GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (joepuzzles234), 146 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,095
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,284
Hollander 23,360
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,487
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,218
Posts1,056,203
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" #715572
05/13/13 11:02 PM
05/13/13 11:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715588
05/14/13 02:06 AM
05/14/13 02:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
Danito Offline
Underboss
Danito  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
There are some very weak arguments:
- Of course, the founding fathers were religious (as it's being said at minute 3:00), including Jefferson. Thus their ethics were built on or supported by their religious beliefs. But from their European experiences they knew very well that interference of the state in religious matters would cause trouble.
- At 3:39 he quotes O'Douglas that the American institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. I don't know whether this is still the view of Supreme Court judges today. Anyway, the illustration of a Christian church is just propaganda. And what do you do with atheists? Aren't they part of the American people?
- What does bad behavior in school have to do with decline of religion?
- "Crime rates rose". It's simply not true. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: Danito] #715589
05/14/13 02:21 AM
05/14/13 02:21 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: Danito
There are some very weak arguments:
- Of course, the founding fathers were religious (as it's being said at minute 3:00), including Jefferson. Thus their ethics were built on or supported by their religious beliefs. But from their European experiences they knew very well that interference of the state in religious matters would cause trouble.


What they knew is that there shouldn't be a state religion (i.e. like the Church of England). Not that there should actually be a "wall" or "separation" of church and state.

Quote:
- At 3:39 he quotes O'Douglas that the American institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. I don't know whether this is still the view of Supreme Court judges today. Anyway, the illustration of a Christian church is just propaganda.


What the Constitution actually says, as written by those who actually wrote it, is what matters. Not necessarily what future judges think. I'm not sure what you mean by "the illustration of a Christian church is just propaganda," but this nation has always been a Christian nation in the sense that most of it's citizens have always been Christian.

Quote:
And what do you do with atheists? Aren't they part of the American people?


Nobody is forcing them to believe or worship. But that doesn't mean they're free from being surrounded by religion or believing the false notion that there is a "wall" or "separation" between church and state.

Quote:
- What does bad behavior in school have to do with decline of religion?


It's one example of the decline of mores in society, which has coincided with the decline in religious observance.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715590
05/14/13 02:42 AM
05/14/13 02:42 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
L
Lenin_and_McCarthy Offline
Capo
Lenin_and_McCarthy  Offline
L
Capo
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
Googled Prager University. From a subsequent wiki-walk I learned that Adam Carolla is a bit of a dickhead.

You learn something new every day.

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715596
05/14/13 06:04 AM
05/14/13 06:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
Danito Offline
Underboss
Danito  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
Original geschrieben von: IvyLeague

What they knew is that there shouldn't be a state religion (i.e. like the Church of England). Not that there should actually be a "wall" or "separation" of church and state.


We don't know what they really thought. Of course, they had no idea of modern American society. So they referred to what they knew. At their times there were only 1.6 % Catholics. Few Jews. And I wonder if you could find a Muslim, a Buddhist. Atheists were rare.
Eastman fails to prove the point that the founding fathers did not want a separation between church and state. There are only few documents. Jefferson's letter is just one.



Antwort auf:
What the Constitution actually says, as written by those who actually wrote it, is what matters. Not necessarily what future judges think. I'm not sure what you mean by "the illustration of a Christian church is just propaganda," but this nation has always been a Christian nation in the sense that most of it's citizens have always been Christian.


The Constitution is more than its words. It has to be interpreted. That's why there's a Supreme Court. Anyway, Eastman is the one who quotes a "future judge".
What I mean by "the illustration of a Christian Church" is the illustration in the video. True, the majority have been Christian. What if that changes one day?

Antwort auf:
And what do you do with atheists? Aren't they part of the American people?


Nobody is forcing them to believe or worship. But that doesn't mean they're free from being surrounded by religion or believing the false notion that there is a "wall" or "separation" between church and state.

Antwort auf:
Antwort auf:
- What does bad behavior in school have to do with decline of religion?


It's one example of the decline of mores in society, which has coincided with the decline in religious observance.

