Everyone knows Merlino is guilty of all the charges yet he still has his loyal disciples defending him and dismissing the Feds case because of technicalities.
I know, proof beyond reasonable doubt etc. etc.
In which case.
Where would these Merlino groupies morals stand if, say, a pedophile or rapist was acquitted on a technicality or some other fluke?
Yeah, because comparing gambling and insurance fraud charges to pedophlia charge is the same thing.
