Home

Why didnt associates just form their own families?

Posted By: Primo

Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/12/19 10:49 PM

Guys who couldn't get made or associates why didn't they just say fuck this waiting around lets go set up shop together. they knew all the rackets etc. if one fam aint gonna let you in for 20 plus years why not just say fuck it and round up all your other non made friends who have been trying to get made and move to like Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?

Just to clarify I posted this while super high on some good kush haha
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 09:41 AM

Quote
Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?


Because also in Honolulu there big criminals that you must pay for protection. More associates especially if are italians have parents that are made and made more cash staying under the radar or more street guys know that are respected and feared on the streets without getting made and even prefer to dont get made because the made men risk more heavy sentences only because ghey are part of a mob family.
For the non-italians I think that is because they made more $$$ staying with the mob that alone.
The albanian rudaj tried to fight the mafia and was disbanded by the feds and the other people turned back to pay protection to the mob.
I hope I was clear.
Posted By: Neo

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 12:01 PM

Originally Posted by Primo
they knew all the rackets etc. if one fam aint gonna let you in for 20 plus years why not just say fuck it and round up all your other non made friends who have been trying to get made and move to like Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?



They don't "know all the rackets". If they did they would have got their button.

A bunch of white boys can't just move to Honalulu and "take over shit". You've got powerful groups like the Sinaloa cartel, Chinese Triads and Yakuza that all have interests there. They ain't going to move aside for a bunch of second rate grease balls that couldn't get made.
Posted By: FrankValenti

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 12:37 PM

Some tried.

In Rochester, the C-Team was comprised of mostly non-made associates. Headed by Tom Torpey and Tom Taylor, two former bodyguards to Rochester's slain underboss Sammy G Gingello, they attempted to take over control of rackets from the ruling crime family as it was weakened in the midst of a gang war during the early 1980s. They were successful in hiring "Mad Dog" Sullivan to whack a capo and they roughed up a few made guys, but for the most part they were unsuccessful, getting aired out by the mobsters first and locked up in a string of RICO indictments immediately after.
Posted By: Immortale

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by Neo
Originally Posted by Primo
they knew all the rackets etc. if one fam aint gonna let you in for 20 plus years why not just say fuck it and round up all your other non made friends who have been trying to get made and move to like Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?



They don't "know all the rackets". If they did they would have got their button.

A bunch of white boys can't just move to Honalulu and "take over shit". You've got powerful groups like the Sinaloa cartel, Chinese Triads and Yakuza that all have interests there. They ain't going to move aside for a bunch of second rate grease balls that couldn't get made.


Please don't use racist terms like a bunch of white boys.
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 02:49 PM

Same thing with Danny Greene and the celtica Club in Cleveland in the 1970s.
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by FrankValenti
Some tried.

In Rochester, the C-Team was comprised of mostly non-made associates. Headed by Tom Torpey and Tom Taylor, two former bodyguards to Rochester's slain underboss Sammy G Gingello, they attempted to take over control of rackets from the ruling crime family as it was weakened in the midst of a gang war during the early 1980s. They were successful in hiring "Mad Dog" Sullivan to whack a capo and they roughed up a few made guys, but for the most part they were unsuccessful, getting aired out by the mobsters first and locked up in a string of RICO indictments immediately after.


Same thing with Danny Greene and the Celtic Club in Cleveland in the 1970s.
Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by Immortale


Please don't use racist terms like a bunch of white boys.


Calling someone white is a racism these days? Oh my god
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 03:47 PM

For Pittsburgh, Cleveland or SF, I think it's not unlikely that something has taken place.

For Pittsburgh example.
https://archive.triblive.com/news/o...hi-sentenced-to-probation/#axzz3qGTN5sVl
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 04:20 PM

Originally Posted by Nitro
For Pittsburgh, Cleveland or SF, I think it's not unlikely that something has taken place.

