In addition, when Manna was originally arrested in 88, the original judge that heard his case for bail GRANTED him bail until Chertoff appealed to Trump and she kept him in prison. See below. So how can one judge who saw the same transcripts the government offered opposing bail believe Manna wasn't dangerous enough to keep behind bars and another judge see it a completely different way?

It's just an interesting point to consider. This is from a 1988 NY Times article.