I’ve been reading this crap for years that he answered to Accardo, not true. He consulted with Ricca and JB on outfit investments, but he was the boss. On his exile to Mexico, he left Chicago in his own because of the heat, he INSTALLED Teets because teets would do what Mooney wanted. If you look at the leadership in the 70s you’d know Mooney held power in Chicago until Milwaukee Phil got put away. Also, if you’d understand that Dick Cain was given gambling territory in Chicago in the late 70s you’d understand who held power. Now on his murder, forget about Santo, Accardo or blasi, these guys did NOT kill him. My best guess is Roselli did it as part of the jfk/cia cleanup. The rumors about Sam not kicking back to the bosses from his overseas gambling is silly if you know that Larner had pretty much taken over the gambling overseas . Also Larner had his hands deep into Israel and cia affairs so it wouldn’t be a stretch that he had his voice heard involving Sams murder
Re: I’d like to put to rest some BS re Giancana
[Re: PalJoey]
#1028442 01/19/2201:06 PM01/19/2201:06 PM
Are you saying that Roselli killed him on behalf of the United States government, or more specifically for a shadow group in the government, with rogue CIA agents? What do you have to back this up.
Re: I’d like to put to rest some BS re Giancana
[Re: PalJoey]
#1028529 01/20/2202:11 PM01/20/2202:11 PM
That’s exactly what I’m saying, look at all the people killed around that time that were linked to jfk. I believe only 2 people have mentioned Roselli being involved, Jeanne Carmen and someone else I can’t remember, but to ask for proof is ridiculous, everything is speculation and opinion. What I’m saying matches well with the hundreds of books and people I’ve talked to. It makes sense in my opinion. Dominic Blasi I don’t think killed Mooney. Mooney used his car all the time, it’s a lazy hypotheses
Re: I’d like to put to rest some BS re Giancana
[Re: PalJoey]
#1028534 01/20/2202:48 PM01/20/2202:48 PM