So I'm thinking about Goodfellas and some of the stuff that happened in that movie I'm thinking that it was all made up in Henry's head. I don't really think it happened and he basically made it all up for the book embellishing stories to portray his experience as something that actually never fucking happened.
Who here wants to disagree with me?
The burden of proof is on you to disprove his story.
There is a misunderstanding about the phrase "burden of proof".
The burden is always (and only) on the person making the claim,and must be supported by evidence.
This is the basic foundation of logic.
There is no burden of disproof.
