Home

Sequels better than the original

Posted By: Fame

Sequels better than the original - 07/18/06 02:10 AM

Many ppl consider GF2 a better film than GF1.
Same thing with SW - many ppl rate TESB above ANH.
I disagree with both.
Yes, GF2 has the young Vito scenes, and yes, TESB has the Vader theme. But overall, the originals are better movies. (that doesnt diminish the fact that GF2 is one of my top 10 movies)

Now, my choices for sequels that are better than the originals :

Terminator II (...and T1 bloody rocks, so that should tell you just how amazing is T2...)
Superman II (best superhero film to date. Beats the crap outta stupid Spiderman films, and much better than Batman Returns & Begins. Yes, I totally mean that)
The Bourne Supremacy
Batman Returns

Thats all I can think of now.

Any other superior sequels?
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/18/06 02:24 AM

The Empire Strikes Back is better than A New Hope. I thought that was a universal truth.
Posted By: Don Vercetti

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/18/06 02:34 AM

I think Empire is better then the first. It's darker side is more impacting to me. As for The Godfather films, it depends when you ask me.

Batman Returns is better then Batman, IMO.
Posted By: hova4ever9

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/18/06 02:49 AM

The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly is better than few more dollars and A Fist Full Of Dollars. I know they aren't direct sequels but it has the same main character in all of them
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/18/06 04:09 AM

Actually, THE GOOD, THE BAD, & THE UGLY is a "prequel" to FISTFULL OF DOLLARS and FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE. Why? Because Eastwood doesn't get his trademark coat vest until the end of UGLY. But for practical purposes, I'll let it slide.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 02:39 PM

I always thought that Aliens was better than Alien. They should've stopped at the second one, though.
Posted By: Daigo Mick Friend

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 03:22 PM

Hands down the best sequel to date

Toy Story 2
Posted By: MistaMista Tom Hagen

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 03:34 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sicilian Babe:
I always thought that Aliens was better than Alien. They should've stopped at the second one, though.
I've seen this said other places and completely do not understand it. I thought Alien blew Aliens away, no contest.
Posted By: Debz

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 04:16 PM

I really liked Indiana Jones 2 & 3 ! I think they were just as good as the first movie
Posted By: long_lost_corleone

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 04:36 PM

Weekend at Bernie's 2.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 04:48 PM

ALIENS rocks, but ALIEN is a superior picture. Even James Cameron has admitted as much.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 05:53 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
Actually, THE GOOD, THE BAD, & THE UGLY is a "prequel" to FISTFULL OF DOLLARS and FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE. Why? Because Eastwood doesn't get his trademark coat vest until the end of UGLY. But for practical purposes, I'll let it slide.
Hmm, I never picked that up. You learn something new everyday
Posted By: goombah

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 09:04 PM

I agree about Empire Strikes Back being better than Star Wars. But I always thought GF was better than GFII. And that's not a slam on II.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/20/06 10:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:
But I always thought GF was better than GFII. And that's not a slam on II.
I agree. Part II is good but nothing, IMO, beats the original
Posted By: MistaMista Tom Hagen

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/21/06 12:29 AM

Disagreed
Posted By: goombah

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/21/06 12:46 AM

I'll go one step further. GFII is probably the best sequel ever made. I don't consider II a sequel, but more of a continuation of the original. I like the original better because of the actors who played the characters - Tessio, Clemenza, Carlo, Sonny, Luca, Woltz, Sollozzo, and most importantly, Vito. I realize their younger counterparts play in II, but it's not the same. Although as much as I like the characters, I don't think there has been a better antagonist in a movie than Hyman Roth.

The plot in II is far more complex and sophisticated. Telling a dual storyline was a brilliant idea by FFC. Despite all of its great qualities, I rank II slightly behind the original.
Posted By: Enzo Scifo

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/21/06 12:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:
more of a continuation of the original.
And what do you think the definition of 'sequel' is?
Posted By: Enzo Scifo

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/21/06 12:56 AM

I like Alien more than Aliens, Empire Strikes Back more than A New hope, and GF I more than II. BTW.
Posted By: The Iceman

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/21/06 06:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
Actually, THE GOOD, THE BAD, & THE UGLY is a "prequel" to FISTFULL OF DOLLARS and FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE. Why? Because Eastwood doesn't get his trademark coat vest until the end of UGLY. But for practical purposes, I'll let it slide.
One of the few times I find myself agreeing with you.


Sequels better than the original?

GodfatherII
Empire Strikes Back
Posted By: flucko

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/24/06 05:11 AM

Here's my list:

- The Godfather: Part II
- Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
- Spider-Man 2
- Toy Story 2
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/24/06 02:12 PM

Don't forget about X2 beating out the original. I'd also say Kill Bill Volume 2 was better than Kill Bill Volume 1.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/24/06 05:47 PM

I agree Irish on both counts.

Too bad X3 sucked fucking outright(damn, I should post my version of it if I had made it!)
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/24/06 06:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
Too bad X3 sucked fucking outright(damn, I should post my version of it if I had made it!)
Still waiting on it :p
Posted By: goombah

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/25/06 04:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Enzo Scifo:
[quote]Originally posted by goombah:
[b] more of a continuation of the original.
And what do you think the definition of 'sequel' is? [/b][/quote]I know you're joking, but I think GF & GFII are continuations vs another separate story. When I think of sequels (not necessarily good ones), look at the 2nd Die Hard, Rocky, Friday the 13th, etc. They take the same theme, some of the same things that worked in the original and just repackage.

I think GFII picks up perfectly from the time we see Neri close the door on Kay at the end of the original and when we first see the Corleone's at the first communion.

I'm not saying there are no similarities between the first & second GF - I think it's far more clever and better than any other sequel, Part II - whatever one wants to call it.
Posted By: Paul Krendler

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/25/06 07:54 PM

Agree with GFII and TESB without a doubt - both superior to the originals.

Disagree with Spiderman 2, purely because Willem Dafoe as the Green Goblin is twenty times the villain that Doc Ock could ever be. And the Batman franchise? The previous films pale in comparison to the masterpiece that is Batman Begins.

Have yet to see Superman Returns, or Clerks II. MInd you, I've not seen Clerks yet...
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/25/06 08:10 PM

I think Before Sunset is a very worthy expansion of Before Sunrise.

And 2046 may well just be even more devastating than In the Mood for Love.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Sequels better than the original - 07/25/06 08:41 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Paul Krendler:
Disagree with Spiderman 2, purely because Willem Dafoe as the Green Goblin is twenty times the villain that Doc Ock could ever be.
I agree. Willam Dafoe was the MAN in Spider-Man and is the main reason why I like it more than 2
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET