Originally Posted by NYMafia
Originally Posted by jace
Originally Posted by NYMafia
The question is, did you enjoy the story?


I won't pay to read it. The point is you said you only write about people who died, Namath is alive.



#1, if as you say you "didn't read" the story then how in the heck would you even know what I did or didn't write about him, or in what context? So why make a derisive comment?
#2, the story is a biography written about a mafia soldier, not Joe Namath per se.
#3, I don't usually write about wise guys unless they've passed away. It doesn't apply to regular folks, get it?
#4, If anything, my article exonerates Namath further, it doesn't condemn him.
#5. (which should be number one) when you say "I won't pay to read it.".... To that I say "of course you wouldn't." LOL. How silly of me. Judging from all of your very uninformed viewpoints over the last year that fact has become painfully obvious. Thats your loss young lady, not mine.





If it is not about Namath, why is he the feature of your title? That's sneaky and deceiving. You could just say it is about Mancuso, instead your title makes as if the story features both equally, implying that Namath may have been involved with him in illegal activity.