Even if there's a coincidence of the two. I don't see why one thing has to do with the other.
And what do you say about his lie about the crime rates?

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715599
05/14/13 07:46 AM
05/14/13 07:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Prager university? Are you kidding me? Next thing you're going to post a video from patriot bible university talking about the evils of homosexuality rolleyes


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #715601
05/14/13 08:37 AM
05/14/13 08:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
fathersson Offline
Underboss
fathersson  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Prager university? Are you kidding me? Next thing you're going to post a video from patriot bible university talking about the evils of homosexuality rolleyes



Never mind the name of the place it came from...That is a cheap shot,

Tell us what do you disagree with within the piece?


ONLY gun owners have the POWER to PROTECT and PRESERVE our FREEDOM.
"...it is their (the people's) right and duty to be at all times armed" - Thomas Jefferson, June 5, 1824

Everyone should read. "HOW TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD"

CAUTION: This Post has not been approved by Don Cardi.

You really don't expect people to believe your shit do you?

Read: "The Daily Apple"- Telling America and the Gangster BB like it really is!
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: fathersson] #715605
05/14/13 09:25 AM
05/14/13 09:25 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Originally Posted By: fathersson
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Prager university? Are you kidding me? Next thing you're going to post a video from patriot bible university talking about the evils of homosexuality rolleyes



Never mind the name of the place it came from...That is a cheap shot,

Tell us what do you disagree with within the piece?


My basic disagreement is that you don't need religion to have a moral society. Religion does not belong in public schools, nor does it need to be in politics. As far as going to church and choosing a religion that is a right every American has. But I think it's a bit too far to say America is a "Christian nation". If we are a Christian nation than we would follow everything the bible and god says. This would include genocide, stoning our children, and all sorts of random rules that dont belong in a modern society. Our government structure and rights are more based on England's magna carta and the enlightenment than Christianity. Religion has been used to commit atrocities and crimes for decades. Iran lives under religious law, ask them how they're doing.

I don't object to Christianity, nor people who follow it. My objection is people who carry it to the extreme and use it to manipulate and hurt others. I say this meaning every word: religion has nothing to do with this so called fictitious decline in American society and values. If Christianity were used as a foundation for political decisions and in the business world we'd be back in the dark ages


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715614
05/14/13 11:07 AM
05/14/13 11:07 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
L
Lenin_and_McCarthy Offline
Capo
Lenin_and_McCarthy  Offline
L
Capo
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
And Ivy and Fathersson, before you try fobbing it all off on Islam, look up Scott Lively and the Uganda connection.

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: Lenin_and_McCarthy] #715619
05/14/13 11:28 AM
05/14/13 11:28 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
fathersson Offline
Underboss
fathersson  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
Originally Posted By: Lenin_and_McCarthy
And Ivy and Fathersson, before you try fobbing it all off on Islam, look up Scott Lively and the Uganda connection.


Hold On there- BEFORE YOU go running on and on acusing someone of doing something, please tell me what your post has to do with THIS thread?

"Separation of Church & State"
This my friend is your 2nd bullshit post in this thread.

Last edited by fathersson; 05/14/13 11:30 AM.

ONLY gun owners have the POWER to PROTECT and PRESERVE our FREEDOM.
"...it is their (the people's) right and duty to be at all times armed" - Thomas Jefferson, June 5, 1824

Everyone should read. "HOW TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD"

CAUTION: This Post has not been approved by Don Cardi.

You really don't expect people to believe your shit do you?

Read: "The Daily Apple"- Telling America and the Gangster BB like it really is!
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: fathersson] #715623
05/14/13 11:34 AM
05/14/13 11:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
L
Lenin_and_McCarthy Offline
Capo
Lenin_and_McCarthy  Offline
L
Capo
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 259
Originally Posted By: fathersson
Originally Posted By: Lenin_and_McCarthy
And Ivy and Fathersson, before you try fobbing it all off on Islam, look up Scott Lively and the Uganda connection.


Hold On there- BEFORE YOU go running on and on acusing someone of doing something, please tell me what your post has to do with THIS thread?

"Separation of Church & State"


Just preempting a talking point I know someone will bring up eventually.

But on the topic, so I don't have to make anyone any ad revenue, how does the video explain away Jefferson himself noting the 1st amendment creating a "wall of separation"?

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #715663
05/14/13 01:35 PM
05/14/13 01:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
pizzaboy Offline
The Fuckin Doctor
pizzaboy  Offline
The Fuckin Doctor

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
But I think it's a bit too far to say America is a "Christian nation". If we are a Christian nation than we would follow everything the bible and god says. This would include genocide, stoning our children, and all sorts of random rules that dont belong in a modern society.

If you don't believe that America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, then you've been living under a rock. And I can't help but notice that when citing examples of Christianity, you went right to "genocide and "stoning our children." You didn't mention any of the good. But I guess you just can't help yourself.


Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
I don't object to Christianity, nor people who follow it.

^^^
You say this.

Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
If Christianity were used as a foundation for political decisions and in the business world we'd be back in the dark ages

^^^
And then you post this.

Well make up your fucking mind. Why is it that every time---EVERY FUCKING TIME---you post your contempt for religion, it's Christianity you use as the example?

I can't help but notice how much you plead for tolerance where gay marriage is concerned---and you know I agree with you there. But when it come to Christianity, you refuse to show the very same tolerance you ask for when you get up on your soapbox about your own cause.

Now I don't agree with half of Ivy's politics. Maybe less than half. But what's right is right. When you can't shake the man's faith, you resort to throwing blanket statements at the Christian faith. Bringing up medieval examples like "stoning" and "genocide" to make your point. It's hypocritical, and in its own way it's just as hateful as anything the right wing evangelists say (and God only knows I'm not a fan of theirs).

But I'm done with this thread. And I'm done with you.


"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715665
05/14/13 01:37 PM
05/14/13 01:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,881
The Jokers Social Club
DickNose_Moltasanti Offline
BANNED
DickNose_Moltasanti  Offline
BANNED
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,881
The Jokers Social Club
That place is just for gays


Random Poster:"I'm sorry I didn't go to an Ivy-league school like you"

"Ah I actually I didn't. It's a nickname the feds gave the
Genovese Family."
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: DickNose_Moltasanti] #715674
05/14/13 01:51 PM
05/14/13 01:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
fathersson Offline
Underboss
fathersson  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,595
Originally Posted By: DickNose_Moltasanti
That place is just for gays


What the f*@k have you put up your nose? Your Brain Cells must be fried! frown

Last edited by fathersson; 05/14/13 01:52 PM.

ONLY gun owners have the POWER to PROTECT and PRESERVE our FREEDOM.
"...it is their (the people's) right and duty to be at all times armed" - Thomas Jefferson, June 5, 1824

Everyone should read. "HOW TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD"

CAUTION: This Post has not been approved by Don Cardi.

You really don't expect people to believe your shit do you?

Read: "The Daily Apple"- Telling America and the Gangster BB like it really is!
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: fathersson] #715676
05/14/13 02:08 PM
05/14/13 02:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso Offline
Consigliere to the Stars
dontomasso  Offline
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
Originally Posted By: fathersson
Originally Posted By: DickNose_Moltasanti
That place is just for gays


What the f*@k have you put up your nose? Your Brain Cells must be fried! frown


FS its up his nose and up his ass also.


"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"

"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."

"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: dontomasso] #715677
05/14/13 02:28 PM
05/14/13 02:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,881
The Jokers Social Club
DickNose_Moltasanti Offline
BANNED
DickNose_Moltasanti  Offline
BANNED
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,881
The Jokers Social Club
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
Originally Posted By: fathersson
Originally Posted By: DickNose_Moltasanti
That place is just for gays


What the f*@k have you put up your nose? Your Brain Cells must be fried! frown


FS its up his nose and up his ass also.


Yeah DonteMasso Monday Morning Public Defender at his best !!


Random Poster:"I'm sorry I didn't go to an Ivy-league school like you"

"Ah I actually I didn't. It's a nickname the feds gave the
Genovese Family."
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: DickNose_Moltasanti] #715784
05/15/13 12:24 PM
05/15/13 12:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,487
AZ
In trying to make a case that "God" has been in decline in public life, he pointedly left out that, on June 14, 1954, Congress inserted "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.

"In God We Trust" is on our currency, in our courtrooms and our government buildings. Every session of the House and the Senate opens with a prayer, and probably every state and municipal legislature, too. All religious institutions get tax breaks from every taxing entity. Christmas is a national holiday, even though it is nominally a Christian event.

The Founding Fathers were primarily concerned that the new United States not establish a state religion, as the Church of England was, and still is, in their ancestral home. They never intended that God be absent from public life, or that religious practice be banned in America. This video is much ado about nothing. And, by overlooking "under God," by falsely stating that crime rates are going up, and by trying to combine that phony observation with school behavior, divorce, out of wedlock births, etc., it just weakens its case.

America has more churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, and other religious institutions than any other nation. It got that way because we cherish religious freedom and have enshrined it in our Constitution. What's the problem??


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #715801
05/15/13 01:58 PM
05/15/13 01:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Pizzaboy above said it better than I could.

Also notice how I said this country has always been a Christian nation in the sense that most of it's citizens have always been Christian.

As for Dennis Prager, I would highly recommend him and his radio show to anyone, conservatives or liberals. He isn't a big mouth hack like Rush, Hannity, etc. The guy is extremely intelligent and well spoken. Even a lot of liberals listen to him, even though they may not agree with him often.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716200
05/18/13 03:48 PM
05/18/13 03:48 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2
D
DougIndeap Offline
Associate
DougIndeap  Offline
D
Associate
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2
Eastman offers but a compact collection of common canards.

Separation of church and state is a bedrock principle of our Constitution much like the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances. In the Constitution, the founders did not simply say in so many words that there should be separation of powers and checks and balances; rather, they actually separated the powers of government among three branches and established checks and balances. Similarly, they did not merely say there should be separation of church and state; rather, they actually separated them by (1) establishing a secular government on the power of "We the people" (not a deity), (2) saying nothing to connect that government to god(s) or religion, (3) saying nothing to give that government power over matters of god(s) or religion, and (4), indeed, saying nothing substantive about god(s) or religion at all except in a provision precluding any religious test for public office. Given the norms of the day, the founders' avoidance of any expression in the Constitution suggesting that the government is somehow based on any religious belief was quite a remarkable and plainly intentional choice. They later buttressed this separation of government and religion with the First Amendment, which constrains the government from undertaking to establish religion or prohibit individuals from freely exercising their religions. The basic principle, thus, rests on much more than just the First Amendment.

That the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear in the text of the Constitution assumes much importance, it seems, to some who may have once labored under the misimpression it was there and, upon learning they were mistaken, reckon they’ve discovered a smoking gun solving a Constitutional mystery. To those familiar with the Constitution, the absence of the metaphor commonly used to name one of its principles is no more consequential than the absence of other phrases (e.g., Bill of Rights, separation of powers, checks and balances, fair trial, religious liberty) used to describe other undoubted Constitutional principles.

To the extent that some nonetheless would like confirmation--in those very words--of the founders' intent to separate government and religion, Madison and Jefferson supplied it. Some try to pass off the Supreme Court’s decision in Everson v. Board of Education as simply a misreading of Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists–as if that were the only basis of the Court’s decision. Instructive as that letter is, it played but a small part in the Court’s decision. Rather, the Court discussed the historical context in which the Constitution and First Amendment were drafted, and only after concluding its analysis did the Court refer–once–to Jefferson’s letter, largely to borrow his famous metaphor as a clever label or summary of its conclusion.

Perhaps even more than Jefferson, James Madison influenced the Court’s view. Madison, who had a central role in drafting the Constitution and the First Amendment, confirmed that he understood them to “[s]trongly guard[] . . . the separation between Religion and Government.” Madison, Detached Memoranda (~1820). He made plain, too, that they guarded against more than just laws creating state sponsored churches or imposing a state religion. Mindful that even as new principles are proclaimed, old habits die hard and citizens and politicians could tend to entangle government and religion (e.g., “the appointment of chaplains to the two houses of Congress” and “for the army and navy” and “[r]eligious proclamations by the Executive recommending thanksgivings and fasts”), he considered the question whether these actions were “consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom” and responded: “In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the United States forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion.”

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716208
05/18/13 04:27 PM
05/18/13 04:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline
ronnierocketAGO  Offline
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
If you want church and state together, you would probably like what's happening in Russia and Georgia (country, not state) where those governments are further leaning more and more on the religious orthodox institutions to stay in power.

Its why Moscow is currently going on the offense against LDS in that country (all 5 of them) because they're "CIA Agents," which is amazingly still the same card used for the last 70 years against anybody they don't like.

And then you get incidents like this:

Quote:
A throng of thousands led by priests in black robes surged through police cordons in downtown Tbilisi, Georgia, on Friday and attacked a group of about 50 gay rights demonstrators. Carrying banners reading “No to mental genocide” and “No to gays,” the masses of mostly young men began by hurling rocks and eggs at the gay rights demonstrators.

The police pushed most of the demonstrators onto yellow minibuses to evacuate them from the scene, but, the attackers swarmed the buses, trying to break the windows with metal gratings, trash cans, rocks and even fists.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/world/europe/gay-rights-rally-is-attacked-in-georgia.html?src=recg

In this world of ours when people in the name of religion terrorize and oppress others out of methodical determination as if we're living in the last days of upcoming apocalypse or clash of cultures, seperation of church and state is a principle that's proven to be just and sensical more and more.

And Jefferson abso-fucking-lutely understood this centuries ago, when it came to the Church of England. As much as he and the other Founding Fathers believed in democracy, they knew its history in Rome and Greece when minority populations were oppressed with popular support from the majority.

He was a very devout man*, but he pushed forward the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom which de-established the Church of England as the state (colonial) church. He didn't ban religion, he didn't ban the Church of England. He probably might be puzzled (to say the least) about the amount of secularism in culture today. But none the less he believed that church/state are just two things that should stay seperate in general for the greater good.

He was so proud of that Statute, he had it listed as one of his achievements on his epitaph. (Interesting note: His Presidency wasn't listed as one of them.)

*=I have no evidence, but I would like to believe if he saw the religious right today and their ridiculous wars against science and knowledge, he would be revolted. Of course he might also be queasy with the whole no-slavery thing but who knows?

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716214
05/18/13 04:42 PM
05/18/13 04:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
klydon1 Offline
klydon1  Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
The Constitution of the U.S. is not in any sense based on religion or, in particular, Christianity. By attaching the label Christian to the 50+ Founding Fathers doesn't begin to describe them. They are better described as men of the enlightenment, who were motivated by science, intellectualism and reason. They were inspired more by Locke than Leviticus.

The pre-Amendment Constitution only mentions religion once, and that is to mandate that there will never be a religious test for holding office in the new government. Madison and others were skeptical about religion entering politics and feared that majoritarian sects would seek to manipulate federal offices to exclude others and dictate their religion on others.

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: klydon1] #716223
05/18/13 05:29 PM
05/18/13 05:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,018
Texas
Absolutlely Kly. I might also add that at the Constitutional Convention Ben Franklin's suggestion that a pastor be employed to lead the delegates in a daily prayer was met with a collective sigh. To save face, Alexander Hamilton stated that the Convention had no funds with which to pay such a pastor.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: klydon1] #716421
05/19/13 07:55 PM
05/19/13 07:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: klydon1
The Constitution of the U.S. is not in any sense based on religion or, in particular, Christianity. By attaching the label Christian to the 50+ Founding Fathers doesn't begin to describe them. They are better described as men of the enlightenment, who were motivated by science, intellectualism and reason. They were inspired more by Locke than Leviticus.

The pre-Amendment Constitution only mentions religion once, and that is to mandate that there will never be a religious test for holding office in the new government. Madison and others were skeptical about religion entering politics and feared that majoritarian sects would seek to manipulate federal offices to exclude others and dictate their religion on others.



Some truth here, but also a lot of revisionist history, in order to minimize the religious foundations of this country.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: klydon1] #716450
05/19/13 09:36 PM
05/19/13 09:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,089
Brooklyn, New York
Dapper_Don Offline
Underboss
Dapper_Don  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,089
Brooklyn, New York
Originally Posted By: klydon1
The Constitution of the U.S. is not in any sense based on religion or, in particular, Christianity. By attaching the label Christian to the 50+ Founding Fathers doesn't begin to describe them. They are better described as men of the enlightenment, who were motivated by science, intellectualism and reason. They were inspired more by Locke than Leviticus.

The pre-Amendment Constitution only mentions religion once, and that is to mandate that there will never be a religious test for holding office in the new government. Madison and others were skeptical about religion entering politics and feared that majoritarian sects would seek to manipulate federal offices to exclude others and dictate their religion on others.



+1

Well said my friend.


Tommy Shots: They want me running the family, don't they know I have a young wife?
Sal Vitale: (laughs) Tommy, jump in, the water's fine.


Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716534
05/20/13 11:14 AM
05/20/13 11:14 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
klydon1 Offline
klydon1  Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: klydon1
The Constitution of the U.S. is not in any sense based on religion or, in particular, Christianity. By attaching the label Christian to the 50+ Founding Fathers doesn't begin to describe them. They are better described as men of the enlightenment, who were motivated by science, intellectualism and reason. They were inspired more by Locke than Leviticus.

The pre-Amendment Constitution only mentions religion once, and that is to mandate that there will never be a religious test for holding office in the new government. Madison and others were skeptical about religion entering politics and feared that majoritarian sects would seek to manipulate federal offices to exclude others and dictate their religion on others.



Some truth here, but also a lot of revisionist history, in order to minimize the religious foundations of this country.


Nothing revisionist about it.

The government of the United States of America was not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion. Religious liberty is guaranteed under the First Amendment and that liberty endures in large part to the government's neutrality to all matters religious.

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: klydon1] #716640
05/20/13 11:04 PM
05/20/13 11:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: klydon1
Nothing revisionist about it.

The government of the United States of America was not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion. Religious liberty is guaranteed under the First Amendment and that liberty endures in large part to the government's neutrality to all matters religious.


Notice I never said the government was founded on the Christian religion. What I've said is:

A) The U.S. has always been a Christian nation in the sense that most of it's citizens have always been Christian.

B) Most the founders were religious, specifically Christian, and not just deists, agnostics, or secular non-believers as liberal revisionist historians have claimed.

C) The "separation of church and state" is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, as many believe. And the First Amendment simply means there is no state religion (like the Church of England) and not that religion is to be completed marginalized in society, as many secular liberals would like.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716652
05/21/13 12:02 AM
05/21/13 12:02 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2
D
DougIndeap Offline
Associate
DougIndeap  Offline
D
Associate
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2
While the First Amendment undoubtedly was intended to preclude the government from establishing a national religion as you note, that was hardly the limit of its intended scope. The first Congress debated and rejected just such a narrow provision (“no religion shall be established by law, nor shall the equal rights of conscience be infringed”) and ultimately chose the more broadly phrased prohibition now found in the Amendment. During his presidency, Madison vetoed two bills, neither of which would form a national religion or compel observance of any religion, on the ground that they were contrary to the establishment clause. While some in Congress expressed surprise that the Constitution prohibited Congress from incorporating a church in the town of Alexandria in the District of Columbia or granting land to a church in the Mississippi Territory, Congress upheld both vetoes. Separation of church and state is hardly a new invention of modern courts. In keeping with the Amendment’s terms and legislative history and other evidence, the courts have wisely interpreted it to restrict the government from taking steps that could establish religion de facto as well as de jure. Were the Amendment interpreted merely to preclude government from enacting a statute formally establishing a state church, the intent of the Amendment could easily be circumvented by government doing all sorts of things to promote this or that religion–stopping just short of cutting a ribbon to open its new church.

Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: DougIndeap] #716653
05/21/13 12:09 AM
05/21/13 12:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,453
California
X
XDCX Offline
XDCX  Offline
X

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,453
California
Originally Posted By: DougIndeap
While the First Amendment undoubtedly was intended to preclude the government from establishing a national religion as you note, that was hardly the limit of its intended scope. The first Congress debated and rejected just such a narrow provision (“no religion shall be established by law, nor shall the equal rights of conscience be infringed”) and ultimately chose the more broadly phrased prohibition now found in the Amendment. During his presidency, Madison vetoed two bills, neither of which would form a national religion or compel observance of any religion, on the ground that they were contrary to the establishment clause. While some in Congress expressed surprise that the Constitution prohibited Congress from incorporating a church in the town of Alexandria in the District of Columbia or granting land to a church in the Mississippi Territory, Congress upheld both vetoes. Separation of church and state is hardly a new invention of modern courts. In keeping with the Amendment’s terms and legislative history and other evidence, the courts have wisely interpreted it to restrict the government from taking steps that could establish religion de facto as well as de jure. Were the Amendment interpreted merely to preclude government from enacting a statute formally establishing a state church, the intent of the Amendment could easily be circumvented by government doing all sorts of things to promote this or that religion–stopping just short of cutting a ribbon to open its new church.


+1 clap


"Growing up my dad was like 'You have a great last name, Galifianakis. Galifianakis...begins with a gal...and ends with a kiss...' I'm like that's great dad, can we get it changed to 'Galifianafuck' please?" -- Zach Galifianakis



Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: DougIndeap] #716657
05/21/13 12:37 AM
05/21/13 12:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline OP
IvyLeague  Offline OP
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: DougIndeap
While the First Amendment undoubtedly was intended to preclude the government from establishing a national religion as you note, that was hardly the limit of its intended scope. The first Congress debated and rejected just such a narrow provision (“no religion shall be established by law, nor shall the equal rights of conscience be infringed”) and ultimately chose the more broadly phrased prohibition now found in the Amendment. During his presidency, Madison vetoed two bills, neither of which would form a national religion or compel observance of any religion, on the ground that they were contrary to the establishment clause. While some in Congress expressed surprise that the Constitution prohibited Congress from incorporating a church in the town of Alexandria in the District of Columbia or granting land to a church in the Mississippi Territory, Congress upheld both vetoes. Separation of church and state is hardly a new invention of modern courts. In keeping with the Amendment’s terms and legislative history and other evidence, the courts have wisely interpreted it to restrict the government from taking steps that could establish religion de facto as well as de jure. Were the Amendment interpreted merely to preclude government from enacting a statute formally establishing a state church, the intent of the Amendment could easily be circumvented by government doing all sorts of things to promote this or that religion–stopping just short of cutting a ribbon to open its new church.


Except none of this translates into what secular liberals envision it to be today. For instance, there's nothing unconstitutional with lawmakers being against, say, gay marriage because of their religious beliefs. Or, for instance, something like the alcohol laws here in Utah being more stringent because of the predominant religion. Yet, these are the types of things that libs will cry "Separation of church and state" about when there's really no basis. And many liberal judges in the courts have gone beyond what the founders ever intended in order to marginalize religion as much as possible; even rewriting the history of many of the founders themselves to justify it.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Prager University: "Separation of Church & State" [Re: IvyLeague] #716669
05/21/13 12:54 AM
05/21/13 12:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,602
Yunkai
afsaneh77 Offline
Mother of Dragons
afsaneh77  Offline
Mother of Dragons

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,602
Yunkai
A majority, be it congress or the people, cannot vote against inherent rights of a minority. It's not beyond role of a judge to struck down such an absurd measure, it's its very role to do so.


"Fire cannot kill a dragon." -Daenerys Targaryen, Game of Thrones
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™