Posted By: J Geoff
Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/12 07:35 AM
Walt Disney's most awkward cartoon* ever?
*=Except for those toons they did with the embarrasing, cringeworthy racist chariactures.
*=Except for those toons they did with the embarrasing, cringeworthy racist chariactures.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/12 04:55 PM
No chance of a "Disney Princess" starring in that one, ronnie! 
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/12 07:27 PM
Geez, could have been one I saw when I was in school. Such a "production" (of sorts). And, from Disney no less. 
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/12 11:13 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Walt Disney's most awkward cartoon* ever?
*=Except for those toons they did with the embarrasing, cringeworthy racist chariactures.
*=Except for those toons they did with the embarrasing, cringeworthy racist chariactures.
Okay, I'm sorry - I can't help it. This one is waayy too easy. Here it goes... the Disney Princess for this feature was named Flo or Scarlette. I know - I'm terrible.
Posted By: Mickey_MeatBalls_DeMonica
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/11/12 10:28 PM
...oh thats just awful. Thanks a lot Mark. 
Mrs Meatballs lined up the Nic Cage and Nicole Kidman flick Trespass last night. Checking out the sypnosis and reviews and stuff, I noticed it did...abysmally. A budget of $35 million, only brought in $25,000. Not a typo, apparently it only brought in $25 grand, and was pulled from cinemas after three weeks.
So I wasn't exactly hyped about watching it but she likes all sorts of kitschy crap, so I watched it with her...and was genuinely surprised it did so badly. Its NOT a great film by any stretch, but in my own opinion, not nearly as bad as certain other films that got wider releases. I mean, I watched it all. It was mildly entertaining. Im not the hugest Cage fan, but he can go alright. Kidman doesn't seem to be trying that hard but.
TL, DR - Watched a crappy movie, wasn't quite as crappy as I expected. Wondered why people hated it so much
Mrs Meatballs lined up the Nic Cage and Nicole Kidman flick Trespass last night. Checking out the sypnosis and reviews and stuff, I noticed it did...abysmally. A budget of $35 million, only brought in $25,000. Not a typo, apparently it only brought in $25 grand, and was pulled from cinemas after three weeks.
So I wasn't exactly hyped about watching it but she likes all sorts of kitschy crap, so I watched it with her...and was genuinely surprised it did so badly. Its NOT a great film by any stretch, but in my own opinion, not nearly as bad as certain other films that got wider releases. I mean, I watched it all. It was mildly entertaining. Im not the hugest Cage fan, but he can go alright. Kidman doesn't seem to be trying that hard but.
TL, DR - Watched a crappy movie, wasn't quite as crappy as I expected. Wondered why people hated it so much
Posted By: calvis
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/12 10:35 AM
I have just watched Mission impossible 4 movie it was an adventurous movie like its Earlier 3 parts of Mission impossible series
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/12 04:28 AM
I just watched The Natural. Why did Harriet shoot Roy?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/12 07:10 PM
Because she was a serial killer that was killing the best athletes in every sport. She was originally going to kill The Whammer, but when Roy was able to strike him out, proving he was better, she switched her attention to Roy. I believe that you see one of the characters reading a newspaper that has an article about another athlete that she murdered.
Posted By: XDCX
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/12 12:41 AM
Finally got around to watching SUPER 8. It turned out A LOT better than I thought. I went in assuming something along the lines of CLOVERFIELD (which sucked), but I was pleasantly surprised. The film wasn't short on sci-fi cliches (monster/alien escapes a train/ship/UFO/etc. wreck, a bunch of kids stumble upon it and investigate, military rolls into town, etc.) but the film had heart, and I quite enjoyed it.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/12 04:33 AM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Because she was a serial killer that was killing the best athletes in every sport. She was originally going to kill The Whammer, but when Roy was able to strike him out, proving he was better, she switched her attention to Roy. I believe that you see one of the characters reading a newspaper that has an article about another athlete that she murdered.
Grazie.
Posted By: venzuiella
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/12 10:12 AM
There was a movie grown ups , full with comedy and fun all the time. All the friends have pay tribute to their former coach in anew way.
Posted By: veneratio
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/12 04:11 AM
I just saw the movie 'Shame' which I thought was fantastic. Amazing film, well worth a watch.
Posted By: veneratio
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/12 04:11 AM
Has anyone seen The Ides Of March? Any good?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/03/12 07:47 PM
VH1 is showing, "The Temptations",(based on the 60's singing group). It's actually on a lot but it seems I always catch it in the middle. It's on now and I am enjoying not only the music but the flashback to that era with many familiar group names. Can't help but tap my feet. 
TIS
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/12 06:40 PM
TCM showed The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms from 1953. That was such a great era for sci-fi.
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/12 06:47 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
TCM showed The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms from 1953. That was such a great era for sci-fi.
One of my favorite movies from a GREAT era for movies.
We had the advantage of being scared by something that was new to us then.... the Atomic Bomb, and its effects.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 05:49 AM
Watched "The King's Speech" last night. Really well done. All of the actors did a splendid job. It was well-written and well-acted and even had a few laughs. What more could you want?
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 08:58 AM
Watched the film/documentary SENNA last night. All about the brilliant Brazilian Formula 1 racing driver Ayrton Senna. Very good and touching show, well worth a watch!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 05:13 PM
Watched Game Change. Not bad. I'm not a Woody Harrelson fan, but he was pretty good in it. I think they actually got Palin to play herself too.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 05:54 PM
I agree Oli. Talk about in over her head. 
It was much better than I had anticipated. I did miss the first half hour however, and will try to catch it later today.
They didn't show a whole lot of McCain did they? The entire cast was great. Moore did a really good job IMHO, and I agree with you on Harrelson. I'm thinking a couple emmys next year, but we'll see.
TIS
It was much better than I had anticipated. I did miss the first half hour however, and will try to catch it later today.They didn't show a whole lot of McCain did they? The entire cast was great. Moore did a really good job IMHO, and I agree with you on Harrelson. I'm thinking a couple emmys next year, but we'll see.
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 07:01 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
I agree Oli. Talk about in over her head. It was much better than I had anticipated. I did miss the first half hour however, and will try to catch it later today.
They didn't show a whole lot of McCain did they? The entire cast was great. Moore did a really good job IMHO, and I agree with you on Harrelson. I'm thinking a couple emmys next year, but we'll see.
TIS
It was much better than I had anticipated. I did miss the first half hour however, and will try to catch it later today.They didn't show a whole lot of McCain did they? The entire cast was great. Moore did a really good job IMHO, and I agree with you on Harrelson. I'm thinking a couple emmys next year, but we'll see.
TIS
I just saw Chris Wallace inteerview McCain who, not unexpectedly, decried the movie. He stated that although he does swear, he didn't do it as much as the movie portrayed him doing it. When Wallace informed him about Steve Schmidt's (portrayed by Woody) comment that the movie was accurate, McCain replied that that was unfortunate.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 07:08 PM
I saw Nicole (forgot last name) on yesterday before I saw the film. Amazing that after all she tried to do in the campaign, she said she simply couldn't vote and ended up NOT voting in the election. I can't say much surprised me with how they portrayed Palin, can you? She bit off way way more than she could chew.
TIS
Btw, I missed the first half hour last night but am watching now on HBO.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/12 07:11 PM
Sundance Channel is playing "Standing in the Shadows of Motown," about Motown's studio musicians The Funk Brothers. It's about half over, but will replay on Friday.
Posted By: Hisenberg
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/12 05:15 AM
21 jump street! Fucking awesome!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/12 01:21 AM
Just watched Attack of the 5 Ft. 2 Women. How about these blasts from the past: Stella Stevens and Lauren Tewes.
I was surprised to learn that Stella has worked consistently over the years. She still looks pretty good.
I was surprised to learn that Stella has worked consistently over the years. She still looks pretty good.
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 03:59 AM
I didn't know what to except from 50/50 (2011), with Seth Rogen + a cancer theme and all, but this was actually pretty good. A full range of emotions going on in this one, and Rogen was well restrained. Third Rock's Joseph Gordon-Levitt* was really good, as usual.
*Just realized he has a high-billing in this year's The Dark Knight Rises, and plays Robert Todd Lincoln in Lincoln, among other things. Good for him! I always thought he was very good in the more obscure films I've seen him in.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 04:26 AM
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
I didn't know what to except from 50/50 (2011), with Seth Rogen + a cancer theme and all, but this was actually pretty good. A full range of emotions going on in this one, and Rogen was well restrained. Third Rock's Joseph Gordon-Levitt* was really good, as usual.
*Just realized he has a high-billing in this year's The Dark Knight Rises, and plays Robert Todd Lincoln in Lincoln, among other things. Good for him! I always thought he was very good in the more obscure films I've seen him in.
Yeah JGL is one of those talented people who's been steadily accumulated a very solid respectable resume, commercial and artistic. I would be absolutely surprised if he doesn't break out as a major movie star within the next 5 years. He almost feels like Johnny Depp before his Pirates stuff.
He's also got an upcoming time travel action/thriller in LOOPER with Bruce Willis that looks interesting. Also just the other day, he and Warner Bros. announced plans to remake LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS with himself playing the nerd protagonist part.
And unlike most announced remakes, I'm intrigued.
EDIT - LOOPER trailer
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 04:53 AM
My only "problem" with JGL is that I still see him as (left) despite his appearances as (right) sometimes...
Yeah, those are both him!
from here -- no, I didn't do that creepy bad Photoshop lol
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 06:50 AM
Can you watch a Kurt Russell movie like ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK without his Disney kidstar past getting in the way like The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes? C'mon grandpa. 
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 06:58 AM
1969? At least I was talking about the "Current Age"... wow, really?? I gotta check that out lol
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 07:31 AM
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
1969? At least I was talking about the "Current Age"... wow, really?? I gotta check that out lol
OK more recent for you senior, how about Alyssa Milano. Does her being a kid actor in COMMANDO stop you from enjoying the fact that as a grown woman, she's hot?
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/12 07:38 AM
I'm surprised you didn't mention Anna Paquin in THE PIANO -- but I don't know the film as much as I adore Paquin (now, as she's an adult)!!
I know what you mean, and you know what I mean....
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/13/12 01:39 PM
The Avengers.
I best know Whedon as director/creator of Serenity/Firefly. He brings some of that trademark humor to The Avengers. Look, this is an enjoyable film but it's not by any means one that is plot driven. It's a summer extravaganza flick and must be understood and enjoyed on that level. It is also as good an example as any just why American made films dominate the domestic and international marketplace. They're entertaining. It really is that simple. If you make quality movies and have good people marketing them you can do well. That said, as Disney's failed turkey John Carter shows, no one knows ahead of time just what any one particular film will do. But The Avengers is breaking box office records and will likely continue to do so.
So, what kind of movie is it? Comic book movies do tend to skew male and young just as comic book readers do. The Avengers is not that different in that regard. However there are "realistic" (to the extent that you can talk about realistic anything in a comic book film) female characters who are not sexpots nor are they just there to be rescued by male characters. You simply don't do the kind of business this movie has done just by appealing to boys. The movie runs a tad long at roughly 2 hours and 22 minutes but I don't think it's all that noticeable.
This is definitely the most entertaining film I've seen this year and one that is worth seeing on the big screen. There's lot of humorous banter among the team members, SFX are superb and Ruffalo makes you forget about previous Bruce Banners.
I best know Whedon as director/creator of Serenity/Firefly. He brings some of that trademark humor to The Avengers. Look, this is an enjoyable film but it's not by any means one that is plot driven. It's a summer extravaganza flick and must be understood and enjoyed on that level. It is also as good an example as any just why American made films dominate the domestic and international marketplace. They're entertaining. It really is that simple. If you make quality movies and have good people marketing them you can do well. That said, as Disney's failed turkey John Carter shows, no one knows ahead of time just what any one particular film will do. But The Avengers is breaking box office records and will likely continue to do so.
So, what kind of movie is it? Comic book movies do tend to skew male and young just as comic book readers do. The Avengers is not that different in that regard. However there are "realistic" (to the extent that you can talk about realistic anything in a comic book film) female characters who are not sexpots nor are they just there to be rescued by male characters. You simply don't do the kind of business this movie has done just by appealing to boys. The movie runs a tad long at roughly 2 hours and 22 minutes but I don't think it's all that noticeable.
This is definitely the most entertaining film I've seen this year and one that is worth seeing on the big screen. There's lot of humorous banter among the team members, SFX are superb and Ruffalo makes you forget about previous Bruce Banners.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/13/12 09:31 PM
Eden Lake from 2008. It's sort of a thriller. I watched it because it had a good rating on Rotten Tomatoes and Michael Fassbender (who I think is a great actor) is in it. Great movie. Very suspenseful. The ending has caused a lot of debate. It's one of those films that sticks in your gut for a while.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/14/12 08:08 AM
Originally Posted By: Lilo
I best know Whedon as director/creator of Serenity/Firefly. He brings some of that trademark humor to The Avengers. Look, this is an enjoyable film but it's not by any means one that is plot driven.
It's not plot driven as much as storytelling-driven. Big difference. People reguarly confuse the two, but I would complain that many movies suffer from having too much plot at times. (Depp's PIRATES movies immediately come to mind. Jesus they're overcomplicated.)
What do I mean exactly? AVENGERS as a movie plot is very streamlined, almost this side of an excellent saturday morning episode if stretched to 2+ hours. Whedon was able to sport what, 10 or so major characters and nobody gets slighted? Everybody has their moment and nobody come off as rather useless, not even a guy who brought a bow & arrow to an alien gunfight. The alien invasion is a generic plot device, but that's not a flaw since their leader does all the work as their spokesman.
Because Marvel already did several "solo" movies culminating together into these Nerd Olympics, they got the origins stories already disposed of so you don't have to bother with that bullshit again. And yet the remarkable thing is, you don't necessarily need to have seen them to enjoy THE AVENGERS. Even though I would argue that it adds to the experience. (Think of them as foreplay.)
Consider Whedon's clever writing in regards Robert Downey Jr. and Mark Ruffalo being BFFs. If you saw those pictures, it makes logical sense. But without those movies, you absolutely buy that connection because of their great chemistry together. Two scientists (if completely different personalities) bond over their private well-founded reasons for distrusting the government/military. Not to mention nobody else around them "gets" their technobabble.
It rather reminds me of comic books in the pre-digital days when characters would make references to a previous adventure or villain, and this passage would be marked with a big black "*". The characters won't go into detail explaining that background (i.e. plot), but at the bottom of the page would say "*=As seen in Amazing Spider-Man #337!" or something of that ilk. You don't need to know the specifics to enjoy that current issue, but hey if you want to know the specifics you're given a reference point to check the backissues.
In that regard, Marvel has done that with their controlled properties. For AVENGERS, you don't need to more than that Captain America is a soldier stuck out of time or that Thor is an alien demigod (and his brother's an asshole) or that Iron Man is a smartass, etc. If you didn't already know the backstories, well you have their movies to go rent.
(Well except for Black Widow and Hawkeye, but I suppose that'll be remedied with a SHIELD movie. It could even be Marvel's MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE, a spy thriller set in a superhero world.)
Originally Posted By: Lilo
However there are "realistic" (to the extent that you can talk about realistic anything in a comic book film) female characters who are not sexpots nor are they just there to be rescued by male characters. You simply don't do the kind of business this movie has done just by appealing to boys.
AVENGERS has gotten much heavier female traffic than such comic book adaptations tend to draw, and even considerable repeat business with them. It's rather popular too with folks who've never read a single Marvel comic (much less seen the other movies) or even know what a SHIELD is.
As summer spectacle entertainment, it's top flight. Good cast, good action, good SFX, friendly to imagination and intelligence (broadly) instead of insulting either as Michael Bay tends to do with his stupid crap. But you want to know what I think the secret recipe for this billion-dollar hit is? The humor. My audience was cracking up at the appropriate spots and punchlines, including the best smashing scene (literally) in the movie which brought more laughs than the last few comedies I've seen.
Originally Posted By: Lilo
The movie runs a tad long at roughly 2 hours and 22 minutes but I don't think it's all that noticeable.
Oh I disagree. Storytelling wise, you can tell how Whedon introduces the set-pieces, the audience even anticipating them and their entrances because they're fans or they've seen the ads. Then you see how he sets those pieces into line which pays off with that finale. It takes awhile to get there, but I didn't mind because I thought it was paced very well.
That's another reason for AVENGERS' success. Alot of summer movies in recent years lack that magic of suspenseful anticipation when you the audience are ahead of the characters and know their future destination andencounters, which the characters might be ignorant in the dark about. Way too many movies go autopilot and have the audience/characters share the same knowledge.
(STAR WARS comes to mind as a classic example of that sensation. Empire captures Leia, takes her to the Death Star. The droids escape, land on Tantoine, meet up with Luke Skywalker. He meets Obi-Wan, they meet Han Solo and charter a flight. They don't know it yet until it's too late, but you just know they're gonna end up at the Death Star, kick ass, and save Leia.)
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/15/12 07:47 AM
Well I saw Tim Burton's DARK SHADOWS, starring his BFF Johnny Depp and of course based off the cult TV Show. But I'm gravely disapointed to tell you all that it bites. A few laughs*, but a mostly a stiff narrative that bones me by how overall tone deaf the movie was in mixing the thrills with laughs. Was this really the same guy who made BEETLEJUICE? The vampire was too good at sucking, because this movie sucks!
(OK I promise, no more bad puns. I swear it on my sole.)
Remember my rant above? If AVENGERS thankfully had little plot but overfilled with storytelling, DARK SHADOWS unfortunately had little storytelling and overfilled with plotting, coffin up subplot after subplot (enough to occupy a whole franchise) with very little payoff. This is one of those movies which tells us that character A hates or loves character B, instead of showing us why and investing the audience enough to sorta give a shit what happens to whom.
I mean it starts out promising enough, interestingly just like the TV show did: Mysterious woman on a train heading to an ominous mansion owned by a family dynasty on the decline. But once Depp shows up, the movie completely loses focus and really the scripts panics by throwing ideas in quiet desperation. Which is unfortunate because in retrospect, all the elements wrecklessly and cheaply tossed out there (which the movie pathetically tries to unsatisfatory tie up together) maybe could've been nailed down into a coherent, engaging, entertaining, (and simplified) plot. This indeed could've been a decent movie that some folks maybe were expecting from the ads.
You know what this movie really reminds me of? COWBOYS & ALIENS. That one also had a bigass budget, a good cast, a summer release date, lots of pricey SFX, a respectable director at the helm. And like DARK SHADOWS, technically it wasn't a "bad" movie but it's something worse for me: An offensively lazy mediocre picture. At least with real turkeys, you can laugh at them in retrospect like a Nostalgia Critic video or whatever. You don't get that luxuy with these sort of misfires.
The other day, Cracked.com had an article about artists who need to take a break and Tim Burton was ranked. And I have to agree with them. Burton in the past has made movies I've enjoyed whether BATMAN RETURNS or EDWARD SCISSORHANDS or A NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS (which he produced/co-wrote) and so forth, but now he's stuck like way too many pop star legends who produce work derivative of their greatest hits, but with diminishing artistic returns. In that regard, Burton is alot like a former associate of his in Prince.
You know what I'm talking about with Burton's "greatest hits," and DARK SHADOWS is full of it: Dark gloomy goth-friendly aesthetics that rape and plunder German Expressionism, misfit protagonists (usually monsters) who don't relate well with or tolerated by the normal conservative society, Danny Elfman soundtrack, lots of SFX and CGI, Depp covered in enough pancake makeup to be confused for Queen Elizabeth I, his mate Helena Bonham Carter always in the cast, even Christopher Lee gets a part once he gets stirred up from his tomb.
Easily the worst Depp/Burton collaborated production yet. (Yes, even worse than CHARLIE & THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY. Let that fact sink in.)
*=I'll admit it, I laughed at the hippie scene. But for some reason it's funnier when I think of how Seth McFarlane would've written that sketch. Vampire smokes pot, gets stoned, gets the munchies...
Hell I'm surprised the movie didn't make more of a point where Depp is trying to quit sucking blood by going to an AA meeting. "Hello, I'm Barnabas Collins and I'm here because I have a drinking problem." NYUCK NYUCK!
(OK I promise, no more bad puns. I swear it on my sole.)
Remember my rant above? If AVENGERS thankfully had little plot but overfilled with storytelling, DARK SHADOWS unfortunately had little storytelling and overfilled with plotting, coffin up subplot after subplot (enough to occupy a whole franchise) with very little payoff. This is one of those movies which tells us that character A hates or loves character B, instead of showing us why and investing the audience enough to sorta give a shit what happens to whom.
I mean it starts out promising enough, interestingly just like the TV show did: Mysterious woman on a train heading to an ominous mansion owned by a family dynasty on the decline. But once Depp shows up, the movie completely loses focus and really the scripts panics by throwing ideas in quiet desperation. Which is unfortunate because in retrospect, all the elements wrecklessly and cheaply tossed out there (which the movie pathetically tries to unsatisfatory tie up together) maybe could've been nailed down into a coherent, engaging, entertaining, (and simplified) plot. This indeed could've been a decent movie that some folks maybe were expecting from the ads.
You know what this movie really reminds me of? COWBOYS & ALIENS. That one also had a bigass budget, a good cast, a summer release date, lots of pricey SFX, a respectable director at the helm. And like DARK SHADOWS, technically it wasn't a "bad" movie but it's something worse for me: An offensively lazy mediocre picture. At least with real turkeys, you can laugh at them in retrospect like a Nostalgia Critic video or whatever. You don't get that luxuy with these sort of misfires.
The other day, Cracked.com had an article about artists who need to take a break and Tim Burton was ranked. And I have to agree with them. Burton in the past has made movies I've enjoyed whether BATMAN RETURNS or EDWARD SCISSORHANDS or A NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS (which he produced/co-wrote) and so forth, but now he's stuck like way too many pop star legends who produce work derivative of their greatest hits, but with diminishing artistic returns. In that regard, Burton is alot like a former associate of his in Prince.
You know what I'm talking about with Burton's "greatest hits," and DARK SHADOWS is full of it: Dark gloomy goth-friendly aesthetics that rape and plunder German Expressionism, misfit protagonists (usually monsters) who don't relate well with or tolerated by the normal conservative society, Danny Elfman soundtrack, lots of SFX and CGI, Depp covered in enough pancake makeup to be confused for Queen Elizabeth I, his mate Helena Bonham Carter always in the cast, even Christopher Lee gets a part once he gets stirred up from his tomb.
Easily the worst Depp/Burton collaborated production yet. (Yes, even worse than CHARLIE & THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY. Let that fact sink in.)
*=I'll admit it, I laughed at the hippie scene. But for some reason it's funnier when I think of how Seth McFarlane would've written that sketch. Vampire smokes pot, gets stoned, gets the munchies...
Hell I'm surprised the movie didn't make more of a point where Depp is trying to quit sucking blood by going to an AA meeting. "Hello, I'm Barnabas Collins and I'm here because I have a drinking problem." NYUCK NYUCK!
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/15/12 11:49 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: Lilo
I best know Whedon as director/creator of Serenity/Firefly. He brings some of that trademark humor to The Avengers. Look, this is an enjoyable film but it's not by any means one that is plot driven.
It's not plot driven as much as storytelling-driven. Big difference. People reguarly confuse the two, but I would complain that many movies suffer from having too much plot at times. (Depp's PIRATES movies immediately come to mind. Jesus they're overcomplicated.)
Exactly. This. The plot is simple and the story is compelling. It just works. It works so well that you look at other films and think why can't that director/producer/actor/writer get it right.
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Consider Whedon's clever writing in regards Robert Downey Jr. and Mark Ruffalo being BFFs. If you saw those pictures, it makes logical sense. But without those movies, you absolutely buy that connection because of their great chemistry together. Two scientists (if completely different personalities) bond over their private well-founded reasons for distrusting the government/military. Not to mention nobody else around them "gets" their technobabble.
Yes, Stark and Banner play off each other nicely.
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
As summer spectacle entertainment, it's top flight. Good cast, good action, good SFX, friendly to imagination and intelligence (broadly) instead of insulting either as Michael Bay tends to do with his stupid crap. But you want to know what I think the secret recipe for this billion-dollar hit is? The humor. My audience was cracking up at the appropriate spots and punchlines, including the best smashing scene (literally) in the movie which brought more laughs than the last few comedies I've seen.
PUNY GOD!
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
That's another reason for AVENGERS' success. Alot of summer movies in recent years lack that magic of suspenseful anticipation when you the audience are ahead of the characters and know their future destination andencounters, which the characters might be ignorant in the dark about. Way too many movies go autopilot and have the audience/characters share the same knowledge.
(STAR WARS comes to mind as a classic example of that sensation. Empire captures Leia, takes her to the Death Star. The droids escape, land on Tantoine, meet up with Luke Skywalker. He meets Obi-Wan, they meet Han Solo and charter a flight. They don't know it yet until it's too late, but you just know they're gonna end up at the Death Star, kick ass, and save Leia.)
Well it was a surprise to me but then again I was only 8 yrs old when I first saw it..
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/15/12 11:51 PM
Is Depp basically playing the same character in all of his films?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/12 01:54 AM
Originally Posted By: Lilo
Is Depp basically playing the same character in all of his films?
Same make-up case too, apparently.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/12 12:25 PM
Brighton Rock
This noir movie is based on a Graham Greene novel which I have not read. I was actually happy about this as I had no preconceptions about the movie. This adaptation takes place in 1960's Great Britain near and around as you might guess, Brighton. A small time group of hoodlums want some payback for the murder of their boss. A naive, lonely and virginal waitress named Rose (Andrea Riseborough) accidentally gets photographic evidence that could implicate a gang member in a revenge murder. Pinkie (Sam Riley) gets the assignment to obtain and destroy the picture, find out what if anything Rose knows and if necessary, send her to the afterlife. Pinkie is just the person for the job as his vileness and coldness and willingness to kill have already made the other gang members nervous to be around him. Pinkie's boldness and hatred only increase throughout the film as he kills his way to become boss of his gang.
This film is not an action film; it's a drama. And the drama is primarily about the relationship between good and evil or more precisely between Rose and Pinkie.
Rose is quite obviously desperate for someone, anyone to pay attention to her. In a sad, very depressing scene she has to listen as her obviously uncaring (and abusive?) father bargains a fair brideprice for her with the maleficent Pinkie, who intends to marry the underage Rose to forestall any chance of testimony against him. Actually whenever I see Rose, I expect that Eleanor Rigby should be playing. It's a very religious film , not so much in the imagery though there is that but in the conversations between Pinkie and Rose about heaven and hell. Pinkie and Rose are both Catholics.
Pinkie is quite adamant that there is hell but couldn't care less about heaven. He has a way of speaking that constantly belittles Rose and a few times it looks as if he's not above hitting her. At the same time while Rose is enthralled by and deeply in love with Pinkie, Pinkie is fascinated by her, even if that fascination is almost wholly based in contempt.
On the side of the angels is Rose's employer Ida (Helen Mirren-who is still going to be vamping men when she's 70), who as a former "party girl" herself, can recognize the pure evil radiating from Pinkie. One of the men Pinkie killed was an associate of Ida's. Ida basically engages in a struggle to save Rose's life and soul. In this she's advised by her friend Phil (John Hurt) who has never gotten to know Ida in a biblical way and appears to deeply resent it.
Look for current Game of Thrones actor Nonso Anozie as Dallow, a member of Pinkie's gang who starts to realize that Pinkie is not all there. Andy Serkis has a small but important role as Mr. Colleoni, the most powerful gangster in Brighton and a man who intends to keep that distinction. This is a VERY dark noir indeed but it's not very violent. I liked the acting here. I liked this film and thought it was very worthwhile. It throws a few curveballs at the viewer's head and like all good curveballs they don't necessarily break when or where you think they should.
This looks, feels and sounds like a fifties or sixties movie. It doesn't have hyperactive camera work or crushing sound. It assumes that a scene can last for a while and not lose the viewer's interest. The ending will stay with you.
This noir movie is based on a Graham Greene novel which I have not read. I was actually happy about this as I had no preconceptions about the movie. This adaptation takes place in 1960's Great Britain near and around as you might guess, Brighton. A small time group of hoodlums want some payback for the murder of their boss. A naive, lonely and virginal waitress named Rose (Andrea Riseborough) accidentally gets photographic evidence that could implicate a gang member in a revenge murder. Pinkie (Sam Riley) gets the assignment to obtain and destroy the picture, find out what if anything Rose knows and if necessary, send her to the afterlife. Pinkie is just the person for the job as his vileness and coldness and willingness to kill have already made the other gang members nervous to be around him. Pinkie's boldness and hatred only increase throughout the film as he kills his way to become boss of his gang.
This film is not an action film; it's a drama. And the drama is primarily about the relationship between good and evil or more precisely between Rose and Pinkie.
Rose is quite obviously desperate for someone, anyone to pay attention to her. In a sad, very depressing scene she has to listen as her obviously uncaring (and abusive?) father bargains a fair brideprice for her with the maleficent Pinkie, who intends to marry the underage Rose to forestall any chance of testimony against him. Actually whenever I see Rose, I expect that Eleanor Rigby should be playing. It's a very religious film , not so much in the imagery though there is that but in the conversations between Pinkie and Rose about heaven and hell. Pinkie and Rose are both Catholics.
Pinkie is quite adamant that there is hell but couldn't care less about heaven. He has a way of speaking that constantly belittles Rose and a few times it looks as if he's not above hitting her. At the same time while Rose is enthralled by and deeply in love with Pinkie, Pinkie is fascinated by her, even if that fascination is almost wholly based in contempt.
On the side of the angels is Rose's employer Ida (Helen Mirren-who is still going to be vamping men when she's 70), who as a former "party girl" herself, can recognize the pure evil radiating from Pinkie. One of the men Pinkie killed was an associate of Ida's. Ida basically engages in a struggle to save Rose's life and soul. In this she's advised by her friend Phil (John Hurt) who has never gotten to know Ida in a biblical way and appears to deeply resent it.
Look for current Game of Thrones actor Nonso Anozie as Dallow, a member of Pinkie's gang who starts to realize that Pinkie is not all there. Andy Serkis has a small but important role as Mr. Colleoni, the most powerful gangster in Brighton and a man who intends to keep that distinction. This is a VERY dark noir indeed but it's not very violent. I liked the acting here. I liked this film and thought it was very worthwhile. It throws a few curveballs at the viewer's head and like all good curveballs they don't necessarily break when or where you think they should.
This looks, feels and sounds like a fifties or sixties movie. It doesn't have hyperactive camera work or crushing sound. It assumes that a scene can last for a while and not lose the viewer's interest. The ending will stay with you.
Posted By: neha46101
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/21/12 08:53 AM
Watched Movies discussion
Harry poter
Batman
Resident Evil
Harry poter
Batman
Resident Evil
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/12 04:56 AM
I don't wanna give this piece of shit film more time or energy than it deserves, so about Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) all I will do is repeat my GetGlue/Facebook posting:
"I don't know what the reviewers said, but this drawn-out third-grade implementation of a fifth-grade plot is borderline ridiculous."
C'mon, now... the ENTIRE premise could've been summed up in 15 minutes in a well-made film; I didn't need 1.75 hrs of CGI to "get it".
HOLLYWOOD NEEDS TO STOP fucking up the APES series!! Leave it alone already!!!
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/12 05:05 AM
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
"I don't know what the reviewers said, but this drawn-out third-grade implementation of a fifth-grade plot is borderline ridiculous."
How do you watch most blockbusters?
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
C'mon, now... the ENTIRE premise could've been summed up in 15 minutes in a well-made film; I didn't need 1.75 hrs of CGI to "get it".
What does that even mean?
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
HOLLYWOOD NEEDS TO STOP fucking up the APES series!! Leave it alone already!!!
Oh please. RISE is practically silver compared to Tim Burton's ill-advised and downright stupid POTA remake.
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/12 05:20 AM
I actually respect your opinions more than you think. But not this time. IMHO, that was a total piece of shit film! Well, it would've been okay if an hour and a half was taken away, and the "point" was supplanted into a REAL movie... but I think I already said that.
As for your previous feedback on that post...
I LOVE SHITTY MOVIES and will chomp on popcorn with Michael Bay any day of the week! But this wasn't good enough.
What does WHAT mean? It took 1.75 hrs of OBVIOUS (aka distracting) CGI to make a point that a real filmmaker could've made in 15 minutes. The plot/idea was fine -- but it was a 15-minute idea, not an entire feature film idea!
And yes, I really do question which is worse... RISE or POTA... and I'm thinking RISE at this point. But I'd have to watch the POTA remake again to be sure (since I only saw it once years ago, another POS ;))
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/12 05:48 AM
But for a brief second, let me give you a bit of where I'm coming from. Unlike you, because you weren't born yet, I grew up with this shit -- the originals are sacred. Hell, I even give the old TV series a pass. For nostalgic sake.
But my point remains: HOLLYWOOD NEEDS TO STOP FUCKING AROUND WITH THE APES SERIES ALREADY! Those nimrods can't think of anything new, but can think of plenty of shit to fuck something over.... egads. I used to want to visit Hollywood... not any more, for a long time...
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/12 03:20 AM
I thought RISE was a decent movie, a somewhat solid throwback to those 50s/60s sci-fi movies which were about ideas and characters, not just an excuse for mindless FX-laden action scenes. Of course RISE does court the one movie scientist trope I sorta despise. You know, the "how dare you play God!" nonsense. But it's not so bad in RISE is only because of James Franco's scenes with his father John Lithgow, which sells that angle.
Of course the movie really cooks when Caesar gets thrown into the zoo and we get a good execution of the ole reliable jailbreak picture. God you should've the crowd at my screening enjoying themselves immensely when the sadistic zookeeper meets his just deserts.
Now if you know your monkey movies, RISE is basically a down to Earth contemporary retread of CONQUEST OF THE APES. I thought Andy Serkis in body mo-cap delivered a wonderful performance from surrogate child to misunderstood teenage victim to revolt leader, up there with his Gollum but arguably more impressive considering he has no dialogue. Isn't it wonderful to be impressed by FX again?
Hell even the climax on the Golden Gate Bridge, which easily could've come off as nonsensically stupid you would find in a Michael Bay movie, works because it's quite compelling and sorta intelligent. (You gotta love that scene of the total gorilla assault on the helicopter.)
RISE has two slight flaws though. One, there is some chaotic editing with characters and subplots introduced and then forgotten. Usually this is a good sign that this was heavily recut in post-production. (Well they did a good job in the editing bay.)
Two, well the ending itself.
But otherwise, a likeable Hollywood popcorn sci-fi thriller that doesn't insult your IQ or imagination unlike say BATTLESHIP.
(Also the title is bullshit. It was scripted, shot, and presented to Fox as RISE OF THE APES. That's an awesome, simple title full of power. The Marketing department shoehorned the RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES to directly tie itself into that film franchise. To be fair looking at it's box-office totals, I guess it worked in spite of that mouthful.)
Of course the movie really cooks when Caesar gets thrown into the zoo and we get a good execution of the ole reliable jailbreak picture. God you should've the crowd at my screening enjoying themselves immensely when the sadistic zookeeper meets his just deserts.
Now if you know your monkey movies, RISE is basically a down to Earth contemporary retread of CONQUEST OF THE APES. I thought Andy Serkis in body mo-cap delivered a wonderful performance from surrogate child to misunderstood teenage victim to revolt leader, up there with his Gollum but arguably more impressive considering he has no dialogue. Isn't it wonderful to be impressed by FX again?
Hell even the climax on the Golden Gate Bridge, which easily could've come off as nonsensically stupid you would find in a Michael Bay movie, works because it's quite compelling and sorta intelligent. (You gotta love that scene of the total gorilla assault on the helicopter.)
RISE has two slight flaws though. One, there is some chaotic editing with characters and subplots introduced and then forgotten. Usually this is a good sign that this was heavily recut in post-production. (Well they did a good job in the editing bay.)
Two, well the ending itself.
Click to reveal..
But otherwise, a likeable Hollywood popcorn sci-fi thriller that doesn't insult your IQ or imagination unlike say BATTLESHIP.
(Also the title is bullshit. It was scripted, shot, and presented to Fox as RISE OF THE APES. That's an awesome, simple title full of power. The Marketing department shoehorned the RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES to directly tie itself into that film franchise. To be fair looking at it's box-office totals, I guess it worked in spite of that mouthful.)
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 02:02 AM
Okay. I got thru about half (at most) of Inglourius Bastards, then opted for The Breakup. I thought IG was going to be a The Dirty Dozen Type movie. What in the world was it with all that dialogue? Madonne!
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 02:52 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Okay. I got thru about half (at most) of Inglourius Bastards, then opted for The Breakup. I thought IG was going to be a The Dirty Dozen Type movie. What in the world was it with all that dialogue? Madonne!
Quentin Tarantino.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 08:04 PM
Just saw "The Grey" OnDemand with Liam Neeson... over all a good intense survival type movie but the ending (KIND OF A SPOILER ALERT!)...
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 08:07 PM
Originally Posted By: Mark
Just saw "The Grey" OnDemand with Liam Neeson... over all a good intense survival type movie but the ending (KIND OF A SPOILER ALERT!)...
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Did the car ever get parked?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 08:19 PM
I am anxious to see "The Grey." I saw your post Mark, and when I saw spoiler alert, I immediately scrolled down. Didn't know if you had the ending in view or not but I for one, don't want to know how it ends.
Anyway, I saw "Unknown" & "Taken" with Liam Nesson and really liked both of them. I read with "The Grey" not to leave til credits run and assume it affects the ending.
TIS
Anyway, I saw "Unknown" & "Taken" with Liam Nesson and really liked both of them. I read with "The Grey" not to leave til credits run and assume it affects the ending.
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 08:20 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: Mark
Just saw "The Grey" OnDemand with Liam Neeson... over all a good intense survival type movie but the ending (KIND OF A SPOILER ALERT!)...
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Did the car ever get parked?
No, I don't think so!
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/12 08:21 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
I am anxious to see "The Grey." I saw your post Mark, and when I saw spoiler alert, I immediately scrolled down. Didn't know if you had the ending in view or not but I for one, don't want to know how it ends.
Anyway, I saw "Unknown" & "Taken" with Liam Nesson and really liked both of them. I read with "The Grey" not to leave til credits run and assume it affects the ending.
TIS
Anyway, I saw "Unknown" & "Taken" with Liam Nesson and really liked both of them. I read with "The Grey" not to leave til credits run and assume it affects the ending.
TIS
He is a very good actor. I enjoyed those films you listed as well, TIS.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/12 06:48 PM
Just watched Armand Assante in a really horrible movie (which I am sure went right to video) about a shark attack. It's a shame when really good and successful actors step down to do this type of drivel. Who knows why. I'm sure it wasn't because the role was challenging. Perhaps it's money.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/01/12 07:59 AM
We Need to Talk About Kevin (2011)
Interesting movie. Got good reviews. Sort of reminded me of The Omen in a way. Has Tilda Swinton, who is one of my favorite actresses.
Interesting movie. Got good reviews. Sort of reminded me of The Omen in a way. Has Tilda Swinton, who is one of my favorite actresses.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/01/12 08:00 AM
Originally Posted By: Mark
Just saw "The Grey" OnDemand with Liam Neeson... over all a good intense survival type movie but the ending (KIND OF A SPOILER ALERT!)...
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
Don't read past this - You've been warned!
(... the movie's ending was very similar to The Sopranos series ending.)
I don't know why some people didn't like the ending to The Grey. It was perfect.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/01/12 11:42 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
I don't know why some people didn't like the ending to The Grey. It was perfect.
Agree.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/12 07:03 PM
Watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes last night. I was disappointed. It was kind of plodding. I expected it to sum up with the apes taking over instead of just the end of their rampage. I guess that leaves room for a sequel-prequel.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/12 11:06 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes last night. I was disappointed. It was kind of plodding. I expected it to sum up with the apes taking over instead of just the end of their rampage. I guess that leaves room for a sequel-prequel.
I thought CONQUEST already did that?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/12 04:02 AM
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011) - 4 out of 5
A tense, deeply engaging Cold War spy thriller (based off John le Carre's book) it plays out not in shootouts or car chases, but in tense enigmatic conversations held between middle-aged men in suits who smoke and drink way too much. (Yes they smoke. I bet that's why MPAA gave it a R rating.)
But this does work as an entertaining who-dunnit murder mystery, played out by an awesomely Anglophilic cast that it'll probably make you want to go eat spotted dick or something. Gary Oldman, Toby Jones, Colin Firth, Tom Hardy, Mark Strong, and John Hurt. BTW, when hasn't Hurt not ever looked old at the movies? Was he born old like Benjamin Button?
Would you believe that in his long career, TTSS scored Oldman his very first Oscar acting nomination? Yeah I know, unbelievable but he earned it here. Just looking at Oldman's face as George Smiley, you don't need exposition detailing all the battles that old spy has fought over the decades and old demons bottled up inside. Controls his emotions, but when he does shall we say "lose his shit," my god you're reminded how damn good Oldman is. That's always a pleasant reminder.
Just one problem this movie has. It's a very complicated mystery, which in mind you need to keep aware of the clues being given for every character. Initially I mixed up Hardy's character with Strong, which sorta confused the shit out of me initially. As long as you keep all the pieces mentally, you'll be fine with this movie.
le Carre wrote some sequels detailing Smiley's continued shadow war with his commie counterpart in Karla. I want those movies with Oldman kicking ass by talking and smoking/drinking too much.
A tense, deeply engaging Cold War spy thriller (based off John le Carre's book) it plays out not in shootouts or car chases, but in tense enigmatic conversations held between middle-aged men in suits who smoke and drink way too much. (Yes they smoke. I bet that's why MPAA gave it a R rating.)
But this does work as an entertaining who-dunnit murder mystery, played out by an awesomely Anglophilic cast that it'll probably make you want to go eat spotted dick or something. Gary Oldman, Toby Jones, Colin Firth, Tom Hardy, Mark Strong, and John Hurt. BTW, when hasn't Hurt not ever looked old at the movies? Was he born old like Benjamin Button?
Would you believe that in his long career, TTSS scored Oldman his very first Oscar acting nomination? Yeah I know, unbelievable but he earned it here. Just looking at Oldman's face as George Smiley, you don't need exposition detailing all the battles that old spy has fought over the decades and old demons bottled up inside. Controls his emotions, but when he does shall we say "lose his shit," my god you're reminded how damn good Oldman is. That's always a pleasant reminder.
Just one problem this movie has. It's a very complicated mystery, which in mind you need to keep aware of the clues being given for every character. Initially I mixed up Hardy's character with Strong, which sorta confused the shit out of me initially. As long as you keep all the pieces mentally, you'll be fine with this movie.
le Carre wrote some sequels detailing Smiley's continued shadow war with his commie counterpart in Karla. I want those movies with Oldman kicking ass by talking and smoking/drinking too much.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 07:50 AM
Much like DeNiro and Pacino, Oldman doesn't get the roles he deserves nowadays. Of course, unlike them, he has yet to receive an Oscar; which shows just how much of a joke the Academy is.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 07:50 AM
Both great movies I just watched again...
The Kingdom
No Country for Old Men
The Kingdom
No Country for Old Men
Posted By: NickyScarfo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 07:55 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Much like DeNiro and Pacino, Oldman doesn't get the roles he deserves nowadays. Of course, unlike them, he has yet to receive an Oscar; which shows just how much of a joke the Academy is.
If Sandra Bullock can win an Oscar...who knows maybe Rob Schenider can too...
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 09:31 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Much like DeNiro and Pacino, Oldman doesn't get the roles he deserves nowadays. Of course, unlike them, he has yet to receive an Oscar; which shows just how much of a joke the Academy is.
I wouldn't consider them to be an apt comparison. DeNiro and Pacino were stars who were also widely respected actors, and their problem these days is that their feature film acting careers are secondary for their interests. DeNiro is busy producing movies and his Tribeca film festival and Pacino is off playing theatre. Trust me you think any filmmaker, established and new, would turn them down? Ridiculous. I think they're at the Marlon Brando stage where working movies are now a hobby, not the profession.
Oldman, as loved and admired as he is, was never a star. At best a name, but not a star. Not his fault or anybody's really I suppose, it's just boils down to luck and timing. Also he's still working the movies for a living, hell he just signed up for the ROBOCOP remake.
(What I mean by "luck and timing," look in comparison at Johnny Depp. He was following the same career trajectory, then he did that Pirates movie which made him a star. Or more recently Mark Ruffalo, a guy who previously earned two Oscar acting nominations, but Joe Public couldn't pick him out of a police line-up, much less be considered a star. Yet he was the break-out star from THE AVENGERS.)
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Both great movies I just watched again...
The Kingdom
No Country for Old Men
The Kingdom
No Country for Old Men
I liked Peter Berg's THE KINGDOM too, a solidly entertaining "smart" popcorn thriller. All which doesn't describe Berg's recent BATTLESHIP.
NO COUNTRY I'll always remember for having one of the more fascinating screening crowd reactions I've been to. When that particular plot turn happens, the movie lost half the audience, and the other half were split 50/50 between those hoping for some sort of payoff and the rest were digging this.
Then when the movie suddenly cuts to black, some guy in the back yelled "That's it?!?"
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 10:37 AM
Men in Black III (2012) - ***1/2
After endless bad reports about a troubled production (which started without the script having a 3rd act and caused it to be stopped for 6 months w/ budget ballooning reportedly to $300 million) along with the fact that this was a sequel the masses weren't exactly screaming for (the last one was made a decade ago), this actually turned out to be decently entertaining.
That is if you can through the first 15-20 minutes, which start out unpromising with failed gags and jokes movie threatens to be deaf tone forgettable like the second MIB movie was. (Seeing Emma Thompson making unfunny "funny" noises was painful.) Tommy Lee Jones especially looked terrible, a woman at my screening muttered to her date that he looked like he just had a face lift. He also looked bored being in this movie, a pity really.
But once Will Smith goes back to 1969 to save young Jones, played in masterstroke casting by Josh Brolin, the movie starts working. Hell he and Smith have great chemistry, more much than Smith does w/ Jones this time around. There's still a hit/miss ratio with the jokes, but most are funny and the movie clicks like the first MEN IN BLACK did with the black comic cultural satire.
The highlight is the sequence at The Factory with Andy Warhol and all that. (I fully expected a sketch with John Lennon and Yoko Ono, with the punchline being Lennon was an alien beetle.) Some of my favorite gags were plays on the MIB technology, like the devices looked/acted like people back in '69 would consider to be futuristic. I always dig those little steampunk-esque touches when attempted.
The aliens in this one are interesting. The villain has detachable appendages which shoot darts and freely roam away from his body, with googles for eyes which give off this odd vibe. Then there's the alien who can see the future (and all possible variations), and despite one's expectations if you or me had this power, he's always cheerful and happy and obsesses too much on mundane irrelevant details. For some reason, this was a charming touch for me.
MEN IN BLACK III always had this small cloud of disposability surrounding it, but I still enjoyed. I do wonder if I saw this after drivel like BATTLESHIP and DARK SHADOWS influenced me to embrace any subsequent competent entertainment. But if a fourth MEN IN BLACK movie happens, don't bring back Jones. Have him de-age into Brolin or something.
EDIT - You all realize this is Smith's first movie in 4 years? That fact surprised me too. As much as I never cared for his rap career, I'll admit the track he did for the first MEN IN BLACK movie was memorable and catchy pop-rap. ("Men in Black/Guardians of the Galaxy...") Too bad he didn't do a track for this one since the song Pitbull did is fucking garbage. What do people see in that shithead?
After endless bad reports about a troubled production (which started without the script having a 3rd act and caused it to be stopped for 6 months w/ budget ballooning reportedly to $300 million) along with the fact that this was a sequel the masses weren't exactly screaming for (the last one was made a decade ago), this actually turned out to be decently entertaining.
That is if you can through the first 15-20 minutes, which start out unpromising with failed gags and jokes movie threatens to be deaf tone forgettable like the second MIB movie was. (Seeing Emma Thompson making unfunny "funny" noises was painful.) Tommy Lee Jones especially looked terrible, a woman at my screening muttered to her date that he looked like he just had a face lift. He also looked bored being in this movie, a pity really.
But once Will Smith goes back to 1969 to save young Jones, played in masterstroke casting by Josh Brolin, the movie starts working. Hell he and Smith have great chemistry, more much than Smith does w/ Jones this time around. There's still a hit/miss ratio with the jokes, but most are funny and the movie clicks like the first MEN IN BLACK did with the black comic cultural satire.
The highlight is the sequence at The Factory with Andy Warhol and all that. (I fully expected a sketch with John Lennon and Yoko Ono, with the punchline being Lennon was an alien beetle.) Some of my favorite gags were plays on the MIB technology, like the devices looked/acted like people back in '69 would consider to be futuristic. I always dig those little steampunk-esque touches when attempted.
The aliens in this one are interesting. The villain has detachable appendages which shoot darts and freely roam away from his body, with googles for eyes which give off this odd vibe. Then there's the alien who can see the future (and all possible variations), and despite one's expectations if you or me had this power, he's always cheerful and happy and obsesses too much on mundane irrelevant details. For some reason, this was a charming touch for me.
MEN IN BLACK III always had this small cloud of disposability surrounding it, but I still enjoyed. I do wonder if I saw this after drivel like BATTLESHIP and DARK SHADOWS influenced me to embrace any subsequent competent entertainment. But if a fourth MEN IN BLACK movie happens, don't bring back Jones. Have him de-age into Brolin or something.
EDIT - You all realize this is Smith's first movie in 4 years? That fact surprised me too. As much as I never cared for his rap career, I'll admit the track he did for the first MEN IN BLACK movie was memorable and catchy pop-rap. ("Men in Black/Guardians of the Galaxy...") Too bad he didn't do a track for this one since the song Pitbull did is fucking garbage. What do people see in that shithead?
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/12 04:11 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
I wouldn't consider them to be an apt comparison. DeNiro and Pacino were stars who were also widely respected actors, and their problem these days is that their feature film acting careers are secondary for their interests. DeNiro is busy producing movies and his Tribeca film festival and Pacino is off playing theatre. Trust me you think any filmmaker, established and new, would turn them down? Ridiculous. I think they're at the Marlon Brando stage where working movies are now a hobby, not the profession.
Mmm...I don't know. If that were true, you'd think both DeNiro and Pacino would be more selective in the roles they've accepted over the pasts 15 years or so. As they've gotten older, I don't think they've been as appreciated as before. And so not as used by the industry.
Quote:
Oldman, as loved and admired as he is, was never a star. At best a name, but not a star. Not his fault or anybody's really I suppose, it's just boils down to luck and timing. Also he's still working the movies for a living, hell he just signed up for the ROBOCOP remake.
Of course, I don't have to say that star power should have nothing to do with whether an actor wins an Academy Award or not.
Quote:
NO COUNTRY I'll always remember for having one of the more fascinating screening crowd reactions I've been to. When that particular plot turn happens, the movie lost half the audience, and the other half were split 50/50 between those hoping for some sort of payoff and the rest were digging this.
Then when the movie suddenly cuts to black, some guy in the back yelled "That's it?!?"
Then when the movie suddenly cuts to black, some guy in the back yelled "That's it?!?"
The moron probably said the same thing at the end of The Grey.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/12 12:36 AM
Watched Sexy Beast again. One of the great British gangster movies. And one of Ben Kingsley's most famous performances. Though I actually thought Ian McShane's character (Teddy Bass) was even scarier.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/12 05:16 PM
TCM is NOW airing "The Bad Seed" (1956). Any other oldster remember that one? With Patty McCormack (Actually the only movie I know of that she was in)?
The host describes Patti's character as "The cute, little blonde, pig-tailed sociopath.
TIS
The host describes Patti's character as "The cute, little blonde, pig-tailed sociopath.
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/24/12 08:12 PM
Watched "Wanderlust" last night with Mrs. Mark. We laughed pretty good at that one. Paul Rudd & Jenifer Aniston were hilarious. Great escape movie if you want to laugh at a comedy that is very well thought out and not over the top.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/24/12 09:50 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
TCM is NOW airing "The Bad Seed" (1956). Any other oldster remember that one? With Patty McCormack (Actually the only movie I know of that she was in)?
The host describes Patti's character as "The cute, little blonde, pig-tailed sociopath.
TIS
The host describes Patti's character as "The cute, little blonde, pig-tailed sociopath.
TIS
Oh, I definitely remember it. Just like Psycho and other B&Ws of that era, it exemplifies Hollywood's ability to create real suspense and mystery without resorting to technical or other tricks. That little girl was just plain scary.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/25/12 01:18 AM
Watch Hoffa again. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Hard to believe it came out 20 years ago now. As usual, fact mixed with fiction, but worth watching for Jack's performance.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/25/12 03:20 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Watch Hoffa again. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Hard to believe it came out 20 years ago now. As usual, fact mixed with fiction, but worth watching for Jack's performance.
I once won a radio contest on the question, "Name 2 movies that Jack Nicholson played in with Ddanny DeVito?"
It was this movie and Cuckoo's Nest.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 09:53 PM
I watched my cousin vinny abbout an hour ago can't believe it's the first time i've seen pesci was hilarious
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:02 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
I watched my cousin vinny abbout an hour ago can't believe it's the first time i've seen pesci was hilarious
Cam - this is one of those flicks that I always stop on when channel surfing. I agree, it is terrific!
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:12 PM
Although cable shows it a lot, I usually don't watch it but the other day they aired "The Shawshank Redemption" again and this time I watched it again. What a great flick. I still keep forgetting it's actually a Stephen King story. Anyway, one of my favorites.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:14 PM
There should be a "Movies I've Seen a Hundred Times and Can't Wait to Watch Again" thread.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:21 PM
Cable does that a lot...showing same movies over and over. I mean for God's sake, tons of movies made in the last decade(s). Lots of good movies too yet they choose to show the same ones over and over again. 
I enjoy watching LMN (I know a chick channel)
Yet I notice they'll show the same two movies from late afternoon til evening. So the movie that showed at 5:00 will show again at 7:00. Good grief, I KNOW lifetime has aired way more movies for a lot of years, than it shows.
TIS
I enjoy watching LMN (I know a chick channel)
Yet I notice they'll show the same two movies from late afternoon til evening. So the movie that showed at 5:00 will show again at 7:00. Good grief, I KNOW lifetime has aired way more movies for a lot of years, than it shows. TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:29 PM
IS - Mrs. Mark is a BIG LMN fan. One Saturday night she talked me into watching "The Blue Eyed Butcher" on LMN. It gave me nightmares! I think she stabbed her husband like 100 times?!? Of course it was based on a true story... which made it even more disturbing! 
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:36 PM
Originally Posted By: Mark
IS - Mrs. Mark is a BIG LMN fan. One Saturday night she talked me into watching "The Blue Eyed Butcher" on LMN. It gave me nightmares! I think she stabbed her husband like 100 times?!? Of course it was based on a true story... which made it even more disturbing!
LOL Mark, I saw that when it was first on. By the title, I expected a blue eyed guy who was actually a butcher til I read what it was about. Yea, you wouldn't wanna be messing with her.
I don't watch it all the time but they do have some good movies and sometimes some really good movies.
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:38 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Cable does that a lot...showing same movies over and over. I mean for God's sake, tons of movies made in the last decade(s). Lots of good movies too yet they choose to show the same ones over and over again.
TIS
TIS
That's true. What puzzles me is that I see movies listed that I never heard of and many are with well known stars.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/12 10:52 PM
Has anyone ever seen arlington road? My mum suggested it to me and i thought it would be a lmn type movie (in the uk hallmark if i'm thinking about the same type of movie) but i thought it was amazing especially tim robbins being the bad guy so unexpected
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/12 01:08 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
That's true. What puzzles me is that I see movies listed that I never heard of and many are with well known stars.
It boils down to the price for TV rights.
You think TNT/TBS replayed SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION endlessly because they loved it? No. Ted Turner got those TV rights for dirt cheap (it was a box-office flop despite Oscar nominations) and hey you need programming to fill out all those hours on your TV networks besides wrestling, Braves baseball. Same reason why they replayed BEASTMASTER and ROADHOUSE into oblivion back in the day.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/12 02:42 PM
Other movies that are constantly on tv are DIE HARD, DIE HARD 2, IN THE LINE OF FIRE, THE FUGITIVE and KILL BILL.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/12 02:44 PM
Kly,
I LOVE Die Hard AND The Fugitive but they air them WAY TOO MUCH. I don't watch them on purpose because they lose their "greatness" if you see them too much IMHO.
TIS
I LOVE Die Hard AND The Fugitive but they air them WAY TOO MUCH. I don't watch them on purpose because they lose their "greatness" if you see them too much IMHO.
TIS
Posted By: samparker
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 08:49 AM
last time i watched rock of ages
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 09:43 AM
Originally Posted By: samparker
last time i watched rock of ages
Most people I know who saw that walked out of the theater.
Posted By: NickyScarfo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 10:31 AM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Has anyone ever seen arlington road? My mum suggested it to me and i thought it would be a lmn type movie (in the uk hallmark if i'm thinking about the same type of movie) but i thought it was amazing especially tim robbins being the bad guy so unexpected
yeah I thought that was a very underrated movie!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 07:01 PM
I just watched the original Gloria with Gena Rowlands. Wow, what a good film and one heck of a performance not only by Gena, but the little kid. How precocious! This is a different kind of Mafia movie that perfectly juxtaposes the endemic horrific qualities of Mafiosi with those which most of us possess. Give it a look.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 07:07 PM
Great movie, Oli. Rowlands is always worth a look, and Cassavetes may have been the most underrated director of all time.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/12 07:37 PM
Cassavetes also directed Gena Rowlands in what I considered her greatest role - the wife in "A Woman Under The Influence". She plays the wife of Peter Falk, an insane woman, and the impact of that insanity on her family. They were both amazing in the movie.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/30/12 12:13 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Kly,
I LOVE Die Hard AND The Fugitive but they air them WAY TOO MUCH. I don't watch them on purpose because they lose their "greatness" if you see them too much IMHO.
TIS
I LOVE Die Hard AND The Fugitive but they air them WAY TOO MUCH. I don't watch them on purpose because they lose their "greatness" if you see them too much IMHO.
TIS
I like them too. And I still watch them even though it may only be for a half hour or so.
Posted By: Don Zadjali
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/30/12 11:26 AM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Cassavetes also directed Gena Rowlands in what I considered her greatest role - the wife in "A Woman Under The Influence". She plays the wife of Peter Falk, an insane woman, and the impact of that insanity on her family. They were both amazing in the movie.
Whenever I read or hear the name "John Cassavetes" reminds me of two movies, Rosemary's baby (he played the hubby?) and the killing of a Chinese bookie, which is IMO one of the most if not the most underrated gangster movie ever, Cassavetes wrote and directed it.
"A Woman Under The Influence" sounds interesting, perhaps I should check it out.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:03 AM
Originally Posted By: NickyScarfo
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Has anyone ever seen arlington road? My mum suggested it to me and i thought it would be a lmn type movie (in the uk hallmark if i'm thinking about the same type of movie) but i thought it was amazing especially tim robbins being the bad guy so unexpected
yeah I thought that was a very underrated movie!
I know right none of my friends have seen it but when i loan it to them they lov2e it
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:06 AM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: NickyScarfo
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Has anyone ever seen arlington road? My mum suggested it to me and i thought it would be a lmn type movie (in the uk hallmark if i'm thinking about the same type of movie) but i thought it was amazing especially tim robbins being the bad guy so unexpected
yeah I thought that was a very underrated movie!
I know right none of my friends have seen it but when i loan it to them they lov2e it
Saw it back when it was in theaters. Pretty good.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:08 AM
Just watched Lockout with Guy Pearce. OK action movie. Some funny one liners.
Watched Waiting again. It's a comedy from 7 or 8 years ago, I think. I tend to not like the more crass comedies but this one is pretty dang funny. Especially for anyone who's every worked in a restaurant or done customer service.
Watched Waiting again. It's a comedy from 7 or 8 years ago, I think. I tend to not like the more crass comedies but this one is pretty dang funny. Especially for anyone who's every worked in a restaurant or done customer service.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:11 AM
Oh yeah, definitely won't be seeing Magic Mike. Even if it does have Oliva Munn topless in it.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 03:08 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Oh yeah, definitely won't be seeing Magic Mike. Even if it does have Oliva Munn topless in it.
I know, what a cruel trick played by the fates.
"Munn is finally showing us her boobs! In that movie about male strippers."
I'll wait for it to pop-up online.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 03:49 AM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
I'll wait for it to pop-up online.
Well, there really wasn't a "wait." (A friend of mine excitedly sent me a link.)
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 04:07 AM
Brave (2012) - ***1/2 out of 5
The people at Pixar have some of the more consistent-quality controlling filmmakers working today, and they crank out another winner. It doesn't match the Pixar triumphs like UP or TOY STORY 3 if only because it doesn't have that that trademark emotional gutpunch (My God, adults at those UP and TS3 screenings I went to cried.) This is more on the level of RATATOUILLE or FINDING NEMO, simply a terrific comedy that got me semi-involved with the narrative. In essence, Pixar makes adult comedies that also appeal to children.
But this movie has gotten wrongly slammed by misguided liberals who whine that they expected a "Pixar feminist" movie and complain instead that they got another Disney Princess movie. Which is total bullshit.
It does broadly follow that popular and popularily derided Disney Princess formula, but with sophisticated creative touches and surprising turns by the movie's original female director/writer (she was replaced during production because the movie was behind schedule.) Really reminds me of to a degree of THE INCREDIBLES (Pixar's best movie IMO) with what it did with the superhero formula in that regard.
What do I mean? There is no prince. There is no villain. The two lead characters are women. The princess doesn't marry or fall in love with anybody at the end. Well there is a witch*, but she's a benevolent nice scatter-brain, no more evil at worst than a legal gun dealer. There are princes, but they're one-off jokes.
Even with the conventional plot set-up with the orthodox mother and the liberalized daughter, both are treated with more depth and intelligence than usualy in these sorts of movies as they're stuck together trying to solve their dilemma (girl got mad at mom, accidentally turns her into a bear.) The princess is likeable, she made a childish mistake out of rash anger, owned up to it and fixed it like an adult. In the ending, she's treated like an independent adult woman. Oh and she shoots arrows.
I mean my fellow libs, doesn't that sound like basic feminism 101 in a nutshell that we wished Hollywood would do more of or attempt at the movies? You know, try to actually back up their supposed progressive values?
In that fashion, if PROMETHEUS aged like milk for me in reflection, BRAVE is aging like wine. It's not a great movie, but it deserves much more credit than it's currently getting. It's getting punished for orbiting the Earth and not landing on Mars.
*=Someone pointed out to me that the BRAVE witch in design (with the oversized eyeball) was obviously influenced by the evil witch in SNOW WHITE, the original Disney princess movie. A clever twist on the cliche.
The people at Pixar have some of the more consistent-quality controlling filmmakers working today, and they crank out another winner. It doesn't match the Pixar triumphs like UP or TOY STORY 3 if only because it doesn't have that that trademark emotional gutpunch (My God, adults at those UP and TS3 screenings I went to cried.) This is more on the level of RATATOUILLE or FINDING NEMO, simply a terrific comedy that got me semi-involved with the narrative. In essence, Pixar makes adult comedies that also appeal to children.
But this movie has gotten wrongly slammed by misguided liberals who whine that they expected a "Pixar feminist" movie and complain instead that they got another Disney Princess movie. Which is total bullshit.
It does broadly follow that popular and popularily derided Disney Princess formula, but with sophisticated creative touches and surprising turns by the movie's original female director/writer (she was replaced during production because the movie was behind schedule.) Really reminds me of to a degree of THE INCREDIBLES (Pixar's best movie IMO) with what it did with the superhero formula in that regard.
What do I mean? There is no prince. There is no villain. The two lead characters are women. The princess doesn't marry or fall in love with anybody at the end. Well there is a witch*, but she's a benevolent nice scatter-brain, no more evil at worst than a legal gun dealer. There are princes, but they're one-off jokes.
Even with the conventional plot set-up with the orthodox mother and the liberalized daughter, both are treated with more depth and intelligence than usualy in these sorts of movies as they're stuck together trying to solve their dilemma (girl got mad at mom, accidentally turns her into a bear.) The princess is likeable, she made a childish mistake out of rash anger, owned up to it and fixed it like an adult. In the ending, she's treated like an independent adult woman. Oh and she shoots arrows.
I mean my fellow libs, doesn't that sound like basic feminism 101 in a nutshell that we wished Hollywood would do more of or attempt at the movies? You know, try to actually back up their supposed progressive values?
In that fashion, if PROMETHEUS aged like milk for me in reflection, BRAVE is aging like wine. It's not a great movie, but it deserves much more credit than it's currently getting. It's getting punished for orbiting the Earth and not landing on Mars.
*=Someone pointed out to me that the BRAVE witch in design (with the oversized eyeball) was obviously influenced by the evil witch in SNOW WHITE, the original Disney princess movie. A clever twist on the cliche.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 04:24 AM
Bah! Need I point out that the last thing we need, especially in a Pixar movie, is any liberal, feminist, propaganda? Seriously, Disney/Pixar is supposed to be family-oriented. Traditional-values oriented. Is nothing sacred? But it is Hollywood after all so maybe I'm hoping for the impossible. 
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 01:25 PM
Just watched 21 jump street it was decent but i was expecting more
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:25 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Bah! Need I point out that the last thing we need, especially in a Pixar movie, is any liberal, feminist, propaganda? Seriously, Disney/Pixar is supposed to be family-oriented. Traditional-values oriented. Is nothing sacred? But it is Hollywood after all so maybe I'm hoping for the impossible.
There is no conflict what so ever between "family values" and leading compelling female characters in movies/TV that aren't merely designated props/playthings for men. For all of Hollywood's preaching, by default they usually fall back to the same patriarchal traditionalism that town supposedly decries. Not that I necessarily mind such traditionalism, but when they do it out of creative bankruptcy or worse cowardice, they deserve to be criticized with feet to the fires.
I'm reminded of ALIENS, Big classic action blockbuster with Sigourney Weaver the star and character that everybody liked and rooted for. She earned that rare Oscar acting nomination given for an action film. But that was what, 1986? Hollywood can do much more frequently than that.
Of course there is unfortunately still an undercurrent of sexism within Hollywood. I'm reminded of when Kathryn Bigelow was the front-runner to win the Best Director Oscar for HURT LOCKER, Salon magazine ran a piece criticizing and dismissing her talents because she never made "women movies," or whatever that means because women should only direct movies about women, like how men always make movies about men and other such wonderfully stupid observations that somebody was paid to write and somebody else published.
~I use quotations on "family values" because it's a questionable moniker used by particular peoples in recent decades waging their own cultural war using the mechanics of government against other particular peoples are actually very much pro-nuclear family and pro-marriage, a very welcome alternative to forsaking the institution of marriage or even celebrating divorce, a fact lost when some people miss the forest for the trees.
Posted By: NickyScarfo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 02:49 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Just watched 21 jump street it was decent but i was expecting more
Couldn't even finish that, very disappointed I will stick with 80s teen movies which ruled!
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 06:04 PM
I don't know how many of you have seen any of the "Final Destination" films but I admit, for some reason I enjoy them. HBO is running the latest (at least I think it is) Final Destination 4 or 5?
I guess I like the premise of "you can't cheat death". I don't know, but I find myself watching each one. I admit to laughing at scenes which weren't meant to by funny, but still have fun watching these films. I've never seen any of them at the movies but on HBO or cable. This last one was actually not too bad considering it's 4th (or maybe fifth) in the series.
Anyone see any of these FD films?
TIS
I guess I like the premise of "you can't cheat death". I don't know, but I find myself watching each one. I admit to laughing at scenes which weren't meant to by funny, but still have fun watching these films. I've never seen any of them at the movies but on HBO or cable. This last one was actually not too bad considering it's 4th (or maybe fifth) in the series.
Anyone see any of these FD films?
TIS
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 06:45 PM
I saw the first movie, and I remember thinking it was alright. Not seen the rest.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 06:55 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
I saw the first movie, and I remember thinking it was alright. Not seen the rest.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
RR, the first one was the airplane, then there was car accident, a carnival mishap, race track disaster and the last one, they escaped death from a collapsing bridge. Btw, the villan is the same guy who was in The Candyman...Tony????something.
I am not a fan of slasher films and I wouldn't call these that,tho there are some graphic scenes. I loved too how the very first one ended.
On the same line of "Fun entertainment" I liked Jeepers Creepers too.
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 09:09 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
I saw the first movie, and I remember thinking it was alright. Not seen the rest.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
I heard the last few were inventive with their demises. I like that.
RR, the first one was the airplane, then there was car accident, a carnival mishap, race track disaster and the last one, they escaped death from a collapsing bridge. Btw, the villan is the same guy who was in The Candyman...Tony????something.
I am not a fan of slasher films and I wouldn't call these that,tho there are some graphic scenes. I loved too how the very first one ended.
On the same line of "Fun entertainment" I liked Jeepers Creepers too.
TIS
The first one and the one with the rollercoaster are quite good.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/12 11:00 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
There is no conflict what so ever between "family values" and leading compelling female characters in movies/TV that aren't merely designated props/playthings for men. For all of Hollywood's preaching, by default they usually fall back to the same patriarchal traditionalism that town supposedly decries. Not that I necessarily mind such traditionalism, but when they do it out of creative bankruptcy or worse cowardice, they deserve to be criticized with feet to the fires.
I'm reminded of ALIENS, Big classic action blockbuster with Sigourney Weaver the star and character that everybody liked and rooted for. She earned that rare Oscar acting nomination given for an action film. But that was what, 1986? Hollywood can do much more frequently than that.
Of course there is unfortunately still an undercurrent of sexism within Hollywood. I'm reminded of when Kathryn Bigelow was the front-runner to win the Best Director Oscar for HURT LOCKER, Salon magazine ran a piece criticizing and dismissing her talents because she never made "women movies," or whatever that means because women should only direct movies about women, like how men always make movies about men and other such wonderfully stupid observations that somebody was paid to write and somebody else published.
~I use quotations on "family values" because it's a questionable moniker used by particular peoples in recent decades waging their own cultural war using the mechanics of government against other particular peoples are actually very much pro-nuclear family and pro-marriage, a very welcome alternative to forsaking the institution of marriage or even celebrating divorce, a fact lost when some people miss the forest for the trees.
I'm reminded of ALIENS, Big classic action blockbuster with Sigourney Weaver the star and character that everybody liked and rooted for. She earned that rare Oscar acting nomination given for an action film. But that was what, 1986? Hollywood can do much more frequently than that.
Of course there is unfortunately still an undercurrent of sexism within Hollywood. I'm reminded of when Kathryn Bigelow was the front-runner to win the Best Director Oscar for HURT LOCKER, Salon magazine ran a piece criticizing and dismissing her talents because she never made "women movies," or whatever that means because women should only direct movies about women, like how men always make movies about men and other such wonderfully stupid observations that somebody was paid to write and somebody else published.
~I use quotations on "family values" because it's a questionable moniker used by particular peoples in recent decades waging their own cultural war using the mechanics of government against other particular peoples are actually very much pro-nuclear family and pro-marriage, a very welcome alternative to forsaking the institution of marriage or even celebrating divorce, a fact lost when some people miss the forest for the trees.
Compelling leading female characters is fine. Since you mentioned it, Aliens is one of my all time favorite movies. But in addition to being such a great writer and director, it worked because of how Cameron went about it. Ripley wasn't trying to be "GI Jane." She wasn't a soldier trying to be "one of the guys." She was just put in a position and did what she had to do. More than anything, it was really more about her taking on the mother role and protecting Newt among all the chaos.
The problem comes when movie makers, for whatever reason, but often to make some political or social statement, try to have their female characters act outside of their gender roles. And then present it as something that's a good thing. Something to be cheered.
And for the record, I liked the Hurt Locker, but I don't think it deserved both "Best Movie" and "Best Director."
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/12 10:10 PM
Mrs. Mark talked me into watching "The Help" last night. Very good picture I must say. I didn't think I would like it but I enjoyed it very much. Highly recommend. I give it 4-1/2 meatballs out of 5!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/12 12:33 AM
One of my faves, Mark, both the book and the movie.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/12 05:14 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
One of my faves, Mark, both the book and the movie.
Does the movie do the book justice?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/12 06:56 PM
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) - ***1/2
Decent, if at times even spectacularly decent reboot of the Spider-Man franchise that is less Sam Raimi's movie from a decade ago and more Sony gunning for Spidey in the BATMAN BEGINS mold. The cast was good, with the leads in Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are great, dynamite chemistry but I must admit I was disapointed that they made a point of introducing Stone's Gwen Stacy as an intellectual equal of Peter Parker, only for the movie to do absolutely nothing with that introduced element. (Then why bother?) Garfield's Parker is more inert, more awkward, more clumsy, and quite frankly more interesting than Tobey Maguire's portrayal was.
People complain about the origin story being rehashed, but that's an irrelevant concern. You've seen movies before, why watch them again? You've seen a movie about Jesus before, why see another one? Hey they already made Batman movies, why did we need Christopher Nolan's (superior) movies? Hell fans know most of these superhero origin tales by heart, so why bother? Because some stories we love to hear, even if we're very familiar with them.
I was mildly engaged, I laughed at most of the intended punchlines, I was excited, and I'm baffled by complaints that the CGI is not good. Realy guys? I saw Raimi's SPIDER-MAN on TV some weeks back, and it's amazing (no pun intended) how much CGI has evolved just in the last decade.
I do admit he first hour sorta dragged, but I can't decide if it was the story being told (technically nothing wrong with it) or the fact I didn't get much sleep last night. Also the ending turned me off, and I'm not sure why. It keeps with the tone of the movie was going for and faithful (more or less) to the Spider-Man comics, but I dunno it feels sorta contrived? Maybe it feels short in the aftermath of THE AVENGERS, but that can't be helped. It feels too contrived of the first SPIDER-MAN movie, such moments of creative lazyness that somewhat hold this back.
If there is a real reason to go see ASM, there were some scenes as I alluded to that were rare moments when I go from critically watching a movie on a technical level and get myself lost in the moment as a moviegoer. Spider-Man tying up criminals and hanging them outside the local police precinct? His great plan to get a picture of the Lizard down in the sewers that horribly backfires? Goofing off playing games on his smartphone during a stake-out? Taking his mask off to get a kid to escape a burning car? Playfully revealing his spandex hobby to his girlfriend? Such charming scenes that give a nice reminder of why Spider-Man is one of the superhero heavyweights in global popularity.
Again not a great movie, but at least it's better than SPIDER-MAN 3. That's a nicer compliment than I intended. I hope the sequel is even better, and I think that it can. Definately doesn't deserve some of the intense backlash from the Internet. (Yet it got an "A-" from Cinemascore, a decent if not gospel barometer of audience WOM.)
NOTE: I think it's funny that the marketing made a big friggin deal about how "you've not see the whole story!" mystery aspect of Spider-Man, especially regarding his parents. Which as you Spidey/comic book fans might remembere, were never around or mentioned. And you know what? I never cared about them or their fate, either as a kid or adult, and I'll argue most people feel the same way. It's like wondering about young King Lear, I mean who cares?
But regardless, ASM doesn't answer it, leaving it again for the inevitable sequel so don't worry about it. I liked the movie in spite of that shamelss marketing bait & switch. (But Sony, please no Green Goblin again. Why not try Mysterio? He was my favorite Spidey villain as a kid.)
Decent, if at times even spectacularly decent reboot of the Spider-Man franchise that is less Sam Raimi's movie from a decade ago and more Sony gunning for Spidey in the BATMAN BEGINS mold. The cast was good, with the leads in Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are great, dynamite chemistry but I must admit I was disapointed that they made a point of introducing Stone's Gwen Stacy as an intellectual equal of Peter Parker, only for the movie to do absolutely nothing with that introduced element. (Then why bother?) Garfield's Parker is more inert, more awkward, more clumsy, and quite frankly more interesting than Tobey Maguire's portrayal was.
People complain about the origin story being rehashed, but that's an irrelevant concern. You've seen movies before, why watch them again? You've seen a movie about Jesus before, why see another one? Hey they already made Batman movies, why did we need Christopher Nolan's (superior) movies? Hell fans know most of these superhero origin tales by heart, so why bother? Because some stories we love to hear, even if we're very familiar with them.
I was mildly engaged, I laughed at most of the intended punchlines, I was excited, and I'm baffled by complaints that the CGI is not good. Realy guys? I saw Raimi's SPIDER-MAN on TV some weeks back, and it's amazing (no pun intended) how much CGI has evolved just in the last decade.
I do admit he first hour sorta dragged, but I can't decide if it was the story being told (technically nothing wrong with it) or the fact I didn't get much sleep last night. Also the ending turned me off, and I'm not sure why. It keeps with the tone of the movie was going for and faithful (more or less) to the Spider-Man comics, but I dunno it feels sorta contrived? Maybe it feels short in the aftermath of THE AVENGERS, but that can't be helped. It feels too contrived of the first SPIDER-MAN movie, such moments of creative lazyness that somewhat hold this back.
If there is a real reason to go see ASM, there were some scenes as I alluded to that were rare moments when I go from critically watching a movie on a technical level and get myself lost in the moment as a moviegoer. Spider-Man tying up criminals and hanging them outside the local police precinct? His great plan to get a picture of the Lizard down in the sewers that horribly backfires? Goofing off playing games on his smartphone during a stake-out? Taking his mask off to get a kid to escape a burning car? Playfully revealing his spandex hobby to his girlfriend? Such charming scenes that give a nice reminder of why Spider-Man is one of the superhero heavyweights in global popularity.
Again not a great movie, but at least it's better than SPIDER-MAN 3. That's a nicer compliment than I intended. I hope the sequel is even better, and I think that it can. Definately doesn't deserve some of the intense backlash from the Internet. (Yet it got an "A-" from Cinemascore, a decent if not gospel barometer of audience WOM.)
NOTE: I think it's funny that the marketing made a big friggin deal about how "you've not see the whole story!" mystery aspect of Spider-Man, especially regarding his parents. Which as you Spidey/comic book fans might remembere, were never around or mentioned. And you know what? I never cared about them or their fate, either as a kid or adult, and I'll argue most people feel the same way. It's like wondering about young King Lear, I mean who cares?
But regardless, ASM doesn't answer it, leaving it again for the inevitable sequel so don't worry about it. I liked the movie in spite of that shamelss marketing bait & switch. (But Sony, please no Green Goblin again. Why not try Mysterio? He was my favorite Spidey villain as a kid.)
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/12 07:43 PM
The Hunger Games (2012) - ****
Now this is what I was talking about with my rant about women characters and Hollywood. This was a monster hit ($400 million grossed in America alone) and based off a similarly successful book series. I think it's pretty obvious two-fold why teenagers (specifically young women) really reacted positively to this and I assume the source material (which I've obviously never read) too:
(1) Teenagers love reading/seeing teenagers in adult situations, having to more or less fend for themselves. It's why HARRY POTTER and (the idiotic) TWILIGHT were so popular, among other reasons.
(2) The protagonist (played here by the talented newcomer Jennifer Lawrence)is a young girl, who you immediately rally around. She's resourceful, she's intelligent, she's likeable, we relate to her troubles more or less running what's left of her family, we follow her complicated relationship throughout the narrative with local boy Josh Hutcherson, she's a human beacon which we see this horribly dystopic future (or wicked alternate reality?) from her perspective.
See Hollywood, how hard is that?
That scene with her showing off her archery skills to the oligarchy's amusement (but more like indiffernece) was magic. The way it's paced and develops you know what will happen but man it's wonderful when it does unfold exactly as you hoped for.
(I do think it's odd how Lawrence here is a master archer, as was the female protagonist in BRAVE. Then you have Hawkeye in THE AVENGERS. Did archery become popular with the hipsters without me being aware?)
That "perspective," director Gary Ross here does in costume deisgn, art direction and other aesthetic detaild that Ridley Scott did with BLADE RUNNER, informing and educating you about everything about this ficitonal universe with the technological disparity between the impoverished powerless masses and the self-enclosed oligarchy not really in touch with reality, all without being being spoonfed with dull, insulting exposition. HUNGER GAMES the movie is more intelligent and superbly crafted than I think most of it's fans give it credit.
The opening with Lawrence in her home "district," I thought it looked quite like southwestern Virginia/West Virginia and looking up on wikipedia, what do you know that distrct is supposed to be set in the Appalachians. I even liked President/dictator Donald Sutherland's speech about that part of the world being full of underdogs. "If you knew them, you wouldn't cheer for the underdog." Brilliant.
I'll tell you what I honestly enjoyed most about HG, and it's Woody Harleson. He can be such a great actor, scoring two well-earned Oscar acting nominations over the years, yet he's still remarkably underrated in spite of all that. To some folks, he's still fucking Woody from CHEERS. He deserves more credit, specifically what he adds to HUNGER GAMES.
He's introduced before appearing as only the ex-champion of these Hunger Games, a gladiator deathmatch spectacle held by this dictatorship with kids sent to kill each other until one is left standing. Then Woody appears, and his demeanor with those eyes tells you everything you need to know about him. Yes he won, or the last survivor where he assumingly did kill other kids to save himself. And that thought has haunted him, and he tries to escape with booze and cynical indifference but with no success.
That's how dictatorships stay in power, dehumanizing the population and making such horrible shit the accepted status quo. Woody is like the masses, he knows these Hunger Games are savage and horrible, but what he's helpless. There is nothing he can do, right I like the impression given only the lunatic cabal at the capitol city are the only ones who "enjoy" this violent circus, everybody else is horrified and put in their place by this these Games.
Yet when Harleson grows some sort of friendship/mentorship with Lawrence, fire returns to those eyes and she forces him through smarts and admiration to care about her, makes him give a shit again and try to help her anyway she can during those Games. I suppose if the two upcoming movie sequels (according to wikipedia) are about the growing revolution against this society, then Harleson gives a great microcosmic demonstration of why this happens.
I have only one severe reservation about HUNGER GAMES: The fucking post-action cinematography, or as better known (or better scorned) as "shakey cam." You know where action scenes are now usually filmed with a camera tossed around back and forth, and you the audience are disoriented with no sense of geography (i.e. what the fuck is happening.) I was so capitvated by this movie, but those scenes did take me out of that spell.
But I guess I give Ross credit in one way: He doesn't sensationalize the violence with the scenes of kids actually killing other kids, he denies people a chance to enjoy that juvenile violence. And quite frankly I appreciate that because I had no appetite for it. (Yet I had no qualms with KICK ASS and the cursing/murdering 11 year old girl. Go figure. )
I suppose going in I expected THE RUNNING MAN with teenagers, an adventure thriller or something. Instead I got ROLLERBALL with teenagers (the James Caan movie, not that dumbass Chris Klein remake.) Yes it's "entertainment," but along the way you're provoked to think about certain things larger than your popcorn that only good movies make you comtemplate.
Now this is what I was talking about with my rant about women characters and Hollywood. This was a monster hit ($400 million grossed in America alone) and based off a similarly successful book series. I think it's pretty obvious two-fold why teenagers (specifically young women) really reacted positively to this and I assume the source material (which I've obviously never read) too:
(1) Teenagers love reading/seeing teenagers in adult situations, having to more or less fend for themselves. It's why HARRY POTTER and (the idiotic) TWILIGHT were so popular, among other reasons.
(2) The protagonist (played here by the talented newcomer Jennifer Lawrence)is a young girl, who you immediately rally around. She's resourceful, she's intelligent, she's likeable, we relate to her troubles more or less running what's left of her family, we follow her complicated relationship throughout the narrative with local boy Josh Hutcherson, she's a human beacon which we see this horribly dystopic future (or wicked alternate reality?) from her perspective.
See Hollywood, how hard is that?
That scene with her showing off her archery skills to the oligarchy's amusement (but more like indiffernece) was magic. The way it's paced and develops you know what will happen but man it's wonderful when it does unfold exactly as you hoped for.
(I do think it's odd how Lawrence here is a master archer, as was the female protagonist in BRAVE. Then you have Hawkeye in THE AVENGERS. Did archery become popular with the hipsters without me being aware?)
That "perspective," director Gary Ross here does in costume deisgn, art direction and other aesthetic detaild that Ridley Scott did with BLADE RUNNER, informing and educating you about everything about this ficitonal universe with the technological disparity between the impoverished powerless masses and the self-enclosed oligarchy not really in touch with reality, all without being being spoonfed with dull, insulting exposition. HUNGER GAMES the movie is more intelligent and superbly crafted than I think most of it's fans give it credit.
The opening with Lawrence in her home "district," I thought it looked quite like southwestern Virginia/West Virginia and looking up on wikipedia, what do you know that distrct is supposed to be set in the Appalachians. I even liked President/dictator Donald Sutherland's speech about that part of the world being full of underdogs. "If you knew them, you wouldn't cheer for the underdog." Brilliant.
I'll tell you what I honestly enjoyed most about HG, and it's Woody Harleson. He can be such a great actor, scoring two well-earned Oscar acting nominations over the years, yet he's still remarkably underrated in spite of all that. To some folks, he's still fucking Woody from CHEERS. He deserves more credit, specifically what he adds to HUNGER GAMES.
He's introduced before appearing as only the ex-champion of these Hunger Games, a gladiator deathmatch spectacle held by this dictatorship with kids sent to kill each other until one is left standing. Then Woody appears, and his demeanor with those eyes tells you everything you need to know about him. Yes he won, or the last survivor where he assumingly did kill other kids to save himself. And that thought has haunted him, and he tries to escape with booze and cynical indifference but with no success.
That's how dictatorships stay in power, dehumanizing the population and making such horrible shit the accepted status quo. Woody is like the masses, he knows these Hunger Games are savage and horrible, but what he's helpless. There is nothing he can do, right I like the impression given only the lunatic cabal at the capitol city are the only ones who "enjoy" this violent circus, everybody else is horrified and put in their place by this these Games.
Yet when Harleson grows some sort of friendship/mentorship with Lawrence, fire returns to those eyes and she forces him through smarts and admiration to care about her, makes him give a shit again and try to help her anyway she can during those Games. I suppose if the two upcoming movie sequels (according to wikipedia) are about the growing revolution against this society, then Harleson gives a great microcosmic demonstration of why this happens.
I have only one severe reservation about HUNGER GAMES: The fucking post-action cinematography, or as better known (or better scorned) as "shakey cam." You know where action scenes are now usually filmed with a camera tossed around back and forth, and you the audience are disoriented with no sense of geography (i.e. what the fuck is happening.) I was so capitvated by this movie, but those scenes did take me out of that spell.
But I guess I give Ross credit in one way: He doesn't sensationalize the violence with the scenes of kids actually killing other kids, he denies people a chance to enjoy that juvenile violence. And quite frankly I appreciate that because I had no appetite for it. (Yet I had no qualms with KICK ASS and the cursing/murdering 11 year old girl. Go figure. )
I suppose going in I expected THE RUNNING MAN with teenagers, an adventure thriller or something. Instead I got ROLLERBALL with teenagers (the James Caan movie, not that dumbass Chris Klein remake.) Yes it's "entertainment," but along the way you're provoked to think about certain things larger than your popcorn that only good movies make you comtemplate.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/12 11:31 PM
Originally Posted By: Mark
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
One of my faves, Mark, both the book and the movie.
Does the movie do the book justice?
The movie is fairly faithful, and I think the actors all did their characters justice. I felt that the book did a better job of conveying the danger that they were all in for telling their stories, but I enjoyed them both.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/12 02:44 AM
Watched The Talented Mr. Ripley. Great movie.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/12 01:44 PM
We rented "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo" Friday night, only to find that it was airing on cable last night. I didn't love Daniel Craig in the lead. I couldn't understand half of what he was saying; he always seemed to be mumbling (although that might have been the DVD). The rest of the cast, however, did an outstanding job, especially Stellan Skarsgard and Rooney Mara.
The movie has a very dark and disturbing story to tell. Daniel Craig plays a disgraced journalist who is hired by a Swedish industrialist to look into the 40 year old disappearance of his beloved niece. The book had an incredible number of characters that were often difficult to follow (especially given the Swedish names and places, which are not familiar to me) and the film did an admirable job of keeping them all in place.
I am glad that I saw the movie in the summer, though. Everyone always looked so freezing cold! My mom told me that she saw Dr. Zhivago on a bitter cold night and had to wait on a long line outside to get tickets. She said that they were freezing cold the entire night!
The movie has a very dark and disturbing story to tell. Daniel Craig plays a disgraced journalist who is hired by a Swedish industrialist to look into the 40 year old disappearance of his beloved niece. The book had an incredible number of characters that were often difficult to follow (especially given the Swedish names and places, which are not familiar to me) and the film did an admirable job of keeping them all in place.
I am glad that I saw the movie in the summer, though. Everyone always looked so freezing cold! My mom told me that she saw Dr. Zhivago on a bitter cold night and had to wait on a long line outside to get tickets. She said that they were freezing cold the entire night!
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/12 03:54 AM
All the parts were there for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Daniel Craig is always good and it's a perfect movie for Fincher. But the question is, did it really need to be made after the original Swedish version? I'm not one of these movie snobs that automatically writes off an American remake of a foreign film but it is often the case the remakes don't measure up for one reason or another.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/12 06:39 AM
Also watched Bad Santa. Not for everybody but very funny if you like dark comedy.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/12/12 02:35 AM
Most of the reviews said that the American version was pretty much Swedish Version Redux, and was slightly inferior to the original. I haven't seen the Swedish version, but I believe they filmed the entire trilogy, no?
Lisbeth Salander is one of the most tragic heroines ever written. I couldn't put the first book down. I didn't admire the next two quite as much, but I would be interested to see the films.
Lisbeth Salander is one of the most tragic heroines ever written. I couldn't put the first book down. I didn't admire the next two quite as much, but I would be interested to see the films.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/12 05:31 AM
Watch Pride & Glory again. Saw it originally in the theater. Gritty cop movie with Ed Norton and Colin Farrell. Really good.
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/12 05:53 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Watch Pride & Glory again. Saw it originally in the theater. Gritty cop movie with Ed Norton and Colin Farrell. Really good.
My younger brother (who wants to join the NYPD) and I LOVE that movie.
I wish Netflix had it on instant streaming
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/12 02:45 AM
Another one I watched again is NARC, with Jason Patrick and Ray Liotta. Another very gritty cop movie. The opening scene is unforgettable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTWACLTZBYA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTWACLTZBYA
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/12 03:05 AM
I'm watching Stephen King's, "The Mist" on the SyFy channel. I never saw it before. It's actually pretty good; keeping my interest.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/12 02:49 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
I'm watching Stephen King's, "The Mist" on the SyFy channel. I never saw it before. It's actually pretty good; keeping my interest.
TIS
TIS
Very cool movie, TIS. I read this years ago and can honestly say that one is not better than the other... the book compliments the movie and vice versa. However, one thing the movie does not show is that the lead character does sleep with the check out girl in one of the back rooms of the market thus fueling the religious zealot's ire.
Posted By: short841
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/12 03:01 PM
Just watched Bronson with Tom Hardy in. Very good acting from Hardy.
Posted By: dontomasso
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/12 05:19 PM
I saw the Batman movie this weekend. Meh.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/12 11:16 PM
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
I saw the Batman movie this weekend. Meh.
What didn't you like?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/12 01:40 AM
Last night one of the cable channels ran Denzel Washington's "John Q." I hadn't seen the movie in a few years and forgot how good it was. I haven't seen all of Denzel's films but I do like the movies I've seen.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/12 03:15 PM
Denzel is my man, TIS (after Jeter, anyway). John Q didn't get very good reviews, and I always thought it a much better film than credited.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/12 03:19 PM
SB,
I don't remember it as being real popular at the theater but I too enjoyed it.
I saw "Training Day" for the first time a while back. Whoa what an a-hole his character was.
So easy to hate. Great acting job by Denzel. (If I'm not mistaken he won deservedly and Oscar for that part)?
TIS
I don't remember it as being real popular at the theater but I too enjoyed it.
I saw "Training Day" for the first time a while back. Whoa what an a-hole his character was.
So easy to hate. Great acting job by Denzel. (If I'm not mistaken he won deservedly and Oscar for that part)? TIS
Posted By: Mastronardo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/12 06:01 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
SB,
I don't remember it as being real popular at the theater but I too enjoyed it.
I saw "Training Day" for the first time a while back. Whoa what an a-hole his character was. So easy to hate. Great acting job by Denzel. (If I'm not mistaken he won deservedly and Oscar for that part)?
TIS
I don't remember it as being real popular at the theater but I too enjoyed it.
I saw "Training Day" for the first time a while back. Whoa what an a-hole his character was.
So easy to hate. Great acting job by Denzel. (If I'm not mistaken he won deservedly and Oscar for that part)? TIS
I’m afraid Washington only got an Academy Award for his role in Training Day. Another incredible Denzel Washington movie is The Taking of Pelham 123, also starring John Travolta.
A movie I’ve recently watched is Ted, it’s a comedy starring Mark Wahlberg and Mila Kunis. I highly recommend it if you’re into hysterically funny movies. I have also heard a lot about Sacha Baron Cohen’s new movie, The Dictator. I’m looking forward to seeing it.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/12 09:35 PM
Originally Posted By: Lilo
[quote=dontomasso]
What didn't you like?
What didn't you like?
He didn't like the lack of Nuke Repellent Bat Spray.
Originally Posted By: Mastronardo
I’m afraid Washington only got an Academy Award for his role in Training Day. Another incredible Denzel Washington movie is The Taking of Pelham 123, also starring John Travolta.
Bleh, the original PELHAM (a classic thriller from that decade) makes the remake come off as very tame and quite forgettable. The remake isn't bad, just I don't think its worth one's time for what you get from it.
Also you're wrong: Denzel also won a suppoting actor Oscar for GLORY back in the day.
Originally Posted By: Mastronardo
A movie I’ve recently watched is Ted, it’s a comedy starring Mark Wahlberg and Mila Kunis. I highly recommend it if you’re into hysterically funny movies. I have also heard a lot about Sacha Baron Cohen’s new movie, The Dictator. I’m looking forward to seeing it.
I liked TED too, even if it does that meta-referencing stuff which I don't care mostly. (It's really the FAMILY GUY movie, just on steroids and unrestricted by TV censors.)
Not seen DICTATOR, heard mixed word on that one.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/12 01:24 AM
Training Day terrifies me, he was such a horrible, horrible man. I don't want to hate Denzel! Oh, Glory was just such a great movie, and he was the best part about it. That scene, when Matthew Broderick orders that Denzel be flogged for going AWOL, wow! And then he finds out that Denzel's character was just looking for boots.
Posted By: Mignon
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/12 05:10 PM
Right now I'm watching John Wayne's Mclintock on AMC.
Posted By: Mastronardo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/12 11:01 PM
I watched The Expendables 2 today at the local cinema. It stars Jean-Claude van Damme, Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Chuck Norris, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis and Terry Crews. Not bad at all.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/12 11:17 PM
After Tony Scott's death, I was spurred to rewatch probably his best movie (this or THE HUNGER) in TRUE ROMANCE which just might very well be among my favorite movies ever. Everything about it is awesome from a then-novie Quentin Tarantino's screenplay to Tony Scott servicing it with his slick look and action pyrotechnics to this movie stuffed with a hell of a cast regardless of role size.
"You're part Eggplant!"
"You're part Eggplant!"
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 05:35 AM
It's been so long, I had to add TRUE ROMANCE to the top of my Netflix queue
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 02:37 PM
You know, sometimes with movies like HOBO WITH A SHOTGUN, words fail to accurately describe that ultraviolet cartoon mayhem. What a great title. But I certainly enjoyed that circus. It's like all those weirdo kids who caught TOXIC AVENGER and wanted to remake that sort of movie when they grow up, and well they did.
The best scene is when Rutger Hauer makes that snuff movie producer eat his own film at gunpoint.
The best scene is when Rutger Hauer makes that snuff movie producer eat his own film at gunpoint.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 06:50 PM
Love Rutger Hauer. He's such a great psychopath.
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 06:54 PM
Just saw The Dictator, only a few laughs here and there. Not as funny as I was expecting.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 06:56 PM
I do too! For me, one of his best was the original "The Hitcher" and you're right. He IS a great psycho. I've seen a few other movies with him, but that one stands out.
TIS
I've seen a few other movies with him, but that one stands out.TIS
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 07:15 PM
Did you ever see Nighthawks, with Stallone, Billy Dee Williams and Hauer? Hauer plays a very mean and scary "terrorist" and Williams and Stallone are the NYPD after him. Typical 1980s cop vs. bad guy, but there are some very good performances that elevate it a bit. Anyway, it's decent entertainment.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 07:19 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Did you ever see Nighthawks, with Stallone, Billy Dee Williams and Hauer? Hauer plays a very mean and scary "terrorist" and Williams and Stallone are the NYPD after him. Typical 1980s cop vs. bad guy, but there are some very good performances that elevate it a bit. Anyway, it's decent entertainment.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
When Hauer joins the great Dutch harbor in the sky, I'll remember him mostly for BLADE RUNNER.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/12 07:26 PM
I forgot about Nighthawks. Not a real popular Stallone movie, but I liked it. It's been so long since I've seen it I forgot Hauer was in it. Some people are just cut out to be the bad guy and he's one of them.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/12 12:11 PM
just watched WINTERS BONE. Very grim but compelling film about miserable hillbillies!!
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/12 03:34 PM
Speaking of hillbillies, caught LAWLESS yesterday. Meh.
Not a technically bad movie, with a good cast and good attention to period detail. But really it's ultimately rather disposable and not really all that interesting or remarkable.
Is this a thoughtful piece about America's never-ending War on Drugs (before that term was invented?)? Is this an engaging family melodrama? Is this an entertaining rednecksploitation action thriller? None of them, though I guess LAWLESS tried to take a stab at all of them.
Not a technically bad movie, with a good cast and good attention to period detail. But really it's ultimately rather disposable and not really all that interesting or remarkable.
Is this a thoughtful piece about America's never-ending War on Drugs (before that term was invented?)? Is this an engaging family melodrama? Is this an entertaining rednecksploitation action thriller? None of them, though I guess LAWLESS tried to take a stab at all of them.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/12 03:42 PM
rr - I hear that Gary Oldman is in the film but not nearly as much as he should be. At one point, I am told, he appears and then doesn't come back for a while and you almost forget that he is even in the flick.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/12 03:59 PM
I think it was FX that aired a remake of the Michael Douglas movie, COMA last night. It's a two parter and I saw part 1 but couldn't stay awake for part II. Anyone see this remake?
It wasn't bad but unless the second part is really really good, I like the original better.
TIS
It wasn't bad but unless the second part is really really good, I like the original better.
TIS
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/12 04:36 PM
Originally Posted By: Mark
rr - I hear that Gary Oldman is in the film but not nearly as much as he should be. At one point, I am told, he appears and then doesn't come back for a while and you almost forget that he is even in the flick.
It's a glorified cameo this side of TRUE ROMANCE. Except I think his TR part may've had more screen coverage.
Still I did forget that Oldman had the best scene in LAWLESS, and maybe I'm a sadistic psychopath because I grinned when he grabbed that shovel...
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/12 11:53 PM
Somebody uploaded this quite decent movie, one of director Peter Hyams' better works. Pretty much HIGH NOON in Outer Space, but w/ 100% more exploding heads.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/12 10:12 AM
Watched Brad Pitt's baseball movie MONEYBALL last night. Very good, thoroughly enjoyed it!
Posted By: YukonCorneleone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/12 06:15 PM
RR.....
LOVED Outland. One of my all time faves!
Saw Premium Rush the other night at theater
Good movie, well done and suspenseful
Go see Michael Shannon's (Agent Van Alden
from BE) performance. Spectacular!
LOVED Outland. One of my all time faves!
Saw Premium Rush the other night at theater
Good movie, well done and suspenseful
Go see Michael Shannon's (Agent Van Alden
from BE) performance. Spectacular!
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/21/12 10:10 PM
Saw DREDD, it was pretty good. This year's 4th comic book-based movie and the 4th good one, except thankfully a well-earned R-rated futuristic adventure that isn't made to please everybody or sell lunchboxes.
High octane entertaining B-action movie w/ streaks of humor from the one-liners and ultraviolence. Part DIRTY HARRY, part DIE HARD, part ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13 and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK (this movie feels John Carpenter-ish), with a subtly effective production/art design that won't get enough credit in giving you a sense of grim and (pun!) dread that a future this bad needs such a fascist police state to stem the problems of Mega City One (800 million in a super city the size of New England), and they're apparently not enough.
Not a great movie, but a good adaptation of the 2000 A.D. Comics with Karl Urban in a Clint Eastwood-inspired performance as the Judge Dredd that finally will hopefully erase memories of that lame Sylvester Stallone movie from back in the day.
I give this ***1/2 out of 5.
High octane entertaining B-action movie w/ streaks of humor from the one-liners and ultraviolence. Part DIRTY HARRY, part DIE HARD, part ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13 and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK (this movie feels John Carpenter-ish), with a subtly effective production/art design that won't get enough credit in giving you a sense of grim and (pun!) dread that a future this bad needs such a fascist police state to stem the problems of Mega City One (800 million in a super city the size of New England), and they're apparently not enough.
Not a great movie, but a good adaptation of the 2000 A.D. Comics with Karl Urban in a Clint Eastwood-inspired performance as the Judge Dredd that finally will hopefully erase memories of that lame Sylvester Stallone movie from back in the day.
I give this ***1/2 out of 5.
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/22/12 12:40 AM
Saw Traffic the other day for the first time, it was very good.
Posted By: MisterPurple
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/22/12 02:19 AM
Watched Hard Eight just now. Great movie!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/12 11:19 PM
Last night I watched some of John Travolta's movie (which I never geard of) entitled Love from Paris (or something like that)in which he's a CIA agent. It was pretty good and so was he although bald headed. Give it a look.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/12 11:35 PM
I saw that movie and almost watched it. LOL I ended up falling asleep. I did however watch a movie I hadn't heard of, with John Cusack and Morgan Freeman but can't think of the title. It was about a father/son out hiking and come across an assassin. Was pretty good.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/12 01:12 PM
Taken 2.
The glorious thing about the first Taken was the hidden bada$$ery of Liam Neeson. Of course if you've ever seen Rob Roy, Gangs of New York, Les Miserables or Darkman this shouldn't have really been a surprise but unfortunately for the mental defectives in the first film they didn't see those movies. The first film had really good pacing. It communicated the frantic nature of Bryan Mills' search for his daughter Kim before she is sold off into Third World sex-slavery.
But in Taken 2, presumably everyone, including the half of the Albanian male population that Mills DIDN'T kill and his ex-wife and daughter, knows that Mills is not a man to be f***** with. Because if you mess with him or his family you will die. And if he has the time, you might die painfully.
So there's really no reason for the bad guys to try again and there is even less reason for them to do incredibly stupid stuff like not kill Mills immediately once they have kidnapped Mills and his ex-wife Lenore.
If you were determined to keep Mills alive for a while that would be dumb.
At the very least since you know that he is very resourceful, incredibly dangerous, and has a downright mean streak, wouldn't you keep him under 24 hr armed guard, search him thoroughly, bind him with iron and steel instead of plastic or rope and just to be on the safe side, cripple him to forestall any escape attempts? I mean what are they teaching in Evil Overlord Boot Camp these days?
Also I will have to go back and watch the first Taken but I don't seem to remember Maggie Grace either being as curvy or showing as much flesh. Not that I'm complaining but it's impossible to believe that she's 16 years old. Again, since both his ex-wife and daughter know what he does , it makes no sense for them to insist on questioning his directives while people are shooting at them or saying they can't do what he tells them to do or falling into hysteria, which is most of what they do throughout the film.
Lots of stupid people get shot in the head. The end.
The glorious thing about the first Taken was the hidden bada$$ery of Liam Neeson. Of course if you've ever seen Rob Roy, Gangs of New York, Les Miserables or Darkman this shouldn't have really been a surprise but unfortunately for the mental defectives in the first film they didn't see those movies. The first film had really good pacing. It communicated the frantic nature of Bryan Mills' search for his daughter Kim before she is sold off into Third World sex-slavery.
But in Taken 2, presumably everyone, including the half of the Albanian male population that Mills DIDN'T kill and his ex-wife and daughter, knows that Mills is not a man to be f***** with. Because if you mess with him or his family you will die. And if he has the time, you might die painfully.
So there's really no reason for the bad guys to try again and there is even less reason for them to do incredibly stupid stuff like not kill Mills immediately once they have kidnapped Mills and his ex-wife Lenore.
If you were determined to keep Mills alive for a while that would be dumb.
At the very least since you know that he is very resourceful, incredibly dangerous, and has a downright mean streak, wouldn't you keep him under 24 hr armed guard, search him thoroughly, bind him with iron and steel instead of plastic or rope and just to be on the safe side, cripple him to forestall any escape attempts? I mean what are they teaching in Evil Overlord Boot Camp these days?
Also I will have to go back and watch the first Taken but I don't seem to remember Maggie Grace either being as curvy or showing as much flesh. Not that I'm complaining
but it's impossible to believe that she's 16 years old. Again, since both his ex-wife and daughter know what he does , it makes no sense for them to insist on questioning his directives while people are shooting at them or saying they can't do what he tells them to do or falling into hysteria, which is most of what they do throughout the film. Lots of stupid people get shot in the head. The end.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/12 09:14 PM
Not seen TAKEN 2 yet, but I'll be honest I'm pretty certain that as action movies go, it won't as good as DREDD was. (TAKEN 2 will make a fortune, DREDD unfortunately tanked in theatres.)
And well shit, somebody online agreed with me.
Do Yourself a Favor and See Dredd 3D Instead of Taken 2
http://gawker.com/5949128/do-yourself-a-favor-and-see-dredd-3d-instead-of-taken-2
I saw that too, I liked it as a good afternoon killer. (Travolta camping up as the ultimate "Ugly American" was good fun.)
That was another movie produced (and co-written) by Luc Besson, the French filmmaker who's become probably king of the B-action movies, low/modest budgets and usually taking place in Europe. His credits range from the TRANSPORTER series to the TAKEN movies to even LOCKOUT w/ Guy Pearce which came out earlier this year.
And well shit, somebody online agreed with me.
Do Yourself a Favor and See Dredd 3D Instead of Taken 2
Quote:
Pushing for a truce near Taken 2's end, Bryan Mills tells his adversary, "I am tired of it all." Yeah, and you feel it in every second of his dull movie. Dredd 3D, meanwhile, barely stops to take a breath - and when it does it's because it's so fucked up, an astonishingly massive garbage truck high on its own fumes.
http://gawker.com/5949128/do-yourself-a-favor-and-see-dredd-3d-instead-of-taken-2
Originally Posted By: olivant
Last night I watched some of John Travolta's movie (which I never geard of) entitled Love from Paris (or something like that)in which he's a CIA agent. It was pretty good and so was he although bald headed. Give it a look.
I saw that too, I liked it as a good afternoon killer. (Travolta camping up as the ultimate "Ugly American" was good fun.)
That was another movie produced (and co-written) by Luc Besson, the French filmmaker who's become probably king of the B-action movies, low/modest budgets and usually taking place in Europe. His credits range from the TRANSPORTER series to the TAKEN movies to even LOCKOUT w/ Guy Pearce which came out earlier this year.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/12 09:31 AM
Went to the cinema the other day to see KILLING THEM SOFTLY, the new Brad Pitt gig. Very good show i have to say, with star turns from Mr. Gandolofini, Mr. Liotta and Vincent Curatola also!!
Worth seeing, most definitely.
Worth seeing, most definitely.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/12 07:11 PM
Anyone else watch HBO's "The Girl" a story about Alfred Hitchcock's filming of The Birds and the obsession he had with it's star, Tippi Hedron? He comes off as very strange and kind of creepy in this film.
I am still watching but apparently when they filmed the scene of her in the attic and being attacked by the birds, she was told it would take a day to film and turned out to be 76 or so days. Hitchcock seemed to be just pushing & pushing. Plus, Hitch didn't tell her there would be mostly real birds (along with mechanical) in that scene.
I forgot she also took a movie part in Hitchock's "Marnie". She must have been a glutton for punishment. LOL
TIS
I am still watching but apparently when they filmed the scene of her in the attic and being attacked by the birds, she was told it would take a day to film and turned out to be 76 or so days. Hitchcock seemed to be just pushing & pushing. Plus, Hitch didn't tell her there would be mostly real birds (along with mechanical) in that scene.
I forgot she also took a movie part in Hitchock's "Marnie". She must have been a glutton for punishment. LOL
TIS
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/12 10:26 PM
I watched "Gone With The Wind" tonight for the first time, truly an epic film and i can see why this is one of the greatest films ever made, but geez it's on a long time 3hrs and 45 mins .. Vivien Leigh's performance is amazing and is up there with the best of all time..
.. Vivien Leigh's performance is amazing and is up there with the best of all time..
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/12 12:30 AM
It's one of my favorites, DeNiro! With the exception of Leslie Howard's British accent, the entire cast was just incredible. I especially loved Aunt Pittypat.
Did you realize that one of the Tarleton twins (they were on the front porch of Tara with Scarlett in the beginning of the film) is George Reeves, who later went on to play TV's Superman?
Did you realize that one of the Tarleton twins (they were on the front porch of Tara with Scarlett in the beginning of the film) is George Reeves, who later went on to play TV's Superman?
Posted By: NickyScarfo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/12 12:13 PM
Just saw that Dredd film it sucked big time. Note to Hollywood directors, just because you have 3D doesn't mean we have to see stupid scenes to highlight this technology, I didn't need to see a minute of a woman in slo motion splashing water out of a bath.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/12 12:16 AM
Originally Posted By: NickyScarfo
Just saw that Dredd film it sucked big time. Note to Hollywood directors, just because you have 3D doesn't mean we have to see stupid scenes to highlight this technology, I didn't need to see a minute of a woman in slo motion splashing water out of a bath.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/12 12:22 AM
Capo, what did you think of DREDD?
Who the fuck said this was TERMINATOR? More like a John Carpenter-esque remake of DIE HARD, which is a compliment not a criticism.
A movie where a fascist cop shoots a flare into a perp's mouth can't be bad in my book.
Originally Posted By: NickyScarfo
Just saw that Dredd film it sucked big time. Note to Hollywood directors, just because you have 3D doesn't mean we have to see stupid scenes to highlight this technology, I didn't need to see a minute of a woman in slo motion splashing water out of a bath.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Also 3D should not mean you disregard screenplay, acting and hell a half decent script! Terminator this ain't.
Who the fuck said this was TERMINATOR? More like a John Carpenter-esque remake of DIE HARD, which is a compliment not a criticism.
A movie where a fascist cop shoots a flare into a perp's mouth can't be bad in my book.
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/12 12:26 AM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Did you ever see Nighthawks, with Stallone, Billy Dee Williams and Hauer? Hauer plays a very mean and scary "terrorist" and Williams and Stallone are the NYPD after him. Typical 1980s cop vs. bad guy, but there are some very good performances that elevate it a bit. Anyway, it's decent entertainment.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
Edit: I almost forgot, but Willy Cicci is in it, too, as the police lieutenant.
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/12 12:32 AM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Capo, what did you think of DREDD?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/12 12:49 AM
Originally Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
I liked it overall. Thoughts: jump down to the text that follows the Dredd image.
Good reviews mate.
Yeah I enjoyed DREDD too, which of the comic book movies this year might just be the most perfect and honest, least pretentious/bloated of the bunch. Not necessarily the best or the one I enjoyed the most, but DREDD rocks.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/12 10:57 AM
DJANGO UNCHAINED
Tarantino has an eye for cinematic mayhem so it's not surprising that he would make a film set during slavery. I was surprised that he made one that was so darkly humorous and ultimately touching. I don't think that Tarantino does "message" films. So this is not some profound deeply moving serious film with slow reveals, silent screams and classical music that ponderously swells at just the right moment to bring audience tears. There are no long speeches aimed at the mentally slow explaining why slavery is bad. I think Tarantino considers that far too obvious to mention.
There is a tremendous amount of violence in this film and some brief nudity. Obviously, racial slurs and profanity abound. This is not a film for children. Blood spurts and flows. There are a few broadly comedic killings. You really have to see the film to understand what I mean by this last statement. You kinda had to be there and I wouldn't care to spoil it for you.
This movie touches the same core American cinematic themes of protecting your family, standing up for yourself and getting some righteous payback that animated such movies as Shane, Death Wish, True Grit, The Brave One, Rambo, Taken, Braveheart, Death Sentence, Once Upon a Time in the West, The Sons of Katie Elder, and virtually any 80s Steven Seagal flick. The only difference in Django Unchained is that the good guy (well the main good guy anyway) is black while almost all the bad guys are white. This is really unusual for American cinema. This is a perfect antidote to Lost Cause nostalgia that suffuses so many movies about this time period.
If you are looking for a sober searing movie, this is not that film.
If you enjoy action and heroics this is a remarkably entertaining movie. Foxx really inhabits the titular role while Waltz shines in a strong supporting role. Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel Jackson star as villains. Good stuff. A little long but worthwhile.
Tarantino has an eye for cinematic mayhem so it's not surprising that he would make a film set during slavery. I was surprised that he made one that was so darkly humorous and ultimately touching. I don't think that Tarantino does "message" films. So this is not some profound deeply moving serious film with slow reveals, silent screams and classical music that ponderously swells at just the right moment to bring audience tears. There are no long speeches aimed at the mentally slow explaining why slavery is bad. I think Tarantino considers that far too obvious to mention.
There is a tremendous amount of violence in this film and some brief nudity. Obviously, racial slurs and profanity abound. This is not a film for children. Blood spurts and flows. There are a few broadly comedic killings. You really have to see the film to understand what I mean by this last statement. You kinda had to be there and I wouldn't care to spoil it for you.
This movie touches the same core American cinematic themes of protecting your family, standing up for yourself and getting some righteous payback that animated such movies as Shane, Death Wish, True Grit, The Brave One, Rambo, Taken, Braveheart, Death Sentence, Once Upon a Time in the West, The Sons of Katie Elder, and virtually any 80s Steven Seagal flick. The only difference in Django Unchained is that the good guy (well the main good guy anyway) is black while almost all the bad guys are white. This is really unusual for American cinema. This is a perfect antidote to Lost Cause nostalgia that suffuses so many movies about this time period.
If you are looking for a sober searing movie, this is not that film.
If you enjoy action and heroics this is a remarkably entertaining movie. Foxx really inhabits the titular role while Waltz shines in a strong supporting role. Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel Jackson star as villains. Good stuff. A little long but worthwhile.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/12 09:10 PM
I do enjoy Tarantino and was looking forward to this film, but was unsure if we should see it. Thanks for the review, Lilo. Although it was nominated for some Golden Globes, most of the reviews I read have been mixed.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/13 05:57 PM
Anyone else ever see the movie "Eagle Eye" with Shia Labeouf? It's been on TV quite a bit. It's getting to be one of the movies (Like GF, Shawshank Redemption, Die Hard and others) that I always have to tune in to watch at least part of it. Anyway, good movie IMHO. I really don't even remember when it was out at the theaters. Maybe it wasn't a huge hit but I liked it. I also liked him in a Rear Window variation (loosely) in "Disturbia."
Also, I started to watch also, on HBO last night, "Contraband" with Mark Wahlberg. I fell asleep halfway thru but not because I didn't like it. It was just late. I intend to watch the rest later today. Anyway, not too bad a movie so far.
TIS
Also, I started to watch also, on HBO last night, "Contraband" with Mark Wahlberg. I fell asleep halfway thru but not because I didn't like it. It was just late. I intend to watch the rest later today. Anyway, not too bad a movie so far.
TIS
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/13 07:38 PM
I liked Eagle Eye and Contraband. I think Contraband is the better film.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/13 09:11 PM
Good movie day. Now watching the remake of "Taking of Pelham 123. Tony Soprano, Mayor of the city?
TIS
TIS
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/13 11:36 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Good movie day. Now watching the remake of "Taking of Pelham 123. Tony Soprano, Mayor of the city?
TIS
TIS
I much prefer the original with Matthau and Shaw. The remake (another forgettable entry in the latter days of the late Tony Scott) to me just feels like on the level of a big budget TV episode. It's not a bad film, but I can't say I was intrigued or engaged or excited beyond the level I would hold for a basic TV action/thriller episode.
And that's my smug observation for the day.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/13 01:14 AM
Hi RR,
You know I don't think I ever saw the original Pelham 123 believe or not. It probably IS better. As history shows usually the originals are the best.
Btw, I'm seeing previews of a new "Hansel & Gretal" movie. Sounds like a real scary twist no?
TIS
You know I don't think I ever saw the original Pelham 123 believe or not. It probably IS better. As history shows usually the originals are the best.
Btw, I'm seeing previews of a new "Hansel & Gretal" movie. Sounds like a real scary twist no?
TIS
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/13 01:29 AM
I also never saw the original Pelham 123, I thought the remake was good in its own right.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/13 01:36 AM
I can't say I'm a huge Travolta fan but he plays a real good asshole.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/13 01:40 AM
Oh, and speaking of bad guys, you know who else played a great bad guy/villian? Dennis Hopper. I thought he was great in Speed. Gosh, I remember him way way back as an "Easy Rider."
TIS
TIS
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/13 10:37 PM
Tonight i watched A Streetcar Named Desire with Marlon Brando and Vivien Leigh, amazing film and acting. Marlon brando at his best..
8/10
8/10
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/13 10:44 PM
I just saw the movie djanko unchanged the copy they give out for academy award consideration. It was ok but I just did not think it was that good to get an academy award. My wife liked it surprisely she does not like movies with a lot of violence in it.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/13 11:36 PM
Originally Posted By: RichieAnimal
I just saw the movie djanko unchanged the copy they give out for academy award consideration. It was ok but I just did not think it was that good to get an academy award. My wife liked it surprisely she does not like movies with a lot of violence in it.
Imo there's only 2 awards it can win Walts for SA(which i doubt) or QT for original screenplay.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 12:29 PM
Watched the Liam Neeson film THE GREY the other night. Started quite well but became boring very quickly. I was rooting for the wolves by the end...which incidentally, couldn't come quick enough
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 03:58 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Watched the Liam Neeson film THE GREY the other night. Started quite well but became boring very quickly. I was rooting for the wolves by the end...which incidentally, couldn't come quick enough
You didn't like it Yogi? When it came out some BBers commented and it got good reviews. I haven't seen it yet, but was warned to watch thru the ending credits.
I'm waiting for it to come on HBO.TIS
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 03:58 PM
I felt the same way.
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 04:00 PM
It has been on netflex for a while now.
Posted By: dontomasso
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 07:06 PM
I want to see Silver Linings Playbook again... A brilliant piece of work.
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 08:13 PM
Up to epoxied 5 house of cards.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 10:32 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Watched the Liam Neeson film THE GREY the other night. Started quite well but became boring very quickly. I was rooting for the wolves by the end...which incidentally, couldn't come quick enough
Absolutely. I hated it, and I'm a bit Liam Neeson fan.
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/13 11:15 PM
I like him to especially taken 1. But taken 2 was not good. I known Albanians pretty well. In two when they put the hoods over his wife and his heads. They would have killed them right on the spot.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/13 02:34 AM
My favorite roles of his are as the deaf defendant in "Suspect" and the title roles in "Rob Roy" and, of course, "Schindler's List".
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/13 02:39 AM
Schindlers list was a once in a lifetime roll for both Nesson and Ralph FIennes
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/13 02:41 AM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Watched the Liam Neeson film THE GREY the other night. Started quite well but became boring very quickly. I was rooting for the wolves by the end...which incidentally, couldn't come quick enough
Absolutely. I hated it, and I'm a big Liam Neeson fan.
I felt the same way.
Originally Posted By: RichieAnimal
I like him to especially taken 1. But taken 2 was not good. I known Albanians pretty well. In two when they put the hoods over his wife and his heads. They would have killed them right on the spot.
part 1 was great, part 2 was bad.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 08:10 PM
Last night i watched "The Bridge On The River Kwai". Excellent film and cast
8/10
8/10
Posted By: RichieAnimal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 10:24 PM
Watched it on turner classic movie Chanel right. That is the best channel on cable
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 10:34 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Last night i watched "The Bridge On The River Kwai". Excellent film and cast
8/10
8/10
Saw that in business school for a negotiation class, i agree with your score.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 10:38 PM
Originally Posted By: RichieAnimal
Watched it on turner classic movie Chanel right. That is the best channel on cable
If this question is aimed me, then no i watched in on DVD..
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 11:07 PM
Originally Posted By: RichieAnimal
Watched it on turner classic movie Chanel right. That is the best channel on cable
Chanel has it's own channel?? Is it No. 5??? Ha ha, Number 5? Get it? Chanel No. 5??
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/13 11:24 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: RichieAnimal
Watched it on turner classic movie Chanel right. That is the best channel on cable
Chanel has it's own channel?? Is it No. 5??? Ha ha, Number 5? Get it? Chanel No. 5??
Ha ha ha! Very cute.
Yea if Chanel had a channel I'm guessing it would be #5.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/13 10:55 AM
last night we watched the Mark Wahlberg show CONTRABAND. Loved it, great film.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/13 01:17 PM
Yogi,
It's been on HBO and I started watching it twice. It was on late each time and I fell asleep. I'm gonna try to finish it on "On Demand." It was good from the portion I saw.
TIS
It's been on HBO and I started watching it twice. It was on late each time and I fell asleep.
I'm gonna try to finish it on "On Demand." It was good from the portion I saw. TIS
Posted By: Skinny
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/13 02:24 AM
Children of Men. In my opinion, one of the best directed movies of all time. If anyone here appreciattes Directing, Camera Work, Writing, angle of movies... I recommend this, great movie.
Posted By: LL
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/13 01:23 AM
I really enjoyed super 8 too
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/13 08:17 PM
I just watched I, Robot the other day. The last scene is Sonny standing on top of a hill looking down on thousands of robots who stop and look up at him. That would seem to lay the basis for a sequel.
Also, I wonder why there was never a sequel to Close Encounters. I'd entitle it The Return.
Also, I wonder why there was never a sequel to Close Encounters. I'd entitle it The Return.
Posted By: EastHarlemItal
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/13 08:18 PM
[quote=olivant]I just watched I, Robot the other day. The last scene is Sonny standing on top of a hill looking down on thousands of robots who stop and look up at him. That would seem to lay the basis for a sequel.
As long as they bring Bridget Moynahan back it's all good!
As long as they bring Bridget Moynahan back it's all good!
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/13 03:59 PM
Bridget Moynahan is scrumptious 
Shucks.....
Shucks.....
Posted By: SgWaue86
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/13 06:53 PM
Just caught Elite Squad 1&2, it's about the slums in Rio and the efforts by the law to clean them up. Overall it was pretty good it's in spainish but i don't mind the subtitles. If you got Netflix i would recommend it for sure.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/13 11:05 PM
Watched Fun with Dick and Jane, laughed too damn much.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/13 11:47 AM
Caught OLYMPUS HAS FALLEN, which opened this past weekend. The first of two "DIE HARD in the White House" movies we're getting this year, believe it or not.
As a DIE HARD rip-off, it has some merit with some laughs, some thrills, director Antoine Fuqua's most watchable movie since TRAINING DAY. I respect that like DIE HARD, he takes the time to set-up the pieces to be put into play once the hammer drops, i.e. the bad guys take over. (Something the original DIE HARD was brilliant at.)
Unlike last year's RED DAWN remake, the North Koreans here are the semi-believable enough adversariess needed to make a paperback thriller fantasy like this work. But ultimately not memorable enough for me to wholly recommend this OK, disposable entertainment. I give it 3 stars out of 5.
(Why? I got tired of this movie reusing way too many scenes from DIE HARD. Its one thing to borrow this very dependable story formula, its another to echo that film beat by beat. Hero and adversary exchange threats and one-liners over walkie-talkies, the hero dodges a rooftop helicopter-involved explosion, the useless authorities launch a futile raid that the hero advises against, etc. Too much photocopying, not enough originality from OHF's end.
They could've taken inspiration from the best of the DIE HARD knock-offs in UNDER SIEGE. Instead of one villain, that gives us two. Instead of a lone savior, he's saddled with a sidekick also stuck in the wrong place, wrong time like the hero. And so forth.)
EDIT - Sadly if DIE HARD was produced today, John McClaine would have a scene where he tortures a bad guy to death. I miss American movie heroes that prevailed because of wits and kicking ass. Why did we have movie villains like Darth Vader torture? Because we considered it barbaric, practiced only by despots and thugs.
Its one thing if say The Punisher or TAKEN doing this, because those characters are bastards, ruthless to accomplish their own little personal vendettas. But OHF, its your traditional supposed righteous American hero (even though Gerard Butler is Scottish, but nevermind) against the evil foreign terrorists, who torture which suddenly becomes bad. The hero does it, its good.
But times change. Weird to say that in this regard, the 1980s were more civilized than movies produced today.
As a DIE HARD rip-off, it has some merit with some laughs, some thrills, director Antoine Fuqua's most watchable movie since TRAINING DAY. I respect that like DIE HARD, he takes the time to set-up the pieces to be put into play once the hammer drops, i.e. the bad guys take over. (Something the original DIE HARD was brilliant at.)
Unlike last year's RED DAWN remake, the North Koreans here are the semi-believable enough adversariess needed to make a paperback thriller fantasy like this work. But ultimately not memorable enough for me to wholly recommend this OK, disposable entertainment. I give it 3 stars out of 5.
(Why? I got tired of this movie reusing way too many scenes from DIE HARD. Its one thing to borrow this very dependable story formula, its another to echo that film beat by beat. Hero and adversary exchange threats and one-liners over walkie-talkies, the hero dodges a rooftop helicopter-involved explosion, the useless authorities launch a futile raid that the hero advises against, etc. Too much photocopying, not enough originality from OHF's end.
They could've taken inspiration from the best of the DIE HARD knock-offs in UNDER SIEGE. Instead of one villain, that gives us two. Instead of a lone savior, he's saddled with a sidekick also stuck in the wrong place, wrong time like the hero. And so forth.)
EDIT - Sadly if DIE HARD was produced today, John McClaine would have a scene where he tortures a bad guy to death. I miss American movie heroes that prevailed because of wits and kicking ass. Why did we have movie villains like Darth Vader torture? Because we considered it barbaric, practiced only by despots and thugs.
Its one thing if say The Punisher or TAKEN doing this, because those characters are bastards, ruthless to accomplish their own little personal vendettas. But OHF, its your traditional supposed righteous American hero (even though Gerard Butler is Scottish, but nevermind) against the evil foreign terrorists, who torture which suddenly becomes bad. The hero does it, its good.
But times change. Weird to say that in this regard, the 1980s were more civilized than movies produced today.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/01/13 10:10 AM
Too bad about "Olympus has Fallen". I couldn't get with North Koreans as believable competent bad guys.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/01/13 10:22 AM
The English Teacher
I always liked Julianne Moore ever since the movies Hannibal and Boogie Nights. I hadn't seen her in a comedic role before. The English Teacher is a successful mix of comedy and drama. The film mostly takes place in a school, a gym, or someone's home. Sets and sound levels are well done. The character motivations might occasionally be described as broad but again they are very true to life. People get lonely and do stupid things. People gossip and try to protect their jobs.
Linda Sinclair (Julianne Moore) is a Pennsylvania area high school English teacher. She has incredible zest and passion for her work and her students. But otherwise life is passing her by. In a voiceover, an older female narrator (her conscience?, her fear?) explains that Linda is an incurable romantic and thus thinks that any man she meets should live up to the men found in works like "Pride and Prejudice" or "A Tale of Two Cities". Of course most men don't and in one of the film's running gags, when Linda rarely dates, she immediately judges and grades the men. Negative comments in red ink appear on screen. No, Linda is happy most days just to go home alone and read or watch TV. And the voiceover says that's just the way it should be, thank you very much.
She bumps into a former student Jason Sherwood (Michael Angarano). The last she heard Jason had gone to NYU's writing program and on to Broadway but Jason ruefully explains that he washed out of NYU and is under increasing pressure from his father, Dr. Tom Sherwood (Greg Kinnear in an excellent albeit small role) to attend law school. Linda thinks this is a shame because she still believes Jason has real, world changing writing talent. Feeling encouraged, Jason gives Linda his masterpiece play, something he claims is based in part on his own life. Linda reads it and is transformed by the artistry and tragedy on display. She shares it with the hammy drama teacher Carl Kapinas (Nathan Lane), who can't stop telling everyone about the time he auditioned for Soderbergh, as well as the school principal Slocum (Jessica Hecht) and vice principal Pelaski (Norbert Butz).
Slocum and Pelaski decide to allow the play to be performed at the school. Positive it will be a success, Linda even agrees to pay for any cost overruns out of her own pocket. Linda is excited by the prospect of "saving" Jason from law school and working closely with a creative person. And that's when Jason shows Linda how hot for teacher he really is while Linda shows Jason how to make a lady smile. And then things get interesting. It is an interesting phenomenon that illicit sex can harm or help a man's reputation but virtually never helps a woman's. Them's the breaks. Linda's jealousy and defensiveness don't help matters, either. When you spend too long lying to yourself you lose the ability to tell when other people can see through your lies.
This was, to me anyway, an enjoyable film. It doesn't have any obvious bad guys. It's just a slice of life that doesn't take any sides other than giving the very clear message that whoever you are, whatever you do, you need to get up and enjoy life because it's too precious to waste away.
I always liked Julianne Moore ever since the movies Hannibal and Boogie Nights. I hadn't seen her in a comedic role before. The English Teacher is a successful mix of comedy and drama. The film mostly takes place in a school, a gym, or someone's home. Sets and sound levels are well done. The character motivations might occasionally be described as broad but again they are very true to life. People get lonely and do stupid things. People gossip and try to protect their jobs.
Linda Sinclair (Julianne Moore) is a Pennsylvania area high school English teacher. She has incredible zest and passion for her work and her students. But otherwise life is passing her by. In a voiceover, an older female narrator (her conscience?, her fear?) explains that Linda is an incurable romantic and thus thinks that any man she meets should live up to the men found in works like "Pride and Prejudice" or "A Tale of Two Cities". Of course most men don't and in one of the film's running gags, when Linda rarely dates, she immediately judges and grades the men. Negative comments in red ink appear on screen. No, Linda is happy most days just to go home alone and read or watch TV. And the voiceover says that's just the way it should be, thank you very much.
She bumps into a former student Jason Sherwood (Michael Angarano). The last she heard Jason had gone to NYU's writing program and on to Broadway but Jason ruefully explains that he washed out of NYU and is under increasing pressure from his father, Dr. Tom Sherwood (Greg Kinnear in an excellent albeit small role) to attend law school. Linda thinks this is a shame because she still believes Jason has real, world changing writing talent. Feeling encouraged, Jason gives Linda his masterpiece play, something he claims is based in part on his own life. Linda reads it and is transformed by the artistry and tragedy on display. She shares it with the hammy drama teacher Carl Kapinas (Nathan Lane), who can't stop telling everyone about the time he auditioned for Soderbergh, as well as the school principal Slocum (Jessica Hecht) and vice principal Pelaski (Norbert Butz).
Slocum and Pelaski decide to allow the play to be performed at the school. Positive it will be a success, Linda even agrees to pay for any cost overruns out of her own pocket. Linda is excited by the prospect of "saving" Jason from law school and working closely with a creative person. And that's when Jason shows Linda how hot for teacher he really is while Linda shows Jason how to make a lady smile. And then things get interesting. It is an interesting phenomenon that illicit sex can harm or help a man's reputation but virtually never helps a woman's. Them's the breaks. Linda's jealousy and defensiveness don't help matters, either. When you spend too long lying to yourself you lose the ability to tell when other people can see through your lies.
This was, to me anyway, an enjoyable film. It doesn't have any obvious bad guys. It's just a slice of life that doesn't take any sides other than giving the very clear message that whoever you are, whatever you do, you need to get up and enjoy life because it's too precious to waste away.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/03/13 08:00 PM
Caught IRON MAN 3 last night. What an awesome start to the summer 2013 season.
Terrific, slickly produced, funny as hell pseudo-throwback to the 1980s/early 90s Hollywood action movies mixed with modern pytotechnics and the sci-fi/fantasy portal that is Marvel. We get 3 (or was it 4?) outstanding action setpieces. This might be better than the first (wonderful) IRON MAN film. This entry was directed by Shane Black, who back in his day of course scripted LETHAL WEAPON and LAST BOY SCOUT and a few years back directed KISS KISS BANG BANG with a pre-superstardom Robert Downey Jr.
And yeah like those movies, IM3 is basically a buddy actioneer albeit Downey and Don Cheadle don't team up together until the 3rd act but that beast narrative is there, highly kinetic and more one-liners than it knows what to do with. This is what the disapointing IRON MAN 2 should've been in the first place.
It's also solid science fiction. The ads you all might've seen showed Downey's new gizmos like remote controlling his Iron Man suits and pieces of the suit magnetically attaching to him one at a time. (And Black and his crew utilize this established fact for inspired imagination.) The villains with their new "Extremis" virus, which turns people into nearly-indestructable superhumans with regenerative powers if a tad explodey. How can a guy in a tin can defeat this technological superiority? By throwing everything plus the kitchen sink at them. (I'm sure I saw a kitchen sink flying around in that impressive climax fight.)
Crazy thing is the best moments in IM3 for me are when he's on the run, without his suits and basically forced to use his brains to fight back MacGuyver style. Handcuffed in the middle of a Tennessee town with two of those Extremis freaks on his ass? He doesn't let that get him (and his massive ego) down because he's Tony Stark, he'll figure something out. And he does.
I will say this though. The ads are misleading. This is not a remake of THE DARK KNIGHT, and some fanboys are pissed they didn't get that remake that they apparently were expecting. Oh boo hoo. I respect Marvel and Black for not going down that plot road that many recent movies have done already (SKYFALL, etc.) and tried to basically use that presumptions against you.
I give this ****1/2 out of 5.
Terrific, slickly produced, funny as hell pseudo-throwback to the 1980s/early 90s Hollywood action movies mixed with modern pytotechnics and the sci-fi/fantasy portal that is Marvel. We get 3 (or was it 4?) outstanding action setpieces. This might be better than the first (wonderful) IRON MAN film. This entry was directed by Shane Black, who back in his day of course scripted LETHAL WEAPON and LAST BOY SCOUT and a few years back directed KISS KISS BANG BANG with a pre-superstardom Robert Downey Jr.
And yeah like those movies, IM3 is basically a buddy actioneer albeit Downey and Don Cheadle don't team up together until the 3rd act but that beast narrative is there, highly kinetic and more one-liners than it knows what to do with. This is what the disapointing IRON MAN 2 should've been in the first place.
It's also solid science fiction. The ads you all might've seen showed Downey's new gizmos like remote controlling his Iron Man suits and pieces of the suit magnetically attaching to him one at a time. (And Black and his crew utilize this established fact for inspired imagination.) The villains with their new "Extremis" virus, which turns people into nearly-indestructable superhumans with regenerative powers if a tad explodey. How can a guy in a tin can defeat this technological superiority? By throwing everything plus the kitchen sink at them. (I'm sure I saw a kitchen sink flying around in that impressive climax fight.)
Crazy thing is the best moments in IM3 for me are when he's on the run, without his suits and basically forced to use his brains to fight back MacGuyver style. Handcuffed in the middle of a Tennessee town with two of those Extremis freaks on his ass? He doesn't let that get him (and his massive ego) down because he's Tony Stark, he'll figure something out. And he does.
I will say this though. The ads are misleading. This is not a remake of THE DARK KNIGHT, and some fanboys are pissed they didn't get that remake that they apparently were expecting. Oh boo hoo. I respect Marvel and Black for not going down that plot road that many recent movies have done already (SKYFALL, etc.) and tried to basically use that presumptions against you.
I give this ****1/2 out of 5.
Posted By: Mastronardo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/03/13 08:58 PM
This Is 40. It stars Paul Rudd, Megan Fox and Jason Segel. ****/5.
Posted By: Dapper_Don
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/13 03:22 AM
Originally Posted By: Mastronardo
This Is 40. It stars Paul Rudd, Megan Fox and Jason Segel. ****/5.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/13 02:47 AM
I watched 1992's Innocent Blood again last night (I've seen it a few times). It's sort of Donnie Brasco meets Twilight. Despite its critics and failure at the box office, I like it (it was filmed in Pittsburgh). One thing that's cool about it is that its cast was a Sopranos warm-up of sorts. Besides Anthony LaPaglia and Chazz Palminteri, there's Robert Loggia, Tony Sirico, and David Proval. Also, Don Rickles has fun with his role.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/13 08:45 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I watched 1992's Innocent Blood again last night (I've seen it a few times). It's sort of Donnie Brasco meets Twilight. Despite its critics and failure at the box office, I like it (it was filmed in Pittsburgh). One thing that's cool about it is that its cast was a Sopranos warm-up of sorts. Besides Anthony LaPaglia and Chazz Palminteri, there's Robert Loggia, Tony Sirico, and David Proval. Also, Don Rickles has fun with his role.
I believe John Landis directed that, didn't he?
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/13 01:16 AM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: olivant
I watched 1992's Innocent Blood again last night (I've seen it a few times). It's sort of Donnie Brasco meets Twilight. Despite its critics and failure at the box office, I like it (it was filmed in Pittsburgh). One thing that's cool about it is that its cast was a Sopranos warm-up of sorts. Besides Anthony LaPaglia and Chazz Palminteri, there's Robert Loggia, Tony Sirico, and David Proval. Also, Don Rickles has fun with his role.
I believe John Landis directed that, didn't he?
Yes.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/13 05:32 PM
The Sundance Channel is now playing DDA (Pacino is great) with Marathon Man to follow. Two good flicks.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/13 09:41 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
The Sundance Channel is now playing DDA (Pacino is great) with Marathon Man to follow. Two good flicks.
TIS
TIS
I just watched Serpico for the first time a few days ago it reminds me of The King of Comedy because it's one of the truly underrated movies of 2 of the greatest Actors. IMO it's Al's best performance other than GF 1.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/13 10:37 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
The Sundance Channel is now playing DDA (Pacino is great) with Marathon Man to follow. Two good flicks.
TIS
TIS
I just watched Serpico for the first time a few days ago it reminds me of The King of Comedy because it's one of the truly underrated movies of 2 of the greatest Actors. IMO it's Al's best performance other than GF 1.
Yes, I loved Serpico too. One of my favorites.
I saw it at the theater and it was very popular (as was Pacino). I remember seeing the real Frank Serpico on various shows after that movie. The Tomorrow Show comes to mind with Tom Syner, if you remember.TIS
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/13 01:08 AM
Boy, that didn't take long. I just saw an ad for a new Lifetime Movie titled, "Jodi Arias, Dirty Little Secret." Geez, trial just ended.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: dontomasso
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/13 05:16 PM
Saw "The Internship" with Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson. The best way to describe it is "Wedding Crashers Lite."
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/12/13 06:35 PM
Ya'll might want to give a look at Trouble With the Curve with Clint Eastwood, Amy Adams, and Justin Timberlake. It's a pretty good baseball movie as the back ground to something of a troubled father/daughter relationship (By the way, you might pick up some batting tips).
I like Clint's values themed movies these days. Also, Timberlake has turned out to be a good actor. For those of us who are fathers, it may stir memories of teaching our daughters about baseball (even football). I know I tried to teach all of my daughters baseball and used to throw the football with them. There's one scene where he pitches to his 33 year old daughter and she hits it into outfield and then rounds the bases. He watches her as she does so smiling all the time especially when she does a cartwheel between 2nd and 3rd.
I like Clint's values themed movies these days. Also, Timberlake has turned out to be a good actor. For those of us who are fathers, it may stir memories of teaching our daughters about baseball (even football). I know I tried to teach all of my daughters baseball and used to throw the football with them. There's one scene where he pitches to his 33 year old daughter and she hits it into outfield and then rounds the bases. He watches her as she does so smiling all the time especially when she does a cartwheel between 2nd and 3rd.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/13 05:01 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
For those of us who are fathers, it may stir memories of teaching our daughters about baseball (even football). I know I tried to teach all of my daughters baseball and used to throw the football with them. There's one scene where he pitches to his 33 year old daughter and she hits it into outfield and then rounds the bases. He watches her as she does so smiling all the time especially when she does a cartwheel between 2nd and 3rd.
My daughter grew up with two older brothers, so she was a bit of a tomboy. One of my favorite memories of summer was pitching to her and her friend Joey, who has Down Syndrome, on a scorching sunday afternoon while a golden retriever collected the balls after each hit.
I'll give that movie a see just for that scene.
Posted By: Frank_Nitti
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/13 06:26 PM
Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: olivant
For those of us who are fathers, it may stir memories of teaching our daughters about baseball (even football). I know I tried to teach all of my daughters baseball and used to throw the football with them. There's one scene where he pitches to his 33 year old daughter and she hits it into outfield and then rounds the bases. He watches her as she does so smiling all the time especially when she does a cartwheel between 2nd and 3rd.
My daughter grew up with two older brothers, so she was a bit of a tomboy. One of my favorite memories of summer was pitching to her and her friend Joey, who has Down Syndrome, on a scorching sunday afternoon while a golden retriever collected the balls after each hit.
I'll give that movie a see just for that scene.
Gee tug at my heart strings a bit why don't ya.
I'm sure your daughters enjoyed those moments as much as you did.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/13 08:57 AM
Saw a midnight showing of Man of Steel. Pretty good. Some things worked. Others not so much. Would be interested in a sequel with something like Doomsday. None of that Justice League crap though.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/13 02:54 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Saw a midnight showing of Man of Steel. Pretty good. Some things worked. Others not so much. Would be interested in a sequel with something like Doomsday. None of that Justice League crap though.
My oldest son got home from work at eleven, showered and headed off to a midnight showing of the movie too. He also thought it was pretty good.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/13 03:49 PM
I thought MOS was OK, in fact I would compare it to SUPERMAN RETURNS from several years back: Several interesting ideas*, some nice eyecandy action setpieces, and I'm ultimately underwhelmed.
Its weird that for a movie that tried its darn best to make you care about the hero (following the Nolan playbook, its basically SUPERMAN BEGINS), I felt no real investment in him or his journey or the stakes really. The one moment where I did feel something was that brief scene with Meloni in Smallville, where fear and ignorance is defeated by decency.
The 3rd fact becomes disaster movie mayhem porn like you expect from Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich. When Supes and General Zod have their big expensive fight, I really didn't care and actually wanted this movie to end.
Not to mention there was never (for me at least) a big "whoop" moment, if you will where for a scene you lose yourself in the story and leave yourself hopelessly giddy. I think of Hulk smashing Loki like a ragdoll in THE AVENGERS.I think of IRON MAN when Tony Stark fights his way out of the cave. I think of Batman's first night out in BATMAN BEGINS, or Christopher Reeve's Superman debut when he grabs the helicopter. Or beyond that superhero genre, Harrison Ford pulling out his gun on that swordman in RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. Bruce Willis telling off the police captain in DIE HARD. The heroes in STAR WARS escaping the pitfalls in the Death Star, and so forth.
Using a scale, I would give this 3 out of 5.
*=For example, how the Lois/Clark relationship is totally reimagined is a good idea. Wished it would've actually added up to something.
Its weird that for a movie that tried its darn best to make you care about the hero (following the Nolan playbook, its basically SUPERMAN BEGINS), I felt no real investment in him or his journey or the stakes really. The one moment where I did feel something was that brief scene with Meloni in Smallville, where fear and ignorance is defeated by decency.
The 3rd fact becomes disaster movie mayhem porn like you expect from Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich. When Supes and General Zod have their big expensive fight, I really didn't care and actually wanted this movie to end.
Not to mention there was never (for me at least) a big "whoop" moment, if you will where for a scene you lose yourself in the story and leave yourself hopelessly giddy. I think of Hulk smashing Loki like a ragdoll in THE AVENGERS.I think of IRON MAN when Tony Stark fights his way out of the cave. I think of Batman's first night out in BATMAN BEGINS, or Christopher Reeve's Superman debut when he grabs the helicopter. Or beyond that superhero genre, Harrison Ford pulling out his gun on that swordman in RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. Bruce Willis telling off the police captain in DIE HARD. The heroes in STAR WARS escaping the pitfalls in the Death Star, and so forth.
Using a scale, I would give this 3 out of 5.
*=For example, how the Lois/Clark relationship is totally reimagined is a good idea. Wished it would've actually added up to something.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/16/13 05:07 AM
I watched The Great Mouse Detective and The Black Cauldron last night with my niece imo the 2 most underrated Disney films.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/16/13 05:16 PM
Well, I finally caught The Dark Knight Rises on HBO last night. I was somewhat disappointed. Primarily, I wanted to watch it because it was filmed in Pittsburgh (In fact, when I was in Pittburgh two years ago, I got caught in traffic when they were filming one fight scene).
I don't know; it seemed like there was something missing. It seemed pedestrian. The superhero pathos that seem to be on display in today's movies makes those heroes seem ordinary. Also, the villain seemed a stretch. I was surprised that Rotten Tomatoes gave it a 90s rating in both categories.
I don't know; it seemed like there was something missing. It seemed pedestrian. The superhero pathos that seem to be on display in today's movies makes those heroes seem ordinary. Also, the villain seemed a stretch. I was surprised that Rotten Tomatoes gave it a 90s rating in both categories.
Posted By: Giancarlo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/16/13 11:05 PM
Watched The Italian Job from 1969 yesterday, it was ok.
Ends in a literal cliffhanger, i think they were planning on making a second one to start where this one ended but i guess they never got around to it.
Ends in a literal cliffhanger, i think they were planning on making a second one to start where this one ended but i guess they never got around to it.
Posted By: dontomasso
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/17/13 03:39 PM
I think without equivocation Man of Steel is the best Superman movie ever made.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/17/13 10:04 PM
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
I think without equivocation Man of Steel is the best Superman movie ever made.
As I said in the Man of Steel thread, I saw it a second time. I got more out of it and the fact that I saw it in a huge screen certainly helped. It still wasn't perfect but I'd maybe give it 3 out of 4 stars.
Posted By: BlackFamily
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/25/13 06:20 PM
I recently saw First Time Felon starring Omar Epps as a vice lord. This movie is on YouTube and came out in 1997 on HBO. Decent movie.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/13 06:56 PM
In the Dark Knight Rises final scene, Robin stands on a rising platform. What is that platform?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/13 11:14 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
In the Dark Knight Rises final scene, Robin stands on a rising platform. What is that platform?
Same one seen earlier in the film, which if I remember right, encompassed Batman's workstation and costume.
Also I suppose Nolan liked the symbolism of the rising of a new Dark Knight.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/13 03:47 PM
I watched two movies recently, but couldn't stay up to see the endings. One was Mystic River, which I liked quite a bit. I thought the acting was outstanding, and was wondering whether it received Academy Award nominations/awards, specifically Sean Penn.
The other was Shutter Island, which had me hooked in the beginning, but I was losing a little interest before I went to sleep. Is this movie worth watching to the end?
The other was Shutter Island, which had me hooked in the beginning, but I was losing a little interest before I went to sleep. Is this movie worth watching to the end?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/13 03:57 PM
Kly, I've seen that Shutter Island has been on tv several times in the last few weeks. I have never watched it but was tempted to cause it sounds like it might be good.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/13 04:26 PM
Originally Posted By: klydon1
I watched two movies recently, but couldn't stay up to see the endings. One was Mystic River, which I liked quite a bit. I thought the acting was outstanding, and was wondering whether it received Academy Award nominations/awards, specifically Sean Penn.
The other was Shutter Island, which had me hooked in the beginning, but I was losing a little interest before I went to sleep. Is this movie worth watching to the end?
The other was Shutter Island, which had me hooked in the beginning, but I was losing a little interest before I went to sleep. Is this movie worth watching to the end?
I've seen both you should definitely watch the end of them imo, both have very dramatic endings i won't ruin anything but i think you'd be glad you watched the rest of them. Also, Sean Penn and Tim Robbins both won Oscars for their roles in Mystic River, but i'm not sure if Kevin Bacon or any of the other actors were nominated.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/13 05:47 PM
Yeah SHUTTER ISLAND is worth watching to the end. I mean Scorsese and Leo, why wouldn't you give it a chance?
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/13 03:57 PM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Yeah SHUTTER ISLAND is worth watching to the end. I mean Scorsese and Leo, why wouldn't you give it a chance?
Do you think that Mystic River is worth watching to the end too?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/13 04:21 PM
Originally Posted By: Lilo
Too bad about "Olympus has Fallen". I couldn't get with North Koreans as believable competent bad guys.
Oh, too bad, and I thought it looked really good.
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/13 04:54 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: Lilo
Too bad about "Olympus has Fallen". I couldn't get with North Koreans as believable competent bad guys.
Oh, too bad, and I thought it looked really good.
TIS
I actually thought it looked good too, the only problem i had with it was the fact that i don't really like Gerard Butler even though that he's Scottish and supports Celtic
. Gerard Butler playing for celtic -
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/13 07:11 PM
I watched The Road with Viggo Mortnesen. Great movie. A downer, but a realistic view of what a post apocalyptic world would be like.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/13 07:26 PM
Originally Posted By: jace
I watched The Road with Viggo Mortnesen. Great movie. A downer, but a realistic view of what a post apocalyptic world would be like.
I've read the book, i haven't seen the film though now that you've reminded me i think i'll buy it because i love Viggo in A History of Violence,LOTR and Eastern Promises.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 12:43 AM
Ok, with the temps over 100 degrees and me not feeling like doing anything it's been a lazy ass day for me. I've been watching movies/tv almost all day. Starting with Fallen (Denzel Washington) a nice creepy flick; Then, even creepier, Omen II with William Holden, which I hadn't seen in years, but a pretty decent sequel; Then I couldn't resist re-watching a few episodes of "The Bates Motel." You know that is really a good show.
To top it all off I can never resist Jason Bourne and they are showing "The Bourne Identity on TNT. I absolute love Bourne movies.
And that's my lazy Sunday.
TIS
I've been watching movies/tv almost all day. Starting with Fallen (Denzel Washington) a nice creepy flick; Then, even creepier, Omen II with William Holden, which I hadn't seen in years, but a pretty decent sequel; Then I couldn't resist re-watching a few episodes of "The Bates Motel." You know that is really a good show. To top it all off I can never resist Jason Bourne and they are showing "The Bourne Identity on TNT. I absolute love Bourne movies.
And that's my lazy Sunday.
TIS
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 12:47 AM
Haha i was watching the bates motel today 2 i had never seen it b4 but i was hooked after the first episode and im whatching the bourne ultamatum right now.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 12:50 AM
Originally Posted By: Dellacroce
Haha i was watching the bates motel today 2 i had never seen it b4 but i was hooked after the first episode and im whatching the bourne ultamatum right now.
Dellacroce, I highly recommend Bates Motel. I was reminded as a re-watched how good the show is. Norma (forgot her real names) is really a good actress (as is the rest of the cast)
Bourne Ultimatum will show next, BUT I have to watch AMC's "The Killing so I won't see all of Bourne Ultimatum (I have all 3 on video tho. LOL)
Enjoy
TIS
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 01:03 AM
Ya bates motel is really compelling, i had never seen the original movie which im definatly going to have to go rent. But is the killing also really good? Its been in my netflix que for awhile i just havnt got around to it yet, but if its on par with the other amc shows ( breaking bad, the walking dead) it should at least be worth cheacking out right?
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 03:26 AM
I don't know how ya'll can live on this diet of murder shows. You remind me of my mother who read nothing but murder mysteries. For a time we were worried: she took notes.
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 06:03 AM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: jace
I watched The Road with Viggo Mortnesen. Great movie. A downer, but a realistic view of what a post apocalyptic world would be like.
I've read the book, i haven't seen the film though now that you've reminded me i think i'll buy it because i love Viggo in A History of Violence,LOTR and Eastern Promises.
He is one of best actors of these times.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 04:53 PM
Saturday night I watched "High Noon" 1952, starring Gary Cooper, Grace Kelly. 61 years ago, movies sure have changed, but a good story is a good story.
What I found amusing was the actors in supporting roles; Harry Morgan - (Dragnet, M*A*S*H's Col. Potter), Lloyd Bridges (Sea Hunt, father of Jeff and the other kid, and lots of movies), Lon Chaney Jr.(The Wolf Man), Lee Van Cleef (ubiquitous bad guy).
What I found amusing was the actors in supporting roles; Harry Morgan - (Dragnet, M*A*S*H's Col. Potter), Lloyd Bridges (Sea Hunt, father of Jeff and the other kid, and lots of movies), Lon Chaney Jr.(The Wolf Man), Lee Van Cleef (ubiquitous bad guy).
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/13 06:35 PM
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Saturday night I watched "High Noon" 1952, starring Gary Cooper, Grace Kelly. 61 years ago, movies sure have changed, but a good story is a good story.
This past weekend for some reason I thought of High Noon. But no blood; no naked women; no foul language. I don't know. Should it really be considered one of the best westerns ever? I mean, how can you make any movie without all of those things?
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/13 08:03 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Saturday night I watched "High Noon" 1952, starring Gary Cooper, Grace Kelly. 61 years ago, movies sure have changed, but a good story is a good story.
This past weekend for some reason I thought of High Noon. But no blood; no naked women; no foul language. I don't know. Should it really be considered one of the best westerns ever? I mean, how can you make any movie without all of those things?
Thank You! I think one day Hollywood will remake a classic westerns and add car chases, and movie goers will suspend any disbelief.
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/13 06:13 PM
Watched world war z today with brad pitt. It was a pretty good zombie flick, nice action scenes and great special effects and a pretty good story. I give it a solid 7 or 8 out of 10.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/13 04:06 AM
I have wanted to see WWZ. I hope to get around to it.
Sounds good!!
TIS
Sounds good!!
TIS
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/13 04:54 AM
THE LONE RANGER has some of the same intended slapstick mayhem charms of the PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN films, and it does kinda work. Just about as bloated as that series in general. But what an oddball, halfbaked blockbuster. It drags in too many spots, a half hour too long and goes back and forth as both a sincere cornball throwback to the white hat western heroics and a parody of it. (Doesn't really work.)
I think the biggest problem is that it saddles itself with two origin stories for Mr. Lone Ranger and Tonto, and...they're not very interesting at all. Kinda boring honestly. Origin stories for say Superman and Batman and Spider-Man and so forth work because part of those characters' appeals as mythology goes.
Then again maybe I'm biased because Lone Ranger has been an irrelevant character since what, the 1950s? (Or let me put it this way: Sometimes origin stories are good to make a protagonist appealing. Other times actions do just fine. Did anybody care about knowing Jack Sparrow's origins in the first PIRATES movie with his antics and outsmarting his enemies?)
In contrast, I think of DREDD last year. That movie understood that Judge Dredd's origins didn't matter at all. He's fun because he's a resourceful, tough son of a bitch who shoots bad guys in the face.
TLR, not a bad film. It has some charms (the train race finale is insane) and not as bad as the terrible reviews are making this out to be. But you can wait for DVD on this one.
I think the biggest problem is that it saddles itself with two origin stories for Mr. Lone Ranger and Tonto, and...they're not very interesting at all. Kinda boring honestly. Origin stories for say Superman and Batman and Spider-Man and so forth work because part of those characters' appeals as mythology goes.
Then again maybe I'm biased because Lone Ranger has been an irrelevant character since what, the 1950s? (Or let me put it this way: Sometimes origin stories are good to make a protagonist appealing. Other times actions do just fine. Did anybody care about knowing Jack Sparrow's origins in the first PIRATES movie with his antics and outsmarting his enemies?)
In contrast, I think of DREDD last year. That movie understood that Judge Dredd's origins didn't matter at all. He's fun because he's a resourceful, tough son of a bitch who shoots bad guys in the face.
TLR, not a bad film. It has some charms (the train race finale is insane) and not as bad as the terrible reviews are making this out to be. But you can wait for DVD on this one.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/13 10:30 PM
Pacific Rim
Actually pretty good if you approach it in the right frame of mind, i.e. it's rather predictable, your typical pop-corn flick, but it's fun and has some great battle scenes. Definitely needs to be seen on the big screen though.
Actually pretty good if you approach it in the right frame of mind, i.e. it's rather predictable, your typical pop-corn flick, but it's fun and has some great battle scenes. Definitely needs to be seen on the big screen though.
Posted By: Logomassini
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/13 02:29 AM
I agree Ivy League. Pacific Rim I thought was a pretty good movie. Just like you said you have to approach with the right mind frame. I don't think it's a movie for eveyone but it certainly was my type of movie, but I wouldn't say it was phenomenal.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/13 02:55 AM
Wow, I actually agree with you 2 gents on PACIFIC RIM.
Yes the story is blockbuster autopilot with characters and arches borrowed from TOP GUN and INDEPENDENCE DAY and several other summer movies. But I admire that unlike the works of Michael Bay (and MAN OF STEEL), such a pitch doesn't end up being an excuse for poorly paced, boring mayhem porn. The filmmakers are actually intrigued by the concept of an everyday life where giant robots and monsters duke it out regularly. This is terrific science fiction regarding the thought put behind the machinery of these robots, along with the "Drifting" and all that.
I liked this. ***1/2 out of 5.
Yes the story is blockbuster autopilot with characters and arches borrowed from TOP GUN and INDEPENDENCE DAY and several other summer movies. But I admire that unlike the works of Michael Bay (and MAN OF STEEL), such a pitch doesn't end up being an excuse for poorly paced, boring mayhem porn. The filmmakers are actually intrigued by the concept of an everyday life where giant robots and monsters duke it out regularly. This is terrific science fiction regarding the thought put behind the machinery of these robots, along with the "Drifting" and all that.
I liked this. ***1/2 out of 5.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/13 08:48 PM
Watched Safe House(2012), Denzel Washington's a pretty damn good actor. And the movie also was great.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/19/13 03:04 AM
Originally Posted By: ThePolakVet
Watched Safe House(2012), Denzel Washington's a pretty damn good actor. And the movie also was great.
I never got around to that one. Now on top of my Netflix queue. Thanks!
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/13 03:12 AM
Caught RED 2 yesterday. Meh. Dragged for too much of the movie for my taste. Then again to be fair, I wasn't the biggest fan of RED, which was watchable enough of an action/comedy I suppose. Perhaps fans will forgive this sequel more than I did? (My crowd ate this up.) Best Bruce Willis movie of 2013, which to be fair is not exactly saying much.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/13 03:54 AM
Now THE CONJURING, I would definately recommend that one folks. It's so goddamn refreshing to see a horror film actually made with methodical pacing and a successful attempt at atmosphere. Most engaging mainstream horror movie I've seen in ages.
This takes its time establishing both families, the large family realizing too late they just moved into a haunted house (I would sue their real estate agent) and the other a demon-busting family who go out and give college lectures about their work. Mind you I don't believe in ghosts and exorcisms and all that stuff, but I found this clinical approach to that topic very fascinating. Of course they have to go into that house and with a mixture of technology and old time religion asskicking figure out the mystery behind this house and solve it.
CONJURING will remind you of past terrific films of this sort like POLTERGEIST and THE CHANGELING and Robert Wise's THE HAUNTING and all that. But unlike most recently produced horror films, this doesn't do an empty shout-out to such old glories and ride on their coattails. No CONJURING works as a thriller for the same reasons as those films did.
This takes its time establishing both families, the large family realizing too late they just moved into a haunted house (I would sue their real estate agent) and the other a demon-busting family who go out and give college lectures about their work. Mind you I don't believe in ghosts and exorcisms and all that stuff, but I found this clinical approach to that topic very fascinating. Of course they have to go into that house and with a mixture of technology and old time religion asskicking figure out the mystery behind this house and solve it.
CONJURING will remind you of past terrific films of this sort like POLTERGEIST and THE CHANGELING and Robert Wise's THE HAUNTING and all that. But unlike most recently produced horror films, this doesn't do an empty shout-out to such old glories and ride on their coattails. No CONJURING works as a thriller for the same reasons as those films did.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/13 03:52 PM
RR,
I've seen previews of it. It DOES look creepy.
TIS
I've seen previews of it. It DOES look creepy.
TIS
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/13 02:09 AM
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Now THE CONJURING, I would definately recommend that one folks. It's so goddamn refreshing to see a horror film actually made with methodical pacing and a successful attempt at atmosphere. Most engaging mainstream horror movie I've seen in ages.
This takes its time establishing both families, the large family realizing too late they just moved into a haunted house (I would sue their real estate agent) and the other a demon-busting family who go out and give college lectures about their work. Mind you I don't believe in ghosts and exorcisms and all that stuff, but I found this clinical approach to that topic very fascinating. Of course they have to go into that house and with a mixture of technology and old time religion asskicking figure out the mystery behind this house and solve it.
CONJURING will remind you of past terrific films of this sort like POLTERGEIST and THE CHANGELING and Robert Wise's THE HAUNTING and all that. But unlike most recently produced horror films, this doesn't do an empty shout-out to such old glories and ride on their coattails. No CONJURING works as a thriller for the same reasons as those films did.
This takes its time establishing both families, the large family realizing too late they just moved into a haunted house (I would sue their real estate agent) and the other a demon-busting family who go out and give college lectures about their work. Mind you I don't believe in ghosts and exorcisms and all that stuff, but I found this clinical approach to that topic very fascinating. Of course they have to go into that house and with a mixture of technology and old time religion asskicking figure out the mystery behind this house and solve it.
CONJURING will remind you of past terrific films of this sort like POLTERGEIST and THE CHANGELING and Robert Wise's THE HAUNTING and all that. But unlike most recently produced horror films, this doesn't do an empty shout-out to such old glories and ride on their coattails. No CONJURING works as a thriller for the same reasons as those films did.
Good movie. One of the better horror flicks I've seen in some time. Has 85% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/25/13 10:49 PM
Anyone ever see a movie called "Red Eye?" HBO is running it this week. Story of one woman's terrifying flight with an assassin. Kept me on the edge of my seat. Much of the same excitement ast Eagle Eye which also was action packed.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/25/13 11:50 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Anyone ever see a movie called "Red Eye?" HBO is running it this week. Story of one woman's terrifying flight with an assassin. Kept me on the edge of my seat. Much of the same excitement ast Eagle Eye which also was action packed.
TIS
TIS
Never have i just googled it though and it sounds quite interesting, i may give it a try sometime. It shocked me that it is a Wes Craven film since he usually directs Horrors, who knows what this madman will do though since he directed this
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 12:17 AM
Yes Camarel I too was surprised to see Wes Craven's name. When you get a chance, check it out.
I can't say I've heard of Music of the Heart.
TIS
I can't say I've heard of Music of the Heart.
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 01:05 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Yes Camarel I too was surprised to see Wes Craven's name. When you get a chance, check it out.
I can't say I've heard of Music of the Heart.
TIS
I can't say I've heard of Music of the Heart.
TIS
It's anoher Wes Craven film
Much less expexted than Red Eye. Here's the trailer - I will watch Red Eye within the next week and tell you what i thought of it.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 01:11 AM
Hmmm I really don't remember it. Yet, I know all of the stars. Thanks for the trailer.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 01:23 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Hmmm I really don't remember it. Yet, I know all of the stars. Thanks for the trailer.
TIS
TIS
I haven't seen it, but it's baffling a director would've made a film of that nature when he's famous for films like Nightmare on Elm Street,Scream,Last House on The Left etc.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 01:39 AM
It sure is. I wonder what he was thinking? Who would have thought?
TIS
Who would have thought?TIS
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 01:54 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
It sure is. I wonder what he was thinking? Who would have thought?
TIS
Who would have thought?TIS
My guess is Meryl Streep didn't wnt to be a murder victim
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/13 08:28 PM
Just watched get shorty, ive seen it many times before, but after dennis farina passing i had to watch it again bc its my favorite of all his movies(besides maybe midnight run). Its got james gandolfini in it to.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/13 01:52 AM
Caught THE WOLVERINE last night. Decent, engaging enough actioneer that's both an existential story and a Clint Eastwood-type movie with a well-paced, economical narrative of action, humor, and plot not getting in the way. Too bad the movie sorta jumps the rails in the 3rd act by being the cartoonish sillyness that up to then TW had refreshingly avoided. But regardless, an afternoon still worth seeing.
Or let's put it another way. This is a film where we have an immortal hero with retractable claws surviving a nuclear blast, a humanoid snake mutant villainess, another mutant who's a master samurai swordsman soothsayer, a ridiculous (and ridiculously entertaining) train sequence with characters using gravity to fight each other, heart surgery is done by hand through the chest. Yet the giant samurai robot is generally considered by most folks to be the absurd bridge too far. I consider this credit to a picture that (mostly) works.
(Be sure to stay in your seats and watch the mid-credits scene. Absolute joy, and sets up X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE past out next summer. Hell of a teaser!)
Or let's put it another way. This is a film where we have an immortal hero with retractable claws surviving a nuclear blast, a humanoid snake mutant villainess, another mutant who's a master samurai swordsman soothsayer, a ridiculous (and ridiculously entertaining) train sequence with characters using gravity to fight each other, heart surgery is done by hand through the chest. Yet the giant samurai robot is generally considered by most folks to be the absurd bridge too far. I consider this credit to a picture that (mostly) works.
(Be sure to stay in your seats and watch the mid-credits scene. Absolute joy, and sets up X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE past out next summer. Hell of a teaser!)
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/13 03:04 PM
Fun Fact: Ryan Gosling was in THE CONJURING. (Albeit in voice only.)
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/13 07:00 PM
Just watched hangover 3, it was better than i expected. Not as funny as the original ofcourse but it had its moments and it wasnt as ridicoulos as i thought it might be. But overall it was a good and fitting end to the hangover saga.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/13 06:48 PM
I thought Hangover was hilarious and but that's the only one I've seen of the three.
HBO just ran "The Bourne Legacy" and I must admit it wasn't half bad. A whole lot of action, especially in the end. I did enjoy it. However, that being said, I still maintain there is only ONE Jason Bourne and that's Matt Damon. It just didn't seem quite the same to me. Sort of like watching a "Bourne-ish" type movie and not the real thing.
TIS
HBO just ran "The Bourne Legacy" and I must admit it wasn't half bad. A whole lot of action, especially in the end. I did enjoy it. However, that being said, I still maintain there is only ONE Jason Bourne and that's Matt Damon. It just didn't seem quite the same to me.
Sort of like watching a "Bourne-ish" type movie and not the real thing.TIS
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/13 07:19 PM
Ya thats about the same feeling i had about to. It was a well done and an intriguing storyline and jeremy renner is a good actor but hes no matt damon. I forget how it was said exactly by the director but i think it was something like that it was in the same universe as the other bourne films, meaning that the time frame of the events in legacy were happening simultaneously with the events in the other bourne movies. Which is kind of strange but intriguing concept and a pretty creative way to continue with the bourne saga despite damon not wanting to sign up for another one.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/13 08:50 PM
I saw Matt Damon on Today with Matt Lauer promoting "Elysium". He seems so genuine and down to earth. He got a little annoyed with the interview when Lauer asked him about a quote attributed to Damon that said he's sure that Brad Pitt is jealous of him. Matt Damon said that the quote was taken out of context and that what he actually said was that Brad Pitt is probably jealous of the fact that Matt Damon can walk his kids to school without being mobbed. And then he looked at Matt Lauer and said in a rather cold voice, "Yeah, because Brad Pitt has lots to be jealous of."
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/11/13 03:11 AM
Saw Elysium. Good movie. A few plot holes and a fairly predictable ending but the visual effects and action more than make up for it. I don't know what Blomkamp's secret is but, if you've seen this movie or District 9, his special effects are head and shoulders above everybody else. So realistic looking. Not CGI looking at all. Sharlto Copley, who plays the bad guy Kruger (and was the lead in District 9) steals the show, in my opinion.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/13 09:57 PM
Pain and Gain, really cool movie, liked it.
Posted By: dixiemafia
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/13 10:17 PM
I liked Hangover 3 too. The 2nd one SUCKED and of course none will be better than the first. The way 3 ended there HAS to be another one soon.
I took the wife out to see We're The Millers Friday night and you talk about a funny ass movie!! One of the best comedies out in awhile for me, probably since Hangover 3.
I took the wife out to see We're The Millers Friday night and you talk about a funny ass movie!! One of the best comedies out in awhile for me, probably since Hangover 3.
Posted By: Arina
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/20/13 07:01 AM
I watched the Movie Small Soldiers last night .........Its a Good Action movie .
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/13 10:55 AM
Fruitvale Station was a really good movie and should likely be an early Oscar contender.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/13 02:03 PM
Originally Posted By: Lilo
Fruitvale Station was a really good movie and should likely be an early Oscar contender.
Hey Lilo! Welcome back! I hope all is well.
I want to see Fruitvale Station too. I've heard only good reviews.
TIS
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/13 04:44 AM
Got dragged to The Mortal Instruments. Wasn't horrible is the best way I can put it.
Posted By: afsaneh77
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/13 04:59 AM
"Now You See Me" was crap. Plots for movies have become really dumb as of late. I rarely get to watch a movie that I liked based on the story and script. :[
Star Trek and Iron Man 3 were fun.
Star Trek and Iron Man 3 were fun.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/13 10:00 AM
Sunlight Jr.
This movie is well acted, written and directed. It's Oscar bait. It also takes a left turn (pun definitely intended) to put itself firmly on one side of a social question. This happens in the film's denouement. I was blindsided but some other people who saw the film thought that the twist was incredibly obvious and that I evidently simply hadn't been paying attention to earlier events. Either way afterwards I felt a little manipulated. But sometimes those are the feelings that a good writer/director brings forth right? YMMV on the ending. It made clear poverty's cost. It also might make you think just how far are you from a much reduced standard of living? This is a pretty bleak film that doesn't pull punches on what impoverishment does to people. There are choices that people make that are informed or rather deformed by lack of money.
Anyway.
Melissa (Naomi Watts) is a convenience store clerk who lives in a motel with her boyfriend, former construction worker Richie (Matt Dillon- who seems somehow not to have aged at all over the past twenty years-good genes and clean living or deal with the Infernal Powers?). Richie is permanently crippled and lives off his small disability check. Richie's got a good heart. He is mechanically handy but also likes to drink. He hasn't fully accepted that he can't do the things for his girlfriend that he'd like to do, and no I'm not talking about sex as Richie and Melissa have a pretty active intimate life. I'm talking about simple things like buying his girlfriend a working umbrella or leaving the motel. Richie doesn't like that Melissa is the breadwinner or that his car runs out of gas as he drives her to work. Richie never feels sorry for himself and refuses to let anyone else do so.
This film, much like Collyer's past work (Sherrybaby), examines the lives of the working poor. Melissa and Richie have some additional challenges pop up, including but not limited to Melissa's old boyfriend Justin (Norman Reedus) and her lecherous boss Edwin, which will strain their relationship to the breaking point.
This movie is well acted, written and directed. It's Oscar bait. It also takes a left turn (pun definitely intended) to put itself firmly on one side of a social question. This happens in the film's denouement. I was blindsided but some other people who saw the film thought that the twist was incredibly obvious and that I evidently simply hadn't been paying attention to earlier events. Either way afterwards I felt a little manipulated. But sometimes those are the feelings that a good writer/director brings forth right? YMMV on the ending. It made clear poverty's cost. It also might make you think just how far are you from a much reduced standard of living? This is a pretty bleak film that doesn't pull punches on what impoverishment does to people. There are choices that people make that are informed or rather deformed by lack of money.
Anyway.
Melissa (Naomi Watts) is a convenience store clerk who lives in a motel with her boyfriend, former construction worker Richie (Matt Dillon- who seems somehow not to have aged at all over the past twenty years-good genes and clean living or deal with the Infernal Powers?). Richie is permanently crippled and lives off his small disability check. Richie's got a good heart. He is mechanically handy but also likes to drink. He hasn't fully accepted that he can't do the things for his girlfriend that he'd like to do, and no I'm not talking about sex as Richie and Melissa have a pretty active intimate life. I'm talking about simple things like buying his girlfriend a working umbrella or leaving the motel. Richie doesn't like that Melissa is the breadwinner or that his car runs out of gas as he drives her to work. Richie never feels sorry for himself and refuses to let anyone else do so.
This film, much like Collyer's past work (Sherrybaby), examines the lives of the working poor. Melissa and Richie have some additional challenges pop up, including but not limited to Melissa's old boyfriend Justin (Norman Reedus) and her lecherous boss Edwin, which will strain their relationship to the breaking point.
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/13 02:43 AM
i took last week off of work and decided to get caught up on movies. i saw gravity, the counselor, and captain phillips. All three were great films, but gravity was by far the best, awesome special effects. The counselor had a great cast but i thought it couldve been better, it was just kinda missing something, couldnt really put my finger on what though, although it had a good plot and overall it was a solid movie, o yeah cameron diaz is crazy. captain phillips was great, had some good action and excellent insight into the somali pirate situation, tom hanks is a great actor but no matter how hard i try all i can think about when he talks is woody from toy story.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/10/13 10:32 AM
Saw We're The Millers, really funny one.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/10/13 06:00 PM
I rewatched Dog Day Afternoon yesterday, great film, Pacino is amazing in it. Only recently i found out it was a true story, so i looked into it and the guy Pacino plays really resembles him.
Posted By: Franzese
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/13 08:44 PM
I watched "Scent of a Woman" two days ago, and I must admit that it's the best performance of Al Pacino I have seen ever! I'll even take a risk saying, it was better than "Godfather II."
Chris O'Donnell's role has been really amazing played, but Pacino completely demolished him with his acting in this movie. Hats off!
The scenario, camera movements, dialogues (!) and many more, it's just too much to deal with and describe. I might write a larger and more extensive review soon, if someone would like to read it.
Anyway, I highly recommend this movie to anyone, whether you are kids, teenagers, middle-aged adults or elder people. It completely does not matter, because the movie is above that. You can watch this film again and again, and you'll still be content.
10/10.
Chris O'Donnell's role has been really amazing played, but Pacino completely demolished him with his acting in this movie. Hats off!
The scenario, camera movements, dialogues (!) and many more, it's just too much to deal with and describe. I might write a larger and more extensive review soon, if someone would like to read it.
Anyway, I highly recommend this movie to anyone, whether you are kids, teenagers, middle-aged adults or elder people. It completely does not matter, because the movie is above that. You can watch this film again and again, and you'll still be content.
10/10.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/13 09:01 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
I rewatched Dog Day Afternoon yesterday, great film, Pacino is amazing in it. Only recently i found out it was a true story, so i looked into it and the guy Pacino plays really resembles him.
I loved DDA. Pacino was in top form. Amazing job!
TIS
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 04:40 PM
I am watching a lot of bad movies these days because my girlfriend refuses to watch horror movies and any movies with violence; the latest being Mr and Mrs Smith. Terrible movie. All style, no substance. Vacuous crap.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
Posted By: Franzese
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 09:31 PM
Brat Pitt is just too mainstream, in my opinion. It's not like he's a bad actor, hence he had a good role in "Seven years in Tibet." I also liked him in the movie about Benjamin Button.
Haven't seen many films with his persona, since he's not my type of actor, but I don't think he's "bad."
Haven't seen many films with his persona, since he's not my type of actor, but I don't think he's "bad."
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 09:44 PM
Originally Posted By: Franzese
Brat Pitt is just too mainstream, in my opinion. It's not like he's a bad actor, hence he had a good role in "Seven years in Tibet." I also liked him in the movie about Benjamin Button.
Haven't seen many films with his persona, since he's not my type of actor, but I don't think he's "bad."
Haven't seen many films with his persona, since he's not my type of actor, but I don't think he's "bad."
He's not a bad actor imo. I haven't seen Seven Years in Tibet, but i agree with Benjamin Button it wasn't a good movie but i thought he gave a good performance. As well as that i'd say Snatch,Fight Club and especially Burn After Reading where he was hilarious and the best thing about the film imo. One thing i struggle to find is a film where he was really bad, then again i haven't seen Mr and Mrs Smith so maybe that's where.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 09:53 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I am watching a lot of bad movies these days because my girlfriend refuses to watch horror movies and any movies with violence; the latest being Mr and Mrs Smith. Terrible movie. All style, no substance. Vacuous crap.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
In what movie has Harvey Kietel been that special? The only movie i liked him in was Mean Streets, he really annoyed me in Reservoir Dogs and The Last Temptation of Christ.
Same goes for Bale. I loved him in American Psycho, but imo he was an average Bruce Wayne the trilogies success had little to do with Bale imo. I haven't seen The Fighter though so maybe he was great as Micky Ward?
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 10:03 PM
the fighter was a pretty good movie, but the guy who played micky ward was mark whalbarg, Bale played the part of the washed up brother, bale was a pretty convincing crack addict.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 10:10 PM
Originally Posted By: Dellacroce
the fighter was a pretty good movie, but the guy who played micky ward was mark whalbarg, Bale played the part of the washed up brother, bale was a pretty convincing crack addict.
Thanks for clearing that up i knew Bale got alot of praise for that role and i honestly thought he played Ward. I heard they're going to make more focusing on the Ward-Gatti trilogy which would be amazing imo.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 10:34 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I am watching a lot of bad movies these days because my girlfriend refuses to watch horror movies and any movies with violence; the latest being Mr and Mrs Smith. Terrible movie. All style, no substance. Vacuous crap.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
In what movie has Harvey Kietel been that special? The only movie i liked him in was Mean Streets, he really annoyed me in Reservoir Dogs and The Last Temptation of Christ.
Same goes for Bale. I loved him in American Psycho, but imo he was an average Bruce Wayne the trilogies success had little to do with Bale imo. I haven't seen The Fighter though so maybe he was great as Micky Ward?
Harvey Keitel's character annoyed me in Reservoir Dogs because he couldn't see that Mr. Orange was undercover; but his acting was great.
Bad Lieutenant is an acting masterclass and he was very good in Cop Land and From Dusk Till Dawn.
His scenes with De Niro in Cop Land always crack me up. Two legends of the game!
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/13 11:01 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I am watching a lot of bad movies these days because my girlfriend refuses to watch horror movies and any movies with violence; the latest being Mr and Mrs Smith. Terrible movie. All style, no substance. Vacuous crap.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
Brad Pitt is a pretty shit actor. I know it's obvious but when you are watching De Niro/Keitel/Bale or Norton, you get lost in their characters. With Pitt, you are just watching Brad Pitt look cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1giVzxyoclE
LOL at Brad Pitt trying to emote.
In what movie has Harvey Kietel been that special? The only movie i liked him in was Mean Streets, he really annoyed me in Reservoir Dogs and The Last Temptation of Christ.
Same goes for Bale. I loved him in American Psycho, but imo he was an average Bruce Wayne the trilogies success had little to do with Bale imo. I haven't seen The Fighter though so maybe he was great as Micky Ward?
Harvey Keitel's character annoyed me in Reservoir Dogs because he couldn't see that Mr. Orange was undercover; but his acting was great.
Bad Lieutenant is an acting masterclass and he was very good in Cop Land and From Dusk Till Dawn.
His scenes with De Niro in Cop Land always crack me up. Two legends of the game!
It's just opposing opinions then
. In Reservoir Dogs, he annoyed me because he didn't fit in with the cast at all imo and i'm one of the few that thinks RD is QT best movie. I thought Cop Land was a really bad film, i'd say it was the Expendables of actors i like and it didn't work imo. I agree that Kietel and Deniro were the only decent things about that film though.
Posted By: Franzese
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/13 05:30 PM
I've seen "Cape Fear" last night, and I need to admit that it's an excellent movie. De Niro had given amazing performance as usual, but this is how any (criminal) movie should be kept. Scorsese? I don't have to talk much about him - top notch director.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/13 05:37 PM
Originally Posted By: Franzese
I've seen "Cape Fear" last night, and I need to admit that it's an excellent movie. De Niro had given amazing performance as usual, but this is how any (criminal) movie should be kept. Scorsese? I don't have to talk much about him - top notch director.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
The thing i love about Scorecese is that along with his well known movies like Goodfellas,Casino and Taxi Driver he's made amazing movies like The King of Comedy and After Hours that you barely hear about.
Posted By: Franzese
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/13 04:31 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Franzese
I've seen "Cape Fear" last night, and I need to admit that it's an excellent movie. De Niro had given amazing performance as usual, but this is how any (criminal) movie should be kept. Scorsese? I don't have to talk much about him - top notch director.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
Few scenes are obviously from "typical Hollywood," but overall it's I'd give it 8.5/10. If you like "heavy-topic" movies, this is definitely for you.
Merry Christmas!
- Franzese.
The thing i love about Scorecese is that along with his well known movies like Goodfellas,Casino and Taxi Driver he's made amazing movies like The King of Comedy and After Hours that you barely hear about.
That's right. Scorsese is by far the best director in Hollywood, right now. Not reducing the skill of directing craft of other famous directors, but I think Scorsese's movies have the in-depth meaning. I can even compare him to Da Vinci of cinematography
On a side-note, I'm waiting patiently for his upcoming movie with Di Caprio -- Wolf of the Wall Street. Trailer of this film, is one of the best I've seen. Definitely a must-watch film.
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/13 05:21 PM
just saw The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, for some reason the girlfriend wanted to go see it, other wise i probably wouldnt have bothered to watch it. But surprisingly enough it turned out to be a pretty good movie.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/13 11:22 PM
I went to watch The Hobbit 2 today, good film and great effects.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/13 10:21 PM
"American Hustle" was a pretty good movie and not just because as the joke goes, Amy Adams, was in the running for "least supported actress" because of her character's usually braless attire. It's a fictionalized retelling of the ABSCAM scandal. It's an ensemble film where everyone gets a chance to shine. In tone and style it was kinda reminiscent of Goodfellas. Christian Bale, Jennifer Lawrence, and Bradley Cooper also star. Jeremy Renner has a very strong supporting role.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/13 11:34 AM
American Hustle is the movie that I want to go see. Good male leads, and foxy female ones
Posted By: Giancarlo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/13 07:02 PM
I saw American Hustle...i liked it. Was surprised to see DeNiro ...i had no idea he was going to be in it. Small part...he played a guy connected to Lansky in the movie.
I felt bad for Carmine who was based on former Camden Mayor Angelo Errichetti.
I felt bad for Carmine who was based on former Camden Mayor Angelo Errichetti.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/14 03:23 AM
Have any of you seen Oblivion with Tom Cruise? I watched most of it, but how was he able to come back from the dead at the end of the movie?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/14 11:27 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Have any of you seen Oblivion with Tom Cruise? I watched most of it, but how was he able to come back from the dead at the end of the movie?
And now I don't ever have to see it!
Did we ever hear of a spoiler alert, Oli???
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/14 11:55 PM
A couple months ago Bill Maher slipped up giving what I perceive to be the ending (or a surprise within the movie) of the movie "Gravity". He put his hand to his mouth as though to say "oops." I haven't seen the movie and now not sure if I want to.
TIS
I haven't seen the movie and now not sure if I want to. TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/14 06:36 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: olivant
Have any of you seen Oblivion with Tom Cruise? I watched most of it, but how was he able to come back from the dead at the end of the movie?
And now I don't ever have to see it!
Did we ever hear of a spoiler alert, Oli???
Mi dispiace!
Posted By: dontomasso
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/14 06:21 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: olivant
Have any of you seen Oblivion with Tom Cruise? I watched most of it, but how was he able to come back from the dead at the end of the movie?
And now I don't ever have to see it!
Did we ever hear of a spoiler alert, Oli???
Mi dispiace!
No sweat. Anything to avoid a Tom Cruise movie works for me!
Posted By: Don Marco
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/20/14 11:44 PM
Just saw American Hustle - fantastic. Christian Bale is great in it.
Posted By: J Geoff
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/14 10:07 AM
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
Anything to avoid a Tom Cruise movie works for me!
+1
Can't stand the smirking a-hole! ...but I still like some of his movies (and not because he's in them!)..
Posted By: Dellacroce
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/14 01:40 PM
Olivant didnt really give anything away at all, what he said certainly isnt a reason to not see the film. and it was a pretty good movie, i would highly recommend it(even if you dislike tom cruise).
And for those who plan to watch it DO NOT READ THE REST OF THIS POST. SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!
Olivant- He blew up and did not come back from the dead, it was one of his clones that comes up to his camp at the end of the film.
And for those who plan to watch it DO NOT READ THE REST OF THIS POST. SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!
Olivant- He blew up and did not come back from the dead, it was one of his clones that comes up to his camp at the end of the film.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/14 04:47 PM
Full of eager anticipation I went to the cinema this week to watch American Hustle. Came away very disappointed. I was not impressed one bit. Full of over indulgent acting and mind numbing character interplay.
Amy Adams nearly saved the day just by being in it, but even she could not do it.
Amy Adams nearly saved the day just by being in it, but even she could not do it.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/14 05:03 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Full of eager anticipation I went to the cinema this week to watch American Hustle. Came away very disappointed. I was not impressed one bit. Full of over indulgent acting and mind numbing character interplay.
Amy Adams nearly saved the day just by being in it, but even she could not do it.
Amy Adams nearly saved the day just by being in it, but even she could not do it.
You know that was one I was thinking about seeing. I don't know much as to what it's about but I get a kick out of (and can relate to) some of the hair/clothes styles.
I do find tho, most of the time, IF a movie wins many awards, there's a good chance I won't like it. Many times IMHO, critics love it and I don't.
Wolf Of Wall Street kind of appeals to me but I am wondering if I'll like it. TIS
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/14 05:07 PM
My daughter said Wolf of Wall Street is excellent, she also said that about American Hustle though.....
Posted By: bigboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/16/14 07:05 PM
I just watched Ft. Apache-Bronx with Paul Neuman for about the umpteenth time. Still a great movie.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/14 02:06 PM
Matty the wonder boy, is going through a massive STAR WARS phase at present and just keeps watching the films over and over again. I like them, but getting a bit sick now
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/14 04:25 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Matty the wonder boy, is going through a massive STAR WARS phase at present and just keeps watching the films over and over again. I like them, but getting a bit sick now
May the force be with him.
I saw the Star Wars movies when I was a young teen, and never cared for them. In 1997 I took my son, who was 3, and his buddy to Star Wars when it was released for its 20 year anniversary. The most interesting part was watching the people in the theatre, many of them alone.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/14 09:38 PM
Originally Posted By: Dellacroce
the fighter was a pretty good movie, but the guy who played micky ward was mark whalbarg, Bale played the part of the washed up brother, bale was a pretty convincing crack addict.
I really enjoyed Christian Bales performance in The Fighter, he played the part well.
Last movie i watched was Misery, with James Caan and Kathy Bates who plays the nut obsessed fan well lol.
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/14 03:04 AM
I haven't seen Philomena, but here's how I'd rank and rate this weekend's Best Picture Oscar nominees...
1. Gravity 8/10
2. The Wolf of Wall Street 8/10
3. Nebraska 7/10
4. Her 7/10
5. Dallas Buyers Club 6/10
6. Captain Phillips 5/10
7. 12 Years a Slave 5/10
8. American Hustle 5/10
1. Gravity 8/10
2. The Wolf of Wall Street 8/10
3. Nebraska 7/10
4. Her 7/10
5. Dallas Buyers Club 6/10
6. Captain Phillips 5/10
7. 12 Years a Slave 5/10
8. American Hustle 5/10
Posted By: afsaneh77
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/14 05:25 AM
Watched "American Hustle." Good thing Capo rated it 5/10, or I would've thought that I've missed something. How this was nominated for an Oscar, I know not. Pretty much agree with Capo's rating on "Dallas Buyers Club" and "Gravity" as well. I suppose I should not even attempt to watch "12 Years a Slave" and "Captain Phillips."
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/14 05:50 PM
My top 10 of last year:
1.The Grandmaster - Wong-Kar Wai
2.The Wolf of Wall Street - Martin Scorcese
3.Prisoners - Denis Villeneuve
4.Gravity - Alfonso Cuaron
5.Nebraska - Alexander Payne
6.The Great Beauty - Paolo Sorrentino
7.To The Wonder - Terence Malick
8.Inside Llewyn Davis - Coens
9.Rush - Ron Howard
10.Side Effects - Steven Soderbergh
1.The Grandmaster - Wong-Kar Wai
2.The Wolf of Wall Street - Martin Scorcese
3.Prisoners - Denis Villeneuve
4.Gravity - Alfonso Cuaron
5.Nebraska - Alexander Payne
6.The Great Beauty - Paolo Sorrentino
7.To The Wonder - Terence Malick
8.Inside Llewyn Davis - Coens
9.Rush - Ron Howard
10.Side Effects - Steven Soderbergh
Posted By: goombah
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/14 02:19 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Matty the wonder boy, is going through a massive STAR WARS phase at present and just keeps watching the films over and over again. I like them, but getting a bit sick now
My boy went through that same phase two years ago. We even vacationed in Disney World where they had a Star Wars themed show. They brought the kids on stage for "jedi training" and to fight Darth Vader.
I saw them as a kid when they were released and then got back into them with my son's interest. I didn't see the films that were released in the early 2000s until my son watched them. I thought that the third one, Revenge of the Sith, was as good as the original three released between 1977-80.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/14 05:19 PM
Don't expect them to get over it any time soon. My daughter is a big fan, and she's almost 24. When she calls me, her ring tone is the Star Wars theme.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/14 10:11 PM
The other night I watched "Jeremiah Johnson" (1972) on IFC. Robert Redford was the hot actor of the 70s. My wife loved him more than me. 
But he was cool; rugged, yet pretty-boy good looks. The movie is one of my favorites from that time period. Looking at it now, it still holds up. Cinematography and scenery are beautiful. Its a very simplistic story and such a contrast to today's culture. No smartphones to find out where the nearest stream of drinkable water might be.
But he was cool; rugged, yet pretty-boy good looks. The movie is one of my favorites from that time period. Looking at it now, it still holds up. Cinematography and scenery are beautiful. Its a very simplistic story and such a contrast to today's culture. No smartphones to find out where the nearest stream of drinkable water might be.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/14 09:10 AM
Just saw "American Hustle" last night. Didn't care for it at all. Couldn't tell if it was a comedy or a drama. Tho acting was good, I was bored. I just didn't find the story interesting, and the characters were all annoying. Just my opinion.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/14 09:12 PM
Trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OSaJE2rqxU
Saw this today. Very good movie but one you have to approach in the right frame of mind. Especially those of us who believe Noah was a real person and the flood was a real event.
First, considering the basic story found in the Bible is quite short, one has to allow for a certain amount of "artistic license" to build a full length film around it.
Second, it does help to be familiar with Darren Aronofsky and his style of film making.
Third, one has to make allowances for Hollywood not knowing the correct interpretation of certain scriptural passages, many of which are naturally difficult to present on screen.
Fourth, in one interview, one of the writers said they chose to make Noah more conflicted and not aware of God's will all at once.
Anyway, whatever individual imperfections the movie has are far outweighed by the whole. It's a very spiritual film and visually incredible.
Saw this today. Very good movie but one you have to approach in the right frame of mind. Especially those of us who believe Noah was a real person and the flood was a real event.
First, considering the basic story found in the Bible is quite short, one has to allow for a certain amount of "artistic license" to build a full length film around it.
Second, it does help to be familiar with Darren Aronofsky and his style of film making.
Third, one has to make allowances for Hollywood not knowing the correct interpretation of certain scriptural passages, many of which are naturally difficult to present on screen.
Fourth, in one interview, one of the writers said they chose to make Noah more conflicted and not aware of God's will all at once.
Anyway, whatever individual imperfections the movie has are far outweighed by the whole. It's a very spiritual film and visually incredible.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/14 11:45 AM
I watched last year's Man of Steel. I was surprised by a few things including appearances by Russell Crowe, Laurence Fishburne, and Kevin Costner. Also, the evil protagonist was none other than (miscast) the guy who played the former Treasury agent in Boardwalk Empire. Not a bad movie though.
By the way, Amy Adams played Lois Lane and apparently has had her nose altered. It looks worse than before.
By the way, Amy Adams played Lois Lane and apparently has had her nose altered. It looks worse than before.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/14 11:20 PM
I re-watched "There Will Be Blood" (2007) recently. Incredible performance by Daniel Day Lewis. Just amazing.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/14 04:47 AM
Re-watched Platoon with my 2 eldest boys last night. Forgot how brutal and powerful it is.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/14 06:29 PM
Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
Re-watched Platoon with my 2 eldest boys last night. Forgot how brutal and powerful it is.
Un-cut, un-edited? It can be brutal. One of my favorites for the depth of emotion and pathos. As a Viet Nam era person who by-passed the draft, when watching Platoon I can't help but wonder what I would have done.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/14 06:34 PM
Last night I watched most of the 1970 film, M*A*S*H. By today's standards it is probably a silly bore. Back in 1970 it was ground breaking as was "The Graduate". Partial nudity, bawdy, irreverent. And a great cast. Donald Sutherland, Elliot Gould, Tom Skerrit, Robert Duvall (yes, Tom Hagen) and Sally Kellerman. Gary Burgoff played Radar O'Reilly and was then cast in the TV show.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/14 03:22 PM
Easy Money
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaZ6tX-N0Pk
A swedish crime thriller involving the drug business and Serbian and arab organized crime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaZ6tX-N0Pk
A swedish crime thriller involving the drug business and Serbian and arab organized crime.
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/14 02:35 AM
Originally Posted By: ThePolakVet
Easy Money
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaZ6tX-N0Pk
A swedish crime thriller involving the drug business and Serbian and arab organized crime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaZ6tX-N0Pk
A swedish crime thriller involving the drug business and Serbian and arab organized crime.
Good movie. Seen part 2 as well. Have yet to see part 3.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/14 05:51 AM
There is part 2?? Must watch then.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/14 02:07 PM
Prisoners. 7/10, either wasn't in the mood or it was just too long.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/14 11:13 AM
Just happened to turn tv and catch one of those "paid programming" shows. This one featured highlights of Dean Martin Roasts. I forgot how funny they were. A whole lot of big names and hilarious jokes/putdowns. Reminds me too of how much I liked Dino.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/14 11:20 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Just happened to turn tv and catch one of those "paid programming" shows. This one featured highlights of Dean Martin Roasts. I forgot how funny they were. A whole lot of big names and hilarious jokes/putdowns. Reminds me too of how much I liked Dino.
TIS
TIS
Indeed. I did too TIS. I just loved his smooth delivery whether it was singing, acting, or talking. He seemed to be always so relaxed.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/14 11:26 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Just happened to turn tv and catch one of those "paid programming" shows. This one featured highlights of Dean Martin Roasts. I forgot how funny they were. A whole lot of big names and hilarious jokes/putdowns. Reminds me too of how much I liked Dino.
TIS
TIS
Indeed. I did too TIS. I just loved his smooth delivery whether it was singing, acting, or talking. He seemed to be always so relaxed.
So may one-liners and slams to each other. I've been cracking up laughing the entire half hour. Very nostalgic. It really remains funny even today. Love it.
Example: Show ended with Dean Martin saying, "Thank you, I'll always remember this night.............Until I get to my car."
TIS
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/14 05:18 PM
When a stranger calls back.
anyone seen this movie, horror doesn't usually scare me, but this was good, a movie to watch alone at night for sure.
anyone seen this movie, horror doesn't usually scare me, but this was good, a movie to watch alone at night for sure.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/14 07:10 PM
I think "When A Stranger Calls Back" is a follow-up to "When I Stranger Calls", right?
Anyone watching CNN (on now) show titled "The Sixties?" It's pretty interesting showing tv shows, events during that era. Pretty interesting and nostalgic for those of us who lived thru the 60s.
TIS
Anyone watching CNN (on now) show titled "The Sixties?" It's pretty interesting showing tv shows, events during that era. Pretty interesting and nostalgic for those of us who lived thru the 60s.
TIS
Posted By: bigboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 07:24 PM
Just watched "Lone Survivor" which is the true story of Navy SEAL Marcus Lutrell. Mark Walberg plays his role. A very well done movie, but I am sorry that they didn't have a PS to tell of Marcus' murder by a PTSD victim who he was teaching to shoot and helping other PTSD victims. Also of the lawsuit by dirtbag Jessie Ventura who is suing Marcus' wife and estate for damaging his reputation.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 07:44 PM
I'm watching "Guess Who" for the tenth time. I swear to God, I can't even look at Bernie Mac make those eyes without busting a gut. He was one of the funniest guys who ever lived .
.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 07:52 PM
Once upon a time in America can't get myself to finish it as yet.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 08:06 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Once upon a time in America can't get myself to finish it as yet.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
In the scene where DeNiro's old and "Yesterday" is playing, my whole life flashes before my eyes
.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 08:33 PM
HBO is airing The Godfather which is unusual. I see it always on AMC but don't recall it being on HBO. Anyway, the big advantage of HBO is no edits and no commercials.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: FunnyHow
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/14 10:27 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Once upon a time in America can't get myself to finish it as yet.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
On the 60s In my head I am still living the 60s.
Is it better than the first time you saw it?
I just watched Raging Bull for the first time the other night. It's great of course, a little depressing.
I plan on watching Bugsy, The Roaring Twenties, and Al Capone sometime soon.
I forgot to add that I am watching The Sixties also. Very good!
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/14 12:16 AM
Yes, but I still have not finished watching it. Who is the actor that killed the guys in the car after he gave them the jewels and he got the cash. I thought that actor was very good.
Roaring twenties s a great movie. I have all of cagney's gangster movies.
Al Capone with rod Steiger? Do you have amazone prime? It is not on prime, but you can buy it on amazon instant video and have now. That is how I bought once upon a time in America. Why wait for it when you can get it now
Roaring twenties s a great movie. I have all of cagney's gangster movies.
Al Capone with rod Steiger? Do you have amazone prime? It is not on prime, but you can buy it on amazon instant video and have now. That is how I bought once upon a time in America. Why wait for it when you can get it now
Posted By: FunnyHow
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/14 11:22 AM
I'm not sure who that actor is, you can check on IMDB. It's been awhile since I've seen it. Al Capone is actually on the TCM app, so I can see it for free
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/14 09:42 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
HBO is airing The Godfather which is unusual. I see it always on AMC but don't recall it being on HBO. Anyway, the big advantage of HBO is no edits and no commercials.
TIS
TIS
In another thread I posted about the GF being shown on HBO and Cinemax many times over the past few months. AMC does own the rights through 2019, so I guess it gets to license it out to those networks.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/14 10:02 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
HBO is airing The Godfather which is unusual. I see it always on AMC but don't recall it being on HBO. Anyway, the big advantage of HBO is no edits and no commercials.
TIS
TIS
In another thread I posted about the GF being shown on HBO and Cinemax many times over the past few months. AMC does own the rights through 2019, so I guess it gets to license it out to those networks.
Long story short: AMC is the only channel on Basic Cable that can show the Trilogy. The Pay Channels can still air them for a fee.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/14 04:40 PM
Edge of Tomorrow starring Tom Cruise and directed by Doug Liman (the guy who did The Bourne Identity). One of the better films I've seen in a while. I would highly recommend it.
Posted By: NNY78
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/14 11:35 AM
Non Stop with Liam Neeson, very good is you like mystery/thriller type films, keeps you guessing until the end.
Posted By: FunnyHow
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/14 10:19 PM
Does anybody know if the movie Heat with Pacino & De Niro ever comes on cable TV? If it does, who owns the rights? Same thing with Se7en.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/14 11:14 PM
Originally Posted By: FunnyHow
Does anybody know if the movie Heat with Pacino & De Niro ever comes on cable TV? If it does, who owns the rights? Same thing with Se7en.
It shows on HBO.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/15/14 06:59 AM
Freddy's Dead.
Many think its one of the weakest entries in the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise, but personally its one of my favorites.
Many think its one of the weakest entries in the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise, but personally its one of my favorites.
Posted By: goombah
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/14 08:41 AM
Watched "Lincoln" over the weekend. I had been wanting to see it, but just had not gotten around to it.
Prior to watching the movie, I was not sure whether it would be a bio-pic or if it would focus only on his presidency. Similar films tend to conduct flashback scenes dating as far back as to the character's youth ("Nixon" comes to mind). But "Lincoln" was essentially centered around a 4-6 months period in 1865 when the Civil War was ending and Lincoln's fight to have the 13th Amendment passed.
There were two actors from "Boardwalk Empire" who I recognized: Michael Stuhlbarg (Arnold Rothstein) and Peter McRobbie (FBI Supervisor) in "Lincoln." Tommy Lee Jones, one of the better actors of the past 25 years, gave a great performance of Thaddeus Stevens.
It wasn't the greatest movie I have ever seen, but it was a well-done film about President Lincoln's struggles to convince Dems & Republicans that the country needed to pass the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery.
3.5 out of 5 stars
Prior to watching the movie, I was not sure whether it would be a bio-pic or if it would focus only on his presidency. Similar films tend to conduct flashback scenes dating as far back as to the character's youth ("Nixon" comes to mind). But "Lincoln" was essentially centered around a 4-6 months period in 1865 when the Civil War was ending and Lincoln's fight to have the 13th Amendment passed.
There were two actors from "Boardwalk Empire" who I recognized: Michael Stuhlbarg (Arnold Rothstein) and Peter McRobbie (FBI Supervisor) in "Lincoln." Tommy Lee Jones, one of the better actors of the past 25 years, gave a great performance of Thaddeus Stevens.
It wasn't the greatest movie I have ever seen, but it was a well-done film about President Lincoln's struggles to convince Dems & Republicans that the country needed to pass the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery.
3.5 out of 5 stars
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/14 09:05 AM
Ever see Tommy Lee jones in the cult movie Rolling Thunder? If not see it good in a crazy way.
Posted By: Paddy_James
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/14 06:54 PM
I just saw The Dark Knight Rises. It was okay but so much disappointment.
Posted By: Paddy_James
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/14 06:56 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Freddy's Dead.
Many think its one of the weakest entries in the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise, but personally its one of my favorites.
Many think its one of the weakest entries in the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise, but personally its one of my favorites.
I like the one. My personal favorite is Dream Warriors. It as well written, had good characters and was at times creepy
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/14 10:47 AM
Over the holiday I watched James Cagney in The Gallant Hours. It was about Admiral Bull Halsey's command of Pacific forces after Pearl Harbor. It's an interesting (if strange) production. It's partially narrated and for most of it there is an acapella score almost constantly in the background (most irritating).
I think it was meant as a tribute to Halsey, but it was more like a documentary than a movie.
I think it was meant as a tribute to Halsey, but it was more like a documentary than a movie.
Posted By: klydon1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/14 11:51 AM
Originally Posted By: goombah
It wasn't the greatest movie I have ever seen, but it was a well-done film about President Lincoln's struggles to convince Dems & Republicans that the country needed to pass the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery.
3.5 out of 5 stars
When Lincoln was first elected president in 1860 he supported a much different 13th Amendment, one which specifically stated that the US Congress is prohibited from abolishing or interfering with state controlled slavery. Lincoln opposed slavery in the territories because white laborers could not compete with slaves and white businessmen could not compete economically with slaveholders.
Lincoln, like many of his contemporaries, was more concerned with preserving the union than abolishing slavery. As the CSA was forming early in his first term, Lincoln supported the Amendment, which was passed by Congress and ratified by Ohio and Maryland, and would certainly have been ratified by 3/4 of the states. The movement came to an end with Fort Sumter.
Lincoln thought that a Constitutional Amendment that rendered Congress powerless on the issue of abolishing slavery would perhaps have averted a Civil War and restored the Union. He thought that as the nation eventually expanded, new states would eventually oppose slavery and state conventions would create an amendment some day abolishing slavery without congressional involvement. Nonetheless if Lincoln's original 13th Amendment had prevented the Civil War and restored the union, slavery would have been practiced in the US into the 20th century.
And his legacy would be different.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/14 01:01 PM
Kly, sometimes we fail to recognize preservation of the Union as Lincoln's primary objective. From his 1862 letter to Horace Greeley: "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery." Even his Emancipation Proclamation of that same year exempting border slave states from its provisions is further evidence of Lincoln's purpose.
It's this history that tends to get buried in our rush to elevate certain historical figures to a certain pinnacle.
It's this history that tends to get buried in our rush to elevate certain historical figures to a certain pinnacle.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/14 04:26 PM
I watched The Green Mile on Sunday, ive seen this many times and its still a great film..
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/14 07:50 PM
There are a lot of movies I like to watch over and over again.
One is "the best years of our lives" a magnificent movie.
One is "the best years of our lives" a magnificent movie.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/14 12:15 PM
Best of the best.
one of my favorite martial arts movies whilst growing up.
one of my favorite martial arts movies whilst growing up.
Posted By: Paddy_James
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/14 11:31 PM
Just saw Tammy. It was funny but the plot could've used some work
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/14 11:44 PM
Best of the best starred Eric Roberts right.
Ever see the sword fighting movie staring Eric Roberts and the actor who won an Oscar for Amadus.
Eric Roberts just started in a short run in the TV show Suits.
If you can find it get the box set only lasted a season of the old tv falcone Eric Roberts was good in that
Ever see the sword fighting movie staring Eric Roberts and the actor who won an Oscar for Amadus.
Eric Roberts just started in a short run in the TV show Suits.
If you can find it get the box set only lasted a season of the old tv falcone Eric Roberts was good in that
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/14 08:22 AM
Eric Roberts was great in The Pope of Greemwich Village!
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/14 09:54 AM
I thought he was great in that so was Mickey rourke and so was tony musante and Burt young for that matter
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/14 10:11 AM
After I saw that movie I started paying more attention to my restaurant checks
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/14 01:16 PM
Over the weekend, once again I watched Pope of Greenwich Village. Eric Roberts' performance was outstanding, of best supporting actor quality.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/14 02:44 PM
Saw Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Good movie.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/14 12:11 PM
Just seen for the first time Yonkers Joe...Thought it was a well played out movie all around. Chazz always plays his parts in movies to the T...Good Flick
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/14 12:45 PM
I saw this movie for some reason I liked it "all the right moves" Tom cruise.
Like the sound tract want to buy the sound tract no one seems to have it.
Like the sound tract want to buy the sound tract no one seems to have it.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/18/14 08:27 AM
The Wolf Of Wall Street
Good movie, everything Scorsese works on turns to gold. Love the scene where hes took too many lemons and has to crawl.
Good movie, everything Scorsese works on turns to gold. Love the scene where hes took too many lemons and has to crawl.
Posted By: Its_da_Jackeeettttttt
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/18/14 08:35 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
The Wolf Of Wall Street
Good movie, everything Scorsese works on turns to gold. Love the scene where hes took too many lemons and has to crawl.
Good movie, everything Scorsese works on turns to gold. Love the scene where hes took too many lemons and has to crawl.
I wonder how many takes it took to get that scene right. I would be so tempted to bust out laughing.
Posted By: NickyEyes1
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/14 05:17 PM
Guardians of the Galaxy. It's a super-hero movie made by Marvel but is also just as much a comedy. Great soundtrack too.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/14 03:02 PM
American Hustle, was ok.
Jennifer Lawrence however.
Lol i know its-da-jacket, one of the funniest scenes ive seen in a while. I love that as hes telling the story he thinks he got home without a scratch then the police come around and his cars trashed.
Jennifer Lawrence however.
Lol i know its-da-jacket, one of the funniest scenes ive seen in a while. I love that as hes telling the story he thinks he got home without a scratch then the police come around and his cars trashed.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/14 03:50 PM
Insomnia (2002), with Al Pacino and Robin Williams, is a fantastic movie. Al Pacino's last great role. The Recruit, with Colin Farrell, a year after this, was only good.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/14 04:34 PM
I agree. Insomnia is indeed a really good film. I could almost feel what Pacino's character was going through without sleep. William's character was almost the quintessential seedy villain. I also enjoyed Hillary Swank.
Posted By: Its_da_Jackeeettttttt
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/14 09:20 PM
"Insomnia" was great -- I think that was Christopher Nolan's film immediately after "Memento." Robin Williams had two outstanding performances as villains that year, "One Hour Photo" was the other.
If you ever get a chance, Nolan's film was a remake of a Norwegian film (same title) starring Stellan Skarsgard. The original is excellent as well, much more focused on Skarsgard dealing with his psychological downslide.
If you ever get a chance, Nolan's film was a remake of a Norwegian film (same title) starring Stellan Skarsgard. The original is excellent as well, much more focused on Skarsgard dealing with his psychological downslide.
Posted By: Its_da_Jackeeettttttt
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/14 09:24 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Insomnia (2002), with Al Pacino and Robin Williams, is a fantastic movie. Al Pacino's last great role. The Recruit, with Colin Farrell, a year after this, was only good.
Looking at IMDB, you're absolutely right. From 1992-99, he had "Glengarry Glen Ross," "Carlito's Way," "Scent of a Woman," "Heat," "Donnie Brasco," "The Devil's Advocate," "The Insider," and "Any Given Sunday." That's a pretty strong string of roles, no matter who the actor is.
He does "Insomnia," and then it's like his film choices just cratered.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 11:38 AM
I watched Grudge Match with Stallone and DeNiro. Well, it'll never be a classic, but it was watchable. Of course, I'll watch any film that's made in Pittsburgh as part of this movie was.
It had the potential to be a good movie, but it never quite got off the ground. By the way, in closeups, Stallone's face is showing more than age; it appears to be showing injury. At 60 though, Kim Bassinger looked pretty good. I don't know what to say about DeNiro. Maybe some movie stars accept roles just for the fun of it.
It had the potential to be a good movie, but it never quite got off the ground. By the way, in closeups, Stallone's face is showing more than age; it appears to be showing injury. At 60 though, Kim Bassinger looked pretty good. I don't know what to say about DeNiro. Maybe some movie stars accept roles just for the fun of it.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 12:16 PM
Something must be up with DeNiro. He never made a lot of movies. He took his time with his movie projects.
Now he is putting a bunch of crap out, the family that garbage with John travolta I just don't get it.
Either he needs money and will do any project to get it. He's I'll and wants to just make a ton of movies before he goes.
But one thing is certain the quality of his work is crap now.
Now he is putting a bunch of crap out, the family that garbage with John travolta I just don't get it.
Either he needs money and will do any project to get it. He's I'll and wants to just make a ton of movies before he goes.
But one thing is certain the quality of his work is crap now.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 12:32 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Either he needs money and will do any project to get it.
It ain't the money: http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/actors/robert-de-niro-net-worth/
It's a desperate attempt to stay relevant. Just like every other self-centered Hollywood phony.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 01:14 PM
Robert De Niro is a man's man.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 09:03 PM
Believe it or not I just watched the original karate kid
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/14 10:04 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I watched Grudge Match with Stallone and DeNiro. Well, it'll never be a classic, but it was watchable. Of course, I'll watch any film that's made in Pittsburgh as part of this movie was.
It had the potential to be a good movie, but it never quite got off the ground. By the way, in closeups, Stallone's face is showing more than age; it appears to be showing injury. At 60 though, Kim Bassinger looked pretty good. I don't know what to say about DeNiro. Maybe some movie stars accept roles just for the fun of it.
It had the potential to be a good movie, but it never quite got off the ground. By the way, in closeups, Stallone's face is showing more than age; it appears to be showing injury. At 60 though, Kim Bassinger looked pretty good. I don't know what to say about DeNiro. Maybe some movie stars accept roles just for the fun of it.
Damn, Oli. I forgot to pm you about that movie, if only for the Pittsburgh connection. I was pleasantly surprised, though.
It had a lot of problems, most of which you've mentioned. But I thought Alan Arkin stole the film from DeNiro and Stallone (much like he stole "Stand Up Guys" from Pacino and Walken).
KIm still looks pretty good. The kid who played her son did a decent job, too.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/14 11:38 PM
High Noon is on tonight. I know that the older Board members have seen it. It is quite a classic, but I don't think it gets the recognition that it should. In any case, it's theme song is one of the best ever and Gary Cooper was perfect in the role.
Also PB, the more I watch Grudge Match, the more I like it. Stallone repeated some of things he did in Rocky such as eating the egg yolks. Just like in Rocky, he started out not being able to lift the tire, but near the end he succeeded. Also, there was the scene where Arkin slapped him in the face just like his manager did in Rocky. You're right about Arkin; he kind of stole the show.
Also PB, the more I watch Grudge Match, the more I like it. Stallone repeated some of things he did in Rocky such as eating the egg yolks. Just like in Rocky, he started out not being able to lift the tire, but near the end he succeeded. Also, there was the scene where Arkin slapped him in the face just like his manager did in Rocky. You're right about Arkin; he kind of stole the show.
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/14 11:44 PM
oli. a young grace Kelly. nobody could play that part but gary cooper. it was a great picture. good triva question. who sang the title song? he had a son who was an actor in Hollywood. died young.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/14 01:32 AM
High noon what a beautiful women Grace Kelly was fantastic. That writter was a black listed writer so they gave the writing credit to some one else. That some one else won the academy award for that movie for something he did not even write.
Gary Cooper was a great actor in this and in Sargent York and other movies. But with friends like him who needed enemies? He gave up his friends to the unamerican activities hearings.
The title song was great the singer was I think tex Ritter the son of the actor John Ritter remember him he died young.
Gary Cooper was a great actor in this and in Sargent York and other movies. But with friends like him who needed enemies? He gave up his friends to the unamerican activities hearings.
The title song was great the singer was I think tex Ritter the son of the actor John Ritter remember him he died young.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/14 01:39 AM
Arkin is a great actor. He was also in the movie with Pacino and walkin in stand up guys.
He was fantastic in Argo.
His best work was when he was younger popi, heart s a lonely hunter he is 80 years old.
He was fantastic in Argo.
His best work was when he was younger popi, heart s a lonely hunter he is 80 years old.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/14 01:50 AM
These older guys can't get much work Which is stupid.
Shows like ray Donavan uses a lot of older actors fun to see them act again. Ann Margarett was on the show for an episode man she looks great for a women her age. When I see a women like that I don't see an old women I see her the way she was when she was a young women.
People mistakenly think older people are old. They are old if they think old. What a bunch of fucking idiots they are who think that. A lot of us are still 20 in our heads. We still do everything young people do, but it takes us a little longer to do it. Which might be a good thing.
Shows like ray Donavan uses a lot of older actors fun to see them act again. Ann Margarett was on the show for an episode man she looks great for a women her age. When I see a women like that I don't see an old women I see her the way she was when she was a young women.
People mistakenly think older people are old. They are old if they think old. What a bunch of fucking idiots they are who think that. A lot of us are still 20 in our heads. We still do everything young people do, but it takes us a little longer to do it. Which might be a good thing.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 11:43 AM
The Finest Hour.
Hard to find Navy Seal movie, decent watch even with Rob Lowe in it.
Hard to find Navy Seal movie, decent watch even with Rob Lowe in it.
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 01:28 PM
footreads, youre right about tex ritter, but, I had no idea that gary cooper gave up his friends in a huac session. I know elia Kazan did. I cant think of anything worse than giving up your friends, anyone who does it is a bottom feeder. as far as newer movies go, 'the lone survivor" is excellent.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 01:55 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
His best work was when he was younger popi, heart s a lonely hunter he is 80 years old.
Great movie. But it's all subjective. I think "The In-Laws" was Arkin's best work. Same goes for Peter Falk.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 02:00 PM
Watched The Judge, it is a must see.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 03:03 PM
Little Caesar (1931)...."This is Rico speaking. Rico! R-I-C-O! Rico! Little Caesar, that's who! Listen, you crummy, flat-footed copper, I'll show you whether I've lost my nerve and my brains!"
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 03:23 PM
Originally Posted By: njcapo35
Little Caesar (1931)...."This is Rico speaking. Rico! R-I-C-O! Rico! Little Caesar, that's who! Listen, you crummy, flat-footed copper, I'll show you whether I've lost my nerve and my brains!"
House of strangers with Robinson and Richard Conte was a pretty good movie worth seeing.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 03:32 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
House of strangers with Robinson and Richard Conte was a pretty good movie worth seeing.
Thanks....I'll have to check it out.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 04:01 PM
I watched American Pie 1 and 2 today, still funny as i remember them to be..
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 04:10 PM
Originally Posted By: njcapo35
Originally Posted By: Footreads
House of strangers with Robinson and Richard Conte was a pretty good movie worth seeing.
Thanks....I'll have to check it out.
My favorite Richard Conte was "The Purple Heart."
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 04:55 PM
The purple heart was that sham trial by the japanese after the counter attack on Japan right after pearl Harbour. I dont know if that trial was based on fact or not. They made at least 6 movies on that counter attack. I think the last one was that Movie Pearl harbor.
Richard Conte should have been a big star but it never really happened for him. My favorite Richard Conte movie was 13 Rue Madeleliene with James Cagney.
Richard Conte should have been a big star but it never really happened for him. My favorite Richard Conte movie was 13 Rue Madeleliene with James Cagney.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 05:13 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
The purple heart was that sham trial by the japanese after the counter attack on Japan right after pearl Harbour.
That's the one, psycho. But "The Purple Heart" held the distinction of being made while the war was still on. So Nationalism was at its peak (which is a good thing).
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Richard Conte should have been a big star but it never really happened for him.
Agreed. I loved him in everything he ever did. He was great in "Ocean's 11."
His grandson is a safety for the Bears now. Tough kid. He plays a little dirty. But you like that, psycho
.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 06:06 PM
Plays a little dirty yes I do like that. Well he is on the right team then. Loved watching Dick Butkus he was a freaking animal as a player. When his knees started to go. Players stopped trying to cut him at the knees except the center of the Pittsburg Steelers he hated him wanted to put him in a wheel chair.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/14 06:49 PM
Chris Conte. Barzini's grandson.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/12/14 08:09 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Footreads
House of strangers with Robinson and Richard Conte was a pretty good movie worth seeing.
My favorite Richard Conte was "The Purple Heart."
The more i watch these old flicks i enjoy them better than the newer stuff, believe it or not...Thanks guys for the recommendations.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/14 05:28 PM
Last night I was flipping channels away from the Giants game (puking sound) and landed on "No Country for Old Men". What a great flick. Those Coen Brothers are whacky. Last week it was "Fargo". They really cast the right people and the dialogue is spot on.
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/14 05:41 PM
marycas yes, those were great movies. I saw a movie that I thought was very good. its a war movie called [ the last survivor] its about navy seals in Afghanistan.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/14 06:46 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Chris Conte. Barzini's grandson.
Conte hurt his shoulder (again) in yesterday's Bears victory over Atlanta. It is the same shoulder he had surgery on in the off season. This entire season he has been battling some kind of injury with multiple concussions. I hope he comes back soon - he's a tough kid!
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/14/14 12:31 PM
Pretty good Richard Conte movie was thieves highway.
Conte just left the service and was going home. His father was a truck driver ade his living by bringing loaded of food like apples to market.his father had an accident became a cripple before conte got home. No one told him about it. Forget how but Cobb got the,load and never paid his father
One of the big market owners was a crook played by the great lee jay Cobb.
So conte gets a truck with a partner and delivers Snothrr load to Cobb. But he wants the money from his fathers last load.
Something like that I can't remember all of it.
But towards the end a big fight scene between Cobb and Conte.
If I remember it right that fight scene rivals the one with Cobb and Brando in on the water front.
It was a good movie.
Conte just left the service and was going home. His father was a truck driver ade his living by bringing loaded of food like apples to market.his father had an accident became a cripple before conte got home. No one told him about it. Forget how but Cobb got the,load and never paid his father
One of the big market owners was a crook played by the great lee jay Cobb.
So conte gets a truck with a partner and delivers Snothrr load to Cobb. But he wants the money from his fathers last load.
Something like that I can't remember all of it.
But towards the end a big fight scene between Cobb and Conte.
If I remember it right that fight scene rivals the one with Cobb and Brando in on the water front.
It was a good movie.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/14/14 10:25 PM
Just saw Grudge Match with Stallone & DeNiro. Pretty good picture! Kevin Hart is funny and spices it up with some good one liners.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/14 09:30 AM
Just saw rebel without a cause. Seen it many times, but could never relate to it.
How about you guy did it ever remind you about the old days.
Well I did have a button knife. Today they call it a switch blade. 8 inch blade was 8 dollars you could buy one in any candy store.
A switch blade back then was a button knife where you could switch blades.
These kids all had money their parents all owned houses and these kids owned cars.
We lived in tenements. 3 rooms kitchen, living room, bedroom and a bathroom if You lived in the front of the building. 25 to 30 dollars a month rent.
If you lived in the back apartment rent was 20 to 25 a month rent. No bathroom in the apartment. The kitchen sink had a plate over part of it. Take it off it turned into bath tub so you took a bath in a kitchen.
The toilets for the back apartments were in the hall ways
Remember we walked in on two twin sisters while they were tacking a bath in the kitchen. I still get a hard on just thinking about it. We made sure they were nice and clean before we left.
Loved bothering them while they were using the bathroom in the hall way. We wait until they were doing their business. Then we would call out Sharon is that you in there. It smells like its you sharan.
How about you guy did it ever remind you about the old days.
Well I did have a button knife. Today they call it a switch blade. 8 inch blade was 8 dollars you could buy one in any candy store.
A switch blade back then was a button knife where you could switch blades.
These kids all had money their parents all owned houses and these kids owned cars.
We lived in tenements. 3 rooms kitchen, living room, bedroom and a bathroom if You lived in the front of the building. 25 to 30 dollars a month rent.
If you lived in the back apartment rent was 20 to 25 a month rent. No bathroom in the apartment. The kitchen sink had a plate over part of it. Take it off it turned into bath tub so you took a bath in a kitchen.
The toilets for the back apartments were in the hall ways
Remember we walked in on two twin sisters while they were tacking a bath in the kitchen. I still get a hard on just thinking about it. We made sure they were nice and clean before we left.
Loved bothering them while they were using the bathroom in the hall way. We wait until they were doing their business. Then we would call out Sharon is that you in there. It smells like its you sharan.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/14 08:00 PM
Originally Posted By: Binnie_Coll
marycas yes, those were great movies. I saw a movie that I thought was very good. its a war movie called [ the last survivor] its about navy seals in Afghanistan.
Bin, I read the book and saw the film. Very intense. The film did the book justice. Shit we have no idea about. The Seals are one dedicated group. One that most Americans cannot relate to, or even begin to understand. Even though you saw the film, I recommend the book. It provides so much more background on the Navy Seals.
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/14 08:16 PM
I will marycas, thank you for the info.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/14 03:30 PM
Striking Distance.
This movie gets so much crap, in fact im sure even Bruce Willis has stated his dislike of it.
Buts its one of my guilty pleasures, always loved the dark tone of the movie.
This movie gets so much crap, in fact im sure even Bruce Willis has stated his dislike of it.
Buts its one of my guilty pleasures, always loved the dark tone of the movie.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/14 03:44 PM
Saw Fury, the WWII tank movie starring Brad Pitt. Very good film.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/14 03:54 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Striking Distance.
This movie gets so much crap, in fact im sure even Bruce Willis has stated his dislike of it.
Buts its one of my guilty pleasures, always loved the dark tone of the movie.
This movie gets so much crap, in fact im sure even Bruce Willis has stated his dislike of it.
Buts its one of my guilty pleasures, always loved the dark tone of the movie.
Being from Pittsburgh, I am prejudiced. However, I liked it; a good story.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/14 10:52 PM
I like it as well. Really good cast, especially Robert Pastorelli. He was very good. I was so used to him as Eldin in "Murphy Brown", the role was a real switch. Shame he died so young.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/14 10:57 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I like it as well. Really good cast, especially Robert Pastorelli. He was very good. I was so used to him as Eldin in "Murphy Brown", the role was a real switch. Shame he died so young.
Good actor. He was a mess, though. He just couldn't get off the drugs. And from what I remember reading, at the time of his death they were looking to bring charges against him for murdering his much younger girlfriend. But cops always look at the significant other first in cases like that, so who knows what happened?
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/14 12:34 AM
saw one on Netflix, [ In old mexico ] robert duvall is great.
WARNING... watch out for the leading lady, her name is angie cepeda. your eyes will stare and, your body tremble!
WARNING... watch out for the leading lady, her name is angie cepeda. your eyes will stare and, your body tremble!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/27/14 07:19 PM
Saw a young James Gandolfini in an old Melanie Griffith movie named "A Stranger Among Us". Melanie plays a cop who goes undercover to catch the killer of an Hasidic man.
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/27/14 07:53 PM
That was a good movie, SB. Gandolfini looked so young in it.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/27/14 08:09 PM
Originally Posted By: SC
Gandolfini looked so young in it.
So did Melanie Griffith. And have you seen her lately?
She was on "Hawaii Five-0" last year as Scott Caan's mother. And sadly, between the booze, the drugs and the plastic surgery (fish lips and a pulled forehead), I wouldn't have recognized her but for her squeaky voice.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/14 04:19 PM
I watched Kill Bill 1 for the first time this evening, incredible film..
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/14 05:24 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched Kill Bill 1 for the first time this evening, incredible film..
I just love uma Thurman.
Posted By: NNY78
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/14 02:48 PM
Just saw Gone Girl, I enjoyed it, its worth a look. Happy Halloween you all.
Posted By: Primo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/14 07:19 PM
Just watched Missippi Burning and The Shining directors cut the other day. Old but good still
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 03:59 PM
Originally Posted By: Primo
Just watched Missippi Burning and The Shining directors cut the other day. Old but good still
I hate how the critics say that Stanley Kubrick sucks as a director in The Shining. (That movie scared the sh*t outta me)
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 04:16 PM
Mississipi burning was a very good movie.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 05:28 PM
American Hustle
I know it came out a while ago but did you see the movie American Hustle? Those of you from NY what did you think of Bale's Bronx accent?
I know it came out a while ago but did you see the movie American Hustle? Those of you from NY what did you think of Bale's Bronx accent?
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 05:34 PM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
American Hustle
I know it came out a while ago but did you see the movie American Hustle? Those of you from NY what did you think of Bale's Bronx accent?
I know it came out a while ago but did you see the movie American Hustle? Those of you from NY what did you think of Bale's Bronx accent?
amy adams is a fox.
Posted By: Joey_Cusack
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 10:52 PM
I just finished Magnum Force. I've seen Dirty Harry multiple times, just never any of the sequels.
I found it enjoyable, not as good as the first of course.
I found it enjoyable, not as good as the first of course.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/14 11:05 PM
Just saw Enough Said with James Gandolfini and Julia Luis Dreyfus. Pretty good picture.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 04:55 AM
Last night i watched A Beautiful Mind with Russell Crowe, how he didn't win a Oscar for his performance is beyond me..
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 05:31 AM
There was something about that movie that I did not like to crazy even for me. He was a teacher at Princeton right? When my daughter was thinking about going to Princeton we took the tour of the college. I booked a few friendly soccer games against Princetons club team. We won both games then I took my daughter for the tour.
I loved that tour Einstein worked there. They had a student just following him around. Einstein was always making notes on paper and throwing them away. The student was ordered to collect those pieces of paper. He would wander between the math and science building. They were afraid he would catch a cold in the winter time so they build a tunnel so hevwould not catch a cold when he walked to each. Man I loved that tour Princetown is also a very nice little place. Unfortunely my daughter did not like it as much as I did. She made it but instead went to Columbia because she liked the night life better here.
Crowe made a lot of really good movie. I really liked Cinderella man good story and it was real.
then I took my daughter for the tour.I loved that tour Einstein worked there. They had a student just following him around. Einstein was always making notes on paper and throwing them away. The student was ordered to collect those pieces of paper. He would wander between the math and science building. They were afraid he would catch a cold in the winter time so they build a tunnel so hevwould not catch a cold when he walked to each. Man I loved that tour Princetown is also a very nice little place. Unfortunely my daughter did not like it as much as I did. She made it but instead went to Columbia because she liked the night life better here.
Crowe made a lot of really good movie. I really liked Cinderella man good story and it was real.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 12:00 PM
A Beautiful Mind was real too. This is the guy Crowe played - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 12:09 PM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Originally Posted By: Primo
Just watched Missippi Burning and The Shining directors cut the other day. Old but good still
I hate how the critics say that Stanley Kubrick sucks as a director in The Shining. (That movie scared the sh*t outta me)
Critics said The Shining sucked? The Shining is one of the most critically acclaimed Horrors ever. It has a 92% rating on Rotten Tomatoes - http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/shining/ . It's also pretty much a lock for top 5 in the majority of best Horror film lists, for instance on Channel 4 over here The Shining top their 100 Scariest Moments list.
http://www.britmovie.co.uk/forums/genera...s-100-50-a.html
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 01:34 PM
Hi Camarel You are correct but years ago the critics did not feel that Kubrick was good as a director in that film. I could not find the documentary I was watching but I found this info to back up what I said.
The Shining (1980)
Stanley Kubrick may be considered one of the greatest directors of all time, but in 1980, he was nominated for a Razzie for Worst Director for his film The Shining. Prior to its release, fans of Stephen King’s novel eagerly awaited the film adaptation—but Kubrick steered the narrative so far away from the source material that audiences were turned off. (King wasn't pleased, either.) The Shining received a mixed critical response for not being a conventional horror film, and it was nominated for two Razzies.
When The Shining was released on VHS, however, critics immediately re-assessed it: Roger Ebert said it was one of the greatest horror films ever made, calling it “strangely disturbing.” Today, there are numerous interpretations of The Shining, many of them documented in the film Room 237 which attempts to uncover the true meaning behind Kubrick’s vision.
http://m.mentalfloss.com/article.php?id=32272
The Shining (1980)
Stanley Kubrick may be considered one of the greatest directors of all time, but in 1980, he was nominated for a Razzie for Worst Director for his film The Shining. Prior to its release, fans of Stephen King’s novel eagerly awaited the film adaptation—but Kubrick steered the narrative so far away from the source material that audiences were turned off. (King wasn't pleased, either.) The Shining received a mixed critical response for not being a conventional horror film, and it was nominated for two Razzies.
When The Shining was released on VHS, however, critics immediately re-assessed it: Roger Ebert said it was one of the greatest horror films ever made, calling it “strangely disturbing.” Today, there are numerous interpretations of The Shining, many of them documented in the film Room 237 which attempts to uncover the true meaning behind Kubrick’s vision.
http://m.mentalfloss.com/article.php?id=32272
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 01:49 PM
I've mentioned this a few times in the Stephen King thread, but as a King fan I personally prefer the 1997 mini-series with Steven Weber (the "Wings" guy). It was much truer to King's novel. The book was divided at least fifty-fifty on what drove Jack to madness, the booze or the supernatural. And that's what the mini-series did.
Conversely, the 1980 Kubrick version was a straight-up horror film that stressed the supernatural element. That said, on its own, the 1980 Kubrick version is still a very good film, Nicholson's hammy, over-the-top performance notwithstanding.
Conversely, the 1980 Kubrick version was a straight-up horror film that stressed the supernatural element. That said, on its own, the 1980 Kubrick version is still a very good film, Nicholson's hammy, over-the-top performance notwithstanding.
Posted By: Primo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 06:36 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I've mentioned this a few times in the Stephen King thread, but as a King fan I personally prefer the 1997 mini-series with Steven Weber (the "Wings" guy). It was much truer to King's novel. The book was divided at least fifty-fifty on what drove Jack to madness, the booze or the supernatural. And that's what the mini-series did.
Conversely, the 1980 Kubrick version was a straight-up horror film that stressed the supernatural element. That said, on its own, the 1980 Kubrick version is still a very good film, Nicholson's hammy, over-the-top performance notwithstanding.
Conversely, the 1980 Kubrick version was a straight-up horror film that stressed the supernatural element. That said, on its own, the 1980 Kubrick version is still a very good film, Nicholson's hammy, over-the-top performance notwithstanding.
I think King really hated Kubrick's version and that is why he wanted the mini series made. You are correct in Kubrick's version I believe that Nicholson character seems more unhinged from the get go where as in the books he slowly goes crazy. That being said I really enjoy Kubrick s version. And I really want to check out the mini series just to see what it is like and the differences. I read the book a long time ago and it is amazing but I need to re read it
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 06:38 PM
How anybody could dislike The Shining is beyond me, love that film..
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 07:06 PM
Originally Posted By: Primo
And I really want to check out the mini series just to see what it is like and the differences. I read the book a long time ago and it is amazing but I need to re read it
This is Youtube, so watch it before it gets taken down:
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 08:02 PM
Fair enough Alfanosgirl, i didn't know you were talking about it's reception upon it's release.
For any Kubrick fans who haven't seen it, you should watch Room 237 . It's basically a bunch of crackpots with too much time on their hands analysing The Shining scene by scene to connect Kubrick to various Conspiracy Theories. Still it's a great look into his movies and all of the small details he left in them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_237
For any Kubrick fans who haven't seen it, you should watch Room 237 . It's basically a bunch of crackpots with too much time on their hands analysing The Shining scene by scene to connect Kubrick to various Conspiracy Theories. Still it's a great look into his movies and all of the small details he left in them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_237
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 09:42 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
It's basically a bunch of crackpots with too much time on their hands analysing The Shining scene by scene to connect Kubrick to various Conspiracy Theories.
Oh, Dear God. Too much time on their hands?
That's like saying that Cook County is a little slow on the draw
.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 10:03 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Camarel
It's basically a bunch of crackpots with too much time on their hands analysing The Shining scene by scene to connect Kubrick to various Conspiracy Theories.
Oh, Dear God. Too much time on their hands?
That's like saying that Cook County is a little slow on the draw
. Have you watched it PB? I wouldn't blame you if you weren't interested in the full Doc, but here's an article detailing some of the theories with the clips that supposedly point to this. -
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...n-room-237.html
It's not just The Shining that's mentioned here, but everything from Killers Kiss to Eyes Wide Shut. The only reason i enjoyed it was the in-depth, HD, shots of Kubricks films as well as the mentions of Kubrick and his associates writings.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/14 10:11 PM
Thanks, Cam. I'll check it out. I've only read the Wiki page on Room 237 so far (and I think these people are clinically insane).
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 04:00 PM
Stephen King didn't like The Shining because it wasn't true enough to the source material, and Jack Nicholson's performance was too hammy.
I definitely recall that it wasn't the critical darling you would think it is.
Same with The Shawshank Redemption to an extent. Its myth grew in popularity with repeated viewings and context.
I definitely recall that it wasn't the critical darling you would think it is.
Same with The Shawshank Redemption to an extent. Its myth grew in popularity with repeated viewings and context.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 05:11 PM
Shawshank Redemption is a decent film and i've seen it many times but according to IMDB it's the best film ever, which im not so sure about..
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 08:09 PM
deniro, ive seen the movie and its great, do you know whether or not it's a true story? I heard it was.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 08:18 PM
Originally Posted By: Binnie_Coll
deniro, ive seen the movie and its great, do you know whether or not it's a true story? I heard it was.
It's not a true story. The Shawshank Redemption is an adaptation of the Stephen King Novella: Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rita_Hayworth_and_Shawshank_Redemption
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 08:51 PM
The Shawshank Redemption is one of my favorite prison movies. When TBS used to broadcast it I would watch it then watch it the second time right it a row
My fave 2 parts are when the warden finds out hes been duped and when Andy walks into the bank to withdraw all that $$$$$$ I cant stop smiling
My fave 2 parts are when the warden finds out hes been duped and when Andy walks into the bank to withdraw all that $$$$$$ I cant stop smiling
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 09:00 PM
And PB I started to watch the mini series u put up but as soon as the kid heard voices I got scared and turned it off. Today while walking on the trail by myself I kept picturing that scene. I want to thank you cuz I walked so much faster that I beat my regular time by 6 mins
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 09:22 PM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
And PB I started to watch the mini series u put up but as soon as the kid heard voices I got scared and turned it off. Today while walking on the trail by myself I kept picturing that scene. I want to thank you cuz I walked so much faster that I beat my regular time by 6 mins
Ha ha!
A-Girl when the Exorcist came out, we went to see it. (Scariest movie I've ever seen). At the time, my husband worked nights, and every time at dark, when I passed our spare bedroom, all I could picture is Regan sitting on the bed with her ugly face, creepy voice, and head spinning. For weeks (maybe months) that image freaked me out!!
All that being said, I must say I still like scary movies. Go figure!!!
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 09:35 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
A-Girl when the Exorcist came out, we went to see it. (Scariest movie I've ever seen).
TIS
For sure TIS. It was authentically scary. Of course, growing up Catholic, I just knew there was a devil seeking Regan's (and my)soul.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 09:40 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
A-Girl when the Exorcist came out, we went to see it. (Scariest movie I've ever seen).
TIS
For sure TIS. It was authentically scary. Of course, growing up Catholic, I just knew there was a devil seeking Regan's (and my)soul.
Oli
At that time they had an intermission right after the scene where hypnotized Regan attacks the doctor. In the lobby everyone was lighting up a cig.
One guy was pacing back & forth and he said to whomever was listening, "this is a hell of a first date movie." TIS
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/14 09:45 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
And PB I started to watch the mini series u put up but as soon as the kid heard voices I got scared and turned it off. Today while walking on the trail by myself I kept picturing that scene. I want to thank you cuz I walked so much faster that I beat my regular time by 6 mins
Ha ha!
A-Girl when the Exorcist came out, we went to see it. (Scariest movie I've ever seen). At the time, my husband worked nights, and every time at dark, when I passed our spare bedroom, all I could picture is Regan sitting on the bed with her ugly face, creepy voice, and head spinning. For weeks (maybe months) that image freaked me out!!
All that being said, I must say I still like scary movies. Go figure!!!
TIS
I dont know how you can still like scary movies...
I was young when that movie came on TV. I tried to watch it but I was much too scared and had to sleep with my light on for years.
Plus my Mom told me that if I lie or sin I can become possessed just like the boy from Rome who she said the movie was based on. I became traumatized.One of my cousins went to see where they filmed a few scenes, I think it was in Virginia. He said it was so eery and evil he will never forget it.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/04/14 03:04 PM
What about Police Squad with Leslie Nielson ? I was watching it on youtube but remember watching it years ago. That show cracks me up.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/14 12:43 PM
I watched No Country for old men last night, excellent film just a pity about the anti climax ending.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/14 04:33 PM
The Daily Mail ran a story on the kid who was apparently the basis for The Exorcist saying: "Roland apparently married, raised children and maintained a long and productive career with the US government before retiring, reportedly to suburban Maryland. He has never spoken publicly about the case."
Then again it's the Daily Mail who has constantly been duped by Ghost Apps, they probably got the story from a homeless guy in London . Here's the link- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...possession.html
Then again it's the Daily Mail who has constantly been duped by Ghost Apps, they probably got the story from a homeless guy in London
. Here's the link- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...possession.html
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/14 04:52 PM
Has anybody seen Requiem for a Dream, a good but destrubing film about The drug-induced utopias of four Coney Island people are shattered when their addictions become stronger.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/14 10:07 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Has anybody seen Requiem for a Dream, a good but destrubing film about The drug-induced utopias of four Coney Island people are shattered when their addictions become stronger.
It's a great movie. Ellen Burstyn's monologue was top notch.
I'm not sure if I mentioned it on here but you should watch "The Basketball Diaries", another disturbing but great movie
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/08/14 12:42 PM
I watched that a few months back, a very young Leo in it, good film
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/09/14 01:40 AM
Just saw Interstellar. AMAZING movie. Maybe the best of the year. Definitely Nolan's best. Loved the realism of both the special effects and the science behind it all. Definitely a 2001: A Space Odyssey influence to it.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/14 01:24 PM
Point Break - 8/10, good movie.
Was watching The Basketball Diaries also, forgot Moltisanti was in it and Bumpensero.
Was watching The Basketball Diaries also, forgot Moltisanti was in it and Bumpensero.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/14 07:20 AM
Rob Zombies Halloween(2007), ive seen it a few times now, its ok.
I really can't stand over the top swearing though in all these newer movies. All this "ill skull fuck you" type insults, it just sounds really cringey.
You can't beat the original Halloween and classic movies, they'd never come away with over the top lines like that.
I really can't stand over the top swearing though in all these newer movies. All this "ill skull fuck you" type insults, it just sounds really cringey.
You can't beat the original Halloween and classic movies, they'd never come away with over the top lines like that.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/14 12:19 PM
It's rare when the constant cursing doesn't seem gratuitous. Even "Scarface" was over the top. Two notable exceptions were "Goodfellas" and "Saturday Night Fever." Pitch perfect dialogue in both. I wouldn't change a word in either.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/14 04:52 PM
There's expletives in Saturday Night Fever? Heh.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/14 04:56 PM
I finally seen Lincoln. Wasn't that bad, wasn't that great. Very dialogue heavy and hard to follow at times.
This was a great scene.
This was a great scene.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/20/14 04:02 AM
Tommy Lee Jones is looking old, that could well be because hes getting old.
but yeah makes me feel old, then i realize im getting old and ain't nobody got any time for that.
but yeah makes me feel old, then i realize im getting old and ain't nobody got any time for that.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/20/14 06:08 AM
Old is a state of mind.
Old can make you scared to live.
Fuck that that's why I don't like hanging with old people who think & act like that.
I like hanging with old people who in their heads their still young. I think I am someone like that.
Most street guys who are still kicking think like that.
I had a neighbor who was afraid he was going to die he was definately old. He volunteered that information to me. I guess he thought I would under stand because we were around the same age in years.
I told him stop thinking about it stop talking about it.
Go to Vegas buy a show girl and fuck her brains out to either you or her die. If you die let the under takers worry about getting the smile off your face.
He did go away never to return. I hope he kicked off happy.
Old can make you scared to live.
Fuck that that's why I don't like hanging with old people who think & act like that.
I like hanging with old people who in their heads their still young. I think I am someone like that.
Most street guys who are still kicking think like that.
I had a neighbor who was afraid he was going to die he was definately old. He volunteered that information to me. I guess he thought I would under stand because we were around the same age in years.
I told him stop thinking about it stop talking about it.
Go to Vegas buy a show girl and fuck her brains out to either you or her die. If you die let the under takers worry about getting the smile off your face.
He did go away never to return. I hope he kicked off happy.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/20/14 06:14 AM
Great story and advice Footreads!
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/22/14 01:04 PM
Anybody see interstellar? I haven't seen it yet but heard great things about it. Rotten tomatoes gave it a pretty good score but not great. IMDB gave it an extremely high score but you can't put too much credibility into IMDB like you can with rotten tomatoes. My friend told me it was incredible.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/22/14 01:05 PM
Also, I've never really been a huge Kubrick fan. I haven't seen all of his movies so it's hard for me to judge but I've just never connected with his movies like I have with Scorsese's or Fincher's among others.
Posted By: DonMega1888
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/14 07:13 PM
The machine 2013,a British film about military creating AI soldiers
An ok sci fi film, 6/10 for me
Really great special effects in this, story's a bit slow
An ok sci fi film, 6/10 for me
Really great special effects in this, story's a bit slow
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/14 11:52 PM
Just re-watched "Top Gun." It's been close to thirty years, and I still don't know why they had to kill Goose. Still pisses me off .
.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/24/14 12:38 AM
I think it was because Maverick left his position of wing man. You never ever leave your wing position. As a wing man you always have to guard the main attacker. If you don't you isolate the main attacker do that he can be shot out of the sky.
Your not going to believe this but the same concept is true also in soccer.
The wing man in soccer is called the second attacker.
Here is an old post I made on it.
"The second attacker is important because when the dribbler (the main attacker) is under pressure the second attacker is an outlet pass that can keep the dribbler from losing the ball. Players lose the ball when they find themselves isolated with no other help.
The danger is when the dribbler has no forward option. The second attacker can not leave his support position even for a second to become that forward pass option the third attacker. In that second he isolated his dribbler. The second attacker has to be patient. He has to wait for someone else to become the forward option the third attacker.
I have not posted on that in a long time."
Your not going to believe this but the same concept is true also in soccer.
The wing man in soccer is called the second attacker.
Here is an old post I made on it.
"The second attacker is important because when the dribbler (the main attacker) is under pressure the second attacker is an outlet pass that can keep the dribbler from losing the ball. Players lose the ball when they find themselves isolated with no other help.
The danger is when the dribbler has no forward option. The second attacker can not leave his support position even for a second to become that forward pass option the third attacker. In that second he isolated his dribbler. The second attacker has to be patient. He has to wait for someone else to become the forward option the third attacker.
I have not posted on that in a long time."
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/14 10:07 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Just re-watched "Top Gun." It's been close to thirty years, and I still don't know why they had to kill Goose. Still pisses me off .
. So that he could go play Dr. Greene on ER and then have that character get a brain tumor and be killed off.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/14 11:10 PM
But he lived on in prominence to star in Revenge of The Nerds!
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/14 04:41 AM
I'm proud to say that i've never seen Top Gun..
Posted By: Primo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/14 08:48 PM
I am a big Deniro and Scorsese fan so I sat down to watch their remake of Cape Fear yesterday. I only made it halfway through though. I mean it wasn't a bad movie but I don't know something about the style of it threw me off and I had a real hard time wanting to watch it all the way through.
I really want to see the original though maye it is better? I don't know did you guys enjoy the DeNiro version?
I really want to see the original though maye it is better? I don't know did you guys enjoy the DeNiro version?
Posted By: DonMega1888
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/14 02:08 PM
Old boy 2003,
Japan version is so good
Japan version is so good
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/14 02:31 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I'm proud to say that i've never seen Top Gun..
Haha you and me both. It may be a decent movie, but i really cannot stand Tom Cruise enough to find out.
I grew up in the late 80s/90s this soundtrack cassette tape was on every car journey for a long while, if i hear "take my breath" away one more time, i may die.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/14 02:43 PM
Originally Posted By: Primo
I am a big Deniro and Scorsese fan so I sat down to watch their remake of Cape Fear yesterday. I only made it halfway through though. I mean it wasn't a bad movie but I don't know something about the style of it threw me off and I had a real hard time wanting to watch it all the way through.
I really want to see the original though maye it is better? I don't know did you guys enjoy the DeNiro version?
I really want to see the original though maye it is better? I don't know did you guys enjoy the DeNiro version?
I prefered the Mitchum version I thought it was a great movie
Posted By: Malandrino
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/14 08:20 AM
The Purge and its sequel. Pretty average, almost mediocre but I liked the concept... one day a year when every crime is legal so the population can vent a little.
Posted By: Its_da_Jackeeettttttt
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/14 08:41 AM
Horrible Bosses 2. Skip it.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/14 06:23 PM
Just saw "The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit" staring Gregory Peck.
Pretty good movie then ended in a great 4 minute scene at the end.
If I did what he did in this movie my wife would have shot me in my sleep.
Pretty good movie then ended in a great 4 minute scene at the end.
If I did what he did in this movie my wife would have shot me in my sleep.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 09:07 PM
Do any of the older members here remember the movie "Duel" with Dennis Weaver? A Spielburg film (his first I think). It's playing on ElRey channel here. I remember seeing it (a tv movie) when it came out. It was really good. Don't think I've seen it since that time.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 09:11 PM
Great movie.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 09:15 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_
Great movie.
Dennis Weaver pulls in gas station and a gas station attendant comes to his car.
Weaver says fill 'er up with Ethel. LOL LOL THEN, attendant offers to look under the hood. OMG, those days are so far gone. What an OLD movie. But yea, it is good.TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 11:31 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Do any of the older members here remember the movie "Duel" with Dennis Weaver? A Spielburg film (his first I think). It's playing on ElRey channel here. I remember seeing it (a tv movie) when it came out. It was really good. Don't think I've seen it since that time.
TIS
TIS
If any actor excelled at portraying angst, it was Weaver.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 11:41 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
If any actor excelled at portraying angst, it was Weaver.
Mister Dillon! Mister Dillon!
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/14 11:44 PM
You can still find gas stations up in Oregon that still do that. Just watched Man on Fire. The original one with Scott Glenn and Joe Pesci, Pesci gives a good performance, forgot he was in it.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/14 06:52 AM
Pacific Heights is a pretty good movie. I thought it should have been more of a slow burner but after watching it again, it was paced well. The acting's dodgy enough at times but Michael Keaton plays a great sleazy villain.
Dan Hedaya is also in one scene. He turns up in everything.
Dan Hedaya is also in one scene. He turns up in everything.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/14 09:04 AM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Pacific Heights is a pretty good movie. I thought it should have been more of a slow burner but after watching it again, it was paced well. The acting's dodgy enough at times but Michael Keaton plays a great sleazy villain.
Dan Hedaya is also in one scene. He turns up in everything.
Dan Hedaya is also in one scene. He turns up in everything.
Oh yea, I forgot about Pacific Heights. It's been years since I've seen it. Always thought it was under rated. Yea, Keaton was a creep that's for sure. Good movie!
TIS
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/14 09:07 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Do any of the older members here remember the movie "Duel" with Dennis Weaver? A Spielburg film (his first I think). It's playing on ElRey channel here. I remember seeing it (a tv movie) when it came out. It was really good. Don't think I've seen it since that time.
TIS
TIS
If any actor excelled at portraying angst, it was Weaver.
LOL Yea That's true. I kept seeing touches of "Mr. Dillon, Mr. Dillon." Ha ha
TIS
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/14 09:19 AM
Weaver was super weird as the motel manager in touch of evil. Heston horribly miscast as a Mexican. I did like Janet Leigh party scene in the motel room. Just wish the scene would of lasted longer.
Posted By: cheech
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/14 11:04 AM
Emmett Otters Jug Band Christmas. Was an Hbo special I think when I was a kid. We have it on DVD now and I play it for my boys. Same guy who created the muppets did this. Wonderful little story.
Posted By: Joey_Cusack
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/14 01:57 AM
I just watched The Pledge. Not the first time.I've seen it but the first time in ahile. Great movie, not really a well known one though. One of Jack Nicholson'd best and probably least known roles.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/14 06:33 PM
Originally Posted By: cheech
Emmett Otters Jug Band Christmas. Was an Hbo special I think when I was a kid. We have it on DVD now and I play it for my boys. Same guy who created the muppets did this. Wonderful little story.
Cheech, what a great memory that was. This is so cool and I used to watch it every time it was on HBO. Mrs. Mark loves it as well.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 02:15 PM
I watched Grudge Match again. It's pretty good. There are several scenes or parallels with the Rocky movies. Stallone drinks the raw eggs again. He starts out in bad shape then slowly gets into shape a la Rocky. He has the bad eye which his manager demonstrates by slapping him just like in Rocky. Part of his training is in a pool just like in Rocky III. In the beginning, Stallone loses his laboring job just like he did in Rocky II. Also, he passes by a billboard of the fight and looks at it just like when he visited the arena the night before the fight in Rocky. I didn't pick up on any parallels with DeNiro's performance in Raging Bull.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 02:39 PM
I think I told you this before, Oli. I had zero expectations for "Grudge Match," and I came away pleasantly surprised. I think I may watch it again this weekend. But I still think that Alan Arkin stole the film, just like he did with "Stand Up Guys."
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 03:43 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I think I told you this before, Oli. I had zero expectations for "Grudge Match," and I came away pleasantly surprised. I think I may watch it again this weekend. But I still think that Alan Arkin stole the film, just like he did with "Stand Up Guys."
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
Arkin and Brian Cranston came very close to stealing Argo as well.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 03:48 PM
I just saw a movie called Rabbit Trap staring Ernest Borgnine.
I don't really know what to make out of it. Has anyone every seen it?
I don't really know what to make out of it. Has anyone every seen it?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 03:51 PM
Glengarry Glen Ross is a great movie. Arkin was good in that but hard to choose between him, Baldwin, Harris, Spacey and Pacino. Jack Lemmon was the star of that show though. One of the best performances I've seen.
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 04:03 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Glengarry Glen Ross is a great movie. Arkin was good in that but hard to choose between him, Baldwin, Harris, Spacey and Pacino. Jack Lemmon was the star of that show though. One of the best performances I've seen.
I agree that Lemmon stole the movie; his role here was equal to his portrayal in "Save the Tiger", one of the grittiest (and most depressing) movies I've ever seen.
A personal note on "Glengarry": many of its scenes were filmed on Sheepshead Bay Road in Brooklyn and one night, as I was geting off the subway, coming home from work in Manhattan, I saw Al Pacino standing in the middle of the street. Even though the police had the area cordoned off and I was a good 40 yards away, it was still quite exciting. (My wife didn't believe me until the local neighborhood paper had a few pix the following week).
Anyway, it's one of the best dramas made in the past thirty years and an EXCELLENT character development story. I'd highly recommend it to anyone who likes good drama.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 05:07 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Glengarry Glen Ross is a great movie. Arkin was good in that but hard to choose between him, Baldwin, Harris, Spacey and Pacino. Jack Lemmon was the star of that show though. One of the best performances I've seen.
Jack Lemmon was one of the ten greatest actors of the 20th century. And you're right, he was brilliant in that film.
And I'm not sure if you're familiar with the playwright, David Mamet, who wrote "Glengarry." But his plays are VERY difficult to adapt to the big screen. For example, I saw Pacino do "American Buffalo" in the early '80s. He owned the role of Teach. But I personally don't think Dustin Hoffman did the role justice in the film. And Hoffman is one of the greatest actors who ever lived.
Point being, they assembled the right crew of actors for "Glengarry." And the thing that made Pacino's role so impressive is that he filmed that movie and "Scent of a Woman" literally back to back.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 06:42 PM
In the play it did not have the Baldwin part. They wrote that for him in the movie.
But his scene is a big scene that real salesman like to say among each other.
Always be selling
Same is true in the boiler room scene with the star of Argo I forget his name
But his scene is a big scene that real salesman like to say among each other.
Always be selling
Same is true in the boiler room scene with the star of Argo I forget his name
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 07:32 PM
http://postimg.org/image/mha5j8cgr/
That's the Sheepshead Bay subway stop in the background. I think this was pretty much the only outdoor set in the movie so it must have been around here that you saw him.
I'd give my left nut to see Pacino or De Niro in NY. The only celebrity I've ever seen in NY (in a street situation) was Billie Joe Armstrong and he was being corralled into a limo.
That's the Sheepshead Bay subway stop in the background. I think this was pretty much the only outdoor set in the movie so it must have been around here that you saw him.
I'd give my left nut to see Pacino or De Niro in NY. The only celebrity I've ever seen in NY (in a street situation) was Billie Joe Armstrong and he was being corralled into a limo.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 10:21 PM
DeNiro does not walk the streets he has a kid who drives for him or he will take a cab.
Pacino had or has a big truck car that he drives.
Ringo the Beatles ringo walks the streets.
Pacino had or has a big truck car that he drives.
Ringo the Beatles ringo walks the streets.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/14 10:36 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
DeNiro does not walk the streets he has a kid who drives for him or he will take a cab.
I've seen them down by our West 8th Street property a bunch of times, Foot. He used to drive him in a black Lincoln LS. Now he uses a Suburban or something similar. It's a big black utility vehicle. It looks like something the Feds drive. DeNiro and Pacino have both gotten very old looking. Much older than they appear on television and in theaters.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/14 01:06 AM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I think I told you this before, Oli. I had zero expectations for "Grudge Match," and I came away pleasantly surprised. I think I may watch it again this weekend. But I still think that Alan Arkin stole the film, just like he did with "Stand Up Guys."
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
I finally saw "Flight," with Denzel Washington last night. Not a great movie, but certainly a great performance. Denzel may honestly be the best actor of his generation (the generation in between Pacino/DeNiro and today's top actors).
Arkin and Brian Cranston came very close to stealing Argo as well.
Agreed.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/14 08:27 AM
Argo fuck yourself.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/14 04:46 PM
Just watched the movie "Boyhood". I liked it but I don't see hype. Maybe there was some deeper meaning I didn't understand about the movie. Idk. I also want to see the movies "Birdman" and "Foxcatcher" so bad.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/14 04:49 PM
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Footreads
DeNiro does not walk the streets he has a kid who drives for him or he will take a cab.
I've seen them down by our West 8th Street property a bunch of times, Foot. He used to drive him in a black Lincoln LS. Now he uses a Suburban or something similar. It's a big black utility vehicle. It looks like something the Feds drive. DeNiro and Pacino have both gotten very old looking. Much older than they appear on television and in theaters.
It gets me a little nervous because I feel like De Niro can still make great movies and put forth greats perfromances but his elderly appearance could hold him back a little bit. I know he's supossed to play frank sheeran in the Irishman, carlos Marcelo in the legacy of secrecy, and Ray Arcel in Hands of stone. Those all sound like movies he could really excel in.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/14 05:20 PM
Does anyone watch Sundance channel series called "The Red Road?" First season was only 6 episodes. I caught up this week.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/14 05:51 PM
I watched Surviving Christmas, a movie James Gandolfini clearly didn't want to be in. This was right before Ben Affleck started getting mainstream acceptance. Terrible movie.
Fun With Dick and Jane was surprisingly good. I watched the whole movie start to finish without looking at my watch. That's always a sign of a good movie. It adapted the original for a more contemporary climate too. Good storyline.
Fun With Dick and Jane was surprisingly good. I watched the whole movie start to finish without looking at my watch. That's always a sign of a good movie. It adapted the original for a more contemporary climate too. Good storyline.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/14 10:59 PM
Just saw a pretty good movie "Shoes of the Fisherman"
Anthony Quinn & Lawrence Olivier interesting Quinn is a beaten Priest a prisoner in Siberia.
Olivier is the Russian who put him there. They cross paths years later won't tell you anymore of the story it will spoil it for you.
Worth seeing
Anthony Quinn & Lawrence Olivier interesting Quinn is a beaten Priest a prisoner in Siberia.
Olivier is the Russian who put him there. They cross paths years later won't tell you anymore of the story it will spoil it for you.
Worth seeing
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/14 08:55 AM
There is a true story about a truce during WW1 on Christmas and they played a soccer game. Then true ended and they went back to killing each other.
There have been some movies made about it but I could not find any here in the US.
But then I found one
Joyeux Noel is a movie about it. You can find it in English on Amazon instant video and it is on Prime.
The German actress Kreuger she was in National treasure was in it.
The football game was actually a small part of it.
I won't spoil it for you by telling more about it.
It is a fantastic Christmas movie.
But it is not for kids.
Check it out
There have been some movies made about it but I could not find any here in the US.
But then I found one
Joyeux Noel is a movie about it. You can find it in English on Amazon instant video and it is on Prime.
The German actress Kreuger she was in National treasure was in it.
The football game was actually a small part of it.
I won't spoil it for you by telling more about it.
It is a fantastic Christmas movie.
But it is not for kids.
Check it out
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/26/14 05:10 PM
"Most Wanted Man" with Phillip Seymour Hoffman has such a WTF ending it's ridiculous! Good movie up until then, though!
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/14 08:02 PM
Just saw "Brooklyn Lobster" staring Danny Aiello.
Pretty good movie sorry no killings in it except lobsters. At the end they said no lobsters were actually killed during the making of this movie.
Pretty good movie sorry no killings in it except lobsters. At the end they said no lobsters were actually killed during the making of this movie.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/14 08:44 PM
Aiello was great in Jacobs Ladder.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/15 07:36 PM
Just saw St. Vincent.
Bill Murray, that McCarthy Chic and the Kid were all outstanding.
Very good movie.
I think it Should get a nomination.
DP
Bill Murray, that McCarthy Chic and the Kid were all outstanding.
Very good movie.
I think it Should get a nomination.
DP
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/15 10:14 PM
Watching a Bruce Willis movie I never heard of called "Fire With Fire (2012)." It's really pretty good.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/11/15 12:49 AM
I'll catch that.
Just watched The Butler, very good also.
DP
Just watched The Butler, very good also.
DP
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/11/15 11:29 PM
The Butler was great. How did it not get nominated for any Oscar awards?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/15 08:27 AM
Just saw "looking for an echo" on Amazon prime. I liked this movie never was released in theathers.
Stars Armand Assante and good supporting cast my friend Johnny, the guy from crime story, the actor that hit the lottery here in ny when it first started and the guy Chris Montesante killed in sopranos for killing his father. It even has Doowop music.
The hospital in the movie was the same hospital my oldest son Vic was born in.
Stars Armand Assante and good supporting cast my friend Johnny, the guy from crime story, the actor that hit the lottery here in ny when it first started and the guy Chris Montesante killed in sopranos for killing his father. It even has Doowop music.
The hospital in the movie was the same hospital my oldest son Vic was born in.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/15 02:18 PM
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
The Butler was great. How did it not get nominated for any Oscar awards?
I dont know, I was wondering the same thing.
imdb gave it a very good rating 7.1 out of 10.
It did say the Movie was awarded several nominations and a Win at black film festival and some others but not The Oscars.
DP
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/15 02:19 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Just saw "looking for an echo" on Amazon prime. I liked this movie never was released in theathers.
Stars Armand Assante and good supporting cast my friend Johnny, the guy from crime story, the actor that hit the lottery here in ny when it first started and the guy Chris Montesante killed in sopranos for killing his father. It even has Doowop music.
The hospital in the movie was the same hospital my oldest son Vic was born in.
Stars Armand Assante and good supporting cast my friend Johnny, the guy from crime story, the actor that hit the lottery here in ny when it first started and the guy Chris Montesante killed in sopranos for killing his father. It even has Doowop music.
The hospital in the movie was the same hospital my oldest son Vic was born in.
I'm going to check this out, sounds good.
DP
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/15 04:27 AM
Halloween H20 - 7/10
Decent movie, one of the better Halloweens after the original.
I always did like part 3 and 6.
Decent movie, one of the better Halloweens after the original.
I always did like part 3 and 6.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/15 06:38 PM
I saw "The Book Thief" last weekend. Very good story about a small German village back in WW2. I recommend this picture very much!
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 09:22 PM
I'm watching the new version of "Godzilla" on tv now. I had seen it a few months back on PPV and hopefully now I'll understand it a bit better. The special effects were pretty good but I objected to the whole storyline of the monster being a "good guy" now.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 09:28 PM
Originally Posted By: SC
but I objected to the whole storyline of the monster being a "good guy" now.
Of course he is. Just like they want you to root for the apes in the new "Planet of the Apes" franchise. Man---especially White Man---is bad.
Hollywood has always been overtly politically correct. But they've become outright hateful now. George Clooney, Sean Penn, et al. Great actors. But as human beings, if an asteroid hit that part of California I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep.
That's how I feel, and I stand by it. Rant over.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 09:46 PM
I wonder how Hollywood is going to take this latest backlash for not nomonating a black actor for the Oscars. Sharpton I'm sure would benefit from this.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/01/16/sharpton-calls-emergency-meeting-oscar-snubs-black-actors
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/01/16/sharpton-calls-emergency-meeting-oscar-snubs-black-actors
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 09:49 PM
Denzel Washington won for Training Day and I didn't even think he was that good in it.
I'm not into the overacting. I much prefer a subtle performance that draws you in and makes you believe you are watching real people. Not a cartoon.
Perhaps, Selma isn't that good. Those kind of movies swing and miss more often than they hit a home run e.g. "Bobby", "The Butler".....
I'm not into the overacting. I much prefer a subtle performance that draws you in and makes you believe you are watching real people. Not a cartoon.
Perhaps, Selma isn't that good. Those kind of movies swing and miss more often than they hit a home run e.g. "Bobby", "The Butler".....
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 09:55 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Denzel Washington won for Training Day and I didn't even think he was that good in it.
That was more like a lifetime achievement Oscar. Like Pacino finally winning for "Scent of a Woman," or Scorsese for "The Departed." Not that those two hadn't been worthy of those wins, but they had both been robbed too many times prior to that.
Plus, they wanted Denzel and Halle Berry to win on the same night, which they did. Although she probably deserved her win for "Monster's Ball" anyway.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 10:09 PM
I think Washington is a great actor.
But just because Winfrey made this moving does not mean this movie is worth getting an Oscar in every category.
Sharpton should make a movie about the real story of Tawana Brawley.
American sniper or the star was not even nominated for a golden globe.
But just because Winfrey made this moving does not mean this movie is worth getting an Oscar in every category.
Sharpton should make a movie about the real story of Tawana Brawley.
American sniper or the star was not even nominated for a golden globe.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/15 10:13 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Sharpton should make a movie about the real story of Tawana Brawley.
"Turd Girl" ---- A Spike Lee Joint
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/20/15 07:01 PM
I'm a bit behind the times when it comes to movies, but I recently rented on demand "Crazy Heart". Jeff Bridges did a good job. I liked the authenticity of his singing and playing. It was not a hyped-up, corny film. Maybe a bit contrived, him playing in a bowling alley, but I don't know if that really exists in Texas.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/15 06:49 AM
Saw American Sniper. Great movie.
Posted By: F_white
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/15 09:20 AM
Selma and American sniper two good movies.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/15 09:50 PM
Denzel definitely deserved his Oscar for training day imo. Crowe was kind of boring in a beautiful mind. I thought Denzel played that character great. Malcolm X so far in his career is his best performance. Pizza boy hit the nail on the head when he said he's arguably the best of his generation. I think he's one of the best of any generation honestly I've always been extremely impressed by him ever since I saw him play malcolm x. But I've seen american sniper and birdman recently. Both great movies. The way birdman was directed was amazing. It was like the whole movie was shot in one continuous shot. You have to see it to know what I'm talking about. I'm not a movie expert or anything, I just like to watch great movies with great performaces from great actors and actresses(as well as great directing) but that director deserves as much recognition as possible. I'm confident he can turn the dicaprio and Tom Hardy movie he's directing into a real gem.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/15 09:50 PM
I think gone girl and birdman are probably the two best movies I've seen that have come out in 2014. I think gone girl might be my number 1 by an edge but idk birdman was really good.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 01:36 AM
Saw a tv show Wednesday night on law and order. I don't watch these kind of shows normally because they have commercials.
I watched it because I saw Armand Assante had a guest roll. He played a Spanish cops father. He never sees the son, but turned up to invite the son to his wedding. He was marrying a young girl half his age. He also invited his daughter, his ex wife the Spanish cops mother.
Everything is fine until someone at the wedding started to dance with assante' young wife. Assante has this crazy look in his eyes.
Then next thing you know his young wife has a skull fracture.cops called in assante us arrested for hitting his new wife. But no one actually saw him do it.
Turns out he had a history of hitting his kids his ex wife.
No one ever presses charges against him. Not even his new wife.
Interesting for me as my Daddio was like that.
I am thinking this us the first step in assante getting a tv show of his own.
I watched it because I saw Armand Assante had a guest roll. He played a Spanish cops father. He never sees the son, but turned up to invite the son to his wedding. He was marrying a young girl half his age. He also invited his daughter, his ex wife the Spanish cops mother.
Everything is fine until someone at the wedding started to dance with assante' young wife. Assante has this crazy look in his eyes.
Then next thing you know his young wife has a skull fracture.cops called in assante us arrested for hitting his new wife. But no one actually saw him do it.
Turns out he had a history of hitting his kids his ex wife.
No one ever presses charges against him. Not even his new wife.
Interesting for me as my Daddio was like that.
I am thinking this us the first step in assante getting a tv show of his own.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 02:21 AM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Saw American Sniper. Great movie.
Going to see it today my son and his wife invited me to come with them. My wife will be watching my grand daughter. I think I rather be with my wife watching the baby.
But I always say no when they ask me to do something with them so I guess I will go.
But my son asked me not to comment out loud when the movie is on.
I wonder what they think I would say?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 05:49 PM
Is anyone watching the new Fox show "Empire?" There's only been 3 episodes so far. I watched them all yesterday on "On Demand". Kind of interesting. Good cast.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 08:04 PM
Just saw American sniper my son and daughter liked it.
I did not feel anything as I watched it.
I did not feel anything as I watched it.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 08:24 PM
My daughter and I recently watched The Budapest Hotel, a very witty comedy. I didn't realize there would be so many sexual innuendos in this movie. On a couple of occasions, my daughter left the room oops She hasn't watched a movie with me since.
Here's trailer.
http://youtu.be/zru-1DbbcsA
oops She hasn't watched a movie with me since.Here's trailer.
http://youtu.be/zru-1DbbcsA
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/15 08:26 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Just saw American sniper my son and daughter liked it.
I did not feel anything as I watched it.
I did not feel anything as I watched it.
Does that mean you were bored? I'd rather watch Barney than that movie.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/15 12:04 AM
It just means I had no emotion seeing it.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/15 02:10 AM
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
I think gone girl and birdman are probably the two best movies I've seen that have come out in 2014. I think gone girl might be my number 1 by an edge but idk birdman was really good.
You were spot on about the 'long take' Birdman is shot in, but whether he deserves it or not the Best Director Oscar will go to Linklater since Boyhood was a 12 year project. I personally have alot of problems with Gone Girl that would stop me from placing it in my top 10, but Birdman is no doubt top 5 for me.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/15 12:02 PM
I saw Foxcatcher. It was very good. Not one of the best I've ever seen good, but it was good.
I was worried at first that Channing Tatum's character was too much of a caricature but I would put the benefit of the doubt in the fact that he was playing a bipolar person.
Good performance by Carell as well. Some very cringe-inducing, memorable scenes.
You almost have to feel sorry for him in several scenes. He is just an outcast - a mentally ill man - looking for acceptance, never getting any sense of belonging and finally falling off the rails.
I was worried at first that Channing Tatum's character was too much of a caricature but I would put the benefit of the doubt in the fact that he was playing a bipolar person.
Good performance by Carell as well. Some very cringe-inducing, memorable scenes.
You almost have to feel sorry for him in several scenes. He is just an outcast - a mentally ill man - looking for acceptance, never getting any sense of belonging and finally falling off the rails.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/15 02:53 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
I think gone girl and birdman are probably the two best movies I've seen that have come out in 2014. I think gone girl might be my number 1 by an edge but idk birdman was really good.
You were spot on about the 'long take' Birdman is shot in, but whether he deserves it or not the Best Director Oscar will go to Linklater since Boyhood was a 12 year project. I personally have alot of problems with Gone Girl that would stop me from placing it in my top 10, but Birdman is no doubt top 5 for me.
I figured Linklater would get it. If I were a betting man I'd put it on him. But I think the director from birdman deserves it. What problems do you have with gone girl exactly? I was riveted the whole time really. What is your #1 for the year?
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/15 02:56 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I saw Foxcatcher. It was very good. Not one of the best I've ever seen good, but it was good.
I was worried at first that Channing Tatum's character was too much of a caricature but I would put the benefit of the doubt in the fact that he was playing a bipolar person.
Good performance by Carell as well. Some very cringe-inducing, memorable scenes.
You almost have to feel sorry for him in several scenes. He is just an outcast - a mentally ill man - looking for acceptance, never getting any sense of belonging and finally falling off the rails.
I was worried at first that Channing Tatum's character was too much of a caricature but I would put the benefit of the doubt in the fact that he was playing a bipolar person.
Good performance by Carell as well. Some very cringe-inducing, memorable scenes.
You almost have to feel sorry for him in several scenes. He is just an outcast - a mentally ill man - looking for acceptance, never getting any sense of belonging and finally falling off the rails.
I saw foxcatcher. I was honestly expecting so much more. It was easily one of my most anticipated movies but idk I felt it dragged. Still pretty good though. Carrell, Ruffalo and Tatum were all great.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 04:17 AM
I watched Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom last night, still a fun film to watch after all these years..
Posted By: BAM_233
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 05:13 AM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom last night, still a fun film to watch after all these years..
I can not stand Spieldberg's wife in that movie. The constant screaming and whining.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 03:26 PM
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
I think gone girl and birdman are probably the two best movies I've seen that have come out in 2014. I think gone girl might be my number 1 by an edge but idk birdman was really good.
You were spot on about the 'long take' Birdman is shot in, but whether he deserves it or not the Best Director Oscar will go to Linklater since Boyhood was a 12 year project. I personally have alot of problems with Gone Girl that would stop me from placing it in my top 10, but Birdman is no doubt top 5 for me.
I figured Linklater would get it. If I were a betting man I'd put it on him. But I think the director from birdman deserves it. What problems do you have with gone girl exactly? I was riveted the whole time really. What is your #1 for the year?
First of all it's the acting outside of Afflecks Sister (forgot her name) sorry to any fans but i think Affleck is one of the worst big Hollywood actors and he was no different here. Then you have Rosamund Pike who imo doesn't deserve the praise she's getting for that completely wooden performance, i feel people are praising the character particularly the way she was written rather than Pike.
Then it's mostly a few plot points some minor, and one pretty major.
GONE GIRL SPOILERS:
The whole 24 Hour Camera thing makes Zero sense. I mean there's no explanation at all whyy, 1.the cameras picked up nothing to show that she wasn't a prisoner, but only the parts that Pike had manafactured to frame Neil Patrick Harris, even though every room in the house is being filmed 24 hours a day. for however many days she stayed there 2.If we are to believe that Pike erased all of the incriminating footage, then why is noone other than the Female detective questioning her story? I'm fine with Suspension of Disbelief but this was just avoiding an explanation so the story fit together.
Overrall i'd say it was a pretty good film, but not among Finchers best and not one of my favourites from the year. I still have a good few movies to watch before i can decide on my favourite from the year.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 04:15 PM
Those are all fair points. I personally loved Pike's performance. I just think they way she went from house wife to a cold calculating killer was just great. I love Affleck as a director. As an actor I don't think he ruins a movie but I don't think he takes it to a different stratosphere like say Dicaprio does now. But I think I've seen all of the most highly praised movies so far this outside of whiplash and inherent vice. I never thought of the 24 hour camera thing before but good catch. I'd still say either that or birdman is overall the best. Maybe it's because of the competition in the best picture category for me. I found last year's best picture category to be much stronger. If wolf of Wall Street had been released this year maybe it would've won. I also want to see that jonah hill and james Franco movie "true story". Looks good. It'll be out in May.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 04:18 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
I think gone girl and birdman are probably the two best movies I've seen that have come out in 2014. I think gone girl might be my number 1 by an edge but idk birdman was really good.
You were spot on about the 'long take' Birdman is shot in, but whether he deserves it or not the Best Director Oscar will go to Linklater since Boyhood was a 12 year project. I personally have alot of problems with Gone Girl that would stop me from placing it in my top 10, but Birdman is no doubt top 5 for me.
I figured Linklater would get it. If I were a betting man I'd put it on him. But I think the director from birdman deserves it. What problems do you have with gone girl exactly? I was riveted the whole time really. What is your #1 for the year?
First of all it's the acting outside of Afflecks Sister (forgot her name) sorry to any fans but i think Affleck is one of the worst big Hollywood actors and he was no different here. Then you have Rosamund Pike who imo doesn't deserve the praise she's getting for that completely wooden performance, i feel people are praising the character particularly the way she was written rather than Pike.
Then it's mostly a few plot points some minor, and one pretty major.
GONE GIRL SPOILERS:
The whole 24 Hour Camera thing makes Zero sense. I mean there's no explanation at all whyy, 1.the cameras picked up nothing to show that she wasn't a prisoner, but only the parts that Pike had manafactured to frame Neil Patrick Harris, even though every room in the house is being filmed 24 hours a day. for however many days she stayed there 2.If we are to believe that Pike erased all of the incriminating footage, then why is noone other than the Female detective questioning her story? I'm fine with Suspension of Disbelief but this was just avoiding an explanation so the story fit together.
Overrall i'd say it was a pretty good film, but not among Finchers best and not one of my favourites from the year. I still have a good few movies to watch before i can decide on my favourite from the year.
I also haven't seen interstellar and Selma. But I was talking about this the other day with my friend, he says that Jonah hill should've won best supporting actor last year but I said I believe that Leto, Fassbender and possibly Cooper were better(although Hill was still great imo). He also says Christoph waltz deserved his Oscar for django more than Hoffman for the master(which if I'm not mistaken you recommended to me a while ago) and even if he(Waltz) was in the lead actor category he still would've won. I personally believe that Dicaprio was better than waltz and should've been the one nomianted. But what are your thoughts?
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 04:26 PM
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
Those are all fair points. I personally loved Pike's performance. I just think they way she went from house wife to a cold calculating killer was just great. I love Affleck as a director. As an actor I don't think he ruins a movie but I don't think he takes it to a different stratosphere like say Dicaprio does now. But I think I've seen all of the most highly praised movies so far this outside of whiplash and inherent vice. I never thought of the 24 hour camera thing before but good catch. I'd still say either that or birdman is overall the best. Maybe it's because of the competition in the best picture category for me. I found last year's best picture category to be much stronger. If wolf of Wall Street had been released this year maybe it would've won. I also want to see that jonah hill and james Franco movie "true story". Looks good. It'll be out in May.
For me both of the last two years nominees have been strong. Of the nominees this year i've yet to see Selma or American Sniper. I'd honestly be fine if Whiplash, Boyhood, Bidman or The Grand Budapest Hotel won, but i can't say i enjoyed The Imitation Game or The Theory of Everything too much. Still 2/3 for the Oscars is not bad, considering i usually only like 1 or 2 and think the best of the year have been ignored.
J.K Simmons in Whiplash is my favourite performance from the nominees i've seen, with Michael Keaton in Birdman a close second, and Patricia Arquette in Boyhood my favourite female performance. Looks like Julianne Moore who i love will get the Best Actress Oscar, but for this seriously? Complete Oscar-Bait performance
.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 04:35 PM
Also i'm fine with you liking Pikes performance, i'm clearly in the minority on that one but can you actually say she was ever a Housewife in the movie? There's maybe 3 short scenes in the entire movie that she could be said to be Housewife-like, and by that point she has already taking the one role she played the entire film as the "Psycho killer" as you put it. Right from the very first scene the movie makes her out to be dark and mysterious, and she never changes her demeanor at all throughout the film, even the scene where she's gutting Neil Patrick Harris like a pig she's completely wooden imo.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 05:17 PM
Originally Posted By: BAM_233
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom last night, still a fun film to watch after all these years..
I can not stand Spieldberg's wife in that movie. The constant screaming and whining.
Spielbergs wife?
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 05:24 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Originally Posted By: BAM_233
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom last night, still a fun film to watch after all these years..
I can not stand Spieldberg's wife in that movie. The constant screaming and whining.
Spielbergs wife?
Spielberg married the main Female from TOD, forget her name.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 08:49 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Also i'm fine with you liking Pikes performance, i'm clearly in the minority on that one but can you actually say she was ever a Housewife in the movie? There's maybe 3 short scenes in the entire movie that she could be said to be Housewife-like, and by that point she has already taking the one role she played the entire film as the "Psycho killer" as you put it. Right from the very first scene the movie makes her out to be dark and mysterious, and she never changes her demeanor at all throughout the film, even the scene where she's gutting Neil Patrick Harris like a pig she's completely wooden imo.
The one thing I didn't really like was her voice. I feel like it was just the same tone the whole movie. Idk if it was meant to be that way or not but idk of I was a fan of that. I think Reese Witherspoon who was originally supposed to play Amy would've been better. Witherspoon can really act.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/15 11:21 PM
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Also i'm fine with you liking Pikes performance, i'm clearly in the minority on that one but can you actually say she was ever a Housewife in the movie? There's maybe 3 short scenes in the entire movie that she could be said to be Housewife-like, and by that point she has already taking the one role she played the entire film as the "Psycho killer" as you put it. Right from the very first scene the movie makes her out to be dark and mysterious, and she never changes her demeanor at all throughout the film, even the scene where she's gutting Neil Patrick Harris like a pig she's completely wooden imo.
The one thing I didn't really like was her voice. I feel like it was just the same tone the whole movie. Idk if it was meant to be that way or not but idk of I was a fan of that. I think Reese Witherspoon who was originally supposed to play Amy would've been better. Witherspoon can really act.
Reese would've improved that character alot, she would've either understated it (Pike was clearly going for this but she failed imo), or she would've went over the top. Something i wouldn't be a fan of, but at least she would bring some life to the Character, particularly in making Affleck half decent as the Female lead usually needs to do with him.
Good call!
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/26/15 12:57 PM
Originally Posted By: Camarel
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Originally Posted By: BAM_233
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom last night, still a fun film to watch after all these years..
I can not stand Spieldberg's wife in that movie. The constant screaming and whining.
Spielbergs wife?
Spielberg married the main Female from TOD, forget her name.
Oh ok, she was annoying at first but then you kind of get used to her..
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/15 01:11 PM
Carlitos Way.
"Dumb move, man. Dumb move. But it’s like them old reflexes comin’ back. I know what’s supposed to happen now. Benny’s gotta go down. And if I don’t do it, they’re gonna say: “Carlito, he’s flaky, man. Slacked-out. A used-to-be bad guy. Joint got to Carlito.” The street is watchin’. She is watchin’ all the time."
"Dumb move, man. Dumb move. But it’s like them old reflexes comin’ back. I know what’s supposed to happen now. Benny’s gotta go down. And if I don’t do it, they’re gonna say: “Carlito, he’s flaky, man. Slacked-out. A used-to-be bad guy. Joint got to Carlito.” The street is watchin’. She is watchin’ all the time."
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/15 02:42 PM
Saw Gentlemen Jim starring Errol Flynn pretty good movie. He look like he could really box.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/15 08:23 PM
Saw great movie Boom Town starring Spenser Tracy & Clark Cable great great movie about oil prospecting.
Posted By: Girlie
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/15 12:41 PM
LOL.
Chico's Bail Bonds is the sponsors of the Bad News Bears. Sorry, lazy rainy day and getting ready for my children to return from their dad's. I had to watch something funny!
And no, I'm watching the original.
Chico's Bail Bonds is the sponsors of the Bad News Bears. Sorry, lazy rainy day and getting ready for my children to return from their dad's. I had to watch something funny!
And no, I'm watching the original.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/15 02:56 PM
Rocky.
What you don't like my house ? my house stinks ? IT STINKS!!.
You want me to fight the big fight, ok ill fight the big fight.
What you don't like my house ? my house stinks ? IT STINKS!!.
You want me to fight the big fight, ok ill fight the big fight.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/15 03:49 PM
The Usual Suspects is a great movie.
Kevin Spacey had some run of acting in really good movies during the mid to late 90's.
Kevin Spacey had some run of acting in really good movies during the mid to late 90's.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/15 02:28 PM
That's a good movie. I agree with you Moe.
Watched the newest Planet of the Apes movie (I love the original) but figured out the whole plot in the first 15 minutes. The acting was pretty good. Gary Oldman was in it he's always great. My kids really enjoyed it. If you have older kids 8-16 I would recommend it.
I have a CRUSH on Kirk Acevedo so anytime they showed him in the movie I was glued to the screen.
Watched the newest Planet of the Apes movie (I love the original) but figured out the whole plot in the first 15 minutes. The acting was pretty good. Gary Oldman was in it he's always great. My kids really enjoyed it. If you have older kids 8-16 I would recommend it.
I have a CRUSH on Kirk Acevedo so anytime they showed him in the movie I was glued to the screen.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/15 02:09 PM
In The Break-up, there's a scene where the clerk at Marilyn Dean's shop is singing to Jennifer Aniston who apparently is feeling bad about her relationship with Vince Vaughn. In walks Ms. Dean who yells at him and fires him. Why did she do that?
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/15 04:22 PM
Cop Land(1997). One of Stallones best.
Moe Tilden: What you've got here, sheriff, is a town that scares the shit outta certain people.
Moe Tilden: What you've got here, sheriff, is a town that scares the shit outta certain people.
Posted By: DonMega1888
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/15 08:47 PM
how to do a screenshot on a pc
legend (1985) by ridley scott,was watching with my nephews today
great preformance by tim curry in this
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/15 10:07 AM
My favorite scene from Casino. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN1qpVheIDs
"The booze, the coke, the broads.... i mean he got sloppy. He just wasn't the same Nicky anymore."
"The booze, the coke, the broads.... i mean he got sloppy. He just wasn't the same Nicky anymore."
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/15 03:05 PM
Exodus gods an Kings not even close to the ten commandments. Put me to sleep more then once.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/15 03:09 PM
On the waterfront great movie Eva Marie Saint got an Oscar for her first movie.
She is 86 still married to same husband for 62 yrs. Still in good shape for some one of her age.
She is 86 still married to same husband for 62 yrs. Still in good shape for some one of her age.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/29/15 02:02 PM
Striking Distance.
Pretty much everyone ive met seems to dislike this movie, i think Bruce Willis was even quoted to saying he hated it.
I always thought it was a decent movie though.
Pretty much everyone ive met seems to dislike this movie, i think Bruce Willis was even quoted to saying he hated it.
I always thought it was a decent movie though.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/29/15 08:55 PM
Never heard of it. Speaking of Willis a good movie to watch that he's in is Planet Terror. Rodriguez directed it. Ever see it?
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/15 03:31 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Striking Distance.
Pretty much everyone ive met seems to dislike this movie, i think Bruce Willis was even quoted to saying he hated it.
I always thought it was a decent movie though.
Pretty much everyone ive met seems to dislike this movie, i think Bruce Willis was even quoted to saying he hated it.
I always thought it was a decent movie though.
My being from Pittsburgh may make me prejudiced, but I enjoyed it. The plot was something of a stretch, but it was serviceable.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/15 11:38 PM
Watching deliver us from evil on Starz.
F N Creepy
F N Creepy
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/15 06:31 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Never heard of it. Speaking of Willis a good movie to watch that he's in is Planet Terror. Rodriguez directed it. Ever see it?
Never even heard of it Alfanosgirl, looks good must give it a watch
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/15 09:03 AM
Not a movie, but just finished watching The Mafia with Trevor McDonald.
Was a decent watch. Was it only one episode ?
Was a decent watch. Was it only one episode ?
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/15 12:09 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Not a movie, but just finished watching The Mafia with Trevor McDonald.
Was a decent watch. Was it only one episode ?
Was a decent watch. Was it only one episode ?
It was a two part series, one episode was on last week..
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/15 05:36 PM
Trapeze is on at 6 eastern time on turner Classic movie channel. Starring Burt Lancaster as we all know this movie kicks ass it well worth watching.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/15 06:38 PM
Saw "Unbroken" last weekend. Very good picture about a WWII POW named Louie Zamperini.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XrjJbl7kRrI
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XrjJbl7kRrI
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/15 09:16 PM
Just watched History of Violence, forgot about this movie but man Ed Harris is really good actor
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/01/15 02:56 PM
The Fast and the Furious.
I like the tuna here.
"Bullshit asshole, no one likes the tuna here"
I like the tuna here.
"Bullshit asshole, no one likes the tuna here"
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/15 03:41 PM
Donnie Brasco.
Except this time it was the uncut version or something.
Runs 2 hours 27 minutes and there are so many extra pointless scenes that aren't on the other version i had seen.
Was like watching a different movie.
Except this time it was the uncut version or something.
Runs 2 hours 27 minutes and there are so many extra pointless scenes that aren't on the other version i had seen.
Was like watching a different movie.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/15 03:54 PM
Saw a movie from the early 60s on Netflix Cop Haters.
Some one was killing cops.
Staring Robert Loggia others in the movie Vincent Gardenia and a youth gang leader the late great Jerry Orbach.
It had an interesting ending
Some one was killing cops.
Staring Robert Loggia others in the movie Vincent Gardenia and a youth gang leader the late great Jerry Orbach.
It had an interesting ending
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/15 06:06 AM
The Family(2013) with Robert De Niro and Michelle Pfieffer.
What did i just watch lol ?
It was like a cross between meet the fockers, goodfellas and lilyhammer.
The daughter with the guns shooting all the mafiosos's and shit.
Passed an hour anyway
What did i just watch lol ?
It was like a cross between meet the fockers, goodfellas and lilyhammer.
The daughter with the guns shooting all the mafiosos's and shit.
Passed an hour anyway
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/15 06:35 PM
Over the weekend I watched "Angel Heart" with Rourke and De Niro. That's as scary a movie as it gets for me.
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0092563/
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0092563/
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/15 10:57 AM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
The Family(2013) with Robert De Niro and Michelle Pfieffer.
What did i just watch lol ?
It was like a cross between meet the fockers, goodfellas and lilyhammer.
The daughter with the guns shooting all the mafiosos's and shit.
Passed an hour anyway
What did i just watch lol ?
It was like a cross between meet the fockers, goodfellas and lilyhammer.
The daughter with the guns shooting all the mafiosos's and shit.
Passed an hour anyway
Why did DeNiro rat? They never said in the movie that I remember. I think if he did rat his kids will kill him. The boy would rape his mother
Posted By: bonanno
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/15 05:26 AM
Once upon time in America... for me.. better movie then Godfather.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/15 09:47 AM
Originally Posted By: bonanno
Once upon time in America... for me.. better movie then Godfather.
Never liked this movie that much. I did like the girl fucking guys for a Charlotte Rousse
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/15 05:32 PM
Watched Forrest Gump again today, still a modern day classic
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/15 11:15 AM
Saw Pope of Greenwich Village the other night. Eric Roberts dialog was a lot better then Rourke's.freaking good movie.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/15 08:54 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Originally Posted By: bonanno
Once upon time in America... for me.. better movie then Godfather.
Never liked this movie that much. I did like the girl fucking guys for a Charlotte Rousse
I liked it quite a bit - not in Godfather range but definitely a strong recommend.
That said, there are various cuts of OUaTiA and the U.S. theaterical release is known for being disjointed. The version I have seen is Sergio Leone's director's cut and was very impressed with it. I cannot speak to other cuts other than their reputation.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/15 08:56 PM
Just saw Entourage. If you liked the show, including the final two seasons, it's worth watching. If you didn't, it's not.
I liked the TV show and was pleased with the movie. It does play like an extended episode, which I suppose is typical for crossovers.
I liked the TV show and was pleased with the movie. It does play like an extended episode, which I suppose is typical for crossovers.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/12/15 02:59 AM
Just saw the movie Jersey boys. I saw the play liked that. I thought the mivie's sounds was not that clear.
But I did notice something interesting. In the movie these guys robbed a safe. They managed to get it down the stairs some how. On of them pulls up in a car or something. They attached a pulley to the safe to lift it and take it away.
But the safe was too heavy and the front of the vehicle was pulled up off the ground. One of the jersey boys got caught and did 6 months.
When I was a kid in east Harlem a guy named horse from a Hun 8 street. Try to rob a safe from a key food store. It was a big safe right against the front window of the store. He steals a truck has a pulley on that crashes the truck throw the key food front window. He attaches the pulley to the safe and tries to lift the safe on to the truck. Same thing happens front of the truck goes off the ground. He gets caught I forget how much time he got.
Does anyone know if the story they told in the movie actually happened. The robbery in Harlem did actually happen.
The reason I ask in the 80s I got friendly with Joe Pesce and I am pretty sure I told him about the key food robbery. I am wondering whether he told that story to Eastwood and they decided to put it into the movie?
But I did notice something interesting. In the movie these guys robbed a safe. They managed to get it down the stairs some how. On of them pulls up in a car or something. They attached a pulley to the safe to lift it and take it away.
But the safe was too heavy and the front of the vehicle was pulled up off the ground. One of the jersey boys got caught and did 6 months.
When I was a kid in east Harlem a guy named horse from a Hun 8 street. Try to rob a safe from a key food store. It was a big safe right against the front window of the store. He steals a truck has a pulley on that crashes the truck throw the key food front window. He attaches the pulley to the safe and tries to lift the safe on to the truck. Same thing happens front of the truck goes off the ground. He gets caught I forget how much time he got.
Does anyone know if the story they told in the movie actually happened. The robbery in Harlem did actually happen.
The reason I ask in the 80s I got friendly with Joe Pesce and I am pretty sure I told him about the key food robbery. I am wondering whether he told that story to Eastwood and they decided to put it into the movie?
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/15 06:59 PM
Underbelly: Tell Them Lucifer Was Here.
Good watch, based on a true story.
Good watch, based on a true story.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/15 09:09 PM
At the theater - saw Terminator - Genisys. Without getting into spoilers, felt that it tweaked too much with the original storyline. Do not recommend.
On HBO - finally saw John Wick. This was really surprisingly good. I generally don't like Keanu post-Matrix but this movie was redemptive for him. Not a subtle movie but if you are looking for an action flick and already have HBO, make sure you catch this one.
On HBO - finally saw John Wick. This was really surprisingly good. I generally don't like Keanu post-Matrix but this movie was redemptive for him. Not a subtle movie but if you are looking for an action flick and already have HBO, make sure you catch this one.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/15 05:49 AM
Just finished watching "Dallas Buyers Club". Now that was an excellent movie. Thnx pmac, I think it was you who recommended it.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/15 08:34 PM
I just saw King Kong, son of kong a short movie about a night club where everyone was wearing formal attire and had on roller skates
Might Joe young is on now.
Am I bored or what!!
Might Joe young is on now.
Am I bored or what!!
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/15 09:10 PM
I watched Atonement Sunday night good film
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/20/15 02:19 AM
Fun note about ANT-MAN that opened in theaters this weekend. Former SNL cast member Garret Morris did a cameo as a car driver.
What's funny is when he was on SNL, the cast did a sketch about superheroes. (Murray=Superman, Belushi=Hulk, etc.) Who did Morris play? Ant-Man.
What's funny is when he was on SNL, the cast did a sketch about superheroes. (Murray=Superman, Belushi=Hulk, etc.) Who did Morris play? Ant-Man.
Posted By: Paul Pisano
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/15 01:27 AM
just re watched for the millionth time carlito's way. Pacino is great in the role. i love the musical score during the chase scene at the end of the movie.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/15 02:50 PM
Currently watching Moon with Sam Rockwell
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/15 11:51 PM
BET is airing "The Temptations", the Motown singing group. I am really enjoying it. I didn't know much about their lives, but it is interesting.
Lots of great music!!! Waiting to hear one of my Temp favorites, "Papa Was A Rolling Stone."
TIS
Lots of great music!!! Waiting to hear one of my Temp favorites, "Papa Was A Rolling Stone."
TIS
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/15 05:42 PM
I taped the Cotton Club so I watched it for about 30 mins but just couldn't get through the entire movie. It had a great cast too plus it was directed by FFC. I didn't even recognize James Remar as Dutch Schultz. I love Remar, great actor. There was something lacking in this film. Anybody see it? Opinions?
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/15 06:00 PM
I tend to agree. The overlapping story lines were distracting and it was a challenge for even the underworld erudite to follow the gangland history.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/10/15 12:19 AM
Just watched Walk the Line, the movie about Johnny Cash. I really do not have much knowledge of Cash; I've only watched one interview of him years ago but I pictured him as a force to be wreckoned with. In the movie, he came across as a very weak man. Is that really true? Maybe someone on here will know more about him.
The movie was entertaining. Acting was pretty good. Good storyline.
The movie was entertaining. Acting was pretty good. Good storyline.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/10/15 07:16 AM
Walk the Line is a great film..The drugs made him look weak i guess,,
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/11/15 06:07 AM
Saw the latest Mission Impossible. Just may be the best of the series.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/12/15 01:37 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Just watched Walk the Line, the movie about Johnny Cash. I really do not have much knowledge of Cash; I've only watched one interview of him years ago but I pictured him as a force to be wreckoned with. In the movie, he came across as a very weak man. Is that really true? Maybe someone on here will know more about him.
The movie was entertaining. Acting was pretty good. Good storyline.
The movie was entertaining. Acting was pretty good. Good storyline.
I think between the death of his brother and his strained relationship with his father broke him first and then the other haunting things.
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Walk the Line is a great film..The drugs made him look weak i guess,,
Yes, the Drugs and Alcoholism were worse than the depressions of his youth.
A perfect Storm, sadness and complete access.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/12/15 02:14 AM
I always considered Johnny Cash country/western tho....not really. Many of his songs were crossover to the R&R charts He is one who I really didn't mind listening too. I liked his deep voice.
Tho I don't have it, I do remember his Folsom Prison album was very popular. I did like Walk The Line and who can forget A Boy Named Sue.
TIS
Many of his songs were crossover to the R&R charts He is one who I really didn't mind listening too. I liked his deep voice. Tho I don't have it, I do remember his Folsom Prison album was very popular. I did like Walk The Line and who can forget A Boy Named Sue.
TIS
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/15 08:34 PM
The Town(2010).
Boston armed robbers movie, wasn't too bad for Ben Affleck.
Boston armed robbers movie, wasn't too bad for Ben Affleck.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/15 09:25 PM
Theater;
The Gift - Interesting. Not as scary as expected, more of a psych thriller. Good for what it was.
Mission Impossible - Exactly what you expect it to be; no more, no less.
Me and Earl and The Dying Girl - You have to be in the right mood for this type of movie. Nothing exceptional other than the film parodies.
Summary - No must sees or must avoids in this group.
Home;
The Drop - This was an excellent movie (and the type of movie those on these boards would easily get into). Will not spoil, but Tom Hardy is really growing on me. It's on the HBO circuit now and really worth making a point of seeing.
The Gift - Interesting. Not as scary as expected, more of a psych thriller. Good for what it was.
Mission Impossible - Exactly what you expect it to be; no more, no less.
Me and Earl and The Dying Girl - You have to be in the right mood for this type of movie. Nothing exceptional other than the film parodies.
Summary - No must sees or must avoids in this group.
Home;
The Drop - This was an excellent movie (and the type of movie those on these boards would easily get into). Will not spoil, but Tom Hardy is really growing on me. It's on the HBO circuit now and really worth making a point of seeing.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/15 09:24 PM
Addition to the post above;
Saw Trainwrecked last night. For a rom-com, it was an excellent movie, exceeded expectations and avoided most of the cliches of the genre. Strongly recommend.
Saw Trainwrecked last night. For a rom-com, it was an excellent movie, exceeded expectations and avoided most of the cliches of the genre. Strongly recommend.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/28/15 04:55 PM
I came across this BW 1949 movie called Stromboli. It's the name that attracted me. It starred Ingrid Bergman. I just watched minutes of it off and on. Stromboli is the name of an Italian island. I'm not sure what the movie was about, but apparently, Bergman starred as a women who married a fisherman to get citizenship after the War and her efforts to integrate into Italian society.
Again, it was the name that got my attention. It's not just what's for dinner.
Again, it was the name that got my attention. It's not just what's for dinner.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/28/15 11:10 PM
When A Stranger Calls Back(1993)
Made for TV movie but much scarier than the likes of Scream.
Sort of movie you should watch alone, only works the first time of course, but has a spooky atmosphere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjK9u38LYO8
Made for TV movie but much scarier than the likes of Scream.
Sort of movie you should watch alone, only works the first time of course, but has a spooky atmosphere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjK9u38LYO8
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/15 08:14 PM
Gravity - interesting but a bit far-fetched. The only actors in the movie were good.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/15 10:22 PM
Hope you saw it 3D. I really enjoyed it.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/09/15 04:10 PM
Amazing effects though..
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/09/15 05:42 PM
Just happened to start watching Mission Impossible-Ghost Protocal and admit, tho not necessarily a Cruise fan, I am really enjoying it. I think I only saw the first MI movie and I did like that as well. Lots of action, hi-tech stuff. Sort of Bourne-ish but I do like Bourne movies better.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/15 04:40 PM
I know that we all lampoon the casting of George Hamilton as Michael's lawyer in GFIII and Eli Wallach as Don Altobello. However, I watched (again) part of The Conqueror starring John Wayne as Ghengis Khan. Madonne! John Wayne at the height of his popularity being cast like that. That's the all-time example of just downright goofy casting.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/15 08:20 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I know that we all lampoon the casting of George Hamilton as Michael's lawyer in GFIII and Eli Wallach as Don Altobello. However, I watched (again) part of The Conqueror starring John Wayne as Ghengis Khan. Madonne! John Wayne at the height of his popularity being cast like that. That's the all-time example of just downright goofy casting.
Oli,
If I'm not mistaken wasn't Wayne also in a biblical movie that he seemed really miscast? Can't think of it.
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/15 10:51 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: olivant
I know that we all lampoon the casting of George Hamilton as Michael's lawyer in GFIII and Eli Wallach as Don Altobello. However, I watched (again) part of The Conqueror starring John Wayne as Ghengis Khan. Madonne! John Wayne at the height of his popularity being cast like that. That's the all-time example of just downright goofy casting.
Oli,
If I'm not mistaken wasn't Wayne also in a biblical movie that he seemed really miscast? Can't think of it.
TIS
Yes TIS, he played a Roman centurion in The Greatest Story Ever Told.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/19/15 08:54 AM
The original A Nightmare On Elm Street(1984).
One of my favorite horror's and in fact it was the first horror movie i ever seen at about the age of 5 lol. Had me hooked on the horror genre ever since.
One of my favorite horror's and in fact it was the first horror movie i ever seen at about the age of 5 lol. Had me hooked on the horror genre ever since.
Posted By: DonKostic
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/19/15 09:24 PM
The Mist. I've been depressed ever since.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/15 11:12 AM
Watched the first of Sergio Leone's Dollar Trilogy, A Fistful of Dollars with Clint Eastwood last night. Pretty good film not as good as Good Bad and the Ugly.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/28/15 07:51 PM
Batman(1989)
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/28/15 09:52 PM
Tale of two cities fantastic movie. They made a musical of it some years ago. I am still amazed it was only on Broadway for a year.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/17/15 09:34 PM
Just saw Champion on Amazon prime. Kirk Douglas should have won an academy award for that performance.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/18/15 05:38 AM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Batman(1989)
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
Good to see someone else recognizes that.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/15 12:08 AM
Watched the new Jurassic Park last night, pretty good not bad not great
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/15 01:26 AM
Watched GFIII a couple of nights ago. I never understood why was the Nevada home in ruins in the first few minutes when Michael is reading the letter to his children. I understand seeing him sitting in his chair smoking a cigarette as his hair starts to grey. I take it that he is insulated with all of this power and wealth, yet he has nothing. He isn't legit, his wife betrayed him, he had his brother killed, and he continues "my father's way of doing things". But I never understood why all the flooring is warped and the floor rafters are exposed. After that cigarette did he just get up and leave the house for good? Was there a bomb? Wtf, I always thought that estate was so beautiful.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/15 08:33 PM
In the spirit of October, I saw The Green Inferno.
It was well done for the type of movie it is but do not see this unless you have a very strong stomach. Even knowing what it was about, I was unprepared for the graphic nature of one particular scene.
It was well done for the type of movie it is but do not see this unless you have a very strong stomach. Even knowing what it was about, I was unprepared for the graphic nature of one particular scene.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/15 09:50 PM
I Know What You Did Last Summer.
Decent generic 90s slasher movie.
Decent generic 90s slasher movie.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/15 09:55 PM
I haven't "just" watched it, but I recommend the movie adaptation of Stephen King's Christine. One of the better King adaptations.
The Wraith is another great 80's horror movie.
I plan on watching both over the next few days.
The Wraith is another great 80's horror movie.
I plan on watching both over the next few days.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/15 10:08 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I haven't "just" watched it, but I recommend the movie adaptation of Stephen King's Christine. One of the better King adaptations.
The Wraith is another great 80's horror movie.
I plan on watching both over the next few days.
The Wraith is another great 80's horror movie.
I plan on watching both over the next few days.
Speaking of King, I think it's AMC that is gonna have all King day (or week), on or around Halloween. OR did it already happen and I missed it? LOL Yea I see it was last week.
I saw previews and lineup includes: It, The Shining, Misery, Dead Zone, Cujo, Carrie Pet Sematary. Great if you're a King fan. TIS
Here's the whole AMC lineup, not just King.
American Werewolf In London, The Omen, among my favorites too.
http://www.amc.com/talk/2014/10/amc-fear...d-chucky-movies
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 01:30 PM
The ending of Pet Sematary was one of the most f**ked up things I ever seen.
Good movie. Has more emotional depth than a lot of horror movies.
I must have seen Misery a hundred times. Great movie.
Good movie. Has more emotional depth than a lot of horror movies.
I must have seen Misery a hundred times. Great movie.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 02:42 PM
Count of Monte Christo about revenge love it. But not nearly brutal enough.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 03:25 PM
Saw, "The Intern" last night with the Mrs. Great movie. Satisfies the "chick movie" for the spouse but enjoyable for guys. Had some real funny scenes. DeNiro was great and once again real funny.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 05:47 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
The ending of Pet Sematary was one of the most f**ked up things I ever seen.
Good movie. Has more emotional depth than a lot of horror movies.
I must have seen Misery a hundred times. Great movie.
Good movie. Has more emotional depth than a lot of horror movies.
I must have seen Misery a hundred times. Great movie.
Yea, it was definitely creepy. My daughters and I still remember the creepy kid saying "I wanna play with youuuuuu" and still will jokingly say it to each other.
Speaking of King, don't know if you remember (or saw) the move "Maximum Overdrive", based on his short story, called "Trucks." Every time that's on, the listing description says "Kings self-admitted most moronic story he ever wrote." (something to that effect.
) I did see the movie but I think only once, years ago. Evidently King is right. Ha ha TIS
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 06:31 PM
King has a new book "Bazaar of Bad Dreams" coming out in a week or so.
It's a collection of 20 short stories which is a selling point for me.
Mr. Mercedes was a good concept with a flawed execution and I wasn't really sold on the follow up Finders Keepers, but I plan on picking up this one.
It's a collection of 20 short stories which is a selling point for me.
Mr. Mercedes was a good concept with a flawed execution and I wasn't really sold on the follow up Finders Keepers, but I plan on picking up this one.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/15 09:03 PM
There is a new series on Amazon prime my son was telling me about it. In it Germany and Japan won world war 2. Except there is proof around that they lost and its trying to be covered up.
Anyone seen it?
Anyone seen it?
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/15 05:35 AM
Finally saw Sicario. Awesome movie. Probably the best I've seen this year and one of the best crime movies I've ever seen. Very gritty and, far from turning away from the ugliness, looks right at it. The plot is unique and not entirely what you'd expect. The music is great and really adds to the feel of it all. Easily 4 stars. No surprise it has 93% on RT.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/15 11:43 PM
Plan on seeing advance screening of Spectre tonight. Means missing Johnny Football tho.
If I do go, I'll let you know my thoughts soon.
If I do go, I'll let you know my thoughts soon.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/15 01:23 AM
Saturday night fever its on netflex.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/15 01:41 AM
Classic movie. Those were some great times.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/15 03:11 PM
I used to wear bell bottoms with the high heel shoes. Would hit all the bars and night clubs in Brooklyn. Penthouse, revelation, 2001 etc
Latin night Tito puente at the revelation.
Latin night Tito puente at the revelation.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/15 12:35 AM
I got a picture of my brother workin the door at 2001, dressed exactly like that.
I will look for it and post.
I will look for it and post.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/15 05:57 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I know that we all lampoon the casting of George Hamilton as Michael's lawyer in GFIII and Eli Wallach as Don Altobello. However, I watched (again) part of The Conqueror starring John Wayne as Ghengis Khan. Madonne! John Wayne at the height of his popularity being cast like that. That's the all-time example of just downright goofy casting.
Posted By: helenwheels
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/15 08:16 PM
Last night I had some friends in and we watched an old gem- Fatso.
Dom DeLuise, Anne Bancroft and Ron Carey. It was written by Bancroft, and has a lot of insider humor for Italian Americans
A hilarious scene:
http://youtu.be/ar9HNDDcMgQ
Dom DeLuise, Anne Bancroft and Ron Carey. It was written by Bancroft, and has a lot of insider humor for Italian Americans
A hilarious scene:
http://youtu.be/ar9HNDDcMgQ
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/09/15 10:03 PM
It turned out that the sweet-talking, tattoo-sporting pikey was a gypsy bare-knuckle boxing champion. Which makes him harder than a coffin nail. Right now, that's the last thing on Tommy's mind. If Gorgeous doesn't wake up in the next few minutes, Tommy knows he'll be buried with him. Why would the gypsies go through the trouble of explaining why a man died in their campsite when they can bury the pair of them and just move camp? It's not like they got social security numbers, is it? Tommy - the tit - is praying. And if he isn't, he fucking should be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWAsI3U2EaE
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/09/15 10:30 PM
Da ya like dags,, Great film..
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/15 04:27 AM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
I used to wear bell bottoms with the high heel shoes. Would hit all the bars and night clubs in Brooklyn. Penthouse, revelation, 2001 etc
Latin night Tito puente at the revelation.
Latin night Tito puente at the revelation.
Do the Hustle
High heels. Oh Foots you have me laughing. My Mom made my Dad get a perm in the late 70's. It was the most awful looking hair style ever. Seeing Tito would have been fun!!
The next year my Dad got this cowboy hat, big leather western boots and belt buckle and leather jacket in CA, went to Jersey like that lol. Looked ridiculous
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/15 04:31 AM
Just watched Pulp Fiction again. Forgot how funny that movie is.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/15 04:41 AM
Originally Posted By: DuesPaid
I got a picture of my brother workin the door at 2001, dressed exactly like that.
I will look for it and post.
I will look for it and post.
You have to post that pic. That I got to see.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/15 06:56 PM
I had curly hair as a kid and wore a mustash. I have a picture of me in those days not to clear but the pixel what ever that is will let it post.
Tell me how to post a picture on this exactly.
Tell me how to post a picture on this exactly.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/15 05:10 PM
That would be a great photo Foots. Get a photobucket account. What I do is go to that site log in to my account. Upload my picture. Then click on the picture to copy the url. Then I paste the url on here in a post. Easy squeezy.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/15/15 04:51 PM
Mr Nice.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/15 03:03 AM
Bone Tomahawk
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/15 03:45 PM
Spotlight is definitely worth a look. Unsavory subject matter (nothing depicted or re-enacted, just discussed) in a procedural. To describe it makes it sound a bit dry but it is fascinating. Strong reccomendation
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/15 02:09 PM
Bubba: Anyway, like I was sayin', shrimp is the fruit of the sea. You can barbecue it, boil it, broil it, bake it, saute it. Dey's uh, shrimp-kabobs, shrimp creole, shrimp gumbo. Pan fried, deep fried, stir-fried. There's pineapple shrimp, lemon shrimp, coconut shrimp, pepper shrimp, shrimp soup, shrimp stew, shrimp salad, shrimp and potatoes, shrimp burger, shrimp sandwich. That- that's about it.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/15 10:53 PM
A Nightmare On Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/15 11:17 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
A Nightmare On Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors.
Decent film, perhaps my favorite after the original. They got stupid after the 3rd film..
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/10/15 08:30 PM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
A Nightmare On Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors.
Decent film, perhaps my favorite after the original. They got stupid after the 3rd film..
Haha yeah, wasn't a fan of part 4 or 5 that much.
Part 6 Freddy's Dead holds some good nostalgic memories for me though. I remember going to rent it with my parents from the VHS shop and getting the free 3D glasses from the woman at about 8 years old lol.
Been getting back into watching horror genre more again.
Watching The Faculty just now.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/11/15 06:33 PM
The second Freddy Kruger movie is the stupidest of all. So bad it's good, though, as opposed to so bad it's boring - like most of the following movies.
Freddy v Jason was pretty good for what it was.
Freddy v Jason was pretty good for what it was.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/15 04:16 AM
Last night watched The $10 million dollar getaway with John Mahoney and Tony LoBianco. It was about the Lufthansa heist portrayed in Goodfellas.
Mahoney was unconvincing as Jimmy Burke and the movie pinned the murder of the heist participants on the mob, not Burke.
Mahoney was unconvincing as Jimmy Burke and the movie pinned the murder of the heist participants on the mob, not Burke.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/15 04:23 PM
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/15 01:55 AM
Elf
Fuckin hysterical
Fuckin hysterical
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/15 08:44 PM
Alien 3.
Know alot of people don't really care for the 3rd movie, but ive always quite liked it. Not as good as Aliens, but still a decent watch.
Know alot of people don't really care for the 3rd movie, but ive always quite liked it. Not as good as Aliens, but still a decent watch.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/15 08:53 PM
I watched Casablanca yesterday, one of my all time favorite films, so many great lines and a classic role by Bogart..
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/15 09:44 PM
The Bishops Wife.
Loretta Young
Loretta Young
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/15 03:27 AM
"The Rat Pack" (1998),an HBO film that's unabashedly--deliriously--trashy. It has everything you'd want in a B-movie about Sinatra: the Rat Pack! The Mob! The Kennedys! Ava! Marilyn! Momo! And with an A-list cast, too, most of whom (except for Don Cheadle) are dreadful. It's so bad that it's enjoyable.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/15 03:33 PM
Rocky.
Probably one of my favorite Stallone/Boxing movies. Copland is good too though.
Continueing on with the rest of the Rocky movies today.
Probably one of my favorite Stallone/Boxing movies. Copland is good too though.
Continueing on with the rest of the Rocky movies today.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/15 08:55 PM
Got a good one for you and it's on YouTube Mississippi Gambler
Check out this video on YouTube:
http://youtu.be/onAptFgDR-w
Check out this video on YouTube:
http://youtu.be/onAptFgDR-w
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/15 12:51 AM
I missed the ending of Star Trek Into Darkness. What saved Kirk's life?
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/15 12:55 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I missed the ending of Star Trek Into Darkness. What saved Kirk's life?
Didn't see it but maybe this 1 minute video helps?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=irw5YUmiS2M
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/15 10:26 AM
Poundland has alot of refurbished/pre-owned dvd's for a pound at the moment, so i picked up a few dvd's yesterday.
Alien Resurrection, Oceans Eleven & Twelve, American Pie 2 and James Bond Die Another Day.
Just watched Oceans Eleven, completey forgot about that movie, used to watch it all the time aswell.
Alien Resurrection, Oceans Eleven & Twelve, American Pie 2 and James Bond Die Another Day.
Just watched Oceans Eleven, completey forgot about that movie, used to watch it all the time aswell.
Posted By: goombah
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/15 04:58 PM
"Bad Words" with Jason Bateman and Allison Janney. Irreverant humor in the mold of "Curb Your Enthusiasm" and "Arrested Development." Bateman plays a 40 year old who has found a loophole to enter spelling bees with children.
Posted By: helenwheels
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 12:40 AM
Saw the new Star Wars today. I really enjoyed it. It's very much like the original 3 in feeling. If you're a fan I recommend it.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 01:45 AM
I'm seeing Star Wars on Saturday. It's already broken opening day records. Just from midnight until around noon it brought in over $50 million.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 06:54 AM
I'll be going on Monday to see the film..
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 01:47 PM
I have never had the slightest interest in the Star Wars or Star Trek franchises.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 03:45 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I have never had the slightest interest in the Star Wars or Star Trek franchises.
Me either. I never saw Star Wars. When Empire Strikes Back came out, my husband and I went with another couple who LOVED Star Wars. Didn't really care for it. I don't even remember NOW what it was about.
Anyway, I'm in the minority I know.TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 06:34 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
I have never had the slightest interest in the Star Wars or Star Trek franchises.
Me either. I never saw Star Wars. When Empire Strikes Back came out, my husband and I went with another couple who LOVED Star Wars. Didn't really care for it. I don't even remember NOW what it was about.
Anyway, I'm in the minority I know.TIS
You know TIS, just like you can receive treatment for your Walking Dead addiction, there is treatment your Star Wars alienation. It can awaken the Force in you!
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/15 08:59 PM
I posted this before I hate Star Wars I saw the first Star Wars when it came out. I took three of my four kids. Never did that before it was too much for me. So I took them all home. Then took 1 at a time to see it. So I saw it 3 1/2 times.
I said when I got home I would never do that again.
I said when I got home I would never do that again.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/15 04:20 AM
Just saw the new Star Wars, certain aspects I love and certain aspects I thought were corny/rushed or just not caring overall in my opinion 8 out of 10
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/15 07:13 AM
Ok so here is my review of the new Star Wars. I'll try not to give any spoilers.
Abrams plays it safe and sticks with a proven formula that works. In a lot of ways The Force Awakens is the original Star Wars again. But it does it in a way that doesn't feel totally redundant. The movie does a good job of balancing the new stuff with the nostalgia.
I liked how they start with the new characters first and wait to reveal the old ones. The guy that plays ex-storm trooper Finn does a really good job. He's intense but also really funny and is able to convey Abram's writing humor. Humor plays a pretty big part in the movie but only at the right times. Abrams has always been good at that.
The girl that plays Rey, who is obviously Luke's daughter (that shouldn't be a spoiler to anyone), does a good job herself. But the only real complaint I had was related to her. Which I'll get to.
I really liked the guy that plays Kylo Ren. His back story was a surprise. I liked how he is still a work in progress and not a finished product (like Vader was) of the Dark Side. He's powerful but has his vulnerabilities. He has to slowly grow to his full power in the Dark Side just like Luke had to in the Good.
That's where my one complaint comes in though. We know that "the force is strong" with Rey, considering who her family is. And there is that same growing on her part. But I felt they rushed it by the end. In other words, she was too far ahead of where she would or should have been in only the first movie. And there are one or two other minor annoyances. They just had to throw in a chick X-wing fighter (rolls eyes). And you do wonder how the Republic lost their position and the First Order rose so quickly. But none of this ruins the movie by any means.
I liked how they used Luke very sparingly. His presence is throughout the movie but you only see a little of him. The next 2 movies will be more about him.
It was good to see Han, Chewie, Leah, C3-P0 and R2D2. The new droid, BB8, works well too.
There is a major death in the movie but I won't give it away. But it's a gut punch.
All in all I'd give it 3 1/2 stars.
The next one comes out in May 2017. A new guy, Rian Johnson, will be writing and directing it. He'll also be writing the last one but someone else will be directing. I've seen some of his movies, including Looper, and so expect a somewhat darker film. Maybe like Empire Strikes Back was.
Abrams plays it safe and sticks with a proven formula that works. In a lot of ways The Force Awakens is the original Star Wars again. But it does it in a way that doesn't feel totally redundant. The movie does a good job of balancing the new stuff with the nostalgia.
I liked how they start with the new characters first and wait to reveal the old ones. The guy that plays ex-storm trooper Finn does a really good job. He's intense but also really funny and is able to convey Abram's writing humor. Humor plays a pretty big part in the movie but only at the right times. Abrams has always been good at that.
The girl that plays Rey, who is obviously Luke's daughter (that shouldn't be a spoiler to anyone), does a good job herself. But the only real complaint I had was related to her. Which I'll get to.
I really liked the guy that plays Kylo Ren. His back story was a surprise. I liked how he is still a work in progress and not a finished product (like Vader was) of the Dark Side. He's powerful but has his vulnerabilities. He has to slowly grow to his full power in the Dark Side just like Luke had to in the Good.
That's where my one complaint comes in though. We know that "the force is strong" with Rey, considering who her family is. And there is that same growing on her part. But I felt they rushed it by the end. In other words, she was too far ahead of where she would or should have been in only the first movie. And there are one or two other minor annoyances. They just had to throw in a chick X-wing fighter (rolls eyes). And you do wonder how the Republic lost their position and the First Order rose so quickly. But none of this ruins the movie by any means.
I liked how they used Luke very sparingly. His presence is throughout the movie but you only see a little of him. The next 2 movies will be more about him.
It was good to see Han, Chewie, Leah, C3-P0 and R2D2. The new droid, BB8, works well too.
There is a major death in the movie but I won't give it away. But it's a gut punch.
All in all I'd give it 3 1/2 stars.
The next one comes out in May 2017. A new guy, Rian Johnson, will be writing and directing it. He'll also be writing the last one but someone else will be directing. I've seen some of his movies, including Looper, and so expect a somewhat darker film. Maybe like Empire Strikes Back was.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/15 08:09 PM
Training Day - 7/10
Definitely one of the best Denzil Washington movies. Ethan Hawke is good in it too.
Definitely one of the best Denzil Washington movies. Ethan Hawke is good in it too.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/15 08:28 PM
Watched Quadrophenia this Afternoon, classic British film..
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/15 05:23 PM
I saw a very old movie last night Taxi staring James Cagney and Loretta Young.
I was surprised how good it was worth seeing.
He dances in it but it's not what the story is about. They get married in it. He had to be having an affair with her during filming. He even spoke Yiddish in it. A cop asked him what part of Ireland are you from. He tells the cop Delaney street.
I was surprised how good it was worth seeing.
He dances in it but it's not what the story is about. They get married in it. He had to be having an affair with her during filming. He even spoke Yiddish in it. A cop asked him what part of Ireland are you from. He tells the cop Delaney street.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/15 11:33 PM
The revenant. Pretty awesome. Also saw the big short which was great as well.
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/15 10:29 PM
Watched "Mean Streets" on the weekend. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Scorsese was good right off the bat. Harvey Keitel and DeNiro were excellent. Surprised to David Proval (Richie Aprile from Sopranos).
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 06:55 AM
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Watched "Mean Streets" on the weekend. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Scorsese was good right off the bat. Harvey Keitel and DeNiro were excellent. Surprised to David Proval (Richie Aprile from Sopranos).
Hi MC
Me too I just watched it. Got the DVD for Xmas. Yup good stuff. Did you notice that David Carradine was the drunk who was shot? Scorsese's Mom is in it. Did you see her?
Best scenes are the $10 on a 2 thou debt
And when De Niro is feeding Keitel all his bs
I'm gonna pay yem
Great music too!
And I always had a crush on Michael.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 11:02 AM
Ocean's Thirteen.
Better than the sequel, but not as good as Oceans Eleven.
Better than the sequel, but not as good as Oceans Eleven.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 02:57 PM
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Watched "Mean Streets" on the weekend. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Scorsese was good right off the bat. Harvey Keitel and DeNiro were excellent. Surprised to David Proval (Richie Aprile from Sopranos).
The shooter of DeNiro at the end was Scorese himself.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 02:59 PM
In taxi driver one of DeNiro passengers was another Scorese cameo.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 05:14 PM
Scorsese's Mum has a cameo in most of his films..She was in GF3 as well..
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 05:55 PM
Saw Hateful Eight not great not bad, typical Tarantino not his best
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 09:45 PM
I watched THE REVENANT tonight with Leo and Tom Hardy, excellent film set In the 1820s, a frontiersman named Hugh Glass sets out on a path of vengeance against those who left him for dead after a bear mauling.it..Stunning location settings also..
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/15 10:07 PM
Every single movie Di Caprio makes is Oscar bait.
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/15 01:56 AM
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched THE REVENANT tonight with Leo and Tom Hardy, excellent film set In the 1820s, a frontiersman named Hugh Glass sets out on a path of vengeance against those who left him for dead after a bear mauling.it..Stunning location settings also..
Isn't Tom Hardy such an excellent actor!! Glad to hear it's worth seeing but I'll wait til it comes out on demand. Happy New Year De Niro!!
Posted By: MaryCas
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/15 02:04 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Watched "Mean Streets" on the weekend. Hadn't seen it in a long time. Scorsese was good right off the bat. Harvey Keitel and DeNiro were excellent. Surprised to David Proval (Richie Aprile from Sopranos).
Hi MC
Me too I just watched it. Got the DVD for Xmas. Yup good stuff. Did you notice that David Carradine was the drunk who was shot? Scorsese's Mom is in it. Did you see her?
Best scenes are the $10 on a 2 thou debt
And when De Niro is feeding Keitel all his bs
I'm gonna pay yem
Great music too!
And I always had a crush on Michael.
Crush on Michael....I was a bit horned up over Theresa. Scorsese always has a great musical soundtrack. Not only David Carradine, but brother Michael was the killer in the bar. I looked back at Scorsese pictography....David Carradine was in his first movie, "Boxcar Bertha". Marty has his favorites; Pesci, De Niro, Keitel, mom.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/15 02:14 AM
I can see why you liked her. So that was Carradine's brother? Very cool, didn't know that. Never saw his first movie. I watched some home movie he made filming his parents. Did you happen to see Mean Streets when it first came out in the theater?
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/15 09:01 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Originally Posted By: DE NIRO
I watched THE REVENANT tonight with Leo and Tom Hardy, excellent film set In the 1820s, a frontiersman named Hugh Glass sets out on a path of vengeance against those who left him for dead after a bear mauling.it..Stunning location settings also..
Isn't Tom Hardy such an excellent actor!! Glad to hear it's worth seeing but I'll wait til it comes out on demand. Happy New Year De Niro!!
Hardy is a excellent actor, i've not really seem him in anything previous films apart from Inception.. I streamed the film, good picture but i may go to the cinemas and see it again.. Happy new year to you also..
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/15 03:13 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Every single movie Di Caprio makes is Oscar bait.
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Couldn't disagree more. Oscar bait movies to me usually end up being boring and forgettable. Everything DiCaprio has been in lately has been pretty great. At least his last 3-4 movies and the movies that he's slated to play in look like they have the potential to be great as well. He just picks great movies to be in with great directors I don't see how that's picking Oscar bait movies. Eddie redmayne's last two movies have been Oscar bait. Not DiCaprio's. Wolf of Wall Street and the revenant both have not exactly been universally loved by critics when they probably should've been because they are amazing in their own ways in my opinion.
Posted By: Camarel
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/16 12:32 AM
Originally Posted By: Revis_Island
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Every single movie Di Caprio makes is Oscar bait.
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Does the guy have any artistic integrity?
Couldn't disagree more. Oscar bait movies to me usually end up being boring and forgettable. Everything DiCaprio has been in lately has been pretty great. At least his last 3-4 movies and the movies that he's slated to play in look like they have the potential to be great as well. He just picks great movies to be in with great directors I don't see how that's picking Oscar bait movies. Eddie redmayne's last two movies have been Oscar bait. Not DiCaprio's. Wolf of Wall Street and the revenant both have not exactly been universally loved by critics when they probably should've been because they are amazing in their own ways in my opinion.
Honestly i've used the phrase quite a few times myself but i am now starting to hate it. Whenever i used it i was speaking of very specific types of roles/movies that the Academy seems to eat up, like disability or homosexual roles. It doesn't mean any movie/role that will do well at the Oscars. As you said Leo seems to like to work with the best directors in Hollywood instead of going for mindless blockbusters which shows alot of artistic integrity if you ask me. Not sure what Moe expects from him, should he be in the next Marvel Movie or what Moe?
I'm not even the biggest Leo fan but fucking hell of all people to call out for that in Hollywood, you picked him
. Whurs da action moovies Leo
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/16 11:22 PM
CREED.
Good movie.
6 1/2 out of 10
Good movie.
6 1/2 out of 10
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/16 11:31 AM
Best of the Best(1989).
7/10 - Probably one of my favorite martial arts movies from the 80s.
Pity that Phillip Rhee didn't make more movies, him and his brother are very good martial artists.
Although theres 3 other movies in the Best of the Best franchise. All pretty decent films, if you enjoyed the first and second or martial art movies.
The second might even be better than the first to be honest.
Great soundtrack too. Something So Strong by Jim Capaldi - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpawaPWO4SE
7/10 - Probably one of my favorite martial arts movies from the 80s.
Pity that Phillip Rhee didn't make more movies, him and his brother are very good martial artists.
Although theres 3 other movies in the Best of the Best franchise. All pretty decent films, if you enjoyed the first and second or martial art movies.
The second might even be better than the first to be honest.
Great soundtrack too. Something So Strong by Jim Capaldi - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpawaPWO4SE
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/16 04:27 AM
Sexy Beast Ben Kingsley is good in it
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/16 02:23 PM
Just saw the movie Undesputed on netflex. I saw it in a black area when it first came out. My friend John was in it. I think I stood out in that theather.
This movie really sucked
This movie really sucked
Posted By: XDCX
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/16 01:34 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Batman(1989)
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
One of my favorite movies, Jack Nicholson was the best Joker.
Good to see someone else recognizes that.
I would argue that Mark Hamill's interpretation of the Joker in Batman: The Animated Series, and the ARKHAM video games, is the best Joker.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/16 01:51 PM
I think Heath Ledger was the best joker by far. I am not even a Batman fan but loved "The Dark Knight." He made the movie IMHO. I can never resist tuning in to bits/pieces of it every time it's on just to see scenes with him.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Mignon
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/16 06:12 PM
Jaws 1975 on the Syfy channel.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/16 08:42 PM
Just saw Pawn Sacrafice the story of Bobby fisher co star as Boris Spassky was the star of Ray Donovan. I think both of them were nuts.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/16 08:56 PM
I randomly decided to watch a Charlie Chaplin film tonight. I choose City Lights from 1931, excellent film with a nice love story and sweet ending..
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/16 05:06 AM
Saw The Revenant. Great film. Very gritty and realistic. The bear attack and the end hand to hand fight scene are brutal. That must have been a tough shoot for DiCaprio. Highly recommend it.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/16 10:18 PM
I watched Ben -Hur tonight an epic film with on of the most famous film scenes ever being the chariot race.. At 3 hours 40 minutes i managed to sit though without a lengthy break. Great Film..
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/16 11:50 PM
That was a great scene IVY! Not only the attack but his whole recovery there after. Great cinematography too. Those scene of the land and snow where spectacular
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/16 09:39 PM
The Terminator(1984).
First was definitely the best, more like a horror slasher flick. Arnold looked so menacing.
First was definitely the best, more like a horror slasher flick. Arnold looked so menacing.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/16 03:49 PM
Watched a crazy movie this past weekend. Goodnight Mommy. If you don't mind subtitles, this is a must-see. Dead heat between this and It Follows for horror film of 2015 IMO.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/16 05:15 PM
Just saw Man in the grey flannel suit. Very good movie for the time it was made.
Fredrich March the most versitle actor of his time. Gregory Peck and the great Lee J Cobb.
Complicated story worth seeing.
Fredrich March the most versitle actor of his time. Gregory Peck and the great Lee J Cobb.
Complicated story worth seeing.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/16 11:21 PM
Legend(2015).
The Krays movie with Tom Hardy, pretty decent.
The best of the movies on the Krays so far i reckon.
The Krays movie with Tom Hardy, pretty decent.
The best of the movies on the Krays so far i reckon.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/16 09:07 PM
Carlitos Way.
Hey, remember me, Benny Blanco from the Bronx lol
Hey, remember me, Benny Blanco from the Bronx lol
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/16 11:11 PM
Here comes the pain!
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/16 11:17 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Carlitos Way.
Hey, remember me, Benny Blanco from the Bronx lol
Hey, remember me, Benny Blanco from the Bronx lol
Maybe I don't give a shit. Maybe I don't remember the last time I blew my nose either. Who the fuck are you, I should remember you? What, you think you like me? You ain't like me motherfucker. You a punk. I've been with made people, connected people. Who you been with? Chain-snatching, jive-ass, maricon motherfuckers. Why don't you get lost? Go a head, snatch a purse. Come on, take a fuckin' walk.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/16 07:42 PM
Lol Beanshooter.
Tell me he's in a fuckin' coffin.
What happened?
Somethin' that shouldn't have happened.
Give me your piece, Dave.
What?
Give me the fuckin' gun.
Since when are you a tough guy?
Get yourself killed.
I can take care of myself.
You think I'm some law school schmuck,
I never saw a bad guy before?
You are gonna wave that thing
at the wrong guy......he's gonna take it from you
and bury it up your ass, guaranteed.
Now give me the gun. Come on.
(on a different note, ive just finished watching wolf of wall street again, 7/10 decent movie)
Tell me he's in a fuckin' coffin.
What happened?
Somethin' that shouldn't have happened.
Give me your piece, Dave.
What?
Give me the fuckin' gun.
Since when are you a tough guy?
Get yourself killed.
I can take care of myself.
You think I'm some law school schmuck,
I never saw a bad guy before?
You are gonna wave that thing
at the wrong guy......he's gonna take it from you
and bury it up your ass, guaranteed.
Now give me the gun. Come on.
(on a different note, ive just finished watching wolf of wall street again, 7/10 decent movie)
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/16 12:17 PM
Ocean's Thirteen.
Better than the second, but not as good as the first movie. Still a good watch though.
Better than the second, but not as good as the first movie. Still a good watch though.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/16 08:31 PM
Yeah, their fun films to switch off too.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/16 11:41 PM
Just watched Spotlight, pretty good
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/16 02:41 AM
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
Just watched Spotlight, pretty good
Watching Spotlight tomorrow night, just watched The Martian.
Good, I give it a 7
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/16 03:10 AM
Originally Posted By: DuesPaid
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
Just watched Spotlight, pretty good
Watching Spotlight tomorrow night, just watched The Martian.
Good, I give it a 7
Martian was good.
My favorites this year are Mad Max and The Revenant
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/16 06:27 AM
Saw The Witch.
Its really not like any horror film I can think of. It's very original and I can see why it won best picture at Sundance. Seemed like the theater was sort of speechless after it ended.
It's not so much scary as just really creepy and unsettling. There are no cheap "jump scares." Much of it is the haunting atmosphere of the movie with a few gruesome scenes. Everything is very authentic to the time period. The actors all do a great job, including the kids.
It's more about the family itself, with the witch as a backdrop. And how things happen that she uses to afflict them and tear the family apart. It's definitely a "dark" film and good certainly does not win at the end of this one. And it's really not the witch who is ultimately behind it all but someone higher up (or lower down) the ladder. When he makes his as appearance, and how he does it, is one of the more unsettling parts of the movie.
Great movie but not one I'd want to own and not for everyone. It's one of those films you either "get" or you dont.
Its really not like any horror film I can think of. It's very original and I can see why it won best picture at Sundance. Seemed like the theater was sort of speechless after it ended.
It's not so much scary as just really creepy and unsettling. There are no cheap "jump scares." Much of it is the haunting atmosphere of the movie with a few gruesome scenes. Everything is very authentic to the time period. The actors all do a great job, including the kids.
It's more about the family itself, with the witch as a backdrop. And how things happen that she uses to afflict them and tear the family apart. It's definitely a "dark" film and good certainly does not win at the end of this one. And it's really not the witch who is ultimately behind it all but someone higher up (or lower down) the ladder. When he makes his as appearance, and how he does it, is one of the more unsettling parts of the movie.
Great movie but not one I'd want to own and not for everyone. It's one of those films you either "get" or you dont.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/16 01:06 PM
That is the first I have heard of that movie, Ivy.
Sounds interesting.
Sounds interesting.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/16 07:26 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Saw The Witch.
Its really not like any horror film I can think of. It's very original and I can see why it won best picture at Sundance. Seemed like the theater was sort of speechless after it ended.
It's not so much scary as just really creepy and unsettling. There are no cheap "jump scares." Much of it is the haunting atmosphere of the movie with a few gruesome scenes. Everything is very authentic to the time period. The actors all do a great job, including the kids.
It's more about the family itself, with the witch as a backdrop. And how things happen that she uses to afflict them and tear the family apart. It's definitely a "dark" film and good certainly does not win at the end of this one. And it's really not the witch who is ultimately behind it all but someone higher up (or lower down) the ladder. When he makes his as appearance, and how he does it, is one of the more unsettling parts of the movie.
Great movie but not one I'd want to own and not for everyone. It's one of those films you either "get" or you dont.
Its really not like any horror film I can think of. It's very original and I can see why it won best picture at Sundance. Seemed like the theater was sort of speechless after it ended.
It's not so much scary as just really creepy and unsettling. There are no cheap "jump scares." Much of it is the haunting atmosphere of the movie with a few gruesome scenes. Everything is very authentic to the time period. The actors all do a great job, including the kids.
It's more about the family itself, with the witch as a backdrop. And how things happen that she uses to afflict them and tear the family apart. It's definitely a "dark" film and good certainly does not win at the end of this one. And it's really not the witch who is ultimately behind it all but someone higher up (or lower down) the ladder. When he makes his as appearance, and how he does it, is one of the more unsettling parts of the movie.
Great movie but not one I'd want to own and not for everyone. It's one of those films you either "get" or you dont.
Good call! This is a phenominal movie. I can't say any more than what you've already posted without getting into spoilers, and I would hate to spoil the experience for anyone. This is a Must See on the Screen, even for those not predisposed towards traditional horror fare.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/16 03:48 PM
Stephen Kings IT.
Good movie. 6/10
Good movie. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/16 06:24 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Stephen Kings IT.
Good movie. 6/10
Good movie. 6/10
The clown terrified me as a child.
A big poster of Pennywise The Clown staring at me anytime I went into the video store.
"We all float down here, Henry."
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/27/16 10:19 PM
Exceptional documentary called The Thin Blue Line about a man sentenced to Death Row for a crime he did not commit.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/16 10:42 PM
There is a mini series on Amazon prime called Poldark master piece theather. It is very good I love history. This takes place in England right after the revolutionary war. Well worth watching I am only into the second episode. I think it is ten episodes.
Lead actor is very good.
Lead actor is very good.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/16 06:54 PM
Saw Room with Brie Larson who won the Academy Award, really good movie a little depressing but worth watching
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/16 06:06 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Stephen Kings IT.
Good movie. 6/10
Good movie. 6/10
The clown terrified me as a child.
A big poster of Pennywise The Clown staring at me anytime I went into the video store.
"We all float down here, Henry."
Great line
They ALL float down here. When you're down here with us, you'll float too!...Just finished watching Layer Cake, one of the better British gangster movies. 7/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/16 01:56 AM
Exodus: Gods and Kings starring Christian Bale is the retelling of the exodus story without the majesty or exuberance of the Cecil B. DeMille epic. It's an unconventional retelling and I liked it.
A side bar: to where has Ben Kingsley disappeared? He's in this film, but in a quite minor role and his screen time is brief. I think I've noticed that the quantity and quality of his roles has declined over the past decade. I wonder is that is his choice.
A side bar: to where has Ben Kingsley disappeared? He's in this film, but in a quite minor role and his screen time is brief. I think I've noticed that the quantity and quality of his roles has declined over the past decade. I wonder is that is his choice.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/16 01:11 PM
Kingsley still is making movies into his 70s.
I still prefer DeMlle version saw it when it first opened at radio city music hall. I think the special effects were better.
I have a piece of furniture from that movie. I really would love ramese's war crown and his sword. The dialogue from that movie was fantastic.
Having Edward G Robinson I used to think was bad casting. He was the only one in the whole movie who actually spoke Hebrew in this movie.
I still prefer DeMlle version saw it when it first opened at radio city music hall. I think the special effects were better.
I have a piece of furniture from that movie. I really would love ramese's war crown and his sword. The dialogue from that movie was fantastic.
Having Edward G Robinson I used to think was bad casting. He was the only one in the whole movie who actually spoke Hebrew in this movie.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/16 04:10 PM
Massacre in the Black Forest. It is a German movie from 1967 about a Germania tribe chief that leads three Roman Legions into ambush that halts Rome expansion and leads up to the German tribes banning together to attack the Roman Empire. It is one of the more accurate historical films I have seen.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/16 08:22 PM
Originally Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Massacre in the Black Forest. It is a German movie from 1967 about a Germania tribe chief that leads three Roman Legions into ambush that halts Rome expansion and leads up to the German tribes banning together to attack the Roman Empire. It is one of the more accurate historical films I have seen.
"Give me back my legions."
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/13/16 01:59 AM
Saw Cloverfield Lane. Good movie. Tense and original. One where you can have your cake and eat it too, so to speak.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/16 09:06 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Saw Cloverfield Lane. Good movie. Tense and original. One where you can have your cake and eat it too, so to speak.
Good to know. Previews looked good but basketball is keeping me away from movies right now.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/16 09:08 PM
Wikipedia's list of cult films lists a lot of my favorites along with some really weird-sounding ones. I may have to try to dig some of these up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cult_films
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cult_films
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/16 09:18 PM
That's one hell of a list Mr. Blonde. Never even heard of some of them. Thank you for the post.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/16 12:08 PM
Just watched both Shrooms(6/10) and Deuce Bigalow: European Gigalo(6.5/10).
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/16 12:41 PM
Gangster No 1.
Decent British gangster movie, lots of familiar actors from other UK crime films.
Decent British gangster movie, lots of familiar actors from other UK crime films.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/16 09:48 AM
Got a great movie for you to watch
Stars Tyrone power Abandon ship based on a true story
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVxN_29f0g
Stars Tyrone power Abandon ship based on a true story
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVxN_29f0g
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/16 11:02 AM
Murder by Death. It is an all star cast and has some of the best dark humor in a film from that time period that I have ever seen from the 1970s.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/16 04:46 PM
Been a long time since I've seen it, but I watched American History X. Wow, what a disturbing film. Edward Norton was fantastic.
TIS
Edward Norton was fantastic. TIS
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/16 06:32 PM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Been a long time since I've seen it, but I watched American History X. Wow, what a disturbing film. Edward Norton was fantastic.
TIS
Edward Norton was fantastic. TIS
Watched American History X for the first time in ages myself the other day. Both Edward Norton and Furlong are fantastic in it, i thought.
Might need to go watch fight club now, been years since i seen that too, can't even remember that much about it.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/16 11:34 PM
Posted By: mickey2
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/16 05:42 PM
run all night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uDuFh-nC-c
i liked it. rotten tomatoes 62%, but i would rate it in the 80s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uDuFh-nC-c
i liked it. rotten tomatoes 62%, but i would rate it in the 80s
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/16 04:32 PM
It's a pity Edward Norton has been blacklisted from working in high profile roles.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/16 07:16 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
It's a pity Edward Norton has been blacklisted from working in high profile roles.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Why would he be blacklisted?
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/17/16 01:04 AM
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/17/16 07:53 PM
Finished watching Snatch. Decent British gangster/crime film.
Now watching Lethal Weapon.
Now watching Lethal Weapon.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/17/16 08:01 PM
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
It's a pity Edward Norton has been blacklisted from working in high profile roles.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Much better Hulk than Mark Ruffalo imo.
Always enjoyed him as an actor.
Why would he be blacklisted?
Because he has a reputation of being difficult to work with and likes to micromanage everything behind the scenes.
That's why he can only get shit roles now.
The story of how and why he was replaced by Mark Ruffalo is interesting. And the power struggle he had with the director of American History X.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/05/16 06:32 PM
The Case of the Hillside Stranglers (TV Movie 1989). 5/10
Just watching Green Street at the moment.
Just watching Green Street at the moment.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/16 05:22 AM
Bullet(1996)~ starring Mickey Rourke, Tupac Shakur, Donnie Wahlberg, Adrien Brody, Ted Levine, and John Enos III...Good flick.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/16 02:40 AM
Saw the new Captain America movie. It was good. Typical Avengers action, drama, with some humor thrown in.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/09/16 10:36 PM
Keanu is good, amusing. Worth a matinee or second-run showing in a few weeks.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/16 09:23 AM
Lethal Weapon 2.
Pretty sure one of the cops is Hank Schrader. Yep, Dean Norris according to the credits.
Back when Hank Schrader was just a street cop lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igrdi_lhhW4
Pretty sure one of the cops is Hank Schrader. Yep, Dean Norris according to the credits.
Back when Hank Schrader was just a street cop lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igrdi_lhhW4
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/18/16 08:15 PM
Picked up another two dvd's.
Hellraiser(1987) - 8/10 - Classic horror movie.
and...
The Bank Job(2008) - 7/10 - Decent British crime movie, based on the Baker Street Bank Robbery.
Hellraiser(1987) - 8/10 - Classic horror movie.
and...
The Bank Job(2008) - 7/10 - Decent British crime movie, based on the Baker Street Bank Robbery.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/18/16 11:36 PM
A couple days ago AMC aired Serpico. I love that movie. I remember seeing it at the theater when it came out. Pacino in his prime.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/16 09:40 PM
I watched Serpico a couple of months ago TIS,great film..
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/16 04:14 PM
Still never seen Serpico myself, must pick it up on dvd.
Just finished yesterday's purchases from the dvd shop.
Mortal Kombat Conquest - 6/10 - Was a decent watch overall. Has Daniel Bernhardt in it, who starred in Bloodsport 2/3.
Ferris Bueller's Day Off - 6.5/10
Bueller....Bueller....Bueller...
Just finished yesterday's purchases from the dvd shop.
Mortal Kombat Conquest - 6/10 - Was a decent watch overall. Has Daniel Bernhardt in it, who starred in Bloodsport 2/3.
Ferris Bueller's Day Off - 6.5/10
Bueller....Bueller....Bueller...
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/16 11:52 PM
Serpico great movie Pacino at his best.
I just saw Sacaramouche. Made in the early 1950's staring Stewart Granger a fantastic movie. Worth seeing he did a lot of his own stunts in that movie. It put him in the hospital more then once while shooting it. You will see why after you see it.
A lot of fencing with real swords not with safety tips. A lot of really heavy shit falling from ceilings plus very funny as well. Maybe one of the best sword fight scenes of all time at the end in the middle of a theather full of people.
I just saw Sacaramouche. Made in the early 1950's staring Stewart Granger a fantastic movie. Worth seeing he did a lot of his own stunts in that movie. It put him in the hospital more then once while shooting it. You will see why after you see it.
A lot of fencing with real swords not with safety tips. A lot of really heavy shit falling from ceilings plus very funny as well. Maybe one of the best sword fight scenes of all time at the end in the middle of a theather full of people.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/28/16 01:54 PM
Batman Begins - 8/10
Really enjoyed Batman Begins this time round.
Guess i should give The Dark Knight another shot.
Really enjoyed Batman Begins this time round.
Guess i should give The Dark Knight another shot.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/16 05:52 PM
Finally got around to watching Taken with Liam Neeson. 6.5/10
Was better than i thought it would be, some half decent fight scenes also.
Got Taken 2 for later.
Was better than i thought it would be, some half decent fight scenes also.
Got Taken 2 for later.
Posted By: BillyBrizzi
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/16 07:04 PM
I enjoyed the Dark Knight way more the 2nd and 3rd time I watched it Friend..
I absolutely loved Taken, Neeson was so refreshing as an action star, and delivered this legendary monologue:
I absolutely loved Taken, Neeson was so refreshing as an action star, and delivered this legendary monologue:
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/16 08:30 PM
I've only seen the first Taken which i thought was good not to fussed about the others, too predictable..
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/16 10:36 PM
Originally Posted By: BillyBrizzi
I enjoyed the Dark Knight way more the 2nd and 3rd time I watched it Friend..
I absolutely loved Taken, Neeson was so refreshing as an action star, and delivered this legendary monologue:
I absolutely loved Taken, Neeson was so refreshing as an action star, and delivered this legendary monologue:
Must give TDK another shot then
.Yeah i enjoyed Taken also, fight scenes were class, hear there even better in part 2 also. Id never really thought much about Liam Neeson before as an actor and didn't even realize it was him in Batman Begins, which is what made me pick up Taken.
Didn't go with Taken 2 tonight in the end, just finished watching The Shawshank Redemption for the first time instead. Can't believe its taken me till now to get round to watching it.
Good movie, 8/10.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/01/16 10:22 PM
Just saw Tap again staring Gregory Hines this movie kicked ass.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/16 02:18 PM
Watch Becket with Richard Burton and Peter O'Toole last night
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/16 02:34 PM
FWIW
I love the Taken movies. Never knew much about Neeson til then.
As for TDK, I love it only because of Ledger's Joker. He's wonderful. I've seen it many times and still tune in off/on to see my favorite scenes when it's on tv. One of my favorite movie villains is Ledger's Joker.
Anyone into the Bourne movies? I love them. A new one due out next month. Can't wait. I'll actually go to the theater for certain films, and this is one.
TIS
I love the Taken movies. Never knew much about Neeson til then.
As for TDK, I love it only because of Ledger's Joker. He's wonderful. I've seen it many times and still tune in off/on to see my favorite scenes when it's on tv. One of my favorite movie villains is Ledger's Joker.
Anyone into the Bourne movies? I love them. A new one due out next month. Can't wait. I'll actually go to the theater for certain films, and this is one.
TIS
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/16 03:20 PM
Never seen the Bourne movies myself, but think ill pick the first few up for next weekend.
Just finished watching Contraband with Mark Walhberg and Kate Beckinsdale. Was decent, 6/10.
Just finished watching Contraband with Mark Walhberg and Kate Beckinsdale. Was decent, 6/10.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/16 10:57 AM
I like to watch the old movie the grand Arte starring Peter coyote has to do with knife fighting. I have the Joe kios similiar to the one in the movie and I have the Randall 14.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 03:04 AM
This lazy Saturday afternoon I watched Robin and the Seven Hoods with Sinatra and Dean Martin. It's a cute movie, but it's Peter Falk who steals the movie. Like Assante, Falk is the perfect gangster.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 07:37 AM
See Peter falk in Murder inc. he was fantastic. I knew someone older then us he owned a moving truck I forget his name. He took the people living in my tenement in Italian Harlem to jones beach for the day more then once. I never been to a beach like that as a kid.
I mentioned him because when he wasn't movie furniture or taking us to the beach he work for murder inc. removing and disposing bodies from the murder scene.
I mentioned him because when he wasn't movie furniture or taking us to the beach he work for murder inc. removing and disposing bodies from the murder scene.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 01:58 PM
I watched 10 Cloverfield last night decent movie, John Goodman was good
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 05:24 PM
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
I watched 10 Cloverfield last night decent movie, John Goodman was good
I thought it was on course to be a great movie but completely ran out of steam by the end.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 09:08 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
I watched 10 Cloverfield last night decent movie, John Goodman was good
I thought it was on course to be a great movie but completely ran out of steam by the end.
I agree could have been much better
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/16 11:42 PM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
I watched 10 Cloverfield last night decent movie, John Goodman was good
I thought it was on course to be a great movie but completely ran out of steam by the end.
I agree Moe and the dude. Goodman was good but that ending, was just horrible and stupid.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/20/16 09:31 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Stephen Kings IT.
Good movie. 6/10
Good movie. 6/10
One of my favorite films as a teenager.. Probably a bit dated now.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/20/16 10:48 PM
Hi DeNiro. How are you?
Yea I enjoyed the film too not my favorite King movie but I liked it. I'd probably give it same rating as you.
The creepy clown, Pennywise, freaks my kids out til this day. I can see why. He was so scary.
TIS
Yea I enjoyed the film too not my favorite King movie but I liked it.
I'd probably give it same rating as you. The creepy clown, Pennywise, freaks my kids out til this day. I can see why. He was so scary.
TIS
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/16 06:04 PM
Hi TIS I'm well thank you.
Yes the clown was a little scary haha.
Yes the clown was a little scary haha.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/16 07:47 PM
Falling Down - 7/10
Another movie i probably should have seen, but have never really got around to watching.
Robert Duvall was good as the cop too.
Another movie i probably should have seen, but have never really got around to watching.
Robert Duvall was good as the cop too.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/16 08:51 PM
I've seen Falling Down at least half a dozen times.
Never gets old.
Never gets old.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 01:45 AM
Here's a blast from the past for some of we Board members. TCM showed Jesus Christ Superstar the other night. Platform shoes, bell bottoms, and afros dominated the cultural landscape back in the early 70s when it came out first on stage than in theaters.
I just love the soundtrack and have enjoyed the movie. Some of you younger Board members should give it a look or at least listen tot he soundtrack.
I just love the soundtrack and have enjoyed the movie. Some of you younger Board members should give it a look or at least listen tot he soundtrack.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 06:12 AM
I did not like the movie or the hair movie either.
I saw Jesus Christ on Broadway. Ben Vereen was Judas and Jeff Feinholt was Jesus. My wife dragged me there, but I dug it.
Hair was even better original cast on Broadway fantastic singers. A lot of people in the original cast made it.
I saw it again 2 years ago not as good, but fun. You could go up on stage and dance with them.
I saw Jesus Christ on Broadway. Ben Vereen was Judas and Jeff Feinholt was Jesus. My wife dragged me there, but I dug it.
Hair was even better original cast on Broadway fantastic singers. A lot of people in the original cast made it.
I saw it again 2 years ago not as good, but fun. You could go up on stage and dance with them.
Posted By: helenwheels
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 11:56 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Here's a blast from the past for some of we Board members. TCM showed Jesus Christ Superstar the other night. Platform shoes, bell bottoms, and afros dominated the cultural landscape back in the early 70s when it came out first on stage than in theaters.
I just love the soundtrack and have enjoyed the movie. Some of you younger Board members should give it a look or at least listen tot he soundtrack.
I just love the soundtrack and have enjoyed the movie. Some of you younger Board members should give it a look or at least listen tot he soundtrack.
Give it a listen kids. It's worth the time.
For those of you into rock n roll music, the part of JC is sung by the great Ian Gillan of Deep Purple, mike d'abo of Manfred Mann is Herod, and Yvonne Elliman is Mary Magdalene.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 01:36 PM
Original cast members of the opening us production of hair
Claude Hooper Bukowski – / James Rado
George Berger – Gerome Ragni
Sheila Franklin – / Lynn Kellogg
Jeanie – Sally Eaton
Neil "Woof" Donovan – Steve Curry
Hud – Lamont Washington
Crissy – Shelley Plimpton
The original Broadway production also included Melba Moore as Dionne, Ronnie Dyson, who sang "Aquarius", Paul Jabara and Diane Keaton.[26]
Claude Hooper Bukowski – / James Rado
George Berger – Gerome Ragni
Sheila Franklin – / Lynn Kellogg
Jeanie – Sally Eaton
Neil "Woof" Donovan – Steve Curry
Hud – Lamont Washington
Crissy – Shelley Plimpton
The original Broadway production also included Melba Moore as Dionne, Ronnie Dyson, who sang "Aquarius", Paul Jabara and Diane Keaton.[26]
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 01:45 PM
US opening production Jesus Christ super star cast
Yvonne Elliman
as Mary Magdalene
Jeff Fenholt
as Jesus of Nazareth
Ben Vereen
as Judas Iscariot
Paul Ainsley
as Merchant
And
Paul Ainsley
as King Herod
Barry Dennen
as Pontius Pilate
Yvonne Elliman
as Mary Magdalene
Jeff Fenholt
as Jesus of Nazareth
Ben Vereen
as Judas Iscariot
Paul Ainsley
as Merchant
And
Paul Ainsley
as King Herod
Barry Dennen
as Pontius Pilate
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 01:46 PM
Barry Dennen was fantastic as pilot
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/16 02:10 PM
Just saw Godzilla king of all monsters. With Raymond burr. The end was fun Godzilla was killed by the oxygen destroyer other wise called dry ice in water.
At the end it looked like Godzilla passed gas in the ocean.
At the end it looked like Godzilla passed gas in the ocean.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/16 01:26 AM
Just re-watched "Atlantic City" (1980). One of the greatest films of the Eighties. Burt Lancaster, Susan Sarandon and Kate Reid superb. Director Louis Malle did a great job.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/16 03:31 AM
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
Just re-watched "Atlantic City" (1980). One of the greatest films of the Eighties. Burt Lancaster, Susan Sarandon and Kate Reid superb. Director Louis Malle did a great job.
I've never seen the movie TB, but Lancaster was one of the last leading men who was a leading man. Like Heston, Gable, Wayne, Peck, etc. he filled up the screen. Maybe I give it a look some day.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/16 06:46 AM
Hey good post olivant.
Lancaster was fantastic even as an older man. He was one of the most versatile actors in Hollywood.
See his Obscure movies rose tattoo, the swimmer , the leopard, come back little Sheba And all my sons.
My favorites of his are too many to mention. I really liked trapeze with him, Tony Curtis and Gina lolabrigida that was a sexy women.
He is an Italian Harlem boy. Used to get his hair cuts where I got mine at Russo's barber shop. I was half ass friends with Russo's son Gregory.
Lancaster was fantastic even as an older man. He was one of the most versatile actors in Hollywood.
See his Obscure movies rose tattoo, the swimmer , the leopard, come back little Sheba And all my sons.
My favorites of his are too many to mention. I really liked trapeze with him, Tony Curtis and Gina lolabrigida that was a sexy women.
He is an Italian Harlem boy. Used to get his hair cuts where I got mine at Russo's barber shop. I was half ass friends with Russo's son Gregory.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/16 10:26 AM
Good movie I saw before and now again.
Lonely are the brave starring Kurt Douglas. Great fight scene against a crazy one armed guy. Funny
Lonely are the brave starring Kurt Douglas. Great fight scene against a crazy one armed guy. Funny
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/16 09:23 PM
Copycat. 7/10
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/16 10:33 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Copycat. 7/10
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
I agree.
It's been a long time since I've seen it, BUT it is good. I thought Harry Connick Jr. was very very creepy villain. Gave me the chills. TIS
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/16 02:02 PM
Watched The Big Short last night, thought it was really good surprised Steve Carell wasn't nominated for an Oscar
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/19/16 11:52 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Copycat. 7/10
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
Definitely one of my favorite Sigourney Weaver movies. Found it pretty scary when i seen it first time round too.
I agree.
It's been a long time since I've seen it, BUT it is good. I thought Harry Connick Jr. was very very creepy villain. Gave me the chills. TIS
I think your the first person ive come across to also like copycat and find it creepy lol
Today i watched Kickboxer with Jean Claude Van Damme.
"Only one man, crazy enough to put you in the ring with a Tong Po"
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/16 07:19 PM
I thought this horror movie was pretty good. Great special effects, excellently worked setpieces, lots of gore and a charismatic antagonist.
The intro and ending feature some of the most disturbing death scenes I have ever seen in a horror movie.
Also watch out for cameos from Tony Todd (Candyman), Kane Hodder (Jason) and Robert Englund (Freddy Kruger).
I recommend it if you haven't seen it before.
7/10.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/16 07:18 PM
Wishmaster is a decent movie, caught it on the horror channel fairly recently.
Just finished watching Hostel, away to stick Hostel part 2 on.
Seen the full trilogy before, but thought id give them all another watch.
Not really keen on the SAW type horror movies, but thought Hostel was good.
Just finished watching Hostel, away to stick Hostel part 2 on.
Seen the full trilogy before, but thought id give them all another watch.
Not really keen on the SAW type horror movies, but thought Hostel was good.
Posted By: IvyLeague
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/16 04:07 AM
Saw the new Bourne movie. I hate to say it but it's started to become predictable, formulaic, and repetitive.
I still think the first one was the best and most true Bourne style. Then Paul Greengrass took over and changed it and not exactly for the better.
I still think the first one was the best and most true Bourne style. Then Paul Greengrass took over and changed it and not exactly for the better.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/15/16 10:52 AM
Picked up Cherry Falls, horror movie with Brittany Murphy. Not bad 7/10.
Also just finished watching Blood Diamond with Leonardo DiCaprio. Was an ok watch, soundtrack is decent too.
Also just finished watching Blood Diamond with Leonardo DiCaprio. Was an ok watch, soundtrack is decent too.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/16 08:03 AM
Operation Takedown - 7/10
Film about computer hacker Kevin Mitnick.
This movie seems to get alot of hate, but i always thought it was a pretty decent watch.
Film about computer hacker Kevin Mitnick.
This movie seems to get alot of hate, but i always thought it was a pretty decent watch.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/16 04:07 AM
I watched "Suburra" on Netflix. Good movie.
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/28/16 02:20 PM
Saw "The Peanuts Movie" and loved it. I am an old school art guy and appreciate the way they kept true to the style and integrity of the cartoonist master, Charles Schulz. It's not just for kids. It was very good!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/16 02:39 PM
Watched The Caine Mutiny with Humphrey Bogart. That kind of superb acting is rare today.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/30/16 08:03 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Watched The Caine Mutiny with Humphrey Bogart. That kind of superb acting is rare today.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/31/16 06:39 PM
Backdraft - 7/10.
Always thought this was a decent movie, albeit a little bit cheesey at times. Soundtrack score is pretty sweet too.
Always thought this was a decent movie, albeit a little bit cheesey at times. Soundtrack score is pretty sweet too.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/04/16 03:42 AM
Today I watched Wyatt Earp's Revenge, a very forgettable Wyatt Earp movie starring Val Kilmer. My God, what happened to Kilmer? His face looked like a bowling ball.
Byt he way, maybe he'll slim down for Top Gun 2 which has been announced for production. Will he be able to fit into the cockpit?
Byt he way, maybe he'll slim down for Top Gun 2 which has been announced for production. Will he be able to fit into the cockpit?
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/09/16 09:03 PM
The Drop - 7/10
Decent movie, think it was one of James Gandolfini's last. Good to see him pair with Tom Hardy. Nice twist at the ending, could see it coming a mile off though.
Decent movie, think it was one of James Gandolfini's last. Good to see him pair with Tom Hardy. Nice twist at the ending, could see it coming a mile off though.
Posted By: Binnie_Coll
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/16 09:42 PM
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
Watched The Big Short last night, thought it was really good surprised Steve Carell wasn't nominated for an Oscar
great movie, dude. everyone of those guys should have been in prison for what they caused, goes for greenspan also. but geog bush was prez and nobody went to jail, then the moron bush bailed them all out, so they can do it again.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/16 03:24 AM
Watched American Gangster which has a New Jersey assistant DA prosecuting Frank Lewis. However, it was a Federal DA that broke the case and successfully prosecuted him. It was only after that that the NJ DA prosecuted him. Also, I never understood how or why the film portrayed the NJ DA as a policeman and a DA.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/16 08:52 PM
Shootfighter: Fight To The Death(1993) - 6/10
Picked this movie up for 50p on dvd from the local shop, merely for the fact it had Bolo Yeung in it and this time as a good guy.
Had never seen this film prior. Shootfighter is your typical 90s old school martial arts movie, complete with cheesy soundtrack score.
Some decent fight scenes, although some of the deaths are pretty over the top, people's hearts getting ripped out of their chests etc lol.
Reminds me of the movie Breathing Fire, which also has Bolo Yeung in it.
Picked this movie up for 50p on dvd from the local shop, merely for the fact it had Bolo Yeung in it and this time as a good guy.
Had never seen this film prior. Shootfighter is your typical 90s old school martial arts movie, complete with cheesy soundtrack score.
Some decent fight scenes, although some of the deaths are pretty over the top, people's hearts getting ripped out of their chests etc lol.
Reminds me of the movie Breathing Fire, which also has Bolo Yeung in it.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/10/16 07:58 PM
Just finished watching The 51st State or Formula 51 as its known in the US.
6/10 - Decent British action/comedy movie with Samuel L Jackson, Robert Carlyle and others.
An American master chemist plans to score big on a once in a lifetime drug deal. All does not go as planned and he is soon entangled in a web of deceit.
Emily Mortimer probably being the best part of the movie lol.
The 51st State(2001) - Emily Mortimer(Dakota Parker) Image Gallery
6/10 - Decent British action/comedy movie with Samuel L Jackson, Robert Carlyle and others.
An American master chemist plans to score big on a once in a lifetime drug deal. All does not go as planned and he is soon entangled in a web of deceit.
Emily Mortimer probably being the best part of the movie lol.
The 51st State(2001) - Emily Mortimer(Dakota Parker) Image Gallery
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/16 06:28 PM
Last night I watched Noah starring Russell Crowe. It's a different take on the flood et al. It dragged some, but was more of a look at the man. I found that look to be much like that of Moses in Exodus: Gods and Kings starring Christian Bale.
One quite unusual thing about Noah was the appearance of tree transformers(?) who helped defend him against the aggression of a local chieftan. All very interesting.
One quite unusual thing about Noah was the appearance of tree transformers(?) who helped defend him against the aggression of a local chieftan. All very interesting.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/16 06:39 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Watched The Caine Mutiny with Humphrey Bogart. That kind of superb acting is rare today.
Very good movie
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/16 08:35 PM
Out For Justice - 7/10
One of my favorite Steven Seagal movies, grew up on films like this.
"It was Richie Madano, Gino".
"Some wannabe wiseguy asshoIe, Richie Madano. Dope deaIer, dope user..."
One of my favorite Steven Seagal movies, grew up on films like this.
"It was Richie Madano, Gino".
"Some wannabe wiseguy asshoIe, Richie Madano. Dope deaIer, dope user..."
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/16 10:00 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
Out For Justice - 7/10
One of my favorite Steven Seagal movies, grew up on films like this.
"It was Richie Madano, Gino".
"Some wannabe wiseguy asshoIe, Richie Madano. Dope deaIer, dope user..."
One of my favorite Steven Seagal movies, grew up on films like this.
"It was Richie Madano, Gino".
"Some wannabe wiseguy asshoIe, Richie Madano. Dope deaIer, dope user..."
"Here we are, under God ..."
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/16 02:47 AM
I watched Batman Vs. Superman last night. Mi dispiace, but I still don't understand why the two of them became enemies.
Also, given the graveside scene, has anyone heard about a "he has risen" sequel?
Also, given the graveside scene, has anyone heard about a "he has risen" sequel?
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/16 06:43 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
I watched Batman Vs. Superman last night. Mi dispiace, but I still don't understand why the two of them became enemies.
Also, given the graveside scene, has anyone heard about a "he has risen" sequel?
Also, given the graveside scene, has anyone heard about a "he has risen" sequel?
I just saw that this weekend. It was ok; lots of plusses and lots of minuses that even each other out. There certainly is going to be a sequel.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/16 10:41 PM
Picked up Gran Torino for 50p from the local dvd shop.
Was a decent watch, with a few funny scenes. - 7/10
"Way to go old man."
"Shut up pussy. What's with all this bro shit anyway ?
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVjMzrCMW9Q[/video]
Was a decent watch, with a few funny scenes. - 7/10
"Way to go old man."
"Shut up pussy. What's with all this bro shit anyway ?
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVjMzrCMW9Q[/video]
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/16 11:10 AM
I don't know how you can get it. I have it on DVD but get "pay or die" starring earnest borgnine. A movie about the black had extorting their own people very brutal in some respects.
Based on a true story of a NYC detective murdered
Based on a true story of a NYC detective murdered
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/16 02:31 AM
The Vanishing starring Jeff Bridges and Kiefer Sutherland.
The villain (Bridges) kidnaps Sutherland's wife at a rest stop. Several years later, the villain reappears and offers to tell Sutherland what happened to his wife - but first, he has to allow himself to be drugged and go through what his wife experienced.
It's a remake of a French movie and isn't as highly rated, but if you take it on its own merits it's an easy watch.
7/10
The Vanishing
The villain (Bridges) kidnaps Sutherland's wife at a rest stop. Several years later, the villain reappears and offers to tell Sutherland what happened to his wife - but first, he has to allow himself to be drugged and go through what his wife experienced.
It's a remake of a French movie and isn't as highly rated, but if you take it on its own merits it's an easy watch.
7/10
The Vanishing
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/16 12:28 PM
Just watched Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window, great film Jimmy Stewart is one of my favorite "old time" actors and Grace Kelly is stunning
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/16 10:52 PM
If ya'll get a chance this holiday, watch Bells of St. Mary's with Bing Crosby and Ingrid Bergman. It's a great black and white film, but the scene that I think is one of the most precious in cinematic history is the children's Christmas play scene. It is really great and for ya'll who went to Catholic school it should stir some memories.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HKDseSyDMM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HKDseSyDMM
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/17 08:35 AM
It always takes me ages to get around to watching movies, but picked up The Bourne Identity and The Bourne Supremacy the other day.
Just finished watching them, decent movies. 7/10.
Just finished watching them, decent movies. 7/10.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/17 07:09 PM
Originally Posted By: afriendofours
It always takes me ages to get around to watching movies, but picked up The Bourne Identity and The Bourne Supremacy the other day.
Just finished watching them, decent movies. 7/10.
Just finished watching them, decent movies. 7/10.
FWIW I love the Bourne movies. For some reason if I see them on tv I never mind tuning in and watching even just parts of it again. I seldom go to the movies but when "Jason Bourne" came out last year I knew I had to go. Was not a bad movie, but my least favorite of the series.
TIS
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/17 12:53 AM
Me too TIS. The Bourne movies are very entertaining.
Ever watch The Golden Girls ? I figured since it is Betty White's 95th birthday I'd mention one of her shows. My Grandma and all my older aunts LOVED that show.
Rose: "Can I ask a dumb question?"
Dorothy: "Better than anyone I know."
I always liked Sophia.
“Picture it… Sicily.”
We never forgot anything in Sicily because people would tie string around each other's fingers. No... wait, it wasn't string, it was piano wire. And wait... it wasn't your finger, it was your neck. In fact, piano wire was the second-biggest export in our village.
Ever watch The Golden Girls ? I figured since it is Betty White's 95th birthday I'd mention one of her shows. My Grandma and all my older aunts LOVED that show.
Rose: "Can I ask a dumb question?"
Dorothy: "Better than anyone I know."
I always liked Sophia.
“Picture it… Sicily.”
We never forgot anything in Sicily because people would tie string around each other's fingers. No... wait, it wasn't string, it was piano wire. And wait... it wasn't your finger, it was your neck. In fact, piano wire was the second-biggest export in our village.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/17 01:42 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Me too TIS. The Bourne movies are very entertaining.
Ever watch The Golden Girls ? I figured since it is Betty White's 95th birthday I'd mention one of her shows. My Grandma and all my older aunts LOVED that show.
Rose: "Can I ask a dumb question?"
Dorothy: "Better than anyone I know."
Ha ha ha ha! I do like the Golden Girls. It's been years since I've seen it. That's hilarious!!
TIS
I always liked Sophia.
“Picture it… Sicily.”
We never forgot anything in Sicily because people would tie string around each other's fingers. No... wait, it wasn't string, it was piano wire. And wait... it wasn't your finger, it was your neck. In fact, piano wire was the second-biggest export in our village.
Ever watch The Golden Girls ? I figured since it is Betty White's 95th birthday I'd mention one of her shows. My Grandma and all my older aunts LOVED that show.
Rose: "Can I ask a dumb question?"
Dorothy: "Better than anyone I know."
Ha ha ha ha! I do like the Golden Girls. It's been years since I've seen it. That's hilarious!!
TIS
I always liked Sophia.
“Picture it… Sicily.”
We never forgot anything in Sicily because people would tie string around each other's fingers. No... wait, it wasn't string, it was piano wire. And wait... it wasn't your finger, it was your neck. In fact, piano wire was the second-biggest export in our village.
Posted By: Gudfadern
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/17 12:42 AM
I just saw "Live By Night" in theaters here tonight and I thought it was just excellent. I found the police chase scene near the begining of the film to be very entertaining especially! 
Not sure how to rank it but to me it was wonderful.
Not sure how to rank it but to me it was wonderful.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/17 06:43 PM
Watched Crazy, Stupid, Love with my other half.
It was interminable.
It was interminable.
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/17 06:42 AM
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Watched Crazy, Stupid, Love with my other half .
It was interminable.
It was interminable.
Oh, yeah...What's HIS name?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/17 02:51 PM
Originally Posted By: njcapo35
Originally Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Watched Crazy, Stupid, Love with my other half .
It was interminable.
It was interminable.
Oh, yeah...What's HIS name?
She's Italian, has a mustache, speed bump nose and says her brother is some guy who looks like Artie Lange and posts as njcrappo or something on gangsterbb.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/17 03:25 AM
Watch Captain Fantastic with Viggo Mortensen, interesting film on parenting
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/17 07:44 AM
Want to see I great movie? Just relax make some pop corn sit in a reclining chair, and watch Singing in the Rain and enjoy it alone.
Do that enough and you just might live forever.
Do that enough and you just might live forever.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 01:59 AM
Foots, that movie is great. It was just on the TCM app.
Hey, I saw your buddy, "Carmine the Bricklayer", in Once Upon a Time in Queens. I never saw that movie, finally got to watch it. Tell him he had me laughing when he was telling the treadmill gym story. Whoever wrote that script really nailed the tough father and daughter relationship scenes. I thought it would be a shoot 'em up gangster type film, not what I expected at all.
And gravy beats sauce again.
Hey, I saw your buddy, "Carmine the Bricklayer", in Once Upon a Time in Queens. I never saw that movie, finally got to watch it. Tell him he had me laughing when he was telling the treadmill gym story.
Whoever wrote that script really nailed the tough father and daughter relationship scenes. I thought it would be a shoot 'em up gangster type film, not what I expected at all. And gravy beats sauce again.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 05:30 AM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
And gravy beats sauce again.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 06:56 PM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
And gravy beats sauce again.
NO!! It's NOT gravy.
Its sauce, or in my family it's sugu. You know I've seen on line you can purchase t-shirts that say "It's Gravy". LOL I think it's an East Coast thing. Talking to a few my old time relatives in MI a while back, nobody heard of calling it gravy. YET, when I was in NYC I learned it's always referred to as gravy. When I first was in NY and heard that, I thought WTF would you put gravy on your pasta?
TIS
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 07:50 PM
In the movie they had the gravy sauce debate and gravy won!!
Here goes nuttin.
This is how I look at the whole gravy sauce dilemma. I'll explain.
You put SAUCE on a pizza pie and add cheese, olive oil more herbs & spices, toppings.
You put GRAVY on macaroni. Gravy means a thickened sauce.
If you have a pot on the stovetop with olive oil, garlic, onions, crushed tomatoes, herbs and spices then that's a SAUCE.
ONCE YOU ADD MEAT, then it becomes GRAVY. You have to have your veal, pork and beef in there and it's all over the place you can barely stir the damn GRAVY. And this is how my family and many NY NJ families make it. It's thick. A thickened sauce called GRAVY. You go to lift the pot from the stovetop to the countertop and it feels like it weighs 20 pounds. And it probably does lol.
And "pasta" we never used that term. It was always called macaroni. If you're making baked ziti then you call it ziti. Most of the time if you're making gravy then that's what they made: macaroni, gavadeel, baked ziti, or lasagne.
Ok, who out there agrees with me?
Here goes nuttin. This is how I look at the whole gravy sauce dilemma. I'll explain.
You put SAUCE on a pizza pie and add cheese, olive oil more herbs & spices, toppings.
You put GRAVY on macaroni. Gravy means a thickened sauce.
If you have a pot on the stovetop with olive oil, garlic, onions, crushed tomatoes, herbs and spices then that's a SAUCE.
ONCE YOU ADD MEAT, then it becomes GRAVY. You have to have your veal, pork and beef in there and it's all over the place you can barely stir the damn GRAVY. And this is how my family and many NY NJ families make it. It's thick. A thickened sauce called GRAVY. You go to lift the pot from the stovetop to the countertop and it feels like it weighs 20 pounds. And it probably does lol.
And "pasta" we never used that term. It was always called macaroni. If you're making baked ziti then you call it ziti. Most of the time if you're making gravy then that's what they made: macaroni, gavadeel, baked ziti, or lasagne.
Ok, who out there agrees with me?
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 07:54 PM
Originally Posted By: Alfanosgirl
In the movie they had the gravy sauce debate and gravy won!!
Here goes nuttin.
This is how I look at the whole gravy sauce dilemma. I'll explain.
You put SAUCE on a pizza pie and add cheese, olive oil more herbs & spices, toppings.
You put GRAVY on macaroni. Gravy means a thickened sauce.
If you have a pot on the stovetop with olive oil, garlic, onions, crushed tomatoes, herbs and spices then that's a SAUCE.
ONCE YOU ADD MEAT, then it becomes GRAVY. You have to have your veal, pork and beef in there and it's all over the place you can barely stir the damn GRAVY. And this is how my family and many NY NJ families make it. It's thick. A thickened sauce called GRAVY. You go to lift the pot from the stovetop to the countertop and it feels like it weighs 20 pounds. And it probably does lol.
And "pasta" we never used that term. It was always called macaroni. If you're making baked ziti then you call it ziti. Most of the time if you're making gravy then that's what they made: macaroni, gavadeel, baked ziti, or lasagne.
Ok, who out there agrees with me?
Here goes nuttin. This is how I look at the whole gravy sauce dilemma. I'll explain.
You put SAUCE on a pizza pie and add cheese, olive oil more herbs & spices, toppings.
You put GRAVY on macaroni. Gravy means a thickened sauce.
If you have a pot on the stovetop with olive oil, garlic, onions, crushed tomatoes, herbs and spices then that's a SAUCE.
ONCE YOU ADD MEAT, then it becomes GRAVY. You have to have your veal, pork and beef in there and it's all over the place you can barely stir the damn GRAVY. And this is how my family and many NY NJ families make it. It's thick. A thickened sauce called GRAVY. You go to lift the pot from the stovetop to the countertop and it feels like it weighs 20 pounds. And it probably does lol.
And "pasta" we never used that term. It was always called macaroni. If you're making baked ziti then you call it ziti. Most of the time if you're making gravy then that's what they made: macaroni, gavadeel, baked ziti, or lasagne.
Ok, who out there agrees with me?
A-girl that's right, you guys always say "macaroni". My family would call that an "Americanized" (in my family Americani)
way to say pasta. Go figure. Ha ha haGravy, sauce, sugu, still tastes great under any name.
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/17 09:02 PM
TIS, you're right about macaroni.
It's sauce, it's sauce, it's sauce. E vero!
It's sauce, it's sauce, it's sauce. E vero!
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/17 12:32 AM
GRAVY! GRAVY! GRAVY!
Don't make me say it again!
Okay, GRAVY!
http://www.great-chicago-italian-recipes.com/neck_bone_gravy.html
I think it is a regional thing? It was always pork neck bone gravy simmering at my grandmother's house.
Don't make me say it again!
Okay, GRAVY!
http://www.great-chicago-italian-recipes.com/neck_bone_gravy.html
I think it is a regional thing? It was always pork neck bone gravy simmering at my grandmother's house.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/17 11:19 PM
Ha ha! That recipe looks good Mark!! I do think it's a regional thing. I remember I had a cousin here in CA years ago, who referred to it a gravy. I thought that was weird at the time too. Maybe it's a big city thing. Come to think of it, there's a restaurant here called "The Macaroni Grill" (have you heard of it). It was years before I went there that I found out it was an Italian restaurant. Who knew.
Now excuse me. I'm gonna pour some gravy where it BELONGS....on my mashed potatoes.
TIS
Now excuse me. I'm gonna pour some gravy where it BELONGS....on my mashed potatoes.
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/17 12:56 AM
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Now excuse me. I'm gonna pour some gravy where it BELONGS....on my mashed potatoes.
TIS
Posted By: Mark
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/17 02:09 AM
Originally Posted By: olivant
Originally Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Now excuse me. I'm gonna pour some gravy where it BELONGS....on my mashed potatoes.
TIS
I know when I been got! Good one, TIS!
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/17 12:10 PM
I watched Manchester by the Sea last night it was good not great in my opinion
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/17 09:33 AM
Total Recall(2012).
Nowhere near as good as the original with Arnold.
But Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel just about make up for it.
Nowhere near as good as the original with Arnold.
But Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel just about make up for it.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/17 05:59 PM
I watched Dead Presidents (1995) last night.
Decent film about a Vietnam vet adjusting to life after the war while trying to support his family, but the chance of a better life may involve crime and bloodshed..
7/10
Decent film about a Vietnam vet adjusting to life after the war while trying to support his family, but the chance of a better life may involve crime and bloodshed..
7/10
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/17 08:02 AM
Chains of gold(1991).
"Scott Barnes (Travolta) is an alcoholic turned social worker hellbent on saving a young boy named Tommy (Lawrence) from self-destructing when he finds out he has begun selling crack in an organization called YIP."
Was actually a decent watch, it's up on youtube at the moment. Had never heard of it before.
"Scott Barnes (Travolta) is an alcoholic turned social worker hellbent on saving a young boy named Tommy (Lawrence) from self-destructing when he finds out he has begun selling crack in an organization called YIP."
Was actually a decent watch, it's up on youtube at the moment. Had never heard of it before.
Posted By: thedudeabides87
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/17 11:06 AM
Watched Fences last night, good movie Viola Davis deserved the Oscar in my opinion
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/17 06:26 PM
Originally Posted By: thedudeabides87
Watched Fences last night, good movie Viola Davis deserved the Oscar in my opinion
Last 3 movies I saw at the theater were Fences, John Wick 2, and Split. I thought Fences had great acting and great dialogue but too many events (and even entire characters) were referenced rather than shown onscreen, making it very obvious that it was based on a play (which I did not know ahead of time). I don't mind movies based on plays so long as they don't hide the ball. A Few Good Men was based on a play but I never got the impression it was taking place in a box. Fences seemed very limited setting and plot wise.
Split and John Wick 2 are much more popcorn/fluff movies but I personally enjoyed them more. All three are good in vastly different ways, but I rank them Split>Wick>Fences.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/17 07:33 PM
Saw white nights I forgot how talented Gregory Hines was he can dance, and he had a great voice. In the movie he sang a song from Porgie and Bess. He sang the song boat to New York better then Sammy Davis Jr sang it in the 1950s.
Unfortunately he did not make music CDs too bad. He died very young.
Unfortunately he did not make music CDs too bad. He died very young.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/17 11:27 PM
John Wick 2 was entertaining. Next on my list to see is Logan. Anybody see it yet?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/16/17 09:45 AM
Just saw the movie "the last night inn"
Its is a movie about an inn called the last night inn. 4 different groups of people check in. It's a dramady. comedy and drama a saw it mainly because my friend Johnny is in it. But has a weird story ending it is actually almost every one who is in the inn it's there last night on earth. The place is like the Roach motel you can check in but you are not checking out at least not alive. While I was watching it I was wondering why Johnny did not ask me to invest in it. Then I saw why if he did and I saw his part it the movie I would have shot him myself
Its is a movie about an inn called the last night inn. 4 different groups of people check in. It's a dramady. comedy and drama a saw it mainly because my friend Johnny is in it. But has a weird story ending it is actually almost every one who is in the inn it's there last night on earth. The place is like the Roach motel you can check in but you are not checking out at least not alive. While I was watching it I was wondering why Johnny did not ask me to invest in it. Then I saw why if he did and I saw his part it the movie I would have shot him myself
Posted By: getthesenets
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/17 07:04 PM
Watching flick from 1993 called Extreme Justice.
Good film so far, and it CLEARLY inspired a film that came out years later.
Lou Diamond Phillips is in it. That's usually a signal to NOT watch a film, but he's ok in this so far.
Good film so far, and it CLEARLY inspired a film that came out years later.
Lou Diamond Phillips is in it. That's usually a signal to NOT watch a film, but he's ok in this so far.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/17 07:12 PM
Anyone ever watch this?
As a child, we used to have this, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) and Empire of the Sun and nothing else on VHS and I'd watch this when I was bored and home alone. I must have watched it 20 times.
I thought it was a really good action movie and Belushi and Gossett kicked ass in the lead roles.
IDK how it would hold up watching it now.
As a child, we used to have this, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) and Empire of the Sun and nothing else on VHS and I'd watch this when I was bored and home alone. I must have watched it 20 times.
I thought it was a really good action movie and Belushi and Gossett kicked ass in the lead roles.
IDK how it would hold up watching it now.
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/17 10:11 PM
There will be blood. One of those movies I had only seen a little bit of on amc but couldn't figure out the name of it until a few years later. It's a long one, but I loved the ending.
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/17 11:25 PM
Originally Posted By: blueracing347
There will be blood. One of those movies I had only seen a little bit of on amc but couldn't figure out the name of it until a few years later. It's a long one, but I loved the ending.
Good choice. That's a great movie.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/17 09:53 PM
If anybody has has a good 9 hours to spare them i would recommend watching the epic Holocaust documentary called Shoah.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090015/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090015/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 09:18 AM
American Psycho - 7/10
Very quirky movie and a good performance from Bale.
"He was into that whole Yale thing." - Patrick Bateman
"Yale thing ?" - Detective
"Well for one thing, i think he was probably a closet homosexual, who did a lot of cocaine. That whole Yale thing." - Patrick Bateman
Very quirky movie and a good performance from Bale.
"He was into that whole Yale thing." - Patrick Bateman
"Yale thing ?" - Detective
"Well for one thing, i think he was probably a closet homosexual, who did a lot of cocaine. That whole Yale thing." - Patrick Bateman
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 04:27 PM
afriendofours, that movie scares the hell out of me.
On the TCM app I watched The Third Man This movie I highly recommend. Great acting. Good story. Here is the IMDb info on it
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0041959/
I also watched The Honeymoon Killers which stars Tony Lo Bianco (Meow) Doris Roberts is in too, didn't even recognize her
Based on a true story. Horrible people.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064437/
On the TCM app I watched The Third Man This movie I highly recommend. Great acting. Good story. Here is the IMDb info on it
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0041959/
I also watched The Honeymoon Killers which stars Tony Lo Bianco (Meow) Doris Roberts is in too, didn't even recognize her
Based on a true story. Horrible people.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064437/
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 11:09 PM
Tony Lo Bianco brother in the French Connection was an Italian Harlem guy Benny Marino he was also in the 7ups also in it was Tony Lo Bianco he was friends with my wife.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
Posted By: alexandarns
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 11:15 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Tony Lo Bianco brother in the French Connection was an Italian Harlem guy Benny Marino he was also in the 7ups also in it was Tony Lo Bianco he was friends with my wife.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
How old was Benny? Older than you?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 11:16 PM
Younger
Posted By: alexandarns
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 11:25 PM
How old are you Foots, if you dont mind? Did you guys from 107th st and 1st ave go to Pleasant Ave? And around 116th st?
Posted By: Alfanosgirl
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/17 11:34 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Tony Lo Bianco brother in the French Connection was an Italian Harlem guy Benny Marino he was also in the 7ups also in it was Tony Lo Bianco he was friends with my wife.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
Here we are in Jefferson park in my old stomping ground. I am in this YouTube some where. Benny is the guy taking a fake beating.
1961 Giglio, Kids Giglio, and Romans baseball in Jefferson park.
I love those two movies. Interesting, Foots. Never realized that he was an East Harlem guy. Very cool. The toughest guys come from that neighborhood imo.
I'll look up the YouTube vid must be funny.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 12:07 AM
Originally Posted By: alexandarns
How old are you Foots, if you dont mind? Did you guys from 107th st and 1st ave go to Pleasant Ave? And around 116th st?
The Giglio feast at Mount Carmel 114 street. Every so often it was lifted from a different block we went to the feast.
Not offen we stayed within a few blocks from where we lived. But if you wanted to go to the park or go to the pool you went to Jefferson park. We played American football against other blocks teams. We played against the Hun 8 guys that is how I met the Prisco's, Anthony santorelli and Ray Ray and horse and other wackos, Hun 9 boys met younger guys Johnny my best living friend the movie star
more or less, and others including Michael Meldish. Then we played a Hun 16 Ponzo team he was Johnny Delightfuls brother. Later my friend Johnny played for them and those nut jobs some of them are still around somewhere.
Posted By: alexandarns
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 12:30 AM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
Originally Posted By: alexandarns
How old are you Foots, if you dont mind? Did you guys from 107th st and 1st ave go to Pleasant Ave? And around 116th st?
The Giglio feast at Mount Carmel 114 street. Every so often it was lifted from a different block we went to the feast.
Not offen we stayed within a few blocks from where we lived. But if you wanted to go to the park or go to the pool you went to Jefferson park. We played American football against other blocks teams. We played against the Hun 8 guys that is how I met the Prisco's, Anthony santorelli and Ray Ray and horse and other wackos, Hun 9 boys met younger guys Johnny my best living friend the movie star
more or less, and others including Michael Meldish. Then we played a Hun 16 Ponzo team he was Johnny Delightfuls brother. Later my friend Johnny played for them and those nut jobs some of them are still around somewhere.Where were guys from the gang red wings from?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 02:50 AM
The red wings were named after the red wing block I Knew them. Johnny babysitter was a red wing deb I think I fucked her some where along the line. They redwings wanted me because I was a pretty good thief. They thought they could make money off me. I was never a follower so no. I like to make money doing what I did best on my own. Had another friend Donnie he lived in my old building. His father left his mother. His mother met a guy he did not want kids. So his mother gave him up to live with his two uncles in my building. We hit it off and we were thieves together. Miss Donnie later he got hooked on heroin and began robbing on his own. He robbed the wrong guy and the guy had him killed.
Posted By: alexandarns
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 08:39 AM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
The red wings were named after the red wing block I Knew them. Johnny babysitter was a red wing deb I think I fucked her some where along the line. They redwings wanted me because I was a pretty good thief. They thought they could make money off me. I was never a follower so no. I like to make money doing what I did best on my own. Had another friend Donnie he lived in my old building. His father left his mother. His mother met a guy he did not want kids. So his mother gave him up to live with his two uncles in my building. We hit it off and we were thieves together. Miss Donnie later he got hooked on heroin and began robbing on his own. He robbed the wrong guy and the guy had him killed.
What does that mean 'red wing block'? I don't understand what you mean foots.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 11:54 AM
It the name of a building in Italian Harlem close to Lexington Ave. Not many people know that. That is how.the gang got there name. I thought they knew everything on here.
Posted By: alexandarns
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 12:11 PM
Originally Posted By: Footreads
It the name of a building in Italian Harlem close to Lexington Ave. Not many people know that. That is how.the gang got there name. I thought they knew everything on here.
No, haven't heard about it. Was the purple gang made out of guys only from around pleasent ave?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/17 12:43 PM
it started in Italian Harlem. I was with Meldish when we saw the movie Purple Gang about the Detroit Purple Gang. He dug it and said we should start our own Purple Gang here. He actually did it. Then people joined him from all over poor Meldish no one lives forever. They even had ties with the IRA sold guns to them. They would hide their fugitives here.
He was a friend of Johnny more then he was a friend of mine. Johnny was not like us but if Johnny was a friend he was a friend he did not care what you did he was not a fair weather friend. My kids all dig Johnny. When John first came for a visit me at my new house. He was parked with his mother and daughter. I forgot he was coming I saw a car parked I came from his blind side I had my gun out then I saw it was him and put it in my pocket.
He was a friend of Johnny more then he was a friend of mine. Johnny was not like us but if Johnny was a friend he was a friend he did not care what you did he was not a fair weather friend. My kids all dig Johnny. When John first came for a visit me at my new house. He was parked with his mother and daughter. I forgot he was coming I saw a car parked I came from his blind side I had my gun out then I saw it was him and put it in my pocket.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/02/17 12:02 PM
Killing Them Softly(2012)
Wasn't sure about this movie the first few times i watched it, but after the third time or so, really enjoyed it, especially Brad Pitt's character.
"Who's running things?"
You have no idea. No decision-makers.
I've got to take them by the hand and I've got to walk them...
slowly through it like they're retarded children.
What is it, a committee?
Total corporate mentality.
Christ's sake.
This country is fucked, I'm telling you.
There's a plague coming.
Wasn't sure about this movie the first few times i watched it, but after the third time or so, really enjoyed it, especially Brad Pitt's character.
"Who's running things?"
You have no idea. No decision-makers.
I've got to take them by the hand and I've got to walk them...
slowly through it like they're retarded children.
What is it, a committee?
Total corporate mentality.
Christ's sake.
This country is fucked, I'm telling you.
There's a plague coming.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/17 03:28 PM
Wall Street - 8/10
Only seen this movie recently despite it being old. Second time watching it there. Good film.
Never been the biggest fan of Douglas or Charlie Sheen, but both were excellent.
Only seen this movie recently despite it being old. Second time watching it there. Good film.
Never been the biggest fan of Douglas or Charlie Sheen, but both were excellent.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/01/17 08:18 PM
I watched The Drop with James Gandolfini in his last movie role.
It was good, not great. Missing a little something.
I watched The Grey with Liam Neeson for the second time.
It holds up well, good character development. I would strongly recommend.
It was good, not great. Missing a little something.
I watched The Grey with Liam Neeson for the second time.
It holds up well, good character development. I would strongly recommend.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/17 07:09 PM
Just watched The Breakfast Club for the 100th time this evening, still a classic and holds up well to this day.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/17 12:32 AM
I just re-watched most of Resurgence and it was just as bad the 2nd time around. However, one thing I didn't realize the first time that I watched it was the remarkable technological progress the human race made in just 20 years. There's now a base on the moon with combat and other aircraft routinely traversing that interplanetary space. There's also remarkably powerful laser canons and other seemingly advanced technological gizmos with which to fight the aliens. If it were only true.
Posted By: goombah
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/29/17 03:56 PM
Watched DeNiro's brilliant portrayal of Bernie Madoff in "Wizard of Lies." I knew the basic Madoff story prior to seeing the movie, but I wasn't aware of much of the details. In the end, I think Madoff has shown almost no remorse and is too narcisstic to understand the degree of the lives he ruined.
Michelle Pfeiffer was also great as the pathetic Ruth Madoff. Hank Azaria played a character the viewer could dislike from the very beginning.
Michelle Pfeiffer was also great as the pathetic Ruth Madoff. Hank Azaria played a character the viewer could dislike from the very beginning.
Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/29/17 04:39 PM
Just watched the new It. Very good. Scary but also has humor and a lot of heart, which is very rare in horror.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/17 04:05 PM
I finally got around to watching the new It. It's pretty bad. Same problems that affect a lot of modern movies. Overlong; overdone shaky cam; overuse of CGI; reliance of jump scares; complete absence of subtlety or nuance.
Just a generic modern horror movie piggybacking on the name value of the original and Stephen King.
It misses the levity Tim Curry brought to the role of Pennywise, the new Pennywise just tries too hard and misses the mark.
I think it failed to expand on the original in any way and any new things it brought to the table were just unnecessary and felt flat.
Very overrated!
P.S. The kids were all okay apart from the annoying, four-eyed dweeb playing the Richie Tozier character.
Just a generic modern horror movie piggybacking on the name value of the original and Stephen King.
It misses the levity Tim Curry brought to the role of Pennywise, the new Pennywise just tries too hard and misses the mark.
I think it failed to expand on the original in any way and any new things it brought to the table were just unnecessary and felt flat.
Very overrated!
P.S. The kids were all okay apart from the annoying, four-eyed dweeb playing the Richie Tozier character.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/18 11:42 PM
For the first time in a very long time watched 1947's B&W Kiss of Death with Victor Mature and Richard Widmark (his first film) as the psychotic gangster Tommy Udo. For those of you who haven't seen it, Widmark's portrayal leaves any similar portrayals in the dust. Give it a look.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/02/18 04:52 PM
I own the original kiss of death. Good movie richard widmark was an interesting guy very smart.
See judgement at Nuremberg movie was terrific. Fantastic cast Richard widmark in that one too.
See judgement at Nuremberg movie was terrific. Fantastic cast Richard widmark in that one too.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/18 03:15 AM
Re-watched "Billy Bathgate," from the E.L. Doctorow novel about Dutch Shultz and the kid (Bathgate) who inveigles his way into Shultz's mob. Dustin Hoffman is outstanding as Shultz.
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/18 03:47 AM
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
Re-watched "Billy Bathgate," from the E.L. Doctorow novel about Dutch Shultz and the kid (Bathgate) who inveigles his way into Shultz's mob. Dustin Hoffman is outstanding as Shultz.
Absolutely. But Bruce Willis stole the show with his bit part.
Posted By: goombah
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/18 02:26 AM
Saw “Spotlight” on Netflix. Great story about Boston Globe put together the Catholic priest sex abuse scandal. Very sick how the church turned a blind eye for decades about pedophile priests abusing boys & girls.
In one last cover-up attempt it was interesting how this movie was released in Dec. 2015 getting buried in Star Wars hype when “Force Awakens” was also released.
In one last cover-up attempt it was interesting how this movie was released in Dec. 2015 getting buried in Star Wars hype when “Force Awakens” was also released.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/18 03:46 AM
Tonight I watched 1968's The Brotherhood starring Kirk Douglas. A few things caught my eye. First, Kirk's brother is a returning military officer just like Michael. A la Vito turning down Sollozzo's deal and Sonny being receptive to it, Kirk says no to a deal proposed to the Commission, but Kirk's brother says yes to it. The movie starts off with a wedding at which Kirk dances with his daughter a la Vito dancing with Connie.
The Godfather was published in 1969; I don't know when Puzo wrote it. Perhaps he was inspired by The Brotherhood. Any thoughts?
The Godfather was published in 1969; I don't know when Puzo wrote it. Perhaps he was inspired by The Brotherhood. Any thoughts?
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/18 12:15 PM
Dallas Buyers Club. 7/10.
"Let me give y'all a little news flash. There ain't nothin' out there can kill fuckin' Ron Woodroof in 30 days."
"Let me give y'all a little news flash. There ain't nothin' out there can kill fuckin' Ron Woodroof in 30 days."
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/18 12:47 PM
Did you watch it on Netflix?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/18 12:49 PM
I saw the brotherhood maybe 30 or more years ago. As I recall nothing memorable about it.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/18 03:00 PM
Check out the tv show the brotherhood on showtime. It was about politics and Irish adult gangs in Rhode Island. It was very good came out in the 1990s.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 04:58 PM
Good old movie, Lives of a Bengal Lancer with Gary Cooper, coming on TCM right now.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 05:22 PM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
Good old movie, Lives of a Bengal Lancer with Gary Cooper, coming on TCM right now.
Good movie Pete. I also like Cooper in Gunga Din. Is that scheduled?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 05:46 PM
Gary cooper was not in Ganga din.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 05:47 PM
Doesn't look like it. Corsican Brothers and King Solomon's Mines coming up, so it's an adventure afternoon.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 07:03 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Originally Posted by mustachepete
Good old movie, Lives of a Bengal Lancer with Gary Cooper, coming on TCM right now.
Good movie Pete. I also like Cooper in Gunga Din. Is that scheduled?
I've always gotten Cooper and Grant confused.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 07:27 PM
I've recognized a sub-genre of movies called, "The British Messing Around in Everyone Else's Business." A lot of great movies on the subject: Braveheart, The Man Who Would Be King, Zulu, Gandhi.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/18 09:02 PM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
I've recognized a sub-genre of movies called, "The British Messing Around in Everyone Else's Business." A lot of great movies on the subject: Braveheart, The Man Who Would Be King, Zulu, Gandhi.
Of course, they're all good.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/18 01:05 PM
Just finished watching the LOTR's trilogy, epic films.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/18 06:46 PM
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET is easily Martin Scorsese's best picture since 2006's THE DEPARTED and another great performance by Leonardo DiCaprio. My first introduction to Margot Robbie as well as Jon Bernthal. Terrific job casting of Jordan Belfort's friends: Jonah Hill (Donnie), P.J. Byrne (Rugrat), Kenneth Choi (Chester), Brian Sacca (Pinhead) and Henry Zebrowski (Sea Otter). They really played well off of each other during each of their scenes and genuinely seemed to get along. Matthew McConaughey steals the few scenes that he's in (particularly when he takes Jordan out to lunch). Credit also goes to Rob Reiner for his role as well for some comedic relief.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/02/18 06:18 PM
WINCHESTER was absolute garbage. Cheap scares and a very lame story plot. Helen Mirren was decent but even she couldn't save this ship from sinking. My suggestion would be to avoid this one! 4/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/02/18 06:32 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET is easily Martin Scorsese's best picture since 2006's THE DEPARTED and another great performance by Leonardo DiCaprio. My first introduction to Margot Robbie as well as Jon Bernthal. Terrific job casting of Jordan Belfort's friends: Jonah Hill (Donnie), P.J. Byrne (Rugrat), Kenneth Choi (Chester), Brian Sacca (Pinhead) and Henry Zebrowski (Sea Otter). They really played well off of each other during each of their scenes and genuinely seemed to get along. Matthew McConaughey steals the few scenes that he's in (particularly when he takes Jordan out to lunch). Credit also goes to Rob Reiner for his role as well for some comedic relief.
A great film. One of my favorite films of the millennium.. Also a terrific supporting cast like you mentioned..
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/02/18 09:18 PM
I thought The Wolf of Wall Street was terrible.
American Psycho is a better, and more realistic, portrayal of the same kind of people.
American Psycho is a better, and more realistic, portrayal of the same kind of people.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/18 06:29 AM
Each to there own i guess.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/18 08:40 PM
This weekend I did a Soledad Miranda/Jess Franco double-feature with VAMPYROS LESBOS and SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY. VAMPYROS LESBOS is the "Tarantino effect" on me as it's considered in some circles, to be one of the 10 best grindhouse films ever made. No other director has influenced my taste in other movies like Tarantino; hence the reason he's my favorite director of all time. KILL BILL opened me up to Asian cinema and likewise when GRINDHOUSE was released, he opened me to that genre as well. SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY had too much of a THE BRIDE WORE BLACK feel to it, which I feel is a superior film and was released only 3 years earlier. Soledad Miranda did have a presence on screen and sadly, these are the only 2 films I've seen her in. What's even more sad is the fact she never got to enjoy her new found fame as she was killed in a car accident shortly after these films were completed but not yet released.
I also rewatched Dario Argento's masterpiece SUSPIRIA. I don't know what it is but the last 3 times I've seen this, I've enjoyed it more and more. His use of lighting in this is a case study within itself. A good score, great story, and great acting, particularly from star Jessica Harper and Stefani Casini.
I also rewatched Dario Argento's masterpiece SUSPIRIA. I don't know what it is but the last 3 times I've seen this, I've enjoyed it more and more. His use of lighting in this is a case study within itself. A good score, great story, and great acting, particularly from star Jessica Harper and Stefani Casini.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/18 06:50 PM
Last night instead of watching "the big game" I watched Quentin Tarantino's World War II film INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS. I absolutely love Tarantino's use of language in this film. And I really don't think it can be overstated how incredible Christoph Waltz's performance as Colonel Hans Landa is. How he's able to make the audience actually like a nazi officer is absolutely amazing and just a testament to his skill. Besides 300, this was really my first introduction to Michael Fassbender, who I've come to respect more in recent years (I especially love him as Magneto in the new X-Men films). Melanie Laurent and Daniel Bruhl equally do excellent jobs as Shosanna and Fredrick Zoller respectively.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/18 08:09 PM
Great Film, i especially like the bar scene leading up to the mass shooting..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/18 09:31 PM
Me too but the best scenes to me are at the beginning with Landa at Monsieur LaPadite's place. That opening scene and the dialogue are amazing!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/18 10:18 PM
THE 15:17 TO PARIS
This is definitely not on par with Clint Eastwood's best efforts. Obviously, with the real life heroes portraying themselves, the acting was amateurish. Most of the movie isn't spent on the events on the train, maybe only the last 20. The rest of the film was them growing up and backpacking through Europe. Not to take anything away from the heroic acts these 3 men displayed in thwarting a terrorist attack, but based solely as a film, this didn't work for me and I even question the necessity of making a movie based on this event in the first place. 5/10
This is definitely not on par with Clint Eastwood's best efforts. Obviously, with the real life heroes portraying themselves, the acting was amateurish. Most of the movie isn't spent on the events on the train, maybe only the last 20. The rest of the film was them growing up and backpacking through Europe. Not to take anything away from the heroic acts these 3 men displayed in thwarting a terrorist attack, but based solely as a film, this didn't work for me and I even question the necessity of making a movie based on this event in the first place. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/18 01:56 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE 15:17 TO PARIS
This is definitely not on par with Clint Eastwood's best efforts. Obviously, with the real life heroes portraying themselves, the acting was amateurish. Most of the movie isn't spent on the events on the train, maybe only the last 20. The rest of the film was them growing up and backpacking through Europe. Not to take anything away from the heroic acts these 3 men displayed in thwarting a terrorist attack, but based solely as a film, this didn't work for me and I even question the necessity of making a movie based on this event in the first place. 5/10
This is definitely not on par with Clint Eastwood's best efforts. Obviously, with the real life heroes portraying themselves, the acting was amateurish. Most of the movie isn't spent on the events on the train, maybe only the last 20. The rest of the film was them growing up and backpacking through Europe. Not to take anything away from the heroic acts these 3 men displayed in thwarting a terrorist attack, but based solely as a film, this didn't work for me and I even question the necessity of making a movie based on this event in the first place. 5/10
I was surprised to hear this week abc movie critic Sandy Kenyon’s review covering this movie.
He was very critical and not as respectful as your review that has shown appreciation to the heroic men.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/18 09:46 PM
I did a Pam Grier double-feature yesterday with COFFY and FOXY BROWN. COFFY is probably the more well known of the two but FOXY stands on her own as well. Pam does a good job in both as an ass kicking, take no prisoners, revenge seeking heroine. Also nice to see Sid Haig in both as well. Quentin Tarantino did swipe a song or two from COFFY for his Pam Grier staring film, JACKIE BROWN. And just a side note, as much as I respect and admire Pam Grier, her Jamaican accent in COFFY definitely could have used some work!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/18 11:52 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I did a Pam Grier double-feature yesterday with COFFY and FOXY BROWN. COFFY is probably the more well known of the two but FOXY stands on her own as well. Pam does a good job in both as an ass kicking, take no prisoners, revenge seeking heroine. Also nice to see Sid Haig in both as well. Quentin Tarantino did swipe a song or two from COFFY for his Pam Grier staring film, JACKIE BROWN. And just a side note, as much as I respect and admire Pam Grier, her Jamaican accent in COFFY definitely could have used some work!
THAT is one sexy woman..always loved her since I saw her Coffy as a teen, especially where she finally turns all the around topless,u could get lost in there & would'nt I luv 2!!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/18 12:00 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I did a Pam Grier double-feature yesterday with COFFY and FOXY BROWN. COFFY is probably the more well known of the two but FOXY stands on her own as well. Pam does a good job in both as an ass kicking, take no prisoners, revenge seeking heroine. Also nice to see Sid Haig in both as well. Quentin Tarantino did swipe a song or two from COFFY for his Pam Grier staring film, JACKIE BROWN. And just a side note, as much as I respect and admire Pam Grier, her Jamaican accent in COFFY definitely could have used some work!
THAT is one sexy woman..always loved her since I saw her Coffy as a teen, especially where she finally turns all the around topless,u could get lost in there & would'nt I luv 2!!
She is a sexy woman and quite the strong protagonist
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/18 04:56 AM
Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.
She was on Top of her Game then.
https://xhamster.com/videos/jamie-lee-curtis-trading-places-topless-1128082
She was on Top of her Game then.
https:/
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/18 05:32 AM
I watched the original Krays 1990 film last night. Played by the Kemp brothers this is a decent film which i haven't seen for years. Standout roles for Billie Whitelaw who played Violet Kray and Susan Fleetwood who played Aunt Rose.
6.5/10
6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/18 06:10 PM
THE BRIDE WORE BLACK
A fantastic revenge story about a widow who tracks down the 5 people responsible for her husband's death. Apparently based on a novel by Cornell Woolrich, of which I'll have to get my hands on to read. Jeanne Moreau does a fantastic job as the seducing, emotionless heroine who will stop at nothing until all of these men are dead. It's easy to see the inspiration for Quentin Tarantino to make KILL BILL. My only grip is I felt the third act ran a little long in terms of her fourth victim. I thought this definitely could have been condensed some but other than that, this is nothing short of awesome. If you're able to get a hold of a copy, I highly recommend it! 7/10
A fantastic revenge story about a widow who tracks down the 5 people responsible for her husband's death. Apparently based on a novel by Cornell Woolrich, of which I'll have to get my hands on to read. Jeanne Moreau does a fantastic job as the seducing, emotionless heroine who will stop at nothing until all of these men are dead. It's easy to see the inspiration for Quentin Tarantino to make KILL BILL. My only grip is I felt the third act ran a little long in terms of her fourth victim. I thought this definitely could have been condensed some but other than that, this is nothing short of awesome. If you're able to get a hold of a copy, I highly recommend it! 7/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/18 12:39 AM
Watched Wonder Woman. Not bad.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/18 03:02 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.[quote=DuesPaid]Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.
She was on Top of her Game then.
https://xhamster.com/videos/jamie-lee-curtis-trading-places-topless-1128082
She was on Top of her Game then.
https:/
You mean Trading Places w/ Eddie Murphy...@ that time ,,Jamie Lee Curtis had the most perfectly shaped breasts in all of Hollywood.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/18 05:44 AM
MS. 45
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/18 04:11 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.[quote=DuesPaid]Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.
She was on Top of her Game then.
https://xhamster.com/videos/jamie-lee-curtis-trading-places-topless-1128082
She was on Top of her Game then.
https:/
You mean Trading Places w/ Eddie Murphy...@ that time ,,Jamie Lee Curtis had the most perfectly shaped breasts in all of Hollywood.
Yes Sir, that would be it.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MS. 45
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Hidden great, wife loves this flick. Ive seen it several times. This movie was filmed in NYC , little Italy.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/18 10:24 AM
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tells. It really seems like they are no longer trying after the third movie. Spoiler alert, the wrong pirate dies.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/18 11:44 AM
Only watched the first two, lost interest after that..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/18 07:17 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MS. 45
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Hidden great, wife loves this flick. Ive seen it several times. This movie was filmed in NYC , little Italy.
Have you seen the Blu-Ray release that Drafthouse Films put out a few years ago? It looks great. The best print I've seen of the film!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/18 07:30 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.[quote=DuesPaid]Yes, when you said turn around .... I thought of Jamie Lee Curtis in Changing Places.
She was on Top of her Game then.
https://xhamster.com/videos/jamie-lee-curtis-trading-places-topless-1128082
She was on Top of her Game then.
https:/
You mean Trading Places w/ Eddie Murphy...@ that time ,,Jamie Lee Curtis had the most perfectly shaped breasts in all of Hollywood.
Yes Sir, that would be it.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MS. 45
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Drafthouse Films did an excellent job with the Blu-Ray transfer for MS. 45. The picture and colors are the best I've ever seen the film. A very strong performance by Zoe Lund who plays a mute who is twice raped on her way home from work one day. Insuring it will never happen to her again, she becomes a vigilante who stalks the city of New York to get rid of any and all aggressive men. This film reminded me very much of a female portrayal of TAXI DRIVER where the grimy New York City is a character within itself as well. Another great revenge thriller. 7/10
Hidden great, wife loves this flick. Ive seen it several times. This movie was filmed in NYC , little Italy.
Dues Paid knows about hamster.com?? the wife also?Hmmm...LOL
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/18 05:00 AM
Did not know what Hamster.com was but I did load it and my computer security spit it out.
I checked it again on another server and allowed.
Works for me. The Wife,, not so Much....
I loaded that from youtube and did not read the link.
I know now.
LOL
I checked it again on another server and allowed.
Works for me. The Wife,, not so Much....
I loaded that from youtube and did not read the link.
I know now.
LOL
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/16/18 05:24 PM
THE STENDHAL SYNDROME
One of the more recent Dario Argento films (1996) that I've viewed within the last 4 months. The CGI in the few scenes it was in was obviously bad and dated. Dario's daughter Asia Argento gives a strong performance of a detective slowly going insane as she attempts to track down a serial killer/rapist who has assaulted her as well. At times I was questioning where Dario was taking us as it was sometimes difficult to separate fiction from reality. A young Thomas Kretschmann stars as the villain. You may remember his work on Peter Jackson's 2005 KING KONG or from CAPTAIN AMERICA: WINTER SOLDIER or AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON. 5.5/10
One of the more recent Dario Argento films (1996) that I've viewed within the last 4 months. The CGI in the few scenes it was in was obviously bad and dated. Dario's daughter Asia Argento gives a strong performance of a detective slowly going insane as she attempts to track down a serial killer/rapist who has assaulted her as well. At times I was questioning where Dario was taking us as it was sometimes difficult to separate fiction from reality. A young Thomas Kretschmann stars as the villain. You may remember his work on Peter Jackson's 2005 KING KONG or from CAPTAIN AMERICA: WINTER SOLDIER or AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/18 06:53 PM
BLACK PANTHER
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/18 12:41 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BLACK PANTHER
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
Thank you for these informative well written reviews. My wife and I really appreciate and enjoy them. I read them to her, she’s not a poster.
We will certainly be looking to catch up with the Slasher flick and the Brolin / Del Toro movie. I will check out the BP but she’s not into Super Hero movies.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/18 11:33 AM
Copland - One of my favorites.
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
![[Linked Image]](http://www.swisscastles.ch/cinemascotte/films/images98/copland.JPG)
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/18 10:14 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BLACK PANTHER
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
Thank you for these informative well written reviews. My wife and I really appreciate and enjoy them. I read them to her, she’s not a poster.
We will certainly be looking to catch up with the Slasher flick and the Brolin / Del Toro movie. I will check out the BP but she’s not into Super Hero movies.
Thank you, I definitely appreciate that and glad I could be of assistance! I'm an Amazon Prime member so I was able to see both SPLATTER UNIVERSITY and SICARIO via their streaming service just FYI.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 01:35 AM
Originally Posted by afriendofours
Copland - One of my favorites.
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
Yes, Good one.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BLACK PANTHER
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
Thank you for these informative well written reviews. My wife and I really appreciate and enjoy them. I read them to her, she’s not a poster.
We will certainly be looking to catch up with the Slasher flick and the Brolin / Del Toro movie. I will check out the BP but she’s not into Super Hero movies.
Thank you, I definitely appreciate that and glad I could be of assistance! I'm an Amazon Prime member so I was able to see both SPLATTER UNIVERSITY and SICARIO via their streaming service just FYI.
Will be looking out and forward to see more reviews.
My niece and nephew love there Amazon Prime Membership.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 09:41 AM
Amazon prime is good but it's expensive here in Germany. You need to use it alot to get your monies worth.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 05:08 PM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Amazon prime is good but it's expensive here in Germany. You need to use it alot to get your monies worth.
Ur in Germany???never noticed,now that I see your profile, I feel so dumb...how's the crime rate & taxes?
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 06:33 PM
Just saw rebel without a cause. I never could understand why Jim was fighting people for. He had it made his parents owned a house, he had his own car they had money. Plus Daddio didn’t do a number on him. So he had a little drink once in a while big deal. Plus he got Natalie Wood.
Buzz had to fuck around with his button knife. Jim should have cut hiss balls off.
Buzz had to fuck around with his button knife. Jim should have cut hiss balls off.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 06:47 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by afriendofours
Copland - One of my favorites.
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
Listen, you deaf fuck. I offered you a chance when we could have done something, I offered you a chance to be a cop, and you blew it! You blew it. - Moe Tilden
You people are all the same. - Sheriff Freddy Heflin
That cupcake makes a mess, we got a case again. - Moe Tilden
Yes, Good one.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BLACK PANTHER
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
I'll start out by saying there is quite a bit of hype surrounding this film. While it is good and better than some other movies within the MCU, I don't believe it's in the upper echelon with the likes of CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, THOR: RAGNAROK or the original IRON MAN. Chadwick Boseman and Michael B. Jordan do fantastic jobs as both T'Challa/Black Panther and Erik Killmonger respectively. I understand the significance this film holds as being one of only a few minority superheroes but that doesn't mean it gets a free pass for breaking fertile ground. The second to third acts I felt seemed to drag and the film could have been trimmed down some. It opened up wonderfully with some nice action, set designs, use of light/colors and the technology was my favorite aspect of the film. I believe Black Panther is going to be one of the major characters going forward after the next 2 AVENGER films. 7.5/10
SPLATTER UNIVERSITY
A nice old fashioned 80's slasher movie with good music, a bad film transfer, some audio problems at certain parts of the film, and a predictable killer. I'm a sucker for cheesy 80's horror. 5.5/10
SICARIO
A slow burn of a film that I believe actually works for it. I don't feel it gets too inflated and times out at just the right moment before seeming to drag. Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro play very well together about keeping Emily Blunt in the dark about her true motives of being on their team. Benicio doesn't have many lines of dialogue but when he does, he delivers them very cold and you believe this man is capable of a great many, hurtful and disturbing things. I'm looking forward to the sequel this summer! 7/10
Thank you for these informative well written reviews. My wife and I really appreciate and enjoy them. I read them to her, she’s not a poster.
We will certainly be looking to catch up with the Slasher flick and the Brolin / Del Toro movie. I will check out the BP but she’s not into Super Hero movies.
Thank you, I definitely appreciate that and glad I could be of assistance! I'm an Amazon Prime member so I was able to see both SPLATTER UNIVERSITY and SICARIO via their streaming service just FYI.
Will be looking out and forward to see more reviews.
My niece and nephew love there Amazon Prime Membership.
The Prime streaming service is getting better in my opinion, movie wise. They're trying harder to compete with Netflix. Before the last year or so it was kind of garbage and I never used it. But when I saw them adding more and better content, I began taking more advantage of it.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 08:21 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Amazon prime is good but it's expensive here in Germany. You need to use it alot to get your monies worth.
Ur in Germany???never noticed,now that I see your profile, I feel so dumb...how's the crime rate & taxes?
No worries, been in Germany close to 5 years now. Living in the rural areas of Germany where i am the crime rates in very low..
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/18 11:34 PM
Watching this movie now.
SPLIT
It’s creepy, this guy has 23 different personalities and kidnaps three teens.
https://g.co/kgs/rtLa7G
SPLIT
It’s creepy, this guy has 23 different personalities and kidnaps three teens.
https://g.co/kgs/rtLa7G
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/18 06:40 AM
Saw family enforcer on youtube real name of movie when it was released was Death Collector starred Joey Cortese. Frank Vincent and Joe Pesci were also in it. Nobody knew who Vincent and Pesci was when it first came out in the movies.
Pretty good copy on you tube I saw it in the movies in the 70s. I thought Cortese would be star back then.
When they were shooting it Pesci and Cortese had a real fist fight. The guys on the set had to break it up. Pesci told me he was kicking cortese’s ass. Cortese much later said that it did not happen. I called up the wise guy show remember that radio show starred big pussy from the sopranos. That day he was absent and Frank Vincent took his place for that show. Vincent said as far as he knew it never happened. But later a guy from the set said the fight did happen and Pesci was telling the truth he was beating on Cortese.
Pretty good copy on you tube I saw it in the movies in the 70s. I thought Cortese would be star back then.
When they were shooting it Pesci and Cortese had a real fist fight. The guys on the set had to break it up. Pesci told me he was kicking cortese’s ass. Cortese much later said that it did not happen. I called up the wise guy show remember that radio show starred big pussy from the sopranos. That day he was absent and Frank Vincent took his place for that show. Vincent said as far as he knew it never happened. But later a guy from the set said the fight did happen and Pesci was telling the truth he was beating on Cortese.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/20/18 06:48 AM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Amazon prime is good but it's expensive here in Germany. You need to use it alot to get your monies worth.
Ur in Germany???never noticed,now that I see your profile, I feel so dumb...how's the crime rate & taxes?
No worries, been in Germany close to 5 years now. Living in the rural areas of Germany where i am the crime rates in very low..
Where are the crime rates high in Germany. Is it in the muslem section of Berlin for example? I like Berlin especially near the zoo. It is a cool place to go but that was where they had a terror attack right? I know a lot of Turkish that live there. They are very poor how poor are they they have to heat their apartments with dirty coal not even the clean coal
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/18 06:50 PM
BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/18 04:21 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
The Keitel movie sounds good for me and the other, Alice Sweet Alice....My wife is already looking up and forward to seeing this.
Never knew Brook Shields was in a Horror flick.
Thanks Boss, keep em coming. Good stuff.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/18 07:24 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
The Keitel movie sounds good for me and the other, Alice Sweet Alice....My wife is already looking up and forward to seeing this.
Never knew Brook Shields was in a Horror flick.
Thanks Boss, keep em coming. Good stuff.
Will do, thanks again! Whenever you and your wife watch these, post your thoughts if you don't mind. I'm curious what your take on them is.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/18 12:39 AM
Originally Posted by Footreads
Saw family enforcer on youtube real name of movie when it was released was Death Collector starred Joey Cortese. Frank Vincent and Joe Pesci were also in it. Nobody knew who Vincent and Pesci was when it first came out in the movies.
Pretty good copy on you tube I saw it in the movies in the 70s. I thought Cortese would be star back then.
When they were shooting it Pesci and Cortese had a real fist fight. The guys on the set had to break it up. Pesci told me he was kicking cortese’s ass. Cortese much later said that it did not happen. I called up the wise guy show remember that radio show starred big pussy from the sopranos. That day he was absent and Frank Vincent took his place for that show. Vincent said as far as he knew it never happened. But later a guy from the set said the fight did happen and Pesci was telling the truth he was beating on Cortese.
Pretty good copy on you tube I saw it in the movies in the 70s. I thought Cortese would be star back then.
When they were shooting it Pesci and Cortese had a real fist fight. The guys on the set had to break it up. Pesci told me he was kicking cortese’s ass. Cortese much later said that it did not happen. I called up the wise guy show remember that radio show starred big pussy from the sopranos. That day he was absent and Frank Vincent took his place for that show. Vincent said as far as he knew it never happened. But later a guy from the set said the fight did happen and Pesci was telling the truth he was beating on Cortese.
Have it on v.h.s. format ..good flick
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/18 01:00 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
The Keitel movie sounds good for me and the other, Alice Sweet Alice....My wife is already looking up and forward to seeing this.
Never knew Brook Shields was in a Horror flick.
Thanks Boss, keep em coming. Good stuff.
Will do, thanks again! Whenever you and your wife watch these, post your thoughts if you don't mind. I'm curious what your take on them is.
Yes sir, certainly will. Looks like we will be having several days of rain next few days and a quiet weekend so these are on the list.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/18 06:09 PM
DRIVE-IN MASSACRE
A great time capsule for those of us to jump in to who were either too young or weren't born yet to enjoy the experience of a drive-in movie theater. The theater used in this film actually had a playground for kids. I'm not sure if this was typical or not? The movie itself is still a somewhat bad/somewhat decent grindhouse film. Very bad lighting in parts during the nighttime scenes. I won't lie that I kind of felt a little gypped at the end in regards to the killer. 4.5/10
ANNIHILATION
Visually, a stunning film with a very interesting story that you keep anticipating what's next. A somewhat slow burn but a mind trip of an ending. I'm a huge Natalie Portman fan and she always brings a dominating performance to her work. In addition, I'm also a big fan of Oscar Isaac who similarly delivers a brilliant performance. Many fans were pleased with writer/director Alex Garland's previous work, EX MACHINA and I'm sure they will with this as well. While I did like EX MACHINA (not as much as some of the other critics), I personally enjoyed this more. I would definitely need to see it again to digest that ending. 7.5/10
A great time capsule for those of us to jump in to who were either too young or weren't born yet to enjoy the experience of a drive-in movie theater. The theater used in this film actually had a playground for kids. I'm not sure if this was typical or not? The movie itself is still a somewhat bad/somewhat decent grindhouse film. Very bad lighting in parts during the nighttime scenes. I won't lie that I kind of felt a little gypped at the end in regards to the killer. 4.5/10
ANNIHILATION
Visually, a stunning film with a very interesting story that you keep anticipating what's next. A somewhat slow burn but a mind trip of an ending. I'm a huge Natalie Portman fan and she always brings a dominating performance to her work. In addition, I'm also a big fan of Oscar Isaac who similarly delivers a brilliant performance. Many fans were pleased with writer/director Alex Garland's previous work, EX MACHINA and I'm sure they will with this as well. While I did like EX MACHINA (not as much as some of the other critics), I personally enjoyed this more. I would definitely need to see it again to digest that ending. 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/18 11:26 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
ALICE, SWEET ALICE
Featuring a very young Brooke Shields (11-years-old), ALICE, SWEET ALICE is a decent 70's horror film. In order to not spoil anything, I would have preferred who the audience originally thinks the killer is as I think it would have been an interesting take as a horror movie. Linda Miller gives a good performance as the "my child could never do that" mother, who is afraid to admit to herself that her daughter could be capable of murder. 5/10
The Keitel movie sounds good for me and the other, Alice Sweet Alice....My wife is already looking up and forward to seeing this.
Never knew Brook Shields was in a Horror flick.
Thanks Boss, keep em coming. Good stuff.
Will do, thanks again! Whenever you and your wife watch these, post your thoughts if you don't mind. I'm curious what your take on them is.
Yes sir, certainly will. Looks like we will be having several days of rain next few days and a quiet weekend so these are on the list.
Watched "Alice Sweet Alice" today, very dark.
Brook did not last long in her debut. The Alice girl was a great little actress, her chubby friend downstairs was really creepy.
I knew Alice was not the one who did Brook since the Director let us see the the killer was bigger than little Alice but also lead us to believe it was.
Alice does take up the position for the Old lady however which made for a great ending.
I will have to thank you for the nightmares I will have tonight. It was a bit soft but had a great creepy feel to it.
I can understand your 5/10, I get that. Very cool.
-----------------
Up Next, BAD LIEUTENANT
Just started Bad Lieutenant, cannot believe I never saw this and Im already blown away.
This guy if a Whack job, I like the way he told his kids to straighten out their Aunt about the bathroom, he says " Are you guys mice or Men" tell her to get the fuck outa there"
Very funny.
This I see you give 6 out of 10, interesting. Im watching right now. I am totally drawn into this one.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/18 01:57 AM
[quote=Irishman12]BAD LIEUTENANT
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
---------------
Blown away, I really enjoyed this move. I feel like I was just out partying and tearing it up like I was 20yrs old.
What a rush.
This man was insane. I found myself routing for him, bad for him, sorry for him and disputed with him all at the same time.
I see your 6/10 rate and agree but want to give 7 or 8 just because I really got to see right into his soul, the good and bad.
When he whinged I felt it and felt like screaming with him. No way back from that.
He self destructed.
Thanks Boss. Very good flick recommendation and critique.
I am really happy I got to see that, Im drained.
Harvey Keitel gives a great performance of an alcoholic, drugged out, degenerate gambling NYC detective. Playing against the background of a fictitious MLB playoff series between the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers (this is after Strawberry switched sides from New York to LA). Abel Ferrara once again does a fantastic job at capturing New York City during this time period. MS. 45 herself Zoe Tamerlis Lund even makes a brief appearance in two scenes with Harvey where he's shooting up (she co-wrote the script with Abel). A sad tale of abuse of power, giving into one's vices, and redemption seeking. 6/10
---------------
Blown away, I really enjoyed this move. I feel like I was just out partying and tearing it up like I was 20yrs old.
What a rush.
This man was insane. I found myself routing for him, bad for him, sorry for him and disputed with him all at the same time.
I see your 6/10 rate and agree but want to give 7 or 8 just because I really got to see right into his soul, the good and bad.
When he whinged I felt it and felt like screaming with him. No way back from that.
He self destructed.
Thanks Boss. Very good flick recommendation and critique.
I am really happy I got to see that, Im drained.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/18 08:17 PM
DuesPaid, in ALICE SWEET ALICE I did notice that too when Brooke died that the killer was bigger but her big sister was bigger than her (but not that big). I thought it could have been due to the angle it was shot at (kind of looking up with the killer coming in from behind). Still, I took the bait in regards to the older sister. Glad you enjoyed it and BAD LIEUTENANT. And yes, I liked the opening scene too with his children in the car and him trying to straighten them out in regards to their Aunt Glad you were able to see both and enjoy them!
GAME NIGHT
I'm really glad I quite enjoyed this. The previews looked hilarious to me but nowadays, so many times I've been burned because all of the funny parts seem to be in the previews (see FATHER FIGURES as a recent example). A good cast that works well together and a story that actually surprises you in parts and isn't just a mind numbing comedy. I love Jason Bateman and kudos also goes to Jesse Plemons as their creepy neighbor as he's one of, if not, the show stealer in this film. 6/10
CHOPPING MALL
I had seen some of this before during an Alamo Drafthouse screening but never completely. Wow, what a completely trashy movie. I would seriously love to meet the individual(s) who green lit this picture to proceed into development. The premise here is 8 stupid California kids who work at a local mall, "camp out" in one of the stores they work in (a furniture store) to drink and have sex. However, recently installed security robots malfunction and begin to pick the kids off one-by-one. I won't lie as there were times I genuinely laughed at some of the death scenes here and I could see this easily falling into the category of "so bad it's good." 3/10
Glad you were able to see both and enjoy them!GAME NIGHT
I'm really glad I quite enjoyed this. The previews looked hilarious to me but nowadays, so many times I've been burned because all of the funny parts seem to be in the previews (see FATHER FIGURES as a recent example). A good cast that works well together and a story that actually surprises you in parts and isn't just a mind numbing comedy. I love Jason Bateman and kudos also goes to Jesse Plemons as their creepy neighbor as he's one of, if not, the show stealer in this film. 6/10
CHOPPING MALL
I had seen some of this before during an Alamo Drafthouse screening but never completely. Wow, what a completely trashy movie. I would seriously love to meet the individual(s) who green lit this picture to proceed into development. The premise here is 8 stupid California kids who work at a local mall, "camp out" in one of the stores they work in (a furniture store) to drink and have sex. However, recently installed security robots malfunction and begin to pick the kids off one-by-one. I won't lie as there were times I genuinely laughed at some of the death scenes here and I could see this easily falling into the category of "so bad it's good." 3/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/18 01:29 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DuesPaid, in ALICE SWEET ALICE I did notice that too when Brooke died that the killer was bigger but her big sister was bigger than her (but not that big). I thought it could have been due to the angle it was shot at (kind of looking up with the killer coming in from behind). Still, I took the bait in regards to the older sister. Glad you enjoyed it and BAD LIEUTENANT. And yes, I liked the opening scene too with his children in the car and him trying to straighten them out in regards to their Aunt Glad you were able to see both and enjoy them!
GAME NIGHT
I'm really glad I quite enjoyed this. The previews looked hilarious to me but nowadays, so many times I've been burned because all of the funny parts seem to be in the previews (see FATHER FIGURES as a recent example). A good cast that works well together and a story that actually surprises you in parts and isn't just a mind numbing comedy. I love Jason Bateman and kudos also goes to Jesse Plemons as their creepy neighbor as he's one of, if not, the show stealer in this film. 6/10
CHOPPING MALL
I had seen some of this before during an Alamo Drafthouse screening but never completely. Wow, what a completely trashy movie. I would seriously love to meet the individual(s) who green lit this picture to proceed into development. The premise here is 8 stupid California kids who work at a local mall, "camp out" in one of the stores they work in (a furniture store) to drink and have sex. However, recently installed security robots malfunction and begin to pick the kids off one-by-one. I won't lie as there were times I genuinely laughed at some of the death scenes here and I could see this easily falling into the category of "so bad it's good." 3/10
Glad you were able to see both and enjoy them!GAME NIGHT
I'm really glad I quite enjoyed this. The previews looked hilarious to me but nowadays, so many times I've been burned because all of the funny parts seem to be in the previews (see FATHER FIGURES as a recent example). A good cast that works well together and a story that actually surprises you in parts and isn't just a mind numbing comedy. I love Jason Bateman and kudos also goes to Jesse Plemons as their creepy neighbor as he's one of, if not, the show stealer in this film. 6/10
CHOPPING MALL
I had seen some of this before during an Alamo Drafthouse screening but never completely. Wow, what a completely trashy movie. I would seriously love to meet the individual(s) who green lit this picture to proceed into development. The premise here is 8 stupid California kids who work at a local mall, "camp out" in one of the stores they work in (a furniture store) to drink and have sex. However, recently installed security robots malfunction and begin to pick the kids off one-by-one. I won't lie as there were times I genuinely laughed at some of the death scenes here and I could see this easily falling into the category of "so bad it's good." 3/10
Jason Bateman good actor, my wife wants to catch this movie.
Bateman was good in The Gift, check it out if you have not.
I may have to check out Chopping mall, I enjoy seeing movies that are so bad , they should not be missed.
That’s my draw to Svengoolie feature flicks.
Have a great evening Boss, more rain heading my way for the weekend so I may just get to see one or both of these as well.
Thanks
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/18 01:39 AM
Not a movie I am into 2 season 5 episode of Married With Children only 9 more seasons to go
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/18 01:53 AM
"Alien - Directors Cut." Most "Directors Cut" want you to pay again for the same old movie. Not this one. This first and best of Ridley Scott's "Alien" franchise is vastly improved, with sharp, clear video, vibrant colors, a big soundtrack and several minutes of extra footage. Really good.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/18 06:42 PM
Watched Some Came Running. I always enjoy Dean Martin movies and, most of the time, Sinatra movies. Shirley MacLaine gave a great performance.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/18 03:24 PM
Harry & Tonto..always heard about it,never saw ,,very nice & enduring perfomance by Art Carney.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/27/18 08:56 PM
Just watched Once Upon A Time In America again, still a stone cold classic. Not much wrong with this film..
9/10
9/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/18 01:33 AM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Just watched Once Upon A Time In America again, still a stone cold classic. Not much wrong with this film..
9/10
9/10
Agree, great film. I can get to 8 -9 on that easy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/18 05:51 PM
RED SPARROW
I was really looking forward to this since the moment I first saw the trailer and I must admit I was kind of disappointed. For an espionage thriller I felt it was rather dry at times. I'll give Jennifer Lawrence credit for stepping out of her comfort zone as this isn't her typical role. However, her Russian accent was all over the place. Sometimes it passed, sometimes it wasn't there and sometimes you could hear the voice over work during post-production. I don't mind Joel Edgerton but he comes off as one dimensional to me. With the exception of BLACK MASS, he's Mr. No Emotion. Not a terrible film at all, but go in with tempered expectations. 6/10
I was really looking forward to this since the moment I first saw the trailer and I must admit I was kind of disappointed. For an espionage thriller I felt it was rather dry at times. I'll give Jennifer Lawrence credit for stepping out of her comfort zone as this isn't her typical role. However, her Russian accent was all over the place. Sometimes it passed, sometimes it wasn't there and sometimes you could hear the voice over work during post-production. I don't mind Joel Edgerton but he comes off as one dimensional to me. With the exception of BLACK MASS, he's Mr. No Emotion. Not a terrible film at all, but go in with tempered expectations. 6/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/18 07:38 PM
Is it me or is Jennifer Lawrence the most overrated actress ever, don't know what the fuss is about, she's like the Taylor Swift of the film world..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/18 08:29 PM
I don't mind her, I like some of her work.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/18 10:38 PM
I'm just now seeing previews of Death Wish with Bruce Willis. I assume it's a remake of the Charles Bronson movie by the same name? Poor Willis will always be John McClain. I love Die Hard but it seems that character type is his legacy. Tho I must say, he's probably good for the part.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/03/18 07:59 PM
Yes TIS, it is a remake of the 1974 Charlie Bronson film of the same name.
DEATH WISH
I never saw the original version with Charlie Bronson so I have nothing to compare it to but Bruce Willis just seemed to mail in this performance. During the scenes were he's suppose to show emotion due to his wife's murder, Bruce just didn't seem to care and it showed. Camila Morrone who plays his daughter has more emotion and care for this movie than Bruce does. Vincent D'Onofrio is cast as Willis' brother Frank, who likewise at times, doesn't seem to care much. What I'm probably disappointed in the most is that Elisabeth Shue is relegated to these types of roles. I was a big fan of her's while I was growing up and she has a lot to offer. It's a shame she's wasted in a movie like this and seems to be exiled to TV shows. 6/10
DETROIT
Another film that looked better from the previews than in it's entirety. The story I felt was kind of rushed at the beginning and bounced around a lot. As such, by the time it did introduce us to our main characters, I wasn't invested in them at all. Their story of mistreatment and injustice is horrible and I'm not trying to belittle what they went through, but this film just didn't touch me in the way I believe they were hoping to reach an audience. However, unfortunately, we as a society haven't grown as much over the course of the last 50 years, as the story is as relevant today as it was back in 1967 when these events occurred: racial tensions and police brutality. Kathryn Bigelow has done better and this is definitely not one of her best films. In addition, some of the riot scenes looked too staged and that took me out of the moment. I'm a sucker for two things: continuity and authenticity and when either one of those is missing, it's hard for me to buy in as an audience member. The continuity of the film was fine but the authenticity ruined it for me. 5/10
DEATH WISH
I never saw the original version with Charlie Bronson so I have nothing to compare it to but Bruce Willis just seemed to mail in this performance. During the scenes were he's suppose to show emotion due to his wife's murder, Bruce just didn't seem to care and it showed. Camila Morrone who plays his daughter has more emotion and care for this movie than Bruce does. Vincent D'Onofrio is cast as Willis' brother Frank, who likewise at times, doesn't seem to care much. What I'm probably disappointed in the most is that Elisabeth Shue is relegated to these types of roles. I was a big fan of her's while I was growing up and she has a lot to offer. It's a shame she's wasted in a movie like this and seems to be exiled to TV shows. 6/10
DETROIT
Another film that looked better from the previews than in it's entirety. The story I felt was kind of rushed at the beginning and bounced around a lot. As such, by the time it did introduce us to our main characters, I wasn't invested in them at all. Their story of mistreatment and injustice is horrible and I'm not trying to belittle what they went through, but this film just didn't touch me in the way I believe they were hoping to reach an audience. However, unfortunately, we as a society haven't grown as much over the course of the last 50 years, as the story is as relevant today as it was back in 1967 when these events occurred: racial tensions and police brutality. Kathryn Bigelow has done better and this is definitely not one of her best films. In addition, some of the riot scenes looked too staged and that took me out of the moment. I'm a sucker for two things: continuity and authenticity and when either one of those is missing, it's hard for me to buy in as an audience member. The continuity of the film was fine but the authenticity ruined it for me. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/09/18 06:43 PM
THE STRANGERS: PREY AT NIGHT
The original THE STRANGERS I thought was forgettable and this will follow suit. I personally didn't think the original necessitated a sequel but here we are. Judging by the number of people, or lack thereof in the theater, I had a feeling this would bomb. Not to take anything away from the victims who experienced these events first hand (again this film is based on actual events), the film is rather mundane. No scares, some gore, not a lot of dialogue. The casting wasn't the best and I don't feel the parents, (Christina Hendricks and Martin Henderson) didn't work well with the kids (Bailee Madison and Lewis Pullman). Bailee put forth the best effort as the bad girl who's pissed off at her parents for shipping her to boarding school. On the way there they spend a night in a trailer park owned by Christina Hendricks Uncle and that's when they cross paths with the strangers. Besides Bailee's performance the only redeeming quality I found with the film was a pretty decent soundtrack. An easy pass for those on the fence about seeing this. 5/10
The original THE STRANGERS I thought was forgettable and this will follow suit. I personally didn't think the original necessitated a sequel but here we are. Judging by the number of people, or lack thereof in the theater, I had a feeling this would bomb. Not to take anything away from the victims who experienced these events first hand (again this film is based on actual events), the film is rather mundane. No scares, some gore, not a lot of dialogue. The casting wasn't the best and I don't feel the parents, (Christina Hendricks and Martin Henderson) didn't work well with the kids (Bailee Madison and Lewis Pullman). Bailee put forth the best effort as the bad girl who's pissed off at her parents for shipping her to boarding school. On the way there they spend a night in a trailer park owned by Christina Hendricks Uncle and that's when they cross paths with the strangers. Besides Bailee's performance the only redeeming quality I found with the film was a pretty decent soundtrack. An easy pass for those on the fence about seeing this. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/18 03:10 PM
GRINGO
A dark comedy with a story that's all over the place. Amazon put a little money behind this with their marketing but the film wasn't satisfying for me. A somewhat decent cast (Charlize Theron, Thandie Newton and Amanda Seyfried). With the exception of Theron and Joel Edgerton, they're all underutilized. Star David Oyelowo was passable as Harold Soyinka who's about to be fired from his pharmaceutical job due to a merger of his company and concocts a kidnapping story to get money from the company he's about to be fired from. In the process, he's on the run from a Mexican drug cartel who's recently been cut out of a business deal with the same pharmaceutical company and they're under the (wrong) impression that Harold is the boss. The only positive I found with the film was Theron who is a no nonsense, ball-breaking, dog eat dog woman who is only out for her best interests. She shines while everyone else fades. 5.5/10
THE OUTSIDER
I would definitely say this is one of Netflix better movies. In 1954, former US soldier Jared Leto joins a yakuza. The story centers on a rival gang that is at odds with Leto's gang over who controls certain territories in post-World War II Japan. The tension of the war is still very much alive between this American and the Japanese. Leto gives a good performance and at times, even being the main star, doesn't have a lot of dialogue (which is even pointed out by a former soldier he was in the service with that he happens to come across one night). Kind of reminded me of Meiko Kaji during her FEMALE PRISONER SCORPION series from the 1970's where her actions, facial expressions and eyes do her talking for her. A solid film in my opinion. 7/10
A dark comedy with a story that's all over the place. Amazon put a little money behind this with their marketing but the film wasn't satisfying for me. A somewhat decent cast (Charlize Theron, Thandie Newton and Amanda Seyfried). With the exception of Theron and Joel Edgerton, they're all underutilized. Star David Oyelowo was passable as Harold Soyinka who's about to be fired from his pharmaceutical job due to a merger of his company and concocts a kidnapping story to get money from the company he's about to be fired from. In the process, he's on the run from a Mexican drug cartel who's recently been cut out of a business deal with the same pharmaceutical company and they're under the (wrong) impression that Harold is the boss. The only positive I found with the film was Theron who is a no nonsense, ball-breaking, dog eat dog woman who is only out for her best interests. She shines while everyone else fades. 5.5/10
THE OUTSIDER
I would definitely say this is one of Netflix better movies. In 1954, former US soldier Jared Leto joins a yakuza. The story centers on a rival gang that is at odds with Leto's gang over who controls certain territories in post-World War II Japan. The tension of the war is still very much alive between this American and the Japanese. Leto gives a good performance and at times, even being the main star, doesn't have a lot of dialogue (which is even pointed out by a former soldier he was in the service with that he happens to come across one night). Kind of reminded me of Meiko Kaji during her FEMALE PRISONER SCORPION series from the 1970's where her actions, facial expressions and eyes do her talking for her. A solid film in my opinion. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/18 07:31 PM
THOROUGHBREDS
Anya Taylor-Joy is one of my favorite young actresses and this trailer caught my eye when I first came across it. The film has a limited cast but each does well in his/her respective roles (Joy, Olivia Cooke, Paul Sparks and Anton Yelchin). It's a shame this is one of Yelchin's final roles before his untimely death in 2016 as he was another fine young actor. The story follows 2 friends, Joy and Cooke, who plot to kill Joy's stepfather, Sparks. There's some dark comedy elements to the script with lovely scenery and set pieces as the story takes place on a Connecticut estate. Unfortunately, this is only seeing a limited release but you could do a lot worse with this weekend's crop of movies being released. 6.5/10
Anya Taylor-Joy is one of my favorite young actresses and this trailer caught my eye when I first came across it. The film has a limited cast but each does well in his/her respective roles (Joy, Olivia Cooke, Paul Sparks and Anton Yelchin). It's a shame this is one of Yelchin's final roles before his untimely death in 2016 as he was another fine young actor. The story follows 2 friends, Joy and Cooke, who plot to kill Joy's stepfather, Sparks. There's some dark comedy elements to the script with lovely scenery and set pieces as the story takes place on a Connecticut estate. Unfortunately, this is only seeing a limited release but you could do a lot worse with this weekend's crop of movies being released. 6.5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/18 07:39 PM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Is it me or is Jennifer Lawrence the most overrated actress ever, don't know what the fuss is about, she's like the Taylor Swift of the film world..
Her public relations team tell her to act quirky, make fart jokes and "accidentally" fall over in public to make her seem more relatable. Saoirse Ronan is a far more capable actress.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/18 12:39 PM
just watched once upon a time in brooklyn...
it was nice movie
it was nice movie
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/18 04:50 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Is it me or is Jennifer Lawrence the most overrated actress ever, don't know what the fuss is about, she's like the Taylor Swift of the film world..
Her public relations team tell her to act quirky, make fart jokes and "accidentally" fall over in public to make her seem more relatable. Saoirse Ronan is a far more capable actress.
Aside from "Silver Linings Playbook" ..which IMO ..she was bona fide & that 70s movie thing she did,,,I agree w/ u..but,, I will say that she looks so delicious that I would drink her through a plastic straw..or ..if I was ever so much 2feet in front of her ,,I would more than likely orgasm in my pants. A Lovely Woman..by the way,,check out her 1rst movie called "Winters Bone"..4 a powerful performance that won me over yrs. ago b4 she was anybody.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/18 05:05 PM
The first time I ever saw Jennifer Lawrence was in X-MEN: FIRST CLASS as Mystique. She was good and then again in THE HUNGER GAMES series but what won me over as a fan of her's was JOY funny enough. I felt she gave a really strong performance (I've still yet to see SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK).
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/18 05:16 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
The first time I ever saw Jennifer Lawrence was in X-MEN: FIRST CLASS as Mystique. She was good and then again in THE HUNGER GAMES series but what won me over as a fan of her's was JOY funny enough. I felt she gave a really strong performance (I've still yet to see SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK).
Originally Posted by Irishman12
The first time I ever saw Jennifer Lawrence was in X-MEN: FIRST CLASS as Mystique. She was good and then again in THE HUNGER GAMES series but what won me over as a fan of her's was JOY funny enough. I felt she gave a really strong performance (I've still yet to see SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK).
OH Fuck dude..GREAT movie..& Jen did an outstanding performance,,even up against Bob Deniro U must see!!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/18 08:36 PM
I love De Niro (obviously being on this board you pretty much need to) and I'm curious as for J-Law's role since she won an Oscar for it but I'm not a big fan of David O. Russell. His movies to me have always been kinda meh and forgettable (I HEART HUCKABEES, THE FIGHTER and AMERICAN HUSTLE); although I did enjoy both THREE KINGS and JOY. I'll have to add it to the list but even after seeing previews, the movie just never seemed to interest me that much. I'll have to take the plunge one day.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/18 03:38 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I love De Niro (obviously being on this board you pretty much need to) and I'm curious as for J-Law's role since she won an Oscar for it but I'm not a big fan of David O. Russell. His movies to me have always been kinda meh and forgettable (I HEART HUCKABEES, THE FIGHTER and AMERICAN HUSTLE); although I did enjoy both THREE KINGS and JOY. I'll have to add it to the list but even after seeing previews, the movie just never seemed to interest me that much. I'll have to take the plunge one day.
I'm sorry ,but we thought THE FIGHTER..& (well, not so much my wife on this one) AMERICAN HUSTLE were not bad flicks...But ,anyways.. J. Lawrence is not a bad actress & a good mind memory when ur having problems in the hay w/ the wife,,which is not often,, but still ...my wife works 16 hr. shifts as a nurse & I take a shower every 12 hrs......now do the math,,& figure out what I'm sayin'......LOL.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/14/18 02:14 PM
Just saw “Tarzan’s New York Aventure†on Turner classic movies.
Best Tarzan movie in my oppionion. Johnny Weissmuller jumps off the Brooklyn bridge in it to get Boy back
Best Tarzan movie in my oppionion. Johnny Weissmuller jumps off the Brooklyn bridge in it to get Boy back
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/14/18 06:21 PM
I love Johnny Weissmuller. I use to watch the old Tarzan movies all the time as a kid. They'd have a 4:00 movie, after school and if it was Tarzan, I watched. I really liked Tarzan and his Mate, Tarzan the Ape Man. Heck, I even learned some jungle talk. Just shout, "UNGOWA" and all the jungle animals come to you.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/18 03:46 AM
Originally Posted by The Italian Stallionette
I love Johnny Weissmuller. I use to watch the old Tarzan movies all the time as a kid. They'd have a 4:00 movie, after school and if it was Tarzan, I watched. I really liked Tarzan and his Mate, Tarzan the Ape Man. Heck, I even learned some jungle talk. Just shout, "UNGOWA" and all the jungle animals come to you.
TIS
TIS
TIS, I remember that language too. Well, I remember about it, but I can't recall the words (except Boy). Do you remember any of the other words?
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/18 03:54 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
I remember that language too. Well, I remember about it, but I can't recall the words (except Boy). Do you remember any of the other words?
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/18 06:55 AM
Originally Posted by Footreads
Just saw “Tarzan’s New York Aventure†on Turner classic movies.
Best Tarzan movie in my oppionion. Johnny Weissmuller jumps off the Brooklyn bridge in it to get Boy back
Best Tarzan movie in my oppionion. Johnny Weissmuller jumps off the Brooklyn bridge in it to get Boy back
Saw that this morning..my time on screen I think is messed up,,it was on around 10:00 wed. morn ..right??T.C.M.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/18 07:41 PM
TOMB RAIDER
As an action film, it felt bland. Alicia Vikander was passable as Lara Croft and I was really happy to see Walton Goggins stretch his wings further as the lead villain as I've always been a fan of his from first seeing him on FX's THE SHIELD (an underrated show IMO). Even Walton I felt was bland, the action scenes were somewhat dull with the exception of the waterfall and Lara grabbing onto part of a plane that is briefly shown in trailers. I believe I saw the original 2 starring Angelina Jolie but don't remember anything good or bad about them so they obviously didn't make much of an impression on me. Overall, this felt like a cheap rip off of an Indiana Jones film. 5.5/10
7 DAY IN ENTEBBE
The true story of Palestinian and Palestinian sympathizers who hijack a plane headed for Paris and reroute it to Entebbe, Uganda to negotiate the release of Palestinian prisoners. The trailer hooked me as it looked pretty interesting and it was. Rosamund Pike has been putting her work in lately with HOSTILES, this and BEIRUT coming out later this summer. I enjoy her work as well as Daniel Brühl's who is also one of the hijackers. Not very suspenseful but still enjoyable watching it all pay out. I don't say that to be disrespectful towards the victims but rather as a movie going experience. 6/10
As an action film, it felt bland. Alicia Vikander was passable as Lara Croft and I was really happy to see Walton Goggins stretch his wings further as the lead villain as I've always been a fan of his from first seeing him on FX's THE SHIELD (an underrated show IMO). Even Walton I felt was bland, the action scenes were somewhat dull with the exception of the waterfall and Lara grabbing onto part of a plane that is briefly shown in trailers. I believe I saw the original 2 starring Angelina Jolie but don't remember anything good or bad about them so they obviously didn't make much of an impression on me. Overall, this felt like a cheap rip off of an Indiana Jones film. 5.5/10
7 DAY IN ENTEBBE
The true story of Palestinian and Palestinian sympathizers who hijack a plane headed for Paris and reroute it to Entebbe, Uganda to negotiate the release of Palestinian prisoners. The trailer hooked me as it looked pretty interesting and it was. Rosamund Pike has been putting her work in lately with HOSTILES, this and BEIRUT coming out later this summer. I enjoy her work as well as Daniel Brühl's who is also one of the hijackers. Not very suspenseful but still enjoyable watching it all pay out. I don't say that to be disrespectful towards the victims but rather as a movie going experience. 6/10
Posted By: Capo de La Cosa Nostra
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/18 11:07 PM
Anyone have a Letterboxd account? I'm here.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/18 05:42 PM
PACIFIC RIM: UPRISING
The original PACIFIC RIM I only saw once and that was in the theaters. With a movie like this, I figure you should see it on the biggest screen possible. Anyway, the first one didn't leave much of an impression on me but this one did because it was bad. The story was weak and rushed. I'm also not a fan of most children or young actors/actresses and Cailee Spaeny reminded me why. I just found her and her character to be somewhat annoying. It's a good thing John Boyega has STAR WARS to fall back on because his work outside of that hasn't impressed me much. I do enjoy Charlie Day and he provided a little comedy to the movie, but overall, it was a mess. I'm glad it wasn't overly long and bloated as well. I would have given it a lower score but the visual FX were good (although some of the battle scenes between the robots and monsters were boring). How do you screw up a robot/monster battle!? 5/10
The original PACIFIC RIM I only saw once and that was in the theaters. With a movie like this, I figure you should see it on the biggest screen possible. Anyway, the first one didn't leave much of an impression on me but this one did because it was bad. The story was weak and rushed. I'm also not a fan of most children or young actors/actresses and Cailee Spaeny reminded me why. I just found her and her character to be somewhat annoying. It's a good thing John Boyega has STAR WARS to fall back on because his work outside of that hasn't impressed me much. I do enjoy Charlie Day and he provided a little comedy to the movie, but overall, it was a mess. I'm glad it wasn't overly long and bloated as well. I would have given it a lower score but the visual FX were good (although some of the battle scenes between the robots and monsters were boring). How do you screw up a robot/monster battle!? 5/10
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/18 06:43 PM
Tarzan's New York Adventure is awesome all the way around. I love Charles Lane as the lawyer, the same nasty character he'd play for the next 40 years.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/18 07:51 PM
Daddy's Home 2 was pretty awful compared to the first one. The rule of diminishing returns in effect.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/18 08:18 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Daddy's Home 2 was pretty awful compared to the first one. The rule of diminishing returns in effect.
It was, but don't sleep on BAD MOMS 2. The first wasn't bad (kind of a nice surprise for recent comedies) but the sequel was wretched!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/18 05:30 PM
UNSANE
I really enjoyed this film, in fact, more so than I originally thought I would. Steven Soderbergh does a great job with his directing, especially in the early parts of the film. When viewed outside, main star Claire Foy is usually observed from a stalker's POV. However, when it's an inside setting, the camera angle is usually off slightly and closer than it should be, giving the audience an awkward or uncomfortable feeling. This was my first time seeing Claire Foy and she gives an amazing performance of a woman who is committed against her will, trying to convince everyone else she's perfectly sane and that she doesn't belong there. However, in the process, she appears to make herself look even more insane to the hospital staff. In addition, it gives more of an insight into how trapped women of stalkers can feel. Having to change their name, telephone numbers and location, all while constantly always looking of their shoulder. Again, I thoroughly enjoyed this and will probably see it in theaters again! 7/10
I really enjoyed this film, in fact, more so than I originally thought I would. Steven Soderbergh does a great job with his directing, especially in the early parts of the film. When viewed outside, main star Claire Foy is usually observed from a stalker's POV. However, when it's an inside setting, the camera angle is usually off slightly and closer than it should be, giving the audience an awkward or uncomfortable feeling. This was my first time seeing Claire Foy and she gives an amazing performance of a woman who is committed against her will, trying to convince everyone else she's perfectly sane and that she doesn't belong there. However, in the process, she appears to make herself look even more insane to the hospital staff. In addition, it gives more of an insight into how trapped women of stalkers can feel. Having to change their name, telephone numbers and location, all while constantly always looking of their shoulder. Again, I thoroughly enjoyed this and will probably see it in theaters again! 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/18 11:55 PM
Great reviews.
I plan on passing on the PR:U
Pass on DH2
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
Thanks
I plan on passing on the PR:U
Pass on DH2
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
Thanks
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/18 03:12 AM
The Rising of the Moon on T.C.M.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/18 09:20 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
Thanks
Thanks
I'd be curious what you and the Mrs. think.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/18 09:51 PM
THE BLOOD SPLATTERED BRIDE
Another film I was able to find on Amazon Prime. I watched it because it was referenced in Quentin Tarantino's KILL BILL, however, this film has very little, if anything to do with Tarantino's work. The film is a Spanish horror movie about a man whose gross sexual appetite alienates his new bride, who eventually recoils from his advances and ends up seduced by a female vampire. The story moved pretty slow and it lost my interest somewhat about halfway or more through. 5/10
Another film I was able to find on Amazon Prime. I watched it because it was referenced in Quentin Tarantino's KILL BILL, however, this film has very little, if anything to do with Tarantino's work. The film is a Spanish horror movie about a man whose gross sexual appetite alienates his new bride, who eventually recoils from his advances and ends up seduced by a female vampire. The story moved pretty slow and it lost my interest somewhat about halfway or more through. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/18 10:40 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
The Rising of the Moon on T.C.M.
saw that, interesting movie. Love getting a good view of the old days in other countries and getting great insight.
The Black & Tan Wars.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
I
Thanks
I
Thanks
I'd be curious what you and the Mrs. think.
Will do, we should be to see it soon, also looking to get to The Shape of Water this week.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/18 10:54 AM
I wasted two hours of my life on 3 Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri yesterday.
Shockingly bad movie.
A couple of minutes in I realized what kind of agenda the movie had with the first interaction between Sam Rockwell's character and one of the black gentleman putting up the billboards, the first of several lamely written proxies in the film.
Every character is a caricature; Rockwell's aforementioned character reminding me of Dax Shepard's character in Idiocracy. Every person in the movie is portrayed as a dribbling moron, apart from McDormand and all the black characters.
The script, too, is poorly written. What is this woman's motivation for putting up the billboards I kept waiting patiently to figure out? Yes, her daughter died brutally, but how were Willoughby and the rest of the police department culpable of not doing their jobs properly? We never really figure out. The closest we come is one of several ham-fistedly scripted scenes where McDormand says every man in the country should be put into a database or some shit. Eh, ok? Apparently, the police department is racist, though, but this has no real tangible link to the investigation surrounding her daughter's death. It merely gives Rockwell an excuse to chew scenery, and the Oscars to celebrate how racist America is while lauding another movie that portrays the entire American South as racist and/or stupid.
Another example of the movie's poor scripting, tone deafness and chronically bad dialogue is a cack-handed flashback where McDormand's daughter says she "hopes she gets raped" after storming out of the house the night, she, you know, gets raped and murdered.
The movie struggles, and fails, to find a balance between the seriousness of the subject matter and humour. All through the movie I was wondering is this supposed to be a comedy? An example is the girlfriend of McDormand's ex-husband. I thought it would have had more merit if the ex had shacked up with a 19 year old because he was subconsciously trying to replace his daughter, but, no, the movie basically uses the 19 year old as comic relief in a movie that already has several comic relief characters, including a midget, and doesn't really warrant comic relief.
This brings me to McDormand. Her acting was very good, but a better writer and director would've gotten a better sense of the character. As it is, she resembles a female version of Kevin Bacon in Death Sentence or Bruce Willis in Death Wish playing the female lead in an exploitation movie, rather than shouldering the serious, character-driven piece this should've been. The scene where she kicked a male and female student respectively in the groin area after throwing a can at her car is probably the most egregious example of this movie being a tonal mess and looking for laughs at the wrong time.
Rockwell's character's "redemption" takes the cake in terms of poor writing, though. Someone who turns from dribbling, racist lunatic to conscientious, hard-nosed detective in the space of what must be days in the movie. Don't get me started on the sequence where he attempts to murder someone (which the movie appears to subsequently forget about, as he doesn't appear to be under any sort of IA investigation) and one of the mea culpa proxies, Lester Freamon from The Wire, is introduced in a predictably heavy-handed manner.
I keep mentioning tone deafness, but I haven't even mentioned the best part. The ex-husband having a 19 year old girlfriend is a recurring plot device, yet Woody Harrelson's wife doesn't look a day over 25!
I will end my rant now before I accidentally spoil anything, but, it bears repeating; Rockwell's arc is crucial to the second half of the movie, but, it is written poorly, Freamon's character doesn't really go anywhere and seems to basically be a morally upstanding black character for the sake of the movie's liberal bent in a movie that portrays every white "redneck" character as racist and/or stupid caricatures, and the movie doesn't figure out how properly to transition the co-lead role from Harrelson to Rockwell.
Shockingly bad movie.
A couple of minutes in I realized what kind of agenda the movie had with the first interaction between Sam Rockwell's character and one of the black gentleman putting up the billboards, the first of several lamely written proxies in the film.
Every character is a caricature; Rockwell's aforementioned character reminding me of Dax Shepard's character in Idiocracy. Every person in the movie is portrayed as a dribbling moron, apart from McDormand and all the black characters.
The script, too, is poorly written. What is this woman's motivation for putting up the billboards I kept waiting patiently to figure out? Yes, her daughter died brutally, but how were Willoughby and the rest of the police department culpable of not doing their jobs properly? We never really figure out. The closest we come is one of several ham-fistedly scripted scenes where McDormand says every man in the country should be put into a database or some shit. Eh, ok? Apparently, the police department is racist, though, but this has no real tangible link to the investigation surrounding her daughter's death. It merely gives Rockwell an excuse to chew scenery, and the Oscars to celebrate how racist America is while lauding another movie that portrays the entire American South as racist and/or stupid.
Another example of the movie's poor scripting, tone deafness and chronically bad dialogue is a cack-handed flashback where McDormand's daughter says she "hopes she gets raped" after storming out of the house the night, she, you know, gets raped and murdered.
The movie struggles, and fails, to find a balance between the seriousness of the subject matter and humour. All through the movie I was wondering is this supposed to be a comedy? An example is the girlfriend of McDormand's ex-husband. I thought it would have had more merit if the ex had shacked up with a 19 year old because he was subconsciously trying to replace his daughter, but, no, the movie basically uses the 19 year old as comic relief in a movie that already has several comic relief characters, including a midget, and doesn't really warrant comic relief.
This brings me to McDormand. Her acting was very good, but a better writer and director would've gotten a better sense of the character. As it is, she resembles a female version of Kevin Bacon in Death Sentence or Bruce Willis in Death Wish playing the female lead in an exploitation movie, rather than shouldering the serious, character-driven piece this should've been. The scene where she kicked a male and female student respectively in the groin area after throwing a can at her car is probably the most egregious example of this movie being a tonal mess and looking for laughs at the wrong time.
Rockwell's character's "redemption" takes the cake in terms of poor writing, though. Someone who turns from dribbling, racist lunatic to conscientious, hard-nosed detective in the space of what must be days in the movie. Don't get me started on the sequence where he attempts to murder someone (which the movie appears to subsequently forget about, as he doesn't appear to be under any sort of IA investigation) and one of the mea culpa proxies, Lester Freamon from The Wire, is introduced in a predictably heavy-handed manner.
I keep mentioning tone deafness, but I haven't even mentioned the best part. The ex-husband having a 19 year old girlfriend is a recurring plot device, yet Woody Harrelson's wife doesn't look a day over 25!
I will end my rant now before I accidentally spoil anything, but, it bears repeating; Rockwell's arc is crucial to the second half of the movie, but, it is written poorly, Freamon's character doesn't really go anywhere and seems to basically be a morally upstanding black character for the sake of the movie's liberal bent in a movie that portrays every white "redneck" character as racist and/or stupid caricatures, and the movie doesn't figure out how properly to transition the co-lead role from Harrelson to Rockwell.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/18 05:17 PM
I wasn't a big fan of THREE BILLBOARDS either. I was looking forward to it because from the trailers it looked pretty funny. Same as you, I was caught off guard with the change in tone as the film progressed. I thought Frances McDormand was good and deserving of her Oscar. I like Sam Rockwell too but wasn't as convinced with his Oscar win. I believe the movie is more hype than anything. Not a bad movie in my opinion, but not as great as what some of the critics have given it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/18 05:21 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
I
Thanks
I
Thanks
I'd be curious what you and the Mrs. think.
Will do, we should be to see it soon, also looking to get to The Shape of Water this week.
[/quote]
I saw it again last night. If you and the Mrs. see a lot of movies in the theaters, then you should definitely sign up for MoviePass! $9.99 per month (per person) for unlimited* movies every month.
*Unlimited meaning 1 movie per calendar day and only works on 2D showings. Doesn't work on 3D, Fathom Events, etc.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/18 12:56 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Will see UNSANE since this would be one the Wife and I both will enjoy.
I
Thanks
I
Thanks
I'd be curious what you and the Mrs. think.
Will do, we should be to see it soon, also looking to get to The Shape of Water this week.
I saw it again last night. If you and the Mrs. see a lot of movies in the theaters, then you should definitely sign up for MoviePass! $9.99 per month (per person) for unlimited* movies every month.
*Unlimited meaning 1 movie per calendar day and only works on 2D showings. Doesn't work on 3D, Fathom Events, etc.[/quote]
Wow, that is a great deal..... if I had the schedule for that , I would.
When I retire, this is happening.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/18 01:11 AM
Just watched the last half of The Force Awakens. Given the rich history of the Star Wars saga, I thought this episode could have been much more dramatic, both performances and storyline.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/18 06:22 PM
I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE
This film, not only being controversial for many reasons, but is also difficult to watch. While the subject matter is nothing to praise, I at least give credit to Director Meir Zarchi for his honest account and portrayal of a woman, played by Camille Keaton, who is repeatedly raped by 4 locals when she ventures off for a summer at a cabin to write her novel. Many view this as filth and exploitation while some commend it for its feminism. It at least gives the audience the chance to think where they feel it belongs without the director giving us his opinion or forcing his upon us. A lot of respect to the cast and crew who shot this as a few people did quit the production due to the violence portrayed. Also, this was shot in 1978 and with a low budget, meaning only one camera was used and the rape scenes had to be filmed multiple times from different angles. In addition, I appreciate the fact very little music is used in the film, rather leaving the characters and the audience left with the tranquility of silence that nature provides, while at the same time, reminding us just how alone this girl is. Again, this is not a film for everyone but I appreciate the honestly it provides as something as selfish and hideous as rape should not be glamorized on the big screen like it has so many times before and since this film's release. 6/10
ACRIMONY
Don't even waste your time, unless you want to spend 2 hours listening to Taraji P. Henson complain for the entire film about how she was fleeced by her ex-husband. The premise of the story follows Taraji as she's in a therapy/anger management session telling us how she came to be in that office. She talks about her ex-husband and how they met in college and she supported him financially (her mother recently died so she came into a little bit of money as a result). He was working on his invention for their entire relationship (18 years later) and she finally divorces him after suspecting him of cheating. Once his invention takes off after their divorce and he's newly engaged to the woman he was suspected to cheat with, Taraji comes out of the woodwork wanting her cut. I've only seen Taraji in PROUD MARY and this and while she did a decent job with this character, I'm not overly impressed with her work. 4.5/10
This film, not only being controversial for many reasons, but is also difficult to watch. While the subject matter is nothing to praise, I at least give credit to Director Meir Zarchi for his honest account and portrayal of a woman, played by Camille Keaton, who is repeatedly raped by 4 locals when she ventures off for a summer at a cabin to write her novel. Many view this as filth and exploitation while some commend it for its feminism. It at least gives the audience the chance to think where they feel it belongs without the director giving us his opinion or forcing his upon us. A lot of respect to the cast and crew who shot this as a few people did quit the production due to the violence portrayed. Also, this was shot in 1978 and with a low budget, meaning only one camera was used and the rape scenes had to be filmed multiple times from different angles. In addition, I appreciate the fact very little music is used in the film, rather leaving the characters and the audience left with the tranquility of silence that nature provides, while at the same time, reminding us just how alone this girl is. Again, this is not a film for everyone but I appreciate the honestly it provides as something as selfish and hideous as rape should not be glamorized on the big screen like it has so many times before and since this film's release. 6/10
ACRIMONY
Don't even waste your time, unless you want to spend 2 hours listening to Taraji P. Henson complain for the entire film about how she was fleeced by her ex-husband. The premise of the story follows Taraji as she's in a therapy/anger management session telling us how she came to be in that office. She talks about her ex-husband and how they met in college and she supported him financially (her mother recently died so she came into a little bit of money as a result). He was working on his invention for their entire relationship (18 years later) and she finally divorces him after suspecting him of cheating. Once his invention takes off after their divorce and he's newly engaged to the woman he was suspected to cheat with, Taraji comes out of the woodwork wanting her cut. I've only seen Taraji in PROUD MARY and this and while she did a decent job with this character, I'm not overly impressed with her work. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/18 12:52 AM
READY PLAYER ONE
Wow, this was an absolute visual and nostalgic treat. A little more than half of the film takes place in the Oasis which I am absolutely fine with as it's just stunning with an awesome 80s soundtrack to back it up! Without giving away too much, my favorite part of the film was during the second challenge. Vintage Spielberg and his most enjoyable film I believe since 2005's MUNICH. Definitely the type of film to see on the big screen and I will be seeing it again in theaters. My favorite film so far of 2018, with ANNIHILATION right behind it. 8.5/10
Wow, this was an absolute visual and nostalgic treat. A little more than half of the film takes place in the Oasis which I am absolutely fine with as it's just stunning with an awesome 80s soundtrack to back it up! Without giving away too much, my favorite part of the film was during the second challenge. Vintage Spielberg and his most enjoyable film I believe since 2005's MUNICH. Definitely the type of film to see on the big screen and I will be seeing it again in theaters. My favorite film so far of 2018, with ANNIHILATION right behind it. 8.5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/03/18 06:19 PM
Again I watched The Force Awakens. I liked Rey having the Force power. However, when Darth Vader's grandson took off his mask, I almost laughed. He looked like a refugee from a 70s rock band with that long hair and benign face (reminded me of Ray on Everybody Loves Raymond) And what is it with the Supreme Leader? How pedestrian a title! I think that's what they called Castro.
Well, one of these days I'll watch the Last Jedi. Hope it's better.
Well, one of these days I'll watch the Last Jedi. Hope it's better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/18 07:01 PM
I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE (2010)
A remake of the Meir Zarchi classic from 1978. It follows the same formula as the original, not adding but rather taking away from the original in my opinion. Not as brutal of a film as the original but what I had a problem with the most were the scenes in which Jennifer gets her revenge against her assailants. The death scenes I felt were very over the top, with contraptions that would impress even Jigsaw (this coming from a character who is a novelist by trade remember). In fact, the movie seemed to take an almost horror film feel to it by the midway point. An unnecessary remake that, with all of the controversy surrounding the original, I wasn't quite sure what they were hoping to gain with this? 5/10
A remake of the Meir Zarchi classic from 1978. It follows the same formula as the original, not adding but rather taking away from the original in my opinion. Not as brutal of a film as the original but what I had a problem with the most were the scenes in which Jennifer gets her revenge against her assailants. The death scenes I felt were very over the top, with contraptions that would impress even Jigsaw (this coming from a character who is a novelist by trade remember). In fact, the movie seemed to take an almost horror film feel to it by the midway point. An unnecessary remake that, with all of the controversy surrounding the original, I wasn't quite sure what they were hoping to gain with this? 5/10
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/05/18 11:39 AM
Any one see the new Production of Jesus Christ Superstar a few days ago on tv?
If you did what did you think about it? Outside of all the commercials they ran during it. They should have did it like a football soccer game. Get them done before the start and at the half.
I saw it but I also saw the original Broadway production of it at a Theather here in a NYC.
If you did what did you think about it? Outside of all the commercials they ran during it. They should have did it like a football soccer game. Get them done before the start and at the half.
I saw it but I also saw the original Broadway production of it at a Theather here in a NYC.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/05/18 05:52 PM
Hey it’s on now.
I prefer the one starring Ben Vereen as Judas he could sing and he was a dancer, Jeff Fenholt as Jesus no Jesus can hit the notes that he could not John Legend, Barry Denen as Pilate and Yvonne Elliman was great.
That was a cast of stars.
I prefer the one starring Ben Vereen as Judas he could sing and he was a dancer, Jeff Fenholt as Jesus no Jesus can hit the notes that he could not John Legend, Barry Denen as Pilate and Yvonne Elliman was great.
That was a cast of stars.
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/18 04:29 AM
Watchin 'Suddenly' starring Frank Sinatra and Sterling Hayden (Captain McCluskey in GF) and shocker he's playing a cop lol
Pretty good film so far
Pretty good film so far
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/18 01:28 PM
Suddenly was a good movie.
I just saw Looking for An Echo it’s on you tube.
It never was released in a Theather. My friend Johnny was in it. Anthony Dennison, Armand Assante stared in it. Tom mason was the guy who lived in Staten Island.also played the cop who killed the father of Christopher Moltisanti on the sopranos. Kenny Vance did the music.
Worth seeing good movie.
I just saw Looking for An Echo it’s on you tube.
It never was released in a Theather. My friend Johnny was in it. Anthony Dennison, Armand Assante stared in it. Tom mason was the guy who lived in Staten Island.also played the cop who killed the father of Christopher Moltisanti on the sopranos. Kenny Vance did the music.
Worth seeing good movie.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/18 05:10 PM
the long ships 1964 is good movie
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/18 12:43 AM
I say it years ago. Then I bought it on amazon months ago have not watched it yet.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/18 02:54 PM
Just saw another old science fiction movie from the 50s that I saw as a kid.
The Brain from Planet Aros starring John Agar. Low budget but good. If you have not seen it and your into old science fiction movies you might want to see it.
I don’t want to spoil it for you. I used to love those movies still do.
The Brain from Planet Aros starring John Agar. Low budget but good. If you have not seen it and your into old science fiction movies you might want to see it.
I don’t want to spoil it for you. I used to love those movies still do.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/18 03:02 PM
midnight express is good movie
it's based on a real story
it's based on a real story
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/18 03:54 PM
I just next episode of Billions very good. Best one so far in the series.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/10/18 12:05 AM
Shape of Water
Strange but compelling.
Can get a bit confusing but hang in there and stay with it.
I liked it. 6-7.5
Up Next ....UNSANE
Strange but compelling.
Can get a bit confusing but hang in there and stay with it.
I liked it. 6-7.5
Up Next ....UNSANE
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/10/18 06:20 PM
Enjoy UNSANE DuesPaid!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/18 12:36 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Enjoy UNSANE DuesPaid!
I thought we would have got to it this past weekend but too much going on, I almost went without the wife but she said she will be in one day this week.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/18 01:12 PM
Since my wife retired she expects me always to be with her. I retired years before she did. I need my time alone or with my friends. Now most of my friends are dead. But I still need my time alone.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/18 01:23 PM
Originally Posted by Footreads
Since my wife retired she expects me always to be with her. I retired years before she did. I need my time alone or with my friends. Now most of my friends are dead. But I still need my time alone.
I hear ya Foots.... we are not retired but we work on doing things together so going to Movies is a good one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/18 05:42 PM
BEIRUT
A pretty solid role for Jon Hamm and it's always nice to see Rosamund Pike as I dig her work but her last few movies, this and 7 DAYS IN ENTEBBE, have been let downs. The story was trying to juggle too many parts I felt and I guess there was supposed to be a big reveal about 30 minutes in that wasn't that hard to actually figure out. Some but not much suspense. 5.5/10
A pretty solid role for Jon Hamm and it's always nice to see Rosamund Pike as I dig her work but her last few movies, this and 7 DAYS IN ENTEBBE, have been let downs. The story was trying to juggle too many parts I felt and I guess there was supposed to be a big reveal about 30 minutes in that wasn't that hard to actually figure out. Some but not much suspense. 5.5/10
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/18 08:06 PM
I hear ya Foots.... we are not retired but we work on doing things together so going to Movies is a good one.
[/quote]
I go every where with her it is never enough. Unless she gets mad at me. We hardly ever fight anymore. Unless I want
to go somewhere with out her.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/18 01:42 AM
My wife don’t Golf , don’t drink and does not Fish.
These are three things I like to do without her.
I will wait to see current Movies till she is ready since that is a solid entertainment we both enjoy.
I have a 55†SAMSUNG , pool table and fully stocked bar in basement for when my wife is mad at me...... I look forward to her being pissed off sometimes.
Better off going to the movies though.
These are three things I like to do without her.
I will wait to see current Movies till she is ready since that is a solid entertainment we both enjoy.
I have a 55†SAMSUNG , pool table and fully stocked bar in basement for when my wife is mad at me...... I look forward to her being pissed off sometimes.
Better off going to the movies though.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/18 04:19 AM
Watched Dominic and Eugene today with Liotta and Hulce. Such an excellent movie. Hulce's performance was outstanding. It's a shame he retired from acting. It was pleasant to see Liotta in his prime.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/18 06:14 PM
A QUIET PLACE
A rollercoaster ride of emotions. I really enjoyed the fact there was so little dialogue and this was a fine example of how much of our communication isn't verbal, but physical. I didn't really see any loopholes in the writing which was a positive. I had one concern and without giving too much away, I'm satisified it was answered in the picture. Glad to see some originality coming out of Hollywood! Word is this almost became part of the CLOVERFIELD series and I'm happy it didn't. I'm glad it's standing on it's own, has received such positive reviews and was the #1 movie in the country last weekend. 6.5/10
A rollercoaster ride of emotions. I really enjoyed the fact there was so little dialogue and this was a fine example of how much of our communication isn't verbal, but physical. I didn't really see any loopholes in the writing which was a positive. I had one concern and without giving too much away, I'm satisified it was answered in the picture. Glad to see some originality coming out of Hollywood! Word is this almost became part of the CLOVERFIELD series and I'm happy it didn't. I'm glad it's standing on it's own, has received such positive reviews and was the #1 movie in the country last weekend. 6.5/10
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/13/18 02:09 AM
Saw bridge over the River Kwai. Took me three days to watch it.
Like the doctor said at the end of the movie Madness.
Like the doctor said at the end of the movie Madness.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/13/18 05:46 PM
CHAPPAQUIDDICK
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/18 02:30 PM
I just found out the Irishman the movie with DeNiro, Pesci and other is not going to be released on Netflix until 2019.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/18 05:33 PM
Originally Posted by Footreads
Saw bridge over the River Kwai. Took me three days to watch it.
Like the doctor said at the end of the movie Madness.
Like the doctor said at the end of the movie Madness.
ohh i've been there ! nice place
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/18 07:17 PM
RAMPAGE
Not a bad movie based upon a video game. How often can you say that? Action, humor and good special effects. It's a popcorn action movie for sure but also brings some feelings for these animals, especially George. I did dig Jeffrey Dean Morgan as a smooth talking, southern government man. Besides The Rock he probably stole the show for me. 6/10
BLOCKERS
A decent comedy that had some hits and some misses. I'm glad to see John Cena getting more involved in Hollywood and with decent movies too, not just straight-to-DVD garbage. The trio of parents (Ike Barinholtz, John Cena and Leslie Mann) seemed to have decent chemistry together as well. 5/10
Not a bad movie based upon a video game. How often can you say that? Action, humor and good special effects. It's a popcorn action movie for sure but also brings some feelings for these animals, especially George. I did dig Jeffrey Dean Morgan as a smooth talking, southern government man. Besides The Rock he probably stole the show for me. 6/10
BLOCKERS
A decent comedy that had some hits and some misses. I'm glad to see John Cena getting more involved in Hollywood and with decent movies too, not just straight-to-DVD garbage. The trio of parents (Ike Barinholtz, John Cena and Leslie Mann) seemed to have decent chemistry together as well. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/18 01:20 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
CHAPPAQUIDDICK
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
Sounds like he played this perfectly.
May move this up to top of the list to see, thanks BOSS
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/18 01:35 AM
I saw Jason Clark in two things. One was a show on showtime. Called the Brotherhood a good show.
The other was that movie on hunting for Ben the the giant Arab terrorist who they caught and killed. But gave a good muslem burial at sea. They did not even piss on his dead fucking body.
The other was that movie on hunting for Ben the the giant Arab terrorist who they caught and killed. But gave a good muslem burial at sea. They did not even piss on his dead fucking body.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/18 04:05 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
CHAPPAQUIDDICK
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
Sounds like he played this perfectly.
May move this up to top of the list to see, thanks BOSS
Enjoy it when you do! Did you get a chance to see UNSANE yet?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/18 07:54 PM
TRUTH OR DARE
Blumhouse is kind of hit or miss for me and this was a miss. Truth be told, I wasn't expecting much from this film anyway but it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. Yes, the premise is stupid and that smile annoying. Not much suspense or decent death scenes. It's PG-13 so other than language, it's pretty watered down. 4/10
Blumhouse is kind of hit or miss for me and this was a miss. Truth be told, I wasn't expecting much from this film anyway but it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. Yes, the premise is stupid and that smile annoying. Not much suspense or decent death scenes. It's PG-13 so other than language, it's pretty watered down. 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/18 11:33 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
CHAPPAQUIDDICK
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
This is one of Jason Clarke's better roles. He is cold, apathetic and uncaring at times. I give the costume and makeup people credit as I feel he even looks a little like Ted Kennedy. I was also happy to see Ed Helms branch out into something more dramatic and he does a passable job as the voice of reason during this whole situation. A decent story about power, corruption and politics. 6/10
Sounds like he played this perfectly.
May move this up to top of the list to see, thanks BOSS
Enjoy it when you do! Did you get a chance to see UNSANE yet?
No, did not get to see UNSANE yet but will.
We watched an older flick we never saw today...... Inside Man, Denzel Washington and many other great actors 2006
Very good stay in Movie, we had bad weather so remained home.
I give it a 8 wife gave 7.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/18 06:46 PM
Yes, INSIDE MAN was a good film. Glad you enjoyed it as well.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/18 07:57 PM
Anyone else love late 80's and early nineties thrillers?
Talking about movies like Tequila Sunrise, Single White Female, Pacific Heights.
I watched Unlawful Entry with Ray Liotta and Kurt Russell the other day.
Liotta is great in the villain role and Russell's always dependable as the yuppie lead.
Liotta's a cop who becomes obsessed with Russell's wife, and ingratiates himself into their lives, after responding to a break in at their home at the start of the movie.
As you can probably tell, I love the bunny boiler oeuvre; movies like Fatal Attraction and Disclosure.
This has an interesting twist as it's the guy (Liotta) who is dangerously hung up on a woman who he can't have.
Talking about movies like Tequila Sunrise, Single White Female, Pacific Heights.
I watched Unlawful Entry with Ray Liotta and Kurt Russell the other day.
Liotta is great in the villain role and Russell's always dependable as the yuppie lead.
Liotta's a cop who becomes obsessed with Russell's wife, and ingratiates himself into their lives, after responding to a break in at their home at the start of the movie.
As you can probably tell, I love the bunny boiler oeuvre; movies like Fatal Attraction and Disclosure.
This has an interesting twist as it's the guy (Liotta) who is dangerously hung up on a woman who he can't have.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/17/18 04:40 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Anyone else love late 80's and early nineties thrillers?
Talking about movies like Tequila Sunrise, Single White Female, Pacific Heights.
I watched Unlawful Entry with Ray Liotta and Kurt Russell the other day.
Liotta is great in the villain role and Russell's always dependable as the yuppie lead.
Liotta's a cop who becomes obsessed with Russell's wife, and ingratiates himself into their lives, after responding to a break in at their home at the start of the movie.
As you can probably tell, I love the bunny boiler oeuvre; movies like Fatal Attraction and Disclosure.
This has an interesting twist as it's the guy (Liotta) who is dangerously hung up on a woman who he can't have.
Talking about movies like Tequila Sunrise, Single White Female, Pacific Heights.
I watched Unlawful Entry with Ray Liotta and Kurt Russell the other day.
Liotta is great in the villain role and Russell's always dependable as the yuppie lead.
Liotta's a cop who becomes obsessed with Russell's wife, and ingratiates himself into their lives, after responding to a break in at their home at the start of the movie.
As you can probably tell, I love the bunny boiler oeuvre; movies like Fatal Attraction and Disclosure.
This has an interesting twist as it's the guy (Liotta) who is dangerously hung up on a woman who he can't have.
Could'nt u become obsessed w/ Madeline Stowe??
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/18 08:45 PM
She's a beautiful woman.
Good nude scene, another reason to watch it.
Good nude scene, another reason to watch it.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/18 08:57 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
She's a beautiful woman.
Good nude scene, another reason to watch it.
Good nude scene, another reason to watch it.
It's been in my collection for yrs.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/18 09:19 PM
As a matter of fact Moe, every 1 of those movies u mentioned above has more than 1 reason 2 watch ,besides the genre itself, Jennifer Jason Leigh & Brigit Fonda (single w. female)Melanie Griffith (Pacific Heights)...& don't even get me started on 1 of the most beautiful woman in the world,,Michele Pfeiffer.....Melanie has sadly destroyed herself w/ xcessive botox..as if getting old wasn't bad enough, some women look great as they age i.e. Racquel Welch, Blythe Danner, Susan Sarandon..etc. why cant some of these ppl. leave them selves alone?? My fav actress,Jessica Lange looks like a fuckin' blown up puppet compared 2 her Tootsie days..what a shame!
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/18 09:49 PM
Susan Sarandon, Celia Imrie, Helen Mirren and Natalia Nogulich are all very beautiful older women in my twenty something eyes.
Sarandon, in particular, oozes sex appeal. She just keeps getting better.
Sarandon, in particular, oozes sex appeal. She just keeps getting better.
Posted By: Footreads
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/18 10:49 PM
Susan Sarandon is quest starring on Ray Donovan last season. Possibly also this season when it starts again. I did notice last season she is walking with a slight limp.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/19/18 10:20 PM
Originally Posted by Footreads
Susan Sarandon is quest starring on Ray Donovan last season. Possibly also this season when it starts again. I did notice last season she is walking with a slight limp.
My fault. I warned her she wouldn't shit right for a week when I was through with her.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/19/18 11:46 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Footreads
Susan Sarandon is quest starring on Ray Donovan last season. Possibly also this season when it starts again. I did notice last season she is walking with a slight limp.
My fault. I warned her she wouldn't shit right for a week when I was through with her.
LOL!!..She is major smokin' in particular....
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/18 03:19 PM
TRAFFIK
A passable story about a couple who go away on a romantic weekend for the main star's birthday, played by Paula Patton. I was glad to see Omar Epps in a movie for a change. Looking at his profile on IMDB, I don't believe I've seen him in anything since 1997's SCREAM 2 What really bothered me about the film was how selfish Paula seemed to be. You know whenever you're in a situation and you have the ability to get away but your friend or boyfriend doesn't and 9 times out of 10, you go back to help them escape as well no matter what they say? Nope, this girl is the 1 out of the 10 when people tell her to leave or go on without them, she actually takes them up on it and hightails it outta there. 4.5/10
I FEEL PRETTY
From the previews it looked somewhat funny. To be honest, I haven't seen enough of Amy Schumer to have an opinion about her one way or another, but from the few things of her's I have seen, she hasn't impressed me much as a comedian. In fact, I think the actresses portraying her friends, Busy Philipps and Aidy Bryant, were funnier than her (Aidy especially). You can pretty much gather the story from the previews where this is a "love yourself no matter what others say or think about you" feel good story. It was in someways a ripoff I felt of BIG with Tom Hanks. This is supposed to be a comedy, and in a comedy you have only one job, which is to make the audience laugh. If you don't, you're going to fall flat on your face. I'm disappointed to see Michelle Williams wasted in this picture. 4.0/10
THE LOBSTER
This one really surprised me, not only with it's cast (consisting of Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz, John C. Reilly and Lea Seydoux) but at how crazy the story is (but it works). The premise is people who are single are taken to a hotel where they have 45 days to find a mate. At the end of that time, if they haven't found someone, they are turned into the animal of their choosing. Again, it sounds a little far out there but I really got into it. I had heard positive reviews about it when it came out but it just didn't appeal to me then. I honestly watched it because I was gearing up for THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER and I wanted to have a little Yorgos Lanthimos double-feature. 6.0/10
THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER
Again, I had heard good things about this when it came out and I just recently saw both LOBSTER and this available on Amazon Prime so I jumped at the chance to watch them both. Another great story where a doctor and his family are being terrorized by a teenager who blames the doctor (once again played by Collin Farrell) for murdering his father since he died on Farrell's operating table. The actors who played his children, Raffey Cassidy and Suny Suljic, do great jobs with their roles and of course, Nicole Kidman always shines in hers. I will definitely have my eye on more of Yorgos Lanthimos' work as he releases them as I was impressed with both of these films. Again, both are on Amazon Prime if you're a member and in the mood for something different. 6.5/10
THE NEW YORK RIPPER
A little less than average 80's horror/giallo film. The title caught my eye as I hadn't heard of this previously. One of the scenes in particular had a very SUSPIRIA feel to it with it's use of colors and lighting, which I quite enjoyed. However, other than that, it was decent. Like any good giallo film, it keeps you guessing right until the very end. My major complaint was the killer would quack and talk like a duck which become somewhat annoying after a while. 4.5/10
A passable story about a couple who go away on a romantic weekend for the main star's birthday, played by Paula Patton. I was glad to see Omar Epps in a movie for a change. Looking at his profile on IMDB, I don't believe I've seen him in anything since 1997's SCREAM 2
What really bothered me about the film was how selfish Paula seemed to be. You know whenever you're in a situation and you have the ability to get away but your friend or boyfriend doesn't and 9 times out of 10, you go back to help them escape as well no matter what they say? Nope, this girl is the 1 out of the 10 when people tell her to leave or go on without them, she actually takes them up on it and hightails it outta there. 4.5/10I FEEL PRETTY
From the previews it looked somewhat funny. To be honest, I haven't seen enough of Amy Schumer to have an opinion about her one way or another, but from the few things of her's I have seen, she hasn't impressed me much as a comedian. In fact, I think the actresses portraying her friends, Busy Philipps and Aidy Bryant, were funnier than her (Aidy especially). You can pretty much gather the story from the previews where this is a "love yourself no matter what others say or think about you" feel good story. It was in someways a ripoff I felt of BIG with Tom Hanks. This is supposed to be a comedy, and in a comedy you have only one job, which is to make the audience laugh. If you don't, you're going to fall flat on your face. I'm disappointed to see Michelle Williams wasted in this picture. 4.0/10
THE LOBSTER
This one really surprised me, not only with it's cast (consisting of Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz, John C. Reilly and Lea Seydoux) but at how crazy the story is (but it works). The premise is people who are single are taken to a hotel where they have 45 days to find a mate. At the end of that time, if they haven't found someone, they are turned into the animal of their choosing. Again, it sounds a little far out there but I really got into it. I had heard positive reviews about it when it came out but it just didn't appeal to me then. I honestly watched it because I was gearing up for THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER and I wanted to have a little Yorgos Lanthimos double-feature. 6.0/10
THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER
Again, I had heard good things about this when it came out and I just recently saw both LOBSTER and this available on Amazon Prime so I jumped at the chance to watch them both. Another great story where a doctor and his family are being terrorized by a teenager who blames the doctor (once again played by Collin Farrell) for murdering his father since he died on Farrell's operating table. The actors who played his children, Raffey Cassidy and Suny Suljic, do great jobs with their roles and of course, Nicole Kidman always shines in hers. I will definitely have my eye on more of Yorgos Lanthimos' work as he releases them as I was impressed with both of these films. Again, both are on Amazon Prime if you're a member and in the mood for something different. 6.5/10
THE NEW YORK RIPPER
A little less than average 80's horror/giallo film. The title caught my eye as I hadn't heard of this previously. One of the scenes in particular had a very SUSPIRIA feel to it with it's use of colors and lighting, which I quite enjoyed. However, other than that, it was decent. Like any good giallo film, it keeps you guessing right until the very end. My major complaint was the killer would quack and talk like a duck which become somewhat annoying after a while. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/18 08:16 PM
SUPER TROOPERS 2
Not a bad sequel for coming in 17 years after the original. Personally, my favorite Broken Lizard film is BEERFEST and I'd like to see that get a sequel but I know that's not going to happen. This was decently funny and if you're a fan of the original, I'm sure you'll enjoy this too. Glad they were able to bring Brian Cox back with the gang. Also, I enjoyed Seann William Scott and Damon Wayans Jr. cameos. 5.5/10
Not a bad sequel for coming in 17 years after the original. Personally, my favorite Broken Lizard film is BEERFEST and I'd like to see that get a sequel but I know that's not going to happen. This was decently funny and if you're a fan of the original, I'm sure you'll enjoy this too. Glad they were able to bring Brian Cox back with the gang. Also, I enjoyed Seann William Scott and Damon Wayans Jr. cameos. 5.5/10
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/26/18 03:59 AM
Just watched Thief with Jimmy Caan. Not a bad movie. Liked the early 80's cars and scenery in the movie.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/26/18 04:49 AM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Just watched Thief with Jimmy Caan. Not a bad movie. Liked the early 80's cars and scenery in the movie.
Agree..good flick, Tuesday Weld also easy 2 watch
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/26/18 05:34 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Just watched Thief with Jimmy Caan. Not a bad movie. Liked the early 80's cars and scenery in the movie.
Agree..good flick, Tuesday Weld also easy 2 watch
Yes she is. Liked her in once upon a time in america too
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/27/18 06:18 AM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Just watched Thief with Jimmy Caan. Not a bad movie. Liked the early 80's cars and scenery in the movie.
Agree..good flick, Tuesday Weld also easy 2 watch
Yes she is. Liked her in once upon a time in america too
Also a good movie I again recently watched is Cincinnati Kid w/ Steve McQueen & a double whammy of visions Tuesday Weld & Ann Margaret.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/18 07:05 PM
AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR
This is what Marvel has been building up to for the past decade and I thought they did a really good job with it. The script was strong and humorous. I was a little concerned because sometimes when you have too many characters it can feel bloated and not come across as good as it should have, ala X-MEN: THE LAST STAND and SPIDER-MAN 3. I was really impressed with the way they were able to balance the massive amount of characters and their storylines. It leaves on a pretty good cliffhanger, which is to be expected. Very excited for part 2 next year. Finally, Josh Brolin slayed it as Thanos! His makeup and effects were spot on and he was my favorite part of the movie. 8/10
This is what Marvel has been building up to for the past decade and I thought they did a really good job with it. The script was strong and humorous. I was a little concerned because sometimes when you have too many characters it can feel bloated and not come across as good as it should have, ala X-MEN: THE LAST STAND and SPIDER-MAN 3. I was really impressed with the way they were able to balance the massive amount of characters and their storylines. It leaves on a pretty good cliffhanger, which is to be expected. Very excited for part 2 next year. Finally, Josh Brolin slayed it as Thanos! His makeup and effects were spot on and he was my favorite part of the movie. 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/18 06:25 PM
TULLY
I kind of felt the Tully character has the same sort of free spirit as JUNO. Which shouldn't come as much of a surprise since this movie was written by Diablo Cody and directed by Jason Reitman who both respectfully wrote and directed JUNO. I enjoy Charlize Theron's work and mad props to her for putting on 50 pounds for the role. According to Theron she would eat In-N-Out for breakfast and wake up at 2am to eat cold macaroni and cheese that was on a table next to her. She was literally forcing herself to eat, not only to gain the weight but to maintain it. Talk about a dedicated actress. Also, it took her a year and a half to finally take all of the weight off. Other than that the movie was kind of so-so but I gave it a bit of a higher score because the end did have a pretty interesting twist that I did not see coming. 6/10
I kind of felt the Tully character has the same sort of free spirit as JUNO. Which shouldn't come as much of a surprise since this movie was written by Diablo Cody and directed by Jason Reitman who both respectfully wrote and directed JUNO. I enjoy Charlize Theron's work and mad props to her for putting on 50 pounds for the role. According to Theron she would eat In-N-Out for breakfast and wake up at 2am to eat cold macaroni and cheese that was on a table next to her. She was literally forcing herself to eat, not only to gain the weight but to maintain it. Talk about a dedicated actress. Also, it took her a year and a half to finally take all of the weight off. Other than that the movie was kind of so-so but I gave it a bit of a higher score because the end did have a pretty interesting twist that I did not see coming. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/18 02:54 AM
OVERBOARD
Another remake that Hollywood continues to churn out falls flat on its face. This is more of a family comedy, which is what I was expecting, but the jokes were pretty lame and only a few times did I actually laugh. A feel good story about how not to allow money to go to your head and to always treat people the right way. The supporting cast is weak with the exception of Mel Rodriguez who plays Bobby. He plays the role of Eva Longoria's husband and they own a pizza shop and construction company together. Bobby gives Leonardo (Eugenio Derbez) a job building a pool while Anna Farris has him living with her, fooling him into thinking he's poor and married to her with 3 kids. Anna Farris is better than this. I hope she gets offered better movies. 4.5/10
Another remake that Hollywood continues to churn out falls flat on its face. This is more of a family comedy, which is what I was expecting, but the jokes were pretty lame and only a few times did I actually laugh. A feel good story about how not to allow money to go to your head and to always treat people the right way. The supporting cast is weak with the exception of Mel Rodriguez who plays Bobby. He plays the role of Eva Longoria's husband and they own a pizza shop and construction company together. Bobby gives Leonardo (Eugenio Derbez) a job building a pool while Anna Farris has him living with her, fooling him into thinking he's poor and married to her with 3 kids. Anna Farris is better than this. I hope she gets offered better movies. 4.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/18 12:15 AM
Thanks for the info I,,,,, I have such limited time lately I can use this to filter out the crap.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/18 01:34 AM
Not a problem. Always happy to help!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/09/18 01:13 AM
We love your reviews, I read them to the Wife.
My schedule should open up soon and I will get her out to a few flicks.
My schedule should open up soon and I will get her out to a few flicks.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/09/18 03:53 AM
The original "Narrow Margin" 1952...way better than the 1w/Gene Hackman & Anne Archer..but Archer way sexier than the original gangster moll.....& "Run Silent, Run Deep" which I could watch @ least 1nce a yr.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/09/18 04:36 AM
Last night watched The Gunfighter with Gregory Peck. I've watched it before a few times, but it never gets old. So good!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/09/18 05:16 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
We love your reviews, I read them to the Wife.
My schedule should open up soon and I will get her out to a few flicks.
My schedule should open up soon and I will get her out to a few flicks.
If you haven't seen it already, go see AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/10/18 04:50 PM
BREAKING IN
Gabrielle Union takes her 2 children to her father's house after he recently passed away in order to move everything out to sell it. During this time a group of 4 individuals intend to steal money that is in a safe somewhere in the house. One of the robbers has a conscience and you can pretty much guess where it goes from there. Very little backstory is given to Gabrielle and her family so I found it hard to be emotionally invested in them during their ordeal. Billy Burke plays the main villain, Eddie, and he's really the only minute redeemable aspect of the film. In addition, a weak script delivers very little in terms of suspense or thrills. 4/10
Gabrielle Union takes her 2 children to her father's house after he recently passed away in order to move everything out to sell it. During this time a group of 4 individuals intend to steal money that is in a safe somewhere in the house. One of the robbers has a conscience and you can pretty much guess where it goes from there. Very little backstory is given to Gabrielle and her family so I found it hard to be emotionally invested in them during their ordeal. Billy Burke plays the main villain, Eddie, and he's really the only minute redeemable aspect of the film. In addition, a weak script delivers very little in terms of suspense or thrills. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/18 04:39 PM
LIFE OF THE PARTY
This was a pretty decent comedy. I really enjoy Melissa McCarthy's work as she's one of my favorite comedians and she usually doesn't disappoint, even if the movie does. This one works and has a pretty decent supporting cast including Julie Bowen, Gillian Jacobs, Stephen Root, Maya Rudolph and Chris Parnell. If you've already seen AVENGERS and were still wanting to get out and see something new, I'd give this a chance. 5.5/10
This was a pretty decent comedy. I really enjoy Melissa McCarthy's work as she's one of my favorite comedians and she usually doesn't disappoint, even if the movie does. This one works and has a pretty decent supporting cast including Julie Bowen, Gillian Jacobs, Stephen Root, Maya Rudolph and Chris Parnell. If you've already seen AVENGERS and were still wanting to get out and see something new, I'd give this a chance. 5.5/10
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/12/18 09:15 PM
'The FBI Story' - 1959 with James Stewart lots of great scenes of new york in the late 50's.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/12/18 10:15 PM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
'The FBI Story' - 1959 with James Stewart lots of great scenes of new york in the late 50's.
Just watched it. 50s Scenes were cool, but a gray headed Stewart was unexpected.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/15/18 07:58 PM
Last night watched The Pride and the Passion with Sinatra, Sophia Loren, and Cary Grant. Alot of people don't care for it, but I've always liked it. It is based on historical events although they took liberties. Most critics didn't care for the casting. Sinatra does play a little to much like a street wise Hoboken guy although it all takes place during the Napoleonic Wars. Loren must have had an 18 waste at the time.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/18 01:19 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
'The FBI Story' - 1959 with James Stewart lots of great scenes of new york in the late 50's.
Just watched it. 50s Scenes were cool, but a gray headed Stewart was unexpected.
Same here.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/18/18 03:39 PM
DEADPOOL 2
The Merc with a Mouth is back and Ryan Reynolds was born to play him! As he did the first go around, Reynolds knocks it out of the park. Josh Brolin I wasn't crazy about when I heard the announcement that he'd be playing Cable but he did a good job. Between this and AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR, he's on quite the hot streak at the box office recently. I enjoyed the Domino character, even if they did make fun of her quite a bit with her superpower being luck. The film started of well, plenty of jokes to go around. I felt it dragged a little in the middle but recovered nicely towards the end. Quite a few surprises made their way onscreen which I was happy with. There are scenes during the credits but nothing after! 7/10
The Merc with a Mouth is back and Ryan Reynolds was born to play him! As he did the first go around, Reynolds knocks it out of the park. Josh Brolin I wasn't crazy about when I heard the announcement that he'd be playing Cable but he did a good job. Between this and AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR, he's on quite the hot streak at the box office recently. I enjoyed the Domino character, even if they did make fun of her quite a bit with her superpower being luck. The film started of well, plenty of jokes to go around. I felt it dragged a little in the middle but recovered nicely towards the end. Quite a few surprises made their way onscreen which I was happy with. There are scenes during the credits but nothing after! 7/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/18 06:58 AM
My favorite character in DeadPool 2 is Peter. I laughed out loud a few times. It did dragged some in the middle, but made one of those rare recoveries. I was pleased when they showed Professor X's brother. The end credits, the last two I enjoyed the most. I up your score and say 8/10.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/18 06:46 PM
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/18 03:47 AM
Mulholland Falls - Another movie set in the 50's. I can't get enough of those. Plus Chazz P was in it.
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/18 04:22 AM
Ike : Countdown to D-Day
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/18 12:59 AM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Ike : Countdown to D-Day
Never saw this, perfect time to watch it.
Thanks G
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/18 07:08 PM
SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY
To begin, I've never been heavily invested in the Star Wars spin-off movies and after watching SOLO last night, both this and ROGUE ONE pale in comparison to the saga with the exception of Episode I. Woody Harrleson was his normal, charming self. Donald Glover seamlessly stepped into the role of Lando Calrissian. Alden Ehrenreich did an admiral job as Han Solo, considering the shoes he's having to fill. Emilia Clarke and Paul Bettany were both enjoyable yet forgettable in their respective roles. The droid, in this film L3-37, is always a fan favorite and provides the necessary humor the film needs. And with any movie of this caliber and being made my Disney, the special FX were spot on. With all of the production problems that occurred, they were able to salvage a decent movie out of it. 6.5/10
To begin, I've never been heavily invested in the Star Wars spin-off movies and after watching SOLO last night, both this and ROGUE ONE pale in comparison to the saga with the exception of Episode I. Woody Harrleson was his normal, charming self. Donald Glover seamlessly stepped into the role of Lando Calrissian. Alden Ehrenreich did an admiral job as Han Solo, considering the shoes he's having to fill. Emilia Clarke and Paul Bettany were both enjoyable yet forgettable in their respective roles. The droid, in this film L3-37, is always a fan favorite and provides the necessary humor the film needs. And with any movie of this caliber and being made my Disney, the special FX were spot on. With all of the production problems that occurred, they were able to salvage a decent movie out of it. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/18 01:21 AM
DISOBEDIENCE
The tale of a woman, Rachel Weisz, who returns home after the death of her father. She is an Orthodox Jew and the entire community banished her when she was younger for a homosexual episode with another girl. This is her first time home since being banished and the adult version of the young girl whom she had the encounter with is played by Rachel McAdams. With Weisz's return, the old feelings between her and McAdams resurface. It's an interesting story about forbidden love within this religious community. Both Rachel's give good but not great performances. 6/10
The tale of a woman, Rachel Weisz, who returns home after the death of her father. She is an Orthodox Jew and the entire community banished her when she was younger for a homosexual episode with another girl. This is her first time home since being banished and the adult version of the young girl whom she had the encounter with is played by Rachel McAdams. With Weisz's return, the old feelings between her and McAdams resurface. It's an interesting story about forbidden love within this religious community. Both Rachel's give good but not great performances. 6/10
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/18 10:50 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Ike : Countdown to D-Day
Never saw this, perfect time to watch it.
Thanks G
No problem dp. I thought it was a pretty good movie. I had never heard of it until I saw it come on.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/18 11:19 PM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Ike : Countdown to D-Day
Never saw this, perfect time to watch it.
Thanks G
No problem dp. I thought it was a pretty good movie. I had never heard of it until I saw it come on.
Double penetration?
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/27/18 02:20 AM
this fucking guy...anyways
Just watched From Here To Eternity.
Always heard about Sinatra's role in it but never seen it.
Just watched From Here To Eternity.
Always heard about Sinatra's role in it but never seen it.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/27/18 02:56 AM
That's the role that was landed to him (allegedly) from a high rank wiseguy..as depicted in The Godfather.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/18 02:18 AM
The longest Day.
&
PATTON
&
PATTON
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/18 07:47 AM
The Longest Day is a good movie. Just watched Kelly's Heroes, next up is Where Eagles Dare.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/18 05:48 PM
ALL EYEZ ON ME
This is what I find to be the problem with biopics, they seem to be a highlight reel of a person's life. They just reenact high or low periods and the story is very weak and seems to skip from one event to the next. That's the problem we have here. I thought Demetrius Shipp Jr. did a fine job as Tupac Shakur. Dominic L. Santana was fine as Suge Knight, however, I felt R. Marcos Taylor's portrayal from STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON was definitely more vicious and menacing. I feared him more than Santana. The costumes were on point as they looked very authentic, however the jewelry, not so much. Some of the more dramatic scenes were almost comical and for whatever reason, at times, this film seemed to have a made-for-TV feel to it. 5/10
This is what I find to be the problem with biopics, they seem to be a highlight reel of a person's life. They just reenact high or low periods and the story is very weak and seems to skip from one event to the next. That's the problem we have here. I thought Demetrius Shipp Jr. did a fine job as Tupac Shakur. Dominic L. Santana was fine as Suge Knight, however, I felt R. Marcos Taylor's portrayal from STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON was definitely more vicious and menacing. I feared him more than Santana. The costumes were on point as they looked very authentic, however the jewelry, not so much. Some of the more dramatic scenes were almost comical and for whatever reason, at times, this film seemed to have a made-for-TV feel to it. 5/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/18 05:38 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
The Longest Day is a good movie. Just watched Kelly's Heroes, next up is Where Eagles Dare.
Thr longest day is a epic film.
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 01:25 AM
I just saw Mother! with Javier Barden and Jennifer Lawrence. It was the worst garbage I have ever seen. It had mixed reviews form critics and fans alike.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 01:31 AM
Originally Posted by jace
I just saw Mother! with Javier Barden and Jennifer Lawrence. It was the worst garbage I have ever seen. It had mixed reviews form critics and fans alike.
I agree... my wife enticed me in to it & I was disappointed .weird...very weird...
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 02:33 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by jace
I just saw Mother! with Javier Barden and Jennifer Lawrence. It was the worst garbage I have ever seen. It had mixed reviews form critics and fans alike.
I agree... my wife enticed me in to it & I was disappointed .weird...very weird...
It seems to be trying hard to be weird and impossible to understand, then to make it worse the ending left you even more confused. The movie was not scary at all, but the fact that the director is gaining a following does scare me.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 02:53 AM
Originally Posted by jace
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by jace
I just saw Mother! with Javier Barden and Jennifer Lawrence. It was the worst garbage I have ever seen. It had mixed reviews form critics and fans alike.
I agree... my wife enticed me in to it & I was disappointed .weird...very weird...
True my friend..
It seems to be trying hard to be weird and impossible to understand, then to make it worse the ending left you even more confused. The movie was not scary at all, but the fact that the director is gaining a following does scare me.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 02:56 AM
Sorry 4 the fuckup..YES..True my friend
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/18 06:05 PM
I enjoyed MOTHER! I've only seen it once but have been interested in seeing it again. It's a religious metaphor and I was surprised I was able to grasp as much of it as I did. When everything is explained it definitely makes more sense (another reason I want to see it again). However, I've been a fan of Darren Aronofsky since I first saw REQUIEM FOR A DREAM.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/01/18 02:37 PM
UPGRADE
UPGRADE is a film about a man who seeks revenge after he's attacked and his wife killed (in front of his very eyes no less). The main star, Grey Trace (played by Logan Marshall-Green), is left a quadriplegic after the attack. He tries an experimental new technology called The Stem, that is inserted into his neck and allows him to regain the use of his body. The Stem also gives Grey abilities he didn't have prior to his accident. The set pieces of this films are at times breathtaking and I applaud the crew for their designs as well as the advancements in technology that are displayed onscreen. We're not given a year when this film takes place but computers and machines are relied upon even more than they are today and are capable enough to do almost any task. For some reason (maybe because of the over-the-top, brutal violence) I was reminded of CRANK while watching this. While there isn't as much action in this film as there was in the former, it's definitely still a very fun and enjoyable ride. I'm unsure how much business it'll do at the box office, but it's good popcorn flick and has been getting some positive reviews as well. 6/10
UPGRADE is a film about a man who seeks revenge after he's attacked and his wife killed (in front of his very eyes no less). The main star, Grey Trace (played by Logan Marshall-Green), is left a quadriplegic after the attack. He tries an experimental new technology called The Stem, that is inserted into his neck and allows him to regain the use of his body. The Stem also gives Grey abilities he didn't have prior to his accident. The set pieces of this films are at times breathtaking and I applaud the crew for their designs as well as the advancements in technology that are displayed onscreen. We're not given a year when this film takes place but computers and machines are relied upon even more than they are today and are capable enough to do almost any task. For some reason (maybe because of the over-the-top, brutal violence) I was reminded of CRANK while watching this. While there isn't as much action in this film as there was in the former, it's definitely still a very fun and enjoyable ride. I'm unsure how much business it'll do at the box office, but it's good popcorn flick and has been getting some positive reviews as well. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/18 02:02 AM
ACTION POINT
Johnny Knoxville is at it again, destroying his body for our amusement. And while the only decent funny scenes are those that are reminiscent of his Jackass days, this is an actual film and not just a bland story woven around his stunts. Unfortunately, the laughs in this are far and few in between. If this is something you're interested in seeing, this is definitely one to wait until it's available for streaming. The film takes place in 1979 so the soundtrack is pretty good with songs of this era. 4/10
Johnny Knoxville is at it again, destroying his body for our amusement. And while the only decent funny scenes are those that are reminiscent of his Jackass days, this is an actual film and not just a bland story woven around his stunts. Unfortunately, the laughs in this are far and few in between. If this is something you're interested in seeing, this is definitely one to wait until it's available for streaming. The film takes place in 1979 so the soundtrack is pretty good with songs of this era. 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/18 03:06 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
UPGRADE
UPGRADE is a film about a man who seeks revenge after he's attacked and his wife killed (in front of his very eyes no less). The main star, Grey Trace (played by Logan Marshall-Green), is left a quadriplegic after the attack. He tries an experimental new technology called The Stem, that is inserted into his neck and allows him to regain the use of his body. The Stem also gives Grey abilities he didn't have prior to his accident. The set pieces of this films are at times breathtaking and I applaud the crew for their designs as well as the advancements in technology that are displayed onscreen. We're not given a year when this film takes place but computers and machines are relied upon even more than they are today and are capable enough to do almost any task. For some reason (maybe because of the over-the-top, brutal violence) I was reminded of CRANK while watching this. While there isn't as much action in this film as there was in the former, it's definitely still a very fun and enjoyable ride. I'm unsure how much business it'll do at the box office, but it's good popcorn flick and has been getting some positive reviews as well. 6/10
UPGRADE is a film about a man who seeks revenge after he's attacked and his wife killed (in front of his very eyes no less). The main star, Grey Trace (played by Logan Marshall-Green), is left a quadriplegic after the attack. He tries an experimental new technology called The Stem, that is inserted into his neck and allows him to regain the use of his body. The Stem also gives Grey abilities he didn't have prior to his accident. The set pieces of this films are at times breathtaking and I applaud the crew for their designs as well as the advancements in technology that are displayed onscreen. We're not given a year when this film takes place but computers and machines are relied upon even more than they are today and are capable enough to do almost any task. For some reason (maybe because of the over-the-top, brutal violence) I was reminded of CRANK while watching this. While there isn't as much action in this film as there was in the former, it's definitely still a very fun and enjoyable ride. I'm unsure how much business it'll do at the box office, but it's good popcorn flick and has been getting some positive reviews as well. 6/10
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Wife loved this. I did not see c but she went with girlfriends they love flicks that were books, I think this one was.
Johnny Knoxville is at it again, destroying his body for our amusement. And while the only decent funny scenes are those that are reminiscent of his Jackass days, this is an actual film and not just a bland story woven around his stunts. Unfortunately, the laughs in this are far and few in between. If this is something you're interested in seeing, this is definitely one to wait until it's available for streaming. The film takes place in 1979 so the soundtrack is pretty good with songs of this era. 4/10
A bit much for me but on a slow do nothin day I would certainly check it out in my reclyner.
Why not, I did see all of his others and was amuzed.
Thanks I 12
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/18 07:25 AM
Not a problem. Glad the wife enjoyed UPGRADE. Hey, at least it's an original story. Strange coming out of Hollywood
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/18 03:10 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Not a problem. Glad the wife enjoyed UPGRADE. Hey, at least it's an original story. Strange coming out of Hollywood
Right, everything is a retread lately.
I watched The Original Universal WearWolf movie tonight...
WearWolf of London, never seen it..... was really good Classic Flick.
Svengoolie gave some interesting facts about the Director , Producer and Star having issues with the makeup Artist.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/18 08:14 AM
Werewolf of London is a classic and I am surprised you never seen until recently DP. Where do you think that Alamo joke came from? Everyone was saying it until it became political incorrect, but that was like two decades ago.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/18 08:29 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Not a problem. Glad the wife enjoyed UPGRADE. Hey, at least it's an original story. Strange coming out of Hollywood
Right, everything is a retread lately.
I watched The Original Universal WearWolf movie tonight...
WearWolf of London, never seen it..... was really good Classic Flick.
Svengoolie gave some interesting facts about the Director , Producer and Star having issues with the makeup Artist.
Nice. I've never seen it before. I still have the Universal Classic Monsters Blu-Ray I've been meaning to watch but I just haven't found the time. It has the original Dracula, Frankenstein, Wolf Man, etc.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/18 08:37 PM
Are you Guys talking about An American Werewolf In London? If so I love that movie 🿠There is s also a song Werewolf of London not related to the movie.
TIS
TIS
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/18 01:51 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Werewolf of London is a classic and I am surprised you never seen until recently DP. Where do you think that Alamo joke came from? Everyone was saying it until it became political incorrect, but that was like two decades ago.
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Not a problem. Glad the wife enjoyed UPGRADE. Hey, at least it's an original story. Strange coming out of Hollywood
Right, everything is a retread lately.
I watched The Original Universal WearWolf movie tonight...
WearWolf of London, never seen it..... was really good Classic Flick.
Svengoolie gave some interesting facts about the Director , Producer and Star having issues with the makeup Artist.
Nice. I've never seen it before. I still have the Universal Classic Monsters Blu-Ray I've been meaning to watch but I just haven't found the time. It has the original Dracula, Frankenstein, Wolf Man, etc
I really like them all, there are so many.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/18 01:57 AM
Originally Posted by The Italian Stallionette
Are you Guys talking about An American Werewolf In London? If so I love that movie 🿠There is s also a song Werewolf of London not related to the movie.
TIS
TIS
Love that one too TIS......
The one you mention is the 1981 version, really good flick.
I was viewing the 1935 version....WereWolf of London , its old....its fun to see how the people lived back then, I always enjoy noticing the furniture and way they dressed and spoke to each other.
The most remembered version is the 1941 WereWolf since it had Lon Chaney Jr.
I enjoy them all.
Check out all of these and the one with Anthony Hopkins.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/18 09:31 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I was viewing the 1935 version....WereWolf of London , its old....its fun to see how the people lived back then, I always enjoy noticing the furniture and way they dressed and spoke to each other.
I like to view older movies too for this reason. To see the costumes/wardrobes, lack of technology, daily life, etc. Time, frozen onscreen.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/18 06:33 AM
Can't beat the old movies. Give me a old movie over a comic book movie anyday..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/18 06:23 PM
OCEAN'S 8
A decade after our last entry in the Ocean's series, we're given the all-female version of the same thing. And, just like the GHOSTBUSTERS remake, it doesn't bring it. Nothing new is brought to the table with this installment. Just a regurgitation of what George Clooney and company did over 10 years ago. The cast is great but each one of them is so two dimensional. Nobody really stands out, hardly any humor and overall, just not a lot of fun either. Without spoiling anything, but towards the end of the movie, one of the reasons a character gives for joining in on this heist is extremely weak. Hopefully, we'll be spared and there will be no Ocean's 9. 5.5/10
A decade after our last entry in the Ocean's series, we're given the all-female version of the same thing. And, just like the GHOSTBUSTERS remake, it doesn't bring it. Nothing new is brought to the table with this installment. Just a regurgitation of what George Clooney and company did over 10 years ago. The cast is great but each one of them is so two dimensional. Nobody really stands out, hardly any humor and overall, just not a lot of fun either. Without spoiling anything, but towards the end of the movie, one of the reasons a character gives for joining in on this heist is extremely weak. Hopefully, we'll be spared and there will be no Ocean's 9. 5.5/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/18 07:22 PM
I admire you Irishman for watching the films you do. For EG I wouldn't even have given Oceans 8 a second thought. To be honest it's very rear that i watch new films these days. The last new film i watched was The Hateful 8..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/18 08:07 PM
Thanks De Niro. Honestly, I've had MoviePass for almost a year now and I LOVE it! As big of a movie junkie as I am, paying $9.99 a month and having the ability to see a movie a day with it, is beyond worth it to me. However, recently they changed their Terms of Service which stipulated that you can't see the same movie more than once. Until AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR came out (from when I began my membership last September) you always could. It's still a good deal regardless and allows you to see other things. Most of what I've posted recently I never would have paid full price for myself. But again, only paying $10 a month with MoviePass, this gives me the opportunity to see those films that I would have passed on originally.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/18 12:54 AM
HEREDITARY
This movie had some pretty lofty expectations going into it. A lot of positive reviews while others were comparing it to such classics as ROSEMARY'S BABY and THE EXORCIST. And after just having watched it I can say one thing: the hype is real. It's such a breath of fresh air to have a horror movie as good as this. Honestly, it's probably one of the best since 2015's THE WITCH or 2014's IT FOLLOWS. Strong performances all the way around from all the family members: Toni Collette, Gabriel Byrne, Alex Wolff and newcomer Milly Shapiro. It's a slow burn of a film but the end definitely makes up for it. A new horror classic! 7.5/10
This movie had some pretty lofty expectations going into it. A lot of positive reviews while others were comparing it to such classics as ROSEMARY'S BABY and THE EXORCIST. And after just having watched it I can say one thing: the hype is real. It's such a breath of fresh air to have a horror movie as good as this. Honestly, it's probably one of the best since 2015's THE WITCH or 2014's IT FOLLOWS. Strong performances all the way around from all the family members: Toni Collette, Gabriel Byrne, Alex Wolff and newcomer Milly Shapiro. It's a slow burn of a film but the end definitely makes up for it. A new horror classic! 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/18 07:37 PM
HOTEL ARTEMIS
My expectations heading in to this were somewhat low. I was mildly interested in seeing it so I decided to give it a shot and it was more enjoyable than I thought it originally was going to be. A well-rounded cast that actually had a pulse. The movie takes a page out of JOHN WICK's playbook about a hotel with an exclusive clientele list where criminals can go to get bandaged up without fear of the police coming after them. It's great seeing Jodie Foster back, chewing up dialogue as I haven't seen her in anything in years. This is a movie that you can pass on seeing in theaters but when it comes to streaming or Redbox, I think it's worth a viewing. 6/10
My expectations heading in to this were somewhat low. I was mildly interested in seeing it so I decided to give it a shot and it was more enjoyable than I thought it originally was going to be. A well-rounded cast that actually had a pulse. The movie takes a page out of JOHN WICK's playbook about a hotel with an exclusive clientele list where criminals can go to get bandaged up without fear of the police coming after them. It's great seeing Jodie Foster back, chewing up dialogue as I haven't seen her in anything in years. This is a movie that you can pass on seeing in theaters but when it comes to streaming or Redbox, I think it's worth a viewing. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/18 01:57 AM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
I admire you Irishman for watching the films you do. For EG I wouldn't even have given Oceans 8 a second thought. To be honest it's very rear that i watch new films these days. The last new film i watched was The Hateful 8..
Agree. Appreciate the reviews big time that I12 posts..... I have limited Movie time and opportunity so this really filters a big group for me and my wife.
I read them all and make notes so I can be informed when deciding what to go see or stream.
Thanks I12
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/18 05:51 PM
Awesome, glad you guys enjoy them! That's part of why I keep doing it
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/18 11:48 PM
Please do, it is Greatly Appreciated.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/18 02:55 AM
"BABY FACE"
This pre-Code (1933) movie features Barbara Stanwyck as Lilly Powers, a tough cookie who waitresses for and is pimped out by her speakeasy proprietor father in dreary Erie PA. Escaping with her friend and sometimes maid Chico (Theresa Harris) by boxcar, she lands in NYC and is determined to sleep her way to the top of a big bank. Although dated, "Baby Face" is quite racy and overtly suggestive for its time. Stanwyck, always good, is excellent here--determined to get ahead and totally unsentimental about all the saps she seduced on the way up. One of them is naive Jimmy McCoy Jr., played by a very young John Wayne. Matinee idol George Brent is the last in line. Really good little (73 minutes) movie.
This pre-Code (1933) movie features Barbara Stanwyck as Lilly Powers, a tough cookie who waitresses for and is pimped out by her speakeasy proprietor father in dreary Erie PA. Escaping with her friend and sometimes maid Chico (Theresa Harris) by boxcar, she lands in NYC and is determined to sleep her way to the top of a big bank. Although dated, "Baby Face" is quite racy and overtly suggestive for its time. Stanwyck, always good, is excellent here--determined to get ahead and totally unsentimental about all the saps she seduced on the way up. One of them is naive Jimmy McCoy Jr., played by a very young John Wayne. Matinee idol George Brent is the last in line. Really good little (73 minutes) movie.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/18 01:50 PM
I recently watched Robert Mitchum double feature.
Out of the Past— Great tragic film noir from 1947
Night of the Hunter— mitchum plays a great villain. Movie combines elements of horror,fairy tale,and coming of age
Out of the Past— Great tragic film noir from 1947
Night of the Hunter— mitchum plays a great villain. Movie combines elements of horror,fairy tale,and coming of age
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/18 02:05 AM
SUPERFLY
I never saw the original SUPERFLY, so I went into this blind. It's an interesting story about a cocaine dealer who's trying to make one last score so he can walk away. However, when he goes around his supplier and goes directly to the source, he soon finds out that walking away is not as easy as it seems. This is one of the better criminal/gangster pictures in recent memory. I was hoping for more from the soundtrack but the costumes, cars, jewelry and certain filming locations added to the authenticity of the picture and got me to buy in more into the believability of the characters. I applaud the writing as the main character Priest is a smart businessman who sees the longer-term goals and isn't so easily provoked to violence. 6/10
LEATHERFACE
Another unnecessary prequel that tells the backstory of a character nobody wanted/asked for/needed. Sometimes not everything needs to be explained and the unknown is actually more terrifying than the known. A weak script, with a low body count and really only the last three minutes of the film are worth anything and even that's a stretch. 4/10
I never saw the original SUPERFLY, so I went into this blind. It's an interesting story about a cocaine dealer who's trying to make one last score so he can walk away. However, when he goes around his supplier and goes directly to the source, he soon finds out that walking away is not as easy as it seems. This is one of the better criminal/gangster pictures in recent memory. I was hoping for more from the soundtrack but the costumes, cars, jewelry and certain filming locations added to the authenticity of the picture and got me to buy in more into the believability of the characters. I applaud the writing as the main character Priest is a smart businessman who sees the longer-term goals and isn't so easily provoked to violence. 6/10
LEATHERFACE
Another unnecessary prequel that tells the backstory of a character nobody wanted/asked for/needed. Sometimes not everything needs to be explained and the unknown is actually more terrifying than the known. A weak script, with a low body count and really only the last three minutes of the film are worth anything and even that's a stretch. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/15/18 05:53 PM
TAG
The premise here is a little crazy. A group of 5 friends play tag every year during the month of May and one of them (Jeremy Renner) is looking to retire after this last season. Renner has never before been tagged as long as they've been playing so the rest of the group goes to extreme lengths in order to prevent him from retiring with a perfect record. The story actually worked quite well for me. The first time I viewed the trailer I was wondering how this was sustainable as a film but I give director Jeff Tomsic and writers Rob McKittrick, Mark Steilen, Mark Steilen and Russell Adams credit for pulling it off. The cast is well-rounded and seems to bounce off of each other well. Everybody is given roughly the same amount of screen time and for my money, Renner stole the show. How much of this story is true I don't know because some of the things these guys went through in order to tag Renner's character was pretty crazy (and hilarious at the same time). As a quick side note: Jeremy Renner actually broke both of his arms during this film while performing a stunt. 6/10
The premise here is a little crazy. A group of 5 friends play tag every year during the month of May and one of them (Jeremy Renner) is looking to retire after this last season. Renner has never before been tagged as long as they've been playing so the rest of the group goes to extreme lengths in order to prevent him from retiring with a perfect record. The story actually worked quite well for me. The first time I viewed the trailer I was wondering how this was sustainable as a film but I give director Jeff Tomsic and writers Rob McKittrick, Mark Steilen, Mark Steilen and Russell Adams credit for pulling it off. The cast is well-rounded and seems to bounce off of each other well. Everybody is given roughly the same amount of screen time and for my money, Renner stole the show. How much of this story is true I don't know because some of the things these guys went through in order to tag Renner's character was pretty crazy (and hilarious at the same time). As a quick side note: Jeremy Renner actually broke both of his arms during this film while performing a stunt. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/18/18 04:31 PM
GOTTI
This has been getting some pretty bad reviews with it's recent release, however, I was quite surprised by the amount of people at the theater when I saw it (at least three-quarters full). There were a couple of problems with the film that I found. 1) it felt like Travolta was trying to play a gangster. I didn't really buy him as a John Gotti type, so when you can't buy in to the believably of your main character, you're already starting off on the wrong foot. 2) at the start of the film, they introduced a lot of characters, sometimes in a very short amount of time. Some of them played big parts going forward, however, some were never followed up with or heard from again, so really, what was the point of introducing them? Unless you were already familiar with them, you were lost as to their significance to the story. 3) the story jumped around quite a bit. The film opens up with John Jr. visiting his father in prison, telling him about him (Jr.) possibly taking a deal to avoid a longer sentence. The film then proceeds to jump back in time, then forward to father and son prison visit, then back again, etc. etc. Is this film a masterpiece? Hardly. Is it the worst film I've ever seen? Once again, hardly. I went in with low expectations and the film wasn't as bad as everyone is making it out to be. 4.5/10
This has been getting some pretty bad reviews with it's recent release, however, I was quite surprised by the amount of people at the theater when I saw it (at least three-quarters full). There were a couple of problems with the film that I found. 1) it felt like Travolta was trying to play a gangster. I didn't really buy him as a John Gotti type, so when you can't buy in to the believably of your main character, you're already starting off on the wrong foot. 2) at the start of the film, they introduced a lot of characters, sometimes in a very short amount of time. Some of them played big parts going forward, however, some were never followed up with or heard from again, so really, what was the point of introducing them? Unless you were already familiar with them, you were lost as to their significance to the story. 3) the story jumped around quite a bit. The film opens up with John Jr. visiting his father in prison, telling him about him (Jr.) possibly taking a deal to avoid a longer sentence. The film then proceeds to jump back in time, then forward to father and son prison visit, then back again, etc. etc. Is this film a masterpiece? Hardly. Is it the worst film I've ever seen? Once again, hardly. I went in with low expectations and the film wasn't as bad as everyone is making it out to be. 4.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/18/18 07:42 PM
I will see it, and I had already felt this was going to be a big sell for Travolta ( believing his character ) - completely agree with what you say about that, if I cannot believe the main character , that makes it a very loose movie.
Never really enjoy time jumping in movies & television but if done properly I cool with it.
Wife looking forward to the New Jarrasic Park film coming out.
Never really enjoy time jumping in movies & television but if done properly I cool with it.
Wife looking forward to the New Jarrasic Park film coming out.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/18/18 08:04 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Wife looking forward to the New Jarrasic Park film coming out.
I haven't seen the last one so I'm passing on this one. I'm sure I'll see them some day, but just don't have the interest at this time.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/18 02:13 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Wife looking forward to the New Jarrasic Park film coming out.
I haven't seen the last one so I'm passing on this one. I'm sure I'll see them some day, but just don't have the interest at this time.
I get that... I think that often.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/18 12:44 AM
Went to Jurrasic World today.
Very entertaining and exactly what I expected.
The Dino saves the good people and eats the Bad.
Perfect.
Funny parts, rediculous parts and parts that make you feel Sad , happy and thrilled all at the same time.
Glad my wife and Friends enjoyed it.
5/10 maybe a 6.
Very entertaining and exactly what I expected.
The Dino saves the good people and eats the Bad.
Perfect.
Funny parts, rediculous parts and parts that make you feel Sad , happy and thrilled all at the same time.
Glad my wife and Friends enjoyed it.
5/10 maybe a 6.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/18 06:11 PM
LOVING PABLO
I was really looking forward to this as the trailer had my interest, as did the subject matter. Both Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz were very good in their roles as Pablo Escobar and Virginia Vallejo respectively. The film is about the longstanding affair the two had during Pablo's rise until his death in 1993. Virginia was a journalist in Columbia who since fled to America for fear of her life. She later wrote a book, which then became this film. Being that this is a love story, their isn't much violence in the film. I was a little disappointed with Bardem's performance as I was hoping he was going to bring more to the film. At times he seemed to mumble and it made it difficult to hear him. At other times, you can clearly tell he was wearing a prosthetic belly to show the weight gain of Pablo. I thought it had some promise and unfortunately, was somewhat of a let down. If you want to see a great show about Pablo watch NARCOS on Netflix. It's fantastic and Wagner Moura is outstanding as Pablo. 5.5/10
I was really looking forward to this as the trailer had my interest, as did the subject matter. Both Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz were very good in their roles as Pablo Escobar and Virginia Vallejo respectively. The film is about the longstanding affair the two had during Pablo's rise until his death in 1993. Virginia was a journalist in Columbia who since fled to America for fear of her life. She later wrote a book, which then became this film. Being that this is a love story, their isn't much violence in the film. I was a little disappointed with Bardem's performance as I was hoping he was going to bring more to the film. At times he seemed to mumble and it made it difficult to hear him. At other times, you can clearly tell he was wearing a prosthetic belly to show the weight gain of Pablo. I thought it had some promise and unfortunately, was somewhat of a let down. If you want to see a great show about Pablo watch NARCOS on Netflix. It's fantastic and Wagner Moura is outstanding as Pablo. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/18 12:30 AM
Cool.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/18 12:51 PM
SICARIO: DAY OF THE SOLDADO
I enjoyed the first SICARIO as it was a very interesting story, suspenseful, with a fantastic trio of leading actors (Emily Blunt, John Brolin and Benicio Del Toro). However, I was quite surprised when a second film was announced. This film continues the story of Matt Graver's (Brolin's) and Alejandro's (Del Toro's) relationship. The story is the Mexican drug cartels are helping terrorists cross the border illegally. As a result, the US government uses this as an excuse to manufacture a war between rival drug cartels by kidnapping the daughter of one of the heads of said cartels. Brolin and Del Toro are their normal badass selves, showing no emotion as these 2 heartless characters, who are nothing more than mercenaries. I was quite impressed with young Isabela Moner, who plays the kidnapped daughter of a cartel kingpin. She's able to hold her own and even push back against the likes of Del Toro in every scene she's in. Overall, it felt like a much longer film than it was, and while it wasn't bad, I enjoyed the first one more. Rumors are, depending on how this does at the box office, there's chatter of a third film and this film leaves the door open nicely to satisfy that need. 6/10
I enjoyed the first SICARIO as it was a very interesting story, suspenseful, with a fantastic trio of leading actors (Emily Blunt, John Brolin and Benicio Del Toro). However, I was quite surprised when a second film was announced. This film continues the story of Matt Graver's (Brolin's) and Alejandro's (Del Toro's) relationship. The story is the Mexican drug cartels are helping terrorists cross the border illegally. As a result, the US government uses this as an excuse to manufacture a war between rival drug cartels by kidnapping the daughter of one of the heads of said cartels. Brolin and Del Toro are their normal badass selves, showing no emotion as these 2 heartless characters, who are nothing more than mercenaries. I was quite impressed with young Isabela Moner, who plays the kidnapped daughter of a cartel kingpin. She's able to hold her own and even push back against the likes of Del Toro in every scene she's in. Overall, it felt like a much longer film than it was, and while it wasn't bad, I enjoyed the first one more. Rumors are, depending on how this does at the box office, there's chatter of a third film and this film leaves the door open nicely to satisfy that need. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/18 12:58 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SICARIO: DAY OF THE SOLDADO
I enjoyed the first SICARIO as it was a very interesting story, suspenseful, with a fantastic trio of leading actors (Emily Blunt, John Brolin and Benicio Del Toro). However, I was quite surprised when a second film was announced. This film continues the story of Matt Graver's (Brolin's) and Alejandro's (Del Toro's) relationship. The story is the Mexican drug cartels are helping terrorists cross the border illegally. As a result, the US government uses this as an excuse to manufacture a war between rival drug cartels by kidnapping the daughter of one of the heads of said cartels. Brolin and Del Toro are their normal badass selves, showing no emotion as these 2 heartless characters, who are nothing more than mercenaries. I was quite impressed with young Isabela Moner, who plays the kidnapped daughter of a cartel kingpin. She's able to hold her own and even push back against the likes of Del Toro in every scene she's in. Overall, it felt like a much longer film than it was, and while it wasn't bad, I enjoyed the first one more. Rumors are, depending on how this does at the box office, there's chatter of a third film and this film leaves the door open nicely to satisfy that need. 6/10
I enjoyed the first SICARIO as it was a very interesting story, suspenseful, with a fantastic trio of leading actors (Emily Blunt, John Brolin and Benicio Del Toro). However, I was quite surprised when a second film was announced. This film continues the story of Matt Graver's (Brolin's) and Alejandro's (Del Toro's) relationship. The story is the Mexican drug cartels are helping terrorists cross the border illegally. As a result, the US government uses this as an excuse to manufacture a war between rival drug cartels by kidnapping the daughter of one of the heads of said cartels. Brolin and Del Toro are their normal badass selves, showing no emotion as these 2 heartless characters, who are nothing more than mercenaries. I was quite impressed with young Isabela Moner, who plays the kidnapped daughter of a cartel kingpin. She's able to hold her own and even push back against the likes of Del Toro in every scene she's in. Overall, it felt like a much longer film than it was, and while it wasn't bad, I enjoyed the first one more. Rumors are, depending on how this does at the box office, there's chatter of a third film and this film leaves the door open nicely to satisfy that need. 6/10
I hope this is on my new streaming device I am getting, will watch.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/18 05:57 PM
No, it just got released in theaters today so it'll be a few months before you'll able to watch it at home.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/18 11:30 PM
If u r into WW2 history like I, check out "Downfall".. based mainly on Hitler's secretary's memoirs on his last days in his bunker & the paranoia he endures within & around him as the allies move closer & closer... & he descends into madness ,,very moving & disturbing...released in 2004 w/Bruno Ganz in a riveting role.
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/18 05:40 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
If u r into WW2 history like I, check out "Downfall".. based mainly on Hitler's secretary's memoirs on his last days in his bunker & the paranoia he endures within & around him as the allies move closer & closer... & he descends into madness ,,very moving & disturbing...released in 2004 w/Bruno Ganz in a riveting role.
Thanks Hoodlum I too love WW2 history and will have to check this out.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/18 12:14 AM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Originally Posted by hoodlum
If u r into WW2 history like I, check out "Downfall".. based mainly on Hitler's secretary's memoirs on his last days in his bunker & the paranoia he endures within & around him as the allies move closer & closer... & he descends into madness ,,very moving & disturbing...released in 2004 w/Bruno Ganz in a riveting role.
Thanks Hoodlum I too love WW2 history and will have to check this out.
It's on Demand.if u have xfinity...might on a Netflix thing, but, I think also on Showtime,,,no problem dude.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/18 03:12 AM
Very Cool.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/18 05:31 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Very Cool.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
One of the best shows ever. Have you watched The Pacific?
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/18 07:04 PM
Watched a double matinee. The First Purge was the first to be shown. Like the sequels after the first movie, it is just gore, killing and mostly of the African American community, once again showing an agenda. I really could not get behind this movie because they could not really build up a character to cling to, but Marisa Tomei can get physical with me anytime she wants to. I give it 5/10
The second movie Sicario Day of the Soldado, was actually better. Not as good as the first movie but still entertaining. I give it 6.5/10
On the movie "Downfall" it is the best movie out there on Adolf Hitler final days. It is in German, and many of the actors give convincing performances.
The second movie Sicario Day of the Soldado, was actually better. Not as good as the first movie but still entertaining. I give it 6.5/10
On the movie "Downfall" it is the best movie out there on Adolf Hitler final days. It is in German, and many of the actors give convincing performances.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/18 09:42 PM
Originally Posted by DE NIRO
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Very Cool.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
In the middle of Band of Brothers.
One of the best shows ever. Have you watched The Pacific?
Yes, very good but not produced as well as BoB
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/18 01:59 AM
47 Meters Down
6/10
Movie was shot well, acting was very good and the twist at end was set up perfectly.
6/10
Movie was shot well, acting was very good and the twist at end was set up perfectly.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/18 02:13 AM
[quote=Irishman12]UNSANE
I really enjoyed this film, in fact, more so than I originally thought I would. Steven Soderbergh does a great job with his directing, especially in the early parts of the film. When viewed outside, main star Claire Foy is usually observed from a stalker's POV. However, when it's an inside setting, the camera angle is usually off slightly and closer than it should be, giving the audience an awkward or uncomfortable feeling. This was my first time seeing Claire Foy and she gives an amazing performance of a woman who is committed against her will, trying to convince everyone else she's perfectly sane and that she doesn't belong there. However, in the process, she appears to make herself look even more insane to the hospital staff. In addition, it gives more of an insight into how trapped women of stalkers can feel. Having to change their name, telephone numbers and location, all while constantly always looking of their shoulder. Again, I thoroughly enjoyed this and will probably see it in theaters again! 7/10[/quote
This chic is creepy, very well done. The people surrounding her are very creepy too.
I really enjoyed this film, in fact, more so than I originally thought I would. Steven Soderbergh does a great job with his directing, especially in the early parts of the film. When viewed outside, main star Claire Foy is usually observed from a stalker's POV. However, when it's an inside setting, the camera angle is usually off slightly and closer than it should be, giving the audience an awkward or uncomfortable feeling. This was my first time seeing Claire Foy and she gives an amazing performance of a woman who is committed against her will, trying to convince everyone else she's perfectly sane and that she doesn't belong there. However, in the process, she appears to make herself look even more insane to the hospital staff. In addition, it gives more of an insight into how trapped women of stalkers can feel. Having to change their name, telephone numbers and location, all while constantly always looking of their shoulder. Again, I thoroughly enjoyed this and will probably see it in theaters again! 7/10[/quote
This chic is creepy, very well done. The people surrounding her are very creepy too.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/18 07:43 PM
Yes indeed. Hope you liked it!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/18 01:22 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Yes indeed. Hope you liked it!
I did ,,,, wife really loved it.
She gave it 4 1/2 Stars.... she does a star rating....LoL
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/12/18 05:15 PM
I've been lazy recently posting my reviews and for that, I apologize. Here's some recent ones I've seen:
UNCLE DREW
I only recently saw the commercial this was based upon and while you have a host of amateur actors (Reggie Miller, Nate Robinson, etc.), the film was decent and the story wasn't bad, but it was incredibly predictable and formulatic. In addition, I felt the film started out with some steam but the jokes ran dry after the first 20 minutes or so. Chris Webber seemed to be doing his best Arsenio Hall/Reverend Brown impression throughout and I was tired of Kyrie Irving referring to everyone as "young blood." 4.5/10
THE FIRST PURGE
With the exception of the first installment of this series, I have never been a fan of this franchise. I thought the premise was interesting but it's never truly translated to film as well as I had hoped. This is just another example of it. The story tells of the very first purge which takes place as an experiment on Staten Island. Residents are encouraged to stay and participate and those who do are compensated (the more you purge, the more you'll make). My biggest problem with the film was the social/political commentary of the film. White mercenaries/police officers going into predominately minority neighborhoods to "cleanse themselves." Another race-baiting movie that I think is inappropriate for it's time, given the current high tensions between minorities and the police. 4/10
ANT-MAN AND THE WASP
I recently rewatched the original before seeing the sequel, and after viewing both, I've undervalued this franchise. The sequel turned me into more of an Ant-Man fan and Evangeline Lilly killed it as Hope Van Dyne/Wasp. As with any sequel, the characters are already established so we can jump right in with more action and more comedy. The supporting cast is back (namely Michael Pena, TI and David Dastmalchian) to provide their antics and levity. The anti-aging CGI used for both Michael Douglas and Michelle Pfeiffer, during a scene earlier in the film set in the 1980's, is incredible. Between the 2, I enjoy the first one slightly more, but this was still a great followup and I'm looking forward to the third. 7/10
UNCLE DREW
I only recently saw the commercial this was based upon and while you have a host of amateur actors (Reggie Miller, Nate Robinson, etc.), the film was decent and the story wasn't bad, but it was incredibly predictable and formulatic. In addition, I felt the film started out with some steam but the jokes ran dry after the first 20 minutes or so. Chris Webber seemed to be doing his best Arsenio Hall/Reverend Brown impression throughout and I was tired of Kyrie Irving referring to everyone as "young blood." 4.5/10
THE FIRST PURGE
With the exception of the first installment of this series, I have never been a fan of this franchise. I thought the premise was interesting but it's never truly translated to film as well as I had hoped. This is just another example of it. The story tells of the very first purge which takes place as an experiment on Staten Island. Residents are encouraged to stay and participate and those who do are compensated (the more you purge, the more you'll make). My biggest problem with the film was the social/political commentary of the film. White mercenaries/police officers going into predominately minority neighborhoods to "cleanse themselves." Another race-baiting movie that I think is inappropriate for it's time, given the current high tensions between minorities and the police. 4/10
ANT-MAN AND THE WASP
I recently rewatched the original before seeing the sequel, and after viewing both, I've undervalued this franchise. The sequel turned me into more of an Ant-Man fan and Evangeline Lilly killed it as Hope Van Dyne/Wasp. As with any sequel, the characters are already established so we can jump right in with more action and more comedy. The supporting cast is back (namely Michael Pena, TI and David Dastmalchian) to provide their antics and levity. The anti-aging CGI used for both Michael Douglas and Michelle Pfeiffer, during a scene earlier in the film set in the 1980's, is incredible. Between the 2, I enjoy the first one slightly more, but this was still a great followup and I'm looking forward to the third. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/18 04:49 PM
SKYSCRAPER
This had a DIE HARD-esqueness to it, just not on that level of quality. I was glad to see Neve Campbell get a gig like this again as I'll always have a soft spot for Sidney Prescott. However, for the most part I felt she was underutilized. Playing the role of mother/wife and with the exception of one or two scenes, is pretty much a bland mother trying to get her kids out of a burning building. The rest of the cast is mediocre, even The Rock. I was glad to see that his character has a physical limitation as it's a nice break from the overly masculine performances we've seen in recent years. The limitation I feel makes him more vulnerable and sympathetic in my opinion. Otherwise, this was a decent summer popcorn flick. 5.5/10
This had a DIE HARD-esqueness to it, just not on that level of quality. I was glad to see Neve Campbell get a gig like this again as I'll always have a soft spot for Sidney Prescott. However, for the most part I felt she was underutilized. Playing the role of mother/wife and with the exception of one or two scenes, is pretty much a bland mother trying to get her kids out of a burning building. The rest of the cast is mediocre, even The Rock. I was glad to see that his character has a physical limitation as it's a nice break from the overly masculine performances we've seen in recent years. The limitation I feel makes him more vulnerable and sympathetic in my opinion. Otherwise, this was a decent summer popcorn flick. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/20/18 06:28 PM
THE EQUALIZER 2
Denzel Washington's first ever sequel in his storied career. I recently rewatched the original to get setup for the sequel, and while the sequel was good, it was predictable (even if the lady sitting next to him didn't find it so); and I enjoyed the first one more. However, the movie begins with a wonderful opening scene on a train in Turkey. More great and brutal action. I love the mannerisms and stoic facial expressions that Denzel portrays in both films. This goes a little bit deeper into his past which I was against. One of the things I enjoyed most about the original was we weren't given a lot of information about his past. He seems to be a mystery. Why does he feel compelled to do right all the time? Why does he help strangers, whom he owes nothing to? Just because he can? I wouldn't mind seeing a trilogy made if Denzel was on board as I'd be down for more of Robert McCall's beat downs! 6.5/10
Denzel Washington's first ever sequel in his storied career. I recently rewatched the original to get setup for the sequel, and while the sequel was good, it was predictable (even if the lady sitting next to him didn't find it so); and I enjoyed the first one more. However, the movie begins with a wonderful opening scene on a train in Turkey. More great and brutal action. I love the mannerisms and stoic facial expressions that Denzel portrays in both films. This goes a little bit deeper into his past which I was against. One of the things I enjoyed most about the original was we weren't given a lot of information about his past. He seems to be a mystery. Why does he feel compelled to do right all the time? Why does he help strangers, whom he owes nothing to? Just because he can? I wouldn't mind seeing a trilogy made if Denzel was on board as I'd be down for more of Robert McCall's beat downs! 6.5/10
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/18 01:21 AM
Just watched 'The Harder They Fall'
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/18 03:04 PM
MARY SHELLEY
Elle Fanning gives a strong performance as a young Mary Shelley. This film deals with the tragedies in her young life that lead to her ultimately penning the Frankenstein novel (something with which I still need to read along with Bram Stoker's DRACULA). What I admire about Elle is the soft and delicate young women she can portray but then in an instant, she can turn that kindness into a fire you wouldn't expect she is capable of spewing based on her looks alone. Also, this is an interesting story of a young woman trying to find her voice during a male dominated period. 5.5/10
BLINDSPOTTING
The previews for this had me somewhat interested and since the surge pricing went into effect in my area and I wasn't able to see the new MISSION IMPOSSIBLE as a result, I took a flyer on this. It was much better than I expected. I thought this was going to be another anti-cop, racial motivated movie. And while the movie does deal with racial tensions, it doesn't smother the viewer with it. The story is about Colin, a recently released felon who has only 3 days left on his probation before he's completely free of his past crime. During this time late at night, driving home from work, he seems a black man run in front of his truck while stopped at a traffic light. Following him is a white police officer who shots the suspect in the back 4 times. Colin is left with a dilemma: does he involve himself and speak up about the shooting, risking the cops retaliating against him by claiming he violated his parole some how and returning him to jail, or does he remain quite? It's an interesting study about a young man, trying to better himself and stay on the right path while at the same time, having the criminal justice system still hoovering over him like an anvil just waiting to be dropped. 6/10
Elle Fanning gives a strong performance as a young Mary Shelley. This film deals with the tragedies in her young life that lead to her ultimately penning the Frankenstein novel (something with which I still need to read along with Bram Stoker's DRACULA). What I admire about Elle is the soft and delicate young women she can portray but then in an instant, she can turn that kindness into a fire you wouldn't expect she is capable of spewing based on her looks alone. Also, this is an interesting story of a young woman trying to find her voice during a male dominated period. 5.5/10
BLINDSPOTTING
The previews for this had me somewhat interested and since the surge pricing went into effect in my area and I wasn't able to see the new MISSION IMPOSSIBLE as a result, I took a flyer on this. It was much better than I expected. I thought this was going to be another anti-cop, racial motivated movie. And while the movie does deal with racial tensions, it doesn't smother the viewer with it. The story is about Colin, a recently released felon who has only 3 days left on his probation before he's completely free of his past crime. During this time late at night, driving home from work, he seems a black man run in front of his truck while stopped at a traffic light. Following him is a white police officer who shots the suspect in the back 4 times. Colin is left with a dilemma: does he involve himself and speak up about the shooting, risking the cops retaliating against him by claiming he violated his parole some how and returning him to jail, or does he remain quite? It's an interesting study about a young man, trying to better himself and stay on the right path while at the same time, having the criminal justice system still hoovering over him like an anvil just waiting to be dropped. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/18 04:31 AM
Great reviews , thanks Guys.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/18 03:16 AM
Keep Watching
\
2017 Horror with Carl from Walking Dead.
Very Creepy, well done.
Director Sean Carter is obviously a fan of classics and do not understand the poor ratings it received.
I give it at least a 6-7 out of 10 or if you rather stars a 3 out of Five .
\
2017 Horror with Carl from Walking Dead.
Very Creepy, well done.
Director Sean Carter is obviously a fan of classics and do not understand the poor ratings it received.
I give it at least a 6-7 out of 10 or if you rather stars a 3 out of Five .
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/18 02:53 PM
Can anyone tell which Dirty Harry movie contains this scene: it's near the opening when Harry goes to a store to get coffee and the waitress pours a ton of sugar into it which causes harry to return to the store to find out why. In fact, the store is being held up.
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/18 06:18 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Can anyone tell which Dirty Harry movie contains this scene: it's near the opening when Harry goes to a store to get coffee and the waitress pours a ton of sugar into it which causes harry to return to the store to find out why. In fact, the store is being held up.
Pretty sure it's Sudden Impact
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/01/18 07:48 PM
Another movie question:
I watched justice League, but didn't see the part when Superman comes back to life. What brings him back to life?
I watched justice League, but didn't see the part when Superman comes back to life. What brings him back to life?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/01/18 10:09 PM
Watched Wes Craven's New Nightmare, which was, at the time, a quite interesting and brave spin on the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise. Coming out in 1994, it predated Scream by two years, so it was probably the first meta horror movie.
The scene where the guy gets killed by the glove coming up through the car seat, which he mistakes for an itchy ball sack, while driving home is something I remembered vividly ever since watching it as a child.
The scene where the guy gets killed by the glove coming up through the car seat, which he mistakes for an itchy ball sack, while driving home is something I remembered vividly ever since watching it as a child.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/18 06:43 PM
THE SPY WHO DUMPED ME
I really did like the pairing of Mila Kunis and Kate McKinnon who's slowly transitioning from SNL to the big screen. These two really feed off of each other and I'm sure the blooper reel would be enjoyable to watch on Blu-Ray/DVD. An original story about a woman (Kunis) who is dumped by her boyfriend, who just happens to work for the CIA. She has no knowledge of this until after their break-up when the people who are trying to kill him, target her as well. Pretty funny movie with some decent action scenes. I did feel the story grew tiresome a little towards the end with the persistent, "who's side is he on" question lingering. 6/10
I really did like the pairing of Mila Kunis and Kate McKinnon who's slowly transitioning from SNL to the big screen. These two really feed off of each other and I'm sure the blooper reel would be enjoyable to watch on Blu-Ray/DVD. An original story about a woman (Kunis) who is dumped by her boyfriend, who just happens to work for the CIA. She has no knowledge of this until after their break-up when the people who are trying to kill him, target her as well. Pretty funny movie with some decent action scenes. I did feel the story grew tiresome a little towards the end with the persistent, "who's side is he on" question lingering. 6/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/18 07:04 PM
Watching the Back To The Future trilogy again for the umpteenth time. Great films..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/18 08:21 PM
The first 2 I loved, the 3rd one, not so much.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/18 05:38 AM
That's normally the case with most trilogy's but i think it's still fun film to watch.. Also surprised that they have never remade this film..
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/05/18 05:20 PM
Unforgiving, Clint Eastwood / Morgan Freeman and Popeye Doyle.
Great Western.
Great Western.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/05/18 09:47 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Unforgiving, Clint Eastwood / Morgan Freeman and Popeye Doyle.
Great Western.
Great Western.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 04:55 PM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Unforgiving, Clint Eastwood / Morgan Freeman and Popeye Doyle.
Great Western.
Great Western.
I really like that one.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 05:39 PM
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Just watched 'The Harder They Fall'
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Somebody up there likes me/// Paul Newman in 1 of the best of the early boxing flicks around...
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 05:40 PM
You guys have any suggestions for a good old (60s -90s)
medieval movies ?
medieval movies ?
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 05:42 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Michael_Giovanni
Just watched 'The Harder They Fall'
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Humphrey Bogart's last film before he died. Not a terrible boxing movie. Some of the fights scenes are awful but I think it served the purpose of showing that all of the fights were fixed.
Has anyone scene 'Somebody Up There Likes Me'? I was told it was a good boxing movie with a lot of great scenes filmed in the legendary Stillman's Gym.
Somebody up there likes me/// Paul Newman in 1 of the best of the early boxing flicks around...
Just watched "TheMan w/ The Golden Arm"..w/ Frank Sinatra & Kim Novak..very engaging.
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 06:40 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Somebody up there likes me/// Paul Newman in 1 of the best of the early boxing flicks around...
It was made in the mid 1950s so I'd hardly call it an early boxing flick but I did enjoy it immensely. Paul Newman did a very nice job of capturing the brutish Rocky Graziano. And look for an early scene on a rooftop with a very young Steve McQueen.
Filmed a few years after came "Requiem for a Heavyweight" starring Anthony Quinn, Jackie Gleason and Mickey Rooney in an excellent adaptation of an earlier teleplay of the same story. A wonderful drama and added real-life boxers like champs Jack Dempsey, Willie Pep and Muhammad Ali (just after he turned pro as Cassius Clay) added a touch of realism.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 07:19 PM
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
You guys have any suggestions for a good old (60s -90s)
medieval movies ?
medieval movies ?
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 09:04 PM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
You guys have any suggestions for a good old (60s -90s)
medieval movies ?
medieval movies ?
Thanks !!!
I'll â€check this !
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 09:25 PM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
You guys have any suggestions for a good old (60s -90s)
medieval movies ?
medieval movies ?
El Cid with Charlton Heston, and the Lion in Winter.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/18 09:46 PM
Thanks olivant
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/09/18 01:44 AM
IVAN THE TERRIBLE PART I
Beautifully shot. Fantastic sets, costumes, cinematography and powerful acting. Even in black and white, visually it's a stunning picture and can absolutely see Russian pride beaming throughout. 8/10
IVAN THE TERRIBLE PART II
Not as visually stunning as its predecessor, but the story is more evolved and goes into just how Ivan earned the nickname "The Terrible." Although some of the film was shot in color and the red was busting onscreen. 7/10
Originally it was planned as a trilogy but Stalin canned it after not liking Part II. I would have liked to have seen where Director Sergei Eisenstein would have taken it.
Beautifully shot. Fantastic sets, costumes, cinematography and powerful acting. Even in black and white, visually it's a stunning picture and can absolutely see Russian pride beaming throughout. 8/10
IVAN THE TERRIBLE PART II
Not as visually stunning as its predecessor, but the story is more evolved and goes into just how Ivan earned the nickname "The Terrible." Although some of the film was shot in color and the red was busting onscreen. 7/10
Originally it was planned as a trilogy but Stalin canned it after not liking Part II. I would have liked to have seen where Director Sergei Eisenstein would have taken it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/18 12:15 AM
Just saw Meg.
It was really good, lots of fun.
In the previews they had shown a few Movies that really caught my attention and will be going to see.
Aquaman
Jack Blacks new flick with him as a warlock, “The house with a clock in the wallâ€, I think that’s what its called.
It was really good, lots of fun.
In the previews they had shown a few Movies that really caught my attention and will be going to see.
Aquaman
Jack Blacks new flick with him as a warlock, “The house with a clock in the wallâ€, I think that’s what its called.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/18 06:14 PM
Yeah THE MEG was a fun time for sure. I've been very lazy with my reviews recently. Stay away from THE SLENDERMAN (utter garbage). MILE 22 with Mark Wahlberg was a disappointment (I was bored with the story less than halfway in. It started out well and the ending was decent, but by then it was too little, too late). BLACKKKLANSMAN was alright but didn't like all the "hit you over the head" with subliminal Trump bashing. THE SPY WHO DUMPED ME I was a little disappointed in because it looked pretty funny from the previews. This weekend I plan on seeing THE HAPPYTIME MURDERS with Melissa McCarthy (I love that woman) as well as SEARCHING.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/18 01:19 AM
SISTERS
Vintage De Palma with his beautifully created split screen shots. A great score by Bernard Herrmann with hints of the CAPE FEAR theme in it and a strong performance by Margot Kidder. I haven't seen much of her work outside of BLACK CHRISTMAS, THE AMITYVILLE HORROR and SUPERMAN franchise, so this was a welcome change. Unfortunately, the story was predictable but still a somewhat enjoyable ride. 6.5/10
ALEXANDER NEVSKY
Director Sergei Eisenstein and lead actor Nikolay Cherkasov create another wonder Russian masterpiece. Released at the outset of World War II, this is another nationalistic picture for Russia about a prince, who leads an army against German foreign invaders. These two collaborated on IVAN THE TERRIBLE PARTS 1 & 2 and while this was released earlier, is still in the same vein in terms of outstanding cinematography, costumes and splendor. 7.5/10
Vintage De Palma with his beautifully created split screen shots. A great score by Bernard Herrmann with hints of the CAPE FEAR theme in it and a strong performance by Margot Kidder. I haven't seen much of her work outside of BLACK CHRISTMAS, THE AMITYVILLE HORROR and SUPERMAN franchise, so this was a welcome change. Unfortunately, the story was predictable but still a somewhat enjoyable ride. 6.5/10
ALEXANDER NEVSKY
Director Sergei Eisenstein and lead actor Nikolay Cherkasov create another wonder Russian masterpiece. Released at the outset of World War II, this is another nationalistic picture for Russia about a prince, who leads an army against German foreign invaders. These two collaborated on IVAN THE TERRIBLE PARTS 1 & 2 and while this was released earlier, is still in the same vein in terms of outstanding cinematography, costumes and splendor. 7.5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/18 03:43 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SISTERS
Vintage De Palma with his beautifully created split screen shots. A great score by Bernard Herrmann with hints of the CAPE FEAR theme in it and a strong performance by Margot Kidder. I haven't seen much of her work outside of BLACK CHRISTMAS, THE AMITYVILLE HORROR and SUPERMAN franchise, so this was a welcome change. Unfortunately, the story was predictable but still a somewhat enjoyable ride. 6.5/10
ALEXANDER NEVSKY
Director Sergei Eisenstein and lead actor Nikolay Cherkasov create another wonder Russian masterpiece. Released at the outset of World War II, this is another nationalistic picture for Russia about a prince, who leads an army against German foreign invaders. These two collaborated on IVAN THE TERRIBLE PARTS 1 & 2 and while this was released earlier, is still in the same vein in terms of outstanding cinematography, costumes and splendor. 7.5/10
Vintage De Palma with his beautifully created split screen shots. A great score by Bernard Herrmann with hints of the CAPE FEAR theme in it and a strong performance by Margot Kidder. I haven't seen much of her work outside of BLACK CHRISTMAS, THE AMITYVILLE HORROR and SUPERMAN franchise, so this was a welcome change. Unfortunately, the story was predictable but still a somewhat enjoyable ride. 6.5/10
ALEXANDER NEVSKY
Director Sergei Eisenstein and lead actor Nikolay Cherkasov create another wonder Russian masterpiece. Released at the outset of World War II, this is another nationalistic picture for Russia about a prince, who leads an army against German foreign invaders. These two collaborated on IVAN THE TERRIBLE PARTS 1 & 2 and while this was released earlier, is still in the same vein in terms of outstanding cinematography, costumes and splendor. 7.5/10
Yes, Irish "Sisters is a quiet classic & was remade recently w/ some b grade actress in the Kidder role..the classic is far superior...by the way , the girl who witnessed it (the murder)was actress Jennifer Salt who, coincidentally was around that time Al Pacino's girlfriend.
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/18 03:11 PM
Watched a few classic horror movies lately: The Wicker Man (original from '73), Don't Look Now, Profondo Rosso and Eraserhead.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/18 05:43 PM
THE HAPPYTIME MURDERS
I'll just start out by saying don't waste your time. I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan and while she's funny, her movies are hit and miss for me and this was definitely a miss. I don't mind the crudeness and it looked funny from the trailers but, like so many comedies today, the funny parts were in the previews. 5/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974)
A good horror flick but not on the level of a HALLOWEEN in my opinion. I understand it has a very big following but it doesn't do it for me the way HALLOWEEN or some of the other legendary horror films do. I do, however, dig the Christmas Slasher genre and wouldn't mind seeing more of them. Great cast by the way and I'd be lying if I didn't say that having seen Margot Kidder in SISTERS recently made me want to watch this. 6.5/10
I'll just start out by saying don't waste your time. I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan and while she's funny, her movies are hit and miss for me and this was definitely a miss. I don't mind the crudeness and it looked funny from the trailers but, like so many comedies today, the funny parts were in the previews. 5/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974)
A good horror flick but not on the level of a HALLOWEEN in my opinion. I understand it has a very big following but it doesn't do it for me the way HALLOWEEN or some of the other legendary horror films do. I do, however, dig the Christmas Slasher genre and wouldn't mind seeing more of them. Great cast by the way and I'd be lying if I didn't say that having seen Margot Kidder in SISTERS recently made me want to watch this. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/18 09:38 PM
LE SAMOURAI
This film is described as the "epitome of cool" with Alain Delon staring as Jef Costello, a hitman who needs an alibi after he's seen leaving the scene of the crime after his most recent hit. Honestly, I'm not much for french films and I'd much rather take Chow Yun-Fat 22 years later in the Hong Kong adaptation of THE KILLER. 6/10
JIGOKU
A visually stunning and at times, gory and graphic Japanese horror film. The film was made in 1960 and prior to that, this type of film wasn't released as Japanese horror cinema prior to this was mostly physiological and not physical. I truly tip my hat to director Nobuo Nakagawa for having the conviction of putting this film out as it was during the period it was released. 7/10
THE MAGICIAN
What I love most about this film is it's basically a big F U to all the critics of Ingmar Bergman's work prior to this point. This is now my fifth Bergman film that I've seen recently and I think I prefer his work prior to 1960 as opposed to later than. Prior to 1960, he did a lot of period pieces while his work post 1960 was more modern. This has the usual ensemble of Bergman actors such as Max von Sydown, Ingrid Thulin, Bibi Andersson and Birgitta Pettersson. 6.5/10
This film is described as the "epitome of cool" with Alain Delon staring as Jef Costello, a hitman who needs an alibi after he's seen leaving the scene of the crime after his most recent hit. Honestly, I'm not much for french films and I'd much rather take Chow Yun-Fat 22 years later in the Hong Kong adaptation of THE KILLER. 6/10
JIGOKU
A visually stunning and at times, gory and graphic Japanese horror film. The film was made in 1960 and prior to that, this type of film wasn't released as Japanese horror cinema prior to this was mostly physiological and not physical. I truly tip my hat to director Nobuo Nakagawa for having the conviction of putting this film out as it was during the period it was released. 7/10
THE MAGICIAN
What I love most about this film is it's basically a big F U to all the critics of Ingmar Bergman's work prior to this point. This is now my fifth Bergman film that I've seen recently and I think I prefer his work prior to 1960 as opposed to later than. Prior to 1960, he did a lot of period pieces while his work post 1960 was more modern. This has the usual ensemble of Bergman actors such as Max von Sydown, Ingrid Thulin, Bibi Andersson and Birgitta Pettersson. 6.5/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/27/18 03:00 AM
Lady in White. Very unknown but underrated ghost story that takes place in 1960s. Its not a gory jump scare type film. Its more of a coming of age story that is about loss and also social issues. Also concentrates on a italian american family which i relate too
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/18 06:26 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE HAPPYTIME MURDERS
I'll just start out by saying don't waste your time. I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan and while she's funny, her movies are hit and miss for me and this was definitely a miss. I don't mind the crudeness and it looked funny from the trailers but, like so many comedies today, the funny parts were in the previews. 5/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974)
A good horror flick but not on the level of a HALLOWEEN in my opinion. I understand it has a very big following but it doesn't do it for me the way HALLOWEEN or some of the other legendary horror films do. I do, however, dig the Christmas Slasher genre and wouldn't mind seeing more of them. Great cast by the way and I'd be lying if I didn't say that having seen Margot Kidder in SISTERS recently made me want to watch this. 6.5/10
I'll just start out by saying don't waste your time. I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan and while she's funny, her movies are hit and miss for me and this was definitely a miss. I don't mind the crudeness and it looked funny from the trailers but, like so many comedies today, the funny parts were in the previews. 5/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974)
A good horror flick but not on the level of a HALLOWEEN in my opinion. I understand it has a very big following but it doesn't do it for me the way HALLOWEEN or some of the other legendary horror films do. I do, however, dig the Christmas Slasher genre and wouldn't mind seeing more of them. Great cast by the way and I'd be lying if I didn't say that having seen Margot Kidder in SISTERS recently made me want to watch this. 6.5/10
Fell asleep watching "Black Christmas".
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/18 08:13 PM
I think it's decent and not a bad movie at all. But again, I don't put it in that upper echelon of horror movie grails. Just my opinion and I know a lot of people do. It just doesn't do it for me the way some other horror movies do. Fun fact: apparently HALLOWEEN director John Carpenter talked to BLACK CHRISTMAS director Bob Clark about him (Clark) making a sequel to BLACK CHRISTMAS. It would be about an escaped mental patient who went back to the house from the original BLACK CHRISTMAS and start his killing spree all over again, with the title being HALLOWEEN. Clark passed, as he didn't want to make another horror film, but gave Carpenter his blessing to pursue his project. The rest is history!
ONIBABA
Another visually stunning film from 1960's Japan. I'm truly impressed with some of these black and white movies and how beautiful they still look so many years later and without color. The story takes place during the 1300's while a Civil War is occurring in Japan. Two women (one a mother and the other her daughter-in-law) kill soldiers and sell their armor/weapons in order to survive. When a neighbor of theirs comes back to tell the women their son/husband has died, the daughter-in-law begins a physical relationship with the neighbor. The mother, who is still grieving from her recently deceased son, tries to prevent the relationship. 7/10
NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968)
I've never been much for zombie movies and I haven't seen much of George Romero's work. I was more curious about this since it started the whole zombie obsession we find ourselves in today. Overall, a decently shot film with some mediocre performances. I was a little surprised by how much gore they put on screen for the time period. However, I went in to this film not caring much for zombies, and I left the film feeling the exact same way. 5.5/10
ONIBABA
Another visually stunning film from 1960's Japan. I'm truly impressed with some of these black and white movies and how beautiful they still look so many years later and without color. The story takes place during the 1300's while a Civil War is occurring in Japan. Two women (one a mother and the other her daughter-in-law) kill soldiers and sell their armor/weapons in order to survive. When a neighbor of theirs comes back to tell the women their son/husband has died, the daughter-in-law begins a physical relationship with the neighbor. The mother, who is still grieving from her recently deceased son, tries to prevent the relationship. 7/10
NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968)
I've never been much for zombie movies and I haven't seen much of George Romero's work. I was more curious about this since it started the whole zombie obsession we find ourselves in today. Overall, a decently shot film with some mediocre performances. I was a little surprised by how much gore they put on screen for the time period. However, I went in to this film not caring much for zombies, and I left the film feeling the exact same way. 5.5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/05/18 07:23 PM
Watched Leatherface the other night. It was better than Texas Chainsaw, and pretty good as far as remakes/reboots/reimaginings go. They probably went a little far with some of the racier scenes, which is not something I'd usually complain about - less is more in this case. And I think the guy who they cast as Leatherface wasn't really a good physical match for him - they probably would've been better off going with another cast member. And I'm not sure his transition into Leatherface was very believable. But, still a respectable showing.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/05/18 08:15 PM
Moe, are you talking about the 2017 version LEATHERFACE? If so, I wasn't such a huge fan of it. It looked alright from the previews but it just didn't deliver for me.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/05/18 08:39 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Moe, are you talking about the 2017 version LEATHERFACE? If so, I wasn't such a huge fan of it. It looked alright from the previews but it just didn't deliver for me.
Yeah. 2017 Leatherface.
I'm also going through the Nightmare on Elm Street series. I've started with Wes Craven's New Nightmare and then chronologically. I've watched up to and including Dream Master. So far they're all pretty good except the second one, with its homoerotic overtones.
Where do you rank them, Irish?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/18 07:11 PM
Honestly, I was never much of a NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET fan. I always preferred FRIDAY THE 13TH. However, to answer your question, my top 3 NIGHTMARE movies, in order, would be:
1) A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET (1984)
2) FREDDY'S DEAD: THE FINAL NIGHTMARE
3) WES CRAVEN'S NEW NIGHTMARE
1) A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET (1984)
2) FREDDY'S DEAD: THE FINAL NIGHTMARE
3) WES CRAVEN'S NEW NIGHTMARE
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/18 08:48 PM
Leatherface was not that good.
On a Nightmare On Elm Street
1. 1984. The First ones are mostly the best
2. The Dream Warriors.
3. 2010. Perhaps the best reboot in a franchise.
On a Nightmare On Elm Street
1. 1984. The First ones are mostly the best
2. The Dream Warriors.
3. 2010. Perhaps the best reboot in a franchise.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/09/18 01:13 AM
ALIVE
1993
Survival Drama
\
Really good nd creeped me out
1993
Survival Drama
\
Really good nd creeped me out
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/10/18 06:08 PM
Yesterday I watched SHAFT, DOLEMITE and SUPER FLY. These were all part of a Blaxploitation collection via Filmstruck. They'll be removed from the service Thursday so I needed to watch them before they did. I had only seen SHAFT before and while the theme is legendary, I wasn't a fan of the movie. The same could be said for SUPER FLY (I actually saw the remake before this and prefer it to the original). DOLEMITE was a nice surprise that was cheesy bad but in a good, 70's kind of way.
Next up will be my first viewings of CLEOPATRA JONES and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG to finish out the collection.
Next up will be my first viewings of CLEOPATRA JONES and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG to finish out the collection.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/18 12:07 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Yesterday I watched SHAFT, DOLEMITE and SUPER FLY. These were all part of a Blaxploitation collection via Filmstruck. They'll be removed from the service Thursday so I needed to watch them before they did. I had only seen SHAFT before and while the theme is legendary, I wasn't a fan of the movie. The same could be said for SUPER FLY (I actually saw the remake before this and prefer it to the original). DOLEMITE was a nice surprise that was cheesy bad but in a good, 70's kind of way.
Next up will be my first viewings of CLEOPATRA JONES and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG to finish out the collection.
Next up will be my first viewings of CLEOPATRA JONES and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG to finish out the collection.
I saw some of those and others could not get through,
The last two may be cool, you know for sure it will be loaded with Hot black chicks.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/18 06:26 PM
Actually, CLEOPATRA JONES wasn't very good at all (bad karate scenes all around) and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG was very boring. Mostly a movie about a guy on the run with an score on it. Very little dialogue, just very disappointing and this was the film that supposedly kicked off the Blaxploitation genre.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/18 02:22 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Actually, CLEOPATRA JONES wasn't very good at all (bad karate scenes all around) and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG was very boring. Mostly a movie about a guy on the run with an score on it. Very little dialogue, just very disappointing and this was the film that supposedly kicked off the Blaxploitation genre.
U guys need 2 watch COFFY, FOXY BROWN & SHEBA BABY...Pam Grier Rocks!...Smokin..
Posted By: njcapo35
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/18 02:19 PM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/18 07:02 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Actually, CLEOPATRA JONES wasn't very good at all (bad karate scenes all around) and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG was very boring. Mostly a movie about a guy on the run with an score on it. Very little dialogue, just very disappointing and this was the film that supposedly kicked off the Blaxploitation genre.
U guys need 2 watch COFFY, FOXY BROWN & SHEBA BABY...Pam Grier Rocks!...Smokin..
I've seen COFFY and FOXY BROWN but not SHEBA BABY. I liked COFFY more than FOXY BROWN but both are enjoyable. And yes, Pam Grier rocks!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/18 04:53 AM
Originally Posted by njcapo35
Yeah, that was a great one..the size of those bombs!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/18 04:56 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Actually, CLEOPATRA JONES wasn't very good at all (bad karate scenes all around) and SWEET SWEETBACK'S BAADASSSSS SONG was very boring. Mostly a movie about a guy on the run with an score on it. Very little dialogue, just very disappointing and this was the film that supposedly kicked off the Blaxploitation genre.
U guys need 2 watch COFFY, FOXY BROWN & SHEBA BABY...Pam Grier Rocks!...Smokin..
I've seen COFFY and FOXY BROWN but not SHEBA BABY. I liked COFFY more than FOXY BROWN but both are enjoyable. And yes, Pam Grier rocks!
She still was hot as she got older..( Jackie Brown )
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/18 06:36 PM
THE PREDATOR
While I wasn't wild about seeing this, I actually had a fun time with it. Shane Black does a great job at making this an homage to the original, while at the same time, allowing this film to stand on its own. The original score is used, it's funny, and references the first 2 films of the franchise. While I wasn't a huge fan of the predator dogs (yes, you read that right), I did understand their purpose. The team of characters seem to work well together, each offering and bringing something to the group. 5.5/10
While I wasn't wild about seeing this, I actually had a fun time with it. Shane Black does a great job at making this an homage to the original, while at the same time, allowing this film to stand on its own. The original score is used, it's funny, and references the first 2 films of the franchise. While I wasn't a huge fan of the predator dogs (yes, you read that right), I did understand their purpose. The team of characters seem to work well together, each offering and bringing something to the group. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/15/18 09:03 PM
A SIMPLE FAVOR
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/15/18 10:28 PM
Watched The Predator. It is a fun ride. Those mama jokes brings back old memories. Shane Black does do a good job, but some of the storylines get overweight and lost to where they are not resolved properly. Danny McBride is in both the Predator and Alien franchises now.
My rank is now
Predator
Predators
The Predator
My rank is now
Predator
Predators
The Predator
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/15/18 11:54 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
A SIMPLE FAVOR
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
Great review i12
Just read this to wife, I told her I’m in of she is in for the Queen Movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/18 08:59 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
A SIMPLE FAVOR
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
I like it when an actor/director branch out of their genre, especially if it's from comedy to drama. Paul Feig, along with writers Jessica Sharzer and Darcey Bell, deliver a suspenseful, thought-provoking, keep you guessing until the very end, whodunit. Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick's characters in this film could not be more unlike each other and yet they strike up a friendship. This is by far the most foul-mouthed and vicious I've ever seen Blake while Anna does a perfect job as an overbearing mother who is trying to grow her vlog. This is a smart, original and refreshing movie. I was excited going in to this and it did not disappoint. I may even help myself to a second viewing while it's still in theaters. If you have any interest, I do recommend seeing this! 7/10
Great review i12
Just read this to wife, I told her I’m in of she is in for the Queen Movie.
Awesome! I really did enjoy it. Enjoy!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/18 11:06 PM
Last night I watched Angel Face with Jean Simmons and Robert Mitchum (1952). Both are fine actors and the movie was black and white. I really like Mitchum.
Those movies are such a contrast with today's; the actors were so good and the screen was devoid of alot of movement and special effects. Thus, the actors had to perform well. It was not that interesting a plot, but it was worth watching because of the performances.
Those movies are such a contrast with today's; the actors were so good and the screen was devoid of alot of movement and special effects. Thus, the actors had to perform well. It was not that interesting a plot, but it was worth watching because of the performances.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/17/18 05:11 PM
I recently saw THE POST MAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE. I had never seen it before and to be perfectly honest, really the only reason I watched is was because it was referenced in KILL BILL VOLUME 2 (which is my favorite movie of all-time). To your point olivant, yes, there isn't a lot of movement on the screen and the actors had to hold the audiences attention (which they usually did). I enjoyed the film. I thought it was good but not great. And that Lana Turner, wow, was she a beautiful woman!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/18 02:42 PM
THE THIEF OF BAGDAD (1940)
This is the type of "old school Hollywood" that I miss. The grand epics with their majestic pageantry. A wonderful and engaging fantasy tale that featured both eye popping technicolor and wonderful special effects. Solid acting all around, especially from Conrad Veidt who I feel stood out the most with his scary and intimidating performance as Jaffar. Would love to see Criterion rerelease this on Bluray and see what that transfer would look like.
This is the type of "old school Hollywood" that I miss. The grand epics with their majestic pageantry. A wonderful and engaging fantasy tale that featured both eye popping technicolor and wonderful special effects. Solid acting all around, especially from Conrad Veidt who I feel stood out the most with his scary and intimidating performance as Jaffar. Would love to see Criterion rerelease this on Bluray and see what that transfer would look like.
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/18 01:14 PM
Watched all 3 parts of Friday last night.
Friday
Next Friday
Friday After Next
Great comedies about the hood, I think the first one was the most favorite for me.
Friday
Next Friday
Friday After Next
Great comedies about the hood, I think the first one was the most favorite for me.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/18 06:44 PM
Great films. Enjoy watching them..
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/18 11:45 PM
Death Wish (1974)
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/ydgLz8CF/IMG_7999.jpg)
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/18 01:00 AM
Originally Posted by Blake
The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
I never saw the original but the remake is straight garbage.
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/18 01:22 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Blake
The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
I never saw the original but the remake is straight garbage.
I expected as much. I might check that out if it's on Netflix or something but I have very low expectations.
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/29/18 08:07 PM
Thrashin'
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/Dyc871Yq/IMG_8946.jpg)
This is a cheesy 80's flick but I like it. Josh Brolin stars as Corey Webster, a skater who faces off against rival skate crew "the daggers". The movie is a look back at the Venice Beach scene in the 80's. A young Red Hot Chili Peppers performs in a scene. I collect skateboard related stuff and movies so I'm glad to have this in the collection. Now they just need to release Gleaming the Cube on Blu-ray.
This is a cheesy 80's flick but I like it. Josh Brolin stars as Corey Webster, a skater who faces off against rival skate crew "the daggers". The movie is a look back at the Venice Beach scene in the 80's. A young Red Hot Chili Peppers performs in a scene. I collect skateboard related stuff and movies so I'm glad to have this in the collection. Now they just need to release Gleaming the Cube on Blu-ray.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/18 03:51 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I recently saw THE POST MAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE. I had never seen it before and to be perfectly honest, really the only reason I watched is was because it was referenced in KILL BILL VOLUME 2 (which is my favorite movie of all-time). To your point olivant, yes, there isn't a lot of movement on the screen and the actors had to hold the audiences attention (which they usually did). I enjoyed the film. I thought it was good but not great. And that Lana Turner, wow, was she a beautiful woman!
Now u gotta see the remake w/ Jack Nicholson & Jessica Lange , directed by Bob Rafelson....not as good as the original but more stylish & sexy..Jessica ??..oh my!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/18 04:09 PM
Originally Posted by Blake
Death Wish (1974)
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
IE: Falling Down/Micheal Douglas?...
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/02/18 04:11 AM
How about The Gambler with James Caan from '74? He's an inveterate gambler who gets in deep with the mob and ends up corrupting a young basketball player to pay his debts.
At the end Caan makes a shot from the top of the key and a hook shot. He really does!
You also get to see a pre-Alice Vic Taybeck and a less than rotund Paul Servino. You also get to see alot of long hair.
The last scene is quite a surprise.
At the end Caan makes a shot from the top of the key and a hook shot. He really does!
You also get to see a pre-Alice Vic Taybeck and a less than rotund Paul Servino. You also get to see alot of long hair.
The last scene is quite a surprise.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/02/18 04:50 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
How about The Gambler with James Caan from '74? He's an inveterate gambler who gets in deep with the mob and ends up corrupting a young basketball player to pay his debts.
At the end Caan makes a shot from the top of the key and a hook shot. He really does!
You also get to see a pre-Alice Vic Taybeck and a less than rotund Paul Servino. You also get to see alot of long hair.
The last scene is quite a surprise.
At the end Caan makes a shot from the top of the key and a hook shot. He really does!
You also get to see a pre-Alice Vic Taybeck and a less than rotund Paul Servino. You also get to see alot of long hair.
The last scene is quite a surprise.
I'll look 4 it...haven't seen that 1 yet..sounds interesting...I do own "Cinderella Liberty" w/ Jimmy Caan & a smoking hot Marsha Mason from ..back then , she was really creamy..gor geous shaped mouth & lips..good movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/03/18 09:35 PM
NIGHT SCHOOL
Just got out from seeing this and while I like Kevin Hart, none of his solo movies have really been great and this is another example. Most of the funny parts as usual are in the previews, but not all (they actually saved you some). Not as funny as I was hoping/expecting. 5.5/10
Just got out from seeing this and while I like Kevin Hart, none of his solo movies have really been great and this is another example. Most of the funny parts as usual are in the previews, but not all (they actually saved you some). Not as funny as I was hoping/expecting. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/18 04:57 PM
VENOM
Ok, so you knew it wasn't going to be Marvel quality going in; but it also wasn't FANTASTIC FOUR/DC level bad either. It's a funny, decently enjoyable ride if you go in with those expectations. The studio went with the PG-13 rating to appeal to a wider audience and I'm not sure a R rating would have done much more for it. Tom Hardy and Michelle Williams are better than this and terribly underutilized. I am a Tom Hardy fan and I can honestly say, I think this was one of his movies that wasn't great. Also, there were 2 credits scenes. The first was kinda cool with a funny cameo but the 2nd was absolute garbage! I doubt a sequel gets made and wonder what it'll do for Sony's plans for their non-Spider-Man Universe? 5.5/10
Ok, so you knew it wasn't going to be Marvel quality going in; but it also wasn't FANTASTIC FOUR/DC level bad either. It's a funny, decently enjoyable ride if you go in with those expectations. The studio went with the PG-13 rating to appeal to a wider audience and I'm not sure a R rating would have done much more for it. Tom Hardy and Michelle Williams are better than this and terribly underutilized. I am a Tom Hardy fan and I can honestly say, I think this was one of his movies that wasn't great. Also, there were 2 credits scenes. The first was kinda cool with a funny cameo but the 2nd was absolute garbage! I doubt a sequel gets made and wonder what it'll do for Sony's plans for their non-Spider-Man Universe? 5.5/10
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/18 11:47 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Blake
Death Wish (1974)
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
Charles Bronson plays Paul Kersey, a man who's wife was murdered and daughter attacked by a group of thugs. Kersey is dissatisfied with how the police handle the case and takes to the streets of NYC to dish out his own vengeance on the crime element of the city. I like these kind of movies where one person takes matters into their own hands. The movie was remade with Bruce Willis in 2018 but I have yet to see it.
IE: Falling Down/Micheal Douglas?...
Exactly. I need to rewatch that movie because I've only seen parts of it.
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/06/18 12:01 AM
Brainscan
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/ZnW2z79p/IMG_0100.jpg)
It's October which means it's time for me to pick up some scary movies. In Brainscan, Edward Furlong (Terminator 2) plays Michael a lonely teenager who orders the latest videogame. The new high tech wizardry penetrates his subconcious, where his darkest impulses lead him through a deadly maze of murder, deception and desire. I remember watching this on HBO as a kid in 90's. (I had older brothers and watched lots of stuff I shouldn't have lol) This movie is so 90's. I remember being jealous of Furlongs bedroom in this. They were ahead of their time with their portrayal of virtual reality which is now no longer science fiction. An underrated movie for sure.
It's October which means it's time for me to pick up some scary movies. In Brainscan, Edward Furlong (Terminator 2) plays Michael a lonely teenager who orders the latest videogame. The new high tech wizardry penetrates his subconcious, where his darkest impulses lead him through a deadly maze of murder, deception and desire. I remember watching this on HBO as a kid in 90's. (I had older brothers and watched lots of stuff I shouldn't have lol) This movie is so 90's. I remember being jealous of Furlongs bedroom in this. They were ahead of their time with their portrayal of virtual reality which is now no longer science fiction. An underrated movie for sure.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/18 10:59 PM
A STAR IS BORN
A lot of buzz is surrounding this movie and for good reason too. Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga give powerful performances respectively as a musician on the way out and one on the way up. I've never seen any of the other 3 versions so I went in to this completely blind. And while it's a great and powerful movie and an awesome soundtrack, it's also quite depressing (at least towards the end of the film). Sam Elliott also gives a strong performance as Cooper's brother. I'm sure Cooper and Gaga will receive Oscar nominations for their work and I wouldn't be surprised to see either of them (or both perhaps) walk away with some gold. 7/10
A lot of buzz is surrounding this movie and for good reason too. Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga give powerful performances respectively as a musician on the way out and one on the way up. I've never seen any of the other 3 versions so I went in to this completely blind. And while it's a great and powerful movie and an awesome soundtrack, it's also quite depressing (at least towards the end of the film). Sam Elliott also gives a strong performance as Cooper's brother. I'm sure Cooper and Gaga will receive Oscar nominations for their work and I wouldn't be surprised to see either of them (or both perhaps) walk away with some gold. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/12/18 05:15 PM
BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE
A slowly burning film with mystery surrounding each of the seven strangers who visit the El Royale hotel. It reminded me somewhat of FOUR ROOMS where we get into a storyline and then it switches to someone else's backstory and repeats this formula. It kind of worked at first but once I was really into a storyline, I kind of got tired of being yanked out and having to start fresh with someone else's. A solid all around cast with a pleasing retro soundtrack. I do feel it outstayed it's welcome a little with a runtime of 2 hours and 21 minutes and by the end it was a little bit of a mess, but overall, I did have fun with it. Also, it was a nice switch to see Chris Hemsworth channeling his inner Jim Morrison as the villain Buddy Lee. 6.5/10
A slowly burning film with mystery surrounding each of the seven strangers who visit the El Royale hotel. It reminded me somewhat of FOUR ROOMS where we get into a storyline and then it switches to someone else's backstory and repeats this formula. It kind of worked at first but once I was really into a storyline, I kind of got tired of being yanked out and having to start fresh with someone else's. A solid all around cast with a pleasing retro soundtrack. I do feel it outstayed it's welcome a little with a runtime of 2 hours and 21 minutes and by the end it was a little bit of a mess, but overall, I did have fun with it. Also, it was a nice switch to see Chris Hemsworth channeling his inner Jim Morrison as the villain Buddy Lee. 6.5/10
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/18 01:03 AM
House on Haunted Hill (1999)
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/RZvqRSKV/IMG-1404.jpg)
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/18 01:58 AM
I remember really wanting to see that movie when it came out but somehow I never got around to it.
Event Horizon and 13 Ghosts are other horror movies I've planned on watching for some time.
First, I've got to continue my Nightmare on Elm Street franchise rewatch; I've watched Wes Craven's New Nightmare and the first 4 movies in chronological order but plan to continue with The Dream Child.
Event Horizon and 13 Ghosts are other horror movies I've planned on watching for some time.
First, I've got to continue my Nightmare on Elm Street franchise rewatch; I've watched Wes Craven's New Nightmare and the first 4 movies in chronological order but plan to continue with The Dream Child.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/18 03:02 PM
Originally Posted by Blake
House on Haunted Hill (1999)
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
I remember liking it quite a bit when it came out because I was a teenager. Since then it hasn't aged well IMO. Still never seen the original but this is a fine little movie.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/18 08:13 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Blake
House on Haunted Hill (1999)
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
I remember liking it quite a bit when it came out because I was a teenager. Since then it hasn't aged well IMO. Still never seen the original but this is a fine little movie.
I prefer the original over the remake. I finishing watching Suspiria and recommend it. It is from the 1970s.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/18 09:06 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Blake
House on Haunted Hill (1999)
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
Scream factory recently released this on Blu-ray. It's a remake of the 1959 film. Geoffrey Rush plays a theme park bigshot who's hosting a scary/jokey birthday bash for his wife at an abandoned institute for the criminally insane. Any attendee who can survive the night will earn a million bucks. This movie is worth a watch for sure around Halloween. I haven't seen it since it came out, but it looks great now on my big fancy true motion 4KTV.
I remember liking it quite a bit when it came out because I was a teenager. Since then it hasn't aged well IMO. Still never seen the original but this is a fine little movie.
I prefer the original over the remake. I finishing watching Suspiria and recommend it. It is from the 1970s.
SUSPIRIA is amazing! I've really gotten in to it more this past year and am eagerly anticipating the remake (although originally I was against it).
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/14/18 08:42 PM
Irishman12, another one from Dario Argento is Tenebre. Just finishing watching Night of the Creeps, some of those lines just makes me laugh.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/18 12:11 AM
I've seen TENEBRE. Not his best but not bad either. A nice little switch about half-way through.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/18 05:30 PM
HALLOWEEN (2018)
I'll start off by saying that I really wanted to like this movie. I had heard some positive reviews going in and the fact that Jamie Lee Curtis was again, taking on the iconic role of Laurie Strode, plus the fact that they would be ignoring everything that happened after the original HALLOWEEN, I was excited and intrigued. There are a number of similarities/homages to the original in this and while it isn't overly gruesome or graphic (they treated the film with respect), I found it to be just an average film. Nothing fantastic but nothing horrible as well. Just kind of middle of the road. Jamie Lee and Andi Matichak shine the brightest in this as Jamie portrays a Laurie Strode who's been living with the trauma she endured back in 1978 that has cost her her family and Andi plays her fiesty, teenage granddaughter. 6/10
I'll start off by saying that I really wanted to like this movie. I had heard some positive reviews going in and the fact that Jamie Lee Curtis was again, taking on the iconic role of Laurie Strode, plus the fact that they would be ignoring everything that happened after the original HALLOWEEN, I was excited and intrigued. There are a number of similarities/homages to the original in this and while it isn't overly gruesome or graphic (they treated the film with respect), I found it to be just an average film. Nothing fantastic but nothing horrible as well. Just kind of middle of the road. Jamie Lee and Andi Matichak shine the brightest in this as Jamie portrays a Laurie Strode who's been living with the trauma she endured back in 1978 that has cost her her family and Andi plays her fiesty, teenage granddaughter. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/18 12:25 AM
Ok, I can deal with that.
Thanks i12
I was worried you were going to review it as a total flop at first.
Goin to see it this week. Wife and crew very excited about it.
Thanks i12
I was worried you were going to review it as a total flop at first.
Goin to see it this week. Wife and crew very excited about it.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/18 02:55 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HALLOWEEN (2018)
I'll start off by saying that I really wanted to like this movie. I had heard some positive reviews going in and the fact that Jamie Lee Curtis was again, taking on the iconic role of Laurie Strode, plus the fact that they would be ignoring everything that happened after the original HALLOWEEN, I was excited and intrigued. There are a number of similarities/homages to the original in this and while it isn't overly gruesome or graphic (they treated the film with respect), I found it to be just an average film. Nothing fantastic but nothing horrible as well. Just kind of middle of the road. Jamie Lee and Andi Matichak shine the brightest in this as Jamie portrays a Laurie Strode who's been living with the trauma she endured back in 1978 that has cost her her family and Andi plays her fiesty, teenage granddaughter. 6/10
I'll start off by saying that I really wanted to like this movie. I had heard some positive reviews going in and the fact that Jamie Lee Curtis was again, taking on the iconic role of Laurie Strode, plus the fact that they would be ignoring everything that happened after the original HALLOWEEN, I was excited and intrigued. There are a number of similarities/homages to the original in this and while it isn't overly gruesome or graphic (they treated the film with respect), I found it to be just an average film. Nothing fantastic but nothing horrible as well. Just kind of middle of the road. Jamie Lee and Andi Matichak shine the brightest in this as Jamie portrays a Laurie Strode who's been living with the trauma she endured back in 1978 that has cost her her family and Andi plays her fiesty, teenage granddaughter. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/18 02:16 PM
I'll more than likely see it in the theaters again before it goes out. I want to give it another shot but going to wait for the crowds to die down first.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/18 07:38 PM
Halloween 2018 is good. They got most of the jump parts right. There is a slow grind near the beginning of the movie, but it soon picks up. There are quite a few call backs to the first movie. Plus you can tell the original actor who played Michael in the first movie is behind the mask in most scenes, until it comes off at moments, or more athletic scenes.There are a few moments where they bring humor into it, the funniest is the kid being babysat. This one also showed a way darker side to Michael. The theater was nearly packed and at some parts I could not hear the dialog, where I think they were making a call back to the second movie.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/21/18 12:03 AM
Just watched it. I liked it. Wasnt mind blowing or anything but its better than any of the sequels thats for sure
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/18 08:17 PM
Going to see Halloween tomorrow.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/18 08:19 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Going to see Halloween tomorrow.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/18 11:56 PM
Yes, we did the tickets online. We are actually do the early show at a Regal and picked our favorite seats.
No other seats were even chosen.
No other seats were even chosen.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/18 10:04 PM
"Two Seconds" (1932: John Allen (Edward G. Robinson), a riveter working on a skyscraper, falls for Shirley Day (Vivienne Osborne), a gold-digging taxi dancer, who gets him drunk and tricks him into marriage. This causes a falling out with Allen's co-worker, best pal and roomie, Bud Clark (Preston Foster). They have a fight on a girder, and Clark falls to his death, plunging Allen into grief, depression and psychosis. He murders two-timing Shirley and gets the chair ("two seconds" refers to his last consciousness before Riding the Lightning). This may sound corny in the pre-Code style, but the movie is powerful, with yet another great performance by Robinson, possibly the most underrated actor in Hollywood history. Osborne and Foster are excellent, and the supporting cast includes Guy Kibbee as a genial bookie, and J. Carol Naish, Eternal Movie-Italian, as Shirley's lover. Really good.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/18 12:11 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
"Two Seconds" (1932: John Allen (Edward G. Robinson), a riveter working on a skyscraper, falls for Shirley Day (Vivienne Osborne), a gold-digging taxi dancer, who gets him drunk and tricks him into marriage. This causes a falling out with Allen's co-worker, best pal and roomie, Bud Clark (Preston Foster). They have a fight on a girder, and Clark falls to his death, plunging Allen into grief, depression and psychosis. He murders two-timing Shirley and gets the chair ("two seconds" refers to his last consciousness before Riding the Lightning). This may sound corny in the pre-Code style, but the movie is powerful, with yet another great performance by Robinson, possibly the most underrated actor in Hollywood history. Osborne and Foster are excellent, and the supporting cast includes Guy Kibbee as a genial bookie, and J. Carol Naish, Eternal Movie-Italian, as Shirley's lover. Really good.
Great flick, I always felt the same way about EGR, he has done more outstanding movies where he was not playing a gangster.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/18 12:11 AM
The Halloween Movie was really good, entire group thought it was very well done.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/18 12:44 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
The Halloween Movie was really good, entire group thought it was very well done.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/18 02:59 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Great flick, I always felt the same way about EGR, he has done more outstanding movies where he was not playing a gangster.
Yes, indeed. Alas, "Little Caesar" stereotyped him forever.
But, his "Caesar" is a choir boy compared to his Johnny Rocco in "Key Largo."
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/24/18 06:45 PM
MATA HARI (1931)
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/18 12:11 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MATA HARI (1931)
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
Wow, 6.5..... while reading your review I was hoping you were going to rate and found it surprising you were only offering 6.5
Great Film
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/18 05:25 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MATA HARI (1931)
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
I only watched this because there was a throwaway line from the original SUSPIRIA, describing a fellow student as, "Mata Hari is filing her report." I saw this available in the Filmstruck library, read the description and added it to my watchlist. I finally made the time to sit down and watch it this morning and I was rather impressed. For those who have never seen or heard of the film, it follows Mata Hari (played by Greta Garbo) an exotic dancer who was accused of spying for Germany during World War I. Garbo gives a mesmerizing performance, as like many of the men in the film, I seemed to have been hypnotized and infatuated by her. This was my first exposure to her work and I have a feeling the rest might be difficult to track down. She also gave up acting after World War II, feeling the world had changed perhaps forever and she retired. Like the Mata Hari character, Garbo craved her privacy and for the rest of her life, perpetuated the Garbo mystique. 6.5/10
Wow, 6.5..... while reading your review I was hoping you were going to rate and found it surprising you were only offering 6.5
Great Film
Honestly, I think a 6.5 is pretty solid. I'd definitely watch it again I'd say that much. I haven't seen enough of them but for some reason, films made during the 1930's seem to surprise me at how well done they are (KING KONG, THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME, MATA HARI, etc.). Or maybe I'm just watching quality flicks
Posted By: ThePolakVet
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/18 05:46 PM
The Lion
Movie is about little Indian boy getting lost from his family, then eventually after 20 years he tries to find them.
I'd say the movie was pretty emotional, to see what a little boy has to go trough in his early age and how this path of being lost actually leads him to bigger possibilities in life. I was more fascinated about the idea, that if he didn't get lost, he'd probably stay in his village all life and wouldn't get far in life. But by being lost, he could get adopted in a good family, get proper education and reach something more. As I like to say - there is no bad, without something good in it.
Movie is about little Indian boy getting lost from his family, then eventually after 20 years he tries to find them.
I'd say the movie was pretty emotional, to see what a little boy has to go trough in his early age and how this path of being lost actually leads him to bigger possibilities in life. I was more fascinated about the idea, that if he didn't get lost, he'd probably stay in his village all life and wouldn't get far in life. But by being lost, he could get adopted in a good family, get proper education and reach something more. As I like to say - there is no bad, without something good in it.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/18 06:00 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Great flick, I always felt the same way about EGR, he has done more outstanding movies where he was not playing a gangster.
Yes, indeed. Alas, "Little Caesar" stereotyped him forever.
But, his "Caesar" is a choir boy compared to his Johnny Rocco in "Key Largo."
I won't watch a movie just because a certain actor is in it. However, Edward G. comes quite close to being an actor whose every film is a gem for me. I haven't seen the movie you cited, but I've seen plenty of others of his. His delivery, like Rod Steiger's and a few others, is so unique.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/18 03:00 PM
BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY
I had heard some mixed reviews going in to this. Mostly that Rami Malek was wonderful as Freddie Mercury but the film as a whole was average. In addition, there were creative differences between the band and potential actors (Sacha Baron Cohen comes to mind as originally he was set to play Freddie). Between the startup problems and the less than stellar reviews, I was hoping the movie would be good. Not only was it good, it was better than I was anticipating. A wonderfully paced film that takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions throughout. Rami absolutely did nail it as Freddie and the band was given their fair share of screen time as well so it didn't feel like just a movie about Freddie Mercury. The film ends with their performance at Live Aid and while they reenacted a few of their numbers from that show, overall, once departing the theater, I had felt like I just attended a concert. An amazing and powerful movie and one of my favorites of the year! 8.5/10
I had heard some mixed reviews going in to this. Mostly that Rami Malek was wonderful as Freddie Mercury but the film as a whole was average. In addition, there were creative differences between the band and potential actors (Sacha Baron Cohen comes to mind as originally he was set to play Freddie). Between the startup problems and the less than stellar reviews, I was hoping the movie would be good. Not only was it good, it was better than I was anticipating. A wonderfully paced film that takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions throughout. Rami absolutely did nail it as Freddie and the band was given their fair share of screen time as well so it didn't feel like just a movie about Freddie Mercury. The film ends with their performance at Live Aid and while they reenacted a few of their numbers from that show, overall, once departing the theater, I had felt like I just attended a concert. An amazing and powerful movie and one of my favorites of the year! 8.5/10
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/18 05:54 PM
I want to see Bohemian Rhapsody as well. The previews look good, but mainly I like the music. I only knew of Rami Malek from the TV show Mr. Robot which I watched the first couple seasons then sort of lost interest. Anyway, by the previews Malek DOES seem to nail Mercury right down to the moves. Btw reviews I'm reading say more or less the same as Irishman said, that story was ok but Malek performance is outstanding. Btw, I read a story today which claims that Mercury did not know of his aids diagnosis at the time of the aids concert, whereas the movie indicates he did?
TIS
TIS
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/18 03:16 AM
Great, so glad the reviews are coming in favoring the Flick and Malek since I would like it no matter what, and have not seen it.
Just the Fact that an amazing Talent has been properly recognized at a high level that is well overdue.
8.5 Wow, that’s huge coming from I12
FM was very private, not sure if we would know if he knew he had contracted the Viris at any time.
Can’t wait to see it.
Thanks for the reviews.
Just the Fact that an amazing Talent has been properly recognized at a high level that is well overdue.
8.5 Wow, that’s huge coming from I12
FM was very private, not sure if we would know if he knew he had contracted the Viris at any time.
Can’t wait to see it.
Thanks for the reviews.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/18 03:38 PM
Enjoy DuesPaid. I'd be curious to your thoughts once you've seen it.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/18 10:15 PM
This past Halloween I watched a lot of good but fairly unknown horror films. I watched a film called Lady in White 1988. Its a really good old fashioned ghost story set in Rochester NY about a Italian family. Real good film
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/04/18 01:19 PM
Goodbye, Charlie with Tony Curtis and Debbie Reynolds. Carousing male screenwriter dies, comes back as Debbie Reynolds. Reynolds and Curtis are great. It repeats a couple times this month on FXM Retro.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/04/18 07:26 PM
American Assassin
6 1/2 . It’s pretty good
6 1/2 . It’s pretty good
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/18 01:55 AM
SUSPIRIA (2018)
I'll start off by saying this: I was against this film when I heard it was announced originally. The original film is one of my favorites of all-time and I'm sick and tired of the remakes/never-ending sequels that Hollywood continues to flush out. In saying that, once I saw the trailers for this film, I become intrigued and even excited. However, after watching it this past weekend, I am completely disappointed. So many things that made the original such a classic were nowhere in this version. And while I understand director Luca Guadagnino wanted to make this his own film (which I do appreciate), it just didn't work for me. Definitely too long and the third act was a series of "what-the-F*CK-was that" moments. Dakota Johnson did a really good job as the new Susie Bannion, who comes to us from an Amish Ohio farm as opposed to a New York girl as we saw in the original with Jessica Harper. But the star of the show is definitely Tilda Swinton who plays 3 roles in the film. The RAF (Red Army Faction) backdrop during the film is distracting and not needed at all in my opinion. Rumors are director Luca Guadagnino wants to make a trilogy out of this (similar to original director Dario Argento's MOTHERS trilogy) and again, while I was originally excited about this possibility before seeing the film, after viewing it, I'm less than ecstatic about the prospect. 5/10
I'll start off by saying this: I was against this film when I heard it was announced originally. The original film is one of my favorites of all-time and I'm sick and tired of the remakes/never-ending sequels that Hollywood continues to flush out. In saying that, once I saw the trailers for this film, I become intrigued and even excited. However, after watching it this past weekend, I am completely disappointed. So many things that made the original such a classic were nowhere in this version. And while I understand director Luca Guadagnino wanted to make this his own film (which I do appreciate), it just didn't work for me. Definitely too long and the third act was a series of "what-the-F*CK-was that" moments. Dakota Johnson did a really good job as the new Susie Bannion, who comes to us from an Amish Ohio farm as opposed to a New York girl as we saw in the original with Jessica Harper. But the star of the show is definitely Tilda Swinton who plays 3 roles in the film. The RAF (Red Army Faction) backdrop during the film is distracting and not needed at all in my opinion. Rumors are director Luca Guadagnino wants to make a trilogy out of this (similar to original director Dario Argento's MOTHERS trilogy) and again, while I was originally excited about this possibility before seeing the film, after viewing it, I'm less than ecstatic about the prospect. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/18 07:47 PM
VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS
I'm desperately trying to go through my watchlist on Filmstruck before the service shuts down completely later this month. I came across this film, which I had never heard of before. I watched the trailer to see if it was worth investing the time in and afterwards, decided it was and gave it a go. What I can say is the experience was wonderful and more than I expected! This is a coming of age story about a 13-year-old Valerie who is on the verge of womanhood. The visuals are incredibly satisfying with their combination of makeup and costumes. In a way the film reminded me of the original SUSPIRIA with how it was able to blend in goth, fairytale and horror elments. The cuts of the film keep the viewer guessing throughout what is real and what is fantasy. Definitely a hidden gem that I'm not sure many people know about. 7/10
I'm desperately trying to go through my watchlist on Filmstruck before the service shuts down completely later this month. I came across this film, which I had never heard of before. I watched the trailer to see if it was worth investing the time in and afterwards, decided it was and gave it a go. What I can say is the experience was wonderful and more than I expected! This is a coming of age story about a 13-year-old Valerie who is on the verge of womanhood. The visuals are incredibly satisfying with their combination of makeup and costumes. In a way the film reminded me of the original SUSPIRIA with how it was able to blend in goth, fairytale and horror elments. The cuts of the film keep the viewer guessing throughout what is real and what is fantasy. Definitely a hidden gem that I'm not sure many people know about. 7/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/14/18 03:54 AM
I just watched I, Robot ... again. I really like it.
So, why no sequel? I can think of a couple of storylines. For one, Sonny leads the robots to save the Earth from aliens.
So, why no sequel? I can think of a couple of storylines. For one, Sonny leads the robots to save the Earth from aliens.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/18 07:30 PM
I saw CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? this weekend and absolutely loved it! Melissa McCarthy is one of my favorite comedians going today; however, I do like it when comedians branch out into more dramatic roles. This is a drama but with McCarthy's delivery and dialogue, I found myself laughing more than I thought I would. McCarthy and Richard E. Grant, who plays her only friend in the movie, really nail their roles. Two unrepentative, morally crippled individuals who do a wonderful job feeding off of each other to further their debauchery.
Also watched THE PUBLIC ENEMY (1931) earlier today for the first time and I enjoyed it. I had seen clips of this before and wanted to watch this before FilmStruck shuts down next week. I'd like to see more of Cagney's gangster pictures. I really liked the end title by the director, informing the audience that gangsters are a societal problem and everyone needs to do there part.
Also watched THE PUBLIC ENEMY (1931) earlier today for the first time and I enjoyed it. I had seen clips of this before and wanted to watch this before FilmStruck shuts down next week. I'd like to see more of Cagney's gangster pictures. I really liked the end title by the director, informing the audience that gangsters are a societal problem and everyone needs to do there part.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/18 05:36 PM
I saw ROBIN HOOD over the weekend. Don't waste your time with it. Had heard bad reviews going in to it, and while the first half of the movie actually surprised me at being interesting, the second half was a mess and I lost interest in it.
I recently saw DOGTOOTH and ALPS so I could be caught up on Yorgos Lanthimos work before seeing his new film, THE FAVOURITE. One thing you can never say about his movies is that they are dull or uninteresting. I really enjoyed DOGTOOTH as it was amazing how much the parents were corrupting their children. Basically holding them hostage in their own home and not teaching them properly (like the correct meanings of words). For me, I'd rank his films:
1) THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER
2) THE LOBSTER
3) DOGTOOTH
4) ALPS
I recently saw DOGTOOTH and ALPS so I could be caught up on Yorgos Lanthimos work before seeing his new film, THE FAVOURITE. One thing you can never say about his movies is that they are dull or uninteresting. I really enjoyed DOGTOOTH as it was amazing how much the parents were corrupting their children. Basically holding them hostage in their own home and not teaching them properly (like the correct meanings of words). For me, I'd rank his films:
1) THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER
2) THE LOBSTER
3) DOGTOOTH
4) ALPS
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/18 02:38 AM
Thanks i12......
Saw the trailer of RH when we went to Halloween. THought it looked great but then was told same thing you said.
How many times do they plan to do RH over again and again,
Saw the trailer of RH when we went to Halloween. THought it looked great but then was told same thing you said.
How many times do they plan to do RH over again and again,
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/18 02:40 AM
I wanna see the marvelous mrs maisel but do not have access.
Will that be in the theater?
Will that be in the theater?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/18 07:36 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I wanna see the marvelous mrs maisel but do not have access.
Will that be in the theater?
Will that be in the theater?
I think it's on Amazon Prime?
I saw THE FRONT RUNNER last night. It was a very interesting tale of how tabloid stories now follow around our politicians. It's definitely an interesting look at the dichotomy of time: how things used to be vs. how things are now going to be. Hugh Jackman really gives a strong performance of a man who wants his privacy. It kind of puts the viewer in the predicament of whether or not to feel sorry for him. Yes, he cheated on his wife (multiple times) and is running for President; but at the same time, is he not entitled to his privacy like everyone else?[quote=DuesPaid]I wanna see the marvelous mrs maisel but do not have access.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/18 02:01 AM
We Dvr’d ELF...that is a must watch every year.
Love it, will watch in morning before the Games.
Love it, will watch in morning before the Games.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/08/18 12:46 AM
Just got done watching THE BIG SHORT. Powerful film! Hadn't seen it since it was released in theaters 3 years ago. I think they did an excellent job taking a subject as boring or complicated as the 2008 mortgage crisis and breaking it down so the viewer could understand it better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/08/18 06:38 PM
I watched both the original CARRIE as well as the 2013 remake. The original is such a classic and this was my first time viewing it in 1080p. The picture, as one would expect, was much improved and probably my most enjoyable time watching it. Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie give such wonderful, horrific, and heartbreaking performances. This was my first time seeing the remake and one of the problems I had with it (other than the fact much of the dialogue was verbatim from the original), was I didn't believe the performances of Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore. Which I was surprised by Moore as I actually enjoy her work and thought she would have been wonderful as Carrie's mother. However, most if not all performances in this film, just seemed to lack empathy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/09/18 11:54 PM
Same as THE BIG SHORT, I hadn't seen SPOTLIGHT since the theaters in 2015 and while it's another powerful film, I don't think it has the same staying power and looking back, I'm a little surprised it won Best Picture. 3 years later, who's still talking about SPOTLIGHT?
I also watched both SINISTER and SINISTER 2. I saw the original years ago and it did nothing for me but had never seen the sequel. After rewatching the original and seeing the sequel for the first time, they both still don't do anything for me. Lackluster films that overstay their welcome with a villain that's hardly seen. I can understand why they stopped at 2 films (probably should have stopped after the first)
I also watched both SINISTER and SINISTER 2. I saw the original years ago and it did nothing for me but had never seen the sequel. After rewatching the original and seeing the sequel for the first time, they both still don't do anything for me. Lackluster films that overstay their welcome with a villain that's hardly seen. I can understand why they stopped at 2 films (probably should have stopped after the first)
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/10/18 01:12 AM
I have an associate who constantly discusses The Big Short and Wolf of WallSt.
He always says “ cannot believe you neva saw theseâ€
I will have to catch them now that you mention as well.
He always says “ cannot believe you neva saw theseâ€
I will have to catch them now that you mention as well.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/10/18 01:44 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I have an associate who constantly discusses The Big Short and Wolf of WallSt.
He always says “ cannot believe you neva saw theseâ€
I will have to catch them now that you mention as well.
He always says “ cannot believe you neva saw theseâ€
I will have to catch them now that you mention as well.
I will vouch as they're both very good! Although between the two, I prefer THE WOLF OF WALL STREET.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/18 05:39 PM
Finally got my MoviePass working (yeah, it's still in business) and was able to see THE FAVOURITE last night. I really did enjoy it. Thought Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz and Olivia Colman gave brilliant performances and it was refreshing to see Stone in a villianess role for a change. In terms of director Yorgos Lanthimos' work, this is up there with THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER as my personal favorite but still having difficulty deciding between the two. I look forward to a second viewing and I do recommend it!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/18 03:46 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Finally got my MoviePass working (yeah, it's still in business) and was able to see THE FAVOURITE last night. I really did enjoy it. Thought Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz and Olivia Colman gave brilliant performances and it was refreshing to see Stone in a villianess role for a change. In terms of director Yorgos Lanthimos' work, this is up there with THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER as my personal favorite but still having difficulty deciding between the two. I look forward to a second viewing and I do recommend it!
I’m going to check that out.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/18 04:25 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Finally got my MoviePass working (yeah, it's still in business) and was able to see THE FAVOURITE last night. I really did enjoy it. Thought Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz and Olivia Colman gave brilliant performances and it was refreshing to see Stone in a villianess role for a change. In terms of director Yorgos Lanthimos' work, this is up there with THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER as my personal favorite but still having difficulty deciding between the two. I look forward to a second viewing and I do recommend it!
I’m going to check that out.
I hope you enjoy it DP
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/18 04:49 PM
Saw a few movies this week: THE MULE, VOX LUX, AQAUMAN and MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS. THE MULE was good. Clint Eastwood's typical self. This film was inspired by a true story and the ending was pretty heartfelt. VOX LUX is a somewhat powerful film in it's own right and I would like to have a second viewing of it soon. AQUAMAN, while the visual effects were beautiful, the story was boring and coming in at about 2 hours and 20 minutes, I was ready for it to be over sooner rather than later. Finally, MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS was an interesting political movie starring two strong female leads in Margot Robbie and Saoirse Ronan. There wasn't as much of Robbie as I was hoping for and the betrayal by the many of Saoirse' "allies" was bitter to witness over and over again.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/18 11:15 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Saw a few movies this week: THE MULE, VOX LUX, AQAUMAN and MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS. THE MULE was good. Clint Eastwood's typical self. This film was inspired by a true story and the ending was pretty heartfelt. VOX LUX is a somewhat powerful film in it's own right and I would like to have a second viewing of it soon. AQUAMAN, while the visual effects were beautiful, the story was boring and coming in at about 2 hours and 20 minutes, I was ready for it to be over sooner rather than later. Finally, MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS was an interesting political movie starring two strong female leads in Margot Robbie and Saoirse Ronan. There wasn't as much of Robbie as I was hoping for and the betrayal by the many of Saoirse' "allies" was bitter to witness over and over again.
Thanks i12 - - reading these to my wife now.
She loves your reviews.
Thought Aquaman was going to be a big hit.
Look forward to seeing all of those.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/18 11:24 PM
I don't really watch any new movies anymore. No good actors anymore. They are all just interchangeable faces.
That's why I'm excited for The Mule. It's sad that it takes a 90 year old actor to knock it out of the ballpark and make you want to see a movie.
That's why I'm excited for The Mule. It's sad that it takes a 90 year old actor to knock it out of the ballpark and make you want to see a movie.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/18 11:46 PM
Amazing.....
90
90
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/18 07:07 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Saw a few movies this week: THE MULE, VOX LUX, AQAUMAN and MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS. THE MULE was good. Clint Eastwood's typical self. This film was inspired by a true story and the ending was pretty heartfelt. VOX LUX is a somewhat powerful film in it's own right and I would like to have a second viewing of it soon. AQUAMAN, while the visual effects were beautiful, the story was boring and coming in at about 2 hours and 20 minutes, I was ready for it to be over sooner rather than later. Finally, MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS was an interesting political movie starring two strong female leads in Margot Robbie and Saoirse Ronan. There wasn't as much of Robbie as I was hoping for and the betrayal by the many of Saoirse' "allies" was bitter to witness over and over again.
Thanks i12 - - reading these to my wife now.
She loves your reviews.
Thought Aquaman was going to be a big hit.
Look forward to seeing all of those.
Thanks DP. I appreciate that. Hopefully I don't steer you guys wrong if you choose to watch one of these films based on my reviews.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/18 01:19 AM
Got around to watching Halloween (2018). I thought it was pretty mediocre. The scene showing the aftermath of the escape had the potential to be a lot better but it fell flat, like much of the movie. The scene in the toilet was a rehash of a much more effective scene in what I believe was Halloween H20. I don't know what the point was of the two British actors who were in the start of the movie and killed off early on; I'm not entirely sure they were necessary. I also think the twist with the new Loomis at the end was treated pretty ham-fistedly.
Just overall I think it was a pretty poorly written and poorly acted movie.
One more thing. Michael Myers is written in this movie as a single-minded monster who does nothing but move and kill. His raison d'être is to kill Laurie Strode. This is impressed upon the viewer. Yet in several scenes after killing somebody he will stage their corpse in an elaborate and complex manner. For example: he turns a decapitated human head into a jack-o-lantern; and he puts a ghost costume over another corpse. It just doesn't seem consistent and true to the character.
No prizes for guessing that the worst performance in the movie is that of Miles Robbins, the son of Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, showing that nepotism is still truly alive and well in Hollywood.
I remarked to myself that the actresses that portray Jamie Lee Curtis's daughter and granddaughter looked more like sisters than mother and daughter. I go to their Wikipedia pages and one is 43 and one is 23. However different sources give different ages for the granddaughter. She could be as old as 30 according to one source listed. Either way she's in the running for one of the oldest looking people to portray a teenager in a movie I've seen.
Just overall I think it was a pretty poorly written and poorly acted movie.
One more thing. Michael Myers is written in this movie as a single-minded monster who does nothing but move and kill. His raison d'être is to kill Laurie Strode. This is impressed upon the viewer. Yet in several scenes after killing somebody he will stage their corpse in an elaborate and complex manner. For example: he turns a decapitated human head into a jack-o-lantern; and he puts a ghost costume over another corpse. It just doesn't seem consistent and true to the character.
No prizes for guessing that the worst performance in the movie is that of Miles Robbins, the son of Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, showing that nepotism is still truly alive and well in Hollywood.
I remarked to myself that the actresses that portray Jamie Lee Curtis's daughter and granddaughter looked more like sisters than mother and daughter. I go to their Wikipedia pages and one is 43 and one is 23. However different sources give different ages for the granddaughter. She could be as old as 30 according to one source listed. Either way she's in the running for one of the oldest looking people to portray a teenager in a movie I've seen.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/18 12:36 AM
Shape of Water
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/18 01:37 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Shape of Water
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
I liked it. it kind of reminded me of a long episode of Twilight Zone
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/18 03:28 PM
Watched Mary Poppins Returns. This is a good movie to take the extended family out to see.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/18 07:52 PM
Originally Posted by Beanshooter
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Shape of Water
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
Strange but really good, Wife loved it.
I liked it. it kind of reminded me of a long episode of Twilight Zone
Hiya Beans.... a little dark, we loved it. That dude from Boardwalk Empire was really good.
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Watched Mary Poppins Returns. This is a good movie to take the extended family out to see.
looking forward to seeing it but will prob wait for it to be out
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/18 05:43 AM
Watched The Help. Great movie; a moving experience. Emma Stone was fantastic as was most of the cast
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/19 05:41 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched The Help. Great movie; a moving experience. Emma Stone was fantastic as was most of the cast
Saw that, it was very good...someone got an Oscar in that. think it was best Actress.
THis weekend we saw Birdbox....good flick. Sandra Bullock was really good.
A lot of good acting including Malkovic.
Netflicks......do not have it but my Sister next door does and we watched there.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/19 09:07 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched The Help. Great movie; a moving experience. Emma Stone was fantastic as was most of the cast
Saw that, it was very good...someone got an Oscar in that. think it was best Actress.
THis weekend we saw Birdbox....good flick. Sandra Bullock was really good.
A lot of good acting including Malkovic.
Netflicks......do not have it but my Sister next door does and we watched there.
Birdbox WAS a good movie , but was dissapointed we didn't find out "mysterious wind?" came from...left u hanging.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/19 09:12 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched The Help. Great movie; a moving experience. Emma Stone was fantastic as was most of the cast
Saw that, it was very good...someone got an Oscar in that. think it was best Actress.
THis weekend we saw Birdbox....good flick. Sandra Bullock was really good.
A lot of good acting including Malkovic.
Netflicks......do not have it but my Sister next door does and we watched there.
Birdbox WAS a good movie , but was dissapointed we didn't find out "mysterious wind?" came from...left u hanging.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/19 11:44 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched The Help. Great movie; a moving experience. Emma Stone was fantastic as was most of the cast
Saw that, it was very good...someone got an Oscar in that. think it was best Actress.
THis weekend we saw Birdbox....good flick. Sandra Bullock was really good.
A lot of good acting including Malkovic.
Netflicks......do not have it but my Sister next door does and we watched there.
Birdbox WAS a good movie , but was dissapointed we didn't find out "mysterious wind?" came from...left u hanging.
Yes, same here Hood, just thought it left it open for another movie.
Better than a series that runs you along for a few years and ya still don’t know WTF is goin on.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/19 07:20 PM
ESCAPE ROOM was better than I was anticipating. I felt it had a lackluster of an ending but prior to that, it was a pretty fun, and at times, pulse raising ride. Not overly grotesque as it's PG-13 and while I can't endorse everyone to see it at the theater, I would recommend catching it when it's available on a streaming service/HBO.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/19 01:14 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ESCAPE ROOM was better than I was anticipating. I felt it had a lackluster of an ending but prior to that, it was a pretty fun, and at times, pulse raising ride. Not overly grotesque as it's PG-13 and while I can't endorse everyone to see it at the theater, I would recommend catching it when it's available on a streaming service/HBO.
I’ll check this with the crew.
So far no one heard of it yet but we are usually late on the scene.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/19 05:50 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ESCAPE ROOM was better than I was anticipating. I felt it had a lackluster of an ending but prior to that, it was a pretty fun, and at times, pulse raising ride. Not overly grotesque as it's PG-13 and while I can't endorse everyone to see it at the theater, I would recommend catching it when it's available on a streaming service/HBO.
I’ll check this with the crew.
So far no one heard of it yet but we are usually late on the scene.
It didn't have a big marketing campaign. Really just saw previews before other movies.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/19 08:00 PM
Mr. Church// Netflix,,Eddie Murphy in a non comedic very serious role that was entertaining as a gentleman who was hired as a cook/caretaker of a woman who has cancer & dying as well as her young daughter in tow who @ 1rst doesn't conform to the adjustment ,then become close after the mother 's death(played by Natasha McElone of Californication fame)...no spoiler alert here, so if ur passing time , I recommend it for a feel good movie.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/19 08:02 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Mr. Church// Netflix,,Eddie Murphy in a non comedic very serious role that was entertaining as a gentleman who was hired as a cook/caretaker of a woman who has cancer & dying as well as her young daughter in tow who @ 1rst doesn't conform to the adjustment ,then become close after the mother 's death(played by Natasha McElone of Californication fame)...no spoiler alert here, so if ur passing time , I recommend it for a feel good movie.
I watched that with my ex-girlfriend. One of the benefits of her refusing to watch horror movies or movies with violence in them is that every now and then I'd come across something like this that I'd never watch otherwise.
Pretty good movie IIRC.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/19 08:28 PM
Nice.... we will check it out.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/19 05:17 PM
I re-watched the original "The Mummy" (1933) for the umpteenth time. A very high-class production, with a great script, brilliant acting by Karloff in the title role, and tasteful, convincing sets. More a love story than horror, it scares by suggestion rather than by hitting you over the head with gruesome scenes. Perhaps the best of the great 1930's monster/horror films.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/19 08:21 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
I re-watched the original "The Mummy" (1933) for the umpteenth time. A very high-class production, with a great script, brilliant acting by Karloff in the title role, and tasteful, convincing sets. More a love story than horror, it scares by suggestion rather than by hitting you over the head with gruesome scenes. Perhaps the best of the great 1930's monster/horror films.
I love movies from the 1930's. I'd also add DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN and THE INVISIBLE MAN to this list.
I saw BUMBLEBEE yesterday. I went in with some high expectations after the amount of positive reviews the film garnered and while it was an enjoyable, at times heartfelt, nostalgic film, by the end of it I was kind of burnt out (either from the movie itself or the TRANSFORMERS franchise as a whole). Not a bad film in any sense and definitely better than probably the last 3 or 4 installments of the franchise, but I could go a few more years without another.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/19 01:37 PM
You see many of these Irishman?
https://411mania.com/movies/a-bloody-good-time-top-10-horror-films-of-2018/
https:/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/19 06:20 PM
Not a bad list. I've seen about half of them:
-SLENDER MAN - Yes, was terrible and that's what I expected going in to it. Nothing redeeming about it. Avoid it at all costs.
-TRUTH OR DARE - Another film that I knew was going to be terrible going in to and it didn't disappoint. I have both MoviePass and AMC A-List so I take flyers on these types of films but yes, they're both bad. TRUTH OR DARE not as bad as SLENDER MAN, but both are pretty awful.
-HALLOWEEN (2018) - I saw it once in the theater and once again recently. It got a lot of good reviews going in to it and while I thought it was a good movie, I wouldn't say it was great.
-ANNIHILATION - Very good movie with a mind trip of an ending. It's on my list for another watch but I wouldn't consider it a horror film really (more Sci-Fi).
-I haven't seen REVENGE or SUMMER OF '84 but they're both on my list.
-A QUIET PLACE was good as well. I hear they're making a sequel, which at this time, I'm kind of against. You don't see much of the monsters as it's left more up to your imagination.
-MANDY - I tried watching Monday night and I fell asleep during it. That's not at all a reflection on the movie. I tried watching a documentary last week and I fell asleep during that too. I think I'm just trying to get back on my sleep schedule. I'm hoping later this week/this weekend I can give it another shot but from what I did see, it is kind of a slowly paced movie.
-HEREDITARY was by far my favorite horror movie of last year and it's on my list for a second viewing. Looking forward to it again! Definitely this generation's ROSEMARY'S BABY!
-SLENDER MAN - Yes, was terrible and that's what I expected going in to it. Nothing redeeming about it. Avoid it at all costs.
-TRUTH OR DARE - Another film that I knew was going to be terrible going in to and it didn't disappoint. I have both MoviePass and AMC A-List so I take flyers on these types of films but yes, they're both bad. TRUTH OR DARE not as bad as SLENDER MAN, but both are pretty awful.
-HALLOWEEN (2018) - I saw it once in the theater and once again recently. It got a lot of good reviews going in to it and while I thought it was a good movie, I wouldn't say it was great.
-ANNIHILATION - Very good movie with a mind trip of an ending. It's on my list for another watch but I wouldn't consider it a horror film really (more Sci-Fi).
-I haven't seen REVENGE or SUMMER OF '84 but they're both on my list.
-A QUIET PLACE was good as well. I hear they're making a sequel, which at this time, I'm kind of against. You don't see much of the monsters as it's left more up to your imagination.
-MANDY - I tried watching Monday night and I fell asleep during it. That's not at all a reflection on the movie. I tried watching a documentary last week and I fell asleep during that too. I think I'm just trying to get back on my sleep schedule. I'm hoping later this week/this weekend I can give it another shot but from what I did see, it is kind of a slowly paced movie.
-HEREDITARY was by far my favorite horror movie of last year and it's on my list for a second viewing. Looking forward to it again! Definitely this generation's ROSEMARY'S BABY!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/19 06:36 PM
I rewatched UNBREKABLE last night and SPLIT today in anticipation of GLASS next week. UNBREAKABLE is such an underrated film and I feel gets over looked so much. The expectation for this when it came out, right after THE SIXTH SENSE, was unrealistic in my opinion (similar to JACKIE BROWN by Quentin Tarantino after his prior release of PULP FICTION). This was only my second time seeing SPLIT and while James McAvoy and Anya Taylor-Joy put in some great work, the movie as a whole I feel is just decent. Nothing exceptional. I've heard some bad reviews about GLASS already and I hope it's a good movie!
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/19 07:06 PM
I, too, plan on watching Unbreakable again tonight in anticipation of watching Glass when it comes out.
Like you, I thought Split was no more than decent. Interesting concept and a great performance by James McAvoy but I felt it was a bit formulaic. Thought there could have been a better movie in there somewhere.
Like you, I thought Split was no more than decent. Interesting concept and a great performance by James McAvoy but I felt it was a bit formulaic. Thought there could have been a better movie in there somewhere.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/19 09:39 PM
Just finished watching MANDY. A very enjoyable ride, visually beautiful and glad to see Nicholas Cage back with a hit. For me, I'd say the only negatives were the pacing was slow at times and I felt it could have used a better soundtrack. Not that the one used was bad but felt a better sound could have put this over more in my opinion. If you get the chance, check it out and see what everyone's talking about!
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/19 10:31 PM
I watched Unbreakable and I thought it was good but there were a good few things I had problems with.
Off the top of my head it's a bit convenient that the person Samuel L. Jackson's been looking for all his life, his polar opposite and arch enemy, is right on his doorstep in the same city. The flashback scene where the old dude tells Samuel L. Jackson's character that if there ever was a fire on floors 1, 2 or 3, that everyone in the hotel they were drinking in would be burned alive was hackneyed. We discover that Bruce Willis's character has visions of people's indiscretions every time he brushes up against them, and at one point towards the end of the movie, in a terminal, every person he brushes against seems to be a rapist or murderer. And speaking of, one of these people, ends up playing a crucial role as a villain near the end of the movie that seems very tacked on almost as an afterthought.
I just thought the movie had a good premise but a lot of it was poorly written and cliched and I don't know if the twist works if you put any thought into it.
Off the top of my head it's a bit convenient that the person Samuel L. Jackson's been looking for all his life, his polar opposite and arch enemy, is right on his doorstep in the same city. The flashback scene where the old dude tells Samuel L. Jackson's character that if there ever was a fire on floors 1, 2 or 3, that everyone in the hotel they were drinking in would be burned alive was hackneyed. We discover that Bruce Willis's character has visions of people's indiscretions every time he brushes up against them, and at one point towards the end of the movie, in a terminal, every person he brushes against seems to be a rapist or murderer. And speaking of, one of these people, ends up playing a crucial role as a villain near the end of the movie that seems very tacked on almost as an afterthought.
I just thought the movie had a good premise but a lot of it was poorly written and cliched and I don't know if the twist works if you put any thought into it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/19 06:21 PM
I've been in the mood for some giallo's so last night I watched YOUR VICE IS A LOCKED ROOM AND ONLY I HAVE THE KEY. It was decent with a somewhat decent twist at the end. Was worn out of the cat meowing by the end of it honestly. The husband in the film, played by Luigi Pistilli, was a real piece of sh*t. But Edwige Fenech was absolutely stunning back in the day!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/19 05:58 AM
I finally watched Gotti. Now I understand why it went straight to video.
Travolta gave a good performance. Although he overplayed Gotti, he still captured the guy's essence.
However, the story was so disjointed that I don't see how anyone other than Mafia aficionados could make heads or tails of it.
I expect much, much better from a Travolta movie.
Travolta gave a good performance. Although he overplayed Gotti, he still captured the guy's essence.
However, the story was so disjointed that I don't see how anyone other than Mafia aficionados could make heads or tails of it.
I expect much, much better from a Travolta movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/19 07:18 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
I finally watched Gotti. Now I understand why it went straight to video.
Travolta gave a good performance. Although he overplayed Gotti, he still captured the guy's essence.
However, the story was so disjointed that I don't see how anyone other than Mafia aficionados could make heads or tails of it.
I expect much, much better from a Travolta movie.
Travolta gave a good performance. Although he overplayed Gotti, he still captured the guy's essence.
However, the story was so disjointed that I don't see how anyone other than Mafia aficionados could make heads or tails of it.
I expect much, much better from a Travolta movie.
Yeah it was pretty bad. I saw it in the theaters via MoviePass and as you said, the story was all over the place.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/19 10:28 PM
I.D.(1995)
"Four policemen go undercover and infiltrate a gang of football hooligans hoping to root-out their leaders. For one of the four, the line between 'job' and 'yob' becomes more unclear as time"
6/10 - one of my favorite British movies, captures the football hooligan element of the 1980/90s here in the UK well at the time.
"Four policemen go undercover and infiltrate a gang of football hooligans hoping to root-out their leaders. For one of the four, the line between 'job' and 'yob' becomes more unclear as time"
6/10 - one of my favorite British movies, captures the football hooligan element of the 1980/90s here in the UK well at the time.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/19 07:25 PM
Watched EVIL EYE last night. An early one (1963), shot in black and white and featuring a very young John Saxon (to my surprise) and a very lovely Leticia Roman. This was my first introduction to Mario Bava's work and the film was taken seriously (unlike some of the other sleazy giallo's that I've seen - which I don't mind by the way). Just stating this wasn't in that same category. For me, giallo's hinge on the end of who the killer is and what his/her motive is and in this, I didn't buy in to it too much. A nicely shot film with a decent storyline. Thanks for the recommendation olivant!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/19 04:25 PM
GLASS
I saw this last night and I absolutely loved it! I didn't read any reviews going in to it but I heard they weren't positive. I really don't understand why? The story was incredibly strong and engaging. The cast was all top notch. Shyamalan always has his twist at the end (which in this case, was actually 2). Definitely better than SPLIT and as good, if not better, than UNBREAKABLE. I'm sure the story will end here but if Shyamalan decided he wanted to continue it, I'd be down for some more. I know it's too early in the year but I could see this being in my Top 10 all year, or worst case scenario, an honorable mention by years end. Go see it! 7.5/10
I saw this last night and I absolutely loved it! I didn't read any reviews going in to it but I heard they weren't positive. I really don't understand why? The story was incredibly strong and engaging. The cast was all top notch. Shyamalan always has his twist at the end (which in this case, was actually 2). Definitely better than SPLIT and as good, if not better, than UNBREAKABLE. I'm sure the story will end here but if Shyamalan decided he wanted to continue it, I'd be down for some more. I know it's too early in the year but I could see this being in my Top 10 all year, or worst case scenario, an honorable mention by years end. Go see it! 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/19 09:02 PM
Some more giallo's I recently watched. I'd seen BLOOD AND BLACK LACE before and I understand it's hailed as one of the great giallo films and even though I did enjoy it more a second time around and I did like the reveal of who the killer is (which is somewhat rare in the horror genre) overall, I wasn't a huge fan of the film. I guess I'm into more of the trashy 1970's giallo's like TORSO and STRIP NUDE FOR YOUR KILLER. And I was mistaken earlier, EVIL EYE was not my introduction to Mario Bava as I'd seen BLOOD AND BLACK LACE before. I also watched THE THIRD EYE and I was not a fan at all. It was nice seeing Frank Nero (the original Django) as I've never seen his movies before; however, at least in my mind, giallo's are mostly of the "who done it" variety. Whereas with this film there's no surprise at all about who the killer is as it's established to the audience very early on in the film. I'll continue checking out the others you recommended olivant that I can track down.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/20/19 09:42 PM
THE FORBIDDEN PHOTOS OF A LADY ABOVE SUSPICION is one of the better giallo films I've seen recently. A woman (played by Dagmar Lassander) trying to get off of drugs and alcohol, is blackmailed by a mysterious man to sleep with him after he provides evidence of her husband killing a co-worker. Once together, this mysterious man photographs the encounter to further blackmail her into sleeping with him. However, every time she goes to the police with evidence, the evidence disappears. Is she really imagining all of this? If not, why won't anyone believe her? It's streaming on Amazon and was recently released by Arrow this Tuesday on Blu-ray. Olivant, I tried watching A...FOR ASSASSIN but Amazon already removed it! Hopefully they put it up again soon. Other than that I think the only other one I was able to track down is FIVE DOLLS FOR AN AUGUST MOON (which I'll watch probably tomorrow).
Watched the Director's Cut of STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON last night (first time seeing this version of the film). Not a whole lot was added to it other than maybe some more nudity. However, this is definitely one of the better musical biopics in recent memory. These can be hit or miss for me. RAY I didn't care for, even though Jamie Foxx won an Oscar for it; NOTORIOUS and ALL EYEZ ON ME sucked IMO. Whereas STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON, WALK THE LINE and BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY are some of the better ones. Looking forward to ROCKETMAN later this year!
Hopefully they put it up again soon. Other than that I think the only other one I was able to track down is FIVE DOLLS FOR AN AUGUST MOON (which I'll watch probably tomorrow).Watched the Director's Cut of STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON last night (first time seeing this version of the film). Not a whole lot was added to it other than maybe some more nudity. However, this is definitely one of the better musical biopics in recent memory. These can be hit or miss for me. RAY I didn't care for, even though Jamie Foxx won an Oscar for it; NOTORIOUS and ALL EYEZ ON ME sucked IMO. Whereas STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON, WALK THE LINE and BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY are some of the better ones. Looking forward to ROCKETMAN later this year!
Posted By: Michael_Giovanni
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/19 03:12 PM
Over the weekend I watched Sergeant York (1941) and The Seven-Ups (1974) a good crime movie set in New York.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/19 04:51 PM
I watched Glass. I am in agreement with you Irishman, despite the reviews, the movie is great. With its completion, it makes up the trilogy and makes it one of the best trilogies out there. The flaw of it is that it leaves the movie studios to make as many spinoffs as they want. Glass is a good movie that MNS has written in a long time.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/19 05:38 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
I watched Glass. I am in agreement with you Irishman, despite the reviews, the movie is great. With its completion, it makes up the trilogy and makes it one of the best trilogies out there. The flaw of it is that it leaves the movie studios to make as many spinoffs as they want. Glass is a good movie that MNS has written in a long time.
I agree. I've heard that he's done with these characters so there won't be a fourth but I hope the studio doesn't try to do any spinoffs. Leave it like it is. I think it could have ended any better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/19 07:26 PM
LET THE RIGHT ONE IN
So I'm a little late to the party on this one as this film was released back in 2008. It's a Swedish horror film about a young 12-year-old boy named Oskar who's being bullied at school. Eli moves in next door to him who says she's 12-years-old as well, however, there's a catch: she's a vampire. This is a beautiful story about love, companionship and finding ones self. Honestly, I loved this and am looking forward to seeing it again. It is an impactful movie that I endorse seeing if you're in the mood or able to track it down.
So I'm a little late to the party on this one as this film was released back in 2008. It's a Swedish horror film about a young 12-year-old boy named Oskar who's being bullied at school. Eli moves in next door to him who says she's 12-years-old as well, however, there's a catch: she's a vampire. This is a beautiful story about love, companionship and finding ones self. Honestly, I loved this and am looking forward to seeing it again. It is an impactful movie that I endorse seeing if you're in the mood or able to track it down.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/19 03:17 PM
Let The Right One In is good. I do not care much for the remake, Let Me In.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/19 05:44 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Let The Right One In is good. I do not care much for the remake, Let Me In.
I'm not familiar with that. Is that an American version?
SERENITY
This movie is a mess from the jump. For almost the first act I was under the impression I was the victim of a bait-and-switch as the story shown during the previews (you know, Anne Hathaway trying to hire Matthew McConaughey to kill her abusive husband), was nowhere to be found. No, the entire first act subjects us to watch Matthew McConaughey miss out a few times on the big fish he's trying to catch, while simultaneously sleeping with Diane Lane. Almost to the point of feeling scammed, the story finally does pick up where it promised it would lead us. And in doing so, especially with the "big twist" in the script, this managed to pinch out one big, steamy pile of dog crap. The twist was completely out of left field and totally lame. I'm very disappointed in both Anne Hathaway and Matthew McConaughey as they're both Oscar winners and better than this. I wouldn't even advise a viewing of this when it comes to streaming or HBO. Hard pass! 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/19 07:33 PM
Saw REVENGE (2017) last night. Nice try. A decent show but nothing more than ordinary. Really don't understand the hype around it?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/19 01:39 AM
Debating getting a streaming device to stay current.
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/19 03:42 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Debating getting a streaming device to stay current.
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Firefox..LOL.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/19 03:58 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Debating getting a streaming device to stay current.
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Have cable and feel it does not offer enough.
Any advice?
Do you already have Amazon Prime? That's not a bad one for Prime members. The standard is still probably Netflix, however, I do know their prices went up recently. Filmstruck shut down towards the end of last year but the Criterion Channel is launching on April 8. I just signed up for it yesterday.
Yesterday I watched SUMMER OF '84. I was pretty disappointed in this. I love nostalgia (especially for the '80s) but this I felt tried too hard for it and felt it tried too hard to be in the realm of STRANGER THINGS to a certain extent. Furthermore:
SPOILERS
I don't like movies that tell you who the killer is from the beginning. The entire movie you're trying to figure out if they really did it or not and by the time you get to the end and find out they actually did do it, I always feel it's a let down. It reminded me of REAR WINDOW in this way which I'm not a huge fan of. I like Hitchcock and I understand the point of the movie is for the main characters to prove the killer actually did do it, but for my money, I'm not in to these type of films.
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/19 08:20 PM
I canceled cable after 34 years. They became to ridiculous with their never-ending increase in rates. I've had an Amazon box for five years to watch movies but now I put one in each room, ordered Netflix and sling. We have to have the fast internet for my wife for she works from home. Saving $80 a month. It got to the point where plugging a cable from the wall into the tv wouldn't work and you had to order a $7/month box for each tv. $35/month on top of the$2 something. That's when I told them to turn it off. There was never anything on anyways. Fuck those cocksuckers.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/19 02:29 AM
Originally Posted by blueracing347
I canceled cable after 34 years. They became to ridiculous with their never-ending increase in rates. I've had an Amazon box for five years to watch movies but now I put one in each room, ordered Netflix and sling. We have to have the fast internet for my wife for she works from home. Saving $80 a month. It got to the point where plugging a cable from the wall into the tv wouldn't work and you had to order a $7/month box for each tv. $35/month on top of the$2 something. That's when I told them to turn it off. There was never anything on anyways. Fuck those cocksuckers.
Good for you, I would love to do that.
I plan on picking up one of those streaming devices and see how it works out for awhile.
If we like it I will cut the cable one day.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/19 06:44 PM
A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT
My first introduction to Iranian cinema. A young man named Arash is trying to get his father off of drugs, while at the same time, he falls in love with a beautiful vampire. The amount of vampire movies I've seen lately has been completely coincidental I assure you. This film is kind of retro/homage in some ways and looks beautiful onscreen bathed in nothing but black and white. A slow burn, not overly gory or with a lot of action sequences, but a beautiful film regardless.
My first introduction to Iranian cinema. A young man named Arash is trying to get his father off of drugs, while at the same time, he falls in love with a beautiful vampire. The amount of vampire movies I've seen lately has been completely coincidental I assure you. This film is kind of retro/homage in some ways and looks beautiful onscreen bathed in nothing but black and white. A slow burn, not overly gory or with a lot of action sequences, but a beautiful film regardless.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/19 11:32 PM
Rewatched THE WITCH and SUSPIRIA (2018) this weekend. THE WITCH is such a beautiful and simple movie. SUSPIRIA I actually enjoyed more after a second viewing, although I still prefer the original. I wouldn't mind seeing the rest of the trilogy be made although I haven't heard anything to that effect yet and I wouldn't hold my breath. It got good reviews but appears it brought in less than $7 million globally.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/19 12:03 AM
I watched Arlington Road and Mirrors over the weekend. Arlington Road was gripping and has a sucker punch of an ending. Mirrors fell apart a bit at the end, but it's still better than a lot of horror movies, featuring a unique premise with some well worked scares, good gore and a moody atmosphere.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/19 02:18 AM
ARLINGTON ROAD is an underrated film. I haven't seen it in years but it's great (especially that ending!)
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/19 01:31 PM
Scream(1996)
Probably one of my favorite 90s slasher movies and Wes Craven films.
Probably one of my favorite 90s slasher movies and Wes Craven films.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/19 02:37 PM
Yeah. I used to love when Scream would be on TV and my parents would let me stay up to watch it on a school night. Love the first couple Scary Movie movies, too. Got to see I want to say the second one in the cinema when I was way underage.
I think movies like Scream and Wes Craven's New Nightmare did an excellent job deconstructing the horror genre. Something guys like Jordan Peele are failing spectacularly to do at the moment with the shit they're coming out with. And something that Joss Whedon failed to do with that flaming sack of crap that was Cabin in the Woods.
By the way, Speed is one of my all time favorite movies and I just found out that Joss Whedon wrote practically all of the dialogue. I find that mindboggling to come to terms with. Guy obviously has a modicum of talent when he's not pandering to the lowest common denominator geeks who live in their parents basement.
I think movies like Scream and Wes Craven's New Nightmare did an excellent job deconstructing the horror genre. Something guys like Jordan Peele are failing spectacularly to do at the moment with the shit they're coming out with. And something that Joss Whedon failed to do with that flaming sack of crap that was Cabin in the Woods.
By the way, Speed is one of my all time favorite movies and I just found out that Joss Whedon wrote practically all of the dialogue. I find that mindboggling to come to terms with. Guy obviously has a modicum of talent when he's not pandering to the lowest common denominator geeks who live in their parents basement.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/19 07:37 PM
SCREAM is one of my favorite movies of all-time. Not just horror movies, but movies in general. Solid film all around and IMO, probably the best and most important horror film of the last 25 years.
Posted By: afriendofours
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/19 10:01 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Yeah. I used to love when Scream would be on TV and my parents would let me stay up to watch it on a school night. Love the first couple Scary Movie movies, too. Got to see I want to say the second one in the cinema when I was way underage.
I think movies like Scream and Wes Craven's New Nightmare did an excellent job deconstructing the horror genre. Something guys like Jordan Peele are failing spectacularly to do at the moment with the shit they're coming out with. And something that Joss Whedon failed to do with that flaming sack of crap that was Cabin in the Woods.
By the way, Speed is one of my all time favorite movies and I just found out that Joss Whedon wrote practically all of the dialogue. I find that mindboggling to come to terms with. Guy obviously has a modicum of talent when he's not pandering to the lowest common denominator geeks who live in their parents basement.
I think movies like Scream and Wes Craven's New Nightmare did an excellent job deconstructing the horror genre. Something guys like Jordan Peele are failing spectacularly to do at the moment with the shit they're coming out with. And something that Joss Whedon failed to do with that flaming sack of crap that was Cabin in the Woods.
By the way, Speed is one of my all time favorite movies and I just found out that Joss Whedon wrote practically all of the dialogue. I find that mindboggling to come to terms with. Guy obviously has a modicum of talent when he's not pandering to the lowest common denominator geeks who live in their parents basement.
Speed was one of my favorite movies when it first came out. Must have rented and watched it about 100 times lol.
Big fan of the first Scary movie also, second was good too, then it went abit downhill after the Wayan brothers left.
Today I've just finished watching Rise Of The Footsoldier(2007)
Probably the most enjoyable and accurate out of all the movies on the Essex rettendon range rover murders.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/19 06:42 PM
Between yesterday and today I watched DEATH WALKS ON HIGH HEELS and DEATH WALKS AT MIDNIGHT. Both feature some of the same cast, which I'm a fan of. It appears with a lot of the giallo's I've seen recently, a lot of the same people are popping up. Nieves Navarro (aka Susan Scott) was absolutely a wonderful delight as the main star in each. However, the stories I felt were more complicated than they needed to be. I'm easy when it comes to giallo's: give me a masked killer, reveal who it is at the end and give them a good reason for doing it. Short and simple. For giallo's these were way more in depth than I thought they needed to be.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/19 05:40 PM
COLD PURSUIT
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/19 11:46 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
COLD PURSUIT
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
I recommend the Scandinavia film In Order of Disappearance that Cold Pursuit is a remake of. It is good and the performances of Skarsgard in the lead role and Ganz in the role of the Serbian crime boss are unforgettable, with a good round out cast with two who had a breakout role after the movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/09/19 07:49 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Originally Posted by Irishman12
COLD PURSUIT
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
Liam Neeson is back at it again. Glad to see him still kicking ass at 66. Seriously, can everyone stop messing with this mans family because for those that do, they get dealt with. A humorous and at times bloody tale about a father who tracks down the people responsible for his sons death. I honestly enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would; however, the whole subplot in regards to White Bull and the Native Americans could have been scrapped and the film would have been tighter by about 20+ minutes. 6.5/10
I recommend the Scandinavia film In Order of Disappearance that Cold Pursuit is a remake of. It is good and the performances of Skarsgard in the lead role and Ganz in the role of the Serbian crime boss are unforgettable, with a good round out cast with two who had a breakout role after the movie.
I was wondering if the original was any good since this was a remake. Thanks for the feedback. Did you see COLD PURSUIT yet? If/when you do, I'd be curious how it stacks up to the original.
ST. AGATHA
Yes, I was torn whether or not to see this and while I was going to pass on it, I did see some (surprisingly) good reviews for it. There were some other not so favorable reviews as well and I fall in to that category. Where to begin? The film isn't so much a mess as they do flashbacks every so often to help fill in the gaps (although one character who's referenced twice was never made clear who she was but anyway). The film follows Mary, later renamed Agatha, in the convent she's run away to while pregnant in 1950's Georgia. Carolyn Hennesy does her best Nurse Ratched impression as Mother Superior and she's really the only redeeming part of the film. The "big reveal" at the end wasn't as surprising as you'd think as everything is pretty noticeable before it's reveled (although I went in a somewhat different way with the ending which I felt would have played better). This didn't get much marketing and for good reason. 4/10
THE PRODIGY
What I originally intended on seeing was this so I made it a double feature. I'm typically not a huge fan of child actors (they annoy me for some reason) but Jackson Robert Scott really gives a creepy and enjoyable performance. The movie was and wasn't what I thought it was going to be from the previews (without spoiling too much) but I did somewhat enjoy the boldness the film took with the story. A few jump scares but overall, again, you mostly see everything coming. A pass for theaters but might not be bad to catch via streaming. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/19 03:48 AM
ALITA: BATTLE ANGEL
From the previews, I was looking forward to this. Visually it's beautiful, but that's about it. The story and the world they created I just couldn't get myself in to and quite frankly, I was a little bored with it about midway through. A waste of talent including both Mahershala Ali and Jennifer Connelly (both of whom I'm a fan of) seemed robotic themselves with their performances. Christoph Waltz is his usually charming self and he's enjoyable, as it Rosa Salazar who plays Alita. Overall, disappointing. 6/10
From the previews, I was looking forward to this. Visually it's beautiful, but that's about it. The story and the world they created I just couldn't get myself in to and quite frankly, I was a little bored with it about midway through. A waste of talent including both Mahershala Ali and Jennifer Connelly (both of whom I'm a fan of) seemed robotic themselves with their performances. Christoph Waltz is his usually charming self and he's enjoyable, as it Rosa Salazar who plays Alita. Overall, disappointing. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/19 01:42 AM
HAPPY DEATH DAY 2U
Yes, another sequel that nobody knew they wanted (other than the studio apparently). I thought the whole horror GROUNDHOG DAY wrapped it up just fine the first time; however, after this, hopefully, they can finally put the franchise to sleep. Towards the beginning of the film the story tries to explain how other characters are now in this time loop and I don't feel like they succeeded in explaining it. They over thunk it but once you get past that, the story actually does have some heart to it, which I was surprised but appreciated. At times main star Jessica Rothe does really pull at your heartstrings. The killer was more obvious this time around, although they did use a part from the original script of part 1 that was later changed. It appears they went ahead with it anyway in the sequel. 5.5/10
Yes, another sequel that nobody knew they wanted (other than the studio apparently). I thought the whole horror GROUNDHOG DAY wrapped it up just fine the first time; however, after this, hopefully, they can finally put the franchise to sleep. Towards the beginning of the film the story tries to explain how other characters are now in this time loop and I don't feel like they succeeded in explaining it. They over thunk it but once you get past that, the story actually does have some heart to it, which I was surprised but appreciated. At times main star Jessica Rothe does really pull at your heartstrings. The killer was more obvious this time around, although they did use a part from the original script of part 1 that was later changed. It appears they went ahead with it anyway in the sequel. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/19 09:02 PM
I watched THE ROOM and THE DISASTER ARTIST for the second time yesterday. If you've never seen either, I would recommend them (or at least THE DISASTER ARTIST). THE ROOM is absolutely horrible but you'll get the references made from THE DISATER ARTIST if you see it obviously. A lot of people give Tommy Wiseau a hard time because of how terrible this movie turned out (THE ROOM that is). But I give the man credit. Yes, the movie is an absolute trainwreck but the man followed his dream and made his own movie. How many of us can truly say that? And, since it's release in 2003, the movie does have a cult following and Tommy has made a name for himself as a result of it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/19 04:00 PM
FIGHTING WITH MY FAMILY
I should probably begin this with a disclosure that I am a WWE fan and I was very glad to see this project get a serious and proper theatrical release with some name actors, specifically Nick Frost and Lena Headey. In saying that, this is your typical, feel good sports movie with nothing much really added to it and at times felt it was just another platform for WWE to market themselves to fans/potential new fans. The film follows a young woman Paige (real name Saraya Knight) and her brother Zak who grew up in a wrestling family. While WWE is briefly in England they both are invited to tryout. Paige is selected while her older brother is not. Paige has to move away from her family to train in the States and in striving to become a WWE Superstar, finds her true self in the process. Florence Pugh who plays Saraya/Paige does a great job displaying Paige's vulnerability and lack of self-confidence. Typically, I like Vince Vaughn's work but felt he was a little out of place with this role as the WWE trainer. Overall, I did enjoy this film and I would like to see more of these made as others have equally inspiring stories to tell. 6/10
I should probably begin this with a disclosure that I am a WWE fan and I was very glad to see this project get a serious and proper theatrical release with some name actors, specifically Nick Frost and Lena Headey. In saying that, this is your typical, feel good sports movie with nothing much really added to it and at times felt it was just another platform for WWE to market themselves to fans/potential new fans. The film follows a young woman Paige (real name Saraya Knight) and her brother Zak who grew up in a wrestling family. While WWE is briefly in England they both are invited to tryout. Paige is selected while her older brother is not. Paige has to move away from her family to train in the States and in striving to become a WWE Superstar, finds her true self in the process. Florence Pugh who plays Saraya/Paige does a great job displaying Paige's vulnerability and lack of self-confidence. Typically, I like Vince Vaughn's work but felt he was a little out of place with this role as the WWE trainer. Overall, I did enjoy this film and I would like to see more of these made as others have equally inspiring stories to tell. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/19 11:32 PM
Saw Green Book.
I had my reservations, what with it being an "Oscar bait" movie, but I must say it was pretty good. A nice, touching movie with excellent performances by the two leads.
I had no idea it was based on a true story and that Viggo Mortensen's character was based on the guy who played Carmine Lupertazzi Sr, in The Sopranos.
I had my reservations, what with it being an "Oscar bait" movie, but I must say it was pretty good. A nice, touching movie with excellent performances by the two leads.
I had no idea it was based on a true story and that Viggo Mortensen's character was based on the guy who played Carmine Lupertazzi Sr, in The Sopranos.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/19 09:34 PM
I still need to see it. I've heard good things but Vigo's Italian accent from the previews has been scaring me off of it honestly.
I just rewatched VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS today. Such a beautiful and underrated film. Lovely soundtrack, beautiful imagery and a lot of allegories at work here. If you're in to horror/fantasy, I highly recommend this! I watched it for the first time on the now defunct Filmstruck streaming service but the Criterion Collection is coming out with their own service on April 8 so you can track it down there.
I just rewatched VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS today. Such a beautiful and underrated film. Lovely soundtrack, beautiful imagery and a lot of allegories at work here. If you're in to horror/fantasy, I highly recommend this! I watched it for the first time on the now defunct Filmstruck streaming service but the Criterion Collection is coming out with their own service on April 8 so you can track it down there.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/19 04:29 PM
GRETA
Greta, played by Isabelle Huppert, befriends Frances (Chloë Grace Moretz) when Frances returns Greta's purse she left on a subway. The beginning kind of rushed through the story without really fleshing out the characters. Maybe a third of the way into the film Frances finds out Greta's up to no good and appears to leave these handbags all over the city, waiting for them to be returned. This film is about loneliness and loss, which is why initially both women confide in each other so much. Chloe's work I've somewhat enjoyed in the past but her movies can be hit-or-miss for me. I've been of fan of Maika Monroe's since I saw her in IT FOLLOWS but unfortunately for her, she's completely wasted in this film as Frances' roommate/the voice of reason. The only bright spot in the film is really Huppert who plays a very twisted and unhinged stalker. 5/10
Greta, played by Isabelle Huppert, befriends Frances (Chloë Grace Moretz) when Frances returns Greta's purse she left on a subway. The beginning kind of rushed through the story without really fleshing out the characters. Maybe a third of the way into the film Frances finds out Greta's up to no good and appears to leave these handbags all over the city, waiting for them to be returned. This film is about loneliness and loss, which is why initially both women confide in each other so much. Chloe's work I've somewhat enjoyed in the past but her movies can be hit-or-miss for me. I've been of fan of Maika Monroe's since I saw her in IT FOLLOWS but unfortunately for her, she's completely wasted in this film as Frances' roommate/the voice of reason. The only bright spot in the film is really Huppert who plays a very twisted and unhinged stalker. 5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/19 02:25 AM
Watched In the Heat of the Night last night. What a movie! Steiger's performance is the one that stands out for me. He is so underrated. His delivery is so unique. I don't know if he copied it, but Armand Assante delivers like he does. Both are just great.
Posted By: SC
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/19 03:27 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched In the Heat of the Night last night. What a movie! Steiger's performance is the one that stands out for me. He is so underrated.
I never considered Steiger as being underrated, Oli. Anyone who can hold his own against Marlon Brando in one of THE greatest cinema scenes of all-time cannot be underrated.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/19 08:56 PM
CAPTAIN MARVEL was pretty meh and uneventful. Mid-tier Marvel movie and when comparing female superhero's, I actually give DC the advantage thus far with WONDER WOMAN over this. The 90's nostalgia was overdone and was trying too hard to be cool and retro. Soundtrack at times felt out of place. 6/10
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/19 10:05 AM
I just watched King of Thieves. It is a British film based on a real life heist which I had never heard about before. The hook is that the thieves/hoodlums who pulled it off were mostly elderly men who had all the normal aging issues of incontinence, low energy, diabetes, etc It's not a comedy though. Though the men may be old they are still dangerous and often quite mean. The film is full of serious award winning actors such as Michael Caine, Jim Broadbent, and Ray Winstone. The film makes no allowances to American ears for British accents, cadence, and slang. Seemingly the plot stuck pretty closely to real life events. It might have been a more entertaining film had it diverged more from reality. Still, it's always a pleasure watching people like Caine and Broadbeat play off of each other.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/19 04:42 PM
US
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/29/19 04:43 PM
DUMBO was the warm, heartfelt, family movie you expect it to be coming from Disney. Dumbo himself looked fantastic on the big screen. Great CGI. This is my first of their recent live action, formerly cartoon releases. I'll check out ALADDIN and THE LION KING later this summer as well. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/29/19 11:40 PM
I just read your reviews to my wife.
She wants to see DUMBO but she’s going to pass on US.
Thanks i12, we always enjoy your reviews and love when you score them.
She wants to see DUMBO but she’s going to pass on US.
Thanks i12, we always enjoy your reviews and love when you score them.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/19 12:54 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I just read your reviews to my wife.
She wants to see DUMBO but she’s going to pass on US.
Thanks i12, we always enjoy your reviews and love when you score them.
She wants to see DUMBO but she’s going to pass on US.
Thanks i12, we always enjoy your reviews and love when you score them.
Thanks DP, glad you enjoy them. Going to see HOTEL MUMBAI later this morning. I'll let you know how it is.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/19 07:45 PM
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/19 03:27 PM
PRINCE OF DARKNESS
Huge fan of the man's Halloween and The Thing, but this sorta forgotten classic ranks up there as Carpenter's creepiest movie imo.
Huge fan of the man's Halloween and The Thing, but this sorta forgotten classic ranks up there as Carpenter's creepiest movie imo.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/19 04:03 PM
Prince of Darkness is a classic. The Homeless people gathering around the church is the most remarkable for for me as there are a few cameos in that group, Alice Cooper the most recognizable one.
I watched Underworlds back to back this morning. The First one with Joe Mantega, Dennis Miller, Annabella Sciorra, and Larry Bishop is not bad. It starts out with a massacre of mob members. Miller character is a gangster who has been released from prison with many questions and tries to get Mantega character to come back in the life. The movie takes place on the night of Fathers day and is a good ride. The other Underworld is a vampire versus werewolves. This is a good movie with a strong cast and performances. I really enjoy both of these movies.
I watched Underworlds back to back this morning. The First one with Joe Mantega, Dennis Miller, Annabella Sciorra, and Larry Bishop is not bad. It starts out with a massacre of mob members. Miller character is a gangster who has been released from prison with many questions and tries to get Mantega character to come back in the life. The movie takes place on the night of Fathers day and is a good ride. The other Underworld is a vampire versus werewolves. This is a good movie with a strong cast and performances. I really enjoy both of these movies.
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/19 05:42 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Prince of Darkness is a classic. The Homeless people gathering around the church is the most remarkable for for me as there are a few cameos in that group, Alice Cooper the most recognizable one.
Great cameo yeah.
That "this is not a dream" sequence that's repeated throughout the movie is one of the most nightmarish things ever in a mainstream horror movie.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/19 02:25 AM
I watched John Carpenter's adaptation of the Stephen King novel, Christine, again.
It's good but it definitely loses its edge in the second half.
Great soundtrack!
It's good but it definitely loses its edge in the second half.
Great soundtrack!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/19 12:35 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Solid six, well....i was planning on this next but she changed her mind and wants to see US this week.
I may be able to watch some better movies soon as well since Ive decided to pull the trigger and get a streaming box, will keep cable as well but will have much more options.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/19 07:14 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Solid six, well....i was planning on this next but she changed her mind and wants to see US this week.
I may be able to watch some better movies soon as well since Ive decided to pull the trigger and get a streaming box, will keep cable as well but will have much more options.
Nice. What did you get? I wouldn't mind cutting the cord since I only watch a few channels, but there's some shows I don't believe are available on demand, so that's 1 reason I haven't done it yet.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/03/19 12:12 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Solid six, well....i was planning on this next but she changed her mind and wants to see US this week.
I may be able to watch some better movies soon as well since Ive decided to pull the trigger and get a streaming box, will keep cable as well but will have much more options.
Nice. What did you get? I wouldn't mind cutting the cord since I only watch a few channels, but there's some shows I don't believe are available on demand, so that's 1 reason I haven't done it yet.
I am going to meet up with a friend this week who has a friend who demos new type of Jet Stream box that hooks right up to your tv or device and the only thing it needs is WiFi for connection. I am going to check it out and see how it works , if I buy it I will use it as a add on for now to what I have now ( Cablevision).
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/05/19 05:07 PM
SHAZAM! was a lot of fun. I didn't know much about the character going in to the film. Really the only thing I knew was he had many of the same abilities as Superman, but this is definitely one of the better DC movies as of late. Unfortunately, at times they almost "shove" their heroes in your face as one character constantly wears a Superman backpack, has Batman/Superman memorabilia in his room, at toy stores you only see Batman/Superman figures. I understand DC is wanting to promote their own brand and isn't going to plug Marvel; however, DC does have more superheros than Batman and Superman. Back to the film, it's funny, light-hearted and doesn't take itself too seriously. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/19 05:54 PM
I was pretty bored with PET SEMATARY and I should have known better. I have nothing against the man personally, but a handful of Jason Clarke's latest releases have been misses for me. From TERMINATOR GENISYS to WINCHESTER to the horrible SERENITY that was offered up earlier this year. I never read the book or saw the original so I wasn't sure what to expect going in, but the film takes some time to establish itself. The only part I somewhat enjoyed was maybe the last 5-10 minutes honestly. 5.5/10
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/19 08:18 PM
Watched two S. Craig Zahler movies.
BONE TOMAHAWK
Western-meets-Exploitation featuring the always great Kurt Russell. It's a bit of a slow-burn movie, but I happen to like slow-burn. There's some great and nuanced writing going on: it's quirky without venturing into comedy territory, it feels Western but remarkably "dirtier" and when the cannibal horror kicks in it doesn't feel out of place. The movie seems to bring you into a stable mood before hitting you over the head with ultra-violence that comes in fast at an almost unexpected moment and which features a show-stopper of a gruesome scene. I like this movie quite a lot.
BRAWL IN CELL BLOCK 99
The next Zahler movie I like about just as much as Bone Tomahawk. This time a Crime-meets-Exploitation movie it's again one badass affair with some remarkably nasty violence.
Yep, more of this please.
Then I also watched an Argentinian horror flick.
ATERRADOS
Didn't expect much from "Argentine" and "horror" but I was pleasantly surprised. A nice surreal and nightmarish mood as well as some truly unnerving set pieces. It all didn't make much sense, but for what it was, it was well done.
BONE TOMAHAWK
Western-meets-Exploitation featuring the always great Kurt Russell. It's a bit of a slow-burn movie, but I happen to like slow-burn. There's some great and nuanced writing going on: it's quirky without venturing into comedy territory, it feels Western but remarkably "dirtier" and when the cannibal horror kicks in it doesn't feel out of place. The movie seems to bring you into a stable mood before hitting you over the head with ultra-violence that comes in fast at an almost unexpected moment and which features a show-stopper of a gruesome scene. I like this movie quite a lot.
BRAWL IN CELL BLOCK 99
The next Zahler movie I like about just as much as Bone Tomahawk. This time a Crime-meets-Exploitation movie it's again one badass affair with some remarkably nasty violence.
Yep, more of this please.
Then I also watched an Argentinian horror flick.
ATERRADOS
Didn't expect much from "Argentine" and "horror" but I was pleasantly surprised. A nice surreal and nightmarish mood as well as some truly unnerving set pieces. It all didn't make much sense, but for what it was, it was well done.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/19 12:12 AM
Last night watched Gotti with Armand Assante. He is one terrific actor. His delivery is so unique. It can only be matched by Rod Steiger.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/19 12:15 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ESCAPE ROOM was better than I was anticipating. I felt it had a lackluster of an ending but prior to that, it was a pretty fun, and at times, pulse raising ride. Not overly grotesque as it's PG-13 and while I can't endorse everyone to see it at the theater, I would recommend catching it when it's available on a streaming service/HBO.
We are checking back on some of your reviews so we check our list we made for our Watchlist.
We just saw ESCAPE ROOM and both enjoyed it, next up GLASS.
Was also looking to see if you saw and rated VENUMI may not have gone back far enough, we watched that today as well and thought it was very well done.
Thanks again i12 and all.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/19 12:23 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
VENOM
Ok, so you knew it wasn't going to be Marvel quality going in; but it also wasn't FANTASTIC FOUR/DC level bad either. It's a funny, decently enjoyable ride if you go in with those expectations. The studio went with the PG-13 rating to appeal to a wider audience and I'm not sure a R rating would have done much more for it. Tom Hardy and Michelle Williams are better than this and terribly underutilized. I am a Tom Hardy fan and I can honestly say, I think this was one of his movies that wasn't great. Also, there were 2 credits scenes. The first was kinda cool with a funny cameo but the 2nd was absolute garbage! I doubt a sequel gets made and wonder what it'll do for Sony's plans for their non-Spider-Man Universe? 5.5/10
Ok, so you knew it wasn't going to be Marvel quality going in; but it also wasn't FANTASTIC FOUR/DC level bad either. It's a funny, decently enjoyable ride if you go in with those expectations. The studio went with the PG-13 rating to appeal to a wider audience and I'm not sure a R rating would have done much more for it. Tom Hardy and Michelle Williams are better than this and terribly underutilized. I am a Tom Hardy fan and I can honestly say, I think this was one of his movies that wasn't great. Also, there were 2 credits scenes. The first was kinda cool with a funny cameo but the 2nd was absolute garbage! I doubt a sequel gets made and wonder what it'll do for Sony's plans for their non-Spider-Man Universe? 5.5/10
Found it and just read to DW
We enjoyed it a bit more, could go 6.5....we enjoyed the humor.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/19 05:10 PM
Awesome! Glad you saw them and appreciate my reviews. Thanks for the feedback.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/19 02:06 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Awesome! Glad you saw them and appreciate my reviews. Thanks for the feedback.
We really do, read them all and look forward to them.
We have more of yours on our view list and will update after watch.
We both wish we had more time to watch the movies but are making time for it lately since we have better access now and like to see them together and then discuss.
Thanks i12..... keep em coming.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/19 05:42 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Awesome! Glad you saw them and appreciate my reviews. Thanks for the feedback.
We really do, read them all and look forward to them.
We have more of yours on our view list and will update after watch.
We both wish we had more time to watch the movies but are making time for it lately since we have better access now and like to see them together and then discuss.
Thanks i12..... keep em coming.
Will do sir! Last week I didn't see anything in the theater but this weekend I plan on seeing DRUNK PARENTS and then next week is AVENGERS: END GAME
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/17/19 12:34 AM
Very good.
Look forward to reading reviews.
TY i12
Look forward to reading reviews.
TY i12
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/26/19 05:52 PM
AVENGERS: ENDGAME
So the end has finally come and Marvel went out with a hell of a bang! Maybe the best superhero/comic book movie ever made. The third act was a smorgasbord of visuals and nicely knit storylines that fans will be geeking out over for years to come. Funny, emotional, beautifully shot. There's very little to complain about here. My only gripe would be the 3 hour run-time. I definitely plan on seeing it again in theaters (just going to wait a few weeks for the crowds to die down). And if you haven't done so already or plan on doing so, treat yourself and see it in IMAX! 9/10
So the end has finally come and Marvel went out with a hell of a bang! Maybe the best superhero/comic book movie ever made. The third act was a smorgasbord of visuals and nicely knit storylines that fans will be geeking out over for years to come. Funny, emotional, beautifully shot. There's very little to complain about here. My only gripe would be the 3 hour run-time. I definitely plan on seeing it again in theaters (just going to wait a few weeks for the crowds to die down). And if you haven't done so already or plan on doing so, treat yourself and see it in IMAX!
9/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/27/19 09:17 PM
I thought Pet Sematary was a respectable remake of the original. Certainly less offensive than the It remake. Though there were a few things that didn't sit well with me, such as the deal with the kids wearing masks and Ellie morphing into Jud Crandall's deceased wife; less is more would've been better in that regard. Still prefer the ending in the original but the ending in the remake was a decent way for it to put its own stamp on things I guess.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/19 10:42 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Certainly less offensive than the It remake.
Just curious as to what you found offensive in the IT remake?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/19 11:13 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Certainly less offensive than the It remake.
Just curious as to what you found offensive in the IT remake?
I thought Tim Curry's portrayal of Pennywise was much more nuanced than Bill Skarsgard's. He wasn't just scary, he was charismatic and funny. I thought Bill Skarsgard's portrayal was too one-dimensional. I also thought the child actors in the original were better. There was definitely an overreliance on CGI and special effects at the expense of crafting a good story; likewise the selling point of the movie being set in the 80s with e.g. the nod to Nightmare on Elm Street showing at a movie theater in Derry.
I really can't overstate how much I disliked Pennywise in the remake. The way they designed him was like throwing shit on a wall and seeing what sticks, an example of what I'm on about being the rows of teeth he has when he opens his mouth.
One of the big differences I liked in the original was that the child (and adult) actors really sold the threat of Pennywise and their internal conflict. I was never really sold any threat in the remake. Pennywise seemed to expound more energy prancing around making goofy faces and showing off the movie's special effects budget than actually trying to kill the kids.
IDK maybe I'm just being a contrarian, I don't really like new horror movies in general. In terms of special effects it definitely beats the original hands down but IMO the original was a much better told story with scenes that remain with me to this day. I can't really remember anything from the remake save being extremely irritated (unintentionally) by the guy who played Seth Green's character in the original, and being let down by Pennywise.
TBH I think the role of Pennywise should've went to an American or British actor, but not the guy who was originally cast as Pennywise before Skarsgard - he sucks too.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/19 11:41 PM
Moe I understand what you are saying about it. It is hard to replace Curry, but I have to give credit to Skarsgard. Chapter 2 is coming out in September of this year which I am going to attend. After seeing chapter 2, then I will compare them. Like you the children actors from the original were better in my opinion.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/19 06:51 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Certainly less offensive than the It remake.
Just curious as to what you found offensive in the IT remake?
I thought Tim Curry's portrayal of Pennywise was much more nuanced than Bill Skarsgard's. He wasn't just scary, he was charismatic and funny. I thought Bill Skarsgard's portrayal was too one-dimensional. I also thought the child actors in the original were better. There was definitely an overreliance on CGI and special effects at the expense of crafting a good story; likewise the selling point of the movie being set in the 80s with e.g. the nod to Nightmare on Elm Street showing at a movie theater in Derry.
I really can't overstate how much I disliked Pennywise in the remake. The way they designed him was like throwing shit on a wall and seeing what sticks, an example of what I'm on about being the rows of teeth he has when he opens his mouth.
One of the big differences I liked in the original was that the child (and adult) actors really sold the threat of Pennywise and their internal conflict. I was never really sold any threat in the remake. Pennywise seemed to expound more energy prancing around making goofy faces and showing off the movie's special effects budget than actually trying to kill the kids.
IDK maybe I'm just being a contrarian, I don't really like new horror movies in general. In terms of special effects it definitely beats the original hands down but IMO the original was a much better told story with scenes that remain with me to this day. I can't really remember anything from the remake save being extremely irritated (unintentionally) by the guy who played Seth Green's character in the original, and being let down by Pennywise.
TBH I think the role of Pennywise should've went to an American or British actor, but not the guy who was originally cast as Pennywise before Skarsgard - he sucks too.
Thanks for the feedback and I agree with you wholeheartedly that Curry was a better Pennywise than Skarsgard. However, I liked the kids in the remake more probably. The banter and infighting they had seemed more realistic to me. And the opening scene from the remake stuck with me (similar to how it did with the original as well). Plus, I loved the fact they went for the R rating and didn't water it down to appeal to a wider audience. I understand the original was a TV mini-series and it was released in 1990, where the standards for TV are quite different than they are today. But I am eagerly anticipating Chapter 2 in September!
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/19 07:28 PM
I liked the IT remake tbh.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/03/19 02:59 AM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
I liked the IT remake tbh.
Haha that one was good looking forward to the sequel.
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/19 02:29 PM
New IT: Chapter 2 teaser got me pretty hyped!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/19 05:48 PM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
New IT: Chapter 2 teaser got me pretty hyped!
Me too. Probably my 2nd most anticipated movie of the entire year, behind only Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD!
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/19 06:43 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
New IT: Chapter 2 teaser got me pretty hyped!
Me too. Probably my 2nd most anticipated movie of the entire year, behind only Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD!
Definitely looking forward to that one as well, even though I'm not the biggest fan of his last few movies.
Curious to see what the new John Wick will bring as well.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/12/19 10:54 PM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
New IT: Chapter 2 teaser got me pretty hyped!
Me too. Probably my 2nd most anticipated movie of the entire year, behind only Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD!
Definitely looking forward to that one as well, even though I'm not the biggest fan of his last few movies.
Curious to see what the new John Wick will bring as well.
Yeah, Quentin's last great film in my opinion was DJANGO UNCHAINED. I'm looking forward to JOHN WICK 3 as well. The plan is to see it on Thursday.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/12/19 11:25 PM
I just watched Greenbook.
This movie has been placed in my top Ten and rate it a 5 out of 5
I watched all the credits at end and some of the documented facts regarding the film and correct me if I am wrong but I could swear the real life Guy who played the bodyguard driver is the Actor who played Senior Carmine Lupitazzi in Sopranos.
They had a picture of him and I would swear it was him.
Not positive
This movie has been placed in my top Ten and rate it a 5 out of 5
I watched all the credits at end and some of the documented facts regarding the film and correct me if I am wrong but I could swear the real life Guy who played the bodyguard driver is the Actor who played Senior Carmine Lupitazzi in Sopranos.
They had a picture of him and I would swear it was him.
Not positive
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/13/19 06:07 PM
I have yet to see it but it's on my list
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/14/19 01:31 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I have yet to see it but it's on my list
Please do... We are very interested to see what you think.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/19 04:55 PM
TOLKIEN
This is the story about J.R.R. Tolkien and his literary friends, whom he went to school with and formed a club, up to his time in World War I. Honestly, I was interested in seeing this but I was bored with it within the first 15-20 minutes. Very slow, without much going for it. 5/10
LONG SHOT
Any time you list Seth Rogen in a movie, there's a pretty good chance I'll see it as I am a fan of his humor. It was also good to see Charlize Theron show her comedic chops. A funny (if at times raunchy) comedy that still has some heart and soul to it and even has a pretty powerful message at the end. 6/10
This is the story about J.R.R. Tolkien and his literary friends, whom he went to school with and formed a club, up to his time in World War I. Honestly, I was interested in seeing this but I was bored with it within the first 15-20 minutes. Very slow, without much going for it. 5/10
LONG SHOT
Any time you list Seth Rogen in a movie, there's a pretty good chance I'll see it as I am a fan of his humor. It was also good to see Charlize Theron show her comedic chops. A funny (if at times raunchy) comedy that still has some heart and soul to it and even has a pretty powerful message at the end. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/19 02:45 PM
JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 3 - PARABELLUM
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/19 05:54 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 3 - PARABELLUM
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
They are already working on a 4th movie, and a TV show called The Continental. The movies have done so well, that John Wick 3 has nearly broke even already from this passed weekend. Its budget was 55 million, and you always double that for advertising and what not, so 110 million. It currently has a total of 92 million in revenue, in this past weekend alone, so it should break even with an extra 20 million by the end of next weekend or better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/19 06:18 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 3 - PARABELLUM
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
Another no nonsense chapter in the John Wick trilogy. Picking up right where Chapter 2 left off and never letting it's foot off the gas. I was never a huge Keanu Reeves fan before this trilogy but this has definitely made me appreciate him more. Overall, a very solid action film, even if I did feel a little fatigue by the end of it from all of the action. I would definitely be down for another chapter if Lionsgate, Keanu and director Chad Stahelski were down. 7/10
They are already working on a 4th movie, and a TV show called The Continental. The movies have done so well, that John Wick 3 has nearly broke even already from this passed weekend. Its budget was 55 million, and you always double that for advertising and what not, so 110 million. It currently has a total of 92 million in revenue, in this past weekend alone, so it should break even with an extra 20 million by the end of next weekend or better.
I heard about The Continental. About a fourth film, I haven't heard any confirmations yet. Just that Keanu and Stahelski would both be down if the audience and Lionsgate both wanted it to happen (which, judging by the numbers over the weekend, I'd say they do).
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/19 05:30 PM
BRIGHTBURN
The evil Superman. I really enjoyed this opposite end of the spectrum take on the tale of Superman. Crashing in Kansas from another world, Brandon Breyer, uses his powers not for good, but rather for bad intentions, once he realizes his potential and gets his first taste of killing. I typically don't like child/teenage actors as I find them annoying more often than not. However, Jackson A. Dunn who stars as Brandon, does a tremendous job with his characters arc from start to finish. This probably won't make much noise at the box office, but if you're in to horror or superhero films, I recommend this! 7.5/10
GODZILLA: KING OF THE MONSTERS
I wasn't a huge fan of 2014's GODZILLA, but the trailer and special effects for the sequel had my interest. Overall, I felt about the sequel much the same I felt about the first one: the storyline was meh but the effects were good. So depending on how you enjoyed the 2014 installment, will determine how you enjoy this year's release. 6/10
The evil Superman. I really enjoyed this opposite end of the spectrum take on the tale of Superman. Crashing in Kansas from another world, Brandon Breyer, uses his powers not for good, but rather for bad intentions, once he realizes his potential and gets his first taste of killing. I typically don't like child/teenage actors as I find them annoying more often than not. However, Jackson A. Dunn who stars as Brandon, does a tremendous job with his characters arc from start to finish. This probably won't make much noise at the box office, but if you're in to horror or superhero films, I recommend this! 7.5/10
GODZILLA: KING OF THE MONSTERS
I wasn't a huge fan of 2014's GODZILLA, but the trailer and special effects for the sequel had my interest. Overall, I felt about the sequel much the same I felt about the first one: the storyline was meh but the effects were good. So depending on how you enjoyed the 2014 installment, will determine how you enjoy this year's release. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/19 12:06 AM
Thanks for the reviews i12.
Reading them to DW now.
Reading them to DW now.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/19 08:46 AM
ROCKETMAN
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/19 11:59 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ROCKETMAN
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
We have this on the list, thanks for the review.
Hope to see it sooner than later.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/19 06:48 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ROCKETMAN
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
We have this on the list, thanks for the review.
Hope to see it sooner than later.
I hope you enjoy it! I'm seeing MA on Wednesday and X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX on Thursday. (Almost caught up on all of my theater movies)
Posted By: VanillaLimeCoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/19 10:30 PM
Saw three movies today
The Tower (1993)
The Tower (1985)
The Tower (2008)
The Tower (1993)
The Tower (1985)
The Tower (2008)
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/19 12:34 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ROCKETMAN
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
The life of Elton John, told through an unflinching R-rated (thank you!) film and at times, musical. Taron Egerton did a wonderful job as Elton and while overall the film was enjoyable and wasn't too much of a musical (except towards the end). The last 30-45 minutes they seem to cram more musical numbers in which felt forced and rushed and took away from the final product. Not a bad movie at all, but definitely not on the BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY level. 6.5/10
We have this on the list, thanks for the review.
Hope to see it sooner than later.
I hope you enjoy it! I'm seeing MA on Wednesday and X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX on Thursday. (Almost caught up on all of my theater movies)
Very cool.
Originally Posted by VanillaLimeCoke
Saw three movies today
The Tower (1993)
The Tower (1985)
The Tower (2008)
The Tower (1993)
The Tower (1985)
The Tower (2008)
I’m gunna check them out.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/07/19 03:14 PM
MA
Octavia Spencer gives a creepy and enjoyable performance but other than her, this movie is very bland. Storyline is pretty weak and I kept waiting for something to happen and it doesn't really until the last 15 minutes or so of the film. More of a suspense than horror film. 5.5/10
X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX
A mulligan from the 2006 version and while this was better, overall, it beats out APOCALYPSE but not FIRST CLASS or DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The X-Men franchise started out well with the 2000 version and X2: X-MEN UNITED, and with the exception of the reboot FIRST CLASS, the franchise (outside of DEADPOOL and LOGAN) has not put out a quality product. I will miss some of the cast as I've always loved Michael Fassbender as Magneto and James McAvoy as Professor X, but I am glad to see Marvel finally with their property back and hope they wait a couple of years before rolling out their version, which I'm sure is the best we'll get and what fans have been waiting years to see! 6/10
Octavia Spencer gives a creepy and enjoyable performance but other than her, this movie is very bland. Storyline is pretty weak and I kept waiting for something to happen and it doesn't really until the last 15 minutes or so of the film. More of a suspense than horror film. 5.5/10
X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX
A mulligan from the 2006 version and while this was better, overall, it beats out APOCALYPSE but not FIRST CLASS or DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The X-Men franchise started out well with the 2000 version and X2: X-MEN UNITED, and with the exception of the reboot FIRST CLASS, the franchise (outside of DEADPOOL and LOGAN) has not put out a quality product. I will miss some of the cast as I've always loved Michael Fassbender as Magneto and James McAvoy as Professor X, but I am glad to see Marvel finally with their property back and hope they wait a couple of years before rolling out their version, which I'm sure is the best we'll get and what fans have been waiting years to see! 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/19 09:56 PM
"15:17 to Paris":
This movie, directed by Clint Eastwood, is about the three US servicemen, friends since childhood, who in 2015 bravely thwarted an armed terrorist intent on staging a massacre on a French train. It stars the three actual servicemen. It's a good story, but since the action and aftermath are brief, it has to flit back and forth, annoyingly, between their rather maladjusted childhood and the actual event. The movie doesn't bend over backwards to portray them as heroes, just as guys who reacted bravely and effectively. Francois Hollande, then President of France, spoke very eloquently in a ceremony honoring them. Not a bad movie if you can get through the early scenes, which take up most of the film.
This movie, directed by Clint Eastwood, is about the three US servicemen, friends since childhood, who in 2015 bravely thwarted an armed terrorist intent on staging a massacre on a French train. It stars the three actual servicemen. It's a good story, but since the action and aftermath are brief, it has to flit back and forth, annoyingly, between their rather maladjusted childhood and the actual event. The movie doesn't bend over backwards to portray them as heroes, just as guys who reacted bravely and effectively. Francois Hollande, then President of France, spoke very eloquently in a ceremony honoring them. Not a bad movie if you can get through the early scenes, which take up most of the film.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/19 01:05 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MA
Octavia Spencer gives a creepy and enjoyable performance but other than her, this movie is very bland. Storyline is pretty weak and I kept waiting for something to happen and it doesn't really until the last 15 minutes or so of the film. More of a suspense than horror film. 5.5/10
X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX
A mulligan from the 2006 version and while this was better, overall, it beats out APOCALYPSE but not FIRST CLASS or DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The X-Men franchise started out well with the 2000 version and X2: X-MEN UNITED, and with the exception of the reboot FIRST CLASS, the franchise (outside of DEADPOOL and LOGAN) has not put out a quality product. I will miss some of the cast as I've always loved Michael Fassbender as Magneto and James McAvoy as Professor X, but I am glad to see Marvel finally with their property back and hope they wait a couple of years before rolling out their version, which I'm sure is the best we'll get and what fans have been waiting years to see! 6/10
Octavia Spencer gives a creepy and enjoyable performance but other than her, this movie is very bland. Storyline is pretty weak and I kept waiting for something to happen and it doesn't really until the last 15 minutes or so of the film. More of a suspense than horror film. 5.5/10
X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX
A mulligan from the 2006 version and while this was better, overall, it beats out APOCALYPSE but not FIRST CLASS or DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The X-Men franchise started out well with the 2000 version and X2: X-MEN UNITED, and with the exception of the reboot FIRST CLASS, the franchise (outside of DEADPOOL and LOGAN) has not put out a quality product. I will miss some of the cast as I've always loved Michael Fassbender as Magneto and James McAvoy as Professor X, but I am glad to see Marvel finally with their property back and hope they wait a couple of years before rolling out their version, which I'm sure is the best we'll get and what fans have been waiting years to see! 6/10
Will see if it ends up on the list.
Thanks for the reviews i12
Originally Posted by Turnbull
"15:17 to Paris":
This movie, directed by Clint Eastwood, is about the three US servicemen, friends since childhood, who in 2015 bravely thwarted an armed terrorist intent on staging a massacre on a French train. It stars the three actual servicemen. It's a good story, but since the action and aftermath are brief, it has to flit back and forth, annoyingly, between their rather maladjusted childhood and the actual event. The movie doesn't bend over backwards to portray them as heroes, just as guys who reacted bravely and effectively. Francois Hollande, then President of France, spoke very eloquently in a ceremony honoring them. Not a bad movie if you can get through the early scenes, which take up most of the film.
This movie, directed by Clint Eastwood, is about the three US servicemen, friends since childhood, who in 2015 bravely thwarted an armed terrorist intent on staging a massacre on a French train. It stars the three actual servicemen. It's a good story, but since the action and aftermath are brief, it has to flit back and forth, annoyingly, between their rather maladjusted childhood and the actual event. The movie doesn't bend over backwards to portray them as heroes, just as guys who reacted bravely and effectively. Francois Hollande, then President of France, spoke very eloquently in a ceremony honoring them. Not a bad movie if you can get through the early scenes, which take up most of the film.
Wife and I saw this on our new streaming device, very good movie. It staring the actual Service men was amazing.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/19 01:52 PM
CHILD'S PLAY
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/19 10:10 PM
ANNA
Luc Besson is back which can only mean one thing: women kicking ass! Another enjoyable film for his repertoire with an introduction (at least for me) to Sasha Luss who stars as Anna. A beautiful girl who plays both the Russians and Americans between 1985-1990 as a Russian spy. My only beef with the film is the continuous back-and-forth with the timeline. However, coming so soon after JOHN WICK, this is another enjoyable action film that I'm sure won't make a lot of noise at the box office unfortunately. 6/10
Luc Besson is back which can only mean one thing: women kicking ass! Another enjoyable film for his repertoire with an introduction (at least for me) to Sasha Luss who stars as Anna. A beautiful girl who plays both the Russians and Americans between 1985-1990 as a Russian spy. My only beef with the film is the continuous back-and-forth with the timeline. However, coming so soon after JOHN WICK, this is another enjoyable action film that I'm sure won't make a lot of noise at the box office unfortunately. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/19 10:34 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
CHILD'S PLAY
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
Yeah. I'll be giving this one a miss. Doll looks awful.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/22/19 03:02 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
CHILD'S PLAY
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
A terrible remake. After it was over I asked myself, "what did I just watch?" I was never huge into the franchise and I understand how the story shows our growing over reliance on technology. Even though I'm typically not a fan of child actors, Gabriel Bateman really was the only person to do a decent job. Aubrey Plaza was her usual airhead self, with very little to contribute to the film. Mark Hamill even seemed to phone it in as the voice of Chucky. His performance felt like it was done in 1 afternoon session. And the mechanical doll itself (not the CGI) was awful and the look was just off. 4/10
Yeah. I'll be giving this one a miss. Doll looks awful.
You're a smarter man then me
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/19 05:54 PM
ANNABELLE COMES HOME
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/19 12:52 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ANNABELLE COMES HOME
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Thanks i12,,,,, wife will have me searching for this on the streaming device once its uploaded.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/19 05:06 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ANNABELLE COMES HOME
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Thanks i12,,,,, wife will have me searching for this on the streaming device once its uploaded.
That'll be your best bet. I wouldn't waste my time or money on it at the theaters personally.
YESTERDAY
A touching tribute from director Danny Boyle to the Fab Four (plus an interesting premise). A world where no one had ever heard of The Beatles, except for Jack Malik (played by Himesh Patel), after being involved in an accident, wakes up to just such a world. Struggling with his own music career, he plagiarizes The Beatles songs to finally make a name for himself. However, over the course of the film, he must choose between the feelings his has for his long time friend and former manager Ellie (played by Lily James) and his successful music career. A very touching moment towards the end of the film that I won't spoil. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/19 05:01 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ANNABELLE COMES HOME
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Probably the best of the trilogy but that's not saying much. A few misdirection's to keep the audience guessing on the jump scares. Like any movie within this series there is a few but felt the pace was slower than it maybe should have been. It's always great to see Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga sink back into their roles as the Warrens. Even young Mckenna Grace as their daughter Judy Warren showed some range for such a young actress. Other than that, just as with every spin-off within the Conjuring Universe, it didn't do it for me. 5.5/10
Thanks i12,,,,, wife will have me searching for this on the streaming device once its uploaded.
That'll be your best bet. I wouldn't waste my time or money on it at the theaters personally.
YESTERDAY
A touching tribute from director Danny Boyle to the Fab Four (plus an interesting premise). A world where no one had ever heard of The Beatles, except for Jack Malik (played by Himesh Patel), after being involved in an accident, wakes up to just such a world. Struggling with his own music career, he plagiarizes The Beatles songs to finally make a name for himself. However, over the course of the film, he must choose between the feelings his has for his long time friend and former manager Ellie (played by Lily James) and his successful music career. A very touching moment towards the end of the film that I won't spoil. 6/10
Interesting,,, I am looking forward t seeing this so its on my list.
Was hoping it would score higher than a 6.
Thanks i12. Happy Birthday tomorrow Bud, have a great Day.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/19 05:06 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
US
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Saw this last night.... your 5.5 was very generous.
Wife enjoyed it but seamed slow and confusing to me.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/30/19 04:35 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
US
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Expectations were high going in to this after Jordan Peele knocked his debut out of the park with GET OUT. And while the latter story has an element of suspension of disbelief to it in order for it to work, the same is true for US. However, this is one I could not buy in to. In GET OUT the element of the story that required buying in too was rather small and almost insignificant in the grander scheme of the film. With US, so much of the story was built upon this suspension that if you didn't buy in to it, you're going to have a bad time. I applaud Peele for his originality and I'm glad to see him devoting so much time to the horror genre and his attempts to bring fresh material to the table. I just hope he isn't a victim of his own success and he can develop a film more in tune with his first outing, as this was not a worthy successor in my opinion. 5.5/10
Saw this last night.... your 5.5 was very generous.
Wife enjoyed it but seamed slow and confusing to me.
I was disappointed with it. Especially after Peele's initial film GET OUT was so great. This was not a great follow-up in my opinion.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/19 03:21 PM
SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
The official end of Phase 3 for the MCU went out with a bang. This is a very worthy follow-up to 2017's SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING. I really enjoyed Jake Gyllenhaal's performance as Quentin Beck/Mysterio. His charisma oozes through every scene he's in. Zendaya is a good Mary Jane, but after 2 movies, I'm still unsure how I feel about her "awkward" take on the character. The movie is probably best served when Peter and Ned (Jacob Batalon) are bantering back-and-forth (or Peter and Happy for that matter). The movie clocks in at a little over 2 hours but it doesn't drag and the pacing and action keep you entertained throughout. Just as good, if not better than HOMECOMING. 7/10
The official end of Phase 3 for the MCU went out with a bang. This is a very worthy follow-up to 2017's SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING. I really enjoyed Jake Gyllenhaal's performance as Quentin Beck/Mysterio. His charisma oozes through every scene he's in. Zendaya is a good Mary Jane, but after 2 movies, I'm still unsure how I feel about her "awkward" take on the character. The movie is probably best served when Peter and Ned (Jacob Batalon) are bantering back-and-forth (or Peter and Happy for that matter). The movie clocks in at a little over 2 hours but it doesn't drag and the pacing and action keep you entertained throughout. Just as good, if not better than HOMECOMING. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/19 04:51 PM
MIDSOMMAR
A lot to unpack with this one. It took me some time after watching it to really absorb it. And while it's definitely original and in some parts, a little "out there," I did overall enjoy it. Not as good as HEREDITARY in my opinion but a better follow-up than say Jordan Peele's US after GET OUT. This will probably not be for everybody so I'll say if you enjoyed HEREDITARY, you should enjoy this as well. And don't fear the runtime of 2 hours and 27 minutes. The story keeps you hooked throughout, wondering what'll happen next that you won't notice it. 7.5/10
A lot to unpack with this one. It took me some time after watching it to really absorb it. And while it's definitely original and in some parts, a little "out there," I did overall enjoy it. Not as good as HEREDITARY in my opinion but a better follow-up than say Jordan Peele's US after GET OUT. This will probably not be for everybody so I'll say if you enjoyed HEREDITARY, you should enjoy this as well. And don't fear the runtime of 2 hours and 27 minutes. The story keeps you hooked throughout, wondering what'll happen next that you won't notice it. 7.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/19 08:09 PM
MAFIOSO (1962)
Nino Badalamenti (Alberto Sordi) left his small hometown in Sicily for a job at the Fiat plant in Milan. Now he's a successful manager, with a blond Northern wife Marta and two blond little girls. He returns to Sicily after eight years to introduce them to his family. Director Alberto Lattuada brilliantly shows the cultural clashes between Marta and her Sicilian in-laws, in many howlingly funny scenes. Nino, carefree and happily reveling in his native habitat, gets a rude awakening when Don Vincenzo Ugo Attanasio), the local Mafia gabboletto to whom Nino is beholden, asks for a deadly favor in return. "Mafioso" is in the great tradition of postwar Italian cinema, mixing comedy and brutality while never losing humanity. Sordi, often called the Italian Peter Sellers, is never less than perfect. So is Attanasio and everyone else. Outstanding!
Nino Badalamenti (Alberto Sordi) left his small hometown in Sicily for a job at the Fiat plant in Milan. Now he's a successful manager, with a blond Northern wife Marta and two blond little girls. He returns to Sicily after eight years to introduce them to his family. Director Alberto Lattuada brilliantly shows the cultural clashes between Marta and her Sicilian in-laws, in many howlingly funny scenes. Nino, carefree and happily reveling in his native habitat, gets a rude awakening when Don Vincenzo Ugo Attanasio), the local Mafia gabboletto to whom Nino is beholden, asks for a deadly favor in return. "Mafioso" is in the great tradition of postwar Italian cinema, mixing comedy and brutality while never losing humanity. Sordi, often called the Italian Peter Sellers, is never less than perfect. So is Attanasio and everyone else. Outstanding!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/19 02:55 AM
We watched Peppermint
2018 flick
Jennifer Gardner
We really enjoyed it.
6.5 out of 10 for me DW gave it a 4 out of five....for some reason she likes to score on the 0-5 scale.
2018 flick
Jennifer Gardner
We really enjoyed it.
6.5 out of 10 for me DW gave it a 4 out of five....for some reason she likes to score on the 0-5 scale.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/19 03:11 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
GLASS
I saw this last night and I absolutely loved it! I didn't read any reviews going in to it but I heard they weren't positive. I really don't understand why? The story was incredibly strong and engaging. The cast was all top notch. Shyamalan always has his twist at the end (which in this case, was actually 2). Definitely better than SPLIT and as good, if not better, than UNBREAKABLE. I'm sure the story will end here but if Shyamalan decided he wanted to continue it, I'd be down for some more. I know it's too early in the year but I could see this being in my Top 10 all year, or worst case scenario, an honorable mention by years end. Go see it! 7.5/10
I saw this last night and I absolutely loved it! I didn't read any reviews going in to it but I heard they weren't positive. I really don't understand why? The story was incredibly strong and engaging. The cast was all top notch. Shyamalan always has his twist at the end (which in this case, was actually 2). Definitely better than SPLIT and as good, if not better, than UNBREAKABLE. I'm sure the story will end here but if Shyamalan decided he wanted to continue it, I'd be down for some more. I know it's too early in the year but I could see this being in my Top 10 all year, or worst case scenario, an honorable mention by years end. Go see it! 7.5/10
This was our second movie this evening and we also enjoyed it, that dude with 23 personalities was amazing.
And Bruce... my goodness, that last shot of him. We were pissed.
Very rare when we watch a movie that we enjoy and appreciate every characters role and performance.
Gripping Ending
Great Movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/19 08:39 PM
Glad you enjoyed both DP!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/19 01:24 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you enjoyed both DP!
We really did and spoke of it all day.
Today we watched Hotel Mumbai , crazie people in this world.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/19 05:29 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you enjoyed both DP!
We really did and spoke of it all day.
Today we watched Hotel Mumbai , crazie people in this world.
Yes, very sad movie. What did you think of it?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/19 03:16 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you enjoyed both DP!
We really did and spoke of it all day.
Today we watched Hotel Mumbai , crazie people in this world.
Yes, very sad movie. What did you think of it?
I like that it teaches as well as showing the Horror of extremists.
Scary to see how people could loose their faith so quickly but also great to see it shows how many more people of all religions have humanity for all.
We score it a 7
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/19 03:40 AM
BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY (2018)
In this mildly entertaining (but highly touted) movie, Rami Malek plays Freddie Mercury, starting with his first interest in music, through his career with Queen and their reuniting for the Live Aid concert in '85, with a lot of focus on Mercury's transition from hetero, to bi to gay. As played skillfully by Rami Malek, Mercury comes across as a selfish, self-centered prick, but then again, so are most real-life rock stars. The music is good, especially the Live Aid stuff. Don't know what all the fuss was about.
In this mildly entertaining (but highly touted) movie, Rami Malek plays Freddie Mercury, starting with his first interest in music, through his career with Queen and their reuniting for the Live Aid concert in '85, with a lot of focus on Mercury's transition from hetero, to bi to gay. As played skillfully by Rami Malek, Mercury comes across as a selfish, self-centered prick, but then again, so are most real-life rock stars. The music is good, especially the Live Aid stuff. Don't know what all the fuss was about.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/19 05:36 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you enjoyed both DP!
We really did and spoke of it all day.
Today we watched Hotel Mumbai , crazie people in this world.
Yes, very sad movie. What did you think of it?
I like that it teaches as well as showing the Horror of extremists.
Scary to see how people could loose their faith so quickly but also great to see it shows how many more people of all religions have humanity for all.
We score it a 7
Yes, it was very good. Very sad but as you said, also shows the deeper site to extremists.
Turnbull, I loved BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY. It was one of my favorite movies of 2018. Thought Malek knocked it out of the park as Mercury and glad he won an Oscar for it!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/19 07:25 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Turnbull, I loved BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY. It was one of my favorite movies of 2018. Thought Malek knocked it out of the park as Mercury and glad he won an Oscar for it!
Yes, he was very good, Irishman, even down to the teeth. I read that Mercury had four extra teeth..."warts and all" I guess.
BTW: Every year, we read in the newspapers that some religious high school's graduating class chooses "We Are the Champions" for their class song. The clergyman who's the principal bans it because Mercury was gay and died of AIDS. Then the graduating class erupts in protests, boycotts, violence, etc. It's almost as if it was scripted.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/12/19 03:39 PM
STUBER
A decent buddy comedy. Bautista is known for his awkwardness and comedy and this further displays it (glad he's been able to transition from wrestling so successfully). Kumail Nanjiani is a great partner and while I found the film mildly funny, the rest is pretty forgettable. A nice (surprise, at least to me) cameo to open up the film (without spoiling it, someone who Bautista's worked with a few times before). This is definitely a pass in the theaters. Catch it at Redbox or when it's available to stream. 5.5/10
A decent buddy comedy. Bautista is known for his awkwardness and comedy and this further displays it (glad he's been able to transition from wrestling so successfully). Kumail Nanjiani is a great partner and while I found the film mildly funny, the rest is pretty forgettable. A nice (surprise, at least to me) cameo to open up the film (without spoiling it, someone who Bautista's worked with a few times before). This is definitely a pass in the theaters. Catch it at Redbox or when it's available to stream. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/12/19 06:20 PM
STALIN (1992)
This HBO movie features Robert Duvall in the title role. He puts in another great performance, but is so heavily made up to look like Stalin that it masks most of his facial expressions. This enormous (172 minutes), sprawling epic zeroes in on Stalin's personal relations with family and associates--in all of his paranoia, cruelty and sadism. The narration alludes to the brutality he inflicted on the Soviet Union, but wisely doesn't try to depict it. Duvall is supported by an excellent international cast, including Maximilian Schell, Jeroan Krabbe, Joan Plowright and Jim Carter, to name just a few. Stalin as portrayed here loved his wife Nadia (Julia Ormond in a fine performance) and his daughter Svetlana, but no one else. We also get good portrayals of all the Bolsheviks around him: Beria, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Kaganovitch, Khrushchev, Ordzokinidze, Kirov, Bukharin--but most of them killed by their boss. The filming, in Hungary and Russia, is splendid.
This HBO movie features Robert Duvall in the title role. He puts in another great performance, but is so heavily made up to look like Stalin that it masks most of his facial expressions. This enormous (172 minutes), sprawling epic zeroes in on Stalin's personal relations with family and associates--in all of his paranoia, cruelty and sadism. The narration alludes to the brutality he inflicted on the Soviet Union, but wisely doesn't try to depict it. Duvall is supported by an excellent international cast, including Maximilian Schell, Jeroan Krabbe, Joan Plowright and Jim Carter, to name just a few. Stalin as portrayed here loved his wife Nadia (Julia Ormond in a fine performance) and his daughter Svetlana, but no one else. We also get good portrayals of all the Bolsheviks around him: Beria, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Kaganovitch, Khrushchev, Ordzokinidze, Kirov, Bukharin--but most of them killed by their boss. The filming, in Hungary and Russia, is splendid.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/19 02:35 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
STUBER
A decent buddy comedy. Bautista is known for his awkwardness and comedy and this further displays it (glad he's been able to transition from wrestling so successfully). Kumail Nanjiani is a great partner and while I found the film mildly funny, the rest is pretty forgettable. A nice (surprise, at least to me) cameo to open up the film (without spoiling it, someone who Bautista's worked with a few times before). This is definitely a pass in the theaters. Catch it at Redbox or when it's available to stream. 5.5/10
A decent buddy comedy. Bautista is known for his awkwardness and comedy and this further displays it (glad he's been able to transition from wrestling so successfully). Kumail Nanjiani is a great partner and while I found the film mildly funny, the rest is pretty forgettable. A nice (surprise, at least to me) cameo to open up the film (without spoiling it, someone who Bautista's worked with a few times before). This is definitely a pass in the theaters. Catch it at Redbox or when it's available to stream. 5.5/10
Thanks i12
Originally Posted by Turnbull
STALIN (1992)
This HBO movie features Robert Duvall in the title role. He puts in another great performance, but is so heavily made up to look like Stalin that it masks most of his facial expressions. This enormous (172 minutes), sprawling epic zeroes in on Stalin's personal relations with family and associates--in all of his paranoia, cruelty and sadism. The narration alludes to the brutality he inflicted on the Soviet Union, but wisely doesn't try to depict it. Duvall is supported by an excellent international cast, including Maximilian Schell, Jeroan Krabbe, Joan Plowright and Jim Carter, to name just a few. Stalin as portrayed here loved his wife Nadia (Julia Ormond in a fine performance) and his daughter Svetlana, but no one else. We also get good portrayals of all the Bolsheviks around him: Beria, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Kaganovitch, Khrushchev, Ordzokinidze, Kirov, Bukharin--but most of them killed by their boss. The filming, in Hungary and Russia, is splendid.
This HBO movie features Robert Duvall in the title role. He puts in another great performance, but is so heavily made up to look like Stalin that it masks most of his facial expressions. This enormous (172 minutes), sprawling epic zeroes in on Stalin's personal relations with family and associates--in all of his paranoia, cruelty and sadism. The narration alludes to the brutality he inflicted on the Soviet Union, but wisely doesn't try to depict it. Duvall is supported by an excellent international cast, including Maximilian Schell, Jeroan Krabbe, Joan Plowright and Jim Carter, to name just a few. Stalin as portrayed here loved his wife Nadia (Julia Ormond in a fine performance) and his daughter Svetlana, but no one else. We also get good portrayals of all the Bolsheviks around him: Beria, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Kaganovitch, Khrushchev, Ordzokinidze, Kirov, Bukharin--but most of them killed by their boss. The filming, in Hungary and Russia, is splendid.
This is on the Top of my list for HBO view soon.
Thanks T.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/19 03:04 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BRIGHTBURN
The evil Superman. I really enjoyed this opposite end of the spectrum take on the tale of Superman. Crashing in Kansas from another world, Brandon Breyer, uses his powers not for good, but rather for bad intentions, once he realizes his potential and gets his first taste of killing. I typically don't like child/teenage actors as I find them annoying more often than not. However, Jackson A. Dunn who stars as Brandon, does a tremendous job with his characters arc from start to finish. This probably won't make much noise at the box office, but if you're in to horror or superhero films, I recommend this! 7.5/10
GODZILLA: KING OF THE MONSTERS
I wasn't a huge fan of 2014's GODZILLA, but the trailer and special effects for the sequel had my interest. Overall, I felt about the sequel much the same I felt about the first one: the storyline was meh but the effects were good. So depending on how you enjoyed the 2014 installment, will determine how you enjoy this year's release. 6/10
The evil Superman. I really enjoyed this opposite end of the spectrum take on the tale of Superman. Crashing in Kansas from another world, Brandon Breyer, uses his powers not for good, but rather for bad intentions, once he realizes his potential and gets his first taste of killing. I typically don't like child/teenage actors as I find them annoying more often than not. However, Jackson A. Dunn who stars as Brandon, does a tremendous job with his characters arc from start to finish. This probably won't make much noise at the box office, but if you're in to horror or superhero films, I recommend this! 7.5/10
GODZILLA: KING OF THE MONSTERS
I wasn't a huge fan of 2014's GODZILLA, but the trailer and special effects for the sequel had my interest. Overall, I felt about the sequel much the same I felt about the first one: the storyline was meh but the effects were good. So depending on how you enjoyed the 2014 installment, will determine how you enjoy this year's release. 6/10
Tried to stream both of these today but they did not load.
Will try again next week
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/19 02:27 AM
BRIGHTBURN loaded today and man did we enjoy it.
Great Recommendation i12
Wife loved it and scored it a 8
I’m with you and the 7.5 is fair.
Do not usually see movies that I want to watch again right away but this I do.
Great Recommendation i12
Wife loved it and scored it a 8
I’m with you and the 7.5 is fair.
Do not usually see movies that I want to watch again right away but this I do.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/19 02:35 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Solid six, well....i was planning on this next but she changed her mind and wants to see US this week.
I may be able to watch some better movies soon as well since Ive decided to pull the trigger and get a streaming box, will keep cable as well but will have much more options.
Nice. What did you get? I wouldn't mind cutting the cord since I only watch a few channels, but there's some shows I don't believe are available on demand, so that's 1 reason I haven't done it yet.
Go Surf†device..... it could cut the cord but a bit unreliable for the wife,,,, fine for me.
Some stuff loads perfectly , some do not..... its a learning curve and requires a lot of searching but once you know where to go , its really great fun and a eye opener.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/19 04:28 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
BRIGHTBURN loaded today and man did we enjoy it.
Great Recommendation i12
Wife loved it and scored it a 8
I’m with you and the 7.5 is fair.
Do not usually see movies that I want to watch again right away but this I do.
Great Recommendation i12
Wife loved it and scored it a 8
I’m with you and the 7.5 is fair.
Do not usually see movies that I want to watch again right away but this I do.
Glad you enjoyed it DP! It didn't make a lot of noise at the box office unfortunately, but I did like the different take on the Superman character. Interesting stuff.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/19 04:29 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HOTEL MUMBAI was a difficult film to watch at times. Overstayed it's welcome a little bit (runtime of 122 minutes). The Armie Hammer storyline was hamfisted in to the story, which honestly, could have been done without and still come off just as good. 6/10
Solid six, well....i was planning on this next but she changed her mind and wants to see US this week.
I may be able to watch some better movies soon as well since Ive decided to pull the trigger and get a streaming box, will keep cable as well but will have much more options.
Nice. What did you get? I wouldn't mind cutting the cord since I only watch a few channels, but there's some shows I don't believe are available on demand, so that's 1 reason I haven't done it yet.
Go Surf†device..... it could cut the cord but a bit unreliable for the wife,,,, fine for me.
Some stuff loads perfectly , some do not..... its a learning curve and requires a lot of searching but once you know where to go , its really great fun and a eye opener.
Yeah I've seen those before. I'm not sure I have the patience for them. Don't know which movies work and which ones don't. It's great when it works but frustrating when it doesn't.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/19 02:13 AM
Spot on i12
I dig it, since I only use it when nothing else on however the TV Guide ( live Tv ) app works great.
I dig it, since I only use it when nothing else on however the TV Guide ( live Tv ) app works great.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/19/19 05:13 PM
THE LION KING
In the same vein as the other Disney adaptations. If you liked any of them or the animated version of this, you're going to like the movie. I'm really happy they got James Earl Jones back to voice Mufasa but was disappointed they didn't get Jeremy Irons back for Scar (his menacing voice was definitely missing and no offense to Chiwetel Ejiofor, but I just felt his version of Scar wasn't evil enough for this villain). My favorite characters/actors were either John Oliver as Zazu or Seth Rogen as Pumbaa. And as always, the CGI and special FX are top notch. They did a really wonderful job bringing these characters to life! 6/10
In the same vein as the other Disney adaptations. If you liked any of them or the animated version of this, you're going to like the movie. I'm really happy they got James Earl Jones back to voice Mufasa but was disappointed they didn't get Jeremy Irons back for Scar (his menacing voice was definitely missing and no offense to Chiwetel Ejiofor, but I just felt his version of Scar wasn't evil enough for this villain). My favorite characters/actors were either John Oliver as Zazu or Seth Rogen as Pumbaa. And as always, the CGI and special FX are top notch. They did a really wonderful job bringing these characters to life! 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/19 03:58 PM
ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/19 01:38 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
WOW...... 7
I was not planning on seeing this but will check it out being you gave it a 7
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/19 07:30 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
My most eagerly anticipated movie of the year and I was a little disappointed with it. Not Tarantino's best but far from his worse either. The soundtrack wasn't as catchy overall (still had some gems but from top-to-bottom his soundtracks are usually top notch). Leo absolutely stole the show and continues to show why he's one of the finest actors working today. Brad did an excellent job complimenting him as well and their screen time together at times made the movie. Margot was a delicate flower throughout and was glad Tarantino humanized her. Unfortunately, due to the nature of her death she's viewed as a victim whereas this role gave her life. A very beautiful love letter by Quentin to the Hollywood of yesteryear. I'll check it out in theaters again! 7/10
WOW...... 7
I was not planning on seeing this but will check it out being you gave it a 7
It's Tarantino. I count down the days until his next film. Originally I gave it a 6.5, but when I saw I gave THE LION KING a 6 last week, I bumped this up to a 7.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/19 02:06 AM
Gotcha.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/19 06:13 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Gotcha.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Enjoy and as always, let me know what you think about them.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/19 04:18 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Gotcha.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Thanks i12
Hope to catch a few flicks this week.
Enjoy and as always, let me know what you think about them.
Will do, my local news station Critic ( Sandy Kenyon ) - hammered the Tarentino flick.
I never heard him trash any movie so bad and would not even rate it with also stating to save your money.
I'll check it out though.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/02/19 09:52 PM
FAST & FURIOUS PRESENTS: HOBBS & SHAW
I'll start out by saying that I am not a fan of the FAST & FURIOUS franchise, but since this was a spin-off and it features both Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham, I took a flier on it. Statham and Johnson work well together, feeding off of each other in every scene and their banter is very enjoyable. The jokes are hit and miss though. Idris Elba did a nice job as the baddie and while the special effects were good, some of the action was over the top (I know, for spin-off of the FAST & FURIOUS franchise, surprise, right?). Some of it I didn't mind but some of it I thought took away from the movie honestly (see the final showdown between our heroes and the villain). A few good chase and fight scenes make this an enjoyable summer popcorn flick. 6/10
I'll start out by saying that I am not a fan of the FAST & FURIOUS franchise, but since this was a spin-off and it features both Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham, I took a flier on it. Statham and Johnson work well together, feeding off of each other in every scene and their banter is very enjoyable. The jokes are hit and miss though. Idris Elba did a nice job as the baddie and while the special effects were good, some of the action was over the top (I know, for spin-off of the FAST & FURIOUS franchise, surprise, right?). Some of it I didn't mind but some of it I thought took away from the movie honestly (see the final showdown between our heroes and the villain). A few good chase and fight scenes make this an enjoyable summer popcorn flick. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/19 09:58 PM
BLADE RUNNER 2049
I hated this movie when I saw it in the theater, both because it fell so far short of the original, and because the soundtrack was so loud that it was painful, even with ear plugs. I liked it even less when I borrowed a DVD from our library. But, I downloaded a hi-def version from HBO to my computer and burned a disc. I like it better.
The first hour or so is pretty good. Ryan Gosling makes a very effective late-model replicant, with just enough human features to make him appealing, but not quite human. There's a terrific fight in the beginning as he "retires" a leftover Nexus 8, and a charming interlude with his virtual girlfriend. His boss, "Madame," reminds me of Lotte Lenya as Rosa Klebb in "From Russia with Love." The special effects, although not as bright, sparkling and subtle as in the original, are pretty good.
But then it just falls apart. You already know, in the first 20 minutes, what the denouement is going to be. And, it takes a long time to get there. The special effects collapse into something like a 21st Century Aushwicz. . Worse, it's b-o-r-i-n-g. I watch the first hour regularly, but can't steel myself to get past that.
I hated this movie when I saw it in the theater, both because it fell so far short of the original, and because the soundtrack was so loud that it was painful, even with ear plugs. I liked it even less when I borrowed a DVD from our library. But, I downloaded a hi-def version from HBO to my computer and burned a disc. I like it better.
The first hour or so is pretty good. Ryan Gosling makes a very effective late-model replicant, with just enough human features to make him appealing, but not quite human. There's a terrific fight in the beginning as he "retires" a leftover Nexus 8, and a charming interlude with his virtual girlfriend. His boss, "Madame," reminds me of Lotte Lenya as Rosa Klebb in "From Russia with Love." The special effects, although not as bright, sparkling and subtle as in the original, are pretty good.
But then it just falls apart. You already know, in the first 20 minutes, what the denouement is going to be. And, it takes a long time to get there. The special effects collapse into something like a 21st Century Aushwicz. . Worse, it's b-o-r-i-n-g. I watch the first hour regularly, but can't steel myself to get past that.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/08/19 06:35 PM
I agree TB, I found it boring as well. I've only seen it once (in theaters) but I wasn't excited for it to come out either. I'm not a huge BLADE RUNNER fan (the original or this but the original is definitely better).
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/09/19 12:42 AM
Irishman, have you ever seen Event Horizon? I've been meaning to watch it for a long time and have it downloaded. I'm curious about your thoughts on it. A lot of gory stuff was excised from the movie because "audiences wouldn't be able to handle it" and will never see the light of day because the footage has been lost. From the bits and pieces I've watched on YouTube it looks like a bit of an underrated gem.
I hear that there are plans to adapt it into a TV series.
I hear that there are plans to adapt it into a TV series.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/09/19 05:46 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Irishman, have you ever seen Event Horizon? I've been meaning to watch it for a long time and have it downloaded. I'm curious about your thoughts on it. A lot of gory stuff was excised from the movie because "audiences wouldn't be able to handle it" and will never see the light of day because the footage has been lost. From the bits and pieces I've watched on YouTube it looks like a bit of an underrated gem.
I hear that there are plans to adapt it into a TV series.
I hear that there are plans to adapt it into a TV series.
No, I've never seen it. Sorry.
SCARY STORIES TO TELL IN THE DARK
I'll start off by saying I'm not a Guillermo del Toro fan. There's nothing the man has done that I've seen that I've enjoyed. And while I understand he helped write the screenplay and didn't direct this, add this one to the list. I applaud the way they were able to incorporate these small stories into a cohesive film; however, about 30 minutes in I was bored with it and waiting for the credits to roll. I'm a little surprised they were able to get away with some of the language in the film as it's rated PG-13, but do yourself the favor and steer clear of this. 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/09/19 06:25 PM
LE DOULOS (1962)
The French movie industry excels in film noir, and this is a hard-breathing but very confusing entry. Silien (Jean Paul Belmondo in a very restrained performance) is a two faced crook who's pals with gangsters and is an informant for his best pal, who's a police inspector. But, it turns out that all the crooks are two-faced, including Maurice (Serge Reggiani), a just-released-from-prison perp who was aided, and set up, by Silien. Directed by Jean-Pierre Melville, this movie has most of the makings of good film noire: starkly lit B&W photography, terse dialog, no heroes, etc. The plot, though, is hard on the mind, and, in typically cynical French tradition, they all die by each others' hands at the end. I though it was pretty good, but it was tough going.
The French movie industry excels in film noir, and this is a hard-breathing but very confusing entry. Silien (Jean Paul Belmondo in a very restrained performance) is a two faced crook who's pals with gangsters and is an informant for his best pal, who's a police inspector. But, it turns out that all the crooks are two-faced, including Maurice (Serge Reggiani), a just-released-from-prison perp who was aided, and set up, by Silien. Directed by Jean-Pierre Melville, this movie has most of the makings of good film noire: starkly lit B&W photography, terse dialog, no heroes, etc. The plot, though, is hard on the mind, and, in typically cynical French tradition, they all die by each others' hands at the end. I though it was pretty good, but it was tough going.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/10/19 08:35 AM
Moe, Event Horizon is a good horror movie.
I caught a double feature. Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark, the best thing about this movie is the Pale Lady. The movie to me acts as a jumping off point for people being introduced into the horror genre. So many stereotypes, with some of the actors pulling off their roles that it's kind of like swatting away a fly. I give it 5.
The next movie was A score to Settle. This one stars Nicholas Cage. I suggest you wait for it to come DVD BlueRey. A mob enforcer does 20 years then gets out due a health issue, goes after his former partners, while trying to get close to his kid to reconnect. 4/10
I caught a double feature. Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark, the best thing about this movie is the Pale Lady. The movie to me acts as a jumping off point for people being introduced into the horror genre. So many stereotypes, with some of the actors pulling off their roles that it's kind of like swatting away a fly. I give it 5.
The next movie was A score to Settle. This one stars Nicholas Cage. I suggest you wait for it to come DVD BlueRey. A mob enforcer does 20 years then gets out due a health issue, goes after his former partners, while trying to get close to his kid to reconnect. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/10/19 07:12 PM
THE KITCHEN
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/11/19 12:48 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE KITCHEN
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
Yeah, this could have worked as a comedy like Johnny Dangerously.
LoL
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/11/19 09:43 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE KITCHEN
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
I'm a big Melissa McCarthy fan so almost anything with her will get me into the theater, and this had a couple of other good additions as well in Elisabeth Moss and Tiffany Haddish. Based on a comic book series, this story tells that of these 3 women who take over their husbands mob business while they serve a jail sentence. The story could have been better early on to flesh out the characters. Pretty early on in the film their husbands are sent away and they take over. However, my main issue with the film was believability. I wasn't buying that these women, in 1978 in Hell's Kitchen New York could muscle out the other men who were looking to take over for their husbands while they were gone. Short of walking tall with a confident look on their face, the story was clunky and Elisabeth Moss was really the only character to have an interesting character arc out of the 3. 5.5/10
Yeah, this could have worked as a comedy like Johnny Dangerously.
LoL
I was thinking more like GOTTI
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/16/19 03:36 AM
BOOGIE NIGHTS (1997)
Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg), short on brains but long on dong, is recruited to the adult film industry by big time director Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds). Adams becomes Dirk Diggler, and rises to the top of the porno ranks, only to descend into drug addiction, crime and general misery before being taken back by Horner. This very long (155 minutes) film moves along briskly, and though porn is the milieu, it's more about the "family" Horner creates around his movies and his home, with many gentle and comic touches. Wahlberg and Reynolds are excellent, and are ably supported by Don Cheadle, William H. Macy, Julianne Moore, Heather Graham, John C. Reilly and Luis Guzman. Very enjoyable.
Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg), short on brains but long on dong, is recruited to the adult film industry by big time director Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds). Adams becomes Dirk Diggler, and rises to the top of the porno ranks, only to descend into drug addiction, crime and general misery before being taken back by Horner. This very long (155 minutes) film moves along briskly, and though porn is the milieu, it's more about the "family" Horner creates around his movies and his home, with many gentle and comic touches. Wahlberg and Reynolds are excellent, and are ably supported by Don Cheadle, William H. Macy, Julianne Moore, Heather Graham, John C. Reilly and Luis Guzman. Very enjoyable.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/16/19 02:45 PM
GOOD BOYS
A great raunchy comedy that didn't disappoint. The 3 boys (Jacob Tremblay, Keith L. Williams and Brady Noon) worked well together and as an audience, you buy in that these 3 guys are friends. They come across as genuine towards each other and their different dynamics work well blended together during the show. For me, my favorite character was Lucas played by Keith L. Williams. This was my first time seeing his work but his character of Lucas is the straight and narrow, "I have to tell my parents everything" character that pairs beautifully against Tremblay's Max and Noon's Thor, who do everything in their power to hide their recent adventures from parental figures. 6/10
A great raunchy comedy that didn't disappoint. The 3 boys (Jacob Tremblay, Keith L. Williams and Brady Noon) worked well together and as an audience, you buy in that these 3 guys are friends. They come across as genuine towards each other and their different dynamics work well blended together during the show. For me, my favorite character was Lucas played by Keith L. Williams. This was my first time seeing his work but his character of Lucas is the straight and narrow, "I have to tell my parents everything" character that pairs beautifully against Tremblay's Max and Noon's Thor, who do everything in their power to hide their recent adventures from parental figures. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/21/19 02:34 PM
READY OR NOT
Going in to this I was a little apprehensive as I anticipated a let down. The story is simple enough from the previews where a newly wed bride (played by Samara Weaving) has to play a game with her new husband and his family on the night of their wedding. The game that's chosen is hide and seek and while at first she believes the game to be harmless, she quickly realizes his entire family is out to kill her to prevent a terrible curse if she survives until morning. An interesting story that keeps you engaged throughout, doesn't overstay it's welcome, doesn't have overly elaborate death scenes and also at times seems to beckon to a KILL BILL/I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE kinda vibe, which I dug. A great performance by start Samara Weaving. I liked her in Netflix's THE BABYSITTER but she took it up a notch with this and I look forward to seeing more from her. 6/10
Going in to this I was a little apprehensive as I anticipated a let down. The story is simple enough from the previews where a newly wed bride (played by Samara Weaving) has to play a game with her new husband and his family on the night of their wedding. The game that's chosen is hide and seek and while at first she believes the game to be harmless, she quickly realizes his entire family is out to kill her to prevent a terrible curse if she survives until morning. An interesting story that keeps you engaged throughout, doesn't overstay it's welcome, doesn't have overly elaborate death scenes and also at times seems to beckon to a KILL BILL/I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE kinda vibe, which I dug. A great performance by start Samara Weaving. I liked her in Netflix's THE BABYSITTER but she took it up a notch with this and I look forward to seeing more from her. 6/10
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/19 02:02 AM
Brightburn
As most people probably know this is a movie that imagines the origin story of an evil Superman whose alien powers, true purpose and malignant nature (this kid is the walking incarnation of the AD&D alignment of chaotic evil) don't become apparent until about twelve years after he's arrived on our planet and is seemingly undergoing puberty-or whatever the alien equivalent is. His adoptive mother (Elizabeth Banks) is the last to want to believe the worst of her son Brandon, but as the film makes clear with an extended classroom discussion of parasitic wasps and their various victims, Brandon is responding to his instincts and programming. There was likely not anything his adoptive parents could have done to not set him off eventually. This might have been more enjoyable if there had been some internal conflict on Brandon's part.
Richard Donner directed Superman and The Omen. Brightburn is a mashup of both of those films. This is low budget with a fair number of plot holes but it's not meant to be analyzed that deeply. It is very gory, or at least has some quite violent scenes. Those who can't tolerate extreme violence are cautioned.
As most people probably know this is a movie that imagines the origin story of an evil Superman whose alien powers, true purpose and malignant nature (this kid is the walking incarnation of the AD&D alignment of chaotic evil) don't become apparent until about twelve years after he's arrived on our planet and is seemingly undergoing puberty-or whatever the alien equivalent is. His adoptive mother (Elizabeth Banks) is the last to want to believe the worst of her son Brandon, but as the film makes clear with an extended classroom discussion of parasitic wasps and their various victims, Brandon is responding to his instincts and programming. There was likely not anything his adoptive parents could have done to not set him off eventually. This might have been more enjoyable if there had been some internal conflict on Brandon's part.
Richard Donner directed Superman and The Omen. Brightburn is a mashup of both of those films. This is low budget with a fair number of plot holes but it's not meant to be analyzed that deeply. It is very gory, or at least has some quite violent scenes. Those who can't tolerate extreme violence are cautioned.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/19 02:39 AM
Rated this flick high, very good
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/19 02:58 AM
BODY HEAT (1981)
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/30/19 05:31 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BODY HEAT (1981)
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
I remember this Movie..... I gotta turn my wife on to this.
Will do and see what she thinks , I think this is something she may enjoy.
Good pick up T
Thanks
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/31/19 07:52 PM
SECONDS (1966)
Arthur Hamilton, (John Randolph), a frustrated, 50-ish NYC banker contacts a mysterious company that arranges a stand-in death for him. After extensive plastic surgery and physical conditioning, he is "reborn" as Antiochus Wilson (Rock Hudson), a successful painter with a plush studio in Malibu. But, he's still unhappy until he falls for an attractive divorcee (Salome Jens), who turns out to be a company employee paid to make him happy. Crushed, he returns to NY, visits with his widow (as Wilson), gets an earful about Hamilton, and demands that the company give him another remake, which results in a nasty surprise. "Seconds" is John Frankenheimer's masterpiece--every middle aged man's fantasy/nightmare. All the performances are excellent, the supporting cast includes Wesley Addy, Jeff Corey, Will Geer, Frances Reid and Khigh (Wo Fat) Deigh, and the photography by James Wong Howe is brilliant. A masterpiece of suspense and tragedy.
Arthur Hamilton, (John Randolph), a frustrated, 50-ish NYC banker contacts a mysterious company that arranges a stand-in death for him. After extensive plastic surgery and physical conditioning, he is "reborn" as Antiochus Wilson (Rock Hudson), a successful painter with a plush studio in Malibu. But, he's still unhappy until he falls for an attractive divorcee (Salome Jens), who turns out to be a company employee paid to make him happy. Crushed, he returns to NY, visits with his widow (as Wilson), gets an earful about Hamilton, and demands that the company give him another remake, which results in a nasty surprise. "Seconds" is John Frankenheimer's masterpiece--every middle aged man's fantasy/nightmare. All the performances are excellent, the supporting cast includes Wesley Addy, Jeff Corey, Will Geer, Frances Reid and Khigh (Wo Fat) Deigh, and the photography by James Wong Howe is brilliant. A masterpiece of suspense and tragedy.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/01/19 01:25 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BODY HEAT (1981)
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
In this would-be modern film noir, mediocre but girl-chasing lawyer Ned Racine (Mumblemouth William Hurt) picks up rich, bored housewife Matty Walker (Kathleen Turner) and agrees to murder her rich, ruthless husband (Richard Crenna) to cash in on her inheritance. Of course , she's secretly playing him, but any resemblance with "Double Indemnity" and "The Postman Always Rings Twice" ends there because the movie is too slow-moving, and the ironies and traps are too contrived. Still, it's atmospheric, and it held our interest to the end. Not bad.
I liked Ted Danson's performance. Quirky.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/19 04:32 PM
BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE (2018)
It's 1969, and several guests, each with his/her secrets, arrive at the empty El Royale Hotel, on the border of California and Nevada. The two most straightforward stories belong to Doc O'Kelly (Jeff Bridges), posing as a priest, who wants to recover a stash of money he hid under the floorboards after an armored car robbery 10 years earlier; and Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo), a lounge singer on her way to a gig in Reno. The rest are too convoluted to go into here. Director Drew Goddard makes like Tarantino (or perhaps Lynch) in providing a stylish, somewhat menacing setting situation, with sudden (but not excessive) violence and some partly illuminating flashbacks. The movie is pretty gripping for the first 90 minutes or so. Then it just falls apart for the remaining hour, dominated by the sudden appearance of a sadistic, exceedingly irritating, guru. Bridges, always good, is excellent here, and Erivo is even better--and a first-class singer as well. The rest is forgettable.
It's 1969, and several guests, each with his/her secrets, arrive at the empty El Royale Hotel, on the border of California and Nevada. The two most straightforward stories belong to Doc O'Kelly (Jeff Bridges), posing as a priest, who wants to recover a stash of money he hid under the floorboards after an armored car robbery 10 years earlier; and Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo), a lounge singer on her way to a gig in Reno. The rest are too convoluted to go into here. Director Drew Goddard makes like Tarantino (or perhaps Lynch) in providing a stylish, somewhat menacing setting situation, with sudden (but not excessive) violence and some partly illuminating flashbacks. The movie is pretty gripping for the first 90 minutes or so. Then it just falls apart for the remaining hour, dominated by the sudden appearance of a sadistic, exceedingly irritating, guru. Bridges, always good, is excellent here, and Erivo is even better--and a first-class singer as well. The rest is forgettable.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/19 08:19 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE (2018)
It's 1969, and several guests, each with his/her secrets, arrive at the empty El Royale Hotel, on the border of California and Nevada. The two most straightforward stories belong to Doc O'Kelly (Jeff Bridges), posing as a priest, who wants to recover a stash of money he hid under the floorboards after an armored car robbery 10 years earlier; and Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo), a lounge singer on her way to a gig in Reno. The rest are too convoluted to go into here. Director Drew Goddard makes like Tarantino (or perhaps Lynch) in providing a stylish, somewhat menacing setting situation, with sudden (but not excessive) violence and some partly illuminating flashbacks. The movie is pretty gripping for the first 90 minutes or so. Then it just falls apart for the remaining hour, dominated by the sudden appearance of a sadistic, exceedingly irritating, guru. Bridges, always good, is excellent here, and Erivo is even better--and a first-class singer as well. The rest is forgettable.
It's 1969, and several guests, each with his/her secrets, arrive at the empty El Royale Hotel, on the border of California and Nevada. The two most straightforward stories belong to Doc O'Kelly (Jeff Bridges), posing as a priest, who wants to recover a stash of money he hid under the floorboards after an armored car robbery 10 years earlier; and Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo), a lounge singer on her way to a gig in Reno. The rest are too convoluted to go into here. Director Drew Goddard makes like Tarantino (or perhaps Lynch) in providing a stylish, somewhat menacing setting situation, with sudden (but not excessive) violence and some partly illuminating flashbacks. The movie is pretty gripping for the first 90 minutes or so. Then it just falls apart for the remaining hour, dominated by the sudden appearance of a sadistic, exceedingly irritating, guru. Bridges, always good, is excellent here, and Erivo is even better--and a first-class singer as well. The rest is forgettable.
I haven't seen it since the theater but I remember enjoying it. I need to give it another shot. It's actually recorded on my DVR. Just haven't found the time to clean it up yet.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/04/19 10:21 PM
I watched The Mule last night. I don't know why Eastwood chose his character's involvement in a drug operation to convey the moral of a negligent husband and father. Certainly, there are any number of storylines that a talent like Eastwood could have pursued to get the film's message across.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/19 04:03 PM
IT CHAPTER TWO
My most anticipated movie of the year after Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD didn't disappoint! Picking up 27 years later from the events of the first film, Part 2 brings our favorite losers together for round 2 with Pennywise the Clown. Bill Hader as the adult version of Richie Tozier steals the show (much like Finn Wolfhard did in part 1). Bill Skarsgård gives another remarkable performance as Pennywise and with a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes, it didn't feel that long and had good pacing throughout. Rumor is there may be a director's cut which will splice the two films together and have a runtime of 5 hours or more (they may add additional scenes as well). My only grip with the film was the use of the de-aging technology. While I appreciate the efforts for continuity and to have the kids look the same way they did in the first film, for me, the technology's not perfect yet and took away from their performance during those scenes. I truly applaud the cast and crew for bringing one of Stephen King's best novels to such an incredible film experience. 8/10
My most anticipated movie of the year after Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD didn't disappoint! Picking up 27 years later from the events of the first film, Part 2 brings our favorite losers together for round 2 with Pennywise the Clown. Bill Hader as the adult version of Richie Tozier steals the show (much like Finn Wolfhard did in part 1). Bill Skarsgård gives another remarkable performance as Pennywise and with a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes, it didn't feel that long and had good pacing throughout. Rumor is there may be a director's cut which will splice the two films together and have a runtime of 5 hours or more (they may add additional scenes as well). My only grip with the film was the use of the de-aging technology. While I appreciate the efforts for continuity and to have the kids look the same way they did in the first film, for me, the technology's not perfect yet and took away from their performance during those scenes. I truly applaud the cast and crew for bringing one of Stephen King's best novels to such an incredible film experience. 8/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/19 09:49 PM
EDGE OF THE CITY (1957)
In this tense, existentialist-type drama (Martin Ritt's directoral debut), Axel North (John Cassavetes), on the lam as an Army deserter, lands a job on the NYC waterfront, working for thuggish, racist, corrupt crew boss Charlie Malick (Jack Warden, perfect for this role). He's immediately befriended by Tommy Tyler (Sidney Poitier), another crew boss who's not afraid of Malik. Axel only gradually warms to Tommy and his wife (Ruby Dee, always good). The film strongly evokes "On the Waterfront" but more than stands on its own. Cassavetes and Poitier are outstanding, and the filming, on NYC streets, adds grit and realism. Very good.
In this tense, existentialist-type drama (Martin Ritt's directoral debut), Axel North (John Cassavetes), on the lam as an Army deserter, lands a job on the NYC waterfront, working for thuggish, racist, corrupt crew boss Charlie Malick (Jack Warden, perfect for this role). He's immediately befriended by Tommy Tyler (Sidney Poitier), another crew boss who's not afraid of Malik. Axel only gradually warms to Tommy and his wife (Ruby Dee, always good). The film strongly evokes "On the Waterfront" but more than stands on its own. Cassavetes and Poitier are outstanding, and the filming, on NYC streets, adds grit and realism. Very good.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/07/19 03:40 AM
Just watched Stand Up Guys with Pacino, Arkin, and Walken. You know, some movies are meant to be simply enjoyed because of their actors. It's hard to beat that trio. The plot, script, etc. was not the best, but I enjoyed what the actors did with what they had. Walken has an inimitable style and cadence that noone can match.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/19 03:30 AM
THE VIKINGS (1958)
In this sword-and-fjord spectacle, Viking king Ragnar (Ernest Borgnine) and his son Einar (Kirk Douglas) merrily lead their band in plunder-and-rape raids on the British coast. Aided by an English turncoat, they kidnap Morgana (Janet Leigh), who's betrothed to nasty English noble Aiella (Frank Thring, the Sultan of Sneer). But a surly slave, Eric (Tony Curtis), plots to save Morgana by killing Einar, who turns out to be his half-brother as a result of one of Ragnar's royal rapes. The dialog is too incredibly campy to inspire any real attempts at acting. But, the filming is colorful, and the Viking rave-ups, awash in beer drunk out of stagl horns, turkey cuts flung all around, and general barbarian debauchery, are riotous. The juice is supplied by Borgnine, who laughs roaringly throughout the film. You should, too. Enjoy.
In this sword-and-fjord spectacle, Viking king Ragnar (Ernest Borgnine) and his son Einar (Kirk Douglas) merrily lead their band in plunder-and-rape raids on the British coast. Aided by an English turncoat, they kidnap Morgana (Janet Leigh), who's betrothed to nasty English noble Aiella (Frank Thring, the Sultan of Sneer). But a surly slave, Eric (Tony Curtis), plots to save Morgana by killing Einar, who turns out to be his half-brother as a result of one of Ragnar's royal rapes. The dialog is too incredibly campy to inspire any real attempts at acting. But, the filming is colorful, and the Viking rave-ups, awash in beer drunk out of stagl horns, turkey cuts flung all around, and general barbarian debauchery, are riotous. The juice is supplied by Borgnine, who laughs roaringly throughout the film. You should, too. Enjoy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/13/19 06:31 PM
HUSTLERS
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/19 01:41 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HUSTLERS
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
Just read your review to Wife, very interesting.
She has a question for you.
She enjoyed your reviews and likes your scoring method of 1 - 10.
Her question is if you were scoring on a scale of 100 of course it could be translated as a 60 but if you were scoring on scale of 100 , would your score be higher?
Maybe a 70 - 75% ?
Just asking since I said your 6 is 60% but she insisted I get your opinion since scores and percentages can differ.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/19 06:22 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HUSTLERS
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
I'll start out by saying I'm not much of a JLo fan. She hasn't done anything for me, in any form of media. But I'll give her this: she pulled this part off. The rest of the cast (Constance Wu, Keke Palmer, and Lili Reinhart) as well as the film are enjoyable. For most, this is probably a non-theater movie, but it still surpassed my expectations. 6/10
Just read your review to Wife, very interesting.
She has a question for you.
She enjoyed your reviews and likes your scoring method of 1 - 10.
Her question is if you were scoring on a scale of 100 of course it could be translated as a 60 but if you were scoring on scale of 100 , would your score be higher?
Maybe a 70 - 75% ?
Just asking since I said your 6 is 60% but she insisted I get your opinion since scores and percentages can differ.
It'd probably be the same. So in your example, I'd say HUSTLERS is 60% in my opinion.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/15/19 09:41 PM
THE MULE (2018)
This is your basic Clint Eastwood vehicle, and it works pretty well. He plays Earl Stone, a 90-year-old (not hard for Clint, who's 89), estranged from his family and facing foreclosure of his flower business. Then he's offered a job driving drugs for a Mexican cartel--they see him as ideal because he's very old, harmless-looking and is a careful driver. He makes plenty of money, but, inevitably, Crime Doesn't Pay. Eastwood's Stone is independent without being flinty, often humorous, and gets out of a couple of tricky situations. The Mexicans are amiable at first, then thuggish. The ending is weak, but, overall, it was enjoyable.
This is your basic Clint Eastwood vehicle, and it works pretty well. He plays Earl Stone, a 90-year-old (not hard for Clint, who's 89), estranged from his family and facing foreclosure of his flower business. Then he's offered a job driving drugs for a Mexican cartel--they see him as ideal because he's very old, harmless-looking and is a careful driver. He makes plenty of money, but, inevitably, Crime Doesn't Pay. Eastwood's Stone is independent without being flinty, often humorous, and gets out of a couple of tricky situations. The Mexicans are amiable at first, then thuggish. The ending is weak, but, overall, it was enjoyable.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/19 04:13 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE MULE (2018)
This is your basic Clint Eastwood vehicle, and it works pretty well. He plays Earl Stone, a 90-year-old (not hard for Clint, who's 89), estranged from his family and facing foreclosure of his flower business. Then he's offered a job driving drugs for a Mexican cartel--they see him as ideal because he's very old, harmless-looking and is a careful driver. He makes plenty of money, but, inevitably, Crime Doesn't Pay. Eastwood's Stone is independent without being flinty, often humorous, and gets out of a couple of tricky situations. The Mexicans are amiable at first, then thuggish. The ending is weak, but, overall, it was enjoyable.
This is your basic Clint Eastwood vehicle, and it works pretty well. He plays Earl Stone, a 90-year-old (not hard for Clint, who's 89), estranged from his family and facing foreclosure of his flower business. Then he's offered a job driving drugs for a Mexican cartel--they see him as ideal because he's very old, harmless-looking and is a careful driver. He makes plenty of money, but, inevitably, Crime Doesn't Pay. Eastwood's Stone is independent without being flinty, often humorous, and gets out of a couple of tricky situations. The Mexicans are amiable at first, then thuggish. The ending is weak, but, overall, it was enjoyable.
I don't know why Eastwood chose his character's involvement in a drug operation to convey the moral of a negligent but remorseful husband and father. Certainly, there are any number of storylines that a talent like Eastwood could have pursued to get the film's message across.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/19 11:29 PM
Ode to Joy
This is an intermittently humorous though predictable romantic comedy that deftly weaves through some dark passageways before returning to the crowd pleasing formula that typifies the genre. Boy meets girl. Boy loses girl. Boy must reexamine his life choices and triumph over internal challenges and fears. Hopefully transformed, newly confident boy goes after girl again hoping for second chance. The hook is that the boy is this case Charlie (Martin Freeman) has a form of narcolepsy that causes him to pass out when he experiences strong emotions, primarily joy. So he walks around with tacks in his shoes, listens to a lot of Wagner, and avoids pretty women. His life gets complicated when he meets a pretty woman Francesca (Morena Baccarin) who for some reason finds him attractive and wants to get to know him. However, as expected Charlie faints when Francesca invites him up for coffee.
In the hospital, visited by his protective younger brother Cooper (Jake Lacy), Charlie suggests that Cooper, a friendly kindergarten teacher, go out with Francesca. Charlie pretends that this is pure altruism on his part, but he has some hidden purposes. Charlie takes up with the quirky and kooky Bethany (Melissa Rauch in a funny and deliberately deglamorized role) a woman who whatever else she is will not trip Charlie's wires as far as platonic or erotic joy is concerned. Freeman nails his role as a stodgy man who claims to be content that life is passing by him ever more quickly. This movie was not as funny or as interesting as it thought it was but it did make me smile a few times.
This is an intermittently humorous though predictable romantic comedy that deftly weaves through some dark passageways before returning to the crowd pleasing formula that typifies the genre. Boy meets girl. Boy loses girl. Boy must reexamine his life choices and triumph over internal challenges and fears. Hopefully transformed, newly confident boy goes after girl again hoping for second chance. The hook is that the boy is this case Charlie (Martin Freeman) has a form of narcolepsy that causes him to pass out when he experiences strong emotions, primarily joy. So he walks around with tacks in his shoes, listens to a lot of Wagner, and avoids pretty women. His life gets complicated when he meets a pretty woman Francesca (Morena Baccarin) who for some reason finds him attractive and wants to get to know him. However, as expected Charlie faints when Francesca invites him up for coffee.
In the hospital, visited by his protective younger brother Cooper (Jake Lacy), Charlie suggests that Cooper, a friendly kindergarten teacher, go out with Francesca. Charlie pretends that this is pure altruism on his part, but he has some hidden purposes. Charlie takes up with the quirky and kooky Bethany (Melissa Rauch in a funny and deliberately deglamorized role) a woman who whatever else she is will not trip Charlie's wires as far as platonic or erotic joy is concerned. Freeman nails his role as a stodgy man who claims to be content that life is passing by him ever more quickly. This movie was not as funny or as interesting as it thought it was but it did make me smile a few times.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/27/19 07:31 PM
CRIME WAVE (1953)
In this is a very good, little (73 minutes) film noir, Steve Lacey (Gene Nelson), ex-con trying to go straight, is a target for a trio of San Quentin escapees headed by Doc Penney (Ted deCorsia, Eternal Thug with Brains), who want him to steal a plane and fly them to Mexico after a bank robbery. They hold his wife (Phyllis Kirk, very pretty) hostage. Steve's in a tight spot because thuggish, unforgiving LAPD Det. Lt. Sims (Sterling Hayden) has him in his sights. You can sign me up for anything with Hayden in it, and he doesn't disappoint. The ensemble cast, including Charles Buchinsky (later Bronson, who has a significant role), Jay Novello and crazy Timothy Carey, can't be beat. Director Andre De Toth, another of Hitler's gifts to America, keeps the action taut in the film noir tradition, and it gets lots of authenticity from its filming on the streets of LA. A winner.
In this is a very good, little (73 minutes) film noir, Steve Lacey (Gene Nelson), ex-con trying to go straight, is a target for a trio of San Quentin escapees headed by Doc Penney (Ted deCorsia, Eternal Thug with Brains), who want him to steal a plane and fly them to Mexico after a bank robbery. They hold his wife (Phyllis Kirk, very pretty) hostage. Steve's in a tight spot because thuggish, unforgiving LAPD Det. Lt. Sims (Sterling Hayden) has him in his sights. You can sign me up for anything with Hayden in it, and he doesn't disappoint. The ensemble cast, including Charles Buchinsky (later Bronson, who has a significant role), Jay Novello and crazy Timothy Carey, can't be beat. Director Andre De Toth, another of Hitler's gifts to America, keeps the action taut in the film noir tradition, and it gets lots of authenticity from its filming on the streets of LA. A winner.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/04/19 05:53 PM
REVERSAL OF FORTUNE (1990)
Aristocratic Claus von Bulow (Jeremy Irons), convicted of trying to kill his alcohol and pills-abusing, wealthy socialite wife Sunny (Glenn Close), hires ace Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver) to work his appeal. The contrast couldn't be more perfect: von Bulow, elegant, restrained, unflappable; and Dersh, Brooklyn street kid, hyper, intense, with a regular hippie commune of law students helping with the case. The two are absolutely brilliant. Irons won an Oscar, but the movie belongs to Silver, a versatile and vastly underrated actor. Really enjoyable.
Aristocratic Claus von Bulow (Jeremy Irons), convicted of trying to kill his alcohol and pills-abusing, wealthy socialite wife Sunny (Glenn Close), hires ace Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver) to work his appeal. The contrast couldn't be more perfect: von Bulow, elegant, restrained, unflappable; and Dersh, Brooklyn street kid, hyper, intense, with a regular hippie commune of law students helping with the case. The two are absolutely brilliant. Irons won an Oscar, but the movie belongs to Silver, a versatile and vastly underrated actor. Really enjoyable.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/04/19 05:53 PM
JOKER
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/04/19 09:08 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOKER
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
I thought it was Joaquin Phoenix doing the Rupert Pupkin tribute while De Niro was portraying a Jerry Lewis like character?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/19 01:35 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOKER
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
I thought it was Joaquin Phoenix doing the Rupert Pupkin tribute while De Niro was portraying a Jerry Lewis like character?
Yeah pretty much. I'm seeing it again tomorrow!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/19 07:49 PM
AD ASTRA
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/06/19 09:08 PM
Just watched the Joker. This will be perhaps the movie of the year. I highly recommend it. It takes alot of the issues around us in the real world and puts it front and center.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/06/19 09:53 PM
RAMBO: LAST BLOOD
I'm not sure this is how the character of Rambo should go out and I'm usually not a very big fan of the "I told you not to do that, now you got yourself in a jam, and I've gotta fix it" kind of movies. And really, the only violence this movie had in it was during the final showdown. We probably didn't need another Rambo and this was Stallone's attempt at parting ways with the character a la Hugh Jackman/LOGAN, but I don't see why this movie got such bad reviews. It's a decent action flick. 6/10
I'm not sure this is how the character of Rambo should go out and I'm usually not a very big fan of the "I told you not to do that, now you got yourself in a jam, and I've gotta fix it" kind of movies. And really, the only violence this movie had in it was during the final showdown. We probably didn't need another Rambo and this was Stallone's attempt at parting ways with the character a la Hugh Jackman/LOGAN, but I don't see why this movie got such bad reviews. It's a decent action flick. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/19 10:55 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
AD ASTRA
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Maybe a controversial opinion, but I don't think Brad Pitt is a very good actor. For example, Seven and Fight Club are great movies but I think those movies worked well in spite of Pitt not because of him. Maybe that's harsh. Pitt was important to that movie [Fight Club] but because of his charisma, six pack and essence of cool, not any great acting ability.
He's little more than a pretty face.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/19 05:38 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
AD ASTRA
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Brad Pitt is sent on a mission to Mars to try to communicate to his (believe to be dead) father, played by Tommy Lee Jones, who is on Neptune looking for other intelligent life forms. While visually this movie has some stunning shots, overall, it's a very dry and dull movie with mediocre performances by all involved. Pitt probably has the strongest performance but his character is so detached and non-emotional, I question how much of a stretch it was to pull off. If you have any interest in seeing this, I advise on passing. 5/10
Maybe a controversial opinion, but I don't think Brad Pitt is a very good actor. For example, Seven and Fight Club are great movies but I think those movies worked well in spite of Pitt not because of him. Maybe that's harsh. Pitt was important to that movie [Fight Club] but because of his charisma, six pack and essence of cool, not any great acting ability.
He's little more than a pretty face.
I like Pitt. Never had a problem with him. He does come off as save and the cool guy, but he also doesn't seem to let it go to his head and seems approachable (at least that's my opinion of him anyway). Not the best of actor's but I've usually enjoyed his work more times than not.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/10/19 01:34 AM
I can deal with Pitt, he was good in Joe Black,.
Will Smith is in every other movie,,,, total overload.
Had enough of him
Will Smith is in every other movie,,,, total overload.
Had enough of him
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/10/19 05:35 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I can deal with Pitt, he was good in Joe Black,.
Will Smith is in every other movie,,,, total overload.
Had enough of him
Will Smith is in every other movie,,,, total overload.
Had enough of him
I'm checking out GEMINI MAN tonight staring him. Looks pretty interesting and it's in 3D. The trailer has me intrigued so we'll see what happens.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/11/19 04:52 PM
GEMINI MAN
With the cast (Will Smith, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Clive Owen) plus director Ang Lee, this film should have been much better than it was. The de-aging technology used on Will Smith looked fine, however, the CGI used for the fight and action scenes was too cartoony and took away due to it's terribly obvious computerized imagery. The story is a mess, Clive Owen is barely in it and when he is, he's given nothing of note to do. The only semi bright spot was Winstead's performance, who actually throws down a little bit (can't think of many movies she's gotten physical in). 5/10
With the cast (Will Smith, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Clive Owen) plus director Ang Lee, this film should have been much better than it was. The de-aging technology used on Will Smith looked fine, however, the CGI used for the fight and action scenes was too cartoony and took away due to it's terribly obvious computerized imagery. The story is a mess, Clive Owen is barely in it and when he is, he's given nothing of note to do. The only semi bright spot was Winstead's performance, who actually throws down a little bit (can't think of many movies she's gotten physical in). 5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/19 10:55 PM
Joker
I saw this today. I thought it was good, not great. Like most if not all movies using comic book or superhero source material, it suffers from being a little too linear or simplistic in its storytelling. For example, the rioting in Gotham used as a backdrop as the movie approached its climax. Why were people rioting? IDK if Deux Ex Machina is the term I'm looking for but it just seemed to be a cheap storytelling tool to serve the movie. It wasn't very intelligently written IMO and I can see why people may take issue with its portrayal of mental illness. Some of the grittier scenes seemed to be there for shock value lessening their effectiveness. Great performance by Joaquin Phoenix, but I got the impression that's what the movie was ultimately hanging its hat on. Knowing Todd Phillips involvement, I went in expecting pretty simplistic and generic writing. Also, what's up with Phillips statement that it's open-ended as to whether Arthur Fleck is the Joker from Batman mythology? Of course he is. They retconned things so that it was him who killed Batman's parents and not run-of-the-mill hoodlums. Of course it's him!
I saw this today. I thought it was good, not great. Like most if not all movies using comic book or superhero source material, it suffers from being a little too linear or simplistic in its storytelling. For example, the rioting in Gotham used as a backdrop as the movie approached its climax. Why were people rioting? IDK if Deux Ex Machina is the term I'm looking for but it just seemed to be a cheap storytelling tool to serve the movie. It wasn't very intelligently written IMO and I can see why people may take issue with its portrayal of mental illness. Some of the grittier scenes seemed to be there for shock value lessening their effectiveness. Great performance by Joaquin Phoenix, but I got the impression that's what the movie was ultimately hanging its hat on. Knowing Todd Phillips involvement, I went in expecting pretty simplistic and generic writing. Also, what's up with Phillips statement that it's open-ended as to whether Arthur Fleck is the Joker from Batman mythology? Of course he is. They retconned things so that it was him who killed Batman's parents and not run-of-the-mill hoodlums. Of course it's him!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/19 04:43 PM
COUNTDOWN
Basic enough premise: you download an app with said title and it accurately tells you how much longer you have to live. Naturally, those with less time are trying to change their fate and beat the app by staying alive past their countdown. It's PG-13 so it's lite on the violence/gore with the studio trying to milk every ounce they can out of this with the rating. However, more gore wouldn't have done much to save this flop. Mostly scare jumps, with a weak story once it's revealed how the app is always right and what exactly is behind it. Do yourself the favor and avoid this, not just in theaters, but once it's on home video/streaming/cable. 4/10
Basic enough premise: you download an app with said title and it accurately tells you how much longer you have to live. Naturally, those with less time are trying to change their fate and beat the app by staying alive past their countdown. It's PG-13 so it's lite on the violence/gore with the studio trying to milk every ounce they can out of this with the rating. However, more gore wouldn't have done much to save this flop. Mostly scare jumps, with a weak story once it's revealed how the app is always right and what exactly is behind it. Do yourself the favor and avoid this, not just in theaters, but once it's on home video/streaming/cable. 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/19 03:17 AM
THE HOODLUM (1951)
Habitual criminal Vincent Lubeck (Lawrence Tierney) gets paroled out of prison and resentfully goes to work for his brother Johnny (Edward Tierney, Lawrence's real-life brother), who's doubtful about him. In short order, Vincent, chip ever-present on his shoulder, seduces, impregnates and abandons Johnny's girlfriend, recruits a mob, and plans and executes a bank robbery. He dies on a garbage heap--"crime doesn't pay." This is a very trim little (61 minutes) B-level film noir, made credible and enjoyable by Tierney, a real-life tough guy, and through crisp direction by Max Nosseck, yet another of Hitler's gifts to the US. You can sign me up for anything with Lawrence Tierney in it.
Habitual criminal Vincent Lubeck (Lawrence Tierney) gets paroled out of prison and resentfully goes to work for his brother Johnny (Edward Tierney, Lawrence's real-life brother), who's doubtful about him. In short order, Vincent, chip ever-present on his shoulder, seduces, impregnates and abandons Johnny's girlfriend, recruits a mob, and plans and executes a bank robbery. He dies on a garbage heap--"crime doesn't pay." This is a very trim little (61 minutes) B-level film noir, made credible and enjoyable by Tierney, a real-life tough guy, and through crisp direction by Max Nosseck, yet another of Hitler's gifts to the US. You can sign me up for anything with Lawrence Tierney in it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/19 03:12 AM
Hush 2016.
Great Horror Flick
Wife gave 4 out of 5 Stars
I scored it a 7.5 out of 10
Great Horror Flick
Wife gave 4 out of 5 Stars
I scored it a 7.5 out of 10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/01/19 05:39 PM
TERMINATOR: DARK FATE
This is the sequel to TERMINATOR 2: JUDGMENT DAY that fans have been waiting for! Always great to see Linda Hamilton reprise her iconic role as Sarah Connor as well as Arnold as the Terminator. Some deaging technology is used early on in the film but I didn't find it as distracting as some other recent films. A great new addition in bringing Mackenzie Davis on board as can more than hold her own against anyone in her way. Lost some steam towards the end but a film that's enjoyable on the big screen for sure! 6/10
This is the sequel to TERMINATOR 2: JUDGMENT DAY that fans have been waiting for! Always great to see Linda Hamilton reprise her iconic role as Sarah Connor as well as Arnold as the Terminator. Some deaging technology is used early on in the film but I didn't find it as distracting as some other recent films. A great new addition in bringing Mackenzie Davis on board as can more than hold her own against anyone in her way. Lost some steam towards the end but a film that's enjoyable on the big screen for sure! 6/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/02/19 02:40 AM
I'm waiting for Terminator: The Nursing Home Years.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/19 09:56 PM
DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS (1995)
It's 1948 in LA, and Easy Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and trying to hold onto his home. He readily accepts a lucrative offer from seemingly amiable gangster Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore) to find Daphne Monet (Jennifer Beals), fiance of a mayoral candidate, who's disappeared into the black ghetto. Rawlins soon finds himself way over his head in a never-ending procession of brutal cops, double-crosses, palace intrigues and violence. Somehow, he manages by courage, restraint at the right times, and street smarts, to survive and get paid--partly through deadly intervention by his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle). The plot is way too convoluted to make sense much of the time. But, director Carl Franklin brilliantly evokes postwar LA, and the ups and downs of African Americans struggling to get by within and outside the law. Washington is perfect in his role, and Sizemore, always good, is even better than usual--a pleasure to watch him work. Cheadle, in a small role, chews up the scenery. Not bad at all.
It's 1948 in LA, and Easy Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and trying to hold onto his home. He readily accepts a lucrative offer from seemingly amiable gangster Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore) to find Daphne Monet (Jennifer Beals), fiance of a mayoral candidate, who's disappeared into the black ghetto. Rawlins soon finds himself way over his head in a never-ending procession of brutal cops, double-crosses, palace intrigues and violence. Somehow, he manages by courage, restraint at the right times, and street smarts, to survive and get paid--partly through deadly intervention by his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle). The plot is way too convoluted to make sense much of the time. But, director Carl Franklin brilliantly evokes postwar LA, and the ups and downs of African Americans struggling to get by within and outside the law. Washington is perfect in his role, and Sizemore, always good, is even better than usual--a pleasure to watch him work. Cheadle, in a small role, chews up the scenery. Not bad at all.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/19 04:38 PM
I haven't seen it yet since it doesn't come to Netflix until Nov. 27, but I watched the previews of the Irishman and it looks quite good on a par with Casino and Goodfellas. I believe it's about Hoffa with Pacino playing that role and DeNiro and Peche (also Ray Romano).
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/19 10:09 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
I haven't seen it yet since it doesn't come to Netflix until Nov. 27, but I watched the previews of the Irishman and it looks quite good on a par with Casino and Goodfellas. I believe it's about Hoffa with Pacino playing that role and DeNiro and Peche (also Ray Romano).
I can't wait! I'll see it at my local theater but they don't offer it. It's 3 1/1 hours runtime too!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/08/19 04:20 PM
DOCTOR SLEEP
I didn't read the book so I went in to this blind and I did enjoy it; however, in the grand scheme of things, I came out of this movie the same way I went going in to it: a sequel to THE SHINING was unnecessary. The film doesn't take anything away from the original (thank goodness) and actually revisits it quite a bit towards the beginning and end, which was very enjoyable! I heard nothing but praise for Rebecca Ferguson beforehand and while I thought she was very good, I thought prior reviews gave her a little too much credit. McGregor I wanted to like at times as an older version of Dan (not Danny) Torrance. Sometimes I felt he worked, while other times I didn't. My favorite role was probably by Alex Essoe who's in a handful of scenes and to not spoil it, I won't say which part she plays. Overall, it was a fun, although long ride. The first 15-20 minutes and the third act are where I got my money's worth. 6.5/10
I didn't read the book so I went in to this blind and I did enjoy it; however, in the grand scheme of things, I came out of this movie the same way I went going in to it: a sequel to THE SHINING was unnecessary. The film doesn't take anything away from the original (thank goodness) and actually revisits it quite a bit towards the beginning and end, which was very enjoyable! I heard nothing but praise for Rebecca Ferguson beforehand and while I thought she was very good, I thought prior reviews gave her a little too much credit. McGregor I wanted to like at times as an older version of Dan (not Danny) Torrance. Sometimes I felt he worked, while other times I didn't. My favorite role was probably by Alex Essoe who's in a handful of scenes and to not spoil it, I won't say which part she plays. Overall, it was a fun, although long ride. The first 15-20 minutes and the third act are where I got my money's worth. 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/15/19 07:40 AM
WOMEN'S PRISON (1955)
The Fifties gave us a subgenre of prison movies in which the prisoners are the oppressed and the authorities are the bad guys. This one focuses on a fragile housewife (Jan Sterling), sent up for manslaughter after accidentally running over a child. She meets the usual crew you'd find in a women's prison of that era: the brassy blond with the heart of gold (Cleo Moore), the musical black inmate (Juanita Moore), the stuffy, abrupt matron (Mae Clark, she the target of James Cagney's grapefruit in "The Public Enemy"). But the real action centers on the good guy prison doctor (Howard Duff), who's intent on protecting Sterling, and the bad gal women's warden (Ida Lupino), a sadist who's intent on breaking her down. The movie features some howlingly funny, politically incorrect dialog that is worth watching on its own. But director Lewis Seiler provides some interesting twists (a prison pregnancy when an inmate from the men's side gets over to the women's side and makes it with his imprisoned bride in a closet), and a thoughtful ending. I liked it a lot.
The Fifties gave us a subgenre of prison movies in which the prisoners are the oppressed and the authorities are the bad guys. This one focuses on a fragile housewife (Jan Sterling), sent up for manslaughter after accidentally running over a child. She meets the usual crew you'd find in a women's prison of that era: the brassy blond with the heart of gold (Cleo Moore), the musical black inmate (Juanita Moore), the stuffy, abrupt matron (Mae Clark, she the target of James Cagney's grapefruit in "The Public Enemy"). But the real action centers on the good guy prison doctor (Howard Duff), who's intent on protecting Sterling, and the bad gal women's warden (Ida Lupino), a sadist who's intent on breaking her down. The movie features some howlingly funny, politically incorrect dialog that is worth watching on its own. But director Lewis Seiler provides some interesting twists (a prison pregnancy when an inmate from the men's side gets over to the women's side and makes it with his imprisoned bride in a closet), and a thoughtful ending. I liked it a lot.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 11:37 AM
Doctor Sleep
Although Ewan McGregor does yeoman work as the grown up Danny Torrance from The Shining who is struggling with his inherited demons of alcoholism and violence, it's actually Rebecca Ferguson and newcomer Kyliegh Curran who steal just about every scene they're in. As Rose The Hat, the swivel hipped villainous leader of a group of effective vampires, Ferguson gives every impression that she knows what goes where and why, if you know what I mean. It's easy for the viewer (and in universe her child victims) to forget that she's mean as a rattlesnake and as relentless as a great white shark. Curran will hopefully have a long career in front of her as her interpretation of Abra Stone nails down the easy confidence and also naivete of youth. In a world where most people with the shining are like 300 watt light bulbs, Abra is akin to a hydrogen bomb. Curran and Ferguson were very well cast.
The movie lampshades some themes from the book but unless you read the book it's not worth mentioning. What is worth mentioning is that the film shows a little strain at trying to reconcile King's famous dislike of Kubrick's adaptation of his work, Kubrick's iconic scenes, and King's sequel. The result is that this is more of an action/thriller movie with supernatural overtones than a horror movie. This film lacks the isolation, coldness and creepiness that filled Kubrick's work. I don't think there will be any scenes from this movie that will still be referenced thirty years later. Still, given the constant threat that Rose The Hat and her "True Knot" of followers pose to children and the relative ease with which they prey on them, some film scenes may well give parents the heebie-jeebies. This film has a R rating, most likely for fleeting and implied scenes of violence against children. It could have just as easily got an R rating for scenes of Ferguson stretching.
This was a good, but not great film. It ran a little longer than I thought it should have.
Although Ewan McGregor does yeoman work as the grown up Danny Torrance from The Shining who is struggling with his inherited demons of alcoholism and violence, it's actually Rebecca Ferguson and newcomer Kyliegh Curran who steal just about every scene they're in. As Rose The Hat, the swivel hipped villainous leader of a group of effective vampires, Ferguson gives every impression that she knows what goes where and why, if you know what I mean. It's easy for the viewer (and in universe her child victims) to forget that she's mean as a rattlesnake and as relentless as a great white shark. Curran will hopefully have a long career in front of her as her interpretation of Abra Stone nails down the easy confidence and also naivete of youth. In a world where most people with the shining are like 300 watt light bulbs, Abra is akin to a hydrogen bomb. Curran and Ferguson were very well cast.
The movie lampshades some themes from the book but unless you read the book it's not worth mentioning. What is worth mentioning is that the film shows a little strain at trying to reconcile King's famous dislike of Kubrick's adaptation of his work, Kubrick's iconic scenes, and King's sequel. The result is that this is more of an action/thriller movie with supernatural overtones than a horror movie. This film lacks the isolation, coldness and creepiness that filled Kubrick's work. I don't think there will be any scenes from this movie that will still be referenced thirty years later. Still, given the constant threat that Rose The Hat and her "True Knot" of followers pose to children and the relative ease with which they prey on them, some film scenes may well give parents the heebie-jeebies. This film has a R rating, most likely for fleeting and implied scenes of violence against children. It could have just as easily got an R rating for scenes of Ferguson stretching.
This was a good, but not great film. It ran a little longer than I thought it should have.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 11:59 AM
Midsommar
This is another trippy, generally intelligent horror movie directed by Ari Aster, who previously directed Hereditary. Aster leaves bread crumbs throughout the movie in the forms of stylized murals, drawings, and blunt comments that hint at future events. Although this story follows the traditional horror theme of outsiders entering a strange isolated and even inbred community, it's wise enough to make the viewer look past that. In fact, the real horror, as the director has referenced, is the death of a relationship. If you've lived long enough you've probably been both the dumper and the dumpee. Neither one is fun.
Christian, an anthropology grad student, would like to get out of a relationship with his girlfriend Dani. His friends all think it's past time for him to do this. Christian is not getting his sexual or emotional needs met. All he really is, is an emotional support blanket for Dani, who has a ton of emotional/psychological issues. Christian and his friends, including the Swedish exchange student Pelle, are about to take a trip to Sweden for the Midsummer festival where they will live with and observe Pelle's extended family/commune, the rural Harga, engage in various traditional festivities and rituals. Christian's friends think that this provides the perfect opportunity to (1) make time with beautiful Swedish women (2) learn about traditional cultures and (3) dump Dani.
However when Dani's sister murders her parents and kills herself, Christian can't bring himself to dump Dani. Worse (from his friends' perspective) he tells Dani about the impending trip and invites her along. The Americans and a few other visitors find the Swedes to be friendly, initially. But when they witness a voluntary ritual that is shocking to American sensibilities, Dani and Christian (his name is significant) wonder if all the smiling toothy tall Swedes are all there, morally or mentally.
This movie also ran a little long but I liked how it used smiles and constant sunlight to set up increasing unease. The film's score was suitably creepy. There are other callbacks to Hereditary as well.
This is another trippy, generally intelligent horror movie directed by Ari Aster, who previously directed Hereditary. Aster leaves bread crumbs throughout the movie in the forms of stylized murals, drawings, and blunt comments that hint at future events. Although this story follows the traditional horror theme of outsiders entering a strange isolated and even inbred community, it's wise enough to make the viewer look past that. In fact, the real horror, as the director has referenced, is the death of a relationship. If you've lived long enough you've probably been both the dumper and the dumpee. Neither one is fun.
Christian, an anthropology grad student, would like to get out of a relationship with his girlfriend Dani. His friends all think it's past time for him to do this. Christian is not getting his sexual or emotional needs met. All he really is, is an emotional support blanket for Dani, who has a ton of emotional/psychological issues. Christian and his friends, including the Swedish exchange student Pelle, are about to take a trip to Sweden for the Midsummer festival where they will live with and observe Pelle's extended family/commune, the rural Harga, engage in various traditional festivities and rituals. Christian's friends think that this provides the perfect opportunity to (1) make time with beautiful Swedish women (2) learn about traditional cultures and (3) dump Dani.
However when Dani's sister murders her parents and kills herself, Christian can't bring himself to dump Dani. Worse (from his friends' perspective) he tells Dani about the impending trip and invites her along. The Americans and a few other visitors find the Swedes to be friendly, initially. But when they witness a voluntary ritual that is shocking to American sensibilities, Dani and Christian (his name is significant) wonder if all the smiling toothy tall Swedes are all there, morally or mentally.
This movie also ran a little long but I liked how it used smiles and constant sunlight to set up increasing unease. The film's score was suitably creepy. There are other callbacks to Hereditary as well.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 12:20 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS (1995)
It's 1948 in LA, and Easy Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and trying to hold onto his home. He readily accepts a lucrative offer from seemingly amiable gangster Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore) to find Daphne Monet (Jennifer Beals), fiance of a mayoral candidate, who's disappeared into the black ghetto. Rawlins soon finds himself way over his head in a never-ending procession of brutal cops, double-crosses, palace intrigues and violence. Somehow, he manages by courage, restraint at the right times, and street smarts, to survive and get paid--partly through deadly intervention by his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle). The plot is way too convoluted to make sense much of the time. But, director Carl Franklin brilliantly evokes postwar LA, and the ups and downs of African Americans struggling to get by within and outside the law. Washington is perfect in his role, and Sizemore, always good, is even better than usual--a pleasure to watch him work. Cheadle, in a small role, chews up the scenery. Not bad at all.
It's 1948 in LA, and Easy Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and trying to hold onto his home. He readily accepts a lucrative offer from seemingly amiable gangster Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore) to find Daphne Monet (Jennifer Beals), fiance of a mayoral candidate, who's disappeared into the black ghetto. Rawlins soon finds himself way over his head in a never-ending procession of brutal cops, double-crosses, palace intrigues and violence. Somehow, he manages by courage, restraint at the right times, and street smarts, to survive and get paid--partly through deadly intervention by his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle). The plot is way too convoluted to make sense much of the time. But, director Carl Franklin brilliantly evokes postwar LA, and the ups and downs of African Americans struggling to get by within and outside the law. Washington is perfect in his role, and Sizemore, always good, is even better than usual--a pleasure to watch him work. Cheadle, in a small role, chews up the scenery. Not bad at all.
"Damn, Mouse. I told you not to kill him!"
"No. You told me not to shoot him. So I strangled him. Anyway if you didn't want him dead, why'd you leave him with me?"
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 05:59 PM
Human Desire
This film was directed by Fritz Lang. It re-unites the cool as ice award winning stars of Lang's The Big Heat, Glenn Ford and Gloria Grahame. Unlike The Big Heat, which features an almost straightforward cast of good guys and bad guys, Human Desire is a more self-consciously noir film, perhaps even one with an understated proto-feminist stance.
Once again, Grahame plays a woman for whom the John Lee Hooker lyric "She wiggles when she walks! She wiggle!" was likely invented but her character here is less self-assured and to my mind much more sympathetic than many of her other performances. Grahame is more than the bad girl with a sharp tongue and taste for furs that she was in The Big Heat.
If this movie were remade today it would almost certainly have a different ending and likely "corrected" sex stereotypes that would be just as cartoonish as some of the sex stereotypes of the 50s were. So it goes. This film's issues resonate today. The protagonist Jeff Warren (Ford) has just returned from the Korean War and is looking forward to a relatively slow paced easy life as a train engineer. One of his co-workers, the quick tempered, older and portly Carl Buckley (Broderick Crawford) has mouthed off to the boss and been fired for his troubles. Even humbling himself and begging for his job back didn't help. Buckley is too old to switch careers at this point in his life. But Buckley has another plan. His beautiful much younger supportive wife Vicki (Grahame) grew up in the home of an important railroad customer, John Owens (Brandon Rhodes). If Vicki will speak to Owens on her husband's behalf it's a cinch that Owens' influence can make the railroad boss rehire Buckley.
There's a problem however. Vicki doesn't want to speak to Owens. From the way Vicki stiffens when she hears Owens' name to her initial refusal to talk to Owens, it's painfully obvious to a modern audience (and likely would have been to the 50s audience as well) why the otherwise supportive and vivacious Vicki is reluctant to help. Carl's ugly persistence leads to unforeseen consequences that drag in Warren and change everyone's lives.
There's a lot to unpack in this movie. It combines wonderful use of light and shadow with typical snappy dialogue. I think it was one of Grahame's better films.
This film was directed by Fritz Lang. It re-unites the cool as ice award winning stars of Lang's The Big Heat, Glenn Ford and Gloria Grahame. Unlike The Big Heat, which features an almost straightforward cast of good guys and bad guys, Human Desire is a more self-consciously noir film, perhaps even one with an understated proto-feminist stance.
Once again, Grahame plays a woman for whom the John Lee Hooker lyric "She wiggles when she walks! She wiggle!" was likely invented but her character here is less self-assured and to my mind much more sympathetic than many of her other performances. Grahame is more than the bad girl with a sharp tongue and taste for furs that she was in The Big Heat.
If this movie were remade today it would almost certainly have a different ending and likely "corrected" sex stereotypes that would be just as cartoonish as some of the sex stereotypes of the 50s were. So it goes. This film's issues resonate today. The protagonist Jeff Warren (Ford) has just returned from the Korean War and is looking forward to a relatively slow paced easy life as a train engineer. One of his co-workers, the quick tempered, older and portly Carl Buckley (Broderick Crawford) has mouthed off to the boss and been fired for his troubles. Even humbling himself and begging for his job back didn't help. Buckley is too old to switch careers at this point in his life. But Buckley has another plan. His beautiful much younger supportive wife Vicki (Grahame) grew up in the home of an important railroad customer, John Owens (Brandon Rhodes). If Vicki will speak to Owens on her husband's behalf it's a cinch that Owens' influence can make the railroad boss rehire Buckley.
There's a problem however. Vicki doesn't want to speak to Owens. From the way Vicki stiffens when she hears Owens' name to her initial refusal to talk to Owens, it's painfully obvious to a modern audience (and likely would have been to the 50s audience as well) why the otherwise supportive and vivacious Vicki is reluctant to help. Carl's ugly persistence leads to unforeseen consequences that drag in Warren and change everyone's lives.
There's a lot to unpack in this movie. It combines wonderful use of light and shadow with typical snappy dialogue. I think it was one of Grahame's better films.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 08:53 PM
FORD V FERRARI
James Mangold is a little hit (COP LAND, WALK THE LINE, LOGAN) and miss for me (3:10 TO YUMA, THE WOLVERINE). But I went in to this expecting good things and while it's entertaining, with a lot of racing, the films seems basic to me. I've heard Oscar rumors swirling around Bale's and Damon's performances (Bale's I can agree with, Damon's is a bit of a stretch for me). Other than that duo, the film is pretty flat. 6/10
CHARLIE'S ANGELS
I shouldn't have been surprised by how poorly this film turned out. A movie that's "woke," where identity politics are constantly thrown at you. A female empowerment movie where females have evolved, but men are still stuck in their old, sexist, never growing ways. And naturally the villain has to be white and male. Putting politics aside, horrible "jokes" are spouted throughout the film to balance out a few bad fight scenes. And to top it off, Kristen Stewart's character came off as ditzy and annoying. The movies reviews are panning it and for obvious reasons. Hopefully they don't make a sequel to this trainwreck and I advise others to pass on this! 4/10
James Mangold is a little hit (COP LAND, WALK THE LINE, LOGAN) and miss for me (3:10 TO YUMA, THE WOLVERINE). But I went in to this expecting good things and while it's entertaining, with a lot of racing, the films seems basic to me. I've heard Oscar rumors swirling around Bale's and Damon's performances (Bale's I can agree with, Damon's is a bit of a stretch for me). Other than that duo, the film is pretty flat. 6/10
CHARLIE'S ANGELS
I shouldn't have been surprised by how poorly this film turned out. A movie that's "woke," where identity politics are constantly thrown at you. A female empowerment movie where females have evolved, but men are still stuck in their old, sexist, never growing ways. And naturally the villain has to be white and male. Putting politics aside, horrible "jokes" are spouted throughout the film to balance out a few bad fight scenes. And to top it off, Kristen Stewart's character came off as ditzy and annoying. The movies reviews are panning it and for obvious reasons. Hopefully they don't make a sequel to this trainwreck and I advise others to pass on this! 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 09:04 PM
Enjoyable reviews for both DOCTOR SLEEP and MIDSOMMAR Lilo! Did you see the Director's Cut of MIDSOMMAR? It adds almost 30 minutes of footage and I personally think it's better than the original cut. Also, have you seen HEREDITARY and if so, which did you like better? Being that these are the only films I've seen from Ari Aster, I'm looking forward to seeing what he puts out next!
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/19 11:49 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Enjoyable reviews for both DOCTOR SLEEP and MIDSOMMAR Lilo! Did you see the Director's Cut of MIDSOMMAR? It adds almost 30 minutes of footage and I personally think it's better than the original cut. Also, have you seen HEREDITARY and if so, which did you like better? Being that these are the only films I've seen from Ari Aster, I'm looking forward to seeing what he puts out next!
Thx. I didn't see the director's cut for Midsommar. With 30 minutes added it might be worthwhile if it alters the pacing or explains some things. I'll look for it. I did see Hereditary. I liked that film a little better. I thought that Aster's apparent irritation over his break up might have (in retrospect) made him put his thumb on the scale a bit insofar as who he wanted the audience to sympathize with.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 02:32 AM
I liked HEREDITARY a little more as well but MIDSOMMAR is definitely a mind trip of a film. If you are able to view the Director's Cut, I'd be curious of your thoughts and how it comes to the theatrical film.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 10:25 PM
Just saw "The Professor" w/ Johnny Depp..very funny & engaging..
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 11:20 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Just saw "The Professor" w/ Johnny Depp..very funny & engaging..
Will check it out.
Thanx Hood
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 11:27 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOKER
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
Was able to see Joker last night, was I captivated with the acting of all the characters. JP of course really sold it.
Agree with all above and would score even higher
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 11:34 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Joker
I saw this today. I thought it was good, not great. Like most if not all movies using comic book or superhero source material, it suffers from being a little too linear or simplistic in its storytelling. For example, the rioting in Gotham used as a backdrop as the movie approached its climax. Why were people rioting? IDK if Deux Ex Machina is the term I'm looking for but it just seemed to be a cheap storytelling tool to serve the movie. It wasn't very intelligently written IMO and I can see why people may take issue with its portrayal of mental illness. Some of the grittier scenes seemed to be there for shock value lessening their effectiveness. Great performance by Joaquin Phoenix, but I got the impression that's what the movie was ultimately hanging its hat on. Knowing Todd Phillips involvement, I went in expecting pretty simplistic and generic writing. Also, what's up with Phillips statement that it's open-ended as to whether Arthur Fleck is the Joker from Batman mythology? Of course he is. They retconned things so that it was him who killed Batman's parents and not run-of-the-mill hoodlums. Of course it's him!
I saw this today. I thought it was good, not great. Like most if not all movies using comic book or superhero source material, it suffers from being a little too linear or simplistic in its storytelling. For example, the rioting in Gotham used as a backdrop as the movie approached its climax. Why were people rioting? IDK if Deux Ex Machina is the term I'm looking for but it just seemed to be a cheap storytelling tool to serve the movie. It wasn't very intelligently written IMO and I can see why people may take issue with its portrayal of mental illness. Some of the grittier scenes seemed to be there for shock value lessening their effectiveness. Great performance by Joaquin Phoenix, but I got the impression that's what the movie was ultimately hanging its hat on. Knowing Todd Phillips involvement, I went in expecting pretty simplistic and generic writing. Also, what's up with Phillips statement that it's open-ended as to whether Arthur Fleck is the Joker from Batman mythology? Of course he is. They retconned things so that it was him who killed Batman's parents and not run-of-the-mill hoodlums. Of course it's him!
The rioting was the overlooked, forgotten and untreated needy of Gotham rebelling.
There are many realms of Mental Illness so many groups would always have issue.... this was also shown.
I am not sure if he is the same JOKER but I get what your saying as well.
I thought it was well done.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/19 11:50 PM
Also left out the fact that my wife was a bit creeped out since I sometimes laugh the way he did in the movie.
I got a kick out of that.
I got a kick out of that.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/19 01:57 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
JOKER
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
After watching this last night all I can say is, wow and that I can't wait to see it again. Incredible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The hype on this is real. Very Taxi Driver-esque and De Niro slides comfortably into his Rupert Pupkin character from THE KING OF COMEDY. I'm glad this film really shined a light on mental health and hopefully this can bring further discussion to the conversation. I'll admit I was apprehensive when the film was first announced but the cast and crew knocked it out of the park. I'm hoping some Oscars are in their future, especially for Phoenix! 8/10
Was able to see Joker last night, was I captivated with the acting of all the characters. JP of course really sold it.
Agree with all above and would score even higher
Glad you liked it DP. As of now, this is my favorite movie of the year thus far.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/24/19 04:15 PM
A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
Tom Hanks does a fantastic job fantastic job in his portrayal of Fred Rogers and I'm sure this will garner him an Oscar nomination (which I believe would be rightly deserved). I didn't see WON'T YOU BE MY NEIGHBOR from last year but after watching this film, I have more of a desire (especially to compare how closely Hanks' performance was to the real Mr. Rogers). The film plays as an episode of the show, which I found to be an enjoyable take, although at times it almost seems the movie is about journalist Tom Junod as opposed to Mr. Rogers. Other than that, this is typical Oscar bait that may garner more nominations other than Hanks. Overall, it was a pleasant movie but once in which I'm sure many people won't have a long memory for in just a few months time. 6/10
Tom Hanks does a fantastic job fantastic job in his portrayal of Fred Rogers and I'm sure this will garner him an Oscar nomination (which I believe would be rightly deserved). I didn't see WON'T YOU BE MY NEIGHBOR from last year but after watching this film, I have more of a desire (especially to compare how closely Hanks' performance was to the real Mr. Rogers). The film plays as an episode of the show, which I found to be an enjoyable take, although at times it almost seems the movie is about journalist Tom Junod as opposed to Mr. Rogers. Other than that, this is typical Oscar bait that may garner more nominations other than Hanks. Overall, it was a pleasant movie but once in which I'm sure many people won't have a long memory for in just a few months time. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/24/19 05:36 PM
KNIVES OUT
The modern day Agatha Christie tale of a millionaire who dies under mysterious circumstances. An all-star cast lead by Daniel Craig as Detective Benoit Blanc. The first 30-45 minutes the film really grips you and throws a lot of information your way. It's a roller coaster of a ride with humor, various storylines, and character introductions. The film is fast paced and for 130 minutes, flies by fairly quickly (with the exception of about midway into the film, where 2-3 characters are then solely focused on). I found the film to drag a bit during this portion but then the third act makes up for it with the reveal. A fun ride that I would be more than happy to ride again as well as see another story with Detective Blanc if Craig or Director Rian Johnson were so inclined to spin another tale for us. 7.5/10
The modern day Agatha Christie tale of a millionaire who dies under mysterious circumstances. An all-star cast lead by Daniel Craig as Detective Benoit Blanc. The first 30-45 minutes the film really grips you and throws a lot of information your way. It's a roller coaster of a ride with humor, various storylines, and character introductions. The film is fast paced and for 130 minutes, flies by fairly quickly (with the exception of about midway into the film, where 2-3 characters are then solely focused on). I found the film to drag a bit during this portion but then the third act makes up for it with the reveal. A fun ride that I would be more than happy to ride again as well as see another story with Detective Blanc if Craig or Director Rian Johnson were so inclined to spin another tale for us. 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/19 01:59 AM
Wow, 7.5 for Knives Out.
Will try to download that and Mr Rodgers as well once its available \\
Thanks i12
Will try to download that and Mr Rodgers as well once its available \\
Thanks i12
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/19 03:14 AM
SOYLENT GREEN (1973)
It's 2022, and New York's 40 million population is choking on global warming (ahead of its time), pollution, overcrowding and food shortages. A wealthy elitist (Joseph Cotton) is murdered, and a thuggish, not-very-honest cop, Thorn (Charlton Heston) is assigned to find his killer. With the help of his roomie Sol (Edward G. Robinson), he uncovers a deadly secret about the main form of sustenance for the ordinary folks. You'll figure it out way before he does. This isn't a very good movie, though it has a few decent sci-fi scenes and a perfunctory love interest. Heston is sturdy as ever. but the only reason to watch it is Robinson in his last movie. He's great, as usual. Robinson, IMO, is the most underrated great actor in Hollywood history.
It's 2022, and New York's 40 million population is choking on global warming (ahead of its time), pollution, overcrowding and food shortages. A wealthy elitist (Joseph Cotton) is murdered, and a thuggish, not-very-honest cop, Thorn (Charlton Heston) is assigned to find his killer. With the help of his roomie Sol (Edward G. Robinson), he uncovers a deadly secret about the main form of sustenance for the ordinary folks. You'll figure it out way before he does. This isn't a very good movie, though it has a few decent sci-fi scenes and a perfunctory love interest. Heston is sturdy as ever. but the only reason to watch it is Robinson in his last movie. He's great, as usual. Robinson, IMO, is the most underrated great actor in Hollywood history.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/19 05:09 AM
I have not seen that movie in a long time. Agree Turnbull, Robinson is great in the movie and his characters storyline is hard to forget. Two others that standout in the movie iard Connors and Kilpatrick who had limited screen time, but it fit the narrative.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/19 10:31 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Wow, 7.5 for Knives Out.
Will try to download that and Mr Rodgers as well once its available \\
Thanks i12
Will try to download that and Mr Rodgers as well once its available \\
Thanks i12
No problem. Enjoy! And yes, I really did enjoy KNIVES OUT. Hope you guys do as well.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/19 10:03 PM
Watched the first minute or so of The Irishman. If that minute is any indication, I can't wait to watch the rest of it tonight or tomorrow. Che buono.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/19 10:26 PM
I watched The Irishman at the cinema. The last 45 minutes or so was very affecting. Bufalino and Sheeran were monstrous human beings, but dammit if Scorsese didn't have their demises breaking your heart.
A few notes.
Joe Pesci's performance was incredible.
Harvey Keitel wasn't in it enough.
Probably one of De Niro's best performances, if not the best performance, over the last 20 years.
I thought Pesci, Keitel and Pacino de-aged better than De Niro.
If they were going to drag the movie out, I felt they could've devoted another 5-10 minutes of Sheeran's WW2 escapades.
De Niro the oldest looking mid-twentysomething I've ever seen in that WW2 flashback.
I fucking loved the scene where Pesci as Bufalino comes home covered in blood and walks up the stairs without saying a word to his wife. Expertly acted without a single bit of dialogue.
The scene with Sheeran and Bufalino eating in prison and Bufalino unable to eat his favorite bread almost had me choking up.
Speaking of emotional, it was tough to see Sheeran unable to reconnect with his daughter, if not entirely understandable.
It was wonderful to see De Niro and Pacino sharing the scene so often and in such a wonderful film for the first time since Heat. [Righteous Kill doesn't count]
Sebastian Maniscalco's portrayal of Crazy Joe Gallo was charismatic; I loved the scene where he disrespects Bufalino and Sheeran and you can see Sheeran seething with rage after Maniscalco brusquely told him to "get the fuck outta here".
It was a treat as a mob aficionado taking note of all the real-life mobster cameos (Persico, Colombo, Testa etc.]
The whackings were all expertly crafted.
I honestly thought Scorsese was going to retcon Hoffa's assassination because of Sheeran's visible internal conflict; not to mention the fact Hoffa's stepson unintentionally drove him to the scene of his murder.
I loved the soundtrack, particularly the doowop elements.
Fun note: The David Ferrie who appeared in one scene was portrayed by Joe Pesci in JFK.
A few notes.
Joe Pesci's performance was incredible.
Harvey Keitel wasn't in it enough.
Probably one of De Niro's best performances, if not the best performance, over the last 20 years.
I thought Pesci, Keitel and Pacino de-aged better than De Niro.
If they were going to drag the movie out, I felt they could've devoted another 5-10 minutes of Sheeran's WW2 escapades.
De Niro the oldest looking mid-twentysomething I've ever seen in that WW2 flashback.
I fucking loved the scene where Pesci as Bufalino comes home covered in blood and walks up the stairs without saying a word to his wife. Expertly acted without a single bit of dialogue.
The scene with Sheeran and Bufalino eating in prison and Bufalino unable to eat his favorite bread almost had me choking up.
Speaking of emotional, it was tough to see Sheeran unable to reconnect with his daughter, if not entirely understandable.
It was wonderful to see De Niro and Pacino sharing the scene so often and in such a wonderful film for the first time since Heat. [Righteous Kill doesn't count]
Sebastian Maniscalco's portrayal of Crazy Joe Gallo was charismatic; I loved the scene where he disrespects Bufalino and Sheeran and you can see Sheeran seething with rage after Maniscalco brusquely told him to "get the fuck outta here".
It was a treat as a mob aficionado taking note of all the real-life mobster cameos (Persico, Colombo, Testa etc.]
The whackings were all expertly crafted.
I honestly thought Scorsese was going to retcon Hoffa's assassination because of Sheeran's visible internal conflict; not to mention the fact Hoffa's stepson unintentionally drove him to the scene of his murder.
I loved the soundtrack, particularly the doowop elements.
Fun note: The David Ferrie who appeared in one scene was portrayed by Joe Pesci in JFK.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/19 02:36 AM
THE IRISHMAN
I never thought I'd see Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, Joe Pesci, and Martin Scorsese work on a film together, but here we finally are! Pacino and De Niro are back on their game and Pesci, coerced out of retirement, puts together an as equally strong performance. Many Scorsese alum are seen throughout and even the de-aging technology was top notch and actually aided the film, rather than take away from it. My only 2 gripes with the film were the lack of a solid Scorsese soundtrack that we've come to expect from him and the runtime. I did enjoy the film thoroughly, but even at 3 1/2 hours, it was rather long. 8/10
I never thought I'd see Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, Joe Pesci, and Martin Scorsese work on a film together, but here we finally are! Pacino and De Niro are back on their game and Pesci, coerced out of retirement, puts together an as equally strong performance. Many Scorsese alum are seen throughout and even the de-aging technology was top notch and actually aided the film, rather than take away from it. My only 2 gripes with the film were the lack of a solid Scorsese soundtrack that we've come to expect from him and the runtime. I did enjoy the film thoroughly, but even at 3 1/2 hours, it was rather long. 8/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/19 03:01 AM
Great review guys.
I just finished viewing it as well.
Enjoyed it very much, agree with thoughts above from you both.
Pesci was best of the bunch.
Was a bit too long.
Music choices could have been better and broader.
7.5 or if you rather Stars....4 out of 5
I just finished viewing it as well.
Enjoyed it very much, agree with thoughts above from you both.
Pesci was best of the bunch.
Was a bit too long.
Music choices could have been better and broader.
7.5 or if you rather Stars....4 out of 5
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/19 08:18 PM
Just watched The Irishman. Superb! A bit long and it drags just a little in some places, but so, so good otherwise. Another classic in the vein of the GF, Casino, and Goodfellas.
I wonder though if some of the historical scenes and references such as the Teamsters, Hoffa, Cuba, Gallo, even Kennedy, etc. will be lost on younger viewers.
Of course, from the opening scene with In the Still of the Night I was captured.
I wonder though if some of the historical scenes and references such as the Teamsters, Hoffa, Cuba, Gallo, even Kennedy, etc. will be lost on younger viewers.
Of course, from the opening scene with In the Still of the Night I was captured.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/19 07:35 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Of course, from the opening scene with In the Still of the Night I was captured.
Scorsese and I are of a Certain Age, Oli (as I suspect you are), and his taste in soundtrack music has a certain resonance...
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/19 05:28 PM
THE CINCINNATI KID (1965)
After enjoying how Edward G. Robinson saved "Soylent Green," I tuned into this mediocre Steve McQueen vehicle. Robinson did it again. McQueen is the Kid, a rising card sharp in '30's New Orleans, determined to unseat "The Man," Lancey Howard (Robinson). McQueen dials in his performance, and the slow plot is encumbered with a sappy, pointless romance with Tuesday Weld, and an even more pointless infidelity with Ann-Margret. Karl Malden and Joan Blondell provide some color, and the card games are interesting. But it's Robinson who saves it from the pits--his Lancey is gentlemanly, borderline elegant, but always genial and never above the general riffraff that congregates around him and the Big Game with the Kid. Another great performance by Eddie G.
After enjoying how Edward G. Robinson saved "Soylent Green," I tuned into this mediocre Steve McQueen vehicle. Robinson did it again. McQueen is the Kid, a rising card sharp in '30's New Orleans, determined to unseat "The Man," Lancey Howard (Robinson). McQueen dials in his performance, and the slow plot is encumbered with a sappy, pointless romance with Tuesday Weld, and an even more pointless infidelity with Ann-Margret. Karl Malden and Joan Blondell provide some color, and the card games are interesting. But it's Robinson who saves it from the pits--his Lancey is gentlemanly, borderline elegant, but always genial and never above the general riffraff that congregates around him and the Big Game with the Kid. Another great performance by Eddie G.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/01/19 02:45 AM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/01/19 11:59 PM
21 BRIDGES
Didn't have much of a desire to see this after viewing the trailer but a friend of mine wanted to go so I decided to take a flier on it. The opening act really grabbed my attention with the opening robbery scene and thought I might have undervalued this film. Taylor Kitsch was the high point of the film in that first act but by the third act, the film lost all of it's momentum and went out with a whimper. Chadwick Boseman was enjoyable in the lead role, although I never found myself backing his "cool guy" persona he was trying so desperately to convey throughout the film. 6/10
Didn't have much of a desire to see this after viewing the trailer but a friend of mine wanted to go so I decided to take a flier on it. The opening act really grabbed my attention with the opening robbery scene and thought I might have undervalued this film. Taylor Kitsch was the high point of the film in that first act but by the third act, the film lost all of it's momentum and went out with a whimper. Chadwick Boseman was enjoyable in the lead role, although I never found myself backing his "cool guy" persona he was trying so desperately to convey throughout the film. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/19 01:59 AM
DARK WATERS
This film focuses on DuPont poisoning residents in West Virginia for decades. Mark Ruffalo, an environmental attorney, takes the case on for one of the locals. While I applaud the film for being able to sift through the almost 20 years this case went through from beginning to end, to present a digestible and comprehensive account of what happened, the story at times seems to be spotty. And while I am a big Anne Hathaway fan (and to a lesser extent, a Mark Ruffalo fan as well), both seem to mail in their performances. Hathaway as the "this case is costing you your family because your never home" wife, who ever once in a while has a breakdown. Whereas Ruffalo seems dazed throughout with the exception of a few times he actually gets emotional and passionate. Interesting subject, but averagely executed. 6/10
This film focuses on DuPont poisoning residents in West Virginia for decades. Mark Ruffalo, an environmental attorney, takes the case on for one of the locals. While I applaud the film for being able to sift through the almost 20 years this case went through from beginning to end, to present a digestible and comprehensive account of what happened, the story at times seems to be spotty. And while I am a big Anne Hathaway fan (and to a lesser extent, a Mark Ruffalo fan as well), both seem to mail in their performances. Hathaway as the "this case is costing you your family because your never home" wife, who ever once in a while has a breakdown. Whereas Ruffalo seems dazed throughout with the exception of a few times he actually gets emotional and passionate. Interesting subject, but averagely executed. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/19 02:41 AM
@ Irishman
Me and my otha brotha are really looking forward to seeing Motherless Brooklyn as we are big Edward Norton fans. Have you seen it yet? The trailer looks really good.
Me and my otha brotha are really looking forward to seeing Motherless Brooklyn as we are big Edward Norton fans. Have you seen it yet? The trailer looks really good.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/19 06:55 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
@ Irishman
Me and my otha brotha are really looking forward to seeing Motherless Brooklyn as we are big Edward Norton fans. Have you seen it yet? The trailer looks really good.
Me and my otha brotha are really looking forward to seeing Motherless Brooklyn as we are big Edward Norton fans. Have you seen it yet? The trailer looks really good.
I haven't yet. I'm passing on it in the theaters. Gonna wait until it drops on Blu-Ray.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/08/19 02:41 AM
I tried to stream it and it seams to be low Rez right now, but will try it again tomorrow and watch it either way.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/19 03:03 AM
JUMANJI: THE NEXT LEVEL
The cast from the original is back and while the first was a surprisingly fun ride, this was a disappointment. Bad choice to insert both Danny DeVito and Danny Glover to the mix. You could even make a point about Awkwafina, but she was more tolerable than the other 2. The jokes are what really killed this for me as they just weren't funny, relying on DeVito and Glover to carry most of that load, which they were unable to accomplish. Jack Black tried his best to pull his own weight and out of everybody, he did the best he could considering the material. If you enjoyed the first one, be prepared to be disappointed by this one. 5.5/10
The cast from the original is back and while the first was a surprisingly fun ride, this was a disappointment. Bad choice to insert both Danny DeVito and Danny Glover to the mix. You could even make a point about Awkwafina, but she was more tolerable than the other 2. The jokes are what really killed this for me as they just weren't funny, relying on DeVito and Glover to carry most of that load, which they were unable to accomplish. Jack Black tried his best to pull his own weight and out of everybody, he did the best he could considering the material. If you enjoyed the first one, be prepared to be disappointed by this one. 5.5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/19 11:17 PM
I watched The Terminator with my otha brotha the other day. I think it ages pretty well all things considered.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/19 02:30 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I watched The Terminator with my otha brotha the other day. I think it ages pretty well all things considered.
Your otha brutha? From anutha mutha?
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/19 03:07 AM
Reservoir Dogs.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/19/19 11:28 PM
I watched conspiracy movie, Cutter's Way, without knowing the first thing about it. I went in blind but I enjoyed it. Good performance by John Heard and Jeff Bridges in the lead.
I watched Chinatown again. Movie perfection with an ending that knocks the stuffing out of me every time I see it. Jack Nicholson during this era was so charismatic and magnetic.
I'm looking forward to watching the sequel to Chinatown, The Two Jakes, one of these days, especially seeing as Harvey Keitel is in it.
Speaking of noir movies, I watched Motherless Brooklyn with Edward Norton. I wanted to enjoy it more than I did. It was dense and a little hard to follow at times. Respectable effort but I feel there was a much better movie hidden in there somewhere.
I watched Chinatown again. Movie perfection with an ending that knocks the stuffing out of me every time I see it. Jack Nicholson during this era was so charismatic and magnetic.
I'm looking forward to watching the sequel to Chinatown, The Two Jakes, one of these days, especially seeing as Harvey Keitel is in it.
Speaking of noir movies, I watched Motherless Brooklyn with Edward Norton. I wanted to enjoy it more than I did. It was dense and a little hard to follow at times. Respectable effort but I feel there was a much better movie hidden in there somewhere.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/19 03:16 PM
RICHARD JEWELL
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
For anyone who hated THE LAST JEDI, rest assured, JJ Abrams gave you a worthy conclusion to this trilogy. This is on par with THE FORCE AWAKENS (if not better). At times a wonderfully dark film that paces well as the longest Star Wars at 2 hours and 21 minutes. For everything that has been written about this new trilogy over the years, while I was never a big fan of it and I won't miss these characters as much as other characters from the past, I hope this is indeed the end of the cannon. If Disney wants to do spinoffs or movies with new characters, that's fine. I think over the course of the last 40+ years, this cow's been milked dry. 7.5/10
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
For anyone who hated THE LAST JEDI, rest assured, JJ Abrams gave you a worthy conclusion to this trilogy. This is on par with THE FORCE AWAKENS (if not better). At times a wonderfully dark film that paces well as the longest Star Wars at 2 hours and 21 minutes. For everything that has been written about this new trilogy over the years, while I was never a big fan of it and I won't miss these characters as much as other characters from the past, I hope this is indeed the end of the cannon. If Disney wants to do spinoffs or movies with new characters, that's fine. I think over the course of the last 40+ years, this cow's been milked dry. 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/19 02:51 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I watched conspiracy movie, Cutter's Way, without knowing the first thing about it. I went in blind but I enjoyed it. Good performance by John Heard and Jeff Bridges in the lead.
I watched Chinatown again. Movie perfection with an ending that knocks the stuffing out of me every time I see it. Jack Nicholson during this era was so charismatic and magnetic.
I'm looking forward to watching the sequel to Chinatown, The Two Jakes, one of these days, especially seeing as Harvey Keitel is in it.
Speaking of noir movies, I watched Motherless Brooklyn with Edward Norton. I wanted to enjoy it more than I did. It was dense and a little hard to follow at times. Respectable effort but I feel there was a much better movie hidden in there somewhere.
I watched Chinatown again. Movie perfection with an ending that knocks the stuffing out of me every time I see it. Jack Nicholson during this era was so charismatic and magnetic.
I'm looking forward to watching the sequel to Chinatown, The Two Jakes, one of these days, especially seeing as Harvey Keitel is in it.
Speaking of noir movies, I watched Motherless Brooklyn with Edward Norton. I wanted to enjoy it more than I did. It was dense and a little hard to follow at times. Respectable effort but I feel there was a much better movie hidden in there somewhere.
Will check the others out but want to mention I felt the same of Motherless Brooklyn, I think their was a great story in there but slapped together, rushed and could have been better told if right people were involved.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/19 02:53 AM
[quote=Irishman12]RICHARD JEWELL
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/19 02:55 AM
I watched the FX Original A Christmas Carol last night and loved it..... 3.5 out of 5
I love watching all the Christmas Carols.
This new version is Dark and well done.
https://youtu.be/uNxZazunHF0
I love watching all the Christmas Carols.
This new version is Dark and well done.
https://youtu.be/uNxZazunHF0
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/19 03:10 AM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/19 10:23 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
[quote=Irishman12]RICHARD JEWELL
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
I like Clint Eastwood, but his movies can be kind of hit or miss for me.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/19 10:41 PM
BOMBSHELL
During the previews, I thought Charlize Theron was a spitting image of Megyn Kelly (makeup and wardrobe did a great job with her transformation). As for the story, as you can probably guess going in, this is an attack on Roger Ailes and Fox News so a certain amount of salt must be taken while viewing this film. However, all politics aside I do think John Lithgow shined in his portrayal of misogynistic Fox News President/CEO Roger Ailes. I had high hopes for this as judging from the previews, this to me had kind of a THE BIG SHORT/VICE vibe to it and I really enjoyed those movies. With this film, I think it was at times, all over the place. Theron is the star and then from time to time they'd pepper Gretchen Carlson (played by Nicole Kidman) and Kayla Pospisil (Margot Robbie) stories in. However, the film should have done a better job of making up its mind: focus on Theron strictly or fleshing out the Carlson/Pospisil stories more. A little disappointing but good performances all around. 6/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS
The second remake of the 1974 classic and this was by far the worst. If you're a fan of horror and can look past the excessive amount of misandry throughout the film, then you may enjoy it. However, it's so obvious and heavy handed that as a male, yeah, I had a problem with it. Not to mention the entire third act which was an absolute trainwreck and story wise, too ludicrous. Women will whine and complain about not getting enough representation to make movies, however, when they make garbage such as this or CHARLIE'S ANGELS, and they segregate half of the population, don't be surprised when it bombs at the box office! 4/10
During the previews, I thought Charlize Theron was a spitting image of Megyn Kelly (makeup and wardrobe did a great job with her transformation). As for the story, as you can probably guess going in, this is an attack on Roger Ailes and Fox News so a certain amount of salt must be taken while viewing this film. However, all politics aside I do think John Lithgow shined in his portrayal of misogynistic Fox News President/CEO Roger Ailes. I had high hopes for this as judging from the previews, this to me had kind of a THE BIG SHORT/VICE vibe to it and I really enjoyed those movies. With this film, I think it was at times, all over the place. Theron is the star and then from time to time they'd pepper Gretchen Carlson (played by Nicole Kidman) and Kayla Pospisil (Margot Robbie) stories in. However, the film should have done a better job of making up its mind: focus on Theron strictly or fleshing out the Carlson/Pospisil stories more. A little disappointing but good performances all around. 6/10
BLACK CHRISTMAS
The second remake of the 1974 classic and this was by far the worst. If you're a fan of horror and can look past the excessive amount of misandry throughout the film, then you may enjoy it. However, it's so obvious and heavy handed that as a male, yeah, I had a problem with it. Not to mention the entire third act which was an absolute trainwreck and story wise, too ludicrous. Women will whine and complain about not getting enough representation to make movies, however, when they make garbage such as this or CHARLIE'S ANGELS, and they segregate half of the population, don't be surprised when it bombs at the box office! 4/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/19 07:39 PM
I watched The Two Jakes. It wasn't remotely as good as Chinatown, but if you watch it on it's own terms it's not without it's charms. Whereas Chinatown was moody throughout its duration, Two Jakes was lighthearted at times to the point it was verging on slapstick; it perhaps would've benefited from a more consistent tone. Jack Nicholson was just doing "Jack" at this point, playing himself, to the point it almost felt like parody, but Harvey Keitel was excellent and it was a kick seeing them interact. The movie was dense, wordy, and hard to follow but the denouement was well put together and almost made it all worthwhile.
One other thing - it was jarring seeing two fifty-something year old men playing opposite women young enough to be their daughters, and Nicholson almost seemed to be taking directorial license with some of his scenes, particularly the "romantic" scenes.
One other thing - it was jarring seeing two fifty-something year old men playing opposite women young enough to be their daughters, and Nicholson almost seemed to be taking directorial license with some of his scenes, particularly the "romantic" scenes.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/19 04:51 PM
BRUTE FORCE (1947)
Hollywood did very well by prison movies from the Thirties through the Fifties, and this is one of the best--tough, forceful and focused. Joe Collins (Burt Lancaster) is single-minded in breaking out, and leads his cellmates in a brave (but as you no doubt correctly surmise) futile attempt. Director Jules Dassin turns this into a borderline film noir, and he gets excellent performances from the supporting cast that includes Charles Bickford, Whit Bissel, Jeff Corey, Sam Levine, Howard Duff and Yvonne DeCarlo. But the movie belongs to Hume Cronyn, who plays the sadistic chief guard Capt. Munsey. Despite his small size and gentle voice, Cronyn turns Munsey into one of the scariest, most loathsome characters you'll ever see. Like most prison movies, "Brute Force" can't escape cliches (including a singing West Indian prisoner), but overall, it's really good.
Hollywood did very well by prison movies from the Thirties through the Fifties, and this is one of the best--tough, forceful and focused. Joe Collins (Burt Lancaster) is single-minded in breaking out, and leads his cellmates in a brave (but as you no doubt correctly surmise) futile attempt. Director Jules Dassin turns this into a borderline film noir, and he gets excellent performances from the supporting cast that includes Charles Bickford, Whit Bissel, Jeff Corey, Sam Levine, Howard Duff and Yvonne DeCarlo. But the movie belongs to Hume Cronyn, who plays the sadistic chief guard Capt. Munsey. Despite his small size and gentle voice, Cronyn turns Munsey into one of the scariest, most loathsome characters you'll ever see. Like most prison movies, "Brute Force" can't escape cliches (including a singing West Indian prisoner), but overall, it's really good.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/19 08:19 PM
Candy Corn 2019
Not bad and not great, had creepy value and some actors were pretty good, others not so much.
5 out of 10
https://youtu.be/EGf6Q7CQDH8
Not bad and not great, had creepy value and some actors were pretty good, others not so much.
5 out of 10
https://youtu.be/EGf6Q7CQDH8
Posted By: Beanshooter
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/19 09:48 PM
Just watched, The Two Popes. Great writing and acting. Although I'm not a fan of Pope Francis, specially with his political stands, I thought it was well made.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/19 11:00 PM
Anyone watch Korean movies?
The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Memories of Murder are all really good, and of course Old Boy is a classic.
The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Memories of Murder are all really good, and of course Old Boy is a classic.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 12:12 AM
I’ll have to catch Two Popes, heard good things.
Never seen Koren Movies Moe but will look it up sometime.
Never seen Koren Movies Moe but will look it up sometime.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 02:02 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Anyone watch Korean movies?
The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Memories of Murder are all really good, and of course Old Boy is a classic.
The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Memories of Murder are all really good, and of course Old Boy is a classic.
I only recently heard of I SAW THE DEVIL but heard it was really good. What's your review of it and how high would you rate it?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 02:11 AM
UNCUT GEMS
This looked pretty interesting from the previews and at times it seemed to move pretty fast but at other times, it seemed to repeat itself. Honestly, one of, if not the best Adam Sandler role I've ever seen him in. I'd like to say he deserves at least an Academy Award nomination for this, but with all of the other competition (some of which I agree with and some of which I don't), I wouldn't be surprised if they squeezed him out of the Best Actor category. I also thought they found an interesting way to incorporate Kevin Garnett throughout the film, as he is an integral part in the film and doesn't just make a cameo. An interesting study of sports gambling addiction with a depressing ending. 6.5/10
This looked pretty interesting from the previews and at times it seemed to move pretty fast but at other times, it seemed to repeat itself. Honestly, one of, if not the best Adam Sandler role I've ever seen him in. I'd like to say he deserves at least an Academy Award nomination for this, but with all of the other competition (some of which I agree with and some of which I don't), I wouldn't be surprised if they squeezed him out of the Best Actor category. I also thought they found an interesting way to incorporate Kevin Garnett throughout the film, as he is an integral part in the film and doesn't just make a cameo. An interesting study of sports gambling addiction with a depressing ending. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 02:17 AM
I’m looking forward to seeing Sandler in this movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 02:54 AM
With 2019 coming to a close, here's my top ten list for the year. Curious what some of yours looks like:
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 03:01 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I’m looking forward to seeing Sandler in this movie.
It just got released this week. If you see it, I'd be curious as to your thoughts on it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/19 03:15 AM
Will do....
Right now I would have to say the best Movies for me this year were
GreenBook.
Joker
Irishman
Right now I would have to say the best Movies for me this year were
GreenBook.
Joker
Irishman
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/20 09:50 PM
Shaka Zulu (make sure its the one starring Henry Cele). I recommend it to all. It's really a tv miniseries from 1986 about the emergence of Shaka as the Zulu leader and how he revolutionized Zulu warfare and reigned over his people. The soundtrack includes several a cappella chants and songs which I thoroughly enjoyed. It's ten episodes and much is it is quite violent. It's actors are primarily English and their dialogues can be a challenge to understand. Nevertheless, I give it 5 stars.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/20 10:28 PM
THE GRUDGE
Started the year off by taking a flier on this last night. I've never been big on Japanese horror so I went in to this hesitantly (also the Sarah Michelle Gellar version was hot garbage back in 2004, so I still had that image in my head.) The premise here is an American nurse working in Tokyo misses her family and gets spooked out and shortens her commitment in Japan to return home. Unbeknownst to her, a spirit has attached itself to her, which causes her to kill her family. Thus, the house is haunted and now anyone entering the house (realtors, police, etc.) will have the same spirit attached to them. For a R rated horror film, it's pretty tame with mostly jump scares and some "grotesque" images. The story skips around primarily between 2004-2006. Wasn't expecting much going in and that's how I felt coming out. Nothing special to see here. 4.5/10
Started the year off by taking a flier on this last night. I've never been big on Japanese horror so I went in to this hesitantly (also the Sarah Michelle Gellar version was hot garbage back in 2004, so I still had that image in my head.) The premise here is an American nurse working in Tokyo misses her family and gets spooked out and shortens her commitment in Japan to return home. Unbeknownst to her, a spirit has attached itself to her, which causes her to kill her family. Thus, the house is haunted and now anyone entering the house (realtors, police, etc.) will have the same spirit attached to them. For a R rated horror film, it's pretty tame with mostly jump scares and some "grotesque" images. The story skips around primarily between 2004-2006. Wasn't expecting much going in and that's how I felt coming out. Nothing special to see here. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/20 07:06 PM
LUCY IN THE SKY
I'm seriously perplexed at why this film doesn't have better reviews? This is one of, if not the best, Natalie Portman performance I've ever seen. Not as dark or deep as Joaquin Phoenix in Joker but I still got that vibe of someone who's slowly losing touch with reality. She's strong, smart, and fierce at times. Wonderful editing with a lot of overhead shots and camera zooms to heighten Portman's isolation. And on a final note: after seeing him in this and RICHARD JEWEL recently, I'm convinced Jon Hamm doesn't have to stretch his acting chops very much to pull off playing an a--hole. I have nothing against the man and his work is spotty for me at times, but recently, he just comes across as that a--hole (so kudos to him). Looking forward to another viewing and I hope Natalie not only gets an Oscar nomination but wins the damn thing! I would definitely have to update my Top Ten list of 2019 and include this film in there. 8/10
I'm seriously perplexed at why this film doesn't have better reviews? This is one of, if not the best, Natalie Portman performance I've ever seen. Not as dark or deep as Joaquin Phoenix in Joker but I still got that vibe of someone who's slowly losing touch with reality. She's strong, smart, and fierce at times. Wonderful editing with a lot of overhead shots and camera zooms to heighten Portman's isolation. And on a final note: after seeing him in this and RICHARD JEWEL recently, I'm convinced Jon Hamm doesn't have to stretch his acting chops very much to pull off playing an a--hole. I have nothing against the man and his work is spotty for me at times, but recently, he just comes across as that a--hole (so kudos to him). Looking forward to another viewing and I hope Natalie not only gets an Oscar nomination but wins the damn thing! I would definitely have to update my Top Ten list of 2019 and include this film in there. 8/10
Posted By: pizzaboy
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/20 07:36 PM
Natalie Portman is the best actress of her generation. Hands down.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/20 08:07 PM
Originally Posted by pizzaboy
Natalie Portman is the best actress of her generation. Hands down.
She's one of my favorite actresses of all-time, alongside Nicole Kidman. But yes, this is a wonderful performance by her!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/20 01:49 AM
The Best of Enemies 2019
3 1/2 out of 5
Good movie really enjoyed it.
True story of an Activist and a Clansman in Durham S.C. 1971.
3 1/2 out of 5
Good movie really enjoyed it.
True story of an Activist and a Clansman in Durham S.C. 1971.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/20 01:51 AM
CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME: 2018
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/20 01:24 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME: 2018
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
Glad you liked it DP! It was in my Top Ten for 2018. Loved Melissa McCarthy's performance. I don't think many people have seen it due to not much of an advertising campaign, hence the reason for lack of buzz.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/20 02:55 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME: 2018
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
Glad you liked it DP! It was in my Top Ten for 2018. Loved Melissa McCarthy's performance. I don't think many people have seen it due to not much of an advertising campaign, hence the reason for lack of buzz.
I was looking back for a review but guess I did not go back fur enough, search did not work either.
Your top 10....WOW...... what was your score? I figure my 3.5 is a 7 on the out of 10 scale.
I really liked it a lot.
My new streaming device is having me catch up rapidly on Movies I missed so sorry if I am on a delay.
I can also tell you my device is now kicking Disney + and this Disney ToGo Movie with the Dog is HUGE for me and the Wife
Check it out if you can. We score it off the charts and Best Disney movie Ever.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/20 11:38 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME: 2018
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
3 1/2 out of 5
Really well done and the characters were so likable.
Not sure why this movie did not score more of a buzz.
Glad you liked it DP! It was in my Top Ten for 2018. Loved Melissa McCarthy's performance. I don't think many people have seen it due to not much of an advertising campaign, hence the reason for lack of buzz.
I was looking back for a review but guess I did not go back fur enough, search did not work either.
Your top 10....WOW...... what was your score? I figure my 3.5 is a 7 on the out of 10 scale.
I really liked it a lot.
My new streaming device is having me catch up rapidly on Movies I missed so sorry if I am on a delay.
I can also tell you my device is now kicking Disney + and this Disney ToGo Movie with the Dog is HUGE for me and the Wife
Check it out if you can. We score it off the charts and Best Disney movie Ever.
I found my review of CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? on page 36 of this thread but for some reason, I didn't score it? I have no idea but I'd give it at least a 7 or 7.5, so sounds like we agree on that.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/20 06:32 PM
JUST MERCY
The true story of civil right lawyer Bryan Stevenson (played by Michael B. Jordan) who dedicates his life to free innocent men on death row in Alabama. The movie primarily deals with the case of Walter McMillian (played by Jamie Foxx), who wrongly spent 6 years on death row between the years 1987-1993. Going in to this, you know what to expect: a heartfelt story about the injustice the criminal justice system and racism can reap and sow. Other than the tragedy that this story is, the performances are flat. Oscar bait, one in which I don't think the Academy will bite as this is a pretty forgettable movie. 6/10
The true story of civil right lawyer Bryan Stevenson (played by Michael B. Jordan) who dedicates his life to free innocent men on death row in Alabama. The movie primarily deals with the case of Walter McMillian (played by Jamie Foxx), who wrongly spent 6 years on death row between the years 1987-1993. Going in to this, you know what to expect: a heartfelt story about the injustice the criminal justice system and racism can reap and sow. Other than the tragedy that this story is, the performances are flat. Oscar bait, one in which I don't think the Academy will bite as this is a pretty forgettable movie. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/11/20 02:16 AM
1917
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/11/20 05:37 PM
Real Women Have Curves was America Ferrera's first movie. It center's on 18 year old Ana whose life in the LA barrio has some unique aspects that are characteristic of the Hispanic culture. However, it has those characteristics that are common in all families. For one, Ana has the opportunity to attend Columbia, but her mother wants her home. Her sister has a struggling dress making company and she needs Ana to help out. Ana meets her first love with those implications. It's really so interesting also because it is scripted from a woman's point of view.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/20 05:07 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2019 coming to a close, here's my top ten list for the year. Curious what some of yours looks like:
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
Spider-Man was that good? I have not seen it yet but am looking forward to it.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/20 05:13 AM
That netflix documentary Don’t fuck with Cats is really interesting. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time. It’s a crime documentary kind of along the lines of making a murderer and others. People who treat their pets(animals in general) that way have no place in this world in my opinion.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/20 08:01 PM
Just watched a movie from 2018
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/20 10:41 PM
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2019 coming to a close, here's my top ten list for the year. Curious what some of yours looks like:
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
Spider-Man was that good? I have not seen it yet but am looking forward to it.
I thought so, it was fun. I need to rewatch it so this was after just one viewing. I'd have to update my list anyway. Would take out KNIVES OUT and READY OR NOT and add LUCY IN THE SKY and 1917, since I've seen both since I created this list.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/20 10:41 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Just watched a movie from 2018
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
I remember watching that. It was a fun ride. Good popcorn flick. The Rock was good but the stealer for me was Jeffrey Dean Morgan and his southern drawl.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/20 03:54 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Just watched a movie from 2018
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
RAMPAGE
It was pretty good, very entertaining and fun , Rocks friend.... the Huge Gorilla was very cool.
I remember watching that. It was a fun ride. Good popcorn flick. The Rock was good but the stealer for me was Jeffrey Dean Morgan and his southern drawl.
Yes. It was Fun, Negan was Awesome Too!
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/20 05:51 PM
I didn’t go through the past pages and check, but has anybody here seen The Joker? I find it really intriguing and from what I can tell Joaquin Phoenix seems totally into the part. Another question, I’m not a huge Batman fan at all but loved The Dark Knight because of Heath Ledger’s fantastic performance, so maybe a dumb question but this is the same joker in relationship to Batman? And I am assuming it’s telling his story of how he got to be the joker. Am I correct? I have HBO on it’s coming on this month, and I think I’m going to check it out
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/13/20 06:10 PM
Originally Posted by The Italian Stallionette
I didn’t go through the past pages and check, but has anybody here seen The Joker? I find it really intriguing and from what I can tell Joaquin Phoenix seems totally into the part. Another question, I’m not a huge Batman fan at all but loved The Dark Knight because of Heath Ledger’s fantastic performance, so maybe a dumb question but this is the same joker in relationship to Batman? And I am assuming it’s telling his story of how he got to be the joker. Am I correct? I have HBO on it’s coming on this month, and I think I’m going to check it out
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
Yes TIS, I've seen both. To answer your questions about JOKER, it was my favorite movie of last year and if the Academy doesn't give Joaquin Phoenix the Oscar, they're robbing him of it. I was apprehensive when I first heard the project announced, figuring DC/Warner Bros. would screw it up. But once Joaquin was attached, I became more interested. I saw it twice in the theaters and once since then and have absolutely loved it! A truly powerful film. And yes, this is the Joker in relation to Batman but different than Ledger's Joker. This film is more about the Joker and not about Batman, so don't go in to it expecting action or to see a lot of Batman as this is a character study of how the Joker became the way he is.
As for ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD, again, I've seen it multiple times and enjoyed it. It's on my Top Ten list of 2019 films. I love anything Tarantino so I'm a little biased. It's not his best film but it's far from his worse (it's somewhere in the middle). Definitely worth checking out IMO.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 02:25 AM
Originally Posted by The Italian Stallionette
I didn’t go through the past pages and check, but has anybody here seen The Joker? I find it really intriguing and from what I can tell Joaquin Phoenix seems totally into the part. Another question, I’m not a huge Batman fan at all but loved The Dark Knight because of Heath Ledger’s fantastic performance, so maybe a dumb question but this is the same joker in relationship to Batman? And I am assuming it’s telling his story of how he got to be the joker. Am I correct? I have HBO on it’s coming on this month, and I think I’m going to check it out
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
Also, what about “Once Upon Time In Hollywood?†I have to admit the music is appealing and I’m guessing I’ll be able to relate to the era. Has anyone seen it?
😀
TIS
It was a great movie like Irish said. Once upon a time in Hollywood was also great. Both are two of my favorite movies of the year right behind The Irishman. Another movie I loved was marriage story.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 02:29 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2019 coming to a close, here's my top ten list for the year. Curious what some of yours looks like:
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
Spider-Man was that good? I have not seen it yet but am looking forward to it.
I thought so, it was fun. I need to rewatch it so this was after just one viewing. I'd have to update my list anyway. Would take out KNIVES OUT and READY OR NOT and add LUCY IN THE SKY and 1917, since I've seen both since I created this list.
Is it true that they are not making another Spider-Man movie with Holland? I think I read that somewhere. Also, did anyone see the Oscar nominations? What are everyone’s thoughts?
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 02:29 AM
I saw the HBO new Jason Bateman show. The Outsiders is the name of it. Very interesting so far! Between this and Don’t Fuck with Cats documentary(GREAT watch) on Netflix I am pretty satisfied with the true crime drama this year.
Posted By: The Italian Stallionette
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 02:45 AM
I saw previews of the Jason Bateman series and it looked pretty good. How many episodes have I missed?
😀
TIS
😀
TIS
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 03:43 AM
ELVIS: THAT'S THE WAY IT IS (1970)
About half of this documentary shows The King, in great shape physically and vocally, rehearsing at an MGM studio for his big Vegas shows with a terrific band including Charlie Hodge, Glen Hardin, Jerry Scheff, Ronnie Tutt, John Wilkenson, and lead by the immortal James Burton, possibly the greatest guitar sideman ever. Two backup choruses join him. Elvis is relaxed, horsing around, but sings brilliantly. The band is fantastic. The second half a composite of shows in Vegas and Phoenix, with a gigantic musical entourage--if he got a million bucks per performance, he'd probably have kept $49.50 after paying everyone off. I thought he sang better in the rehearsals, but it's the show that counts. Here you get to see the Master Showman at his best: confident, in complete control, kissing the gals, walking into the audience, just slaying his fans. Very good. Never be another like him.
About half of this documentary shows The King, in great shape physically and vocally, rehearsing at an MGM studio for his big Vegas shows with a terrific band including Charlie Hodge, Glen Hardin, Jerry Scheff, Ronnie Tutt, John Wilkenson, and lead by the immortal James Burton, possibly the greatest guitar sideman ever. Two backup choruses join him. Elvis is relaxed, horsing around, but sings brilliantly. The band is fantastic. The second half a composite of shows in Vegas and Phoenix, with a gigantic musical entourage--if he got a million bucks per performance, he'd probably have kept $49.50 after paying everyone off. I thought he sang better in the rehearsals, but it's the show that counts. Here you get to see the Master Showman at his best: confident, in complete control, kissing the gals, walking into the audience, just slaying his fans. Very good. Never be another like him.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 06:48 PM
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2019 coming to a close, here's my top ten list for the year. Curious what some of yours looks like:
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
1) JOKER
2) MIDSOMMAR
3) AVENGERS: ENDGAME
4) ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
5) THE IRISHMAN
6) SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME
7) IT: CHAPTER TWO
8) STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
9) KNIVES OUT
10) READY OR NOT
Spider-Man was that good? I have not seen it yet but am looking forward to it.
I thought so, it was fun. I need to rewatch it so this was after just one viewing. I'd have to update my list anyway. Would take out KNIVES OUT and READY OR NOT and add LUCY IN THE SKY and 1917, since I've seen both since I created this list.
Is it true that they are not making another Spider-Man movie with Holland? I think I read that somewhere. Also, did anyone see the Oscar nominations? What are everyone’s thoughts?
Originally it was reported that no, he was not going to play Spider-Man again and that Disney wouldn't work with Sony on it (Sony owns the rights to the character). But things got sorted out, at least for one more film so there will be a third Spider-Man film with Tom Holland in it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 06:49 PM
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
I saw the HBO new Jason Bateman show. The Outsiders is the name of it. Very interesting so far! Between this and Don’t Fuck with Cats documentary(GREAT watch) on Netflix I am pretty satisfied with the true crime drama this year.
Watched episode one on Sunday and episode two yesterday. It definitely has my attention. I haven't read the book but so far I'm invested. Hoping it can sustain and finish as well as it opene
Originally Posted by The Italian Stallionette
I saw previews of the Jason Bateman series and it looked pretty good. How many episodes have I missed?
😀
TIS
😀
TIS
They aired 2 episodes on Sunday and now it'll be once a week so you're only 2 behind.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/20 10:07 PM
I haven’t read the book either but I really enjoyed both episodes so far.
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/20 10:09 PM
What are some movies that everyone is looking forward to this year?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/20 11:06 PM
BAD BOYS FOR LIFE
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
Posted By: Revis_Knicks
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/20 10:34 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD BOYS FOR LIFE
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
I read that they are moving forward with a 4th one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/20 06:58 PM
Originally Posted by Revis_Knicks
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BAD BOYS FOR LIFE
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
A very entertaining and satisfying conclusion to this trilogy spanning the last 25 years. Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are back to their old tricks again as Detectives Marcus Burnett and Mike Lowrey (respectively). The story follows the 2 aging detectives: Lawrence who's ready to hang it up and retire, while Lowrey still has the need for speeds, action, and women. While enjoying a night on the town, Lowrey is shot and left clinging for his life. Luckily it's not his time yet as he seeks revenge. But he has to go it alone with a new team titled AMMO, as Lawrence makes good on his desire to retire. I'm glad they were able to recast some old faces from previous BAD BOYS films, and while this was an enjoyable and fun ride, it beats out the sequel BAD BOYS II, but can't faze the original. I'm sure this is the end of the road for both characters and it was a nice send off. 6/10
I read that they are moving forward with a 4th one.
I read that too and honestly, I'm surprised. 8 years between movies 1 & 2 and then 17 years between parts 2 & 3. I think it's fine as a trilogy. Now they're just being greedy.
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/20 08:09 PM
This weekend I went to see Ford vs. Ferrari and watched Last Rampage on Netflix. I took my youngest to Ford vs. Ferrari to spark an interest in race cars. He stayed awake for the whole thing and was cheering and mimicking shifting gears same as me. I would recommend it.
Last Rampage was just a random pick. I found it disturbing how Fucked up a father can be. It turns out it's a true story which makes it even more Fucked up. But, it was a good movie. T-1000 did a great job portraying the wicked father.
Last Rampage was just a random pick. I found it disturbing how Fucked up a father can be. It turns out it's a true story which makes it even more Fucked up. But, it was a good movie. T-1000 did a great job portraying the wicked father.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/20 01:48 AM
PARASITE
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/20 03:17 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
PARASITE
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
I've watched a good few Korean movies over the past two months. Parasite was good but not the best I've seen. I can recommend a few that are, arguably, better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/20 04:33 PM
THE GENTLEMEN
Guy Ritchie is back to his old tricks and this film is more in the vein of LOCK, STOCK AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS and SNATCH. However, compared to those, this film desperately tries to recreate the magic of those films but fails in its attempt. As Ritchie is known for, many characters to introduce at the beginning, followed by a lot of misdirection before the final reveal. While it has an impressive cast and McConaughey star shines the brightest, the film was too loquacious for me. Most of the film is told from Hugh Grants POV, who plays an investigative journalist, who's blackmailing McConaughey via his right hand man, Ray (played by Charlie Hunnam). The film will either grip you or leave you bored. And while I wasn't entirely bored, I was somewhat ready for the credits to roll earlier than I would have wished. 5.5/10
Guy Ritchie is back to his old tricks and this film is more in the vein of LOCK, STOCK AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS and SNATCH. However, compared to those, this film desperately tries to recreate the magic of those films but fails in its attempt. As Ritchie is known for, many characters to introduce at the beginning, followed by a lot of misdirection before the final reveal. While it has an impressive cast and McConaughey star shines the brightest, the film was too loquacious for me. Most of the film is told from Hugh Grants POV, who plays an investigative journalist, who's blackmailing McConaughey via his right hand man, Ray (played by Charlie Hunnam). The film will either grip you or leave you bored. And while I wasn't entirely bored, I was somewhat ready for the credits to roll earlier than I would have wished. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/20 04:34 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
PARASITE
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
I've watched a good few Korean movies over the past two months. Parasite was good but not the best I've seen. I can recommend a few that are, arguably, better.
Which do you recommend?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/20 06:48 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
PARASITE
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
This is a wonderful movie! My first Korean film (I think) and it was a lot of fun. Funny, tragic, completely original and a deep commentary on the class system and what this family was willing to do to have a better life. The story follows a poor family in South Korea. The son is asked by a friend of his to take over the tutoring of his wealthy student while he studies abroad himself. The son does and in the process, attempts to get his family all jobs themselves, all under the guise that they don't really know each other. It should win the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in my opinion. Looking forward to another viewing! If you get the opportunity at any point, this is definitely worth a watch! 7.5/10
I've watched a good few Korean movies over the past two months. Parasite was good but not the best I've seen. I can recommend a few that are, arguably, better.
Which do you recommend?
The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Memories of Murder are all excellent. The Chaser's pretty good too.
I'd start with The Wailing first. Emotional rollercoaster of a movie that reaches an epic crescendo in the last third. A few of the most terrifying scenes I've ever seen in a movie too, up there with any horror.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/20 09:31 PM
Thanks. i had never heard of I SAW THE DEVIL but heard it made some Top Ten lists for best horror films of the 2010's and I'm a huge horror fan! I'll have to see if i can track these down and add it to the ever growing list.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/20 10:04 PM
THE TURNING
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/20 10:10 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE TURNING
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
That kid really annoys me. The It remake was a steaming pile of garbage and he was one of the many reasons why.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/20 10:13 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE TURNING
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
This is slow burn of a film that often repeats the same scenes but doesn't go anywhere with the finale. Usually even if the film is bad, there's at least a payout in the end. None here. Plot holes, with an ending that's ambiguous and that'll leave you with more questions than answers after sitting through this 94-minute piece of garbage. A film with a very weak story that even actors such as Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard can't do anything with or shine at all. I only hope the payday was worth it for these 2. Very reminiscent of a messy school project that was done the night before just to have something to turn in. 3/10
That kid really annoys me. The It remake was a steaming pile of garbage and he was one of the many reasons why.
Really? I really enjoyed his performances in both parts of IT (thought he was one of the bright spots as Richie actually). And I've enjoyed him playing Mike on STRANGER THINGS. Oh well, to each his own. We all have our opinions and are entitled to them. But yes, THE TURNING, avoid at all costs!
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/20 10:55 PM
I watched Nightcrawler. I personally can't understand why it was so highly rated. I get the message they were going for. My problem is that it was completely lacking in any kind of subtlety.
It kind of strayed into several different genres without fitting comfortably into any one.
I'd give it maybe a 6 out of 10 at best.
LOL at how Jake Gyllenhaal and Rene Russo never had a kissing scene despite her being a (contrived) love interest for him.
Then I looked it up on Wikipedia and read that Russo's husband was the director.
And I was wondering why she had crawled out of the woodwork again all of a sudden!
She looked fine though.
It kind of strayed into several different genres without fitting comfortably into any one.
I'd give it maybe a 6 out of 10 at best.
LOL at how Jake Gyllenhaal and Rene Russo never had a kissing scene despite her being a (contrived) love interest for him.
Then I looked it up on Wikipedia and read that Russo's husband was the director.
And I was wondering why she had crawled out of the woodwork again all of a sudden!
She looked fine though.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/20 03:13 PM
THE RHYTHM SECTION
I was looking forward to this film going in to it as it looked like a great action, revenge thriller with Blake Lively stretching her acting chops even further. And while Lively gives her second best performance I've ever seen (behind 2018's A SIMPLE FAVOR), the story was interesting and had promise, but the execution is what killed it. The film starts out slow and I'm willing to ride with it as long as it picks up in the second half. Sadly, this does not. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a boring film, but again, a lot of promise and just a letdown after viewing it. For a woman seeking revenge, there aren't a lot of kills and not very much action either, which is especially surprising seeing as how both Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G, Wilson were both producers on this as well. Disappointed! 5.5/10
I was looking forward to this film going in to it as it looked like a great action, revenge thriller with Blake Lively stretching her acting chops even further. And while Lively gives her second best performance I've ever seen (behind 2018's A SIMPLE FAVOR), the story was interesting and had promise, but the execution is what killed it. The film starts out slow and I'm willing to ride with it as long as it picks up in the second half. Sadly, this does not. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a boring film, but again, a lot of promise and just a letdown after viewing it. For a woman seeking revenge, there aren't a lot of kills and not very much action either, which is especially surprising seeing as how both Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G, Wilson were both producers on this as well. Disappointed! 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/01/20 01:36 AM
GRETEL & HANSEL
A wonderful live-action, retelling of the Grimms fairy tale. I find it interesting that they transposed the names in the title, giving Gretel top billing and I can understand why after viewing it. As much as Hansel is a vital part, this is Gretel's story. Beautiful scenery along with a nice, tight story really made this a pleasurable viewing experience. Natural light is used somewhat throughtout, however, in other scenes, the use of colors is very reminiscent of the original SUSPIRIA. Likewise, the use of nature and with this being a fairy tale, it also reminded me somewhat of THE WITCH in it's storytelling. Alice Krige stands out the most as the Witch (or Holda as she's called here) and young Sophia Lillis continues to impress at her young age with another great performance after going 2 rounds with Derry's menacing clown. Finally, I thought using the 1.55:1 aspect ratio was a bold but brave move; one in which I applaud and enjoyed. It works in 2 ways: the first being a symbol of the closeness between the 2 siblings, as they have no one else to rely upon other than each other after being thrown out by their mother. The second shows the confinement the children (and audience for that matter) have in relation to the Witch, where there is no hiding underneath her roof. Looking forward to seeing this again! 7/10
A wonderful live-action, retelling of the Grimms fairy tale. I find it interesting that they transposed the names in the title, giving Gretel top billing and I can understand why after viewing it. As much as Hansel is a vital part, this is Gretel's story. Beautiful scenery along with a nice, tight story really made this a pleasurable viewing experience. Natural light is used somewhat throughtout, however, in other scenes, the use of colors is very reminiscent of the original SUSPIRIA. Likewise, the use of nature and with this being a fairy tale, it also reminded me somewhat of THE WITCH in it's storytelling. Alice Krige stands out the most as the Witch (or Holda as she's called here) and young Sophia Lillis continues to impress at her young age with another great performance after going 2 rounds with Derry's menacing clown. Finally, I thought using the 1.55:1 aspect ratio was a bold but brave move; one in which I applaud and enjoyed. It works in 2 ways: the first being a symbol of the closeness between the 2 siblings, as they have no one else to rely upon other than each other after being thrown out by their mother. The second shows the confinement the children (and audience for that matter) have in relation to the Witch, where there is no hiding underneath her roof. Looking forward to seeing this again! 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/20 03:45 AM
THE ASPHALT JUNGLE (1950)
Doc Riedenschneider (Sam Jaffe), master criminal just released from prison, blows into a Midwestern city with a plan for a big diamond heist. He connects with Emmerich (Louis Calhearn), crooked lawyer and doublecrosser, who'll fence the goods, and Cobby (Marc Lawrence), sniveling bookie who'll put up working capital. He also recruits a small gang to pull off the heist, including Dix Handley (Sterling Hayden, just about my favorite actor of this period), who'll supply strong-arm. The heist goes off almost perfectly, until a series of unforeseen mishaps takes everything down. This is one of John Huston's masterpieces, with a tight, film-noir-worthy script, superbly filmed with lots of deep focus, no music, and full of interesting characters and situations, played beautifully by a great cast. Marilyn Monroe has a bit part as Emmerich's dumb-blond mistress, and she's absolutely mesmerizing. A great movie.
Doc Riedenschneider (Sam Jaffe), master criminal just released from prison, blows into a Midwestern city with a plan for a big diamond heist. He connects with Emmerich (Louis Calhearn), crooked lawyer and doublecrosser, who'll fence the goods, and Cobby (Marc Lawrence), sniveling bookie who'll put up working capital. He also recruits a small gang to pull off the heist, including Dix Handley (Sterling Hayden, just about my favorite actor of this period), who'll supply strong-arm. The heist goes off almost perfectly, until a series of unforeseen mishaps takes everything down. This is one of John Huston's masterpieces, with a tight, film-noir-worthy script, superbly filmed with lots of deep focus, no music, and full of interesting characters and situations, played beautifully by a great cast. Marilyn Monroe has a bit part as Emmerich's dumb-blond mistress, and she's absolutely mesmerizing. A great movie.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/20 09:47 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE ASPHALT JUNGLE (1950)
Doc Riedenschneider (Sam Jaffe), master criminal just released from prison, blows into a Midwestern city with a plan for a big diamond heist. He connects with Emmerich (Louis Calhearn), crooked lawyer and doublecrosser, who'll fence the goods, and Cobby (Marc Lawrence), sniveling bookie who'll put up working capital. He also recruits a small gang to pull off the heist, including Dix Handley (Sterling Hayden, just about my favorite actor of this period), who'll supply strong-arm. The heist goes off almost perfectly, until a series of unforeseen mishaps takes everything down. This is one of John Huston's masterpieces, with a tight, film-noir-worthy script, superbly filmed with lots of deep focus, no music, and full of interesting characters and situations, played beautifully by a great cast. Marilyn Monroe has a bit part as Emmerich's dumb-blond mistress, and she's absolutely mesmerizing. A great movie.
Doc Riedenschneider (Sam Jaffe), master criminal just released from prison, blows into a Midwestern city with a plan for a big diamond heist. He connects with Emmerich (Louis Calhearn), crooked lawyer and doublecrosser, who'll fence the goods, and Cobby (Marc Lawrence), sniveling bookie who'll put up working capital. He also recruits a small gang to pull off the heist, including Dix Handley (Sterling Hayden, just about my favorite actor of this period), who'll supply strong-arm. The heist goes off almost perfectly, until a series of unforeseen mishaps takes everything down. This is one of John Huston's masterpieces, with a tight, film-noir-worthy script, superbly filmed with lots of deep focus, no music, and full of interesting characters and situations, played beautifully by a great cast. Marilyn Monroe has a bit part as Emmerich's dumb-blond mistress, and she's absolutely mesmerizing. A great movie.
I agree..watch it whenever it appears on TCM..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/09/20 03:01 AM
BIRDS OF PREY: AND THE FANTABULOUS EMANCIPATION OF ONE HARLEY QUINN
This movie was a lot of fun! I enjoyed the all-female (non man-hating) cast. Robbie's second turn as Harley Quinn is even better than her debut as the movie is centered around her and she's really able to shine and stretch out this character. You feel Robbie was born to play this character and you can tell she's having so much fun with the dialogue, her energy, and bringing this character to life. At first I wasn't sure how I felt about Ewan McGregor as Black Mask as I didn't know anything about the character heading in to this. Originally, I wasn't buying his take on the character (felt he was a little too lighthearted and not menacing enough). However, after pondering on it for a day or so, it's starting to grow on me. DC is on a roll and has another winner on their hands. 7/10
This movie was a lot of fun! I enjoyed the all-female (non man-hating) cast. Robbie's second turn as Harley Quinn is even better than her debut as the movie is centered around her and she's really able to shine and stretch out this character. You feel Robbie was born to play this character and you can tell she's having so much fun with the dialogue, her energy, and bringing this character to life. At first I wasn't sure how I felt about Ewan McGregor as Black Mask as I didn't know anything about the character heading in to this. Originally, I wasn't buying his take on the character (felt he was a little too lighthearted and not menacing enough). However, after pondering on it for a day or so, it's starting to grow on me. DC is on a roll and has another winner on their hands. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/20 07:14 PM
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG
I’ll give the studio this much, they listened to the audience when the first trailer dropped and changed the appearance of Sonic due to the fan backlash. They should have had more screenings of this with test audiences because this was a train wreck of a film. Rated PG so as to appease to a wider market and trying to establish a franchise, but the script writers seemed on a mission to make this a one and done. Bad jokes (even with a theater full of children and parents, no one was hardly laughing), pointless scenes that at times did little to nothing to further the storyline (for example, a creepy Jim Carrey dance sequence), and of course, a rip off of the Quicksilver slo-mo scene from X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST and X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Not to mention shameless product placement of a certain Italian restaurant chain. Avoid this film at all times! 4/10
I’ll give the studio this much, they listened to the audience when the first trailer dropped and changed the appearance of Sonic due to the fan backlash. They should have had more screenings of this with test audiences because this was a train wreck of a film. Rated PG so as to appease to a wider market and trying to establish a franchise, but the script writers seemed on a mission to make this a one and done. Bad jokes (even with a theater full of children and parents, no one was hardly laughing), pointless scenes that at times did little to nothing to further the storyline (for example, a creepy Jim Carrey dance sequence), and of course, a rip off of the Quicksilver slo-mo scene from X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST and X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Not to mention shameless product placement of a certain Italian restaurant chain. Avoid this film at all times! 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/20 05:54 AM
FANTASY ISLAND
Lucy Hale’s second collaboration with Blumhouse is about as much of a stinker as 2018’s TRUTH OR DARE. Based on the TV show of the same name, this movie is about a group of 5 people who win a contest and are taken to said island to live out a fantasy. The only rules are each person is allowed only one fantasy and they have to see it through until the end, no matter what. Very early on each contestant is living out his/her fantasy and the story becomes very messy very quickly, trying to juggle 4 storylines at once (4 fantasies instead of 5 as a pair of brothers share 1 fantasy together). As such, plot holes quickly begin to develop, storylines about the island as well as characters introduced are never fully explained, leaving the viewing asking more questions than answers given. Not to mention the dreaded PG-13 rating, which you know will water down any language or violence, both of which this films suffers from a lack of as well. Blumhouse is usually hit-or-miss and this film is most certainly in the latter. 3/10
Lucy Hale’s second collaboration with Blumhouse is about as much of a stinker as 2018’s TRUTH OR DARE. Based on the TV show of the same name, this movie is about a group of 5 people who win a contest and are taken to said island to live out a fantasy. The only rules are each person is allowed only one fantasy and they have to see it through until the end, no matter what. Very early on each contestant is living out his/her fantasy and the story becomes very messy very quickly, trying to juggle 4 storylines at once (4 fantasies instead of 5 as a pair of brothers share 1 fantasy together). As such, plot holes quickly begin to develop, storylines about the island as well as characters introduced are never fully explained, leaving the viewing asking more questions than answers given. Not to mention the dreaded PG-13 rating, which you know will water down any language or violence, both of which this films suffers from a lack of as well. Blumhouse is usually hit-or-miss and this film is most certainly in the latter. 3/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/20 02:19 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
[quote=Irishman12]RICHARD JEWELL
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
Clint Eastwood returns about the 1996 Olympics bombing and the security guard, Richard Jewell, who first noticed the bag and began evacuating the area, becoming a hero for his efforts. However, soon after his discovery is made, he is filleted by the media and FBI and becomes the main suspect. I really have enjoyed Paul Walter Hauser's work since I first saw him in I, TONYA. Usually he plays the bumbling idiot and while that is still mainly his role in this film, he does show a dramatic range here. Olivia Wilde is detestable as reporter Kathy Scruggs, who has no morals or conscience to speak of whatsoever, and does whatever she can to get a story. Overall, the movie seems quite repetitive: FBI tries to get Jewell to implicate himself, Jewell assists to clear his name or assist them with their investigation, Jewell's lawyer Watson Bryant (played by Sam Rockwell) yells at him to not cooperate with them, repeat. Could have been a better study at the power of the media and how they can ruin lives when they don't get the facts straight/jump to conclusions. 5.5/10
Surprised with the 5.5, I have not seen it yet but hear of better reviews.
Saw it last night , I’d go a bit higher, I liked it ....6.5
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/20 02:23 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
1917
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
Saw it today, did not think I was going to dig it since I’m more of a WW2 movie fan but this was really great and could not believe how realistic it was done.
Also enjoyed knowing how some of it was shot since you had posted that clip.
I can stand with that 8 as well.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/20 02:14 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
1917
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
Saw it today, did not think I was going to dig it since I’m more of a WW2 movie fan but this was really great and could not believe how realistic it was done.
Also enjoyed knowing how some of it was shot since you had posted that clip.
I can stand with that 8 as well.
I'm more of a World War II fan myself but 1917 is an experience in the cinema. Much like GRAVITY was (or at least, that's my opinion anyway). Looking forward to seeing it again!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/20 10:17 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
1917
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
A movie experience! At times while watching this, I had the same experience while watching GRAVITY back in 2013: suspenseful, realistic, believable, and an intimate connection that at times, makes you feel you're not watching a movie but right beside the characters. Wonderful set designs and cinematography. I've always been a fan of long one-take shots, and Mendes and company pull off an entire film that way masterfully. One of the best war movies probably ever and definitely the type of film to see on the big screen! I'm sure this will clean up at the Oscars next month. 8/10
Saw it today, did not think I was going to dig it since I’m more of a WW2 movie fan but this was really great and could not believe how realistic it was done.
Also enjoyed knowing how some of it was shot since you had posted that clip.
I can stand with that 8 as well.
I'm more of a World War II fan myself but 1917 is an experience in the cinema. Much like GRAVITY was (or at least, that's my opinion anyway). Looking forward to seeing it again!
"Im more a fan of WW2"...Myself included 12....but I will check this out ..it's on our firestick when u "jailbreak"??..my wife can conjure it up in our guest bedroom #2..just saw a movie w/ Viola Davis called "MA"...fuckin' horrific.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/20 10:54 PM
hoodlum, let us know what you think when you see it. And yes, I saw MA in the theaters last year and it was pretty awful!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/20 11:30 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
hoodlum, let us know what you think when you see it. And yes, I saw MA in the theaters last year and it was pretty awful!
O.K....Hood..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/20 05:46 PM
THE LODGE
I was excited going into this film as I had previously seen and heard good things about it. I’m not quite sure we saw the same movie. THE LODGE has elements of THE SHINING and HEREDITARY but tried too hard to be smart. A lot of themes are touched upon such as family, isolation, nature, childhood trauma. However, religion is the biggest one and it’s at first done in a subtle way but by the end of the film, it becomes heavy handed. It’s unfortunate because the film had some potential. A slow burn so I was willing to give it some time to cash in but by around the halfway to three quarters point of the film, it got snowed in in my eyes. 4.5/10
I was excited going into this film as I had previously seen and heard good things about it. I’m not quite sure we saw the same movie. THE LODGE has elements of THE SHINING and HEREDITARY but tried too hard to be smart. A lot of themes are touched upon such as family, isolation, nature, childhood trauma. However, religion is the biggest one and it’s at first done in a subtle way but by the end of the film, it becomes heavy handed. It’s unfortunate because the film had some potential. A slow burn so I was willing to give it some time to cash in but by around the halfway to three quarters point of the film, it got snowed in in my eyes. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/20 05:41 PM
THE INVISIBLE MAN
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/20 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE INVISIBLE MAN
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
Wow, you saw this already, Just opened today.
Was thinking this would score higher..... will see sooner than later since the wife is interested and I will take her or see if it streams this week.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/29/20 07:51 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE INVISIBLE MAN
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
A modern take on the 1933 horror film of the same name as well as a social commentary on the horrors of domestic abuse. The story really worked in that regard as this is definitely a psychological horror film rather than you’re typical slasher. Elisabeth Moss gives a wide range performance as Cecilia, a young woman who escapes from her abuser but who is able to “cheat death†to continue harassing and abusing her. However, as the story plays out, it becomes repetitive: Cecilia says her abuser is not dead but is still terrorizing her and since no one can see her, they victim blame her and make her feel as if she’s losing her mind until she finally outsmarts him and proves to everyone she’s not insane. Again, a good modern take on the story that probably could have been cut down some and doesn’t finish particularly strong. 5.5/10
Wow, you saw this already, Just opened today.
Was thinking this would score higher..... will see sooner than later since the wife is interested and I will take her or see if it streams this week.
I saw it Thursday night (most films I see as that's when they preview and I usually don't have much else going on Thursday nights). Haven't been on as much recently, hence yesterday was my first opportunity to post my review.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/20 01:14 AM
Great, will try to see it tomorrow.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/20 06:21 PM
There were lots of dramas, thrillers and action movies featuring a fictional American president in the 90s. The American President, Primary Colors, The Pelican Brief, Air Force One, In the Line of Fire, among others, not to mention TV series like The West Wing.
I watched the forgotten movie, Absolute Power, directed by and starring Clint Eastwood the other night.
It was plodding stuff with a weak payoff.
I would not recommend.
I watched the forgotten movie, Absolute Power, directed by and starring Clint Eastwood the other night.
It was plodding stuff with a weak payoff.
I would not recommend.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/09/20 04:39 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DOCTOR SLEEP
I didn't read the book so I went in to this blind and I did enjoy it; however, in the grand scheme of things, I came out of this movie the same way I went going in to it: a sequel to THE SHINING was unnecessary. The film doesn't take anything away from the original (thank goodness) and actually revisits it quite a bit towards the beginning and end, which was very enjoyable! I heard nothing but praise for Rebecca Ferguson beforehand and while I thought she was very good, I thought prior reviews gave her a little too much credit. McGregor I wanted to like at times as an older version of Dan (not Danny) Torrance. Sometimes I felt he worked, while other times I didn't. My favorite role was probably by Alex Essoe who's in a handful of scenes and to not spoil it, I won't say which part she plays. Overall, it was a fun, although long ride. The first 15-20 minutes and the third act are where I got my money's worth. 6.5/10
I didn't read the book so I went in to this blind and I did enjoy it; however, in the grand scheme of things, I came out of this movie the same way I went going in to it: a sequel to THE SHINING was unnecessary. The film doesn't take anything away from the original (thank goodness) and actually revisits it quite a bit towards the beginning and end, which was very enjoyable! I heard nothing but praise for Rebecca Ferguson beforehand and while I thought she was very good, I thought prior reviews gave her a little too much credit. McGregor I wanted to like at times as an older version of Dan (not Danny) Torrance. Sometimes I felt he worked, while other times I didn't. My favorite role was probably by Alex Essoe who's in a handful of scenes and to not spoil it, I won't say which part she plays. Overall, it was a fun, although long ride. The first 15-20 minutes and the third act are where I got my money's worth. 6.5/10
Great review i12, just saw this yesterday. We came away feeling the same.
It was OK, your 6.5 is generous.
I would like to mention again we really appreciate and enjoy your reviews and LOVE how you type the movie titles in all CAPS which makes it so easy to locate after we finally catch up and see the flick. My wife and I discuss the movie after and of course always share your review and discuss that as well.
Thank you and keep em commin.
DP & the Mrs.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/09/20 04:57 PM
Thanks DP & the Mrs. Always appreciate the feedback and glad to assist as well. No good release came out last week but this week I’m seeing BLOODSHOT, A QUIET PLACE II the week after, followed by MULAN the week after that.
Watched the original A QUIET PLACE this weekend to get ready for the sequel. Hadn’t seen it since the theaters in 2018 and I forgot how great of a movie it was! I recommend it if you haven’t seen it. Also rewatched DON’T BREATH yesterday. Hadn’t seen that since the theaters either (2016) and I thought it’s a good movie. Good, but it great and a little overhyped in my opinion.
Watched the original A QUIET PLACE this weekend to get ready for the sequel. Hadn’t seen it since the theaters in 2018 and I forgot how great of a movie it was! I recommend it if you haven’t seen it. Also rewatched DON’T BREATH yesterday. Hadn’t seen that since the theaters either (2016) and I thought it’s a good movie. Good, but it great and a little overhyped in my opinion.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/20 11:47 AM
Quiz Show
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/13/20 12:53 AM
BLOODSHOT
A fun and action packed ride about a recently deceased soldier (played by Vin Diesel) and how’s he brought back to life to seek revenge on the man who killed his wife. This is a story of revenge, manipulation, as well as morality when it comes to free will and choice. Diesel does a fine job as Bloodshot. He’s believable and more than capable of pulling off the physicality this role requires. I knew next to nothing about the character, so even those unfamiliar with the comic book can still enjoy it. Hopefully the coronavirus doesn’t keep audiences away this weekend as I’d be down for a sequel as well as other Valiant comic book properties to be adapted for the big screen. 6/10
A fun and action packed ride about a recently deceased soldier (played by Vin Diesel) and how’s he brought back to life to seek revenge on the man who killed his wife. This is a story of revenge, manipulation, as well as morality when it comes to free will and choice. Diesel does a fine job as Bloodshot. He’s believable and more than capable of pulling off the physicality this role requires. I knew next to nothing about the character, so even those unfamiliar with the comic book can still enjoy it. Hopefully the coronavirus doesn’t keep audiences away this weekend as I’d be down for a sequel as well as other Valiant comic book properties to be adapted for the big screen. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/18/20 04:31 PM
A Most Violent Year
Was a slog to get through. Oscar Isaac would make a good John Gotti.
The Prestige
Enjoyed this. Great performances by Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale and constantly enthralling with lots of twists and turns.
Was a slog to get through. Oscar Isaac would make a good John Gotti.
The Prestige
Enjoyed this. Great performances by Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale and constantly enthralling with lots of twists and turns.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/18/20 05:04 PM
A MOST VIOLENT YEAR I found it enjoyable but felt it tried too hard. Had a lot of buzz when it first came out and I don’t understand why? Not a bad film but nothing very memorable either.
Outside of the Batman trilogy, THE PRESTIGE may be my favorite Nolan movie along with MEMENTO. Great movie with Bale and Jackman going toe-to-toe with each other!
Outside of the Batman trilogy, THE PRESTIGE may be my favorite Nolan movie along with MEMENTO. Great movie with Bale and Jackman going toe-to-toe with each other!
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 01:48 AM
Bram Stoker's Dracula
Pros
Excellent cinematography, set design, makeup and special effects; aesthetically pleasing. Memorable performance by Gary Oldman. Good ending.
Cons
Boring for the entire middle of the movie, lacking momentum and getting bogged down with unnecessary scene after unnecessary scene. Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
I really want to like this more because of the aesthetics, Gary Oldman and The Simpsons pastiche of it, but it's ultimately very hard to stay invested in it.
Chop 30 minutes off it, replace Keanu Reeves with someone who can act, and cut out the waffle, and this could've been a satisfactory movie with a rewarding ending.
I still suggest watching the classic intro on YouTube, but that's it.
Pros
Excellent cinematography, set design, makeup and special effects; aesthetically pleasing. Memorable performance by Gary Oldman. Good ending.
Cons
Boring for the entire middle of the movie, lacking momentum and getting bogged down with unnecessary scene after unnecessary scene. Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
I really want to like this more because of the aesthetics, Gary Oldman and The Simpsons pastiche of it, but it's ultimately very hard to stay invested in it.
Chop 30 minutes off it, replace Keanu Reeves with someone who can act, and cut out the waffle, and this could've been a satisfactory movie with a rewarding ending.
I still suggest watching the classic intro on YouTube, but that's it.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 01:51 AM
The latest Jumanji, but I watch anything with The Rock !
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 02:03 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Bram Stoker's Dracula
Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
Understatement of the year.
Ryder not much better.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 09:10 PM
THE HUNT
I'm not a fan of censorship at all, so I don't agree with the film being pushed back and almost banned. However, I will say I was surprised it was pushed back at all. Being that this film is anti-right wing politics, it mostly gets a pass from the media and other outlets. In saying that, this film portrays itself as a comedy but is nothing more than a veiled attempt to attack anyone who is a conservative, Republican, or Trump supporter. It uses the same logic as someone who offends another with their words and then in an effort to justify it, without apologizing, simply saying, "I was joking." Same premise here. The movie tries to and fails to satire both sides of the aisle but as can be seen from the premise, characters, and violence against those "deplorables" (the film's own description of said characters), it's quite clear who the intended audience of this film is. Not to mention every one of the deplorables is showcased as ignorant, uneducated, redneck, trailer trash, gun-toting, nut jobs. I mean, Heaven forbid an educated personal could actually have a conscience and be a conservative/Trump supporter. Further liberal agendas are pushed and peppered throughout such as white guilt, anti-gun, global warming, and atheism. The only character who is being hunted and can say her ABC's correctly is a white woman, so you know how "woke" this film is (Brie Larson would be proud by the way). The final fight between said character and Hillary Swank is a poor man's Jackass scene. Overall, this film is anything but a comedy and does nothing more than to continue dividing us as a country. I can only imagine the backlash this film would have received had it been about a group of rich, white, men hunting liberal minorities. The media would be running with it, saying how dangerous and off the rails it is and to follow suit, major movie theaters (such as AMC, Regal, and Cinemark) would even fail to run it due to the "controversy" surrounding it and it would be relegated to VOD, where it would die a quite death. Unfortunately, the same didn't happen here. 2/10
I'm not a fan of censorship at all, so I don't agree with the film being pushed back and almost banned. However, I will say I was surprised it was pushed back at all. Being that this film is anti-right wing politics, it mostly gets a pass from the media and other outlets. In saying that, this film portrays itself as a comedy but is nothing more than a veiled attempt to attack anyone who is a conservative, Republican, or Trump supporter. It uses the same logic as someone who offends another with their words and then in an effort to justify it, without apologizing, simply saying, "I was joking." Same premise here. The movie tries to and fails to satire both sides of the aisle but as can be seen from the premise, characters, and violence against those "deplorables" (the film's own description of said characters), it's quite clear who the intended audience of this film is. Not to mention every one of the deplorables is showcased as ignorant, uneducated, redneck, trailer trash, gun-toting, nut jobs. I mean, Heaven forbid an educated personal could actually have a conscience and be a conservative/Trump supporter. Further liberal agendas are pushed and peppered throughout such as white guilt, anti-gun, global warming, and atheism. The only character who is being hunted and can say her ABC's correctly is a white woman, so you know how "woke" this film is (Brie Larson would be proud by the way). The final fight between said character and Hillary Swank is a poor man's Jackass scene. Overall, this film is anything but a comedy and does nothing more than to continue dividing us as a country. I can only imagine the backlash this film would have received had it been about a group of rich, white, men hunting liberal minorities. The media would be running with it, saying how dangerous and off the rails it is and to follow suit, major movie theaters (such as AMC, Regal, and Cinemark) would even fail to run it due to the "controversy" surrounding it and it would be relegated to VOD, where it would die a quite death. Unfortunately, the same didn't happen here. 2/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 09:11 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
The latest Jumanji, but I watch anything with The Rock !
I wasn't a fan. The first one was a fun ride but the sequel failed to deliver in every aspect!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/20 09:12 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Bram Stoker's Dracula
Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
Keanu Reeves' performance is atrocious.
Understatement of the year.
Ryder not much better.I'll give you Reeves but don't say a cross word about Winona Ryder sir (just joking). Oldman was fantastic as Dracula but I still prefer the 1931 version or NOSFERATU.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/29/20 05:19 PM
Clockers
Directed by Spike Lee. Starring the likes of Harvey Keitel, John Turturro and Delroy Lindo. Features a who's who of guys who acted in Goodfellas and Sopranos in cameo roles. Takes a while to get going, but has a very good second half. One complaint is that the soundtrack gets distracting and has a habit of drowning out important dialogue. Also, I don't know what they were thinking naming two important characters "Ronnie" and "Ronald".
If you're a fan of The Wire, you will love this as the similarities are uncanny. This is, of course, because it was adapted from a Richard Price book and he wrote for The Wire.
Directed by Spike Lee. Starring the likes of Harvey Keitel, John Turturro and Delroy Lindo. Features a who's who of guys who acted in Goodfellas and Sopranos in cameo roles. Takes a while to get going, but has a very good second half. One complaint is that the soundtrack gets distracting and has a habit of drowning out important dialogue. Also, I don't know what they were thinking naming two important characters "Ronnie" and "Ronald".
If you're a fan of The Wire, you will love this as the similarities are uncanny. This is, of course, because it was adapted from a Richard Price book and he wrote for The Wire.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 12:48 AM
Watched The Kitchen staring Melissa McCarthy. It's really a downer of a movie and not that good which tends to be the case with many of McCarthy's movies.
It's a combination of a mob movie and girl power. However, all it proves is that women can be just as terrible as men (although women always have a good reason). It takes place in Hell's Kitchen. It paints Hell's Kitchen as really hell. Is it really that bad?
It's a combination of a mob movie and girl power. However, all it proves is that women can be just as terrible as men (although women always have a good reason). It takes place in Hell's Kitchen. It paints Hell's Kitchen as really hell. Is it really that bad?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 01:47 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched The Kitchen staring Melissa McCarthy. It's really a downer of a movie and not that good which tends to be the case with many of McCarthy's movies.
It's a combination of a mob movie and girl power. However, all it proves is that women can be just as terrible as men (although women always have a good reason). It takes place in Hell's Kitchen. It paints Hell's Kitchen as really hell. Is it really that bad?
It's a combination of a mob movie and girl power. However, all it proves is that women can be just as terrible as men (although women always have a good reason). It takes place in Hell's Kitchen. It paints Hell's Kitchen as really hell. Is it really that bad?
That movie Sucked.
Completely a goof, they took some facts, true stories and places and then twisted the shit out of them.
Hell’s Kitchen was a rough and tumble area for many years up until the late 90’s when it began to change with new people, business and money coming in that invested in the real estate.
The Westies that ran the area back in the day would have cut those women’s heads off and burned them in LIC, literally.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 06:31 AM
I watched the netflix film The Outsider, not bad if you are into yakuza films.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 12:15 PM
I saw THE KITCHEN in the theaters and I wasn’t impressed either. Haven’t seen it since and don’t have a desire to. Just another “female power/representation†movie that once again, bombed at the box office as a result.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 05:44 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DARK WATERS
This film focuses on DuPont poisoning residents in West Virginia for decades. Mark Ruffalo, an environmental attorney, takes the case on for one of the locals. While I applaud the film for being able to sift through the almost 20 years this case went through from beginning to end, to present a digestible and comprehensive account of what happened, the story at times seems to be spotty. And while I am a big Anne Hathaway fan (and to a lesser extent, a Mark Ruffalo fan as well), both seem to mail in their performances. Hathaway as the "this case is costing you your family because your never home" wife, who ever once in a while has a breakdown. Whereas Ruffalo seems dazed throughout with the exception of a few times he actually gets emotional and passionate. Interesting subject, but averagely executed. 6/10
This film focuses on DuPont poisoning residents in West Virginia for decades. Mark Ruffalo, an environmental attorney, takes the case on for one of the locals. While I applaud the film for being able to sift through the almost 20 years this case went through from beginning to end, to present a digestible and comprehensive account of what happened, the story at times seems to be spotty. And while I am a big Anne Hathaway fan (and to a lesser extent, a Mark Ruffalo fan as well), both seem to mail in their performances. Hathaway as the "this case is costing you your family because your never home" wife, who ever once in a while has a breakdown. Whereas Ruffalo seems dazed throughout with the exception of a few times he actually gets emotional and passionate. Interesting subject, but averagely executed. 6/10
We saw DARK WATERS yesterday.
we both really enjoyed it and found the story memorable from actual events, agree with your review of the actors but thought the farmers performance was very good and loved his scenes as well as the dude for Shawshank, he was good too.
I might go to a 7 on this one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/30/20 07:38 PM
Glad you enjoyed DP!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/20 01:34 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you enjoyed DP!
We really did.
Great Recco.
We look through all your reviews and then pick a movie option to view.
Thank you Sir.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/20 09:33 AM
Just finished watching Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry. That will always be a classic.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/20 06:58 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Quiz Show
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
A brilliant movie in every respect. World-beating performances not only by Turturro and Fiennes, but also by David Paymer and Hank Azaria (always good), and the great Paul Scofield, who almost steals it in a relatively minor role. Only weak note: Rob Morrow with that phony "Bahston" accent.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/03/20 02:25 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Quiz Show
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
Excellently directed by Robert Redford and superbly acted by John Turturro and Ralph Fiennes. Evocative of the 1960s and never loses its stranglehold on the viewer.
A brilliant movie in every respect. World-beating performances not only by Turturro and Fiennes, but also by David Paymer and Hank Azaria (always good), and the great Paul Scofield, who almost steals it in a relatively minor role. Only weak note: Rob Morrow with that phony "Bahston" accent.
Funny u guys raised this up.....1rst time I watched it I fell asleep, I had 1.. 2 many.&..2nd time I saw it was many yrs. later & was in love w/ it...Great Movie!!!
Posted By: flamingokid123
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/20 03:08 PM
Just watch Green Book this weekend. Loved it
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/20 10:17 PM
Vivarium
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/20 11:13 PM
International Falls
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/20 12:13 AM
Originally Posted by Lilo
Vivarium
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
Thanks for the review Lilo. I saw the trailer for this. Worth a watch or pass?
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/20 01:42 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Lilo
Vivarium
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
Thanks for the review Lilo. I saw the trailer for this. Worth a watch or pass?
I thought it was marginally worthwhile. It was unsettling. It would have been more effective with a shorter run time. It is a film that likes to show rather than tell. Dialogue is minimalist once the viewer gets into the meat of the story.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/20 02:04 AM
Originally Posted by Lilo
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Lilo
Vivarium
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
If you know anything at all about the behavior of a certain bird species and/or Irish mythology then this movie's story was very heavily foreshadowed or possibly even spoiled in the first 15-30 seconds. The film might be considered an extended metaphor about the pointlessness of modern suburban life but I thought it worked much better as a modern day Twilight Zone episode. It probably ran on a little longer than necessary. Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots are a gardener and school teacher couple who find themselves in a situation that is unexplainable. It starts with them getting lost. Their day goes downhill from there.
Any more plot description would venture into spoiler territory so let's just leave it at that. This movie isn't quite as intelligent as it imagines itself to be but I appreciated that despite the plot being somewhat predictable the film had the courage to not explain every little thing or force the expected ending. This film was low on special effects or gore but high on creepiness/weirdness. This is something that were it a book, could have been written by Bradbury, King or Lovecraft.
Thanks for the review Lilo. I saw the trailer for this. Worth a watch or pass?
I thought it was marginally worthwhile. It was unsettling. It would have been more effective with a shorter run time. It is a film that likes to show rather than tell. Dialogue is minimalist once the viewer gets into the meat of the story.
Ok, thanks for the feedback!
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/20 01:59 PM
you guys should watch the movie - war 2007 with jet li
it's a great movie !
it's a great movie !
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/20 10:41 PM
Only
This film works the same side of the street as novels like Stephen and Owen King's book Sleeping Beauties, Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, or the films Children of Men, and A Quiet Place.
For an apocalyptic movie this film has few special effects. The story is woven tightly around two young lovers.
Many of us know people of both genders who express disdain and vitriol for the other gender. I think those are generally unfortunate opinions held by people with unexamined sexual/psychological issues. A dystopic story where one gender disappears shows us what we truly need from each other.
Will (Leslie Odom Jr.) and Eva (Freda Pinto) are a loving couple. A comet passes over the world. For a period of time (the film jumps around chronologically), the comet produces ash which falls across the planet. Although it looks like snow, it's not.
This ash contains a bacteria or virus that occasionally infects but does not kill men or boys. Men can infect women. But the pathogen kills women and girls. Some women live longer than others but with one possible exception there aren't any women who are immune. Females die by the multitudes. Humanity faces its end. Governments create medical centers to find a cure. But everyone suspects that the centers are not designed to help women so much as they are built to harvest eggs and find a way to mass produce artificial wombs. Women and girls have become so rare that the US government is offering million dollar bounties for the delivery of a live female. Initially the bounties are only for women of child bearing age but eventually armed government agents search for females of any age. Thugs search for women for other reasons.
Will refuses to turn over Eva to the government. The formerly genial, soft-spoken, and decidedly non-bada$$ Will intends to keep Eva safe.
Will takes this responsibility seriously, to the point of building a complicated "stay in place/quarantine system". Will will kill and die for Eva if needed. Eva may be the last woman in the world.
Although Eva appreciates Will's protectiveness she thinks he's become monomaniacal. Eva resents and occasionally resists some of Will's decisions.
As in many emergency situations, both individual and societal, democracy falls by the wayside. Will struggles with his girlfriend's unhappiness and challenges while trying to keep them both safe.
Is it, during times of stress and conflict, automatically the man's role to provide and protect? If so can the woman question her man's leadership if doing so can get them both killed.
This was an intelligent movie that demonstrates that sci-fi/speculative fiction doesn't need to rely on cheap thrills, gore and T&A. One big narrative weakness was that it is utterly pointless ever to attempt to disguise Freida Pinto as male. Even the dimmest man would immediately recognize that Eva is female. There's nothing that is androgynous about Pinto. Also, this film could have benefited a LOT from a shorter running time and a larger budget. Lighting was bad too often. This wasn't a home run must see film. But neither was it garbage. Only nimbly demonstrates how intimates communicate wordlessly with each other. Will and Eva love each other desperately, even as their relationship is strained to the breaking point. There is constantly rising tension and drama but little violence.
This film works the same side of the street as novels like Stephen and Owen King's book Sleeping Beauties, Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, or the films Children of Men, and A Quiet Place.
For an apocalyptic movie this film has few special effects. The story is woven tightly around two young lovers.
Many of us know people of both genders who express disdain and vitriol for the other gender. I think those are generally unfortunate opinions held by people with unexamined sexual/psychological issues. A dystopic story where one gender disappears shows us what we truly need from each other.
Will (Leslie Odom Jr.) and Eva (Freda Pinto) are a loving couple. A comet passes over the world. For a period of time (the film jumps around chronologically), the comet produces ash which falls across the planet. Although it looks like snow, it's not.
This ash contains a bacteria or virus that occasionally infects but does not kill men or boys. Men can infect women. But the pathogen kills women and girls. Some women live longer than others but with one possible exception there aren't any women who are immune. Females die by the multitudes. Humanity faces its end. Governments create medical centers to find a cure. But everyone suspects that the centers are not designed to help women so much as they are built to harvest eggs and find a way to mass produce artificial wombs. Women and girls have become so rare that the US government is offering million dollar bounties for the delivery of a live female. Initially the bounties are only for women of child bearing age but eventually armed government agents search for females of any age. Thugs search for women for other reasons.
Will refuses to turn over Eva to the government. The formerly genial, soft-spoken, and decidedly non-bada$$ Will intends to keep Eva safe.
Will takes this responsibility seriously, to the point of building a complicated "stay in place/quarantine system". Will will kill and die for Eva if needed. Eva may be the last woman in the world.
Although Eva appreciates Will's protectiveness she thinks he's become monomaniacal. Eva resents and occasionally resists some of Will's decisions.
As in many emergency situations, both individual and societal, democracy falls by the wayside. Will struggles with his girlfriend's unhappiness and challenges while trying to keep them both safe.
Is it, during times of stress and conflict, automatically the man's role to provide and protect? If so can the woman question her man's leadership if doing so can get them both killed.
This was an intelligent movie that demonstrates that sci-fi/speculative fiction doesn't need to rely on cheap thrills, gore and T&A. One big narrative weakness was that it is utterly pointless ever to attempt to disguise Freida Pinto as male. Even the dimmest man would immediately recognize that Eva is female. There's nothing that is androgynous about Pinto. Also, this film could have benefited a LOT from a shorter running time and a larger budget. Lighting was bad too often. This wasn't a home run must see film. But neither was it garbage. Only nimbly demonstrates how intimates communicate wordlessly with each other. Will and Eva love each other desperately, even as their relationship is strained to the breaking point. There is constantly rising tension and drama but little violence.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/20 12:08 AM
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Boring.
Boring.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/20/20 12:48 AM
Originally Posted by Lilo
International Falls
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
Just added this to the list will track back on your review.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/20 07:26 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Lilo
International Falls
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
First time director Amber McGinnis directed this indie movie.
It's based on a two person play but McGinnis transcends those limitations. It's by far the best movie I've seen in 2020. International Falls tells a familiar story but the director puts her own twist and interpretation on the tale. She mixes drama and absurdity in a way that is realistic and often poignant. In the hands of a lesser director or more intrusive studio, this film would have found the time to grind various ideological axes.
This is not a movie for kids, not because of the adult themes, but because this film will appeal primarily to people who have lived long enough to have regrets and recognize mistakes but who can still change their future. This film brings to mind the Coen Brothers' Fargo because of the surface similarity of each film's depiction of the Swedish/German derived distinctive sing song vowel heavy Upper Midwest accents, specifically those found in Minnesota.The film finds some humor in those tones; a few actors appear to lay it on quite thick.
Dee (Rachael Harris) is a hotel clerk/manager of a certain age who works in International Falls, Minnesota. Dee has two daughters with fellow town native, Gary (Matthew Glave). The slightly built Dee normally keeps her emotions bottled up, which can make it equally humorous and scary when she reveals her true thoughts. Dee and Gary are growing apart. Gary's unfaithful, though Dee is pretending ignorance. Dee has always wanted to be a standup comedian. Dee thinks that life is passing her by more and more quickly.
So when a tall, divorced, similarly aged comedian named Tim (Rob Huebel) stops into the hotel for a two night engagement, Dee is primed to talk to him, learn from him, be his town tour guide, and offer Tim some special hospitality. There's a problem though. Tim is depressed, self-loathing, misanthropic, burnt out, and hates, really, really really HATES his chosen career path. Tim will tell anyone who'll listen that's he's not very good. Tim thinks most comedians stink. Tim believes wannabee comedians are even worse. Tim's depression, anger, and bitterness seep into his jokes, which indeed are mostly bad.
Tim displays subtle disdain and later open hostility for the locals. That is, he shows dislike for everyone except Dee. Tim enjoys Dee's curiosity despite himself. As Dee and Tim interact with one another they each discover some things about themselves. I don't think the film has villains. Dee's description of Gary's ineptness at failing to clear his bizarre PC browser cache and incriminating phone call history is not a "gotcha" moment of female revenge so much as it is a mature rueful acceptance of a spouse's shortcomings. International Falls is not a romantic comedy. This is a quiet bittersweet film. I think anyone who has either considered or taken a new journey in life might enjoy this film.
Just added this to the list will track back on your review.
Cool. Pls let me know what you think, good, bad or indifferent.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/20 08:10 PM
Gun Crazy
directed by Joseph E. Lewis
I've always liked older movies. Over the past few years I've been watching more noir films. This 1949 film, although it obviously was not explicit in terms of sex or violence, was nonetheless quite bold at how it used those two themes. It was something which was likely Tarantino before its time. It certainly had to have made an impression on Arthur Penn's Bonnie and Clyde, in terms of the beret wearing female lead, the innovative camera work and the automobile being used as metaphor for danger and freedom.
Although as mentioned there's little here that would offend modern audiences in terms of sex/violence (people fall down wordlessly when they're shot, an attractive woman runs while wearing tight clothing) in some aspects this is an intensely sexy film. The leads had great chemistry together.
Bart Tare (John Dall) is an aw shucks kind of guy who, despite being unwilling to harm any living creature, has since childhood been obsessed with firearms of all kinds. Not only is he a natural marksman, he works continually to improve his aim and speed. After a stint in reform school for stealing a gun he's spent much of his adult life in the army training other soldiers to shoot. Coming home, he and his friends attend a carnival featuring skilled sharpshooter Annie Starr (Peggy Cummins), a young woman who shows off incredible gun skills to the audience and routinely defeats any challengers.
Both Annie and Bart like what they see in each other. Egged on by his friends, Bart challenges Annie to a duel of skills, and wins. THAT really turns Annie on. She convinces the carnival boss Packett (Berry Kroeger) to hire Bart. As Bart finds out though Packett and Annie have history together. And Packett at least would like to have a future with Annie.
One night Bart prevents Packett from assaulting Annie. Packett fires them both. Bart and Annie get married. The two don't have much money. Annie loves Bart because by her lights he's a real man with guts. But she has no interest in waiting around for him to build a life for her on a $40/week job that he hasn't found yet. She has ideas for quick money, robberies. Bart agrees provided no one gets hurt. But Annie doesn't have the same objections to violence that hubby does.
This was an entertaining movie that in so many ways was the filmic incarnation of the later Eagles lyrics:
The husband and wife have different pasts and different ideas about the utility of violence. They argue with each other, but they are incredibly loyal to and protective of each other, no matter what. This was really more Cummins' film than Dall's. Annie is always watching her husband's back and woe to anyone she thinks will harm Bart, even his relatives or cops. Dall and Cummins improvised much of their dialog with each other, which added to the film's naturalistic feel.
directed by Joseph E. Lewis
I've always liked older movies. Over the past few years I've been watching more noir films. This 1949 film, although it obviously was not explicit in terms of sex or violence, was nonetheless quite bold at how it used those two themes. It was something which was likely Tarantino before its time. It certainly had to have made an impression on Arthur Penn's Bonnie and Clyde, in terms of the beret wearing female lead, the innovative camera work and the automobile being used as metaphor for danger and freedom.
Although as mentioned there's little here that would offend modern audiences in terms of sex/violence (people fall down wordlessly when they're shot, an attractive woman runs while wearing tight clothing) in some aspects this is an intensely sexy film. The leads had great chemistry together.
Bart Tare (John Dall) is an aw shucks kind of guy who, despite being unwilling to harm any living creature, has since childhood been obsessed with firearms of all kinds. Not only is he a natural marksman, he works continually to improve his aim and speed. After a stint in reform school for stealing a gun he's spent much of his adult life in the army training other soldiers to shoot. Coming home, he and his friends attend a carnival featuring skilled sharpshooter Annie Starr (Peggy Cummins), a young woman who shows off incredible gun skills to the audience and routinely defeats any challengers.
Both Annie and Bart like what they see in each other. Egged on by his friends, Bart challenges Annie to a duel of skills, and wins. THAT really turns Annie on. She convinces the carnival boss Packett (Berry Kroeger) to hire Bart. As Bart finds out though Packett and Annie have history together. And Packett at least would like to have a future with Annie.
One night Bart prevents Packett from assaulting Annie. Packett fires them both. Bart and Annie get married. The two don't have much money. Annie loves Bart because by her lights he's a real man with guts. But she has no interest in waiting around for him to build a life for her on a $40/week job that he hasn't found yet. She has ideas for quick money, robberies. Bart agrees provided no one gets hurt. But Annie doesn't have the same objections to violence that hubby does.
This was an entertaining movie that in so many ways was the filmic incarnation of the later Eagles lyrics:
Quote
She said, "Listen, baby, you can hear the engine ring."
"We've been up and down this highway, haven't seen a goddamn thing."
"We've been up and down this highway, haven't seen a goddamn thing."
The husband and wife have different pasts and different ideas about the utility of violence. They argue with each other, but they are incredibly loyal to and protective of each other, no matter what. This was really more Cummins' film than Dall's. Annie is always watching her husband's back and woe to anyone she thinks will harm Bart, even his relatives or cops. Dall and Cummins improvised much of their dialog with each other, which added to the film's naturalistic feel.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/20 10:46 PM
For at least the 20th time, The Man Who Would be King with Sean Connery and Michael Caine. A great story, transferred to film very well.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/20 11:00 PM
A few on my to watch list.
New Jack City
The Game
Session 9
Cube
Frantic
New Jack City
The Game
Session 9
Cube
Frantic
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/25/20 11:24 AM
I'm watching Goldfinger again Thunderball next.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/25/20 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
I'm watching Goldfinger again Thunderball next.
1 of my Top 3 Bond films along with GOLDENEYE and CASINO ROYALE. Classic film!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/27/20 06:55 PM
THE NARROW MARGIN (1952)
I watched this little (70 min.) film noir because it stars Marie Windsor, my Favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Fifties (she and Sterling Hayden are the two whose movies I'll never pass up). She plays the widow of Frankie Neall, a big time mobster, who's on her way by train from Chicago to LA to testify before a grand jury. She's being guarded by LAPD Det. Sgt. Walter Brown (Charles McGraw), who knows that other mobsters are on that train, planning to kill her. Windsor is at her hard-boiled best and gets most of the many snappy lines in the script. (You thought Eileen Brennan wrote the book on Tough Dames? She's a den mother compared to Windsor.) McGraw is just as hard-boiled and plays his part convincingly with his gravelly voice and bent nose (he was a boxer), looking like a cross between Kirk Douglas and real-life tough guy Lawrence Tierney. Filming is brilliant in the deliberately claustrophobic confines of a train, and the supporting cast, especially Jacqueline White as a seemingly innocent mother, is superb. There are plenty of surprises and twists in the story. But, the plot is too improbable to be convincing--starting with having only one cop guarding a critical witness, and all the times that Brown abandons Neall to generate dramatic situations. I liked it a lot, but it's still a B-movie.
I watched this little (70 min.) film noir because it stars Marie Windsor, my Favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Fifties (she and Sterling Hayden are the two whose movies I'll never pass up). She plays the widow of Frankie Neall, a big time mobster, who's on her way by train from Chicago to LA to testify before a grand jury. She's being guarded by LAPD Det. Sgt. Walter Brown (Charles McGraw), who knows that other mobsters are on that train, planning to kill her. Windsor is at her hard-boiled best and gets most of the many snappy lines in the script. (You thought Eileen Brennan wrote the book on Tough Dames? She's a den mother compared to Windsor.) McGraw is just as hard-boiled and plays his part convincingly with his gravelly voice and bent nose (he was a boxer), looking like a cross between Kirk Douglas and real-life tough guy Lawrence Tierney. Filming is brilliant in the deliberately claustrophobic confines of a train, and the supporting cast, especially Jacqueline White as a seemingly innocent mother, is superb. There are plenty of surprises and twists in the story. But, the plot is too improbable to be convincing--starting with having only one cop guarding a critical witness, and all the times that Brown abandons Neall to generate dramatic situations. I liked it a lot, but it's still a B-movie.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/27/20 07:02 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Hollander
I'm watching Goldfinger again Thunderball next.
1 of my Top 3 Bond films along with GOLDENEYE and CASINO ROYALE. Classic film!
My three favorite Bonders, in order, are "From Russia With Love," "Dr. No." and "Goldfinger."
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/20 12:29 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Hollander
I'm watching Goldfinger again Thunderball next.
1 of my Top 3 Bond films along with GOLDENEYE and CASINO ROYALE. Classic film!
My three favorite Bonders, in order, are "From Russia With Love," "Dr. No." and "Goldfinger."
Dang, the original trilogy got you, huh Turnbull? I love the classics!
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/20 02:01 AM
For Your Eyes Only is my favorite with Roger Moore.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/20 06:35 PM
Presumed Innocent (1990)
Well crafted intelligent courtroom thriller with Harrison Ford. Nothing spoon-fed like modern flicks. Well paid off at the end.
Well crafted intelligent courtroom thriller with Harrison Ford. Nothing spoon-fed like modern flicks. Well paid off at the end.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/20 12:03 AM
After many years I watched Patriot Games (1992) again, still one of the better thrillers of the 90s.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/20 01:35 AM
The Game
I wanted to enjoy this more than I did. I had high hopes for it since it's directed by David Fincher, stars Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, and has an interesting concept, but it doesn't really deliver on the concept in any meaningful way. It's hard to get invested in the movie and you never get rewarded for your patience.
I wanted to enjoy this more than I did. I had high hopes for it since it's directed by David Fincher, stars Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, and has an interesting concept, but it doesn't really deliver on the concept in any meaningful way. It's hard to get invested in the movie and you never get rewarded for your patience.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/20 01:59 AM
Mad Max fury road one of the best films of the last decade.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/20 02:29 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
The Game
I wanted to enjoy this more than I did. I had high hopes for it since it's directed by David Fincher, stars Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, and has an interesting concept, but it doesn't really deliver on the concept in any meaningful way. It's hard to get invested in the movie and you never get rewarded for your patience.
I wanted to enjoy this more than I did. I had high hopes for it since it's directed by David Fincher, stars Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, and has an interesting concept, but it doesn't really deliver on the concept in any meaningful way. It's hard to get invested in the movie and you never get rewarded for your patience.
I'm a big Fincher fan and agree. This is one of his worst films.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/20 02:17 PM
Underrated comedies
Let's Go to Prison
Employee of the Month
When in Rome
Underrated horrors
The Night Flier
Cube
Pin
Session 9
I plan on setting aside time to watch some of these again.
Let's Go to Prison
Employee of the Month
When in Rome
Underrated horrors
The Night Flier
Cube
Pin
Session 9
I plan on setting aside time to watch some of these again.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/30/20 05:12 PM
Most underrated great movie of the '80's:
True Confessions
True Confessions
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/30/20 05:22 PM
20 Million Miles to Earth (1957)
In this typical '50's sci-fi, a space ship returning from a secret mission to Venus crashes off the cost of Sicily with only one survivor: Col. Calder (William Hopper, lethargic middle-aged leading man). A little kid finds a cylinder containing an embryonic creature called the "Ymir," which grows by leaps and bounds into a half-man, half-reptile looking like an oversized Creature from the Black Lagoon. It gets loose in Rome and ends up,in the Coloseum, after a fight with a bull elephant from the zoo. The plot and acting are ridiculous. The only saving grace is the special effects by the immortal Ray Harryhausen, which you'll recognize immediately.
In this typical '50's sci-fi, a space ship returning from a secret mission to Venus crashes off the cost of Sicily with only one survivor: Col. Calder (William Hopper, lethargic middle-aged leading man). A little kid finds a cylinder containing an embryonic creature called the "Ymir," which grows by leaps and bounds into a half-man, half-reptile looking like an oversized Creature from the Black Lagoon. It gets loose in Rome and ends up,in the Coloseum, after a fight with a bull elephant from the zoo. The plot and acting are ridiculous. The only saving grace is the special effects by the immortal Ray Harryhausen, which you'll recognize immediately.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/30/20 07:34 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
20 Million Miles to Earth (1957)
In this typical '50's sci-fi, a space ship returning from a secret mission to Venus crashes off the cost of Sicily with only one survivor: Col. Calder (William Hopper, lethargic middle-aged leading man). A little kid finds a cylinder containing an embryonic creature called the "Ymir," which grows by leaps and bounds into a half-man, half-reptile looking like an oversized Creature from the Black Lagoon. It gets loose in Rome and ends up,in the Coloseum, after a fight with a bull elephant from the zoo. The plot and acting are ridiculous. The only saving grace is the special effects by the immortal Ray Harryhausen, which you'll recognize immediately.
In this typical '50's sci-fi, a space ship returning from a secret mission to Venus crashes off the cost of Sicily with only one survivor: Col. Calder (William Hopper, lethargic middle-aged leading man). A little kid finds a cylinder containing an embryonic creature called the "Ymir," which grows by leaps and bounds into a half-man, half-reptile looking like an oversized Creature from the Black Lagoon. It gets loose in Rome and ends up,in the Coloseum, after a fight with a bull elephant from the zoo. The plot and acting are ridiculous. The only saving grace is the special effects by the immortal Ray Harryhausen, which you'll recognize immediately.
I so remember that movie TB. There were quite a few of those movies back then and the special effects were primitive by today's standards. Loved them all!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/20 01:47 AM
BAD EDUCATION (2019)
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/20 11:45 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BAD EDUCATION (2019)
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Never heard of her. Going by the name I'm assuming that Hollywood are handing major roles to people based on the color of their skin now rather than any other metric.
Good to see affirmative action is going to decide how movies are casted now.
Soon there will be a Rooney Rule for acting insisting that there is a minimum of 1 gay, 1 lesbian, 1 transgender, 1 black person and 1 Asian person in a speaking role in every movie.
You would think movies would be the one place where you can escape from this shit. In a world where a Presidential candidate is making a woman his running mate for no reason other than the fact she's a woman.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/04/20 06:14 PM
Thanks for the review Turnbull. I have it recorded but haven’t found my way to it yet. Glad to know it’s good and worth the watch!
Moe, I agree with you, but this atmosphere has been preeclampsia in Hollywood (especially the last couple of years). Look at the remakes that have to feature feminism (see last year’s train wreck of BLACK CHRISTMAS) or any other remake in the last 15 years or so, staring minorities, that don’t bring anything new to the movie they’re making. Simply doing it to show that “we can to.†Or Hollywood patting itself in the back saying “look how inclusive we are!†It truly turns my stomach. People should be cast, hired, etc by their work or artistry - not their skin color.
Moe, I agree with you, but this atmosphere has been preeclampsia in Hollywood (especially the last couple of years). Look at the remakes that have to feature feminism (see last year’s train wreck of BLACK CHRISTMAS) or any other remake in the last 15 years or so, staring minorities, that don’t bring anything new to the movie they’re making. Simply doing it to show that “we can to.†Or Hollywood patting itself in the back saying “look how inclusive we are!†It truly turns my stomach. People should be cast, hired, etc by their work or artistry - not their skin color.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 03:35 AM
EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS (1956)
Another typical mid-Fifties sci-fi-er, but better than most. Rocket scientist Russell Marvin (Hugh Marlowe) and his wife Carol (Joan Taylor) get a mysterious recording from aliens hovering over their car in a flying saucer. They've been aborting rocket launches and hatching a plan to take over Earth unless science and the military can stop them. A familiar theme in this genre, but the Ray Harryhausen special effects are exceptionally well done, and the aliens' attack (and defeat, natch) on Washington DC is exciting. Marlowe and Taylor do a fine job, too. Very enjoyable.
Another typical mid-Fifties sci-fi-er, but better than most. Rocket scientist Russell Marvin (Hugh Marlowe) and his wife Carol (Joan Taylor) get a mysterious recording from aliens hovering over their car in a flying saucer. They've been aborting rocket launches and hatching a plan to take over Earth unless science and the military can stop them. A familiar theme in this genre, but the Ray Harryhausen special effects are exceptionally well done, and the aliens' attack (and defeat, natch) on Washington DC is exciting. Marlowe and Taylor do a fine job, too. Very enjoyable.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 04:18 AM
Again TB, a movie that I well remember. I especially remember the ray guns they used to shoot down the saucers.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 07:13 AM
Crown Vic (2019)
Posted By: Paul Pisano
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 04:19 PM
the irishman. pesci did not need to do tommy devito or nicky santoro to be scary. he was very scary. i believe he was telling frank that if the hoffa thing wasn't handled it could be trouble for frank. remember he says to frank that both frank and his family are with him.
Posted By: Paul Pisano
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 04:22 PM
glengary glenn ross. al pacino was trying to pull a fast one on the guy. this movie has an excellent cast. love how ed harris starts laughing after finding out the guy's name is fuck you. the actual character was named blake. i also believe this is one of kevin spacey's first movies.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/11/20 10:00 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Again TB, a movie that I well remember. I especially remember the ray guns they used to shoot down the saucers.
Hollywood was obsessed with ray guns and death rays long before lasers were invented. In "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers," the ray guns disrupted the saucers' magnetic fields, causing them to crash--a death ray by any other name. Then again, the saucers used retractable death rays to vaporize buildings, tanks, people, etc...
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/20 10:55 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BAD EDUCATION (2019)
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Based on the real-life Rape of Roslyn, LI, Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman), superintendent of that Long Island town's school system, and his chief administrator, Pam Glukin (Allison Janney), embezzled $11 million in public education funds before being brought down by a reporter (Geraldine Viswanathan) for the high school newspaper. The acting carries this film well, with Jackman especially good as smooth, self-confident Tassone, revered locally for his results but leading multiple secret lives. Janney is a real New-Yawker, with a lavish lifestyle hiding in plain sight. Supporting cast includes three "The Irishman" veterans: Ray Romano as chair of the school board; Welker White as a school office worker, and Kathrine Narducci as a parent . Director Cory Finlay has a light touch, and the movie has many comedic moments, but they never get in the way of the message: Crime Does Not Pay. Pretty good overall.
Never heard of her. Going by the name I'm assuming that Hollywood are handing major roles to people based on the color of their skin now rather than any other metric.
Good to see affirmative action is going to decide how movies are casted now.
Soon there will be a Rooney Rule for acting insisting that there is a minimum of 1 gay, 1 lesbian, 1 transgender, 1 black person and 1 Asian person in a speaking role in every movie.
You would think movies would be the one place where you can escape from this shit. In a world where a Presidential candidate is making a woman his running mate for no reason other than the fact she's a woman.
You know, if it makes you feel better, Viswanathan's mother is a classically trained stage actress who happens to be Caucasian. So now are you only half as upset???
Presumably the young lady got the role in Bad Education because of her success in Blockers and Hala and because people who are paid to be right about such things correctly judged that she was right for the part.
Even if you hadn't known any of this you coud have looked it up instead of assuming that because someone has a name of apparently non-Caucasian provenance that she must not have gotten the job because of talent.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/28/20 06:08 PM
Watched the dynamic duo of James Cagney and Edward G. Robinson in Smart Money. The story was not that interesting, but to watch those two cinematic giants together was a treat. I wonder if they ever appeared together again.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/28/20 07:33 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched the dynamic duo of James Cagney and Edward G. Robinson in Smart Money. The story was not that interesting, but to watch those two cinematic giants together was a treat. I wonder if they ever appeared together again.
According 2 TCM, the pair were 2gether4 times..1 of which I know of is "Kid Galahad".
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/20 02:51 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by olivant
Watched the dynamic duo of James Cagney and Edward G. Robinson in Smart Money. The story was not that interesting, but to watch those two cinematic giants together was a treat. I wonder if they ever appeared together again.
According 2 TCM, the pair were 2gether4 times..1 of which I know of is "Kid Galahad".
They both have such unique dialogue deliveries.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/20 06:41 PM
Cagney is justifiably a legend. but Robinson is probably the most underrated great actor in Hollywood history--and incredibly versatile, too. I can't think of a movie that he didn't improve simply by being in it, and that includes such dead dogs as "Cincinnati Kid" and "Soylent Green."
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/20 11:34 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
They both have such unique dialogue deliveries.
I used to love Biggie Rat, who sounded just like Robinson, in the old King Leonardo cartoons.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/20 02:59 AM
MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS (1974)
This tour-de-force treatment of a juicy Agatha Christie mystery, directed by the great Sidney Lumet, features an all-star cast of seemingly unrelated, unconnected conspirators who kill a tough gangster (Richard Widmark) on the famous European luxury train. It's eventually unraveled by Christie's inimitable Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Albert Finney in a world-beating performance). There's plenty of dry humor mixed in with the murderous hi-jinks, much of it supplied dead-pan by Finney. Filming is luxurious, but it's a bit slow going, particularly at the end.
This tour-de-force treatment of a juicy Agatha Christie mystery, directed by the great Sidney Lumet, features an all-star cast of seemingly unrelated, unconnected conspirators who kill a tough gangster (Richard Widmark) on the famous European luxury train. It's eventually unraveled by Christie's inimitable Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Albert Finney in a world-beating performance). There's plenty of dry humor mixed in with the murderous hi-jinks, much of it supplied dead-pan by Finney. Filming is luxurious, but it's a bit slow going, particularly at the end.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/31/20 11:45 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS (1974)
This tour-de-force treatment of a juicy Agatha Christie mystery, directed by the great Sidney Lumet, features an all-star cast of seemingly unrelated, unconnected conspirators who kill a tough gangster (Richard Widmark) on the famous European luxury train. It's eventually unraveled by Christie's inimitable Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Albert Finney in a world-beating performance). There's plenty of dry humor mixed in with the murderous hi-jinks, much of it supplied dead-pan by Finney. Filming is luxurious, but it's a bit slow going, particularly at the end.
This tour-de-force treatment of a juicy Agatha Christie mystery, directed by the great Sidney Lumet, features an all-star cast of seemingly unrelated, unconnected conspirators who kill a tough gangster (Richard Widmark) on the famous European luxury train. It's eventually unraveled by Christie's inimitable Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Albert Finney in a world-beating performance). There's plenty of dry humor mixed in with the murderous hi-jinks, much of it supplied dead-pan by Finney. Filming is luxurious, but it's a bit slow going, particularly at the end.
I've thoroughly enjoyed MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS. Fantastic cast and a superior film than the remake that was released (unnecessarily in my opinion) in 2017. A great whodunnit. Did you happen to catch last year's KNIVES OUT? Another fantastic film very much in the vein of a modern day Agatha Christie and one in which I'm looking forward to the sequel. There's also a sequel going to be made to MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS in DEATH ON THE NILE (another remake).
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/20 12:24 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Cagney is justifiably a legend. but Robinson is probably the most underrated great actor in Hollywood history--and incredibly versatile, too. I can't think of a movie that he didn't improve simply by being in it, and that includes such dead dogs as "Cincinnati Kid" and "Soylent Green."
Both r on demand right now on TCM..Ann Margaret is ravishing (as usual) in C. Kid...
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/20 03:26 AM
ANATOMY OF A MURDER (1959)
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/20 08:13 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
ANATOMY OF A MURDER (1959)
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
Ur wrong Turn..it's not a good watch......it's a GREAT watch..just watched on TCM 4 the 4th or 5th in my life..& u forgot 2 mention how beautiful Ms. Remick is as well as an accomplished actress..
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/20 08:17 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Turnbull
ANATOMY OF A MURDER (1959)
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
In this superior courtroom drama directed by Otto Preminger, a small town Michigan lawyer (Jimmy Stewart) defends an Army lieutenant (ever-scowling Ben Gazzara), who killed a bartender who raped his flirty, trampy wife (Lee Remick). He works uphill to establish a "temporary insanity" defense for his client, against a special prosecutor (bent-nose George C. Scott), brought in from the state capital to nail the lieutenant. The acting (especially Stewart) and the legal jousting carry this film. The ending is something of a letdown and the plot is encumbered by several generally extraneous characters. But, the film is almost stolen by a real lawyer, Joseph N. Welch, who plays the judge. Welch was the Army's lawyer in the famous, televised Army/McCarthy hearings (1954), and he cut down McCarthy in what was arguably the most dramatic moment in live television history. He's brilliant here. A good watch.
Ur wrong Turn..it's not a good watch......it's a GREAT watch..just watched on TCM 4 the 4th or 5th in my life..& u forgot 2 mention how beautiful Ms. Remick is as well as an accomplished actress..
"a womans panties is not a humorous matter"
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/20 05:46 PM
Noah, starring Russell Crowe. It's storyline is something of a different take on the typical Bible story with which we grew up. For one, from catechism, I don't recall a stoweaway on the Ark nor the tree-like creatures who defend Noah and his family. An interesting film.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/20 04:52 AM
I streamed the excellent Harrison Ford thriller "WHAT LIES BENEATH" on demand on Pluto TV tonight.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/20 11:46 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Noah, starring Russell Crowe. It's storyline is something of a different take on the typical Bible story with which we grew up. For one, from catechism, I don't recall a stoweaway on the Ark nor the tree-like creatures who defend Noah and his family. An interesting film.
I completely forgot that movie existed even though I saw it in theaters when it came out. I remember it being pretty awful.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/20 07:08 PM
COMA (1978)
A surgery intern at a big Boston hospital (Genevieve Bujold) gets suspicious because a large number of young patients having routine surgical procedures emerge from anesthesia in irreversible comas. She single-mindedly tries to investigate despite patronizing tut-tutting from hospital bigshots and discouragement from her fellow surgical intern and boyfriend (Michael Douglas), who's afraid her persistence will threaten his plans to become chief resident. Things turn deadly against her, but after some hair-raising escapes, she uncovers a vast plot by hospital doctors to harvest the comatose patients' vital organs and sell them to the highest bidder. The villain-in-chief is the hospital's top surgeon (Richard Widmark, my favorite bad guy), who tries and almost succeeds in putting her into a coma. Despite straining credibility at times, this is a very good thriller, with fine performances by the principals.
A surgery intern at a big Boston hospital (Genevieve Bujold) gets suspicious because a large number of young patients having routine surgical procedures emerge from anesthesia in irreversible comas. She single-mindedly tries to investigate despite patronizing tut-tutting from hospital bigshots and discouragement from her fellow surgical intern and boyfriend (Michael Douglas), who's afraid her persistence will threaten his plans to become chief resident. Things turn deadly against her, but after some hair-raising escapes, she uncovers a vast plot by hospital doctors to harvest the comatose patients' vital organs and sell them to the highest bidder. The villain-in-chief is the hospital's top surgeon (Richard Widmark, my favorite bad guy), who tries and almost succeeds in putting her into a coma. Despite straining credibility at times, this is a very good thriller, with fine performances by the principals.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/20 08:38 PM
Scarface
I saw this for the first time in about 15 years. 3 hours long and never lags. It's enjoyable from start to finish. In fact I feel like watching it again right now.
I saw this for the first time in about 15 years. 3 hours long and never lags. It's enjoyable from start to finish. In fact I feel like watching it again right now.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/10/20 10:40 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Scarface
I saw this for the first time in about 15 years. 3 hours long and never lags. It's enjoyable from start to finish. In fact I feel like watching it again right now.
I saw this for the first time in about 15 years. 3 hours long and never lags. It's enjoyable from start to finish. In fact I feel like watching it again right now.
I'm in the mood to watch it again. This is one of my top 5 favorite movies of all-time and Al Pacino's greatest performance IMO. The Godfather at one point was my favorite movie of all-time until I saw this. I still have trouble believing to this day that Michael Corleone went on to play Tony Montana!
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/20 03:17 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
COMA (1978)
A surgery intern at a big Boston hospital (Genevieve Bujold) gets suspicious because a large number of young patients having routine surgical procedures emerge from anesthesia in irreversible comas. She single-mindedly tries to investigate despite patronizing tut-tutting from hospital bigshots and discouragement from her fellow surgical intern and boyfriend (Michael Douglas), who's afraid her persistence will threaten his plans to become chief resident. Things turn deadly against her, but after some hair-raising escapes, she uncovers a vast plot by hospital doctors to harvest the comatose patients' vital organs and sell them to the highest bidder. The villain-in-chief is the hospital's top surgeon (Richard Widmark, my favorite bad guy), who tries and almost succeeds in putting her into a coma. Despite straining credibility at times, this is a very good thriller, with fine performances by the principals.
A surgery intern at a big Boston hospital (Genevieve Bujold) gets suspicious because a large number of young patients having routine surgical procedures emerge from anesthesia in irreversible comas. She single-mindedly tries to investigate despite patronizing tut-tutting from hospital bigshots and discouragement from her fellow surgical intern and boyfriend (Michael Douglas), who's afraid her persistence will threaten his plans to become chief resident. Things turn deadly against her, but after some hair-raising escapes, she uncovers a vast plot by hospital doctors to harvest the comatose patients' vital organs and sell them to the highest bidder. The villain-in-chief is the hospital's top surgeon (Richard Widmark, my favorite bad guy), who tries and almost succeeds in putting her into a coma. Despite straining credibility at times, this is a very good thriller, with fine performances by the principals.
It has been years since I seen it. There were a lot of young and unknown actors in it, Rip Torn, Ed Harris, Michael Douglas, there is one more I can't remember but was a patient. It based on a Robin Cook book. Some great moments in the film.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/20 06:48 PM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
There were a lot of young and unknown actors in it, Rip Torn, Ed Harris, Michael Douglas, there is one more I can't remember but was a patient.
Tom Selleck.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/20 07:08 PM
St. VALENTINE'S DAY MASSACRE (1967)
Fans of Roger Corman will have a field day with this tour de force treatment of the infamous Prohibition bloodbath. It has everything you'd expect from the King of the B's: Garish sets. Cut rate snowfalls (cars make no tire tracks in the snow). Six-minute, no-holds-barred fight between a gangster and his moll. Huge ketchup blood spatters. Ponderous, documentary style voice-overs by the mellifluous Reed Hadley (full of historical errors, too). Inspired miscasting of the principals: Jason Robards as Capone (with rubber-cement scars), George Segal as Pete Gusenberg, both compensating by frenzied overacting (Segal out over-the-tops Pacino in Scarface, if you can imagine such a feat). And, with it, a great supporting cast of Hollywood's most familiar thugs and plug-uglies: Ralph Meeker, Clint Ritchie, Frank Silvero, Joseph Campanella, David Canary, Harold J. Stone, Paul Richards, Joe Turkel and Alex Rocco. Bruce Dern and, yes, Jack Nicholson have bit parts. All of this brought off with Corman's usual verve. Love it? Hate it? Up to you.
Fans of Roger Corman will have a field day with this tour de force treatment of the infamous Prohibition bloodbath. It has everything you'd expect from the King of the B's: Garish sets. Cut rate snowfalls (cars make no tire tracks in the snow). Six-minute, no-holds-barred fight between a gangster and his moll. Huge ketchup blood spatters. Ponderous, documentary style voice-overs by the mellifluous Reed Hadley (full of historical errors, too). Inspired miscasting of the principals: Jason Robards as Capone (with rubber-cement scars), George Segal as Pete Gusenberg, both compensating by frenzied overacting (Segal out over-the-tops Pacino in Scarface, if you can imagine such a feat). And, with it, a great supporting cast of Hollywood's most familiar thugs and plug-uglies: Ralph Meeker, Clint Ritchie, Frank Silvero, Joseph Campanella, David Canary, Harold J. Stone, Paul Richards, Joe Turkel and Alex Rocco. Bruce Dern and, yes, Jack Nicholson have bit parts. All of this brought off with Corman's usual verve. Love it? Hate it? Up to you.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/20 09:37 PM
Miscasting indeed, TB. Stone was the best though. The documentary style was not what I was expecting. However, I liked it when the narrator would say "on the last morning of his life."
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/12/20 03:01 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Miscasting indeed, TB. Stone was the best though.
I agree, Oli. Stone was one of the most versatile ethnic portrayers. He did 'em all. A fixture in TV series.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/20 06:26 AM
DA 5 BLOODS (2020)
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/20 07:55 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
DA 5 BLOODS (2020)
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
I saw the trailer when it dropped and knew then and there I was passing on it. Glad to be proven right. I don't mind Spike, but when he (or Hollywood for that matter) get into their heavy handed liberal messages, it turns me off (see ESPN's 30-for-30 BE WATER about Bruce Lee).
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/15/20 04:46 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Turnbull
DA 5 BLOODS (2020)
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
Four ageing African American veterans of the Viet Nam war return to the country, ostensible to find and repatriate the remains of their beloved squad leader (the fifth Blood) and also to retrieve a cache of gold bars they found and buried during a wartime patrol. Director Spike Lee kluges together flashbacks of 50-year-old battle scenes with the same actors, no attempt to de-age them; newsreels of the civil rights era and MLK's assassination; a love plot with one of the Bloods and a half-century-later mistress (and daughter from the relationship); betrayal; land mines blowing up; Paul (Delroy Lindo) cracking up, plus about a thousand MF-bombs. Lee clumsily tries to deliver several important messages at once, including PTSD, unfulfilled racial promises; police brutality--to say nothing of ripping off Apocalypse Now ("Ride of the Valkuries") playing while the Bloods boat upriver to their site) and Treasure of the Sierra Madre (leader of a group of Vietnamese bushwhackers telling them, "I don't gotta show you no stinkin' credentials"). What a mess!
(see ESPN's 30-for-30 BE WATER about Bruce Lee).
During this virus related hiatus I've become quite familiar with Youtube and rediscovered Bruce Lee. Madonne! I've never seen any human being move that quickly.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/19/20 11:45 PM
Fire in the Sky
I vaguely remembered this movie from my childhood and randomly decided to watch it on a whim. It was better than I expected it to be. Well-acted, thoughtful, and with special effects that hold up reasonably well to this day. The scene on the spaceship is intense and terrifying, and it helps that the lead actor knocks his performance out of the park.
Good movie!
I vaguely remembered this movie from my childhood and randomly decided to watch it on a whim. It was better than I expected it to be. Well-acted, thoughtful, and with special effects that hold up reasonably well to this day. The scene on the spaceship is intense and terrifying, and it helps that the lead actor knocks his performance out of the park.
Good movie!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/20/20 06:17 PM
THE GOOD LIAR (2019)
An aged con man (Ian McKellen) inveigles himself into the life of a seemingly trusting, well-heeled widow (Helen Mirren). With help from his partner in crime (Jim Carter, posing as an investment adviser), he convinces her to merge her finances with his, the better to earn a higher return on both--and for him to make off with the total. But, it turns out that neither is who he/she seems to be, with complex, credibility-busting connections from the past.
It's a pleasure to watch these brilliant actors at work, and the pace and buildup are pretty good--up to a point. But, the movie spends way too much time with flashbacks at the end to make those connections from the past work with the denouement.
An aged con man (Ian McKellen) inveigles himself into the life of a seemingly trusting, well-heeled widow (Helen Mirren). With help from his partner in crime (Jim Carter, posing as an investment adviser), he convinces her to merge her finances with his, the better to earn a higher return on both--and for him to make off with the total. But, it turns out that neither is who he/she seems to be, with complex, credibility-busting connections from the past.
It's a pleasure to watch these brilliant actors at work, and the pace and buildup are pretty good--up to a point. But, the movie spends way too much time with flashbacks at the end to make those connections from the past work with the denouement.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/20 12:07 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE GOOD LIAR (2019)
An aged con man (Ian McKellen) inveigles himself into the life of a seemingly trusting, well-heeled widow (Helen Mirren). With help from his partner in crime (Jim Carter, posing as an investment adviser), he convinces her to merge her finances with his, the better to earn a higher return on both--and for him to make off with the total. But, it turns out that neither is who he/she seems to be, with complex, credibility-busting connections from the past.
It's a pleasure to watch these brilliant actors at work, and the pace and buildup are pretty good--up to a point. But, the movie spends way too much time with flashbacks at the end to make those connections from the past work with the denouement.
An aged con man (Ian McKellen) inveigles himself into the life of a seemingly trusting, well-heeled widow (Helen Mirren). With help from his partner in crime (Jim Carter, posing as an investment adviser), he convinces her to merge her finances with his, the better to earn a higher return on both--and for him to make off with the total. But, it turns out that neither is who he/she seems to be, with complex, credibility-busting connections from the past.
It's a pleasure to watch these brilliant actors at work, and the pace and buildup are pretty good--up to a point. But, the movie spends way too much time with flashbacks at the end to make those connections from the past work with the denouement.
I've got this recorded. Haven't watched it yet but with Ian McKellen and Helen Mirren, I figured you couldn't go too wrong (I hope I'm right).
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/22/20 05:44 AM
KNIFE IN THE WATER (1962)
In this Polish film, Andrezj and his wife, Krystyna, a well-off couple by Communist-bloc standards, pick up a young male hitch-hiker after almost hitting him with their car, and, presumably bored, invite him on their sailboat. The two men immediately set off on a subdued alpha-male contest. pitting the older man's knowledge of sailing with the younger one's refusal to knuckle under, and the woman switching sides at key moments. It's a typical European film of that era, full of subtle moves and psychological turns (think: "L'Aventura" and "Purple Noon"), plus crisp, deep-focus cinematography, but not much action. Ending leaves us about where it began. This was Roman Polanski's directoral debut and it won the Oscar for Best Foreign Film. I thought it was worth watching, but I'll take his "Chinatown" and "Rosemary's Baby" over it any day.
In this Polish film, Andrezj and his wife, Krystyna, a well-off couple by Communist-bloc standards, pick up a young male hitch-hiker after almost hitting him with their car, and, presumably bored, invite him on their sailboat. The two men immediately set off on a subdued alpha-male contest. pitting the older man's knowledge of sailing with the younger one's refusal to knuckle under, and the woman switching sides at key moments. It's a typical European film of that era, full of subtle moves and psychological turns (think: "L'Aventura" and "Purple Noon"), plus crisp, deep-focus cinematography, but not much action. Ending leaves us about where it began. This was Roman Polanski's directoral debut and it won the Oscar for Best Foreign Film. I thought it was worth watching, but I'll take his "Chinatown" and "Rosemary's Baby" over it any day.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/20 12:03 AM
I just watched Polanski's REPULSION for the first time on Friday. A good film but not on the level of ROSEMARY'S BABY, which I consider his best film. Very strong performance by Catherine Deneuve as well. She did an absolutely amazing job displaying her fragile, vulnerable, "I'm going slightly mad" performance.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/20 06:06 PM
When Worlds Collide (1951)
In this early entry in the great Fifties sci-fi genre, a South African pilot (Richard Derr) is paid by astronomers to bring a top-secret cache of film to scientists in New York. The scientists confirm the astronomers' worst fear: A star will come close enough to Earth to cause floods, fires, volcanos, tidal waves, etc. A few days later, a new planet will crash into Earth, destroying it. The scientists recruit some industrialists willing to fund a Noah's Ark spaceship that will take just a handful of people and animals to a planet that might sustain life (one of the backers, played by John Hoyt, deserved an Oscar in the "Nastiest Character" category). The acting is pretty broad, except for Barbara Rush, who plays the obligatory love interest. Special effects range from impressive (Times Square NYC flooded by a tidal wave, the space ship launching) to cheesy (the host planet's landscape, looking like a kid's watercolor). But, the movie has good action and raises some thoughtful ethical questions. Not bad at all.
In this early entry in the great Fifties sci-fi genre, a South African pilot (Richard Derr) is paid by astronomers to bring a top-secret cache of film to scientists in New York. The scientists confirm the astronomers' worst fear: A star will come close enough to Earth to cause floods, fires, volcanos, tidal waves, etc. A few days later, a new planet will crash into Earth, destroying it. The scientists recruit some industrialists willing to fund a Noah's Ark spaceship that will take just a handful of people and animals to a planet that might sustain life (one of the backers, played by John Hoyt, deserved an Oscar in the "Nastiest Character" category). The acting is pretty broad, except for Barbara Rush, who plays the obligatory love interest. Special effects range from impressive (Times Square NYC flooded by a tidal wave, the space ship launching) to cheesy (the host planet's landscape, looking like a kid's watercolor). But, the movie has good action and raises some thoughtful ethical questions. Not bad at all.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/20 11:01 PM
Once Upon a Time in America
Elegantly crafted and superbly acted. A beautifully filmed movie and a nice counterpoint to the romanticism of The Godfather. After watching the ending scene, I subscribe to the theory that everything after Noodles's betrayal in 1933 never really happened, and is all the result of his hallucinating on opium as a means to deal with his conscience. Take note of the surroundings after Noodles leaves Max's mansion; the symbolism and metaphors. Then compare them to what's in the opium den; the lanterns and, in particular, the opium pipe. It's the lingering shot on something that strongly resembles an opium pipe on the garbage truck that sells this theory for me.
One complaint is that Joe Pesci's character was underused, which is odd for such a long movie, and another is, perhaps, the gratuitous rape scenes. But De Niro is, as always, magnetic to watch, and James Woods knocks his role out of the park, too.
I highly recommend.
Elegantly crafted and superbly acted. A beautifully filmed movie and a nice counterpoint to the romanticism of The Godfather. After watching the ending scene, I subscribe to the theory that everything after Noodles's betrayal in 1933 never really happened, and is all the result of his hallucinating on opium as a means to deal with his conscience. Take note of the surroundings after Noodles leaves Max's mansion; the symbolism and metaphors. Then compare them to what's in the opium den; the lanterns and, in particular, the opium pipe. It's the lingering shot on something that strongly resembles an opium pipe on the garbage truck that sells this theory for me.
One complaint is that Joe Pesci's character was underused, which is odd for such a long movie, and another is, perhaps, the gratuitous rape scenes. But De Niro is, as always, magnetic to watch, and James Woods knocks his role out of the park, too.
I highly recommend.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/20 11:48 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Once Upon a Time in America
Elegantly crafted and superbly acted. A beautifully filmed movie and a nice counterpoint to the romanticism of The Godfather. After watching the ending scene, I subscribe to the theory that everything after Noodles's betrayal in 1933 never really happened, and is all the result of his hallucinating on opium as a means to deal with his conscience. Take note of the surroundings after Noodles leaves Max's mansion; the symbolism and metaphors. Then compare them to what's in the opium den; the lanterns and, in particular, the opium pipe. It's the lingering shot on something that strongly resembles an opium pipe on the garbage truck that sells this theory for me.
One complaint is that Joe Pesci's character was underused, which is odd for such a long movie, and another is, perhaps, the gratuitous rape scenes. But De Niro is, as always, magnetic to watch, and James Woods knocks his role out of the park, too.
I highly recommend.
Elegantly crafted and superbly acted. A beautifully filmed movie and a nice counterpoint to the romanticism of The Godfather. After watching the ending scene, I subscribe to the theory that everything after Noodles's betrayal in 1933 never really happened, and is all the result of his hallucinating on opium as a means to deal with his conscience. Take note of the surroundings after Noodles leaves Max's mansion; the symbolism and metaphors. Then compare them to what's in the opium den; the lanterns and, in particular, the opium pipe. It's the lingering shot on something that strongly resembles an opium pipe on the garbage truck that sells this theory for me.
One complaint is that Joe Pesci's character was underused, which is odd for such a long movie, and another is, perhaps, the gratuitous rape scenes. But De Niro is, as always, magnetic to watch, and James Woods knocks his role out of the park, too.
I highly recommend.
Great movie, I would have to have this in my top ten.
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/20 03:33 PM
No shit Moe. I've never looked at it for more than face value. One off my favorite movies. Now, I will dedicate four hours to reevaluate. Good observations.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/29/20 12:19 AM
Becky,
Really good , 7.5
Kevin James did a great job selling himself as a really bad guy.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/bwwQMnxZ/IMG-0215.jpg)
Really good , 7.5
Kevin James did a great job selling himself as a really bad guy.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/30/20 06:40 AM
BODYGUARD (1948)
I took a flyer on this movie because it stars Lawrence Tierney, my favorite movie and real-life tough guy of the Forties. This time he plays Mike Carter, a LAPD detective fired for rough stuff and insubordination. He takes a job bodyguarding a rich woman who's head of a meatpacking company. Doesn't take Carter long to find he's been made the fall guy in the murder of his former boss. He spends the rest of the movie dodging his former colleagues and finding the real murderer, with considerable help from his former mole and girlfriend in the LAPD (Priscilla Lane, who's very good). Tierney is still tough, but he plays a good guy (barely) for once, and brings it off. The plot's kind of thin, but the action is good. Liked it a lot.
I took a flyer on this movie because it stars Lawrence Tierney, my favorite movie and real-life tough guy of the Forties. This time he plays Mike Carter, a LAPD detective fired for rough stuff and insubordination. He takes a job bodyguarding a rich woman who's head of a meatpacking company. Doesn't take Carter long to find he's been made the fall guy in the murder of his former boss. He spends the rest of the movie dodging his former colleagues and finding the real murderer, with considerable help from his former mole and girlfriend in the LAPD (Priscilla Lane, who's very good). Tierney is still tough, but he plays a good guy (barely) for once, and brings it off. The plot's kind of thin, but the action is good. Liked it a lot.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/20 06:40 PM
PROMETHEUS (2012)
In this Alien prequel, two scientists (Noomi Rapace, Logan Marshall-Green), study ancient cave paintings and conclude that a bygone race, whom they call "The Engineers," created mankind. A zillionaire funds an expedition (including a bunch of technicians. a predictably perfidious robot called David played by Michael Fassbender, and an icy Charlize Theron as the mission boss) to a distant planet where they think The Engineers may have lived. The anticipated chaos, violence and betrayal ensue. The plot is thin, the dialog weak, and the logic of David helping to impregnate Rapace with an alien life form is never explained. Nearly all the characters are forgettable; and even Idris Elba, a talented and versatile English actor (who's in more movies than the MGM lion) who plays the space ship's pilot, is trapped in an inner city patois that leaves him with nothing much to say except "Copy dat." Rapace is good, Fassbender better, but Marshall-Green is just-plain obnoxious. BUT: Director Ridley Scott shows a sure hand with the action and especially the special effects, CGI and soundtrack, which are just brilliant and at times, beautiful. This movie is pure eye-and-ear candy.
In this Alien prequel, two scientists (Noomi Rapace, Logan Marshall-Green), study ancient cave paintings and conclude that a bygone race, whom they call "The Engineers," created mankind. A zillionaire funds an expedition (including a bunch of technicians. a predictably perfidious robot called David played by Michael Fassbender, and an icy Charlize Theron as the mission boss) to a distant planet where they think The Engineers may have lived. The anticipated chaos, violence and betrayal ensue. The plot is thin, the dialog weak, and the logic of David helping to impregnate Rapace with an alien life form is never explained. Nearly all the characters are forgettable; and even Idris Elba, a talented and versatile English actor (who's in more movies than the MGM lion) who plays the space ship's pilot, is trapped in an inner city patois that leaves him with nothing much to say except "Copy dat." Rapace is good, Fassbender better, but Marshall-Green is just-plain obnoxious. BUT: Director Ridley Scott shows a sure hand with the action and especially the special effects, CGI and soundtrack, which are just brilliant and at times, beautiful. This movie is pure eye-and-ear candy.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/20 08:18 PM
There's a little Western subchannel called Grit TV that makes it's living off B movies and black-and-white reruns. They've pulled out all the stops this weekend for their 8 pm ET movie: Silverado on Thursday, El Dorado last night, The Magnificent 7 (Edit: sorry, it's True Grit tonight) tonight, and The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Sunday night.
I hadn't seen El Dorado in several years. It has obvious weaknesses you could pick at if you wanted, like some clumsy dialogue, weird casting, and hokey stunts. But you have Wayne and Mitchum, the story is very tight, and just about every scene is entertaining.
I hadn't seen El Dorado in several years. It has obvious weaknesses you could pick at if you wanted, like some clumsy dialogue, weird casting, and hokey stunts. But you have Wayne and Mitchum, the story is very tight, and just about every scene is entertaining.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/20 11:41 PM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
There's a little Western subchannel called Grit TV that makes it's living off B movies and black-and-white reruns. They've pulled out all the stops this weekend for their 8 pm ET movie: Silverado on Thursday, El Dorado last night, The Magnificent 7 (Edit: sorry, it's True Grit tonight) tonight, and The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Sunday night.
I hadn't seen El Dorado in several years. It has obvious weaknesses you could pick at if you wanted, like some clumsy dialogue, weird casting, and hokey stunts. But you have Wayne and Mitchum, the story is very tight, and just about every scene is entertaining.
I hadn't seen El Dorado in several years. It has obvious weaknesses you could pick at if you wanted, like some clumsy dialogue, weird casting, and hokey stunts. But you have Wayne and Mitchum, the story is very tight, and just about every scene is entertaining.
Good stuff, Love it.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/20 12:54 AM
Bringing Out the Dead
Probably my least favourite Scorsese movie out of the ones that I've seen. On paper, everything about it sounded good to me, but I just couldn't get into it. Halfway into it and I was just waiting for it to end.
Probably my least favourite Scorsese movie out of the ones that I've seen. On paper, everything about it sounded good to me, but I just couldn't get into it. Halfway into it and I was just waiting for it to end.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/20 06:45 AM
HOMBRE (1967)
John Russell (Paul Newman), white guy raised by and lives with Apaches in 1880s Arizona, inherits a boarding house from his white father, which he sells immediately. He gets on a stagecoach out of town with an interesting bunch, including Cicero Grimes (Richard Boone, peerless bad guy), who's in with a group of holdup men who are after big bucks that one of the passengers, Dr. Favor (Frederick March) embezzled from Indians in his charge. The robbery leaves the passengers on foot and short of water, but the robbers without the money. The passengers, who dissed Russell, now need him to show them how to survive. The script (from an Elmore Leonard novel) is intelligent and sharp on the hypocrisy of the whites. Acting is superb, especially by Diane Cilento, as the tart-tongued boarding house manager Russell made jobless when he sold the place; Barbara Rush as Favor's world-weary wife; ever-versatile Martin Balsam (always good) as the stagecoach driver, and Frank Silvera (also always good) as one of the bad guys. One of my favorite Westerns.
John Russell (Paul Newman), white guy raised by and lives with Apaches in 1880s Arizona, inherits a boarding house from his white father, which he sells immediately. He gets on a stagecoach out of town with an interesting bunch, including Cicero Grimes (Richard Boone, peerless bad guy), who's in with a group of holdup men who are after big bucks that one of the passengers, Dr. Favor (Frederick March) embezzled from Indians in his charge. The robbery leaves the passengers on foot and short of water, but the robbers without the money. The passengers, who dissed Russell, now need him to show them how to survive. The script (from an Elmore Leonard novel) is intelligent and sharp on the hypocrisy of the whites. Acting is superb, especially by Diane Cilento, as the tart-tongued boarding house manager Russell made jobless when he sold the place; Barbara Rush as Favor's world-weary wife; ever-versatile Martin Balsam (always good) as the stagecoach driver, and Frank Silvera (also always good) as one of the bad guys. One of my favorite Westerns.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/20 06:01 PM
FRENCH CONNECTION II (1975)
Gene Hackman reprises his role as Popeye Doyle, now in Marseille to track down French drug kingpin Charnier (Fernando Rey), who somehow escaped being being busted at the end of the first movie. He gets grudging help from French police. Then he's mugged by Charnier's gang and shot up with heroin for three weeks; then given an overdose and dumped at police HQ; then forced into a cold-turkey withdrawal. He finally recovers and nails Charnier. The beginning and ending of this movie are pretty good, but as you no doubt infer, the addiction/withdrawal sequence is unbearably long and boring, and drags the whole film down. Add this to the pile of sequels-that-failed. A rare miscue for the great John Frankenheimer.
Gene Hackman reprises his role as Popeye Doyle, now in Marseille to track down French drug kingpin Charnier (Fernando Rey), who somehow escaped being being busted at the end of the first movie. He gets grudging help from French police. Then he's mugged by Charnier's gang and shot up with heroin for three weeks; then given an overdose and dumped at police HQ; then forced into a cold-turkey withdrawal. He finally recovers and nails Charnier. The beginning and ending of this movie are pretty good, but as you no doubt infer, the addiction/withdrawal sequence is unbearably long and boring, and drags the whole film down. Add this to the pile of sequels-that-failed. A rare miscue for the great John Frankenheimer.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/20 06:01 PM
BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK (1955)
One-armed, middle aged John Macreedy (Spencer Tracy) gets off a train in a tiny, decrepit desert town and is immediately blitzed with hostility, suspicion and fear from the handful of locals. He's there to look up the family of a Japanese-American farmer who served with him in Italy and gave his life protecting him. Macreedy is soon fighting for his life. It's one of Tracy's best roles. The cast is first-rate, including Robert Ryan (one of my favorite actors of that period) as the head honcho; Ernest Borgnine and Lee Marvin, as his two thugs (both in career-making roles); Walter Brennan as the town doc and undertaker; Dean Jagger as the hopelessly drunk sheriff; and Anne Francis as a perky, conflicted gas station operator. They're all complicit in murder, most wracked by guilt. The movie is enlivened by Macreedy in a one-armed karate beating of Borgnine, who is sensationally brutal and evil, as well as taut, crisp direction from John Sturges and vivid Technicolor filming. A classic Western brought up to contemporary relevance.
One-armed, middle aged John Macreedy (Spencer Tracy) gets off a train in a tiny, decrepit desert town and is immediately blitzed with hostility, suspicion and fear from the handful of locals. He's there to look up the family of a Japanese-American farmer who served with him in Italy and gave his life protecting him. Macreedy is soon fighting for his life. It's one of Tracy's best roles. The cast is first-rate, including Robert Ryan (one of my favorite actors of that period) as the head honcho; Ernest Borgnine and Lee Marvin, as his two thugs (both in career-making roles); Walter Brennan as the town doc and undertaker; Dean Jagger as the hopelessly drunk sheriff; and Anne Francis as a perky, conflicted gas station operator. They're all complicit in murder, most wracked by guilt. The movie is enlivened by Macreedy in a one-armed karate beating of Borgnine, who is sensationally brutal and evil, as well as taut, crisp direction from John Sturges and vivid Technicolor filming. A classic Western brought up to contemporary relevance.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/20 04:43 PM
I watched El Dorado a couple of times, so then watched the similar Hawks/Wayne pictures Rio Bravo and Rio Lobo. Rio Lobo is what I'd call a throwaway - amiable enough but remarkable only for a really bad performance by Jennifer O'Neill, in her first big role. It also has the rare pairing of Victor French and Jack Elam.
I wanted to watch Rio Bravo again because I've always preferred El Dorado, and that seems to be a minority opinion. Rewatching both movies now just reinforces my opinion. My main problem with Rio Bravo is that it loses my interest as they do this and that. They devote a lot of time to the Wayne-Dickinson relationship, but it's implausible even by Hollywood old star/hot starlet standards, and so that's just wasted time to me. I think that in just about every matched set of characters - the villains, the green kids, the victims, Wayne's crew - that the character in El Dorado is more vibrant and does more to advance the story. El Dorado's just a lot easier for me to sit through.
I wanted to watch Rio Bravo again because I've always preferred El Dorado, and that seems to be a minority opinion. Rewatching both movies now just reinforces my opinion. My main problem with Rio Bravo is that it loses my interest as they do this and that. They devote a lot of time to the Wayne-Dickinson relationship, but it's implausible even by Hollywood old star/hot starlet standards, and so that's just wasted time to me. I think that in just about every matched set of characters - the villains, the green kids, the victims, Wayne's crew - that the character in El Dorado is more vibrant and does more to advance the story. El Dorado's just a lot easier for me to sit through.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/20 06:33 PM
Pete, I really like those two movies, but they are far from cinematic masterpieces.
However, one movie I just watched shouldn't even be classified as a movie. I ran across it on YouTube. It's entitled The Bamboo Saucer and it stars Dan Duryea and Lois Nettleton. I like both of them, but not in this one.
The film is from 1968 and I had never heard or read of it. It's plot which involves Russians and Chinese is right out of the us versus them Cold War playbook. It's so called special effects are primitive, quite a step back from even the 50s version of special effects. I recall the criticism of Independence Day because it had crop duster pilots being able to operate F-18s even in combat. This film is even worse because it has earthlings being able to pilot a flying saucer not only in the atmosphere, but even in outerspace. The plot is elementary, the dialogue is terrible, and the acting ... well, what can you do with bad material, etc? Duryea and Nettleton are not the quality of actors who can rescue a bad film.
I could go on and on, but to no end. It's just about the worst film I've ever watched. In fact, it is the worst film I've ever watched.
However, one movie I just watched shouldn't even be classified as a movie. I ran across it on YouTube. It's entitled The Bamboo Saucer and it stars Dan Duryea and Lois Nettleton. I like both of them, but not in this one.
The film is from 1968 and I had never heard or read of it. It's plot which involves Russians and Chinese is right out of the us versus them Cold War playbook. It's so called special effects are primitive, quite a step back from even the 50s version of special effects. I recall the criticism of Independence Day because it had crop duster pilots being able to operate F-18s even in combat. This film is even worse because it has earthlings being able to pilot a flying saucer not only in the atmosphere, but even in outerspace. The plot is elementary, the dialogue is terrible, and the acting ... well, what can you do with bad material, etc? Duryea and Nettleton are not the quality of actors who can rescue a bad film.
I could go on and on, but to no end. It's just about the worst film I've ever watched. In fact, it is the worst film I've ever watched.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/20 06:47 PM
Recently watched An Unfinished Life with Robert Redford, Morgan Freeman and Jennifer Lopez. She plays a widowed mom fleeing an abusive relationship. Redford is her grieving father-in-law who blames her for the death of his son. Morgan Freeman is his best friend and right hand at his ranch, who was grievously injured by a bear. Just watching those two actors together is worth the price of admission, but, honestly, the young actress who plays the daughter/granddaughter steals the whole movie.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/20 07:34 PM
Originally Posted by Sicilian Babe
Recently watched An Unfinished Life with Robert Redford, Morgan Freeman and Jennifer Lopez. She plays a widowed mom fleeing an abusive relationship. Redford is her grieving father-in-law who blames her for the death of his son. Morgan Freeman is his best friend and right hand at his ranch, who was grievously injured by a bear. Just watching those two actors together is worth the price of admission, but, honestly, the young actress who plays the daughter/granddaughter steals the whole movie.
Wife has been looking for good movies she may have never seen.
I just gave her this and she is going to watch, its on stars tomorrow morning.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/20 10:16 AM
The Shepherd of the Hills (1941): another Wayne film, and an unusual one. It's an Ozarks family drama, and the family's somewhat twisted.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/20 08:11 PM
THE HIGHWAYMEN (2019)
This is a Bonnie-and-Clyde movie without Bonnie and Clyde (except at the very end). It is a great story about two old pals/rivals, Texas Rangers Maney Gault (Woody Harrelson) and Frank Hamer (Kevin Kostner), taken out of retirement by Texas Gov. Ma Ferguson (Kathy Bates) to hunt down and kill the desperados. Harrelson and Kostner are absolutely terrific together--the geezer Redford and Newman--and are given lots of great scenes and scriptlines to delight us. The film does a great job of evoking the dustbowl at its lowest ebb (the two geezers looking as dusty as the roads they travel). Only regret: too little of Bates, who manages to steal every movie she's in.
This is a Bonnie-and-Clyde movie without Bonnie and Clyde (except at the very end). It is a great story about two old pals/rivals, Texas Rangers Maney Gault (Woody Harrelson) and Frank Hamer (Kevin Kostner), taken out of retirement by Texas Gov. Ma Ferguson (Kathy Bates) to hunt down and kill the desperados. Harrelson and Kostner are absolutely terrific together--the geezer Redford and Newman--and are given lots of great scenes and scriptlines to delight us. The film does a great job of evoking the dustbowl at its lowest ebb (the two geezers looking as dusty as the roads they travel). Only regret: too little of Bates, who manages to steal every movie she's in.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/25/20 02:14 AM
"A Gunfight" (1971): Johnny Cash and Kirk Douglas are veteran gunfighters who run across each other in a small border town. To replenish their fortunes, they naturally decide to sell tickets to their own shootout at the bullring across the border. A pretty good film.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/20 03:40 AM
Red Sun (1971): Charles Bronson and Toshiro Mifune in what turns into a buddy film between an Old West grain robber and a samurai. Supported by Ursula Andress, Alain Delon, and Capucine. Entertaining film.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/20 03:16 AM
Stagecoach (1939), which I haven't seen in years. Greatly entertaining, although my memory was that the Indian attack took up the great bulk of the movie.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/20 07:08 PM
MR. BROOKS (2007)
Earl Brooks (Kevin Costner), a respected businessman, is named Portland OR's Man of the Year. He's also a serial killer, and is egged on by his alter-ego Marshall (William Hurt) to keep doing it. His latest double murder is witnessed by "Smith," a pervert who threatens blackmail unless Brooks kills again and takes him along. The first hour or so is gripping, and Kostner and Hurt make a great duo. But, the movie bogs down in a couple of semi-related scenarios that stretch credibility to near-breaking. Not bad, thoough.
Earl Brooks (Kevin Costner), a respected businessman, is named Portland OR's Man of the Year. He's also a serial killer, and is egged on by his alter-ego Marshall (William Hurt) to keep doing it. His latest double murder is witnessed by "Smith," a pervert who threatens blackmail unless Brooks kills again and takes him along. The first hour or so is gripping, and Kostner and Hurt make a great duo. But, the movie bogs down in a couple of semi-related scenarios that stretch credibility to near-breaking. Not bad, thoough.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/20 12:03 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
MR. BROOKS (2007)
Earl Brooks (Kevin Costner), a respected businessman, is named Portland OR's Man of the Year. He's also a serial killer, and is egged on by his alter-ego Marshall (William Hurt) to keep doing it. His latest double murder is witnessed by "Smith," a pervert who threatens blackmail unless Brooks kills again and takes him along. The first hour or so is gripping, and Kostner and Hurt make a great duo. But, the movie bogs down in a couple of semi-related scenarios that stretch credibility to near-breaking. Not bad, thoough.
Earl Brooks (Kevin Costner), a respected businessman, is named Portland OR's Man of the Year. He's also a serial killer, and is egged on by his alter-ego Marshall (William Hurt) to keep doing it. His latest double murder is witnessed by "Smith," a pervert who threatens blackmail unless Brooks kills again and takes him along. The first hour or so is gripping, and Kostner and Hurt make a great duo. But, the movie bogs down in a couple of semi-related scenarios that stretch credibility to near-breaking. Not bad, thoough.
I always dug MR. BROOKS and felt it was an underrated movie. Apparently they had plans for a trilogy but unfortunately, 13 years later, they've never, and will never, materialize. SPOILERS
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/20 11:05 AM
Black Mass
Merely okay. Kind of reminded me of a lesser version of The Irishman and The Departed. Good performance by Johnny Depp but I felt the story and some of the characters could've been fleshed out a lot more. The narrative device featuring guys like Weeks and Martorano felt kind of tacked on as well.
The relationship between Bulger and Connolly felt rote compared to the conflict in the straight man/gangster relationships in the other movies I mentioned. A lot of the dialogue, particularly with the FBI characters, was expository, I feel.
Still, worth a watch.
Merely okay. Kind of reminded me of a lesser version of The Irishman and The Departed. Good performance by Johnny Depp but I felt the story and some of the characters could've been fleshed out a lot more. The narrative device featuring guys like Weeks and Martorano felt kind of tacked on as well.
The relationship between Bulger and Connolly felt rote compared to the conflict in the straight man/gangster relationships in the other movies I mentioned. A lot of the dialogue, particularly with the FBI characters, was expository, I feel.
Still, worth a watch.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/01/20 12:37 PM
Ox-Bow Incident (1943): Henry Fonda joins a posse that turns into a lynching. Young Anthony Quinn is great as one of the accused.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/20 05:38 AM
CRIME OF PASSION (1957)
I tuned into this latter-day film noir because it stars two of my favorite actors of that period: Barbara Stanwyk and Sterling Hayden. She's Kathy, a proto-Women's Lib newspaper columnist who falls in love instantly with Bill (Hayden), a visiting police detective. She quits her job, marries, moves to LA and is instantly bored being a housewife and having to put up with airhead police wives (one of whom is Fay Wray, of King Kong fame). She devotes her scheming self to advancing her laconic husband's career (even to sleeping with his boss, played by Raymond Burr), and mayhem results. The beginning is clumsy and poorly scripted, and Hayden, the arch-tough cop, plays completely against type. But, once it gets going, the redoubtable Stanwyk brings it off. Worth watching.
I tuned into this latter-day film noir because it stars two of my favorite actors of that period: Barbara Stanwyk and Sterling Hayden. She's Kathy, a proto-Women's Lib newspaper columnist who falls in love instantly with Bill (Hayden), a visiting police detective. She quits her job, marries, moves to LA and is instantly bored being a housewife and having to put up with airhead police wives (one of whom is Fay Wray, of King Kong fame). She devotes her scheming self to advancing her laconic husband's career (even to sleeping with his boss, played by Raymond Burr), and mayhem results. The beginning is clumsy and poorly scripted, and Hayden, the arch-tough cop, plays completely against type. But, once it gets going, the redoubtable Stanwyk brings it off. Worth watching.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/20 06:36 AM
WHITE HEAT (1949)
James Cagney is at his most forceful and unforgettable as Cody Jarret, psychopathic, sadistic killer and leader of a gang of big-time armed robbers--and who has a mother complex. He is brilliantly supported by Virginia Mayo as his sometimes dumb, sometimes scheming, moll; Margaret Wycherly as his tough-as-nails Ma; black-shirt-wearing Steve Cochran (winner of the Elvis Presley Precursor Award) as his double crossing rival, and Edmond O'Brien as a cop set up to get close to him for the kill. But it's Cag's movie all the way. Director Raul Walsh keeps the action at a blistering pace, and you'll never forget its two most famous scenes: "Ma's Dead" in the prison mess hall, and "top of the world, Ma" just before Cody's blown up at a refinery. No doubt about it: this is the greatest purely gangster movie ever made.
James Cagney is at his most forceful and unforgettable as Cody Jarret, psychopathic, sadistic killer and leader of a gang of big-time armed robbers--and who has a mother complex. He is brilliantly supported by Virginia Mayo as his sometimes dumb, sometimes scheming, moll; Margaret Wycherly as his tough-as-nails Ma; black-shirt-wearing Steve Cochran (winner of the Elvis Presley Precursor Award) as his double crossing rival, and Edmond O'Brien as a cop set up to get close to him for the kill. But it's Cag's movie all the way. Director Raul Walsh keeps the action at a blistering pace, and you'll never forget its two most famous scenes: "Ma's Dead" in the prison mess hall, and "top of the world, Ma" just before Cody's blown up at a refinery. No doubt about it: this is the greatest purely gangster movie ever made.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/20 02:47 PM
The Brothers Rico (1957) with Richard Conte.
He plays a reformed mobster who is trying to reform his mob-brothers, but his former bosses are dragging him back into the mob life. His character is low-key (kind of like Barzini), almost sheepish. It's black and white which is fitting for a film noir. James Darren played one of the brothers. He's not the greatest actor, but did okay. Larry Gates was cast as the mob boss and was too white bread for that role since there's a strong Mafia overlay to the whole thing. There's a Catholicism overlay too.
He plays a reformed mobster who is trying to reform his mob-brothers, but his former bosses are dragging him back into the mob life. His character is low-key (kind of like Barzini), almost sheepish. It's black and white which is fitting for a film noir. James Darren played one of the brothers. He's not the greatest actor, but did okay. Larry Gates was cast as the mob boss and was too white bread for that role since there's a strong Mafia overlay to the whole thing. There's a Catholicism overlay too.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/20 12:42 AM
UNHINGED
The theaters are open again and we're welcomed back with Russell Crowe, who's having a bad day! Crowe stars as Tom Cooper (although he's credited as "The Man"), who has nothing left to live for, has mental problems, abuses prescription medication, and who wants to inflict pain and punishment before going out in a blaze of glory. The film starts out without any dialogue, which is very powerful. We see Crowe commit his first act of violence, displaying his apathy and brutality, that sets the tone for the rest of the film (this is definitely not a man to be trifled with). It hooks you in before introducing the rest of the trio: Rachel (played by Caren Pistorius) and her son Kyle (Gabriel Bateman). What starts out as a simple misunderstanding, that could have been diffused, quickly turns in to a deadly game of cat-and-mouse. Yes, there is a bit of suspension of disbelief, but it's still a fun ride. The film and story start out good for the first 30-45 minutes, but about three quarters in, it starts to lose air and the ending feels rushed. Crowe really shines in this, from his accent, to the weight he had to put on for the film (hopefully he put weight on for the film and this isn't just "all natural Russell Crowe), to the way this harkins to 1993's FALLING DOWN with Michael Douglas. I will also give credit to Caren Pistorius as she played a passable Rachel. A woman who's likewise down on her luck as a single mother, trying to provide for her child, and is now being stalked by a mad man. Two characters in somewhat similar situations who choose to deal with their frustrations and angry in decisively different ways. 5.5/10
The theaters are open again and we're welcomed back with Russell Crowe, who's having a bad day! Crowe stars as Tom Cooper (although he's credited as "The Man"), who has nothing left to live for, has mental problems, abuses prescription medication, and who wants to inflict pain and punishment before going out in a blaze of glory. The film starts out without any dialogue, which is very powerful. We see Crowe commit his first act of violence, displaying his apathy and brutality, that sets the tone for the rest of the film (this is definitely not a man to be trifled with). It hooks you in before introducing the rest of the trio: Rachel (played by Caren Pistorius) and her son Kyle (Gabriel Bateman). What starts out as a simple misunderstanding, that could have been diffused, quickly turns in to a deadly game of cat-and-mouse. Yes, there is a bit of suspension of disbelief, but it's still a fun ride. The film and story start out good for the first 30-45 minutes, but about three quarters in, it starts to lose air and the ending feels rushed. Crowe really shines in this, from his accent, to the weight he had to put on for the film (hopefully he put weight on for the film and this isn't just "all natural Russell Crowe), to the way this harkins to 1993's FALLING DOWN with Michael Douglas. I will also give credit to Caren Pistorius as she played a passable Rachel. A woman who's likewise down on her luck as a single mother, trying to provide for her child, and is now being stalked by a mad man. Two characters in somewhat similar situations who choose to deal with their frustrations and angry in decisively different ways. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/20 01:03 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
UNHINGED
The theaters are open again and we're welcomed back with Russell Crowe, who's having a bad day! Crowe stars as Tom Cooper (although he's credited as "The Man"), who has nothing left to live for, has mental problems, abuses prescription medication, and who wants to inflict pain and punishment before going out in a blaze of glory. The film starts out without any dialogue, which is very powerful. We see Crowe commit his first act of violence, displaying his apathy and brutality, that sets the tone for the rest of the film (this is definitely not a man to be trifled with). It hooks you in before introducing the rest of the trio: Rachel (played by Caren Pistorius) and her son Kyle (Gabriel Bateman). What starts out as a simple misunderstanding, that could have been diffused, quickly turns in to a deadly game of cat-and-mouse. Yes, there is a bit of suspension of disbelief, but it's still a fun ride. The film and story start out good for the first 30-45 minutes, but about three quarters in, it starts to lose air and the ending feels rushed. Crowe really shines in this, from his accent, to the weight he had to put on for the film (hopefully he put weight on for the film and this isn't just "all natural Russell Crowe), to the way this harkins to 1993's FALLING DOWN with Michael Douglas. I will also give credit to Caren Pistorius as she played a passable Rachel. A woman who's likewise down on her luck as a single mother, trying to provide for her child, and is now being stalked by a mad man. Two characters in somewhat similar situations who choose to deal with their frustrations and angry in decisively different ways. 5.5/10
The theaters are open again and we're welcomed back with Russell Crowe, who's having a bad day! Crowe stars as Tom Cooper (although he's credited as "The Man"), who has nothing left to live for, has mental problems, abuses prescription medication, and who wants to inflict pain and punishment before going out in a blaze of glory. The film starts out without any dialogue, which is very powerful. We see Crowe commit his first act of violence, displaying his apathy and brutality, that sets the tone for the rest of the film (this is definitely not a man to be trifled with). It hooks you in before introducing the rest of the trio: Rachel (played by Caren Pistorius) and her son Kyle (Gabriel Bateman). What starts out as a simple misunderstanding, that could have been diffused, quickly turns in to a deadly game of cat-and-mouse. Yes, there is a bit of suspension of disbelief, but it's still a fun ride. The film and story start out good for the first 30-45 minutes, but about three quarters in, it starts to lose air and the ending feels rushed. Crowe really shines in this, from his accent, to the weight he had to put on for the film (hopefully he put weight on for the film and this isn't just "all natural Russell Crowe), to the way this harkins to 1993's FALLING DOWN with Michael Douglas. I will also give credit to Caren Pistorius as she played a passable Rachel. A woman who's likewise down on her luck as a single mother, trying to provide for her child, and is now being stalked by a mad man. Two characters in somewhat similar situations who choose to deal with their frustrations and angry in decisively different ways. 5.5/10
Thanks i12.... we have been waiting for a review from you on something new once it was out.
Wife has this on the list and we will try to see if it streams this weekend.
Our theaters remain closed as of today I think.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/20 01:51 AM
Ours just opened either yesterday or today. Seeing THE NEW MUTANTS next Thursday and then TENET on the 31st. It's GREAT to be back!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/20 02:03 AM
"The Bad & the Beautiful"..1953??..Kirk Douglas is a ruthless Hollywood mogul who scratches his way 2 the top chewing & spittin' out those who come into his orbit including temptress Lana Turner & Walter Pigeon...very catching.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/20 02:08 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Ours just opened either yesterday or today. Seeing THE NEW MUTANTS next Thursday and then TENET on the 31st. It's GREAT to be back!
That’s great, Enjoy i12
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/20 02:09 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
"The Bad & the Beautiful"..1953??..Kirk Douglas is a ruthless Hollywood mogul who scratches his way 2 the top chewing & spittin' out those who come into his orbit including temptress Lana Turner & Walter Pigeon...very catching.
Good one Hood, Love the classics.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/23/20 08:51 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Ours just opened either yesterday or today. Seeing THE NEW MUTANTS next Thursday and then TENET on the 31st. It's GREAT to be back!
That’s great, Enjoy i12
Thank you! Been looking forward to THE NEW MUTANTS for the better part of a year. Been pushed back about 4 different times now.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/20 04:41 AM
5 times Irishman, and the Gambit project is in limbo again for the fourth time. I am looking forward to the new Highlander movie.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/24/20 04:56 PM
Last night I watched the Original 1978 Dawn of the Dead.
It was the best one and I feel much of The Walking Dead came from this one.
It was the best one and I feel much of The Walking Dead came from this one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/20 12:02 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
5 times Irishman, and the Gambit project is in limbo again for the fourth time. I am looking forward to the new Highlander movie.
I lost count but thanks for the correction. Point is that it's been moved many times and glad I FINALLY get a chance to see it on Thursday. We'll see how Fox treated their last X-Men property before Disney bought them out but I'm more pessimistic going in than optimistic.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/25/20 06:40 AM
NIGERIAN PRINCE (2019)
In this Netflix movie, Eze, an American teenager born to Nigerian immigrants, is sent by his mother to Lagos to live with his stern aunt and be immersed in his native culture. He immediately falls in with his older Nigerian cousin, Pius, and is immersed in the Nigerian National Pastime--scamming--and in the all-pervasive official corruption that sustains it. The culture of scamming makes everyone betray everyone else, family and friendships be damned. A well-acted, well-directed, well-written look at an unfamiliar culture.
In this Netflix movie, Eze, an American teenager born to Nigerian immigrants, is sent by his mother to Lagos to live with his stern aunt and be immersed in his native culture. He immediately falls in with his older Nigerian cousin, Pius, and is immersed in the Nigerian National Pastime--scamming--and in the all-pervasive official corruption that sustains it. The culture of scamming makes everyone betray everyone else, family and friendships be damned. A well-acted, well-directed, well-written look at an unfamiliar culture.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/28/20 10:12 PM
THE NEW MUTANTS
After multiple delays, rumors, and a buyout from Disney, Fox's last lap in the X-Men/Marvel swimming pool is just what you expected it to be: mediocre. The film slowly builds as we're introduced to Danille Moonstar, played by Blu Hunt. After a tragedy, she wakes up in a hospital, unaware of where she is or why she's there. She's met by Dr. Reyes (Alice Braga) who fills her in on the details. She's soon introduced to the rest of the group, who are all given there travel size backstories. The women are out front for most of this film, while the boys play second fiddle. The star of the show is easily Anya Taylor-Joy, as the bullying and headstrong Illyana Rasputin (aka Magik). She swallows up every scene that she is in with a spectrum of emotions from strong, to frightened, with not much else in between. Never a good sign, the film was plagued by problems and it showed onscreen. While the performances were there and the actors tried to make it work, the script (or lack thereof), held them back unfortunately. Now that Disney/Marvel finally have the characters back in their possession, they'll make the X-Men movie fans have been clamoring for for years. 5/10
After multiple delays, rumors, and a buyout from Disney, Fox's last lap in the X-Men/Marvel swimming pool is just what you expected it to be: mediocre. The film slowly builds as we're introduced to Danille Moonstar, played by Blu Hunt. After a tragedy, she wakes up in a hospital, unaware of where she is or why she's there. She's met by Dr. Reyes (Alice Braga) who fills her in on the details. She's soon introduced to the rest of the group, who are all given there travel size backstories. The women are out front for most of this film, while the boys play second fiddle. The star of the show is easily Anya Taylor-Joy, as the bullying and headstrong Illyana Rasputin (aka Magik). She swallows up every scene that she is in with a spectrum of emotions from strong, to frightened, with not much else in between. Never a good sign, the film was plagued by problems and it showed onscreen. While the performances were there and the actors tried to make it work, the script (or lack thereof), held them back unfortunately. Now that Disney/Marvel finally have the characters back in their possession, they'll make the X-Men movie fans have been clamoring for for years. 5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/01/20 06:48 AM
PATTERNS (1956)
Fred Staples (Van Heflin), manager of a plant owned by a big NYC conglomerate, is promoted to the executive suite of the parent company. He doesn't know that ruthless CEO Walter Ramsey (Everett Sloan) brought him in to replace ageing Bill Briggs (Ed Begley in a rare good guy role), whom Ramsey is driving out by constant humiliation and criticism, pitting Staples' ambition against his humanitarian concern for Briggs. The brilliant script by Rod Serling unmercifully and realistically portrays the ugly infighting and survival-of-the-fittest competition in Big Business--a rarity in the complacent Fifties. The acting, especially by Sloan, Begley and Beatrice Straight as Staples' wife, is superb, as is the on-site cinematography in NYC's financial district. This is a Grade A drama that you won't forget.
Fred Staples (Van Heflin), manager of a plant owned by a big NYC conglomerate, is promoted to the executive suite of the parent company. He doesn't know that ruthless CEO Walter Ramsey (Everett Sloan) brought him in to replace ageing Bill Briggs (Ed Begley in a rare good guy role), whom Ramsey is driving out by constant humiliation and criticism, pitting Staples' ambition against his humanitarian concern for Briggs. The brilliant script by Rod Serling unmercifully and realistically portrays the ugly infighting and survival-of-the-fittest competition in Big Business--a rarity in the complacent Fifties. The acting, especially by Sloan, Begley and Beatrice Straight as Staples' wife, is superb, as is the on-site cinematography in NYC's financial district. This is a Grade A drama that you won't forget.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/01/20 04:35 PM
Rocco and His Brothers with Alain Delon, 1960 in B&W. It's about a widowed mother and her several adult boys who emigrate from southern Italy to Milan and endure the frustrations of supporting themselves and the urban environment. It's subtitled.
European films just have a way of portraying the nitty-gritty of their subjects as this one does also. The plot is almost irrelevant because of its realism. It has some boxing scenes, in some ways like The Raging Bull, but not like Rocky. Again, the realism is there. It's long, over three hours.
European films just have a way of portraying the nitty-gritty of their subjects as this one does also. The plot is almost irrelevant because of its realism. It has some boxing scenes, in some ways like The Raging Bull, but not like Rocky. Again, the realism is there. It's long, over three hours.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/01/20 10:28 PM
TENET
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/20 03:33 AM
I saw "Rocco and his Brothers" when it hit the NYC "art movie houses" in '61 or '62. Brilliant performances by Delon and Salvadori. Italian cinema, especially in that era, was the best, IMO, but this movie was way too long.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/20 11:16 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
TENET
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Nolan's movies are like filmic Rubik's Cubes. I think he tries to be too clever for his own good and ends up coming across as silly. Maybe people are catching on? A truly great movie will attain rewatch value and reward the viewer with new interpretations in an organic manner. I feel that Nolan tries to construct a puzzle piece first and then writes a movie around that. It's all highfalutin concept, striving for artistic merit, yet depends on the same gimmickry and budget as other, oft-derided, movies.
The Prestige was a good movie but it was too complicated and messy for its own good, constantly playing around with the timeline and using the "twin" trope as tools to manipulate the viewer's ability to follow the movie properly.
Needlessly pretentious!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/20 11:49 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
TENET
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Christopher Nolan is back and Hollywood, as well as movie theaters, are hoping this blockbuster will be enough to bring back the crowds. As I sat in the audience before the lights went out and the film started up, socially distancing within a movie theater and wearing a mask, I was optimistic and believed this could do just that. However, after seeing it, I'm more pessimistic now. While this is visually stunning in IMAX, Nolan tries too had here. I appreciate the originality but even at the beginning of this film, when they first introduce the inversion concept of the story, a character says to John David Washington's character to, "try not to understand it." Essentially, asking the audience to at the same time, enjoy the ride. And for the better part of the movie, that's exactly what I did. A film about an agent (Washington), attempting to prevent an arms dealer from committing world annihilation. Washington is fantastic in this with the swagger and power performance he brings to the screen. Meanwhile, Robert Pattinson is his trusty sidekick, Neil, who he quickly attaches himself to and they're off on their mission. Elizabeth Debicki plays Kat, a woman who is trapped in a loveless and violent marriage by the films villain Andrei Sator (played by Kenneth Branagh). Branagh is passable as the villain, but not menacing enough for my taste (too subdued most of the time save for the occasional outburst). Between the second and third acts is where the film begins to go off the rails as they return to the inversion aspect of the story introduced earlier, which takes us through the finale (which is a mess). A film that will be more forgettable like INTERSTELLAR, than his usual can't miss pedigree. 6/10
Nolan's movies are like filmic Rubik's Cubes. I think he tries to be too clever for his own good and ends up coming across as silly. Maybe people are catching on? A truly great movie will attain rewatch value and reward the viewer with new interpretations in an organic manner. I feel that Nolan tries to construct a puzzle piece first and then writes a movie around that. It's all highfalutin concept, striving for artistic merit, yet depends on the same gimmickry and budget as other, oft-derided, movies.
The Prestige was a good movie but it was too complicated and messy for its own good, constantly playing around with the timeline and using the "twin" trope as tools to manipulate the viewer's ability to follow the movie properly.
Needlessly pretentious!
I definitely agree with most of what you said here. The last Nolan movie I loved was THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. INCEPTION, INTERSTELLAR, DUNKIRK, and TENET I felt he tried too hard and didn't understand all the "love" surrounding them. Although, I am a big fan of THE PRESTIGE!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/04/20 03:18 AM
RICHARD JEWELL (2019)
Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) was a security guard at the '96 Summer Olympics in Atlanta whose vigilance saved many lives when he spotted a suspicious backpack that held a powerful nail bomb. Since no good deed goes unpunished, the news media and FBI ganged up on him as a "person of interest," and made his life miserable before finally clearing him. Jewell seems simple- and single-minded in his (over)zealous devotion to law enforcement, but he retains enough smarts to keep his head above water--and is helped by a dedicated lawyer (Sam Rockwell) and his devoted mother (Kathy Bates). How Hauser didn't get an Oscar for this movie is beyond me--he is just superb and completely believable--always sympathetic, often naive but never pitiful. Well done!
Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) was a security guard at the '96 Summer Olympics in Atlanta whose vigilance saved many lives when he spotted a suspicious backpack that held a powerful nail bomb. Since no good deed goes unpunished, the news media and FBI ganged up on him as a "person of interest," and made his life miserable before finally clearing him. Jewell seems simple- and single-minded in his (over)zealous devotion to law enforcement, but he retains enough smarts to keep his head above water--and is helped by a dedicated lawyer (Sam Rockwell) and his devoted mother (Kathy Bates). How Hauser didn't get an Oscar for this movie is beyond me--he is just superb and completely believable--always sympathetic, often naive but never pitiful. Well done!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/04/20 10:24 PM
I liked RICHARD JEWELL but not Eastwood's finest film but I do agree Hauser did a great job. He's always brought it no matter what the film has been (JEWELL, I, TONYA, BLACKKKLANSMAN).
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/05/20 04:43 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
RICHARD JEWELL (2019)
Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) was a security guard at the '96 Summer Olympics in Atlanta whose vigilance saved many lives when he spotted a suspicious backpack that held a powerful nail bomb. Since no good deed goes unpunished, the news media and FBI ganged up on him as a "person of interest," and made his life miserable before finally clearing him. Jewell seems simple- and single-minded in his (over)zealous devotion to law enforcement, but he retains enough smarts to keep his head above water--and is helped by a dedicated lawyer (Sam Rockwell) and his devoted mother (Kathy Bates). How Hauser didn't get an Oscar for this movie is beyond me--he is just superb and completely believable--always sympathetic, often naive but never pitiful. Well done!
Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) was a security guard at the '96 Summer Olympics in Atlanta whose vigilance saved many lives when he spotted a suspicious backpack that held a powerful nail bomb. Since no good deed goes unpunished, the news media and FBI ganged up on him as a "person of interest," and made his life miserable before finally clearing him. Jewell seems simple- and single-minded in his (over)zealous devotion to law enforcement, but he retains enough smarts to keep his head above water--and is helped by a dedicated lawyer (Sam Rockwell) and his devoted mother (Kathy Bates). How Hauser didn't get an Oscar for this movie is beyond me--he is just superb and completely believable--always sympathetic, often naive but never pitiful. Well done!
I cannot stand Sam Rockwell as an actor.
Off the top of my head, he was in Poltergeist, which I remember being a terrible remake; his overacting was the worst thing about The Green Mile and in marked contrast to fine performances by the rest of the cast; and he had the subtlety of a sledgehammer in Three Billboards, although, tonally, that movie was a mess.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/20 06:27 PM
THE T.A.M.I SHOW (1964)
This classic icon of R&R history showcased some of the top acts of '64: Chuck Berry, Marvin Gay, Supremes, Miracles, James Brown, Lesley Gore, Beach Boys, Jan and Dean, Barbarians, Rolling Stones, Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas, Gerry and the Pacemakers. It was done, live, as a TV broadcast from Santa Monica, and it still holds up because there was no lip-synching--they all played and sang their music. Every act was better than good--amazing quality. As was [i]de rigeur[/i in those days, go-go dancers (including future Oscar nominee Teri Garr) enlivened the proceedings, as did hordes of screaming girls. You see the Hardest Working Man in Show Business working hard, and the Stones, who were terrified to follow him, rising to the occasion. Thoroughly enjoyable.
This classic icon of R&R history showcased some of the top acts of '64: Chuck Berry, Marvin Gay, Supremes, Miracles, James Brown, Lesley Gore, Beach Boys, Jan and Dean, Barbarians, Rolling Stones, Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas, Gerry and the Pacemakers. It was done, live, as a TV broadcast from Santa Monica, and it still holds up because there was no lip-synching--they all played and sang their music. Every act was better than good--amazing quality. As was [i]de rigeur[/i in those days, go-go dancers (including future Oscar nominee Teri Garr) enlivened the proceedings, as did hordes of screaming girls. You see the Hardest Working Man in Show Business working hard, and the Stones, who were terrified to follow him, rising to the occasion. Thoroughly enjoyable.
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/20 02:42 AM
Mob Town with Robert Davi as Vito Genovese (2019)
Definitely a B (maybe even a C) movie of the Mafia genre. Although about the Appalachin meeting, it's forgettable, but Davi's performance was pretty good. Along with Armand Assante, he is the ultimate portrayor of Mafiosi.
The film is unusual though because it focuses on the role of the New York State Trooper who discovered that the Appalachin meeting was underway. It goes into depth about how he doggedly pursued some leads that something big was happening in that rural New York town. One other notable performance was the actor who portrayed Joe Barbera. One reward if you watch it is the very cool cars of that 50s era.
Definitely a B (maybe even a C) movie of the Mafia genre. Although about the Appalachin meeting, it's forgettable, but Davi's performance was pretty good. Along with Armand Assante, he is the ultimate portrayor of Mafiosi.
The film is unusual though because it focuses on the role of the New York State Trooper who discovered that the Appalachin meeting was underway. It goes into depth about how he doggedly pursued some leads that something big was happening in that rural New York town. One other notable performance was the actor who portrayed Joe Barbera. One reward if you watch it is the very cool cars of that 50s era.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/20 08:07 AM
That was Nick Cordero last movie. You are thinking of Danny Abeckaser. He plays in a lot of gangster flicks, he is attached to the new Lansky movie. His performance in the film was pretty good as Joe Barbara, he is also the director. Jennifer Esposito is always a solid support actor. The film itself is mediocre. Robert Davi is usually a solid villian, his performance in this movie is good. The big letdown for me was Gino Cafarelli as Carmine Galante, the actor has done some good movies with his acting, but his performance in the movie was eh. He played Vinny in the Sopranos. Speaking of the Sopranos, Jamie-Lynn Sigler who played Meadow Soprano in the Sopranos, plays Joe Barbara's wife Josephine.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/10/20 03:25 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
That was Nick Cordero last movie. You are thinking of Danny Abeckaser. He plays in a lot of gangster flicks, he is attached to the new Lansky movie. His performance in the film was pretty good as Joe Barbara, he is also the director. Jennifer Esposito is always a solid support actor. The film itself is mediocre. Robert Davi is usually a solid villian, his performance in this movie is good. The big letdown for me was Gino Cafarelli as Carmine Galante, the actor has done some good movies with his acting, but his performance in the movie was eh. He played Vinny in the Sopranos. Speaking of the Sopranos, Jamie-Lynn Sigler who played Meadow Soprano in the Sopranos, plays Joe Barbara's wife Josephine.
A forgettable flick...watched it 2wice & only reedeeming value was time frame...& how do they think that Barbara's wife had an affair w/ Croswell?
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/17/20 11:45 PM
On the Waterfront (1954). Very few movies can legitimately be called "powerful." For me, this one is affecting even after seeing it many times. It's almost unique in that.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
Posted By: Dob_Peppino
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/20 12:40 AM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
On the Waterfront (1954). Very few movies can legitimately be called "powerful." For me, this one is affecting even after seeing it many times. It's almost unique in that.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
"Waterfront" is such a timeless classic. When they are in the car, when Brando's head snaps around and he says "it wasn't them, it was you" and the violins start to play
I geek out everytime.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/20 10:39 PM
INFIDEL
I hadn't heard much about this film save for one trailer recently. I didn't have much of a desire to see it but with so few new releases hitting cinemas due to COVID-19, I took a flyer on it. The film is obviously low budget, not a lot of marketing behind it, and it's not going to break any box office records. People will notice Jim Caviezel as the lead who plays Doug Rawlins, an outspoken American religious blogger. He's invited to a religious conference in Egypt that he attends to discuss the similarities between Christians and Muslims, rather than our differences ("to build bridges" in his own words). While there, he's gets kidnapped and taken to Iran where he's tortured and placed on trail for being an American Spy. Jim is the only redeeming aspect of this film. He's calm, confident, and unapologetic about his beliefs (both in the film and real life). His wife Elizabeth, played by Claudia Karvan, lacks any sort of emotion of a woman who's husband is kidnapped and put on trail for his life. The marriage between Doug and Elizabeth in the film is rocky due to a prior accident that shook Elizabeth's faith but not Doug's. Other than that and one other scene, she's completed detached in her performance. In addition, she's too naive and trusting (especially in a foreign country where strangers seem to know her and want to "offer her assistance," which she accepts before finally questioning if they're being truthful or not). Finally, the story is a bit lite and could have used some more meat to not only flesh out the story but also the characters, and the dynamics of their relationships. 4.5/10
I hadn't heard much about this film save for one trailer recently. I didn't have much of a desire to see it but with so few new releases hitting cinemas due to COVID-19, I took a flyer on it. The film is obviously low budget, not a lot of marketing behind it, and it's not going to break any box office records. People will notice Jim Caviezel as the lead who plays Doug Rawlins, an outspoken American religious blogger. He's invited to a religious conference in Egypt that he attends to discuss the similarities between Christians and Muslims, rather than our differences ("to build bridges" in his own words). While there, he's gets kidnapped and taken to Iran where he's tortured and placed on trail for being an American Spy. Jim is the only redeeming aspect of this film. He's calm, confident, and unapologetic about his beliefs (both in the film and real life). His wife Elizabeth, played by Claudia Karvan, lacks any sort of emotion of a woman who's husband is kidnapped and put on trail for his life. The marriage between Doug and Elizabeth in the film is rocky due to a prior accident that shook Elizabeth's faith but not Doug's. Other than that and one other scene, she's completed detached in her performance. In addition, she's too naive and trusting (especially in a foreign country where strangers seem to know her and want to "offer her assistance," which she accepts before finally questioning if they're being truthful or not). Finally, the story is a bit lite and could have used some more meat to not only flesh out the story but also the characters, and the dynamics of their relationships. 4.5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/19/20 08:05 PM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
On the Waterfront (1954). Very few movies can legitimately be called "powerful." For me, this one is affecting even after seeing it many times. It's almost unique in that.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
It is astonishing that this and The Godfather were released only 17 years apart, and Brando wasn't 50 when he took on the role of Vito. It seems like completely unrelated guys.
Very true Pete. Brando's line about his brother looking out for him is such a classic as is the whole film.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/19/20 11:21 PM
ANTEBELLUM
I applauded the trailer for this film as it doesn't give away too much of the movie (nowadays I feel like I've seen 75% of movies in their 2-minute trailers). So there was a bit of unknown heading in to this. From what I saw, it seemed like an interesting concept and piqued my curiosity. In doing so, for the better part of the movie you're glued to the story, trying to decipher the time period exactly and it was quite entertaining. I applaud the writers and directors (both Gerard Bush and Christopher Renz), on their originality in developing this story. Once the time period is revealed, however, the film becomes too preachy. Save the performances of leading star Janelle Monae and villain Jena Malone, the film is WAY too heavy handed with it's virtue signaling. The third act is nothing more than an anti-white, I mean anti-right, propaganda piece. I'm surprised more critics are lauding this more as a "timely" film. My biggest grip with the film however, was with Gabourey Sidibe, who plays Dawn and is the best friend of Monae's character of Veronica. I'm sure some will find her performance strong and empowering. Whereas I found her to be nothing more than rude and ill-mannered, displaying her toxic femininity. 5/10
I applauded the trailer for this film as it doesn't give away too much of the movie (nowadays I feel like I've seen 75% of movies in their 2-minute trailers). So there was a bit of unknown heading in to this. From what I saw, it seemed like an interesting concept and piqued my curiosity. In doing so, for the better part of the movie you're glued to the story, trying to decipher the time period exactly and it was quite entertaining. I applaud the writers and directors (both Gerard Bush and Christopher Renz), on their originality in developing this story. Once the time period is revealed, however, the film becomes too preachy. Save the performances of leading star Janelle Monae and villain Jena Malone, the film is WAY too heavy handed with it's virtue signaling. The third act is nothing more than an anti-white, I mean anti-right, propaganda piece. I'm surprised more critics are lauding this more as a "timely" film. My biggest grip with the film however, was with Gabourey Sidibe, who plays Dawn and is the best friend of Monae's character of Veronica. I'm sure some will find her performance strong and empowering. Whereas I found her to be nothing more than rude and ill-mannered, displaying her toxic femininity. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/20 11:29 PM
KAJILLIONAIRE
A heartbreaking tale about a family of grifters staring Evan Rachel Wood, Richard Jenkins, and Debra Winger. Throughout the film I'm left wondering how successful these people could be if they focused their efforts on real employment, rather than just trying to skate by in life? At first I was very struck by Wood's portrayal of her character Old Dolio (yeah, I'm not a fan of it either). She's very monotone and practically robotic for most of the film. However, as the relationship between her and her parents unfold, you understand the reasoning behind it. She's being emotionally abused and neglected by her parents, until Melanie enters the picture (played by Gina Rodriguez). The first half of the film is a look at a pseudo-family, while the second half, with the introduction of Rodriguez, introduces us to companionship. A very strong performance by Wood that I'd daresay is borderline Oscar nomination worthy. I say border because the next Oscars will take both films released in 2020 and 2021 into account. 5.5/10
A heartbreaking tale about a family of grifters staring Evan Rachel Wood, Richard Jenkins, and Debra Winger. Throughout the film I'm left wondering how successful these people could be if they focused their efforts on real employment, rather than just trying to skate by in life? At first I was very struck by Wood's portrayal of her character Old Dolio (yeah, I'm not a fan of it either). She's very monotone and practically robotic for most of the film. However, as the relationship between her and her parents unfold, you understand the reasoning behind it. She's being emotionally abused and neglected by her parents, until Melanie enters the picture (played by Gina Rodriguez). The first half of the film is a look at a pseudo-family, while the second half, with the introduction of Rodriguez, introduces us to companionship. A very strong performance by Wood that I'd daresay is borderline Oscar nomination worthy. I say border because the next Oscars will take both films released in 2020 and 2021 into account. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/28/20 04:50 PM
The Brain Eaters 1958
Pretty good Horror I had never seen.
Good story line and acting.
Leonard Nemoy had a small roll, it was fun trying and waiting to spot him.
6.5 / 10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/Kzpyf6x3/th.jpg)
Pretty good Horror I had never seen.
Good story line and acting.
Leonard Nemoy had a small roll, it was fun trying and waiting to spot him.
6.5 / 10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/28/20 04:55 PM
DEEP IN THE DARKNESS 2014
Another good Horror I never seen.
7 / 10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/Pf8wZTtD/th-1.jpg)
Another good Horror I never seen.
7 / 10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/16/20 11:10 PM
HONEST THIEF
Liam Neeson is back as Tom Carter. A former marine who for the previous 10 years has robbed banks without being caught. He meets Annie (played by Kate Walsh), falls in love, and wants to spend the rest of his life with her. As such, he doesn't want to lie to her so he contacts the FBI to turn himself, and the money he stole, in. However, when Agents Nivens (Jai Courtney) and Hall (Anthony Ramos) discover he's not some crackpot and actually telling the truth, they decide to take the money and get rid of him. The story is shallow and everyone, including Neeson, seem to be on autopilot and mailing in their performance. Neeson's performance is tired and uninteresting. Perhaps that's the way he intended to play this character who's under a tremendous amount of pressure between continuing to lie to his girlfriend and the prospect of turning himself in? However, if that wasn't his intention, then this is a rather poor performance by this man and I only hope he doesn't begun to go the way of Bruce Willis. 5/10
Liam Neeson is back as Tom Carter. A former marine who for the previous 10 years has robbed banks without being caught. He meets Annie (played by Kate Walsh), falls in love, and wants to spend the rest of his life with her. As such, he doesn't want to lie to her so he contacts the FBI to turn himself, and the money he stole, in. However, when Agents Nivens (Jai Courtney) and Hall (Anthony Ramos) discover he's not some crackpot and actually telling the truth, they decide to take the money and get rid of him. The story is shallow and everyone, including Neeson, seem to be on autopilot and mailing in their performance. Neeson's performance is tired and uninteresting. Perhaps that's the way he intended to play this character who's under a tremendous amount of pressure between continuing to lie to his girlfriend and the prospect of turning himself in? However, if that wasn't his intention, then this is a rather poor performance by this man and I only hope he doesn't begun to go the way of Bruce Willis. 5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/17/20 08:09 PM
I'm trying to locate a clip of the Irishman. The clip I want is of the bowling ally scene where Russell asks Peggy the birdies question. So far, I've perused the web to no avail.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/20 04:03 AM
LET HIM GO
Unfortunately, due to the pandemic and a sleepy ad campaign this film will probably fall under most people's radars but it shouldn't. Diane Lane and Kevin Costner play Margaret and George Blackledge. Lane plays the outgoing, stubborn, and when need be, spitfire Mid-West wife while Costner plays the rough and rugged, reserved Gary Cooper-esque, strong and silent type. The film follows the couple who's former daughter-in-law and grandson move away from Montana to North Dakota to be with her new husband's family. Thankfully director Thomas Bezucha uses the beautiful and mountainous state's scenery to provide some eye candy during transitional scenes while the couple is traveling. They come upon trouble when they find where their former daughter-in-law and grandson are now calling home. The Weboy family is quite popular in the Dakota's and the real Queen B of the picture is played marvelously by Lesley Manville, who's the mother of the clan as Blanche Weboy. The scenes involving the Blackledge's and Weboy's are nothing short of tense. Upon arriving at the Weboy house, I was immediately reminded of the house from the original TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, and even though this is anything but a horror film, the build up, isolation, and sense of unease quickly develop. The film is well paced and doesn't overstay it's welcome. A very enjoyable ride that again, I hope is viewed by many as it's an all around solid flick! 7/10
Unfortunately, due to the pandemic and a sleepy ad campaign this film will probably fall under most people's radars but it shouldn't. Diane Lane and Kevin Costner play Margaret and George Blackledge. Lane plays the outgoing, stubborn, and when need be, spitfire Mid-West wife while Costner plays the rough and rugged, reserved Gary Cooper-esque, strong and silent type. The film follows the couple who's former daughter-in-law and grandson move away from Montana to North Dakota to be with her new husband's family. Thankfully director Thomas Bezucha uses the beautiful and mountainous state's scenery to provide some eye candy during transitional scenes while the couple is traveling. They come upon trouble when they find where their former daughter-in-law and grandson are now calling home. The Weboy family is quite popular in the Dakota's and the real Queen B of the picture is played marvelously by Lesley Manville, who's the mother of the clan as Blanche Weboy. The scenes involving the Blackledge's and Weboy's are nothing short of tense. Upon arriving at the Weboy house, I was immediately reminded of the house from the original TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, and even though this is anything but a horror film, the build up, isolation, and sense of unease quickly develop. The film is well paced and doesn't overstay it's welcome. A very enjoyable ride that again, I hope is viewed by many as it's an all around solid flick! 7/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/20 04:37 AM
Cry of the City with Victor Mature and Richard Conte (1948). t's shame that probably most kids of the last two generations or so have not experienced the acting and production quality of most of those black and whites of the 30s, 40s, and even the 50s.
Mature plays a detective hot on the trail of Conte who is a thief and murdered a cop. I have to admit that I think Mature is one of the best actors ever. He is one of that genre of leading men back then that filled up the screen. When I saw him, I thought that he could have played Michael Corleone. He had that slicked back hair and calm demeanor. The film was also a first for the young Debra Paget who would go on to play roles in The Ten Commandments and Broken Arrow among others. To tell you the truth though, I didn't buy Conte as the cop-killer. His demeanor was much like Barzini's in The Godfather - kind of layed back. The movie was a hit with audiences; give it a view.
Mature plays a detective hot on the trail of Conte who is a thief and murdered a cop. I have to admit that I think Mature is one of the best actors ever. He is one of that genre of leading men back then that filled up the screen. When I saw him, I thought that he could have played Michael Corleone. He had that slicked back hair and calm demeanor. The film was also a first for the young Debra Paget who would go on to play roles in The Ten Commandments and Broken Arrow among others. To tell you the truth though, I didn't buy Conte as the cop-killer. His demeanor was much like Barzini's in The Godfather - kind of layed back. The movie was a hit with audiences; give it a view.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/20 11:55 PM
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/20 06:17 PM
Two Wolf Man movies:
WEREWOLF OF LONDON (1935, Dir. Stuart Walker): Doctor Glendon (Henry Hull), English botanist, is bitten by a werewolf while searching in Tibet for the rare, moonlight-blooming Mariphasa plant. Back in London, Glendon discovers he's a werewolf--and the Mariphasa is the only antidote. But, his specimen is stolen by Dr. Yogami (Warner Oland of Charlie Chan fame), a polite but determined Asian who is also a werewolf--the same one who attacked Glendon in Tibet. Oland is great but Hull is unsympathetic. Action scenes are few, and much of the movie is wasted on sappy high- and low-society semi-comic scenes. The whole thing looks like a British drawing room stage play. Not very good.
THE WOLF MAN (1941, Dir. George Wagner): Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr.) returns to England after 18 years in the US, greeted by his father, Sir John (Claude Rains), who wants him to run the family estate. While visiting a gypsy fair, he's attacked by a werewolf (Bela Lugosi). Talbot kills him, but Bela's fortune-telling mother (the inimitable Maria Ouspenskaya) sees the Sign of the Pentagram in Larry's palm; and he's condemned to moonlit monstrosities. Chaney Jr. was an unsubtle actor, but he defined the Wolf Man in this movie, genuinely portraying his agony and his knowledge that he must kill the one he loves most. A well-acted, well directed film.
WEREWOLF OF LONDON (1935, Dir. Stuart Walker): Doctor Glendon (Henry Hull), English botanist, is bitten by a werewolf while searching in Tibet for the rare, moonlight-blooming Mariphasa plant. Back in London, Glendon discovers he's a werewolf--and the Mariphasa is the only antidote. But, his specimen is stolen by Dr. Yogami (Warner Oland of Charlie Chan fame), a polite but determined Asian who is also a werewolf--the same one who attacked Glendon in Tibet. Oland is great but Hull is unsympathetic. Action scenes are few, and much of the movie is wasted on sappy high- and low-society semi-comic scenes. The whole thing looks like a British drawing room stage play. Not very good.
THE WOLF MAN (1941, Dir. George Wagner): Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr.) returns to England after 18 years in the US, greeted by his father, Sir John (Claude Rains), who wants him to run the family estate. While visiting a gypsy fair, he's attacked by a werewolf (Bela Lugosi). Talbot kills him, but Bela's fortune-telling mother (the inimitable Maria Ouspenskaya) sees the Sign of the Pentagram in Larry's palm; and he's condemned to moonlit monstrosities. Chaney Jr. was an unsubtle actor, but he defined the Wolf Man in this movie, genuinely portraying his agony and his knowledge that he must kill the one he loves most. A well-acted, well directed film.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/20 03:03 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
I'm trying to locate a clip of the Irishman. The clip I want is of the bowling ally scene where Russell asks Peggy the birdies question. So far, I've perused the web to no avail.
https://youtu.be/AE-Tn3GpJPM
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/20 04:34 PM
Thanks.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/20 08:05 PM
That was a good scene.
Ever notice that Peggy, as a grown-up, looks almost like a twin of Bill Bufalino's daughter in her wedding scene?
Ever notice that Peggy, as a grown-up, looks almost like a twin of Bill Bufalino's daughter in her wedding scene?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/13/20 11:51 PM
FREAKY
A horror take on the old FREAKY FRIDAY where Millie (played by Kathryn Newton) and the Blissfield Butcher (Vince Vaughn), swap bodies. They have only 24 hours to switch back or else the change will be permanent. I love Vince Vaughn and I still remember when he made good comedies. It wasn't all that long ago. Sadly, this is not one of them. The jokes are flat and juvenile that seemed like they were written for a PG-13 audience (which is a bit odd considering the film is rated R for violence and language). Besides that the film attempts to be too multilayered and woke. Not in a heavy handed sort of way, but more in terms of gaslighting (just enough to let you know that they're there). In addition the film is quite misandrynistic towards every white, male character with the exception of course of Millie's love interest. The only theme that does a decent job at preaching a positive message is at the end where *surprise* Millie finally finds her strength. 4/10
A horror take on the old FREAKY FRIDAY where Millie (played by Kathryn Newton) and the Blissfield Butcher (Vince Vaughn), swap bodies. They have only 24 hours to switch back or else the change will be permanent. I love Vince Vaughn and I still remember when he made good comedies. It wasn't all that long ago. Sadly, this is not one of them. The jokes are flat and juvenile that seemed like they were written for a PG-13 audience (which is a bit odd considering the film is rated R for violence and language). Besides that the film attempts to be too multilayered and woke. Not in a heavy handed sort of way, but more in terms of gaslighting (just enough to let you know that they're there). In addition the film is quite misandrynistic towards every white, male character with the exception of course of Millie's love interest. The only theme that does a decent job at preaching a positive message is at the end where *surprise* Millie finally finds her strength. 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/15/20 12:23 AM
1934 Treasure Island
Really good, Jackie Cooper.
Really good, Jackie Cooper.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/20 09:57 PM
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
I've been on a Philip Seymour Hoffman kick lately and this is a fabulous morality tale with noir elements that also features memorable performances from Ethan Hawke and Albert Finney. Very hard-hitting, impactful, stuff, and it never lags.
Happiness
Another excellent movie that I cannot recommend enough. The lives of three sisters intersect in morbidly hilarious ways. Grim subject matter. Almost like an indie black comedy version of Pulp Fiction. Again, Philip Seymour Hoffman is masterful. And Dylan Baker is superb as the father carrying a terrible secret.
I've been on a Philip Seymour Hoffman kick lately and this is a fabulous morality tale with noir elements that also features memorable performances from Ethan Hawke and Albert Finney. Very hard-hitting, impactful, stuff, and it never lags.
Happiness
Another excellent movie that I cannot recommend enough. The lives of three sisters intersect in morbidly hilarious ways. Grim subject matter. Almost like an indie black comedy version of Pulp Fiction. Again, Philip Seymour Hoffman is masterful. And Dylan Baker is superb as the father carrying a terrible secret.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/20 03:22 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I've been on a Philip Seymour Hoffman kick lately.
Did you check him out in "Capote"?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/17/20 02:56 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I've been on a Philip Seymour Hoffman kick lately.
Did you check him out in "Capote"?
That is on my rotation. Do you recommend it?
Flawless with Robert De Niro is another one I saw many years ago. From what I can recollect, it's a nice little movie that flew under the radar at the time. Hoffman, again, displaying his versatility and De Niro is, well, De Niro.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/20 08:06 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I've been on a Philip Seymour Hoffman kick lately.
Did you check him out in "Capote"?
That is on .my rotation. Do you recommend it?
Definitely! He's brilliant as Capote. A very well rounded performance. Chris Cooper is excellent, too.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/20/20 05:45 PM
Watched Capote. Another bravura performance from PSH, and Clifton Collins Jr, who I've always rated as an actor. The scene where Collins character confesses to stabbing the father and shooting the rest of the family was spellbinding.
It reminded me of Dead Man Walking
It reminded me of Dead Man Walking
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/20 09:54 PM
Glad you liked it, Moe. Hoffman is Capote. I loved how the movie showed him as ultra-manipulator, especially how he name-dropped his way into the lawman's home, and how he strung along the killers by paying for appeals.
Have you seen "In Cold Blood"? A truly memorable film.
Have you seen "In Cold Blood"? A truly memorable film.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/20 06:46 AM
THE GLASS HOUSE (1972)
This TV movie pioneered the ugly, realistic depiction of prison life, complete with rape, sadism shakedowns, crooked guards and murder. Shot in a Utah prison with real convicts as extras, it stars Alan Alda as a college professor in for accidental manslaughter; Dean Jagger as the warden who won't reform the system; Clu Gulager as a new guard who does want to change the system (and fails); Billy Dee Williams as leader of the politicized black convicts and the one, the only Vic Morrow, Nabob of Nastiness, as the boss con running all the rackets. Although it has some rough edges, this is a near first-class film.
This TV movie pioneered the ugly, realistic depiction of prison life, complete with rape, sadism shakedowns, crooked guards and murder. Shot in a Utah prison with real convicts as extras, it stars Alan Alda as a college professor in for accidental manslaughter; Dean Jagger as the warden who won't reform the system; Clu Gulager as a new guard who does want to change the system (and fails); Billy Dee Williams as leader of the politicized black convicts and the one, the only Vic Morrow, Nabob of Nastiness, as the boss con running all the rackets. Although it has some rough edges, this is a near first-class film.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/20 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Glad you liked it, Moe. Hoffman is Capote. I loved how the movie showed him as ultra-manipulator, especially how he name-dropped his way into the lawman's home, and how he strung along the killers by paying for appeals.
Have you seen "In Cold Blood"? A truly memorable film.
Have you seen "In Cold Blood"? A truly memorable film.
I haven't seen that, but it's on my list.
I watched Get Shorty. It was an interesting diversion. Carried the same momentum all the way through. Lacked a bit of spark or urgency. But even middling movies back then had so many charismatic actors on screen to make it worthy of a watch - this one had John Travolta, Gene Hackman, Danny De Vito and Dennis Farina, plus the likes of Delroy Lindo, James Gandolfini and David Paymer in smaller roles. Harvey Keitel's cameo at the end cracked me up as well.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/20 03:17 AM
KISS ME DEADLY (1955)
I tuned into this movie because Ralph Meeker, one of my favorite actors of that era, plays Mike Hammer in this Mickey Spillane tale. He picks up an escapee from a nuthouse (Cloris Leachman in her screen debut) running on a highway, is nearly killed because of her, and pursues the case, unpaid. Plenty of the usual Hammer violence (tame by today's standards) along the way. This movie gets rave reviews as "an American Film Noir classic." I don't know why--Meeker and his gal Friday (Maxine Cooper) are good, but the plot creaks along, the dialog is awkward, and the bad guys' objective is never really clear, except that the "prize: is some radioactive material, toward what end is never made clear. The cast includes a complete set of extras that no fan of Fifties B-movies could possibly resist: Albert Dekker, Paul Stewart, Juano Hernandez, Wesley Addy, Strother Martin, Nick Dennis, Robert Cornthwaite, Jack (The Evil Eye) Elam, and Percy (Eternal Victim) Helton. I stuck with it only for the cast.
I tuned into this movie because Ralph Meeker, one of my favorite actors of that era, plays Mike Hammer in this Mickey Spillane tale. He picks up an escapee from a nuthouse (Cloris Leachman in her screen debut) running on a highway, is nearly killed because of her, and pursues the case, unpaid. Plenty of the usual Hammer violence (tame by today's standards) along the way. This movie gets rave reviews as "an American Film Noir classic." I don't know why--Meeker and his gal Friday (Maxine Cooper) are good, but the plot creaks along, the dialog is awkward, and the bad guys' objective is never really clear, except that the "prize: is some radioactive material, toward what end is never made clear. The cast includes a complete set of extras that no fan of Fifties B-movies could possibly resist: Albert Dekker, Paul Stewart, Juano Hernandez, Wesley Addy, Strother Martin, Nick Dennis, Robert Cornthwaite, Jack (The Evil Eye) Elam, and Percy (Eternal Victim) Helton. I stuck with it only for the cast.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/29/20 12:25 AM
COME PLAY
A modern day social commentary mashup of THE RING and PULSE, showering the audience in "horrifying" ways, our reliance and dependency upon technology. COME PLAY deals with a monster named Larry (I know, how terrifying), scaring but wanting to befriend young autistic Oliver (Azhy Robertson). The film jumps right into bringing Larry and Oliver together and piecing the backstory of Oliver and his family during the duration of the film. I'm not much for child actors but Robertson gives the only worthwhile performance and his range is quite impressive for a 10-year-old. Gillian Jacobs is wasted as the overprotective mother of Oliver, but in her defense, anyone would be wasted as Oliver's mother Sarah due to the lack of depth given to this character. As a horror movie, this does not work. Suspense maybe, but definitely not horror. Very few scares and by less than the halfway point, I was bored with it already. 3/10
A modern day social commentary mashup of THE RING and PULSE, showering the audience in "horrifying" ways, our reliance and dependency upon technology. COME PLAY deals with a monster named Larry (I know, how terrifying), scaring but wanting to befriend young autistic Oliver (Azhy Robertson). The film jumps right into bringing Larry and Oliver together and piecing the backstory of Oliver and his family during the duration of the film. I'm not much for child actors but Robertson gives the only worthwhile performance and his range is quite impressive for a 10-year-old. Gillian Jacobs is wasted as the overprotective mother of Oliver, but in her defense, anyone would be wasted as Oliver's mother Sarah due to the lack of depth given to this character. As a horror movie, this does not work. Suspense maybe, but definitely not horror. Very few scares and by less than the halfway point, I was bored with it already. 3/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/20 01:37 AM
Just saw 'I love you Alice B. Tolkus"...an interesting comedy in the late 60s about the "freaked out " Peter Sellers..TCM on demand...& after all these yrs. finally gave in to"Dead Man Walking"..very good, but saddening ending.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/30/20 06:36 PM
Christmas Cronicales 2018 Netflix, good light fun...... Kurt Russel plays a great Santa.
CC2 is out this week, will catch that later in the season as well.
https://youtu.be/YaeDa_Uempk
CC2 is out this week, will catch that later in the season as well.
https://youtu.be/YaeDa_Uempk
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/20 01:01 AM
WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN
I must admit, I had never heard of this film before until recently. Unfortunately, the end was spoiled for me so I knew what the story was building to while viewing it. However, it was able to put things in perspective from the get go as this is definitely a film you'd want to watch a second time immediately after viewing it for the first. The film stars Tilda Swinton, John C. Reilly, and a young Ezra Miller. The film primarily deals with Swinton's relationship with her son Ezra. It's a parrell story told through present day as well as flashbacks. The story is given to the viewer in bits and I typically don't enjoy that style of filmmaking, however, it works in this case. Swinton and Ezra really bring out the best in each other and give wonderful performances. If you're able to track this down, I highly endorse a viewing. 7.5/10
I must admit, I had never heard of this film before until recently. Unfortunately, the end was spoiled for me so I knew what the story was building to while viewing it. However, it was able to put things in perspective from the get go as this is definitely a film you'd want to watch a second time immediately after viewing it for the first. The film stars Tilda Swinton, John C. Reilly, and a young Ezra Miller. The film primarily deals with Swinton's relationship with her son Ezra. It's a parrell story told through present day as well as flashbacks. The story is given to the viewer in bits and I typically don't enjoy that style of filmmaking, however, it works in this case. Swinton and Ezra really bring out the best in each other and give wonderful performances. If you're able to track this down, I highly endorse a viewing. 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/20 05:12 PM
2011?
Originally Posted by Irishman12
WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN
I must admit, I had never heard of this film before until recently. Unfortunately, the end was spoiled for me so I knew what the story was building to while viewing it. However, it was able to put things in perspective from the get go as this is definitely a film you'd want to watch a second time immediately after viewing it for the first. The film stars Tilda Swinton, John C. Reilly, and a young Ezra Miller. The film primarily deals with Swinton's relationship with her son Ezra. It's a parrell story told through present day as well as flashbacks. The story is given to the viewer in bits and I typically don't enjoy that style of filmmaking, however, it works in this case. Swinton and Ezra really bring out the best in each other and give wonderful performances. If you're able to track this down, I highly endorse a viewing. 7.5/10
I must admit, I had never heard of this film before until recently. Unfortunately, the end was spoiled for me so I knew what the story was building to while viewing it. However, it was able to put things in perspective from the get go as this is definitely a film you'd want to watch a second time immediately after viewing it for the first. The film stars Tilda Swinton, John C. Reilly, and a young Ezra Miller. The film primarily deals with Swinton's relationship with her son Ezra. It's a parrell story told through present day as well as flashbacks. The story is given to the viewer in bits and I typically don't enjoy that style of filmmaking, however, it works in this case. Swinton and Ezra really bring out the best in each other and give wonderful performances. If you're able to track this down, I highly endorse a viewing. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/03/20 12:10 AM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/20 12:52 AM
MANK
Netflix had me at David Fincher. His first film since 2014's GONE GIRL did not disappoint. From the opening credits, the viewer is transported to 1930's Hollywood. A wonderful and truly authentic homage, in the style of Quentin Tarantino, to Hollywood's golden years. Gary Oldman stars (and shines) as Herman Mankiewicz, who is the writer of CITIZEN KANE. The film is told through present day and flashbacks. Quite a bit of politics, backstabbing, and excessivism (which I applaud both Fincher and Netflix for not shying away from the excessive drinking and smoking due to today's cancel culture). Oldman plays a wonderful drunken writer who, towards the end of his career, writes his masterpiece. Set against the Great Depression, the film explores gluttony, greed, and corruption. Oldman is steller (and Oscar nomination worthy) in his performance as Mank and Amanda Seyfried assists him as Marion Davies, a woman who he's had to bail out of more than one situation. Seyfriend plays the role flawlessly and I daresay is worthy of an Oscar nomination herself. The final pillar to this film is Charles Dance. Always a shark in blood infested waters, he continues his domineering performance here going toe-to-toe with Oldman. The true scene stealers are any scenes involving Oldman & Seyfried or Oldman & Dance. Although the runtime runs a little long in the tooth (it clocks in at 131 minutes), I am rather looking forward to a second viewing. 7/10
Netflix had me at David Fincher. His first film since 2014's GONE GIRL did not disappoint. From the opening credits, the viewer is transported to 1930's Hollywood. A wonderful and truly authentic homage, in the style of Quentin Tarantino, to Hollywood's golden years. Gary Oldman stars (and shines) as Herman Mankiewicz, who is the writer of CITIZEN KANE. The film is told through present day and flashbacks. Quite a bit of politics, backstabbing, and excessivism (which I applaud both Fincher and Netflix for not shying away from the excessive drinking and smoking due to today's cancel culture). Oldman plays a wonderful drunken writer who, towards the end of his career, writes his masterpiece. Set against the Great Depression, the film explores gluttony, greed, and corruption. Oldman is steller (and Oscar nomination worthy) in his performance as Mank and Amanda Seyfried assists him as Marion Davies, a woman who he's had to bail out of more than one situation. Seyfriend plays the role flawlessly and I daresay is worthy of an Oscar nomination herself. The final pillar to this film is Charles Dance. Always a shark in blood infested waters, he continues his domineering performance here going toe-to-toe with Oldman. The true scene stealers are any scenes involving Oldman & Seyfried or Oldman & Dance. Although the runtime runs a little long in the tooth (it clocks in at 131 minutes), I am rather looking forward to a second viewing. 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/06/20 05:07 PM
Did you do a review of “ Sound of Metal†?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/06/20 05:13 PM
Wonder 2017
Really good 7.5 / 10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/Pr4SBC0t/EB98-CC88-94-F9-4356-AD1-A-F5-DF39522780.jpg)
Really good 7.5 / 10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/06/20 08:28 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Did you do a review of “ Sound of Metal†?
SOUND OF METAL
Heavy metal drummer Ruben, played marvelously by Riz Ahmed, suddenly and unexpectedly losses his hearing. A former addict, Ruben leans heavily on his girlfriend Lou (Olivia Cooke) rather than substance abuse, to help him through this life changing event by distraction as opposed to confronting the problem. Lou, realizing the severity of the situation and being more pragmatic, encourages Ruben to go to a deaf community to adapt to his change in lifestyle. Director Darius Marder does a wonderful job putting the audience in Ruben's shoes while at the community. Immersing the audience into how it feels to not only be deaf, but being the newcomer in a foreign environment. Naturally, Ruben runs the gamut of emotions from frustration of not knowing sign language and being excluded from every activity upon his arrival, to isolation, anger, loneliness, and heartbreak. A gutting movie about self-reliance and self-sufficiency with strong performances all around. A shout out must also be given to Paul Raci, who plays Joe, the leader and mentor of Ruben at the deaf community. Definitely worth checking out on Amazon Prime. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/20 04:00 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Did you do a review of “ Sound of Metal†?
SOUND OF METAL
Heavy metal drummer Ruben, played marvelously by Riz Ahmed, suddenly and unexpectedly losses his hearing. A former addict, Ruben leans heavily on his girlfriend Lou (Olivia Cooke) rather than substance abuse, to help him through this life changing event by distraction as opposed to confronting the problem. Lou, realizing the severity of the situation and being more pragmatic, encourages Ruben to go to a deaf community to adapt to his change in lifestyle. Director Darius Marder does a wonderful job putting the audience in Ruben's shoes while at the community. Immersing the audience into how it feels to not only be deaf, but being the newcomer in a foreign environment. Naturally, Ruben runs the gamut of emotions from frustration of not knowing sign language and being excluded from every activity upon his arrival, to isolation, anger, loneliness, and heartbreak. A gutting movie about self-reliance and self-sufficiency with strong performances all around. A shout out must also be given to Paul Raci, who plays Joe, the leader and mentor of Ruben at the deaf community. Definitely worth checking out on Amazon Prime. 6.5/10
\\
Certainly on the list..... thanks i12
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/20 06:33 AM
Sounds like all u guy's pinpoint new stuff , but the thread is called "what u just watched"...therefore may I say that I just enjoyed an oldie but goodie from 1950 called " No Way Out" .....no..not the Kevin Costner movie of 87' ...starring Sidney Poitier & Richard Widmark...Widmark sparks a community race riot after his brother dies under a doctor's (Poitier) care who is the only black doc in the hospital..very stunning performances all around as well as 4 it's day , language...also stars Linda Darnell in a saucy but poinaint role ...a must see 4 anyone to see life in a microscope of that time at it's realist.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/20 06:38 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Sounds like all u guy's pinpoint new stuff , but the thread is called "what u just watched"...therefore may I say that I just enjoyed an oldie but goodie from 1950 called " No Way Out" .....no..not the Kevin Costner movie of 87' ...starring Sidney Poitier & Richard Widmark...Widmark sparks a community race riot after his brother dies under a doctor's (Poitier) care who is the only black doc in the hospital..very stunning performances all around as well as 4 it's day , language...also stars Linda Darnell in a saucy but poinaint role ...a must see 4 anyone to see life in a microscope of that time at it's realist.
TCM on Demand
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/20 06:57 AM
That's a good movie Hood, and it broke a lot of barriers for it's time.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/20 07:17 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
That's a good movie Hood, and it broke a lot of barriers for it's time.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
Yes , I would imagine it broke boundries back in that time period...thanx Gio..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/08/20 12:33 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Did you do a review of “ Sound of Metal†?
SOUND OF METAL
Heavy metal drummer Ruben, played marvelously by Riz Ahmed, suddenly and unexpectedly losses his hearing. A former addict, Ruben leans heavily on his girlfriend Lou (Olivia Cooke) rather than substance abuse, to help him through this life changing event by distraction as opposed to confronting the problem. Lou, realizing the severity of the situation and being more pragmatic, encourages Ruben to go to a deaf community to adapt to his change in lifestyle. Director Darius Marder does a wonderful job putting the audience in Ruben's shoes while at the community. Immersing the audience into how it feels to not only be deaf, but being the newcomer in a foreign environment. Naturally, Ruben runs the gamut of emotions from frustration of not knowing sign language and being excluded from every activity upon his arrival, to isolation, anger, loneliness, and heartbreak. A gutting movie about self-reliance and self-sufficiency with strong performances all around. A shout out must also be given to Paul Raci, who plays Joe, the leader and mentor of Ruben at the deaf community. Definitely worth checking out on Amazon Prime. 6.5/10
\\
Certainly on the list..... thanks i12
Hope you enjoy it DP
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/08/20 12:35 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
That's a good movie Hood, and it broke a lot of barriers for it's time.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
I just watched Carlito's Way which is a good film with Al Pacino, Sean Penn, among others. I hadn't seen that movie for awhile and yesterday I was surfing the channels and watched South Park episode with Fishsticks. There is a scene in that episode that was a parody of Carlito's way, Viggo Mortensen character.
Watching The Usual Suspects right now.
THE USUAL SUSPECTS is one of my favorite movies of all time. Was never a fan of CARLITO'S WAY though.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/20 04:57 AM
Rediculous
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/20 05:00 AM
So difficult to upload a image..... rediculous
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/20 11:37 PM
Still nothing DP. The website I showed you isn't working any more?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/20 12:54 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Still nothing DP. The website I showed you isn't working any more?
It was down, twice.
Seams to be able to upload now but it takes three or moves to make a link ( which I will continue do) but it should be one copy past for a image of these size we want to show.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/20 05:57 AM
ROLLERBALL (1975)
It's sometime in the near future. The world is ruled by industrial cartels (Energy, Luxury, Transportation, etc.), headed by Executives who make all the decisions for people. Aggression is confined to the game of Rollerball, an ultra-vi form of roller derby. Houston (Energy) is the champ team, captained by Jonathan E (James Caan), impassively brutal on the track but seemingly wimpy off track (you have to lean into your TV to hear him). Executive bigshot Bartholomew (John Houseman) wants him to retire, but Jonathan won't obey--he holds a grudge because an Executive took away a "wife" assigned to him that he loved. The Execs can't just kill Jonathan because he's too popular. So, they remove all rules from Rollerball, hoping he'll be killed in the game.
The plot isn't very complex, and Caan, as Jonathan, isn't a very sympatico character. But, the action, though brutal, is outstanding, and the filming is superb. Worth watching.
It's sometime in the near future. The world is ruled by industrial cartels (Energy, Luxury, Transportation, etc.), headed by Executives who make all the decisions for people. Aggression is confined to the game of Rollerball, an ultra-vi form of roller derby. Houston (Energy) is the champ team, captained by Jonathan E (James Caan), impassively brutal on the track but seemingly wimpy off track (you have to lean into your TV to hear him). Executive bigshot Bartholomew (John Houseman) wants him to retire, but Jonathan won't obey--he holds a grudge because an Executive took away a "wife" assigned to him that he loved. The Execs can't just kill Jonathan because he's too popular. So, they remove all rules from Rollerball, hoping he'll be killed in the game.
The plot isn't very complex, and Caan, as Jonathan, isn't a very sympatico character. But, the action, though brutal, is outstanding, and the filming is superb. Worth watching.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/18/20 08:30 PM
MONSTER HUNTER
Milla Jovovich and Director Paul W.S. Anderson are both back within the video game adaptation realm where they seem to be most comfortable. Jovovich plays US Army Ranger Captain Natalie Artemis, who leads her team on a reconnaissance mission in the Middle East, when they are abruptly swept away to another world full of gigantic monsters. The film doesn't waste any time and picks right up switching between our world and the alternate. Before long Jovovich finds herself isolated, in a strange new world, being hunted by monsters, and unable to communicate with Tony Jaa (who plays the Hunter) once there paths cross. The two must find ways to trust and communicate with each other, as well as survive due to monsters looking to eat them at every turn. This film is pure eye candy with big special effects, fight scenes, and a loose story. Not a bad B-action flick to entertain yourself with during the holidays or for wanting something new to see in the theater. 5/10
Milla Jovovich and Director Paul W.S. Anderson are both back within the video game adaptation realm where they seem to be most comfortable. Jovovich plays US Army Ranger Captain Natalie Artemis, who leads her team on a reconnaissance mission in the Middle East, when they are abruptly swept away to another world full of gigantic monsters. The film doesn't waste any time and picks right up switching between our world and the alternate. Before long Jovovich finds herself isolated, in a strange new world, being hunted by monsters, and unable to communicate with Tony Jaa (who plays the Hunter) once there paths cross. The two must find ways to trust and communicate with each other, as well as survive due to monsters looking to eat them at every turn. This film is pure eye candy with big special effects, fight scenes, and a loose story. Not a bad B-action flick to entertain yourself with during the holidays or for wanting something new to see in the theater. 5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/20 02:36 AM
OUTLAND (1981)
High Noon in outer space: Marshal Bill O'Neill (Sean Connery) arrives at a mining colony on Io, a Jupiter moon. He soon discovers that the GM, Mark Sheppard (Peter Boyle) is supplying his miners with an amphetamine-like drug that makes them more productive, drives them to suicide--and enhances Sheppard's bonus. But, no one--not even the cops under him--will help because they're all either on the take or afraid His only ally is Dr. Lazarus (Frances Sternhagen), a broken-down, acid-tongued MD. She helps him when Sheppard calls for two assassins to whack O'Neill. Connery is sturdy as ever, Boyle is genially detestable, the special effects are convincing, and the action is good. But Sternhagen owns this movie--the role is tailor-made for her. Very good entertainment.
High Noon in outer space: Marshal Bill O'Neill (Sean Connery) arrives at a mining colony on Io, a Jupiter moon. He soon discovers that the GM, Mark Sheppard (Peter Boyle) is supplying his miners with an amphetamine-like drug that makes them more productive, drives them to suicide--and enhances Sheppard's bonus. But, no one--not even the cops under him--will help because they're all either on the take or afraid His only ally is Dr. Lazarus (Frances Sternhagen), a broken-down, acid-tongued MD. She helps him when Sheppard calls for two assassins to whack O'Neill. Connery is sturdy as ever, Boyle is genially detestable, the special effects are convincing, and the action is good. But Sternhagen owns this movie--the role is tailor-made for her. Very good entertainment.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/20 08:59 AM
The Incident (1967) Martin Sheens debut as well as Donna Mills...tough., brutal story of 2 drunken hoods (Sheen &Tony Musante) who terrorize passengers in a NY city subway & Traincar....Well made but sometimes unpleasent but still topical...I was disturbed @ 1rst,because of the time period...But u realize this kind of drama would never happen in this day & age....excellent cast in what I see as an experimental film..grapples you in as go , starting w/ each couple or character from the start....I could not take my eyes off the screen even 2 get a bottle of water...WATCH IF U CAN... Merry Christmas..Love,,,Hoodlum.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/20 09:39 PM
THE EMPTY MAN
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/20 12:21 AM
PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN
Carey Mulligan gives an empowering, strong, and devilish performance as Cassandra, a young woman who goes out to bars on a seemingly nightly basis, pretending to be falling down drunk in order to lure men to take her home. Once there, she dishes out her own form of punishment, shame, and humiliation as they attempt to take advantage of her in her inebriated state. Cassandra does this as a way of fighting the patriarch, as while attending medical school 7 years prior, her best friend Nina, was sexually assaulted by multiple men. Unable to cope with the experience, Cassandra drops out to take care of her friend. To make matters worse, other female friends, school administrators, and the criminal justice system all betray Nina and Cassandra in finding justice. As such, Cassandra feels empowered to take it upon herself to seek revenge on behalf of her friend. A timely film that features lack of personal responsibility, blame, guilt, and revenge. Also plenty of “me too†moments along with “every male is a sexual predator†themes. Save for one, no males have any redeeming qualities, so it’s dripping in misogyny. Despite all of that, it’s still an enjoyable film. 6/10
Carey Mulligan gives an empowering, strong, and devilish performance as Cassandra, a young woman who goes out to bars on a seemingly nightly basis, pretending to be falling down drunk in order to lure men to take her home. Once there, she dishes out her own form of punishment, shame, and humiliation as they attempt to take advantage of her in her inebriated state. Cassandra does this as a way of fighting the patriarch, as while attending medical school 7 years prior, her best friend Nina, was sexually assaulted by multiple men. Unable to cope with the experience, Cassandra drops out to take care of her friend. To make matters worse, other female friends, school administrators, and the criminal justice system all betray Nina and Cassandra in finding justice. As such, Cassandra feels empowered to take it upon herself to seek revenge on behalf of her friend. A timely film that features lack of personal responsibility, blame, guilt, and revenge. Also plenty of “me too†moments along with “every male is a sexual predator†themes. Save for one, no males have any redeeming qualities, so it’s dripping in misogyny. Despite all of that, it’s still an enjoyable film. 6/10
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/20 12:22 PM
[Deleted.
Warning you again, Ralphie: No more bigoted remarks on this or any other boards!
Warning you again, Ralphie: No more bigoted remarks on this or any other boards!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/20 11:05 PM
WONDER WOMAN 1984
2020 has been a year to forget but at least HBO eased our suffering a little bit with the release of WONDER WOMAN 1984. Here, we find Diana Prince, decades from when we first saw her, this time in the nostalgic and excessive times that were the 1980's. A lot of the nostalgia comes in the form of the wardrobe's, where some fun is had. Unfortunately, Patty Jenkins missed out on a golden opportunity to capitalize on the music of the time, as an 80's soundtrack is sorely missing from this film. However, recent DC films have been derided as too dark. This is a break from that as WW84 is the most lighthearted and color vibrant film DC has put out in quite some time. Pedro Pascal, who's killing it recently with the just completed second season of THE MANDALORIAN on Disney+, has such a fun time as Maxwell Lord, an eccentric, deceptive swindler, selling audiences on their fantasies. I also did enjoy Kristen Wiig as I did scratch my head a bit at the announcement of her casting; however, I'm always in favor of seeing comedians stretch their range into other, non-comedic roles and she does an admirable job as the villian Barbara Minerva/Cheetah. Finally, the way in which Chris Pine's character of Steve Trevor is brought back (and that it wasn't spoiled in the trailers so I won't spoil it here), works and is such an integral part of the story. Overall, the sequel surpasses its predecessor and I look forward to a third Wonder Woman film to complete the trilogy. And yes, there is a mid-credit scene by the way. 6.5/10
2020 has been a year to forget but at least HBO eased our suffering a little bit with the release of WONDER WOMAN 1984. Here, we find Diana Prince, decades from when we first saw her, this time in the nostalgic and excessive times that were the 1980's. A lot of the nostalgia comes in the form of the wardrobe's, where some fun is had. Unfortunately, Patty Jenkins missed out on a golden opportunity to capitalize on the music of the time, as an 80's soundtrack is sorely missing from this film. However, recent DC films have been derided as too dark. This is a break from that as WW84 is the most lighthearted and color vibrant film DC has put out in quite some time. Pedro Pascal, who's killing it recently with the just completed second season of THE MANDALORIAN on Disney+, has such a fun time as Maxwell Lord, an eccentric, deceptive swindler, selling audiences on their fantasies. I also did enjoy Kristen Wiig as I did scratch my head a bit at the announcement of her casting; however, I'm always in favor of seeing comedians stretch their range into other, non-comedic roles and she does an admirable job as the villian Barbara Minerva/Cheetah. Finally, the way in which Chris Pine's character of Steve Trevor is brought back (and that it wasn't spoiled in the trailers so I won't spoil it here), works and is such an integral part of the story. Overall, the sequel surpasses its predecessor and I look forward to a third Wonder Woman film to complete the trilogy. And yes, there is a mid-credit scene by the way. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/20 06:29 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE EMPTY MAN
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Great review, just read it to wife and we will now watch it knowing it may drag.
Started watching it last night but dumped it when it got slow.
Might give it another shot from where we left off.
Posted By: fergie
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/20 10:07 PM
Zulu...in the top ten films of all time just about...we’ve been watching it tonight and I always have to stand up at every attack for some reason...keep reassuring the wife I would never run either! great film!
great film!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/20 11:01 PM
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/20 11:04 PM
Good movie 7/10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/xdScGXRx/26-F342-FA-0-E4-D-45-EF-B7-F2-0-B3-EF86-E3887.jpg)
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/28/20 12:12 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE EMPTY MAN
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Another take on the "if you summon this spirit, you'll die in so many days" subgenre. However, THE EMPTY MAN actually works. While suspension of disbelief is needed in some areas, it isn't overly campy. Former cop, now turned security company owner, James Lasombra, investigates the disappearance of her neighbors daughter, Amanda. At first believed to be dead, the investigation soon turns to determine if she ran away to join a local cult, who are attempting to summon the empty man. The first 20-30 minutes of the film are in stark contrast to the rest of the picture and I actually had to pause to ensure I was watching the right movie. However, the opening is very well done and fits in nicely towards the later end of the story. This flew under a lot of people's radars but it is a decent film to give a chance on. 5.5/10
Great review, just read it to wife and we will now watch it knowing it may drag.
Started watching it last night but dumped it when it got slow.
Might give it another shot from where we left off.
Hope you can make it through it. It did drag a bit but that opening scene hooked me. Too bad it tailed off after that.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/20 12:38 AM
NEWS OF THE WORLD
Tom Hanks stars as Captain Kidd, a Civil War veteran who roams from town to town in 1870 Texas, reading local and national newspapers to the locals "for a dime and anyone who'll give them their time." After his first stop of the film, he soon comes across an overturned carriage that was transporting young Johanna, until the African-American in charge of her was lynched. Hanks, unable to leave the young girl by herself, takes over and makes it his mission to return the young girl to her last remaining family members. Johanna is of German descent but was kidnapped by Indians at a young age and as such, only speaks Kiowa. So for the rest of the movie, Hanks attempts to teach Johanna English, while in return Johanna tries to teach Hanks Kiowa. The film is still in its infancy before Hanks and Johanna team up and not much background is given about either character. We find out more about Hanks as the film progresses but we're never really afforded much backstory about Johanna. I wasn't invested in either character so it made it difficult to be emotionally invested when Hanks is approached by 3 locals in Dallas about buying the girl, Indian attacks, or whatever else the old west could throw at them. Better work has definitely been seen by both Hanks and director Paul Greengrass and this film was a disappointment. 5/10
Tom Hanks stars as Captain Kidd, a Civil War veteran who roams from town to town in 1870 Texas, reading local and national newspapers to the locals "for a dime and anyone who'll give them their time." After his first stop of the film, he soon comes across an overturned carriage that was transporting young Johanna, until the African-American in charge of her was lynched. Hanks, unable to leave the young girl by herself, takes over and makes it his mission to return the young girl to her last remaining family members. Johanna is of German descent but was kidnapped by Indians at a young age and as such, only speaks Kiowa. So for the rest of the movie, Hanks attempts to teach Johanna English, while in return Johanna tries to teach Hanks Kiowa. The film is still in its infancy before Hanks and Johanna team up and not much background is given about either character. We find out more about Hanks as the film progresses but we're never really afforded much backstory about Johanna. I wasn't invested in either character so it made it difficult to be emotionally invested when Hanks is approached by 3 locals in Dallas about buying the girl, Indian attacks, or whatever else the old west could throw at them. Better work has definitely been seen by both Hanks and director Paul Greengrass and this film was a disappointment. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/20 11:37 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NEWS OF THE WORLD
Tom Hanks stars as Captain Kidd, a Civil War veteran who roams from town to town in 1870 Texas, reading local and national newspapers to the locals "for a dime and anyone who'll give them their time." After his first stop of the film, he soon comes across an overturned carriage that was transporting young Johanna, until the African-American in charge of her was lynched. Hanks, unable to leave the young girl by herself, takes over and makes it his mission to return the young girl to her last remaining family members. Johanna is of German descent but was kidnapped by Indians at a young age and as such, only speaks Kiowa. So for the rest of the movie, Hanks attempts to teach Johanna English, while in return Johanna tries to teach Hanks Kiowa. The film is still in its infancy before Hanks and Johanna team up and not much background is given about either character. We find out more about Hanks as the film progresses but we're never really afforded much backstory about Johanna. I wasn't invested in either character so it made it difficult to be emotionally invested when Hanks is approached by 3 locals in Dallas about buying the girl, Indian attacks, or whatever else the old west could throw at them. Better work has definitely been seen by both Hanks and director Paul Greengrass and this film was a disappointment. 5/10
Tom Hanks stars as Captain Kidd, a Civil War veteran who roams from town to town in 1870 Texas, reading local and national newspapers to the locals "for a dime and anyone who'll give them their time." After his first stop of the film, he soon comes across an overturned carriage that was transporting young Johanna, until the African-American in charge of her was lynched. Hanks, unable to leave the young girl by herself, takes over and makes it his mission to return the young girl to her last remaining family members. Johanna is of German descent but was kidnapped by Indians at a young age and as such, only speaks Kiowa. So for the rest of the movie, Hanks attempts to teach Johanna English, while in return Johanna tries to teach Hanks Kiowa. The film is still in its infancy before Hanks and Johanna team up and not much background is given about either character. We find out more about Hanks as the film progresses but we're never really afforded much backstory about Johanna. I wasn't invested in either character so it made it difficult to be emotionally invested when Hanks is approached by 3 locals in Dallas about buying the girl, Indian attacks, or whatever else the old west could throw at them. Better work has definitely been seen by both Hanks and director Paul Greengrass and this film was a disappointment. 5/10
Wow. 5/10. I was looking forward to this but will check out others first.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/20 12:22 AM
I wasn't really looking forward to it and I was still disappointed. Pretty dull and same old Tom Hanks. Wish he would take a risk with some of the roles he chooses. He's too safe and has been for a very long time.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/20 06:45 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I wasn't really looking forward to it and I was still disappointed. Pretty dull and same old Tom Hanks. Wish he would take a risk with some of the roles he chooses. He's too safe and has been for a very long time.
At least he is not a scienotologist ..
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/20 06:54 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I wasn't really looking forward to it and I was still disappointed. Pretty dull and same old Tom Hanks. Wish he would take a risk with some of the roles he chooses. He's too safe and has been for a very long time.
At least he is not a scienotologist ..
But he might very well be a pedophile. Have a look https:/
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/20 04:28 PM
Watched Palm Springs last night. Pretty funny movie with Adam Samberg
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/21 03:33 AM
THE ANDERSON TAPES (1971)
Duke Anderson (Sean Connery), just released from prison, puts together a gang to rob residents of a high-end apartment building in Manhattan. It's well acted by Connery and a very strong supporting team, including Diane Cannon as his girlfriend; Martin Balsam as a gay decorator who scouts the place out, and Christopher Walken, in his first movie, as a young electronics expert. All the rest of the cast are good, too, and look like real NYers. Director Sidney Lumet adds plenty of humor and irony, but they don't get in the way of the well-done heist and the police response. Ralph Meeker does a terrific comic turn as Police Capt. "Iron Balls" Delaney. Excellent entertainment.
Duke Anderson (Sean Connery), just released from prison, puts together a gang to rob residents of a high-end apartment building in Manhattan. It's well acted by Connery and a very strong supporting team, including Diane Cannon as his girlfriend; Martin Balsam as a gay decorator who scouts the place out, and Christopher Walken, in his first movie, as a young electronics expert. All the rest of the cast are good, too, and look like real NYers. Director Sidney Lumet adds plenty of humor and irony, but they don't get in the way of the well-done heist and the police response. Ralph Meeker does a terrific comic turn as Police Capt. "Iron Balls" Delaney. Excellent entertainment.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/21 04:51 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE ANDERSON TAPES (1971)
Duke Anderson (Sean Connery), just released from prison, puts together a gang to rob residents of a high-end apartment building in Manhattan. It's well acted by Connery and a very strong supporting team, including Diane Cannon as his girlfriend; Martin Balsam as a gay decorator who scouts the place out, and Christopher Walken, in his first movie, as a young electronics expert. All the rest of the cast are good, too, and look like real NYers. Director Sidney Lumet adds plenty of humor and irony, but they don't get in the way of the well-done heist and the police response. Ralph Meeker does a terrific comic turn as Police Capt. "Iron Balls" Delaney. Excellent entertainment.
Duke Anderson (Sean Connery), just released from prison, puts together a gang to rob residents of a high-end apartment building in Manhattan. It's well acted by Connery and a very strong supporting team, including Diane Cannon as his girlfriend; Martin Balsam as a gay decorator who scouts the place out, and Christopher Walken, in his first movie, as a young electronics expert. All the rest of the cast are good, too, and look like real NYers. Director Sidney Lumet adds plenty of humor and irony, but they don't get in the way of the well-done heist and the police response. Ralph Meeker does a terrific comic turn as Police Capt. "Iron Balls" Delaney. Excellent entertainment.
Yes...sir.. I saw that on TCM....good flick...I did love Meeker as wisecrack cop...Cannon also sexy as usual.....fun 2 c Walken so young!!...& I always loved Martin Balsam in his prime..
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/21 06:48 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
I always loved Martin Balsam in his prime..
Balsam was one of the best, most versatile and most underrated character actors ever. He improved every movie he was in. His best, IMO: as a Presidential assistant in "Seven Days in May."
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/21 06:52 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by hoodlum
I always loved Martin Balsam in his prime..
Balsam was one of the best, most versatile and most underrated character actors ever. He improved every movie he was in. His best, IMO: as a Presidential assistant in "Seven Days in May."
Hmmm...will have look that up & check it out ...Thank u T...
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/05/21 09:57 PM
Hoodlum, remember the old biddy in "Anderson Tapes" who was so thrilled that her apartment was being burglarized? She was played by none other than Margaret Hamilton, immortalized as the Wicked Witch of the East in "Wizard of Oz."
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/08/21 06:36 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Hoodlum, remember the old biddy in "Anderson Tapes" who was so thrilled that her apartment was being burglarized? She was played by none other than Margaret Hamilton, immortalized as the Wicked Witch of the East in "Wizard of Oz."
Oh yes! I haven't heard that title in eons.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/21 12:56 AM
PIECES OF A WOMAN
Vanessa Kirby and Shia LaBeouf star as Martha and Sean, a couple on the verge on having their first child. Vanessa insisted on having a home birth and before long, something goes terribly wrong and the baby is lost. Both attempting to move on, they handle the grief in their own ways and as such, drift further apart. Sean self-destructs while self-medicating, while Martha not only has to deal with the lose of her child, but her overbearing mother (played by Ellen Burstyn), who wants revenge against the midwife as she's made to be the scapegoat for the lose of the child. I really wanted to like the movie after viewing the trailer, but other than wonderful performances by both Kirby and Burstyn (I could see one or both get Academy nominations), the film seemed rather dull and sluggish at times, with the exception of the one shot birth scene in the beginning. 5.5/10
Also, rewatched THE GODFATHER PART III today in anticipation of watching the new CODA: THE DEATH OF MICHAEL CORLEONE cut tomorrow. And while Part III can never hold a candle to part I or II, today's viewing was my most enjoyable ever of this film and the story made more sense (probably helped that I had the subtitles on).
Vanessa Kirby and Shia LaBeouf star as Martha and Sean, a couple on the verge on having their first child. Vanessa insisted on having a home birth and before long, something goes terribly wrong and the baby is lost. Both attempting to move on, they handle the grief in their own ways and as such, drift further apart. Sean self-destructs while self-medicating, while Martha not only has to deal with the lose of her child, but her overbearing mother (played by Ellen Burstyn), who wants revenge against the midwife as she's made to be the scapegoat for the lose of the child. I really wanted to like the movie after viewing the trailer, but other than wonderful performances by both Kirby and Burstyn (I could see one or both get Academy nominations), the film seemed rather dull and sluggish at times, with the exception of the one shot birth scene in the beginning. 5.5/10
Also, rewatched THE GODFATHER PART III today in anticipation of watching the new CODA: THE DEATH OF MICHAEL CORLEONE cut tomorrow. And while Part III can never hold a candle to part I or II, today's viewing was my most enjoyable ever of this film and the story made more sense (probably helped that I had the subtitles on).
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/21 02:10 AM
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/21 08:48 AM
Originally Posted by Hollander
i hope you're joking
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/21 07:31 PM
Just watched THE GODFATHER PART III CODA: THE DEATH OF MICHAEL CORLEONE and I wasn't a big fan of it. The pacing felt rushed and there wasn't anything new added to the story. Coppola simply changed the opening scene, the ending, and moved a few scenes around while cutting others altogether or shortened existing scenes. For my money, I prefer the original cut.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/21 03:14 AM
Thanks for that feedback, Irishman. Coming from you, I'll take that as the reason not to buy it.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/21 03:24 AM
GILDA (1946)
Johnny Farrell (Glenn Ford), down-and-out gambling cheat in Buenos Aires, is taken out of the gutter by Ballin Mundson (George Macready) and made manager of his gambling casino. He's doing great until Mundson introduces him to his new bride Gilda (Rita Hayworth)--Farrell's former lover. The two hate each other and the sparks fly. Ford, nobody's idea of a great actor, is good here as a tough guy with loyalty to Mundson. Macready (second only to George Sanders in the Elegant Bad Guy sweepstakes), gives a nuanced performance as a crook at heart. But the movie belongs to Hayworth, at her peak as a tough but gorgeous independent, snappy repartee, refusing to knuckle under, and doing a sensational turn as a nightclub singer/dancer ("Put the Blame on Mame" number is Hollywood legend). The movie is too long and has too many extraneous subplots. But, you won't want to miss Hayworth at her absolutely sexiest and most mesmerizing.
Johnny Farrell (Glenn Ford), down-and-out gambling cheat in Buenos Aires, is taken out of the gutter by Ballin Mundson (George Macready) and made manager of his gambling casino. He's doing great until Mundson introduces him to his new bride Gilda (Rita Hayworth)--Farrell's former lover. The two hate each other and the sparks fly. Ford, nobody's idea of a great actor, is good here as a tough guy with loyalty to Mundson. Macready (second only to George Sanders in the Elegant Bad Guy sweepstakes), gives a nuanced performance as a crook at heart. But the movie belongs to Hayworth, at her peak as a tough but gorgeous independent, snappy repartee, refusing to knuckle under, and doing a sensational turn as a nightclub singer/dancer ("Put the Blame on Mame" number is Hollywood legend). The movie is too long and has too many extraneous subplots. But, you won't want to miss Hayworth at her absolutely sexiest and most mesmerizing.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/21 11:38 PM
THE MARKSMAN
Liam Neeson stars as Jim, a former marine, who's Arizona home is on the US-Mexico border. One day while out, Jim comes up two illegal immigrants (a mother and son) running across the border from the cartel. A shootout ensues when Jim refuses to hand over the duo to the cartel and in the process the mother is killed. Before succumbing to her wounds, the mother entrusts Jim to drive her son to family in Chicago. Jim agrees and the rest of the film is a cat-and-mouse game between Jim & the boy, and the cartel. The film deals with themes of family, the loss of a loved one, and strong character. Neeson gives a little more passion in his performance from his previous HONEST THIEF, which he mailed in. And even though his rugged, Irish accent sticks out like a sore thumb as a rancher living along the border, he always commands every scene that he's in with power. 5/10
Liam Neeson stars as Jim, a former marine, who's Arizona home is on the US-Mexico border. One day while out, Jim comes up two illegal immigrants (a mother and son) running across the border from the cartel. A shootout ensues when Jim refuses to hand over the duo to the cartel and in the process the mother is killed. Before succumbing to her wounds, the mother entrusts Jim to drive her son to family in Chicago. Jim agrees and the rest of the film is a cat-and-mouse game between Jim & the boy, and the cartel. The film deals with themes of family, the loss of a loved one, and strong character. Neeson gives a little more passion in his performance from his previous HONEST THIEF, which he mailed in. And even though his rugged, Irish accent sticks out like a sore thumb as a rancher living along the border, he always commands every scene that he's in with power. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/21 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Thanks for that feedback, Irishman. Coming from you, I'll take that as the reason not to buy it.
I appreciate that TB but I'm always of the mindset of if you're open to watching it, go ahead and watch it. My review is just one man's opinion, but I am happy to hear that it carry's some weight on here.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/21 12:56 PM
GALVESTON
This 2018 neo-noir movie was the English language directorial debut of Melanie Laurent. You may remember her from her role in Inglorious Basterds as Shoshanna, the Jewish cinema owner, who is seeking revenge on the Nazis for murdering her family. Apparently Laurent is something of a Renaissance woman, being a director, actress and singer among other things. On the surface this movie may seem familiar to you.
After a chance encounter a bad man feels obligated to defend a broken angel of a woman from even worse people. In so doing he may rediscover his own humanity, find redemption and/or even find the love that he has convinced himself he doesn't need, previously lost, or will never have. And as in many films of this type a road trip is included. So yes, we've all likely seen that story before.
Galveston follows that basic outline before deviating. This film was an emotional gut-punch because it defied typical Hollywood conventions even as it teased the viewer into thinking that they would be upheld. The best way I can describe this film visually is that it hearkens back to some late sixties early seventies films. Things are literally very dark on screen at times, which reflects some of the characters and the decisions that they make.
This is not a Hollywood action film. No one gets shot in the shoulder and declares in a deadpan manner "It went straight through. I'll be fine." When people get hurt, physically or emotionally, they stay hurt for a while.
Roy (Ben Foster) is an enforcer and occasional hit man for the New Orleans mobster Stan Pitko (Beau Bridges). Roy's vaguely aware that he's not Stan's most favorite person in the world. Apparently a woman is involved. But Roy has more serious problems. An alcoholic and prodigious cigarette smoker, Roy's been having breathing problems and coughing fits. A doctor confirms that there's a mass on Roy's lung. Roy leaves before the doctor can tell him how much longer he has to live with the Big C. Stan informs Roy and another goon that he has a job for them.
They must scare someone who owes Stan money. But because Roy and the other fellow can sometimes be too intense, Stan orders them not to take any guns with them. Just a shakedown, maybe a few slaps and threats is all that Stan wants. Well that's odd.
When Roy and his co-worker show up at the house to play Big Bad Wolf they are ambushed. But you don't become a middle aged hit man by being unresourceful or trusting.
Roy turns the tables on Stan's hitters and kills them all. Roy rescues a very young and very frightened escort named Rocky (Elle Fanning) who was evidently in the wrong place at the wrong time. Roy and Rocky flee New Orleans for Roy's hometown of Galveston. Along the way they pick up Rocky's three year old sister.
As mentioned this isn't your typical Hollywood film. Many of the people who have watched it told me that it was a downer. I thought if nothing else it was realistic about life and the choices people make. Laurent is not afraid to let things play out naturally on screen. There are many long silences, some of them awkward. Most of the people don't have any big dreams.
This 2018 neo-noir movie was the English language directorial debut of Melanie Laurent. You may remember her from her role in Inglorious Basterds as Shoshanna, the Jewish cinema owner, who is seeking revenge on the Nazis for murdering her family. Apparently Laurent is something of a Renaissance woman, being a director, actress and singer among other things. On the surface this movie may seem familiar to you.
After a chance encounter a bad man feels obligated to defend a broken angel of a woman from even worse people. In so doing he may rediscover his own humanity, find redemption and/or even find the love that he has convinced himself he doesn't need, previously lost, or will never have. And as in many films of this type a road trip is included. So yes, we've all likely seen that story before.
Galveston follows that basic outline before deviating. This film was an emotional gut-punch because it defied typical Hollywood conventions even as it teased the viewer into thinking that they would be upheld. The best way I can describe this film visually is that it hearkens back to some late sixties early seventies films. Things are literally very dark on screen at times, which reflects some of the characters and the decisions that they make.
This is not a Hollywood action film. No one gets shot in the shoulder and declares in a deadpan manner "It went straight through. I'll be fine." When people get hurt, physically or emotionally, they stay hurt for a while.
Roy (Ben Foster) is an enforcer and occasional hit man for the New Orleans mobster Stan Pitko (Beau Bridges). Roy's vaguely aware that he's not Stan's most favorite person in the world. Apparently a woman is involved. But Roy has more serious problems. An alcoholic and prodigious cigarette smoker, Roy's been having breathing problems and coughing fits. A doctor confirms that there's a mass on Roy's lung. Roy leaves before the doctor can tell him how much longer he has to live with the Big C. Stan informs Roy and another goon that he has a job for them.
They must scare someone who owes Stan money. But because Roy and the other fellow can sometimes be too intense, Stan orders them not to take any guns with them. Just a shakedown, maybe a few slaps and threats is all that Stan wants. Well that's odd.
When Roy and his co-worker show up at the house to play Big Bad Wolf they are ambushed. But you don't become a middle aged hit man by being unresourceful or trusting.
Roy turns the tables on Stan's hitters and kills them all. Roy rescues a very young and very frightened escort named Rocky (Elle Fanning) who was evidently in the wrong place at the wrong time. Roy and Rocky flee New Orleans for Roy's hometown of Galveston. Along the way they pick up Rocky's three year old sister.
As mentioned this isn't your typical Hollywood film. Many of the people who have watched it told me that it was a downer. I thought if nothing else it was realistic about life and the choices people make. Laurent is not afraid to let things play out naturally on screen. There are many long silences, some of them awkward. Most of the people don't have any big dreams.
Posted By: Lilo
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/21 01:16 PM
The Last Shift
This indie film is worthwhile watching despite some occasionally muddled themes. I appreciated that this movie didn't neatly resolve everything like an old episode of Scooby Doo or one of those ABC Afternoon Specials. Life is not like that.
This film is set in Albion, Michigan. Stanley (Richard Jenkins) is the night manager of an Albion location of a regional fast food franchise. In what could be a nod to co-actor Ed O'Neill's role of Al Bundy, Stanley took this job more or less right out of high school and has remained there for the next forty years or so, give or take. Starting at just over $3/hr back in the day, Stanley has managed to grow his salary to the princely rate of just over $13/hr. Real ambitious hard charging dude, Stanley is. Not. Stanley is ready to retire and move to Florida to take care of his sickly mother. But in order to get his last check and possible retirement bonus Stanley must train his replacement, Jevon (Shane Paul McGhie). Jevon must succeed at this job or else.
Over the next three days the two men may learn something from and about each other. Or they may not. These are not larger than life characters. Their differences in age, race, and politics are never far from the surface. They both sneer at and sympathize with each other. This movie finds some humor in fast food situations and for that matter aging, but it's not a comedy. Don't expect consistent laughs. This film could have said more about race, class, capitalism, and opportunity but at crucial points much like Stanley it throws up its hands and grimaces.
This indie film is worthwhile watching despite some occasionally muddled themes. I appreciated that this movie didn't neatly resolve everything like an old episode of Scooby Doo or one of those ABC Afternoon Specials. Life is not like that.
This film is set in Albion, Michigan. Stanley (Richard Jenkins) is the night manager of an Albion location of a regional fast food franchise. In what could be a nod to co-actor Ed O'Neill's role of Al Bundy, Stanley took this job more or less right out of high school and has remained there for the next forty years or so, give or take. Starting at just over $3/hr back in the day, Stanley has managed to grow his salary to the princely rate of just over $13/hr. Real ambitious hard charging dude, Stanley is. Not. Stanley is ready to retire and move to Florida to take care of his sickly mother. But in order to get his last check and possible retirement bonus Stanley must train his replacement, Jevon (Shane Paul McGhie). Jevon must succeed at this job or else.
Over the next three days the two men may learn something from and about each other. Or they may not. These are not larger than life characters. Their differences in age, race, and politics are never far from the surface. They both sneer at and sympathize with each other. This movie finds some humor in fast food situations and for that matter aging, but it's not a comedy. Don't expect consistent laughs. This film could have said more about race, class, capitalism, and opportunity but at crucial points much like Stanley it throws up its hands and grimaces.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/21 03:00 AM
DANTON (1083)
In this French/Polish production, Georges Danton (Gerard Depardieu), a hero of the French Revolution, returns to Paris in 1793 to confront Maxim Robespierre (Wojciech Psoniak), who has imposed a Reign of Terror on France, with heads rolling every day. Danton--bumptious, charismatic, undisciplined--thinks he has "the people" with him. Robespierre--steely, focused, but physically ill for all the blood he's causing to flow--is determined to hold onto power. Both cite "revolutionary principles," both violate them "in the name of the people." In the end, "the people," thoroughly sick of the revolution's excesses, fail to keep Danton from the guillotine. Robespierre cowers under his bedsheet (he lost his head only a few months later). Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. Depardieu and Psoniak are brilliant in their roles. The filming is a triumph, evoking the squalor, the luxury and the anarchy of revolutionary France. Many unforgettable scenes. The costumes are stunning, bizarre and (according to scholars) totally authentic. No doubt about it: this is a great movie.
In this French/Polish production, Georges Danton (Gerard Depardieu), a hero of the French Revolution, returns to Paris in 1793 to confront Maxim Robespierre (Wojciech Psoniak), who has imposed a Reign of Terror on France, with heads rolling every day. Danton--bumptious, charismatic, undisciplined--thinks he has "the people" with him. Robespierre--steely, focused, but physically ill for all the blood he's causing to flow--is determined to hold onto power. Both cite "revolutionary principles," both violate them "in the name of the people." In the end, "the people," thoroughly sick of the revolution's excesses, fail to keep Danton from the guillotine. Robespierre cowers under his bedsheet (he lost his head only a few months later). Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. Depardieu and Psoniak are brilliant in their roles. The filming is a triumph, evoking the squalor, the luxury and the anarchy of revolutionary France. Many unforgettable scenes. The costumes are stunning, bizarre and (according to scholars) totally authentic. No doubt about it: this is a great movie.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/21 06:48 AM
I watched Gene Hackman and William Dafoe in Mississippi Burning, a biographical crime thriller film directed by Alan Parker that is loosely based on the 1964 Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner murder investigation in Mississippi. FBI agents are assigned to investigate the disappearance of three civil rights workers in fictional Jessup County, Mississippi. The investigation is met with hostility by the town's residents, local police, and the Ku Klux Klan.
![[Linked Image]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/513OCIFSe8L._SY445_.jpg)
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/21 02:31 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE MARKSMAN
Liam Neeson stars as Jim, a former marine, who's Arizona home is on the US-Mexico border. One day while out, Jim comes up two illegal immigrants (a mother and son) running across the border from the cartel. A shootout ensues when Jim refuses to hand over the duo to the cartel and in the process the mother is killed. Before succumbing to her wounds, the mother entrusts Jim to drive her son to family in Chicago. Jim agrees and the rest of the film is a cat-and-mouse game between Jim & the boy, and the cartel. The film deals with themes of family, the loss of a loved one, and strong character. Neeson gives a little more passion in his performance from his previous HONEST THIEF, which he mailed in. And even though his rugged, Irish accent sticks out like a sore thumb as a rancher living along the border, he always commands every scene that he's in with power. 5/10
Liam Neeson stars as Jim, a former marine, who's Arizona home is on the US-Mexico border. One day while out, Jim comes up two illegal immigrants (a mother and son) running across the border from the cartel. A shootout ensues when Jim refuses to hand over the duo to the cartel and in the process the mother is killed. Before succumbing to her wounds, the mother entrusts Jim to drive her son to family in Chicago. Jim agrees and the rest of the film is a cat-and-mouse game between Jim & the boy, and the cartel. The film deals with themes of family, the loss of a loved one, and strong character. Neeson gives a little more passion in his performance from his previous HONEST THIEF, which he mailed in. And even though his rugged, Irish accent sticks out like a sore thumb as a rancher living along the border, he always commands every scene that he's in with power. 5/10
Thanks i12... I was looking forward to this. Im gunna give this a shot.
As for the Irish guy being a rancher.... I can think it possible. Quick story........
My Da came over from Ireland and ended up being one of the best Diamond appraiser and dealers in NY, not the biggest or the wealthiest but highly respected and trusted among those who were.
Knowing what a tight nit group of people those men are it says a lot when they let someone who is not one of their own in. He made a good living.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/21 11:31 PM
Very nice story DP. Did you follow in his footsteps?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/21 12:30 AM
You'd think they'd just let Liam Neeson play an Irish character. Surely it's not that much of a stretch considering how many Irish people emigrate to America. Less of a stretch than passing off that accent as American.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/21 01:40 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Very nice story DP. Did you follow in his footsteps?
No bud... im a printer. Ran a press for a few years and then went into sales after cementing solid contacts.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/21 01:40 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
You'd think they'd just let Liam Neeson play an Irish character. Surely it's not that much of a stretch considering how many Irish people emigrate to America. Less of a stretch than passing off that accent as American.
Agree
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/21 06:55 PM
WITNESS TO MURDER (1954)
Cheryl Draper (Barbara Stanwyck), artist and designer for a high end home furnishing chain, sees a murder being committed in the building across from hers. She reports it to the police, and Det. Larry Matthews (Gary Merrill) questions the occupant, Albert Richter (George Sanders, Champion of the Cultured Cads), who denies it and accuses Cheryl of being crazy. Matthews falls in with that, trying to get her to agree that she had "a bad dream." She persists, and Richter proceeds to get her committed to a psychiatric ward, then tries to kill her. Thanks to many gaping holes in the plot, Det. Matthews starts to believe her and rescues her in the nick of time.
This movie is a tour de force of all the sexist cliches that were typical of that era. But, Stanwyck's Cheryl does her best to realistically, and without heroics, fight them. Stanwyck, as usual, is a marvel. She was 46 when she made the movie, and does an excellent transition from femme fatale (as in "Double Indemnity") to career woman. She made 85 movies in 38 years before turning to TV. "Witness to Murder" isn't a great film noir, but Stanwyck makes it worth watching.
Cheryl Draper (Barbara Stanwyck), artist and designer for a high end home furnishing chain, sees a murder being committed in the building across from hers. She reports it to the police, and Det. Larry Matthews (Gary Merrill) questions the occupant, Albert Richter (George Sanders, Champion of the Cultured Cads), who denies it and accuses Cheryl of being crazy. Matthews falls in with that, trying to get her to agree that she had "a bad dream." She persists, and Richter proceeds to get her committed to a psychiatric ward, then tries to kill her. Thanks to many gaping holes in the plot, Det. Matthews starts to believe her and rescues her in the nick of time.
This movie is a tour de force of all the sexist cliches that were typical of that era. But, Stanwyck's Cheryl does her best to realistically, and without heroics, fight them. Stanwyck, as usual, is a marvel. She was 46 when she made the movie, and does an excellent transition from femme fatale (as in "Double Indemnity") to career woman. She made 85 movies in 38 years before turning to TV. "Witness to Murder" isn't a great film noir, but Stanwyck makes it worth watching.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/21 06:02 AM
Camorra movie Piranhas (2019). An adaptation of Saviano's third book La paranza dei bambini. I liked it a lot.
The story revolves around 15-year-old Nicola (Francesco Di Napoli) and his friends, who spend most of their days wandering the streets of the Neapolitan neighborhood of Rione Sanità . The underworld is here the upper world, and it controls the entire social life of the city. No wonder these big boys are attracted to the fast money of the crime world. Nicola has just a little more to offer than his friends in terms of intelligence and swagger, and quickly manages to climb up the ranks.
In interviews, director Giovannesi spoke broadly about the underprivileged boys who start working for the mafia at an increasingly younger age, and the social circumstances that lead them to crime. But too little of those backgrounds has ended up in the film. Nicole and his friends are already incorrigible mourners when the movie starts, and the biggest problem in his single mother's life is the extortion of her dry cleaners by the mafia.
It's an effective crime film, Piranhas narratively relies heavily on the blueprints set by previous films in the genre - from Gomorrah itself to Martin Scorsese's classic Goodfellas (1990).
The story revolves around 15-year-old Nicola (Francesco Di Napoli) and his friends, who spend most of their days wandering the streets of the Neapolitan neighborhood of Rione Sanità . The underworld is here the upper world, and it controls the entire social life of the city. No wonder these big boys are attracted to the fast money of the crime world. Nicola has just a little more to offer than his friends in terms of intelligence and swagger, and quickly manages to climb up the ranks.
In interviews, director Giovannesi spoke broadly about the underprivileged boys who start working for the mafia at an increasingly younger age, and the social circumstances that lead them to crime. But too little of those backgrounds has ended up in the film. Nicole and his friends are already incorrigible mourners when the movie starts, and the biggest problem in his single mother's life is the extortion of her dry cleaners by the mafia.
It's an effective crime film, Piranhas narratively relies heavily on the blueprints set by previous films in the genre - from Gomorrah itself to Martin Scorsese's classic Goodfellas (1990).
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/21 06:48 PM
Loading Marksman now.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/21 12:42 AM
Let me know what you think DP.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/26/21 03:10 AM
ACTION IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC (1943)
I'm a sucker for WWII movies made during WWII--all guts and glory, good vs. bad with no ambiguities. This one celebrates brave Merchant Marine sailors, delivering essential war materials on dangerous Atlantic passages:
First Mate Joe Rossi (Humphrey Bogart) and his boss, Capt. Steve Jarvis (Raymond Massey) are torpedoed by a Nazu U-Boat commanded by a sadistic captain, who surfaces and rams the lifeboat holding the survivors. They somehow manage to survive 11 days in freezing Atlantic waters (only in Hollywood, only in WWII) and sail again on a Liberty Ship delivering tanks and guns to Russia. They get separated from their convoy and are stalked by (you guessed it) the same Nazi sub. This time they outwit the Nazis and ram the sub. The cast includes the All-American Ethnics, who always populate WWII movies. This time out they include Alan Hale, Sam Levene and Dane Clark (Eternal Hothead), plus the obligatory idealistic kid who you know is going to die heroically. The action sequences are gripping and first-rate, and the stalking scenes are tense and gripping. Rousing movie!
I'm a sucker for WWII movies made during WWII--all guts and glory, good vs. bad with no ambiguities. This one celebrates brave Merchant Marine sailors, delivering essential war materials on dangerous Atlantic passages:
First Mate Joe Rossi (Humphrey Bogart) and his boss, Capt. Steve Jarvis (Raymond Massey) are torpedoed by a Nazu U-Boat commanded by a sadistic captain, who surfaces and rams the lifeboat holding the survivors. They somehow manage to survive 11 days in freezing Atlantic waters (only in Hollywood, only in WWII) and sail again on a Liberty Ship delivering tanks and guns to Russia. They get separated from their convoy and are stalked by (you guessed it) the same Nazi sub. This time they outwit the Nazis and ram the sub. The cast includes the All-American Ethnics, who always populate WWII movies. This time out they include Alan Hale, Sam Levene and Dane Clark (Eternal Hothead), plus the obligatory idealistic kid who you know is going to die heroically. The action sequences are gripping and first-rate, and the stalking scenes are tense and gripping. Rousing movie!
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/26/21 08:10 AM
Originally Posted by U talkin' da me ??
I watched Gene Hackman and William Dafoe in Mississippi Burning, a biographical crime thriller film directed by Alan Parker that is loosely based on the 1964 Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner murder investigation in Mississippi. FBI agents are assigned to investigate the disappearance of three civil rights workers in fictional Jessup County, Mississippi. The investigation is met with hostility by the town's residents, local police, and the Ku Klux Klan.
Good movie. I had to do three Supreme court cases reports in high school and United States verses Cecil Price was one of them. The movie is not accurate and takes many liberties. Gene Hackman does a great performance.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/21 12:45 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Let me know what you think DP.
Streamer is unpredictable....did not load but it will when its up and I will write back on it.
We are enjoying another upload from streamer, will write up shortly.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/21 03:12 AM
Enjoyed watching 3 Days of the Condor. I admit, when the scenes with Faye Dunaway came on, I was expecting Redford to slap her around, until she confessed... "She's my sister... She's my daughter..."
"She's my sister AND my daughter!!!"
![[Linked Image]](https://posterspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/condor-genzo-1280.jpg)
"She's my sister AND my daughter!!!"
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/21 11:27 PM
THE LITTLE THINGS
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/30/21 07:30 AM
This thread is called Movies u just watched..no??....I am no synopsis dude in the least.. but..I can ask the question..has anyone seen a movie called "This Thing of Ours"...???..starring Vincent Pastore...Frank Vincent..James Cann..(in a small role)..........saw it on youtube..f--cking great movie (I at least thought)....the unintentuial comedy from Pastore &Vincent is worth the price of admission...it's basically about how the mob would or could do spoils in this tech day & age...w/ alot of comic moments from familiar mob faces...,,Now,, my wife is buggin' me...but check it out on youtube..."This thing of Ours"...later..!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/21 12:06 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE LITTLE THINGS
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
https://youtu.be/U3ZcYpZoOUM
We are watching it right now on our streaming device.
Its good, a bit slow at times but like you said luv the villain guy and the others really good.
6 / 10 is a agreeable score.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/21 12:06 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
This thread is called Movies u just watched..no??....I am no synopsis dude in the least.. but..I can ask the question..has anyone seen a movie called "This Thing of Ours"...???..starring Vincent Pastore...Frank Vincent..James Cann..(in a small role)..........saw it on youtube..f--cking great movie (I at least thought)....the unintentuial comedy from Pastore &Vincent is worth the price of admission...it's basically about how the mob would or could do spoils in this tech day & age...w/ alot of comic moments from familiar mob faces...,,Now,, my wife is buggin' me...but check it out on youtube..."This thing of Ours"...later..!
I will check it out again.... I think I started watching this once and could not get through it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/21 12:37 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE LITTLE THINGS
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
With 3 Academy Award Winning actors, THE LITTLE THINGS follows former Los Angeles detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) and new department hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) on the trail of accused serial killer Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Obviously the cast and trailer hook you into this film and it's Leto who shines the brightest. The villains always has the most fun and here Leto enjoys playing in that sandbox. Teasing the police, attempting to outsmart them, all the while not being completely stable and the audience is left wondering if this man is a mad genius or just a few cards short of a full deck? Denzel is smooth as ever as a tired, rugged, now county sheriff, after being run off his LA detective job 5 years prior. Malek is the only one who seems hollow and robotic, not displaying a lot of emotion except for a few outbursts here and there. There is not a lot of violence in the film as the victims are all shown after their murder, which was an interesting choice. They dumb it down for the audience, but at the same time, you're left wondering as much as Deacon and Baxter if Sparma is really their man (even up until the final credits). A decent film that wasn't as great as I was hoping for but worth the watch (especially if you have HBO Max). 6/10
I12, can you help with this?
What was the significance of the hair clip?
Was it a threat to rami;s daughter?
Was Deacon the killer, we think so.
Or was Rami the Killer?
We became a bit confused at the end.
When they focused in on the boots deacon was wearing....twice at the end......Leto adds up but deacon did it all.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/21 10:02 PM
CRISS CROSS (1947)
Steve Thompson (Burt Lancaster), carrying a torch for his ex-wife Anna (Yvonne DeCarlo), returns to LA and finds her in the clutches of small-time gangster Slim Dundee (Dan Duryea, Eternal Cut-Rate Richard Widmark). Thompson concocts a scheme to get a job on his father's armored car and have it robbed by Dundee and his gang so that he and Anna can abscond with the money. Nothing goes as planned, Anna double crosses him and they meet a bad end. This isn't a great movie, and I'd have liked to see more of Duryea, a particularly effective and nasty bad guy (the Warren Oates/Bruce Dern of the Forties). But, it's worth watching for Lancaster and DeCarlo, plus Duryea's irresistable gang of miscreants--how can you miss with a cast that includes Tom Pedi, Alan Napier, Richard Long, Percy Helton and Marc Krah?
Steve Thompson (Burt Lancaster), carrying a torch for his ex-wife Anna (Yvonne DeCarlo), returns to LA and finds her in the clutches of small-time gangster Slim Dundee (Dan Duryea, Eternal Cut-Rate Richard Widmark). Thompson concocts a scheme to get a job on his father's armored car and have it robbed by Dundee and his gang so that he and Anna can abscond with the money. Nothing goes as planned, Anna double crosses him and they meet a bad end. This isn't a great movie, and I'd have liked to see more of Duryea, a particularly effective and nasty bad guy (the Warren Oates/Bruce Dern of the Forties). But, it's worth watching for Lancaster and DeCarlo, plus Duryea's irresistable gang of miscreants--how can you miss with a cast that includes Tom Pedi, Alan Napier, Richard Long, Percy Helton and Marc Krah?
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/21 04:07 PM
No Way Out (1987)
Kevin Costner, Gene Hackman and Sean Young star in a neo-noir suspense thriller with espionage elements. Costner's navy commander hero and Hackman's secretary of defense are caught up in a sordid love triangle with Hackman's mistress, played by Sean Young. Hackman finds out about Young's duplicity and murders her in a blind rage, having been witnessed earlier at the scene by the third man who the audience can see is Costner. Hackman enlists Costner to help cover it up and find the "real killer", a suspected KGB sleeper agent. However, Hackman doesn't know that Costner was the man sleeping with Young. Meanwhile, Hackman's second-in-command, a fixer played by Will Patton, discovers a negative of a photograph Young took of Costner linking him to the scene of the murder. Therefore, a race against time ensues for Costner to find evidence linking Hackman to Young while they wait for the photo to develop so as to ensure he can defend himself against being charged with both murder and espionage.
Took a while to get going but the payoff is worth it. Incredibly suspenseful stuff with plenty of twists and turns as it builds to a crescendo. Costner is serviceable, and Hackman is brilliant as always, but the star of the show is Will Patton as Hackman's devoted and enigmatic fixer. Pay attention in the first half as there is some very clever foreshadowing at play.
Kevin Costner, Gene Hackman and Sean Young star in a neo-noir suspense thriller with espionage elements. Costner's navy commander hero and Hackman's secretary of defense are caught up in a sordid love triangle with Hackman's mistress, played by Sean Young. Hackman finds out about Young's duplicity and murders her in a blind rage, having been witnessed earlier at the scene by the third man who the audience can see is Costner. Hackman enlists Costner to help cover it up and find the "real killer", a suspected KGB sleeper agent. However, Hackman doesn't know that Costner was the man sleeping with Young. Meanwhile, Hackman's second-in-command, a fixer played by Will Patton, discovers a negative of a photograph Young took of Costner linking him to the scene of the murder. Therefore, a race against time ensues for Costner to find evidence linking Hackman to Young while they wait for the photo to develop so as to ensure he can defend himself against being charged with both murder and espionage.
Took a while to get going but the payoff is worth it. Incredibly suspenseful stuff with plenty of twists and turns as it builds to a crescendo. Costner is serviceable, and Hackman is brilliant as always, but the star of the show is Will Patton as Hackman's devoted and enigmatic fixer. Pay attention in the first half as there is some very clever foreshadowing at play.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/21 11:57 PM
SAINT MAUD
Morfydd Clark plays Maud, a recently converted Christian, who serves as a hospice nurse to Amanda, played by Jennifer Ehle. During their brief time together, Maud exceedingly cares for and even tries to save Amanda's soul with her new found Christianity. However, when she is removed as Amanda's caretaker, she believes she is called by God to save Amanda's soul before she passes. Based on the trailer, this seemed to be a sleepy horror film that I was willing to take a flyer on, but the film is so much more. It's rather short by today's standards (84 minutes long) so it gets right to the point but the final act really pays off for the viewer. An outstanding performance by Clark and I look very forward to seeing this again. This has cult status written all over it. Do not sleep on this film! 7/10
Morfydd Clark plays Maud, a recently converted Christian, who serves as a hospice nurse to Amanda, played by Jennifer Ehle. During their brief time together, Maud exceedingly cares for and even tries to save Amanda's soul with her new found Christianity. However, when she is removed as Amanda's caretaker, she believes she is called by God to save Amanda's soul before she passes. Based on the trailer, this seemed to be a sleepy horror film that I was willing to take a flyer on, but the film is so much more. It's rather short by today's standards (84 minutes long) so it gets right to the point but the final act really pays off for the viewer. An outstanding performance by Clark and I look very forward to seeing this again. This has cult status written all over it. Do not sleep on this film! 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/21 12:02 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
No Way Out (1987)
Kevin Costner, Gene Hackman and Sean Young star in a neo-noir suspense thriller with espionage elements. Costner's navy commander hero and Hackman's secretary of defense are caught up in a sordid love triangle with Hackman's mistress, played by Sean Young. Hackman finds out about Young's duplicity and murders her in a blind rage, having been witnessed earlier at the scene by the third man who the audience can see is Costner. Hackman enlists Costner to help cover it up and find the "real killer", a suspected KGB sleeper agent. However, Hackman doesn't know that Costner was the man sleeping with Young. Meanwhile, Hackman's second-in-command, a fixer played by Will Patton, discovers a negative of a photograph Young took of Costner linking him to the scene of the murder. Therefore, a race against time ensues for Costner to find evidence linking Hackman to Young while they wait for the photo to develop so as to ensure he can defend himself against being charged with both murder and espionage.
Took a while to get going but the payoff is worth it. Incredibly suspenseful stuff with plenty of twists and turns as it builds to a crescendo. Costner is serviceable, and Hackman is brilliant as always, but the star of the show is Will Patton as Hackman's devoted and enigmatic fixer. Pay attention in the first half as there is some very clever foreshadowing at play.
Kevin Costner, Gene Hackman and Sean Young star in a neo-noir suspense thriller with espionage elements. Costner's navy commander hero and Hackman's secretary of defense are caught up in a sordid love triangle with Hackman's mistress, played by Sean Young. Hackman finds out about Young's duplicity and murders her in a blind rage, having been witnessed earlier at the scene by the third man who the audience can see is Costner. Hackman enlists Costner to help cover it up and find the "real killer", a suspected KGB sleeper agent. However, Hackman doesn't know that Costner was the man sleeping with Young. Meanwhile, Hackman's second-in-command, a fixer played by Will Patton, discovers a negative of a photograph Young took of Costner linking him to the scene of the murder. Therefore, a race against time ensues for Costner to find evidence linking Hackman to Young while they wait for the photo to develop so as to ensure he can defend himself against being charged with both murder and espionage.
Took a while to get going but the payoff is worth it. Incredibly suspenseful stuff with plenty of twists and turns as it builds to a crescendo. Costner is serviceable, and Hackman is brilliant as always, but the star of the show is Will Patton as Hackman's devoted and enigmatic fixer. Pay attention in the first half as there is some very clever foreshadowing at play.
NO WAY OUT is a very underrated film. Solid all around. Great pick!
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/07/21 01:11 AM
Denzel Washington ~ Equalizer
No power tools were harmed during the making of this film.
No power tools were harmed during the making of this film.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/08/21 07:06 PM
FORCE OF EVIL (1948)
Joe Morse (John Garfield), cocky young lawyer, is providing a "legal" front for "The Syndicate" to monopolize the numbers racket by squeezing out small bankers. One of them is Leo Morse (Thomas Gomez), Joe's brother. But, Leo rejects Joe's help because he sees himself as a pillar of virtue in the racket(!), while his brother is just-plain corrupt. This is one of several absurdities in this rather feeble film noir. Another is Joe wooing and winning Doris Lowry (Beatrice Pearson), a comely protege of Leo's who starts out detesting him. I tuned into this movie because I spotted Marie Windsor, my favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Forties and Fifties, who plays the wife of the Syndicate boss and tries to seduce Joe. Alas, she has only two small scenes. She's up to her usual par in the second one, but it's not worth the price of admission. Garfield is energetic as usual, but he's strictly a one-and-a-half-note actor. Gomez is pretty good. Skip it.
Joe Morse (John Garfield), cocky young lawyer, is providing a "legal" front for "The Syndicate" to monopolize the numbers racket by squeezing out small bankers. One of them is Leo Morse (Thomas Gomez), Joe's brother. But, Leo rejects Joe's help because he sees himself as a pillar of virtue in the racket(!), while his brother is just-plain corrupt. This is one of several absurdities in this rather feeble film noir. Another is Joe wooing and winning Doris Lowry (Beatrice Pearson), a comely protege of Leo's who starts out detesting him. I tuned into this movie because I spotted Marie Windsor, my favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Forties and Fifties, who plays the wife of the Syndicate boss and tries to seduce Joe. Alas, she has only two small scenes. She's up to her usual par in the second one, but it's not worth the price of admission. Garfield is energetic as usual, but he's strictly a one-and-a-half-note actor. Gomez is pretty good. Skip it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/09/21 12:06 AM
Originally Posted by U talkin' da me ??
Denzel Washington ~ Equalizer
No power tools were harmed during the making of this film.
No power tools were harmed during the making of this film.
One of Denzel's best roles but I still like MAN ON FIRE better and felt the sequel to EQUALIZER was unnecessary.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/21 12:39 AM
LAND
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/21 02:36 AM
JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH
Daniel Kaluuya & LaKeith Stanfield are 2 of the finest actors working in Hollywood today and they continue to pad their already impressive resumes. JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH tells the story of Fred Hampton (Kaluuya), the chairman of the Chicago chapter of the Black Panther Party. Stanfield plays Bill O'Neal, a petty car thief who gets busted by the police and for the promise of his freedom, infiltrates the Black Panther's and becomes an informant for the FBI. I hate the term "this film is timely" but in this situation it's actually true. The events depicted during the 1960's practically mirror the events of today. Kaluuya is fiery as the activist Hampton, who wants to bring war against the police, the US government, and fight inequality with every ounce of his being. Stanfield plays the role of the swindler, who goes along enough just to save his tail and satisfy his keepers. Wonderful performances by both but I must also note that Martin Sheen's makeup for the role of J. Edgar Hoover, was unnecessarily over-the-top. 6.5/10
Daniel Kaluuya & LaKeith Stanfield are 2 of the finest actors working in Hollywood today and they continue to pad their already impressive resumes. JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH tells the story of Fred Hampton (Kaluuya), the chairman of the Chicago chapter of the Black Panther Party. Stanfield plays Bill O'Neal, a petty car thief who gets busted by the police and for the promise of his freedom, infiltrates the Black Panther's and becomes an informant for the FBI. I hate the term "this film is timely" but in this situation it's actually true. The events depicted during the 1960's practically mirror the events of today. Kaluuya is fiery as the activist Hampton, who wants to bring war against the police, the US government, and fight inequality with every ounce of his being. Stanfield plays the role of the swindler, who goes along enough just to save his tail and satisfy his keepers. Wonderful performances by both but I must also note that Martin Sheen's makeup for the role of J. Edgar Hoover, was unnecessarily over-the-top. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/21 06:11 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAND
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
I will check it out..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/21 02:31 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAND
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
I will check it out..
👌 Let me know what you think after you've watched it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/21 07:08 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAND
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
I will check it out..
👌 Let me know what you think after you've watched it.
Yes, will do...... did not get to see it yet.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/19/21 12:32 AM
No worries and no rush. I rewatched SAINT MAUD a second time yesterday because of how blown away I was after the first viewing and it still holds up. Gonna revisit THE LITTLE THINGS as well as JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH hopefully here in the next few weeks. All very good movies and might as well see them again since I can get them on HBO Max.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/21 11:56 PM
NOMADLAND
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/21 05:31 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NOMADLAND
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
Great review i12, my wife did not like this movie much but I loved it.
I thought it was a great view into the lives of these people.
I gave this a high score of 7.5
I keep teasing my wife that I cannot wait for Nomad Land 2....she just says, "oh dear God"
LoL
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/21 05:38 PM
We found a really good flick we both loved yesterday, try to catch it if you can...its on Netflix 2020
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/Ty0yWzQb/t-500x300.jpg)
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/21 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NOMADLAND
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
NOMADLAND stars Frances McDormand as Fern, a widower nearing retirement who can't make ends meet by taking early social security. She lived in Empire, Nevada with her husband until 2011, where the film begins, until his death and the closing of the plant. Fern works odd end and seasonal jobs while traveling to support herself. She lives in her van and travels around the country from Nevada, to Arizona, to South Dakota, and California. At first, with this being so close to the market collapse of 2008, the viewer may believe this is a film dealing with classism in America and the capitalistic exploitation of its workers; however, that notion is quickly dispelled as we follow Fern and her friends from community to community. It's actually a very touching tale about these communities that society has forgotten about. It's very much a commune where individuals band together like family members, are welcomed and invited, and help each other survive. It also explores the hurdles some of these individuals must overcome in order to do the most mundane of tasks, like getting a flat tire fixed and other inconveniences that we take for granted but is a real struggle for them. McDormand brings a lot of life to Fern and while her performance does stand out, it isn't her best work and even if she's nominated for an Oscar, I'd be surprised if she won for this performance. Other than that, there's nothing much else here. 5/10
Great review i12, my wife did not like this movie much but I loved it.
I thought it was a great view into the lives of these people.
I gave this a high score of 7.5
I keep teasing my wife that I cannot wait for Nomad Land 2....she just says, "oh dear God"
LoL
To each their own. I'm glad you liked it. Were you ever able to track down SAINT MAUD yet?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/22/21 11:39 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
We found a really good flick we both loved yesterday, try to catch it if you can...its on Netflix 2020
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
Not sure I've heard of this. What's it about? I do love Naomi Watts!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/21 02:36 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
We found a really good flick we both loved yesterday, try to catch it if you can...its on Netflix 2020
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
PENGUIN BLOOM
I gave this a 7/10
Not sure I've heard of this. What's it about? I do love Naomi Watts!
I gotta tell ya i12....this movie was awesome..
Very nice family in Australia get a horrible turn of events after the Mother has a freak accident while on vacation.
One of the kids blames himself.
This bird enters into the family and turns things around.
Its a true story and was a well received book brought to the screen.
Try it out.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/21 12:06 AM
Thanks for the recommendation DP. Got a lot of things at the moment on the watch list but I'll have to add it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/21 04:10 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
[quote=Irishman12]NOMADLAND
To each their own. I'm glad you liked it. Were you ever able to track down SAINT MAUD yet?
No, did not find St. Maud yet.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/28/21 07:59 PM
THE SILENT PARTNER (1978)
Miles Cullen (Elliott Gould), a seemingly nerdy clerk in a Toronto bank, has his Inner Crook awakened when he spots Reikle (Christopher Plummer), a department store Santa, casing the bank when big depositors come in. Cullen stashes $50k in his lunchbox and, when Reikle pulls off the heist, he turns over a few hundred bucks from the drawer, and tells the cops that the "Santa" made off with the $50k. Reikle knows Cullen tricked him, and comes after him, but soon discovers that Cullen is a lot more clever than he seems.
This is not a great heist movie, but the cat-and-mouse machinations are entertaining. Plummer, a talented and versatile actor, is good as the sadistic Reikle. Gould, who is neither, is adequate as Cullen. The best performance is by Susannah York as Cullen's sometimes romantic interest.
Miles Cullen (Elliott Gould), a seemingly nerdy clerk in a Toronto bank, has his Inner Crook awakened when he spots Reikle (Christopher Plummer), a department store Santa, casing the bank when big depositors come in. Cullen stashes $50k in his lunchbox and, when Reikle pulls off the heist, he turns over a few hundred bucks from the drawer, and tells the cops that the "Santa" made off with the $50k. Reikle knows Cullen tricked him, and comes after him, but soon discovers that Cullen is a lot more clever than he seems.
This is not a great heist movie, but the cat-and-mouse machinations are entertaining. Plummer, a talented and versatile actor, is good as the sadistic Reikle. Gould, who is neither, is adequate as Cullen. The best performance is by Susannah York as Cullen's sometimes romantic interest.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/21 12:22 AM
TOM & JERRY
The live action debut for the duo who have been around for decades. The film follows Tom & Jerry who are up to their old antics in one of New York's oldest and most prestigious hotels, the Royal Gate. The film is supposed to be an origin story, but doesn't really seem like one as the back-and-forth between the characters picks up right from the start, leading the audience to believe these two are already familiar with each other. Chloë Grace Moretz stars as Kayla, a part-time worker at the hotel, who's made it her mission to rid the hotel of Jerry by employing Tom. I like Moretz as an actress, and while this is a safe film for her, she's so much better than this. She's better as the bad ass, with a chip on her shoulder kinda girl. I appreciate her attempt to expand her range, but not in a PG Tom & Jerry movie. Most of the film she tugs at her uniform that becomes quite distracting as the film progresses. Michael Pena also co-stars as Terence, her immediate supervisor at the hotel who's against her hiring from the beginning. Again, Pena's better than this too and as the runtime continues, it's almost painful at times seeing both actors subjected to this type of film. If you have young ones, this is a film for them. Anyone who enjoyed the characters from their youth and are over the age of 10, this is a hard pass. 4/10
The live action debut for the duo who have been around for decades. The film follows Tom & Jerry who are up to their old antics in one of New York's oldest and most prestigious hotels, the Royal Gate. The film is supposed to be an origin story, but doesn't really seem like one as the back-and-forth between the characters picks up right from the start, leading the audience to believe these two are already familiar with each other. Chloë Grace Moretz stars as Kayla, a part-time worker at the hotel, who's made it her mission to rid the hotel of Jerry by employing Tom. I like Moretz as an actress, and while this is a safe film for her, she's so much better than this. She's better as the bad ass, with a chip on her shoulder kinda girl. I appreciate her attempt to expand her range, but not in a PG Tom & Jerry movie. Most of the film she tugs at her uniform that becomes quite distracting as the film progresses. Michael Pena also co-stars as Terence, her immediate supervisor at the hotel who's against her hiring from the beginning. Again, Pena's better than this too and as the runtime continues, it's almost painful at times seeing both actors subjected to this type of film. If you have young ones, this is a film for them. Anyone who enjoyed the characters from their youth and are over the age of 10, this is a hard pass. 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/21 12:32 AM
We just saw T & J last night, it was fun background entertainment while I was doing something else.
It was fun and funny.
Good for kids as you mention.
We cannot get LAND to load on streamer but hope to try again later in the week.
It was fun and funny.
Good for kids as you mention.
We cannot get LAND to load on streamer but hope to try again later in the week.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/21 03:28 AM
THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE (1962)
This Johh Frankenheimer film created a sensation when it was released at the height of the Cold War. You know the plot: A platoon of GI's in the Korean War are captured by the Commies and brainwashed to create a legend that their despised sergeant, Raymond Shaw (Laurence Harvey, Eternal Cad) is really a hero who saved their lives. He gets the Medal of Honor, and is returned to the US to his manipulative mother (Angela Lansbury) and his dimwitted, McCarthy-like Senator stepfather (James Gregory). He's a long trigger programmed by the Commies to assassinate a presidential candidate on command from his mom so his stepfather, the VP candidate, can take over and hand the country to the Commies. But, his former commander, Maj. Ben Marko (Frank Sinatra) and other brainwashed GI's, start having bad dreams that reveal what really happened.
This is a nail-biter at times, but it's a bit dated and has several big lapses in logic and sappy moments. Harvey and Sinatra are ok, but the best performances are by Lansbury (really scary) and Gregory (perfect in the dimwit role). Fans of the original TV series "Hawaii Five-O" will recognize repeat bad guys Khigh Dhiegh as the Chinese brain-washer and Albert Poulsen as his Russkie counterpart.
This Johh Frankenheimer film created a sensation when it was released at the height of the Cold War. You know the plot: A platoon of GI's in the Korean War are captured by the Commies and brainwashed to create a legend that their despised sergeant, Raymond Shaw (Laurence Harvey, Eternal Cad) is really a hero who saved their lives. He gets the Medal of Honor, and is returned to the US to his manipulative mother (Angela Lansbury) and his dimwitted, McCarthy-like Senator stepfather (James Gregory). He's a long trigger programmed by the Commies to assassinate a presidential candidate on command from his mom so his stepfather, the VP candidate, can take over and hand the country to the Commies. But, his former commander, Maj. Ben Marko (Frank Sinatra) and other brainwashed GI's, start having bad dreams that reveal what really happened.
This is a nail-biter at times, but it's a bit dated and has several big lapses in logic and sappy moments. Harvey and Sinatra are ok, but the best performances are by Lansbury (really scary) and Gregory (perfect in the dimwit role). Fans of the original TV series "Hawaii Five-O" will recognize repeat bad guys Khigh Dhiegh as the Chinese brain-washer and Albert Poulsen as his Russkie counterpart.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/21 02:38 PM
I watched The Green Mile last night with Tom Hanks. Still a excellent film after all these years and one of the films i can always go back to.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/21 06:35 AM
ODDS AGAINST TOMORROW (1959)
In this "last American film noir," Burke (Ed Begley), a fallen NYC cop, brings together Slater (Robert Ryan), a redneck ex-con, and Ingram (Harry Belafonte), a gambler in debt to the Mob, to rob a bank in upstate New York. Most of the first half is devoted to building up personal story lines, and it's good for a while, pitting Slater's racism against Ingram's defiance of it. The acting is excellent all around, which you'd expect from Begley and Ryan; and Belafonte, in only his fourth movie and his first against type, is very sharp. (He produced it, forming his own production company.) Shelly Winters and Gloria Grahame, in tangential roles, also are very good. But, this movie. which was obviously partly modeled on the all-time-great "Asphalt Jungle," comes nowhere near it because violates several sacred precepts of film noir: it's too long for the story line; is too talky at times; has an intrusive jazz soundtrack, and has too many time-wasting scenes that director Robert Wise threw in just to make the movie look "artistic. Believe it or not, Richard Bright, "Al Neri" in the Godfather Trilogy, has a small part as a gay pretty boy on the Mob's payroll.
In this "last American film noir," Burke (Ed Begley), a fallen NYC cop, brings together Slater (Robert Ryan), a redneck ex-con, and Ingram (Harry Belafonte), a gambler in debt to the Mob, to rob a bank in upstate New York. Most of the first half is devoted to building up personal story lines, and it's good for a while, pitting Slater's racism against Ingram's defiance of it. The acting is excellent all around, which you'd expect from Begley and Ryan; and Belafonte, in only his fourth movie and his first against type, is very sharp. (He produced it, forming his own production company.) Shelly Winters and Gloria Grahame, in tangential roles, also are very good. But, this movie. which was obviously partly modeled on the all-time-great "Asphalt Jungle," comes nowhere near it because violates several sacred precepts of film noir: it's too long for the story line; is too talky at times; has an intrusive jazz soundtrack, and has too many time-wasting scenes that director Robert Wise threw in just to make the movie look "artistic. Believe it or not, Richard Bright, "Al Neri" in the Godfather Trilogy, has a small part as a gay pretty boy on the Mob's payroll.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/21 10:03 PM
CHAOS WALKING
Peter Parker and Rey team up for this sci-fi adventure that takes place 236 years into the future on a planet called New World. This planet is made up entirely of men, who can hear and see each others thoughts called Noise. Tom Holland plays Todd, who one mundane day comes up Viola (Daisy Ridley) after her ship crashes on his planet and she's the lone survivor (lone female member of the team as well). Quickly, Viola's life is endangered on the planet and Todd takes it upon himself to display his "toxic masculinity" by constantly telling himself to "be a man," so he agrees to protect her. The film plays to man's primal nature: hunter, protector, violent. Whereas women are seen are caring, thoughtful, and rational. Unfortunately, Holland's oogling over Viola the entire movie wears then rather quickly (having never seen a woman before). The studio and producers I'm sure are banking on the star power of Holland and Ridley to bring audiences in and sadly, it might just work. However, this film is all sizzle and no steak. 4/10
Peter Parker and Rey team up for this sci-fi adventure that takes place 236 years into the future on a planet called New World. This planet is made up entirely of men, who can hear and see each others thoughts called Noise. Tom Holland plays Todd, who one mundane day comes up Viola (Daisy Ridley) after her ship crashes on his planet and she's the lone survivor (lone female member of the team as well). Quickly, Viola's life is endangered on the planet and Todd takes it upon himself to display his "toxic masculinity" by constantly telling himself to "be a man," so he agrees to protect her. The film plays to man's primal nature: hunter, protector, violent. Whereas women are seen are caring, thoughtful, and rational. Unfortunately, Holland's oogling over Viola the entire movie wears then rather quickly (having never seen a woman before). The studio and producers I'm sure are banking on the star power of Holland and Ridley to bring audiences in and sadly, it might just work. However, this film is all sizzle and no steak. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/06/21 12:10 AM
COMING 2 AMERICA
The 33-year-old sequel to the 1988 hit brings most of the original cast back: Eddie Murphy and Arsenio Hall once again play multiple characters, Shari Headley as Lisa, John Amos as Cleo, and James Earl Jones as King Jaffe Joffer amongst others. However, like most sequels that are made today decades after the original, this one is both unwanted and unneeded. The title is somewhat bizarre as about 90% of the film takes place in Africa as opposed to America. Yes, I'm fully aware it's a sequel but COMING 2 AMERICA was the best they could do? The film follows Akeem, who learns from a local witch doctor that he has an illegitimate son in America and must bring him back to Zamunda to be his heir, since Akeem and Lisa have 3 girls and no male heirs of their own. The first film is a classic and one of my favorite Eddie Murphy movies of all-time. It was original and funny, whereas the sequel attempts to recycle the same jokes and the new ones are far and few in-between that fall flat upon delivery. They also ruined whatever positive image fans had of the character of Lisa as she was a strong and outspoken character in the original. Here, she's wasted and thrown behind the scenes with the exception of one outburst. Finally, there's quite a bit of product placement that is just too cringeworthy during every scene. Once again, another needless sequel that nobody asked for that tarnishes the memory of its predecessor. 5/10
The 33-year-old sequel to the 1988 hit brings most of the original cast back: Eddie Murphy and Arsenio Hall once again play multiple characters, Shari Headley as Lisa, John Amos as Cleo, and James Earl Jones as King Jaffe Joffer amongst others. However, like most sequels that are made today decades after the original, this one is both unwanted and unneeded. The title is somewhat bizarre as about 90% of the film takes place in Africa as opposed to America. Yes, I'm fully aware it's a sequel but COMING 2 AMERICA was the best they could do? The film follows Akeem, who learns from a local witch doctor that he has an illegitimate son in America and must bring him back to Zamunda to be his heir, since Akeem and Lisa have 3 girls and no male heirs of their own. The first film is a classic and one of my favorite Eddie Murphy movies of all-time. It was original and funny, whereas the sequel attempts to recycle the same jokes and the new ones are far and few in-between that fall flat upon delivery. They also ruined whatever positive image fans had of the character of Lisa as she was a strong and outspoken character in the original. Here, she's wasted and thrown behind the scenes with the exception of one outburst. Finally, there's quite a bit of product placement that is just too cringeworthy during every scene. Once again, another needless sequel that nobody asked for that tarnishes the memory of its predecessor. 5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/06/21 12:28 AM
I too watched it last night. I watched the first 30 minutes and then fast forwarded through it to watch minutes of what remained. Madonne! What a waste of time, money, and talent. Murphy was his usual ebullient self, but time has taken its toll on him and Hall and some of the others from the original. That original had dignity and was authentically funny. This one? Ohh! To tell the truth, parts of it seemed like a BET production during Black History Month. Wesley Snipes and the whole African "we are thugs" scenes were hugely contrived and lacked any production virtue. Cringeworthy is the right word.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/07/21 05:46 PM
RIOT IN CELL BLOCK 11 (1954)
I'm a sucker for prison movies of the Forties and Fifties, when writers and directors were sympathetic to prisoners. In this film, inmate Dunne (Neville Brand, Eternal One-Note Thug) leads a riot against the usual list of inhumane conditions. Thanks to an intelligent script, he gets to show leadership qualities and motivation, plus support for the prisoners' demands from the warden (Emile Meyer, Eternal Bohunk). Of course the bad guys are the corrections commissioner and the state legislators, who double-cross Dunne, the warden and the prisoners. It's preachy in parts, but packs a strong punch and message. Ace B-director Don Siegel uses a knowing hand with this material, and the supporting cast includes lots of familiar faces, like Whit Bissell (as a hated guard), Robert Osterloh (a former Army colonel looked up to by prisoners), Frank Faylen (the treacherous commissioner),and Leo Gordon (a violent psychopath who's dressed in an undershirt for the entire movie so he can show off his physique). Pretty good movie.
I'm a sucker for prison movies of the Forties and Fifties, when writers and directors were sympathetic to prisoners. In this film, inmate Dunne (Neville Brand, Eternal One-Note Thug) leads a riot against the usual list of inhumane conditions. Thanks to an intelligent script, he gets to show leadership qualities and motivation, plus support for the prisoners' demands from the warden (Emile Meyer, Eternal Bohunk). Of course the bad guys are the corrections commissioner and the state legislators, who double-cross Dunne, the warden and the prisoners. It's preachy in parts, but packs a strong punch and message. Ace B-director Don Siegel uses a knowing hand with this material, and the supporting cast includes lots of familiar faces, like Whit Bissell (as a hated guard), Robert Osterloh (a former Army colonel looked up to by prisoners), Frank Faylen (the treacherous commissioner),and Leo Gordon (a violent psychopath who's dressed in an undershirt for the entire movie so he can show off his physique). Pretty good movie.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/21 05:22 PM
Blood Spot 2020
Not a typical Vin Diesel movie watcher but this flick had a great story line and was well done.
I enjoyed it
6.5
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1634106/
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/NLz8PfhR/th-1.jpg)
Not a typical Vin Diesel movie watcher but this flick had a great story line and was well done.
I enjoyed it
6.5
https:/
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/21 06:13 PM
TORA TORA TORA (1970)
No dearth of Pearl Harbor movies--and this one is the best by far, for four reasons: It's an American/Japanese production, so the other side is portrayed realistically, not in the "Yellow Peril" paint of so many other "Day of Infamy" movies. It's done in a documentary style, without the sappy love stories and maudlin tragic deaths of kid soldiers. The special effects of the attack are incredibly good, considering that 1970 was the early dawn of CGI.
And, most important, the cast: EG Marshall and Wesley Addey as the Army and Navy intelligence guys vainly trying to get someone to pay attention to their decrypts pointing to an attack; Martin Balsam (one of the most versatile and underappreciated actors ever) as Adm. Kimmel, and Jason Robards as Gen. Short, the Navy and Army honchos at Pearl; George ("Mr. Detestable") Macready as Secy. of State Hull; Joseph Cotton as Secy. of War Stimson; and look fast for Neville Brand as an Army Air Corps officer; Richard ("The Evil One") Anderson as a Navy Capt., and G.D.(Senator Geary) Spradlin as an aide to Kimmel. The Japanese side is strong, too, with Su Yamamura as Adm. Yamamoto, the reluctant warrior, and Takahito Tamura as Lt. Commander Fuchida, leader of the air attack. A fine movie that vividly portrays the inevitability of the attack--and the stupidity on both sides that led to it.
No dearth of Pearl Harbor movies--and this one is the best by far, for four reasons: It's an American/Japanese production, so the other side is portrayed realistically, not in the "Yellow Peril" paint of so many other "Day of Infamy" movies. It's done in a documentary style, without the sappy love stories and maudlin tragic deaths of kid soldiers. The special effects of the attack are incredibly good, considering that 1970 was the early dawn of CGI.
And, most important, the cast: EG Marshall and Wesley Addey as the Army and Navy intelligence guys vainly trying to get someone to pay attention to their decrypts pointing to an attack; Martin Balsam (one of the most versatile and underappreciated actors ever) as Adm. Kimmel, and Jason Robards as Gen. Short, the Navy and Army honchos at Pearl; George ("Mr. Detestable") Macready as Secy. of State Hull; Joseph Cotton as Secy. of War Stimson; and look fast for Neville Brand as an Army Air Corps officer; Richard ("The Evil One") Anderson as a Navy Capt., and G.D.(Senator Geary) Spradlin as an aide to Kimmel. The Japanese side is strong, too, with Su Yamamura as Adm. Yamamoto, the reluctant warrior, and Takahito Tamura as Lt. Commander Fuchida, leader of the air attack. A fine movie that vividly portrays the inevitability of the attack--and the stupidity on both sides that led to it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/21 11:56 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Blood Spot 2020
Not a typical Vin Diesel movie watcher but this flick had a great story line and was well done.
I enjoyed it
6.5
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1634106/
Not a typical Vin Diesel movie watcher but this flick had a great story line and was well done.
I enjoyed it
6.5
https:/
I enjoyed it as well DP. Unfortunately, it came out right as the theaters were beginning to close down due to the pandemic but I've heard rumors they may go ahead with a sequel. I'd watch it.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/13/21 06:19 PM
THE LADY IN RED (1979)
Farm girl Polly Franklin (Pamela Sue Martin) escapes her stifling home and cruel, Bible-belting father for Chicago in the Thirties. She slaves in a sweatshop, then as a taxi dancer, then in a brothel, does a stint in jail, and ends up as John Dillinger's girlfriend. This ultra-B movie was directed by Lewis Teague, but it's a Corman production from start to finish--deliriously and unashamedly trashy and lurid, and often funny, pushing the limits of ca.1979 nudity, f-bombs and general mayhem. The jail scenes are over the top, even by the generally sadistic treatment of women's prisons in earlier movies. But, it's never obnoxious because Corman spent money on this production, and got excellent performances from Martin, spunky and resilient; Louise Fletcher as Anna Sage, who betrayed Dillinger; and Nancy Parsons, who plays the cruel but somehow entertaining Tiny Alice, prison matron, with verve and conviction (to say nothing of self-parody--you'll howl). This movie is good, dirty fun.
Farm girl Polly Franklin (Pamela Sue Martin) escapes her stifling home and cruel, Bible-belting father for Chicago in the Thirties. She slaves in a sweatshop, then as a taxi dancer, then in a brothel, does a stint in jail, and ends up as John Dillinger's girlfriend. This ultra-B movie was directed by Lewis Teague, but it's a Corman production from start to finish--deliriously and unashamedly trashy and lurid, and often funny, pushing the limits of ca.1979 nudity, f-bombs and general mayhem. The jail scenes are over the top, even by the generally sadistic treatment of women's prisons in earlier movies. But, it's never obnoxious because Corman spent money on this production, and got excellent performances from Martin, spunky and resilient; Louise Fletcher as Anna Sage, who betrayed Dillinger; and Nancy Parsons, who plays the cruel but somehow entertaining Tiny Alice, prison matron, with verve and conviction (to say nothing of self-parody--you'll howl). This movie is good, dirty fun.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/14/21 12:40 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAND
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
LAND is a story about Edee, played by Robin Wright, a recent widower who lost her husband and son in a tragic and violent manner. Edee is left shattered, experiencing survivor's guilt, and at times, contemplates reuniting with her family. She moves out to the mountains of Wyoming, isolated away from her past, the world, but more importantly, her grief. Out of her element, starving, and freezing to death, Miguel (played wonderfully smooth by Demian Bichir) saves her life. They strike up a friendship and Edee before long, with his guidance, begins to conquer the mountain and the elements, rather than succumbing to them. This film deals primarily with grief, isolation, but also serves as a PSA to the fragility of life. To live each moment, and to keep pushing forward, rather than getting swallowed up by our problems. A great reminder, but the film is average at best with nothing standing out as memorable honestly. 5.5/10
We got this to stream today and glad we did.
It fit right in with a slow day.
We did enjoy the scenery and loved Miguel, we sometimes did not like Edee.
6 / 10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/16/21 11:10 PM
12 Angry Men.
I generally don't watch movies that were made before the 70s but this was okay I guess. It's extremely dated now but it probably would've been a lot better then. It was an interesting premise with a claustrophobic atmosphere; 95% of the movie is set in the one room.
Looking forward to watching the remake by William Friedkin with James Gandolfini.
I generally don't watch movies that were made before the 70s but this was okay I guess. It's extremely dated now but it probably would've been a lot better then. It was an interesting premise with a claustrophobic atmosphere; 95% of the movie is set in the one room.
Looking forward to watching the remake by William Friedkin with James Gandolfini.
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/21 07:10 PM
12 Angry Men sucked. So overrated. Getting Even With Dad was better
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/21 11:17 PM
Watched JUSTICE LEAGUE today in anticipation of the Snyder cut finally dropping tomorrow on HBO Max. The reviews have been positive so far (not that they could be any worse than the original). Looking forward to the 4 hour cut!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/18/21 09:05 PM
ZACK SNYDER'S JUSTICE LEAGUE
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/21 03:11 AM
RUN SILENT RUN DEEP (1958)
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/21 04:38 AM
I just watched Captain Fantastic starring Viggo Mortensen on Netflix, a great film. It's a comedy with a few serious moments. He is raising his 6 children, ages 18 down to about 5 years old, in the wilderness, cutting them off from the world as much as he can. When they have to travel to a funeral for his wife, and we see how out of touch the children are.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/21 11:37 PM
THE COURIER
Benedict Cumberbatch stars as Greville Wynne, a private citizen and businessman who the British government approaches about being a middle man between England and their mole in Russia during the 1960's and the height of the Cold War. Cumberbatch as usual is a chameleon in his role, playing the part of a businessman who at times, doesn't want to know too much. He plays the role of amateur spy wonderfully, while Merab Ninidze, who plays Oleg Penkovsky and is Wynee's mole in Moscow, works well with Cumberbatch as the more seasoned spy. Overall for a movie about spies during the Cold War, there's very little suspense with the exception of one part in the film about three-quarters of the way in. Cumberbatch also lost quite a bit of weight too for the role during the later part of the film (unexpected but props to the man for going for it). Otherwise, this is nothing more than an average B film, which is sad as it is based on actual events. 5.5/10
Benedict Cumberbatch stars as Greville Wynne, a private citizen and businessman who the British government approaches about being a middle man between England and their mole in Russia during the 1960's and the height of the Cold War. Cumberbatch as usual is a chameleon in his role, playing the part of a businessman who at times, doesn't want to know too much. He plays the role of amateur spy wonderfully, while Merab Ninidze, who plays Oleg Penkovsky and is Wynee's mole in Moscow, works well with Cumberbatch as the more seasoned spy. Overall for a movie about spies during the Cold War, there's very little suspense with the exception of one part in the film about three-quarters of the way in. Cumberbatch also lost quite a bit of weight too for the role during the later part of the film (unexpected but props to the man for going for it). Otherwise, this is nothing more than an average B film, which is sad as it is based on actual events. 5.5/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/20/21 03:02 AM
Malice(1993). I saw when around when it came out. It’s one of those early 90’s Hitchcockuan thrillers they made a lot in the early 90’s. This one was with Nicole Kidman and Bill Pullman. Pretty good with a lot of twists
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/20/21 04:27 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
RUN SILENT RUN DEEP (1958)
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
I love this movie. Saw it as a kid. There's so many of those great black and white WWII movies. Loved Lancaster in it.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/21 07:02 AM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Malice(1993). I saw when around when it came out. It’s one of those early 90’s Hitchcockuan thrillers they made a lot in the early 90’s. This one was with Nicole Kidman and Bill Pullman. Pretty good with a lot of twists
Just watched it on HBO on Demand last nite...saw it when it hit video back in the day,,luv it...I like the scene where the lawyers are discussing Baldwins character w/ him (Baldwin)..being silent about the god fixation & then Baldwin gives a speech about himself & ends it w/..( " I am god")...flawless.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/21 07:04 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Originally Posted by Turnbull
RUN SILENT RUN DEEP (1958)
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
WWII Navy Cmdr. Rich Richardson (Clark Gable). sidelined for a year because he lost his sub to a Japanese destroyer, pulls strings to command another sub that was slated for Lt. Jim Bledsoe (Burt Lancaster). This sets off a bitter feud between them, and the crew (siding with Bledsoe) that both officers manage to finesse with dedication to duty, as Richardson obsesses about finding and sinking that destroyer. Gable, who never played anyone other than himself no matter what the nominal role, is ageing, paunchy but turns in a surprisingly nuanced performance. Lancaster is excellent, as always, in a typically manly role. The human drama is very well done, as are the battle scenes. This is a typical WWII movie made 15 years after the fact, but still packing the punch of those earlier films. Instead of Alan Hale, Sam Levene, Richard Conti and Dane Clark, the all-ethnic crew in "Run Silent," includes Jack Warden, Eddie Foy III, Nick Cravat, Brad Dexter, Rudy Bond and...Don Rickles. The obligatory kid sailor on his first mission gets killed off, too. Very fine movie.
I love this movie. Saw it as a kid. There's so many of those great black and white WWII movies. Loved Lancaster in it.
I Ditto that...
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/21 07:12 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE LADY IN RED (1979)
Farm girl Polly Franklin (Pamela Sue Martin) escapes her stifling home and cruel, Bible-belting father for Chicago in the Thirties. She slaves in a sweatshop, then as a taxi dancer, then in a brothel, does a stint in jail, and ends up as John Dillinger's girlfriend. This ultra-B movie was directed by Lewis Teague, but it's a Corman production from start to finish--deliriously and unashamedly trashy and lurid, and often funny, pushing the limits of ca.1979 nudity, f-bombs and general mayhem. The jail scenes are over the top, even by the generally sadistic treatment of women's prisons in earlier movies. But, it's never obnoxious because Corman spent money on this production, and got excellent performances from Martin, spunky and resilient; Louise Fletcher as Anna Sage, who betrayed Dillinger; and Nancy Parsons, who plays the cruel but somehow entertaining Tiny Alice, prison matron, with verve and conviction (to say nothing of self-parody--you'll howl). This movie is good, dirty fun.
Farm girl Polly Franklin (Pamela Sue Martin) escapes her stifling home and cruel, Bible-belting father for Chicago in the Thirties. She slaves in a sweatshop, then as a taxi dancer, then in a brothel, does a stint in jail, and ends up as John Dillinger's girlfriend. This ultra-B movie was directed by Lewis Teague, but it's a Corman production from start to finish--deliriously and unashamedly trashy and lurid, and often funny, pushing the limits of ca.1979 nudity, f-bombs and general mayhem. The jail scenes are over the top, even by the generally sadistic treatment of women's prisons in earlier movies. But, it's never obnoxious because Corman spent money on this production, and got excellent performances from Martin, spunky and resilient; Louise Fletcher as Anna Sage, who betrayed Dillinger; and Nancy Parsons, who plays the cruel but somehow entertaining Tiny Alice, prison matron, with verve and conviction (to say nothing of self-parody--you'll howl). This movie is good, dirty fun.
Oh boy...I saw that a couple of yrs. ago..Playboy did a pictorial w/a very pretty Pamela to promote the movie which I still happen 2 own..not in the best shape 4 a collectors item..but still nice having in my collection.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/21 12:37 AM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Malice(1993). I saw when around when it came out. It’s one of those early 90’s Hitchcockuan thrillers they made a lot in the early 90’s. This one was with Nicole Kidman and Bill Pullman. Pretty good with a lot of twists
Love that movie. So many twists and turns and never loses its momentum. Alec Baldwin is great as the sleazy villain you hate to like and Bill Pullman does his job as the sympathetic dweeb.
If you enjoyed that, I recommend Pacific Heights which is in the same wheelhouse, with a similarly charismatic villainous performance from Michael Keaton.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/21 03:25 AM
ODD MAN OUT (1947)
Johnny McQueen (James Mason), a leader of the IRA, and his comrades pull off a heist of a Belfast mill to fund their revolutionary activities. This part (~25 minutes) is pretty good, allowing Mason to flex his considerable acting chops. But, he gets shot during the robbery and spends the rest of this long (2 hrs.) movie dying in various arms. It's a long, boring drag, and director Carol Reed throws in an interminable parade of superfluous characters, including some right out of "them Elves which kiss'd th' Blarney Stone" Irish cliches archive. What a mess!
Johnny McQueen (James Mason), a leader of the IRA, and his comrades pull off a heist of a Belfast mill to fund their revolutionary activities. This part (~25 minutes) is pretty good, allowing Mason to flex his considerable acting chops. But, he gets shot during the robbery and spends the rest of this long (2 hrs.) movie dying in various arms. It's a long, boring drag, and director Carol Reed throws in an interminable parade of superfluous characters, including some right out of "them Elves which kiss'd th' Blarney Stone" Irish cliches archive. What a mess!
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/21 12:34 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Malice(1993). I saw when around when it came out. It’s one of those early 90’s Hitchcockuan thrillers they made a lot in the early 90’s. This one was with Nicole Kidman and Bill Pullman. Pretty good with a lot of twists
Love that movie. So many twists and turns and never loses its momentum. Alec Baldwin is great as the sleazy villain you hate to like and Bill Pullman does his job as the sympathetic dweeb.
If you enjoyed that, I recommend Pacific Heights which is in the same wheelhouse, with a similarly charismatic villainous performance from Michael Keaton
.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/21 10:51 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ZACK SNYDER'S JUSTICE LEAGUE
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
I liked this cut, hopefully it's a new start for DC's live-action movies, although we already had Joker.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/21 11:10 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ZACK SNYDER'S JUSTICE LEAGUE
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
The version that fans have clamored for so long is finally here and it was good (not great). In all honestly, after the theatrical version of JUSTICE LEAGUE that was released in 2017, this could only be an improvement upon it. More time is devoted to flesh out characters and storylines, which is appreciated for those who are fans of Cyborg, Darkseid, or others. The film is double the runtime of the original version (this coming in at around 4 hours), so set aside some time to view it. Overall, it didn't seem to lag too much and I'm glad Snyder was finally given the permission and tools to release his original vision. Honestly, I hope this is a trend that continues in Hollywood. I'm curious where a Justice League 2 and 3 would have went but in interviews recently, Snyder said the theatrical version is canon and he will not be making more DCEU movies as he's focusing on other projects. A nice sendoff for this great filmmaker. 7/10
I liked this cut, hopefully it's a new start for DC's live-action movies, although we already had Joker.
They're planning on doing another Batman movie plus The Flash but as far as the DCEU is concerned, I believe they've given up on that. They shot themselves in the foot IMO. They should have given all the characters their own movies (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, etc) BEFORE doing Justice League. Rather than rushing it and trying to introduce 3 new characters to the mix in The Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/21 11:29 PM
Yes I agree like Marvel did till Avengers: Endgame.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/21 12:12 AM
Yes, they tried to play catch up too fast and wound up screwing themselves over IMO.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/21 11:15 PM
NOBODY
Bob Odenkirk, the action star we never knew we wanted. I honestly never thought I would type those words. I love Odenkirk’s previous work, particularly in regards to BREAKING BAD and BETTER CALL SAUL. So I was game when he spread his wings at his attempt at being an action star. The story came together from a personal experience, as he’s had his home broken into previously. The film follows Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, an auditor at his father-in-laws manufacturing company. In a loveless marriage that seems headed for divorce, robbers break in one evening. Hutch stumbles upon them and asks them to take what they want and leave. They only grab a few bucks, his watch, and (inadvertently) his daughters kitty cat bracelet. Before leaving, his oldest son gets a drop on the burglars but Hutch tells him to let them go. Afterwards, he has to live with the shame of not lifting a finger to protect his family and property. Hearing it from everyone from the police that first respond, to his father and brother-in-laws, his neighbor, and finally, in a passive-aggressive way, his wife. Once his daughter informs him they must have taken her kitty cat bracelet as she’s unable to locate it, Hutch has finally had enough. Similar to Liam Neeson in the TAKEN series, Hutch unleashes he’s very particular set of skills upon the thieves before he finds himself taking on the local Russian mob as well. Having Odenkirk involved, you know it’s going to have a fair amount of levity to it and at times the action was (enjoyably) way over the top (think something along the lines of Jason Statham’s CRANK). Not much of Hutch’s background on how he obtained his skills is given, which I honestly didn’t mind. It still leaves the man a bit of mystery. The film is a fun, B-action movie that if they decided to revisit another time, I’d be on board! 6/10
Bob Odenkirk, the action star we never knew we wanted. I honestly never thought I would type those words. I love Odenkirk’s previous work, particularly in regards to BREAKING BAD and BETTER CALL SAUL. So I was game when he spread his wings at his attempt at being an action star. The story came together from a personal experience, as he’s had his home broken into previously. The film follows Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, an auditor at his father-in-laws manufacturing company. In a loveless marriage that seems headed for divorce, robbers break in one evening. Hutch stumbles upon them and asks them to take what they want and leave. They only grab a few bucks, his watch, and (inadvertently) his daughters kitty cat bracelet. Before leaving, his oldest son gets a drop on the burglars but Hutch tells him to let them go. Afterwards, he has to live with the shame of not lifting a finger to protect his family and property. Hearing it from everyone from the police that first respond, to his father and brother-in-laws, his neighbor, and finally, in a passive-aggressive way, his wife. Once his daughter informs him they must have taken her kitty cat bracelet as she’s unable to locate it, Hutch has finally had enough. Similar to Liam Neeson in the TAKEN series, Hutch unleashes he’s very particular set of skills upon the thieves before he finds himself taking on the local Russian mob as well. Having Odenkirk involved, you know it’s going to have a fair amount of levity to it and at times the action was (enjoyably) way over the top (think something along the lines of Jason Statham’s CRANK). Not much of Hutch’s background on how he obtained his skills is given, which I honestly didn’t mind. It still leaves the man a bit of mystery. The film is a fun, B-action movie that if they decided to revisit another time, I’d be on board! 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/21 11:44 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NOBODY
Bob Odenkirk, the action star we never knew we wanted. I honestly never thought I would type those words. I love Odenkirk’s previous work, particularly in regards to BREAKING BAD and BETTER CALL SAUL. So I was game when he spread his wings at his attempt at being an action star. The story came together from a personal experience, as he’s had his home broken into previously. The film follows Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, an auditor at his father-in-laws manufacturing company. In a loveless marriage that seems headed for divorce, robbers break in one evening. Hutch stumbles upon them and asks them to take what they want and leave. They only grab a few bucks, his watch, and (inadvertently) his daughters kitty cat bracelet. Before leaving, his oldest son gets a drop on the burglars but Hutch tells him to let them go. Afterwards, he has to live with the shame of not lifting a finger to protect his family and property. Hearing it from everyone from the police that first respond, to his father and brother-in-laws, his neighbor, and finally, in a passive-aggressive way, his wife. Once his daughter informs him they must have taken her kitty cat bracelet as she’s unable to locate it, Hutch has finally had enough. Similar to Liam Neeson in the TAKEN series, Hutch unleashes he’s very particular set of skills upon the thieves before he finds himself taking on the local Russian mob as well. Having Odenkirk involved, you know it’s going to have a fair amount of levity to it and at times the action was (enjoyably) way over the top (think something along the lines of Jason Statham’s CRANK). Not much of Hutch’s background on how he obtained his skills is given, which I honestly didn’t mind. It still leaves the man a bit of mystery. The film is a fun, B-action movie that if they decided to revisit another time, I’d be on board! 6/10
Bob Odenkirk, the action star we never knew we wanted. I honestly never thought I would type those words. I love Odenkirk’s previous work, particularly in regards to BREAKING BAD and BETTER CALL SAUL. So I was game when he spread his wings at his attempt at being an action star. The story came together from a personal experience, as he’s had his home broken into previously. The film follows Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, an auditor at his father-in-laws manufacturing company. In a loveless marriage that seems headed for divorce, robbers break in one evening. Hutch stumbles upon them and asks them to take what they want and leave. They only grab a few bucks, his watch, and (inadvertently) his daughters kitty cat bracelet. Before leaving, his oldest son gets a drop on the burglars but Hutch tells him to let them go. Afterwards, he has to live with the shame of not lifting a finger to protect his family and property. Hearing it from everyone from the police that first respond, to his father and brother-in-laws, his neighbor, and finally, in a passive-aggressive way, his wife. Once his daughter informs him they must have taken her kitty cat bracelet as she’s unable to locate it, Hutch has finally had enough. Similar to Liam Neeson in the TAKEN series, Hutch unleashes he’s very particular set of skills upon the thieves before he finds himself taking on the local Russian mob as well. Having Odenkirk involved, you know it’s going to have a fair amount of levity to it and at times the action was (enjoyably) way over the top (think something along the lines of Jason Statham’s CRANK). Not much of Hutch’s background on how he obtained his skills is given, which I honestly didn’t mind. It still leaves the man a bit of mystery. The film is a fun, B-action movie that if they decided to revisit another time, I’d be on board! 6/10
Thank you for the Review.
We plan on trying to stream it tomorrow, I will read this to My wife, she will enjoy it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/21 12:12 AM
Let me know what you think DP. Curious if you guys enjoy it as much as I did.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/21 11:43 PM
GODZILLA VS. KONG
The payoff after a rebooted Godzilla, Kong, followed by a sequel to Godzilla played out as the previous installments of this monsterverse: plenty of eye-candy, huge third act finale, and a decent story. As a payoff film it did leave something to be desired story wise, but at least the writers and director kept a nice, tight pace rather than something bloated like a Michael Bay Transformers movie. Millie Bobby Brown continues to grow as an actress before our very eyes. For my money the stand out of the film was Brian Tyree Henry as Bernie Hayes, a nerdy/eccentric podcaster, who works for a company whom may be responsible for the epic battle between the two titans. It was very enjoyable to see him display his comedic chops as he's mostly known as a dramatic actor. Overall, worth a watch for the visual effects alone, but still pretty average. 5.5/10
The payoff after a rebooted Godzilla, Kong, followed by a sequel to Godzilla played out as the previous installments of this monsterverse: plenty of eye-candy, huge third act finale, and a decent story. As a payoff film it did leave something to be desired story wise, but at least the writers and director kept a nice, tight pace rather than something bloated like a Michael Bay Transformers movie. Millie Bobby Brown continues to grow as an actress before our very eyes. For my money the stand out of the film was Brian Tyree Henry as Bernie Hayes, a nerdy/eccentric podcaster, who works for a company whom may be responsible for the epic battle between the two titans. It was very enjoyable to see him display his comedic chops as he's mostly known as a dramatic actor. Overall, worth a watch for the visual effects alone, but still pretty average. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/21 05:13 PM
THE GRIFTERS (1990)
Lilly Dillon (Anjelica Huston), tough as nails, works at laying off bets at racetracks for the Mob. She wants to reconnect with her son Roy (John Cusack), a small-time grifter, whom she birthed at 14. But he's preoccupied with Myra (Annette Bening), his bouncy, scheming girlfriend who wants to set him up with a Big Con. The two women take an instant dislike for each other that turns deadly, while Roy tries to decide if he wants to stay a grifter or go legit. This is an ugly movie, but it's enlivened by a brilliant triple-cross at the end, and excellent performances, particularly from Huston. Nicely filmed, too. Good movie.
Lilly Dillon (Anjelica Huston), tough as nails, works at laying off bets at racetracks for the Mob. She wants to reconnect with her son Roy (John Cusack), a small-time grifter, whom she birthed at 14. But he's preoccupied with Myra (Annette Bening), his bouncy, scheming girlfriend who wants to set him up with a Big Con. The two women take an instant dislike for each other that turns deadly, while Roy tries to decide if he wants to stay a grifter or go legit. This is an ugly movie, but it's enlivened by a brilliant triple-cross at the end, and excellent performances, particularly from Huston. Nicely filmed, too. Good movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/21 11:27 PM
THE MAURITANIAN
Based on true events, THE MAURITANIAN follows Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a man who is accused of aiding Al-Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks. (For those of you as unfamiliar with Mauritania as I was coming into this film, it's a country in Northwest Africa). The film opens with Slahi attending a wedding, before being kidnapped and taken to Guantanamo Bay where he is held for the next 14 years without being charged with a crime. Jodie Foster and Shailene Woodley play his defense attorney's who sue the U.S. government for them to either charge Slahi with a crime or release him. Benedict Cumberbatch plays the prosecutor in Slahi's case as Stuart Couch, a colonel with a southern drawl who quickly finds out what kind of government he's representing in the post-9/11 world. The film begins suspenseful and fast paced, developing the story and characters rather rapidly. However, by around the mid-point the pacing really slows down and the film seems to drag in some areas as a result of this. Cumberbatch is obviously fighting a cold during the shooting of this film as his southern drawl is noticeably stuffy and nasally in every scene he's in. The biggest star of the film, Foster, is also the one who is the most interesting character out of the cast. She plays Nancy Hollander, a no nonsense lawyer, who detached from her feelings long ago as she's made a career out of these types of cases. Here she works pro bono, and is somewhat villianized by the media and some pockets of citizens who believe Slahi should pay for his alleged role in the attacks and Foster for defending a "terrorist." She gives the most captivating performance, however, Tahar Rahim, who plays Slahi isn't far behind as the accused man. Being that this story takes place over 14 years and two Presidential administrations, I appreciate the fact the film didn't get caught up in a Republican/Democrat problem: this was a U.S. government problem, regardless of who was President at the time. If you're really interested in seeing it, it's worth a shot; otherwise, you're not missing much if you choose to skip it. 5.5/10
Based on true events, THE MAURITANIAN follows Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a man who is accused of aiding Al-Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks. (For those of you as unfamiliar with Mauritania as I was coming into this film, it's a country in Northwest Africa). The film opens with Slahi attending a wedding, before being kidnapped and taken to Guantanamo Bay where he is held for the next 14 years without being charged with a crime. Jodie Foster and Shailene Woodley play his defense attorney's who sue the U.S. government for them to either charge Slahi with a crime or release him. Benedict Cumberbatch plays the prosecutor in Slahi's case as Stuart Couch, a colonel with a southern drawl who quickly finds out what kind of government he's representing in the post-9/11 world. The film begins suspenseful and fast paced, developing the story and characters rather rapidly. However, by around the mid-point the pacing really slows down and the film seems to drag in some areas as a result of this. Cumberbatch is obviously fighting a cold during the shooting of this film as his southern drawl is noticeably stuffy and nasally in every scene he's in. The biggest star of the film, Foster, is also the one who is the most interesting character out of the cast. She plays Nancy Hollander, a no nonsense lawyer, who detached from her feelings long ago as she's made a career out of these types of cases. Here she works pro bono, and is somewhat villianized by the media and some pockets of citizens who believe Slahi should pay for his alleged role in the attacks and Foster for defending a "terrorist." She gives the most captivating performance, however, Tahar Rahim, who plays Slahi isn't far behind as the accused man. Being that this story takes place over 14 years and two Presidential administrations, I appreciate the fact the film didn't get caught up in a Republican/Democrat problem: this was a U.S. government problem, regardless of who was President at the time. If you're really interested in seeing it, it's worth a shot; otherwise, you're not missing much if you choose to skip it. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/03/21 11:30 PM
Just rewatched THE TEN COMMANDMENTS (1956) for the first time in years in anticipation for Easter tomorrow. I love these huge, biblical stories that Hollywood used to produce and wish they'd make movies like this again. Charlton Heston was magnificent as Moses and I haven't been this moved watching a film since THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. Got a few more I'm going to attempt to go through here coming up: THE KING OF KINGS (1927), KING OF KINGS (1961), CLEOPATRA (1963), and THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE (1964). With the exception of THE KING OF KINGS (1927), this will be my first time viewing these films.
***UPDATE***
Adding CLEOPATRA (1934), THE TEN COMMANDMENTS (1923), and SAMSON AND DELILAH (1949) to the list as well. First time viewing all of these also.
***UPDATE***
Adding CLEOPATRA (1934), THE TEN COMMANDMENTS (1923), and SAMSON AND DELILAH (1949) to the list as well. First time viewing all of these also.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/21 06:01 PM
No doubt about it, Irishman--Ten Commandments is a magnificent movie. DeMille knew how to entertain his audiences--pulled out all the stops. I read that at one point he used half of the Egyptian Army as extras. I hope you noticed the attention to design detail in many scenes, especially the costumes and jewelry, all of it custom-made. The credits alone are a work of art. Another plus: the movie prints are among the very few that the studios treated reverently--nearly all others (including GF) were simply dumped somewhere. So, high-quality prints of Ten Commandments were always available for reruns and remastering. They'll never make another like it again.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/21 06:11 PM
CONCRETE COWBOY (2020)
Cole (Caleb McLaughlin), expelled from his Detroit high school for fighting, is dumped by his mother on his long-absent father Harp (Idris Elba) in Philadelphia. Harp is part of a (real life) black cowboy coterie operating out of ancient stables in their inner city neighborhood (Harp actually has a horse in his home). Caleb hates his old man and his new situation, but the group gradually brings him into their fold by making him muck out stables. He bonds with a wild horse and is gradually accepted. He's also tempted into the criminal life by an older friend and is nearly killed.
This is an uneven, sometimes amateurish movie, loaded with F- MF- and N-bombs, but McLaughlin is outstanding as the rebellious but decent kid who goes right. Lorraine Toussaint plays the obligatory motherly member of the group. Elba, who is in more movies than the MGM lion, is curiously ambivalent in his role. The premise is unique, and carries through to the end. Ok for one viewing.
Cole (Caleb McLaughlin), expelled from his Detroit high school for fighting, is dumped by his mother on his long-absent father Harp (Idris Elba) in Philadelphia. Harp is part of a (real life) black cowboy coterie operating out of ancient stables in their inner city neighborhood (Harp actually has a horse in his home). Caleb hates his old man and his new situation, but the group gradually brings him into their fold by making him muck out stables. He bonds with a wild horse and is gradually accepted. He's also tempted into the criminal life by an older friend and is nearly killed.
This is an uneven, sometimes amateurish movie, loaded with F- MF- and N-bombs, but McLaughlin is outstanding as the rebellious but decent kid who goes right. Lorraine Toussaint plays the obligatory motherly member of the group. Elba, who is in more movies than the MGM lion, is curiously ambivalent in his role. The premise is unique, and carries through to the end. Ok for one viewing.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/04/21 10:13 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
CONCRETE COWBOY (2020)
Cole (Caleb McLaughlin), expelled from his Detroit high school for fighting, is dumped by his mother on his long-absent father Harp (Idris Elba) in Philadelphia. Harp is part of a (real life) black cowboy coterie operating out of ancient stables in their inner city neighborhood (Harp actually has a horse in his home). Caleb hates his old man and his new situation, but the group gradually brings him into their fold by making him muck out stables. He bonds with a wild horse and is gradually accepted. He's also tempted into the criminal life by an older friend and is nearly killed.
This is an uneven, sometimes amateurish movie, loaded with F- MF- and N-bombs, but McLaughlin is outstanding as the rebellious but decent kid who goes right. Lorraine Toussaint plays the obligatory motherly member of the group. Elba, who is in more movies than the MGM lion, is curiously ambivalent in his role. The premise is unique, and carries through to the end. Ok for one viewing.
Cole (Caleb McLaughlin), expelled from his Detroit high school for fighting, is dumped by his mother on his long-absent father Harp (Idris Elba) in Philadelphia. Harp is part of a (real life) black cowboy coterie operating out of ancient stables in their inner city neighborhood (Harp actually has a horse in his home). Caleb hates his old man and his new situation, but the group gradually brings him into their fold by making him muck out stables. He bonds with a wild horse and is gradually accepted. He's also tempted into the criminal life by an older friend and is nearly killed.
This is an uneven, sometimes amateurish movie, loaded with F- MF- and N-bombs, but McLaughlin is outstanding as the rebellious but decent kid who goes right. Lorraine Toussaint plays the obligatory motherly member of the group. Elba, who is in more movies than the MGM lion, is curiously ambivalent in his role. The premise is unique, and carries through to the end. Ok for one viewing.
The trailer didn't do anything for me so I passed. Thanks for the review Turnbull.
Rewatched THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST today and I enjoy this film and honestly, don't understand why it's so controversial? I've read the book and the film doesn't paint Jesus in a negative light. From the Bible itself, we're shown Jesus as God and man. What this film accomplishes is a portrayal of Jesus as simply man. Struggling with being God's Son and facing his death on the Cross. I loved the last part where He faces his final temptation and overcomes it. Anyone who hasn't seen this film, I endorse a viewing. And for those who have, what are your thoughts?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/21 10:40 PM
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS (1923)
Watched for the first time Cecile B. DeMille's original, 1923 version of THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. It actually took me for quite a surprise as the film opens up with the story of Moses and the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt. This may take not even a quarter of the film to portray and the rest of the time, it actually illustrates the Commandments at work during the present day this film was released. There's even a title before the second story begins about how the world doesn't feel the Commandments were applicable to life 100 years ago (remember this film was released on the heels of the end of the First World War). So DeMille uses this picture as a vehicle to say the Commandments are never outdated and they're not merely suggestions but rather, the law of God. A good film (not a huge silent film fan honestly) but compared to the 1956 version, this pales in compassion. I do appreciate what he's done here, trying to teach the audience rather than rehash a story many of us have heard plenty of times. I was also glad he was able to make a true version of the story in 1956, with the advancements in technology over the previous 33 years since this release. Both versions are good and worth a watch. 6/10
Watched for the first time Cecile B. DeMille's original, 1923 version of THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. It actually took me for quite a surprise as the film opens up with the story of Moses and the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt. This may take not even a quarter of the film to portray and the rest of the time, it actually illustrates the Commandments at work during the present day this film was released. There's even a title before the second story begins about how the world doesn't feel the Commandments were applicable to life 100 years ago (remember this film was released on the heels of the end of the First World War). So DeMille uses this picture as a vehicle to say the Commandments are never outdated and they're not merely suggestions but rather, the law of God. A good film (not a huge silent film fan honestly) but compared to the 1956 version, this pales in compassion. I do appreciate what he's done here, trying to teach the audience rather than rehash a story many of us have heard plenty of times. I was also glad he was able to make a true version of the story in 1956, with the advancements in technology over the previous 33 years since this release. Both versions are good and worth a watch. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/21 01:54 PM
Great movie i12
Did you ever see The Greatest Story Ever Told"[b][/b]
1965
Amazing cast.
Did you ever see The Greatest Story Ever Told"[b][/b]
1965
Amazing cast.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/21 10:41 PM
Never did DP. Worth the watch?
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/21 05:19 PM
Destination Moon (1950)
In this early sci-fi, a scientist, an aviation builder and a retired general (John Archer, Warner Anderson, Tom Powers) put together an atomic powered spaceship that the government wants to shut down because of radioactive fears. They jump the gun by taking off for the moon, bringing along one of the site workers (Dick Wesson). They land on the moon, but they used up too much fuel maneuvering, so they have to lighten the spacecraft--possibly by leaving one of them behind. This movie is pretty good for its time, with good special effects, and a nice lesson in astrophysics courtesy of Woody Woodpecker(!). Only jarring note is Wesson, playing a Brooklyn dees-and-dozer--he's more annoying than Medavoy on "NYPD Blue."
In this early sci-fi, a scientist, an aviation builder and a retired general (John Archer, Warner Anderson, Tom Powers) put together an atomic powered spaceship that the government wants to shut down because of radioactive fears. They jump the gun by taking off for the moon, bringing along one of the site workers (Dick Wesson). They land on the moon, but they used up too much fuel maneuvering, so they have to lighten the spacecraft--possibly by leaving one of them behind. This movie is pretty good for its time, with good special effects, and a nice lesson in astrophysics courtesy of Woody Woodpecker(!). Only jarring note is Wesson, playing a Brooklyn dees-and-dozer--he's more annoying than Medavoy on "NYPD Blue."
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/21 10:06 PM
VOYAGERS
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/11/21 09:18 PM
Rewatched the 1927 version of Cecil B. DeMille's THE KING OF KINGS yesterday. It's good but not a great film (not much of a fan of silent films). Although for the time period, some of his special effects are very impressive. Today I watched for the first time the 1961 version of KING OF KINGS and I loved it! Very TEN COMMANDMENTS-eque, spiritually moving, wonderful costumes/set pieces/great actors. Just an all-around sold film!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/21 03:22 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Never did DP. Worth the watch?
Oh yeah,,,, you gotta see it i12.
Its a classic.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/21 03:23 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
VOYAGERS
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
Is this new or older?
Seams like a lot of Sci-Fi coming out recently.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/21 10:58 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Never did DP. Worth the watch?
Oh yeah,,,, you gotta see it i12.
Its a classic.
Just added it to my list DP. Thanks for the recommendation!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/21 10:59 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
VOYAGERS
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
VOYAGERS takes place 42 years into the future in the year 2063. The planet is heating up and mankind sends a ship full of teenagers and one chaperon (played by Colin Farrell) to supervise them all. They've found a new planet that they're attempting to explore to see if it can sustain the future of the human race. The only problem: it takes 86 years to reach, meaning the teenagers on our voyage will never see the planet but rather their grandchildren. While onboard, the teens are given a daily regimen of a blue liquid. They're told by Farrell that it's nothing more than vitamins; however, when researching the ingredients of the blue liquid, 2 of the teenagers become suspicious of Farrell, his motives, and whether he's being entirely truthful with them or not. As such, the 2 teenagers refuse to take the blue liquid and all hell breaks loose (think of Lord of the Flies in space). Factions are formed, and many themes are wonderfully woven into this tale such as betrayal, fear, love, and acceptance. Featuring a cast of up-and-coming talent starring Tye Sheridan and Lil-Rose Depp, VOYAGERS is well worth a ride. 6/10
Is this new or older?
Seams like a lot of Sci-Fi coming out recently.
Brand new. Was just released in theaters this past weekend.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/13/21 11:23 PM
THE UNHOLY
THE UNHOLY stars Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Gerry Fenn, a freelance journalist who's desperately seeking a sexy story to repair his damaged reputation and get him back to the life he once knew. While chasing a story down in Banfield, MA, just outside of Boston, Gerry happens upon the story of Alice, a young girl he almost runs over with his vehicle while drinking and driving one evening. Unhurt by the event, Alice is then visited by whom she believes is the Virgin Mary. Alice is deaf and has been since birth. She's prayed to Mary earnestly and believes after this near death experience that Mary has finally granted her prayer, as she suddenly is able to hear and talk. Fenn, a raised Catholic but currently lapsed, strikes at the opportunity to get the exclusive, and decides to stick it out in Banfield, feeling he would be the perfect person to report on the event due to his lack of faith/bias. The local residents who know Alice believe she was healed by Mary and come to her, some with their sick to be healed, listen to her story, and strengthen their faith. Mary's able to work miracles and increase her audience. Banfield soon becomes the center of the Catholic world at this phenomenon; however, before too long, something more sinister is at play here and it appears the Virgin Mary wasn't who healed Alice and the others, but another supernatural being, something far more evil, and seeking their souls in return. This didn't get a huge promotional push to it, however, for being a PG-13 film, introducing Cricket Brown (who does a wonderful job playing Alice), and Jeffrey Dean Morgan, it's a very enjoyable flick. My only grip with the film was the weight that was placed upon jump scares as the audience can see them coming from a mile away. Other than that, better than expected! 6.5/10
THE UNHOLY stars Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Gerry Fenn, a freelance journalist who's desperately seeking a sexy story to repair his damaged reputation and get him back to the life he once knew. While chasing a story down in Banfield, MA, just outside of Boston, Gerry happens upon the story of Alice, a young girl he almost runs over with his vehicle while drinking and driving one evening. Unhurt by the event, Alice is then visited by whom she believes is the Virgin Mary. Alice is deaf and has been since birth. She's prayed to Mary earnestly and believes after this near death experience that Mary has finally granted her prayer, as she suddenly is able to hear and talk. Fenn, a raised Catholic but currently lapsed, strikes at the opportunity to get the exclusive, and decides to stick it out in Banfield, feeling he would be the perfect person to report on the event due to his lack of faith/bias. The local residents who know Alice believe she was healed by Mary and come to her, some with their sick to be healed, listen to her story, and strengthen their faith. Mary's able to work miracles and increase her audience. Banfield soon becomes the center of the Catholic world at this phenomenon; however, before too long, something more sinister is at play here and it appears the Virgin Mary wasn't who healed Alice and the others, but another supernatural being, something far more evil, and seeking their souls in return. This didn't get a huge promotional push to it, however, for being a PG-13 film, introducing Cricket Brown (who does a wonderful job playing Alice), and Jeffrey Dean Morgan, it's a very enjoyable flick. My only grip with the film was the weight that was placed upon jump scares as the audience can see them coming from a mile away. Other than that, better than expected! 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/21 12:22 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Never did DP. Worth the watch?
Oh yeah,,,, you gotta see it i12.
Its a classic.
Just added it to my list DP. Thanks for the recommendation!
So glad you did.... let me know what you think.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/21 12:30 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Never did DP. Worth the watch?
Oh yeah,,,, you gotta see it i12.
Its a classic.
Just added it to my list DP. Thanks for the recommendation!
So glad you did.... let me know what you think.
Will do. It might be a little time but I'm hoping to get through it and these others by the end of next week if I can.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 12:33 AM
SAMSON AND DELILAH
Today I watched Cecil B. DeMille's 1949's SAMSON AND DELILAH. Another biblical story that doesn't hit as high as some of DeMille's other works. Hedy Lamarr is quite captivating as the tempest Delilah but Victor Mature doesn't do much for me as Samson. He has a physique, but not much charisma and his performance seemed rather dry most of the time (unlike a Charlton Heston as Moses as comparison). Not a bad movie but also nothing special and quite forgettable. 6/10
Today I watched Cecil B. DeMille's 1949's SAMSON AND DELILAH. Another biblical story that doesn't hit as high as some of DeMille's other works. Hedy Lamarr is quite captivating as the tempest Delilah but Victor Mature doesn't do much for me as Samson. He has a physique, but not much charisma and his performance seemed rather dry most of the time (unlike a Charlton Heston as Moses as comparison). Not a bad movie but also nothing special and quite forgettable. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 03:35 AM
Agree 100%, Irishman. Some rather poor details--like having a stuntman with an ill-fitting wig stand in for Mature in the lion-wrestling scene, and Sanders poking the "dead" lion, which is little more than a rug.
"Mature doesn't do much for me as Samson"--possible understatement of the year. Mature allegedly tried to join an exclusive Beverly Hills club. Told that they didn't accept actors, he replied, "That's ok--no one ever accused me of being an actor."
"Mature doesn't do much for me as Samson"--possible understatement of the year. Mature allegedly tried to join an exclusive Beverly Hills club. Told that they didn't accept actors, he replied, "That's ok--no one ever accused me of being an actor."
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 04:18 AM
The Last Picture Show/ 1971...no xplanation need apply...great story but better acting chops by entire cast..& who can't fall in luv w/a young Cybill Shepard & I must say a very hot Ellen Burstyn...1 of Peter Bogdanovich ' s best...no wonder he married Cybill.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 06:52 AM
No doubt about it--a great movie for all the reasons you said.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 07:24 AM
Leaving Las Vegas//////....I actually dont like Nic Cage as an actor...but I will give him a nod 4 this....but what keeps my eyes glued is the chops of Elizabeth Shue...who pours her soul out 2 save this drowning heart..not 2 mention she looks great 4 her age in this film...Ive wanted her since I 1rst saw her....
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 08:21 PM
Leaving Las Vegas was too damn depressing for me. Well acted for sure. My fav Nic Cage movie is a mostly forgotten neo-noir with him and Dennis Hopper called Red Rock West.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/15/21 11:30 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Leaving Las Vegas//////....I actually dont like Nic Cage as an actor...but I will give him a nod 4 this....but what keeps my eyes glued is the chops of Elizabeth Shue...who pours her soul out 2 save this drowning heart..not 2 mention she looks great 4 her age in this film...Ive wanted her since I 1rst saw her....
I'm a Nic Cage fan and this is one of (along with FACE/OFF) his finest performances. Huge Elisabeth Shue fan as well since I saw her in the original KARATE KID and she does a wonderful job here too. It was a pity she didn't get an Oscar for her work.
Today I watched THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Not a biblical story but still an epic sandal-and-sword affair. I had NO idea that Christopher Plummer played Commodus as it doesn't even look like him. I also didn't realize the first half of this film is basically an earlier version of Ridley Scott's 2000 GLADIATOR. The second half drags in some parts and didn't hold my interest as keenly as before. However, tons of extras, lavish costumes, wonderful set pieces. One of the reasons I enjoy these types of films is the eye candy. I plan on watching Cecil B. DeMille's 1934 CLEOPATRA tomorrow, followed by the Elizabeth Taylor version on Saturday!
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/21 02:39 AM
Irish, that is a great movie which I have viewed several times. The cast is all-star. Stephen Boyd has that granite face of a Real Roman and Alec Guiness the moxie of an Emperor. Of course, Sophia! What can I say?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/21 10:47 PM
Originally Posted by olivant
Irish, that is a great movie which I have viewed several times. The cast is all-star. Stephen Boyd has that granite face of a Real Roman and Alec Guiness the moxie of an Emperor. Of course, Sophia! What can I say?
I'd give it another go for sure.
Today, I wasn't overly impressed by Cecil B. DeMille's 1934 CLEOPATRA. In fact, I was somewhat disappointed. Early on I wasn't emotionally invested with the story too much, with Cleopatra's love going from Caesar to Marc Antony. In addition, Claudette Colbert didn't mesmerize me as much as I thought she would as Cleopatra. She was good but nothing memorable. Finally, the characters seemed to play the roles too cooly. One of the knocks I have about some films made during this time period as the actors/actresses are theatrically trained and it shows when staring in films rather than the stage (and doesn't come off as well IMO). I'm anticipating the Elizabeth Taylor version to be much better tomorrow.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/21 12:13 AM
Viewed the 1963 version of CLEOPATRA and while it was more enjoyable than DeMille's 1934 version and Elizabeth Taylor's performance was much more enjoyable as the lead role, I did feel the length of the film (coming in at 4 hours and 11 minutes) and other than the lavish eye candy, pretty forgettable. I was a little disappointed in it as I had higher hopes going in.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/21 09:43 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Viewed the 1963 version of CLEOPATRA and while it was more enjoyable than DeMille's 1934 version and Elizabeth Taylor's performance was much more enjoyable as the lead role, I did feel the length of the film (coming in at 4 hours and 11 minutes) and other than the lavish eye candy, pretty forgettable. I was a little disappointed in it as I had higher hopes going in.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
irish my friend
cleopatra 1963 is one the the best movies !
i love it !
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/21 08:24 PM
HUD (1963)
Teenaged Lon Bannon (Brandon de Wilde) lives on a Texas cattle ranch with his upright grandfather Homer (Melvyn Douglas) and his ne'er-do-well uncle Hud (Paul Newman). He's caught in the middle of open hatred between Homer and his son Hud--hard-drinking, womanizing, cynical--and, at 17, is pulled between the two lifestyles. Hud is a thoroughly reprehensible character, but Newman leavens him with his patented killer grin and insouciant charm. All three put in fine performances, but the best by far is Patricia Neal as Alma, their kindly but world-weary, been-around-the-block housekeeper. She gets the best lines in an overall intelligent script. The B&W filming, by all-time-great cinematographer James Wong Howe, realistically evokes small-town Texas--you almost feel the dust in your nostrils. Excellent film.
Teenaged Lon Bannon (Brandon de Wilde) lives on a Texas cattle ranch with his upright grandfather Homer (Melvyn Douglas) and his ne'er-do-well uncle Hud (Paul Newman). He's caught in the middle of open hatred between Homer and his son Hud--hard-drinking, womanizing, cynical--and, at 17, is pulled between the two lifestyles. Hud is a thoroughly reprehensible character, but Newman leavens him with his patented killer grin and insouciant charm. All three put in fine performances, but the best by far is Patricia Neal as Alma, their kindly but world-weary, been-around-the-block housekeeper. She gets the best lines in an overall intelligent script. The B&W filming, by all-time-great cinematographer James Wong Howe, realistically evokes small-town Texas--you almost feel the dust in your nostrils. Excellent film.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/21 09:22 PM
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Viewed the 1963 version of CLEOPATRA and while it was more enjoyable than DeMille's 1934 version and Elizabeth Taylor's performance was much more enjoyable as the lead role, I did feel the length of the film (coming in at 4 hours and 11 minutes) and other than the lavish eye candy, pretty forgettable. I was a little disappointed in it as I had higher hopes going in.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
DP, I'm going to try and view THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD tomorrow.
irish my friend
cleopatra 1963 is one the the best movies !
i love it !
To each their own. Not a terrible movie but I wouldn't be in any rush to sit through it again anytime soon.
DP, I saw THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD today. First of all, wow, I cannot believe the cast of characters. I continued reading them out loud as they scrolled by on the screen: Max von Sydow as Jesus, Charlton Heston as John the Baptist, Martin Landau as Caiaphas, Angela Lansbury as Claudia, Donald Pleasence as the Devil (that was a sweet surprise), Sidney Poitier as Simon of Cyrene, Claude Rains as King Herod, Telly Savalas as Pontius Pilate, and even John Wayne as a Centurion! As for the film itself, I was moved by it early on when Jesus was first performing his miracles, but then it seemed to jump around quite a bit, just hitting well known highlights. I understand trying to condense the Bible or the story of Jesus into a 3 hr and 20 minute version is a difficult task but some of the continuity I felt was lost by the consistent skipping around. Finally, and I don't mean this disrespectfully at all as I like and respect von Sydow as an actor; however, I felt his portrayal of Jesus was missing some passion. For example, when he's kicking out the money changers and freeing the animals to be sacrificed at the temple, he seems to lack enthusiasm and is just going through the motions. However, I had heard of this movie previously and again, appreciate the recommendation.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/21 01:28 PM
Gotcha, I like it all and look forward to watching that an Jesus of Nazareth every Easter season.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/21 10:51 PM
SOLOMON AND SHEBA
Stumbled upon this (don't remember how) and wanted to give it a shot to see another biblical story. It was good, a little slow pacing, ran a little long at 2 hours and 21 mins. However, Yul Brynner was the star of the show as Solomon. Between his performance in this and THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, I've really enjoyed his work. He has such a towering, and confident disposition that is easy to be captivated by. Gina Lollobrigida who played Sheba I wasn't as enamored with. She was fine but I wasn't mesmerized by her beauty or her performance (I would have went with Marisa Pavan who played Abishag). 5/10
Stumbled upon this (don't remember how) and wanted to give it a shot to see another biblical story. It was good, a little slow pacing, ran a little long at 2 hours and 21 mins. However, Yul Brynner was the star of the show as Solomon. Between his performance in this and THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, I've really enjoyed his work. He has such a towering, and confident disposition that is easy to be captivated by. Gina Lollobrigida who played Sheba I wasn't as enamored with. She was fine but I wasn't mesmerized by her beauty or her performance (I would have went with Marisa Pavan who played Abishag). 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/21 10:35 PM
MORTAL KOMBAT
Finally, a reboot that is worthy of praise! That brings something new, fresh, and wanted, rather than just dollars to the studio. This is the Mortal Kombat that we've craved for over the years. A compelling story primarily centered around Sub-Zero and Scorpion. Yet, with a cast full of unique individuals, still pays respect to all of them (with the exception of Sonya Blade, who's the butt of many jokes). This is a violent, bloody, brutal, and funny film. As such, Kano actually turned out to be my favorite character as this guy was hitting on all cylinders on open mic night. Mortal Kombat was a brutal video game upon it's release in the 1990's and I'm glad they didn't shy away from that here with this film, as it's a hard R. I'm very pleased studios are waking up to the fact that films that are rated R can still be bank, rather than a watered down PG-13 version to "appeal to the masses." Great action, Special FX, and script, count me in for a sequel! 6.5/10
Finally, a reboot that is worthy of praise! That brings something new, fresh, and wanted, rather than just dollars to the studio. This is the Mortal Kombat that we've craved for over the years. A compelling story primarily centered around Sub-Zero and Scorpion. Yet, with a cast full of unique individuals, still pays respect to all of them (with the exception of Sonya Blade, who's the butt of many jokes). This is a violent, bloody, brutal, and funny film. As such, Kano actually turned out to be my favorite character as this guy was hitting on all cylinders on open mic night. Mortal Kombat was a brutal video game upon it's release in the 1990's and I'm glad they didn't shy away from that here with this film, as it's a hard R. I'm very pleased studios are waking up to the fact that films that are rated R can still be bank, rather than a watered down PG-13 version to "appeal to the masses." Great action, Special FX, and script, count me in for a sequel! 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/21 11:50 PM
Rewatched PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN today and I enjoyed it even more the second time around. If you haven't seen it, I endorse a viewing of it. Carey Mulligan got robbed on Sunday at the Oscars.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/21 11:10 PM
EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE
EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE bypassed theaters, heading straight for VOD and for good reason: the film is nothing but an average tale about regret, bereavement, betrayal, and revenge. The studio is hoping Oscar winner Casey Affleck and Michelle Monaghan will entice viewers enough to give this a shot. Sadly, they shouldn't, but I did just that based upon them and the semi-interesting trailer. The film follows Philip (Affleck), Grace (Monaghan), and Philip's daughter Lucy (played by India Eisley) who are dealing with the loss of their son/brother in Evan, who tragically dies in a car accident that Grace is driving to open the film. From there we're introduced to Philip, who is a psychiatrist and for the entire film, he's nothing more than an emotionless, detached, and broken man who's still trying to cope with the accident 3 years later. His coping mechanism is to occupy himself with his work and patients, while neglecting his family. Grace attempts to cope by reaching out to Philip both emotionally and physically but is rebuffed at every turn. Feeling unsatisfied, she has no outlet or other ways to cope other than to continually swim laps in their backyard pool. Lucy meanwhile is seeking attention and as such, gets kicked out school for doing a line of cocaine in a science lab. Garnering her father's wrath, she soon turns to hate him with the attention she had previously been seeking. A patient that Philip has been treating for some time and is a prototype of a possible new therapy technique that he's been experimenting with suddenly dies. Her brother James Flagg (played wonderfully by Sam Claflin) enters the picture and begins to form a relationship with the family, before Philip believes his intentions aren't as noble as first perceived. From there James slithers his way between Philip and his family, questioning if the family is strong enough to survive James' charm and ulterior motives. Being an R rated film, I would have suspected this would have been made for a younger, PG-13 audience as the twist at the end, can be seen so obviously within the first 10 minutes of the film. Knowing this while watching, the audience can see the trail of verbal cues and breadcrumbs James leaves in some of the dialogue he chooses to use. From there it's watching everything unfold exactly as you'd expect and as such, the film is very mediocre and painfully predictable. On one final note, with a title of EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE, they didn't capitalize on the Sting & the Police song at all during this film, which is a missed opportunity if you ask me. 5/10
EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE bypassed theaters, heading straight for VOD and for good reason: the film is nothing but an average tale about regret, bereavement, betrayal, and revenge. The studio is hoping Oscar winner Casey Affleck and Michelle Monaghan will entice viewers enough to give this a shot. Sadly, they shouldn't, but I did just that based upon them and the semi-interesting trailer. The film follows Philip (Affleck), Grace (Monaghan), and Philip's daughter Lucy (played by India Eisley) who are dealing with the loss of their son/brother in Evan, who tragically dies in a car accident that Grace is driving to open the film. From there we're introduced to Philip, who is a psychiatrist and for the entire film, he's nothing more than an emotionless, detached, and broken man who's still trying to cope with the accident 3 years later. His coping mechanism is to occupy himself with his work and patients, while neglecting his family. Grace attempts to cope by reaching out to Philip both emotionally and physically but is rebuffed at every turn. Feeling unsatisfied, she has no outlet or other ways to cope other than to continually swim laps in their backyard pool. Lucy meanwhile is seeking attention and as such, gets kicked out school for doing a line of cocaine in a science lab. Garnering her father's wrath, she soon turns to hate him with the attention she had previously been seeking. A patient that Philip has been treating for some time and is a prototype of a possible new therapy technique that he's been experimenting with suddenly dies. Her brother James Flagg (played wonderfully by Sam Claflin) enters the picture and begins to form a relationship with the family, before Philip believes his intentions aren't as noble as first perceived. From there James slithers his way between Philip and his family, questioning if the family is strong enough to survive James' charm and ulterior motives. Being an R rated film, I would have suspected this would have been made for a younger, PG-13 audience as the twist at the end, can be seen so obviously within the first 10 minutes of the film. Knowing this while watching, the audience can see the trail of verbal cues and breadcrumbs James leaves in some of the dialogue he chooses to use. From there it's watching everything unfold exactly as you'd expect and as such, the film is very mediocre and painfully predictable. On one final note, with a title of EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE, they didn't capitalize on the Sting & the Police song at all during this film, which is a missed opportunity if you ask me. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/30/21 10:51 PM
TOM CLANCY'S WITHOUT REMORSE
Michael B. Jordan stars as John Kelly, a NAVY Seal who, along with his team, is tasked to extract a CIA asset in Allepo, Syria. The mission goes according to plan until Kelly realizes the hostiles they've taken out are Russian, not Syrian forces while rummaging through one of the dead assailants pockets. Having completed his mission and tour, Kelly heads back home to his 9-month pregnant wife. He isn't afforded much R&R until his team are hunted down one-by-one. In Kelly's case, they were only able to kill his wife, however, he was able to kill all of the intruders save for one. That puts Kelly on his mission to find the missing person and kill them; however, other players within the U.S. government are secretly using these attacks as a way to restart the Cold War. Overall, this is a disappointing film. Jordan's much better than this. He has a few action-centric one liners that come off as forced. Sprinkle in a bit of SJW virtue signaling about how African-Americans "fight for a country that doesn't love them back," and you've checked the woke crowd box (along with other "marginalized people" who are represented in this film in positions of authority). The action scenes are sloppy and that's by design to give it a more "gritty" style, but it fails in that endeavor and is nothing more than 2 people rolling around on the floor. Furthermore, the story wasn't enticing enough to hold my interest for the full 1 hour and 50 minutes and the reveal of the conspirator was obvious, as the person cast in that role typically is typecast for just that purpose. A pass even on Amazon Prime. 5.5/10
Michael B. Jordan stars as John Kelly, a NAVY Seal who, along with his team, is tasked to extract a CIA asset in Allepo, Syria. The mission goes according to plan until Kelly realizes the hostiles they've taken out are Russian, not Syrian forces while rummaging through one of the dead assailants pockets. Having completed his mission and tour, Kelly heads back home to his 9-month pregnant wife. He isn't afforded much R&R until his team are hunted down one-by-one. In Kelly's case, they were only able to kill his wife, however, he was able to kill all of the intruders save for one. That puts Kelly on his mission to find the missing person and kill them; however, other players within the U.S. government are secretly using these attacks as a way to restart the Cold War. Overall, this is a disappointing film. Jordan's much better than this. He has a few action-centric one liners that come off as forced. Sprinkle in a bit of SJW virtue signaling about how African-Americans "fight for a country that doesn't love them back," and you've checked the woke crowd box (along with other "marginalized people" who are represented in this film in positions of authority). The action scenes are sloppy and that's by design to give it a more "gritty" style, but it fails in that endeavor and is nothing more than 2 people rolling around on the floor. Furthermore, the story wasn't enticing enough to hold my interest for the full 1 hour and 50 minutes and the reveal of the conspirator was obvious, as the person cast in that role typically is typecast for just that purpose. A pass even on Amazon Prime. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/02/21 01:07 AM
CHERRY
Tom Holland stars as Cherry, an Army medic, who returns from war to his Ohio home and his wife Emily (Ciara Bravo) while struggling to readjust to life due to his PTSD. Unable to cope with the horrors he's seen abroad, he soon turns to drugs to self-medicate his pain away with the aid of his friends, who are users themselves. Before long, the drugs are controlling him rather than him having control over his habit. His wife Emily, to deal with her husband's, at times violent outbursts and distance, soon turns to the drugs herself in order to get back at Cherry in a way, with them both eventually becoming addicts. Their shared lifestyle forces Cherry to rob banks to finance both of their addictions that turns from pills like Oxy to heroin. What makes this tale especially sad is how lovely their love story is setup. They're two college kids with Cherry being the more awkward of the two, while Emily suppresses her feelings due to trust issues she has from her father having an affair that she caught him having. The cinematography is very well done as in a lot of the scenes during the first couple of acts, the audience is right in the middle of the action, feeling like either a fly on the wall or an active participate in the scene. The lighting the Russo's utilize also really stands out throughout the film. The scenes where Cherry's in basic training are framed differently as well, with the scope of the screen shrinking to signify his lack of freedom within the service. The Russo's use a lot of various techniques throughout the film, which is very appreciated as it changes the aspect of the film, holding the audiences attention, as well as eliciting certain emotions from the viewer as well. Wonderfully strong performances by both Holland and Bravo, they make a great couple onscreen and their chemistry can be seen for the entire duration of the film (nothing seems forced). What makes the film especially sad is that it's based on true events. Available through Apple TV+, this is definitely worth watching. 6.5/10
Tom Holland stars as Cherry, an Army medic, who returns from war to his Ohio home and his wife Emily (Ciara Bravo) while struggling to readjust to life due to his PTSD. Unable to cope with the horrors he's seen abroad, he soon turns to drugs to self-medicate his pain away with the aid of his friends, who are users themselves. Before long, the drugs are controlling him rather than him having control over his habit. His wife Emily, to deal with her husband's, at times violent outbursts and distance, soon turns to the drugs herself in order to get back at Cherry in a way, with them both eventually becoming addicts. Their shared lifestyle forces Cherry to rob banks to finance both of their addictions that turns from pills like Oxy to heroin. What makes this tale especially sad is how lovely their love story is setup. They're two college kids with Cherry being the more awkward of the two, while Emily suppresses her feelings due to trust issues she has from her father having an affair that she caught him having. The cinematography is very well done as in a lot of the scenes during the first couple of acts, the audience is right in the middle of the action, feeling like either a fly on the wall or an active participate in the scene. The lighting the Russo's utilize also really stands out throughout the film. The scenes where Cherry's in basic training are framed differently as well, with the scope of the screen shrinking to signify his lack of freedom within the service. The Russo's use a lot of various techniques throughout the film, which is very appreciated as it changes the aspect of the film, holding the audiences attention, as well as eliciting certain emotions from the viewer as well. Wonderfully strong performances by both Holland and Bravo, they make a great couple onscreen and their chemistry can be seen for the entire duration of the film (nothing seems forced). What makes the film especially sad is that it's based on true events. Available through Apple TV+, this is definitely worth watching. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/02/21 10:23 PM
Rewatched SCARFACE today and I always fall in love with this movie every time I watch it. Still hard to believe that little ol' Italian Al Pacino could so seamlessly embody the role of Tony Montana. A true American classic with a fantastic script, director, cast, and soundtrack. Treat yourself to another viewing at your next opportunity.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/03/21 06:21 PM
Yep, a cult classic that gets overlooked alot. Been a few years since i watched this. Onc of Pacino's best roles
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/06/21 01:22 PM
My Octopus Teacher. 2020
A documentary of a marine biologist who found himself welcomed into the life of an Octopus, amazing.
I loved it and heard it won an Oscar.
8.5 / 10
I have not been able to score a movie that high in a long time.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/WhvYpY8q/p18683241-p-v11-aa.jpg)
A documentary of a marine biologist who found himself welcomed into the life of an Octopus, amazing.
I loved it and heard it won an Oscar.
8.5 / 10
I have not been able to score a movie that high in a long time.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/06/21 09:54 PM
I need to watch this. Octopuses are extraordinary animals. The more I learn about them, the more amazed I am
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/21 11:57 PM
WRATH OF MAN
Jason Statham and Guy Ritchie reunite and all is right in the world. WRATH OF MAN follows Patrick Hill (Statham) or H as he'll annoyingly be referred to in the film, a cash truck delivery courier who seeks to find the people responsible for his sons murder. The film opens with said robbery, followed soon thereafter by a Bond-esque opening title. Statham plays the role of H wonderfully, emotionless yet not robotic as you can clearly see there's malicious intent behind those big, bulging eyes of his. Statham is one of, if not the best action hero working today besides The Rock, and he single-handedly carries this film. Without his star power, this is easily a VOD title. He's always clam, cool, collect, and suave. Outside of his performance, everyone else's (with the exception of Josh Hartnett) are phoned in. It's tragic to see Hartnett's star fall so much to this testosterone/frat boy, prototypical, wannabe alpha male. About halfway through this film splinters into 2 separate stories that come together nicely at the end. A good, but not great action film. Worthy of your time and viewing. Definitely superior to Ritchie's previous outing, THE GENTLEMEN. 6.5/10
Jason Statham and Guy Ritchie reunite and all is right in the world. WRATH OF MAN follows Patrick Hill (Statham) or H as he'll annoyingly be referred to in the film, a cash truck delivery courier who seeks to find the people responsible for his sons murder. The film opens with said robbery, followed soon thereafter by a Bond-esque opening title. Statham plays the role of H wonderfully, emotionless yet not robotic as you can clearly see there's malicious intent behind those big, bulging eyes of his. Statham is one of, if not the best action hero working today besides The Rock, and he single-handedly carries this film. Without his star power, this is easily a VOD title. He's always clam, cool, collect, and suave. Outside of his performance, everyone else's (with the exception of Josh Hartnett) are phoned in. It's tragic to see Hartnett's star fall so much to this testosterone/frat boy, prototypical, wannabe alpha male. About halfway through this film splinters into 2 separate stories that come together nicely at the end. A good, but not great action film. Worthy of your time and viewing. Definitely superior to Ritchie's previous outing, THE GENTLEMEN. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/21 11:09 PM
SHADOW IN THE CLOUD
Set in 1943, SHADOW IN THE CLOUD stars Chloe Grace Moretz as Maude Garrett, a mechanic and female pilot in the RAF. She nearly misses a flight leaving from New Zealand to Samoa with orders and a top secret package to be delivered upon landing. Coming aboard at the last minute, there's nowhere to store her, save for the gunner position underneath the plane that's made up entirely of glass and steel. Much of the first act is shot from within this tight bubble, terrifying any audience members who are either claustrophobic, have a fear of flying, or both. While underneath, Garret soon sees a gremlin lurking about on the wing and while unsuccessfully trying to convince her crew members of its presence, the gremlin begins to disable to plane, forcing it down. Honestly, I enjoyed this film way more than I thought I was going to. I enjoy Chloe's work as an actress, but she's also on my list of actors who, no matter what film I see them in, I know it's either going to be average or I'm not going to like it at all. This one actually surprised me and was probably my favorite movie of hers to date. The first half of the film starts out as a suspense/horror film while we're introduced to Garrett, the crew, and the gremlin. However, about halfway through it transitions (and quite well I might add) to an action film. In dealing with the subject matter, yes, some suspension of disbelief is required on the audience's part; but if you can get past that, and one cringe worthy action spot shortly after the transition, it's a fun ride. The film doesn't take itself too serious and it's nice to see Chloe breakout into other genres as well. Without credits the film comes in around 80 minutes so it's short, sweet, and to the point. 6/10
Set in 1943, SHADOW IN THE CLOUD stars Chloe Grace Moretz as Maude Garrett, a mechanic and female pilot in the RAF. She nearly misses a flight leaving from New Zealand to Samoa with orders and a top secret package to be delivered upon landing. Coming aboard at the last minute, there's nowhere to store her, save for the gunner position underneath the plane that's made up entirely of glass and steel. Much of the first act is shot from within this tight bubble, terrifying any audience members who are either claustrophobic, have a fear of flying, or both. While underneath, Garret soon sees a gremlin lurking about on the wing and while unsuccessfully trying to convince her crew members of its presence, the gremlin begins to disable to plane, forcing it down. Honestly, I enjoyed this film way more than I thought I was going to. I enjoy Chloe's work as an actress, but she's also on my list of actors who, no matter what film I see them in, I know it's either going to be average or I'm not going to like it at all. This one actually surprised me and was probably my favorite movie of hers to date. The first half of the film starts out as a suspense/horror film while we're introduced to Garrett, the crew, and the gremlin. However, about halfway through it transitions (and quite well I might add) to an action film. In dealing with the subject matter, yes, some suspension of disbelief is required on the audience's part; but if you can get past that, and one cringe worthy action spot shortly after the transition, it's a fun ride. The film doesn't take itself too serious and it's nice to see Chloe breakout into other genres as well. Without credits the film comes in around 80 minutes so it's short, sweet, and to the point. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/14/21 01:41 AM
SPIRAL: FROM THE BOOK OF SAW
It's been 4 years since our last foray into the SAW franchise with 2017's JIGSAW. Attempting to breath new life into an exhausted property, Lionsgate is now attempting another route to capitalize off of this IP with a spinoff staring Chris Rock as detective Ezekiel Banks. Banks is one of, if not the only, honest cop in his department and as such, has no friends as a result of it. As a patrolman 15 years prior to the events in this story, he turns in his partner for murdering a witness in order to silence him. Banks works alone due to his mistrust of his fellow coworkers who in turn, don't want to be partnered up with him either. Against his wishes, and as a punishment from his captain, Banks is partnered up with rookie detective William Schenk. Murders begin in gruesome ways that hearkens back the Jigsaw killings. It becomes clear early on the killer is focusing on cops to punish, rather than drug addicts or criminals that the SAW franchise dealt with. With that exception, there's nothing new here with this latest installment. A handful of elaborate contraptions are setup where the individual will have to literally sacrifice a piece of their body in order to live. By the end of the film, they're just walking through the motions and the big reveal of who the killer is was obvious as well. My money was on one individual early on and it turned out to be true, which was disappointing because I respected the SAW movies for their cleverness and twist endings. If you're a fan of the franchise it's not bad enough to completely ignore, but I would suggest doing yourself the favor, saving some money, and passing on a theatrical run. 6/10
It's been 4 years since our last foray into the SAW franchise with 2017's JIGSAW. Attempting to breath new life into an exhausted property, Lionsgate is now attempting another route to capitalize off of this IP with a spinoff staring Chris Rock as detective Ezekiel Banks. Banks is one of, if not the only, honest cop in his department and as such, has no friends as a result of it. As a patrolman 15 years prior to the events in this story, he turns in his partner for murdering a witness in order to silence him. Banks works alone due to his mistrust of his fellow coworkers who in turn, don't want to be partnered up with him either. Against his wishes, and as a punishment from his captain, Banks is partnered up with rookie detective William Schenk. Murders begin in gruesome ways that hearkens back the Jigsaw killings. It becomes clear early on the killer is focusing on cops to punish, rather than drug addicts or criminals that the SAW franchise dealt with. With that exception, there's nothing new here with this latest installment. A handful of elaborate contraptions are setup where the individual will have to literally sacrifice a piece of their body in order to live. By the end of the film, they're just walking through the motions and the big reveal of who the killer is was obvious as well. My money was on one individual early on and it turned out to be true, which was disappointing because I respected the SAW movies for their cleverness and twist endings. If you're a fan of the franchise it's not bad enough to completely ignore, but I would suggest doing yourself the favor, saving some money, and passing on a theatrical run. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/14/21 11:13 PM
THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/15/21 01:32 PM
Rear Window is one of my favorite films ever and I hate how they keep trying to update it instead of doing something fresh and original. The only film that I felt did a good job with the same idea was Fright Night(1985) because it took elements of Rear Window and mixed them with elements of Hammer horror films
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/21 12:06 AM
That's Hollywood for you: too afraid to put money into new films and would rather continue milking dry older properties with sequels, prequels, reboots, remakes, etc.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/21 02:07 AM
Absolutely. That’s why I mostly watch older films. Very rarely do I watch or enjoy many post 1999
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/21 02:59 AM
The East on Amazon Prime, pretty good war movie about the Dutch-indie War. Still an obscure part of our history with at least 100.000 deaths.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/16/21 03:10 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
HUD (1963)
Teenaged Lon Bannon (Brandon de Wilde) lives on a Texas cattle ranch with his upright grandfather Homer (Melvyn Douglas) and his ne'er-do-well uncle Hud (Paul Newman). He's caught in the middle of open hatred between Homer and his son Hud--hard-drinking, womanizing, cynical--and, at 17, is pulled between the two lifestyles. Hud is a thoroughly reprehensible character, but Newman leavens him with his patented killer grin and insouciant charm. All three put in fine performances, but the best by far is Patricia Neal as Alma, their kindly but world-weary, been-around-the-block housekeeper. She gets the best lines in an overall intelligent script. The B&W filming, by all-time-great cinematographer James Wong Howe, realistically evokes small-town Texas--you almost feel the dust in your nostrils. Excellent film.
Teenaged Lon Bannon (Brandon de Wilde) lives on a Texas cattle ranch with his upright grandfather Homer (Melvyn Douglas) and his ne'er-do-well uncle Hud (Paul Newman). He's caught in the middle of open hatred between Homer and his son Hud--hard-drinking, womanizing, cynical--and, at 17, is pulled between the two lifestyles. Hud is a thoroughly reprehensible character, but Newman leavens him with his patented killer grin and insouciant charm. All three put in fine performances, but the best by far is Patricia Neal as Alma, their kindly but world-weary, been-around-the-block housekeeper. She gets the best lines in an overall intelligent script. The B&W filming, by all-time-great cinematographer James Wong Howe, realistically evokes small-town Texas--you almost feel the dust in your nostrils. Excellent film.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/17/21 03:23 AM
INTO THE WILD (2007)
Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsch), just graduated from Emory University, gives away his bank account, burns his cash, destroys his credit and Social Security cards, and runs off to hitchhike to the wilds of Alaska without telling his parents or his sister. Along his meandering way he meets many gentle souls who shelter and help him with food, money, and work (the least they can do for a total stranger, right?), while he keeps a diary and lards it with quotes from Thoreau. Hirsh is excellent as Chris, and Hal Holbrook was nominatd for an Oscar as an old guy who wants to adopt him. It's easy to see why this metaphysical neo-hippie saga would attract Sean Penn's attention (he directed). The photography is stunning, but the constant time shifts are annoying, and the supposedly lofty theme (young man with promising future abandons all materialism) falls flat against the cruelty he inflicted on his family and his general aimlessness. Held my interest, though.
Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsch), just graduated from Emory University, gives away his bank account, burns his cash, destroys his credit and Social Security cards, and runs off to hitchhike to the wilds of Alaska without telling his parents or his sister. Along his meandering way he meets many gentle souls who shelter and help him with food, money, and work (the least they can do for a total stranger, right?), while he keeps a diary and lards it with quotes from Thoreau. Hirsh is excellent as Chris, and Hal Holbrook was nominatd for an Oscar as an old guy who wants to adopt him. It's easy to see why this metaphysical neo-hippie saga would attract Sean Penn's attention (he directed). The photography is stunning, but the constant time shifts are annoying, and the supposedly lofty theme (young man with promising future abandons all materialism) falls flat against the cruelty he inflicted on his family and his general aimlessness. Held my interest, though.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/21 01:45 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
Gary Oldman was very good, he should work more.
Wife loved it, I felt as you mentioned it being a bit messy.
5 / 10 fits perfectly for me Wife may have gone a bit higher.
I think because she read the book too and that fed her a bit better into wtf was going on with her.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/21 01:49 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I need to watch this. Octopuses are extraordinary animals. The more I learn about them, the more amazed I am
Check it out, its really good....I watched it on a rainy day just thought it would be good background for what else I was doing and found myself captivated.
Enjoy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/21 08:13 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
An updated version of Alfred Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox. A child psychologist who suffers from agoraphobia, a condition that gives her panic attacks and anxiety whenever she leaves her home. Confined, isolated, and self medicating with alcohol and pills, Anna is the nosy neighbor of the block, spying on anyone with an open blind to pass the time (and I have to point out the fact that ALL of her neighbors have their blinds open, which is pretty strange for New York, but I digress). The Russell family (comprising of Ethan, Alistair, and Jane - played by Fred Hechinger, Gary Oldman, and Julianne Moore/Jennifer Jason Leigh respectively) quickly move in across the street. On Halloween night, Anna (pretending not to be home in order not to have to pass out candy to the neighborhood children) attempts to go outside and shoo away said children, who are egging her house. Before she is able to, she passes out and wakes up with Jane (Julianne Moore) in her house, who brought her inside. They introduce themselves and tell their backstories over drinks. Anna is happy and proud of the fact she's able to connect and make new friends. However, one night she hears a scream coming from the Russell's house across the street and believes Jane (Julianne Moore) is murdered. After calling the police, the Russell's and police believe Anna to be nothing more than a crazy drug addict as Jennifer Jason Leigh is then introduced as the real Jane Russell. The rest of the film is a mess, immersing the audience into Anna's drug and alcohol infused lose of reality. It's purposefully disorienting, attempting to decipher fact from fiction until the real story is finally ironed out at the end; however, by that time, any momentum the film has gained has already lost its steam and I'm waiting for the credits to roll. Great performances by Amy Adams and Gary Oldman, but unfortunately, neither of them can save this flop. 5/10
Gary Oldman was very good, he should work more.
Wife loved it, I felt as you mentioned it being a bit messy.
5 / 10 fits perfectly for me Wife may have gone a bit higher.
I think because she read the book too and that fed her a bit better into wtf was going on with her.
If she read the book and enjoyed it, then yes, I could definitely see her enjoying the film more than you and me (if you didn't read the book that is).
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/21/21 03:15 AM
I came out where both you guys did on "Woman in the Window." My wife read the book and liked it a bit better than I did.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/21/21 12:31 PM
Friends of Eddie Coyle(1973). Great crime/mob movie with the legendary Robert Mitchum. I feel it’s a film not talked about nearly enough especially by crime/mob movie fans
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/21/21 10:01 PM
FINAL ACCOUNT
FINAL ACCOUNT is a documentary about the last living generation having been born and raised under The Third Reich. About a dozen or so individuals are interviewed throughout and all perspectives are covered: men, women, those who are remorseful now, those who are still unapologetic all these years later, etc. The subject matter was enough for me to take a gamble on this but overall, it was nothing more than average. Initially the film opens up, introducing us to our cast of characters and describes their roles during the war. Many of them were very young so a lot of them were in youth programs before seeing some war action. Because of the time period, the focus is mainly on the men and the war as the women are only slightly touched upon. Unfortunately, after the opening, some color photos and videos of the time, the film bounces around from subject to subject, with most people denying they had any knowledge or participation in the atrocities their countrymen engaged in. An interesting concept that failed to deliver. 5.5/10
FINAL ACCOUNT is a documentary about the last living generation having been born and raised under The Third Reich. About a dozen or so individuals are interviewed throughout and all perspectives are covered: men, women, those who are remorseful now, those who are still unapologetic all these years later, etc. The subject matter was enough for me to take a gamble on this but overall, it was nothing more than average. Initially the film opens up, introducing us to our cast of characters and describes their roles during the war. Many of them were very young so a lot of them were in youth programs before seeing some war action. Because of the time period, the focus is mainly on the men and the war as the women are only slightly touched upon. Unfortunately, after the opening, some color photos and videos of the time, the film bounces around from subject to subject, with most people denying they had any knowledge or participation in the atrocities their countrymen engaged in. An interesting concept that failed to deliver. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/22/21 12:38 AM
ARMY OF THE DEAD
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/23/21 12:24 AM
PROFILE
Another computer screen only based "thriller" (and I use that term loosely) from producer and director Timur Bekmambetov. As with previous projects of his including UNFRIENDED, SEARCHING, and UNFRIENDED: DARK WEB, this film takes place entirely over Skype and a MacBook. While I understand this is a cost cutting measure designed to keep cost down and maximize profits, I certainly hope this trend does not continue. For UNFRIENDED and this, I could see this concept working (SEARCHING to a lesser extent could work but also could have not leaned so heavily on it either); however, at the end of the day, you're watching a 90 minute Skype conversation between a handful of actors. At this point in time, the experiment is over and they should try a new approach. The film takes place in 2014 and follows Amy, a journalist who is posing as Melody, a 19 year old and recently converted Muslim in order to be recruited by jihadist in Syria so she can report on and expose them. She quickly begins an online relationship with Bilel, a high profile target with ISIS by secretly recording their Skype sessions and reporting back to her editor Vick. By the time Amy gets in too deep with Bilel, Vick wants to pull the plug for her safety and run the story as is. Amy, sacrificing so much of her time, energy, and her real life relationship with her boyfriend Matt, believes she can dig deeper and pleads with Vick to hold off. Before Amy and Bilel can meet face-to-face, Amy is doxxed and a bounty is placed on her life. What does make the film somewhat chilling is it is inspired by true events. With the exception of Valene Kane who plays Amy and puts forth the most grueling performance, everyone else is rather lackluster, especially Shazad Latif as Bilel as he tries to come off too aloof and his constant use of "baby" becomes quite irritating by the end. This is definitely a film that can be passed over. 5.5/10
Another computer screen only based "thriller" (and I use that term loosely) from producer and director Timur Bekmambetov. As with previous projects of his including UNFRIENDED, SEARCHING, and UNFRIENDED: DARK WEB, this film takes place entirely over Skype and a MacBook. While I understand this is a cost cutting measure designed to keep cost down and maximize profits, I certainly hope this trend does not continue. For UNFRIENDED and this, I could see this concept working (SEARCHING to a lesser extent could work but also could have not leaned so heavily on it either); however, at the end of the day, you're watching a 90 minute Skype conversation between a handful of actors. At this point in time, the experiment is over and they should try a new approach. The film takes place in 2014 and follows Amy, a journalist who is posing as Melody, a 19 year old and recently converted Muslim in order to be recruited by jihadist in Syria so she can report on and expose them. She quickly begins an online relationship with Bilel, a high profile target with ISIS by secretly recording their Skype sessions and reporting back to her editor Vick. By the time Amy gets in too deep with Bilel, Vick wants to pull the plug for her safety and run the story as is. Amy, sacrificing so much of her time, energy, and her real life relationship with her boyfriend Matt, believes she can dig deeper and pleads with Vick to hold off. Before Amy and Bilel can meet face-to-face, Amy is doxxed and a bounty is placed on her life. What does make the film somewhat chilling is it is inspired by true events. With the exception of Valene Kane who plays Amy and puts forth the most grueling performance, everyone else is rather lackluster, especially Shazad Latif as Bilel as he tries to come off too aloof and his constant use of "baby" becomes quite irritating by the end. This is definitely a film that can be passed over. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/24/21 03:05 AM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Friends of Eddie Coyle(1973). Great crime/mob movie with the legendary Robert Mitchum. I feel it’s a film not talked about nearly enough especially by crime/mob movie fans
I've watched it at least a dozen times. Definitive performance by Robert Mitchum in the title role--some critics think it was the best in his long career. Peter Boyle just as good.
Crusher: Did you ever read the novel by George V. Higgins? IMO, the greatest crime novel ever written. Higgins' second novel, "The Digger's Game," is equally great.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/21 10:46 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ARMY OF THE DEAD
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Have you ever seen the Mike Judge movie, Idiocracy, from 2006? It was like a prelude to the way liberals and social justice warriors and democratic politicians would start acting beginning under Obama and into Trump's term in office.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/21 10:50 PM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
ARMY OF THE DEAD
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Dave Bautista stars as Scott Ward, a cook who's hired to lead a team into zombie infested and quarantined zone Las Vegas in order to pull off a $200 million heist from a casino. Zack Snyder throws his hat into the zombie apocalypse genre and for my money, it's one of the better ones as I'm typically not a fan of zombie movies. The film quickly opens with the escape of the host zombie, who then infects anyone and everyone within Las Vegas. The mayhem is wonderfully transitioned during the opening credits as by the time they're finished rolling, we're on the other side of the outbreak. Las Vegas is walled off (because apparently walls work now) and quarantined, keeping the zombies contained. The President, unnamed but an obvious jab at Trump, is set to nuke the area on the 4th of July to rid the country of the zombies because it's "patriotic" and "would be cool" according to a news report we're shown. With military forces evacuating, awaiting the incoming bomb, Ward's team takes the opportunity to break into the quarantine zone at their chance to become rich. There's a lot of action to open it up but once the team arrives at the casino and attempts to break into the vault, the story comes to a screeching halt. With a runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, Snyder definitely could have trimmed some parts here to aid in the pacing. In addition, typically Snyder wonderfully places the right piece of music in just the right places; however, this time around some of the songs are covers of classics by The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Elvis (definitely a missed opportunity for a killer soundtrack). Overall, this was a very fun, Zack Snyder action film ride, and besides Dave Bautista who continues to pad an impressive resume, Tig Notaro shines the most as the wisecracking pilot Marianne Peters. Worth a watch on Netflix. 6/10
Have you ever seen the Mike Judge movie, Idiocracy, from 2006? It was like a prelude to the way liberals and social justice warriors and democratic politicians would start acting beginning under Obama and into Trump's term in office.
I saw it a LONG time ago and don't remember anything about it, other than that I found it dumb and didn't like it.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/25/21 11:37 PM
Rampage (1987)
Forgotten movie directed by William Friedkin. A courtroom thriller ascertaining the guilt of a serial killer on trial for his life using the insanity defense. Beset by low production values, it nonetheless benefits from a steady pace and brisk running time. It was surprisingly good and had interesting things to say about the justice system and culpability.
Thief (1981)
Directed by Michael Mann, it's an inoffensive watch. Great cinematography as you'd come to expect from a master of his craft. Similar to Heat, but lacking in the high-end production values and thrilling set pieces. James Caan is charismatic and believable in his role as the titular thief, while Robert Prosky is in his element as the antagonist who cajoles him into one last big score. Certain plot points such as the love interest could've been more fleshed out, like they were in Heat. Mann improved on this with Manhunter in 1986, and perfected it with Heat in 1995.
Forgotten movie directed by William Friedkin. A courtroom thriller ascertaining the guilt of a serial killer on trial for his life using the insanity defense. Beset by low production values, it nonetheless benefits from a steady pace and brisk running time. It was surprisingly good and had interesting things to say about the justice system and culpability.
