Originally posted by Don Smitty:
But i ask the question, why should we have just sit back and let Genocide take place in Iraq, arent we all against that also.
Ofcourse we are. We're against genocide everywhere, atleast I am. The point is this: Bush told us that we were entering to DISARM Saddam of his WMDs. That was the main reason. The main reason wasn't to end genocide in Iraq. What makes Iraq's genocide so much more 'special' than that of Sudan? As I said a number of times in this thread, Bush is changing the reason of entering Iraq to make himself look better and it embarrasses me to be a citizen with a guy like that. We already know the world hates us. Now they're going to hate us even more. Why did it even matter if Iraq had WMDs? Why couldn't the main reason have been entering to end genocide? We KNEW genocide was happening. WMDs being there was 50/50. -Pat
