Home

Accardo vs Giancana

Posted By: Feech_La_Manna85

Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 08:46 AM

I was always under the impression (btw im not a Chicago guy by any means) that Accardo was always the top guy after Ricca's reign was over. But the new poster "Chicago"(who seems like he really knows his shit about the outfits history says Giancana was the top guy. So who was it, Accardo or Giancana?? Any opinions??
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 10:03 AM

To understand Chicago, one must understand that the power was based upon Street Crews, which were like small to moderate sized families.

Ricca was the Boss of the West Side Crew around the First Ward which controlled Chicago and BOSS of the entire Outfit. Within his CREW was his protégé Sam Giancana & Sam Battaglia. They were both Capos. Sam Giancana had the West Side and Sam Battaglia had the West Suburbs.

Tony Accardo was Boss of the Grand Ave Crew & UNDERBOSS of the entire Outfit. Within his Crew was a Capo named Jackie Cerone.

In 1957, Ricca, at the age of 60, stepped back and Giancana became the Boss of the West Side Crew and Top Boss of the Outfit at the age of 49. The crew changed it's name to be known as the Taylor St. Crew. Fiore Bucciere moved up and became the other Capo. Ricca was now the Semi-Retired Senior Advisor.

Also, in 1957, Accardo stepped down and Semi-Retired with Ricca at the age of 51 and became the other Senior Advisor. Cerone became the Boss of the Grand Ave Crew which moved out further west and became known as the Elmwood Park Crew.

HERE COMES THE BIG ARGUEMENT THAT TOOK PLACE WITHIN THE OUTFIT:

Accardo wanted his man Cerone to be the UNDERBOSS of the entire Outfit and be partnered with Giancana the way Accardo was partnered with Ricca.

Giancana refused and there was really nothing Accardo could do about it.

When Giancana left Chicago in 1966, Sam Battaglia became the Boss of Taylor St. and the Top Boss of the Outfit. Phil Alderisio moved up and then became the other Capo. After Battaglia went to jail and died shortly thereafter, Alderisio then became the Boss of Taylor St and the Top Boss of the Outfit.

After Alderisio went to jail, Bucciere was too sick to take over and a lot of the Taylor St. men were dead and a couple were in jail like Willie Daddano.

Then came the big CHANGING OF THE GUARD. Around 1969 or 1970, Auippa and the Cicero Crew became partnered with Elmwood Park and THEY took over the Outfit. The Taylor St Crew was all but disbanded and the remaining men were either direct with Auippa and Cerone or they were now under Turk Torello who took Bucciere's place and became Boss of what became known as the 26th St Crew.
Lombardo became Boss of another Crew which became known as the Grand Ave Crew because Lombardo lived in Little Italy on Grand and Ogden.

Accardo's greatest power came AFTER the CHANGING OF THE GUARD.
Ricca died in 1972. After Ricca died, The Outfit killed a few left over Taylor St. men who didn't FIT IN properly.
The first to go was Sammy DeStefano. 1973
The second to go was Chuckie Nicoletti 1977
The third to go was Chuckie English 1985


Do you get the picture? It was based upon Street Crew Power, not individual power per se.
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 10:14 AM

Technically, Chicago kind of(not totally) put me in my place on that in my thread about Accardo being my favorite mobster. I think it's one of those things where you can make your own assumption but Giancana was mentored in by Paul Ricca who shared power with Accardo even while Ricca was in prison. Giancana I would say for a period of time was the big guy on top with Accardo right next to him as his advisor. Although I believe Accardo still signed off on mostly everything Giancana did as Boss. In the end Giancana didn't want to share, even after being tossed to Mexico for 3 years he still had an enormous amount of power and had alot of business ventures outside the U.S.. One being casinos in Israel that he profited on alone without any sharing with the Outfit. Giancana was certainly a boss on his own right, but I firmly believe that alot of guys didn't answer totally to him and always kept their loyalty with The Big Tuna. If I was Accardo I would have been happy to sit in the back seat while Mr. Flashy Giancana drove the car.

I think an even more interesting debate would be who clipped Giancana? CIA or Accardo?
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 10:24 AM

I added some more to my posting above.

The Outfit killed Giancana and the other 3 men I mentioned, one of whom was my father.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 02:17 PM

If giancana was so powerful, why was accardo able to banish him to mexico???
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 02:30 PM

You obviously put my Outfit knowledge to shame Chicago. I feel like I could definitely learn a thing or two from you my friend. Very interesting to hear that your old man was either Mad Sam, Nicoletti or English. I also have some connection. I grew up with alot of the children of Rockford Crew guys. Saladinos, Frisella, Galluzzos, and Fiorenzas.
Posted By: Giancarlo

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 02:37 PM

Originally Posted By: Logomassini
I think an even more interesting debate would be who clipped Giancana? CIA or Accardo?

Chicago or anyone that knows, where was Spilotro the day Giancana was killed? I remember reading that some crooked police chief thought it was Tony. He said Spilotro lived in the neighborhood and knew how to sneak over to Sam's place without being seen. Is that all bullshit or is it possible? Where was Tony that day? Vegas?
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 02:46 PM

What exactly does it take to be made around here? I see the big fella just got straightened out. How does one earn his button in this GBB?
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 02:48 PM

Interesting.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 03:02 PM

@logomassini: you have to be a good earner, and don't forget to slide the boss something extra for his birthday
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 03:06 PM

I believe the guy you're talking about may be Michael Corbitt (sp). He had some other theories about who killed Giancana, and Tony Spilotro was someone he mentioned. There were others.

I have no idea relative to Spilotro's whereabouts the night Giancana was killed. The most common theory I've heard is that Dominic "Butch" Blasi was the person responsible for killing Sam Giancana. No one was ever charged. Blasi was one of Giancana's closet friends. If you read the FBI files, Giancana once offered to lend Blasi something like $120- 130,000 to purchase some land. Blasi turned him down because he said the IRS would be all over him about where he got the money. Who knows what eventually happened? Maybe they "worked something out." Two points here: 1. Giancana's willingness to help one of his men, and 2. Some of your best friends will "do you in."

CHICAGO will probably have some additional information.
Posted By: 12thStreet

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 03:19 PM

There are several theories about who knocked down Giancana. Blasi is probably the most likely as Giancana knew him and would have allowed him in the house and was most likely to turn his back to him. That's how they ALWAYS get you...through people you know and trust..There's another train of thought that has Turk Torello and Johnny DiFronzo as the killers and yes, there's Corbitt's statement about Spilotro. Keep in mind the Oak Park Police and probably even the FBI were sitting on Giancana's house in Oak Park that night. I don't buy Spilotro and I don't buy Turk/Johnny either. There was no shootout that night, which there would have been had Spilotro, Turk or Johnny came knocking at Mooney's door lol it stands to reason Mooney would have known why they were there..:) Blasi was trusted by Mooney that's why he got Mooney's ticket. Regardless of WHO killed Giancana, it's obvious it was ordered by Aiuppa/Cerone. Probably the greatest myth perpetrated by Bill Roemer in his love affair with Accardo is that Accardo was the BOSS OF BOSSES, he NEVER WAS....
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 03:30 PM

Can someobe explain to me why accardo was' nt the bos of bosses? And did he step aside or was he forced out? Please explain
Posted By: Giancarlo

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 03:35 PM

Originally Posted By: GaryMartin
I believe the guy you're talking about may be Michael Corbitt (sp). He had some other theories about who killed Giancana, and Tony Spilotro was someone he mentioned. There were others.

Gary, yes thats the guy. I always heard Blasi's name mentioned as most likely the hitter so i remember i was kind of surprised by his comments about Spilotro. Being that he was a police chief i thought maybe he knew something.

Thanks guys.
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 04:02 PM

Giananca's high profile lifestyle and the loss of some of his loyal backers, put him at risk. His exile was self-imposed, but certainly Ricca and probably Accardo warned him of the dangers of remaining in Chicago at this time.

Giancana was tough and had a difficult time adjusting to change (IMO). He wanted to conduct business the old-fashioned way: corruption, extortion or murder. Times were changing in Chicago and it was necessary for The Outfit to adjust and modify their ways to allow for these changes. I believe Giancana had a very difficult time adjusting. Plus, he was very stubborn; it was his way, the highway or the grave. A real gangster for sure.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 04:24 PM

Originally Posted By: GaryMartin
Giananca's high profile lifestyle and the loss of some of his loyal backers, put him at risk. His exile was self-imposed, but certainly Ricca and probably Accardo warned him of the dangers of remaining in Chicago at this time.

Giancana was tough and had a difficult time adjusting to change (IMO). He wanted to conduct business the old-fashioned way: corruption, extortion or murder. Times were changing in Chicago and it was necessary for The Outfit to adjust and modify their ways to allow for these changes. I believe Giancana had a very difficult time adjusting. Plus, he was very stubborn; it was his way, the highway or the grave. A real gangster for sure.





more like an egotistical idiot

they told him to get off the bullshit in the mid 60s and he didn't

then he comes back 10 yrs later on the same bullshit and got himself popped
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 04:46 PM

But giancana said himself he was being forced out of chicago so it was' nt self imposed, if ur the top boss how can u get kicked out of ur own city? And its been reported that accardo was mad at him for not sending money back to chicago while he was in mexico, I need more evidence if u want to say giancana was the top boss instead of accardo, now if u want to say o'brien had a higher ranking than accardo, I'm open to it, but not giancana
Posted By: jonnynonos

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 05:17 PM

A lot of informed people feel that Accardo was never even the boss, just kind of an overseer.

I personally really have no idea; the books of course all have him as the top guy, mostly, in some respect, though there are people who know far more than me who insist he never was.

I do think, though, that people make too much about the heirarchy. Gus Russo's book, while flawed in some respects, is probably the best treatise on the subject, and after reading that I was left with the impression that the Outfit at its peak probably didn't engage in a lot of the rather silly ceremony that later came to be associated with LCN.

In that book it was really more that a few extremely cunning, opportunistic career criminals--mainly Humphries, Ricca, Giancana and Accardo--were at the head of an astoundingly effective money making criminal enterprise.

By inference it seemed like it was run loosely by consensus of the above.

I mean think about it, it's unlikely that Tony Accardo ever once referred to himself as an "underboss," or a "consigliere" or any other ridiculous title in his entire life; I imagine he would have found the idea hysterical.

What do you get, a jacket with your title in it?
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 05:42 PM

Thebigfella, Who told you Giancana was ORDERED to step down? Roemer? STOP saying it.
1) Giancana wasn't ordered to do anything. It was done by a consensus of Ricca, Giancana & Accardo.
2) You have the wrong idea when you think one person always made the final decisions.
3) jonnynonos has more the right idea. Not you.
4) Tony Spilotro had nothing to do with killing Giancana.
5) Dominic Blasi set up Mooney.
6) Dominic Blasi was ordered to do it by Auippa/Cerone.
7) Cook County, stop saying Giancana was an idiot. you don't know what you're talking about. Giancana was killed in 1975 because Auippa & Cerone FEARED HIM. THEY DIDN'T WANT HIM TO TRY AND MAKE A COMEBACK. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HE DID 9 YEARS AGO.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 06:17 PM

@chicago: are u saying giancana wanted to go to mexico?
Posted By: Toodoped

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 06:24 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Thebigfella, Who told you Giancana was ORDERED to step down? Roemer? STOP saying it.
1) Giancana wasn't ordered to do anything. It was done by a consensus of Ricca, Giancana & Accardo.
2) You have the wrong idea when you think one person always made the final decisions.
3) jonnynonos has more the right idea. Not you.
4) Tony Spilotro had nothing to do with killing Giancana.
5) Dominic Blasi set up Mooney.
6) Dominic Blasi was ordered to do it by Auippa/Cerone.
7) Cook County, stop saying Giancana was an idiot. you don't know what you're talking about. Giancana was killed in 1975 because Auippa & Cerone FEARED HIM. THEY DIDN'T WANT HIM TO TRY AND MAKE A COMEBACK. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HE DID 9 YEARS AGO.


I gotta say Chicago you r the best poster ever on the Chi outfit on GBB.Im not from the US but ive always belived in the things you just said and confirmed everything.Bout the Giancana murder...Chuck G. in his book says that the CIA was involved?Any truth in that?thanx again
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 06:32 PM

Who's the Boss? Underboss? Explain earning in the context of here.
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 06:35 PM

Johnny - That's a very good post. Throw in a few more names like Gus Alex, and others at different times, and you have a very good description of what I've read and been told.

There are lots of stories about specifics relative to The Outfit, but paragraphs 3,4,5 and 6 of your post, pretty well sums up how I understand they operated. I also believe that by including others in the decision- making process is what made The Outfit so strong.

Results were important, not titles.

Thanks for the very good analysis. Well stated.

I need a jacket !!!
Posted By: Faithful1

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 07:00 PM

Accardo was a boss before Giancana. This isn't from Roemer, this is from many different informants including members of other Families, as well as recorded conversations. Accardo sat on the Commission before Giancana did and was recorded explaining protocol to Giancana when he was a new boss. Before Accardo was the boss Ricca was and he sat on the Commission, the difference is that while Ricca was the boss Lefty Campagna was considered the top Outfit boss. Accardo became acting boss while Ricca and Campagna were in prison, then Ricca retired and became an adviser, and remained an adviser until he died in 1972.

In 1956/57 Accardo retired as day-to-day boss and became an adviser like Ricca, but Ricca had seniority. Giancana was the day-to-day boss until he retired to Mexico in 1966. No one considered Giancana an idiot. He was respected by all Outfit guys but not everyone liked him. Aiuppa and Cerone didn't. When Giancana returned I don't think he tried to become boss again. His main backer and protector was Ricca, and all the Taylor Street killings happened after Ricca died. Other killings include Richard Cain and John Rosselli. Cain was an informant and may have been discovered, but it seems that he was alleged to try to take over the Outfit too. Giancana was Rosselli's protector, but with Mooney he had no protection and wasn't liked by Aiuppa.

As for Blasi killing Giancana, there's another theory that Blasi let the killers in, but he wasn't an actual shooter. This one makes the most sense to me. Joe Fosco talks about it.
Posted By: TommyGambino

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 07:29 PM

Chicago I know you got your information from your father, which is obviously a better source then any of us but like you say your father was in Giancanas crew. Have you ever thought he showed bias towards Sam?

Just putting it out there.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 08:41 PM

Faithful1, I agree with everything you said about the timeline. Very good.
It's only a small technicality that I was pointing out that you have basically restated for me.
Yes, Accardo was on the Commission before Giancana.
However, here is the key thing to remember that I will not back down on at any time:
As long as Ricca was ALIVE, Accardo was NEVER the top Boss. Even when Ricca was in jail temporarily. Ricca & Accardo were the two Bosses, but if push came to shove, Ricca made the final call.
The same can be said during Giancana's reign. Giancana was the Day to Day Boss, but as long as Ricca was alive, Ricca made the final call on certain issues.
Accardo was more of an equal with Giancana. Giancana never took orders from Accardo. I repeat. Never.
The fact that Giancana REFUSED to have Cerone be Underboss of the entire Outfit shows Giancana's power. Accardo could not over rule him. ACCARDO HAD TO ACCEPT IT. That is proof alone.
You'll never read this in a book.
Does this make sense to you?
Posted By: TommyGambino

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 08:52 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Faithful1, I agree with everything you said about the timeline. Very good.
It's only a small technicality that I was pointing out that you have basically restated for me.
Yes, Accardo was on the Commission before Giancana.
However, here is the key thing to remember that I will not back down on at any time:
As long as Ricca was ALIVE, Accardo was NEVER the top Boss. Even when Ricca was in jail temporarily. Ricca & Accardo were the two Bosses, but if push came to shove, Ricca made the final call.
The same can be said during Giancana's reign. Giancana was the Day to Day Boss, but as long as Ricca was alive, Ricca made the final call on certain issues.
Accardo was more of an equal with Giancana. Giancana never took orders from Accardo. I repeat. Never.
The fact that Giancana REFUSED to have Cerone be Underboss of the entire Outfit shows Giancana's power. Accardo could not over rule him. ACCARDO HAD TO ACCEPT IT. That is proof alone.
You'll never read this in a book.
Does this make sense to you?


Well that wiretap of accardo and Giancana painted a different picture. It was if Accardo was TELLING Sam what to do, listen to it, it's online somewhere.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 09:08 PM

Tommy, In a marriage with a husband and wife, they are basically considered equal. Correct?
Sometimes the husband gets his way, sometimes the wife gets her way.

I don't need to hear any recording.
You can't judge a multi-year relationship on ONE recording. The fact that Giancana refused to have Cerone be his basic equal partner and underboss of the entire Outfit SPEAKS VOLUMES.

If you want to insist that Giancana took orders from Accardo, then so be it. The whole discussion about Accardo versus Giancana is becoming ridiculous. No offense.
Posted By: jonnynonos

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 09:36 PM

Originally Posted By: Faithful1
Other killings include Richard Cain and John Rosselli. Cain was an informant and may have been discovered, but it seems that he was alleged to try to take over the Outfit too.


I have a book on Cain called "The Tangled Web" but have only flipped through it; I think his brother wrote it. He was an interesting guy but like so much of mob history it sounds like there has been a lot of half truths and myths mixed in with whatever he actually did; he has been fingered in everything from the JFK assasination to the Bay of Pigs, and by one account I remember reading his "double agent" act was the inspiration for Scoreses's "Departed." Cain himself also seemed to purposefully promote these kinds of rumors.

Anyway, he got wasted in a place here on Grand Avenue then called Rose's Sandwich Shop which is now another business; I would bet the current owners have no idea what happened there and it's probably better they don't.

Two guys in masks came in and made everyone line up against the wall and pretended like it was a robbery then executed Cain and ran.

It was one of those crimes from what I remember that virtually every mob assassin who was on the street at the time has been fingered for, including Aleman and Lombardo.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 09:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Thebigfella, Who told you Giancana was ORDERED to step down? Roemer? STOP saying it.
1) Giancana wasn't ordered to do anything. It was done by a consensus of Ricca, Giancana & Accardo.
2) You have the wrong idea when you think one person always made the final decisions.
3) jonnynonos has more the right idea. Not you.
4) Tony Spilotro had nothing to do with killing Giancana.
5) Dominic Blasi set up Mooney.
6) Dominic Blasi was ordered to do it by Auippa/Cerone.
7) Cook County, stop saying Giancana was an idiot. you don't know what you're talking about. Giancana was killed in 1975 because Auippa & Cerone FEARED HIM. THEY DIDN'T WANT HIM TO TRY AND MAKE A COMEBACK. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HE DID 9 YEARS AGO.




consensus said giancana had to go which means ricca and accardo demoted him

giancana was demoted for doing goofy shit

then he was killed in 1975 for running off the at the mouth (more goofy shit)
Posted By: PP

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/09/13 09:59 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
To understand Chicago, one must understand that the power was based upon Street Crews, which were like small to moderate sized families.

Ricca was the Boss of the West Side Crew around the First Ward which controlled Chicago and BOSS of the entire Outfit. Within his CREW was his protégé Sam Giancana & Sam Battaglia. They were both Capos. Sam Giancana had the West Side and Sam Battaglia had the West Suburbs.

Tony Accardo was Boss of the Grand Ave Crew & UNDERBOSS of the entire Outfit. Within his Crew was a Capo named Jackie Cerone.

In 1957, Ricca, at the age of 60, stepped back and Giancana became the Boss of the West Side Crew and Top Boss of the Outfit at the age of 49. The crew changed it's name to be known as the Taylor St. Crew. Fiore Bucciere moved up and became the other Capo. Ricca was now the Semi-Retired Senior Advisor.

Also, in 1957, Accardo stepped down and Semi-Retired with Ricca at the age of 51 and became the other Senior Advisor. Cerone became the Boss of the Grand Ave Crew which moved out further west and became known as the Elmwood Park Crew.

HERE COMES THE BIG ARGUEMENT THAT TOOK PLACE WITHIN THE OUTFIT:

Accardo wanted his man Cerone to be the UNDERBOSS of the entire Outfit and be partnered with Giancana the way Accardo was partnered with Ricca.

Giancana refused and there was really nothing Accardo could do about it.

When Giancana left Chicago in 1966, Sam Battaglia became the Boss of Taylor St. and the Top Boss of the Outfit. Phil Alderisio moved up and then became the other Capo. After Battaglia went to jail and died shortly thereafter, Alderisio then became the Boss of Taylor St and the Top Boss of the Outfit.

After Alderisio went to jail, Bucciere was too sick to take over and a lot of the Taylor St. men were dead and a couple were in jail like Willie Daddano.

Then came the big CHANGING OF THE GUARD. Around 1969 or 1970, Auippa and the Cicero Crew became partnered with Elmwood Park and THEY took over the Outfit. The Taylor St Crew was all but disbanded and the remaining men were either direct with Auippa and Cerone or they were now under Turk Torello who took Bucciere's place and became Boss of what became known as the 26th St Crew.
Lombardo became Boss of another Crew which became known as the Grand Ave Crew because Lombardo lived in Little Italy on Grand and Ogden.

Accardo's greatest power came AFTER the CHANGING OF THE GUARD.
Ricca died in 1972. After Ricca died, The Outfit killed a few left over Taylor St. men who didn't FIT IN properly.
The first to go was Sammy DeStefano. 1973
The second to go was Chuckie Nicoletti 1977
The third to go was Chuckie English 1985


Do you get the picture? It was based upon Street Crew Power, not individual power per se.


When Aiuppa and Cicero took over, was Taylor St's earning power effected or was there just a loss of power because they were no longer direct with the boss, Giancana? Or was there no loss at all?

Also, did the guys ever refer to themselves as the Cicero crew and 26th st crew, etc, or is that just something we are saying now to identify who they are? Would someone under Aiuppa say "I'm with Aiuppa" or would he say "I'm with Cicero"? Would a guy in Elmwood Park refer to someone as a Grand Ave guy or as The Clown's guy, when Lombardo was in charge?

Thanks.
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 01:08 AM

Here's a story about the murder of Sam Giancana.



http://books.google.com/books?id=5ugCAAA...ana&f=false
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 02:46 AM

PP, When Auippa/Cerone took over, it was because of the diminished power of the Taylor St. Crew.

The remaining men went in 1 of 3 directions.

1) Some were now under Torello, 26th St.
2) Some were now under Lombardo, Grand Ave.
3) some WERE NOW DIRECT with Auippa/Cerone. (Inherited)

They would use code names usually when referring to things:

They would usually say 'He belongs to Cigar' (Giancana)
or He belongs to Joe Nick (Ferriola) or there's a beef between Taylor and Grand Ave.

