0 registered members (),
773
guests, and 6
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,463
Posts1,061,350
Members10,349
|
Most Online992 Jun 1st, 2024
|
|
|
Re: John Cazale - anyone with a better record?
#76102
10/21/04 10:52 AM
10/21/04 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,539
AZ
|
Originally posted by Frankie 5-angels: Although he died prematurely of bone cancer in 1978, his filmography is one of the most impressive. He only stared in five films, but all received oscar nominations.
The Godfather (Fredo) 1972 The Conversation (Stan) 1974 The Godfather II (Fredo) 1974 Dog Day afternoon (Sal) 1975 The Deer Hunter (Stanley) 1978
(He also appeared in GFIII in archive footage, as we all know, this film also received oscar nominations!)
Who knows what would have become of Cazale had he not died of this terrible disease.
Can anyone name an actor with a similarly impressive record? Yes. James Dean made only seven films. He was unbilled in four of the seven. But, of the three in which he was billed, he got Oscar nominations for two: "East of Eden" and "Giant." He wasn't nominated for "Rebel Without a Cause," but it was widely regarded as his best role. Many critics (and most fans) believe that Dean had the potential to surpass Brando if he'd lived.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: John Cazale - anyone with a better record?
#76110
10/24/04 02:13 PM
10/24/04 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,249 Desolation Row
Don Sonny Corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,249
Desolation Row
|
Originally posted by SC: Not taking anything away from Cazale's acting abilities (which I think were quite good), he can't even be considered in the same league as James Dean. Yes, Cazale's resume of movies was extremely impressive, but you have to ask yourself if those movies were great because of HIM. The answer is "no"..... I do get what you're saying and I have to agree with you. The Godfather did not achieve its greatness because Fredo was a weak loser, or The Deer Hunter because John Cazale happened to play yet another bumbling idiot. No one rushed to see The Conversation becuase cazale was in it. But does anyone rush to a movie because a supporting actor, who has only played one other supporting role, where he was on screen all of 15 minutes?No of course not. They want to see the lead actor, who they have seen a lot of his other works. Had Cazale been given a lead role(as someone other than a weak insecure moron)then prehaps his in next lead role, the people would be coming to see him. People didnt see the Godfather for Pacino.
If winners never lose, well, then a loser sure can sing the blues.
|
|
|
Re: John Cazale - anyone with a better record?
#76112
10/24/04 02:37 PM
10/24/04 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 275 UK
Paul Krendler
The Dude
|
The Dude
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 275
UK
|
Originally posted by Don Vercetti: There was a brilliant article in Entertainment Weekly called "Unfortunate Son" about Cazale, telling of his friends, and his love with Meryl Streep while he was dying. I've managed to find that article for anyone who would like to read it. You can find it at the following link : Unfortunate Son
"I'm sorry if your stepmother is a nympho but I don't see what this has to do with, uh... do you have any Kalhua?"
|
|
|
|