Another Myth about Prison Sentences

@crash

Do u realize u admitted that crack sentences are more harsh than powder coke sentences. That kinda destroys your argument

it was a combination of the mostly Democrat Black Congressional Caucus and Republicans who wanted these laws for the purpose of getting rid of those offenders who were causing the most damage to Black communities. So it wasn't racist, the purpose of the harsher sentences was to PROTECT Black communities.

Its getting old.

Here we go.

The 'it can't be racist because some black people supported it' argument.

Crack is a very dangerous and destructive drug hence the harsh sentences. Just because it affects blacks much more than whites doesnt mean the sentences are racist.
As i said, the penalties for crystal meth are actually more harsh than crack and guess what ??? The overwhelming majority arrested and sentenced for crystal meth are white people. Isnt that raicist ???

Do you know the penalties for LSD are more severe than crack? Most people arrested for LSD are white.

Stop making excuses for irresponsible and violent behavior at the hands of blacks. Its getting old.
You wanna make a difference, go speak to blacks about the dangers of having kids out of wedlock.

No, actually I never posted anything like that. And anyone can read my comment to see that I didn't. Anything else?

The 'it can't be racist because some black people supported it' argument.

^Pathetic.

As long as I come up with something. And, I always do. Even the Beatles did several covers.

^^^^^

Maybe yoda orchestrated those 3 recent college rapist (who happened to be white) that all got off with less than 6 months served. Only 2 of them have to register as sex offender.....that's fucked up

I think it's pretty obvious what anyone would mean by saying it's a racial thing, and that is that the white suspect got a slap in the wrist. Just put a black face on Brock Turner, and try to picture him walking out of jail this soon for raping a girl by a trash dumpster.

The simplest explanation is the best for the simple minded.

@faithful

rapist and pedophiles almost always get light sentences

brock turner, john enochs, and austin wilkerson admitted rape and served no real time

there ain't no way in hell these cretins should be on the streets to rape again

There are also times when a young woman falsely accuses her sex partner of rape because she changed her mind the next day. Some types of Third Wave Feminism actually encourage this.

I don't have that much time anymore

It's like having to explain that Lucky Luciano didn't create the Mafia to every new member every five minutes, or how forty mobsters weren't slain across the country in the wake of Salvatore Maranzano's death, or having to prove that the "Last Testament of Lucky Luciano" is a fraud. I wrote lengthy pieces on all this and the facts are out there.

Now, I'll get back to living my life.

Another example of the injustice system. A 19-year-old raped a baby when he was 16 and put up a video on social media and only gets a 10-year suspended sentence. There better be some outrage.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-n...tumwa-Vile-Evil

Responding to the criticism, Gary Oldenburger, the county attorney for Wapello County, defended the sentence in a statement dated Thursday, presenting Mr. Grooms as the unwitting lackey of child pornographers who tricked him into the assault, as they had done to hundreds of other children.

By pretending to be a girl his age, then 16, the two men, one in New Orleans and one in Ireland, persuaded the teenager to perform sex acts he wouldn’t otherwise have done, Mr. Oldenburger said.

Mr. Grooms did not know he was being recorded, the prosecutor said in the statement.

He added that the child was uninjured, no pain was inflicted, and the child was too young to be aware of what was happening. Though the crime was no “less horrible because the child was too young to understand,” the lack of injury is an important factor in sentencing, he said.

Mr. Oldenburger said the case likely would have been dismissed had it gone to trial. The parents of the victim did not want Mr. Grooms to serve significant jail time and were more focused on him receiving treatment, he said.

The prosecutor also said that important witnesses were unwilling to testify, so the video might not have been admissible as evidence, making a trial more difficult.

He said a long sentence likely would have been overturned on appeal, with a quick parole. The 860 days he had already spent in jail would have counted toward his time served.

Mr. Oldenburger said psychologists did not believe Mr. Grooms was a high-risk candidate for committing more offenses.

“If Grooms was sent to prison for a long period of time rather than being sentenced to probation, he more than likely would be a greater risk to the community after his release than he will be after serving the sentence he received,” he said.