Home

HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED?

Posted By: cookcounty

HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 04:02 PM

how many five family bosses, underbosses, consiglieres, and/or captains have turned states evidence against their former comrades and ratted them out in court?

Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 08:23 PM

damn nobody has any answers?
Posted By: Dapper_Don

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 09:02 PM

66 (including soldiers)
Posted By: SC

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 09:24 PM

Originally Posted By: Dapper_Don
66


You forgot Sammy Gravano and Joe Valachi. So, the correct answer is 68.
Posted By: Dapper_Don

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 09:37 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Dapper_Don
66


You forgot Sammy Gravano and Joe Valachi. So, the correct answer is 68.


i have them both counted, it is still 66 (including soldiers).
Posted By: cheech

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 10:01 PM

Not as many as people think. How many made guys in last 60 years? Tens of thousands?
Posted By: 123JoeSchmo

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 10:30 PM

More members don't rat than do. That should be a big indicator of who's stronger
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/03/13 11:54 PM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
how many five family bosses, underbosses, consiglieres, and/or captains have turned states evidence against their former comrades and ratted them out in court?



While I have a feeling this is a baiting question so you can go on another rant about quality over quantity in regards to Chicago, I'll answer it.


Genovese
Renaldi “Ray” Ruggiero/Capo
Felix Tranghese/Capo


Gambino
Michael "Mikey Scars" DiLeonardo/Captain
Salvatore "Sammy the Bull" Gravano/Underboss


Lucchese
Alphonse "Little Al" D'Arco/Acting Boss
Peter "Fat Pete" Chiodo/Capo
Anthony "Tumac" Accetturo/Capo
Anthony "Gas Pipe" Casso/UnderBoss
Joseph "Little Joe/Joe D" Defede/Acting Boss


Colombo
Greg “The Grim Reaper” Scarpa Sr/Capo
Michael "Mikey" Franzese/Acting Capo
Carmine Sessa/Consigliere
Salvatore "Big Sal" Miciotta/Acting Capo
John Pate/Capo
Dino “Big Dino” Calabro/Capo
Reynold "Ren" Maragni/Capo
Anthony Russo/Acting Capo
Paul “Paulie Guns” Bevacqua/Acting Capo


Bonanno
Joseph "Jersey Joe" Bonanno/Acting Capo
Richard "Shellackhead" Cantarella/Acting UnderBoss
Dominick Cicale/Acting Capo
Frank Coppa/Capo
Frank "Curly" Lino/Capo
Joseph "Big Joey/The Ear" Massino/Boss
Nicholas “P.J” Pisciotti/Acting Capo
James "Jimmy Tag/Big Lou" Tartaglione/Capo
Salvatore "The Chief" Vitale/UnderBoss
Posted By: NickyEyes1

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/04/13 12:45 AM

Michael Franzese never ratted
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/04/13 12:59 AM

Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
Michael Franzese never ratted


In addition to testifying against Norby Walters, a business partner of his father, Franzese also testified before Congress about the mob's involvement in the gas tax scam.
Posted By: Five_Felonies

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/04/13 01:04 AM

Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
Michael Franzese never ratted

i guess that depends on your definition of "ratting". he certainly didn't wear a wire and directly record other made men discussing/planning criminal activities, but he did give away info on a few shady associates, as well as spill the beans on the whole gas tax operation. that certainly seems to qualify as breaking omerta, so i think the label of a "rat" is justified in his case.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/04/13 07:12 PM

that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching
Posted By: Vigil

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/04/13 09:21 PM

Like I said before, all omerta means today is, "How much time will it knock off my sentence?"
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 03:40 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching



But not "everybody" rats. Even today, far more guys don't rat then do. The rats just get all the attention.
Posted By: bronx

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 04:29 AM

cafaro..genovese crew
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 04:56 AM

Originally Posted By: bronx
cafaro..genovese crew


Cafaro was a soldier. He was only asking for captains or above.
Posted By: Sonny_Black

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 01:42 PM

So basically Franzese is still alive thanks to his father?
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 06:16 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching



But not "everybody" rats. Even today, far more guys don't rat then do. The rats just get all the attention.




the new york mafia has been ratting for decades

it ain't good when ranking members of an organization are ratting

it tells new recruits that if all else fails....just rat like the boss
Posted By: southend

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/05/13 09:57 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: bronx
cafaro..genovese crew


Cafaro was a soldier. He was only asking for captains or above.


Felix Tranghese was never capo. This I know to be fact
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/06/13 03:23 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty


the new york mafia has been ratting for decades

it ain't good when ranking members of an organization are ratting

it tells new recruits that if all else fails....just rat like the boss


Apparently, 2 very high ranking members of the Outfit have been informants for the FBI for the last 20-25 years. So it's not just a NY thing.

But the main point is that, despite however many rats there are, NY actually has a consistent supply of new recruits. Chicago and the other remaining small families elsewhere, not so much.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/06/13 03:25 AM

Originally Posted By: southend


Felix Tranghese was never capo. This I know to be fact


"The superseding indictment unsealed today charges TRANGHESE, an alleged capo..."

http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2010/nyfo072310a.htm
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/06/13 01:11 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty


the new york mafia has been ratting for decades

it ain't good when ranking members of an organization are ratting

it tells new recruits that if all else fails....just rat like the boss


Apparently, 2 very high ranking members of the Outfit have been informants for the FBI for the last 20-25 years. So it's not just a NY thing.

But the main point is that, despite however many rats there are, NY actually has a consistent supply of new recruits. Chicago and the other remaining small families elsewhere, not so much.



more like a consistant supply of new rats

one family had 2 acting bosses & 1 underboss that turned informant

who the fuck would wanna join that mob?
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/07/13 05:39 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty

more like a consistant supply of new rats

one family had 2 acting bosses & 1 underboss that turned informant

who the fuck would wanna join that mob?


Enough guys that those NY families will still be around long after the Outfit is gone. That's what you don't seem to take into consideration. The Outfit can have quality guys but if they aren't getting replaced, it's going to die out. I've said it a million times. General attrition has effected the LCN far more than all the rats and feds combined.
Posted By: Vigil

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/07/13 06:34 AM

Very true. Good point IL.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/07/13 02:40 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty

more like a consistant supply of new rats

one family had 2 acting bosses & 1 underboss that turned informant

who the fuck would wanna join that mob?


Enough guys that those NY families will still be around long after the Outfit is gone. That's what you don't seem to take into consideration. The Outfit can have quality guys but if they aren't getting replaced, it's going to die out. I've said it a million times. General attrition has effected the LCN far more than all the rats and feds combined.



how powerful could new york be if they're a bunch of taddle tales?

the boss pricked my finger while wearing a recording device

the boss told me to kill and then called the authorities on me
Posted By: cheech

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/07/13 03:19 PM

NY >>>>>>>>>> Chi
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/08/13 04:47 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
how powerful could new york be if they're a bunch of taddle tales?

the boss pricked my finger while wearing a recording device

the boss told me to kill and then called the authorities on me


You keep making these stupid, generalized statements that don't really apply. I realize your feelings have been hurt regarding the Chicago mob but you need to move on.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/08/13 04:29 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
how powerful could new york be if they're a bunch of taddle tales?

the boss pricked my finger while wearing a recording device

the boss told me to kill and then called the authorities on me


You keep making these stupid, generalized statements that don't really apply. I realize your feelings have been hurt regarding the Chicago mob but you need to move on.




this thread has nothing to do with the windy city

the big apple's mafia families taddle on each other

the big apple's mafia families commission was led by a rat (massino)

the boss/underboss/consigliere/captain (new york) sits on the witness stand and points his finger at people to identify them in open court
Posted By: Scorsese

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/08/13 04:37 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
Michael Franzese never ratted


In addition to testifying against Norby Walters, a business partner of his father, Franzese also testified before Congress about the mob's involvement in the gas tax scam.



i read somewhere once that he gave up some russians or israeli gangsters.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/08/13 11:43 PM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
this thread has nothing to do with the windy city

the big apple's mafia families taddle on each other

the big apple's mafia families commission was led by a rat (massino)

the boss/underboss/consigliere/captain (new york) sits on the witness stand and points his finger at people to identify them in open court


You can say it has nothing to do with Chicago but it's obvious you keep harping on this issue because you're obsessed with the relative comparisons between the NY families and the Outfit.

Regardless of how much quality or discipline the Outfit may have, it doesn't have what even the most reckless NY family has - and that's a significant enough recruiting pool to stave off general attrition for as long as possible. That's why even the Colombos will outlast the Chicago mob. That's what you don't take into consideration or at least seem to ignore.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 12:50 AM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
this thread has nothing to do with the windy city

the big apple's mafia families taddle on each other

the big apple's mafia families commission was led by a rat (massino)

the boss/underboss/consigliere/captain (new york) sits on the witness stand and points his finger at people to identify them in open court


You can say it has nothing to do with Chicago but it's obvious you keep harping on this issue because you're obsessed with the relative comparisons between the NY families and the Outfit.

Regardless of how much quality or discipline the Outfit may have, it doesn't have what even the most reckless NY family has - and that's a significant enough recruiting pool to stave off general attrition for as long as possible. That's why even the Colombos will outlast the Chicago mob. That's what you don't take into consideration or at least seem to ignore.




you keep bringing up comparisons of chicago and new york

so how am i the one who is obsessed with the comparisons?

god knows how many wires are being worn currently in new york
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 02:19 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
you keep bringing up comparisons of chicago and new york

so how am i the one who is obsessed with the comparisons?

god knows how many wires are being worn currently in new york


You keep bringing up this guy or that guy that flipped. The whole point of an organized crime family is that it's not dependent on a single guy, even the boss. So, even if the boss flips, and can cause a lot of damage, the family goes on. And like I said before, for all the rats, they are still very much in the minority compared to the guys who don't rat. There's no comparison.
Posted By: Benny_Eggs

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 04:22 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching




66 rats (made guys) out of thousands doesn't seem to me like "alot of snitches". Like Ivy said, it seems like there are lots of rats cause the rats get tons of attention. I kno there have been many threads about the current state of the outfit, but truth be told, they dont hold all that much power anymore. The weakest of the 5 families (Columbos), are even leaps and bounds more powerful than the outfit. Alot of biased Chicago and Philly people on these boards it seems.
Posted By: tommykarate

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 06:25 AM

U know cookcounty there's 2high ranking members of the outfit wearing wires rite now to....and have been for20 years.its not just ny.its every family.the outfit ain't that special
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 07:58 AM

Originally Posted By: tommykarate
U know cookcounty there's 2high ranking members of the outfit wearing wires rite now to....and have been for20 years.its not just ny.its every family.the outfit ain't that special


I've pointed that out to him a few times too.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 01:03 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
you keep bringing up comparisons of chicago and new york

so how am i the one who is obsessed with the comparisons?

god knows how many wires are being worn currently in new york


You keep bringing up this guy or that guy that flipped. The whole point of an organized crime family is that it's not dependent on a single guy, even the boss. So, even if the boss flips, and can cause a lot of damage, the family goes on. And like I said before, for all the rats, they are still very much in the minority compared to the guys who don't rat. There's no comparison.




you ain't gotta single out one person when the bosses are flipping
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 01:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Benny_Eggs
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching




66 rats (made guys) out of thousands doesn't seem to me like "alot of snitches". Like Ivy said, it seems like there are lots of rats cause the rats get tons of attention. I kno there have been many threads about the current state of the outfit, but truth be told, they dont hold all that much power anymore. The weakest of the 5 families (Columbos), are even leaps and bounds more powerful than the outfit. Alot of biased Chicago and Philly people on these boards it seems.




there ain't been thousands of made guys since people started flipping(60s)

but alot of bosses/acting bosses/underbosses/consigliere's/captains/ have ate the cheese after getting indicted

most if not all of the ranking member snitching has occured since the 80s
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 10:14 PM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
there ain't been thousands of made guys since people started flipping(60s)

but alot of bosses/acting bosses/underbosses/consigliere's/captains/ have ate the cheese after getting indicted

most if not all of the ranking member snitching has occured since the 80s[/i][/u]


They're still very much in the minority. And keep in mind one reason the New York families are going to have more rats is because they have more members to begin with.
Posted By: 123JoeSchmo

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/09/13 10:23 PM

Cook County I honestly think you're too thick-skulled to take in that New York maintains a high level disicipline even in this day and age. Oh yeah people are wearing wires as we speak. But if every single member started talking to the feds, they wouldn't even exist right now. Their power far exceeds Chicago.

I mean talk about in one ear and out the other rolleyes
Posted By: Benny_Eggs

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 01:24 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
Originally Posted By: Benny_Eggs
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
that's alot of snitches....no wonder everybody rats

if you were made by a rat then why not rat?

whose gonna stand tall in this day and age when the boss is snitching




66 rats (made guys) out of thousands doesn't seem to me like "alot of snitches". Like Ivy said, it seems like there are lots of rats cause the rats get tons of attention. I kno there have been many threads about the current state of the outfit, but truth be told, they dont hold all that much power anymore. The weakest of the 5 families (Columbos), are even leaps and bounds more powerful than the outfit. Alot of biased Chicago and Philly people on these boards it seems.




there ain't been thousands of made guys since people started flipping(60s)

but alot of bosses/acting bosses/underbosses/consigliere's/captains/ have ate the cheese after getting indicted

most if not all of the ranking member snitching has occured since the 80s



OK I exaggerated by saying thousands but prob over 1,000. I heard the Gambinos alone had close to 500 made guys at one point. Ivy could prob come up with a pretty accurate #. Nonetheless, how many made guys has the outfit had in its history?? 100 or so?? If that? I know they rely alot on associates.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 01:51 AM

Originally Posted By: Benny_Eggs
OK I exaggerated by saying thousands but prob over 1,000. I heard the Gambinos alone had close to 500 made guys at one point. Ivy could prob come up with a pretty accurate #. Nonetheless, how many made guys has the outfit had in its history?? 100 or so?? If that? I know they rely alot on associates.


Estimates prior to the 1980's are very sketchy but one estimate put the Gambinos at around 400 members at their peak. But that was back in the 50's/60's. Still, think about how many NYC mob members have lived in the 50 years since Valachi first testified in 1963. Right now there's at least 700 or so. And that's not counting everyone else who died between now and then. It would be well over 1,000. Maybe twice that many. Needless to say, the number of members who have flipped constitute a very small fraction; though even one guy can do a lot of damage.

Of course, there's also an unknown number of secret informants - guys who feed info to the feds but never openly flipped, testified in court, went into witness protection, etc. But it doesn't do much good to theorize on how many because there's no way to know.
Posted By: Skinny

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 03:48 AM

This is like some stupid sports forum. "No! Chicago has a better defense! NYs offense had 32 interceptions last year!" The problem is cookcounty is trying to convince you the black sox will win the superbowl next year....
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 04:17 AM

Originally Posted By: Skinny
This is like some stupid sports forum. "No! Chicago has a better defense! NYs offense had 32 interceptions last year!" The problem is cookcounty is trying to convince you the black sox will win the superbowl next year....


Exactly. It's this mentality that gave rise to the term "fan boy" here on the forums. Some people are soooo invested in the rep of their hometown crime family. Some Chicago posters most of all. It's bizarre.
Posted By: Skinny

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 04:44 AM

Not all of them tho! Marks my man!
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 03:23 PM

why are so many people defending cheese eating rats?

why are so many people bringing up anything about chicago?

chicago ain't got shit to do with people in new york ratting left and right

Posted By: streetbossliborio

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 06:26 PM

lool whos more powerful ny or the chicago mob?!! cmon kids break it up!
Posted By: Scorsese

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 06:31 PM

everyone knows that vermont is the most powerful. lol
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 06:57 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: Skinny
This is like some stupid sports forum. "No! Chicago has a better defense! NYs offense had 32 interceptions last year!" The problem is cookcounty is trying to convince you the black sox will win the superbowl next year....


Exactly. It's this mentality that gave rise to the term "fan boy" here on the forums. Some people are soooo invested in the rep of their hometown crime family. Some Chicago posters most of all. It's bizarre.

That's EXACTLY what I usually equate these silly arguments to. I mean, you wanna brag on your hometown, that's great. But pick something to actually be proud of rolleyes.
Posted By: 123JoeSchmo

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/10/13 07:00 PM

Really? I thought it was st louis, you know they've been flying under the radar for years. They've been making guys recently, I hear they carry more weight than the colombos. Dem new york guys just keep on eating cheese and snitching left and right lol lol
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/11/13 12:06 AM

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
why are so many people defending cheese eating rats?

why are so many people bringing up anything about chicago?

chicago ain't got shit to do with people in new york ratting left and right



Nobody is defending rats and we're familiar with them. Not exactly news here. It's just that anyone familiar with your posts knows you have an underlying motive here, whether you admit it or not.
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/11/13 05:15 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: cookcounty
why are so many people defending cheese eating rats?

why are so many people bringing up anything about chicago?

chicago ain't got shit to do with people in new york ratting left and right



Nobody is defending rats and we're familiar with them. Not exactly news here. It's just that anyone familiar with your posts knows you have an underlying motive here, whether you admit it or not.




anyone familiar with the post in this thread can see blatant rat defending
Posted By: Scorsese

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 03/11/13 06:14 PM

why do you care about people defending rats for? are you like a criminal or something where snitches have some sort of relevance to your lifestyle?
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/20/13 06:30 AM

How do you know that Chicago doesn't have a supply of new men? Is it because the feds haven't posted their names in a news bulletin? Do you live in Chicago? Do you have a relative who was a member there? The F.B.I. is most probably bluffing about having two upper echelon men feeding them information. It's a game they play to make guys on the street insecure and paranoid. Have you ever had a family member arrested by the Feds? Have you ever seen first hand how the feds operate in trying to get information by posting disinformation? Ivy, seriously, in this department about believing whatever the Feds print or say to the public, you are naïve. No offense.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/20/13 06:34 AM

Wow! 68 rats in New York and still counting. I think New York should make some more guys because quantity is all that matters. The only real strong organized Family in New York is the Genovese Family. That is a Family to be respected. The Gambino Family had Junior Gotti as their Boss for awhile? Are you kidding me? What a joke.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 02:21 AM

You're making the same talking points several other Chicago posters have before. We've been over and over this before. The fact that you have inflated the size of the Chicago Outfit (talk about disinformation!), as well as find it so hard to believe the Outfit could have two high-level informants, shows you likely have the same agenda other Chicago posters have. And while the Outfit may be more disciplined than some of the NY families, that discipline won't save it from general attrition. Even the "rat infested" Colombos will be around long after the Outfit is gone. And I say that simply because it's a fact, not because I'm rooting for any particular family.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 03:24 AM

Ivy, Shut the Fuck up and don't talk to me about Chicago again. Understand.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 03:30 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Ivy, Shut the Fuck up and don't talk to me about Chicago again. Understand.


How about this. I'll only talk about the real Chicago Outfit. And you can stick to the Chicago Outfit that exists only in your head. Sound like a deal?
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 04:41 AM

Ivy, Doesn't it seem strange to you that at least 3 other knowledgeable people from Chicago two of whom have relatives in the Outfit have told you the same God damn thing? if it's so important to you that the rat infested Colombo Family has a bigger Dick than the Chicago Outfit and will be around a lot longer,and that the structure of Chicago is exactly like new York, then so be it. I don't fucking care what you think because you never lived in it like me. I don't even like the fucking Oufit. all it did was bring misery to some of my relatives. They are generally not nice people. You are naïve and living in a dream world written in a fucking book by some guys who are struggling to understand what they're dealing with. if the Feds said Donald Trump was the Top Boss in the Outfit, you would argue that point until you were in your grave because YOU READ IT IN A BOOK. THE GUY WHO WROTE THE BOOK NEVER LIVED IT. I AM ASKING YOU POLITELY TO NOT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE OUTFIT ANYMORE. Thank You.
Posted By: SC

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 04:51 AM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
I'll only talk about the real Chicago Outfit. And you can stick to the Chicago Outfit that exists only in your head. Sound like a deal?


Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I AM ASKING YOU POLITELY TO NOT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE OUTFIT ANYMORE. Thank You.


Why don't you both put each other on "Ignore"?
Posted By: GAMBINOBOY

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 04:52 AM

THE ONES THAT DON'T , DON'T BECAUSE THEY WINED UP DEAD
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 04:52 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Ivy, Doesn't it seem strange to you that at least 3 other knowledgeable people from Chicago two of whom have relatives in the Outfit have told you the same God damn thing? if it's so important to you that the rat infested Colombo Family has a bigger Dick than the Chicago Outfit and will be around a lot longer,and that the structure of Chicago is exactly like new York, then so be it. I don't fucking care what you think because you never lived in it like me. I don't even like the fucking Oufit. all it did was bring misery to some of my relatives. They are generally not nice people. You are naïve and living in a dream world written in a fucking book by some guys who are struggling to understand what they're dealing with. if the Feds said Donald Trump was the Top Boss in the Outfit, you would argue that point until you were in your grave because YOU READ IT IN A BOOK. THE GUY WHO WROTE THE BOOK NEVER LIVED IT. I AM ASKING YOU POLITELY TO NOT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE OUTFIT ANYMORE. Thank You.


I'm not sure which Chicago posters you're talking about, or what specifically they've said that matches up with you, but it doesn't matter one way or the other. ChiTown (formerly Fratto on the Real Deal form) is a known fraud. And now you are here using the same talking points, and hyping the Outfit, just like other Chicago posters have in the past. And like them, when you're confronted with conflicting evidence, you simply get defensive and belligerent. That you get so uppity about the Colombos being bigger, and likely lasting longer than the Outfit, shows you have an inherent bias here. Again, just like the other Chicago posters.

And just in case I need to say it again....

YOU AND THE REST OF THE CHICAGO POSTERS NEED THE FBI AND OTHER PUBLIC INFO JUST AS MUCH AS EVERYBODY ELSE. YOU SIMPLY LIVING IN CHICAGO AFFORDS YOU NO SIGNIFICANT INSIGHT ON THE LOCAL UNDERWORLD, AS MUCH AS YOU WOULD LIKE TO BELIEVE IT DOES. YOU LIVING IN CHICAGO DOES NOT = YOU LIVING THE LIFE.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 05:06 AM

I don't need anything. I had my uncle who was a soldier in the Outfit for 40 years explain it to me. YOU CAN TAKE THE FEDS REPORT LITERALLY AND I'LL TAKE THE WORD OF SOMEBODY WHO WAS ACTIVE IN IT FOR 40 YEARS. MY SOURCE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SOURCE. CASE CLOSED.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 05:12 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I don't need anything. I had my uncle who was a soldier in the Outfit for 40 years explain it to me. YOU CAN TAKE THE FEDS REPORT LITERALLY AND I'LL TAKE THE WORD OF SOMEBODY WHO WAS ACTIVE IN IT FOR 40 YEARS. MY SOURCE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SOURCE. CASE CLOSED.


Your source is your imagination. Nothing more.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 05:46 AM

Blow it out of your rat infested ass.
Posted By: SC

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 05:48 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Blow it out of your rat infested ass.


You're being warned to stop this flaming behavior. Just stop it!
Posted By: DickNose_Moltasanti

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 06:27 AM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I don't need anything. I had my uncle who was a soldier in the Outfit for 40 years explain it to me. YOU CAN TAKE THE FEDS REPORT LITERALLY AND I'LL TAKE THE WORD OF SOMEBODY WHO WAS ACTIVE IN IT FOR 40 YEARS. MY SOURCE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SOURCE. CASE CLOSED.


Your source is your imagination. Nothing more.


Like another poster said simply "give the guy a chance" just don't automatically attack him as a fraud.
Posted By: DickNose_Moltasanti

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 06:31 AM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I don't need anything. I had my uncle who was a soldier in the Outfit for 40 years explain it to me. YOU CAN TAKE THE FEDS REPORT LITERALLY AND I'LL TAKE THE WORD OF SOMEBODY WHO WAS ACTIVE IN IT FOR 40 YEARS. MY SOURCE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SOURCE. CASE CLOSED.


Your source is your imagination. Nothing more.


Ivy your a flamer..flaming this guy n that guy bada bing bada boom
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 07:13 AM

Dick Nose, Thanks but I don't need a chance from him or anyone else. Maybe he needs a chance from me. About 3 or 4 other commenters hear exactly what I was saying. Ivy league is the only one who wants to argue because it disrupts his image that the Outfit has to be much smaller than the rat infested Colombo Family. The dispute is over terminology. I say the Chicago outfit has a small number of made men because the soldiers are not made guys in the Outfit. He says the soldiers and associates are the same thing. I say in Chicago they are not the same thing. Therefore, if you add up the numbers, the Outfit is larger than expected. He doesn't want the Outfit to be larger in number. It bothers him. Because the Feds didn't spell it out for him in the Family Secrets Trial, he won't accept what I'm saying. All of his information comes from what he reads on the Internet. NONE OF IT COMES FROM REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE. I WOULD WELCOME OTHER PEOPLE'S OPINION. This is the crux of the whole argument that he has had with a couple other Chicago people besides me. My Uncle, Joey Lombardi, was a soldier for 40 years in the Outfit but was never a made guy. He explained to me the whole structure. He explained to me why he was never made. He explained to me the difference between soldiers who belong to the Crew and Associates who do business with the Crew. Ivy doesn't want to believe it. I don't fucking care. That's pretty much it. I looked at his profile and he is a New York wannabe who is fascinated by the Mafia and wants to be part of it. He has pictures of all these guys in his profile. To be honest with you, I think the guy is a little sick in his head.
Posted By: jace

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 07:16 AM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I don't need anything. I had my uncle who was a soldier in the Outfit for 40 years explain it to me. YOU CAN TAKE THE FEDS REPORT LITERALLY AND I'LL TAKE THE WORD OF SOMEBODY WHO WAS ACTIVE IN IT FOR 40 YEARS. MY SOURCE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SOURCE. CASE CLOSED.


Your source is your imagination. Nothing more.


Maybe he really has a source, why not give it some consideration?
Posted By: Sonny_Black

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 03:00 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
I'll only talk about the real Chicago Outfit. And you can stick to the Chicago Outfit that exists only in your head. Sound like a deal?


Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I AM ASKING YOU POLITELY TO NOT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE OUTFIT ANYMORE. Thank You.


Why don't you both put each other on "Ignore"?


Now that sounds like a good deal.
Posted By: Camarel

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/21/13 03:48 PM

Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
I'll only talk about the real Chicago Outfit. And you can stick to the Chicago Outfit that exists only in your head. Sound like a deal?


Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
I AM ASKING YOU POLITELY TO NOT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE OUTFIT ANYMORE. Thank You.


Why don't you both put each other on "Ignore"?


Now that sounds like a good deal.


Agreed, these Outfit threads are beggining to give me a headache.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/22/13 12:44 AM

Ivy league, Since the holy bible of the Outfit is not in the street but instead in F.B.I. Reports, In 1997, You're Gods, The Feds, said that there were 70 made guys in the Outfit and 700 to 1200 Associates!! What happened to the 1,000 Associates from 1997 to 2007??? They all vanished except for 100??? You can believe the 2007 report and take it literally, and I will believe THE FEDS REPORT FROM 1997 which even if it was reduced 50%, 10 years later would be 350 to 600 Associates. I can play the same game as you.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/23/13 09:44 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Dick Nose, Thanks but I don't need a chance from him or anyone else. Maybe he needs a chance from me. About 3 or 4 other commenters hear exactly what I was saying. Ivy league is the only one who wants to argue because it disrupts his image that the Outfit has to be much smaller than the rat infested Colombo Family. The dispute is over terminology. I say the Chicago outfit has a small number of made men because the soldiers are not made guys in the Outfit. He says the soldiers and associates are the same thing. I say in Chicago they are not the same thing. Therefore, if you add up the numbers, the Outfit is larger than expected. He doesn't want the Outfit to be larger in number. It bothers him. Because the Feds didn't spell it out for him in the Family Secrets Trial, he won't accept what I'm saying. All of his information comes from what he reads on the Internet. NONE OF IT COMES FROM REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE. I WOULD WELCOME OTHER PEOPLE'S OPINION. This is the crux of the whole argument that he has had with a couple other Chicago people besides me. My Uncle, Joey Lombardi, was a soldier for 40 years in the Outfit but was never a made guy. He explained to me the whole structure. He explained to me why he was never made. He explained to me the difference between soldiers who belong to the Crew and Associates who do business with the Crew. Ivy doesn't want to believe it. I don't fucking care. That's pretty much it. I looked at his profile and he is a New York wannabe who is fascinated by the Mafia and wants to be part of it. He has pictures of all these guys in his profile. To be honest with you, I think the guy is a little sick in his head.


First, I don't say "members" and "soldiers" in Chicago are the same thing. All the available evidence says it. When or where have any of us ever seen they are different besides you claiming it? If this were so, somebody would have likely seen it somewhere before. The Family Secrets indictment showed the Outfit has the same structure and terminology as other LCN families.

Second, even if you're related to Lombardi, how does that translate to you having this so called inside knowledge? What, did you ask him how many members, soldiers, and associates there still are? Did you do a poll? You're "40 made members, 120 soldiers, and several hundred associates" is obviously made up.

This is the problem with so many local guys. Even if they are related to or know some people, and have some good info to offer, many of them inevitably kill their own credibility by going beyond what they really know. They can't help it. Their ego gets the best of them.

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Ivy league, Since the holy bible of the Outfit is not in the street but instead in F.B.I. Reports, In 1997, You're Gods, The Feds, said that there were 70 made guys in the Outfit and 700 to 1200 Associates!! What happened to the 1,000 Associates from 1997 to 2007??? They all vanished except for 100??? You can believe the 2007 report and take it literally, and I will believe THE FEDS REPORT FROM 1997 which even if it was reduced 50%, 10 years later would be 350 to 600 Associates. I can play the same game as you.


See my response to this in 3 other threads you posted this.
Posted By: DodgerMan57

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/25/13 10:28 PM

I say let the Mob Wives fight it out lol Doesn't Chicago have thier own train wrecked Mob Wives?
Posted By: tiger84

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/26/13 02:24 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Dick Nose, Thanks but I don't need a chance from him or anyone else. Maybe he needs a chance from me. About 3 or 4 other commenters hear exactly what I was saying. Ivy league is the only one who wants to argue because it disrupts his image that the Outfit has to be much smaller than the rat infested Colombo Family. The dispute is over terminology. I say the Chicago outfit has a small number of made men because the soldiers are not made guys in the Outfit. He says the soldiers and associates are the same thing. I say in Chicago they are not the same thing. Therefore, if you add up the numbers, the Outfit is larger than expected. He doesn't want the Outfit to be larger in number. It bothers him. Because the Feds didn't spell it out for him in the Family Secrets Trial, he won't accept what I'm saying. All of his information comes from what he reads on the Internet. NONE OF IT COMES FROM REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE. I WOULD WELCOME OTHER PEOPLE'S OPINION. This is the crux of the whole argument that he has had with a couple other Chicago people besides me. My Uncle, Joey Lombardi, was a soldier for 40 years in the Outfit but was never a made guy. He explained to me the whole structure. He explained to me why he was never made. He explained to me the difference between soldiers who belong to the Crew and Associates who do business with the Crew. Ivy doesn't want to believe it. I don't fucking care. That's pretty much it. I looked at his profile and he is a New York wannabe who is fascinated by the Mafia and wants to be part of it. He has pictures of all these guys in his profile. To be honest with you, I think the guy is a little sick in his head.


How come your uncle never become a made guy?Was he offered and rejected it or does chicago very rarely like opening the books
Posted By: Dapper_Don

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/26/13 02:29 AM

Originally Posted By: DodgerMan57
Doesn't Chicago have thier own train wrecked Mob Wives?


Mob Wives Chicago was cancelled after one season
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 11:42 AM

Tiger84, He wasn't the kind of person to kill someone because a superior ordered it.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 12:22 PM

Ivy, As a matter of fact, I did ask him how many made guys are currently in The Outfit in 2013. He said about 40, but not all are active and I think he was counting some in jail. I think the big difference between you and me is that we are using different terminology. The terminology in Chicago is different. For example, Chicago never refers to themselves as "The Family" or "Cosa Nostra". they refer to themselves as "The Outfit". The Feds gave the 2007 trial the name " Family Secrets". If you would like, I can refer to the Soldiers as "Associates" and I can refer to all the other people who do business with the Outfit as "Connected Guys". For example, How would you or the F.B.I. in any of their Reports, refer to Bar owners who are 50% partners with the Outfit on Poker machines? Are they also called "Associates", but of a different nature? How would you refer to collectors who belong to a crew but are not made guys in Chicago? Are they called soldiers or are they called Associates? If we can agree on the same terminology, then we can possibly have more productive discussions on occasion. During the Auippa reign years ago, I was told there were about 60 active made guys on the street at any given time with 240 men working for them and several hundred doing business with them. By doing business with them, I am referring to all the bar owners, street bookies (who are 25% partners) etc.
In 2013, you're probably correct, or the Feds are probably correct in saying that it is 50% less and there are maybe 30 active made men and say 120 associates working for them. That's probably accurate. Then, there are all the other people like the bar owners and street bookies and lots of other people who do business with the Outfit. I don't know what you want to call those people. Maybe we can call them Outfit connected guys or street associates who are different than the other associates who work directly for the Outfit. I was also told that the Street activity is down at least 50% from years before, but the White Collar activity is higher and that's where they are concentrating more of an effort on as opposed to the blue collar activity. The White collar activity involves Unions, Construction, legit businesses getting city contracts through bidding, offshore bookmaking ( which is legit and the customers use credit cards ). I can't offer any proof that would satisfy you accept for the fact that I do have a relative, Lombardi, who was involved in the blue collar part of it with the Elmwood Park Crew from 1957 to 1993. In 1993, he was indicted with Sarno & about 5 others for Loan Sharking. He went to jail in 1998 for 2 years. After he got out, he was no longer active and has nothing to do with those guys anymore. However, he is respected because he never ratted on anyone and did his time like a man. This is what I can offer but I have no way to prove it to you. If you do not accept anything I say, that's okay with me and there are no hard feelings. As you can see, after being admonished, I've decided to be a gentleman and try to understand WHY we clashed. I believe it was over terminology. Sincerely, Elmwoodparker
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 06:20 PM

After reading your post, it seems like we're going back over old ground as you're making the same "terminology" argument you did before.

Yes, the Chicago mob is called "The Outfit," just like other families have been called "The Office," "The Arm," "The Partnership," etc. But they're all LCN families.

If the Outfit really had a difference in terminology, the FBI would acknowledge that in their reports and indictments. But, from what I've seen, a made guy in Chicago is the same as anywhere else. There isn't a difference in "member" and "soldier." A guy is made or he isn't. Everyone else is going to be an associate of some type.

And no offense but I'll take published FBI figures over anecdotal rumor posted on an internet forum. When the feds say 28-30 members and a little over 100 associates, that's good enough for me.
Posted By: NickyEyes1

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 08:16 PM

Ivy let it go your opinions won't change
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 10:56 PM

Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
After reading your post, it seems like we're going back over old ground as you're making the same "terminology" argument you did before.

Yes, the Chicago mob is called "The Outfit," just like other families have been called "The Office," "The Arm," "The Partnership," etc. But they're all LCN families.

If the Outfit really had a difference in terminology, the FBI would acknowledge that in their reports and indictments. But, from what I've seen, a made guy in Chicago is the same as anywhere else. There isn't a difference in "member" and "soldier." A guy is made or he isn't. Everyone else is going to be an associate of some type.

And no offense but I'll take published FBI figures over anecdotal rumor posted on an internet forum. When the feds say 28-30 members and a little over 100 associates, that's good enough for me.





terminology aka slang ain't the same in Chicago as it is in NY

two different cities.....NY has 5 families and Chicago has 1

made guys in Chicago don't have the same function as NY madeguys. 100 madeguys in NY all try to eat off the same plate, where in Chicago most madeguys have their own crew of guys that operate in their designated section (north,south,west)

for example; nick calabrese had a crew and he wasn't made
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/30/13 11:33 PM

Ivy, I agree that there are 30 active made guys. Where I disagree is in the number and definition of an associate. If you were to count all the guys who work full time directly for the made guys, plus you added in all the people WHO DO BUSINESS WITH THE OUTFIT ( which would be all the Bar Owners, street bookies, union guys etc.) the number OF ASSOCIATES would be way more than 120. There are at least 100 bar owners who have poker machines alone! That's why the 1997 Crime Commission Report stated 700 to 1,200 Associates. They were counting EVERBODY. The 2007 Report of more than 100 Associates was only counting the full time guys who work directly for the made guys because the made guys run their own crews. Do you see what I'm saying? I KNOW YOU ARE SMART ENOUGH TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE.
In addition, as a side note, The Feds questioned my Uncle as far back as 1997 about the Outfit structure and other things that we talk about here on these blogs. If they know everything, why would they want to question him and when he refused to talk, send him to Jail for two years?? No Offense, but all I'm saying is that my Uncle knows more than the Feds.
Posted By: Skinny

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 12:16 AM

Alright damn it. Im bored as fuck so ill address this from a different perspective.

I will speak for Ny (even tho my location says nj, 90% of nj guys belong to a ny family). In regards to the argument over the term "crew"... I have heard two different usages for the term crew involving NY guys... One is a captain's "crew". This includes Soldiers (Madeguys) and Associates. Another is what is referred to as the group of guys who are under the Soldier/Made Guy. This also gets into the debate over associates. The FBI will call someone an associate if they eat dinner with a made guy... If they sell the made guy coke... If they arre a relative to a made guy... If they are one of two hundred agents that operate under a connected sportsbook. The feds are lying hypocrits who do this to inflate their numbers and justify their paychecks. If they catch one connected guy who sells weed and ten of his customers, they say "11 Gambino Associates arrested for running million dollar drug trafficking ring"... On the street, in NY, a REAL associate is considered someone who is "on the record" or "under" a made guy. A soldier has no limit on the number of guys he can claim. He can claim his father, his brother, his cousins, his in laws, his best friends, his neighbor, his business partner, his bartender, his drug dealer, someone who owes him money, whatever.. It can be 2 guys or 20 under a made guys flag. I dont know how they are counted in chicago. The soldier tells the captain so and sos with me, and hes officially an associate. The feds multiply the number of soldiers they have by 10 and say whatever like 1000 or something.... Basically captains have crews of soldiers, soldiers have crews of associates, and associates can have crews of there own guys if they have enough leadership. I consider someone to be connected when theyre actually with a crew. But some people will call a guy connected if he buys coke from a connected guy so it varies.

When it comes to gambling, some books have THOUSANDS of agents. A famous example, Pennacle.Connected as fuck. Bonannos and Westside both have hooks into that group. Penny (and affiliated groups) have thousands of agents up and down the east coast... Some packages are completely run by connected guys. Big package holder in the bronx...Made guy, under him connected guys/associates. But does that make EVERY AGENT an associate of organized crime? I can say this about 3 other books not quite the size of Penny but still up there. Big ass books-run 100% by a NY crime family... But would that make like 10,000 associates? Theres a double standard to this shit and the government never plays fair. And another thing i must say is, Ivy doesnt have opinions. He has his mind set. 100% that whatever he reads online is right and there is no evidence that will change his opinion. Ive talked with him for months. He cant help it. He asks me for what i say on a few things and if i reply with something that doesnt match the majority evidence he presents whatever documents he has and says "this says so and so as official captain, there fore based on... " you know how he is.. Hes not really saying im a liar or anything, and its a little off putting at first but its just how he is. I dont hold it against him, but he sticks to his guns and wont stray from the facts that are presented before him. Im not here for a popularity contest, if you dont believe what i have to say you can fuck yourself with bowie knife, i dont care, i know what i know. Life is too short to argue about the size of the mafia. Take care my friends.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 07:08 AM

Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
Ivy let it go your opinions won't change


Did you happen to notice that elmwoodparker was the one who brought this all up again?

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
terminology aka slang ain't the same in Chicago as it is in NY


Only with a handful of minor things, like a captain in Chicago often being referred to as a "crew boss."

Quote:
two different cities.....NY has 5 families and Chicago has 1


Thanks for clarifying that.

Quote:
made guys in Chicago don't have the same function as NY madeguys. 100 madeguys in NY all try to eat off the same plate, where in Chicago most madeguys have their own crew of guys that operate in their designated section (north,south,west)

for example; nick calabrese had a crew and he wasn't made


Nonsense. You don't think there are plenty of NY soldiers who have their own crew of associates? Made guys in Chicago have the same function as those in New York. It's no different.

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Ivy, I agree that there are 30 active made guys.


Maybe we're making some headway now. But, for the record, the FBI didn't say "active." Of the two quotes by different FBI officials, one said there were "28 members roaming the Chicagoland area." The other simply said there were "30 members," which seems to suggest a total figure.

Quote:
Where I disagree is in the number and definition of an associate. If you were to count all the guys who work full time directly for the made guys, plus you added in all the people WHO DO BUSINESS WITH THE OUTFIT ( which would be all the Bar Owners, street bookies, union guys etc.) the number OF ASSOCIATES would be way more than 120. There are at least 100 bar owners who have poker machines alone! That's why the 1997 Crime Commission Report stated 700 to 1,200 Associates. They were counting EVERBODY. The 2007 Report of more than 100 Associates was only counting the full time guys who work directly for the made guys because the made guys run their own crews. Do you see what I'm saying? I KNOW YOU ARE SMART ENOUGH TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE.
In addition, as a side note, The Feds questioned my Uncle as far back as 1997 about the Outfit structure and other things that we talk about here on these blogs. If they know everything, why would they want to question him and when he refused to talk, send him to Jail for two years?? No Offense, but all I'm saying is that my Uncle knows more than the Feds.


I've said many times before that I don't take associate estimates that seriously because, depending on how one defines it, the number can expand or retract. A looser definition is obviously going to result in a bigger number. A more strict definition is obviously going to result in a smaller number.

That said, for comparison purposes, i.e. apples to apples or Chicago and New York, we have to go with the same criteria - the latest official estimates. If one wants to use the more expansive number of associates for Chicago, fine, but then they also have to do the same for New York.

Finally, one can get a better impression of the the likely Outfit associate number when they look at the number of made members, the activity in recent years, and compare it to other families. When one takes these things into account for Chicago, a little over 100 associates seems more likely than 700-1,200.

Originally Posted By: Skinny
I will speak for Ny (even tho my location says nj, 90% of nj guys belong to a ny family). In regards to the argument over the term "crew"... I have heard two different usages for the term crew involving NY guys... One is a captain's "crew". This includes Soldiers (Madeguys) and Associates. Another is what is referred to as the group of guys who are under the Soldier/Made Guy. This also gets into the debate over associates. The FBI will call someone an associate if they eat dinner with a made guy... If they sell the made guy coke... If they arre a relative to a made guy... If they are one of two hundred agents that operate under a connected sportsbook. The feds are lying hypocrits who do this to inflate their numbers and justify their paychecks. If they catch one connected guy who sells weed and ten of his customers, they say "11 Gambino Associates arrested for running million dollar drug trafficking ring"... On the street, in NY, a REAL associate is considered someone who is "on the record" or "under" a made guy. A soldier has no limit on the number of guys he can claim. He can claim his father, his brother, his cousins, his in laws, his best friends, his neighbor, his business partner, his bartender, his drug dealer, someone who owes him money, whatever.. It can be 2 guys or 20 under a made guys flag. I dont know how they are counted in chicago. The soldier tells the captain so and sos with me, and hes officially an associate. The feds multiply the number of soldiers they have by 10 and say whatever like 1000 or something.... Basically captains have crews of soldiers, soldiers have crews of associates, and associates can have crews of there own guys if they have enough leadership. I consider someone to be connected when theyre actually with a crew. But some people will call a guy connected if he buys coke from a connected guy so it varies.


For what it's worth, a poster over on the RD (who was retired law enforcement) said the associate estimate for a family is typically left up to the local FBI SAC. And, from what I've read, the FBI has a stricter criteria on who they consider an associate than, say, the NYPD.

Quote:
When it comes to gambling, some books have THOUSANDS of agents. A famous example, Pennacle.Connected as fuck. Bonannos and Westside both have hooks into that group. Penny (and affiliated groups) have thousands of agents up and down the east coast... Some packages are completely run by connected guys. Big package holder in the bronx...Made guy, under him connected guys/associates. But does that make EVERY AGENT an associate of organized crime? I can say this about 3 other books not quite the size of Penny but still up there. Big ass books-run 100% by a NY crime family... But would that make like 10,000 associates? Theres a double standard to this shit and the government never plays fair. And another thing i must say is, Ivy doesnt have opinions. He has his mind set. 100% that whatever he reads online is right and there is no evidence that will change his opinion. Ive talked with him for months. He cant help it. He asks me for what i say on a few things and if i reply with something that doesnt match the majority evidence he presents whatever documents he has and says "this says so and so as official captain, there fore based on... " you know how he is.. Hes not really saying im a liar or anything, and its a little off putting at first but its just how he is. I dont hold it against him, but he sticks to his guns and wont stray from the facts that are presented before him. Im not here for a popularity contest, if you dont believe what i have to say you can fuck yourself with bowie knife, i dont care, i know what i know. Life is too short to argue about the size of the mafia. Take care my friends.


Though I think the relative size of LCN families is a crucial factor, I actually agree with much of what you said above. We need to take care not to throw out the label "associate" too freely. Because many, if not most, if those agents probably wouldn't fit the criteria.

Incidentally, in addition to Pinnacle, do you know of any others that are mob-connected, Skinny? Below are some of the ones I've seen involved in mob gambling busts over the past decade.

http://www.betonsports.com
http://www.playwithal.com
http://www.betonline.com
http://ww1.bigactionsports.com
http://www.beteagle.com
http://www.perfectwager.com
http://www.betmsg.com
http://www.betallsports.com
http://www.betwsi.com
http://www.betoffshore.net
http://www.betonsports.com
http://www.44wager.com
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 08:05 AM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
The White collar activity involves Unions, Construction, legit businesses getting city contracts through bidding, offshore bookmaking ( which is legit and the customers use credit cards ).


I've seen this mentioned before.

Obviously, it's no secret that mob families have been using offshore gambling sites where a player is given a user name and password, and can place a bet. And the bookie can also log into the same site to see who is players bet on and how much. And, of course, all the money is exchanged locally. No credit cards.

And obviously there are many legal online betting sites, where one can use a credit card, though many of them have been chased away from the U.S. market.

But where do we get the idea that the Outfit is involved in this quasi-legal form of bookmaking? I know somebody mentioned that on Fosco's blog a few years ago but that's it. And, interestingly enough, there hasn't been a gambling bust involving anyone from DiFronzo's North Side crew since the Dotes and Scalise were busted back 2000.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 08:51 AM

The number of associates COMPARED to made guys in Chicago is not the same as the number of associates COMPARED to New York. This is where you are very wrong and misinformed. Chicago has a very high number of associates compared to made men. New York's ratio is smaller and always has been smaller. Why? New York has always been very liberal in making people. Chicago has always been much more select. The F.B.I. has stated this fact in some of their reports. You should know this being an F.B.I. report expert. Many of the associates who work for made guys in Chicago would have been made guys in New York and allowed to do what they want as long as they kicked up to their Captain. Chicago has always been different in this regard. My Uncle would have EASILY been a made guy in one of the New York Families. Chicago has always been much more selective.
As far as busts in Chicago, the OFFSHORE Gambling ( supervised by Marco D'Amico) would not involve busts because it is basically legit. You make the wrong assumption that no busts for Gambling means no activity. You are very wrong on this point. The Outfit is like the Corleone family becoming basically legit. This is the only example I can use that you might understand. The Chicago Outfit is very shrewd, smaller, leaner and more legitimate which means in the long run, they will survive a very long time. Don't ask me to prove what I said with an F.B.I Report. You can believe what you want, and I'll believe what I know. It's not a problem. You and I will never really agree on too much because I'm going mainly by inside information that I can't prove to you and you're going by an F.B.I. REPORT WHICH IS NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE OR UP TO DATE. THAT'S WHY THE FEDS ARE ALWAYS TRING TO GET MORE INFORMATION from guys like my Uncle who will not tell them anything. They punished him by sending him to prison. I'm talking from a street inside level which can't be proven on a Blog. You're talking from a F.B.I. Report which is 5 years old and incomplete. We will never agree on some of these points. Not a problem
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 09:20 AM

@ivyleague


Chicago doesn't necessarily use the word captain all the time

sometimes they have area bosses


maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=70996&relPageId=4http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=70996&relPageId=4


madeguys in new York are 1000 deep and sharing dinner plates

madeguys in Chicago operate on their lonesome if they're capable

madeguys in Chicago probably all have legitimate business
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 10:22 AM

Smaller Leaner Well Organized Secretive Politically Insulated White Collar Organized Crime Group like the Outfit led by Elmwood park will always outlast a Blue Collar Disorganized Rat Infested Organized Crime Group like the Colombos or the Gambinos anyday. I don't care how many 'Made members' they have presently. The number of made members DOES NOT MEAN STRENGTH. BIGGER DOESN'T MEAN BETTER. If that were the case, then the Crips Street Gang in Los Angeles would be more powerful than ALL THE MAFIA FAMILIES PUT TOGETHER, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS NOT THE TRUTH. The only Group in New York similar to Chicago would be the Genovese Family. They are the EXCEPTION, not the norm in New York. That's why Chicago only dealt with them. The Goal for the Italian American Mafia to survive from 2013 forward is to become smaller, more selective, and a lot more White Collar than Blue Collar. That is the ONLY way to survive. The number of made members, in the long run, really doesn't mean shit and does not represent strength. Again, if that were the case, then everyone in this Country would be working for the Crips or the Bloods.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 09:19 PM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
The number of associates COMPARED to made guys in Chicago is not the same as the number of associates COMPARED to New York. This is where you are very wrong and misinformed. Chicago has a very high number of associates compared to made men. New York's ratio is smaller and always has been smaller. Why? New York has always been very liberal in making people. Chicago has always been much more select. The F.B.I. has stated this fact in some of their reports. You should know this being an F.B.I. report expert. Many of the associates who work for made guys in Chicago would have been made guys in New York and allowed to do what they want as long as they kicked up to their Captain. Chicago has always been different in this regard. My Uncle would have EASILY been a made guy in one of the New York Families. Chicago has always been much more selective.


This may have been the case in the past but, if you look at more recent reports, the member-to-associate ratio is about the same in New York and Chicago. For example, the Colombo family is said to have about 100 members and 500 associates. The Genovese family is said to have about 200 members and 1,000 associates. By comparison, the Outfit is said to have 25-30 members and a little over 100 associates. That's about a 1:5 ratio for both. The New England and Philadelphia families have 40-50 members and about 100 associates, making a 1:2 ratio. So, comparatively speaking, Chicago is more similar in total size to New England or Philadelphia but the member-to-associate ratio is a little different.

Quote:
As far as busts in Chicago, the OFFSHORE Gambling ( supervised by Marco D'Amico) would not involve busts because it is basically legit. You make the wrong assumption that no busts for Gambling means no activity. You are very wrong on this point. The Outfit is like the Corleone family becoming basically legit. This is the only example I can use that you might understand. The Chicago Outfit is very shrewd, smaller, leaner and more legitimate which means in the long run, they will survive a very long time. Don't ask me to prove what I said with an F.B.I Report. You can believe what you want, and I'll believe what I know. It's not a problem. You and I will never really agree on too much because I'm going mainly by inside information that I can't prove to you and you're going by an F.B.I. REPORT WHICH IS NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE OR UP TO DATE. THAT'S WHY THE FEDS ARE ALWAYS TRING TO GET MORE INFORMATION from guys like my Uncle who will not tell them anything. They punished him by sending him to prison. I'm talking from a street inside level which can't be proven on a Blog. You're talking from a F.B.I. Report which is 5 years old and incomplete. We will never agree on some of these points. Not a problem


I see. The Outfit (the real life Corleone family) has gone legit and has figured out a way to avoid law enforcement scrutiny. Is that why we saw Anthony Centracchio, Michael Spano, James Inendino, Jimmy Marcello, Joey Lombardo, Frank Calabrese, Rudy Fratto, and Mike Sarno all indicted since 2000? Not to mention many more associates. Many of them for the standard mob rackets.

Bottom line. All you've presented so far is anecdotal information. On the internet no less.

Originally Posted By: cookcounty
@ivyleague


Chicago doesn't necessarily use the word captain all the time

sometimes they have area bosses


I'm aware of that. Which is why I said above they've been known to use the term "crew boss" instead of "captain." The difference is, we've seen evidence of that, while we've seen no evidence of made members and soldiers being different in Chicago.

Quote:
madeguys in new York are 1000 deep and sharing dinner plates

madeguys in Chicago operate on their lonesome if they're capable

madeguys in Chicago probably all have legitimate business


This is why you Chicago posters have the fanboy reputation you do. The Outfit is like the Corleone family. All Outfit members have legit businesses while the NY guy are scraping by. You guys can't see past your own inherent bias.

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Smaller Leaner Well Organized Secretive Politically Insulated White Collar Organized Crime Group like the Outfit led by Elmwood park will always outlast a Blue Collar Disorganized Rat Infested Organized Crime Group like the Colombos or the Gambinos anyday. I don't care how many 'Made members' they have presently. The number of made members DOES NOT MEAN STRENGTH. BIGGER DOESN'T MEAN BETTER. If that were the case, then the Crips Street Gang in Los Angeles would be more powerful than ALL THE MAFIA FAMILIES PUT TOGETHER, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS NOT THE TRUTH. The only Group in New York similar to Chicago would be the Genovese Family. They are the EXCEPTION, not the norm in New York. That's why Chicago only dealt with them. The Goal for the Italian American Mafia to survive from 2013 forward is to become smaller, more selective, and a lot more White Collar than Blue Collar. That is the ONLY way to survive. The number of made members, in the long run, really doesn't mean shit and does not represent strength. Again, if that were the case, then everyone in this Country would be working for the Crips or the Bloods.


It's true that the Outfit has downsized and streamlined it's operations, which is a smart move in the shorter term. However, in the longer term, attrition will see it's demise. Yes, quality is a big factor. But so is quantity. If a family doesn't have the necessary pool of recruits, or simply doesn't make new members, it will eventually fade away. We've seen the Outfit's membership be cut in half over the past 15 years. That shows a definite trend, even if some don't want to see it. The Outfit can have all the stability and discipline in the world. It will still go the way other LCN families have, who are no longer around, long before any of the NY families will.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 10:26 PM

The Family Secrets trial was all about Crimes committed years ago. C'mon Ivy, stop pretending to act stupid about facts when it might serve your purpose. Lombardo was convicted of a murder done in 1974! Marcello was convicted of murder done in 1986! Calabrese never got out of jail and went in in 1995! Centracchio, was indicted for poker machines in 2001. You're talking about the past and some of it ANCIENT PAST. You always say there is very little activity in Chicago on all your other postings. Now, you want to talk about a lot of activity but most of it was in the past. You're a funny guy. lol
Posted By: cookcounty

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 10:51 PM

@ivyleague


less mouths to feed means more money

madeguys in ny bicker over money because they're so many of them

madeguys in Chicago can operate without interference for the most part
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 11:10 PM

Cook County, Very true. The Made guys in Chicago ran their own crews either by themselves or in partnership with another made guy. Examples would be Frank & Nick Calabrese, Dominic Cortina & Donald Angelini. Examples of singular would be Tony Spilotro, Rocky Infelice Etc. These made guys were equal to the Captains in New York who received a percentage of the made guys under them. The Made guys in Chicago were a big deal because Chicago was very select in who they made, unlike New York who made everybody they could think of so the Captains could extort their percentage from them. That's why New York, for the most part, is rat infested AND MOST MEMBERS SCRAPE BY like in the movie Donnie Brasco which shows what the Mob is really like in New York. The Movie was based upon an actual F.B.I. informant who got made rather quickly into one of the 5 Families.( Naturally, he got made very quickly since New York makes everybody and their brother).

The Outfit in 2013 is about 50% less in man power compared to the Auippa Days, however, they are more white collar which is a good thing. New made guys are usually relatives of older men and are less and less blue collar. New York is still mainly blue collar which means it will not last as long. The Only strong New York Family with very few rats that has a vision OF THE FUTURE is the GENOVESE FAMILY.
Posted By: Camarel

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 11:14 PM

Originally Posted By: elmwoodparker
Cook County, Very true. The Made guys in Chicago ran their own crews either by themselves or in partnership with another made guy. Examples would be Frank & Nick Calabrese, Dominic Cortina & Donald Angelini. Examples of singular would be Tony Spilotro, Rocky Infelice Etc. These made guys were equal to the Captains in New York who received a percentage of the made guys under them. The Made guys in Chicago were a big deal because Chicago was very select in who they made, unlike New York who made everybody they could think of so the Captains could extort their percentage from them. That's why New York, for the most part, is rat infested AND MOST MEMBERS SCRAPE BY like in the movie Donnie Brasco which shows what the Mob is really like in New York. The Movie was based upon an actual F.B.I. informant who got made rather quickly into one of the 5 Families.( Naturally, he got made very quickly since New York makes everybody and their brother)

The Outfit in 2013 is about 50% less in man power compared to the Auippa Days, however, they are more white collar which is a good thing. New made guys are usually relatives of older men and are less and less blue collar. New York is still mainly blue collar which means it will not last as long. The Only strong New York Family with very few rats that has a vision OF THE FUTURE is the GENOVESE FAMILY.


He wasn't made.
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 05/31/13 11:30 PM

For all realistic intents and purposes, HE WAS MADE. He was direct with his captain and he was ACCEPTED to be made. They never got around to their Boy Scouts pricking of the finger because the Feds busted the whole thing right before it happened. Do you remember seeing the MADE GUYS in Sonny Black's Crew cracking open parking meters to make some money so they could kick a percentage of it up to him? Also, the minute Sonny Black got something going in Florida, another Captain IN HIS OWN FAMILY conspired with the Florida Boss to ruin the whole thing. That was back in the late 1970's. Can you imagine how pathetic is is now in 2013? That movie was very realistic because it was based upon the Feds which is the Bible of these Blogs. Watch the movie again.
Posted By: tiger84

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 06/01/13 05:54 AM

Also, the minute Sonny Black got something going in Florida, another Captain IN HIS OWN FAMILY conspired with the Florida Boss to ruin the whole thing.


LOL that was funny the sonny red guy got jelous and also wanted to whack SB entire crew

What is chicagos policy on guys turning down their buttonn.Do guys have a choice or is it seen as disrespectful?
Posted By: elmwoodparker

Re: HOW MANY 5 FAMILY RANKING MEMBERS HAVE RATTED? - 06/01/13 09:04 AM

Chicago was always very very selective in making a man, unlike New York, LOL. In Chicago, when a man was made, he ran his own crew by himself or with another made man as his 'hands on' partner. In his crew were soldiers/associates who worked for him doing specific jobs. The made man was a partner with his Area Boss (CAPO). The Area Bosses were all partnered with the two Top Bosses. In order for a man to be made, he had to have participated in a murder in some way or another. After that happened, The Capo at some point would ask the Top Bosses if this new man working in the crew could be elevated to run some kind of a franchise. If the Two Top Bosses agreed, then the man would be made with a handshake and a dinner in his honor. So, to really answer your question, a man knew WAY in advance what he was aiming to accomplish. Yes, the man could politely refuse the "button" and remain as a soldier/associate with no hard feelings at all. However, once a man participated in a murder, there really was no turning back. A man could refuse to be involved in a murder and there wpuld be no hard feelings. This is what happened with my Uncle. It takes a certain kind of man to be involved in killing someone because he has been ordered to do it. This is not for everyone.
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET