GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 77 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,095
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,284
Hollander 23,355
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,487
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,216
Posts1,056,189
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Could Michael have gone legit if.... #982860
12/15/19 10:00 PM
12/15/19 10:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Could Michael have gone legit if he actually was invoked with drugs? Michael was strongly opposed to drugs and I believe that that’s what enabled him to be able to go legit in the eyes of the public and politicians. But what do you all think? Would it have mattered if he was involved with drug trafficking at all? He made a lot of his money through his various businesses that he legitimized. After taking most if not all of the rackets from the rest of the families after he took out the bosses, it’s safe to assume that he had a monopoly.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #982869
12/15/19 11:11 PM
12/15/19 11:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
I've never bought into Michael's seeking legitimacy (as most people define it) or that society in New York or Nevada would have granted him any legitimacy. How could the people in those locations not know who he was?

In prior posts, I, TB, and others have extensively commented on how Vito and Michael defined legitimacy concluding that it was quite different from the way most people define it. Regardless, a high profile Mafioso is not going to be legitimized.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #982872
12/16/19 12:30 AM
12/16/19 12:30 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,358
L
Lou_Para Offline
Underboss
Lou_Para  Offline
L
Underboss
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,358
Any quest for "legitimacy" on Michael's part was partly fueled by a healthy dose of self-delusion. By he end of II, he is not just a generic Mob Boss,but I would say that he has become THE Mob Boss.Of course,Michael wasn't subject to the kind of modern Media scrutiny that we see now, but I would think that his history would have never been too far below the surface. To divest himself of that baggage would have been a major feat indeed. Even by the time III rolls around and Michael has presumably no involvement in anything unsavory,there is still that stigma. The Archbishop mentions the Corleone family history,and the man at the shareholder's meeting protests Michael's involvement.Had he pulled off the Immobillare deal,no matter how rich and powerful he became,he would still be Michael Corleone.

Last edited by Lou_Para; 12/16/19 12:37 AM.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Lou_Para] #982898
12/16/19 04:32 PM
12/16/19 04:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
We're never told that Michael was opposed to drug trafficking--he wasn't part of the discussion Vito had with Solozzo. Of course he would never permit the Family, even under Clemenza and Pentangeli, to actively deal drugs. But, since Vito agreed that he would provide police/political protection for drug rackets, and charge a fee, it's hard for me to imagine that Michael would walk away from that source of income--and leverage over other families. I think he might have been more realistic than Vito, who thought he could stop drug trafficking by refusing to provide that protection. As long as his NYC operation was doing what Vito agreed to, and as long as they were kicking back money (including drug protection money) to Michael, he'd look the other way.

I agree completely with Oli and Lou about the broader question of "legitimacy"--Michael defined it on his terms, which both eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Turnbull] #982933
12/16/19 11:00 PM
12/16/19 11:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Originally Posted by Turnbull
We're never told that Michael was opposed to drug trafficking--he wasn't part of the discussion Vito had with Solozzo. Of course he would never permit the Family, even under Clemenza and Pentangeli, to actively deal drugs. But, since Vito agreed that he would provide police/political protection for drug rackets, and charge a fee, it's hard for me to imagine that Michael would walk away from that source of income--and leverage over other families. I think he might have been more realistic than Vito, who thought he could stop drug trafficking by refusing to provide that protection. As long as his NYC operation was doing what Vito agreed to, and as long as they were kicking back money (including drug protection money) to Michael, he'd look the other way.

I agree completely with Oli and Lou about the broader question of "legitimacy"--Michael defined it on his terms, which both eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him.


He told Zasa that he was against drugs.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #982934
12/16/19 11:02 PM
12/16/19 11:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
I agree that Michael’s definition of legit is different than ours. But what do you think his definition would be then? Would it be him being able to make as much money and have as much power as he wants without criminal rackets?

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #982942
12/17/19 02:02 AM
12/17/19 02:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Michael's definition of legitimacy was contained in this dialog from GF when he went to New Hampshire to woo Kay:
MICHAEL
I'm working for my father now, Kay. He's been sick -- very sick.
KAY
But you're not like him, Michael. I thought you weren't going to become a man like your
father. That's what you told me...
MICHAEL
My father's no different than any other powerful man --
(then, after Kay laughs)
-- Any man who's responsible for other people. Like a senator or a president.
KAY
You know how naive you sound?
MICHAEL
Why?
KAY
Senators and presidents don't have men killed...
MICHAEL
Oh -- who's being naïve, Kay?

In other words, if senators and presidents can have people killed and be considered "legitimate," so can Michael and Vito be considered "legitimate" when they have people killed. No different from other people with responsibilities for other people...


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #982985
12/17/19 09:47 PM
12/17/19 09:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
E
Evita Offline
Underboss
Evita  Offline
E
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
My two cents worth!

No doubt it is well known, no secret Michael is a Mafia Don

GF III reporters were still asking even after he had achieved the semblance of legitimacy with being the largest single shareholder of Immobiliare
"What about Mr. Corleone’s connections with Las Vegas gambling? What about his involvements with the underworld?"

Michael's "legitimate" front was the Elephant in the room

I reckon people were not treating him as crime boss to his face and going along with his "legitimate" front

He sat with all those business people at Batista's meeting and Roth's birthday party like he was no different, was one of them
Senators were associating with him, Anthony's first Communion party at his home, Superman club and the Presidential palace New Year reception

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983149
12/20/19 09:49 PM
12/20/19 09:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
I think that’s a really smart way to look at it Evita and TB. Do they ever make it clear just how much of the gambling in Las Vegas michael controls?

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Evita] #983162
12/21/19 01:05 AM
12/21/19 01:05 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
L
Lana Offline
The Hunted One
Lana  Offline
The Hunted One
L
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
Well put Evita I too believe Michael had “achieved the semblance of legitimacy”

Originally Posted by Turnbull
I agree completely with Oli and Lou about the broader question of "legitimacy"--Michael defined it on his terms, which both eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him.
Michael may have defined "legitimacy" on his terms but it does not seem to me the "legitimacy" eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him”

I believe what destroyed Michael was not having a wife like Camela
If Michael's wife Kay was like Vito's wife Carmela, Michael too would have had it all!

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983183
12/21/19 03:25 PM
12/21/19 03:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Was it ever Vito’s dream to become “legitimate” like Michael?

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983260
12/22/19 09:36 PM
12/22/19 09:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Could Michael be compared to what Semion Mogilevich is in real life? Mogilevich is “legitimate” even though he most certainly is not and he has never done any prison time. He still lives freely and is supposedly worth billions.

Last edited by Revis_Knicks; 12/22/19 09:39 PM.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983261
12/22/19 09:48 PM
12/22/19 09:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
This is also an important question. Would it be possible at all for a mob boss like Michael to reach the level of wealth and pseudo legitimacy in America like he did in Godfather 3?

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983263
12/22/19 11:18 PM
12/22/19 11:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Was it ever Vito’s dream to become “legitimate” like Michael?

No. Vito's hope for Michael's legitimacy ("Senator Corleone...Governor Corleone...") was based on Michael's prospects before the Sol-and-Mac shootings. He would have been a college grad, possibly a lawyer, with no criminal record or Mafia notoriety. Some here have compared Michael to JFK, in that JFK's father's notoriety didn't hinder his political career, while his father's money and influence were major assets in JFK's campaigns. But Vito was uneducated, probably not even officially a US citizen, and was identified as a major Mob boss. Didn't matter to Vito: he derived his legitimacy through his position as "justice dispenser" to his fellow Sicilian immigrants.
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
This is also an important question. Would it be possible at all for a mob boss like Michael to reach the level of wealth and pseudo legitimacy in America like he did in Godfather 3?

Yes. Moe Dalitz, a major Prohibition-era gangster who was head of Cleveland's Mayfield Road rum-running gang (the "Lakeville Road boys" in GFII), started going legit in the laundry business, won commendations as a laundry officer in the Army in WWII, then moved to Vegas in '47, where he built the Desert Inn, the Stardust and the Sundance hotel-casinos; financed and ran the re-election campaign of Sen. Pat McCarren (Senator Geary in GFII), Sunrise Hospital, the Las Vegas Country Club and the Las Vegas Convention Center. Dalitz, not Wayne Newton or Liberace, was known as "Mr. Las Vegas." Dalitz was named Humanitarian of the Year by the American Cancer Research Center and Hospital in 1976. In 1982 he received the Torch of Liberty Award by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Turnbull] #983295
12/23/19 06:55 PM
12/23/19 06:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Was it ever Vito’s dream to become “legitimate” like Michael?

No. Vito's hope for Michael's legitimacy ("Senator Corleone...Governor Corleone...") was based on Michael's prospects before the Sol-and-Mac shootings. He would have been a college grad, possibly a lawyer, with no criminal record or Mafia notoriety. Some here have compared Michael to JFK, in that JFK's father's notoriety didn't hinder his political career, while his father's money and influence were major assets in JFK's campaigns. But Vito was uneducated, probably not even officially a US citizen, and was identified as a major Mob boss. Didn't matter to Vito: he derived his legitimacy through his position as "justice dispenser" to his fellow Sicilian immigrants.
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
This is also an important question. Would it be possible at all for a mob boss like Michael to reach the level of wealth and pseudo legitimacy in America like he did in Godfather 3?

Yes. Moe Dalitz, a major Prohibition-era gangster who was head of Cleveland's Mayfield Road rum-running gang (the "Lakeville Road boys" in GFII), started going legit in the laundry business, won commendations as a laundry officer in the Army in WWII, then moved to Vegas in '47, where he built the Desert Inn, the Stardust and the Sundance hotel-casinos; financed and ran the re-election campaign of Sen. Pat McCarren (Senator Geary in GFII), Sunrise Hospital, the Las Vegas Country Club and the Las Vegas Convention Center. Dalitz, not Wayne Newton or Liberace, was known as "Mr. Las Vegas." Dalitz was named Humanitarian of the Year by the American Cancer Research Center and Hospital in 1976. In 1982 he received the Torch of Liberty Award by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith.


I wish they went deeper in Godfather 3 into how Michael made his billions so quickly. He was giving away hundreds of millions like candy LOL. Even though Vito did not want the mafia life for Michael, it seems like he was proud of how he was running the business. And I think Vito felt all along that Michael was the best choice to be his heir because he could take the family business to a level that his other sons could not. And that is exactly what Michael did. But even with all of the money and power that Michael had as Don, he never commanded the same respect that his father had. I truly believe that he is chasing that throughout the trilogy. Just look at how Senator Geary speaks to him at the beginning of the movie compared to how the people speak to Vito at the beginning of Godfather 1.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983316
12/24/19 01:47 AM
12/24/19 01:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
L
Lana Offline
The Hunted One
Lana  Offline
The Hunted One
L
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
My take, for what it is worth!

Both Vito and Michael were evil murderous monsters Times were changing

As Turnbull posted Vito was the "justice dispenser" to his fellow Sicilian immigrants“ - even then Bonasera insulted Vito by offering Vito money

A tale of two Pats......Geary and Webb.
Extract:
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Nevadans in public office who traced their families back a few generations thought they owned the state, could get away with any kind of questionable behavior, and had the right to lord it over any "newcomers."
Michael was dealing with [sophisticated 'top end'] entitled public office / business people eg: Senators who 'owned' the state and had the 'right' to lord it over any "newcomers."

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Lana] #983443
12/26/19 11:49 PM
12/26/19 11:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Originally Posted by Lana
My take, for what it is worth!

Both Vito and Michael were evil murderous monsters Times were changing

As Turnbull posted Vito was the "justice dispenser" to his fellow Sicilian immigrants“ - even then Bonasera insulted Vito by offering Vito money

A tale of two Pats......Geary and Webb.
Extract:
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Nevadans in public office who traced their families back a few generations thought they owned the state, could get away with any kind of questionable behavior, and had the right to lord it over any "newcomers."
Michael was dealing with [sophisticated 'top end'] entitled public office / business people eg: Senators who 'owned' the state and had the 'right' to lord it over any "newcomers."


Michael outsmarted all of them.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Lana] #983599
12/29/19 07:03 AM
12/29/19 07:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 320
C
Capri Offline
Capo
Capri  Offline
C
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 320
Originally Posted by Lana
Well put Evita I too believe Michael had “achieved the semblance of legitimacy”

Originally Posted by Turnbull
I agree completely with Oli and Lou about the broader question of "legitimacy"--Michael defined it on his terms, which both eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him.
Michael may have defined "legitimacy" on his terms but it does not seem to me the "legitimacy" eluded and deluded him, ultimately destroyed him”

I believe what destroyed Michael was not having a wife like Camela
If Michael's wife Kay was like Vito's wife Carmela, Michael too would have had it all!


Biggest hypocrite Michael's horror, destroyer

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #983739
12/30/19 10:51 PM
12/30/19 10:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
R
Revis_Knicks Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
Revis_Knicks  Offline OP
Was: Revis_Island
R
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Can you expand Capri?

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #985501
01/28/20 07:06 AM
01/28/20 07:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 320
C
Capri Offline
Capo
Capri  Offline
C
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 320
Kay was part of the same hypocrisy the business she had chosen Biggest hypocrite
She had the choice not to marry into murderous crime family

She knew when marrying he was Mafia Happily enjoyed all the spoils of unholy and evil

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Capri] #985988
02/06/20 11:19 PM
02/06/20 11:19 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
E
Evita Offline
Underboss
Evita  Offline
E
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
Carmela would never have done to Vito, what Kay did to Michael One word abortion Say no more!

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Evita] #986109
02/08/20 11:42 PM
02/08/20 11:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Looking at this thread again, with a broader view:

Could Michael ever have been legitimate? Or was he destined--by fate, by birth or by choice--to be a gangster? I've always contented that Michael had choices at every stage of his life, and always chose the gangster way.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #986116
02/09/20 12:08 AM
02/09/20 12:08 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 17,300
New York
Sicilian Babe Offline
Sicilian Babe  Offline

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 17,300
New York
I don't think Kay had any clue what she was getting into when she married into the family. She had very limited exposure to them before marrying Michael, that we know of. We were only shown her presence at Connie's wedding, and then the one trip out to the mall when Michael was in Sicily.

The next thing she knows, the guy comes back and says that his father's way of doing things is over, that he's going to take the family legitimate in five years, blah, blah, blah. Also, what would she know about organized crime? She was a WASP from New Hampshire. She knew nothing, except that it was different and dangerous and sort of exciting.

I think KAY was betrayed. Michael sold her a bill of goods, I don't think he truly loved her any longer. That died with Apollonia, However, he loved that WASP legitimacy that Kay brought to the marriage, that good old-fashioned thing that you can't buy.; And he promised her that he was a different man than his father, that he was going to change the business, move the family out of NY, to that nice clean air, and make his money as a legitimate man who owned shares of hotels and stock in AT&T. But he lied.

So, I think that Kay miscarried (abortions were incredibly difficult to come by, especially for someone watched over as closely as Kay), and told him the two things he could never forgive - that it was an abortion and, worse, that it had been a son. She was hurt, and she wanted to hurt him back in the worst way. Just remember the look she gave him the night of Anthony's communion party after the shooting. IMO, that was the end of their marriage.


President Emeritus of the Neal Pulcawer Fan Club
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #986121
02/09/20 12:38 AM
02/09/20 12:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
I think both TB and Babe pretty much say it all.

Michael made a choice to pursue his brand of legitimacy through lies and murder.

From his conniving words to convince Kay to marry him, one sentence stands out: "I need you." He needed [used] everyone.

Last edited by olivant; 02/09/20 12:38 AM.

"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Sicilian Babe] #986165
02/09/20 11:13 AM
02/09/20 11:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,463
No. Virginia
mustachepete Offline
Special
mustachepete  Offline
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,463
No. Virginia
Originally Posted by Turnbull
I've always contented that Michael had choices at every stage of his life, and always chose the gangster way.


Yes. Moreover, I don't think that there's anything, in either the book or movie, that hints that Michael thought that there was anything wrong about gangsterism. It was old-fashioned or inefficient, but not wrong - or at least not any more wrong than politics or business.

Originally Posted by Sicilian Babe
I don't think Kay had any clue what she was getting into when she married into the family. She had very limited exposure to them before marrying Michael, that we know of. We were only shown her presence at Connie's wedding, and then the one trip out to the mall when Michael was in Sicily.



I think the exchange where Michael tells Kay about his father and the bandleader is a seduction scene, Michael pausing every so often for Kay to ask for more, and Kay asking for more each time. I don't think that she wanted to know all the details, but I do think that it was a turn-on for her to be connected to that life.


Last edited by mustachepete; 02/09/20 11:14 AM.

"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Turnbull] #986211
02/09/20 11:23 PM
02/09/20 11:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
E
Evita Offline
Underboss
Evita  Offline
E
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
My two cents worth!

Michael and Kay, sentiments aside....

I reckon Michael's choices were thrust upon him

She was exposed to the gun to the band leader's head, his brains or his signature

I reckon she had an idea what she was getting into, might not have been the full extent, she knew they were crime family, about the killings and he has become like his father when she married him but deluded herself or was a turn-on for her to be connected to that different and dangerous and sort of exciting life.

He deluded himself believing he can make the family legitimate in five years

She never understood nor supportive that he was a top Mafia boss, trying to become a "legitimate" businessman

Once Michael took over, it was not easy just to walk away He was a powerful man with responsibility for others

They became each other's horror but I don't think he lied to her because I reckon he, himself believed in the bill of goods he was selling Both were unrealistic in their expectations

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Sicilian Babe] #986212
02/09/20 11:39 PM
02/09/20 11:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Originally Posted by Sicilian Babe
And he promised her that he was a different man than his father, that he was going to change the business, move the family out of NY, to that nice clean air, and make his money as a legitimate man who owned shares of hotels and stock in AT&T. But he lied.

Yes he did--he owned stock in ITT, not AT&T(my former employer, AT&T, would never have let a gangster like him own shares. lol

Quote
So, I think that Kay miscarried (abortions were incredibly difficult to come by, especially for someone watched over as closely as Kay), and told him the two things he could never forgive - that it was an abortion and, worse, that it had been a son. She was hurt, and she wanted to hurt him back in the worst way.

Though abortion wasn't legal until after Roe v. Wade in 1973, most women or girls with a few hundred bucks could have gotten an abortion, and from a medical professional in a sanitary setting. But, I agree that Kay's confinement to the compound would have made it difficult. Even more difficult: what Dr. in his right mind would perform an abortion on the wife of Michael Corleone? So, I think miscarriage, with lies about abortion to hurt Michael, is more probable. Also, amnneocentesis was unknown in the US in 1958--how could she have known (at three months, per Tom) that it was a boy? She said it to hurt him.

Quote
Just remember the look she gave him the night of Anthony's communion party after the shooting. IMO, that was the end of their marriage.

Yes, indeed. It was all over, right there and then. If looks could kill...

Last edited by Turnbull; 02/09/20 11:41 PM.

Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: mustachepete] #986216
02/10/20 01:19 AM
02/10/20 01:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
L
Lana Offline
The Hunted One
Lana  Offline
The Hunted One
L
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
My take, for what it is worth!

Kay knew Michael had gone from “That's my family Kay It's not me” to It is me when they married and was happy to enjoy the spoils of the unholy and evil Sicilian thing for five years, the original time frame for “legitimacy” and another two years [and another....] until the Tahoe shooting, then learning at the Senate hearing that Michael had personally murdered in addition to ordering murders

Originally Posted by mustachepete
Originally Posted by Turnbull
I've always contented that Michael had choices at every stage of his life, and always chose the gangster way.

Yes. Moreover, I don't think that there's anything, in either the book or movie, that hints that Michael thought that there was anything wrong about gangsterism. It was old-fashioned or inefficient, but not wrong - or at least not any more wrong than politics or business.
Michael's “choices at every stage of his life” was catch-22 and in a way “thrust upon him” and 'forced' to “choose the gangster way” under the circumstances

among others -
  • Michael murdering Sollozzo and McCluskey to protect Vito We saw Michael's mental anguish on his return from the bathroom with the gun
  • Vito got Michael to re-establish the Corleones' glory, standing, reputation etc. to do all the dirty work, thus leaving a murderous legacy for “I never wanted this for you” son Thanks! Pop
  • Michael initially underestimating Roth until the Tahoe shooting

Michael must have thought that gangsterism was wrong Hence he wanted to have nothing to do with their family business
Though later Michael conveniently deluded and justified gangsterism was “not wrong - or at least not any more wrong than politics or business”

Once a common Mafia hood always an evil murderous monster indeed However
Originally Posted by Evita
Once Michael took over, it was not easy just to walk away He was a powerful man with responsibility for others

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Evita] #986217
02/10/20 01:19 AM
02/10/20 01:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
L
Lana Offline
The Hunted One
Lana  Offline
The Hunted One
L
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 750
Australia
Aptly put! – Extracts:

What would Kay have done?
Quote
The Last Woltz
Kay was part of the same hypocrisy as Michael. She had ample reason to believe that Michael was a murderous crime lord, but chose not to
Quote
Turnbull
Kay wasn't stupid, she was a champion self-deceiver

I think that the Tahoe shooting pushed her over the edge because (apparently for the first time) Michael's criminal business threatened her and her kids' safety. Note the look she gives him after the shooting when she and Connie are cradling the kids. That was it, period
Quote
Don Cardi
However, in fairness to Michael ..... It's the buisness she had chosen
Quote
dontomasso
I have said before that as much as she protested, Kay enjoyed the privileged lifestyle Michael gave her. She very well knew what his business was, and I agree with the others that she was totally in denial and deceiving herslf.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #986218
02/10/20 01:39 AM
02/10/20 01:39 AM
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 70
T
TheDon1999 Offline
Button
TheDon1999  Offline
T
Button
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 70
I believe Michael was against the use, possession and trade of drugs. He understood the amount of distrust and backstabbing within the world of drugs. He also disliked the race-mixing (similar to Joe Bonanno) because it broke down the tradition and the rules of the secret society.

If his plan was to stop the drug trade he would ultimately fail.

But this is The Godfather , he could of opened a fish shop the next day if Coppola wanted.

Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Revis_Knicks] #1006171
02/26/21 11:29 PM
02/26/21 11:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 88
Adelaide, Australia
L
lucab19 Offline
Button
lucab19  Offline
L
Button
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 88
Adelaide, Australia
The Senate hearings surely scuppered any chance of his going legitimate. But any remaining possibility went totally out of the window when he sent his very high profile capo to murder his enemy in front of cameras at an international airport. Utterly lame-brained.


Last edited by lucab19; 02/26/21 11:29 PM.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: lucab19] #1006179
02/27/21 03:12 AM
02/27/21 03:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Originally Posted by lucab19
The Senate hearings surely scuppered any chance of his going legitimate.

Pentangeli's renunciation of his affidavit apparently brought a swift end to the hearings, and Tom seems to have had the last word: "This committee owes an apology...an apology, Senator!!" On the other hand, the hearings put on record accusations of Michael's criminal activities, and people always believe what they want to believe. In the end: Money talks! Michael in III bought a Papal Knighthood. What's interesting is that, at the Senate hearing in II, Michael denied owning three casinos and said he owned some stock in the hotels, but very little." But, at his party in III, Abbandando tells the press that Michael "sold the casinos."
Quote
But any remaining possibility went totally out of the window when he sent his very high profile capo to murder his enemy in front of cameras at an international airport. Utterly lame-brained.


That is troubling. The FBI knew all about Rocco--he was in the Family organization chart shown at the Senate hearing in II. Even if he'd somehow gotten away and gone into hiding, his face would have appeared in some of the many pictures snapped by press photographers at the airport. It could be argued that Michael wanted to send a message to his enemies that nothing would stop him from getting vengeance--even if, as Tom said in the boathouse, it was like "killing the President." But, that would hardly be consistent with wanting to maintain a "legitimate" image. confused


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Could Michael have gone legit if.... [Re: Turnbull] #1006250
02/27/21 11:10 PM
02/27/21 11:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
E
Evita Offline
Underboss
Evita  Offline
E
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 553
No doubt it is well known, no secret Michael is a Mafia Don, he was in the "legitimate" gambling business, owned or controlled hotels and casinos including the Hotel they bankrolled for Greene, the casino they took over, moving Klingman out

Only he had the key to his Fort Knox vault and unlocked it when he "sold the casinos."

They killed the New York Police Captain in a restaurant, the heads of all the other families, Roth at the airport surrounded by Police and reporters, got Pentangeli to kill himself in an Army barracks guarded by FBI and got away with them all No doubt brilliant

Michael's "legitimate" front was the Elephant in the room

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™