A made guy would never come out and say 'I am with Auippa'.
It would never be that blatant.

Also, if a guy was made, everybody knew who he was with, there was no need to spell it out.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 03:07 AM

Cook County, I guess we all forgot that you were there in the room with Ricca, Accardo and Giancana 50 years ago and know the whole story about how stupid, egotisical, can't do anything, Giancana was ordered around by big bad Tony Accardo because Giancana was afraid of him. Please excuse me for trying to explain it. After all, what do I know?
Posted By: Faithful1

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 03:11 AM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Faithful1, I agree with everything you said about the timeline. Very good.
It's only a small technicality that I was pointing out that you have basically restated for me.
Yes, Accardo was on the Commission before Giancana.
However, here is the key thing to remember that I will not back down on at any time:
As long as Ricca was ALIVE, Accardo was NEVER the top Boss. Even when Ricca was in jail temporarily. Ricca & Accardo were the two Bosses, but if push came to shove, Ricca made the final call.
The same can be said during Giancana's reign. Giancana was the Day to Day Boss, but as long as Ricca was alive, Ricca made the final call on certain issues.
Accardo was more of an equal with Giancana. Giancana never took orders from Accardo. I repeat. Never.
The fact that Giancana REFUSED to have Cerone be Underboss of the entire Outfit shows Giancana's power. Accardo could not over rule him. ACCARDO HAD TO ACCEPT IT. That is proof alone.
You'll never read this in a book.
Does this make sense to you?


I agree that Ricca was first among equals. That's why nothing happened to Taylor Street while he was alive. That says something about his power.

Regarding Giancana never taking orders from Accardo I would disagree in this sense: BEFORE Giancana became the boss in 1956/57 he would have taken orders from Accardo. After Accardo stepped down, I agree. Most sources have Giancana as Accardo's underboss before he promoted.

On Cerone, agreed. The evidence that we have has Frank Ferraro as the underboss until 1965 when he died, succeeded by Battaglia. I don't know if Accardo tried to push Cerone, but it seems that Accardo would have accepted that it was Giancana's right to pick who he wanted as underboss.

The way I see the transcripts where it looks like Accardo was telling Giancana what to do, he was in the sense of Bill Clinton advising Barack Obama. Accardo was used to barking out orders, but Giancana could accept or reject his advice. What else that's interesting in these transcripts are that Murray Humphreys barks out a lot of orders -- except to the very top guys. Because the top guys understood that Humphreys was intelligent and experienced he had their backing and could do this. Since he wasn't made it shows how respected he was.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 03:31 AM

Faithful1, Check you PM'S.

I agree with you on everthing except two points:

1) Ferraro was never the underboss of the Outfit. I don't care what Roemer said in his book, Ferraro was never the underboss of the entire Outfit. Never. Ferraro was a strong made guy who reported direct to Giancana, Ricca, Accardo.
Giancana had no underboss. That's what the big beef was all about. If anything, his 2 Capos, Battaglia and Bucciere, were his underbosses.

2) Giancana and Accardo were more like equals if anything. Even before 1957, Accardo was the Boss of Grand Ave and Underboss of the entire Outfit. However, Giancana had tremendous power even before 1957. He was Ricca's protégé and was Ricca's PERSONAL underboss. Also, the Taylor St. Crew was in power before 1957. At worst, Giancana & Accardo were more like equals with Accardo being only 2 years older than him.

Giancana only took actual orders from one man, Ricca. Giancana and Accardo were more like Rivals. Ricca loved both of them.

Posted By: SonnyBlackstein

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 03:35 AM

@Chicago.
Your contributions here are very, very appreciated. We've all learnt a lot from your assistance.

Many thanks.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 03:42 AM

Thank Sonny, My wife said this has been like therapy for me. She encourages me to talk about the past.

I Apologize if I sometimes lose my patience. I really try to be a gentleman.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 04:37 AM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Cook County, I guess we all forgot that you were there in the room with Ricca, Accardo and Giancana 50 years and know the whole story about how stupid, egotisical, can't do anything, Giancana was ordered around by big bad Tony Accardo because Giancana was afraid of him. Please excuse me for trying to explain it. After all, what do I know?




I ain't ever say that accardo gave giancana orders

I think ricca called the shots with accardo/giancana driving the car
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 07:54 AM

The Big Fella, Giancana had no choice. He had to leave Chicago or go to prison. It was a consensus opinion of Ricca, Giancana and Accardo. It was agreed that Giancana would expand the Outfit's interests abroad.
Big decisions in Chicago were made by a meeting of the minds of the Top men. It was not a Dictatorship.
The sooner you forget the Dictatorship concept, the sooner you will understand the Outfit's Leadership.
Stop making it a competition between these three men, that's where you failing to see the point. No one of these men ordered each other around. Get that out of your head.

Posted By: DA13

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 05:08 PM

What do you think about the accuracy of this article?




Quote:


"Like Cashmere On A Leper"

(Part Two)

By John William Tuohy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Ricca knew they were right of course. From watching Diamond Joe Esposito and his ridiculous jewelry and Al Capone and his banana-colored suites, Ricca was sure that low profile was the way for a gangster to go.

On the day Al Capone was sentenced to his term in prison for income tax evasion, he was led away in chains to the Cook County jail where he was held until he could be transferred to Atlanta Federal Prison.

Late that same afternoon, Murray Humpreys, Jake Guzak and New York crime boss Lucky Luciano visited Capone in Cook County jail. A while later two more New Yorkers showed up, Dutch Schultz in the company of Johnny Torrio.

Capone called for the warden and told him that he needed a place where he and Torrio and Schultz could talk privately. Incredibly, Warden Moneypenny led the hoods to the soundproofed death chamber where Capone promptly sat himself in the electric chair.

What Torrio told Capone that afternoon was that he had been double-crossed by Nitti and Ricca and the rest of the boys. What Torrio told Capone was the same thing that Gus Winkler's wife told Special Agent O.C. Dewey on May 20, 1936 in the FBI's Louisville, Kentucky office.

"For a while Gus was working to clear Capone of the tax charges. Bartholomus said (to Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti) that he could get it fixed in Washington for $100,000, however Frank Nitti, Rocky De Grazio and Lefty Louie Campagna came to (Winkler's) apartment and told him to back off, that they wanted Capone in jail." She added that "in 1934 some of Capone's friends in the organization were trying to get him released before word went out from Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti to leave well enough alone."

Aside from not fixing a bribe on Capone's behalf, the boys withheld other vital information from Al as well.

Capone could have walked on the tax evasion charges up to the last minute before the jury in the case retired to make its decision. All Capone had to do was pay the money on the back taxes that he owed.

Capone's army of lawyers had told that to the Fischetti brothers at the start of the trial but the money to pay the fine and the back taxes never arrived.

Nitti, Ricca and the Fischettis liked being the top guys. So they talked it over and decided that it was best that Capone be convicted, never to come back to Chicago.

It was better for the organization everyone, Ricca said, if Capone stayed in jail. He was right too. The United States Government wanted Capone in jail and the entire world was watching them put him there.

An early release from Capone's sentence brought on by a well placed bribe in Washington would do nothing but bring back more investigators. It was nothing against Capone personally. For Ricca was genuinely fond of Capone. In 1930 Capone learned that Nicola "Culicchia" Gentile, who later turned government informer, was elected to the national Mafia commission. Capone, a non-Sicilian sent Ricca to New York to see Gentile and tell him that Capone supported Mafia Masseria in his bid to control the New York underworld. According to legend, Ricca went a step further and issued a threat from Capone, saying that Chicago was prepared to support Masseria in an all out war to control New York.

But, as close as Ricca and Capone were, Ricca said, "Al was bad for business and it was better that he left the scene."

The gossip in the underworld, and there is always gossip in the underworld, and it made the rounds for years, was that Ricca had authorized members of the Capone organization who worked under him, to assist the Treasury department in nailing Al Capone and members of the organization that Ricca felt were a threat or were in his way from rising to the top.

One of the first to go down was Frank Nitti, the so-called "enforcer" of the Capone organization and the contempt that Ricca and Nitti held for each other was widely known.

Once Capone was locked away, the mob in Chicago was able to operate, unmolested, for almost twenty years before the Kefauver committee came to town. When Nitti was released from jail on his tax rap, Ricca decided that it was best to prop up Nitti as the boss. Ricca did this despite his correct view that although Frank Nitti was an educated man, and learned from him what he could, Nitti was a hothead, more prone to act first and think later. That was a dangerous trait in a mob leader. But the newspapers wanted another leader to target in on once Capone was gone. Murray Humpreys was the center of the media's attention for a while and then Rocco Fischetti. Pretty soon they would figure out that Ricca was a power and they would come after him with their flash cameras and front page stories.

Ricca figured that if Frank Nitti wanted to take the heat from the limelight and have the world believe that he was the boss, that was fine with Ricca and everyone else.

Just how much of the organization Ricca was really running became clear in April of 1932 when Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky were seized by Chicago police while in company of Paul Ricca and Rocca Fischetti as they were leaving the Congress hotel, but they were released after being booked and printed since the cops had no reason to hold them.

So, while Nitti sat on his leather throne in the Bismark Hotel throwing around orders, Paul Ricca privately called Lucky Luciano, Rocco Fischetti and Harry Ducket to Chicago for a meeting, Ricca telling Meyer Lansky, a non-Sicilian, to wait downstairs in the lobby of the Bismarck Hotel while they talked.

The Eastern syndicate found Ricca to be responsive to their desire to connect with the otherwise isolated Chicago outfit.

New York's boss Frank Costello was already working out deals with Ricca by 1935 while Nitti was supposed to be the boss, and he was plotting against Frank Nitti to take control by already cutting separate deals for himself.

He became Costello's ally and they were close enough so that they were arrested together on a raid in a Blue Island gambling place. It looked like a war was brewing between Costello and Chicago over gambling rights in Broward County, Florida where New York controlled narcotics and vice in the early thirties.

When Chicago started encroaching on that territory with their own gambling operations, New York objected. Ricca had Nitti argue that Chicago would gladly withdraw from Miami for a split of all the fees that New York was taking from Miami. The New York families refused and likewise Ricca told Nitti not to back down on his demands. It looked like war. Then Ricca, without telling Nitti what he was doing flew out New York and sat down with Costello and Lucky Luciano. Chicago, he said, would pull out of Miami if New York would agree to allow Chicago to share in some of its national unions.

Lucky Luciano refused to give them either one, where Costello believed that by giving Chicago a small portion of the union business they would leave Miami to New York but Luciano wouldn't hear of it.

Actually Chicago didn't care about Miami or even have an interest in it, what they wanted was the unions; Miami was just a smokescreen. In the end Ricca managed to get New York to open up some of its east coast unions and have Miami declared an open city.

Several years later, when Chicago had the money and muscle to break that agreement, they did.

In the late 1920s Ricca had managed the Dante movie house in Little Italy and then, later, the World Playhouse corporation on Michigan Avenue so he was considered a specialist in the movie business. Besides that, in 1960, Murray Humpreys claimed that he and Paul Ricca had grubstaked Joe Kennedy's move into the motion picture industry in the early 1920s and as a result was brought in by Frank Nitti to oversee the Bioff & Browne Hollywood shake down scandal.

