Was Michael bloodthirsty?Extract:
Michael, like father like son and like Vito, negotiated first and used murder generally as a last resort, Michael's first choice was not murder. He's no different than his father
Khartoum and Hooker -- both were defenseless, truly innocent victims and I reckon, parallel could be drawn
The collateral damage is unfortunate, in the business they've chosen same as Don Ciccio's guards
The Baptism massacre was devised by Vito's guidance and counsel, to be carried out by Michael
after Vito died, leaving a murderous legacy for “never wanted this for you son” Thanks! Pop
Anybody kinda rooting for Roth to beat Mike?Extract:
On the other hand, Michael, who could have used violence or murder against Roth, didn't--he was negotiating for the Havana properties. Roth, on the other hand, set up the machine gun attack at Tahoe, and didn't care if Kay was killed in the attack. Moral of story: No honor among thieves
