies' hands, then Michael loses his muscle and becomes just another casino operator, easy pickings for anyone. No more Mr. untouchable If it was the three territories which Pentangeli presumably was handing over, “settle these problems then why kill him? Why tell Roth Pentangeli is a dead man, then dispatch him? They would have got them anyway and perhaps more with Roth's backing after Pentangeli is whacked No blood shed as internal disciplinary whacking Michael put his head into the lion's mouth Both stringing each other along Both saved by Batista's resignation
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Turnbull]
#1087342
04/08/24 11:18 PM
04/08/24 11:18 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,048
Australia
|
The obvious answer to my question is that it's another of the many director/script "liberties" (or "irrationalities" if you prefer) that FFC and Puzo took to move the film along--in this case to set up Pentangeli's betrayal of Michael, the Senate hearing and all the great drama that followed. obvious answer.... that's a cop out! Sure thing Turnbull there is only so much the director/script can 'story tell' squeeze in, to create all the great drama and to move the film along-- I still find, Michael's visits and the sequence of events somewhat bizarre.... Well, more bizarre than some of the other "liberties" (or "irrationalities") and “plenty of loose ends and inconsistencies” Great casting in small rolesExtract: To me, for all of the criticisms of GFIII, the real difference between that and the first two films is the acting. There are plenty of loose ends and inconsistencies in GFII (that we're still debating today) but we still buy into the story because the acting is so perfect.
With poor performances small (Hamilton) and large (Wallach, Sofia), we don't extend the same grace to III.
|
|
|
Re: Michael and Rosatos
[Re: Trojan]
#1104474
11/06/24 10:11 PM
11/06/24 10:11 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,632
AZ
|
Well, happenstances like that are real enough in life. It was a logical question the Geary. And, what if Fredo hadn't screwed up with his answer? Michael knew he had to have Roth killed before the end of the Presidential party, when Roth had set him up to be killed. He'd have had to leave Havana and return to Tahoe without knowing who was the traitor was--a very scary situation for him and his family. Thank you, FFC, for inserting the Superman scene in II and sparing Michael and his family all that anxiety.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
|