That involvement would cost Ricca a term in federal prison and his resulting early release under highly suspicious circumstances would bring him to the attention of federal investigators who would never, for the rest of Ricca's life, take him out of their sight.

Expansionism was the call of the day under Ricca.

In 1945, somebody, it was never established who it was, called the Chicago District director of the Immigration and Naturalization service and informed him that Paul Ricca had entered the United States illegally under the name Paul Maglio and that Ricca's true name was Felice DeLucia and that he was wanted in Italy for manslaughter.

Almost certainly the caller was a member of the outfit, perhaps Tony Accardo or one of the Fischettis who could never stand Ricca for as long as they had known him.

The caller told the federal agent that the real Paul Maglio was living in the United States and if they found him that they could prove that Ricca had entered the United States illegally.

It's a big country, but the INS agents began their search. The odd twist was that the real Paul Maglio was living in Chicago, only a few miles due south from Ricca estate.

Then in 1948, the Bureau of Narcotics opened a Rome office and sent Charles Siragusa to manage it. Siragusa took fingerprints and photographs of known hoodlums with him and asked Italian police if they recognized any of the names of faces and were they wanted for anything. Paul Ricca was positively identified as a murderer who escaped justice.

Now the government was starting to pay attention.

In 1954, it all came together when the real Paul Maglio, the name Ricca used to enter the United States, was located in Chicago after an anonymous caller to US Attorney Robert Ticken told him that Ricca had entered the US under another name.

Ticken's office located Emillio's sister, Mrs. Margaret Terrible in Brooklyn and she was shown photographs of Ricca and identified him as the man who killed her brother. However, under a constant flow of death threats she changed her mind about testifying in court.

On June 4, 1954, agents from the INS waited for Chicago factory laborer Paul Maglio to arrive from work to his modest south side home It was all high drama for Maglio who had led a predictable life for the past 34 years since he had left Italy.

The agents took Maglio to their office in the Loop and politely questioned him for six hours. When asked if he had any proof at all that he was really Paul Maglio, he produced his United States passport. No, he said, he had never heard of Paul Ricca. The agents were skeptical.

How could you not know who Paul Ricca is? Don't you read the newspaper?

No, Maglio replied, he didn't read so good, and when he did read it was mostly the Itlo American newspapers.

Had he ever heard of Felice DeLucia or Paul DeLucia?

No, he hadn't.

The agents combed every library and archives in Chicago to try to prove that Paul Ricca had once lived his life as Paul Maglio, and that before that he had lived his life as Felice DeLucia of Naples. They got lucky when they searched Chicago Dioceses Church records and found the 1926 church record where Ricca identified himself as Felice DeLucia of Naples.

Next the agents found a bank account in the First National Bank of Chicago that Ricca had opened in 1932 and forgotten to close out. In 1956, the account still had $1.39 in it and according to state laws of the time, the bank was forced to keep the account active. Pulling the records, the agents discovered that Ricca had had opened the account under his real name and birthday and it carried his actual signature.

In September of 1956, the government agents wrapped up their investigation of Ricca and handed the evidence over to Robert Tieken, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. Tieken turned the case over to a tough 27 year old ex marine on his staff named John H. Bickley Jr., who had gained a formidable reputation in his short career as an expert in deportation and denaturalization cases.

Tieken's office took the evidence gathered by the field agents but went one step further; after contacting Police in Naples it was learned that the sister of Ricca's first murder victim, Emilio Perillo, the young suitor who had dropped Ricca's sister and was stabbed to death because of it, was alive and well and living in New York City and was willing to identify Paul Ricca in court as Felice DeLucia, the man who stabbed her brother to death.

Federal agents dropped by Margaret Perillo's Brooklyn apartment and questioned her. Yes, she said, she would testify against Paul Ricca because she wanted revenge for her brother's death. Satisfied, the agents left and reported their finding to the Chicago office of the US Attorney's office.

The field agents' reports were in the hands of Paul Ricca the next day. Ricca sent word to Naples. The family of Emilio and Margaret Perillo that remained in Naples were threatened and goons were sent to visit Margaret Perillo in Brooklyn as well.

When agents returned to question Margaret Perillo a second time, the woman dropped to her knees and begged the agents not to make her testify. The agents held their ground, she would testify against Ricca or be deported. Margaret Perillo said she would consider what the agents had said.

Then Margaret Perillo and her husband had vanished off the face of the earth never to be heard from again.

From that moment on the government sealed its case against Paul Ricca in absolute secrecy. The government assigned a five man team to guard the real Paul Maglio 24 hours day, the agents slept in Maglio's living room, washed in his bathroom, drove him to and from work. It was better that way. Ricca was known to kill, or at least to order the deaths of anyone who threatened him in any way.

When the government started to squeeze its net around Ricca, the hood became paranoid, he sensed informers were everywhere. Ricca's loyal driver disappeared forever.

In 1953 Ricca ordered the murder of Anthony Ragucci, one of his sub bosses who began in the organization with Capone. Ricca figured that the old man was talking to the Federal government so he had to go. Even if he wasn't talking to the feds, every now and then you got to set an example and besides, the old man had outlived his usefulness, it was time to move young blood into the operation.

They found Ragucci shot to death on October 1, 1953. He was face down in a sewer on 35th Street. His brother identified him by his ring with the initials "AR" since the rest of his body was ravaged by the cold.

The government's case to deport Paul Ricca from the United States started in April 1957. The government lawyers arrived armed with over 200 documents detailing their case that Paul Ricca/Felice DeLucia was not Paul Maglio, that he was a draft dodger from the Italian army, that he was a convicted killer of one man and the convicted, in absentia, killer of another and that he was the power behind the Chicago branch of the Mafia.

To Ricca's amazement the government called as its first wittiness "Paul Maglio...the real Paul Maglio."

To add to the drama, prosecutor Bickley had the real Paul Maglio stand and face Paul Ricca who he also requested to stand. As the two strangers faced each other Bickley asked, "Mr. Maglio do you know this man, this man standing in front of you?"

"No...no I do not."

"Mr. Maglio, have you ever seen this man before?"

"No."

"Mr. Maglio this man standing in front of you claims to be named Paul Maglio and that he comes from the Italian village of Apricena. Do you believe this to be true Mr. Maglio?"

"No I do not."

"And how do you know that sir?"

"I was the town clerk, the recorder of births in my village of Apricena, there are still only 6,000 people there. We have all lived there for many generations, since before the Romans. I personally kept track of all of the births and deaths there for many years. There is only one Maglio family there and it is my family and there is only one Paul Maglio and that is me."

The trial ended shortly afterwards with Ricca offering no defense against the charges. He was found guilty and sentenced to four years in prison for evading payments of $99,000 in income tax for the years 1948 through 1950.

Furthermore, the court ordered that Ricca be stripped of his American citizenship and that he be deportated to Naples where he faced a 21-year sentence for the shooting murder of Capasso.

On July 1, 1959, Ricca entered federal prison in Terre Haute.

In February of 1961 Ricca was ordered to be deported from the United States as soon as he was released from prison on October 1 of that year. Ricca appealed he case.

On April 2, 1961, the United States Supreme Court denied a hearing of the Ricca case and Paul Ricca, the ultimate Godfather, was asked to choose a country where he would be like to deported to.

Ricca's legal team, made up mostly of former government agents, replied that since he was wanted for murder in Italy that to deport him there would be "heartless" and he and his legal team sent letters to the immigration offices of 60 countries indicating what kind of undesirable Ricca was.

Each country wrote to the United States Government saying that they would not accept a deported Ricca under any terms or conditions.

The INS responded by ordering Ricca to appear in their Chicago office every month while they looked for a country to accept him.

It went around and around until finally on June 20, 1965, the INS ordered Paul Ricca removed from the country as an undesirable alien. Ricca went to court with an army of lawyers to fight the ruling, and, predictably, the judge ruled that deportation was impossible since no country wanted the Godfather within their borders.

But ten days later, under scrutiny from the FBI, Internal Revenue and the Immigration and Naturalization Office, the Judge reversed himself by saying that he had been provided information that Italy had agreed to accept Ricca.

The hood's lawyers appealed the ruling, which stayed the deportation. On September 18, 1964, the Immigration office agreed to review the case again, and a new order for deportation was ordered which, in effect, started the whole legal procedure all over again.

By 1965, Ricca was reduced to reporting to the INS office every three months, but at least he was still in the US.

Ricca's citizenship was eventually revoked by a federal judge yet he managed to fight off deportation for fifteen years. He considered returning to Italy on his own, but the Italian government didn't want him back and wouldn't permit him into the country because Ricca's lawyer, Jack Wassermann, flew to Italy and filed a petition asking the Italian government to declare that Paul Ricca was not an Italian citizen.

After that the Italian government dropped its arrest warrant for Ricca after Ricca sent them news clippings of himself and his deeds over the years as the Lord of Chicago's underworld.

Just how powerful Ricca was inside the organization was confirmed as late as 1957 when Jimmy "The Weasel" Fratianno, a west coast based mobster, called Johnny Roselli and on the day he was released from prison.

The two hoods had lunch at a top floor restaurant in Los Angeles on Wilshire Boulevard. During the lunch Fratianno said, "I understand Sam is the boss out there now."

"Sam's the boss," Roselli replied, "but the man in Chicago is still Paul Ricca. Sam doesn't make any moves without consulting Paul...He's been the man in Chicago since Capone went to prison. Forget Frank (Nitti) and Joe Batters. They listen to Paul, believe me."

When the Chicago mob took over the teamster Ricca again exercised his power by directing union boss Jimmy Hoffa to purchase Ricca's Long Beach Indiana summer house from Ricca for $150,000, even though the property was valued at only $85,000 and the teamsters never assumed ownership of the property because Ricca kept the deed.

Later, when the purchase was brought to the attention of federal investigators, Ricca turned the deed of the property over to the Detroit Local of the teamsters, but continued to live there for decades afterwards.

Later, when Sam Giancana came to power after Tony Accardo stepped down, Ricca acted as though he was fond of Giancana but he detested him.

It was Ricca who ordered Sam Giancana to remove Giancana's childhood friend Marshal Caifano from his position as Chicago's outside man in Vegas and later it was Ricca who guided and nurtured the criminal career of Caifano's replacement, Nicky Spilotro.

As a demonstration as to how much power he had, on January 12, 1964, Ricca chaired a meeting with Murray Humpreys, Tony Accardo, Obbie Frabotta and Frankie Fratto at the Jacques restaurant and agreed to replace Sam Giancana as boss.

Ricca was reindicted again for tax evasion in 1965 after he told Federal investigators that his entire income for the year 1963 was only $80,159, and all of that came from racetrack bets.

He testified, in court, that he placed a total of 86 bets on 37 races in which his horse always came in first.

Incredibly, he was acquitted by a jury for insufficient evidence.

As late as 1965, long after Ricca was said to have retired, Accardo, Momo Giancana, Battaglia and others still went every Sunday at 3:00 to Ricca's house and in 1966 an FBI informant reported that Ricca and Accardo still set policy for the Chicago outfit.

Ricca died of natural causes, a heart attack, on October 11, 1972, and as was his wish, was buried with the full rites of the Catholic Church.



Mr. Tuohy can be reached at MobStudy@aol.com.


[url= http://www.americanmafia.com/feature_articles_137.html]Like Cashmere on a Leper[/url]
Posted By: Toodoped

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 05:28 PM

Originally Posted By: DA13
What do you think about the accuracy of this article?




Quote:


"Like Cashmere On A Leper"

(Part Two)

By John William Tuohy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Ricca knew they were right of course. From watching Diamond Joe Esposito and his ridiculous jewelry and Al Capone and his banana-colored suites, Ricca was sure that low profile was the way for a gangster to go.

On the day Al Capone was sentenced to his term in prison for income tax evasion, he was led away in chains to the Cook County jail where he was held until he could be transferred to Atlanta Federal Prison.

Late that same afternoon, Murray Humpreys, Jake Guzak and New York crime boss Lucky Luciano visited Capone in Cook County jail. A while later two more New Yorkers showed up, Dutch Schultz in the company of Johnny Torrio.

Capone called for the warden and told him that he needed a place where he and Torrio and Schultz could talk privately. Incredibly, Warden Moneypenny led the hoods to the soundproofed death chamber where Capone promptly sat himself in the electric chair.

What Torrio told Capone that afternoon was that he had been double-crossed by Nitti and Ricca and the rest of the boys. What Torrio told Capone was the same thing that Gus Winkler's wife told Special Agent O.C. Dewey on May 20, 1936 in the FBI's Louisville, Kentucky office.

"For a while Gus was working to clear Capone of the tax charges. Bartholomus said (to Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti) that he could get it fixed in Washington for $100,000, however Frank Nitti, Rocky De Grazio and Lefty Louie Campagna came to (Winkler's) apartment and told him to back off, that they wanted Capone in jail." She added that "in 1934 some of Capone's friends in the organization were trying to get him released before word went out from Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti to leave well enough alone."

Aside from not fixing a bribe on Capone's behalf, the boys withheld other vital information from Al as well.

Capone could have walked on the tax evasion charges up to the last minute before the jury in the case retired to make its decision. All Capone had to do was pay the money on the back taxes that he owed.

Capone's army of lawyers had told that to the Fischetti brothers at the start of the trial but the money to pay the fine and the back taxes never arrived.

Nitti, Ricca and the Fischettis liked being the top guys. So they talked it over and decided that it was best that Capone be convicted, never to come back to Chicago.

It was better for the organization everyone, Ricca said, if Capone stayed in jail. He was right too. The United States Government wanted Capone in jail and the entire world was watching them put him there.

An early release from Capone's sentence brought on by a well placed bribe in Washington would do nothing but bring back more investigators. It was nothing against Capone personally. For Ricca was genuinely fond of Capone. In 1930 Capone learned that Nicola "Culicchia" Gentile, who later turned government informer, was elected to the national Mafia commission. Capone, a non-Sicilian sent Ricca to New York to see Gentile and tell him that Capone supported Mafia Masseria in his bid to control the New York underworld. According to legend, Ricca went a step further and issued a threat from Capone, saying that Chicago was prepared to support Masseria in an all out war to control New York.

But, as close as Ricca and Capone were, Ricca said, "Al was bad for business and it was better that he left the scene."

The gossip in the underworld, and there is always gossip in the underworld, and it made the rounds for years, was that Ricca had authorized members of the Capone organization who worked under him, to assist the Treasury department in nailing Al Capone and members of the organization that Ricca felt were a threat or were in his way from rising to the top.

One of the first to go down was Frank Nitti, the so-called "enforcer" of the Capone organization and the contempt that Ricca and Nitti held for each other was widely known.

Once Capone was locked away, the mob in Chicago was able to operate, unmolested, for almost twenty years before the Kefauver committee came to town. When Nitti was released from jail on his tax rap, Ricca decided that it was best to prop up Nitti as the boss. Ricca did this despite his correct view that although Frank Nitti was an educated man, and learned from him what he could, Nitti was a hothead, more prone to act first and think later. That was a dangerous trait in a mob leader. But the newspapers wanted another leader to target in on once Capone was gone. Murray Humpreys was the center of the media's attention for a while and then Rocco Fischetti. Pretty soon they would figure out that Ricca was a power and they would come after him with their flash cameras and front page stories.

Ricca figured that if Frank Nitti wanted to take the heat from the limelight and have the world believe that he was the boss, that was fine with Ricca and everyone else.

Just how much of the organization Ricca was really running became clear in April of 1932 when Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky were seized by Chicago police while in company of Paul Ricca and Rocca Fischetti as they were leaving the Congress hotel, but they were released after being booked and printed since the cops had no reason to hold them.

So, while Nitti sat on his leather throne in the Bismark Hotel throwing around orders, Paul Ricca privately called Lucky Luciano, Rocco Fischetti and Harry Ducket to Chicago for a meeting, Ricca telling Meyer Lansky, a non-Sicilian, to wait downstairs in the lobby of the Bismarck Hotel while they talked.

The Eastern syndicate found Ricca to be responsive to their desire to connect with the otherwise isolated Chicago outfit.

New York's boss Frank Costello was already working out deals with Ricca by 1935 while Nitti was supposed to be the boss, and he was plotting against Frank Nitti to take control by already cutting separate deals for himself.

He became Costello's ally and they were close enough so that they were arrested together on a raid in a Blue Island gambling place. It looked like a war was brewing between Costello and Chicago over gambling rights in Broward County, Florida where New York controlled narcotics and vice in the early thirties.

When Chicago started encroaching on that territory with their own gambling operations, New York objected. Ricca had Nitti argue that Chicago would gladly withdraw from Miami for a split of all the fees that New York was taking from Miami. The New York families refused and likewise Ricca told Nitti not to back down on his demands. It looked like war. Then Ricca, without telling Nitti what he was doing flew out New York and sat down with Costello and Lucky Luciano. Chicago, he said, would pull out of Miami if New York would agree to allow Chicago to share in some of its national unions.

Lucky Luciano refused to give them either one, where Costello believed that by giving Chicago a small portion of the union business they would leave Miami to New York but Luciano wouldn't hear of it.

Actually Chicago didn't care about Miami or even have an interest in it, what they wanted was the unions; Miami was just a smokescreen. In the end Ricca managed to get New York to open up some of its east coast unions and have Miami declared an open city.

Several years later, when Chicago had the money and muscle to break that agreement, they did.

In the late 1920s Ricca had managed the Dante movie house in Little Italy and then, later, the World Playhouse corporation on Michigan Avenue so he was considered a specialist in the movie business. Besides that, in 1960, Murray Humpreys claimed that he and Paul Ricca had grubstaked Joe Kennedy's move into the motion picture industry in the early 1920s and as a result was brought in by Frank Nitti to oversee the Bioff & Browne Hollywood shake down scandal.

That involvement would cost Ricca a term in federal prison and his resulting early release under highly suspicious circumstances would bring him to the attention of federal investigators who would never, for the rest of Ricca's life, take him out of their sight.

Expansionism was the call of the day under Ricca.

In 1945, somebody, it was never established who it was, called the Chicago District director of the Immigration and Naturalization service and informed him that Paul Ricca had entered the United States illegally under the name Paul Maglio and that Ricca's true name was Felice DeLucia and that he was wanted in Italy for manslaughter.

Almost certainly the caller was a member of the outfit, perhaps Tony Accardo or one of the Fischettis who could never stand Ricca for as long as they had known him.

The caller told the federal agent that the real Paul Maglio was living in the United States and if they found him that they could prove that Ricca had entered the United States illegally.

It's a big country, but the INS agents began their search. The odd twist was that the real Paul Maglio was living in Chicago, only a few miles due south from Ricca estate.

Then in 1948, the Bureau of Narcotics opened a Rome office and sent Charles Siragusa to manage it. Siragusa took fingerprints and photographs of known hoodlums with him and asked Italian police if they recognized any of the names of faces and were they wanted for anything. Paul Ricca was positively identified as a murderer who escaped justice.

Now the government was starting to pay attention.

In 1954, it all came together when the real Paul Maglio, the name Ricca used to enter the United States, was located in Chicago after an anonymous caller to US Attorney Robert Ticken told him that Ricca had entered the US under another name.

Ticken's office located Emillio's sister, Mrs. Margaret Terrible in Brooklyn and she was shown photographs of Ricca and identified him as the man who killed her brother. However, under a constant flow of death threats she changed her mind about testifying in court.

On June 4, 1954, agents from the INS waited for Chicago factory laborer Paul Maglio to arrive from work to his modest south side home It was all high drama for Maglio who had led a predictable life for the past 34 years since he had left Italy.

The agents took Maglio to their office in the Loop and politely questioned him for six hours. When asked if he had any proof at all that he was really Paul Maglio, he produced his United States passport. No, he said, he had never heard of Paul Ricca. The agents were skeptical.

How could you not know who Paul Ricca is? Don't you read the newspaper?

No, Maglio replied, he didn't read so good, and when he did read it was mostly the Itlo American newspapers.

Had he ever heard of Felice DeLucia or Paul DeLucia?

No, he hadn't.

The agents combed every library and archives in Chicago to try to prove that Paul Ricca had once lived his life as Paul Maglio, and that before that he had lived his life as Felice DeLucia of Naples. They got lucky when they searched Chicago Dioceses Church records and found the 1926 church record where Ricca identified himself as Felice DeLucia of Naples.

Next the agents found a bank account in the First National Bank of Chicago that Ricca had opened in 1932 and forgotten to close out. In 1956, the account still had $1.39 in it and according to state laws of the time, the bank was forced to keep the account active. Pulling the records, the agents discovered that Ricca had had opened the account under his real name and birthday and it carried his actual signature.

In September of 1956, the government agents wrapped up their investigation of Ricca and handed the evidence over to Robert Tieken, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. Tieken turned the case over to a tough 27 year old ex marine on his staff named John H. Bickley Jr., who had gained a formidable reputation in his short career as an expert in deportation and denaturalization cases.

Tieken's office took the evidence gathered by the field agents but went one step further; after contacting Police in Naples it was learned that the sister of Ricca's first murder victim, Emilio Perillo, the young suitor who had dropped Ricca's sister and was stabbed to death because of it, was alive and well and living in New York City and was willing to identify Paul Ricca in court as Felice DeLucia, the man who stabbed her brother to death.

Federal agents dropped by Margaret Perillo's Brooklyn apartment and questioned her. Yes, she said, she would testify against Paul Ricca because she wanted revenge for her brother's death. Satisfied, the agents left and reported their finding to the Chicago office of the US Attorney's office.

The field agents' reports were in the hands of Paul Ricca the next day. Ricca sent word to Naples. The family of Emilio and Margaret Perillo that remained in Naples were threatened and goons were sent to visit Margaret Perillo in Brooklyn as well.

When agents returned to question Margaret Perillo a second time, the woman dropped to her knees and begged the agents not to make her testify. The agents held their ground, she would testify against Ricca or be deported. Margaret Perillo said she would consider what the agents had said.

Then Margaret Perillo and her husband had vanished off the face of the earth never to be heard from again.

From that moment on the government sealed its case against Paul Ricca in absolute secrecy. The government assigned a five man team to guard the real Paul Maglio 24 hours day, the agents slept in Maglio's living room, washed in his bathroom, drove him to and from work. It was better that way. Ricca was known to kill, or at least to order the deaths of anyone who threatened him in any way.

When the government started to squeeze its net around Ricca, the hood became paranoid, he sensed informers were everywhere. Ricca's loyal driver disappeared forever.

In 1953 Ricca ordered the murder of Anthony Ragucci, one of his sub bosses who began in the organization with Capone. Ricca figured that the old man was talking to the Federal government so he had to go. Even if he wasn't talking to the feds, every now and then you got to set an example and besides, the old man had outlived his usefulness, it was time to move young blood into the operation.

They found Ragucci shot to death on October 1, 1953. He was face down in a sewer on 35th Street. His brother identified him by his ring with the initials "AR" since the rest of his body was ravaged by the cold.

The government's case to deport Paul Ricca from the United States started in April 1957. The government lawyers arrived armed with over 200 documents detailing their case that Paul Ricca/Felice DeLucia was not Paul Maglio, that he was a draft dodger from the Italian army, that he was a convicted killer of one man and the convicted, in absentia, killer of another and that he was the power behind the Chicago branch of the Mafia.

To Ricca's amazement the government called as its first wittiness "Paul Maglio...the real Paul Maglio."

To add to the drama, prosecutor Bickley had the real Paul Maglio stand and face Paul Ricca who he also requested to stand. As the two strangers faced each other Bickley asked, "Mr. Maglio do you know this man, this man standing in front of you?"

"No...no I do not."

"Mr. Maglio, have you ever seen this man before?"

"No."

"Mr. Maglio this man standing in front of you claims to be named Paul Maglio and that he comes from the Italian village of Apricena. Do you believe this to be true Mr. Maglio?"

"No I do not."

"And how do you know that sir?"

"I was the town clerk, the recorder of births in my village of Apricena, there are still only 6,000 people there. We have all lived there for many generations, since before the Romans. I personally kept track of all of the births and deaths there for many years. There is only one Maglio family there and it is my family and there is only one Paul Maglio and that is me."

The trial ended shortly afterwards with Ricca offering no defense against the charges. He was found guilty and sentenced to four years in prison for evading payments of $99,000 in income tax for the years 1948 through 1950.

Furthermore, the court ordered that Ricca be stripped of his American citizenship and that he be deportated to Naples where he faced a 21-year sentence for the shooting murder of Capasso.

On July 1, 1959, Ricca entered federal prison in Terre Haute.

In February of 1961 Ricca was ordered to be deported from the United States as soon as he was released from prison on October 1 of that year. Ricca appealed he case.

On April 2, 1961, the United States Supreme Court denied a hearing of the Ricca case and Paul Ricca, the ultimate Godfather, was asked to choose a country where he would be like to deported to.

Ricca's legal team, made up mostly of former government agents, replied that since he was wanted for murder in Italy that to deport him there would be "heartless" and he and his legal team sent letters to the immigration offices of 60 countries indicating what kind of undesirable Ricca was.

Each country wrote to the United States Government saying that they would not accept a deported Ricca under any terms or conditions.

The INS responded by ordering Ricca to appear in their Chicago office every month while they looked for a country to accept him.

It went around and around until finally on June 20, 1965, the INS ordered Paul Ricca removed from the country as an undesirable alien. Ricca went to court with an army of lawyers to fight the ruling, and, predictably, the judge ruled that deportation was impossible since no country wanted the Godfather within their borders.

But ten days later, under scrutiny from the FBI, Internal Revenue and the Immigration and Naturalization Office, the Judge reversed himself by saying that he had been provided information that Italy had agreed to accept Ricca.

The hood's lawyers appealed the ruling, which stayed the deportation. On September 18, 1964, the Immigration office agreed to review the case again, and a new order for deportation was ordered which, in effect, started the whole legal procedure all over again.

By 1965, Ricca was reduced to reporting to the INS office every three months, but at least he was still in the US.

Ricca's citizenship was eventually revoked by a federal judge yet he managed to fight off deportation for fifteen years. He considered returning to Italy on his own, but the Italian government didn't want him back and wouldn't permit him into the country because Ricca's lawyer, Jack Wassermann, flew to Italy and filed a petition asking the Italian government to declare that Paul Ricca was not an Italian citizen.

After that the Italian government dropped its arrest warrant for Ricca after Ricca sent them news clippings of himself and his deeds over the years as the Lord of Chicago's underworld.

Just how powerful Ricca was inside the organization was confirmed as late as 1957 when Jimmy "The Weasel" Fratianno, a west coast based mobster, called Johnny Roselli and on the day he was released from prison.

The two hoods had lunch at a top floor restaurant in Los Angeles on Wilshire Boulevard. During the lunch Fratianno said, "I understand Sam is the boss out there now."

"Sam's the boss," Roselli replied, "but the man in Chicago is still Paul Ricca. Sam doesn't make any moves without consulting Paul...He's been the man in Chicago since Capone went to prison. Forget Frank (Nitti) and Joe Batters. They listen to Paul, believe me."

When the Chicago mob took over the teamster Ricca again exercised his power by directing union boss Jimmy Hoffa to purchase Ricca's Long Beach Indiana summer house from Ricca for $150,000, even though the property was valued at only $85,000 and the teamsters never assumed ownership of the property because Ricca kept the deed.

Later, when the purchase was brought to the attention of federal investigators, Ricca turned the deed of the property over to the Detroit Local of the teamsters, but continued to live there for decades afterwards.

Later, when Sam Giancana came to power after Tony Accardo stepped down, Ricca acted as though he was fond of Giancana but he detested him.

It was Ricca who ordered Sam Giancana to remove Giancana's childhood friend Marshal Caifano from his position as Chicago's outside man in Vegas and later it was Ricca who guided and nurtured the criminal career of Caifano's replacement, Nicky Spilotro.

As a demonstration as to how much power he had, on January 12, 1964, Ricca chaired a meeting with Murray Humpreys, Tony Accardo, Obbie Frabotta and Frankie Fratto at the Jacques restaurant and agreed to replace Sam Giancana as boss.

Ricca was reindicted again for tax evasion in 1965 after he told Federal investigators that his entire income for the year 1963 was only $80,159, and all of that came from racetrack bets.

He testified, in court, that he placed a total of 86 bets on 37 races in which his horse always came in first.

Incredibly, he was acquitted by a jury for insufficient evidence.

As late as 1965, long after Ricca was said to have retired, Accardo, Momo Giancana, Battaglia and others still went every Sunday at 3:00 to Ricca's house and in 1966 an FBI informant reported that Ricca and Accardo still set policy for the Chicago outfit.

Ricca died of natural causes, a heart attack, on October 11, 1972, and as was his wish, was buried with the full rites of the Catholic Church.



Mr. Tuohy can be reached at MobStudy@aol.com.


[url= http://www.americanmafia.com/feature_articles_137.html]Like Cashmere on a Leper[/url]


I gotta say its a nice read.Thanks
Posted By: Faithful1

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 08:58 PM

Originally Posted By: DA13
What do you think about the accuracy of this article?




Quote:


"Like Cashmere On A Leper"

(Part Two)

By John William Tuohy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Ricca knew they were right of course. From watching Diamond Joe Esposito and his ridiculous jewelry and Al Capone and his banana-colored suites, Ricca was sure that low profile was the way for a gangster to go.

On the day Al Capone was sentenced to his term in prison for income tax evasion, he was led away in chains to the Cook County jail where he was held until he could be transferred to Atlanta Federal Prison.

Late that same afternoon, Murray Humpreys, Jake Guzak and New York crime boss Lucky Luciano visited Capone in Cook County jail. A while later two more New Yorkers showed up, Dutch Schultz in the company of Johnny Torrio.

Capone called for the warden and told him that he needed a place where he and Torrio and Schultz could talk privately. Incredibly, Warden Moneypenny led the hoods to the soundproofed death chamber where Capone promptly sat himself in the electric chair.

What Torrio told Capone that afternoon was that he had been double-crossed by Nitti and Ricca and the rest of the boys. What Torrio told Capone was the same thing that Gus Winkler's wife told Special Agent O.C. Dewey on May 20, 1936 in the FBI's Louisville, Kentucky office.

"For a while Gus was working to clear Capone of the tax charges. Bartholomus said (to Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti) that he could get it fixed in Washington for $100,000, however Frank Nitti, Rocky De Grazio and Lefty Louie Campagna came to (Winkler's) apartment and told him to back off, that they wanted Capone in jail." She added that "in 1934 some of Capone's friends in the organization were trying to get him released before word went out from Paul Ricca and Frank Nitti to leave well enough alone."

Aside from not fixing a bribe on Capone's behalf, the boys withheld other vital information from Al as well.

Capone could have walked on the tax evasion charges up to the last minute before the jury in the case retired to make its decision. All Capone had to do was pay the money on the back taxes that he owed.

Capone's army of lawyers had told that to the Fischetti brothers at the start of the trial but the money to pay the fine and the back taxes never arrived.

Nitti, Ricca and the Fischettis liked being the top guys. So they talked it over and decided that it was best that Capone be convicted, never to come back to Chicago.

It was better for the organization everyone, Ricca said, if Capone stayed in jail. He was right too. The United States Government wanted Capone in jail and the entire world was watching them put him there.

An early release from Capone's sentence brought on by a well placed bribe in Washington would do nothing but bring back more investigators. It was nothing against Capone personally. For Ricca was genuinely fond of Capone. In 1930 Capone learned that Nicola "Culicchia" Gentile, who later turned government informer, was elected to the national Mafia commission. Capone, a non-Sicilian sent Ricca to New York to see Gentile and tell him that Capone supported Mafia Masseria in his bid to control the New York underworld. According to legend, Ricca went a step further and issued a threat from Capone, saying that Chicago was prepared to support Masseria in an all out war to control New York.

But, as close as Ricca and Capone were, Ricca said, "Al was bad for business and it was better that he left the scene."

The gossip in the underworld, and there is always gossip in the underworld, and it made the rounds for years, was that Ricca had authorized members of the Capone organization who worked under him, to assist the Treasury department in nailing Al Capone and members of the organization that Ricca felt were a threat or were in his way from rising to the top.

One of the first to go down was Frank Nitti, the so-called "enforcer" of the Capone organization and the contempt that Ricca and Nitti held for each other was widely known.

Once Capone was locked away, the mob in Chicago was able to operate, unmolested, for almost twenty years before the Kefauver committee came to town. When Nitti was released from jail on his tax rap, Ricca decided that it was best to prop up Nitti as the boss. Ricca did this despite his correct view that although Frank Nitti was an educated man, and learned from him what he could, Nitti was a hothead, more prone to act first and think later. That was a dangerous trait in a mob leader. But the newspapers wanted another leader to target in on once Capone was gone. Murray Humpreys was the center of the media's attention for a while and then Rocco Fischetti. Pretty soon they would figure out that Ricca was a power and they would come after him with their flash cameras and front page stories.

Ricca figured that if Frank Nitti wanted to take the heat from the limelight and have the world believe that he was the boss, that was fine with Ricca and everyone else.

Just how much of the organization Ricca was really running became clear in April of 1932 when Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky were seized by Chicago police while in company of Paul Ricca and Rocca Fischetti as they were leaving the Congress hotel, but they were released after being booked and printed since the cops had no reason to hold them.

So, while Nitti sat on his leather throne in the Bismark Hotel throwing around orders, Paul Ricca privately called Lucky Luciano, Rocco Fischetti and Harry Ducket to Chicago for a meeting, Ricca telling Meyer Lansky, a non-Sicilian, to wait downstairs in the lobby of the Bismarck Hotel while they talked.

The Eastern syndicate found Ricca to be responsive to their desire to connect with the otherwise isolated Chicago outfit.

New York's boss Frank Costello was already working out deals with Ricca by 1935 while Nitti was supposed to be the boss, and he was plotting against Frank Nitti to take control by already cutting separate deals for himself.

He became Costello's ally and they were close enough so that they were arrested together on a raid in a Blue Island gambling place. It looked like a war was brewing between Costello and Chicago over gambling rights in Broward County, Florida where New York controlled narcotics and vice in the early thirties.

When Chicago started encroaching on that territory with their own gambling operations, New York objected. Ricca had Nitti argue that Chicago would gladly withdraw from Miami for a split of all the fees that New York was taking from Miami. The New York families refused and likewise Ricca told Nitti not to back down on his demands. It looked like war. Then Ricca, without telling Nitti what he was doing flew out New York and sat down with Costello and Lucky Luciano. Chicago, he said, would pull out of Miami if New York would agree to allow Chicago to share in some of its national unions.

Lucky Luciano refused to give them either one, where Costello believed that by giving Chicago a small portion of the union business they would leave Miami to New York but Luciano wouldn't hear of it.

Actually Chicago didn't care about Miami or even have an interest in it, what they wanted was the unions; Miami was just a smokescreen. In the end Ricca managed to get New York to open up some of its east coast unions and have Miami declared an open city.

Several years later, when Chicago had the money and muscle to break that agreement, they did.

In the late 1920s Ricca had managed the Dante movie house in Little Italy and then, later, the World Playhouse corporation on Michigan Avenue so he was considered a specialist in the movie business. Besides that, in 1960, Murray Humpreys claimed that he and Paul Ricca had grubstaked Joe Kennedy's move into the motion picture industry in the early 1920s and as a result was brought in by Frank Nitti to oversee the Bioff & Browne Hollywood shake down scandal.

That involvement would cost Ricca a term in federal prison and his resulting early release under highly suspicious circumstances would bring him to the attention of federal investigators who would never, for the rest of Ricca's life, take him out of their sight.

Expansionism was the call of the day under Ricca.

In 1945, somebody, it was never established who it was, called the Chicago District director of the Immigration and Naturalization service and informed him that Paul Ricca had entered the United States illegally under the name Paul Maglio and that Ricca's true name was Felice DeLucia and that he was wanted in Italy for manslaughter.

Almost certainly the caller was a member of the outfit, perhaps Tony Accardo or one of the Fischettis who could never stand Ricca for as long as they had known him.

The caller told the federal agent that the real Paul Maglio was living in the United States and if they found him that they could prove that Ricca had entered the United States illegally.

It's a big country, but the INS agents began their search. The odd twist was that the real Paul Maglio was living in Chicago, only a few miles due south from Ricca estate.

Then in 1948, the Bureau of Narcotics opened a Rome office and sent Charles Siragusa to manage it. Siragusa took fingerprints and photographs of known hoodlums with him and asked Italian police if they recognized any of the names of faces and were they wanted for anything. Paul Ricca was positively identified as a murderer who escaped justice.

Now the government was starting to pay attention.

In 1954, it all came together when the real Paul Maglio, the name Ricca used to enter the United States, was located in Chicago after an anonymous caller to US Attorney Robert Ticken told him that Ricca had entered the US under another name.

Ticken's office located Emillio's sister, Mrs. Margaret Terrible in Brooklyn and she was shown photographs of Ricca and identified him as the man who killed her brother. However, under a constant flow of death threats she changed her mind about testifying in court.

On June 4, 1954, agents from the INS waited for Chicago factory laborer Paul Maglio to arrive from work to his modest south side home It was all high drama for Maglio who had led a predictable life for the past 34 years since he had left Italy.

The agents took Maglio to their office in the Loop and politely questioned him for six hours. When asked if he had any proof at all that he was really Paul Maglio, he produced his United States passport. No, he said, he had never heard of Paul Ricca. The agents were skeptical.

How could you not know who Paul Ricca is? Don't you read the newspaper?

No, Maglio replied, he didn't read so good, and when he did read it was mostly the Itlo American newspapers.

Had he ever heard of Felice DeLucia or Paul DeLucia?

No, he hadn't.

The agents combed every library and archives in Chicago to try to prove that Paul Ricca had once lived his life as Paul Maglio, and that before that he had lived his life as Felice DeLucia of Naples. They got lucky when they searched Chicago Dioceses Church records and found the 1926 church record where Ricca identified himself as Felice DeLucia of Naples.

Next the agents found a bank account in the First National Bank of Chicago that Ricca had opened in 1932 and forgotten to close out. In 1956, the account still had $1.39 in it and according to state laws of the time, the bank was forced to keep the account active. Pulling the records, the agents discovered that Ricca had had opened the account under his real name and birthday and it carried his actual signature.

In September of 1956, the government agents wrapped up their investigation of Ricca and handed the evidence over to Robert Tieken, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. Tieken turned the case over to a tough 27 year old ex marine on his staff named John H. Bickley Jr., who had gained a formidable reputation in his short career as an expert in deportation and denaturalization cases.

Tieken's office took the evidence gathered by the field agents but went one step further; after contacting Police in Naples it was learned that the sister of Ricca's first murder victim, Emilio Perillo, the young suitor who had dropped Ricca's sister and was stabbed to death because of it, was alive and well and living in New York City and was willing to identify Paul Ricca in court as Felice DeLucia, the man who stabbed her brother to death.

Federal agents dropped by Margaret Perillo's Brooklyn apartment and questioned her. Yes, she said, she would testify against Paul Ricca because she wanted revenge for her brother's death. Satisfied, the agents left and reported their finding to the Chicago office of the US Attorney's office.

The field agents' reports were in the hands of Paul Ricca the next day. Ricca sent word to Naples. The family of Emilio and Margaret Perillo that remained in Naples were threatened and goons were sent to visit Margaret Perillo in Brooklyn as well.

When agents returned to question Margaret Perillo a second time, the woman dropped to her knees and begged the agents not to make her testify. The agents held their ground, she would testify against Ricca or be deported. Margaret Perillo said she would consider what the agents had said.

Then Margaret Perillo and her husband had vanished off the face of the earth never to be heard from again.

From that moment on the government sealed its case against Paul Ricca in absolute secrecy. The government assigned a five man team to guard the real Paul Maglio 24 hours day, the agents slept in Maglio's living room, washed in his bathroom, drove him to and from work. It was better that way. Ricca was known to kill, or at least to order the deaths of anyone who threatened him in any way.

When the government started to squeeze its net around Ricca, the hood became paranoid, he sensed informers were everywhere. Ricca's loyal driver disappeared forever.

In 1953 Ricca ordered the murder of Anthony Ragucci, one of his sub bosses who began in the organization with Capone. Ricca figured that the old man was talking to the Federal government so he had to go. Even if he wasn't talking to the feds, every now and then you got to set an example and besides, the old man had outlived his usefulness, it was time to move young blood into the operation.

They found Ragucci shot to death on October 1, 1953. He was face down in a sewer on 35th Street. His brother identified him by his ring with the initials "AR" since the rest of his body was ravaged by the cold.

The government's case to deport Paul Ricca from the United States started in April 1957. The government lawyers arrived armed with over 200 documents detailing their case that Paul Ricca/Felice DeLucia was not Paul Maglio, that he was a draft dodger from the Italian army, that he was a convicted killer of one man and the convicted, in absentia, killer of another and that he was the power behind the Chicago branch of the Mafia.

To Ricca's amazement the government called as its first wittiness "Paul Maglio...the real Paul Maglio."

To add to the drama, prosecutor Bickley had the real Paul Maglio stand and face Paul Ricca who he also requested to stand. As the two strangers faced each other Bickley asked, "Mr. Maglio do you know this man, this man standing in front of you?"

"No...no I do not."

"Mr. Maglio, have you ever seen this man before?"

"No."

"Mr. Maglio this man standing in front of you claims to be named Paul Maglio and that he comes from the Italian village of Apricena. Do you believe this to be true Mr. Maglio?"

"No I do not."

"And how do you know that sir?"

"I was the town clerk, the recorder of births in my village of Apricena, there are still only 6,000 people there. We have all lived there for many generations, since before the Romans. I personally kept track of all of the births and deaths there for many years. There is only one Maglio family there and it is my family and there is only one Paul Maglio and that is me."

The trial ended shortly afterwards with Ricca offering no defense against the charges. He was found guilty and sentenced to four years in prison for evading payments of $99,000 in income tax for the years 1948 through 1950.

Furthermore, the court ordered that Ricca be stripped of his American citizenship and that he be deportated to Naples where he faced a 21-year sentence for the shooting murder of Capasso.

On July 1, 1959, Ricca entered federal prison in Terre Haute.

In February of 1961 Ricca was ordered to be deported from the United States as soon as he was released from prison on October 1 of that year. Ricca appealed he case.

On April 2, 1961, the United States Supreme Court denied a hearing of the Ricca case and Paul Ricca, the ultimate Godfather, was asked to choose a country where he would be like to deported to.

Ricca's legal team, made up mostly of former government agents, replied that since he was wanted for murder in Italy that to deport him there would be "heartless" and he and his legal team sent letters to the immigration offices of 60 countries indicating what kind of undesirable Ricca was.

Each country wrote to the United States Government saying that they would not accept a deported Ricca under any terms or conditions.

The INS responded by ordering Ricca to appear in their Chicago office every month while they looked for a country to accept him.

It went around and around until finally on June 20, 1965, the INS ordered Paul Ricca removed from the country as an undesirable alien. Ricca went to court with an army of lawyers to fight the ruling, and, predictably, the judge ruled that deportation was impossible since no country wanted the Godfather within their borders.

But ten days later, under scrutiny from the FBI, Internal Revenue and the Immigration and Naturalization Office, the Judge reversed himself by saying that he had been provided information that Italy had agreed to accept Ricca.

The hood's lawyers appealed the ruling, which stayed the deportation. On September 18, 1964, the Immigration office agreed to review the case again, and a new order for deportation was ordered which, in effect, started the whole legal procedure all over again.

By 1965, Ricca was reduced to reporting to the INS office every three months, but at least he was still in the US.

Ricca's citizenship was eventually revoked by a federal judge yet he managed to fight off deportation for fifteen years. He considered returning to Italy on his own, but the Italian government didn't want him back and wouldn't permit him into the country because Ricca's lawyer, Jack Wassermann, flew to Italy and filed a petition asking the Italian government to declare that Paul Ricca was not an Italian citizen.

After that the Italian government dropped its arrest warrant for Ricca after Ricca sent them news clippings of himself and his deeds over the years as the Lord of Chicago's underworld.

Just how powerful Ricca was inside the organization was confirmed as late as 1957 when Jimmy "The Weasel" Fratianno, a west coast based mobster, called Johnny Roselli and on the day he was released from prison.

The two hoods had lunch at a top floor restaurant in Los Angeles on Wilshire Boulevard. During the lunch Fratianno said, "I understand Sam is the boss out there now."

"Sam's the boss," Roselli replied, "but the man in Chicago is still Paul Ricca. Sam doesn't make any moves without consulting Paul...He's been the man in Chicago since Capone went to prison. Forget Frank (Nitti) and Joe Batters. They listen to Paul, believe me."

When the Chicago mob took over the teamster Ricca again exercised his power by directing union boss Jimmy Hoffa to purchase Ricca's Long Beach Indiana summer house from Ricca for $150,000, even though the property was valued at only $85,000 and the teamsters never assumed ownership of the property because Ricca kept the deed.

Later, when the purchase was brought to the attention of federal investigators, Ricca turned the deed of the property over to the Detroit Local of the teamsters, but continued to live there for decades afterwards.

Later, when Sam Giancana came to power after Tony Accardo stepped down, Ricca acted as though he was fond of Giancana but he detested him.

It was Ricca who ordered Sam Giancana to remove Giancana's childhood friend Marshal Caifano from his position as Chicago's outside man in Vegas and later it was Ricca who guided and nurtured the criminal career of Caifano's replacement, Nicky Spilotro.

As a demonstration as to how much power he had, on January 12, 1964, Ricca chaired a meeting with Murray Humpreys, Tony Accardo, Obbie Frabotta and Frankie Fratto at the Jacques restaurant and agreed to replace Sam Giancana as boss.

Ricca was reindicted again for tax evasion in 1965 after he told Federal investigators that his entire income for the year 1963 was only $80,159, and all of that came from racetrack bets.

He testified, in court, that he placed a total of 86 bets on 37 races in which his horse always came in first.

Incredibly, he was acquitted by a jury for insufficient evidence.

As late as 1965, long after Ricca was said to have retired, Accardo, Momo Giancana, Battaglia and others still went every Sunday at 3:00 to Ricca's house and in 1966 an FBI informant reported that Ricca and Accardo still set policy for the Chicago outfit.

Ricca died of natural causes, a heart attack, on October 11, 1972, and as was his wish, was buried with the full rites of the Catholic Church.



Mr. Tuohy can be reached at MobStudy@aol.com.


[url= http://www.americanmafia.com/feature_articles_137.html]Like Cashmere on a Leper[/url]


In general I don't recommend John William Tuohy. His articles tend to have a lot of mistakes and he jumps to conclusions.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/10/13 09:26 PM

If capone had a chance to pay his back taxes he would have told his brother ralph to take care of it, in reality capone offered to pay his back taxes and the government refused, I wonder how many other lies is in this article
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 03:33 AM

The article is filled with ridiculous stories, plots and false accusations with no basis.

Ricca didn't like Accardo?
Ricca betrayed Capone?
Ricca didn't like Giancana?
Ricca replaced Caifano with Spilotro?
Ricca guided Spilotro's career?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Ricca Loved Accardo.
Ricca sponsored Giancana into the Outfit for Christ sake!
Caifano left Las Vegas AFTER RICCA DIED!

The article is TERRIBLE!

Well, what do you expect from an Irish guy named John Tuohy.
He needs to stick to writing about St. Patrick's Day. He made up about 75% of the whole article on his own. Laughable.

Whoever put up the article should take it down, it insults the intelligence of many fine posters here on gangsterbb.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 04:09 AM

Faithful1, Again, Nice chatting with you via PM. Yes, you've basically got it.
In your future articles, remember one thing:
Chicago was not a Dictatorship.
With that concept, you will have more credibility.

Campagna, Ricca, Accardo is correct.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Giancana.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Battaglia.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Alderisio.

Changing of the Guard:

Then: Ricca, Accardo, Auippa, Cerone (include Ricca out of respect. this was only for about 2 or 3 years). Ricca died in 1972.
Then: Accardo, Auippa, Cerone.
Then: Accardo, Carlisi, DiFronzo (Auippa & Cerone in jail)

Among those men, assume greatest respect was shown to the eldest at each time. Chicago was big on respect.

PM me any time.
Posted By: DA13

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 06:36 AM

I came across this article and it sounded suspect. I wanted to know what the take on it was, never said it was legit. Take it down for what? I didn't write it.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 07:59 AM

DA13, I know you didn't write it. I was simply stating the article is so bad it doesn't deserve to be on this site. That's all. No more, no less. No offense was meant towards you at all. The writer of the article should be shot in the fucking head.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 08:27 AM

http://www.drbilllong.com/CurrentEventsVI/CaponeIII.html
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 08:28 AM

There was nothing anyone could have done to save capone, when the government want u they will get u by any means, capone got railroaded from the begining
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 08:46 AM

TheBigFella,
Agreed 110%. Capone could have offered the government 1 Million Dollars instead of $100,000 Dollars and he still would have gone to jail.
They wanted Capone and they were going to get him anyway possible. He was a great organizer and a good Boss. He lived through some very violent times. He was smart enough to survive and build a great organization. No question.
Posted By: thebigfella

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 08:49 AM

I argue with people on here about how smart capone was all the time , he always gets the short end of the stick
Posted By: DA13

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 04:31 PM

No problem Mr Eng.. I mean Chicago. I'm sure you can get his contact info and straighten him out if you wanted to.
Posted By: Toodoped

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 05:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
The Big Fella, Giancana had no choice. He had to leave Chicago or go to prison. It was a consensus opinion of Ricca, Giancana and Accardo. It was agreed that Giancana would expand the Outfit's interests abroad.
Big decisions in Chicago were made by a meeting of the minds of the Top men. It was not a Dictatorship.
The sooner you forget the Dictatorship concept, the sooner you will understand the Outfit's Leadership.
Stop making it a competition between these three men, that's where you failing to see the point. No one of these men ordered each other around. Get that out of your head.



Hey Chicago i know your the most informative guy on the Outfit around here and thanks for that,but i gotta ask this question cuz i dont belive it but ive read it somewhere a while ago,that there was some kind of an internal war,like there was a meeting between Giancana ,Accardo and i dont remember who else and that some1 took a shot at Accardo(or maybe the shot was ment for all of them) and a another rumour that Giancana(or some1 else from his crew)took a warning shot at Accardo,by comming to his home,ringed on the bell and after hearing footsteps,fired a few shots at the door.After that Accardo had the "retirement".I bet its pure fantasy right?
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 07:46 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Faithful1, Again, Nice chatting with you via PM. Yes, you've basically got it.
In your future articles, remember one thing:
Chicago was not a Dictatorship.
With that concept, you will have more credibility.

Campagna, Ricca, Accardo is correct.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Giancana.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Battaglia.
Then: Ricca, Accardo, Alderisio.

Changing of the Guard:

Then: Ricca, Accardo, Auippa, Cerone (include Ricca out of respect. this was only for about 2 or 3 years). Ricca died in 1972.
Then: Accardo, Auippa, Cerone.
Then: Accardo, Carlisi, DiFronzo (Auippa & Cerone in jail)

Among those men, assume greatest respect was shown to the eldest at each time. Chicago was big on respect.

PM me any time.



it seems like accardo was that dude if you consider his top tier lineage
Posted By: Faithful1

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 09:34 PM

There were follow up stories that claimed it was a dispute between Accardo and Ricca after a meat scandal and John Torrio had to go to Chicago to mediate. It was said that Ricca had ordered a hit on Accardo. According to the narrative, Torrio worked things out.
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 09:57 PM

The horsemeat scandal? I have a link if you're interested to The Chicago Tribune . It's pay-per-view. They list a short narrative to tweak your interest. I didn't bother to pay because it seemed to just evaporate. I believe you just explained why.

I never heard anything about a hit, but there was a story, in the Tribune, about Accardo being in fear for his life and that Ricca had removed him as boss over the horsemeat scandal. But again, it just seemed to "go away."

Correction on the link to TheTribune. I can give you the date when the article was published, but the Tribune has "fixed" their site where the links can't be copied. I'll keep playing with it and see what I can do.

Thanks
Posted By: jonnynonos

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 09:58 PM


[/quote]
Originally Posted By: GaryMartin
I received this email from a Chicago OC/Outfit historian when i asked about someone shooting into Accardo's home.

Mr. Martin:

There is a Chicago Tribune story from May 8,1954 that mentions a shot being fired at him. It's in the last sentence of the last paragraph and reads: 'Police have said a shot was fired near Accardo recently, and a high fence is being erected around his home." This is the only reference regarding that, written at the time, I have read about so far.

If you have seen a picture of Accardo's home, which at that time was the one at 915 N. Franklin in suburban River Forest, the fence is rather open.

As to who was responsible for the "shot" (if it actually happened) I cannot say. I don't believe it was Giancana. There were several gangland slayings in 1954. Two of them, Charles Gioe on August 18 and Frank Maritote on August 21, could be candidates. Both had been imprisoned in the Hollywood Extortion case and could be considered disaffected. Still there's no way of knowing.

Even when Giancana took over day to day operations, Accardo was still a presence.


Hahaha... does the historian's first name begin with J?
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 10:04 PM

Toodoped, Giancana never fired any shots at Accardo. Some of these stories are either invented or exaggerated into non reality. The same way the amount of money grossed is exaggerated into non reality.
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 10:06 PM

Another ridiculous exaggerated story into non reality. Ricca and Accardo had there disagreements. Ricca never ordered any hit on Accardo. Ridiculous.
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 10:19 PM


Here's the link, but you'll have to go into the archives to check it out. I don't believe this will open by just clicking on it.

I'm using an iPad and I can't seem to get it to copy and paste. I'll keep trying.


http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/499596702.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Mar+30%2C+1952&author=&pub=Chicago+Daily+Tribune+(1923-1963)&edition=&startpage=29&desc=RICCA+REPLACES+ACCARDO+AS+TOP+SYNDICATE+BOSS
Posted By: Faithful1

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/11/13 10:42 PM

Originally Posted By: Chicago
Another ridiculous exaggerated story into non reality. Ricca and Accardo had there disagreements. Ricca never ordered any hit on Accardo. Ridiculous.


I'm sure it was media hype mixing fact with guesses.
Posted By: Logomassini

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/12/13 12:03 AM

Very interesting to hear that Ricca supposedly ordered a hit on Accardo. Never heard that before
Posted By: GaryMartin

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/12/13 12:32 AM

Could be! What's the story? Enlighten me, please.


Originally Posted By: jonnynonos

Originally Posted By: GaryMartin
I received this email from a Chicago OC/Outfit historian when i asked about someone shooting into Accardo's home.

Mr. Martin:

There is a Chicago Tribune story from May 8,1954 that mentions a shot being fired at him. It's in the last sentence of the last paragraph and reads: 'Police have said a shot was fired near Accardo recently, and a high fence is being erected around his home." This is the only reference regarding that, written at the time, I have read about so far.

If you have seen a picture of Accardo's home, which at that time was the one at 915 N. Franklin in suburban River Forest, the fence is rather open.

As to who was responsible for the "shot" (if it actually happened) I cannot say. I don't believe it was Giancana. There were several gangland slayings in 1954. Two of them, Charles Gioe on August 18 and Frank Maritote on August 21, could be candidates. Both had been imprisoned in the Hollywood Extortion case and could be considered disaffected. Still there's no way of knowing.

Even when Giancana took over day to day operations, Accardo was still a presence.


Hahaha... does the historian's first name begin with J? [/quote]
Posted By: Chicago

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/12/13 01:11 AM

Logomassini, You never heard that stupid story because it never happened. It was fabricated by a drunk Irishman named Tuohy who should've been writing about how many Shamrocks Mayor Daley had in front of his house on St. Patrick's Day.
Something maybe he knew a little bit about instead of the Outfit of which he knew nothing.
Posted By: 12thStreet

Re: Accardo vs Giancana - 07/12/13 03:14 AM

LOL...:) Dem drunken Irish eh? I'm tellin' ya, paisan lol
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET