"Reclaiming History" is the definitive work on the JFK assassination. It should be required reading for people on both sides of the conspiracy debate.
But, just to speak to my earlier point,I loaned it to a pro - conspiracy friend of mine, and after several weeks he returned it. When I asked what he thought,his reply was "Well it was written by a prosecutor,so of course he's going to be biased toward a lone gunman conclusion".
It never ends.
You should ask your friend, while acknowledging that yes, it was written by the prosecutor; who's material should we consider as the defence? And is there any defence which rebuts the arguments Bugliosi makes?
The other thing I have realized with age was just how hard it would be to keep a lid on a conspiracy like this one. When you compare this alleged conspiracy to a known conspiracy such as Watergate - consider that if the President of the United States could not successfully facilitate the burglary of a hotel room just blocks away from the White House with a small team of CIA-trained operatives, how on God's green earth would they be able to facilitate a massively-scaled conspiracy like the assassination of Kennedy which would have to involve dozens if not hundreds of people? It seems highly unlikely.