For Pittsburgh example.
https://archive.triblive.com/news/o...hi-sentenced-to-probation/#axzz3qGTN5sVl


Only ecause the mob families in this cities was disbanded by the LE.
Posted By: BarrettM

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 05:58 PM

Joey Gallo was going to form his own crime family with all races. The Gallo Crew had always been large and Joey was recruiting latinos, blacks, and anyone who could fight. Of course he was killed shortly after.
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/13/19 11:05 PM

Originally Posted by furio_from_naples
Originally Posted by Nitro
For Pittsburgh, Cleveland or SF, I think it's not unlikely that something has taken place.

For Pittsburgh example.
https://archive.triblive.com/news/o...hi-sentenced-to-probation/#axzz3qGTN5sVl


Only ecause the mob families in this cities was disbanded by the LE.


For Sure.

Another interesting question is whether members have set up a new cell somewhere.
Posted By: Neo

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 02:23 AM

Originally Posted by Immortale
Originally Posted by Neo
Originally Posted by Primo
they knew all the rackets etc. if one fam aint gonna let you in for 20 plus years why not just say fuck it and round up all your other non made friends who have been trying to get made and move to like Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?



They don't "know all the rackets". If they did they would have got their button.

A bunch of white boys can't just move to Honalulu and "take over shit". You've got powerful groups like the Sinaloa cartel, Chinese Triads and Yakuza that all have interests there. They ain't going to move aside for a bunch of second rate grease balls that couldn't get made.


Please don't use racist terms like a bunch of white boys.


lol you zero in on the term "white boys". But you ignore a direct racist slur ("grease balls") in my next sentence.

You're one twisted white boy




Posted By: DuesPaid

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 02:28 AM

They did not since they thrived to be in...In with the guys they knew , to be high level and in the neighborhood they were from to be seen as a success.
Get the Big Time.

However they would have been better off with a Civil service job and retiring in 20 with a check in mailbox every month.
Posted By: Immortale

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 06:56 AM

Originally Posted by Neo
Originally Posted by Immortale
Originally Posted by Neo
Originally Posted by Primo
they knew all the rackets etc. if one fam aint gonna let you in for 20 plus years why not just say fuck it and round up all your other non made friends who have been trying to get made and move to like Honolulu or wherever and just fucking take that shit over for themselves?



They don't "know all the rackets". If they did they would have got their button.

A bunch of white boys can't just move to Honalulu and "take over shit". You've got powerful groups like the Sinaloa cartel, Chinese Triads and Yakuza that all have interests there. They ain't going to move aside for a bunch of second rate grease balls that couldn't get made.


Please don't use racist terms like a bunch of white boys.


lol you zero in on the term "white boys". But you ignore a direct racist slur ("grease balls") in my next sentence.

You're one twisted white boy






That's alright, Neo.
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 08:39 AM

Originally Posted by Nitro
Originally Posted by furio_from_naples
Originally Posted by Nitro
For Pittsburgh, Cleveland or SF, I think it's not unlikely that something has taken place.

For Pittsburgh example.
https://archive.triblive.com/news/o...hi-sentenced-to-probation/#axzz3qGTN5sVl


Only ecause the mob families in this cities was disbanded by the LE.


For Sure.

Another interesting question is whether members have set up a new cell somewhere.


I think that after a mob family was disbanded by LE the remaining made men and the associates prefer to operate independently like cleveland associate bobby iannelli and his son that was arrested because ran a gambling ring.They continue to made money but doesnt have to give a part of $$$ to a capo or a boss.
Posted By: m2w

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 07:17 PM

it's very difficult to form an own family without the consent of other families or the commission and when this happens it triggers war (i bet this is the main reason of the big mafia war in canada)
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 08:19 PM

Originally Posted by m2w
it's very difficult to form an own family without the consent of other families or the commission and when this happens it triggers war (i bet this is the main reason of the big mafia war in canada)


The Commission doesnt exist anymore and after Apalachin was only a NY thing. If sone criminals with an italian surnames want to create a mob family,for sure doesnt had to fear a war with the remaining 9 mob families apart if they would try to go in its territories.
Posted By: m2w

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/16/19 09:14 PM

Originally Posted by furio_from_naples

The Commission doesnt exist anymore and after Apalachin was only a NY thing. If sone criminals with an italian surnames want to create a mob family,for sure doesnt had to fear a war with the remaining 9 mob families apart if they would try to go in its territories.


there is always some sort of commission in the lcn circles, there is no way somebody starts a mafia family without be recognized, he could form an ordinary gang at most, a street gang,and that's all
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 10:19 AM

Originally Posted by m2w
Originally Posted by furio_from_naples

The Commission doesnt exist anymore and after Apalachin was only a NY thing. If sone criminals with an italian surnames want to create a mob family,for sure doesnt had to fear a war with the remaining 9 mob families apart if they would try to go in its territories.


there is always some sort of commission in the lcn circles, there is no way somebody starts a mafia family without be recognized, he could form an ordinary gang at most, a street gang,and that's all


I doubt that if someone would rebuilt a mob family in Cleveland should ask the ok to NY if this guys made money only in Cleveland and in Ohio.
Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 02:15 PM

This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.
Posted By: Immortale

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 02:19 PM

Originally Posted by Strax
This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.


Why though? Who says these 20 guys can't get away with it?
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 04:56 PM

Originally Posted by Immortale
Originally Posted by Strax
This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.


Why though? Who says these 20 guys can't get away with it?


Because the Feds thanks to the RICO can disband the organization so little that can be to be easily incriminated,like the Rudaj orgazation that at its peak had 20 members while the biggest organization can be incriminated with only a trial.The mob families out NY died because after the big guys went in jail there was nodoby to replace them; plus in the US if someone will form a "stable organization" better if is mob family will immediately end up on the radar of the feds who will try to dismantle it.
Posted By: blueracing347

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 05:50 PM

Sammy the bull tried to start his own family and he was once an underboss.
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 06:56 PM

Originally Posted by blueracing347
Sammy the bull tried to start his own family and he was once an underboss.


Gravanno was a fucking rat and runned a ecstasy ring,nothing more while Michael Rizzitello asked the gambinos in 1986 for create a family but they said no,anyway was able to run an independent crew under L.A. family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Rizzitello

Quote
When Rizzitello was released from prison in early 1986, Peter Milano had became the new boss of the Los Angeles crime family. While Milano and Rizzitello had worked together in the 1970s, they now had a distant relationship. Rizzitello then went to the Gambino crime family in New York City to seek permission to start his own crime family in California, but it never came to be. However, he was able to run an independent crew under Milano's family.
Posted By: Primo

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 07:39 PM

Originally Posted by Strax
This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.



Sorry guys for posting such pointless thread haha. I will from now only post about John Gotti
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 08:29 PM

Originally Posted by Primo
Originally Posted by Strax
This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.



Sorry guys for posting such pointless thread haha. I will from now only post about John Gotti


Not so pointless Primo.The US is not Canada and was only Frank Valenti that managed to create his own family splitting from Buffalo mob but that was before the Rico and the better the FBI declare war to the mob.
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 09:56 PM

Originally Posted by Strax
This thread is extremely pointless, a Gambino associate just can't say: "Hey guys,fuck this, im forming my own family" , it doesn't work that way.


For example you are not associated with any of families in US , you could get like 15-20 guys and go to some neutral territory and form a family and in 5 years MAX the feds will lock you all up and you are gone. As it has happened with Albanians in NYC.


Strongly Disagree! Without Murder no Feds. In neutral territory the FED have other problems.Since 2000 how many Fed case in neutral territory against OC groups (No Gangs, MC ) you know ? We saw not much RICO case.

This Thread is not pointless but we had not much information.
Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 09:58 PM

Post about John Gotti ? I never even discuss about him , im much more focused on Italian mafia groups in Italy. I did not mean the question you asked to be pointless , but conversation we are having here , we are not getting anywhere with this

@Nitro: Look what happened to Albanians and any other small groups,they were all done in 5 years or so. This is not the golden age of mafia anymore, small groups stick around for a very short time.
Posted By: Primo

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 10:25 PM

Sorry Strax I wasn't trying to start trouble just joking around. I agree the FEDS make it hard for any non established criminal entity to get its feet off the ground. Depends on if you can stay off their radar also
Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/17/19 10:29 PM

Originally Posted by Primo
Sorry Strax I wasn't trying to start trouble just joking around. I agree the FEDS make it hard for any non established criminal entity to get its feet off the ground. Depends on if you can stay off their radar also


Exactly , in 2019 with all technology and the amount of informants on the streets ,you can't stay under the radar for a long time. Take a look at guys that take care of cartel shipments, they get wiped off in 5 years max , only thing keeping those groups active are constant flow of new members from Mexico.
Posted By: Immortale

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 08:07 AM

RICO is only in place in America. Say an associate did it in the EU?
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 08:47 AM

Originally Posted by Strax
Post about John Gotti ? I never even discuss about him , im much more focused on Italian mafia groups in Italy. I did not mean the question you asked to be pointless , but conversation we are having here , we are not getting anywhere with this

@Nitro: Look what happened to Albanians and any other small groups,they were all done in 5 years or so. This is not the golden age of mafia anymore, small groups stick around for a very short time.


In New York, sure you are right. The Feds watch closely they don't want war or new groups.

But look how many RICO cases against russians in Florida,Cali oder midwest we saw ? Not much.
The Midwest families were less destroyed by Feds but by aging.
Outside New York i don't know one RICO case connected with FBI middle East squad . So chaldean, lebanese, pakistanis are more or less not under pressure.


Exemplary in last 5-10 years New Orleans had only three RICO cases and all three against gangs.
How many cases in Phoenix, AZ ?

Social changes are maybe the worst enemy against OLD OC groups. But it doens't mean that there are no possibilities for OC groups. The whole Pay Day loan are perfect for them.

Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 09:01 AM

Why do you keep saying RICO ? People are getting locked up 15-20 years without RICO when there are drugs involved. No need for RICO to wipe out small groups

There are no hope if they don't have constant flow of new members,especially if they get too powerful , they will get wiped out.
Posted By: Immortale

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by Strax
Why do you keep saying RICO ? People are getting locked up 15-20 years without RICO when there are drugs involved. No need for RICO to wipe out small groups

There are no hope if they don't have constant flow of new members,especially if they get too powerful , they will get wiped out.


But say they do? It's not entirely impossible. I think they have refrained from doing it because the odds are stacked against them, and those who aspire to be will aspire to be with one of the existing orgs.
Posted By: Hollander

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 09:55 AM

In the 'Ndrangheta, the locali enjoy a high degree of autonomy when it comes to conducting business. But the structure of the hierarchy is not negotiable. When Carmelo Novella, the head of the Lombardy 'Ndrangheta, tried to operate independently, he was shot dead in 2008.
Posted By: m2w

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 05:01 PM

Originally Posted by Hollander
In the 'Ndrangheta, the locali enjoy a high degree of autonomy when it comes to conducting business. But the structure of the hierarchy is not negotiable. When Carmelo Novella, the head of the Lombardy 'Ndrangheta, tried to operate independently, he was shot dead in 2008.


the same is for cosa nostra, when some members formed the so called stidda it started a war that left hundreds dead, in the states i never heard somebody formed an own family without permission of the others families it's not like crips and bloods or ms13 that can form their own group easily
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 07:27 PM

Originally Posted by Strax
Why do you keep saying RICO ? People are getting locked up 15-20 years without RICO when there are drugs involved. No need for RICO to wipe out small groups

There are no hope if they don't have constant flow of new members,especially if they get too powerful , they will get wiped out.


Nobody talks about drugs.

Gambling without RICO

Both Cases against longtime gambler and mafia connected guys.

Virgina:
https://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/article_4ced73b5-0a01-5b8e-bcc4-7df5a855e321.html

https://www.pilotonline.com/news/article_e243a8d9-c0c2-5243-b6ab-d4ede8ebdede.html

Pennsylvania:
https://www.casino.org/news/pennsylvania-family-charged-with-running-illegal-gambling-operation

https://triblive.com/local/westmore...d-gambling-ring-wants-charges-dismissed/

This case is "huge" but i suspect we will don't see prison terms over 5 years.

another example
“Operation Pork Chop" No jail time for nobody.


Cali:
https://signalscv.com/2017/11/saugus-man-gets-1-3-years-prison-corruption/

Ron (the Cigar) Sacco:
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Leader-of-Offshore-Betting-Ring-Gets-68-Month-Term-3042922.php
(It is "one of the longest sentences secured by the United States for bookmaking-related offenses" since the federal sentencing guidelines were enacted a decade ago) (6years).


Drugs is a different story. If you catch it is hard do get a good deal. But further you are away from the street trade, the better your chances of not being seen
Posted By: Nitro

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 07:42 PM

To be clear i do not say it is an "easy way or without punishment". But if a criminal group disappear. The criminal market still exist. Maybe they shrink but they still exist. So it's normal that others guy's try to take over. For me logical that some associate or low level guys try it. If they had succes they get money with money they get new chance to earn more money. With more money they get connection...... I mean USA isn't a state without OC. And some white collar guys are more involve in such things as most people thinking.
Posted By: DuesPaid

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/18/19 11:45 PM

Originally Posted by blueracing347
Sammy the bull tried to start his own family and he was once an underboss.


That’s right b
Posted By: pmac

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/19/19 12:01 AM

this questions like why dont a group of white kids from the suburbs become a gang and call it latin kings. i guess they could but it just wouldnt work long term
Posted By: DuesPaid

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/19/19 12:24 AM

Right, you need to understand the people and the neighborhoods to know the answer to a question like this.
Posted By: Primo

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/21/19 02:31 AM

I was thinking more ike 10-20 associates move somewhere like DES MOINES and set up shop. get ties with the british columbia weed dealers etc and just make a big LCN org in a new city. I get it most guys want to be in the hood with the guys they know. family ties etc. it was purely hypothetical situation.
Posted By: Luxurydog

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/23/19 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by Primo
I was thinking more ike 10-20 associates move somewhere like DES MOINES and set up shop. get ties with the british columbia weed dealers etc and just make a big LCN org in a new city. I get it most guys want to be in the hood with the guys they know. family ties etc. it was purely hypothetical situation.



I find this thread very intruiging
I don't get why everyone's saying it would be impossible
The families probably got small crews of 10-20 men in all kinds of states and towns or cities. Guys operating gambling and loansharking in say Missouri or Louisiana
Who's to say there really aren't an under the radar crime family somewhere that the feds haven't picked up on?
40-50 guys in total are enough to make millions and have some muscle on the streets.
I find it very possible and I guess the future is when we'll ever know. Suddenly there is a massive mob bust in New Orleans or in Salem, Oregon
Posted By: CabriniGreen

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 10:16 AM

Originally Posted by m2w
Originally Posted by Hollander
In the 'Ndrangheta, the locali enjoy a high degree of autonomy when it comes to conducting business. But the structure of the hierarchy is not negotiable. When Carmelo Novella, the head of the Lombardy 'Ndrangheta, tried to operate independently, he was shot dead in 2008.


the same is for cosa nostra, when some members formed the so called stidda it started a war that left hundreds dead, in the states i never heard somebody formed an own family without permission of the others families it's not like crips and bloods or ms13 that can form their own group easily



I'm consistently seeing new groups emerging from within older ones. The Mallardo clan split, the Piscopisani clan, there are emerging clans in Canada, yall gotta stop using the Five Families as the Contemporary model, it's actually NOT really accurate...

@m2w

What did you think about Renauds new article? The Canada guys on the other board wont go near it, it seems....
Posted By: Blackmobs

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 02:03 PM

@CabriniGreen

Good point

A passage in the article of Renaud

The police no longer speak systematically among themselves of "traditional Italian organized crime" (COTI), but of Italian organized crime. The traditional word has been evacuated.

I think most of italian organized crime has changed a long time ago, but most people still think its work with the old ways.
Posted By: m2w

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 03:01 PM

Originally Posted by Blackmobs
@CabriniGreen

Good point

A passage in the article of Renaud

The police no longer speak systematically among themselves of "traditional Italian organized crime" (COTI), but of Italian organized crime. The traditional word has been evacuated.

I think most of italian organized crime has changed a long time ago, but most people still think its work with the old ways.


in italy and the united states italian organized crime is the same as it was in the past (ranks, ceremonies etc.) canada is just an exception if it true what renaud said
Posted By: Blackmobs

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 04:06 PM

Do we have infos on italian and US families?
Infos that are at least from the 2010s ?

Because alot of the infos how those families are working are kind of old.
Posted By: LuanKuci

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 04:15 PM

I must have missed something then...what’s “new” among Italian OC in North America? What’s no longer traditional? As m2w stated, ceremonies and ranks are still key and promoted. Alliances change but that’s more than normal.
Posted By: LuanKuci

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 04:23 PM

Originally Posted by Luxurydog
Who's to say there really aren't an under the radar crime family somewhere that the feds haven't picked up yet?


According to some of the most knowledgeable posters around here, remnants of defunct crime families are still active and spread out. Albeit not in the structured LCN form they once were but still “around” and involved. Nothing major I imagine, but enough to still shed some influence over those often forgotten locales. This is especially true along the rust belt, areas like Scranton-Wilkes Barre, Youngstown-Monongahela areas as well as Pittsburgh.

I guess we could refer to them as the “Out in the Sticks crews”.
Posted By: m2w

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 05:06 PM

Originally Posted by Blackmobs
Do we have infos on italian and US families?
Infos that are at least from the 2010s ?

Because alot of the infos how those families are working are kind of old.


there are very recent infos of both organized crime families in italy and the states, and there is not any difference between today and past organized crime groups, aside the level of power and influence the structure is the same
Posted By: Hollander

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/28/19 10:48 PM

I do think there is now more opportunism and they are less religious and family oriented like society as a whole.
Posted By: furio_from_naples

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/30/19 10:51 AM

I think that the Stidda (The Star) can be a good example:in the 1970s after the Corleonesi killed Giuseppe Di Cristina the boss of Riesi,more of his men was shelved and decided to create their own organization calling it the Stidda and making new members without the Sicilian Commission approval and choosed Gela because there was few men of honor there in 1970s-1980s.
Posted By: Strax

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/30/19 11:08 AM

Originally Posted by Blackmobs
Do we have infos on italian and US families?
Infos that are at least from the 2010s ?

Because alot of the infos how those families are working are kind of old.


[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Posted By: LuanKuci

Re: Why didnt associates just form their own families? - 09/30/19 01:07 PM

^ despite being an interesting map, please be advised that most of it lacks any sort of actual source. I own that book and there is no index of some sort with actual data showing how that layout was mapped. At least the one covering the USA.

Also it needs to be said that many of those “families” are not active per-se but more like some geographical connections to Italian areas run by certain crime families and alleged/general links to individuals living on American soil, such as the Springfield MA reference. Most Genovese associates living in Western MA are descendants of Avellinese and Nolani immigrants or are immigrants themselves (like Emilio Fusco), but, other than that, actual links to overseas organizations have yet to be proven.

Same for the Terrasini connection in Detroit. The D’Anna brothers (Domenico and Girolamo) are related to mafiosi from that area but that’s not enough to imply that the D’Annas out of Sicily run any activity in metro Detroit.

Take it with a grain of salt or, at best, as a way to explore some blood-and-immigration-lines.
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET