Home

Long Island

Posted By: Frank

Long Island - 04/02/11 10:05 PM

historycally the nyc families have had businness and interests in long island like in new jersey?there was some crew or family in particular?i heard something about some businness there for example the waste management but i never heard other
Posted By: tt120

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 06:19 PM

yes definitely. i think all of the 5 families have a presence there - personal and business. you got older guys who grew up in the city or the boros and moved out there. then younger guys coming up who grew up out there. just like NJ and the upstate suburbs. recently a colombo capo was arrested for trying to shake down a long island pizzera...and I think the waste management thing you're talking about was the Luccheses - Sal Avellino to be exact.

Nassau County is basically like an extension of Queens in my opinion. i'd imagine there's been a presence on long island for as long as the 5 families have been in existance
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 06:31 PM

A lot of mob guys are still in Long Island.
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 06:40 PM

Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...
Posted By: phatmatress

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 06:41 PM

me too i was to affraid to ask it thanks for taking the heat on that one!
Posted By: tt120

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 06:51 PM

they're two seperate places. Staten Island is a boro of NYC and is a standalone island located south of Manhattan, inbetween jeresy and brooklyn. Long Island is Nassau and Suffolk counties... not a part of NYC but connected to the same land mass as brooklyn and queens . when it doubt...look at a map smile
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 08:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Frank
historycally the nyc families have had businness and interests in long island like in new jersey?there was some crew or family in particular?i heard something about some businness there for example the waste management but i never heard other


The mob still has a significant presence throughout the greater New York metropolitan area. Also known as the Tri-State area. That would include the five boroughs of New York City, Long Island, Westchester County, Southwest Connecticut, and North/Central New Jersey.

All together you're probably looking at roughly 75% of the mob's remaining membership in this area, which would include the DeCavalcante family. Then, if you include the Patriarca family up in New England, the Bruno/Scarfo family in Philadephia and South Jersey, and what members are left elsewhere in the northeast, it's upwards of 85-90% of the mob's total remaining membership.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 08:28 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.
Posted By: Sonny_Black

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 08:54 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.


How the hell do you come up with this bullshit. Staten Island is part of the United Kingdom. It's an island next to Ireland.

And Long Island is an invisible island at the base of Italy.
Posted By: Dapper_Don

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 09:45 PM

Originally Posted By: tt120
yes definitely. i think all of the 5 families have a presence there - personal and business. you got older guys who grew up in the city or the boros and moved out there. then younger guys coming up who grew up out there. just like NJ and the upstate suburbs. recently a colombo capo was arrested for trying to shake down a long island pizzera...and I think the waste management thing you're talking about was the Luccheses - Sal Avellino to be exact.

Nassau County is basically like an extension of Queens in my opinion. i'd imagine there's been a presence on long island for as long as the 5 families have been in existance


that Colombo Capo is Michael Catapano he is the nephew of Sonny Franzese, Catapano is currently serving a 6½ year sentence after pleading guilty to extorting a pizzeria and a gambling club.
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:11 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.


That might have been funny at your bar mitzvah, but not here.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:19 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.


That might have been funny at your bar mitzvah, but not here.


Don't be so sensitive. Retarded questions deserve retarded answers.
Posted By: SC

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:28 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Don't be so sensitive. Retarded questions deserve retarded answers.


You've been warned before about making statements like this. Consider this your FINAL WARNING.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:35 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Don't be so sensitive. Retarded questions deserve retarded answers.


You've been warned before about making statements like this. Consider this your FINAL WARNING.


I didn't call him retarded. Just his question. There is no need to take this personal. Besides, me and Gerry go way back. I love him almost as much as I love you.
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:48 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.


That might have been funny at your bar mitzvah, but not here.


Don't be so sensitive. Retarded questions deserve retarded answers.


I'm not being sensitive, I'm being honest. You're very bar mitzvah-Sarah Silvermanish.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 10:52 PM

I am sensing antisemitism.
Posted By: Shots

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 11:04 PM

Is Long Island the same as Lawn Guyland?
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 11:11 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
I am sensing antisemitism.


I'm sensing sensitivity. My wife is Pakistani, I can't be antisemitic.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/03/11 11:31 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
I am sensing antisemitism.


I'm sensing sensitivity. My wife is Pakistani, I can't be antisemitic.


You are right. I am actually very sensitive when it comes to antisemitism or anything racist for that matter. To me, we are all equals.
Posted By: Mickey_MeatBalls_DeMonica

Re: Long Island - 04/04/11 01:49 AM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Some people might shake their head at the stupidity of this question, but what is the difference between Staten Island and Long Island, or they just different names for the same place? I've always wondered that...


Staten Island is a city in Los Angeles. Long Island is a country in Poland, but due to the electromagnetic fields in Yemen, these places can be found in Brooklyn between 1am and 3am.


That might have been funny at your bar mitzvah, but not here.


lol lol lol
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/04/11 10:02 PM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
I am sensing antisemitism.


I'm sensing sensitivity. My wife is Pakistani, I can't be antisemitic.


You are right. I am actually very sensitive when it comes to antisemitism or anything racist for that matter. To me, we are all equals.


Semite isn't a race, its relates to language.
Posted By: VinnyGorgeous

Re: Long Island - 04/04/11 10:20 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
I am sensing antisemitism.


I'm sensing sensitivity. My wife is Pakistani, I can't be antisemitic.


You are right. I am actually very sensitive when it comes to antisemitism or anything racist for that matter. To me, we are all equals.


Semite isn't a race, its relates to language.


Antisemitism is rooted in hatred for the Jewish people which includes their ethnic background. That is racist. You may need to pick up a book or something lol. Any more questions you wanna ask me? I wish you luck with your coping skills.
Posted By: IvyLeague

Re: Long Island - 04/05/11 07:03 AM

Speaking of the mob on Long Island, here are some great articles....


http://www.mediabistro.com/portfolios/samples_files/88544_kwwcG9F0IFUyeB1gvPTB_cpPh.pdf

http://www.mediabistro.com/portfolios/samples_files/88544_wJy58lmRyhm0qKShtSTka4t4I.pdf
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/07/11 04:55 AM

Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
[quote=VinnyGorgeous][quote=GerryLang][quote=VinnyGorgeous]I am sensing antisemitism.


Semite isn't a race, its relates to language.


Originally Posted By: VinnyGorgeous
Antisemitism is rooted in hatred for the Jewish people which includes their ethnic background. That is racist. You may need to pick up a book or something lol. Any more questions you wanna ask me? I wish you luck with your coping skills.


A Semite is someone who speaks a Semitic language, there are loads of Jews who aren't Semites, and loads of Semites who aren't Jews. What does Jew have to do with ethnic background, I thought it was a religion, not a ethnicity or race? Antisemitism is now a slur used by Jews to silent anyone who is critical of Israel, and their killing of the real Semites, the Palestinians. I guess you consider Jehova Witnesses an ethnic group too? grin
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: Long Island - 04/07/11 02:27 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
What does Jew have to do with ethnic background, I thought it was a religion, not a ethnicity or race?

It has been proven through DNA testing, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Jews carry a common genome (share a common ancestry), and are not just a random collection of people who practice the same religion.

By Sharon Begley, Newsweek:

June 3, 2010

The DNA of Abraham’s Children

Analysis of Jewish genomes refutes the Khazar claim.

Jews have historically considered themselves “people of the book” (am hasefer in Hebrew), referring to sacred tomes, but the phrase is turning out to have an equally powerful, if unintended, meaning: scientists are able to read Jewish genomes like a history book. The latest DNA volume weighs in on the controversial, centuries-old (and now revived in a 2008 book) claim that European Jews are all the descendants of Khazars, a Turkic group of the north Caucasus who converted to Judaism in the late eighth and early ninth century. The DNA has spoken: no.

In the wake of studies in the 1990s that supported biblically based notions of a priestly caste descended from Aaron, brother of Moses, an ambitious new project to analyze genomes collected from Jewish volunteers has yielded its first discoveries. In a paper with the kind of catchy title you rarely see in science journals—“Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era”—scientists report that the Jews of the Diaspora share a set of telltale genetic markers, supporting the traditional belief that Jews scattered around the world have a common ancestry. But various Diaspora populations have their own distinct genetic signatures, shedding light on their origins and history. In addition to the age-old question of whether Jews are simply people who share a religion or are a distinct population, the scientific verdict is settling on the latter.

Although the origin of the Jews has been traced, archeologically, to the Middle East in the second millennium B.C.E., what happened next has been more opaque. To sort it out, researchers collected DNA from Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, and Ashkenazi Jews around New York City; Turkish Sephardic Jews in Seattle; Greek Sephardic Jews in Thessaloniki and Athens; and Italian Jews in Rome as part of the Jewish HapMap Project. (All four grandparents of each participant had to have come from the same community.) As the scientists will report in the next issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, the analysis shows that “each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

Jewish populations, that is, have retained their genetic coherence just as they have retained their cultural and religious traditions, despite migrations from the Middle East into Europe, North Africa, and beyond over the centuries, says geneticist Harry Ostrer of NYU Langone Medical Center, who led the study. Each Diaspora group has distinctive genetic features “representative of each group’s genetic history,” he says, but each also “shares a set of common genetic threads” dating back to their common origin in the Middle East. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

The various Jewish groups were more related to each other than to non-Jews, as well. Within every Jewish group, individuals shared as much of their genome as two fourth or fifth cousins, with Italian, Syrian, Iranian, and Iraqi Jews the most inbred, in the sense that they married within the small, close-knit community. In general, the genetic similarity of any two groups was larger the closer they lived to one another, but there was an exception: Turkish and Italian Jews were most closely related genetically, but are quite separated geographically.

Historical records suggest that Iranian and Iraqi Jews date from communities that formed in Persia and Babylon, respectively, in the fourth to sixth centuries B.C.E., and the DNA confirms that. The genetic signatures of these groups show that they remained relatively isolated—inbred—for some 3,000 years. The DNA also reveals that these Middle Eastern Jews diverged from the ancestors of today’s European Jews about 100 to 150 generations ago, or sometime during the first millennium B.C.E.

That’s when the Jewish communities in Italy, the Balkans, and North Africa originated, from Jews who migrated or were expelled from Palestine and from people who converted to Judaism during Hellenic times. During that period Jews proselytized with an effectiveness that would put today’s Mormons to shame: at the height of the Roman Empire, as the Roman historian Josephus chronicled, mass conversions produced 6 million practicing Jews, or 10 percent of the population of the Roman Empire. The conversions brought in DNA that had not been part of the original gene pool in the land of Abraham.

The DNA analysis undermines the claim that most of today’s Jews, particularly the Ashkenazi, are the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars—which has angered many in the Jewish community as an implicit attack on the Jews’ claim to the land of Israel, since it implies that today’s Jews have no blood ties to the original Jews of the Middle East. Instead, find the scientists, at most there was “limited admixture with local populations, including Khazars and Slavs ... during the 1,000-year (second millennium) history of the European Jews.”

Of the non-Jewish Europeans, northern Italians were most genetically similar to the Jews, followed by the Sardinians and French. The Druze, Bedouins, and Palestinians were closest to the Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian Jews. That is evidence of “a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations.” Adds Ostrer, “the study supports the idea of a Jewish people linked by a shared genetic history. Yet the admixture with European people explains why so many European and Syrian Jews have blue eyes and blond hair.”

Southern Europeans were the closest genetic cousins of Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Italian Jews, reflecting the large-scale conversion of these Southern European populations to Judaism some 2,000 years ago, when European Jewry was forming. The Sephardic groups share genetic makers with North Africans, probably a result of marriages between Moors and Jews in Spain from 711 to 1492.

Several details of the Ashkenazi genome imply that centuries ago, the population experienced a severe bottleneck, in which the size of a group plummets, followed by a rapid expansion. That jibes with the historical record showing that the Jewish population in Western and Eastern Europe bottomed out at about 50,000 in the Middle Ages and then soared to 500,000 by the 19th century, growing at twice the rate of non-Jews—something called “the demographic miracle.”

Analysis of Jewish genomes has been yielding fascinating findings for more than a decade. A pioneer in this field, Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona, made the first big splash when he discovered that genetics supports the biblical account of a priestly family, the Cohanim, descended from Aaron, the brother of Moses: one specific genetic marker on the Y chromosome (which is passed on from father to son, as membership in the priestly family would be) is found in 98.5 percent of people who self-identify as Cohanim, he and colleagues reported in a 1997 paper in Nature (the PBS science series Nova did a nice segment on that work, summarized here). The Cohanim DNA has been found in both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, evidence that it predates the time when the two groups diverged, about 1,000 years ago. DNA can also be used to infer when particular genetic markers appeared, and suggests that the Cohanim emerged about 106 generations ago, making it fall during what is thought to be the period of the exodus from Egypt, and thus Aaron’s lifetime.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/03/the-dna-of-abraham-s-children.html
Posted By: Sonny_Black

Re: Long Island - 04/07/11 04:07 PM

GerryLang is right about semites though. A semite could be a Jew or an Arab. But it became a popular phrase to describe only Jews.
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/07/11 05:03 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
What does Jew have to do with ethnic background, I thought it was a religion, not a ethnicity or race?

It has been proven through DNA testing, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Jews carry a common genome (share a common ancestry), and are not just a random collection of people who practice the same religion.

By Sharon Begley, Newsweek:

June 3, 2010

The DNA of Abraham’s Children

Analysis of Jewish genomes refutes the Khazar claim.

Jews have historically considered themselves “people of the book” (am hasefer in Hebrew), referring to sacred tomes, but the phrase is turning out to have an equally powerful, if unintended, meaning: scientists are able to read Jewish genomes like a history book. The latest DNA volume weighs in on the controversial, centuries-old (and now revived in a 2008 book) claim that European Jews are all the descendants of Khazars, a Turkic group of the north Caucasus who converted to Judaism in the late eighth and early ninth century. The DNA has spoken: no.

In the wake of studies in the 1990s that supported biblically based notions of a priestly caste descended from Aaron, brother of Moses, an ambitious new project to analyze genomes collected from Jewish volunteers has yielded its first discoveries. In a paper with the kind of catchy title you rarely see in science journals—“Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era”—scientists report that the Jews of the Diaspora share a set of telltale genetic markers, supporting the traditional belief that Jews scattered around the world have a common ancestry. But various Diaspora populations have their own distinct genetic signatures, shedding light on their origins and history. In addition to the age-old question of whether Jews are simply people who share a religion or are a distinct population, the scientific verdict is settling on the latter.

Although the origin of the Jews has been traced, archeologically, to the Middle East in the second millennium B.C.E., what happened next has been more opaque. To sort it out, researchers collected DNA from Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, and Ashkenazi Jews around New York City; Turkish Sephardic Jews in Seattle; Greek Sephardic Jews in Thessaloniki and Athens; and Italian Jews in Rome as part of the Jewish HapMap Project. (All four grandparents of each participant had to have come from the same community.) As the scientists will report in the next issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, the analysis shows that “each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

Jewish populations, that is, have retained their genetic coherence just as they have retained their cultural and religious traditions, despite migrations from the Middle East into Europe, North Africa, and beyond over the centuries, says geneticist Harry Ostrer of NYU Langone Medical Center, who led the study. Each Diaspora group has distinctive genetic features “representative of each group’s genetic history,” he says, but each also “shares a set of common genetic threads” dating back to their common origin in the Middle East. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

The various Jewish groups were more related to each other than to non-Jews, as well. Within every Jewish group, individuals shared as much of their genome as two fourth or fifth cousins, with Italian, Syrian, Iranian, and Iraqi Jews the most inbred, in the sense that they married within the small, close-knit community. In general, the genetic similarity of any two groups was larger the closer they lived to one another, but there was an exception: Turkish and Italian Jews were most closely related genetically, but are quite separated geographically.

Historical records suggest that Iranian and Iraqi Jews date from communities that formed in Persia and Babylon, respectively, in the fourth to sixth centuries B.C.E., and the DNA confirms that. The genetic signatures of these groups show that they remained relatively isolated—inbred—for some 3,000 years. The DNA also reveals that these Middle Eastern Jews diverged from the ancestors of today’s European Jews about 100 to 150 generations ago, or sometime during the first millennium B.C.E.

That’s when the Jewish communities in Italy, the Balkans, and North Africa originated, from Jews who migrated or were expelled from Palestine and from people who converted to Judaism during Hellenic times. During that period Jews proselytized with an effectiveness that would put today’s Mormons to shame: at the height of the Roman Empire, as the Roman historian Josephus chronicled, mass conversions produced 6 million practicing Jews, or 10 percent of the population of the Roman Empire. The conversions brought in DNA that had not been part of the original gene pool in the land of Abraham.

The DNA analysis undermines the claim that most of today’s Jews, particularly the Ashkenazi, are the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars—which has angered many in the Jewish community as an implicit attack on the Jews’ claim to the land of Israel, since it implies that today’s Jews have no blood ties to the original Jews of the Middle East. Instead, find the scientists, at most there was “limited admixture with local populations, including Khazars and Slavs ... during the 1,000-year (second millennium) history of the European Jews.”

Of the non-Jewish Europeans, northern Italians were most genetically similar to the Jews, followed by the Sardinians and French. The Druze, Bedouins, and Palestinians were closest to the Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian Jews. That is evidence of “a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations.” Adds Ostrer, “the study supports the idea of a Jewish people linked by a shared genetic history. Yet the admixture with European people explains why so many European and Syrian Jews have blue eyes and blond hair.”

Southern Europeans were the closest genetic cousins of Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Italian Jews, reflecting the large-scale conversion of these Southern European populations to Judaism some 2,000 years ago, when European Jewry was forming. The Sephardic groups share genetic makers with North Africans, probably a result of marriages between Moors and Jews in Spain from 711 to 1492.

Several details of the Ashkenazi genome imply that centuries ago, the population experienced a severe bottleneck, in which the size of a group plummets, followed by a rapid expansion. That jibes with the historical record showing that the Jewish population in Western and Eastern Europe bottomed out at about 50,000 in the Middle Ages and then soared to 500,000 by the 19th century, growing at twice the rate of non-Jews—something called “the demographic miracle.”

Analysis of Jewish genomes has been yielding fascinating findings for more than a decade. A pioneer in this field, Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona, made the first big splash when he discovered that genetics supports the biblical account of a priestly family, the Cohanim, descended from Aaron, the brother of Moses: one specific genetic marker on the Y chromosome (which is passed on from father to son, as membership in the priestly family would be) is found in 98.5 percent of people who self-identify as Cohanim, he and colleagues reported in a 1997 paper in Nature (the PBS science series Nova did a nice segment on that work, summarized here). The Cohanim DNA has been found in both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, evidence that it predates the time when the two groups diverged, about 1,000 years ago. DNA can also be used to infer when particular genetic markers appeared, and suggests that the Cohanim emerged about 106 generations ago, making it fall during what is thought to be the period of the exodus from Egypt, and thus Aaron’s lifetime.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/03/the-dna-of-abraham-s-children.html


I think this study is misleading and biased, don't all humans share a common ancestry? Are you telling me Sammy Davis Jr shared a common ancestry with Jerry Seinfeld? In the study it says Jews are genetically close to Southern Europeans like the Spanish, Italians, and Pourtuguese, so we can consider them to be of the same Jewish "ethnic" group? Even the name of the article shows the study's bias, by calling it The DNA of Abraham's Children, giving the Jews a "divine" right to the land of Palestine.
Posted By: Shots

Re: Long Island - 04/07/11 05:46 PM

This thread is ass.
Posted By: Mickey_MeatBalls_DeMonica

Re: Long Island - 04/08/11 07:56 AM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
What does Jew have to do with ethnic background, I thought it was a religion, not a ethnicity or race?

It has been proven through DNA testing, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Jews carry a common genome (share a common ancestry), and are not just a random collection of people who practice the same religion.

By Sharon Begley, Newsweek:

June 3, 2010

The DNA of Abraham’s Children

Analysis of Jewish genomes refutes the Khazar claim.

Jews have historically considered themselves “people of the book” (am hasefer in Hebrew), referring to sacred tomes, but the phrase is turning out to have an equally powerful, if unintended, meaning: scientists are able to read Jewish genomes like a history book. The latest DNA volume weighs in on the controversial, centuries-old (and now revived in a 2008 book) claim that European Jews are all the descendants of Khazars, a Turkic group of the north Caucasus who converted to Judaism in the late eighth and early ninth century. The DNA has spoken: no.

In the wake of studies in the 1990s that supported biblically based notions of a priestly caste descended from Aaron, brother of Moses, an ambitious new project to analyze genomes collected from Jewish volunteers has yielded its first discoveries. In a paper with the kind of catchy title you rarely see in science journals—“Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era”—scientists report that the Jews of the Diaspora share a set of telltale genetic markers, supporting the traditional belief that Jews scattered around the world have a common ancestry. But various Diaspora populations have their own distinct genetic signatures, shedding light on their origins and history. In addition to the age-old question of whether Jews are simply people who share a religion or are a distinct population, the scientific verdict is settling on the latter.

Although the origin of the Jews has been traced, archeologically, to the Middle East in the second millennium B.C.E., what happened next has been more opaque. To sort it out, researchers collected DNA from Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, and Ashkenazi Jews around New York City; Turkish Sephardic Jews in Seattle; Greek Sephardic Jews in Thessaloniki and Athens; and Italian Jews in Rome as part of the Jewish HapMap Project. (All four grandparents of each participant had to have come from the same community.) As the scientists will report in the next issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, the analysis shows that “each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

Jewish populations, that is, have retained their genetic coherence just as they have retained their cultural and religious traditions, despite migrations from the Middle East into Europe, North Africa, and beyond over the centuries, says geneticist Harry Ostrer of NYU Langone Medical Center, who led the study. Each Diaspora group has distinctive genetic features “representative of each group’s genetic history,” he says, but each also “shares a set of common genetic threads” dating back to their common origin in the Middle East. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

The various Jewish groups were more related to each other than to non-Jews, as well. Within every Jewish group, individuals shared as much of their genome as two fourth or fifth cousins, with Italian, Syrian, Iranian, and Iraqi Jews the most inbred, in the sense that they married within the small, close-knit community. In general, the genetic similarity of any two groups was larger the closer they lived to one another, but there was an exception: Turkish and Italian Jews were most closely related genetically, but are quite separated geographically.

Historical records suggest that Iranian and Iraqi Jews date from communities that formed in Persia and Babylon, respectively, in the fourth to sixth centuries B.C.E., and the DNA confirms that. The genetic signatures of these groups show that they remained relatively isolated—inbred—for some 3,000 years. The DNA also reveals that these Middle Eastern Jews diverged from the ancestors of today’s European Jews about 100 to 150 generations ago, or sometime during the first millennium B.C.E.

That’s when the Jewish communities in Italy, the Balkans, and North Africa originated, from Jews who migrated or were expelled from Palestine and from people who converted to Judaism during Hellenic times. During that period Jews proselytized with an effectiveness that would put today’s Mormons to shame: at the height of the Roman Empire, as the Roman historian Josephus chronicled, mass conversions produced 6 million practicing Jews, or 10 percent of the population of the Roman Empire. The conversions brought in DNA that had not been part of the original gene pool in the land of Abraham.

The DNA analysis undermines the claim that most of today’s Jews, particularly the Ashkenazi, are the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars—which has angered many in the Jewish community as an implicit attack on the Jews’ claim to the land of Israel, since it implies that today’s Jews have no blood ties to the original Jews of the Middle East. Instead, find the scientists, at most there was “limited admixture with local populations, including Khazars and Slavs ... during the 1,000-year (second millennium) history of the European Jews.”

Of the non-Jewish Europeans, northern Italians were most genetically similar to the Jews, followed by the Sardinians and French. The Druze, Bedouins, and Palestinians were closest to the Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian Jews. That is evidence of “a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations.” Adds Ostrer, “the study supports the idea of a Jewish people linked by a shared genetic history. Yet the admixture with European people explains why so many European and Syrian Jews have blue eyes and blond hair.”

Southern Europeans were the closest genetic cousins of Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Italian Jews, reflecting the large-scale conversion of these Southern European populations to Judaism some 2,000 years ago, when European Jewry was forming. The Sephardic groups share genetic makers with North Africans, probably a result of marriages between Moors and Jews in Spain from 711 to 1492.

Several details of the Ashkenazi genome imply that centuries ago, the population experienced a severe bottleneck, in which the size of a group plummets, followed by a rapid expansion. That jibes with the historical record showing that the Jewish population in Western and Eastern Europe bottomed out at about 50,000 in the Middle Ages and then soared to 500,000 by the 19th century, growing at twice the rate of non-Jews—something called “the demographic miracle.”

Analysis of Jewish genomes has been yielding fascinating findings for more than a decade. A pioneer in this field, Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona, made the first big splash when he discovered that genetics supports the biblical account of a priestly family, the Cohanim, descended from Aaron, the brother of Moses: one specific genetic marker on the Y chromosome (which is passed on from father to son, as membership in the priestly family would be) is found in 98.5 percent of people who self-identify as Cohanim, he and colleagues reported in a 1997 paper in Nature (the PBS science series Nova did a nice segment on that work, summarized here). The Cohanim DNA has been found in both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, evidence that it predates the time when the two groups diverged, about 1,000 years ago. DNA can also be used to infer when particular genetic markers appeared, and suggests that the Cohanim emerged about 106 generations ago, making it fall during what is thought to be the period of the exodus from Egypt, and thus Aaron’s lifetime.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/03/the-dna-of-abraham-s-children.html


I think this study is misleading and biased, don't all humans share a common ancestry? Are you telling me Sammy Davis Jr shared a common ancestry with Jerry Seinfeld? In the study it says Jews are genetically close to Southern Europeans like the Spanish, Italians, and Pourtuguese, so we can consider them to be of the same Jewish "ethnic" group? Even the name of the article shows the study's bias, by calling it The DNA of Abraham's Children, giving the Jews a "divine" right to the land of Palestine.


No because Sammy Davis was a convert to Judaism. Duh. Anyway, I dont think the study was biased, actually rather interesting. & bias in what way? Jews are widely known as the descendants of Abraham. Its almost a generic term.

Originally Posted By: Shots
This thread is ass.

That is perhaps the most useless post Ive ever read on the GBB.
Posted By: Sonny_Black

Re: Long Island - 04/08/11 11:50 AM

Originally Posted By: Mickey_MeatBalls_DeMonica

Originally Posted By: Shots
This thread is ass.

That is perhaps the most useless post Ive ever read on the GBB.


What he probably meant by that is that this topic is about Long Island, not about Jews...
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/08/11 08:06 PM

Originally Posted By: Mickey_MeatBalls_DeMonica
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
What does Jew have to do with ethnic background, I thought it was a religion, not a ethnicity or race?

It has been proven through DNA testing, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Jews carry a common genome (share a common ancestry), and are not just a random collection of people who practice the same religion.

By Sharon Begley, Newsweek:

June 3, 2010

The DNA of Abraham’s Children

Analysis of Jewish genomes refutes the Khazar claim.

Jews have historically considered themselves “people of the book” (am hasefer in Hebrew), referring to sacred tomes, but the phrase is turning out to have an equally powerful, if unintended, meaning: scientists are able to read Jewish genomes like a history book. The latest DNA volume weighs in on the controversial, centuries-old (and now revived in a 2008 book) claim that European Jews are all the descendants of Khazars, a Turkic group of the north Caucasus who converted to Judaism in the late eighth and early ninth century. The DNA has spoken: no.

In the wake of studies in the 1990s that supported biblically based notions of a priestly caste descended from Aaron, brother of Moses, an ambitious new project to analyze genomes collected from Jewish volunteers has yielded its first discoveries. In a paper with the kind of catchy title you rarely see in science journals—“Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era”—scientists report that the Jews of the Diaspora share a set of telltale genetic markers, supporting the traditional belief that Jews scattered around the world have a common ancestry. But various Diaspora populations have their own distinct genetic signatures, shedding light on their origins and history. In addition to the age-old question of whether Jews are simply people who share a religion or are a distinct population, the scientific verdict is settling on the latter.

Although the origin of the Jews has been traced, archeologically, to the Middle East in the second millennium B.C.E., what happened next has been more opaque. To sort it out, researchers collected DNA from Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, and Ashkenazi Jews around New York City; Turkish Sephardic Jews in Seattle; Greek Sephardic Jews in Thessaloniki and Athens; and Italian Jews in Rome as part of the Jewish HapMap Project. (All four grandparents of each participant had to have come from the same community.) As the scientists will report in the next issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, the analysis shows that “each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

Jewish populations, that is, have retained their genetic coherence just as they have retained their cultural and religious traditions, despite migrations from the Middle East into Europe, North Africa, and beyond over the centuries, says geneticist Harry Ostrer of NYU Langone Medical Center, who led the study. Each Diaspora group has distinctive genetic features “representative of each group’s genetic history,” he says, but each also “shares a set of common genetic threads” dating back to their common origin in the Middle East. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own distinctive cluster, indicating the shared ancestry and relative genetic isolation of the members of each of those groups.”

The various Jewish groups were more related to each other than to non-Jews, as well. Within every Jewish group, individuals shared as much of their genome as two fourth or fifth cousins, with Italian, Syrian, Iranian, and Iraqi Jews the most inbred, in the sense that they married within the small, close-knit community. In general, the genetic similarity of any two groups was larger the closer they lived to one another, but there was an exception: Turkish and Italian Jews were most closely related genetically, but are quite separated geographically.

Historical records suggest that Iranian and Iraqi Jews date from communities that formed in Persia and Babylon, respectively, in the fourth to sixth centuries B.C.E., and the DNA confirms that. The genetic signatures of these groups show that they remained relatively isolated—inbred—for some 3,000 years. The DNA also reveals that these Middle Eastern Jews diverged from the ancestors of today’s European Jews about 100 to 150 generations ago, or sometime during the first millennium B.C.E.

That’s when the Jewish communities in Italy, the Balkans, and North Africa originated, from Jews who migrated or were expelled from Palestine and from people who converted to Judaism during Hellenic times. During that period Jews proselytized with an effectiveness that would put today’s Mormons to shame: at the height of the Roman Empire, as the Roman historian Josephus chronicled, mass conversions produced 6 million practicing Jews, or 10 percent of the population of the Roman Empire. The conversions brought in DNA that had not been part of the original gene pool in the land of Abraham.

The DNA analysis undermines the claim that most of today’s Jews, particularly the Ashkenazi, are the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars—which has angered many in the Jewish community as an implicit attack on the Jews’ claim to the land of Israel, since it implies that today’s Jews have no blood ties to the original Jews of the Middle East. Instead, find the scientists, at most there was “limited admixture with local populations, including Khazars and Slavs ... during the 1,000-year (second millennium) history of the European Jews.”

Of the non-Jewish Europeans, northern Italians were most genetically similar to the Jews, followed by the Sardinians and French. The Druze, Bedouins, and Palestinians were closest to the Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian Jews. That is evidence of “a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations.” Adds Ostrer, “the study supports the idea of a Jewish people linked by a shared genetic history. Yet the admixture with European people explains why so many European and Syrian Jews have blue eyes and blond hair.”

Southern Europeans were the closest genetic cousins of Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Italian Jews, reflecting the large-scale conversion of these Southern European populations to Judaism some 2,000 years ago, when European Jewry was forming. The Sephardic groups share genetic makers with North Africans, probably a result of marriages between Moors and Jews in Spain from 711 to 1492.

Several details of the Ashkenazi genome imply that centuries ago, the population experienced a severe bottleneck, in which the size of a group plummets, followed by a rapid expansion. That jibes with the historical record showing that the Jewish population in Western and Eastern Europe bottomed out at about 50,000 in the Middle Ages and then soared to 500,000 by the 19th century, growing at twice the rate of non-Jews—something called “the demographic miracle.”

Analysis of Jewish genomes has been yielding fascinating findings for more than a decade. A pioneer in this field, Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona, made the first big splash when he discovered that genetics supports the biblical account of a priestly family, the Cohanim, descended from Aaron, the brother of Moses: one specific genetic marker on the Y chromosome (which is passed on from father to son, as membership in the priestly family would be) is found in 98.5 percent of people who self-identify as Cohanim, he and colleagues reported in a 1997 paper in Nature (the PBS science series Nova did a nice segment on that work, summarized here). The Cohanim DNA has been found in both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, evidence that it predates the time when the two groups diverged, about 1,000 years ago. DNA can also be used to infer when particular genetic markers appeared, and suggests that the Cohanim emerged about 106 generations ago, making it fall during what is thought to be the period of the exodus from Egypt, and thus Aaron’s lifetime.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/03/the-dna-of-abraham-s-children.html


I think this study is misleading and biased, don't all humans share a common ancestry? Are you telling me Sammy Davis Jr shared a common ancestry with Jerry Seinfeld? In the study it says Jews are genetically close to Southern Europeans like the Spanish, Italians, and Pourtuguese, so we can consider them to be of the same Jewish "ethnic" group? Even the name of the article shows the study's bias, by calling it The DNA of Abraham's Children, giving the Jews a "divine" right to the land of Palestine.


No because Sammy Davis was a convert to Judaism. Duh. Anyway, I dont think the study was biased, actually rather interesting. & bias in what way? Jews are widely known as the descendants of Abraham. Its almost a generic term.

Originally Posted By: Shots
This thread is ass.

That is perhaps the most useless post Ive ever read on the GBB.


Uh, if you actually read the article it says the number of Jews in the past has been bolstered by conversions, and they "brought in new DNA." There are actually black skinned Jews from Africa. Are you saying you have to be born a Jew to be a Jew? Yes, the article is bias, it tries to make it seem the Jews have a divine right to Israel. Let's be honest adults for about 10 seconds, in the West, if you write an article, book, or speak negatively about the Jews you're career is bound to be over, if your not thrown in prison (that happens in some European countries, Australia, and Canada).
Posted By: SC

Re: Long Island - 04/08/11 09:17 PM

Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Yes, the article is bias, it tries to make it seem the Jews have a divine right to Israel. Let's be honest adults for about 10 seconds, in the West, if you write an article, book, or speak negatively about the Jews you're career is bound to be over, if your not thrown in prison (that happens in some European countries, Australia, and Canada).


Thank you for providing that perfect example of anti-Semitism.
Posted By: GerryLang

Re: Long Island - 04/08/11 11:12 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: GerryLang
Yes, the article is bias, it tries to make it seem the Jews have a divine right to Israel. Let's be honest adults for about 10 seconds, in the West, if you write an article, book, or speak negatively about the Jews you're career is bound to be over, if your not thrown in prison (that happens in some European countries, Australia, and Canada).


Thank you for providing that perfect example of anti-Semitism.


Baseless accusations, go ask Rick Sanchez if I'm right, or Helen Thomas. Former POTUS, humanitarian, and world renown peacemaker Jimmy Carter has been called an antisemite because he doesn't think the US taxpayers should be forced to give billions of dollars every year to Israel so they can buy weapons to kill Palestinians, and build fences to cage them in like animals.
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET