Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
[quote]Originally posted by Don Smitty:
[b] But i ask the question, why should we have just sit back and let Genocide take place in Iraq, arent we all against that also.
Ofcourse we are. We're against genocide everywhere, atleast I am. The point is this: Bush told us that we were entering to DISARM Saddam of his WMDs. That was the main reason. The main reason wasn't to end genocide in Iraq. What makes Iraq's genocide so much more 'special' than that of Sudan? As I said a number of times in this thread, Bush is changing the reason of entering Iraq to make himself look better and it embarrasses me to be a citizen with a guy like that. We already know the world hates us. Now they're going to hate us even more. Why did it even matter if Iraq had WMDs? Why couldn't the main reason have been entering to end genocide? We KNEW genocide was happening. WMDs being there was 50/50. -Pat [/b][/quote]:rolleyes: around and around we go. Judge, I think we have heard this story more then enough.

We know:

1) There were no WMD.
(you were kidding us, right)

2)The rest of the world hates us.

3)Pat is embarrassed to a citizen
under President Bush. :rolleyes:

4)Since Bush said that WMD were the main reason, then no other reasons matter. :rolleyes:

ONLY gun owners have the POWER to PROTECT and PRESERVE our FREEDOM.
"...it is their (the people's) right and duty to be at all times armed" - Thomas Jefferson, June 5, 1824

Everyone should read. "HOW TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD"

CAUTION: This Post has not been approved by Don Cardi.

You really don't expect people to believe your shit do you?

Read: "The Daily Apple"- Telling America and the Gangster BB like it really is!