Thief (1981)
Directed by Michael Mann, it's an inoffensive watch. Great cinematography as you'd come to expect from a master of his craft. Similar to Heat, but lacking in the high-end production values and thrilling set pieces. James Caan is charismatic and believable in his role as the titular thief, while Robert Prosky is in his element as the antagonist who cajoles him into one last big score. Certain plot points such as the love interest could've been more fleshed out, like they were in Heat. Mann improved on this with Manhunter in 1986, and perfected it with Heat in 1995.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/21 02:24 AM
Thief is great. I made a topic in it not that long ago. Jimmy Caan is the man
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/21 10:44 PM
THE CONJURING: THE DEVIL MADE ME DO IT
Ed and Lorraine Warren are back for another paranormal adventure from their case files. This takes place during 1981 in Connecticut and involves the exorcisms of both David Glatzel and Arne Johnson. The film opens up with the exorcism of 8-year-old David and at first, I figured this would be another short story opener like the two previous films before transitioning towards a new case. However, the demon who's possessing David moves into Arne, who then early in the film commits murder and is the first person (in this country anyway) to use demonic possession as a defense during his manslaughter trial. When I first heard this was going to be about exorcisms and demonic possessions, I wasn't exactly thrilled as I'm not a fan of the subgenre (and yes, that includes THE EXORCIST as well). The first film was fantastic, the second was a worthy follow up, and this unfortunately is the worst of the bunch. James Wan's tension, suspense building, and overall touch are sorely lacking. This is the first film in the trilogy that delves deep into Lorraine's clairvoyance gift as it's used in passing during the first 2 installments; however, here it's a major theme, which was one of the issues I had with the film, bouncing back-and-forth from vision to realty. Not as many scares either as there aren't characters stumbling around in the dark, seeking out a spirit who's ready to scare the crap out of them and the audience. I do give the studio credit for trying to go in a new direction, rather than continuing to churn out the same old haunted house motif, but this entry falls flat. The previous 2 films have been criticized for the portrayal of the Warren's and how much they actually had a hand in these cases, so who knows how much of this installment is true? Although I do enjoy Patrick Wilson's and Vera Farmiga's performances as these characters, this was a messy, disappointment film for the franchise. I'd be up for another one of their adventures, hoping they could end things on a higher note than this. 5.5/10
Ed and Lorraine Warren are back for another paranormal adventure from their case files. This takes place during 1981 in Connecticut and involves the exorcisms of both David Glatzel and Arne Johnson. The film opens up with the exorcism of 8-year-old David and at first, I figured this would be another short story opener like the two previous films before transitioning towards a new case. However, the demon who's possessing David moves into Arne, who then early in the film commits murder and is the first person (in this country anyway) to use demonic possession as a defense during his manslaughter trial. When I first heard this was going to be about exorcisms and demonic possessions, I wasn't exactly thrilled as I'm not a fan of the subgenre (and yes, that includes THE EXORCIST as well). The first film was fantastic, the second was a worthy follow up, and this unfortunately is the worst of the bunch. James Wan's tension, suspense building, and overall touch are sorely lacking. This is the first film in the trilogy that delves deep into Lorraine's clairvoyance gift as it's used in passing during the first 2 installments; however, here it's a major theme, which was one of the issues I had with the film, bouncing back-and-forth from vision to realty. Not as many scares either as there aren't characters stumbling around in the dark, seeking out a spirit who's ready to scare the crap out of them and the audience. I do give the studio credit for trying to go in a new direction, rather than continuing to churn out the same old haunted house motif, but this entry falls flat. The previous 2 films have been criticized for the portrayal of the Warren's and how much they actually had a hand in these cases, so who knows how much of this installment is true? Although I do enjoy Patrick Wilson's and Vera Farmiga's performances as these characters, this was a messy, disappointment film for the franchise. I'd be up for another one of their adventures, hoping they could end things on a higher note than this. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/21 10:45 PM
Just realized I posted these in the wrong thread:
A QUIET PLACE PART II
John Krasinski is at it again, wonderfully weaving suspense and themes of family, loss, and communication throughout his follow-up to the hugely successful original. The opening plays as a brief prequel, beginning on day 1 and the monster's arrival on earth. From there, we're immediately thrown back to the end of Part I and pick the Abbott's up from there. Having their home destroyed with the events in the first film, the Abbott family is now on the move, seeking shelter and resources. They come upon Cillian Murphy's Emmett and his hideout in a local steel mill (Cillian having being introduced to us during said prequel). The film then splits off into 2, and then at times, 3 separate storylines before coming together at the end. Again, Krasinski leaves the film on such a high note that the audience is wanting more and this is easily left open for a third installment that I'm sure will come to fruition once the numbers from this weekend roll in. If you enjoyed the events of the original, you're going to enjoy this sequel just as much as this is truly a sequel, and not just a bridge to a third, trilogy ending film. For my money, I still prefer the original slightly more, but this is definitely a film enjoyed in theaters. 7.5/10
CRUELLA
Disney is once again showing their baddies some love, moving on from Maleficent and this time turning their attention to Cruella de Vil. When the trailer was originally dropped, fans complained about how this was too similar to JOKER, which it was not. And even if it was, would that really be such a bad thing? Considering JOKER made over $1 billion and won multiple Oscars. However, had this not been a Disney property and constrained by the House of Mouse, this could have been a better and darker film. As such, it's still a fun ride but just missed it's potential in my opinion. Emma Stone is deliciously devilish as Estella/Cruella, an orphan who grows up on the hard streets of London with her friends and pseudo-family Jasper (Joel Fry) and Horace (Paul Walter Hauser) working as grifters to get by. By the time she's an adult, she sets her sights on becoming a fashion designer, wanting to work at the most "in" store in town, hoping it'll be a springboard for her to break into the business. Unfortunately for her, she's hired as a cleaner and rebuffed by her boss whenever she attempts to pitch him ideas. Terrible and unsatisfied at her position, she's soon hired by the Baroness (Emma Thompson) immediately after being fired from her cleaning position. The Baroness is THE last word in fashion during this time period of London in the 1970's. Before long, Estella embraces her Cruella side before going toe-to-toe with the Baroness for both personal and professional reasons. Stone was most enjoyable when she was given the freedom to dial up the Cruella character, but sadly, this is short lived. Jasper and Horace both shine in their own way as her sidekicks and you can feel the chemistry between the three. However, the most enjoyable interactions are between Estella/Cruella and the Baroness herself. Throughout the duration of the film, Thompson at times seems to be the heart and soul of this story. She is likewise absolutely wonderful and her many scenes with Stone never become stale or dull. I'd be up for more of Cruella's antics if Disney were to roll the dice on her sequel. 6.5/10
A QUIET PLACE PART II
John Krasinski is at it again, wonderfully weaving suspense and themes of family, loss, and communication throughout his follow-up to the hugely successful original. The opening plays as a brief prequel, beginning on day 1 and the monster's arrival on earth. From there, we're immediately thrown back to the end of Part I and pick the Abbott's up from there. Having their home destroyed with the events in the first film, the Abbott family is now on the move, seeking shelter and resources. They come upon Cillian Murphy's Emmett and his hideout in a local steel mill (Cillian having being introduced to us during said prequel). The film then splits off into 2, and then at times, 3 separate storylines before coming together at the end. Again, Krasinski leaves the film on such a high note that the audience is wanting more and this is easily left open for a third installment that I'm sure will come to fruition once the numbers from this weekend roll in. If you enjoyed the events of the original, you're going to enjoy this sequel just as much as this is truly a sequel, and not just a bridge to a third, trilogy ending film. For my money, I still prefer the original slightly more, but this is definitely a film enjoyed in theaters. 7.5/10
CRUELLA
Disney is once again showing their baddies some love, moving on from Maleficent and this time turning their attention to Cruella de Vil. When the trailer was originally dropped, fans complained about how this was too similar to JOKER, which it was not. And even if it was, would that really be such a bad thing? Considering JOKER made over $1 billion and won multiple Oscars. However, had this not been a Disney property and constrained by the House of Mouse, this could have been a better and darker film. As such, it's still a fun ride but just missed it's potential in my opinion. Emma Stone is deliciously devilish as Estella/Cruella, an orphan who grows up on the hard streets of London with her friends and pseudo-family Jasper (Joel Fry) and Horace (Paul Walter Hauser) working as grifters to get by. By the time she's an adult, she sets her sights on becoming a fashion designer, wanting to work at the most "in" store in town, hoping it'll be a springboard for her to break into the business. Unfortunately for her, she's hired as a cleaner and rebuffed by her boss whenever she attempts to pitch him ideas. Terrible and unsatisfied at her position, she's soon hired by the Baroness (Emma Thompson) immediately after being fired from her cleaning position. The Baroness is THE last word in fashion during this time period of London in the 1970's. Before long, Estella embraces her Cruella side before going toe-to-toe with the Baroness for both personal and professional reasons. Stone was most enjoyable when she was given the freedom to dial up the Cruella character, but sadly, this is short lived. Jasper and Horace both shine in their own way as her sidekicks and you can feel the chemistry between the three. However, the most enjoyable interactions are between Estella/Cruella and the Baroness herself. Throughout the duration of the film, Thompson at times seems to be the heart and soul of this story. She is likewise absolutely wonderful and her many scenes with Stone never become stale or dull. I'd be up for more of Cruella's antics if Disney were to roll the dice on her sequel. 6.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/21 09:24 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE CONJURING: THE DEVIL MADE ME DO IT
Ed and Lorraine Warren are back for another paranormal adventure from their case files. This takes place during 1981 in Connecticut and involves the exorcisms of both David Glatzel and Arne Johnson. The film opens up with the exorcism of 8-year-old David and at first, I figured this would be another short story opener like the two previous films before transitioning towards a new case. However, the demon who's possessing David moves into Arne, who then early in the film commits murder and is the first person (in this country anyway) to use demonic possession as a defense during his manslaughter trial. When I first heard this was going to be about exorcisms and demonic possessions, I wasn't exactly thrilled as I'm not a fan of the subgenre (and yes, that includes THE EXORCIST as well). The first film was fantastic, the second was a worthy follow up, and this unfortunately is the worst of the bunch. James Wan's tension, suspense building, and overall touch are sorely lacking. This is the first film in the trilogy that delves deep into Lorraine's clairvoyance gift as it's used in passing during the first 2 installments; however, here it's a major theme, which was one of the issues I had with the film, bouncing back-and-forth from vision to realty. Not as many scares either as there aren't characters stumbling around in the dark, seeking out a spirit who's ready to scare the crap out of them and the audience. I do give the studio credit for trying to go in a new direction, rather than continuing to churn out the same old haunted house motif, but this entry falls flat. The previous 2 films have been criticized for the portrayal of the Warren's and how much they actually had a hand in these cases, so who knows how much of this installment is true? Although I do enjoy Patrick Wilson's and Vera Farmiga's performances as these characters, this was a messy, disappointment film for the franchise. I'd be up for another one of their adventures, hoping they could end things on a higher note than this. 5.5/10
Ed and Lorraine Warren are back for another paranormal adventure from their case files. This takes place during 1981 in Connecticut and involves the exorcisms of both David Glatzel and Arne Johnson. The film opens up with the exorcism of 8-year-old David and at first, I figured this would be another short story opener like the two previous films before transitioning towards a new case. However, the demon who's possessing David moves into Arne, who then early in the film commits murder and is the first person (in this country anyway) to use demonic possession as a defense during his manslaughter trial. When I first heard this was going to be about exorcisms and demonic possessions, I wasn't exactly thrilled as I'm not a fan of the subgenre (and yes, that includes THE EXORCIST as well). The first film was fantastic, the second was a worthy follow up, and this unfortunately is the worst of the bunch. James Wan's tension, suspense building, and overall touch are sorely lacking. This is the first film in the trilogy that delves deep into Lorraine's clairvoyance gift as it's used in passing during the first 2 installments; however, here it's a major theme, which was one of the issues I had with the film, bouncing back-and-forth from vision to realty. Not as many scares either as there aren't characters stumbling around in the dark, seeking out a spirit who's ready to scare the crap out of them and the audience. I do give the studio credit for trying to go in a new direction, rather than continuing to churn out the same old haunted house motif, but this entry falls flat. The previous 2 films have been criticized for the portrayal of the Warren's and how much they actually had a hand in these cases, so who knows how much of this installment is true? Although I do enjoy Patrick Wilson's and Vera Farmiga's performances as these characters, this was a messy, disappointment film for the franchise. I'd be up for another one of their adventures, hoping they could end things on a higher note than this. 5.5/10
Watched it on my flight home. What a mess of a movie. I thought the first one was rather good, but then they just lost it. The Warrens were full of it in reality, but it's perfect fodder for Hollywood and excellent entertainment for people who get a kick out of the genre. Sadly, they didn't deliver this time around.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/21 10:52 PM
Agreed. The second entry into the franchise wasn't bad but not as good as the original but I do agree that part III was a mess. How unfortunate as I was excited when I heard it was coming out. Glad I didn't have to pay or go to the theaters for this as I watched it on HBO Max. I know a lot of people are upset that they're releasing movies in the theater and on HBO Max on the same day but as a consumer, I absolutely love it!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/12/21 11:17 PM
THE WORLD TO COME
New York, 1856, THE WORLD TO COME stars Casey Affleck and Katherine Waterston as Dyer and Abigail, a grieving couple who just recently lost their only child Nellie. Dyer is a wounded man, both physically and emotionally. He pours himself into his work, constantly keeping busy, in order to not have to cope with the loss, while also wanting to attempt at having another child with Abigail. Not as busy and unsatisfied with her domestic duties, Abigail is not ready for that step yet. As they grow apart, the distance is exacerbated when new neighbors Finney and Tallie move in. Abigail and Tallie quickly strike up a friendship that soon becomes more than that: forbidden love. Due to the time period and society's unaccepting nature of a lesbian couple, they must keep it quite. There are times throughout the film where there is some tension, wondering if the couple will be found out by their husbands or an unsuspecting passerby. Dyer and Finney only seem to talk about their work, whereas the women talk about writing, poems, and literature (they also appear to be more intellectual than the brute men). Waterston plays the delicate flower, while Vanessa Kirby is more the free spirit of the couple. An enjoyable watch that's somewhat reminiscent of a female version of BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN. 6.5/10
New York, 1856, THE WORLD TO COME stars Casey Affleck and Katherine Waterston as Dyer and Abigail, a grieving couple who just recently lost their only child Nellie. Dyer is a wounded man, both physically and emotionally. He pours himself into his work, constantly keeping busy, in order to not have to cope with the loss, while also wanting to attempt at having another child with Abigail. Not as busy and unsatisfied with her domestic duties, Abigail is not ready for that step yet. As they grow apart, the distance is exacerbated when new neighbors Finney and Tallie move in. Abigail and Tallie quickly strike up a friendship that soon becomes more than that: forbidden love. Due to the time period and society's unaccepting nature of a lesbian couple, they must keep it quite. There are times throughout the film where there is some tension, wondering if the couple will be found out by their husbands or an unsuspecting passerby. Dyer and Finney only seem to talk about their work, whereas the women talk about writing, poems, and literature (they also appear to be more intellectual than the brute men). Waterston plays the delicate flower, while Vanessa Kirby is more the free spirit of the couple. An enjoyable watch that's somewhat reminiscent of a female version of BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/13/21 09:57 PM
CITY OF LIES
CITY OF LIES stars Johnny Depp as Detective Russell Poole and Forest Whitaker as journalist Jack Jackson. During the opening of the film, Poole is called to investigate a road rage incident turned deadly that before long, sets him on a course in search for the killer of Christopher Wallace aka The Notorious B.I.G. Years later, Jackson hunts down Poole, now living in isolation after having been forced out of the LAPD, to inquire what his investigation found as he writes a 20 year retrospective piece on Wallace. Poole takes him through what he found, where he was forced to not follow leads by his superiors, and why. An interesting subject matter with 2 household names that should have made for a better film. The script is soft, leaving Depp and Whitaker with not much to chew on. However, Depp in particular seems to be going through the motions as this seems like a cash grab film for him. The detective he's playing, Poole, lost his family, job, and reputation as many consider him to be nothing more than a cooky conspiracy theorist, due to this case. I never got any sense of that anger, frustration, loneliness, or isolation one would expect from a man who's lost everything attempting to simply do his job. The final product is disappointing, even if it does make some explosive accusations about who was really involved in the death of The Notorious B.I.G. 5.5/10
CITY OF LIES stars Johnny Depp as Detective Russell Poole and Forest Whitaker as journalist Jack Jackson. During the opening of the film, Poole is called to investigate a road rage incident turned deadly that before long, sets him on a course in search for the killer of Christopher Wallace aka The Notorious B.I.G. Years later, Jackson hunts down Poole, now living in isolation after having been forced out of the LAPD, to inquire what his investigation found as he writes a 20 year retrospective piece on Wallace. Poole takes him through what he found, where he was forced to not follow leads by his superiors, and why. An interesting subject matter with 2 household names that should have made for a better film. The script is soft, leaving Depp and Whitaker with not much to chew on. However, Depp in particular seems to be going through the motions as this seems like a cash grab film for him. The detective he's playing, Poole, lost his family, job, and reputation as many consider him to be nothing more than a cooky conspiracy theorist, due to this case. I never got any sense of that anger, frustration, loneliness, or isolation one would expect from a man who's lost everything attempting to simply do his job. The final product is disappointing, even if it does make some explosive accusations about who was really involved in the death of The Notorious B.I.G. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/16/21 10:24 PM
THE HITMAN'S WIFE'S BODYGUARD
They say two's company and three's a crowd and in this instance, they're 100% right. What made THE HITMAN'S BODYGUARD such a success was the camaraderie and banter between stars Ryan Reynolds and Samuel L. Jackson. However, with this unnecessary sequel (what else do you expect from Lionsgate studio?) Salma Hayek is shoehorned in to the script and takes over, cutting Jackson's screen time in favor for herself. And while that isn't her fault and she was enjoyable as her supporting role in the original, here, her chemistry doesn't work as well with Reynolds. Constantly screaming to get her point across while spewing bad jokes that aren't near as funny as the original. The film also is too fast paced when it opens, with Reynolds quickly getting thrown out of a therapy session, to being introduced to Frank Grillo's character from Boston who's somehow demoted to being an Interpol agent in Italy (this entire character and his brief subplot could have been cut), to Antonio Banderas' bad Bond villain, Aristotle Papadopolous. The story also has a more ludicrous and over-the-top, convoluted premise than the original involving Aristotle wanting to destroy the entire European power grid as payback for sanctions placed upon his country of Greece. Overall, this is a terrible sequel and I was ready for the credits to roll about the midway point. Hopefully this does bad enough to not entice Lionsgate to make a third entry in the franchise. 4/10
They say two's company and three's a crowd and in this instance, they're 100% right. What made THE HITMAN'S BODYGUARD such a success was the camaraderie and banter between stars Ryan Reynolds and Samuel L. Jackson. However, with this unnecessary sequel (what else do you expect from Lionsgate studio?) Salma Hayek is shoehorned in to the script and takes over, cutting Jackson's screen time in favor for herself. And while that isn't her fault and she was enjoyable as her supporting role in the original, here, her chemistry doesn't work as well with Reynolds. Constantly screaming to get her point across while spewing bad jokes that aren't near as funny as the original. The film also is too fast paced when it opens, with Reynolds quickly getting thrown out of a therapy session, to being introduced to Frank Grillo's character from Boston who's somehow demoted to being an Interpol agent in Italy (this entire character and his brief subplot could have been cut), to Antonio Banderas' bad Bond villain, Aristotle Papadopolous. The story also has a more ludicrous and over-the-top, convoluted premise than the original involving Aristotle wanting to destroy the entire European power grid as payback for sanctions placed upon his country of Greece. Overall, this is a terrible sequel and I was ready for the credits to roll about the midway point. Hopefully this does bad enough to not entice Lionsgate to make a third entry in the franchise. 4/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/17/21 12:54 AM
I enjoy reading your reviews even if I have little to no interest in watching most of the movies you suffer through!
I can't help but wonder if Casey Affleck took that role in The World to Come as some sort of damage control for his reputation considering some of the stuff that has come out about him recently.
I can't help but wonder if Casey Affleck took that role in The World to Come as some sort of damage control for his reputation considering some of the stuff that has come out about him recently.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/17/21 01:21 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
I enjoy reading your reviews even if I have little to no interest in watching most of the movies you suffer through!
I can't help but wonder if Casey Affleck took that role in The World to Come as some sort of damage control for his reputation considering some of the stuff that has come out about him recently.
I can't help but wonder if Casey Affleck took that role in The World to Come as some sort of damage control for his reputation considering some of the stuff that has come out about him recently.
I appreciate the feedback. I was wondering why Affleck took this role and the role in EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE? He seems to be struggling in both roles, not just as an actor but as a person as well. Wonder if it's some form of self-inflicting punishment?
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Thief (1981)
Directed by Michael Mann, it's an inoffensive watch. Great cinematography as you'd come to expect from a master of his craft. Similar to Heat, but lacking in the high-end production values and thrilling set pieces. James Caan is charismatic and believable in his role as the titular thief, while Robert Prosky is in his element as the antagonist who cajoles him into one last big score. Certain plot points such as the love interest could've been more fleshed out, like they were in Heat. Mann improved on this with Manhunter in 1986, and perfected it with Heat in 1995.
Directed by Michael Mann, it's an inoffensive watch. Great cinematography as you'd come to expect from a master of his craft. Similar to Heat, but lacking in the high-end production values and thrilling set pieces. James Caan is charismatic and believable in his role as the titular thief, while Robert Prosky is in his element as the antagonist who cajoles him into one last big score. Certain plot points such as the love interest could've been more fleshed out, like they were in Heat. Mann improved on this with Manhunter in 1986, and perfected it with Heat in 1995.
I watched this for the first time a few weeks ago. I'd never heard of it until about a year or so ago and know it has somewhat of a cult following; however, it didn't do much for me. Mann for me is usually a miss. And while I did enjoy both Caan and Prosky in their respective roles, overall, the film was forgettable with nothing really standing out.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/18/21 11:06 PM
WILLY'S WONDERLAND
Nicolas Cage stars as an unnamed janitor, without a single line of dialogue, and still managers to be a bad ass. Cage's character is stranded in a small town after all 4 of his tires are blown by a spike strip, with teenagers being blamed as the culprits. With no cash to pay for the repairs, he agrees to work off the debt by spending a night cleaning Willy's Wonderland, an abandoned knock-off of Chuck E. Cheese, complete with animatronics. The restaurant has been abandoned due to its horrific past; however, the owner is trying to fix it up for a reopening and as such, will pay for the repair on Cage's car in exchange for one night of labor. The only problem is, Cage is unaware he's being locked inside with animatronics looking to devour him for their next meal. Going in to this, you know the premise is tongue-in-cheek. It doesn't take itself too seriously and is a fun B movie. Nothing about Cage's character is revealed, which actually benefits him. It gives him an air of mystique and not everything needs an explanation. If you're a fan of Cage or just looking for something a little humorous or outside the box, you could do a lot worse than this. 5.5/10
Nicolas Cage stars as an unnamed janitor, without a single line of dialogue, and still managers to be a bad ass. Cage's character is stranded in a small town after all 4 of his tires are blown by a spike strip, with teenagers being blamed as the culprits. With no cash to pay for the repairs, he agrees to work off the debt by spending a night cleaning Willy's Wonderland, an abandoned knock-off of Chuck E. Cheese, complete with animatronics. The restaurant has been abandoned due to its horrific past; however, the owner is trying to fix it up for a reopening and as such, will pay for the repair on Cage's car in exchange for one night of labor. The only problem is, Cage is unaware he's being locked inside with animatronics looking to devour him for their next meal. Going in to this, you know the premise is tongue-in-cheek. It doesn't take itself too seriously and is a fun B movie. Nothing about Cage's character is revealed, which actually benefits him. It gives him an air of mystique and not everything needs an explanation. If you're a fan of Cage or just looking for something a little humorous or outside the box, you could do a lot worse than this. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/21 06:24 AM
FATALE (2020)
Derrick Tyler (Michael Ealy), wealthy, successful agent for basketball stars, goes to Vegas and has a one-night stand with Val Quinlan (Hilary Swank). After his lavish home in LA is invaded and he's nearly killed, Quinlan turns up as the lead LAPD detective on the case. This evolves to several murders, and Quinlan using Tyler for her own predatory and nefarious schemes. The plot is absurd, but the action is good, and it's tense and gripping more often than not. Swank is good, if you like pure, unadulterated viciousness. Ealy has one expression: hang-dog.
Derrick Tyler (Michael Ealy), wealthy, successful agent for basketball stars, goes to Vegas and has a one-night stand with Val Quinlan (Hilary Swank). After his lavish home in LA is invaded and he's nearly killed, Quinlan turns up as the lead LAPD detective on the case. This evolves to several murders, and Quinlan using Tyler for her own predatory and nefarious schemes. The plot is absurd, but the action is good, and it's tense and gripping more often than not. Swank is good, if you like pure, unadulterated viciousness. Ealy has one expression: hang-dog.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/21/21 10:33 PM
Thanks for the review Turnbull. This is on my list, just haven't got around to it yet.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/22/21 08:22 PM
KEY LARGO (1948)
Frank McCloud (Humphrey Bogart) visits a small Key Largo hotel to pay his respects to the widow (Lauren Bacall) of a guy who died in his outfit during WWII, and her father in law (Lionel Barrymore). The only guests at the hotel are a gang of thugs, headed by Johnny Rocco (Edward G. Robinson), waiting to do a counterfeit money deal and trying (not very well) to hide their thuggery by pretending to be sports fisherman. A hurricane blows away their pretense, giving full steam ahead to Rocco's pathological evil. The supporting cast is aces, including Thomas Gomez, Dan Seymour, Marc Lawrence, Harry Lewis and Claire Trevor, as Rocco's moll (Oscar winner). The script (based on a stage play by Sherwood Anderson) is excellent, and the lighting and direction (John Huston) make the most of the movie. But it's Robinson's all the way, putting in his finest gangster performance. Only Cagney in "White Heat" comes close to the inner psychopath Robinson unleashes here, but it's a nuanced performance that includes humor and fear--making him all the more scary. A great movie, and another brilliant performance by Hollywood's most underrated great actor.
Frank McCloud (Humphrey Bogart) visits a small Key Largo hotel to pay his respects to the widow (Lauren Bacall) of a guy who died in his outfit during WWII, and her father in law (Lionel Barrymore). The only guests at the hotel are a gang of thugs, headed by Johnny Rocco (Edward G. Robinson), waiting to do a counterfeit money deal and trying (not very well) to hide their thuggery by pretending to be sports fisherman. A hurricane blows away their pretense, giving full steam ahead to Rocco's pathological evil. The supporting cast is aces, including Thomas Gomez, Dan Seymour, Marc Lawrence, Harry Lewis and Claire Trevor, as Rocco's moll (Oscar winner). The script (based on a stage play by Sherwood Anderson) is excellent, and the lighting and direction (John Huston) make the most of the movie. But it's Robinson's all the way, putting in his finest gangster performance. Only Cagney in "White Heat" comes close to the inner psychopath Robinson unleashes here, but it's a nuanced performance that includes humor and fear--making him all the more scary. A great movie, and another brilliant performance by Hollywood's most underrated great actor.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/22/21 09:42 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
KEY LARGO (1948)
Frank McCloud (Humphrey Bogart) visits a small Key Largo hotel to pay his respects to the widow (Lauren Bacall) of a guy who died in his outfit during WWII, and her father in law (Lionel Barrymore). The only guests at the hotel are a gang of thugs, headed by Johnny Rocco (Edward G. Robinson), waiting to do a counterfeit money deal and trying (not very well) to hide their thuggery by pretending to be sports fisherman. A hurricane blows away their pretense, giving full steam ahead to Rocco's pathological evil. The supporting cast is aces, including Thomas Gomez, Dan Seymour, Marc Lawrence, Harry Lewis and Claire Trevor, as Rocco's moll (Oscar winner). The script (based on a stage play by Sherwood Anderson) is excellent, and the lighting and direction (John Huston) make the most of the movie. But it's Robinson's all the way, putting in his finest gangster performance. Only Cagney in "White Heat" comes close to the inner psychopath Robinson unleashes here, but it's a nuanced performance that includes humor and fear--making him all the more scary. A great movie, and another brilliant performance by Hollywood's most underrated great actor.
Frank McCloud (Humphrey Bogart) visits a small Key Largo hotel to pay his respects to the widow (Lauren Bacall) of a guy who died in his outfit during WWII, and her father in law (Lionel Barrymore). The only guests at the hotel are a gang of thugs, headed by Johnny Rocco (Edward G. Robinson), waiting to do a counterfeit money deal and trying (not very well) to hide their thuggery by pretending to be sports fisherman. A hurricane blows away their pretense, giving full steam ahead to Rocco's pathological evil. The supporting cast is aces, including Thomas Gomez, Dan Seymour, Marc Lawrence, Harry Lewis and Claire Trevor, as Rocco's moll (Oscar winner). The script (based on a stage play by Sherwood Anderson) is excellent, and the lighting and direction (John Huston) make the most of the movie. But it's Robinson's all the way, putting in his finest gangster performance. Only Cagney in "White Heat" comes close to the inner psychopath Robinson unleashes here, but it's a nuanced performance that includes humor and fear--making him all the more scary. A great movie, and another brilliant performance by Hollywood's most underrated great actor.
U must have seen it (again probably)..it was just on this afternoon on T.C.M. ...awesome flick.
Posted By: fergie
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/24/21 10:41 PM
ARMY OF THE DEAD 2021
Not a great film and lacking any coherent story…if this film was 15 mins long, it’d be great because it’s downhill all the way after that…it started off great!
Bad things:
Typical “strong†female leads replacing and acting like males
Helicopter pilot (who I read is an alleged comedian) was awful
The lead guys daughter in the film had no need to be there, her role and “mission†was completely unnecessary
Zombies can now apparently develop meaningful relationships and social structure
Zombies can’t obviously climb over walled storage containers (apparently they were happy inside a Las Vegas wallled city 20ft high)
Good things:
Possibly the special effects? At a stretch
AVOID…..
Not a great film and lacking any coherent story…if this film was 15 mins long, it’d be great because it’s downhill all the way after that…it started off great!
Bad things:
Typical “strong†female leads replacing and acting like males
Helicopter pilot (who I read is an alleged comedian) was awful
The lead guys daughter in the film had no need to be there, her role and “mission†was completely unnecessary
Zombies can now apparently develop meaningful relationships and social structure
Zombies can’t obviously climb over walled storage containers (apparently they were happy inside a Las Vegas wallled city 20ft high)
Good things:
Possibly the special effects? At a stretch
AVOID…..
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/21 08:23 PM
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN (1980)
Every schoolboy has a fantasy of going back in time and using modern American military force to subdue those pesky enemies that bedeviled our country in decades (or centuries) past. This is the (almost) adult version:
The supercarrier Nimitz, sailing off of Hawaii, gets caught in an unusually powerful storm that turns out to be a time warp. Captain Matt Yelland (Kirk Douglas) and his officers can't figure out why they aren't able to contact HQ or other Navy ships. They monitor low-band radio broadcasts and send out recon aircraft---and discover that they've been plopped down off Pearl Harbor on Dec.6, 1941. Now Yelland thinks he has an opportunity to reverse history--or does he? In keeping with the general silliness of this film, the cast (which includes Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, Ron O'neill, James Farentino and Charles Durning) aren't trying very hard. But, the producer evidently got a lot of cooperation from the Navy, and there's lots of good Naval Ops footage and equipment close-ups. If you like that sort of thing (I do), watch it once. If not, skip it.
Every schoolboy has a fantasy of going back in time and using modern American military force to subdue those pesky enemies that bedeviled our country in decades (or centuries) past. This is the (almost) adult version:
The supercarrier Nimitz, sailing off of Hawaii, gets caught in an unusually powerful storm that turns out to be a time warp. Captain Matt Yelland (Kirk Douglas) and his officers can't figure out why they aren't able to contact HQ or other Navy ships. They monitor low-band radio broadcasts and send out recon aircraft---and discover that they've been plopped down off Pearl Harbor on Dec.6, 1941. Now Yelland thinks he has an opportunity to reverse history--or does he? In keeping with the general silliness of this film, the cast (which includes Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, Ron O'neill, James Farentino and Charles Durning) aren't trying very hard. But, the producer evidently got a lot of cooperation from the Navy, and there's lots of good Naval Ops footage and equipment close-ups. If you like that sort of thing (I do), watch it once. If not, skip it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/21 11:01 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN (1980)
Every schoolboy has a fantasy of going back in time and using modern American military force to subdue those pesky enemies that bedeviled our country in decades (or centuries) past. This is the (almost) adult version:
The supercarrier Nimitz, sailing off of Hawaii, gets caught in an unusually powerful storm that turns out to be a time warp. Captain Matt Yelland (Kirk Douglas) and his officers can't figure out why they aren't able to contact HQ or other Navy ships. They monitor low-band radio broadcasts and send out recon aircraft---and discover that they've been plopped down off Pearl Harbor on Dec.6, 1941. Now Yelland thinks he has an opportunity to reverse history--or does he? In keeping with the general silliness of this film, the cast (which includes Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, Ron O'neill, James Farentino and Charles Durning) aren't trying very hard. But, the producer evidently got a lot of cooperation from the Navy, and there's lots of good Naval Ops footage and equipment close-ups. If you like that sort of thing (I do), watch it once. If not, skip it.
Every schoolboy has a fantasy of going back in time and using modern American military force to subdue those pesky enemies that bedeviled our country in decades (or centuries) past. This is the (almost) adult version:
The supercarrier Nimitz, sailing off of Hawaii, gets caught in an unusually powerful storm that turns out to be a time warp. Captain Matt Yelland (Kirk Douglas) and his officers can't figure out why they aren't able to contact HQ or other Navy ships. They monitor low-band radio broadcasts and send out recon aircraft---and discover that they've been plopped down off Pearl Harbor on Dec.6, 1941. Now Yelland thinks he has an opportunity to reverse history--or does he? In keeping with the general silliness of this film, the cast (which includes Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, Ron O'neill, James Farentino and Charles Durning) aren't trying very hard. But, the producer evidently got a lot of cooperation from the Navy, and there's lots of good Naval Ops footage and equipment close-ups. If you like that sort of thing (I do), watch it once. If not, skip it.
I saw it years ago TB. I had never heard of it before but it's one of my best friends movies so we watched it along with his kids and I remember enjoying it. Haven't seen it since and I remember never hearing of this film prior, but it was good.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/27/21 11:47 PM
I've been watching a lot of old '80s and '90s movies lately, some movies I've seen, some I don't remember seeing and some I definitely never saw before. Watched Joshua Tree with Dolph Lundgren last night. Saw it when it first came out. Underrated silly fun with lots of action and Dolph doing his best American accent lol
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/21 12:24 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
I had never seen or heard of this before until a few months ago when friends of mine suggested watching it. Great performances all around and like you said, very depressing. Solid flick!
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/21 11:19 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
I had never seen or heard of this before until a few months ago when friends of mine suggested watching it. Great performances all around and like you said, very depressing. Solid flick!
I saw it some 30 years back, but I had forgotten most of it. Another guy worth mentioning is James Spader. He is so good at playing psychopaths that I almost feel he should only play those roles. Did you see 2 Days In The Valley? That's another underrated flick
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/28/21 11:39 PM
I've seen parts of it. Not 100% sure I've seen it all the way through.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/30/21 01:51 AM
ZOLA
Based on true events, Zola tells her account of a road trip to Florida gone wrong. The film opens with Zola, a waitress at a country food restaurant who happens to one day be the server for Stefani. Unable to place where she has seen and/or met Zola before, Stefani inquires if Zola's ever danced, which she confirms. They exchange numbers and after Zola dances at her other job, Stefani asks her is she wants to take a quick weekend trip to Florida to make some serious money. All about the hustle, Zola quickly agrees but finds out early in the trip she's been duped into going by Stefani and her pimp, who is only credited as X. At the mercy of X who drove her, Stefani, and Stefani's dimwitted boyfriend Derrek, she soon finds herself unable to escape until the trip is over, while at the same time, expected to engage in prostitution for X. Director Janicza Bravo does a wonderful job at building suspense, as for the entire trip the audience has a sense of dread as the story continues to unfold. Wonderful performances all around from the 4 main players. The film is based upon tweets Zola sent out after the ordeal and only a few scenes are from Stefani's point of view, as she's denied Zola's recounting of the events (otherwise, this is Zola's film and from her view point only). A weird 48 hours (but then again, it is Florida), and we'll never know for sure how much of this is true, but it does make for an entertaining film that exceeded my expectations for it going in. 6.5/10
Based on true events, Zola tells her account of a road trip to Florida gone wrong. The film opens with Zola, a waitress at a country food restaurant who happens to one day be the server for Stefani. Unable to place where she has seen and/or met Zola before, Stefani inquires if Zola's ever danced, which she confirms. They exchange numbers and after Zola dances at her other job, Stefani asks her is she wants to take a quick weekend trip to Florida to make some serious money. All about the hustle, Zola quickly agrees but finds out early in the trip she's been duped into going by Stefani and her pimp, who is only credited as X. At the mercy of X who drove her, Stefani, and Stefani's dimwitted boyfriend Derrek, she soon finds herself unable to escape until the trip is over, while at the same time, expected to engage in prostitution for X. Director Janicza Bravo does a wonderful job at building suspense, as for the entire trip the audience has a sense of dread as the story continues to unfold. Wonderful performances all around from the 4 main players. The film is based upon tweets Zola sent out after the ordeal and only a few scenes are from Stefani's point of view, as she's denied Zola's recounting of the events (otherwise, this is Zola's film and from her view point only). A weird 48 hours (but then again, it is Florida), and we'll never know for sure how much of this is true, but it does make for an entertaining film that exceeded my expectations for it going in. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/21 03:32 PM
THE FOREVER PURGE
This franchise has long since run it's course. This latest installment follows a (white) family of ranchers on the Texas boarder, along with their predominately Hispanic workforce, who hunker down for the 12 hour purge and escape unscathed. The following morning, when everything should be back to normal, a former white ranch hand and a group of "purifiers" hold the family hostage to "cleanse" the country of the "foreign invaders." And this is not only relegated to Texas, as this is a nationwide uprising, because, you know, "white supremacy." Almost an hour and 45 minutes worth of gaslighting and virtue signaling with completely exaggerated, subtitle, cartoon characters like some of the villains (once of which has a swastika on his left cheek while another, as seen from the trailer, continues to scream at a Hispanic character to "SPEAK ENGLISH!"). You can imagine where the rest of the film goes from here. There was so much "unity" on display here that it was almost unbearable. The best way to sum up this film is with 2 words: liberal porn. 2/10
This franchise has long since run it's course. This latest installment follows a (white) family of ranchers on the Texas boarder, along with their predominately Hispanic workforce, who hunker down for the 12 hour purge and escape unscathed. The following morning, when everything should be back to normal, a former white ranch hand and a group of "purifiers" hold the family hostage to "cleanse" the country of the "foreign invaders." And this is not only relegated to Texas, as this is a nationwide uprising, because, you know, "white supremacy." Almost an hour and 45 minutes worth of gaslighting and virtue signaling with completely exaggerated, subtitle, cartoon characters like some of the villains (once of which has a swastika on his left cheek while another, as seen from the trailer, continues to scream at a Hispanic character to "SPEAK ENGLISH!"). You can imagine where the rest of the film goes from here. There was so much "unity" on display here that it was almost unbearable. The best way to sum up this film is with 2 words: liberal porn. 2/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/21 04:36 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I've been watching a lot of old '80s and '90s movies lately, some movies I've seen, some I don't remember seeing and some I definitely never saw before. Watched Joshua Tree with Dolph Lundgren last night. Saw it when it first came out. Underrated silly fun with lots of action and Dolph doing his best American accent lol
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
Watched Less Than Zero a few days ago. Had completely forgotten about it, but not Jami Gertz' beauty. Not a bad movie, but it was a bit depressing at times. Can't help but wonder if Downey was coked up for real during the filming. That was some performance
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/21 07:28 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE FOREVER PURGE
This franchise has long since run it's course. This latest installment follows a (white) family of ranchers on the Texas boarder, along with their predominately Hispanic workforce, who hunker down for the 12 hour purge and escape unscathed. The following morning, when everything should be back to normal, a former white ranch hand and a group of "purifiers" hold the family hostage to "cleanse" the country of the "foreign invaders." And this is not only relegated to Texas, as this is a nationwide uprising, because, you know, "white supremacy." Almost an hour and 45 minutes worth of gaslighting and virtue signaling with completely exaggerated, subtitle, cartoon characters like some of the villains (once of which has a swastika on his left cheek while another, as seen from the trailer, continues to scream at a Hispanic character to "SPEAK ENGLISH!"). You can imagine where the rest of the film goes from here. There was so much "unity" on display here that it was almost unbearable. The best way to sum up this film is with 2 words: liberal porn. 2/10
This franchise has long since run it's course. This latest installment follows a (white) family of ranchers on the Texas boarder, along with their predominately Hispanic workforce, who hunker down for the 12 hour purge and escape unscathed. The following morning, when everything should be back to normal, a former white ranch hand and a group of "purifiers" hold the family hostage to "cleanse" the country of the "foreign invaders." And this is not only relegated to Texas, as this is a nationwide uprising, because, you know, "white supremacy." Almost an hour and 45 minutes worth of gaslighting and virtue signaling with completely exaggerated, subtitle, cartoon characters like some of the villains (once of which has a swastika on his left cheek while another, as seen from the trailer, continues to scream at a Hispanic character to "SPEAK ENGLISH!"). You can imagine where the rest of the film goes from here. There was so much "unity" on display here that it was almost unbearable. The best way to sum up this film is with 2 words: liberal porn. 2/10
Thanks i12
So glad I saw this review before trying it out.
I WILL PASS.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/21 08:02 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Thanks i12
So glad I saw this review before trying it out.
I WILL PASS.
Smart man and glad I could help!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/21 09:01 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Thanks i12
So glad I saw this review before trying it out.
I WILL PASS.
Smart man and glad I could help!
Your reviews are outstanding and better than any of these hacks who do it for a living on the Major networks.
They only read what they are told, if Disney had a bomb, do you thing Sandy Kenyan of ABC would tell it like it is…….?
NO….He would still have to try and sell that shit LOL
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/21 07:00 AM
Just watched "Lansky" on firestick...as I have said 1nce b4..I'm not a good synopsis writer ..so in laymens terms ....was kinda cheesy..not what I expected..& Keitel was a wasted talent compared 2 his earlier work..seemed on the low budget..specially by some of the cinematography , script , & no name talent that flashes back & forth throughout the picture...I believe Keitel needed $$ 2 do this shit!......
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/03/21 07:34 PM
NO SUDDEN MOVE (2021)
In this weird neo-Noir, set in Detroit in 1954, a group of small time criminals is brought together to a family hostage to force the husband/father to steal an automotive secret from his employer that the crooks can then sell to the highest bidding car maker. The most interesting part is the interaction between two of the crooks--Goynes (Don Cheadle, looking like an emaciated Al Sharpton), and Russo (Benicio del Toro, who makes Robert Mitchum look wired on meth), with Goynes becoming the leader. Nothing is as it seems, no one is a good guy, and there are a dizzying number of double-, triple-, and quadruple-crosses. Direction by Steven Soderbergh is jerky at times, and satiric humor appears at random, often illogical, points, presumably poking fun at Fifties culture and mores. Brendan Fraser, Ray Liotta ,and Matt Damon appear, too. Acting by the principals is excellent and so is the filming; the rest, not so good.
In this weird neo-Noir, set in Detroit in 1954, a group of small time criminals is brought together to a family hostage to force the husband/father to steal an automotive secret from his employer that the crooks can then sell to the highest bidding car maker. The most interesting part is the interaction between two of the crooks--Goynes (Don Cheadle, looking like an emaciated Al Sharpton), and Russo (Benicio del Toro, who makes Robert Mitchum look wired on meth), with Goynes becoming the leader. Nothing is as it seems, no one is a good guy, and there are a dizzying number of double-, triple-, and quadruple-crosses. Direction by Steven Soderbergh is jerky at times, and satiric humor appears at random, often illogical, points, presumably poking fun at Fifties culture and mores. Brendan Fraser, Ray Liotta ,and Matt Damon appear, too. Acting by the principals is excellent and so is the filming; the rest, not so good.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/21 03:20 AM
HARPER (1966)
Private detective Lew Harper (Paul Newman) is hired by a rich, cynical matron (Lauren Bacall) to find her missing shitheel husband, whom she could care less about. His quest involves him with a former DA and pal turned bad guy(Arthur Hill); the matron's dimwitted, jealous stepdaughter (Pamela Tiffin) and her lover (Robert Wagner); cultured evil-man (Robert Webber) and uncultured evil-man (Roy Jenson, Eternal Thug); a fat, blowsy former movie star (Shelley Winters); a junkie jazz pianist (Julie Harris), and a fake guru (Strother Martin)--a great cast for that era. Their only job is to provide a playground for Newman's patented grinning, leering and cynicism--but, as usual, he's good at it. Entertaining film.
Private detective Lew Harper (Paul Newman) is hired by a rich, cynical matron (Lauren Bacall) to find her missing shitheel husband, whom she could care less about. His quest involves him with a former DA and pal turned bad guy(Arthur Hill); the matron's dimwitted, jealous stepdaughter (Pamela Tiffin) and her lover (Robert Wagner); cultured evil-man (Robert Webber) and uncultured evil-man (Roy Jenson, Eternal Thug); a fat, blowsy former movie star (Shelley Winters); a junkie jazz pianist (Julie Harris), and a fake guru (Strother Martin)--a great cast for that era. Their only job is to provide a playground for Newman's patented grinning, leering and cynicism--but, as usual, he's good at it. Entertaining film.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/21 11:41 AM
Winchester 73(1950)
Great western that I often say is more if a western noir. It’s an interesting setup because it’s a revenge story but also the gun is the ducal point and whoever had the gun kind of controls the story. When I was a kid I was as not a western fan since westerns were t really a thing anymore but I after watching so many with my grandfather I grew to really love them especially the Jimmy Stewart/Anthony Mann collaborations like this one
Great western that I often say is more if a western noir. It’s an interesting setup because it’s a revenge story but also the gun is the ducal point and whoever had the gun kind of controls the story. When I was a kid I was as not a western fan since westerns were t really a thing anymore but I after watching so many with my grandfather I grew to really love them especially the Jimmy Stewart/Anthony Mann collaborations like this one
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/21 10:32 PM
NO SUDDEN MOVE
Detroit, 1954 is our setting for this thrilling heist movie featuring a well-rounded, All-Star cast. Recently released from prison Curt Goynes (Don Cheadle) is quickly given a vague assignment to "babysit" Matt Wertz's (David Harbour's) family as he breaks into his bosses safe to steal a proprietary document. Unbeknownst to him, he will not be alone on this job as he's forced to work with Ronald Russo (Benecio Del Toro) and Charley (Kieran Culkin). However, they quickly learn they've all been set up and they must figure out by whom and why to stay alive. Once again, a wonderful cast brings this story to life from mafioso Ray Liotta, to housewife Julia Fox, to even crime boss Bill Duke, who seems rather fragile in this film unfortunately. Cheadle and Del Toro are the main stars who beautifully weave together distrust and survival within their characters. However, I must say this is probably one of the best performances I've seen from Cheadle as the hoarse voiced ex-convict, looking to make a quick score to begin a new life. Authentic set pieces such as many different cars that are featured throughout, a story that keeps you engaged and continues to flip the script on the audience during the final act. This may be a sleeper at the box since it was also released same day on HBO Max, but this was a lot of fun and I'd even be up for a second viewing sooner rather than later. 7/10
Detroit, 1954 is our setting for this thrilling heist movie featuring a well-rounded, All-Star cast. Recently released from prison Curt Goynes (Don Cheadle) is quickly given a vague assignment to "babysit" Matt Wertz's (David Harbour's) family as he breaks into his bosses safe to steal a proprietary document. Unbeknownst to him, he will not be alone on this job as he's forced to work with Ronald Russo (Benecio Del Toro) and Charley (Kieran Culkin). However, they quickly learn they've all been set up and they must figure out by whom and why to stay alive. Once again, a wonderful cast brings this story to life from mafioso Ray Liotta, to housewife Julia Fox, to even crime boss Bill Duke, who seems rather fragile in this film unfortunately. Cheadle and Del Toro are the main stars who beautifully weave together distrust and survival within their characters. However, I must say this is probably one of the best performances I've seen from Cheadle as the hoarse voiced ex-convict, looking to make a quick score to begin a new life. Authentic set pieces such as many different cars that are featured throughout, a story that keeps you engaged and continues to flip the script on the audience during the final act. This may be a sleeper at the box since it was also released same day on HBO Max, but this was a lot of fun and I'd even be up for a second viewing sooner rather than later. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/05/21 10:34 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Thanks i12
So glad I saw this review before trying it out.
I WILL PASS.
Smart man and glad I could help!
Your reviews are outstanding and better than any of these hacks who do it for a living on the Major networks.
They only read what they are told, if Disney had a bomb, do you thing Sandy Kenyan of ABC would tell it like it is…….?
NO….He would still have to try and sell that shit LOL
Thanks DP. I appreciate the positive feedback and glad you and the Mrs. enjoy them!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/21 11:06 PM
FEAR STREET PART ONE: 1994
Based upon the novels by R. L. Stine, FEAR STREET PART ONE: 1994 follows Deena, depressed and angry after her recent breakup with Sam, who's just moved to a neighboring high school. Sam, having already moved on emotionally and dating someone else, Deena quickly causes a car accident in order to get back at Sam and her new lover. However, she could not have expected for her actions to have such grave consequences for her and her friends. Honestly, I thought this was going to be a watered down, PG-13, "safe" horror film but it's not like that at all. Bloody, violent, and profanity laced (even though it does seem to be held back at times), and you've got yourself a pretty solid film even if it does slow down a bit between the second and third acts. Don't worry about gore as there isn't any here, nor is it scary unfortunately as all of the jump scares are telegraphed. How, this is not your prototypical whodunit horror film that'll keep you guessing until the very end as you're made aware of who the killer is early on and it still works. With only minor samples of some sweet 90's tracks, a script that could have used a little bit more vulgarity and humor but overall, I was not disappointed and look forward to the second installment. 6/10
Based upon the novels by R. L. Stine, FEAR STREET PART ONE: 1994 follows Deena, depressed and angry after her recent breakup with Sam, who's just moved to a neighboring high school. Sam, having already moved on emotionally and dating someone else, Deena quickly causes a car accident in order to get back at Sam and her new lover. However, she could not have expected for her actions to have such grave consequences for her and her friends. Honestly, I thought this was going to be a watered down, PG-13, "safe" horror film but it's not like that at all. Bloody, violent, and profanity laced (even though it does seem to be held back at times), and you've got yourself a pretty solid film even if it does slow down a bit between the second and third acts. Don't worry about gore as there isn't any here, nor is it scary unfortunately as all of the jump scares are telegraphed. How, this is not your prototypical whodunit horror film that'll keep you guessing until the very end as you're made aware of who the killer is early on and it still works. With only minor samples of some sweet 90's tracks, a script that could have used a little bit more vulgarity and humor but overall, I was not disappointed and look forward to the second installment. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/07/21 11:12 PM
THE TOMORROW WAR
A refreshingly new take on the alien invasion subgenre and the best Prime original I've ever seen. Chris Pratt stars as Dan Forester, ex-military and current high school biology teacher. During the December 2022 holiday season, Chris is selected as part of the first global draft to be transported 30 years into the future to assist in fighting an alien invasion before the entire human species is eradicated. Tons of action with a few wonderful supporting actors (I'm looking at both of you Yvonne Strahovski and Sam Richardson), and the typical action hero family man/heartfelt moments. A unique take on the look of the aliens and even with a runtime of 140 minutes, you'll never feel bored and will always be invested in the story. One of my favorites movies of 2021 thus far! 8/10
A refreshingly new take on the alien invasion subgenre and the best Prime original I've ever seen. Chris Pratt stars as Dan Forester, ex-military and current high school biology teacher. During the December 2022 holiday season, Chris is selected as part of the first global draft to be transported 30 years into the future to assist in fighting an alien invasion before the entire human species is eradicated. Tons of action with a few wonderful supporting actors (I'm looking at both of you Yvonne Strahovski and Sam Richardson), and the typical action hero family man/heartfelt moments. A unique take on the look of the aliens and even with a runtime of 140 minutes, you'll never feel bored and will always be invested in the story. One of my favorites movies of 2021 thus far! 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/21 06:25 PM
THE ICE ROAD
Beginning in North Dakota, THE ICE ROAD stars Liam Neeson as Mike, a truck driver who's taking care of his adult-aged, mechanic brother Gurty, who is mentally disabled. In a mine shaft in Winnipeg, there's a methane explosion that traps 26 miners. With 30 hours worth of oxygen left for the miners and having been fired from his previous job (not to mention a sweet payday from the Canadian government upon delivery of emergency supplies he's hauling), Mike and Gurty decide to teamup with Goldenrod (played by Laurence Fishburne) and Tantoo (Amber Midthunder) to make the arduous journey north. The only problem is, in order to reach the miners in time, they need to take their extremely heavy trailers on a shortcut known as the ice road, which during the winter time due to the extreme cold, the lakes freeze and truckers use them as roadways. However, this story takes place during April when the ice is ready to thaw. All I can say is after watching this, Neeson and Fishburne better have gotten paid some serious money for attaching their names to this dumpster fire. The story opens with the miners getting trapped and the audience doesn't have any connection to them. Throw in Mike's at times unpleasant and short tempered attitude with Gurty, Fishburne who's in maybe 20% of the movie, sloppy editing, obvious low budget production quality, and you have a recipe for a terrible film. With movies like this, it's obvious Neeson's losing a step. I only hope he can rebound, and quickly, from the bad taste this will leave in your mouth. 3/10
Beginning in North Dakota, THE ICE ROAD stars Liam Neeson as Mike, a truck driver who's taking care of his adult-aged, mechanic brother Gurty, who is mentally disabled. In a mine shaft in Winnipeg, there's a methane explosion that traps 26 miners. With 30 hours worth of oxygen left for the miners and having been fired from his previous job (not to mention a sweet payday from the Canadian government upon delivery of emergency supplies he's hauling), Mike and Gurty decide to teamup with Goldenrod (played by Laurence Fishburne) and Tantoo (Amber Midthunder) to make the arduous journey north. The only problem is, in order to reach the miners in time, they need to take their extremely heavy trailers on a shortcut known as the ice road, which during the winter time due to the extreme cold, the lakes freeze and truckers use them as roadways. However, this story takes place during April when the ice is ready to thaw. All I can say is after watching this, Neeson and Fishburne better have gotten paid some serious money for attaching their names to this dumpster fire. The story opens with the miners getting trapped and the audience doesn't have any connection to them. Throw in Mike's at times unpleasant and short tempered attitude with Gurty, Fishburne who's in maybe 20% of the movie, sloppy editing, obvious low budget production quality, and you have a recipe for a terrible film. With movies like this, it's obvious Neeson's losing a step. I only hope he can rebound, and quickly, from the bad taste this will leave in your mouth. 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/21 01:48 AM
BLACK WIDOW
A beautiful swan song for Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff, for the eighth and final time. The film opens in 1995 in Ohio when her world is completely shattered as her family immediately and inexplicably goes on the run. We then fast forward to 2016 where we pick up ScarJo, who is consumed with finding the originator of the widow program, Dreykov (played marvelously by Ray Winstone). During her mission she soon crosses paths with her younger sister Yelena (Florence Pugh), then enlists the help of their father Alexi/Red Guardian (David Harbour) and mother Melina (Rachel Weisz). The family dynamic between the 4 is magnetic and each were perfectly cast for their respective roles. I am rather looking forward to Pugh's direction within the MCU in the future and I wouldn't mind seeing more of the Red Guardian either. Director Cate Shortland needs to be congratulated as well for this powerhouse of a film that has themes of betrayal, family, and free will. A shout out must also be given for the marvelous henchman Taskmaster, the mesmerizing choreographed fight scenes, and top notch CGI. Marvel has done it again and this is just the type of film to bring audiences back to the theaters! 8.5/10
A beautiful swan song for Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff, for the eighth and final time. The film opens in 1995 in Ohio when her world is completely shattered as her family immediately and inexplicably goes on the run. We then fast forward to 2016 where we pick up ScarJo, who is consumed with finding the originator of the widow program, Dreykov (played marvelously by Ray Winstone). During her mission she soon crosses paths with her younger sister Yelena (Florence Pugh), then enlists the help of their father Alexi/Red Guardian (David Harbour) and mother Melina (Rachel Weisz). The family dynamic between the 4 is magnetic and each were perfectly cast for their respective roles. I am rather looking forward to Pugh's direction within the MCU in the future and I wouldn't mind seeing more of the Red Guardian either. Director Cate Shortland needs to be congratulated as well for this powerhouse of a film that has themes of betrayal, family, and free will. A shout out must also be given for the marvelous henchman Taskmaster, the mesmerizing choreographed fight scenes, and top notch CGI. Marvel has done it again and this is just the type of film to bring audiences back to the theaters! 8.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/21 02:14 AM
I can't wait to see Black Widow. Excellent review Irish!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/21 10:33 PM
FEAR STREET PART TWO: 1978
Picking up right where Part One left off, Part Two goes back and tells the story of C. Berman, the only person to ever survive an attack from the Shadyside witch. Just like it's predecessor, awesome samples of songs from the time. In addition, this plays like the time period it's set in. It's a slow burn before we get to our first death whereas Part One played like a 90's horror film with a brutal attack in the opening sequence. The story this time around, filing in more of the blanks about the Shadyside witch, didn't garner my interest enough to keep me invested in these characters, save for Sadie Sink who plays Ziggy, as the foul mouthed, pissed-off-at-the-world ying to other main star and older sister Cindy Berman (Emily Rudd) who plays the yang as "little Miss Perfect." Although it did leave with a decent enough cliff hanger and we'll see how it all wraps up with Part Three. 5/10
Picking up right where Part One left off, Part Two goes back and tells the story of C. Berman, the only person to ever survive an attack from the Shadyside witch. Just like it's predecessor, awesome samples of songs from the time. In addition, this plays like the time period it's set in. It's a slow burn before we get to our first death whereas Part One played like a 90's horror film with a brutal attack in the opening sequence. The story this time around, filing in more of the blanks about the Shadyside witch, didn't garner my interest enough to keep me invested in these characters, save for Sadie Sink who plays Ziggy, as the foul mouthed, pissed-off-at-the-world ying to other main star and older sister Cindy Berman (Emily Rudd) who plays the yang as "little Miss Perfect." Although it did leave with a decent enough cliff hanger and we'll see how it all wraps up with Part Three. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/09/21 10:33 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I can't wait to see Black Widow. Excellent review Irish!
Thanks Giacalone! I can't wait to watch it again.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/21 07:24 PM
FALSE POSITIVE
A 2021 take on ROSEMARY'S BABY where they substitute "the patriarchy" for satanism. The film isn't heavy handed misandry but there's plenty in there to get full off of. Lucy and her husband Adrian have failed to conceive for the last 2 years. Lucy finally gives in to Adrian's request to see his former teacher Dr. Hindle to see if he's able to assist them. Once Lucy is pregnant, she finds out she has 3 babies: twin boys and a girl; however, fearing all 3 babies could be lost unless one of the fetus' is terminated, Lucy and Adrian are left with the choice of who to keep and who to terminate. Pierce Brosnan is the only bright spot of this film as the always suave, debonair, and villainous Dr. Hindle but even he cannot save this garbage of a story. I really hope this isn't a trend going forward for Hollywood to remake classic films and fill them with their extremist, leftist, woke politics. 4/10
A 2021 take on ROSEMARY'S BABY where they substitute "the patriarchy" for satanism. The film isn't heavy handed misandry but there's plenty in there to get full off of. Lucy and her husband Adrian have failed to conceive for the last 2 years. Lucy finally gives in to Adrian's request to see his former teacher Dr. Hindle to see if he's able to assist them. Once Lucy is pregnant, she finds out she has 3 babies: twin boys and a girl; however, fearing all 3 babies could be lost unless one of the fetus' is terminated, Lucy and Adrian are left with the choice of who to keep and who to terminate. Pierce Brosnan is the only bright spot of this film as the always suave, debonair, and villainous Dr. Hindle but even he cannot save this garbage of a story. I really hope this isn't a trend going forward for Hollywood to remake classic films and fill them with their extremist, leftist, woke politics. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/21 09:06 PM
SHIVA BABY
Based on a short film of the same name, SHIVA BABY brings back main star Rachel Sennott and director Emma Seligman. The premise is Danielle (Sennott) runs into her sugar daddy and ex-girlfriend at a shiva (Jewish funeral). What ensues over the next 77 minutes are revelations about the man she's currently sleeping with, how her ex-girlfriend feels about her, maintaining composure under pressure and embarrassment from family members, and uncertainty about one's future as Danielle is a soon-to-be college graduate who has no idea what she's going to do with her life upon graduation. I rather enjoyed this as the script had some rather comedic elements to it, stereotypical tropes the filmmakers played with, and a tale of self-discovery and worth. Also with the short runtime, it wraps up before the audience grows tired of constantly being batted around between our main stair and her ex and the main she's currently sleeping with. Worth checking out on HBO Max. 6/10
Based on a short film of the same name, SHIVA BABY brings back main star Rachel Sennott and director Emma Seligman. The premise is Danielle (Sennott) runs into her sugar daddy and ex-girlfriend at a shiva (Jewish funeral). What ensues over the next 77 minutes are revelations about the man she's currently sleeping with, how her ex-girlfriend feels about her, maintaining composure under pressure and embarrassment from family members, and uncertainty about one's future as Danielle is a soon-to-be college graduate who has no idea what she's going to do with her life upon graduation. I rather enjoyed this as the script had some rather comedic elements to it, stereotypical tropes the filmmakers played with, and a tale of self-discovery and worth. Also with the short runtime, it wraps up before the audience grows tired of constantly being batted around between our main stair and her ex and the main she's currently sleeping with. Worth checking out on HBO Max. 6/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/21 12:01 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I can't wait to see Black Widow. Excellent review Irish!
Thanks Giacalone! I can't wait to watch it again.
Will be watching it tonight with the wifey. I'm trying to lower my expectations, but it's almost impossible lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/21 01:36 AM
Let me know your thoughts after seeing it.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/21 02:00 AM
Scarlett Johansson is one of my favorites!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/21 07:21 PM
WEREWOLVES WITHIN
New Forest Ranger Finn Wheeler moves to small mountain town Beaverfield, VT. Upon his arrival, residents are being mauled by a werewolf. In order to survive the night and crack the identity of the werewolf, a group of the townies spend the night in the local hotel trying to uncover the mystery. This films bills itself as a horror comedy and with the exception of 1 or 2 jokes, this is anything but funny. The jokes are flat and other than Sam Richardson who stars as Wheeler and co-star Milana Vayntrub as Cecily Moore (you'll know her as Lily from the AT&T commercials), no one's performance stands out. Richardson's had a few movies released recently and I'm really enjoying his work. He's got great timing but unfortunately, he doesn't have much to work with here. The end also becomes too convoluted as director Josh Ruben tries to setup every character as the werewolf and giving them a reason why. By the time of the big reveal I will say I was a bit surprised, but by that point, I wasn't very interested in it anyway. 4.5/10
New Forest Ranger Finn Wheeler moves to small mountain town Beaverfield, VT. Upon his arrival, residents are being mauled by a werewolf. In order to survive the night and crack the identity of the werewolf, a group of the townies spend the night in the local hotel trying to uncover the mystery. This films bills itself as a horror comedy and with the exception of 1 or 2 jokes, this is anything but funny. The jokes are flat and other than Sam Richardson who stars as Wheeler and co-star Milana Vayntrub as Cecily Moore (you'll know her as Lily from the AT&T commercials), no one's performance stands out. Richardson's had a few movies released recently and I'm really enjoying his work. He's got great timing but unfortunately, he doesn't have much to work with here. The end also becomes too convoluted as director Josh Ruben tries to setup every character as the werewolf and giving them a reason why. By the time of the big reveal I will say I was a bit surprised, but by that point, I wasn't very interested in it anyway. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/21 09:01 PM
AMERICA: THE MOTION PICTURE
After viewing this, I'm still not quite sure what this is supposed to be? My guess is it was made for anyone between the ages of 8-14. The film is supposed to be a "tongue-and-cheek retelling" of America that blends together history and contemporary. The opening of the film isn't too bad but right from the get go the jokes are immature and forced. It seems the purpose of the writers in creating this story was because they had a hard on for having the founding fathers curse and nothing more. Toss in Thomas Edison being a female, Chinese immigrant for some weird and unexplained reason (you know, diversity). If this film was supposed to serve as inspirational or conjure up patriotism, it fails miserably as the only thing I felt after watching this was pure embarrassment (although, maybe that was the point?). 2/10
After viewing this, I'm still not quite sure what this is supposed to be? My guess is it was made for anyone between the ages of 8-14. The film is supposed to be a "tongue-and-cheek retelling" of America that blends together history and contemporary. The opening of the film isn't too bad but right from the get go the jokes are immature and forced. It seems the purpose of the writers in creating this story was because they had a hard on for having the founding fathers curse and nothing more. Toss in Thomas Edison being a female, Chinese immigrant for some weird and unexplained reason (you know, diversity). If this film was supposed to serve as inspirational or conjure up patriotism, it fails miserably as the only thing I felt after watching this was pure embarrassment (although, maybe that was the point?). 2/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/14/21 11:39 PM
GUNPOWDER MILKESHAKE
Karen Gillan stars as Sam, abandoned by her mother at a young age due to her occupation (assassin), Sam grows to follow in her mother's footsteps. She works for an all male organization known as The Firm and is their dedicated in house problem solver. On one particular job she's burdened with a harsh reality: give her employer back their stolen money she's recently recovered or use it to spare the life of an 8 3/4-year-old girl. She chooses the later and as such, is greenlit by her employer. The rest of the film is a very fun, fast-paced, and well-written ride. Gillan is wonderful as Sam, showing she can handle a gun and kick ass (well, that was never in question). A star studded cast back her up as Lena Headey players her mother, Carla Gugino, Angela Bassett, and Michelle Yeoh as 3 "librarians" who belong to an all female society of their own and one which Sam's mother used to be a member of and Sam herself enlists for weapons and assistance. Director Navot Papushado creates a wonderful and classic world, highlighted by neon lights and 1950's aesthetics. There is a wonderful fight scene that might be the first for me, where Gillan hilariously engages in some baddies sent after her and she fends them off, all without the use of her arms. This is the type of film that could become a franchise and I would definitely sign up for another round! 7/10
Karen Gillan stars as Sam, abandoned by her mother at a young age due to her occupation (assassin), Sam grows to follow in her mother's footsteps. She works for an all male organization known as The Firm and is their dedicated in house problem solver. On one particular job she's burdened with a harsh reality: give her employer back their stolen money she's recently recovered or use it to spare the life of an 8 3/4-year-old girl. She chooses the later and as such, is greenlit by her employer. The rest of the film is a very fun, fast-paced, and well-written ride. Gillan is wonderful as Sam, showing she can handle a gun and kick ass (well, that was never in question). A star studded cast back her up as Lena Headey players her mother, Carla Gugino, Angela Bassett, and Michelle Yeoh as 3 "librarians" who belong to an all female society of their own and one which Sam's mother used to be a member of and Sam herself enlists for weapons and assistance. Director Navot Papushado creates a wonderful and classic world, highlighted by neon lights and 1950's aesthetics. There is a wonderful fight scene that might be the first for me, where Gillan hilariously engages in some baddies sent after her and she fends them off, all without the use of her arms. This is the type of film that could become a franchise and I would definitely sign up for another round! 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 03:22 AM
IN THE LINE OF FIRE (1993)
Aging, irreverent Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood) has never gotten over his grief and guilt over having failed President Kennedy in Dallas. Now a rogue CIA assassin Mitch Leary (John Malkevitch) gives him a chance to take a bullet for the current President in a psychological game of cat and mouse, with plenty of high-tech to keep things interesting. It's enlivened by a romance/competition between Horrigan and fellow agent Lilly Raines (Renee Russo). All three principals are excellent (especially Russo) and director Wolfgang Petersen, who made the all-time-great war movie "Das Boot," knows how to keep the action fast and crackling. Excellent thriller.
Aging, irreverent Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood) has never gotten over his grief and guilt over having failed President Kennedy in Dallas. Now a rogue CIA assassin Mitch Leary (John Malkevitch) gives him a chance to take a bullet for the current President in a psychological game of cat and mouse, with plenty of high-tech to keep things interesting. It's enlivened by a romance/competition between Horrigan and fellow agent Lilly Raines (Renee Russo). All three principals are excellent (especially Russo) and director Wolfgang Petersen, who made the all-time-great war movie "Das Boot," knows how to keep the action fast and crackling. Excellent thriller.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 05:31 PM
I love In the Line of Fire
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 08:53 PM
ESCAPE ROOM: TOURNAMENT OF CHAMPIONS
ESCAPE ROOM: TOURNAMENT OF CHAMPIONS picks up 6 months after the events of the original. Once again we follow Zoey and Ben, who leave Illinois and travel to New York in order to expose the individuals behind Minos. While doing so, they're trapped in another game with previous winners, who know the rules and are all trying to survive. With this being a sequel, the games are much more elaborate, bigger, and more cleaver. There was a nice cameo/twist to the end that I didn't see coming but even during my first viewing of the original film, I had my doubts about this surprise. A smart and well thought out franchise similar to SAW without the gore and I'd be up for a third installment! 5.5/10
ESCAPE ROOM: TOURNAMENT OF CHAMPIONS picks up 6 months after the events of the original. Once again we follow Zoey and Ben, who leave Illinois and travel to New York in order to expose the individuals behind Minos. While doing so, they're trapped in another game with previous winners, who know the rules and are all trying to survive. With this being a sequel, the games are much more elaborate, bigger, and more cleaver. There was a nice cameo/twist to the end that I didn't see coming but even during my first viewing of the original film, I had my doubts about this surprise. A smart and well thought out franchise similar to SAW without the gore and I'd be up for a third installment! 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 09:05 PM
PIG
Nicolas Cage plays Rob, a former well respected chef in the Portland, Oregon area who, after a devastating loss, has retreated to the wilderness. He now spends his days as a truffle hunter with his beloved pig, living a peaceful and quite life. That is until robbers come to steal the pig from Cage. Upon waking up, he sets out for those who took her and for her safe return. Although, this isn't the film you might think it is based upon the trailer. This isn't an action/revenge film, but rather a more delicate and soft drama. Still a wonderful performance by Cage and co-star Amir (Alex Wolff), who buys said truffles from Cage. It plays as a drama but could have also worked as a revenge film. 5.5/10
Nicolas Cage plays Rob, a former well respected chef in the Portland, Oregon area who, after a devastating loss, has retreated to the wilderness. He now spends his days as a truffle hunter with his beloved pig, living a peaceful and quite life. That is until robbers come to steal the pig from Cage. Upon waking up, he sets out for those who took her and for her safe return. Although, this isn't the film you might think it is based upon the trailer. This isn't an action/revenge film, but rather a more delicate and soft drama. Still a wonderful performance by Cage and co-star Amir (Alex Wolff), who buys said truffles from Cage. It plays as a drama but could have also worked as a revenge film. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 09:23 PM
SPACE JAM: A NEW LEGACY
25 years after the original, this new entry is designed to appeal to a new generation. However, sadly and unfortunately, it's nothing more than a Warner Bros love fest. Either trying to indoctrinate the viewer with anything and everything WB or desperately trying to be "cool" by cross referencing classics a la READY PLAYER ONE, this film losses focus and fails. What should have been a story about LeBron trying to save his son from an AI Don Cheadle, does more to promote the WB brand. Also, even in a cartoon movie, LeBron just can't help himself and still whines to the officials about fouls. Some things never change. Truly a disappointment and another desperate attempt trying to revitalize previous IP's. 4/10
25 years after the original, this new entry is designed to appeal to a new generation. However, sadly and unfortunately, it's nothing more than a Warner Bros love fest. Either trying to indoctrinate the viewer with anything and everything WB or desperately trying to be "cool" by cross referencing classics a la READY PLAYER ONE, this film losses focus and fails. What should have been a story about LeBron trying to save his son from an AI Don Cheadle, does more to promote the WB brand. Also, even in a cartoon movie, LeBron just can't help himself and still whines to the officials about fouls. Some things never change. Truly a disappointment and another desperate attempt trying to revitalize previous IP's. 4/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 09:26 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SPACE JAM: A NEW LEGACY
25 years after the original, this new entry is designed to appeal to a new generation. However, sadly and unfortunately, it's nothing more than a Warner Bros love fest. Either trying to indoctrinate the viewer with anything and everything WB or desperately trying to be "cool" by cross referencing classics a la READY PLAYER ONE, this film losses focus and fails. What should have been a story about LeBron trying to save his son from an AI Don Cheadle, does more to promote the WB brand. Also, even in a cartoon movie, LeBron just can't help himself and still whines to the officials about fouls. Some things never change. Truly a disappointment and another desperate attempt trying to revitalize previous IP's. 4/10
25 years after the original, this new entry is designed to appeal to a new generation. However, sadly and unfortunately, it's nothing more than a Warner Bros love fest. Either trying to indoctrinate the viewer with anything and everything WB or desperately trying to be "cool" by cross referencing classics a la READY PLAYER ONE, this film losses focus and fails. What should have been a story about LeBron trying to save his son from an AI Don Cheadle, does more to promote the WB brand. Also, even in a cartoon movie, LeBron just can't help himself and still whines to the officials about fouls. Some things never change. Truly a disappointment and another desperate attempt trying to revitalize previous IP's. 4/10
Haha I was just about to post about this. You beat me by minutes. Saw it with my nephew yesterday and thought it was absolutely horrific. Agree with you 100% but 2/10 for me lol
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 09:40 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I can't wait to see Black Widow. Excellent review Irish!
Thanks Giacalone! I can't wait to watch it again.
Hey Black Widow kicked fucking ass!! I loved David Harbour especially. Scar Scar always delivers of course. She is such a natural and fluid actress that I honestly believe if she had been competing with Meryl Streep in the '70s and '80s, she'd win every round. 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/21 09:48 PM
Glad you liked it! I'm due for a second viewing here pretty soon but so many things have been dropping lately between the theaters and streaming, I'm having a hard time keeping up!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/21 03:44 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE ICE ROAD
Beginning in North Dakota, THE ICE ROAD stars Liam Neeson as Mike, a truck driver who's taking care of his adult-aged, mechanic brother Gurty, who is mentally disabled. In a mine shaft in Winnipeg, there's a methane explosion that traps 26 miners. With 30 hours worth of oxygen left for the miners and having been fired from his previous job (not to mention a sweet payday from the Canadian government upon delivery of emergency supplies he's hauling), Mike and Gurty decide to teamup with Goldenrod (played by Laurence Fishburne) and Tantoo (Amber Midthunder) to make the arduous journey north. The only problem is, in order to reach the miners in time, they need to take their extremely heavy trailers on a shortcut known as the ice road, which during the winter time due to the extreme cold, the lakes freeze and truckers use them as roadways. However, this story takes place during April when the ice is ready to thaw. All I can say is after watching this, Neeson and Fishburne better have gotten paid some serious money for attaching their names to this dumpster fire. The story opens with the miners getting trapped and the audience doesn't have any connection to them. Throw in Mike's at times unpleasant and short tempered attitude with Gurty, Fishburne who's in maybe 20% of the movie, sloppy editing, obvious low budget production quality, and you have a recipe for a terrible film. With movies like this, it's obvious Neeson's losing a step. I only hope he can rebound, and quickly, from the bad taste this will leave in your mouth. 3/10
Beginning in North Dakota, THE ICE ROAD stars Liam Neeson as Mike, a truck driver who's taking care of his adult-aged, mechanic brother Gurty, who is mentally disabled. In a mine shaft in Winnipeg, there's a methane explosion that traps 26 miners. With 30 hours worth of oxygen left for the miners and having been fired from his previous job (not to mention a sweet payday from the Canadian government upon delivery of emergency supplies he's hauling), Mike and Gurty decide to teamup with Goldenrod (played by Laurence Fishburne) and Tantoo (Amber Midthunder) to make the arduous journey north. The only problem is, in order to reach the miners in time, they need to take their extremely heavy trailers on a shortcut known as the ice road, which during the winter time due to the extreme cold, the lakes freeze and truckers use them as roadways. However, this story takes place during April when the ice is ready to thaw. All I can say is after watching this, Neeson and Fishburne better have gotten paid some serious money for attaching their names to this dumpster fire. The story opens with the miners getting trapped and the audience doesn't have any connection to them. Throw in Mike's at times unpleasant and short tempered attitude with Gurty, Fishburne who's in maybe 20% of the movie, sloppy editing, obvious low budget production quality, and you have a recipe for a terrible film. With movies like this, it's obvious Neeson's losing a step. I only hope he can rebound, and quickly, from the bad taste this will leave in your mouth. 3/10
Just watched it...could not have agreed w/ u more....very cheesy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/21 01:33 PM
Sorry you had to waste your time with it as well hoodlum.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 03:00 PM
I liked iceroad.
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 03:12 PM
If posts could be awarded thumbs ups and thumbs down I think i12 would have tons of thumbs up
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 03:13 PM
Videodrome(1983)- Great movie by David Cronenberg and the great James Woods as the star. It was really ahead of it’s time in many way. It really predicted how corrupt and manipulative the media can be
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 03:15 PM
2015 - Life on the Line
6.5 / 10
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/bSDMxJ5H/335-F72-AC-70-AB-438-C-8-CE1-00-EBEE06-DA6-F.jpg)
6.5 / 10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 08:22 PM
FEAR STREET PART III: 1666
The concluding chapter of the FEAR STREET series goes back to where it all started: Shadyside 1666, when the town was first being settled. Kiana Madiera plays the role of Sarah Fier, the witch who haunts her town and attempts to rewrite history and break the witch's curse over Shadyside. All of the characters from the first two films are back playing various roles. For half of the film, it plays as a well done period piece/thriller, before the known events begin to take shape onscreen. For a brief period of time there is the question of who made the deal with Satan and not a bad reveal of said person. The story then switches gears and returns back to 1994 to finish out what was originally started in the first film. Impressive performances by up-and-comers Kiara and co-star/love interest Olivia Scott Welch. Overall, an enjoyable B level series that had a decent marketing push but will probably be soon forgotten. I did enjoy the fact Netflix released each film only a week apart from one another and my final rankings would be 1994, 1666, 1978. 6.5/10
The concluding chapter of the FEAR STREET series goes back to where it all started: Shadyside 1666, when the town was first being settled. Kiana Madiera plays the role of Sarah Fier, the witch who haunts her town and attempts to rewrite history and break the witch's curse over Shadyside. All of the characters from the first two films are back playing various roles. For half of the film, it plays as a well done period piece/thriller, before the known events begin to take shape onscreen. For a brief period of time there is the question of who made the deal with Satan and not a bad reveal of said person. The story then switches gears and returns back to 1994 to finish out what was originally started in the first film. Impressive performances by up-and-comers Kiara and co-star/love interest Olivia Scott Welch. Overall, an enjoyable B level series that had a decent marketing push but will probably be soon forgotten. I did enjoy the fact Netflix released each film only a week apart from one another and my final rankings would be 1994, 1666, 1978. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 08:25 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I liked iceroad.
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
I put new releases/first time viewings in this thread whereas older movies I put in the Movies/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 08:25 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
If posts could be awarded thumbs ups and thumbs down I think i12 would have tons of thumbs up
Thanks DP! I'm just glad others enjoy them.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/21 08:42 PM
A CLASSIC HORROR STORY
5 strangers ubering together in a van in southern Italy are suddenly stranded in the woods in front of a mysterious house after one of the drivers swerved to avoid an animal in the street, causing their van to crash. Upon entering the house, they learn of an ancient Italian ghost story that appears to have actually come to life. With a title like A CLASSIC HORROR STORY, the viewer is aware this will be a film that will recycle typical horror tropes. And while that is indeed the case, this still manages to make them fresh and modern. Borrowing and/or paying homage to classics as well as more contemporary films within the genre, this is a roller coaster of a ride that wowed me! A story that continued to impress and build upon itself the whole way through and left me wanting more, even with a tight story as any more could have made the film drag or overdrawn. A second viewing is eagerly anticipated sooner rather than later. Do not sleep on this film as this is one of the best Italian horror films to be released in recent memory! 8/10
5 strangers ubering together in a van in southern Italy are suddenly stranded in the woods in front of a mysterious house after one of the drivers swerved to avoid an animal in the street, causing their van to crash. Upon entering the house, they learn of an ancient Italian ghost story that appears to have actually come to life. With a title like A CLASSIC HORROR STORY, the viewer is aware this will be a film that will recycle typical horror tropes. And while that is indeed the case, this still manages to make them fresh and modern. Borrowing and/or paying homage to classics as well as more contemporary films within the genre, this is a roller coaster of a ride that wowed me! A story that continued to impress and build upon itself the whole way through and left me wanting more, even with a tight story as any more could have made the film drag or overdrawn. A second viewing is eagerly anticipated sooner rather than later. Do not sleep on this film as this is one of the best Italian horror films to be released in recent memory! 8/10
Posted By: Signor Vitelli
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/19/21 01:32 AM
Signora V. got a press screener copy (a link, actually) of that new documentary about Anthony Bourdain, Road Runner. She reviews for Irish Arts Online, so we saw it a couple of weeks ago, even though it only officially came out two days ago.
Fascinating, but ultimately, very sad because you knew how things ended up. We always watched Anthony Bourdain's shows and were shocked when he committed suicide. Such a shame, even though it seems he had been doing a dance with death for some time.
Two things that troubled us - the film seemed to make a case (possibly unfairly) that Asia Argento was what sent him over the edge into taking his life (she was not interviewed for the film), and the revelation that some of the Bourdain voice-overs were actually AI computer re-creations, and not Bourdain.
Still, even with those caveats, I would recommend the film. Absolutely.
My two cents, for what it's worth.
Signor V.
Fascinating, but ultimately, very sad because you knew how things ended up. We always watched Anthony Bourdain's shows and were shocked when he committed suicide. Such a shame, even though it seems he had been doing a dance with death for some time.
Two things that troubled us - the film seemed to make a case (possibly unfairly) that Asia Argento was what sent him over the edge into taking his life (she was not interviewed for the film), and the revelation that some of the Bourdain voice-overs were actually AI computer re-creations, and not Bourdain.
Still, even with those caveats, I would recommend the film. Absolutely.
My two cents, for what it's worth.
Signor V.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/21 01:16 PM
Originally Posted by Signor Vitelli
Signora V. got a press screener copy (a link, actually) of that new documentary about Anthony Bourdain, Road Runner. She reviews for Irish Arts Online, so we saw it a couple of weeks ago, even though it only officially came out two days ago.
Fascinating, but ultimately, very sad because you knew how things ended up. We always watched Anthony Bourdain's shows and were shocked when he committed suicide. Such a shame, even though it seems he had been doing a dance with death for some time.
Two things that troubled us - the film seemed to make a case (possibly unfairly) that Asia Argento was what sent him over the edge into taking his life (she was not interviewed for the film), and the revelation that some of the Bourdain voice-overs were actually AI computer re-creations, and not Bourdain.
Still, even with those caveats, I would recommend the film. Absolutely.
My two cents, for what it's worth.
Signor V.
Fascinating, but ultimately, very sad because you knew how things ended up. We always watched Anthony Bourdain's shows and were shocked when he committed suicide. Such a shame, even though it seems he had been doing a dance with death for some time.
Two things that troubled us - the film seemed to make a case (possibly unfairly) that Asia Argento was what sent him over the edge into taking his life (she was not interviewed for the film), and the revelation that some of the Bourdain voice-overs were actually AI computer re-creations, and not Bourdain.
Still, even with those caveats, I would recommend the film. Absolutely.
My two cents, for what it's worth.
Signor V.
Heard of this, thanks for sharing your thoughts...I feel this will be sad and dark to watch knowing like you said "how things ended".
I will be viewing as well since I was a fan reading his books and watching his shows.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/21 01:17 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
I liked iceroad.
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
I12 , I’ve noticed you are not putting dates on your movies lately , is that mean they are 2012 and all new.?
I put new releases/first time viewings in this thread whereas older movies I put in the Movies/
Gotcha.....thanks i12
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/21 09:40 PM
SNAKE EYES: G.I. JOE ORIGINS
In another attempt to reboot the G.I. Joe franchise, Paramount brings us it's Snake Eyes origin story. And as such, it's the best G.I. JOE movie we have to date, which isn't saying much but it is a start. Henry Golding stars as the title character, who seeks revenge upon the man who murdered his father. A drifter who's enlisted by the local yakuza boss, soon finds himself on the run from the same boss who hired him on when he refused to murder a fellow yakuza member, Tommy. Fleeing to Japan and safe within his family's clan, Tommy does the unthinkable by allowing Snake Eyes, an outsider, the opportunity of joining them. Plenty of great, choreographed, non-stop action. Andrew Koji who plays Tommy actually outshines Golding here, as Golding just seems to shuffle along outside of any action sequence. Nice appearances by both Samara Weaving as Scarlett and Úrsula Corberó as Baroness (although both are hardly in the film). There is a nice mid-credit scene that sets up a sequel beautifully and I would definitely be up for another round of JOE. 6.5/10
In another attempt to reboot the G.I. Joe franchise, Paramount brings us it's Snake Eyes origin story. And as such, it's the best G.I. JOE movie we have to date, which isn't saying much but it is a start. Henry Golding stars as the title character, who seeks revenge upon the man who murdered his father. A drifter who's enlisted by the local yakuza boss, soon finds himself on the run from the same boss who hired him on when he refused to murder a fellow yakuza member, Tommy. Fleeing to Japan and safe within his family's clan, Tommy does the unthinkable by allowing Snake Eyes, an outsider, the opportunity of joining them. Plenty of great, choreographed, non-stop action. Andrew Koji who plays Tommy actually outshines Golding here, as Golding just seems to shuffle along outside of any action sequence. Nice appearances by both Samara Weaving as Scarlett and Úrsula Corberó as Baroness (although both are hardly in the film). There is a nice mid-credit scene that sets up a sequel beautifully and I would definitely be up for another round of JOE. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/21 10:46 PM
JOLT
Kate Beckinsale stars as Lindy, a woman who has difficulty controlling her anger and as such, engages in unbridled violence. To control her problem, she wears an electrified vest that she uses whenever she feels the urge to act on her uncontrollable impulse. The film is a cheesy rip off of The Incredible Hulk meets CRANK and it doesn't work on any level. Kate Beckinsale is an enjoyable actress, but she's so much better than the drivel this script provided. In theory, it's not a bad concept but it is so poorly executed. A low production value throughout, with obvious stage like quality, is distracting to the audience. Furthermore, there's nothing out of the ordinary going on here; just going through the same cliches that comes to a cringe worthy climax during a scene where Beckinsale's character is on the run from the police, attempting to escape from a hospital. Poor performances all around and throughout the film, it's more painful to watch than entertaining. Not surprising considering it's a Prime Original. 4/10
Kate Beckinsale stars as Lindy, a woman who has difficulty controlling her anger and as such, engages in unbridled violence. To control her problem, she wears an electrified vest that she uses whenever she feels the urge to act on her uncontrollable impulse. The film is a cheesy rip off of The Incredible Hulk meets CRANK and it doesn't work on any level. Kate Beckinsale is an enjoyable actress, but she's so much better than the drivel this script provided. In theory, it's not a bad concept but it is so poorly executed. A low production value throughout, with obvious stage like quality, is distracting to the audience. Furthermore, there's nothing out of the ordinary going on here; just going through the same cliches that comes to a cringe worthy climax during a scene where Beckinsale's character is on the run from the police, attempting to escape from a hospital. Poor performances all around and throughout the film, it's more painful to watch than entertaining. Not surprising considering it's a Prime Original. 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/21 06:43 AM
AMERICAN PASTORAL (2016)
In this skillful adaptation of a Philip Roth novel, Swede Levov (Ewan McGregor, who also directed) has lead a charmed life as a star high school athlete, WWII Marine officer, operator of a successful NJ glove factory with a trophy Miss New Jersey wife Dawn (Jennifer Connelly) and a big spread in the 'burbs. But his beloved, stuttering daughter (Dakota Fanning) turns into a parent-hating Sixties radical who bombs the local gas station/post office, killing the proprietor. She goes on the lam, and Swede goes through hell trying to find her. Fanning is excellent, as is Peter Riegart as Swede's father. A tragic, well-done movie.
In this skillful adaptation of a Philip Roth novel, Swede Levov (Ewan McGregor, who also directed) has lead a charmed life as a star high school athlete, WWII Marine officer, operator of a successful NJ glove factory with a trophy Miss New Jersey wife Dawn (Jennifer Connelly) and a big spread in the 'burbs. But his beloved, stuttering daughter (Dakota Fanning) turns into a parent-hating Sixties radical who bombs the local gas station/post office, killing the proprietor. She goes on the lam, and Swede goes through hell trying to find her. Fanning is excellent, as is Peter Riegart as Swede's father. A tragic, well-done movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/26/21 01:06 AM
OLD
OLD follows a group of travelers who are on an exotic getaway. While there, the hotel manager entices a few individuals with exclusive access to a private and secluded beach. The travelers take the manager up on his offer, only to find that once they are there, they cannot escape and they are aging 2 years for every hour they're on the beach. The performances by the actors were fine, with standouts being Vicky Krieps and Thomasin McKenzie as mother and daughter, part of a larger family who are the main stars. As with all M. Night Shyamalan films, he hedges his bets on the payoff that was in this case, meh. I could buy into his explanation at the end, but overall, this was just an average story with some social commentaries on vanity, the pricelessness of time and family, and making peace with old squabbles. 5/10
OLD follows a group of travelers who are on an exotic getaway. While there, the hotel manager entices a few individuals with exclusive access to a private and secluded beach. The travelers take the manager up on his offer, only to find that once they are there, they cannot escape and they are aging 2 years for every hour they're on the beach. The performances by the actors were fine, with standouts being Vicky Krieps and Thomasin McKenzie as mother and daughter, part of a larger family who are the main stars. As with all M. Night Shyamalan films, he hedges his bets on the payoff that was in this case, meh. I could buy into his explanation at the end, but overall, this was just an average story with some social commentaries on vanity, the pricelessness of time and family, and making peace with old squabbles. 5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/21 02:30 AM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Videodrome(1983)- Great movie by David Cronenberg and the great James Woods as the star. It was really ahead of it’s time in many way. It really predicted how corrupt and manipulative the media can be
And who would have predicted a hot Deborah Harry nude scene...she was delicious...LOL.
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/21 03:08 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
[quote=JCrusher]Videodrome(1983)- Great movie by David Cronenberg and the great James Woods as the star. It was really ahead of it’s time in many way. It really predicted how corrupt and manipulative the media can be
And who would have predicted a hot Deborah Harry nude scene...she was delicious...LOL.[
/quote]. Absolutely lol
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/21 03:45 AM
Originally Posted by JCrusher
Originally Posted by hoodlum
[quote=JCrusher]Videodrome(1983)- Great movie by David Cronenberg and the great James Woods as the star. It was really ahead of it’s time in many way. It really predicted how corrupt and manipulative the media can be
And who would have predicted a hot Deborah Harry nude scene...she was delicious...LOL.[
/quote]. Absolutely lol
Ur Right , Crusher...when I 1rst saw the flick , I was 21 yrs. of age...& even though I was not so much into Blondie , I loved Debbie...I was into Led Zep @ that era..But I still went into my bedroom w/ thoughts about Deb...She was so hot ..it would make ur skin burn.....I was torn between Natalie Wood (who recently passed)..& Debbie all of whom made my pole go north........U know what young males @ that age do...I was fortunatly getting alot because in those day's , ,I stupidly was selling dope @ 13th & Locust in Philly & had all the pussy in the world....this is back in 1983 or so...Back then , that area was all strip joints & fag joints...but EVERBODY bought my shit....I lived in Collingswood N.J. but used 2 take PATCO over 2 Philly every 2 sell some other dudes shit...I only got a percentage...It was all meth back then...O.K.....I've said 2 much rambling already..later.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/21 09:46 PM
Murder Rap
Labyrinthine documentary about the internecine feud between Suge Knight's Death Row Records and Puff Daddy's Bad Boy Records in the mid-90s. A feud that resulted in Tupac's ignominious death in 1996 and Notorious B.I.G.'s assassination, commonly thought to be a reprisal, several months later in 1997.
The documentary makes a convincing case as to who and what was responsible for the murders, backed up by interviews with chief investigator Greg Kading, and copious police interview recordings with some of the main players in the murder conspiracies.
Documentary does a good job of keeping things on track considering the voluminous number of names and information flying at you.
In the end I felt rather sorry for Tupac and Biggie. Both, particularly Tupac, were in way over their heads with some very serious gangsters and paid the most serious price for the image their record companies cultivated for them.
Particularly resonating is surveillance footage from the night of Tupac's death where he participates in a gang assault on the man (a Crip) thought to have killed him on chancing upon him while leaving a Mike Tyson fight, pretty much signing his own death warrant in the process.
Labyrinthine documentary about the internecine feud between Suge Knight's Death Row Records and Puff Daddy's Bad Boy Records in the mid-90s. A feud that resulted in Tupac's ignominious death in 1996 and Notorious B.I.G.'s assassination, commonly thought to be a reprisal, several months later in 1997.
The documentary makes a convincing case as to who and what was responsible for the murders, backed up by interviews with chief investigator Greg Kading, and copious police interview recordings with some of the main players in the murder conspiracies.
Documentary does a good job of keeping things on track considering the voluminous number of names and information flying at you.
In the end I felt rather sorry for Tupac and Biggie. Both, particularly Tupac, were in way over their heads with some very serious gangsters and paid the most serious price for the image their record companies cultivated for them.
Particularly resonating is surveillance footage from the night of Tupac's death where he participates in a gang assault on the man (a Crip) thought to have killed him on chancing upon him while leaving a Mike Tyson fight, pretty much signing his own death warrant in the process.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/21 07:13 PM
THE GREEN KNIGHT
THE GREEN KNIGHT is another feather in A24's cap, who continue to produce fantastic films! This is a beautiful, live-action fantasy of the immortal story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I will admit I had my reservations at first about Dev Patel being cast as Gawain; however, long before the credits rolled, he won me over. He has great chemistry with Alicia Vikander who plays dual roles as Essel and The Lady (with her shining more as the tempest Lady). There's even a brief and mini THE WITCH reunion with the studio bringing Kate Dickie back as the Queen and Ralph Ineson as the Green Knight. Also a shout out needs to go to Sean Harris who plays the King. His small but hypnotic voice and performance are enthralling. A wonderful ride that I'd enjoy taking again soon! 8/10
THE GREEN KNIGHT is another feather in A24's cap, who continue to produce fantastic films! This is a beautiful, live-action fantasy of the immortal story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I will admit I had my reservations at first about Dev Patel being cast as Gawain; however, long before the credits rolled, he won me over. He has great chemistry with Alicia Vikander who plays dual roles as Essel and The Lady (with her shining more as the tempest Lady). There's even a brief and mini THE WITCH reunion with the studio bringing Kate Dickie back as the Queen and Ralph Ineson as the Green Knight. Also a shout out needs to go to Sean Harris who plays the King. His small but hypnotic voice and performance are enthralling. A wonderful ride that I'd enjoy taking again soon! 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/21 07:23 PM
STILLWATER
Loosely based on Amanda Knox, STILLWATER finds Allison Baker (played by Abigail Breslin), a small town girl from Stillwater, OK who finds herself in a French prison after the murder of her girlfriend and roommate. Matt Damon plays her father Bill, who even 5 years into her imprisonment with another 4 to go, is trying everything he can to get his daughter released. Damon does a great job playing the fish out of water American who doesn't speak the language and sticks out like a sore thumb with his southern drawl, his well mannered demeanor (constantly calling everyone sir and ma'am), and his reliance on only eating American food (in this case Subway) abroad. He's trying to do everything he can for his daughter, even taking multiple trips yearly from Oklahoma to France to visit her. Meanwhile, Allison has pent up daddy issues since Bill was always on the move working rather than raising her during her youth. Less than midway through the film branches out and takes an unexpected turn that builds to a sorrowful third act. A decent enough film that's worth a watch once it's released on a streaming service. 6/10
Loosely based on Amanda Knox, STILLWATER finds Allison Baker (played by Abigail Breslin), a small town girl from Stillwater, OK who finds herself in a French prison after the murder of her girlfriend and roommate. Matt Damon plays her father Bill, who even 5 years into her imprisonment with another 4 to go, is trying everything he can to get his daughter released. Damon does a great job playing the fish out of water American who doesn't speak the language and sticks out like a sore thumb with his southern drawl, his well mannered demeanor (constantly calling everyone sir and ma'am), and his reliance on only eating American food (in this case Subway) abroad. He's trying to do everything he can for his daughter, even taking multiple trips yearly from Oklahoma to France to visit her. Meanwhile, Allison has pent up daddy issues since Bill was always on the move working rather than raising her during her youth. Less than midway through the film branches out and takes an unexpected turn that builds to a sorrowful third act. A decent enough film that's worth a watch once it's released on a streaming service. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/21 07:30 PM
JUNGLE CRUISE
Another film Disney is itching to franchise, JUNGLE CRUISE finds Emily Blunt and Dwayne Johnson, searching the Amazon for a tree that has petals capable of curing any disease, or in this case, curse. Johnson and Blunt are great together, constantly feeding off of each other in every scene, and even establishing nicknames for the other early on. Surprisingly for Disney, some of the CGI was noticeably bad in regards to some of the animals used (and coming from the studio that houses Marvel and Star Wars, that's saying something). There's nothing new here except the same Disney formula, which still continues to work. Laughs, action, tenderness, Disney knows what they're doing and how to appeal to as wide of an audience as possible. I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear a sequel announced sooner rather than later. If you enjoy Disney films, you'll enjoy this as well. One last note, a missed opportunity for not utilizing the song Welcome To The Jungle by Guns N' Roses. I believe it was used in one trailer, but going for Metallica's Nothing Else Matters as opposed to GNR was a head scratcher. 6.5/10
Another film Disney is itching to franchise, JUNGLE CRUISE finds Emily Blunt and Dwayne Johnson, searching the Amazon for a tree that has petals capable of curing any disease, or in this case, curse. Johnson and Blunt are great together, constantly feeding off of each other in every scene, and even establishing nicknames for the other early on. Surprisingly for Disney, some of the CGI was noticeably bad in regards to some of the animals used (and coming from the studio that houses Marvel and Star Wars, that's saying something). There's nothing new here except the same Disney formula, which still continues to work. Laughs, action, tenderness, Disney knows what they're doing and how to appeal to as wide of an audience as possible. I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear a sequel announced sooner rather than later. If you enjoy Disney films, you'll enjoy this as well. One last note, a missed opportunity for not utilizing the song Welcome To The Jungle by Guns N' Roses. I believe it was used in one trailer, but going for Metallica's Nothing Else Matters as opposed to GNR was a head scratcher. 6.5/10
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/02/21 08:19 PM
THE TWO JAKE'S.
I watched Chinatown about a month ago and thought it was pretty good. I liked the era and style of the movie. Then this morning around 1a.m., I was searching through Amazon prime and there was The Two JAKE'S, the follow-up to Chinatown. I thought it was great. However, I saw the year it was made and thought to myself "why haven't I heard of this before today?" I wonder how many other great movies are out there that nobody mentions anymore.
I watched Chinatown about a month ago and thought it was pretty good. I liked the era and style of the movie. Then this morning around 1a.m., I was searching through Amazon prime and there was The Two JAKE'S, the follow-up to Chinatown. I thought it was great. However, I saw the year it was made and thought to myself "why haven't I heard of this before today?" I wonder how many other great movies are out there that nobody mentions anymore.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/21 01:31 AM
THE SUICIDE SQUAD
Warner Bros. gives us another round of villains, teaming up together to save the world and reduce their prison sentences in the process. However, this is not the same 2016 Suicide Squad. Although a few of the original members are carried over, this is a whole new team. In addition, WB tagged James Gunn during his brief respite from Disney and he hit another homerun with this! A wild and unexpected ride, which is exactly what I would come to expect from him. The film opens quickly with Johnny Cash's Folsom Prison Blues and hits the ground running, filing in the audience along the way. The team is lengthy as well; however, each shines in his and her respective roles. Harley is the easy favorite but Idris Elba, John Cena, and Sylvester Stallone (yes, that's him voicing King Shark) could just as easily take that crown away from her just to name a few. Wonderful special FX, especially in regards to the third act. Profane and gory, there's really nothing more you could of asked from this film! With Gunn going back to the House of Mouse for GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY III, and Margot Robbie recently stating she's done playing Harley for a while, I'm curious where WB goes from here as I'm sure fans will be clamoring for more after this offering. 7.5/10
Warner Bros. gives us another round of villains, teaming up together to save the world and reduce their prison sentences in the process. However, this is not the same 2016 Suicide Squad. Although a few of the original members are carried over, this is a whole new team. In addition, WB tagged James Gunn during his brief respite from Disney and he hit another homerun with this! A wild and unexpected ride, which is exactly what I would come to expect from him. The film opens quickly with Johnny Cash's Folsom Prison Blues and hits the ground running, filing in the audience along the way. The team is lengthy as well; however, each shines in his and her respective roles. Harley is the easy favorite but Idris Elba, John Cena, and Sylvester Stallone (yes, that's him voicing King Shark) could just as easily take that crown away from her just to name a few. Wonderful special FX, especially in regards to the third act. Profane and gory, there's really nothing more you could of asked from this film! With Gunn going back to the House of Mouse for GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY III, and Margot Robbie recently stating she's done playing Harley for a while, I'm curious where WB goes from here as I'm sure fans will be clamoring for more after this offering. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/21 09:58 PM
VAL
VAL is a wonderful, unflinching, authentic, and humanizing look at actor Val Kilmer. Using footage he shot over his entire career, fans are given a glimpse not only into his life but also into his craft and especially into his most known roles like Iceman, Batman, Doc Holliday, Jim Morrison, etc. It's quite heartbreaking to see him in the unfortunate health situation he finds himself in (throat cancer survivor) and as such, his speech is often difficult to understand. However, I applaud the man for pulling back the curtain and proudly saying to the world, this is who I am! Definitely worth a watch on Prime! 6.5/10
VAL is a wonderful, unflinching, authentic, and humanizing look at actor Val Kilmer. Using footage he shot over his entire career, fans are given a glimpse not only into his life but also into his craft and especially into his most known roles like Iceman, Batman, Doc Holliday, Jim Morrison, etc. It's quite heartbreaking to see him in the unfortunate health situation he finds himself in (throat cancer survivor) and as such, his speech is often difficult to understand. However, I applaud the man for pulling back the curtain and proudly saying to the world, this is who I am! Definitely worth a watch on Prime! 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/08/21 05:00 PM
SUDDENLY (1954)
Todd Shaw (Sterling Hayden), sheriff of tiny Suddenly CA, gets a message that the President of the US will be getting off a train in his town on his way to a fishing trip. While Shaw coordinates with the Secret Service and State Police, a trio of assassins, headed by John Baron (Frank Sinatra), and posing as FBI agents, commandeer a home with a perfect view of the train station, and tell residents Pop Benson, his war-widow daughter in law Ellen, and her son Pidge, that they can't leave. All goes well until Shaw and the SS detail chief show up. Then Baron starts shooting, killing the chief and wounding Shaw. The rest of the film devolves into an intense, superbly directed psychological cat-and-mouse game, with Shaw baiting Baron to bring out his inner psychopath to throw him off-guard.
Hayden, one of my favorite actors of the period, is fully up to snuff here. Sinatra, always good as a tough guy, is brilliant in what is probably his best non-singing role. This movie is a little (89 minutes) gem of a thriller.
Todd Shaw (Sterling Hayden), sheriff of tiny Suddenly CA, gets a message that the President of the US will be getting off a train in his town on his way to a fishing trip. While Shaw coordinates with the Secret Service and State Police, a trio of assassins, headed by John Baron (Frank Sinatra), and posing as FBI agents, commandeer a home with a perfect view of the train station, and tell residents Pop Benson, his war-widow daughter in law Ellen, and her son Pidge, that they can't leave. All goes well until Shaw and the SS detail chief show up. Then Baron starts shooting, killing the chief and wounding Shaw. The rest of the film devolves into an intense, superbly directed psychological cat-and-mouse game, with Shaw baiting Baron to bring out his inner psychopath to throw him off-guard.
Hayden, one of my favorite actors of the period, is fully up to snuff here. Sinatra, always good as a tough guy, is brilliant in what is probably his best non-singing role. This movie is a little (89 minutes) gem of a thriller.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/13/21 07:51 AM
MULHOLLAND DR. (2003)
Here we go again with David Lynch. Betty (Naomi Watts, in a terrific performance), naive and wide-eyed, arrives in Hollywood, looking for movie work. She finds Rita (Laura Haring), victim of a car crash, taking a shower in Betty's aunt's apartment. Rita can't remember anything, but she and Betty become pals (and lovers) as they search for who/what/where, encountering the usual panoply of Lynchian bizarre and irrelevant characters and situations; spooky music, lengthy camera shots of empty tables, coffee makers, pastel colored walls, etc. Trying to make sense out of this plot is an endeavor as unlikely of success as trying to decrypt the Code of Hammurabi. But, the sheer weirdness of this movie held my interest to the end.
Here we go again with David Lynch. Betty (Naomi Watts, in a terrific performance), naive and wide-eyed, arrives in Hollywood, looking for movie work. She finds Rita (Laura Haring), victim of a car crash, taking a shower in Betty's aunt's apartment. Rita can't remember anything, but she and Betty become pals (and lovers) as they search for who/what/where, encountering the usual panoply of Lynchian bizarre and irrelevant characters and situations; spooky music, lengthy camera shots of empty tables, coffee makers, pastel colored walls, etc. Trying to make sense out of this plot is an endeavor as unlikely of success as trying to decrypt the Code of Hammurabi. But, the sheer weirdness of this movie held my interest to the end.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/13/21 06:41 PM
FREE GUY
FREE GUY stars Ryan Reynolds, a NPC (non-player character), who is an AI and grows a conscience of his own. Upon finding his new found consciousness he meets and falls in love with Millie (played by Jodie Comer). Millie, along with Keys (Joe Keery), had previously developed a game they suspect Antoine (Taika Waititi) has stolen and rebranded as Free Guy. Millie enlists Guy's help to find evidence within the game to prove Antoine used their stolen code, availing them to millions of dollars through the proper litigation. For a Ryan Reynolds movie, the jokes were a mixed bag with some that stuck and others didn't (although it is slightly watered down to fit a PG-13 rating). This was my first introduction to Jodie Comer and for me, she honestly stole the show with a wide range of emotions. The film does display a lot of heartfelt emotions for a comedy and even the casual movie going fan can enjoy this while gamers should love it. I've seen Waititi in better roles as he appears aloof and mailed in his performance sadly as I expected more out of him. 6/10
FREE GUY stars Ryan Reynolds, a NPC (non-player character), who is an AI and grows a conscience of his own. Upon finding his new found consciousness he meets and falls in love with Millie (played by Jodie Comer). Millie, along with Keys (Joe Keery), had previously developed a game they suspect Antoine (Taika Waititi) has stolen and rebranded as Free Guy. Millie enlists Guy's help to find evidence within the game to prove Antoine used their stolen code, availing them to millions of dollars through the proper litigation. For a Ryan Reynolds movie, the jokes were a mixed bag with some that stuck and others didn't (although it is slightly watered down to fit a PG-13 rating). This was my first introduction to Jodie Comer and for me, she honestly stole the show with a wide range of emotions. The film does display a lot of heartfelt emotions for a comedy and even the casual movie going fan can enjoy this while gamers should love it. I've seen Waititi in better roles as he appears aloof and mailed in his performance sadly as I expected more out of him. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/14/21 04:46 PM
DON'T BREATHE 2
Stephen Lang is back as Norman Nordstrom aka The Blind Man to inflict punishment on those who break into his house and wish to take what's his. In this follow-up (although we're unsure how long after the events of the first film this takes place), Norman now has a daughter. After watching the previous film, I can only hope it wasn't in the way he originally intended to with Cindy and Rocky. Once again set in Detroit, the film opens with his daughter Phoenix (wonderfully played by 14-year-old Madelyn Grace) being trained survival skills by her unrelenting and harsh father. Before long however, a truck of criminals soon descends upon the house, looking for Norman and Phoenix. While there are some plot holes and the story isn't as strong as its predecessor, this surprised me as I wasn't too invested in seeing a sequel. However, in some ways it rehashes the original yet also expands upon it. The first film was a psychological thriller where sound was your enemy, which made for a very quiet film. This is the complete opposite: loud, violent, and bloody! It's also hard to be sympathetic to Norman's character after the events of part 1 and even parts of his storyline in this film. The film took a hard left about two-thirds of the way in that continued to raise my eyebrows as it grew but I'll give the crew and studio credit for having the balls to go through with it. Overall, I still prefer the original but this was a worthy sequel (still surprised I'm saying that) and could even be up for a third, given the right story. 6/10
Stephen Lang is back as Norman Nordstrom aka The Blind Man to inflict punishment on those who break into his house and wish to take what's his. In this follow-up (although we're unsure how long after the events of the first film this takes place), Norman now has a daughter. After watching the previous film, I can only hope it wasn't in the way he originally intended to with Cindy and Rocky. Once again set in Detroit, the film opens with his daughter Phoenix (wonderfully played by 14-year-old Madelyn Grace) being trained survival skills by her unrelenting and harsh father. Before long however, a truck of criminals soon descends upon the house, looking for Norman and Phoenix. While there are some plot holes and the story isn't as strong as its predecessor, this surprised me as I wasn't too invested in seeing a sequel. However, in some ways it rehashes the original yet also expands upon it. The first film was a psychological thriller where sound was your enemy, which made for a very quiet film. This is the complete opposite: loud, violent, and bloody! It's also hard to be sympathetic to Norman's character after the events of part 1 and even parts of his storyline in this film. The film took a hard left about two-thirds of the way in that continued to raise my eyebrows as it grew but I'll give the crew and studio credit for having the balls to go through with it. Overall, I still prefer the original but this was a worthy sequel (still surprised I'm saying that) and could even be up for a third, given the right story. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/14/21 05:02 PM
RESPECT
Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson is perfectly cast as the late Aretha Franklin. Judging by the previews and Hudson's known musical talent, this seemed like an early Oscar contender for her (and even after watching it, I still believe that to be the case). However, she didn't do enough with the role to win me over and I see her gaining nothing more than a nomination, rather than a win. She plays Aretha wonderfully, always poised, respectful, and humble being able to show her full acting talents towards the later part of the film. However, her performance, and film overall, felt very average. It's bloated with a runtime of 2 hours and 25 minutes and a handful of scenes, particularly early in the film could have been trimmed down to assist with the films pace. Quite a bit of time is devoted to Aretha's youth to open with, which stalls any momentum out of the gate, before the audience is finally introduced to Hudson. She is remarkably surrounded by very strong supporting actors as well, especially when talking about Forest Whitaker, who plays her preacher father and Marlon Wayans who plays her first husband, Ted White. Both men are extremely demanding, controlling, and hard headed, who attempt to keep Aretha under their thumbs throughout the film, until she finally finds her self-worth and respect to stand up to the both of them. I wouldn't be surprised to see either or both of them land nominations as well (and I'd really be pulling for Wayans if that's the case). A film that looked to have more promise but failed in it's delivery. Unless your a fan of Aretha's, you can probably avoid the theaters for this. 5/10
Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson is perfectly cast as the late Aretha Franklin. Judging by the previews and Hudson's known musical talent, this seemed like an early Oscar contender for her (and even after watching it, I still believe that to be the case). However, she didn't do enough with the role to win me over and I see her gaining nothing more than a nomination, rather than a win. She plays Aretha wonderfully, always poised, respectful, and humble being able to show her full acting talents towards the later part of the film. However, her performance, and film overall, felt very average. It's bloated with a runtime of 2 hours and 25 minutes and a handful of scenes, particularly early in the film could have been trimmed down to assist with the films pace. Quite a bit of time is devoted to Aretha's youth to open with, which stalls any momentum out of the gate, before the audience is finally introduced to Hudson. She is remarkably surrounded by very strong supporting actors as well, especially when talking about Forest Whitaker, who plays her preacher father and Marlon Wayans who plays her first husband, Ted White. Both men are extremely demanding, controlling, and hard headed, who attempt to keep Aretha under their thumbs throughout the film, until she finally finds her self-worth and respect to stand up to the both of them. I wouldn't be surprised to see either or both of them land nominations as well (and I'd really be pulling for Wayans if that's the case). A film that looked to have more promise but failed in it's delivery. Unless your a fan of Aretha's, you can probably avoid the theaters for this. 5/10
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/16/21 03:45 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DON'T BREATHE 2
Stephen Lang is back as Norman Nordstrom aka The Blind Man to inflict punishment on those who break into his house and wish to take what's his. In this follow-up (although we're unsure how long after the events of the first film this takes place), Norman now has a daughter. After watching the previous film, I can only hope it wasn't in the way he originally intended to with Cindy and Rocky. Once again set in Detroit, the film opens with his daughter Phoenix (wonderfully played by 14-year-old Madelyn Grace) being trained survival skills by her unrelenting and harsh father. Before long however, a truck of criminals soon descends upon the house, looking for Norman and Phoenix. While there are some plot holes and the story isn't as strong as its predecessor, this surprised me as I wasn't too invested in seeing a sequel. However, in some ways it rehashes the original yet also expands upon it. The first film was a psychological thriller where sound was your enemy, which made for a very quiet film. This is the complete opposite: loud, violent, and bloody! It's also hard to be sympathetic to Norman's character after the events of part 1 and even parts of his storyline in this film. The film took a hard left about two-thirds of the way in that continued to raise my eyebrows as it grew but I'll give the crew and studio credit for having the balls to go through with it. Overall, I still prefer the original but this was a worthy sequel (still surprised I'm saying that) and could even be up for a third, given the right story. 6/10
Stephen Lang is back as Norman Nordstrom aka The Blind Man to inflict punishment on those who break into his house and wish to take what's his. In this follow-up (although we're unsure how long after the events of the first film this takes place), Norman now has a daughter. After watching the previous film, I can only hope it wasn't in the way he originally intended to with Cindy and Rocky. Once again set in Detroit, the film opens with his daughter Phoenix (wonderfully played by 14-year-old Madelyn Grace) being trained survival skills by her unrelenting and harsh father. Before long however, a truck of criminals soon descends upon the house, looking for Norman and Phoenix. While there are some plot holes and the story isn't as strong as its predecessor, this surprised me as I wasn't too invested in seeing a sequel. However, in some ways it rehashes the original yet also expands upon it. The first film was a psychological thriller where sound was your enemy, which made for a very quiet film. This is the complete opposite: loud, violent, and bloody! It's also hard to be sympathetic to Norman's character after the events of part 1 and even parts of his storyline in this film. The film took a hard left about two-thirds of the way in that continued to raise my eyebrows as it grew but I'll give the crew and studio credit for having the balls to go through with it. Overall, I still prefer the original but this was a worthy sequel (still surprised I'm saying that) and could even be up for a third, given the right story. 6/10
I stopped reading after the first sentence, because I have to see this. I have been hoping for a remake, the first one was great.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/21 11:11 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
RESPECT
Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson is perfectly cast as the late Aretha Franklin. Judging by the previews and Hudson's known musical talent, this seemed like an early Oscar contender for her (and even after watching it, I still believe that to be the case). However, she didn't do enough with the role to win me over and I see her gaining nothing more than a nomination, rather than a win. She plays Aretha wonderfully, always poised, respectful, and humble being able to show her full acting talents towards the later part of the film. However, her performance, and film overall, felt very average. It's bloated with a runtime of 2 hours and 25 minutes and a handful of scenes, particularly early in the film could have been trimmed down to assist with the films pace. Quite a bit of time is devoted to Aretha's youth to open with, which stalls any momentum out of the gate, before the audience is finally introduced to Hudson. She is remarkably surrounded by very strong supporting actors as well, especially when talking about Forest Whitaker, who plays her preacher father and Marlon Wayans who plays her first husband, Ted White. Both men are extremely demanding, controlling, and hard headed, who attempt to keep Aretha under their thumbs throughout the film, until she finally finds her self-worth and respect to stand up to the both of them. I wouldn't be surprised to see either or both of them land nominations as well (and I'd really be pulling for Wayans if that's the case). A film that looked to have more promise but failed in it's delivery. Unless your a fan of Aretha's, you can probably avoid the theaters for this. 5/10
Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson is perfectly cast as the late Aretha Franklin. Judging by the previews and Hudson's known musical talent, this seemed like an early Oscar contender for her (and even after watching it, I still believe that to be the case). However, she didn't do enough with the role to win me over and I see her gaining nothing more than a nomination, rather than a win. She plays Aretha wonderfully, always poised, respectful, and humble being able to show her full acting talents towards the later part of the film. However, her performance, and film overall, felt very average. It's bloated with a runtime of 2 hours and 25 minutes and a handful of scenes, particularly early in the film could have been trimmed down to assist with the films pace. Quite a bit of time is devoted to Aretha's youth to open with, which stalls any momentum out of the gate, before the audience is finally introduced to Hudson. She is remarkably surrounded by very strong supporting actors as well, especially when talking about Forest Whitaker, who plays her preacher father and Marlon Wayans who plays her first husband, Ted White. Both men are extremely demanding, controlling, and hard headed, who attempt to keep Aretha under their thumbs throughout the film, until she finally finds her self-worth and respect to stand up to the both of them. I wouldn't be surprised to see either or both of them land nominations as well (and I'd really be pulling for Wayans if that's the case). A film that looked to have more promise but failed in it's delivery. Unless your a fan of Aretha's, you can probably avoid the theaters for this. 5/10
Thanks i12
I will
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/21 11:21 PM
New Tomorrow
8/20 - Bios (‘21) Tom Hanks.
8/20 - Sweet Girl (‘21) Jason Mamoa.
8/20 - Reminiscence (‘21 HBOMax) w/Hugh Jackman; retrieving memories.
8/20 - TRUTH BE TOLD (‘21 S2)
(w/Octavia Spencer & Aaron Paul)
(AppleTv/AmazP)
S1 : 2019 8E 4 Stars.
8/20 - Flag Day (‘21) w/Sean Penn.
8/20 - Bios (‘21) Tom Hanks.
8/20 - Sweet Girl (‘21) Jason Mamoa.
8/20 - Reminiscence (‘21 HBOMax) w/Hugh Jackman; retrieving memories.
8/20 - TRUTH BE TOLD (‘21 S2)
(w/Octavia Spencer & Aaron Paul)
(AppleTv/AmazP)
S1 : 2019 8E 4 Stars.
8/20 - Flag Day (‘21) w/Sean Penn.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/21 11:42 PM
Tomorrow I'm going to the theaters to see THE PROTEGE and THE NIGHT HOUSE. This weekend I'll watch REMINISCENCE on HBO Max.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/21 12:41 AM
THE PROTEGE
Maggie Q stars as Anna, an assassin who's on a trail of revenge after her mentor (Samuel L. Jackson), is unexpectedly killed. Being this is a Lionsgate release, I'm sure the studio is hoping for this to become another of their franchises but I don't see that happening. For an action film, there's very few action scenes peppered throughout. I'm quite surprised with the cast they were able to assemble with Jackson, Robert Patrick, and Michael Keaton. I'm sure the studio was banking on their star power to bring in audiences but once there, you're duped by an average story that's all over the place, a weak villain who's not Keaton by the way (although that's not what the trailers want you to believe), and no other performances by any of the main players are of any significance. A very disappointing showing from director Martin Campbell, who's previous work alone within the James Bond franchise, proves he's capable of so much more. This is the type of film you take a gamble on while trapped on a long flight with nothing else to do. 5/1
Maggie Q stars as Anna, an assassin who's on a trail of revenge after her mentor (Samuel L. Jackson), is unexpectedly killed. Being this is a Lionsgate release, I'm sure the studio is hoping for this to become another of their franchises but I don't see that happening. For an action film, there's very few action scenes peppered throughout. I'm quite surprised with the cast they were able to assemble with Jackson, Robert Patrick, and Michael Keaton. I'm sure the studio was banking on their star power to bring in audiences but once there, you're duped by an average story that's all over the place, a weak villain who's not Keaton by the way (although that's not what the trailers want you to believe), and no other performances by any of the main players are of any significance. A very disappointing showing from director Martin Campbell, who's previous work alone within the James Bond franchise, proves he's capable of so much more. This is the type of film you take a gamble on while trapped on a long flight with nothing else to do. 5/1
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/21 12:41 AM
THE NIGHT HOUSE
Rebecca Hall stars as Beth, a recent widow, who's husband Owen committed suicide by shooting himself in the head on a boat in the middle of a lake outside of their home. Self-medicating with various amounts of alcohol, she begins to unearth aspects of her late husbands life she was not previously privy to. An onion of a film that continues to keep you guessing with each layer that's peeled away as the film progresses and does a wonderful job at building the audiences suspense when multiple, unexplained disturbances occur within the house (such as the stereo constantly being turned on in the middle of the night). This leads Beth to believe her house is haunted and that her husband may be trying to make contact with her from beyond the grave. There's a lot to unpack here and this is one of those films where a second viewing is needed to really absorb everything being presented. An interesting story and twist at the end. This probably won't make much noise at the box office and from the previews I was only mildly interested; however, after seeing it, I look forward to getting back on this roller coaster. 6/10
Rebecca Hall stars as Beth, a recent widow, who's husband Owen committed suicide by shooting himself in the head on a boat in the middle of a lake outside of their home. Self-medicating with various amounts of alcohol, she begins to unearth aspects of her late husbands life she was not previously privy to. An onion of a film that continues to keep you guessing with each layer that's peeled away as the film progresses and does a wonderful job at building the audiences suspense when multiple, unexplained disturbances occur within the house (such as the stereo constantly being turned on in the middle of the night). This leads Beth to believe her house is haunted and that her husband may be trying to make contact with her from beyond the grave. There's a lot to unpack here and this is one of those films where a second viewing is needed to really absorb everything being presented. An interesting story and twist at the end. This probably won't make much noise at the box office and from the previews I was only mildly interested; however, after seeing it, I look forward to getting back on this roller coaster. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/22/21 10:59 PM
REMINISCENE
In the future, Miami is a city underwater. As such, the future looks bleak, so society now turns to the past in order to cope via nostalgia (a water tank system people use to access and relive memories from their past). One day Mae, a nightclub singer, (Rebecca Ferguson) comes in to find her misplaced keys. Nick Bannister (Hugh Jackson) who oversees the nostalgia operation, quickly falls for the beauty. They soon develop a romance until suddenly Mae disappears without a trace. Head over heels for Mae, Nick frantically searches for her, while unexpectedly, uncovering a plot involving a rich property owner that has dire consequences for everyone involved. I'll give the writers credit for creating a new and enticing idea on paper, and even the initial setup worked; however, once Mae went missing and each memory of Nick's seemed to be another memory within a memory, it was easy to quickly lose interest. By the midway point, you're wondering what happened to Mae and for this story to be over with. A shame as the film had promise. 4/10
In the future, Miami is a city underwater. As such, the future looks bleak, so society now turns to the past in order to cope via nostalgia (a water tank system people use to access and relive memories from their past). One day Mae, a nightclub singer, (Rebecca Ferguson) comes in to find her misplaced keys. Nick Bannister (Hugh Jackson) who oversees the nostalgia operation, quickly falls for the beauty. They soon develop a romance until suddenly Mae disappears without a trace. Head over heels for Mae, Nick frantically searches for her, while unexpectedly, uncovering a plot involving a rich property owner that has dire consequences for everyone involved. I'll give the writers credit for creating a new and enticing idea on paper, and even the initial setup worked; however, once Mae went missing and each memory of Nick's seemed to be another memory within a memory, it was easy to quickly lose interest. By the midway point, you're wondering what happened to Mae and for this story to be over with. A shame as the film had promise. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/28/21 12:29 AM
CANDYMAN
A sequel to the original, this quasi-reboot stars Yahya Abdul-Mateen II as Anthony McCoy, an up-and-coming artist in the Chicago area, who becomes fixated on the Candyman myth. Yahya is passable as the main star, but the film only works when Candyman is lurking and slicing and dicing his victims. Otherwise, this is just another "woke" piece from Jordan Peele, who IMO, hasn't done much since GET OUT. This film had much promise going in to it, but didn't deliver with the finished product. 5/10
A sequel to the original, this quasi-reboot stars Yahya Abdul-Mateen II as Anthony McCoy, an up-and-coming artist in the Chicago area, who becomes fixated on the Candyman myth. Yahya is passable as the main star, but the film only works when Candyman is lurking and slicing and dicing his victims. Otherwise, this is just another "woke" piece from Jordan Peele, who IMO, hasn't done much since GET OUT. This film had much promise going in to it, but didn't deliver with the finished product. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/03/21 10:06 PM
SHANG-CHI AND THE LEGEND OF THE TEN RINGS
Like many of the Marvel audience who went into this film, I didn't know anything about this character outside of what the previews showed. However, upon viewing, consider me a Shang-Chi fan! This was a legitimate, straight up Marvel kung-fu movie the likes of which I'd never thought I'd see. Simu Liu stars as Shaun/Shang-Chi, a Chinese immigrant living an ordinary life in San Francisco, working as a valet with his best friend Katy (Awkwafina), until a gang of ruffians attack him on a bus in an attempt to steal a pendant he's wearing. The gang is successful in their attempt and as such, Shang-Chi travels to Macao in search of the pendant and his sister as she's next on the gang's hit list. Plenty of action throughout (especially early on in the film) and Awkwafina passably plays the bumbling sidekick. However, the film comes to a screeching halt when Michelle Yeoh's character is introduced and more backstory is given. A fantastic third act that I won't spoil for you save for spectacular CGI. A few cameo's throughout, especially one who winds up playing a prominent role upon his introduction. This was a very action packed, funny, and at times, touching film that hit on all the notes and I eagerly anticipate not only a second viewing, but a sequel! 8/10
Like many of the Marvel audience who went into this film, I didn't know anything about this character outside of what the previews showed. However, upon viewing, consider me a Shang-Chi fan! This was a legitimate, straight up Marvel kung-fu movie the likes of which I'd never thought I'd see. Simu Liu stars as Shaun/Shang-Chi, a Chinese immigrant living an ordinary life in San Francisco, working as a valet with his best friend Katy (Awkwafina), until a gang of ruffians attack him on a bus in an attempt to steal a pendant he's wearing. The gang is successful in their attempt and as such, Shang-Chi travels to Macao in search of the pendant and his sister as she's next on the gang's hit list. Plenty of action throughout (especially early on in the film) and Awkwafina passably plays the bumbling sidekick. However, the film comes to a screeching halt when Michelle Yeoh's character is introduced and more backstory is given. A fantastic third act that I won't spoil for you save for spectacular CGI. A few cameo's throughout, especially one who winds up playing a prominent role upon his introduction. This was a very action packed, funny, and at times, touching film that hit on all the notes and I eagerly anticipate not only a second viewing, but a sequel! 8/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/04/21 04:24 AM
Arrived Today ! !
![[Linked Image]](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51421808666_125d3e953b_o.jpg)
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/06/21 04:40 PM
WORTH
Based on true events, Michael Keaton stars as Ken Feinberg, an analyst who volunteers for the job nobody wants of attempting to determine how much a life is worth for the families of the victims of 9/11. Keaton is passable as Feinberg, who sticks to his formula's and numbers without getting emotionally involved with the victims (in fact, not until much further on in the film does his attitude change when he begins hearing victims stories firsthand, rather than passing them off to his staff). He and his team are given a deadline of December 24, 2003 to have at least 80% of the 7,000 potential plaintiffs agree to his formula and payment amounts, thus waiving their right to future litigation. The film goes in circles and repeats itself almost ad nauseam between Feinberg's formula and getting the 80% of participants before the deadline. A watchable movie, but nothing memorable upon completion, even with the delicate subject matter discussed and the 20th anniversary of the terrorists attacks approaching. Although I do applaud the film for not being political and sticking to what is relevant: the victims and their families. 5/10
Based on true events, Michael Keaton stars as Ken Feinberg, an analyst who volunteers for the job nobody wants of attempting to determine how much a life is worth for the families of the victims of 9/11. Keaton is passable as Feinberg, who sticks to his formula's and numbers without getting emotionally involved with the victims (in fact, not until much further on in the film does his attitude change when he begins hearing victims stories firsthand, rather than passing them off to his staff). He and his team are given a deadline of December 24, 2003 to have at least 80% of the 7,000 potential plaintiffs agree to his formula and payment amounts, thus waiving their right to future litigation. The film goes in circles and repeats itself almost ad nauseam between Feinberg's formula and getting the 80% of participants before the deadline. A watchable movie, but nothing memorable upon completion, even with the delicate subject matter discussed and the 20th anniversary of the terrorists attacks approaching. Although I do applaud the film for not being political and sticking to what is relevant: the victims and their families. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/10/21 10:15 PM
MALIGNANT
James Wan's newest feature tells the story of Madison, a woman who believes she's being haunted by an evil spirit by the name of Gabriel. Madison sees vision's of murders in real-time, desperately attempting to convince the police she's trying to help, rather than committing the crimes herself. However, having so much intimate knowledge of the crimes, she's the cops prime suspect. I'm a fan of both star Annabelle Wallis and director James Wan but this story is too ludicrous to take seriously. The ending is too predictable within the first 20-30 minutes and the film does nothing to hold your interest throughout until you're proven right. Before the midway point, the film is a snoozefest and you're waiting for the credits to roll (in fact, the story becomes somewhat laughable by the third act). No scares in this one but plenty of gore to go around. Wan has proven he can deliver the goods within this genre but this was an extremely bad miss (although I do give him credit for originality). Is that really where we're at in society and fans of the horror genre where we're applauding attempts, rather than the finished product? A hard pass, even for those with HBO Max. 4/10
James Wan's newest feature tells the story of Madison, a woman who believes she's being haunted by an evil spirit by the name of Gabriel. Madison sees vision's of murders in real-time, desperately attempting to convince the police she's trying to help, rather than committing the crimes herself. However, having so much intimate knowledge of the crimes, she's the cops prime suspect. I'm a fan of both star Annabelle Wallis and director James Wan but this story is too ludicrous to take seriously. The ending is too predictable within the first 20-30 minutes and the film does nothing to hold your interest throughout until you're proven right. Before the midway point, the film is a snoozefest and you're waiting for the credits to roll (in fact, the story becomes somewhat laughable by the third act). No scares in this one but plenty of gore to go around. Wan has proven he can deliver the goods within this genre but this was an extremely bad miss (although I do give him credit for originality). Is that really where we're at in society and fans of the horror genre where we're applauding attempts, rather than the finished product? A hard pass, even for those with HBO Max. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/21 08:57 PM
KATE
KATE finds Mary Elizabeth Winstead as a retiring assassin, who during her final job, is poisoned and has 24 hours left to live. Set in Japan, Winstead begins a brief but very deadly journey of revenge against one of the most powerful Yakuza clans in the land in order to kill the person(s) responsible for her impending death. I'm really enjoying Mary Elizabeth stretching her chops as an action star and hope she continues as she kicks major ass in the film (particularly in her fight sequence in a Japanese restaurant that would make Quentin Tarantino proud). Woody Harrelson plays her mentor, Varrick. Harrelson always demands your attention with his powerful performances but here, he's somewhat wasted and used as filler as the character is very two dimensional, without much to work with. A fun and bloody journey to take a chance on Netflix. 6/10
KATE finds Mary Elizabeth Winstead as a retiring assassin, who during her final job, is poisoned and has 24 hours left to live. Set in Japan, Winstead begins a brief but very deadly journey of revenge against one of the most powerful Yakuza clans in the land in order to kill the person(s) responsible for her impending death. I'm really enjoying Mary Elizabeth stretching her chops as an action star and hope she continues as she kicks major ass in the film (particularly in her fight sequence in a Japanese restaurant that would make Quentin Tarantino proud). Woody Harrelson plays her mentor, Varrick. Harrelson always demands your attention with his powerful performances but here, he's somewhat wasted and used as filler as the character is very two dimensional, without much to work with. A fun and bloody journey to take a chance on Netflix. 6/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/21 09:37 PM
I love reading your reviews, Irish. Your contribution is very much appreciated, I must say. Do you post these reviews elsewhere as well? You'd definitely score high on imdb. I'm a movie buff as well, but you sure put me to shame when it comes to combing through the new stuff lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/12/21 10:09 PM
I appreciate that my man. Glad others enjoy reading them and am able to guide those to either avoid a bad picture or seek out a good one. I'm on Letterboxd and Rotten Tomatoes as well.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/13/21 07:57 AM
I'm gonna check out Malignant later this week. I know you didn't like that one, but people seem to either hate it or absolutely love it. At this point, I just have to see it to make sure lol. I do like the director, I will say
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/13/21 11:20 PM
I'm a James Wan fan as well and that's why this was even more disappointing for me. Curious as to your thoughts after viewing it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/14/21 10:22 PM
THE GUILTY
Jake Gyllenhaal stars as Joe Baylor, a LAPD officer who's recently been assigned to work as a 911 operator after being investigated for a shooting he was involved in while on duty. His attitude towards his current position is evident early on with callers as he's frequently blunt and even downright rude to people who are in emergency situations, looking for assistance rather than a 911 operator with an attitude. Playing against the backdrop of a California wildfire and resources that are stretched thin, Joe receives a call from Emily, who's been abducted. Trying to save Emily before any harm comes to her, Joe becomes overly invested in this kidnapping, going above and beyond (both legally and illegally) to rescue her. Director Antoine Fuqua and writer Nic Pizzolatto do a wonderful job at creating suspense, always wondering what the next phone call between the two will bring. At around 85 minutes, it doesn't sit around waiting to get revved up but rather gets right to the point. Gyllenhaal does a spectacular job as Joe, going from oftentimes tender to raging mad without much provocation and it's easy to see why he's currently sitting on the sidelines due to his violent temper. Be sure to check out this modern day Hitchcockian film when it drops on Netflix on October 1. 7.5/10
Jake Gyllenhaal stars as Joe Baylor, a LAPD officer who's recently been assigned to work as a 911 operator after being investigated for a shooting he was involved in while on duty. His attitude towards his current position is evident early on with callers as he's frequently blunt and even downright rude to people who are in emergency situations, looking for assistance rather than a 911 operator with an attitude. Playing against the backdrop of a California wildfire and resources that are stretched thin, Joe receives a call from Emily, who's been abducted. Trying to save Emily before any harm comes to her, Joe becomes overly invested in this kidnapping, going above and beyond (both legally and illegally) to rescue her. Director Antoine Fuqua and writer Nic Pizzolatto do a wonderful job at creating suspense, always wondering what the next phone call between the two will bring. At around 85 minutes, it doesn't sit around waiting to get revved up but rather gets right to the point. Gyllenhaal does a spectacular job as Joe, going from oftentimes tender to raging mad without much provocation and it's easy to see why he's currently sitting on the sidelines due to his violent temper. Be sure to check out this modern day Hitchcockian film when it drops on Netflix on October 1. 7.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/15/21 11:17 PM
Saw The Guilty last night, Irish. Totally agree with your assessment. I thoroughly enjoyed it. It only gets a 6.1 on imdb, which is totally bizarre to me, but the masses ain't always right. Loved Gyllenhaal's performance. The way he's able to tap into those difficult feelings is quite impressive.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/21 12:20 AM
I was very impressed with it as well (moreso than I anticipated going in to it). I'll be watching it again when it drops on Netflix). Going to see CRY MACHO on Friday and then a few more that I'll post over the weekend.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/21 07:12 AM
CHERNOBYL DIARIES (2012)
A group of carefree twenty-somethings, vacationing in Kiev, sign up for an "extreme tour" with a local guide who says he can get them into Pripyat, the town abandoned after the Chernobyl reactor meltdown in '86. Guards block them, but the driver takes them in via a hidden entrance. They have an interesting time in the eerily abandoned ruins, but when it's time to go, the van has been sabotaged, and as night falls, they learn to their horror that they're not alone.
You could call this the Eastern European "Blair Witch Project" except that it's better filmed (color) in authentic, abandoned Soviet-era military bases. It's tense, often gripping, as the unseen forces reduce the tourists' numbers and they get more and more terrified. The ending is kinda lame, but getting there was most of the fun.
A group of carefree twenty-somethings, vacationing in Kiev, sign up for an "extreme tour" with a local guide who says he can get them into Pripyat, the town abandoned after the Chernobyl reactor meltdown in '86. Guards block them, but the driver takes them in via a hidden entrance. They have an interesting time in the eerily abandoned ruins, but when it's time to go, the van has been sabotaged, and as night falls, they learn to their horror that they're not alone.
You could call this the Eastern European "Blair Witch Project" except that it's better filmed (color) in authentic, abandoned Soviet-era military bases. It's tense, often gripping, as the unseen forces reduce the tourists' numbers and they get more and more terrified. The ending is kinda lame, but getting there was most of the fun.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/21 09:31 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I was very impressed with it as well (moreso than I anticipated going in to it). I'll be watching it again when it drops on Netflix). Going to see CRY MACHO on Friday and then a few more that I'll post over the weekend.
Looking forward to your Cry Macho review. I really enjoyed The Mule. It's crazy how many good movies Eastwood has made in his career. One of my all time favorite movies is A Perfect World, the one with Kevin Costner and Laura Dern.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/21 10:33 PM
I never saw A PERFECT WORLD and I need to revisit THE MULE. Only saw it once in theaters. Didn't blow me away but I enjoyed it. I did enjoy RICHARD JEWEL however. Not crazy about CRY MACHO tomorrow honestly but I'll take a flyer on it. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/17/21 09:12 PM
CRY MACHO
CRY MACHO tells the story of Mike Milo, played by Clint Eastwood. A one-time rodeo star who's career was cut short by an accident. He's now far removed from his glory days, working as a horse trainer. The film opens with his boss Howard (Dwight Yoakam) firing him and bringing in a new trainer. Fast forward a year later and Howard needs Mike's help: he asks Mike to go to Mexico to bring his son, Rafo, to the States. At first Mike asks all the right questions such as "why don't you go through the authorities" and whatnot until Howard gives his reasoning before guilting Mike into going as repayment since Howard covered Mike's expenses once his family passed and left him a drunk and emotionally shattered man. For a film about Eastwood trying to find and convince Rafo to come north with him, all while staying off the police's radar, they certainly make a lot of stops along the way. Their car finally breaks down in a small town where a lot of the story is focused and Mike finds a new lease on life when he meets Marta and her 4 granddaughters. Eastwood's continuing to look frail, but what else is to be expected from a 91-year-old? I only bring it up because there's a couple of scenes where he's physical and it doesn't come off particularly well or believable because of it. Although, it is a decent enough story about an aging cowboy finally finding some peace and happiness before leaving this old earth of ours. 5.5/10
CRY MACHO tells the story of Mike Milo, played by Clint Eastwood. A one-time rodeo star who's career was cut short by an accident. He's now far removed from his glory days, working as a horse trainer. The film opens with his boss Howard (Dwight Yoakam) firing him and bringing in a new trainer. Fast forward a year later and Howard needs Mike's help: he asks Mike to go to Mexico to bring his son, Rafo, to the States. At first Mike asks all the right questions such as "why don't you go through the authorities" and whatnot until Howard gives his reasoning before guilting Mike into going as repayment since Howard covered Mike's expenses once his family passed and left him a drunk and emotionally shattered man. For a film about Eastwood trying to find and convince Rafo to come north with him, all while staying off the police's radar, they certainly make a lot of stops along the way. Their car finally breaks down in a small town where a lot of the story is focused and Mike finds a new lease on life when he meets Marta and her 4 granddaughters. Eastwood's continuing to look frail, but what else is to be expected from a 91-year-old? I only bring it up because there's a couple of scenes where he's physical and it doesn't come off particularly well or believable because of it. Although, it is a decent enough story about an aging cowboy finally finding some peace and happiness before leaving this old earth of ours. 5.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/21 08:07 AM
When I watched the Cry Macho trailer, I felt I had seen the movie. I'll probably watch it one of these days, but the trailer and your review make me think this movie is as predictable as it gets.
I have yet to see Richard Jewell. That's another movie that I felt I didn't need to see because I knew the story. What the feds did to that guy was unforgivable.
I have yet to see Richard Jewell. That's another movie that I felt I didn't need to see because I knew the story. What the feds did to that guy was unforgivable.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/21 04:56 PM
THE POWER OF THE DOG
Brothers Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jessie Plemons) are wealthy ranchers in 1925 Montana. The film opens with them bringing cattle into town and settle themselves at an establishment run by a widow by the name of Rose (Kirsten Dunst) and her son Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee). Phil and George couldn't be any different from each other. Where Phil is loud, aggressive, and rude, George is quiet, reserved, and well mannered. While dining after their journey into town, Phil continuously offends and bullies the fragile and delicate Peter. This leads George to not only settle the bill upon everyone's departure but also apologize to Rose for his brothers actions. The next day he visits Rose again and he continues to drive into town to see her until they're finally married. This does not go over well with Phil as Rose now moves into the house he shares with his brother George while Phil is sent away to medical school. A slow burn of a film that in some ways could act as a spiritual sequel to THERE WILL BE BLOOD; however, again they deal with cattle as opposed to oil. One of the finest performances I've ever seen from Cumberbatch and I'm fully aware of how bold a statement that is due to his very impressive body of work. This should at least garner him an Oscar nomination. Plemons and Dunst were equally as good and balance out a very strong cast, although for a period of time, Plemons does disappear from the story between acts 2 & 3. I cannot recommend this movie enough! 8/10
Brothers Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jessie Plemons) are wealthy ranchers in 1925 Montana. The film opens with them bringing cattle into town and settle themselves at an establishment run by a widow by the name of Rose (Kirsten Dunst) and her son Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee). Phil and George couldn't be any different from each other. Where Phil is loud, aggressive, and rude, George is quiet, reserved, and well mannered. While dining after their journey into town, Phil continuously offends and bullies the fragile and delicate Peter. This leads George to not only settle the bill upon everyone's departure but also apologize to Rose for his brothers actions. The next day he visits Rose again and he continues to drive into town to see her until they're finally married. This does not go over well with Phil as Rose now moves into the house he shares with his brother George while Phil is sent away to medical school. A slow burn of a film that in some ways could act as a spiritual sequel to THERE WILL BE BLOOD; however, again they deal with cattle as opposed to oil. One of the finest performances I've ever seen from Cumberbatch and I'm fully aware of how bold a statement that is due to his very impressive body of work. This should at least garner him an Oscar nomination. Plemons and Dunst were equally as good and balance out a very strong cast, although for a period of time, Plemons does disappear from the story between acts 2 & 3. I cannot recommend this movie enough! 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/21 04:59 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
When I watched the Cry Macho trailer, I felt I had seen the movie. I'll probably watch it one of these days, but the trailer and your review make me think this movie is as predictable as it gets.
I have yet to see Richard Jewell. That's another movie that I felt I didn't need to see because I knew the story. What the feds did to that guy was unforgivable.
I have yet to see Richard Jewell. That's another movie that I felt I didn't need to see because I knew the story. What the feds did to that guy was unforgivable.
I agree with you on JEWELL, tragedy what they did to that poor man who wound up being a hero than a villain. I had nothing else to watch yesterday so I took a flyer on CRY MACHO. Yes, very predictable and average.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/21 08:47 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE POWER OF THE DOG
Brothers Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jessie Plemons) are wealthy ranchers in 1925 Montana. The film opens with them bringing cattle into town and settle themselves at an establishment run by a widow by the name of Rose (Kirsten Dunst) and her son Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee). Phil and George couldn't be any different from each other. Where Phil is loud, aggressive, and rude, George is quiet, reserved, and well mannered. While dining after their journey into town, Phil continuously offends and bullies the fragile and delicate Peter. This leads George to not only settle the bill upon everyone's departure but also apologize to Rose for his brothers actions. The next day he visits Rose again and he continues to drive into town to see her until they're finally married. This does not go over well with Phil as Rose now moves into the house he shares with his brother George while Phil is sent away to medical school. A slow burn of a film that in some ways could act as a spiritual sequel to THERE WILL BE BLOOD; however, again they deal with cattle as opposed to oil. One of the finest performances I've ever seen from Cumberbatch and I'm fully aware of how bold a statement that is due to his very impressive body of work. This should at least garner him an Oscar nomination. Plemons and Dunst were equally as good and balance out a very strong cast, although for a period of time, Plemons does disappear from the story between acts 2 & 3. I cannot recommend this movie enough! 8/10
Brothers Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jessie Plemons) are wealthy ranchers in 1925 Montana. The film opens with them bringing cattle into town and settle themselves at an establishment run by a widow by the name of Rose (Kirsten Dunst) and her son Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee). Phil and George couldn't be any different from each other. Where Phil is loud, aggressive, and rude, George is quiet, reserved, and well mannered. While dining after their journey into town, Phil continuously offends and bullies the fragile and delicate Peter. This leads George to not only settle the bill upon everyone's departure but also apologize to Rose for his brothers actions. The next day he visits Rose again and he continues to drive into town to see her until they're finally married. This does not go over well with Phil as Rose now moves into the house he shares with his brother George while Phil is sent away to medical school. A slow burn of a film that in some ways could act as a spiritual sequel to THERE WILL BE BLOOD; however, again they deal with cattle as opposed to oil. One of the finest performances I've ever seen from Cumberbatch and I'm fully aware of how bold a statement that is due to his very impressive body of work. This should at least garner him an Oscar nomination. Plemons and Dunst were equally as good and balance out a very strong cast, although for a period of time, Plemons does disappear from the story between acts 2 & 3. I cannot recommend this movie enough! 8/10
Just added this one to my watchlist. Cumberbatch is an incredible actor, but Plemons is no slouch either in my book. I absolutely loved him in Breaking Bad and he was hilarious in that Justin Bateman flick Game Night lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/21 09:14 PM
Plemons is an overlooked actor but has done some great work and I look forward to seeing what else he dazzles us with. I'm definitely a fan of his as well.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/19/21 07:14 PM
I came out about where Irishman did on "Cry Macho." An interesting story but marred by some sappy, improbable scenes and weak dialog for the kid, Rafo. Eastwood was...well...Eastwood, looking all of his 91 years but still good. The movie wasn't without its charming moments, especially as Eastwood starts appreciating Mexicans and especially when dancing with Marta.
t
t
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/20/21 08:44 AM
Just watched Malignant. Fell asleep midway because it was so boring, but woke up just in time for the most predictable ending ever. What a shit movie, Irish. I'm so disappointed in James Wan.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/20/21 10:42 PM
THE CARD COUNTER
Let me preface this review by stating to avoid this film, which is a real shame as I am a fan of Oscar Isaac, Tye Sheridan, Willem Dafoe, Paul Schrader, and Martin Scorsese (who was a producer on this film). But this story was painful to get through all 112 minutes of it. It's a slow, dry film that just drifts from scene-to-scene. At first I gave it some time, allowing itself to establish and then open up with the story but it never does that. It just continues to flow through it's monotonous tone for the duration of the film. Isaac plays William Tell, a former military interrogator trying to extract intelligence from supposed terrorist at a blacklist site. Pictures of him and colleagues torturing inmates are made public and as such, the soldiers pictured take the fall, not any of their superiors, so he's an ex-con as well. While in prison, he learns to count cards and upon his release, uses his newfound skill to his advantage. Although, he's able to evade the ire of casinos in that his winnings are modest and not high dollar. Tiffany Haddish also stars as La Linda, who sponsors William in tournaments in exchange for a cut of his winnings. The pairing and forced romance between the two is awkward, with none to little chemistry shared between them. Unless you're having difficulty sleeping at night, avoid this snoozefest. 3/10
Let me preface this review by stating to avoid this film, which is a real shame as I am a fan of Oscar Isaac, Tye Sheridan, Willem Dafoe, Paul Schrader, and Martin Scorsese (who was a producer on this film). But this story was painful to get through all 112 minutes of it. It's a slow, dry film that just drifts from scene-to-scene. At first I gave it some time, allowing itself to establish and then open up with the story but it never does that. It just continues to flow through it's monotonous tone for the duration of the film. Isaac plays William Tell, a former military interrogator trying to extract intelligence from supposed terrorist at a blacklist site. Pictures of him and colleagues torturing inmates are made public and as such, the soldiers pictured take the fall, not any of their superiors, so he's an ex-con as well. While in prison, he learns to count cards and upon his release, uses his newfound skill to his advantage. Although, he's able to evade the ire of casinos in that his winnings are modest and not high dollar. Tiffany Haddish also stars as La Linda, who sponsors William in tournaments in exchange for a cut of his winnings. The pairing and forced romance between the two is awkward, with none to little chemistry shared between them. Unless you're having difficulty sleeping at night, avoid this snoozefest. 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/20/21 10:48 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Just watched Malignant. Fell asleep midway because it was so boring, but woke up just in time for the most predictable ending ever. What a shit movie, Irish. I'm so disappointed in James Wan.
You and me both my man. Had the ending figured out within the first 20-30 minutes of the show. Then was just waiting to be proven right.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/26/21 02:29 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE CARD COUNTER
Let me preface this review by stating to avoid this film, which is a real shame as I am a fan of Oscar Isaac, Tye Sheridan, Willem Dafoe, Paul Schrader, and Martin Scorsese (who was a producer on this film). But this story was painful to get through all 112 minutes of it. It's a slow, dry film that just drifts from scene-to-scene. At first I gave it some time, allowing itself to establish and then open up with the story but it never does that. It just continues to flow through it's monotonous tone for the duration of the film. Isaac plays William Tell, a former military interrogator trying to extract intelligence from supposed terrorist at a blacklist site. Pictures of him and colleagues torturing inmates are made public and as such, the soldiers pictured take the fall, not any of their superiors, so he's an ex-con as well. While in prison, he learns to count cards and upon his release, uses his newfound skill to his advantage. Although, he's able to evade the ire of casinos in that his winnings are modest and not high dollar. Tiffany Haddish also stars as La Linda, who sponsors William in tournaments in exchange for a cut of his winnings. The pairing and forced romance between the two is awkward, with none to little chemistry shared between them. Unless you're having difficulty sleeping at night, avoid this snoozefest. 3/10
Let me preface this review by stating to avoid this film, which is a real shame as I am a fan of Oscar Isaac, Tye Sheridan, Willem Dafoe, Paul Schrader, and Martin Scorsese (who was a producer on this film). But this story was painful to get through all 112 minutes of it. It's a slow, dry film that just drifts from scene-to-scene. At first I gave it some time, allowing itself to establish and then open up with the story but it never does that. It just continues to flow through it's monotonous tone for the duration of the film. Isaac plays William Tell, a former military interrogator trying to extract intelligence from supposed terrorist at a blacklist site. Pictures of him and colleagues torturing inmates are made public and as such, the soldiers pictured take the fall, not any of their superiors, so he's an ex-con as well. While in prison, he learns to count cards and upon his release, uses his newfound skill to his advantage. Although, he's able to evade the ire of casinos in that his winnings are modest and not high dollar. Tiffany Haddish also stars as La Linda, who sponsors William in tournaments in exchange for a cut of his winnings. The pairing and forced romance between the two is awkward, with none to little chemistry shared between them. Unless you're having difficulty sleeping at night, avoid this snoozefest. 3/10
My Wife & I loved this movie….it had great mystiek.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/27/21 12:05 AM
Glad you guys did. I was pretty disappointed in this, with the cast and Scorsese being a producer on it and all.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/27/21 12:58 AM
Watched a double feature.
Cry Macho, not impressed, same story as others with nothing new to it. Yeah, trying to get 9ut of Mexico fast and stopping way more than they should really was a waste. Eduardo Minett did a terrible job, and Clint Eastwood was not that much better.
Copshop, this one does not add any new formula, but is that old shoot em up action movie. Think of the original Assault on Precinct 13 and Fargo Season 3 in the jail scene and you know what you are getting yourself into. The editing was done poorly and you can see moments where they cut Butler and Grillo from delivering more. The ending leaves off to a possible sequel. You into the old 70s and 80s action shooters? This is for you. It played after Cry Macho and was more entertaining for me despite some of the old quiches.
Cry Macho, not impressed, same story as others with nothing new to it. Yeah, trying to get 9ut of Mexico fast and stopping way more than they should really was a waste. Eduardo Minett did a terrible job, and Clint Eastwood was not that much better.
Copshop, this one does not add any new formula, but is that old shoot em up action movie. Think of the original Assault on Precinct 13 and Fargo Season 3 in the jail scene and you know what you are getting yourself into. The editing was done poorly and you can see moments where they cut Butler and Grillo from delivering more. The ending leaves off to a possible sequel. You into the old 70s and 80s action shooters? This is for you. It played after Cry Macho and was more entertaining for me despite some of the old quiches.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/28/21 11:45 PM
THINGS HEARD & SEEN
Taking place during the year 1980 in the Hudson Valley, New York, a young married couple and their daughter move from the big city to this small, quite town when the breadwinner, George Claire (James Norton), accepts a teaching position upon completion of graduating from college. His wife Catherine (Amanda Seyfried) works as an art restorer in the city, but once they move, she's left with little to do in her life: no job and no family, she's quickly looking for her purpose during this next phase of her life. However, she soon suspects her home may be haunted after both her and her daughter begin seeing a strange figure. This was a slow paced film but does a fine job at keeping the audience engaged throughout, curious as to what will happen next. My biggest grip was the ending didn't have enough of a payoff for me. Seyfriend and Norton do well in their respective roles, particularly Norton as he is easily believable as the preppy, Connecticut, spoiled rich boy who gets any and everything he wants. He's pompous and overly confident whereas Seyfried is rational and intelligent. A well balanced cast with the additions of Natalia Dyer, Rhea Seehorn, Karen Allen, and F. Murray Abraham. Not a bad gamble to take on Netflix. 5.5/10
Taking place during the year 1980 in the Hudson Valley, New York, a young married couple and their daughter move from the big city to this small, quite town when the breadwinner, George Claire (James Norton), accepts a teaching position upon completion of graduating from college. His wife Catherine (Amanda Seyfried) works as an art restorer in the city, but once they move, she's left with little to do in her life: no job and no family, she's quickly looking for her purpose during this next phase of her life. However, she soon suspects her home may be haunted after both her and her daughter begin seeing a strange figure. This was a slow paced film but does a fine job at keeping the audience engaged throughout, curious as to what will happen next. My biggest grip was the ending didn't have enough of a payoff for me. Seyfriend and Norton do well in their respective roles, particularly Norton as he is easily believable as the preppy, Connecticut, spoiled rich boy who gets any and everything he wants. He's pompous and overly confident whereas Seyfried is rational and intelligent. A well balanced cast with the additions of Natalia Dyer, Rhea Seehorn, Karen Allen, and F. Murray Abraham. Not a bad gamble to take on Netflix. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/21 05:07 PM
THE EYES OF TAMMY FAYE
Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield play former TV evangelists Tammy Faye Bakker and Jim Bakker. The story tells the rise and fall of this Minnesota couple who, in an attempt to spread the word of God, succumbed to the desires of this world. Desires that tested their love, their marriage, and their faith. A lot has been said about Chastain's role as Tammy Faye and while I agree an Academy Award nomination could and probably should be in the cards for her, I'm not sure she did enough to bring it home (we'll have to see who her competition is). Garfield doesn't get talked about enough as he's equally mesmerizing as the sleazy, con-artist, looking to enrich himself through his parishioners donations, rather than give the money for its intended charities. However, while Tammy Faye is the Betty Boop voiced, obedient wife, she too is just as culpable as Jim in their transgressions. I appreciate the fact that director Michael Showalter kept his focus throughout and didn't make this a hit/anti-religion piece. 6/10
Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield play former TV evangelists Tammy Faye Bakker and Jim Bakker. The story tells the rise and fall of this Minnesota couple who, in an attempt to spread the word of God, succumbed to the desires of this world. Desires that tested their love, their marriage, and their faith. A lot has been said about Chastain's role as Tammy Faye and while I agree an Academy Award nomination could and probably should be in the cards for her, I'm not sure she did enough to bring it home (we'll have to see who her competition is). Garfield doesn't get talked about enough as he's equally mesmerizing as the sleazy, con-artist, looking to enrich himself through his parishioners donations, rather than give the money for its intended charities. However, while Tammy Faye is the Betty Boop voiced, obedient wife, she too is just as culpable as Jim in their transgressions. I appreciate the fact that director Michael Showalter kept his focus throughout and didn't make this a hit/anti-religion piece. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/21 12:03 AM
VENOM: LET THERE BE CARNAGE
Tom Hardy is back as Eddie Brock/Venom. Picking up where the mid credit scene left off in the original, serial killer Cletus Kasady (Woody Harrelson) asks Eddie back so he can give him the exclusive interview every media member has been salivating to get: Kasady opening up about his murders. However, before doing so, he asks Eddie to print something for him in his column that only his love interest Frances Barrison (Naomie Harris) will understand. Once Eddie does and during their interview, Cletus begins mouthing off at Eddie before biting him, transferring some of his blood and thus enabling Cletus to become Carnage. I was a fan of the original, and while this is in many ways in the same vein as it, it doesn't capture the same magic. The banter between Eddie and Venom is still there and I applaud the Axel Foley wardrobe Eddie's rocking throughout. However, being that it's PG-13, the films violent parts are watered down which was disappointing and somewhat took away from the story. Not to mention both Naomi Harris and Eddie's love interest Michelle Williams are sorely underutilized in this, especially Williams who is ever only needed onscreen to help Eddie it seems. Harris' character of Shriek is almost laughable at times with her powers. The only star of the show is Harrelson who does a fantastic job, living it up as the villain in an almost Mickey Knox sort of way. If you liked the original, you'll probably like this (and if you didn't, you probably won't). I'd still see a third film to see if it can redeem the franchise. Great mid credit scene here by the way so stick around for it! 5.5/10
Tom Hardy is back as Eddie Brock/Venom. Picking up where the mid credit scene left off in the original, serial killer Cletus Kasady (Woody Harrelson) asks Eddie back so he can give him the exclusive interview every media member has been salivating to get: Kasady opening up about his murders. However, before doing so, he asks Eddie to print something for him in his column that only his love interest Frances Barrison (Naomie Harris) will understand. Once Eddie does and during their interview, Cletus begins mouthing off at Eddie before biting him, transferring some of his blood and thus enabling Cletus to become Carnage. I was a fan of the original, and while this is in many ways in the same vein as it, it doesn't capture the same magic. The banter between Eddie and Venom is still there and I applaud the Axel Foley wardrobe Eddie's rocking throughout. However, being that it's PG-13, the films violent parts are watered down which was disappointing and somewhat took away from the story. Not to mention both Naomi Harris and Eddie's love interest Michelle Williams are sorely underutilized in this, especially Williams who is ever only needed onscreen to help Eddie it seems. Harris' character of Shriek is almost laughable at times with her powers. The only star of the show is Harrelson who does a fantastic job, living it up as the villain in an almost Mickey Knox sort of way. If you liked the original, you'll probably like this (and if you didn't, you probably won't). I'd still see a third film to see if it can redeem the franchise. Great mid credit scene here by the way so stick around for it! 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/21 08:00 PM
THE MANY SAINTS OF NEWARK
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/21 08:05 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE MANY SAINTS OF NEWARK
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
Thanks Irishman !
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/21 09:12 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE MANY SAINTS OF NEWARK
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
To begin with, I was against this project initially when I first heard about it. THE SOPRANOS is sacred territory as far as I'm concerned and I was afraid HBO was trying to unnecessarily return to a franchise in order to turn out another mediocre film, hoping the title alone would sell itself. Fortunately, after watching this, my fears were put to rest as this was a very beautiful and respectful prequel to THE SOPRANOS story. The trailer leads to you to believe this is a coming of age story of a young Tony Soprano. And while that is true, that part of the story doesn't take shape until the second half. The first half deals with his Uncle, Dickie Moltisanti, and his relationship with his father, step-mother, and business associates (some Italian and others African-American). It was awesome going back in time to see younger versions of Paulie, Livia, Silvio, and Uncle Junior amongst others. Every actor who stepped into those shoes did a great job at capturing the essence of the character from the show. However, the standout for me was Vera Farmiga as Livia as you can definitely tell why Tony wound up in therapy all those years later, she's wonderful! As is Michael Gandolfini as a young Tony. He's great as a teenager of the character his father made famous and I even hear whispers the cast and crew would be up for a sequel if HBO decided to move ahead with one. I would absolutely be up for it! 8/10
i agree with everything you said my friend
btw you also think it was a little bit short ?
i feel like something missing
maybe i something inside me miss the show so much that it hurts to see it over
but the sequel thing
i hope we going to get it !
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/21 09:42 PM
I think it was just right. It's a slow burn as I had to pause the movie a few times and was surprised how little of it I'd seen but I think the runtime was fine. Just hope it does well in theaters and HBO Max and that they greenlight a sequel! Fantastic movie. Can't wait to watch it again.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/02/21 05:18 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I think it was just right. It's a slow burn as I had to pause the movie a few times and was surprised how little of it I'd seen but I think the runtime was fine. Just hope it does well in theaters and HBO Max and that they greenlight a sequel! Fantastic movie. Can't wait to watch it again.
Agree, however…i only wish their was more of Johnny and less Dickie.
I also wish the soap opera drama of the Zip chic could have been a bit less….and the need for Ray Liotta to have a second part as DIckies uncle in prison was to only show who was really in prison….Dickie was.
Acting was very good, the 2hrs run was plenty.
Love how they help us hate Uncle Junior even more.
7.5
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/03/21 10:53 AM
The Many Saints of Newark was good. Agreed with Farmiga did a superb job. We can see how Olivia got the way she did with John Sopranos antics. So much to that movie, I have to see it again to see if there was anything I missed. Tony Soprano and baby Chris is a good scene. We see why Junior gets so petty with things and why he turned out the way he did. We get a better look at Dickie Moltisanti and why Tony turned out the way he did. The Christmas scene in the warehouse was heartbreaking. There are a couple of things I am confused about, Salvatore in prison and what Dickie had in his pockets suggests something else, but it could also have been a gift for Olivia. Giuseppina helped to push, not drag the movie otherwise we would not have gotten the movie we got. Great part and I am pretty sure David Chase played DiMeo it is only for a few seconds and we only see his back and him sitting in the chair.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/21 10:59 PM
NO TIME TO DIE
Daniel Craig goes out with a bang as James Bond. A beautiful, heartfelt, and at times, gut wrenching film, which is quite surprising to type when describing a film in this franchise. From the opening scene, the film in many ways goes against the grain. The audience thinks they know how the formula works and while it still does stay true to it, in some ways, it doesn't give the audience what they want all the time either. Craig and Lea Seydoux are spectacular in this. Continuing their love affair after the events of SPECTRE before James goes off the grid and into retirement for 5 years before being forced out by new Bond villain Lyutsifer Safin (played by Rami Malek), who like any good Bond villain, has an elaborate plan to infect the world's population with a new biological weapon. Armed with an outstanding supporting cast, this is definitely one of the better Bond films in Craig's repertoire (better than QUANTUM OF SOLACE & SPECTRE but not quite as good as CASINO ROYALE or SKYFALL). Unfortunately for the likes of Christoph Waltz, who's Blofeld was very bland in both here and SPECTRE and Rami Malek, who's hardly in the film, these villains are tragically forgettable. I pity the man who has to take over for Craig as he has some very big shoes to fill. Not too bad for an actor who fans were screaming bloody murder upon his announcement as the new face of the franchise. 8/10
Daniel Craig goes out with a bang as James Bond. A beautiful, heartfelt, and at times, gut wrenching film, which is quite surprising to type when describing a film in this franchise. From the opening scene, the film in many ways goes against the grain. The audience thinks they know how the formula works and while it still does stay true to it, in some ways, it doesn't give the audience what they want all the time either. Craig and Lea Seydoux are spectacular in this. Continuing their love affair after the events of SPECTRE before James goes off the grid and into retirement for 5 years before being forced out by new Bond villain Lyutsifer Safin (played by Rami Malek), who like any good Bond villain, has an elaborate plan to infect the world's population with a new biological weapon. Armed with an outstanding supporting cast, this is definitely one of the better Bond films in Craig's repertoire (better than QUANTUM OF SOLACE & SPECTRE but not quite as good as CASINO ROYALE or SKYFALL). Unfortunately for the likes of Christoph Waltz, who's Blofeld was very bland in both here and SPECTRE and Rami Malek, who's hardly in the film, these villains are tragically forgettable. I pity the man who has to take over for Craig as he has some very big shoes to fill. Not too bad for an actor who fans were screaming bloody murder upon his announcement as the new face of the franchise. 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/21 11:08 PM
LAMB
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/21 05:52 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAMB
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Where do I find this Irish...Netflix or????..I do have firestick which gave me the opportunity 2 watch "the many saints..."
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/21 02:29 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LAMB
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Set in Iceland, a childless couple witness the birth of a miracle lamb on their farm. With nothing but animals as their own to serve as substitute children, the couple raises the lamb as their daughter. A lot of religious iconography with very little dialogue makes this a beautiful and well told story. Nothing's spoon fed to you here so this is a film that could definitely be dissected and appreciated more with each additional viewing. Released by studio A24 and one of the main reasons why I took a flyer on this, as they continue to churn out great films. I look forward to another viewing to see what I missed the first time around but the film leaves you asking yourself many questions. An interesting and different film if you're curious enough to get on this ride. 6/10
Where do I find this Irish...Netflix or????..I do have firestick which gave me the opportunity 2 watch "the many saints..."
This and NO TIME TO DIE are only in theaters currently. THE MANY SAINTS OF NEWARK is in theaters and HBO Max (I saw it on HBO Max).
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/21 09:22 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE NIGHT HOUSE
Rebecca Hall stars as Beth, a recent widow, who's husband Owen committed suicide by shooting himself in the head on a boat in the middle of a lake outside of their home. Self-medicating with various amounts of alcohol, she begins to unearth aspects of her late husbands life she was not previously privy to. An onion of a film that continues to keep you guessing with each layer that's peeled away as the film progresses and does a wonderful job at building the audiences suspense when multiple, unexplained disturbances occur within the house (such as the stereo constantly being turned on in the middle of the night). This leads Beth to believe her house is haunted and that her husband may be trying to make contact with her from beyond the grave. There's a lot to unpack here and this is one of those films where a second viewing is needed to really absorb everything being presented. An interesting story and twist at the end. This probably won't make much noise at the box office and from the previews I was only mildly interested; however, after seeing it, I look forward to getting back on this roller coaster. 6/10
Rebecca Hall stars as Beth, a recent widow, who's husband Owen committed suicide by shooting himself in the head on a boat in the middle of a lake outside of their home. Self-medicating with various amounts of alcohol, she begins to unearth aspects of her late husbands life she was not previously privy to. An onion of a film that continues to keep you guessing with each layer that's peeled away as the film progresses and does a wonderful job at building the audiences suspense when multiple, unexplained disturbances occur within the house (such as the stereo constantly being turned on in the middle of the night). This leads Beth to believe her house is haunted and that her husband may be trying to make contact with her from beyond the grave. There's a lot to unpack here and this is one of those films where a second viewing is needed to really absorb everything being presented. An interesting story and twist at the end. This probably won't make much noise at the box office and from the previews I was only mildly interested; however, after seeing it, I look forward to getting back on this roller coaster. 6/10
I enjoyed this movie. I almost want to give it a 7, but the second half could've been better. Good effort though. I applaud them.
But yes, a second viewing might be in order.
Posted By: Blake
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/10/21 01:08 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO TIME TO DIE
Daniel Craig goes out with a bang as James Bond. A beautiful, heartfelt, and at times, gut wrenching film, which is quite surprising to type when describing a film in this franchise. From the opening scene, the film in many ways goes against the grain. The audience thinks they know how the formula works and while it still does stay true to it, in some ways, it doesn't give the audience what they want all the time either. Craig and Lea Seydoux are spectacular in this. Continuing their love affair after the events of SPECTRE before James goes off the grid and into retirement for 5 years before being forced out by new Bond villain Lyutsifer Safin (played by Rami Malek), who like any good Bond villain, has an elaborate plan to infect the world's population with a new biological weapon. Armed with an outstanding supporting cast, this is definitely one of the better Bond films in Craig's repertoire (better than QUANTUM OF SOLACE & SPECTRE but not quite as good as CASINO ROYALE or SKYFALL). Unfortunately for the likes of Christoph Waltz, who's Blofeld was very bland in both here and SPECTRE and Rami Malek, who's hardly in the film, these villains are tragically forgettable. I pity the man who has to take over for Craig as he has some very big shoes to fill. Not too bad for an actor who fans were screaming bloody murder upon his announcement as the new face of the franchise. 8/10
Daniel Craig goes out with a bang as James Bond. A beautiful, heartfelt, and at times, gut wrenching film, which is quite surprising to type when describing a film in this franchise. From the opening scene, the film in many ways goes against the grain. The audience thinks they know how the formula works and while it still does stay true to it, in some ways, it doesn't give the audience what they want all the time either. Craig and Lea Seydoux are spectacular in this. Continuing their love affair after the events of SPECTRE before James goes off the grid and into retirement for 5 years before being forced out by new Bond villain Lyutsifer Safin (played by Rami Malek), who like any good Bond villain, has an elaborate plan to infect the world's population with a new biological weapon. Armed with an outstanding supporting cast, this is definitely one of the better Bond films in Craig's repertoire (better than QUANTUM OF SOLACE & SPECTRE but not quite as good as CASINO ROYALE or SKYFALL). Unfortunately for the likes of Christoph Waltz, who's Blofeld was very bland in both here and SPECTRE and Rami Malek, who's hardly in the film, these villains are tragically forgettable. I pity the man who has to take over for Craig as he has some very big shoes to fill. Not too bad for an actor who fans were screaming bloody murder upon his announcement as the new face of the franchise. 8/10
I've been worried the new James Bond would be super woke, and therefore be terrible. You're review has given me a little hope.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/10/21 01:12 AM
Still has it's moments. There's 2 characters (one a beloved franchise icon) who's "wokeness" seeps through unfortunately.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/21 03:33 AM
LANSKY (2021)
I can't figure out why Harvey Keitel signed on for the title role in this piece of crap. He's good, as you'd expect, as the aged Lansky, who allows writer David Stone (Sam Worthington, a one-expression actor) to be his biographer. But, most of the story is told in anachronistic flashbacks, with a weak cast wearing funny hats and suits they must have gotten from the Goodwill bin, and full of errors that easily could have been avoided if they'd simply read "Little Man - Meyer Lansky and the Gangster Life," Robert Lacey's excellent and thoroughly researched bio. Don't waste your time.
I can't figure out why Harvey Keitel signed on for the title role in this piece of crap. He's good, as you'd expect, as the aged Lansky, who allows writer David Stone (Sam Worthington, a one-expression actor) to be his biographer. But, most of the story is told in anachronistic flashbacks, with a weak cast wearing funny hats and suits they must have gotten from the Goodwill bin, and full of errors that easily could have been avoided if they'd simply read "Little Man - Meyer Lansky and the Gangster Life," Robert Lacey's excellent and thoroughly researched bio. Don't waste your time.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/21 06:23 AM
Lacey misunderstood Lansky in such a colossal way, I'm surprised he's still being referenced. I have close ties to Miami and have had many conversations with the old timers down there. Lacey can write, but he discounted too many things. He discounted the wiretap information that was available, the accounts of Fratianno, Teresa, Fopiano, his lawyers, almost all of his family members (except for Buddy of course) and pretty much everything Robert Morgenthau and the Southern District had uncovered. Not to mention, the recent accounts of Phil Leonetti and Lansky's mistress who was living like a queen until the man's dying day. I liked the movie though. It was fiction, but I enjoyed it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/21 01:23 PM
THE LAST DUEL
Ridley Scott is back at it again with another star studded cast that includes Matt Damon, Adam Driver, Ben Affleck, and TV now turned film star, Jodie Comer. The story is based on a true event taking place in 1386 France. Damon plays Jean de Carrouges, a man struggling financially through life, and in turn to earn money, constantly is off fighting France's battles with their neighbors in order to stay afloat. While fighting he meets Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver) and the 2 begin their friendship to open the film. However, Driver is quick to make powerful friends upon his return to France, which only elevates his status within high society; whereas Damon is a brute, not very well mannered, and painstakingly speaks his mind at times, which more often than not, gets him into trouble with the very same crowd. One of Driver's new friends is Pierre d'Alençon (Ben Affleck) who is the cousin to King Charles VI. He lives a life of leisure but has trouble collecting debts. He enlists Driver's help in collecting and proving himself valuable to the task, he's quickly rewarded with property and status. The rise in Driver's status and the friction between Affleck's and Damon's drives a wedge between the Driver/Damon friendship. Off fighting another war, Damon's wife Marguerite de Carrouges (Comer) is left home alone one day when her mother-in-law goes to town to run some errands. Driver uses the opportunity of her solitude to force himself in the house and onto Comer. With no evidence of the crime other than Comer's word of guilt against Driver's of innocence, Damon challenges Driver to a duel and allow God to decide where the truth lays. A modern day RASHOMON, the story repeats itself 3 different times, from each characters point of view. And while this is appreciated, Kurosawa was able to wrap it up in 88 minutes. Scott's runtime balloons up to 152 minutes. Obviously, some scenes could have been trimmed out or omitted all together. The opening 30-45 minutes speeds through rather quickly to establish Driver's/Damon's friendship along with Affleck's/Damon's acrimonious relationship. However, once that's settled, the rest of the film until the duel itself is wrapped up within the 3 main characters. The film did feel a bit bloated but any longer and it would have really dragged on. With a cast like this, Comer continues to shine the brightest as she transitions from TV star to film star, showing a wonderful range as the sweet and innocent wife from Damon's perspective, to a woman who "wanted it" from Driver's, to how she views herself. Affleck also deserves a shoutout as the extremely pompous and arrogant, while rocking blonde hair and beard, Pierre. 6/10
Ridley Scott is back at it again with another star studded cast that includes Matt Damon, Adam Driver, Ben Affleck, and TV now turned film star, Jodie Comer. The story is based on a true event taking place in 1386 France. Damon plays Jean de Carrouges, a man struggling financially through life, and in turn to earn money, constantly is off fighting France's battles with their neighbors in order to stay afloat. While fighting he meets Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver) and the 2 begin their friendship to open the film. However, Driver is quick to make powerful friends upon his return to France, which only elevates his status within high society; whereas Damon is a brute, not very well mannered, and painstakingly speaks his mind at times, which more often than not, gets him into trouble with the very same crowd. One of Driver's new friends is Pierre d'Alençon (Ben Affleck) who is the cousin to King Charles VI. He lives a life of leisure but has trouble collecting debts. He enlists Driver's help in collecting and proving himself valuable to the task, he's quickly rewarded with property and status. The rise in Driver's status and the friction between Affleck's and Damon's drives a wedge between the Driver/Damon friendship. Off fighting another war, Damon's wife Marguerite de Carrouges (Comer) is left home alone one day when her mother-in-law goes to town to run some errands. Driver uses the opportunity of her solitude to force himself in the house and onto Comer. With no evidence of the crime other than Comer's word of guilt against Driver's of innocence, Damon challenges Driver to a duel and allow God to decide where the truth lays. A modern day RASHOMON, the story repeats itself 3 different times, from each characters point of view. And while this is appreciated, Kurosawa was able to wrap it up in 88 minutes. Scott's runtime balloons up to 152 minutes. Obviously, some scenes could have been trimmed out or omitted all together. The opening 30-45 minutes speeds through rather quickly to establish Driver's/Damon's friendship along with Affleck's/Damon's acrimonious relationship. However, once that's settled, the rest of the film until the duel itself is wrapped up within the 3 main characters. The film did feel a bit bloated but any longer and it would have really dragged on. With a cast like this, Comer continues to shine the brightest as she transitions from TV star to film star, showing a wonderful range as the sweet and innocent wife from Damon's perspective, to a woman who "wanted it" from Driver's, to how she views herself. Affleck also deserves a shoutout as the extremely pompous and arrogant, while rocking blonde hair and beard, Pierre. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/21 07:52 PM
HALLOWEEN KILLS
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/21 10:03 PM
Years ago I asked this question about a movie, but I cannot locate it.
There's a movie about a devilish monster that appears out of nowhere. If I remember correctly, he starts out as a kind of a dot and then expands into this horrid looking beast who goes after certain people...I can't remember why. I think he 's controlled by someone.
'The movie is B&W and may be from the 50s or 60s.
There's a movie about a devilish monster that appears out of nowhere. If I remember correctly, he starts out as a kind of a dot and then expands into this horrid looking beast who goes after certain people...I can't remember why. I think he 's controlled by someone.
'The movie is B&W and may be from the 50s or 60s.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/21 07:10 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HALLOWEEN KILLS
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
We are ( wife & I ) are huge fans of the Halloween movies and feel you are very generous with a 5 1/2.
Seen many movies that do flashbacks and jump around but this was like a time travelers nightmare of confusion.
Gave it a 4 at best.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/19/21 11:14 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
HALLOWEEN KILLS
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
As with the original sequel HALLOWEEN II in 1981, HALLOWEEN KILLS picks up immediately following the events of the first part of this new trilogy. Laurie Strode, her daughter Karen, and granddaughter Allyson are in the back of a pickup truck as Michael and Laurie's home are burning down. However, the local fire department attempts to put out the blaze and in the process, allow Michael to escape. Some of the local survivors from the original 40+ years ago (Tommy Doyle, Lindsey Wallace, and one other that I won't spoil here) gather at a local bar for a Halloween talent show. When they hear of Michael's escape, they gather as many of the townies as they can in order to hunt and kill Michael. In addition to these characters, the story also goes back to 1978 to paperclip a few additional characters into the story who play substantial parts in this film. The dynamic and volatile relationship within the Strode women is what keeps the story going as Tommy Doyle's vigilante arc is a hot mess, involving a very messy hospital sequence, which allows Laurie's and Tommy's paths to finally cross all of these years later. This is by far the most violent Halloween film of the franchise. It is the most gory film to have the name Halloween attached to it and in some ways, some of the deaths could be considered unnecessarily over-the-top. A disappointing sequel in my eyes and we can only hope the third film is able to redeem it. 5.5/10
We are ( wife & I ) are huge fans of the Halloween movies and feel you are very generous with a 5 1/2.
Seen many movies that do flashbacks and jump around but this was like a time travelers nightmare of confusion.
Gave it a 4 at best.
I had another friend who didn't like it either so I'm glad it wasn't just me. Very disappointed in this!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/21 06:47 AM
Shine a Light (2008)
Martin Scorsese directed this (mostly) concert film of two Rolling Stones shows at the Beacon Theater (NYC) during their A Bigger Bang tour in '06. It starts with a few minutes of Scorsese doing his director thing (mostly bitching about not having a set list), and includes some lame footage of wincey interviews from various parts of the Stones' career No matter: the concert's excellent. The band and their musical entourage are in great form, relaxed and at ease; Jagger, in his master showman role, is energetic as ever, the songs are well chosen from their enormous repertoire, and the filming, lightingn and audio are brilliant. Buddy Guy is one of the guest performers; at the end of his song ("Champagne and Reefer"), Richards, ever in obeisance to classic bluesman, gives Guy his Guild guitar. Nice touch.
Martin Scorsese directed this (mostly) concert film of two Rolling Stones shows at the Beacon Theater (NYC) during their A Bigger Bang tour in '06. It starts with a few minutes of Scorsese doing his director thing (mostly bitching about not having a set list), and includes some lame footage of wincey interviews from various parts of the Stones' career No matter: the concert's excellent. The band and their musical entourage are in great form, relaxed and at ease; Jagger, in his master showman role, is energetic as ever, the songs are well chosen from their enormous repertoire, and the filming, lightingn and audio are brilliant. Buddy Guy is one of the guest performers; at the end of his song ("Champagne and Reefer"), Richards, ever in obeisance to classic bluesman, gives Guy his Guild guitar. Nice touch.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/21 12:56 AM
DUNE
I've never seen the original movie or read the novel so I went into this completely fresh and I'm glad I did. A captivating sci-fi story that mixes politics, eye popping technology, gorgeous visual FX, and a rock solid cast.Timothée Chalamet plays Paul Atreides, the son of Duke Leto Atreides, played by Oscar Isaac. The Atreides are a powerful family within the galaxy and as such, the emperor has given them the planet of Arrakis, a dessert planet that's home to the most precious commodity in the galaxy: spice. However, Arrakis is already being ruled and plundered by the Harkonnen family, thus making the two families enemies when the emperor takes it away from the Harkonnen's to gift to the Atreides. The Fremen or natives on Arrakis live underground, is home to dangerous sand worms, and is so hot that without the proper equipment and water, people die rather quickly. The Harkonnen's ravaged the planet for its resources and paid no attention to the Fremen; however, now with the Atreides in power, they wish to make peace with the them. Very impressive performances all around, especially in regards to the mother/son duo of Chalamet, who is very mature for a 26-year-old actor and Rebecca Ferguson. I hope this does well in the theaters and HBO Max as I'd love to see the next installment and continue on this story's journey. Definitely worth your time to check it out. 7/10
I've never seen the original movie or read the novel so I went into this completely fresh and I'm glad I did. A captivating sci-fi story that mixes politics, eye popping technology, gorgeous visual FX, and a rock solid cast.Timothée Chalamet plays Paul Atreides, the son of Duke Leto Atreides, played by Oscar Isaac. The Atreides are a powerful family within the galaxy and as such, the emperor has given them the planet of Arrakis, a dessert planet that's home to the most precious commodity in the galaxy: spice. However, Arrakis is already being ruled and plundered by the Harkonnen family, thus making the two families enemies when the emperor takes it away from the Harkonnen's to gift to the Atreides. The Fremen or natives on Arrakis live underground, is home to dangerous sand worms, and is so hot that without the proper equipment and water, people die rather quickly. The Harkonnen's ravaged the planet for its resources and paid no attention to the Fremen; however, now with the Atreides in power, they wish to make peace with the them. Very impressive performances all around, especially in regards to the mother/son duo of Chalamet, who is very mature for a 26-year-old actor and Rebecca Ferguson. I hope this does well in the theaters and HBO Max as I'd love to see the next installment and continue on this story's journey. Definitely worth your time to check it out. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/21 05:31 PM
COPSHOP
Frank Grillo plays Teddy Murretto, a con man on the run from Gerard Butler's Bob Viddick, who is contracted to kill him. In order to get away from Bob, Teddy purposefully assaults a police officer so he can be sent to jail. With a wily plan of his own, Bob fakes a drunk driving accent by almost running over a couple of state troopers so he too can be locked up. And as fate would have it, they're in the same precinct together, staring across each other from their separate cells divided by only bars and the walkway through the holding cells. The film starts out quite intriguing, with an interesting setup that peels enough curiosity into the audiences mind to see how this'll play out. Add heavy doses of expletive humor early on from frustrated Sgt. Duane Mitchell (Chad L. Coleman) and it was off to a good start. The film slowly begins to unfold before we're later introduced to another contract killer, southern speaking Anthony Lamb played impeccably by Toby Huss. However, once Huss is introduced and had his fun, the film slower begins losing steam as well as my attention. Before the end credits roll, you're ready for it to be over as the film comes a little off the rails. Pacing is an issue as too much time is spent between Teddy, Bob, and Officer Valerie Young (Alexis Louder) hiding in the holding cells upon Lamb's arrival. The film started with promise and was pretty fun for the first 30-45 minutes, but after that, it doesn't play as well on the back end. 5/10
Frank Grillo plays Teddy Murretto, a con man on the run from Gerard Butler's Bob Viddick, who is contracted to kill him. In order to get away from Bob, Teddy purposefully assaults a police officer so he can be sent to jail. With a wily plan of his own, Bob fakes a drunk driving accent by almost running over a couple of state troopers so he too can be locked up. And as fate would have it, they're in the same precinct together, staring across each other from their separate cells divided by only bars and the walkway through the holding cells. The film starts out quite intriguing, with an interesting setup that peels enough curiosity into the audiences mind to see how this'll play out. Add heavy doses of expletive humor early on from frustrated Sgt. Duane Mitchell (Chad L. Coleman) and it was off to a good start. The film slowly begins to unfold before we're later introduced to another contract killer, southern speaking Anthony Lamb played impeccably by Toby Huss. However, once Huss is introduced and had his fun, the film slower begins losing steam as well as my attention. Before the end credits roll, you're ready for it to be over as the film comes a little off the rails. Pacing is an issue as too much time is spent between Teddy, Bob, and Officer Valerie Young (Alexis Louder) hiding in the holding cells upon Lamb's arrival. The film started with promise and was pretty fun for the first 30-45 minutes, but after that, it doesn't play as well on the back end. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/21 10:52 PM
THE LAST NIGHT IN SOHO
Thomasin McKenzie plays Eloise, a simple English countryside girl who has big dreams of becoming a famous fashion designer in London. The film opens with her receiving her acceptance letter to a fashion school in London, thus thrusting the fish-out-of-water girl into Soho. However, Eloise has a gift where she can feel and even see things before or after they've happened. This has allowed her to still have a relationship with her dead mother, who committed suicide when she was only 7 years old. Upon her arrival in her dorm room, she's quickly greeted by her two faced roommate, who smiles and acts as her friend but runs her down behind her back. Having a difficult time adjusting, Eloise comes across a notice on campus about a room to rent. Needing some distance from her roommate and her own space to adjust to the move, Eloise jumps at the chance, even picking up a job at a pub to assist with the rent. However, the more Eloise stays in the room, the more she's visited in her dreams by Sandie, played wonderfully by the very talented Anya Taylor-Joy. She stayed in Eloises' room back in 1965 and Eloise, being obsessed with the 60's, is captivated to learn more about Sandie and her story. Sandie is a singer and falls in love with Jack (Matt Smith) until she's tragically murdered. Eloise then turns her obsession to finding Jack and bringing him to justice over 50 years later. If ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD is Quentin Tarantino's love story to Hollywood, then this (or at least the first act or two) are Edgar Wright's love story to Soho and London during the 1960's. Wonderful music, costumes, and set designs enthralls the audience into the time period. McKenzie and Taylor-Joy both do a spectacular job at carrying this film: McKenzie for making the audience constantly question her mental state as the film progresses and Taylor-Joy for her range. Throw in Terrance Stamp as well as 1960's icon Dianna Rigg (nice touch Mr. Wright) and you've got a hard hitting lineup of talent. A lot to take in and I would definitely be up for another viewing. This may not appeal to everyone as the opening is absolutely beautiful, energizing, and exciting; however, it definitely takes a different turn into a roller coaster of a crescendo by the finale. 7/10
Thomasin McKenzie plays Eloise, a simple English countryside girl who has big dreams of becoming a famous fashion designer in London. The film opens with her receiving her acceptance letter to a fashion school in London, thus thrusting the fish-out-of-water girl into Soho. However, Eloise has a gift where she can feel and even see things before or after they've happened. This has allowed her to still have a relationship with her dead mother, who committed suicide when she was only 7 years old. Upon her arrival in her dorm room, she's quickly greeted by her two faced roommate, who smiles and acts as her friend but runs her down behind her back. Having a difficult time adjusting, Eloise comes across a notice on campus about a room to rent. Needing some distance from her roommate and her own space to adjust to the move, Eloise jumps at the chance, even picking up a job at a pub to assist with the rent. However, the more Eloise stays in the room, the more she's visited in her dreams by Sandie, played wonderfully by the very talented Anya Taylor-Joy. She stayed in Eloises' room back in 1965 and Eloise, being obsessed with the 60's, is captivated to learn more about Sandie and her story. Sandie is a singer and falls in love with Jack (Matt Smith) until she's tragically murdered. Eloise then turns her obsession to finding Jack and bringing him to justice over 50 years later. If ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD is Quentin Tarantino's love story to Hollywood, then this (or at least the first act or two) are Edgar Wright's love story to Soho and London during the 1960's. Wonderful music, costumes, and set designs enthralls the audience into the time period. McKenzie and Taylor-Joy both do a spectacular job at carrying this film: McKenzie for making the audience constantly question her mental state as the film progresses and Taylor-Joy for her range. Throw in Terrance Stamp as well as 1960's icon Dianna Rigg (nice touch Mr. Wright) and you've got a hard hitting lineup of talent. A lot to take in and I would definitely be up for another viewing. This may not appeal to everyone as the opening is absolutely beautiful, energizing, and exciting; however, it definitely takes a different turn into a roller coaster of a crescendo by the finale. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/21 11:05 PM
ANTLERS
Set in Oregon, Antlers tells the story of elementary school teacher Julia (Keri Russell) and her sheriff brother Paul (Jesse Plemons). Julia becomes concerned when one of her students, Lucas Weaver (Jeremy T. Thomas) is showing signs of abuse. His clothes are raggedy and have multiple holes in them. He's extremely quiet and is bullied by some of his classmates. Julia takes it upon herself to befriend her young student, as she grew up in an abusive household herself. As she gets to learn more about Lucas, she also comes to discovery they both have something else in common: they were both young when their mothers died so Lucas and his brother are being raised by his father, who's dealing drugs and has an extensive history with the local police. But, an ancient being is roaming the area, feeding off individuals and Lucas seems to be the key in determining how to stop it. The trailer doesn't show much and not a lot is explained about the film and after viewing it, I can see why. It's a far fetched theory that unless you buy into it, you're not going to enjoy it otherwise. I didn't buy into it so you know how my experience went. A rather limp explanation is giving about this mythical creature and not much else. As such, you don't invest too much into the creature, the characters, or the story. I was quite disappointed by this and it seemed to have some promise based upon the trailers. Pass if you come across it or are considering watching it. 4/10
Set in Oregon, Antlers tells the story of elementary school teacher Julia (Keri Russell) and her sheriff brother Paul (Jesse Plemons). Julia becomes concerned when one of her students, Lucas Weaver (Jeremy T. Thomas) is showing signs of abuse. His clothes are raggedy and have multiple holes in them. He's extremely quiet and is bullied by some of his classmates. Julia takes it upon herself to befriend her young student, as she grew up in an abusive household herself. As she gets to learn more about Lucas, she also comes to discovery they both have something else in common: they were both young when their mothers died so Lucas and his brother are being raised by his father, who's dealing drugs and has an extensive history with the local police. But, an ancient being is roaming the area, feeding off individuals and Lucas seems to be the key in determining how to stop it. The trailer doesn't show much and not a lot is explained about the film and after viewing it, I can see why. It's a far fetched theory that unless you buy into it, you're not going to enjoy it otherwise. I didn't buy into it so you know how my experience went. A rather limp explanation is giving about this mythical creature and not much else. As such, you don't invest too much into the creature, the characters, or the story. I was quite disappointed by this and it seemed to have some promise based upon the trailers. Pass if you come across it or are considering watching it. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/21 11:27 PM
ETERNALS
ETERNALS tells the story of 10 eternals from the planet Olympia, who are sent here to protect mankind from the Deviants, an alien species who prey upon us. Having been here the entire time, the big question everyone is asking is why didn't they intervene when Thanos eviscerated half of the planets population? A limp answer is given and that's how the rest of the movie fares. A weak opening with little character depth, the film does a poor job of gaining the audiences attention outside of the sporadic fight scenes throughout. Even with a cast featuring names such as Angelina Jolie, Selma Hayek, Kit Harington, and Kumail Nanjiani, this film is more of a sleeper than anything. I guess after 13 years of the MCU we've been spoiled to anticipate greatest every time out and to their credit, Marvel usually delivers; however, this was definitely a miss on their track record. 5.5/10
ETERNALS tells the story of 10 eternals from the planet Olympia, who are sent here to protect mankind from the Deviants, an alien species who prey upon us. Having been here the entire time, the big question everyone is asking is why didn't they intervene when Thanos eviscerated half of the planets population? A limp answer is given and that's how the rest of the movie fares. A weak opening with little character depth, the film does a poor job of gaining the audiences attention outside of the sporadic fight scenes throughout. Even with a cast featuring names such as Angelina Jolie, Selma Hayek, Kit Harington, and Kumail Nanjiani, this film is more of a sleeper than anything. I guess after 13 years of the MCU we've been spoiled to anticipate greatest every time out and to their credit, Marvel usually delivers; however, this was definitely a miss on their track record. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/21 11:50 PM
Finch 2021[b][/b]
Tom Hanks does it again with one for the books.
Will remember this movie for a long time, he made me love his robot and the method he uses to win you over.
Great flick, highly recommend.
5 STARS.
Tom Hanks does it again with one for the books.
Will remember this movie for a long time, he made me love his robot and the method he uses to win you over.
Great flick, highly recommend.
5 STARS.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/21 05:06 AM
Mant
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/21 12:41 AM
CLIFFORD THE BIG RED DOG
Based upon the children's book, CLIFFORD THE BIG RED DOG tells the story of red colored, 10-foot tall Clifford and his owner Emily. While her mother (and no mention of the father) is in Chicago for work, she's left in the care of her bumbling Uncle Casey. While walking to school one morning, Emily convinces her Uncle Casey to stop by a rescue animal tent that's set up on her school's campus. She soon falls in love with the young pup, who at this point is a normal pups size. However, her Uncle knowing her mother would never allow or forgive him and her daughter for bringing in an animal while she's away at work, they leave the tent empty handed. That is until Emily returns home from school to find Clifford hiding in her backpack. She convinces her Uncle to allow the dog to spend the night before returning him in the morning. However, when she wakes up, some magic happens as Clifford is the size we all know and love him for. Shenanigans quickly ensue as Clifford is still a pup: playful, naive, and doesn't realize his own size or strength yet. Once spotted, the villain of the picture sees the larger-than-life sized dog as an opportunity for his food creation business; hoping to harness Clifford's DNA to unlock the mysteries that are preventing them from achieving their goal of feeding the planet. I have to admit I had a soft spot for this going in as I grew up on the books and this, thankfully, did not disappoint. It's a beautiful, heartfelt, and fun family movie, without being too cheesy for the kids or talking down to the adults either. I'm usually not much for child actors but 14-year-old star Darby Camp puts together a great performance for an actor her age. Keep an eye on her as she could be on the rise. I had a blast with this and would definitely take another walk around the block with Clifford should they franchise this property out. 7/10
Based upon the children's book, CLIFFORD THE BIG RED DOG tells the story of red colored, 10-foot tall Clifford and his owner Emily. While her mother (and no mention of the father) is in Chicago for work, she's left in the care of her bumbling Uncle Casey. While walking to school one morning, Emily convinces her Uncle Casey to stop by a rescue animal tent that's set up on her school's campus. She soon falls in love with the young pup, who at this point is a normal pups size. However, her Uncle knowing her mother would never allow or forgive him and her daughter for bringing in an animal while she's away at work, they leave the tent empty handed. That is until Emily returns home from school to find Clifford hiding in her backpack. She convinces her Uncle to allow the dog to spend the night before returning him in the morning. However, when she wakes up, some magic happens as Clifford is the size we all know and love him for. Shenanigans quickly ensue as Clifford is still a pup: playful, naive, and doesn't realize his own size or strength yet. Once spotted, the villain of the picture sees the larger-than-life sized dog as an opportunity for his food creation business; hoping to harness Clifford's DNA to unlock the mysteries that are preventing them from achieving their goal of feeding the planet. I have to admit I had a soft spot for this going in as I grew up on the books and this, thankfully, did not disappoint. It's a beautiful, heartfelt, and fun family movie, without being too cheesy for the kids or talking down to the adults either. I'm usually not much for child actors but 14-year-old star Darby Camp puts together a great performance for an actor her age. Keep an eye on her as she could be on the rise. I had a blast with this and would definitely take another walk around the block with Clifford should they franchise this property out. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/12/21 11:28 PM
SPENCER
Kristen Stewart marvelously fills the shoes of Princess Diana in this story which unfolds within the course of 3 days: Christmas Eve - Boxing Day at the Sandringham estate. The film beautifully portrays Diana's mental health concerns and her patches of being out of touch with reality due to the shocking scandal of Prince Charles' affair being made public and the impending end to their marriage. Diana is a prisoner, a fish within a fish bowl. She's constantly on display and judged by the Royal Family, her country, and the world for that matter. Although, Stewart does a fantastic job in honing in on the grace, vulnerability, and humbleness that made Diana loved around the world. The scenes with her children are at times heartwarming and heartbreaking. At other times, you share Diana's pain whether she's constantly being harassed by the paparazzi or having to maintain her poise within the estate, knowing full well how much she's looked down upon and talked about behind her back. She also has to go up mostly against Timothy Spall who plays Major Alistar Gregory and is hired by the Royal Family as security but also to look after Diana. Look after in the manner of ensuring she's where she's expected to be and on time; wearing the proper wardrobe for the specific occasion, etc. Stewart's and Spall's chemistry is terrific as Spall is always respectful and knows his place around the Princess, but also doesn't back down from her either. Hair, makeup, and costumes did their best to make Stewart look as close to Diana as they could and they absolutely succeeded, as there are flashes where you believe it really is Diana onscreen. Not much of a marketing push behind this one but worth checking out! 7.5/10
Kristen Stewart marvelously fills the shoes of Princess Diana in this story which unfolds within the course of 3 days: Christmas Eve - Boxing Day at the Sandringham estate. The film beautifully portrays Diana's mental health concerns and her patches of being out of touch with reality due to the shocking scandal of Prince Charles' affair being made public and the impending end to their marriage. Diana is a prisoner, a fish within a fish bowl. She's constantly on display and judged by the Royal Family, her country, and the world for that matter. Although, Stewart does a fantastic job in honing in on the grace, vulnerability, and humbleness that made Diana loved around the world. The scenes with her children are at times heartwarming and heartbreaking. At other times, you share Diana's pain whether she's constantly being harassed by the paparazzi or having to maintain her poise within the estate, knowing full well how much she's looked down upon and talked about behind her back. She also has to go up mostly against Timothy Spall who plays Major Alistar Gregory and is hired by the Royal Family as security but also to look after Diana. Look after in the manner of ensuring she's where she's expected to be and on time; wearing the proper wardrobe for the specific occasion, etc. Stewart's and Spall's chemistry is terrific as Spall is always respectful and knows his place around the Princess, but also doesn't back down from her either. Hair, makeup, and costumes did their best to make Stewart look as close to Diana as they could and they absolutely succeeded, as there are flashes where you believe it really is Diana onscreen. Not much of a marketing push behind this one but worth checking out! 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/14/21 12:37 AM
RED NOTICE
Staring an A-list cast of Ryan Reynolds, Dwayne Johnson, and Gal Gadot, RED NOTICE tells the story of master thief Reynolds who gets busted by FBI agent Johnson and their pursuit of another master thief, Gadot. All of them are after 3 priceless eggs that belonged to Cleopatra that were gifted to her by Mark Antony. The whereabouts of 2 are known, however, the third eggs location has been lost to history. Jet setting around the world and multiple continents, this is your typical formulaic action film. Nothing breaking new ground or standing out, action scenes are lacking, and Reynolds & Johnson both play their stereotypical selves. Reynolds as the funny man, Johnson as the brute who gets a few one liners in as well. The only one of the trio not regurgitating former roles is Gadot as she plays the villain and even though it's lighthearted, she seems to be having fun with it and I'm glad she at least changed things up a bit. Not bad if catching this on Netflix but there are also better options around. 6/10
Staring an A-list cast of Ryan Reynolds, Dwayne Johnson, and Gal Gadot, RED NOTICE tells the story of master thief Reynolds who gets busted by FBI agent Johnson and their pursuit of another master thief, Gadot. All of them are after 3 priceless eggs that belonged to Cleopatra that were gifted to her by Mark Antony. The whereabouts of 2 are known, however, the third eggs location has been lost to history. Jet setting around the world and multiple continents, this is your typical formulaic action film. Nothing breaking new ground or standing out, action scenes are lacking, and Reynolds & Johnson both play their stereotypical selves. Reynolds as the funny man, Johnson as the brute who gets a few one liners in as well. The only one of the trio not regurgitating former roles is Gadot as she plays the villain and even though it's lighthearted, she seems to be having fun with it and I'm glad she at least changed things up a bit. Not bad if catching this on Netflix but there are also better options around. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/21 01:50 AM
BENEDETTA
Set in Italy and based upon true events, BENEDETTA tells the story of a nun who claims to have visions of Jesus and stigmatic episodes while serving in a convent. While receiving a visit from her parents, the family quickly saves the life of a young peasant girl, Bartolomea, from her abusive father as the girl claims she wishes to stay at the convent with Benedetta's parents footing the bill. Benedetta becomes a mentor to Bartolomea but what begins as a mentorship, soon turns into a romantic love affair. Benedetta continues to have visions of Jesus and convinces the rest of the convent that God is speaking through her and as such, becomes the new Mother Superior of their group while in the process making an enemy of the former Mother Superior's mentor all while playing against the backdrop of the plague that's ravishing Europe at this time. The film kind of was and kind of wasn't what I expected it to be. At times it's sheer blasphemy and at other times it can be religiously moving. Storyline wise, I was checked out within the first 30 minutes but pushed through to see how it would end. I would recommend skipping this one. 4/10
Set in Italy and based upon true events, BENEDETTA tells the story of a nun who claims to have visions of Jesus and stigmatic episodes while serving in a convent. While receiving a visit from her parents, the family quickly saves the life of a young peasant girl, Bartolomea, from her abusive father as the girl claims she wishes to stay at the convent with Benedetta's parents footing the bill. Benedetta becomes a mentor to Bartolomea but what begins as a mentorship, soon turns into a romantic love affair. Benedetta continues to have visions of Jesus and convinces the rest of the convent that God is speaking through her and as such, becomes the new Mother Superior of their group while in the process making an enemy of the former Mother Superior's mentor all while playing against the backdrop of the plague that's ravishing Europe at this time. The film kind of was and kind of wasn't what I expected it to be. At times it's sheer blasphemy and at other times it can be religiously moving. Storyline wise, I was checked out within the first 30 minutes but pushed through to see how it would end. I would recommend skipping this one. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/21 10:24 PM
GHOSTBUSTERS: AFTERLIFE
The true sequel we deserved and have been waiting for since 1989. GHOSTBUSTERS: AFTERLIFE is more of a direct sequel to the original film than its 1989 predecessor, which is seldom mentioned. Over 30 years after the events that transpired in New York, Egon Spengler has left the Big Apple behind, now residing in Summerville, Oklahoma. A small rural town where he's known as the town nut. Upon his passing we're introduced to his daughter and grandchildren who are being evicted from their apartment back in New York. With little resources and even fewer options to choose from, the family makes the trip to Oklahoma to settle Egon's affairs. This allows the family, or more precisely the mother, who is the head of the household, to decide if they wish to stay in Oklahoma or move back to New York. From here the story follows the grandchildren Phoebe (Mckenna Grace) and Trevor (Finn Wolfhard). Phoebe is a brianiac like her grandfather: wise behind her years but socially awkward and has difficulty making friends. Trevor meanwhile is more outgoing and quickly finds love in the form of Lucky (Celeste O'Connor), a waitress at the local burger joint Trevor gets a job at simply because she works there. The story begins to unfold of how the events of the original film are now very much coming alive in present day Summerville. A well balanced mix of nostalgia and contemporary, the film plays well to its hardcore audience while introducing it to another generation of moviegoers. Plenty of Easter eggs throughout with only one characters lack of involvement missing, which was disappointing (unless I did miss an Easter egg along the way). Getting the original cast of Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Sigourney Weaver, and Annie Potts validates this film for those who are uneasy going into it after the disastrous 2016 reboot. For someone such as myself who grew up with the franchise, both movies and the cartoon, this was fun and paid it's respects to those films that came before it. Keep your eyes on Mckenna Grace as I can continue seeing big things from her as she single-handedly carried this film. 6.5/10
The true sequel we deserved and have been waiting for since 1989. GHOSTBUSTERS: AFTERLIFE is more of a direct sequel to the original film than its 1989 predecessor, which is seldom mentioned. Over 30 years after the events that transpired in New York, Egon Spengler has left the Big Apple behind, now residing in Summerville, Oklahoma. A small rural town where he's known as the town nut. Upon his passing we're introduced to his daughter and grandchildren who are being evicted from their apartment back in New York. With little resources and even fewer options to choose from, the family makes the trip to Oklahoma to settle Egon's affairs. This allows the family, or more precisely the mother, who is the head of the household, to decide if they wish to stay in Oklahoma or move back to New York. From here the story follows the grandchildren Phoebe (Mckenna Grace) and Trevor (Finn Wolfhard). Phoebe is a brianiac like her grandfather: wise behind her years but socially awkward and has difficulty making friends. Trevor meanwhile is more outgoing and quickly finds love in the form of Lucky (Celeste O'Connor), a waitress at the local burger joint Trevor gets a job at simply because she works there. The story begins to unfold of how the events of the original film are now very much coming alive in present day Summerville. A well balanced mix of nostalgia and contemporary, the film plays well to its hardcore audience while introducing it to another generation of moviegoers. Plenty of Easter eggs throughout with only one characters lack of involvement missing, which was disappointing (unless I did miss an Easter egg along the way). Getting the original cast of Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Sigourney Weaver, and Annie Potts validates this film for those who are uneasy going into it after the disastrous 2016 reboot. For someone such as myself who grew up with the franchise, both movies and the cartoon, this was fun and paid it's respects to those films that came before it. Keep your eyes on Mckenna Grace as I can continue seeing big things from her as she single-handedly carried this film. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/21 10:54 PM
KING RICHARD
Will Smith serves us another outstanding performance as Richard Williams, the father and coach to tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams. Armed with unshakable confidence in his girls, Richard gambles and in the process, rewrites the books of how young tennis protege's are thought of. Taking place on the hard streets of Compton during the 1980's & 1990's, the film shows the family's struggles to rise out of poverty, with Richard seemingly keeping an eye on his girls every waking minute with the exception of when he works nights and the girls are asleep. An overbearing, but loving, positive reinforcing father, Richard wants greatness for his girls and knows they're capable of it. In addition, he tries to keep the girls as busy as possible between school and tennis so they can't get into mischief on the streets. In fact, it doesn't seem the girls have time for friends either as the film stays strictly with the family. Once the film establishes our characters, the story then turns more into the story of Richard and Venus as opposed to Serena, who's relegated to the background due to her younger age. Unable to afford tennis lessons, Richard makes tapes and begins searching for a tennis coach who'll do it for free and finds such a man in Paul Cohen (Tony Goldwyn). Cohen, having coached the likes of John McEnroe and Pete Sampras, further develops Venus as she begins entering and dominating tournaments against her peers. She seems to be on the right path until Richard, shockingly cuts ties with Cohen for no apparent reason and switches to another coach, Rick Macci (Jon Bernthal). The family moves from California to Florida where Macci's tennis academy is located but the relationship between Richard and Macci quickly takes a turn upon their arrival, as Richard states he's no longer going to allow Venus to play in junior level tournaments and only wants her to train and have fun being a kid. I will tip my cap to Richard as he bet on his girls big and won big in the process, going against every logical and historically road it takes to become a professional tennis player. Smith is outstanding as the soft spoken Richard Williams and could garner an Academy award nomination but I wasn't 100% convinced he did enough to win it once the credits rolled. Also Saniyya Sidney who played Venus and Demi Singleton who played Serena need to be recognized as they too were very enjoyable as the teenage stars. 6.5/10
Will Smith serves us another outstanding performance as Richard Williams, the father and coach to tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams. Armed with unshakable confidence in his girls, Richard gambles and in the process, rewrites the books of how young tennis protege's are thought of. Taking place on the hard streets of Compton during the 1980's & 1990's, the film shows the family's struggles to rise out of poverty, with Richard seemingly keeping an eye on his girls every waking minute with the exception of when he works nights and the girls are asleep. An overbearing, but loving, positive reinforcing father, Richard wants greatness for his girls and knows they're capable of it. In addition, he tries to keep the girls as busy as possible between school and tennis so they can't get into mischief on the streets. In fact, it doesn't seem the girls have time for friends either as the film stays strictly with the family. Once the film establishes our characters, the story then turns more into the story of Richard and Venus as opposed to Serena, who's relegated to the background due to her younger age. Unable to afford tennis lessons, Richard makes tapes and begins searching for a tennis coach who'll do it for free and finds such a man in Paul Cohen (Tony Goldwyn). Cohen, having coached the likes of John McEnroe and Pete Sampras, further develops Venus as she begins entering and dominating tournaments against her peers. She seems to be on the right path until Richard, shockingly cuts ties with Cohen for no apparent reason and switches to another coach, Rick Macci (Jon Bernthal). The family moves from California to Florida where Macci's tennis academy is located but the relationship between Richard and Macci quickly takes a turn upon their arrival, as Richard states he's no longer going to allow Venus to play in junior level tournaments and only wants her to train and have fun being a kid. I will tip my cap to Richard as he bet on his girls big and won big in the process, going against every logical and historically road it takes to become a professional tennis player. Smith is outstanding as the soft spoken Richard Williams and could garner an Academy award nomination but I wasn't 100% convinced he did enough to win it once the credits rolled. Also Saniyya Sidney who played Venus and Demi Singleton who played Serena need to be recognized as they too were very enjoyable as the teenage stars. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/24/21 11:26 PM
HOUSE OF GUCCI
Ridley Scott and Adam Driver return for their second release this year in HOUSE OF GUCCI, a story about Maurizio Gucci (Driver), who falls in love and marries Patrizia Reggiani (Lady Gaga). Maurizio and Patrizia could not be any more different: he obviously comes from money, is more delicate with his language and in the beginning, has no interest in the family business (instead, we find him studying to become a lawyer); whereas Patrizia, who's family owns a small trucking company, is ambitious, power hungry, and wishes for the finer things in life. Their relationship soon ensnares the family and business. Jeremy Irons, who plays Maurizio's father, sees Patrizia for what she really is: an attempted passenger on the Gucci gravy train. Al Pacino, who plays Maurizio's Uncle Aldo and owns 50% of the company along with his brother, Maurizio's father Rodolfo Gucci, handles the day-to-day operations. The final member of the family portrayed is Aldo's son Paolo, played wonderfully by Jared Leto. The casting in this is top notch as there isn't a single weak link in the bunch and Gaga continues to pad her already impressive resume. The film in many ways plays like a soap opera with family discord, greed, and self-discovery. In addition to the cast, with the subject matter being about fashion, the costumes are top notch. Everyone's looking their best in every scene. With roughly the same runtime as THE LAST DUEL, this doesn't drag as much as that film as the power struggle within the family, plus the fate of Maurizio at the films end is able to hold the audiences attention. 6/10
Ridley Scott and Adam Driver return for their second release this year in HOUSE OF GUCCI, a story about Maurizio Gucci (Driver), who falls in love and marries Patrizia Reggiani (Lady Gaga). Maurizio and Patrizia could not be any more different: he obviously comes from money, is more delicate with his language and in the beginning, has no interest in the family business (instead, we find him studying to become a lawyer); whereas Patrizia, who's family owns a small trucking company, is ambitious, power hungry, and wishes for the finer things in life. Their relationship soon ensnares the family and business. Jeremy Irons, who plays Maurizio's father, sees Patrizia for what she really is: an attempted passenger on the Gucci gravy train. Al Pacino, who plays Maurizio's Uncle Aldo and owns 50% of the company along with his brother, Maurizio's father Rodolfo Gucci, handles the day-to-day operations. The final member of the family portrayed is Aldo's son Paolo, played wonderfully by Jared Leto. The casting in this is top notch as there isn't a single weak link in the bunch and Gaga continues to pad her already impressive resume. The film in many ways plays like a soap opera with family discord, greed, and self-discovery. In addition to the cast, with the subject matter being about fashion, the costumes are top notch. Everyone's looking their best in every scene. With roughly the same runtime as THE LAST DUEL, this doesn't drag as much as that film as the power struggle within the family, plus the fate of Maurizio at the films end is able to hold the audiences attention. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/21 11:43 PM
BRUISED
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/21 03:35 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BRUISED
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Where 2 find Irish??? Netflix or ???
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/26/21 04:35 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BRUISED
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Where 2 find Irish??? Netflix or ???
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/27/21 03:46 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BRUISED
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Hallie Berry makes her directional debut and it's a winner. The story follows Jackie Justice, a former undefeated UFC fighter who unceremoniously fled the ring when it looked like she was about to lose her first fight. She then went into hiding and became the butt end of jokes. However, Berry puts forth a strong performance and directional effort. Even though the film follows the same paint-by-numbers effort of previous films that follow the same formula and Berry brings nothing new to the table, the story is still engaging as she's thrust upon her new role as a mother. Having previously bore a son who was living with his now deceased father, the 6-year-old boy is brought back into her life and she's tasked with providing and establishing a relationship with him. Living in an emotional, abusive relationship with her live-in boyfriend and manager, he brings her to an underground fight to "sign a new talent" before said talent picks a fight with her. Beating her ass and becoming a topic of conversation again, she's thrust back into the spotlight, reestablishing her training now ready for a championship match that brings her name back to the forefront, with a potential to an invite back into the UFC if she can prove herself. Another rags to riches story that rips off the ROCKY storyline but even though it's something you've seen before, the story is still enough to keep you wanting more. Berry and her trainer Buddhakan (Sheila Atim) piece together a wonderful, comeback story. You already know how the story will end but worth spending the 2 hours with Ms. Berry. 6.5/10
Where 2 find Irish??? Netflix or ???
Yes, it's on Netflix hoodlum. Happy Birthday by the way!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/21 12:57 AM
8 bit Christmas
5 Stars for New Christmas movie
5 Stars for New Christmas movie
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/21 01:20 AM
8-BIT CHRISTMAS
We open the film to find Jake Doyle (Neil Patrick Harris) being harassed by his 10-year-old daughter Annie, about getting her a cellphone for Christmas. With unbendable will power, Annie becomes increasing frustrated with her father for turning her down at every request. Believing her father to be overly harsh, Jake recounts the tale from when he was her age, in 1988 and how badly he wanted a Nintendo Entertainment System. There is only 1 kid in their town who owns 1, and kids camp out all morning for the opportunity to be picked to play along side him (technically, he allows 10 kids in per day to play). However, it's soon announced the local boy scouts troop (of which Jake and all of his friends with the exception of one due to her gender, are apart of) is giving away a free NES to the scout who can sell the most Christmas wreaths. Another 1980's nostalgia fest as well as a "it's the journey, not the destination story" and while this doesn't bring anything new to the table for a Christmas or throwback film, it's still entertaining, at times funny, and heartfelt as well. With the ability to watch it on HBO Max, if you're a fan of the 80's or were into the NES, this will appeal to you. And if not, the Christmas themes should still be enough to grab the attention of even the most casual viewer. 6.5/10
We open the film to find Jake Doyle (Neil Patrick Harris) being harassed by his 10-year-old daughter Annie, about getting her a cellphone for Christmas. With unbendable will power, Annie becomes increasing frustrated with her father for turning her down at every request. Believing her father to be overly harsh, Jake recounts the tale from when he was her age, in 1988 and how badly he wanted a Nintendo Entertainment System. There is only 1 kid in their town who owns 1, and kids camp out all morning for the opportunity to be picked to play along side him (technically, he allows 10 kids in per day to play). However, it's soon announced the local boy scouts troop (of which Jake and all of his friends with the exception of one due to her gender, are apart of) is giving away a free NES to the scout who can sell the most Christmas wreaths. Another 1980's nostalgia fest as well as a "it's the journey, not the destination story" and while this doesn't bring anything new to the table for a Christmas or throwback film, it's still entertaining, at times funny, and heartfelt as well. With the ability to watch it on HBO Max, if you're a fan of the 80's or were into the NES, this will appeal to you. And if not, the Christmas themes should still be enough to grab the attention of even the most casual viewer. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/21 06:39 PM
Loved it…. Watching now….
“ Father Christmas is back”
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/90gTpjbj/2-A6-A502-F-AA10-45-B6-BF87-283-BAB0552-F1.png)
“ Father Christmas is back”
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/21 07:28 PM
DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS (1995)
It's 1948 in LA, and Ezekiel Easy) Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and about to lose his home. A friend introduces him to seemingly amiable Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore, always good), who gives him $100 to locate Daphne (Jennifer Beals), missing girlfriend of a mayoral candidate who dropped out of the race. Rawlins soon finds out, like Jake Gittes in "Chinatown," that he's way over his head in a lethal plot that has him battling Albright, a ruthless gangster, the racist LAPD, and assorted black hoodlums and traitors. He sends for his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle), and the combination of Easy's cool intelligence and Mouse's cheerful lethality save the day. Director Carl Franklin shows how to make a convincing film noir from a black perspective; and while he doesn't hit you over the head with the race card, you see how Easy's skin color makes his survival a crapshoot. The filming and design are richly authentic, and the cast is all-around brilliant, especially the three principals. But, the plot is almost too convoluted to follow, and at times it seems as if characters are added just to make the movie longer. Still, a good watch.
It's 1948 in LA, and Ezekiel Easy) Rawlins (Denzel Washington) is out of work and about to lose his home. A friend introduces him to seemingly amiable Dewitt Albright (Tom Sizemore, always good), who gives him $100 to locate Daphne (Jennifer Beals), missing girlfriend of a mayoral candidate who dropped out of the race. Rawlins soon finds out, like Jake Gittes in "Chinatown," that he's way over his head in a lethal plot that has him battling Albright, a ruthless gangster, the racist LAPD, and assorted black hoodlums and traitors. He sends for his murderous pal Mouse (Don Cheadle), and the combination of Easy's cool intelligence and Mouse's cheerful lethality save the day. Director Carl Franklin shows how to make a convincing film noir from a black perspective; and while he doesn't hit you over the head with the race card, you see how Easy's skin color makes his survival a crapshoot. The filming and design are richly authentic, and the cast is all-around brilliant, especially the three principals. But, the plot is almost too convoluted to follow, and at times it seems as if characters are added just to make the movie longer. Still, a good watch.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/21 07:49 PM
Devil In A Blue Dress is an underrated flick. I like the early Denzel stuff. I watched Ricochet the other day and it still holds good
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/21 08:52 PM
SILK ROAD
An intriguing story of 27-year-old Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the silk road website, which allowed its users to (illegally) purchase drugs over the internet and have them shipped directly to a buyer (think Amazon for illegal drugs). Ross was brilliant in his creation: using a browser such as Tor and bitcoin for currency to protect the site and it's users through encryption. However, Ross finds out the hard way that anonymity can work for or against you. The film opens with Ross, an intelligent young libertarian with a desire to change the world. The only problem, he doesn't have the faintest idea on how to accomplish that. Very much against big government, he soon gets the idea for the people to make their own choices and exercise their own freedoms. This leads to the creation of his website as part of a F U to government but also empowering the people at the same time. He bounces the idea off of his girlfriend Julia (Alexandra Shipp) and best friend Max (Daniel David Stewart). They both try to talk him out of it but Ross is determined this is his calling. After about the first 20-30 minutes, Max drops out of the story until much later on and we're left with Ross and Julia and their relationship as the site grows but also consumes Ross' entire life soon afterwards. A former drug addict and DEA agent, Rick Bowden (Jason Clarke) is demoted to cyber crimes after a recent suspension. A complete relic of the past, Rick is an old-school cop. Moved off of the streets as punishment and relegated to a desk job, he's 9 month away from retirement and nothing is expected from him. His new boss is 26-years-old and their relationship is rather cantankerous: Rick feeling his boss is too young and inexperienced, doing everything behind a keyboard without getting his hands dirty; while his boss feels Rick is outdated and the world has passed him up as police work has changed. Attempting to prove his boss wrong and to himself he can still be a valuable asset to the team, Rick struggles but embraces the underdog role in trying to crack this case. A formulaic story, with parts and clues that suddenly appear to drop into law enforcements laps to quicken the pace of the film, with no real performance standing out save for Nick Robinson who plays Ross and Paul Walter Hauser, who plays Ross' only employee. Hauser's levity is always welcomed in any film he's in but appears he's being typecast in that role. Not the greatest introduction to the story but perhaps there's a documentary out there that's more worthy of your time. 5.5/10
An intriguing story of 27-year-old Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the silk road website, which allowed its users to (illegally) purchase drugs over the internet and have them shipped directly to a buyer (think Amazon for illegal drugs). Ross was brilliant in his creation: using a browser such as Tor and bitcoin for currency to protect the site and it's users through encryption. However, Ross finds out the hard way that anonymity can work for or against you. The film opens with Ross, an intelligent young libertarian with a desire to change the world. The only problem, he doesn't have the faintest idea on how to accomplish that. Very much against big government, he soon gets the idea for the people to make their own choices and exercise their own freedoms. This leads to the creation of his website as part of a F U to government but also empowering the people at the same time. He bounces the idea off of his girlfriend Julia (Alexandra Shipp) and best friend Max (Daniel David Stewart). They both try to talk him out of it but Ross is determined this is his calling. After about the first 20-30 minutes, Max drops out of the story until much later on and we're left with Ross and Julia and their relationship as the site grows but also consumes Ross' entire life soon afterwards. A former drug addict and DEA agent, Rick Bowden (Jason Clarke) is demoted to cyber crimes after a recent suspension. A complete relic of the past, Rick is an old-school cop. Moved off of the streets as punishment and relegated to a desk job, he's 9 month away from retirement and nothing is expected from him. His new boss is 26-years-old and their relationship is rather cantankerous: Rick feeling his boss is too young and inexperienced, doing everything behind a keyboard without getting his hands dirty; while his boss feels Rick is outdated and the world has passed him up as police work has changed. Attempting to prove his boss wrong and to himself he can still be a valuable asset to the team, Rick struggles but embraces the underdog role in trying to crack this case. A formulaic story, with parts and clues that suddenly appear to drop into law enforcements laps to quicken the pace of the film, with no real performance standing out save for Nick Robinson who plays Ross and Paul Walter Hauser, who plays Ross' only employee. Hauser's levity is always welcomed in any film he's in but appears he's being typecast in that role. Not the greatest introduction to the story but perhaps there's a documentary out there that's more worthy of your time. 5.5/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/21 10:40 PM
Love your reviews Irish keep them coming, you watch a lot of movies lol. I'm more of a sport buff watch around 3/4 movies a week.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/21 11:04 PM
Thanks H, I appreciate it. Yes, movies are my passion. I follow sports but don't watch them as much unless it's a playoff game.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/21 12:23 PM
Murder By Numbers
Forgotten crime thriller led ably by Sandra Bullock's detective reckoning with a traumatic past. She's on the hunt of two savant high school students, played by Ryan Gosling and Michael Pitt, who have committed "the perfect murder". Interesting premise with a dynamic interplay between the two killers. Has a bit more going for it than the standard movie of its ilk.
Forgotten crime thriller led ably by Sandra Bullock's detective reckoning with a traumatic past. She's on the hunt of two savant high school students, played by Ryan Gosling and Michael Pitt, who have committed "the perfect murder". Interesting premise with a dynamic interplay between the two killers. Has a bit more going for it than the standard movie of its ilk.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/07/21 10:38 PM
SILENT NIGHT
Taking place in the English countryside, SILENT NIGHT tells the story of a Christmas get together between a group of friends facing their impending demise. The earth is angry and has been abused for far too long and as such, has started to release a toxic gas that will cover the entire globe. Everyone who comes in contact with this gas will die a most painful death; however, the UK government has provided a solution in the form of a pill that'll still kill the recipient, but in a much less painful and quicker way. Featuring a well-rounded cast lead by Keira Knightly, Annabelle Wallis, and Lily-Rose Depp, the story explores a multitude of themes within its 90 minutes time frame such as abortion, the existence of God, and free-choice. For the most part this plays wonderfully as a dark comedy until the final chapter when you know what's already going to happen does indeed happen. While the film begins with plenty of laughs, it does have a lot of heartfelt moments as well and is well balanced between comedy and tragedy. A sleeper of a film that given the opportunity, should be appreciated this holiday season. 6/10
Taking place in the English countryside, SILENT NIGHT tells the story of a Christmas get together between a group of friends facing their impending demise. The earth is angry and has been abused for far too long and as such, has started to release a toxic gas that will cover the entire globe. Everyone who comes in contact with this gas will die a most painful death; however, the UK government has provided a solution in the form of a pill that'll still kill the recipient, but in a much less painful and quicker way. Featuring a well-rounded cast lead by Keira Knightly, Annabelle Wallis, and Lily-Rose Depp, the story explores a multitude of themes within its 90 minutes time frame such as abortion, the existence of God, and free-choice. For the most part this plays wonderfully as a dark comedy until the final chapter when you know what's already going to happen does indeed happen. While the film begins with plenty of laughs, it does have a lot of heartfelt moments as well and is well balanced between comedy and tragedy. A sleeper of a film that given the opportunity, should be appreciated this holiday season. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/09/21 10:40 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SILENT NIGHT
Taking place in the English countryside, SILENT NIGHT tells the story of a Christmas get together between a group of friends facing their impending demise. The earth is angry and has been abused for far too long and as such, has started to release a toxic gas that will cover the entire globe. Everyone who comes in contact with this gas will die a most painful death; however, the UK government has provided a solution in the form of a pill that'll still kill the recipient, but in a much less painful and quicker way. Featuring a well-rounded cast lead by Keira Knightly, Annabelle Wallis, and Lily-Rose Depp, the story explores a multitude of themes within its 90 minutes time frame such as abortion, the existence of God, and free-choice. For the most part this plays wonderfully as a dark comedy until the final chapter when you know what's already going to happen does indeed happen. While the film begins with plenty of laughs, it does have a lot of heartfelt moments as well and is well balanced between comedy and tragedy. A sleeper of a film that given the opportunity, should be appreciated this holiday season. 6/10
Taking place in the English countryside, SILENT NIGHT tells the story of a Christmas get together between a group of friends facing their impending demise. The earth is angry and has been abused for far too long and as such, has started to release a toxic gas that will cover the entire globe. Everyone who comes in contact with this gas will die a most painful death; however, the UK government has provided a solution in the form of a pill that'll still kill the recipient, but in a much less painful and quicker way. Featuring a well-rounded cast lead by Keira Knightly, Annabelle Wallis, and Lily-Rose Depp, the story explores a multitude of themes within its 90 minutes time frame such as abortion, the existence of God, and free-choice. For the most part this plays wonderfully as a dark comedy until the final chapter when you know what's already going to happen does indeed happen. While the film begins with plenty of laughs, it does have a lot of heartfelt moments as well and is well balanced between comedy and tragedy. A sleeper of a film that given the opportunity, should be appreciated this holiday season. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/09/21 10:44 PM
I really enjoyed this movie and hope it continues with a SN2.
Wou;d love to see the ones who did not take pills carry on as Zombies, as hinted to.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/P5wfCBX4/C0-CA66-DD-61-A2-4-D57-BB00-C9-F4-B64-B64-DC.jpg)
Wou;d love to see the ones who did not take pills carry on as Zombies, as hinted to.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/09/21 11:03 PM
I wouldn't hold my breath for a sequel DP but it was enjoyable.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/10/21 11:08 PM
NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
A new film released this weekend that I never knew existed until a week or two prior to it's release when it's trailer dropped. The premise follows LeMarcus James (played by Stephan James), starting QB for the SEC powerhouse that's in the CFP national championship game. 3 days before kickoff, James along with Emmett Sunday (Alexander Ludwig), stage a players strike, holding the game hostage while simultaneously costing the NCAA millions of dollars if no game is played. At the crux of the strike, James is seeking compensation and health care benefits, not only for himself, but for every student athlete in the country. He's sacrificing potentially millions of dollars if he's selected further down in the upcoming NFL draft (before the strike, he's the consensus #1 pick); however, he believes the sacrifice is worth it not only in the present but for further athletes as well. The film does a good job at balancing all of the vested interests in showcasing the title game: from James' head coach James Lazor (played wonderfully by J.K. Simmons), to the President's of the SEC and Big-12, who each have a team vying for the title, to the NCAA itself. It shows how greed, blackmail, corruption, bullying, and the lengths the NCAA but more importantly, grown adults, are willing to go to against young adults to ensure their job and pockets aren't left any lighter. A decent film, with a good message, that's a day late and a dollar short now that the NCAA has greenlit athlete's NIL (name, image, and likeness) rights. Although the message is still profound and pushes for more than just the NIL. James gives the best performance here alongside Simmons, who's always terrific, no matter what material he's given. 5.5/10
A new film released this weekend that I never knew existed until a week or two prior to it's release when it's trailer dropped. The premise follows LeMarcus James (played by Stephan James), starting QB for the SEC powerhouse that's in the CFP national championship game. 3 days before kickoff, James along with Emmett Sunday (Alexander Ludwig), stage a players strike, holding the game hostage while simultaneously costing the NCAA millions of dollars if no game is played. At the crux of the strike, James is seeking compensation and health care benefits, not only for himself, but for every student athlete in the country. He's sacrificing potentially millions of dollars if he's selected further down in the upcoming NFL draft (before the strike, he's the consensus #1 pick); however, he believes the sacrifice is worth it not only in the present but for further athletes as well. The film does a good job at balancing all of the vested interests in showcasing the title game: from James' head coach James Lazor (played wonderfully by J.K. Simmons), to the President's of the SEC and Big-12, who each have a team vying for the title, to the NCAA itself. It shows how greed, blackmail, corruption, bullying, and the lengths the NCAA but more importantly, grown adults, are willing to go to against young adults to ensure their job and pockets aren't left any lighter. A decent film, with a good message, that's a day late and a dollar short now that the NCAA has greenlit athlete's NIL (name, image, and likeness) rights. Although the message is still profound and pushes for more than just the NIL. James gives the best performance here alongside Simmons, who's always terrific, no matter what material he's given. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/11/21 01:22 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
I wouldn't hold my breath for a sequel DP but it was enjoyable.
Not to sure about that, somewhat like Carpenter did with Halloween, they continued filming and editing of outtakes from this for sequel to release two years later.
With the idea of Zombies being mentioned in the movie, the sequel will revolve around that of course with the boy waking up after death at the end of movie.
It can work and also take on its own cult following.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/11/21 04:23 AM
INHERITANCE....Director Vaughn Stein..starring Lilly Collins, Simon Pegg, Connie Nielsen....I'm not good @ giving movie synopsis..so I'll bear u the pain...this is a GREAT movie ..last saw 3 times on HBO...Lilly Collins dad dies & leaves an amaase of fortune 2 younger son / senate wanna be...but older sister Collins has so much more in store by way of a past that dead dad has a secret.....w/out going 2 much further (cause I'm stupid)..Simon Pegg steals the show as a loonybin fuckup who's been in a bunker 4 more than 30 yrs. when dad's daughter finds him...PLEASE WATCH THIS MOVIE!!!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/12/21 12:58 AM
THE UNFORGIVABLE
Sandra Bullock gives a riveting performance as ex-con Ruth Slater, who's recently released from prison after doing 20 years for murder. Seattle is our setting and Bullock is living in a halfway house, working 2 jobs, and trying to straighten out her life and reconnect with her little sister, who was only 5 at the time Ruth was locked up. However, that proves to be more difficult with the sons of the man she murdered, constantly following her around, unsatisfied with her early release. The film also features a great supporting case with Jon Bernthal, a fellow coworker at one of her jobs, Viola Davis and Vincent D'Onofrio as a married couple who currently reside in Ruth's former home and the site of the murder. D'Onofrio is a lawyer and assists Ruth with reconnecting with her sister through the proper legal channels, as part of her early release is that she has no contact with her. Bullock dazzles as much of her performance is nonverbal, angry, and isolated. A film worth seeking out if for nothing else than Bullock's performance. 6/10
Sandra Bullock gives a riveting performance as ex-con Ruth Slater, who's recently released from prison after doing 20 years for murder. Seattle is our setting and Bullock is living in a halfway house, working 2 jobs, and trying to straighten out her life and reconnect with her little sister, who was only 5 at the time Ruth was locked up. However, that proves to be more difficult with the sons of the man she murdered, constantly following her around, unsatisfied with her early release. The film also features a great supporting case with Jon Bernthal, a fellow coworker at one of her jobs, Viola Davis and Vincent D'Onofrio as a married couple who currently reside in Ruth's former home and the site of the murder. D'Onofrio is a lawyer and assists Ruth with reconnecting with her sister through the proper legal channels, as part of her early release is that she has no contact with her. Bullock dazzles as much of her performance is nonverbal, angry, and isolated. A film worth seeking out if for nothing else than Bullock's performance. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/12/21 04:39 PM
BELFAST
Taking place during the late 1960's, the film follows the story of a family: Pa, Ma, Will, and Buddy that shows the origins of The Trouble in Belfast that lasted roughly 30 years. The film is shot in black-and-white and opens on a beautiful August day in 1969, where young Buddy is playing with his friends, imaging he's fighting dragons. On his return home his world, and those of his neighbors are suddenly shattered as a gang of Protestants target and begin destroying the homes of local Catholics. Once the violence has passed, the residents construct a makeshift wall in order to protect themselves. Ma is left home to raise the children as Pa works in England and comes home every 2 weeks. During one of these visits, Pa is attempted to be recruited by the leader of the Protestants, who gives him an ultimatum: you're either with us or against us. Pa, seeing the writing on the wall, looks for escape routes such as Vancouver and Sydney while Ma is reluctant to pick up her family and move as Belfast is all any of them (with the exception of Pa) has ever known. This is getting a lot of buzz since it's release and while it is a beautifully crafted film, with quite a bit of levity to balance out the harsh reality the family currently finds themselves, it's good but not great. I would hope this goes on to win Best Foreign Film at the Oscars but nothing on the level of a PARASITE. Could be worth a watch once released outside of theaters. 6.5/10
Taking place during the late 1960's, the film follows the story of a family: Pa, Ma, Will, and Buddy that shows the origins of The Trouble in Belfast that lasted roughly 30 years. The film is shot in black-and-white and opens on a beautiful August day in 1969, where young Buddy is playing with his friends, imaging he's fighting dragons. On his return home his world, and those of his neighbors are suddenly shattered as a gang of Protestants target and begin destroying the homes of local Catholics. Once the violence has passed, the residents construct a makeshift wall in order to protect themselves. Ma is left home to raise the children as Pa works in England and comes home every 2 weeks. During one of these visits, Pa is attempted to be recruited by the leader of the Protestants, who gives him an ultimatum: you're either with us or against us. Pa, seeing the writing on the wall, looks for escape routes such as Vancouver and Sydney while Ma is reluctant to pick up her family and move as Belfast is all any of them (with the exception of Pa) has ever known. This is getting a lot of buzz since it's release and while it is a beautifully crafted film, with quite a bit of levity to balance out the harsh reality the family currently finds themselves, it's good but not great. I would hope this goes on to win Best Foreign Film at the Oscars but nothing on the level of a PARASITE. Could be worth a watch once released outside of theaters. 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/12/21 11:51 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
INHERITANCE....Director Vaughn Stein..starring Lilly Collins, Simon Pegg, Connie Nielsen....I'm not good @ giving movie synopsis..so I'll bear u the pain...this is a GREAT movie ..last saw 3 times on HBO...Lilly Collins dad dies & leaves an amaase of fortune 2 younger son / senate wanna be...but older sister Collins has so much more in store by way of a past that dead dad has a secret.....w/out going 2 much further (cause I'm stupid)..Simon Pegg steals the show as a loonybin fuckup who's been in a bunker 4 more than 30 yrs. when dad's daughter finds him...PLEASE WATCH THIS MOVIE!!!
What year is this movie? 2020?
I think I saw this and was really good.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/21 12:01 AM
This was very good, filmed almost entirely in my area of LI
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/7Z2v1C7d/04-E7-D128-204-D-4940-967-C-64552240419-C.jpg)
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/21 07:07 PM
Watched the Denzel Washington remake of The Magnificent Seven. While a good movie overall with decent acting, etc., it lacked the outstanding drama and acting of the Yul Brenner, Steve McQueen original. The current version relies heavily (as so many movies do these days) on flash and camera tricks. Of course, the original had none of that; it's quality relied on the acting, script, and, of course, the score.
Based on that, I hope, I hope that noone tries to make a Godfather remake!
Based on that, I hope, I hope that noone tries to make a Godfather remake!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/21 12:36 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Based on that, I hope, I hope that noone tries to make a Godfather remake!
Just give it time. Remember, this is Hollywood so they need to rectify all the sins of the past, have a completely diverse cast (because, you know, "representation is important") and they need to "introduce it to a new generation."
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/21 07:54 PM
Saw the new Spider-Man with my wife last night. Goddamn!! This might be the best Marvel movie ever. I love The Avengers movies, but this is better. My wife is not really into superhero movies but even she was impressed lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/17/21 12:55 AM
SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME
Believe the hype, this is the best Spider-Man movie ever made and has a claim to be considered the best Marvel movie of all-time as well! The film picks up directly after the events of FAR FROM HOME where Peter's identity is now public knowledge. Having his life and the lives of those closest to him irrevocably shattered, Peter turns to Dr. Strange to summon a spell that'll make the world (except for those closest to him) forget that he is Spider-Man. However, in doing so, the multiverse is opened and a long list of previous Spider-man adversaries make their way into this dimension. Plenty of surprises and cameos abound that'll make any diehard geek out while even the most casual fan will still cheer along in excitement. Funny and emotional, this film takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions, very similar to recent entries in the MCU like AVENGERS: END GAME and BLACK WIDOW to name a few. Tom Holland is brilliant as Peter Parker and for my money, he's the best to play him, taking nothing away from previous actors such as Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield who've donned the red and blue. The mid-credit scene is a wonderful crumb the audience is left to marinate on and asks more questions than it answers. With the exception of 2 cameo's I was hoping to see, there is nothing more this film could have done to improve itself. I hardly ever give out perfect ratings but this definitely earned it! 10/10
Believe the hype, this is the best Spider-Man movie ever made and has a claim to be considered the best Marvel movie of all-time as well! The film picks up directly after the events of FAR FROM HOME where Peter's identity is now public knowledge. Having his life and the lives of those closest to him irrevocably shattered, Peter turns to Dr. Strange to summon a spell that'll make the world (except for those closest to him) forget that he is Spider-Man. However, in doing so, the multiverse is opened and a long list of previous Spider-man adversaries make their way into this dimension. Plenty of surprises and cameos abound that'll make any diehard geek out while even the most casual fan will still cheer along in excitement. Funny and emotional, this film takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions, very similar to recent entries in the MCU like AVENGERS: END GAME and BLACK WIDOW to name a few. Tom Holland is brilliant as Peter Parker and for my money, he's the best to play him, taking nothing away from previous actors such as Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield who've donned the red and blue. The mid-credit scene is a wonderful crumb the audience is left to marinate on and asks more questions than it answers. With the exception of 2 cameo's I was hoping to see, there is nothing more this film could have done to improve itself. I hardly ever give out perfect ratings but this definitely earned it! 10/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/21 01:20 AM
THE KING'S MAN
Serving as a prequel to the KINGSMAN franchise, THE KING'S MAN tells the story of the formation of the organization through Orlando Oxford (Ralph Fiennes) and his son Conrad Oxford. Orlando, having lost his wife and Conrad his mother early in the film, Orlando makes her a promise to watch after their son and to keep him safe. Orlando's a former military man and young Conrad has aspirations of serving his country as well; however, his father rebuffs those overtures whenever the subject is broached, which during the first quarter/half of the film, is rather extensively. No longer requiring his father's permission when he comes of age, Conrad enlists as the first World War begins. To keep his son as safe as possible, Orlando uses the agency to end the war quickly and keep his son out of harms way. I'm sorry to say but the KINGSMAN franchise ran it's course upon its introduction. The sequel was an atrocious mess and this wasn't very far behind. Action scenes that make one yawn, Fieness seemingly channeling more of his inner M than anything fresh, and with a plot were millions of lives are at stake can still feel boring and uncommitted. The constant whining from Conrad during a good portion of the film at his father's insistence he not enlist doesn't help the film's case. Avoid this one. 4/10
Serving as a prequel to the KINGSMAN franchise, THE KING'S MAN tells the story of the formation of the organization through Orlando Oxford (Ralph Fiennes) and his son Conrad Oxford. Orlando, having lost his wife and Conrad his mother early in the film, Orlando makes her a promise to watch after their son and to keep him safe. Orlando's a former military man and young Conrad has aspirations of serving his country as well; however, his father rebuffs those overtures whenever the subject is broached, which during the first quarter/half of the film, is rather extensively. No longer requiring his father's permission when he comes of age, Conrad enlists as the first World War begins. To keep his son as safe as possible, Orlando uses the agency to end the war quickly and keep his son out of harms way. I'm sorry to say but the KINGSMAN franchise ran it's course upon its introduction. The sequel was an atrocious mess and this wasn't very far behind. Action scenes that make one yawn, Fieness seemingly channeling more of his inner M than anything fresh, and with a plot were millions of lives are at stake can still feel boring and uncommitted. The constant whining from Conrad during a good portion of the film at his father's insistence he not enlist doesn't help the film's case. Avoid this one. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/21 02:15 AM
BEING THE RICARDOS
Taking place over the course of a week, Lucille Ball (Nicole Kidman) and Desi Arnaz (Javier Bardem) are having a hellacious week: Lucy's accused of being a communist while Desi is accused of cheating on his wife, all set against the backdrop of filming that week's episode of I LOVE LUCY. A peak behind the curtain at the making of the show provides us examples of the infighting that went on behind-the-scenes: Lucy being borderline obsessive-compulsive in her desire for perfection, William Frawley (J.K. Simmons) and Vivian Vance (Nina Arianda) constantly at each others throats, and the writer's who are constantly seeking approval and credit for their work. Kidman and Bardem are delightful as two titans who can go toe-to-toe with each other in every scene they're in: whether between themselves or others. Simmons has the best dialogue but for my money, Kidman is now the clear front runner for Best Actress IMO. Aaron Sorkin can add another feather in his cap as this is a wonderful tale of perseverance, love, and fully committing to one's craft. Definitely worth a watch on Amazon Prime! 7.5/10
Taking place over the course of a week, Lucille Ball (Nicole Kidman) and Desi Arnaz (Javier Bardem) are having a hellacious week: Lucy's accused of being a communist while Desi is accused of cheating on his wife, all set against the backdrop of filming that week's episode of I LOVE LUCY. A peak behind the curtain at the making of the show provides us examples of the infighting that went on behind-the-scenes: Lucy being borderline obsessive-compulsive in her desire for perfection, William Frawley (J.K. Simmons) and Vivian Vance (Nina Arianda) constantly at each others throats, and the writer's who are constantly seeking approval and credit for their work. Kidman and Bardem are delightful as two titans who can go toe-to-toe with each other in every scene they're in: whether between themselves or others. Simmons has the best dialogue but for my money, Kidman is now the clear front runner for Best Actress IMO. Aaron Sorkin can add another feather in his cap as this is a wonderful tale of perseverance, love, and fully committing to one's craft. Definitely worth a watch on Amazon Prime! 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/21 01:24 PM
LICORICE PIZZA
Paul Thomas Anderson strings together an amazing coming of age romance taking place in 1973 in California. The film centers around young breakout star Gary (Cooper Hoffman) and Alana (Alana Haim) who happen to meet while Gary's getting his school picture taken and Alana's working for the photography company. Gary is immediately mesmerized by Alana's beauty; however, he's soon rebuffed when they reveal their ages (Gary's 15 and Alana's 25). Extremely persistent, charming, and confident, Gary doesn't accept Alana's rejection and after a few first couple of awkward meet ups ("they're not dates") they develop a friendship, even becoming business partners later in the film. Their relationship is constantly off-an-on with plenty of tension bubbling to the surface that fizzles before boiling over whereas at other times, they're purposefully trying to make the other jealous by introducing a member of the opposite sex. You already know what the payoffs going to be and when it happens, you're really happy for the kids because the film does use it's full 133 minute runtime. Hoffman really impressed me with his big screen debut; but then again, I guess I shouldn't be all that surprised being he's the son of the late Philip Seymour Hoffman. Finally, the star of the show is madman Bradley Cooper as Jon Peters. He's only in a few scenes but he chews up Gary while attempting to eat up Alana as they install a waterbed in his home. Great stuff! 7/10
Paul Thomas Anderson strings together an amazing coming of age romance taking place in 1973 in California. The film centers around young breakout star Gary (Cooper Hoffman) and Alana (Alana Haim) who happen to meet while Gary's getting his school picture taken and Alana's working for the photography company. Gary is immediately mesmerized by Alana's beauty; however, he's soon rebuffed when they reveal their ages (Gary's 15 and Alana's 25). Extremely persistent, charming, and confident, Gary doesn't accept Alana's rejection and after a few first couple of awkward meet ups ("they're not dates") they develop a friendship, even becoming business partners later in the film. Their relationship is constantly off-an-on with plenty of tension bubbling to the surface that fizzles before boiling over whereas at other times, they're purposefully trying to make the other jealous by introducing a member of the opposite sex. You already know what the payoffs going to be and when it happens, you're really happy for the kids because the film does use it's full 133 minute runtime. Hoffman really impressed me with his big screen debut; but then again, I guess I shouldn't be all that surprised being he's the son of the late Philip Seymour Hoffman. Finally, the star of the show is madman Bradley Cooper as Jon Peters. He's only in a few scenes but he chews up Gary while attempting to eat up Alana as they install a waterbed in his home. Great stuff! 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/21 01:42 PM
AMERICAN UNDERDOG
The true story of Hall-of-Fame quarterback Kurt Warner (Zachary Levi) begins with Kurt as a D-II athlete at the University of Northern Iowa, who's been riding the bench the previous 4 years and is in his last year of eligibility with aspirations of being drafted by the NFL. Warner, known as a humble, honest, and straight forward man, finally questions his coach as to why he doesn't get on the field more, especially when he was so heavily recruited out of high school. His coach provides his reasons and they work together to improve Kurt's game. This is happening while Kurt simultaneously meets and falls in love with Brenda Meoni (Anna Paquin), who's a single mother with 2 small children with trust issues, being her marriage ended due to spousal infidelity. Once Kurt is out of college and doesn't make it to the pros, the story does an even better job at building the relationship and rock solid bond between Kurt and Brenda. Financially struggling as Brenda is attending nursing school and Kurt working graveyard shift at a local supermarket, Kurt finally takes up an offer that's previously extended to him to participate in the AFL. Kurt at first has difficulty adjusting to the rapid pace of the league but once he does, he dominates it while catching the eye of a NFL team, the St. Louis Rams and his chance to fulfill his childhood dream. This is an important story I'm glad is being told as the world needs more Kurt Warner's nowadays: standup, Christian bound men, who lead with their actions and not empty words. You can tell this was a passion project for Levi as he does a terrific job portraying Warner onscreen while Paquin is equally delightful as Brenda. Kind of surprised the NFL isn't pushing this movie harder as I'm sure they could use some good PR. 6/10
The true story of Hall-of-Fame quarterback Kurt Warner (Zachary Levi) begins with Kurt as a D-II athlete at the University of Northern Iowa, who's been riding the bench the previous 4 years and is in his last year of eligibility with aspirations of being drafted by the NFL. Warner, known as a humble, honest, and straight forward man, finally questions his coach as to why he doesn't get on the field more, especially when he was so heavily recruited out of high school. His coach provides his reasons and they work together to improve Kurt's game. This is happening while Kurt simultaneously meets and falls in love with Brenda Meoni (Anna Paquin), who's a single mother with 2 small children with trust issues, being her marriage ended due to spousal infidelity. Once Kurt is out of college and doesn't make it to the pros, the story does an even better job at building the relationship and rock solid bond between Kurt and Brenda. Financially struggling as Brenda is attending nursing school and Kurt working graveyard shift at a local supermarket, Kurt finally takes up an offer that's previously extended to him to participate in the AFL. Kurt at first has difficulty adjusting to the rapid pace of the league but once he does, he dominates it while catching the eye of a NFL team, the St. Louis Rams and his chance to fulfill his childhood dream. This is an important story I'm glad is being told as the world needs more Kurt Warner's nowadays: standup, Christian bound men, who lead with their actions and not empty words. You can tell this was a passion project for Levi as he does a terrific job portraying Warner onscreen while Paquin is equally delightful as Brenda. Kind of surprised the NFL isn't pushing this movie harder as I'm sure they could use some good PR. 6/10
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/21 09:49 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME
Believe the hype, this is the best Spider-Man movie ever made and has a claim to be considered the best Marvel movie of all-time as well! The film picks up directly after the events of FAR FROM HOME where Peter's identity is now public knowledge. Having his life and the lives of those closest to him irrevocably shattered, Peter turns to Dr. Strange to summon a spell that'll make the world (except for those closest to him) forget that he is Spider-Man. However, in doing so, the multiverse is opened and a long list of previous Spider-man adversaries make their way into this dimension. Plenty of surprises and cameos abound that'll make any diehard geek out while even the most casual fan will still cheer along in excitement. Funny and emotional, this film takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions, very similar to recent entries in the MCU like AVENGERS: END GAME and BLACK WIDOW to name a few. Tom Holland is brilliant as Peter Parker and for my money, he's the best to play him, taking nothing away from previous actors such as Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield who've donned the red and blue. The mid-credit scene is a wonderful crumb the audience is left to marinate on and asks more questions than it answers. With the exception of 2 cameo's I was hoping to see, there is nothing more this film could have done to improve itself. I hardly ever give out perfect ratings but this definitely earned it! 10/10
Believe the hype, this is the best Spider-Man movie ever made and has a claim to be considered the best Marvel movie of all-time as well! The film picks up directly after the events of FAR FROM HOME where Peter's identity is now public knowledge. Having his life and the lives of those closest to him irrevocably shattered, Peter turns to Dr. Strange to summon a spell that'll make the world (except for those closest to him) forget that he is Spider-Man. However, in doing so, the multiverse is opened and a long list of previous Spider-man adversaries make their way into this dimension. Plenty of surprises and cameos abound that'll make any diehard geek out while even the most casual fan will still cheer along in excitement. Funny and emotional, this film takes you on a rollercoaster of emotions, very similar to recent entries in the MCU like AVENGERS: END GAME and BLACK WIDOW to name a few. Tom Holland is brilliant as Peter Parker and for my money, he's the best to play him, taking nothing away from previous actors such as Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield who've donned the red and blue. The mid-credit scene is a wonderful crumb the audience is left to marinate on and asks more questions than it answers. With the exception of 2 cameo's I was hoping to see, there is nothing more this film could have done to improve itself. I hardly ever give out perfect ratings but this definitely earned it! 10/10
Review it again next year and see if it's still a 10/10
I cant comment as i've not seen and have no intention of seeing it but i think our ratings would differ.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/26/21 03:31 AM
Very well could. I know rating for films change after multiple viewings, so that could very well be the case here. But after a first viewing, I stand by my rating.
Posted By: DE NIRO
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/21 12:55 PM
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/21 03:34 AM
Two Truman Capote movies
These two films were released within a year of each other. Both focus on Capote's interest in the gruesome killing of four farm family members in Kansas by two jailhouse buddies, leading to his publication of "In Cold Blood"
Philip Seymour Hoffman gives the performance of his career in "Capote" (2005). He is Capote, gay but not flouting it, scheming, manipulative, charming the rubes with shameless Hollywood name-dropping, so he can win over lawman Alvin Dewey (Chris Cooper, always good) and the rest of the rubes to gain access to the killers. Hoffman's Capote is ruthless in gaining the confidence of the killers, paying out just enough to keep their appeals going so he can buy interview time to finish his book, then all but abandoning them (although he does show up for a final farewell just before they're executed).
In "Infamous," Toby Jones is way over the top as Capote--flamboyantly swishing with no qualms about his gay-ness, making the most of it as he inveigles his way into the prison for his interviews. The film spends plenty of time with Capote and his coterie of (mostly female) High Society fans, played by a gaggle of Big Names. A rich vein of humor runs through the first two thirds of the film, but it gets serious near the end as Capote grows closer to Perry S"mith (Daniel Craig in a strong performance),, baring his soul to win over Smith's own confidence--and his confessions. "Capote" is the better drama, but "Infamous" is more entertaining--and dramatic enough on its own.
These two films were released within a year of each other. Both focus on Capote's interest in the gruesome killing of four farm family members in Kansas by two jailhouse buddies, leading to his publication of "In Cold Blood"
Philip Seymour Hoffman gives the performance of his career in "Capote" (2005). He is Capote, gay but not flouting it, scheming, manipulative, charming the rubes with shameless Hollywood name-dropping, so he can win over lawman Alvin Dewey (Chris Cooper, always good) and the rest of the rubes to gain access to the killers. Hoffman's Capote is ruthless in gaining the confidence of the killers, paying out just enough to keep their appeals going so he can buy interview time to finish his book, then all but abandoning them (although he does show up for a final farewell just before they're executed).
In "Infamous," Toby Jones is way over the top as Capote--flamboyantly swishing with no qualms about his gay-ness, making the most of it as he inveigles his way into the prison for his interviews. The film spends plenty of time with Capote and his coterie of (mostly female) High Society fans, played by a gaggle of Big Names. A rich vein of humor runs through the first two thirds of the film, but it gets serious near the end as Capote grows closer to Perry S"mith (Daniel Craig in a strong performance),, baring his soul to win over Smith's own confidence--and his confessions. "Capote" is the better drama, but "Infamous" is more entertaining--and dramatic enough on its own.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/21 06:09 AM
I recommend the film "Galileo," about his astronomical conflicts with the the Catholic Church hierarchy, of the 1600's. It's available to stream for free through the service "TV Time Feature Films" channel on Roku, for example. It stars Topol.
https://www.tvtime.com/
https://www.tvtime.com/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/02/22 12:50 AM
DON'T LOOK UP
Jennifer Lawrence plays PhD student Kate Dibiasky, who notices a comet hurtling towards Earth. At first fascinated by this discovery, she quickly shares her findings with her professor Dr. Randall Mindy, played by Leonardo DiCaprio. Once they conclude their calculations, they're horrified to discover the comet will obliterate mankind in 6 months. In an attempt to prepare for the event, Dr. Mindy and Kate meet with President Trump, I mean President Orlean (Meryl Streep), who's a caricature of the former President along with her son Jason (Jonah Hill). Not being taken seriously by the President, Dr. Mindy and Kate begin making the media rounds to notify the world of the situation. Both are passionate about warning the world and incredibly frustrated by not being taken seriously by anyone. As a result, Kate is painted as a lunatic, loses her credibility, and winds up working at a grocery store; whereas Dr. Mindy buys in on his new found popularity while selling out the planet. A satire involving social media, politics, capitalism, and science that feels extremely similar to a satire of the Trump administration and COVID-19 rather than a comet hitting earth. I typically like Adam McKay but this is a miss for him. Outside of the strenuous relationship between Jason and Kate, there aren't many laughs here and if a comedy doesn't have many laughs, it becomes quite dull. Not to mention not being invested in the film within the first 20 minutes, makes for a long payoff that doesn't do just that. Even with the opportunity of viewing this on Netflix I would still advise you not to waste your time on this. 4/10
Jennifer Lawrence plays PhD student Kate Dibiasky, who notices a comet hurtling towards Earth. At first fascinated by this discovery, she quickly shares her findings with her professor Dr. Randall Mindy, played by Leonardo DiCaprio. Once they conclude their calculations, they're horrified to discover the comet will obliterate mankind in 6 months. In an attempt to prepare for the event, Dr. Mindy and Kate meet with President Trump, I mean President Orlean (Meryl Streep), who's a caricature of the former President along with her son Jason (Jonah Hill). Not being taken seriously by the President, Dr. Mindy and Kate begin making the media rounds to notify the world of the situation. Both are passionate about warning the world and incredibly frustrated by not being taken seriously by anyone. As a result, Kate is painted as a lunatic, loses her credibility, and winds up working at a grocery store; whereas Dr. Mindy buys in on his new found popularity while selling out the planet. A satire involving social media, politics, capitalism, and science that feels extremely similar to a satire of the Trump administration and COVID-19 rather than a comet hitting earth. I typically like Adam McKay but this is a miss for him. Outside of the strenuous relationship between Jason and Kate, there aren't many laughs here and if a comedy doesn't have many laughs, it becomes quite dull. Not to mention not being invested in the film within the first 20 minutes, makes for a long payoff that doesn't do just that. Even with the opportunity of viewing this on Netflix I would still advise you not to waste your time on this. 4/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/02/22 07:57 PM
Good synopsis..just saw it the other nite..I thought it was a black comedy given the way ..they portrayed some characters..
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/22 04:05 PM
Life of Crime, a documentary on HBO that follows 3 drug addicts from 1984 till now. They let themselves be filmed stealing, doing drugs, and in one scene beating a pregnant girlfriend. It's very depressing. It centers on Newark, New Jersey.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/04/22 01:00 AM
Worth a watch jace or no?
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/22 02:26 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Worth a watch jace or no?
Yes, if you can take graphic drug use and a depressing story. It is great, I had to watch. The surprising part is it was filmed intermeditley from 1984-2020 because the man filming it gave up on it project a few times. The main characters had no problem showing their bad sides, drugs use, and crimes. It's definitely worth a watch. I think HBO is taking it off the schedule any day now so catch it now.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/22 03:59 AM
THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER (1990br)
Tom Clancy's novels are unsubtle, but he writes with panache and portrays technology convincingly. Not so this movie, which is too long and for the most part boring. Sean Connery plays a respected Russian submarine captain wanting to defect to the US with an extremely dangerous new submarine, but he's so passive that he adds nothing to the drama that could have been at the heart of this action/adventure film. Alec Baldwin doesn't add much, either, as Jack Ryan, ace CIA analyst who somehow manages to convince top government officials, and all-powerful naval vessel commanders, that his hunches are right. The ensemble cast is very good, but overall...meh.
Tom Clancy's novels are unsubtle, but he writes with panache and portrays technology convincingly. Not so this movie, which is too long and for the most part boring. Sean Connery plays a respected Russian submarine captain wanting to defect to the US with an extremely dangerous new submarine, but he's so passive that he adds nothing to the drama that could have been at the heart of this action/adventure film. Alec Baldwin doesn't add much, either, as Jack Ryan, ace CIA analyst who somehow manages to convince top government officials, and all-powerful naval vessel commanders, that his hunches are right. The ensemble cast is very good, but overall...meh.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/22 11:40 PM
THE 355
With such a star studded cast this certainly disappoints. How Universal was able to get the likes of Jessica Chastain, Penelope Cruz, Diane Kruger, Lupita Nyong'o, and Sebastian Stan onboard outside of a payday is beyond me as this film reeks. The premise follows CIA agents Mace Browne (Chastain) and Nick Fowler (Stan) attempting to retrieve a weapon of mass destruction. No, it's not the kind you're thinking about. It's referred to as "the box," but in realty is nothing more than a hard drive with a program on it that can disrupt telecommunications, stock markets, banks, etc. A buy goes down between the aforementioned agents and Luis Rojas (Edgar Ramírez) before German agent Marie Schmidt (Kruger) interjects herself into their plan in an attempt to retrieve the box for her agency. During the operation, Fowler is removed from the equation and Browne and Schmidt, bitter rivals, have to play nice in order to achieve their objective. Insert non-spy/therapist Graciela (Cruz) and tech wiz Khadijah (Nyong'o) and you have your assembled team. Very little backstory is given about each of the characters so it's hard to invest into any of them emotionally. Throw in an extremely paint-by-numbers script along with a 'I saw that coming within 20 minutes of the opening credits' "reveal" and the story is flat. The action scenes don't generate excitement nor interest and 30 minutes in, you're waiting for the credits. Outside of Browne and Khadijah, there is zero chemistry within the group. I understand that's how it's supposed to play but the way it comes off, if they don't even care about each other, why should I as the viewer? Avoid! 4/10
With such a star studded cast this certainly disappoints. How Universal was able to get the likes of Jessica Chastain, Penelope Cruz, Diane Kruger, Lupita Nyong'o, and Sebastian Stan onboard outside of a payday is beyond me as this film reeks. The premise follows CIA agents Mace Browne (Chastain) and Nick Fowler (Stan) attempting to retrieve a weapon of mass destruction. No, it's not the kind you're thinking about. It's referred to as "the box," but in realty is nothing more than a hard drive with a program on it that can disrupt telecommunications, stock markets, banks, etc. A buy goes down between the aforementioned agents and Luis Rojas (Edgar Ramírez) before German agent Marie Schmidt (Kruger) interjects herself into their plan in an attempt to retrieve the box for her agency. During the operation, Fowler is removed from the equation and Browne and Schmidt, bitter rivals, have to play nice in order to achieve their objective. Insert non-spy/therapist Graciela (Cruz) and tech wiz Khadijah (Nyong'o) and you have your assembled team. Very little backstory is given about each of the characters so it's hard to invest into any of them emotionally. Throw in an extremely paint-by-numbers script along with a 'I saw that coming within 20 minutes of the opening credits' "reveal" and the story is flat. The action scenes don't generate excitement nor interest and 30 minutes in, you're waiting for the credits. Outside of Browne and Khadijah, there is zero chemistry within the group. I understand that's how it's supposed to play but the way it comes off, if they don't even care about each other, why should I as the viewer? Avoid! 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/08/22 06:38 AM
ROAD TO PERDITION (2002)
Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks), solid, stolid middle class husband and father to two young boys, also happens to be an enforcer for Rock Island IL Irish Mob boss John Rooney (Paul Newman in his last film). Rooney's reckless, stupid son Connor (Daniel Craig) sets off a chain of killings that make Sullivan and his 12 year old son Mike Jr.(Tyler Hoechlin) fugitives from a killer hired by the Capone Outfit (Jude Law), who likes to photograph his dead victims. Though there's plenty of violence, the heart of the plot is the bonding between father and son in their partnership of survival, with Sr. teaching Jr. how to be useful without having him pull triggers. It works, too. Hanks is strong and credible as both father and hitman; young Hoechlin is superb as his wide-awake, loyal son, and Law is memorable as the driven assassin. Cinematography won an Oscar. Excellent movie.
Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks), solid, stolid middle class husband and father to two young boys, also happens to be an enforcer for Rock Island IL Irish Mob boss John Rooney (Paul Newman in his last film). Rooney's reckless, stupid son Connor (Daniel Craig) sets off a chain of killings that make Sullivan and his 12 year old son Mike Jr.(Tyler Hoechlin) fugitives from a killer hired by the Capone Outfit (Jude Law), who likes to photograph his dead victims. Though there's plenty of violence, the heart of the plot is the bonding between father and son in their partnership of survival, with Sr. teaching Jr. how to be useful without having him pull triggers. It works, too. Hanks is strong and credible as both father and hitman; young Hoechlin is superb as his wide-awake, loyal son, and Law is memorable as the driven assassin. Cinematography won an Oscar. Excellent movie.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/08/22 06:59 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
ROAD TO PERDITION (2002)
Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks), solid, stolid middle class husband and father to two young boys, also happens to be an enforcer for Rock Island IL Irish Mob boss John Rooney (Paul Newman in his last film). Rooney's reckless, stupid son Connor (Daniel Craig) sets off a chain of killings that make Sullivan and his 12 year old son Mike Jr.(Tyler Hoechlin) fugitives from a killer hired by the Capone Outfit (Jude Law), who likes to photograph his dead victims. Though there's plenty of violence, the heart of the plot is the bonding between father and son in their partnership of survival, with Sr. teaching Jr. how to be useful without having him pull triggers. It works, too. Hanks is strong and credible as both father and hitman; young Hoechlin is superb as his wide-awake, loyal son, and Law is memorable as the driven assassin. Cinematography won an Oscar. Excellent movie.
Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks), solid, stolid middle class husband and father to two young boys, also happens to be an enforcer for Rock Island IL Irish Mob boss John Rooney (Paul Newman in his last film). Rooney's reckless, stupid son Connor (Daniel Craig) sets off a chain of killings that make Sullivan and his 12 year old son Mike Jr.(Tyler Hoechlin) fugitives from a killer hired by the Capone Outfit (Jude Law), who likes to photograph his dead victims. Though there's plenty of violence, the heart of the plot is the bonding between father and son in their partnership of survival, with Sr. teaching Jr. how to be useful without having him pull triggers. It works, too. Hanks is strong and credible as both father and hitman; young Hoechlin is superb as his wide-awake, loyal son, and Law is memorable as the driven assassin. Cinematography won an Oscar. Excellent movie.
Oh my God Yes...thee best movie I have not seen in a long while...great synopsis TB..I forgot all about that flick....just rewatched "A Perfect Murder" 1998 last nite w/ Michael Douglas..& Gwyneth Paltrow...still a fav of mine....
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/09/22 08:09 PM
711 OCEAN DRIVE (1950)
In this somewhat noir-ish gangster movie, Mal Granger (Edmond O'Brien),a cocky, horse-playing telephone company technician, is introduced to a thug (Barry Kelly) who runs a bookie wire service. He hires Granger to rewire his business, they make plenty of money, then Granger takes over when his boss is killed. The promotion goes to his head; he runs afoul of the Kansas City Syndicate (for once, run by WASPs and headed by Otto Krueger); falls for the wife of one of the Syndicate bigshots (Joanne Dru); has him killed, and then goes on the lam as The Syndicate rats him out to the cops' Gangster Squad. It ends in a well-filmed shootout at Boulder Dam. Crime Doesn't Pay. This isn't a deep movie, and the dialog is pretty simple. O'Brien, never a great actor, is as always, versatile and sturdy. The supporting cast has plenty of colorful characters (like Edward Osterloh) whom you'll recognize from that era. Not bad at all.
In this somewhat noir-ish gangster movie, Mal Granger (Edmond O'Brien),a cocky, horse-playing telephone company technician, is introduced to a thug (Barry Kelly) who runs a bookie wire service. He hires Granger to rewire his business, they make plenty of money, then Granger takes over when his boss is killed. The promotion goes to his head; he runs afoul of the Kansas City Syndicate (for once, run by WASPs and headed by Otto Krueger); falls for the wife of one of the Syndicate bigshots (Joanne Dru); has him killed, and then goes on the lam as The Syndicate rats him out to the cops' Gangster Squad. It ends in a well-filmed shootout at Boulder Dam. Crime Doesn't Pay. This isn't a deep movie, and the dialog is pretty simple. O'Brien, never a great actor, is as always, versatile and sturdy. The supporting cast has plenty of colorful characters (like Edward Osterloh) whom you'll recognize from that era. Not bad at all.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/22 08:23 PM
A NIGHT TO REMEMBER (1958)
This is the class act of Titanic movies, with intelligent script by Walter Lord (from a book by Eric Ambler) and directed by Roy Ward Baker.in semi-documentary format--no sappy love stories, just individual scenes of heroism, cowardice and much in between. Kenneth More plays Second Officer Lightoler, take-charge guy without heroics, but the rest of the cast, mostly in small, often emotionally moving vignettes, is just as good. The pace is gripping and the death-throes of the ship, while not spectacular like James Cameron's 1997 epic, are plenty good enough. A superior drama that pits the hubris of "unsinkable" against the certainty of tragedy.
This is the class act of Titanic movies, with intelligent script by Walter Lord (from a book by Eric Ambler) and directed by Roy Ward Baker.in semi-documentary format--no sappy love stories, just individual scenes of heroism, cowardice and much in between. Kenneth More plays Second Officer Lightoler, take-charge guy without heroics, but the rest of the cast, mostly in small, often emotionally moving vignettes, is just as good. The pace is gripping and the death-throes of the ship, while not spectacular like James Cameron's 1997 epic, are plenty good enough. A superior drama that pits the hubris of "unsinkable" against the certainty of tragedy.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/14/22 10:58 PM
SCREAM (2022)
I'll begin by saying the SCREAM franchise is very near and dear to my heart. The original is in my top ten favorite movies of all-time and changed the way I thought about films. Yet another entry into the franchise, I was hesitant going in for many reasons: would any of the original characters be killed off? Wes Craven has since passed so is this just a cash grab? Has the franchise run its course? And after viewing this film, I did pleasantly enjoy the many nuances hearkening back to the original as many scenes are duplicated and rehashed. Attempting to "pass the torch to a new generation" I'm split on this. The film was good but not great. Should it have been made? Probably not. But does it take away from the franchise? I don't think it does. As such a rabid fan of the franchise, I thought it was fine as a trilogy but here we are 2 additional sequels later and I think this should be the last one. My biggest grip with the film (other than resurrecting the franchise after another decade in isolation) was the killer(s) motive. I felt it was too thin and weak. Usually that's the hook and here, it disappointed rather than surprised. I was excited going in to this but for other Scream fans on the fence, I think you can wait on your viewing. Doesn't need to be seen in theaters. My rating is a little more generous for my absolute love of the franchise. 7/10
I'll begin by saying the SCREAM franchise is very near and dear to my heart. The original is in my top ten favorite movies of all-time and changed the way I thought about films. Yet another entry into the franchise, I was hesitant going in for many reasons: would any of the original characters be killed off? Wes Craven has since passed so is this just a cash grab? Has the franchise run its course? And after viewing this film, I did pleasantly enjoy the many nuances hearkening back to the original as many scenes are duplicated and rehashed. Attempting to "pass the torch to a new generation" I'm split on this. The film was good but not great. Should it have been made? Probably not. But does it take away from the franchise? I don't think it does. As such a rabid fan of the franchise, I thought it was fine as a trilogy but here we are 2 additional sequels later and I think this should be the last one. My biggest grip with the film (other than resurrecting the franchise after another decade in isolation) was the killer(s) motive. I felt it was too thin and weak. Usually that's the hook and here, it disappointed rather than surprised. I was excited going in to this but for other Scream fans on the fence, I think you can wait on your viewing. Doesn't need to be seen in theaters. My rating is a little more generous for my absolute love of the franchise. 7/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/15/22 01:37 AM
The Ray Donovan movie was alright. There is space for a sequel, but Liev Schreiber says he's done with it 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/22 04:23 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
The Ray Donovan movie was alright. There is space for a sequel, but Liev Schreiber says he's done with it 7/10
Like most long-running TV series, "Ray Donovan" started with an intriguing story line, held you in its grip for two or three seasons, and fell apart as it tried to keep going with ever-more improbable and uninteresting plots. I suppose it left room for a denouement: if GF III was "Death of Michael Corleone," this movie would be "Death of Mickey." But it is very slow-moving, with too many poorly paced flashbacks. As usual, Ray sustains multiple catastrophic injuries (ad walks or limps away from them) and kills multiple people (and gets away with them). Liev Schreiber wears one expression: terminally depressed. The big reveal is how Mickey ended up in prison for decades (and Ray's role in it, leading to an even more improbable guilt trip). Yes, there's space for a sequel, but I sure hope there isn't one.
Posted By: jace
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/22 05:30 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Giacalone
The Ray Donovan movie was alright. There is space for a sequel, but Liev Schreiber says he's done with it 7/10
Like most long-running TV series, "Ray Donovan" started with an intriguing story line, held you in its grip for two or three seasons, and fell apart as it tried to keep going with ever-more improbable and uninteresting plots. I suppose it left room for a denouement: if GF III was "Death of Michael Corleone," this movie would be "Death of Mickey." But it is very slow-moving, with too many poorly paced flashbacks. As usual, Ray sustains multiple catastrophic injuries (ad walks or limps away from them) and kills multiple people (and gets away with them). Liev Schreiber wears one expression: terminally depressed. The big reveal is how Mickey ended up in prison for decades (and Ray's role in it, leading to an even more improbable guilt trip). Yes, there's space for a sequel, but I sure hope there isn't one.
Quote
Liev Schreiber wears one expression: terminally depressed.
That is one of the reasons I stopped watching the show. Jon Voight is the best, but his character became too far fetched after 3 seasons. I loved the show in the beginning.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/22 03:30 AM
Most people I know came out the same as you did, Jace. I stuck with it to the end only because of Voight.
BTW: The younger Mickey in the flashbacks looked and acted exactly like Gary Oldman in "State of Grace."
BTW: The younger Mickey in the flashbacks looked and acted exactly like Gary Oldman in "State of Grace."
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/22 01:01 AM
The Cooler had a great cast (William H. Macy, Alec Baldwin, Ron Livingston and loads of other recognisable names) and an interesting premise but I found it to be mediocre and undercooked.
It does however have some of the greatest nude scenes I've ever seen. Maria Bello Heart
William H. Macy stars as a hapless loser in thrall to Alec Baldwin's antagonist casino boss, who employs him as a "cooler", someone whose mere presence brings bad fortune to lucky gamblers.
The story turns on Macy falling in love with Bello's cocktail waitress. With Macy's newfound good fortune, his effectiveness as a cooler is no longer conducive to Baldwin's financial bottom line.
Interesting as a companion piece to Scorsese's great Casino with its portrayal of the seediness of Las Vegas, casinos, and the clientele they attract, the aforementioned great cast, good chemistry between the two leads, noir elements and a sh*t eating villainous turn from the naturally unlikeable Baldwin, but I ultimately wanted to enjoy this more than I did.
Probably would've been a great movie if it was directed by a bigger name.
It does however have some of the greatest nude scenes I've ever seen. Maria Bello Heart
William H. Macy stars as a hapless loser in thrall to Alec Baldwin's antagonist casino boss, who employs him as a "cooler", someone whose mere presence brings bad fortune to lucky gamblers.
The story turns on Macy falling in love with Bello's cocktail waitress. With Macy's newfound good fortune, his effectiveness as a cooler is no longer conducive to Baldwin's financial bottom line.
Interesting as a companion piece to Scorsese's great Casino with its portrayal of the seediness of Las Vegas, casinos, and the clientele they attract, the aforementioned great cast, good chemistry between the two leads, noir elements and a sh*t eating villainous turn from the naturally unlikeable Baldwin, but I ultimately wanted to enjoy this more than I did.
Probably would've been a great movie if it was directed by a bigger name.
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/21/22 01:06 AM
The Wrestler
Tour de force performance from Mickey Rourke. Eminently watchable throughout with a climax that sticks the landing.
Very bleak cinematography with characterization to match but it's unerring in its authentic portrayal of the rigours of the world the eponymous character inhabits.
I already feel like a second viewing.
Tour de force performance from Mickey Rourke. Eminently watchable throughout with a climax that sticks the landing.
Very bleak cinematography with characterization to match but it's unerring in its authentic portrayal of the rigours of the world the eponymous character inhabits.
I already feel like a second viewing.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/22/22 07:22 PM
"THE MOB" (1951)
You could call this an "On the Waterfront" prequel. Detective Johnny Damico (Broderick Crawford) screws up an arrest of Blackie, boss of The Mob's waterfront crime empire. As punishment, the Commish sends him on a dangerous mssion: Infiltrate the longshoremen's union and get to the top to nail Blackie. He does this, circuitously, and with the usual fisticuffs and derring-do. Crawford was your basic, one-note actor--either thuggish cop or just-plain thug--but he was good at it. He gets lots of snappy lines from lively script by William Bowers. Plus, the cast of supporting plug-uglies (Ernest Borgnine, Neville Brand, Charles Bronson, Ralph Dumke, John (Jack Woltz) Marley and Emil Meyer, Eternal Bohunk, is irresistible. Not bad.
You could call this an "On the Waterfront" prequel. Detective Johnny Damico (Broderick Crawford) screws up an arrest of Blackie, boss of The Mob's waterfront crime empire. As punishment, the Commish sends him on a dangerous mssion: Infiltrate the longshoremen's union and get to the top to nail Blackie. He does this, circuitously, and with the usual fisticuffs and derring-do. Crawford was your basic, one-note actor--either thuggish cop or just-plain thug--but he was good at it. He gets lots of snappy lines from lively script by William Bowers. Plus, the cast of supporting plug-uglies (Ernest Borgnine, Neville Brand, Charles Bronson, Ralph Dumke, John (Jack Woltz) Marley and Emil Meyer, Eternal Bohunk, is irresistible. Not bad.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/22 06:15 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
The Wrestler
Tour de force performance from Mickey Rourke. Eminently watchable throughout with a climax that sticks the landing.
Very bleak cinematography with characterization to match but it's unerring in its authentic portrayal of the rigours of the world the eponymous character inhabits.
I already feel like a second viewing.
Tour de force performance from Mickey Rourke. Eminently watchable throughout with a climax that sticks the landing.
Very bleak cinematography with characterization to match but it's unerring in its authentic portrayal of the rigours of the world the eponymous character inhabits.
I already feel like a second viewing.
I would repeat watch just 2 look @ Marisa Tomei in the buff..yummy.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/23/22 06:23 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
"THE MOB" (1951)
You could call this an "On the Waterfront" prequel. Detective Johnny Damico (Broderick Crawford) screws up an arrest of Blackie, boss of The Mob's waterfront crime empire. As punishment, the Commish sends him on a dangerous mssion: Infiltrate the longshoremen's union and get to the top to nail Blackie. He does this, circuitously, and with the usual fisticuffs and derring-do. Crawford was your basic, one-note actor--either thuggish cop or just-plain thug--but he was good at it. He gets lots of snappy lines from lively script by William Bowers. Plus, the cast of supporting plug-uglies (Ernest Borgnine, Neville Brand, Charles Bronson, Ralph Dumke, John (Jack Woltz) Marley and Emil Meyer, Eternal Bohunk, is irresistible. Not bad.
You could call this an "On the Waterfront" prequel. Detective Johnny Damico (Broderick Crawford) screws up an arrest of Blackie, boss of The Mob's waterfront crime empire. As punishment, the Commish sends him on a dangerous mssion: Infiltrate the longshoremen's union and get to the top to nail Blackie. He does this, circuitously, and with the usual fisticuffs and derring-do. Crawford was your basic, one-note actor--either thuggish cop or just-plain thug--but he was good at it. He gets lots of snappy lines from lively script by William Bowers. Plus, the cast of supporting plug-uglies (Ernest Borgnine, Neville Brand, Charles Bronson, Ralph Dumke, John (Jack Woltz) Marley and Emil Meyer, Eternal Bohunk, is irresistible. Not bad.
Yes , Turn b...saw it on TCM not 2 long ago..was enveloped by the whole 9 yrds...and how bout' Charles Bronson way back then?..I had no idea he went back that far!....great movie.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/24/22 02:58 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
...and how bout' Charles Bronson way back then?..I had no idea he went back that far!....great movie.
The amazing thing about Bronson is that he was typecast as plug-uglies or worse, yet he became America's top box office star in his fifties, with very decent roles. Ever see "Hard Times"? Great movie, great Bronson--he was 53 when he made it, and was in fantastic physical condition.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/22 12:00 AM
MUNICH: THE EDGE OF WAR
Taking place in 1938, the story follows secretary to Neville Chamberlain Hugh Legat (George MacKay) and German diplomat Paul von Hartmann (Jannis Niewöhner). The two were former classmates at Oxford six years prior and after a political disagreement, had a falling out with Paul returning to Germany and Hugh staying in England. This is a fictional story based on actual events that deals primarily with England ardently attempting to convince Germany not to invade Poland. A drama that at times attempts to crank up the suspense a little bit but fails at every turn as the audience is quite aware of the stories outcome. Throw in a very average script with average performances outside of Jeremy Irons, who is always wonderful and this time taking up the role of Chamberlain (as well as August Diehl who plays a security office to Hitler and you'll also recognize from INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS) and there's not much to see here. Even with it being available on Netflix, you can find better ways to occupy your time. 6/10
Taking place in 1938, the story follows secretary to Neville Chamberlain Hugh Legat (George MacKay) and German diplomat Paul von Hartmann (Jannis Niewöhner). The two were former classmates at Oxford six years prior and after a political disagreement, had a falling out with Paul returning to Germany and Hugh staying in England. This is a fictional story based on actual events that deals primarily with England ardently attempting to convince Germany not to invade Poland. A drama that at times attempts to crank up the suspense a little bit but fails at every turn as the audience is quite aware of the stories outcome. Throw in a very average script with average performances outside of Jeremy Irons, who is always wonderful and this time taking up the role of Chamberlain (as well as August Diehl who plays a security office to Hitler and you'll also recognize from INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS) and there's not much to see here. Even with it being available on Netflix, you can find better ways to occupy your time. 6/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/22 12:11 AM
I watched Gold the other day. I really enjoyed it but people seem to either hate it or love it. If you enjoy slow burners that consist of great performances and beautiful cinematography, you'll probably enjoy Gold. Zac Efron was terrific
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/22 07:19 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by hoodlum
...and how bout' Charles Bronson way back then?..I had no idea he went back that far!....great movie.
The amazing thing about Bronson is that he was typecast as plug-uglies or worse, yet he became America's top box office star in his fifties, with very decent roles. Ever see "Hard Times"? Great movie, great Bronson--he was 53 when he made it, and was in fantastic physical condition.
Will search 4 it ...thanx TB..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/22 12:18 AM
JACKASS FOREVER
2 years into a pandemic and I think we could all use a little laugh. Johnny Knoxville and crew are here to provide that levity by sacrificing their bodies for our amusement. Much like the previous Jackass movies, multiple mini-skits fill out the runtime of this feature. However, an important note must be made that the torch seems to have passed to a new generation featuring the likes of Sean McInerney, Jasper Dolphin, Zach Holmes, Rachel Wolfson, Eric Manaka, and Compson "Darkshark" Wilson. More of the same here and if you've enjoyed any of their previous films, you'll enjoy this. Crazy to think that over 20 years have passed since their introduction and many are in their 50's still doing this. To that, I applaud them! 7/10
2 years into a pandemic and I think we could all use a little laugh. Johnny Knoxville and crew are here to provide that levity by sacrificing their bodies for our amusement. Much like the previous Jackass movies, multiple mini-skits fill out the runtime of this feature. However, an important note must be made that the torch seems to have passed to a new generation featuring the likes of Sean McInerney, Jasper Dolphin, Zach Holmes, Rachel Wolfson, Eric Manaka, and Compson "Darkshark" Wilson. More of the same here and if you've enjoyed any of their previous films, you'll enjoy this. Crazy to think that over 20 years have passed since their introduction and many are in their 50's still doing this. To that, I applaud them! 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/22 10:55 PM
DEATH ON THE NILE
Another star studded cast joins Agatha Christie's adaptation with the likes of Gal Gadot, Armie Hammer, Kenneth Branagh, Annette Bening, Rose Leslie, and Russell Brand. The story opens in a bar with Detective Hercule Poirot, enjoying some much needed and earned down time. He observes the passionately engaged couple of Simon Doyle (Hammer) and Jacqueline de Bellefort (played wonderfully by Margot Robbie doppelganger Emma Mackey), before Simon is subsequently introduced to Jacqueline's good friend Linnet Ridgeway (Gadot), who just hired Doyle as her estate planner at the behest of Jacqueline. Upon meeting each other, love at first sight strikes both Simon and Linnet as 6 weeks later Simon has broken off his engagement with Jacqueline and has instead wed Linnet. Spending their honeymoon abroad and at an attempt to ditch Jacqueline, who's still madly in love with Simon and following them around, the couple hops abroad a steamship down the Nile. Simon and Linnet are surrounded by friends and potential enemies, a murderer is onboard with a thirst for blood and will stop at nothing to get what they want. A far improved version of the novel over the 1978 film that still had a stellar cast but at times felt like a low production and made-for-TV movie. This has more grittiness, mystery, and suspense than it's predecessor. Branagh shines again as Poirot and doesn't come off as much of a jerk this time around compared to his previous turn in 2017's remake of the MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS. However, there are still "updated" character traits for this film as one character is made to be a closet homosexual because, you know, "wokeness/representation." I've never read an Agatha Christie novel but I'm willing to bet the 1978 version is closer to the source material than this as this strays consistently from the original. If you're a fan of whodunit films or any of the cast members, this is a fun ride to take along the Nile. Beautiful costumes and set designs with a wicked twist that unfortunately, comes up limp compared to the '78 version. In saying that, I'd still be up for another Hercule Poirot adventure for a third time! 6/10
Another star studded cast joins Agatha Christie's adaptation with the likes of Gal Gadot, Armie Hammer, Kenneth Branagh, Annette Bening, Rose Leslie, and Russell Brand. The story opens in a bar with Detective Hercule Poirot, enjoying some much needed and earned down time. He observes the passionately engaged couple of Simon Doyle (Hammer) and Jacqueline de Bellefort (played wonderfully by Margot Robbie doppelganger Emma Mackey), before Simon is subsequently introduced to Jacqueline's good friend Linnet Ridgeway (Gadot), who just hired Doyle as her estate planner at the behest of Jacqueline. Upon meeting each other, love at first sight strikes both Simon and Linnet as 6 weeks later Simon has broken off his engagement with Jacqueline and has instead wed Linnet. Spending their honeymoon abroad and at an attempt to ditch Jacqueline, who's still madly in love with Simon and following them around, the couple hops abroad a steamship down the Nile. Simon and Linnet are surrounded by friends and potential enemies, a murderer is onboard with a thirst for blood and will stop at nothing to get what they want. A far improved version of the novel over the 1978 film that still had a stellar cast but at times felt like a low production and made-for-TV movie. This has more grittiness, mystery, and suspense than it's predecessor. Branagh shines again as Poirot and doesn't come off as much of a jerk this time around compared to his previous turn in 2017's remake of the MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS. However, there are still "updated" character traits for this film as one character is made to be a closet homosexual because, you know, "wokeness/representation." I've never read an Agatha Christie novel but I'm willing to bet the 1978 version is closer to the source material than this as this strays consistently from the original. If you're a fan of whodunit films or any of the cast members, this is a fun ride to take along the Nile. Beautiful costumes and set designs with a wicked twist that unfortunately, comes up limp compared to the '78 version. In saying that, I'd still be up for another Hercule Poirot adventure for a third time! 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/22 12:51 AM
NIGHTMARE ALLEY
A remake of the 1947 noir sharing the same name, NIGHTMARE ALLEY is Guillermo del Toro's homage to the genre. Full disclosure, I've never seen the original film nor am I at all a fan of Guillermo del Toro's but this is by far his best film! Powerful performances from Bradley Cooper and Cate Blanchett, the story follows mentalist Stanton Carlisle (Cooper), working his way on to a traveling carnie show while learning the tips and tricks of it all. He meets and falls in love with Molly (Rooney Mara) and they soon leave the festival for venues more "worthy of their talents." Skimming the wealthy out of their money, Stanton's never had it better while Molly feels stale and apologetic about their newfound grifting style. Stanton and Molly have a rule where they will not perform private sessions; however, during one of their shows, Stanton is too tempted by the lure of a big payday to turn it down. Going against Molly's advise, Stanton gets in too deep with psychiatrist Dr. Lilith Ritter (Blanchett), a local judge, and his local businessman friend. An incredibly engaging story that had me hooked from the very onset and while the film is 2 hours 30 minutes and is a slow burn, I still found myself wanting more. I would highly recommend seeking this out! 8/10
A remake of the 1947 noir sharing the same name, NIGHTMARE ALLEY is Guillermo del Toro's homage to the genre. Full disclosure, I've never seen the original film nor am I at all a fan of Guillermo del Toro's but this is by far his best film! Powerful performances from Bradley Cooper and Cate Blanchett, the story follows mentalist Stanton Carlisle (Cooper), working his way on to a traveling carnie show while learning the tips and tricks of it all. He meets and falls in love with Molly (Rooney Mara) and they soon leave the festival for venues more "worthy of their talents." Skimming the wealthy out of their money, Stanton's never had it better while Molly feels stale and apologetic about their newfound grifting style. Stanton and Molly have a rule where they will not perform private sessions; however, during one of their shows, Stanton is too tempted by the lure of a big payday to turn it down. Going against Molly's advise, Stanton gets in too deep with psychiatrist Dr. Lilith Ritter (Blanchett), a local judge, and his local businessman friend. An incredibly engaging story that had me hooked from the very onset and while the film is 2 hours 30 minutes and is a slow burn, I still found myself wanting more. I would highly recommend seeking this out! 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/22 01:19 AM
SHUT IN
The Daily Wire releases their first film about a single mother Jessica (Rainey Qualley) and her 2 young children. Cleaning out her mother's house upon her passing, Jessica is soon visited by the children's father Rob (Jake Horowitz) and his child molesting friend Sammy (Vincent Gallo). Jessica, Rob, and Sammy have a long history together as they're all drug addicts (well, Jessica's clean now so she's a former drug addict but Rob and Sammy are both still currently using). Rob and Sammy, looking to score some quick cash from Jessica, thinking she has it from her mother's recent passing, are upset to learn all she inherited was her broken down house. Wishing to "leave things as they found them," Rob locks Jessica in her pantry in an attempt to "teach her a lesson." Unable to get out, Jessica is powerless to care for her young children as Sammy comes back to terrorize the family; yet Jessica is able to find strength and salvation through a renewance of her long lost faith as a child. I applaud the first effort here by The Daily Wire and am glad to see more content like this available to viewers who subscribe to their beliefs (since apparently representation is so important these days). Although, the film is average at best. Qualley is semi-passable as a mother in duress, powerless to protect her children from a sexual predator and a drug-addicted father. Not at all a bad film but nothing great either. An average attempt the first time out but when they release their first film alongside Gina Carano, I will most definitely be checking it out as well! 5/10
The Daily Wire releases their first film about a single mother Jessica (Rainey Qualley) and her 2 young children. Cleaning out her mother's house upon her passing, Jessica is soon visited by the children's father Rob (Jake Horowitz) and his child molesting friend Sammy (Vincent Gallo). Jessica, Rob, and Sammy have a long history together as they're all drug addicts (well, Jessica's clean now so she's a former drug addict but Rob and Sammy are both still currently using). Rob and Sammy, looking to score some quick cash from Jessica, thinking she has it from her mother's recent passing, are upset to learn all she inherited was her broken down house. Wishing to "leave things as they found them," Rob locks Jessica in her pantry in an attempt to "teach her a lesson." Unable to get out, Jessica is powerless to care for her young children as Sammy comes back to terrorize the family; yet Jessica is able to find strength and salvation through a renewance of her long lost faith as a child. I applaud the first effort here by The Daily Wire and am glad to see more content like this available to viewers who subscribe to their beliefs (since apparently representation is so important these days). Although, the film is average at best. Qualley is semi-passable as a mother in duress, powerless to protect her children from a sexual predator and a drug-addicted father. Not at all a bad film but nothing great either. An average attempt the first time out but when they release their first film alongside Gina Carano, I will most definitely be checking it out as well! 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/14/22 06:19 PM
Thanks i12, will read these reviews to Wife.
She loves your reviews……. I know she is interested in SHUT IN
The others also other that JACKASS FOREVER….LoL.
She loves your reviews……. I know she is interested in SHUT IN
The others also other that JACKASS FOREVER….LoL.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/15/22 01:43 AM
Thanks DP. Check out NIGHTMARE ALLEY. Like I said, I'm not a fan of the director's at all but that would be in my top 5 favorite films of last year for sure!
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/22 08:12 AM
Nightmare Alley is an extraordinary film. What a performance by Bradley Cooper. Anyway, I just got done with watching the new Scream movie. Surprisingly good!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/22 10:06 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Nightmare Alley is an extraordinary film. What a performance by Bradley Cooper. Anyway, I just got done with watching the new Scream movie. Surprisingly good!
What would you rate it out of 10?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/22 10:26 PM
UNCHARTED
Tom Holland and Mark Wahlberg bring this video game adaptation to life about treasure hunter Victor Sullivan (Wahlberg), recruiting young and wise beyond his years, Nathan Drake (Holland) to find a 500-year-old lost treasure. The circumstances of their meeting and subsequent partnership is rushed and thin on the surface as Drake is a bartender/petty thief in New York City, while Sullivan calls him out on his thievery and recruits him. This does play out later in the film as Holland does question his decision to join forces with Sullivan but at that point, he's in too deep and has invested too much to turn back now. A passable action film that doesn't do much for me outside of 2 great aerial action scenes. Other than that, it's a lot of double crossing and don't trust anyone. I know Columbia/Sony are hoping this can jump start a franchise and they've left plenty of room for a sequel/trilogy (with the addition of a mid-credits scene) to further their cause; but after this introduction, I'm less than sold on future adventures with Drake and Sullivan. Holland is awesome and likeable as Drake but this is one of the few roles where Wahlberg comes off as a villain in every sense of the word. The box office will ultimately be the deciding factor but if I had a vote, I'm not sold on further dips into this pool. One final note as I feel it needs to be mentioned: I don't typically comment on hair and makeup but Tati Gabrielle's, who's beautiful by the way and plays villain Braddock, is so distractingly bad that is must be called out. How anyone looked at her and thought she looked fine before going in front of a camera should not be in charge of those types of decisions going forward. 6/10
Tom Holland and Mark Wahlberg bring this video game adaptation to life about treasure hunter Victor Sullivan (Wahlberg), recruiting young and wise beyond his years, Nathan Drake (Holland) to find a 500-year-old lost treasure. The circumstances of their meeting and subsequent partnership is rushed and thin on the surface as Drake is a bartender/petty thief in New York City, while Sullivan calls him out on his thievery and recruits him. This does play out later in the film as Holland does question his decision to join forces with Sullivan but at that point, he's in too deep and has invested too much to turn back now. A passable action film that doesn't do much for me outside of 2 great aerial action scenes. Other than that, it's a lot of double crossing and don't trust anyone. I know Columbia/Sony are hoping this can jump start a franchise and they've left plenty of room for a sequel/trilogy (with the addition of a mid-credits scene) to further their cause; but after this introduction, I'm less than sold on future adventures with Drake and Sullivan. Holland is awesome and likeable as Drake but this is one of the few roles where Wahlberg comes off as a villain in every sense of the word. The box office will ultimately be the deciding factor but if I had a vote, I'm not sold on further dips into this pool. One final note as I feel it needs to be mentioned: I don't typically comment on hair and makeup but Tati Gabrielle's, who's beautiful by the way and plays villain Braddock, is so distractingly bad that is must be called out. How anyone looked at her and thought she looked fine before going in front of a camera should not be in charge of those types of decisions going forward. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/22 10:44 PM
TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (2022)
A sequel to the original 1974 film that is attempting to do much of the same as HALLOWEEN (2018) did with its franchise by ignoring every sequel prior to it. A straight sequel set 48 years later finds another group of 4 friends who set off to Harlow, Texas to open a restaurant. From the outset, the liberal propaganda agenda is painfully obvious as the characters come off as morally superior and condescending to the locals. Deciding to open their "dream" restaurant in small town Harlow, with a population under 1,500 people, the group rides in as if the town is out of touch while enforcing their beliefs upon the people as they have problems with the confederate flag, law enforcement, and citizens who enforce their second amendment rights. As such, it's not difficult to not give a damn what happens to these characters as they're so blatantly wrapped up in their own little world and look down upon anybody who doesn't share their same extremists beliefs. Another attempt to use an established IP while shoveling extremists, leftist propaganda to the audience as "normal." The film then attempts to make up for this with gratuitous violence that's been seen before and brings nothing new to the table. Another sad tale in the TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE series but I guess that's par for the course with this property. There's a very good reason why this wasn't released in theaters but rather on Netflix. Do yourself the favor, save yourself the 83 painful minutes and avoid this! 4/10
A sequel to the original 1974 film that is attempting to do much of the same as HALLOWEEN (2018) did with its franchise by ignoring every sequel prior to it. A straight sequel set 48 years later finds another group of 4 friends who set off to Harlow, Texas to open a restaurant. From the outset, the liberal propaganda agenda is painfully obvious as the characters come off as morally superior and condescending to the locals. Deciding to open their "dream" restaurant in small town Harlow, with a population under 1,500 people, the group rides in as if the town is out of touch while enforcing their beliefs upon the people as they have problems with the confederate flag, law enforcement, and citizens who enforce their second amendment rights. As such, it's not difficult to not give a damn what happens to these characters as they're so blatantly wrapped up in their own little world and look down upon anybody who doesn't share their same extremists beliefs. Another attempt to use an established IP while shoveling extremists, leftist propaganda to the audience as "normal." The film then attempts to make up for this with gratuitous violence that's been seen before and brings nothing new to the table. Another sad tale in the TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE series but I guess that's par for the course with this property. There's a very good reason why this wasn't released in theaters but rather on Netflix. Do yourself the favor, save yourself the 83 painful minutes and avoid this! 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/22 09:31 PM
OLD HENRY
I gave this 4 1/2 Stars
Really good and a great twist on a bit of History.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/56sCSPxd/81-DF969-D-747-F-4-D42-A6-BE-357-DC2-DFF5-B8.jpg)
I gave this 4 1/2 Stars
Really good and a great twist on a bit of History.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/21/22 09:33 PM
WOLF LIKE ME
This is a series but short, only 6 episodes 1/2 hour each, leaves you wanting more.
Very good, 4 - stars.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/7JYLCkJC/D7739-A54-B29-F-4758-9552-C56-BA487-FAB7.jpg)
This is a series but short, only 6 episodes 1/2 hour each, leaves you wanting more.
Very good, 4 - stars.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/22 06:04 AM
KIMI *2021)
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/22 01:40 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
KIMI *2021)
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
What's your rating TB? It's on my to watch list, just been putting it off?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/22 01:41 AM
Just watched THE GODFATHER at AMC in Dolby Cinema for it's 50th anniversary and if you don't see it in this quality, you can no longer post on this website. It is ABSOLUTELY gorgeous!
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/22 07:58 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Turnbull
KIMI *2021)
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
Angela Childs (Zoe Kravitz) is a computer techie in Seattle, shut in by Covid and her own agoraphobia/OCD problems. She's weird, but brilliant and assertive. She works reviewing downloads from a company that produces Kimi, an Alexa-like product that they presumably and nefariously mine for useful data from users. Angela hears a scream on one download and eventually drills down far enough to realize Kimi has recorded a murder. She finally ventures out to report it to the company--and finds herself the target of a hit squad because revealing the murder will imperil their pending IPO. The plot is weak, but direction and filming by Steven Soderberg is excellent--constantly tense, edgy, hi-tech; and the chase and escape by the resourceful Angela is outstanding. Kravitz is terrific.
What's your rating TB? It's on my to watch list, just been putting it off?
I'd say 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/22 08:31 PM
OLD HENRY (2021)
In this "Unforgiven" wannabe, Henry Mccarty (Tim Blake Nelson), a middle aged, widowed farmer with a teenaged son and a mysterious past, spots a riderless horse with blood on its saddle. He finds the gravely wounded rider, Curry, with a satchel full of money, takes him in and warily nurses him. A trio of bad guys masquerading as lawmen come to Henry's door, supposedly looking to bring Curry to justice but obviously looking for the money. Henry knows it, they know he's hiding Curry, and it sets in motion a lively cat-and-mouse game, ending in a spectacular (if none-too-realistic) shootout, a betrayal, and a reveal that was obvious from early on. This movie is best for Nelson's superb rendering of Henry--laconic, brave, resourceful--for the intelligent script, and for the filming and the menacing mood it establishes. Its weaknesses are slow pace at times, an unconvincing teenaged rebellion, and clumsily handled flashbacks. "Unforgiven" it isn't (what could be?), but it's pretty good.
In this "Unforgiven" wannabe, Henry Mccarty (Tim Blake Nelson), a middle aged, widowed farmer with a teenaged son and a mysterious past, spots a riderless horse with blood on its saddle. He finds the gravely wounded rider, Curry, with a satchel full of money, takes him in and warily nurses him. A trio of bad guys masquerading as lawmen come to Henry's door, supposedly looking to bring Curry to justice but obviously looking for the money. Henry knows it, they know he's hiding Curry, and it sets in motion a lively cat-and-mouse game, ending in a spectacular (if none-too-realistic) shootout, a betrayal, and a reveal that was obvious from early on. This movie is best for Nelson's superb rendering of Henry--laconic, brave, resourceful--for the intelligent script, and for the filming and the menacing mood it establishes. Its weaknesses are slow pace at times, an unconvincing teenaged rebellion, and clumsily handled flashbacks. "Unforgiven" it isn't (what could be?), but it's pretty good.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/22 03:02 AM
THE BATMAN
I can't believe as I'm typing this it's been 10 years since Batman's last solo film with the conclusion of Christopher Nolan's trilogy, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. Right off the bat, THE BATMAN is the most gritty, edgy, and dirty I've ever seen Gotham (and I LOVE it!). Sporting a PG-13 rating, this film does push the envelope up against a R without crossing that line. The film follows the Riddler (played marvelously once again by Paul Dano, of who's work I'm a huge fan of), who goes on a killing spree amongst Gotham's most powerful figures. It's a cat-and-mouse game of the Riddler leading Batman on a path of corpses and clues before revealing his grand plan and reasoning behind the chaos in the finale. Director Matt Reeves gives the audience a new take on Batman as this is very much a crime film, much in the same way of David Fincher's 2007 masterpiece ZODIAC (Reeves has also publicly stated the mask of the Riddler was inspired by the Zodiac killer). Robert Pattinson takes a shot as Bruce Wayne/Batman and once again, the naysayers have been proven wrong, as Pattinson is excellent as the caped crusader with his interpretation of the character. The rest of the cast is equally as hard hitting and well rounded with Zoë Kravitz, who also exceeds expectations as iconic villain Catwoman, Jeffrey Wright as Lt. James Gordon, John Turturro as Carmine Falcone, and unrecognizable Collin Farrell as the Penguin. The script is equally solid and smart and I applaud Reeves' use of Nirvana's Something In The Way to open and close the film, as again, it brings home the alternate aspect of the film compared to previous Batman films. This is perhaps the best Batman of all-time or right up there with THE DARK KNIGHT! My only knock against it is you do feel the 2 hours and 55 minute runtime and much like the LORD OF THE RINGS, the film seemed to have multiple endings before it finally does. If maybe 15-20 minutes were cut out, I'd have given this a perfect score. Between this and SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, comic book fans are getting spoiled lately with these groundbreaking films that are going to become harder and harder to top! 9/10
I can't believe as I'm typing this it's been 10 years since Batman's last solo film with the conclusion of Christopher Nolan's trilogy, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. Right off the bat, THE BATMAN is the most gritty, edgy, and dirty I've ever seen Gotham (and I LOVE it!). Sporting a PG-13 rating, this film does push the envelope up against a R without crossing that line. The film follows the Riddler (played marvelously once again by Paul Dano, of who's work I'm a huge fan of), who goes on a killing spree amongst Gotham's most powerful figures. It's a cat-and-mouse game of the Riddler leading Batman on a path of corpses and clues before revealing his grand plan and reasoning behind the chaos in the finale. Director Matt Reeves gives the audience a new take on Batman as this is very much a crime film, much in the same way of David Fincher's 2007 masterpiece ZODIAC (Reeves has also publicly stated the mask of the Riddler was inspired by the Zodiac killer). Robert Pattinson takes a shot as Bruce Wayne/Batman and once again, the naysayers have been proven wrong, as Pattinson is excellent as the caped crusader with his interpretation of the character. The rest of the cast is equally as hard hitting and well rounded with Zoë Kravitz, who also exceeds expectations as iconic villain Catwoman, Jeffrey Wright as Lt. James Gordon, John Turturro as Carmine Falcone, and unrecognizable Collin Farrell as the Penguin. The script is equally solid and smart and I applaud Reeves' use of Nirvana's Something In The Way to open and close the film, as again, it brings home the alternate aspect of the film compared to previous Batman films. This is perhaps the best Batman of all-time or right up there with THE DARK KNIGHT! My only knock against it is you do feel the 2 hours and 55 minute runtime and much like the LORD OF THE RINGS, the film seemed to have multiple endings before it finally does. If maybe 15-20 minutes were cut out, I'd have given this a perfect score. Between this and SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, comic book fans are getting spoiled lately with these groundbreaking films that are going to become harder and harder to top! 9/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/22 03:10 AM
It was wayyyy too long. It was great, but the length took a lot from it. Loved Zoë! 8/10 from me
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/22 12:56 AM
i agree with you irish and gia it was good (i think it was long but i enjoyed it).
i love batman i'm glad we got to see such an amazing movie !
i love batman i'm glad we got to see such an amazing movie !
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/22 01:39 AM
We will try for b m an sunday
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/22 02:09 AM
Thanks Meyer for your feedback. Enjoy it if you're able to make it DP. Would enjoy hearing your thoughts as well.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/06/22 04:45 PM
Anyone see DOG?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/06/22 07:45 PM
FRESH
Anne Hathaway doppelganger Daisy Edgar-Jones plays Noa, a lonely and isolated woman save for her best friend Molly (Jojo T. Gibbs), is tired of trying to meet men through dating apps. In need of groceries one night, she dons sweatpants and an overcoat (everyone's ideal attire for being hit on in public), before she is approached by the charming and handsome Steve (Sebastian Stan). They meet up for drinks one night and hit it off. Both at the point of f**k it, they subscribe to the honesty approach and don't want games or drama. As such, Steve soon thereafter takes Noa on a weekend getaway, where he reveals to her a big secret of his. The film is an allegory of misogyny and how men view women as nothing more than disposable pieces of meat. This is a horror film, with a R rating but there is little to no violence or gore as this plays more from the psychological aspect. Particularly, how men can mentally manipulate and control women. It starts out very intriguing until about the halfway point. Then, the story veers off a little, the pacing slows down, before a clunky final act that shoehorns in characters arc before the runtime expires. The message isn't too heavy-handed, which is appreciated, as we have enough of that coming out of Hollywood these days. Edgar-Jones and Stan have good chemistry and the film sports some great sounds; however, when all's said and done, this film is slightly better than average. Sad as it had promise, especially early on. 6/10
Anne Hathaway doppelganger Daisy Edgar-Jones plays Noa, a lonely and isolated woman save for her best friend Molly (Jojo T. Gibbs), is tired of trying to meet men through dating apps. In need of groceries one night, she dons sweatpants and an overcoat (everyone's ideal attire for being hit on in public), before she is approached by the charming and handsome Steve (Sebastian Stan). They meet up for drinks one night and hit it off. Both at the point of f**k it, they subscribe to the honesty approach and don't want games or drama. As such, Steve soon thereafter takes Noa on a weekend getaway, where he reveals to her a big secret of his. The film is an allegory of misogyny and how men view women as nothing more than disposable pieces of meat. This is a horror film, with a R rating but there is little to no violence or gore as this plays more from the psychological aspect. Particularly, how men can mentally manipulate and control women. It starts out very intriguing until about the halfway point. Then, the story veers off a little, the pacing slows down, before a clunky final act that shoehorns in characters arc before the runtime expires. The message isn't too heavy-handed, which is appreciated, as we have enough of that coming out of Hollywood these days. Edgar-Jones and Stan have good chemistry and the film sports some great sounds; however, when all's said and done, this film is slightly better than average. Sad as it had promise, especially early on. 6/10
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/08/22 12:27 AM
dues did you see the batman movie ?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/09/22 07:27 PM
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
dues did you see the batman movie ?
No Bud, not yet….we had a repair project at home that needs attention.
Nothing serious but something we had been putting off and then a great opportunity for a carpenter who is high demand became available and we have him doing needed work on staircases and moldings.
I’m sure we will this weekend.
Will update.
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/09/22 11:22 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
dues did you see the batman movie ?
No Bud, not yet….we had a repair project at home that needs attention.
Nothing serious but something we had been putting off and then a great opportunity for a carpenter who is high demand became available and we have him doing needed work on staircases and moldings.
I’m sure we will this weekend.
Will update.
cool i hope the house will be fix and make you guys happy !
i will wait for your update on the movie
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/11/22 11:52 PM
THE HYPERIONS
The film follows 2 former superheros Vista Mandulbaum (Penelope Mitchell) and Ansel (Alphonso McAuley), who attempt to rob a museum in search of their former superpowers that are on display to the general public in the form of badges. Vista is the daughter of Professor Ruckus Mandulbaum (Cary Elwes), who is the creator of this superhero group and granted them their superpowers. I'm a fan of Cary Elwes but he looks rather rough in this film. Suffering from some type of paralysis or cerebral palsy, he grudgingly gets through it. The only stars to speak of are Penelope Mitchell, who plays Vista and Indi Star, who plays the younger version of Vista. Overall, this is a fun and alternative superhero film than the current Marvel and DC products that are being produced by Hollywood. 6/10
The film follows 2 former superheros Vista Mandulbaum (Penelope Mitchell) and Ansel (Alphonso McAuley), who attempt to rob a museum in search of their former superpowers that are on display to the general public in the form of badges. Vista is the daughter of Professor Ruckus Mandulbaum (Cary Elwes), who is the creator of this superhero group and granted them their superpowers. I'm a fan of Cary Elwes but he looks rather rough in this film. Suffering from some type of paralysis or cerebral palsy, he grudgingly gets through it. The only stars to speak of are Penelope Mitchell, who plays Vista and Indi Star, who plays the younger version of Vista. Overall, this is a fun and alternative superhero film than the current Marvel and DC products that are being produced by Hollywood. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/13/22 08:24 PM
DOG 2022[/b][b]
Good movie, very entertaining. Military soldier ( Channing Tatum) Saves milDog who handler died.
We are huge Dog people so it was right up our ally.
7/10
Good movie, very entertaining. Military soldier ( Channing Tatum) Saves milDog who handler died.
We are huge Dog people so it was right up our ally.
7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/13/22 09:11 PM
THE ADAM PROJECT
Set in the year 2050, Ryan Reynolds travels back in time to find his missing wife Laura (Zoe Saldana). However, she's in 2018, and in a desperate attempt to avoid security attempting to shoot him down to avoid his time travel, he's sent to the year 2022. Upon his arrival, he's reunited with his 12-year-old self played marvelously by Walker Scobell. Having recently lost their father Louis (Mark Ruffalo) to cancer, Adam is an angry young boy with a fresh mouth, who lashes out and makes his mother Ellie's (Jennifer Garner) life's a living hell, trying to both comfort and accept Adam after the recent death of his father. The film is very heartfelt and nostalgic, playing like a 1980's film of the same premise. And while I did enjoy it, I don't understand the same hoopla around it. It's a good, enjoyable, and watchable film for sure but nothing great. Reynolds again is the quint-essential wise ass, full of funny jokes, and one-liners. The performances are all well-rounded and heartfelt, but this play has been seen before. Worth a watch but nothing out of the ordinary here. 6.5/10
Set in the year 2050, Ryan Reynolds travels back in time to find his missing wife Laura (Zoe Saldana). However, she's in 2018, and in a desperate attempt to avoid security attempting to shoot him down to avoid his time travel, he's sent to the year 2022. Upon his arrival, he's reunited with his 12-year-old self played marvelously by Walker Scobell. Having recently lost their father Louis (Mark Ruffalo) to cancer, Adam is an angry young boy with a fresh mouth, who lashes out and makes his mother Ellie's (Jennifer Garner) life's a living hell, trying to both comfort and accept Adam after the recent death of his father. The film is very heartfelt and nostalgic, playing like a 1980's film of the same premise. And while I did enjoy it, I don't understand the same hoopla around it. It's a good, enjoyable, and watchable film for sure but nothing great. Reynolds again is the quint-essential wise ass, full of funny jokes, and one-liners. The performances are all well-rounded and heartfelt, but this play has been seen before. Worth a watch but nothing out of the ordinary here. 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/22 03:23 AM
SUDDEN FEAR (1952)
Myra Hudson (Joan Crawford), wealthy widow and playwright, fires Lester Blaine (Jack Palance) during tryouts for her new play. But Blaine has designs on her money. He romances her, she marries him--and he teams up with his mistress, Irene Neves (Gloria Grahame) to kill Myra for her money, Myra finds out in an interesting way, and then plots to kill Lester and Irene--all this occurring in a polite, high-society milieu. The movie is a bit slow at first, but director David Miller picks up the pace until the twisty plot has you firmly in its grip. The cast is good, especially Grahame--a real vixen. Palance, a consistently under-rated actor, fits right in. Definitely a first-rate suspenser.
Myra Hudson (Joan Crawford), wealthy widow and playwright, fires Lester Blaine (Jack Palance) during tryouts for her new play. But Blaine has designs on her money. He romances her, she marries him--and he teams up with his mistress, Irene Neves (Gloria Grahame) to kill Myra for her money, Myra finds out in an interesting way, and then plots to kill Lester and Irene--all this occurring in a polite, high-society milieu. The movie is a bit slow at first, but director David Miller picks up the pace until the twisty plot has you firmly in its grip. The cast is good, especially Grahame--a real vixen. Palance, a consistently under-rated actor, fits right in. Definitely a first-rate suspenser.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/22 08:21 PM
KIMI
Zoe Kravitz stars as Angela Childs, an agoraphobic woman who works for a Seattle based tech company called Kimi. They are similar in nature to Amazon's Alexa and Apple's Siri; however, the difference lies in Kimi having real humans interpret and improve their software by listening to recorded requests, unlike Alexa and Siri that rely soley on algorithms. Angela is one of these workers and one day, she hears a woman's frantic cry and believing a crime has been committed, becomes obsessed with finding out what happened. Angela's agoraphobia was brought on by a prior sexual assault, so the viewer can understand why she so easily becomes invested in this case. She also is OCD, brushing her teeth multiple times per day, continuously cleaning her bed sheets and hands. This was all before the lockdowns and once Covid happened, her issues have only gotten worse, refusing to go outside at all costs. However, in order to discover the truth, she has to overcome her mental problems, leave her apartment, and investigate. Kravitz is passable as Angela and the beginning of the film plays very much like REAR WINDOW, being cooped up inside all day and neighbor watching. The story does enough within the first 30 minutes to connect and sympathize with Angela and also hook you into the story. However, once she leaves the apartment, the engagement I had flew apart. Trying to be silenced by her company for fear of this getting out, she's on the run from hired hitmen. I do applaud the efforts of the writers for really giving Angela depth, as well putting a spotlight on mental health issues (and in this case, how some of them originate). Wonderful use of sound as well by director Steven Soderbergh where the audio goes silent everytime Angela puts on her headphones until she plays something, and then immediately the noise of the street comes roaring back upon being taken off. A film that started out with some promise, but ultimately, didn't deliver in the end. 5.5/10
Zoe Kravitz stars as Angela Childs, an agoraphobic woman who works for a Seattle based tech company called Kimi. They are similar in nature to Amazon's Alexa and Apple's Siri; however, the difference lies in Kimi having real humans interpret and improve their software by listening to recorded requests, unlike Alexa and Siri that rely soley on algorithms. Angela is one of these workers and one day, she hears a woman's frantic cry and believing a crime has been committed, becomes obsessed with finding out what happened. Angela's agoraphobia was brought on by a prior sexual assault, so the viewer can understand why she so easily becomes invested in this case. She also is OCD, brushing her teeth multiple times per day, continuously cleaning her bed sheets and hands. This was all before the lockdowns and once Covid happened, her issues have only gotten worse, refusing to go outside at all costs. However, in order to discover the truth, she has to overcome her mental problems, leave her apartment, and investigate. Kravitz is passable as Angela and the beginning of the film plays very much like REAR WINDOW, being cooped up inside all day and neighbor watching. The story does enough within the first 30 minutes to connect and sympathize with Angela and also hook you into the story. However, once she leaves the apartment, the engagement I had flew apart. Trying to be silenced by her company for fear of this getting out, she's on the run from hired hitmen. I do applaud the efforts of the writers for really giving Angela depth, as well putting a spotlight on mental health issues (and in this case, how some of them originate). Wonderful use of sound as well by director Steven Soderbergh where the audio goes silent everytime Angela puts on her headphones until she plays something, and then immediately the noise of the street comes roaring back upon being taken off. A film that started out with some promise, but ultimately, didn't deliver in the end. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/18/22 10:08 PM
X
A beautiful homage to both THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE and FRIDAY THE 13TH, X finds a group of young friends looking to shoot a porno on location. Far away from the confines of big city Houston, Texas, the group sets out for a small, unnamed rural Texas town to shoot their film. Renting an outhouse from the landlord, the crew soon finds themselves on the run from said landlords upon the discovery of their plans. Mia Goth is the real star of this as she pulls double duty as both Maxine and Pearl (she is absolutely terrifying as Pearl). In a sick and twisted way, this is a film about youth vs old, passion vs lust. Brittany Snow makes quite an impactful statement as southern drawl Bobby-Lynne, who is wise beyond her years but pigeonholed by her gender. The film is a slow burn until the first killing but once it begins, all bets are off. Bodies soon begin to drop like flies and only the after-credits scene lends any comprehendence to the audience as to the motive. A decent film that only got me into the theater because of the studio (A24). 6/10
A beautiful homage to both THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE and FRIDAY THE 13TH, X finds a group of young friends looking to shoot a porno on location. Far away from the confines of big city Houston, Texas, the group sets out for a small, unnamed rural Texas town to shoot their film. Renting an outhouse from the landlord, the crew soon finds themselves on the run from said landlords upon the discovery of their plans. Mia Goth is the real star of this as she pulls double duty as both Maxine and Pearl (she is absolutely terrifying as Pearl). In a sick and twisted way, this is a film about youth vs old, passion vs lust. Brittany Snow makes quite an impactful statement as southern drawl Bobby-Lynne, who is wise beyond her years but pigeonholed by her gender. The film is a slow burn until the first killing but once it begins, all bets are off. Bodies soon begin to drop like flies and only the after-credits scene lends any comprehendence to the audience as to the motive. A decent film that only got me into the theater because of the studio (A24). 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/18/22 10:31 PM
DEEP WATER
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/22 10:25 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DEEP WATER
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Great review i12…. I am watching this right now.
We like it very much
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/22 10:28 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DEEP WATER
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Based upon a novel of the same name, the film finds Vic (Ben Affleck), a wealthy entrepreneur who knowingly allows his wife Melinda (Ana de Armas), to have extramarital affairs. However, as Melinda's lovers soon become the victims of homicide, the light is shone brightly on Vic as the prime suspect in each of their demises. Is Vic passive enough to allow his wife to cheat on him, only to then, kill the very same individual with sleeping with his wife? Or is he just a patsy. Wonderful performances by both Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, who exemplify the very definition of a loveless marriage. Having a daughter together, Trixie, complicates things as Vic is a very attentive and loving father, while Melinda is regretful and whoring around to enjoy herself. The pacing of this is slow as we contentiously see victim after victim appear before the final "reveal" at the end that is seen miles away before being shown to the audience. Again good performances by Affleck and de Armas but nothing groundbreaking here. 6/10
Great review i12…. I am watching this right now.
We like it very much
Just up to the part when the Author guy drives off the cliff, i think its the end….
Its like the black Widow.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/G4Ns65Ht/9-DF5-A7-FB-05-D9-4739-ADCE-09-C35735-B673.jpg)
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/20/22 12:27 AM
What did you and the Mrs. think? I thought it was good, but not great and predictable.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/22 06:40 AM
THE POWER OF THE DOG (2021)
This isn't a Western per se, it's a psychological drama set in the West (Montana, 1925). Awkward, taciturn George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) and his mean-eyed, bad-attitude, , slovenly, unlikely Phi Beta Kappa brother Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) are cattle barons who live in a mansion in the middle of the prairie. George marries widow Rose Gordon (Kirsten Dunst), who brings with her Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee), her slight, un-masculine medical student son. Phil does his best to reject and harass both. But despite his menace, he develops a mentor relationship with Peter. The movie is slow to get moving, but it holds your interest, and Cumberbatch's brilliant, intense performance keeps you expecting the worst-- but things are never turn out the way they seem to be going.
This isn't a Western per se, it's a psychological drama set in the West (Montana, 1925). Awkward, taciturn George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) and his mean-eyed, bad-attitude, , slovenly, unlikely Phi Beta Kappa brother Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) are cattle barons who live in a mansion in the middle of the prairie. George marries widow Rose Gordon (Kirsten Dunst), who brings with her Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee), her slight, un-masculine medical student son. Phil does his best to reject and harass both. But despite his menace, he develops a mentor relationship with Peter. The movie is slow to get moving, but it holds your interest, and Cumberbatch's brilliant, intense performance keeps you expecting the worst-- but things are never turn out the way they seem to be going.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/22 11:12 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE POWER OF THE DOG (2021)
This isn't a Western per se, it's a psychological drama set in the West (Montana, 1925). Awkward, taciturn George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) and his mean-eyed, bad-attitude, , slovenly, unlikely Phi Beta Kappa brother Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) are cattle barons who live in a mansion in the middle of the prairie. George marries widow Rose Gordon (Kirsten Dunst), who brings with her Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee), her slight, un-masculine medical student son. Phil does his best to reject and harass both. But despite his menace, he develops a mentor relationship with Peter. The movie is slow to get moving, but it holds your interest, and Cumberbatch's brilliant, intense performance keeps you expecting the worst-- but things are never turn out the way they seem to be going.
This isn't a Western per se, it's a psychological drama set in the West (Montana, 1925). Awkward, taciturn George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) and his mean-eyed, bad-attitude, , slovenly, unlikely Phi Beta Kappa brother Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch) are cattle barons who live in a mansion in the middle of the prairie. George marries widow Rose Gordon (Kirsten Dunst), who brings with her Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee), her slight, un-masculine medical student son. Phil does his best to reject and harass both. But despite his menace, he develops a mentor relationship with Peter. The movie is slow to get moving, but it holds your interest, and Cumberbatch's brilliant, intense performance keeps you expecting the worst-- but things are never turn out the way they seem to be going.
One of my favorites from last year. Definitely in my top 5, maybe even top 3. Pulling for Cumberbatch to take home the Oscar on Sunday for his performance. What would you rate it TB?
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/22 03:05 AM
I'd say 8/10, Irishman.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/22 03:12 AM
Nightmare Alley (2021)
This remake of a 1947 classic stars Bradley Cooper as Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who connects with a traveling carnival, learns the ropes of grifting, and rises to become a "mentalist" with plenty of money and a following. He meets his match in Dr. Lilith Ritter (Kate Blanchette), a sinister psychiatrist who's intent on ruining him. Cooper is excellent, and so is the rest of the cast, which includes Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, David Strathairn and Mark Povinelli. The filming in the second half shows some of the most gorgeous Art Deco I've ever seen.
This remake of a 1947 classic stars Bradley Cooper as Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who connects with a traveling carnival, learns the ropes of grifting, and rises to become a "mentalist" with plenty of money and a following. He meets his match in Dr. Lilith Ritter (Kate Blanchette), a sinister psychiatrist who's intent on ruining him. Cooper is excellent, and so is the rest of the cast, which includes Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, David Strathairn and Mark Povinelli. The filming in the second half shows some of the most gorgeous Art Deco I've ever seen.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/22 10:22 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
I'd say 8/10, Irishman.
I gave it the same.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/22 10:23 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Nightmare Alley (2021)
This remake of a 1947 classic stars Bradley Cooper as Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who connects with a traveling carnival, learns the ropes of grifting, and rises to become a "mentalist" with plenty of money and a following. He meets his match in Dr. Lilith Ritter (Kate Blanchette), a sinister psychiatrist who's intent on ruining him. Cooper is excellent, and so is the rest of the cast, which includes Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, David Strathairn and Mark Povinelli. The filming in the second half shows some of the most gorgeous Art Deco I've ever seen.
This remake of a 1947 classic stars Bradley Cooper as Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who connects with a traveling carnival, learns the ropes of grifting, and rises to become a "mentalist" with plenty of money and a following. He meets his match in Dr. Lilith Ritter (Kate Blanchette), a sinister psychiatrist who's intent on ruining him. Cooper is excellent, and so is the rest of the cast, which includes Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, David Strathairn and Mark Povinelli. The filming in the second half shows some of the most gorgeous Art Deco I've ever seen.
I enjoyed this so much more than I thought I was going to. I am not a fan of Guillermo del Toro at all but I think this is his best film (and I'm not a fan of the noir genre either). Great film that I can't wait to see again!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/26/22 06:32 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
What did you and the Mrs. think? I thought it was good, but not great and predictable.
Wife enjoyed it and thought it was like a Black Window story where one lures you in and another kills you.
She rates with a 5 star method and gas emissions this 4 stars, I gave it a 3.
Good flick.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/22 07:54 PM
TORA! TORA! TORA! (1970)
.This is the hands-down best of all the many Pearl Harbor movies, mainly because it shows how the Japanese and American sides slid inevitably into war--the Japanese cock-sure, arrogant and full of hubris; the Americans sluggish and asleep at the wheel. The movie is meticulously made, with tremendous attention to detail, and the attack scenes are breath-takingly realistic--this at the dawn of the CGI era. Martin Balsam, one of Hollywood's most versatile actors, plays Adm. Kimmel, the smug commander of the Pacific Fleet, and Jason Robards is Lt. Gen. Short, the out-of-it Army Air Corps commander at Hickam Field. But the two best roles go to E.G. Marshall and Wesley Addey, respectively the Army and Navy intelligence officers in Washington who vainly try to get the attention of higher-ups as they read decoded Japanese messages. The excellent cast includes Joseph Cotton, Neville Brand, Richard Anderson and the ever-detestable George Macready.
.This is the hands-down best of all the many Pearl Harbor movies, mainly because it shows how the Japanese and American sides slid inevitably into war--the Japanese cock-sure, arrogant and full of hubris; the Americans sluggish and asleep at the wheel. The movie is meticulously made, with tremendous attention to detail, and the attack scenes are breath-takingly realistic--this at the dawn of the CGI era. Martin Balsam, one of Hollywood's most versatile actors, plays Adm. Kimmel, the smug commander of the Pacific Fleet, and Jason Robards is Lt. Gen. Short, the out-of-it Army Air Corps commander at Hickam Field. But the two best roles go to E.G. Marshall and Wesley Addey, respectively the Army and Navy intelligence officers in Washington who vainly try to get the attention of higher-ups as they read decoded Japanese messages. The excellent cast includes Joseph Cotton, Neville Brand, Richard Anderson and the ever-detestable George Macready.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/22 12:39 AM
MORBIUS
Morbius, the living vampire, gets his live-action treatment with Academy Award Winner Jared Leto staring as Dr. Michael Morbius. Suffering from a rare blood disease, the doctor hopes the cure for his ailment lies within the blood of vampire bats he's recently brought back to New York from Costa Rica. Believing he's successfully found his cure and with the disease quickly winning the fight, like any good comic book storyline, the good doctor becomes the first human test subject. Upon waking up from the experiment, Michael wakes up as a vampire, starving for victims to feed his insatiable appetite. However, he's soon faced with the difficult conundrum: continue killing innocents to stay alive until he can figure out and fix his current state of affairs, or destroy his life's work and in the process, die himself. Coming from Sony, we once again have a safe, going through the motions comic book adaptation. Leto is entertaining as Dr. Morbius but doesn't bring his usual bravado to the film. The special effects need to be credited, especially the facial expressions when Morbius and his friend/villain Milo (played by Matt Smith) are constantly changing between human and vampire. Other than that, I found this at times to be a slow paced and boring offering, with a then rushed third act to compensate that quickly ties up loose ends before the credits role. Not a bad film, but not great either. Still waiting for Sony to give us a great comic book adaptation and after watching this, I'm still waiting. 6/10
Morbius, the living vampire, gets his live-action treatment with Academy Award Winner Jared Leto staring as Dr. Michael Morbius. Suffering from a rare blood disease, the doctor hopes the cure for his ailment lies within the blood of vampire bats he's recently brought back to New York from Costa Rica. Believing he's successfully found his cure and with the disease quickly winning the fight, like any good comic book storyline, the good doctor becomes the first human test subject. Upon waking up from the experiment, Michael wakes up as a vampire, starving for victims to feed his insatiable appetite. However, he's soon faced with the difficult conundrum: continue killing innocents to stay alive until he can figure out and fix his current state of affairs, or destroy his life's work and in the process, die himself. Coming from Sony, we once again have a safe, going through the motions comic book adaptation. Leto is entertaining as Dr. Morbius but doesn't bring his usual bravado to the film. The special effects need to be credited, especially the facial expressions when Morbius and his friend/villain Milo (played by Matt Smith) are constantly changing between human and vampire. Other than that, I found this at times to be a slow paced and boring offering, with a then rushed third act to compensate that quickly ties up loose ends before the credits role. Not a bad film, but not great either. Still waiting for Sony to give us a great comic book adaptation and after watching this, I'm still waiting. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/01/22 03:12 AM
DUNE (2021).
This highly touted remake qualifies for a Dubious Achievement Award: Spends zillions on special effects, produces an unbelievably dull movie. Yeah, it's great looking in places, but it moves at a snail's pace. The acting is wooden, the script leaden. All I got out of it was noise and sand.
This highly touted remake qualifies for a Dubious Achievement Award: Spends zillions on special effects, produces an unbelievably dull movie. Yeah, it's great looking in places, but it moves at a snail's pace. The acting is wooden, the script leaden. All I got out of it was noise and sand.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/22 10:33 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
DUNE (2021).
This highly touted remake qualifies for a Dubious Achievement Award: Spends zillions on special effects, produces an unbelievably dull movie. Yeah, it's great looking in places, but it moves at a snail's pace. The acting is wooden, the script leaden. All I got out of it was noise and sand.
This highly touted remake qualifies for a Dubious Achievement Award: Spends zillions on special effects, produces an unbelievably dull movie. Yeah, it's great looking in places, but it moves at a snail's pace. The acting is wooden, the script leaden. All I got out of it was noise and sand.
I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it Turnbull. I really enjoyed it and it was probably in my top 10 last year. Never read the book or saw the original film, but I did enjoy this version of it.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/22 09:49 PM
This one escaped my attention back in 2015 The Man from U.N.C.L.E. finally watched it based on the 60s TV series, good spy movie by Guy Ritchie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/08/22 07:40 PM
AMBULANCE
Michael Bay is back to his usual tricks with a new toy to provide him with new camera angles. Equipped with a drone, Bay is able to scale and descend buildings and heights previously unimaginable to him. The story opens with veteran Will Sharp (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), who's wife needs an experimental surgery but his benefits will not cover due to it being experimental. Needing over $200,000 for the surgery, he quickly turns to his brother Danny (Jake Gyllenhaal), who's a career criminal. In desperate need of money and Danny quickly on his way to another score, Will grudgingly agrees to tag along for a claim at the $32 million prize. However, things go awry when they take a LAPD officer as a hostage, who attacks Danny, and Will has to shoot in order to fend him off. Holding up an ambulance as hostage, the pair quickly make their getaway with LAPD, the FBI, and others hot on their trail. Gyllenhaal is the star here as psychopath, career criminal Danny, who's father was also a bank robber and who he learned at the knee from. He's suave, seductive, charming, crazy, and maniacal all at once, depending on if he's on the offense or playing defense. Meanwhile, Will wears many hats as the former veteran/triage specialist/driver, who has a conscience and doesn't want to further injury the police officer he's shot or the paramedic Cam (Eiza González), who just happened to be in the ambulance upon their hijacking. A story that quickly brings the audience in but then soon drags along as the film becomes bloated and overstays its welcome with a 136 minute run time. Plenty of Bay style camera shots with an ending that feels cheated to those who have stuck with it. However, and with the exception of one scene, a fun, popcorn film that the audience can escape into without the over-politicized or agenda driven woke cultural cramming their narcissism down the audiences throat. 6/10
Michael Bay is back to his usual tricks with a new toy to provide him with new camera angles. Equipped with a drone, Bay is able to scale and descend buildings and heights previously unimaginable to him. The story opens with veteran Will Sharp (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), who's wife needs an experimental surgery but his benefits will not cover due to it being experimental. Needing over $200,000 for the surgery, he quickly turns to his brother Danny (Jake Gyllenhaal), who's a career criminal. In desperate need of money and Danny quickly on his way to another score, Will grudgingly agrees to tag along for a claim at the $32 million prize. However, things go awry when they take a LAPD officer as a hostage, who attacks Danny, and Will has to shoot in order to fend him off. Holding up an ambulance as hostage, the pair quickly make their getaway with LAPD, the FBI, and others hot on their trail. Gyllenhaal is the star here as psychopath, career criminal Danny, who's father was also a bank robber and who he learned at the knee from. He's suave, seductive, charming, crazy, and maniacal all at once, depending on if he's on the offense or playing defense. Meanwhile, Will wears many hats as the former veteran/triage specialist/driver, who has a conscience and doesn't want to further injury the police officer he's shot or the paramedic Cam (Eiza González), who just happened to be in the ambulance upon their hijacking. A story that quickly brings the audience in but then soon drags along as the film becomes bloated and overstays its welcome with a 136 minute run time. Plenty of Bay style camera shots with an ending that feels cheated to those who have stuck with it. However, and with the exception of one scene, a fun, popcorn film that the audience can escape into without the over-politicized or agenda driven woke cultural cramming their narcissism down the audiences throat. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/22 06:29 AM
BOB LE FLAMBEUR (1955)
The French excel at film noir, and this is one of the better ones from the Fifties. Bob the Gambler (Roger Duchesne) is a middle-aged seemingly former gangster who served a stretch in prison for a bank robbery and still has plenty of clout among the crooks and shady men and women of his Parisian neighborhood. The cops respect him, too. But after a big gambling loss, he's persuaded to mastermind a heist of Deauville casino. As usual, there's no honor among thieves, and director Jean-Pierre Melville supplies a typically cynical and ironic French ending. It's less about a heist and much more about rich character development and brilliant photography on Parisian streets and bistros. Very good,
The French excel at film noir, and this is one of the better ones from the Fifties. Bob the Gambler (Roger Duchesne) is a middle-aged seemingly former gangster who served a stretch in prison for a bank robbery and still has plenty of clout among the crooks and shady men and women of his Parisian neighborhood. The cops respect him, too. But after a big gambling loss, he's persuaded to mastermind a heist of Deauville casino. As usual, there's no honor among thieves, and director Jean-Pierre Melville supplies a typically cynical and ironic French ending. It's less about a heist and much more about rich character development and brilliant photography on Parisian streets and bistros. Very good,
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/20/22 12:07 AM
WHITE HOT: THE RISE & FALL OF ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
A documentary about appeal maker Abercrombie & Fitch, their meteoric rise during the 1990's/2000's, and their previously self-inflicted PR scandals from T-shirts featuring offensive language to their racial hiring practices. I grew up during this time period and went to a school where A&F gear was very prominent, although I never wore the style then. The documentary features former store employees, models, and execs who give all of the behind-the-scenes details about what was really going on. The first half is interesting, as many are afforded the opportunity to tell their story and talk about their experiences. In addition a brief history of the company is given before transitioning to the second half that deals with how exclusive, racial, and sexist the company was. I understood that's where this was ultimately going, as that's what the point of this documentary was; however, director Alison Klayman makes it so heavy handed that before the credits even roll, the audience is left with this thought of, "Ok, we get it, they were racist." A small portion is dedicated to the efforts the company has made since changing CEO's from Mike Jeffries, who is credited with the company's success and racially insensitive culture, to current CEO Fran Horowitz. And I find this shameful as at the end of the day, this is a hit piece directed squarely towards the brand and little is done to show the new direction the company has taken in the 5 years under Horowitz. Granted, more time is going to be needed as well as additional efforts on the part of the company to put their past behind them. But I believe they're well on their way by having a female CEO, in addition to their efforts of being more inclusive through offering plus sizes, as well as charities they raise money for. 5/10
A documentary about appeal maker Abercrombie & Fitch, their meteoric rise during the 1990's/2000's, and their previously self-inflicted PR scandals from T-shirts featuring offensive language to their racial hiring practices. I grew up during this time period and went to a school where A&F gear was very prominent, although I never wore the style then. The documentary features former store employees, models, and execs who give all of the behind-the-scenes details about what was really going on. The first half is interesting, as many are afforded the opportunity to tell their story and talk about their experiences. In addition a brief history of the company is given before transitioning to the second half that deals with how exclusive, racial, and sexist the company was. I understood that's where this was ultimately going, as that's what the point of this documentary was; however, director Alison Klayman makes it so heavy handed that before the credits even roll, the audience is left with this thought of, "Ok, we get it, they were racist." A small portion is dedicated to the efforts the company has made since changing CEO's from Mike Jeffries, who is credited with the company's success and racially insensitive culture, to current CEO Fran Horowitz. And I find this shameful as at the end of the day, this is a hit piece directed squarely towards the brand and little is done to show the new direction the company has taken in the 5 years under Horowitz. Granted, more time is going to be needed as well as additional efforts on the part of the company to put their past behind them. But I believe they're well on their way by having a female CEO, in addition to their efforts of being more inclusive through offering plus sizes, as well as charities they raise money for. 5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/20/22 01:24 AM
I remember in the 80's how hot the "Members Only" gear was. I never bought it myself, but saw many who did. My childhood had no designer clothing to speak of, so it's all bleeeh to me.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/22 01:21 AM
Originally Posted by U talkin' da me ??
I remember in the 80's how hot the "Members Only" gear was. I never bought it myself, but saw many who did. My childhood had no designer clothing to speak of, so it's all bleeeh to me.
Looking back on it, it means you were racist and not inclusive.
![[Linked Image]](https://media.giphy.com/media/lj935f7J3guGc/giphy.gif)
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/22 07:31 PM
THE NORTHMAN
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
Posted By: MeyerLansky
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/22 08:20 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE NORTHMAN
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
i love medieval movies, and ancient times movies
but this is something that made me worry about weather it's going to be fun watching or not
''religion, magic, and fate''
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/22 02:01 PM
Originally Posted by MeyerLansky
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE NORTHMAN
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
A wonderful viking tale from director Roger Eggers, this film tells the story of Amleth (Alexander Skarsgård) a savage who takes on a crusade of revenge to honor his slain father King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) and to free his mother, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). He's supported by up-and-comer Anya Taylor-Joy (Olga) and veteran Willem Dafoe (Heimir The Fool). Beautiful scenery, a poetic and at times, brutal tale, the film is very enjoyable. I wanted to love it, but wound up only liking it. There's a few battle scenes early on and in the final act but outside of that, the film at times comes to a screeching halt and is troubled by pacing problems. Skarsgård gives a very powerful performance as does Taylor-Joy as his oracle. Themes of religion, magic, and fate are ultimately what this is about. Definitely worth checking out and I am looking forward to viewing this again as this is one film where the audience will pick up more a second time around. 7.5/10
i love medieval movies, and ancient times movies
but this is something that made me worry about weather it's going to be fun watching or not
''religion, magic, and fate''
I like director Roger Eggers (loved THE WITCH) and I love Anya Taylor-Joy so I was in when it was announced. Again, while I was hoping to love it, I do recommend seeing it. Just my two cents anyway.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/22 08:33 AM
Just rewatched Mad Max Fury Road after not having seen it since it's premiere. What an incredible movie!! I completely forgot how good it was
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/22 08:43 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Just rewatched Mad Max Fury Road after not having seen it since it's premiere. What an incredible movie!! I completely forgot how good it was
I just rewatched THE BATMAN now that it's on HBO Max and still a great movie. Still a little bit long but very enjoyable. My favorite movie of the year thus far.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/22 09:09 PM
ALL THE OLD KNIVES
Based on the novel of the same name, the film takes place in 2014 in Vienna, Austria that follows a group of CIA agents stationed there. Turkish Airlines flight 127 has been hijacked and is on the tarmac as the terrorists are threatening to kill everyone onboard unless their demands are met. Henry Pelham (Chris Pine) and Celia Harrison (Thandiwe Newton) professionally are coworkers within the group and unprofessionally, lovers. The terrorists follow through with their plans and the story fast forwards to 8 years later, where the terrorist leader has been captured and claims there was a mole within their Vienna CIA group who aided him to carry out the attack. Henry is assigned to investigate, reuniting with Celia, who's since married with 2 children. They meet at a fancy but secluded California restaurant where Henry has to semi-interrogate Celia to rule her out as a suspect. Henry has unanswered questions that could make Celia a suspect while Celia has unanswered questions of her own that could make Henry a suspect. The story does enough to hold the audiences attention throughout and Pine and Newton have passable onscreen chemistry; however, once the mole is revealed and their reasoning for doing so, it comes off limp and doesn't hold the shock value the writer or cast I'm sure where hoping for. A decent film that will quickly be forgotten for not bringing much to the table and once again, Amazon Prime offers their audience mediocre entertainment. 5/10
Based on the novel of the same name, the film takes place in 2014 in Vienna, Austria that follows a group of CIA agents stationed there. Turkish Airlines flight 127 has been hijacked and is on the tarmac as the terrorists are threatening to kill everyone onboard unless their demands are met. Henry Pelham (Chris Pine) and Celia Harrison (Thandiwe Newton) professionally are coworkers within the group and unprofessionally, lovers. The terrorists follow through with their plans and the story fast forwards to 8 years later, where the terrorist leader has been captured and claims there was a mole within their Vienna CIA group who aided him to carry out the attack. Henry is assigned to investigate, reuniting with Celia, who's since married with 2 children. They meet at a fancy but secluded California restaurant where Henry has to semi-interrogate Celia to rule her out as a suspect. Henry has unanswered questions that could make Celia a suspect while Celia has unanswered questions of her own that could make Henry a suspect. The story does enough to hold the audiences attention throughout and Pine and Newton have passable onscreen chemistry; however, once the mole is revealed and their reasoning for doing so, it comes off limp and doesn't hold the shock value the writer or cast I'm sure where hoping for. A decent film that will quickly be forgotten for not bringing much to the table and once again, Amazon Prime offers their audience mediocre entertainment. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/01/22 01:19 AM
THE MYSTERY OF MARILYN MONROE: THE UNHEARD TAPES
A new Netflix documentary goes back to the extenuating circumstances surrounding Marilyn Monroe's death. The documentary follows journalist Anthony Summers findings, with previously unreleased recordings from former directors, costars, and cast all commentating about their experiences with Marilyn. Much of the documentary is fluff with her history of growing up as an orphan, her failed marriages, and depression/mental instability before finally revealing her relationship with both John and Bobby Kennedy. This documentary hinges itself on the fact that many of these conversations have never been heard before and while that in itself is rather revealing to hear what her peers thought about her, the conclusion around her mysterious death does nothing to shine a new light on it. An ample film that brings Marilyn back into the forefront with titillating, recorded conversations, but again, does nothing in the end to close the book on her demise. 5.5/10
A new Netflix documentary goes back to the extenuating circumstances surrounding Marilyn Monroe's death. The documentary follows journalist Anthony Summers findings, with previously unreleased recordings from former directors, costars, and cast all commentating about their experiences with Marilyn. Much of the documentary is fluff with her history of growing up as an orphan, her failed marriages, and depression/mental instability before finally revealing her relationship with both John and Bobby Kennedy. This documentary hinges itself on the fact that many of these conversations have never been heard before and while that in itself is rather revealing to hear what her peers thought about her, the conclusion around her mysterious death does nothing to shine a new light on it. An ample film that brings Marilyn back into the forefront with titillating, recorded conversations, but again, does nothing in the end to close the book on her demise. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/06/22 12:47 AM
DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS
Following the events of SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, DOCTOR STRANGE picks right up where we left off, with our fearless hero plagued by nightmares of multiverse travel and the death of a young girl he's never met before. He attends the wedding of his ex-girlfriend Dr. Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams) before being sucked into the story and attempting to find what darkness is floating through the multiverse and causing chaos along its way. Being a lover of these films, but not much of a reader of the comics, I was a little concerned about the multiverse when it was announced. I was afraid the multiple timelines may be difficult to keep up with; however, if anyone else shares those same concerns let me put your mind at ease that the story is very ease to follow. In addition, one of, if not the biggest benefit of the multiverse in my opinion, are the easter eggs and cameo's Marvel's able to have fun and play around with (and yes, there are a few of them). Cumberbatch continues to make it rain as the arrogant but yet suave Dr. Stephen Strange, who I cannot honestly see anyone else playing. I'm thoroughly enjoying the development of Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) post-WANDAVISION. She seems primed to be the next baddie our hero's will need to take down, which makes it all the more tragic as she's a former team member. Finally, it's so wonderful to have director Sam Raimi back directing superheros! This is by far the most scary/horror like film of the MCU but still light enough for the family to enjoy. Overall, this is another solid film from Marvel and although not a tier 1 film, definitely a strong tier 2. 7/10
Following the events of SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, DOCTOR STRANGE picks right up where we left off, with our fearless hero plagued by nightmares of multiverse travel and the death of a young girl he's never met before. He attends the wedding of his ex-girlfriend Dr. Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams) before being sucked into the story and attempting to find what darkness is floating through the multiverse and causing chaos along its way. Being a lover of these films, but not much of a reader of the comics, I was a little concerned about the multiverse when it was announced. I was afraid the multiple timelines may be difficult to keep up with; however, if anyone else shares those same concerns let me put your mind at ease that the story is very ease to follow. In addition, one of, if not the biggest benefit of the multiverse in my opinion, are the easter eggs and cameo's Marvel's able to have fun and play around with (and yes, there are a few of them). Cumberbatch continues to make it rain as the arrogant but yet suave Dr. Stephen Strange, who I cannot honestly see anyone else playing. I'm thoroughly enjoying the development of Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) post-WANDAVISION. She seems primed to be the next baddie our hero's will need to take down, which makes it all the more tragic as she's a former team member. Finally, it's so wonderful to have director Sam Raimi back directing superheros! This is by far the most scary/horror like film of the MCU but still light enough for the family to enjoy. Overall, this is another solid film from Marvel and although not a tier 1 film, definitely a strong tier 2. 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/22 06:14 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE BATMAN
I can't believe as I'm typing this it's been 10 years since Batman's last solo film with the conclusion of Christopher Nolan's trilogy, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. Right off the bat, THE BATMAN is the most gritty, edgy, and dirty I've ever seen Gotham (and I LOVE it!). Sporting a PG-13 rating, this film does push the envelope up against a R without crossing that line. The film follows the Riddler (played marvelously once again by Paul Dano, of who's work I'm a huge fan of), who goes on a killing spree amongst Gotham's most powerful figures. It's a cat-and-mouse game of the Riddler leading Batman on a path of corpses and clues before revealing his grand plan and reasoning behind the chaos in the finale. Director Matt Reeves gives the audience a new take on Batman as this is very much a crime film, much in the same way of David Fincher's 2007 masterpiece ZODIAC (Reeves has also publicly stated the mask of the Riddler was inspired by the Zodiac killer). Robert Pattinson takes a shot as Bruce Wayne/Batman and once again, the naysayers have been proven wrong, as Pattinson is excellent as the caped crusader with his interpretation of the character. The rest of the cast is equally as hard hitting and well rounded with Zoë Kravitz, who also exceeds expectations as iconic villain Catwoman, Jeffrey Wright as Lt. James Gordon, John Turturro as Carmine Falcone, and unrecognizable Collin Farrell as the Penguin. The script is equally solid and smart and I applaud Reeves' use of Nirvana's Something In The Way to open and close the film, as again, it brings home the alternate aspect of the film compared to previous Batman films. This is perhaps the best Batman of all-time or right up there with THE DARK KNIGHT! My only knock against it is you do feel the 2 hours and 55 minute runtime and much like the LORD OF THE RINGS, the film seemed to have multiple endings before it finally does. If maybe 15-20 minutes were cut out, I'd have given this a perfect score. Between this and SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, comic book fans are getting spoiled lately with these groundbreaking films that are going to become harder and harder to top! 9/10
I can't believe as I'm typing this it's been 10 years since Batman's last solo film with the conclusion of Christopher Nolan's trilogy, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. Right off the bat, THE BATMAN is the most gritty, edgy, and dirty I've ever seen Gotham (and I LOVE it!). Sporting a PG-13 rating, this film does push the envelope up against a R without crossing that line. The film follows the Riddler (played marvelously once again by Paul Dano, of who's work I'm a huge fan of), who goes on a killing spree amongst Gotham's most powerful figures. It's a cat-and-mouse game of the Riddler leading Batman on a path of corpses and clues before revealing his grand plan and reasoning behind the chaos in the finale. Director Matt Reeves gives the audience a new take on Batman as this is very much a crime film, much in the same way of David Fincher's 2007 masterpiece ZODIAC (Reeves has also publicly stated the mask of the Riddler was inspired by the Zodiac killer). Robert Pattinson takes a shot as Bruce Wayne/Batman and once again, the naysayers have been proven wrong, as Pattinson is excellent as the caped crusader with his interpretation of the character. The rest of the cast is equally as hard hitting and well rounded with Zoë Kravitz, who also exceeds expectations as iconic villain Catwoman, Jeffrey Wright as Lt. James Gordon, John Turturro as Carmine Falcone, and unrecognizable Collin Farrell as the Penguin. The script is equally solid and smart and I applaud Reeves' use of Nirvana's Something In The Way to open and close the film, as again, it brings home the alternate aspect of the film compared to previous Batman films. This is perhaps the best Batman of all-time or right up there with THE DARK KNIGHT! My only knock against it is you do feel the 2 hours and 55 minute runtime and much like the LORD OF THE RINGS, the film seemed to have multiple endings before it finally does. If maybe 15-20 minutes were cut out, I'd have given this a perfect score. Between this and SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, comic book fans are getting spoiled lately with these groundbreaking films that are going to become harder and harder to top! 9/10
We got it to stream High Rez today, made for a great rainy day.
I agree 100% i12 , great movie…wife enjoyed it too and she a not a huge Marvel. / DC fan, super hero’s in general but their is no denying this movie is well made with a great story line and love how dark it is.
Great review again i12, thank you,
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/22 01:23 AM
Glad you and the Mrs. enjoyed it DP. My favorite movie of the year so far.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/22 02:40 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you and the Mrs. enjoyed it DP. My favorite movie of the year so far.
OMG, we had. All day rain event here and it was a perfect fit.
We loved it and love your reviews she said.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/08/22 03:09 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Glad you and the Mrs. enjoyed it DP. My favorite movie of the year so far.
OMG, we had. All day rain event here and it was a perfect fit.
We loved it and love your reviews she said.
Thanks DP, that makes it all worthwhile!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/13/22 10:19 PM
FIRESTARTER (2022)
A remake of the 1984 film that's based upon the Stephen King novel, FIRESTARTER finds the McGee family (Andy, Vicky, and Charlie) on the run from The Shop, a government agency who ran experiments on Andy and Vicky and who also posse telekinetic powers. Adolescent Charlie is beginning to learn while struggling to control her pyrokinetic powers. The Shop tracks them down via a hired hand, and while Andy and Charlie manage to get away, Vicky is not so lucky. The rest of the story is the duo on the run, with Andy attempting to train Charlie on how to control her gift. Having never read the novel and only recently seeing the original, I preferred the 1984 version over this. I did find the pacing of this superior to the original as this comes in at 94 minutes, while the original dragged in parts and registered with a 114 minute runtime. Other than that, the original still beats this out as this is nothing more than an average film. Nothing stands out after watching this: no performance, special FX, costumes, makeup, directing, etc. The performances of the original are much better as well as 9-year-old Drew Barrymore spins together a terrific performance for an actress her age, over 12-year-old Ryan Kiera Armstrong. Similarly, David Keith is much more warm and loving father to Charlie than Zac Efron, who comes off very cold and callous. And finally, Art Carney is more likeable as Irv Manders than the alcoholic and "overreacting" John Beasley. I didn't enjoy the original too much to be quite honest, but this remake is even worse. Once again, I don't understand the reasoning for even green lighting this project? I will sign off with a final note this is chock full of identity politics and representation points if you're keeping score at home. 5/10
A remake of the 1984 film that's based upon the Stephen King novel, FIRESTARTER finds the McGee family (Andy, Vicky, and Charlie) on the run from The Shop, a government agency who ran experiments on Andy and Vicky and who also posse telekinetic powers. Adolescent Charlie is beginning to learn while struggling to control her pyrokinetic powers. The Shop tracks them down via a hired hand, and while Andy and Charlie manage to get away, Vicky is not so lucky. The rest of the story is the duo on the run, with Andy attempting to train Charlie on how to control her gift. Having never read the novel and only recently seeing the original, I preferred the 1984 version over this. I did find the pacing of this superior to the original as this comes in at 94 minutes, while the original dragged in parts and registered with a 114 minute runtime. Other than that, the original still beats this out as this is nothing more than an average film. Nothing stands out after watching this: no performance, special FX, costumes, makeup, directing, etc. The performances of the original are much better as well as 9-year-old Drew Barrymore spins together a terrific performance for an actress her age, over 12-year-old Ryan Kiera Armstrong. Similarly, David Keith is much more warm and loving father to Charlie than Zac Efron, who comes off very cold and callous. And finally, Art Carney is more likeable as Irv Manders than the alcoholic and "overreacting" John Beasley. I didn't enjoy the original too much to be quite honest, but this remake is even worse. Once again, I don't understand the reasoning for even green lighting this project? I will sign off with a final note this is chock full of identity politics and representation points if you're keeping score at home. 5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/22 01:20 PM
Top Gun: Maverick will be my next movie...
https://www.france24.com/en/culture...uise-jets-into-cannes-for-top-gun-sequel
Tom Cruise touched down in Cannes on Wednesday to launch "Top Gun: Maverick", making his first appearance in three decades at the world's premier film festival and cementing his status as a champion of the big screen.
Cannes waited 30 years for Tom Cruise to return – so a 12-hour wait in the Riviera’s scorching sun was no hassle for Tania Lopez-Palayo, first in line to catch a glimpse of Hollywood’s last great superstar as he hit the red carpet.
When Cruise was last in Cannes for the premiere of the ill-fated "Far and Away" with his then-wife Nicole Kidman, he was just one among many in the Hollywood star system. Thirty years on, he is the only one who can compete with the superhero franchises that now dominate the studios.
In the words of IndieWire, he is “the last Hollywood movie star of his kind – short as ever but still larger-than-life in an age where most famous actors are only as big as their action figures.”
“Tom Cruise has one of the highest success rates in the history of cinema,” Cannes director Thierry Fremaux told reporters. “This is someone that we haven't seen on streaming platforms, TV series, or doing adverts (…). He is someone who is devoted to cinema. To see Tom Cruise, you have to see a feature film in a cinema theatre.”
https://www.france24.com/en/culture...
Tom Cruise touched down in Cannes on Wednesday to launch "Top Gun: Maverick", making his first appearance in three decades at the world's premier film festival and cementing his status as a champion of the big screen.
Cannes waited 30 years for Tom Cruise to return – so a 12-hour wait in the Riviera’s scorching sun was no hassle for Tania Lopez-Palayo, first in line to catch a glimpse of Hollywood’s last great superstar as he hit the red carpet.
When Cruise was last in Cannes for the premiere of the ill-fated "Far and Away" with his then-wife Nicole Kidman, he was just one among many in the Hollywood star system. Thirty years on, he is the only one who can compete with the superhero franchises that now dominate the studios.
In the words of IndieWire, he is “the last Hollywood movie star of his kind – short as ever but still larger-than-life in an age where most famous actors are only as big as their action figures.”
“Tom Cruise has one of the highest success rates in the history of cinema,” Cannes director Thierry Fremaux told reporters. “This is someone that we haven't seen on streaming platforms, TV series, or doing adverts (…). He is someone who is devoted to cinema. To see Tom Cruise, you have to see a feature film in a cinema theatre.”
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/22 10:45 PM
Mine too. Rewatching the original this weekend and already have my ticket for the sequel next Thursday.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/19/22 11:48 PM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/27/22 01:44 AM
TOP GUN: MAVERICK
Full disclosure, I was against the idea of this movie when it was announced. Sequels to movies 30+ years later have bad track records of being quality and nothing more than a cash grab by the studio. I'm happy to announce that is not the case with TOP GUN: MAVERICK. Taking place 36 years after the original, we find Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell stuck in his career. Too stubborn to retire as this is all he's ever known, yet unpromoted over the decades due to his antics and apathy towards authority. The film opens with Maverick testing a new plane before the funding for his project is pulled. After a successful test, he's called back to Top Gun to train a new generation of fighter pilots, who are undertaking a dangerous mission on foreign land, one with a low probability of success. One of the students is Bradley "Rooster" Bradshaw, son of Maverick's best friend Goose, who doesn't show Maverick the same love and respect his parents did. Maverick has only 3 weeks to train these pilots and in the process, attempts to mend bridges with Rooster. The film does a fantastic job at mixing nostalgia for the older audience members, while still keeping it fresh for the newer ones. Breath-taking aerial footage that puts the audience right into the cockpit and action. Cruise doesn't skip a beat as Maverick, as he's clearly having fun again stepping back into his shoes and cutting up whenever possible. Jennifer Connelly plays a character who's mentioned in the original but never shown as a nice tie-in. Her and Cruise's chemistry steam up the screen and is a healthier one than Maverick's and Charlie's in the original. Looking back, that relationship seemed at times a little unhealthy by today's standards, although it wasn't viewed that way then. Finally, I was very happy to see Val Kilmer brought in and very satisfied with the respect they showed him and accommodated his current limitations. Long live The Iceman! If you loved the original, you're going to love this one as well! 8/10
Full disclosure, I was against the idea of this movie when it was announced. Sequels to movies 30+ years later have bad track records of being quality and nothing more than a cash grab by the studio. I'm happy to announce that is not the case with TOP GUN: MAVERICK. Taking place 36 years after the original, we find Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell stuck in his career. Too stubborn to retire as this is all he's ever known, yet unpromoted over the decades due to his antics and apathy towards authority. The film opens with Maverick testing a new plane before the funding for his project is pulled. After a successful test, he's called back to Top Gun to train a new generation of fighter pilots, who are undertaking a dangerous mission on foreign land, one with a low probability of success. One of the students is Bradley "Rooster" Bradshaw, son of Maverick's best friend Goose, who doesn't show Maverick the same love and respect his parents did. Maverick has only 3 weeks to train these pilots and in the process, attempts to mend bridges with Rooster. The film does a fantastic job at mixing nostalgia for the older audience members, while still keeping it fresh for the newer ones. Breath-taking aerial footage that puts the audience right into the cockpit and action. Cruise doesn't skip a beat as Maverick, as he's clearly having fun again stepping back into his shoes and cutting up whenever possible. Jennifer Connelly plays a character who's mentioned in the original but never shown as a nice tie-in. Her and Cruise's chemistry steam up the screen and is a healthier one than Maverick's and Charlie's in the original. Looking back, that relationship seemed at times a little unhealthy by today's standards, although it wasn't viewed that way then. Finally, I was very happy to see Val Kilmer brought in and very satisfied with the respect they showed him and accommodated his current limitations. Long live The Iceman! If you loved the original, you're going to love this one as well! 8/10
Posted By: blueracing347
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/27/22 08:23 PM
The boy and I got free posters with our tickets. Just when you think it's over. Boom! For all of the fans of the original, there's a sweet surprise!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/22 10:13 PM
2000 MULES
A documentarian investigation into the 2020 election, with particular analysis of key swing states in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, show how rampant illegal voting turned the 2020 election in Joe Biden's favor and how it was ultimately stolen from the American people. Using geofencing technology and previously recorded footage of ballot boxes, there are no doubts that the 2020 election was stolen by the Democratic party. It's not surprising due to the party being so heavily in favor of mail-in balloting during the election, which is more susceptible to voter fraud. They also believe that any form of voting integrity laws are "racist" and "disproportionately effect minorities." Also keep in mind this is the same Democratic party that ran with a wild conspiracy theory for 4 years that the 2016 election was stolen, due to the simple fact, they couldn't process actually losing out to a candidate like Donald Trump. But you may be asking yourself, why haven't you heard more about the 2020 stolen election or seen any proof of voter fraud? It's quite simple really: the same Democratic party and MSM outlets who tried to indoctrinate you that the 2016 election was stolen, choose not to cover the steal of the 2020 election because they achieved their objective by getting Donald Trump illegally out of office. Don't believe me? Watch this film and make your own conclusions only afterwards. 6/10
A documentarian investigation into the 2020 election, with particular analysis of key swing states in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, show how rampant illegal voting turned the 2020 election in Joe Biden's favor and how it was ultimately stolen from the American people. Using geofencing technology and previously recorded footage of ballot boxes, there are no doubts that the 2020 election was stolen by the Democratic party. It's not surprising due to the party being so heavily in favor of mail-in balloting during the election, which is more susceptible to voter fraud. They also believe that any form of voting integrity laws are "racist" and "disproportionately effect minorities." Also keep in mind this is the same Democratic party that ran with a wild conspiracy theory for 4 years that the 2016 election was stolen, due to the simple fact, they couldn't process actually losing out to a candidate like Donald Trump. But you may be asking yourself, why haven't you heard more about the 2020 stolen election or seen any proof of voter fraud? It's quite simple really: the same Democratic party and MSM outlets who tried to indoctrinate you that the 2016 election was stolen, choose not to cover the steal of the 2020 election because they achieved their objective by getting Donald Trump illegally out of office. Don't believe me? Watch this film and make your own conclusions only afterwards. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/30/22 10:35 PM
CHIP 'N DALE: RESCUE RANGERS
I grew up watching the show so I decided to take a flyer on the movie. In some ways it does a good job of blending nostalgia with contemporary, as seen by Chip being a 3D animation and Dale being the more classic cartoon animation. A tongue-in-cheek storyline about rebooting the franchise/getting estranged and former friends Chip and Dale back together, it's about the duo reteaming in order to find their kidnapped friend Monterey Jack. Somewhat self-serving with a plethora of other franchises mixed into it, although not nearly on the level or as heavy handed and pandering as SPACE JAM 2. This film is actually enjoyable in parts and has a couple far and few funny moments. After watching this, I feel only fans of the franchise or younger viewers will enjoy this. 5/10
I grew up watching the show so I decided to take a flyer on the movie. In some ways it does a good job of blending nostalgia with contemporary, as seen by Chip being a 3D animation and Dale being the more classic cartoon animation. A tongue-in-cheek storyline about rebooting the franchise/getting estranged and former friends Chip and Dale back together, it's about the duo reteaming in order to find their kidnapped friend Monterey Jack. Somewhat self-serving with a plethora of other franchises mixed into it, although not nearly on the level or as heavy handed and pandering as SPACE JAM 2. This film is actually enjoyable in parts and has a couple far and few funny moments. After watching this, I feel only fans of the franchise or younger viewers will enjoy this. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/22 01:15 AM
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG 2
Sonic is back but he's not alone as fan favorites Knuckles and Tails join him in this next installment of the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise. Picking up less than a year after the events of the original, Dr. Robotnik is banished to the mushroom planet across our galaxy. Attempting to get back home, Knuckles stumbles upon him and offers his assistance as they're both after Sonic for their own reasons. Meanwhile, Sonic is settling in with his new family Tom (James Marsden) and Maddie Wachowski (Tika Sumpter). During a mid-credit scene during the original film, Tails is introduced, seeking out Sonic to warn him of Knuckles and Robotnik's impending arrival. Before long, Sonic and Tails are teaming up to stop Knuckles and Robotnik from getting their hands on an all powerful emerald that grants the possessor unlimited powers (think of Thanos and the infinity stones). Honestly, I wasn't much of a fan of the original and this was somehow even worse. I passed on seeing this in the theaters so took a chance now that it's available via streaming. I played the video game as a child and as much as I'd like to see this franchise succeed, it just hasn't done it for me. The visual effects are wonderful and at times, bold and beautiful. However, a lot of the jokes here feel forced and fall flat. The only two bright spots are Jim Carrey as Dr. Robotnik as he's his usual quirky, over-the-top, childish villain. The other is Idris Elba whose suave voice work brings depth and at times, humor to his super strong hedgehog Knuckles. The film made bank at the box office so I know a third movie will be made. And even though I'm not excited for it, I'm sure I'll see it at some point. 4/10
Sonic is back but he's not alone as fan favorites Knuckles and Tails join him in this next installment of the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise. Picking up less than a year after the events of the original, Dr. Robotnik is banished to the mushroom planet across our galaxy. Attempting to get back home, Knuckles stumbles upon him and offers his assistance as they're both after Sonic for their own reasons. Meanwhile, Sonic is settling in with his new family Tom (James Marsden) and Maddie Wachowski (Tika Sumpter). During a mid-credit scene during the original film, Tails is introduced, seeking out Sonic to warn him of Knuckles and Robotnik's impending arrival. Before long, Sonic and Tails are teaming up to stop Knuckles and Robotnik from getting their hands on an all powerful emerald that grants the possessor unlimited powers (think of Thanos and the infinity stones). Honestly, I wasn't much of a fan of the original and this was somehow even worse. I passed on seeing this in the theaters so took a chance now that it's available via streaming. I played the video game as a child and as much as I'd like to see this franchise succeed, it just hasn't done it for me. The visual effects are wonderful and at times, bold and beautiful. However, a lot of the jokes here feel forced and fall flat. The only two bright spots are Jim Carrey as Dr. Robotnik as he's his usual quirky, over-the-top, childish villain. The other is Idris Elba whose suave voice work brings depth and at times, humor to his super strong hedgehog Knuckles. The film made bank at the box office so I know a third movie will be made. And even though I'm not excited for it, I'm sure I'll see it at some point. 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/22 03:08 AM
CODA (2021)
Once in a great while, the studios make a feel-good movie that isn't sappy and delivers a meaningful message. That's the case in CODA (Children of Deaf Adults). HS student Ruby Rossi (Emilia Jones in a terrific performance) is the only speaking/hearing member of a family (mother, father, older brother) who run a fishing boat business. They need her as their ttranslator and interface with the business/political world that constantly menaces the family business. She's torn between accepting a singing scholarship to music school and her family's needs. The all manage to work it out, eventually, with histrionics, guilting and love. She did her own singing (excellent) and learned signing. Troy Kotsur, who plays her farther, is deaf and won Best Supporting Actor--the movie was Best Picture.
Once in a great while, the studios make a feel-good movie that isn't sappy and delivers a meaningful message. That's the case in CODA (Children of Deaf Adults). HS student Ruby Rossi (Emilia Jones in a terrific performance) is the only speaking/hearing member of a family (mother, father, older brother) who run a fishing boat business. They need her as their ttranslator and interface with the business/political world that constantly menaces the family business. She's torn between accepting a singing scholarship to music school and her family's needs. The all manage to work it out, eventually, with histrionics, guilting and love. She did her own singing (excellent) and learned signing. Troy Kotsur, who plays her farther, is deaf and won Best Supporting Actor--the movie was Best Picture.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/03/22 11:05 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
FIRESTARTER (2022)
A remake of the 1984 film that's based upon the Stephen King novel, FIRESTARTER finds the McGee family (Andy, Vicky, and Charlie) on the run from The Shop, a government agency who ran experiments on Andy and Vicky and who also posse telekinetic powers. Adolescent Charlie is beginning to learn while struggling to control her pyrokinetic powers. The Shop tracks them down via a hired hand, and while Andy and Charlie manage to get away, Vicky is not so lucky. The rest of the story is the duo on the run, with Andy attempting to train Charlie on how to control her gift. Having never read the novel and only recently seeing the original, I preferred the 1984 version over this. I did find the pacing of this superior to the original as this comes in at 94 minutes, while the original dragged in parts and registered with a 114 minute runtime. Other than that, the original still beats this out as this is nothing more than an average film. Nothing stands out after watching this: no performance, special FX, costumes, makeup, directing, etc. The performances of the original are much better as well as 9-year-old Drew Barrymore spins together a terrific performance for an actress her age, over 12-year-old Ryan Kiera Armstrong. Similarly, David Keith is much more warm and loving father to Charlie than Zac Efron, who comes off very cold and callous. And finally, Art Carney is more likeable as Irv Manders than the alcoholic and "overreacting" John Beasley. I didn't enjoy the original too much to be quite honest, but this remake is even worse. Once again, I don't understand the reasoning for even green lighting this project? I will sign off with a final note this is chock full of identity politics and representation points if you're keeping score at home. 5/10
A remake of the 1984 film that's based upon the Stephen King novel, FIRESTARTER finds the McGee family (Andy, Vicky, and Charlie) on the run from The Shop, a government agency who ran experiments on Andy and Vicky and who also posse telekinetic powers. Adolescent Charlie is beginning to learn while struggling to control her pyrokinetic powers. The Shop tracks them down via a hired hand, and while Andy and Charlie manage to get away, Vicky is not so lucky. The rest of the story is the duo on the run, with Andy attempting to train Charlie on how to control her gift. Having never read the novel and only recently seeing the original, I preferred the 1984 version over this. I did find the pacing of this superior to the original as this comes in at 94 minutes, while the original dragged in parts and registered with a 114 minute runtime. Other than that, the original still beats this out as this is nothing more than an average film. Nothing stands out after watching this: no performance, special FX, costumes, makeup, directing, etc. The performances of the original are much better as well as 9-year-old Drew Barrymore spins together a terrific performance for an actress her age, over 12-year-old Ryan Kiera Armstrong. Similarly, David Keith is much more warm and loving father to Charlie than Zac Efron, who comes off very cold and callous. And finally, Art Carney is more likeable as Irv Manders than the alcoholic and "overreacting" John Beasley. I didn't enjoy the original too much to be quite honest, but this remake is even worse. Once again, I don't understand the reasoning for even green lighting this project? I will sign off with a final note this is chock full of identity politics and representation points if you're keeping score at home. 5/10
Just watched this, agree with your review 100%
I did enjoy the Bullies getting softly abused…she Shuda lit them up.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/22 02:14 AM
The Road to Perdition W/ Tom Hanks ..I know it's old ..but I loved it!!
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/22 02:19 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
The Road to Perdition W/ Tom Hanks ..I know it's old ..but I loved it!!
Now watching the umpteenth time.."Once Upon a Time in Hollywood"....F.....g awesome & funny..always loved Quentin T. ....
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/04/22 08:57 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by hoodlum
The Road to Perdition W/ Tom Hanks ..I know it's old ..but I loved it!!
Now watching the umpteenth time.."Once Upon a Time in Hollywood"....F.....g awesome & funny..always loved Quentin T. ....
Great movie hoodlum. Enjoy it my man!
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/22 05:56 AM
https://www.dailywire.com/news/top-...se-flag-on-tom-cruises-characters-jacket
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Responds To Outcry, Replaces Taiwanese Flag On Tom Cruise’s Character’s Jacket
https://twitter.com/VICE/status/1530307967115055107
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Responds To Outcry, Replaces Taiwanese Flag On Tom Cruise’s Character’s Jacket
https:/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/05/22 09:17 PM
Originally Posted by U talkin' da me ??
https://www.dailywire.com/news/top-...se-flag-on-tom-cruises-characters-jacket
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Responds To Outcry, Replaces Taiwanese Flag On Tom Cruise’s Character’s Jacket
https://twitter.com/VICE/status/1530307967115055107
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Responds To Outcry, Replaces Taiwanese Flag On Tom Cruise’s Character’s Jacket
https:/
Brav f'n O Tom Cruise and company. Stop pandering and bowing to the communist Chinese party for their sweet dollars. Have some pride and I'm glad that they finally found their balls!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/22 12:32 AM
WHAT IS A WOMAN?
This documentary from conservative commentator Matt Walsh asks a very simple question: what is a woman? In seeking out an answer to this most basic of questions, Walsh does a fair and balanced job, garnering opinions from the medical field, academia, athletics, as well as individuals who identity as trans and those who have transitioned away from previously identifying as trans, amongst others. In addition, Walsh travels cross-country between Tennessee, California, New York, Massachusetts and other states as well as traveling to Africa to seek out answers. And yet, through all of this, no one can give him a straight answer. Guests squirm, avoid, deflect, or flat out walk out when any of their beliefs receives the slightest bit of push back, explanation, or clarification. And this is the problem we find ourselves in today as a country, the demise of constructive conversation. No more can two individuals who have opposing viewpoints, civilly discuss why we have our beliefs and why others have theirs. Nowadays you're labeled a sexist, a racist, a bigot, or in this case upon watching the film, a transphobe for simply asking questions. To Matt and the entire team over at The Daily Wire, I applaud their efforts as this is a very thought provoking, and constructed film. I urge more to have the courage, to watch this for yourself, and then form an opinion. 9/10
This documentary from conservative commentator Matt Walsh asks a very simple question: what is a woman? In seeking out an answer to this most basic of questions, Walsh does a fair and balanced job, garnering opinions from the medical field, academia, athletics, as well as individuals who identity as trans and those who have transitioned away from previously identifying as trans, amongst others. In addition, Walsh travels cross-country between Tennessee, California, New York, Massachusetts and other states as well as traveling to Africa to seek out answers. And yet, through all of this, no one can give him a straight answer. Guests squirm, avoid, deflect, or flat out walk out when any of their beliefs receives the slightest bit of push back, explanation, or clarification. And this is the problem we find ourselves in today as a country, the demise of constructive conversation. No more can two individuals who have opposing viewpoints, civilly discuss why we have our beliefs and why others have theirs. Nowadays you're labeled a sexist, a racist, a bigot, or in this case upon watching the film, a transphobe for simply asking questions. To Matt and the entire team over at The Daily Wire, I applaud their efforts as this is a very thought provoking, and constructed film. I urge more to have the courage, to watch this for yourself, and then form an opinion. 9/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/22 12:59 AM
LAMB (2021)
A childless couple, Maria (Noomi Rapace) and Ingvar (Hilmir Snaer Gudnason) operate a sheep farm in a remote area of Iceland. While birthing ewes, they deliver a lamb that strangely catches their attention, and raise it, in a crib in their bedroom as their child. The lamb, who they call Ada, develops human characteristics, and even enchants Ingvar's brother, who shows up unexpectedly. But, there's a price to be paid for this intrusion into nature. I won't say more here.
To call this movie weird would be the understatement of the year. It has an early-Sixties Bergman/Antonioni quality, with spare, haunting scenery, tensions and general going-nowhere direction. Can't say whether or not I liked it, but it held my interest after a slow start.
A childless couple, Maria (Noomi Rapace) and Ingvar (Hilmir Snaer Gudnason) operate a sheep farm in a remote area of Iceland. While birthing ewes, they deliver a lamb that strangely catches their attention, and raise it, in a crib in their bedroom as their child. The lamb, who they call Ada, develops human characteristics, and even enchants Ingvar's brother, who shows up unexpectedly. But, there's a price to be paid for this intrusion into nature. I won't say more here.
To call this movie weird would be the understatement of the year. It has an early-Sixties Bergman/Antonioni quality, with spare, haunting scenery, tensions and general going-nowhere direction. Can't say whether or not I liked it, but it held my interest after a slow start.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/08/22 01:39 AM
Great review Turnbull. I saw this in the theaters and need to rewatch it. A lot to unpack after the initial viewing but I also believed this has a lot of religious themes in it potentially. On my rewatch, need to view it within that lens.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/22 06:46 AM
Went for the full Top Gun: Maverick treatment tonight. Dinner at Applebee's, and AMC full recliner leather seats.
The jet scenes, and there are many, are very intense. There are many heroic actions in this movie. There were emotional moments, and, many belly laughs as well. One scene in particular that was emotional, was the scene at a funeral, where a folded American flag, and a salute with rifles were presented.
The memorable music for me, was the Kenny Loggins song "Danger Zone," David Bowie's "Let's Dance," and The Who's "Won't Get Fooled Again."
"Don't think ... Use The Force Pete!!"
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/22 07:12 AM
Thanks, Irishman, : If you do see it again, please post a review.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/22 10:24 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Thanks, Irishman, : If you do see it again, please post a review.
Will do!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/12/22 08:24 PM
HUSTLE
Adam Sandler gives another wonderful performance as Philadelphia 76ers scout Stanley Sugerman. Burnt out from scouting talent around the world and wanting to spend more time with his family, Stanley is promised his dream job of becoming an assistant coach in the NBA by 76ers owner Rex Merrick (Robert Duvall). However, Rex soon passes after making his promise and his son Vince (Ben Foster) takes over the day-to-day operations of the team and promises Stanley his coaching position if he can scout and sign the missing piece they need in order to win a NBA championship. Stanley finds his unicorn in Spain by the name of Bo Cruz (Juancho Hernangomez). However, having a criminal pass and being easy to manipulate mentally, Cruz struggles in various showcases, until Stanley can convince his best friend and NBA player agent Leon (Kenny Smith) to allow Bo to play in a pickup game in the Bronx with various scouts in attendance. A modern-day Rocky story that fails to deliver the same emotional punch with its underdog story of poverty and going up against the odds. Sandler once again spins a masterful performance as Stanley, a former college star who's career was suddenly halted due to an injury he sustained. Still driven by a passion for the game, he sacrifices everything from time away from his family to financial resources in order to reach his goal of coaching in the NBA. Plenty of NBA stars both past and present are here to validate the story (which LeBron James was a producer on). Overall, a decent way to spend 2 hours and Sandler's best performance since UNCUT GEMS but overall, this will be forgotten within a few weeks of its release. 6/10
Adam Sandler gives another wonderful performance as Philadelphia 76ers scout Stanley Sugerman. Burnt out from scouting talent around the world and wanting to spend more time with his family, Stanley is promised his dream job of becoming an assistant coach in the NBA by 76ers owner Rex Merrick (Robert Duvall). However, Rex soon passes after making his promise and his son Vince (Ben Foster) takes over the day-to-day operations of the team and promises Stanley his coaching position if he can scout and sign the missing piece they need in order to win a NBA championship. Stanley finds his unicorn in Spain by the name of Bo Cruz (Juancho Hernangomez). However, having a criminal pass and being easy to manipulate mentally, Cruz struggles in various showcases, until Stanley can convince his best friend and NBA player agent Leon (Kenny Smith) to allow Bo to play in a pickup game in the Bronx with various scouts in attendance. A modern-day Rocky story that fails to deliver the same emotional punch with its underdog story of poverty and going up against the odds. Sandler once again spins a masterful performance as Stanley, a former college star who's career was suddenly halted due to an injury he sustained. Still driven by a passion for the game, he sacrifices everything from time away from his family to financial resources in order to reach his goal of coaching in the NBA. Plenty of NBA stars both past and present are here to validate the story (which LeBron James was a producer on). Overall, a decent way to spend 2 hours and Sandler's best performance since UNCUT GEMS but overall, this will be forgotten within a few weeks of its release. 6/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/20/22 09:51 PM
Fallen (1998) with Denzel Washington is an underrated and forgotten movie. James Gandolfini, John Goodman, Donald Sutherland and Elias Koteas make up the rest of the cast.
Washington stars as a detective investigating a string of murders linked to a serial killer who was put to death at the start of the movie.
Supernatural crime thriller with a unique premise which involves a Rolling Stones song in several memorably edited scenes.
Washington stars as a detective investigating a string of murders linked to a serial killer who was put to death at the start of the movie.
Supernatural crime thriller with a unique premise which involves a Rolling Stones song in several memorably edited scenes.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/24/22 02:21 AM
THE BLACK PHONE
Taking place in North Denver, 1978, THE BLACK PHONE stars siblings Finney (Mason Thames) and Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) with a serial killer on the loose who is abducting and killing young children. The media dubs him The Grabber, who's played by first-time villain, Ethan Hawke. The story is well paced but does open up with a few children being abducted, in order to build young Finney's fear of this boogeyman, as he soon becomes The Grabber's next victim. There is an old out-of-order rotary phone in the basement where he's being held; however, he somehow receives calls on it from other deceased victims of The Grabber and they assist Finney in his escape, giving him clues of how he can possibly break out that they previously tried. Finney's younger sister Gwen has a somewhat clairvoyant gift where sometimes her dreams are actually visions, a trait that was passed onto her by her recently deceased mother and is being raised by an alcoholic father, who wants her to believe her dreams aren't real in order to save her from a fate similar to her mother's. Doing any and everything within her power to save her older brother, Gwen ignores her father's protest and assists the police in their investigation. As much as I loved Hawke's first step over to the dark side (and he is very enjoyable in this), the children surprisingly are the real stars here. Foul-mouthed and stubborn, they remind you very much of the kids from IT. Both carry themselves extremely mature for such young actors (Mason being only 15 and Madeleine 14). However, their chemistry, affection, and bond truly pulls at your heartstrings throughout the film; especially since neither of them has the same type of relationship with their father, so they confide in each other. A wonderful film that I cannot wait to see again! Director and writer Scott Derrickson deserves a lot of credit and this is his best film to date. 9/10
Taking place in North Denver, 1978, THE BLACK PHONE stars siblings Finney (Mason Thames) and Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) with a serial killer on the loose who is abducting and killing young children. The media dubs him The Grabber, who's played by first-time villain, Ethan Hawke. The story is well paced but does open up with a few children being abducted, in order to build young Finney's fear of this boogeyman, as he soon becomes The Grabber's next victim. There is an old out-of-order rotary phone in the basement where he's being held; however, he somehow receives calls on it from other deceased victims of The Grabber and they assist Finney in his escape, giving him clues of how he can possibly break out that they previously tried. Finney's younger sister Gwen has a somewhat clairvoyant gift where sometimes her dreams are actually visions, a trait that was passed onto her by her recently deceased mother and is being raised by an alcoholic father, who wants her to believe her dreams aren't real in order to save her from a fate similar to her mother's. Doing any and everything within her power to save her older brother, Gwen ignores her father's protest and assists the police in their investigation. As much as I loved Hawke's first step over to the dark side (and he is very enjoyable in this), the children surprisingly are the real stars here. Foul-mouthed and stubborn, they remind you very much of the kids from IT. Both carry themselves extremely mature for such young actors (Mason being only 15 and Madeleine 14). However, their chemistry, affection, and bond truly pulls at your heartstrings throughout the film; especially since neither of them has the same type of relationship with their father, so they confide in each other. A wonderful film that I cannot wait to see again! Director and writer Scott Derrickson deserves a lot of credit and this is his best film to date. 9/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/24/22 10:35 PM
ELVIS
Austin Butler turns in a terrific and I daresay Oscar-nominated worthy performance as The King himself, while veteran Tom Hanks fully supports him as the stars controversial manager Colonel Tom Parker. The film is told from Parker's POV, listing the many labels that have been placed upon him over the decades and I believe writer and director Baz Luhrmann did that intentionally to leave it up to the audience to decide his place in history. Even with a runtime of 159 minutes, it's a difficult task to compress the life and legacy of Elvis Presley within that time frame. Unfortunately, like many biopics made about musicians, they hit all of the major points audiences are familiar with while showing only a peak behind the scenes. Elvis' drug use and womanizing are here but only in bits. The film plays as a tragedy as the first rock 'n roll star the world has ever seen is overworked and sucked dry by Parker and family members. A good but not great film and honestly upon leaving the theater, I was a little disappointed. Had a lot of promise and the trailer piqued my interest but ultimately, the final product didn't deliver. 6/10
Austin Butler turns in a terrific and I daresay Oscar-nominated worthy performance as The King himself, while veteran Tom Hanks fully supports him as the stars controversial manager Colonel Tom Parker. The film is told from Parker's POV, listing the many labels that have been placed upon him over the decades and I believe writer and director Baz Luhrmann did that intentionally to leave it up to the audience to decide his place in history. Even with a runtime of 159 minutes, it's a difficult task to compress the life and legacy of Elvis Presley within that time frame. Unfortunately, like many biopics made about musicians, they hit all of the major points audiences are familiar with while showing only a peak behind the scenes. Elvis' drug use and womanizing are here but only in bits. The film plays as a tragedy as the first rock 'n roll star the world has ever seen is overworked and sucked dry by Parker and family members. A good but not great film and honestly upon leaving the theater, I was a little disappointed. Had a lot of promise and the trailer piqued my interest but ultimately, the final product didn't deliver. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/22 12:39 AM
I just read all your reviews to my Wife, we really enjoy them and always look forward to sharing them when we get our movie binge on.
She is so excited to see ELVIS and even more so to see THE BLACK PHONE, after me reading your reviews.
Thanks for keeping these current and sharing with us all.
Thank you i12
We appreciate you.
She is so excited to see ELVIS and even more so to see THE BLACK PHONE, after me reading your reviews.
Thanks for keeping these current and sharing with us all.
Thank you i12
We appreciate you.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/02/22 01:17 AM
Thanks DP. Would love to hear your thoughts on any movies I've reviewed.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/04/22 09:53 PM
TERROR ON THE PRAIRIE
Montana, post-Civil war, finds the McAllister family (Jeb, Hattie, Will, and baby) struggling to make ends meet on their slice of Americana (having to borrow credit from the local grocery store in order to feed the family). One day while Jeb rides into town in order to find work, a gang of outlaws arrive on their property led by the silver-tongued, Bible spouting leader The Captain (Nick Searcy). Hattie (Gina Carano) is in charge while her husbands away and graciously offers the outlaws water and breakfast. While collecting eggs she discovers the true nature of this gangs intent and upon serving breakfast, forcefully requests they leave at gunpoint. The gang instead squats on their land, attempting to force Hattie and her children from their home in order to take them as hostages upon Jeb's arrival. What seems as a random sequence of events soon proves otherwise, as there's an ulterior motive for the outlaws visit onto their property. Gina Caraon's first role since being unjustly fired from role as Cara Dune in THE MANDALORIAN, I applaud The Daily Wire for picking up such a talent and putting her gifts to use. Based upon her own husbands description as being the toughest woman in the territory, it's not a stretch in the slightest for the audience to agree with that statement giving Gina's MMA background and prior Hollywood roles. She handles her own within the time period, spending time as both mother & protector. In addition to Carano, Nick Searcy deserves just as much credit here as the villain. He's a devilishly southern gentleman who charms his victims into obedience before striking. He's sinister, diabolical, and enjoyable all at the same time. Another hit from The Daily Wire that continues to give minority voices a platform and I eagerly anticipate Gina and TDW's next collaboration in WHITE KNUCKLE. 6.5/10
Montana, post-Civil war, finds the McAllister family (Jeb, Hattie, Will, and baby) struggling to make ends meet on their slice of Americana (having to borrow credit from the local grocery store in order to feed the family). One day while Jeb rides into town in order to find work, a gang of outlaws arrive on their property led by the silver-tongued, Bible spouting leader The Captain (Nick Searcy). Hattie (Gina Carano) is in charge while her husbands away and graciously offers the outlaws water and breakfast. While collecting eggs she discovers the true nature of this gangs intent and upon serving breakfast, forcefully requests they leave at gunpoint. The gang instead squats on their land, attempting to force Hattie and her children from their home in order to take them as hostages upon Jeb's arrival. What seems as a random sequence of events soon proves otherwise, as there's an ulterior motive for the outlaws visit onto their property. Gina Caraon's first role since being unjustly fired from role as Cara Dune in THE MANDALORIAN, I applaud The Daily Wire for picking up such a talent and putting her gifts to use. Based upon her own husbands description as being the toughest woman in the territory, it's not a stretch in the slightest for the audience to agree with that statement giving Gina's MMA background and prior Hollywood roles. She handles her own within the time period, spending time as both mother & protector. In addition to Carano, Nick Searcy deserves just as much credit here as the villain. He's a devilishly southern gentleman who charms his victims into obedience before striking. He's sinister, diabolical, and enjoyable all at the same time. Another hit from The Daily Wire that continues to give minority voices a platform and I eagerly anticipate Gina and TDW's next collaboration in WHITE KNUCKLE. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/06/22 12:51 AM
MEN
The film opens in London with our main character Harper (played wonderfully by Jessie Buckley); however, the next scene and the rest of the film takes place in the English countryside of Cotson, which is about 4 hours from London. Over the course of the film, we discover Harper has left London in order to have time to grieve and heal over the recent passing of her husband, whom she informed she'd be beginning divorce proceedings with. Her tranquil 2-week getaway is immediately interrupted by a series of men, each displaying prominent "toxic" male characteristics: there's a naked homeless man, the victim shamer, the good guy/protector, the cop who doesn't believe her many pleas, as well as her manipulative husband. All of these characters with the exception of the husband are all played by the same actor Rory Kinnear, who does a fantastic job flexing his range. There is a richness of ambiguity and imagery here left for the audience to devour, which is par for the course for writer/director Alex Garland, who also brought us EX-MACHINA and ANNIHILATION previously. And this doesn't even take into account the third act, which will leave the audience scratching their heads when the credits roll. A lot of questions are raised here with Garland I believe, posing them to the audience. This is a film where I don't believe there's a right or wrong answer but rather based upon interpretation. A24 is the only studio I will consistently take a chance on as they continue to challenge and expand cinema with their arthouse, original, and anti-formuliac films. 6/10
The film opens in London with our main character Harper (played wonderfully by Jessie Buckley); however, the next scene and the rest of the film takes place in the English countryside of Cotson, which is about 4 hours from London. Over the course of the film, we discover Harper has left London in order to have time to grieve and heal over the recent passing of her husband, whom she informed she'd be beginning divorce proceedings with. Her tranquil 2-week getaway is immediately interrupted by a series of men, each displaying prominent "toxic" male characteristics: there's a naked homeless man, the victim shamer, the good guy/protector, the cop who doesn't believe her many pleas, as well as her manipulative husband. All of these characters with the exception of the husband are all played by the same actor Rory Kinnear, who does a fantastic job flexing his range. There is a richness of ambiguity and imagery here left for the audience to devour, which is par for the course for writer/director Alex Garland, who also brought us EX-MACHINA and ANNIHILATION previously. And this doesn't even take into account the third act, which will leave the audience scratching their heads when the credits roll. A lot of questions are raised here with Garland I believe, posing them to the audience. This is a film where I don't believe there's a right or wrong answer but rather based upon interpretation. A24 is the only studio I will consistently take a chance on as they continue to challenge and expand cinema with their arthouse, original, and anti-formuliac films. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/08/22 01:35 AM
THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER
The first star in the MCU to outlast a trilogy, THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER returns Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson), and Korg (also writer/director Taika Waititi). Originally, I was against this film as I felt a 4th entry was going back to the well one too many times and they were attempting to capitalize on the success of RAGNAROK. And in a lot of ways, it does and doesn't live up to the prior film in those regards; however, I was wrong about being against the film being made as the story is a powerful one to be told and reintroduces Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) to the franchise. Having not been seen in the MCU in 9 years since THOR: THE DARK WORLD, the story follows Foster who's been diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. Left with few options, she seeks out Mjölnir in an attempt to save her as she reads over an old viking book stating the person who wields the hammer with gain great health. Thor meanwhile is still hanging with the Guardians of the Galaxy until they split off to assist those in need (Thor being called to track down Gorr the god Butcher, who's attacked Sif). During a fight in New Asgard, Jane and Thor's paths cross and the rest of the film is them attempting to reestablish their relationship, with simultaneously rescuing the children of New Asgard who have been taken hostage by Gorr. Once again, the film tries to recreate the same magic of RAGNAROK but is nowhere near as funny even though it struggles to be. And Thor once again is more of a "rock star" as many rock and a few choice Guns 'N Roses songs give the audience tunes to bounce to throughout. The real star here is Christian Bale as he is downright terrifying at times in full costume and in character. He's a man who's in pain due to an earlier loss he continues to carry with him and as such, has made it his mission to kill gods with his Necrosword. My second favorite aspect of the film is Russell Crowe's interpretation of Zeus. Loved his accent, his mannerisms, and the energy he brought to the role. Another satisfying entry into the MCU that'll make plenty of dollars at the box office and second best Thor film of the franchise behind RAGNAROK. 7/10
The first star in the MCU to outlast a trilogy, THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER returns Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson), and Korg (also writer/director Taika Waititi). Originally, I was against this film as I felt a 4th entry was going back to the well one too many times and they were attempting to capitalize on the success of RAGNAROK. And in a lot of ways, it does and doesn't live up to the prior film in those regards; however, I was wrong about being against the film being made as the story is a powerful one to be told and reintroduces Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) to the franchise. Having not been seen in the MCU in 9 years since THOR: THE DARK WORLD, the story follows Foster who's been diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. Left with few options, she seeks out Mjölnir in an attempt to save her as she reads over an old viking book stating the person who wields the hammer with gain great health. Thor meanwhile is still hanging with the Guardians of the Galaxy until they split off to assist those in need (Thor being called to track down Gorr the god Butcher, who's attacked Sif). During a fight in New Asgard, Jane and Thor's paths cross and the rest of the film is them attempting to reestablish their relationship, with simultaneously rescuing the children of New Asgard who have been taken hostage by Gorr. Once again, the film tries to recreate the same magic of RAGNAROK but is nowhere near as funny even though it struggles to be. And Thor once again is more of a "rock star" as many rock and a few choice Guns 'N Roses songs give the audience tunes to bounce to throughout. The real star here is Christian Bale as he is downright terrifying at times in full costume and in character. He's a man who's in pain due to an earlier loss he continues to carry with him and as such, has made it his mission to kill gods with his Necrosword. My second favorite aspect of the film is Russell Crowe's interpretation of Zeus. Loved his accent, his mannerisms, and the energy he brought to the role. Another satisfying entry into the MCU that'll make plenty of dollars at the box office and second best Thor film of the franchise behind RAGNAROK. 7/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/22 06:31 AM
The Black Phone is well made. It is worth the price. I honestly believe it is going to be one of the top 5 movies of the year.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/22 07:51 PM
Elvis: Aloha from Hawaii (1973)
This concert film was made four years before his death. The King looked great: he wasn't fat, ,his face was smooth, and his eyes only a bit drug-glazed, The TCB band and the chorus, directed by the immortal James Burton, was in peak form. Can't say the same for Elvis's voice, which sometimes warbled and wavered in the higher registers, though the lower ones were strong. He didn't move quite as much or as easily as when he was younger, but there is no doubt from this film that the audience was in the hands of the Master Entertainer, still able to work his unique magic effortlessly. Very entertaining.
This concert film was made four years before his death. The King looked great: he wasn't fat, ,his face was smooth, and his eyes only a bit drug-glazed, The TCB band and the chorus, directed by the immortal James Burton, was in peak form. Can't say the same for Elvis's voice, which sometimes warbled and wavered in the higher registers, though the lower ones were strong. He didn't move quite as much or as easily as when he was younger, but there is no doubt from this film that the audience was in the hands of the Master Entertainer, still able to work his unique magic effortlessly. Very entertaining.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/10/22 10:31 PM
FATHER STU
Montana amateur boxer Stuart Long (Mark Wahlberg) has his career cut unexpectedly short due to jaw surgery. Needing to find a new way to support himself, he decides to move to LA in an attempt to break into Hollywood. However, like so many others, he goes relatively undiscovered with the exception of a few TV commercials but has to make ends meet working in the deli of a local supermarket. One day, he spots a beautiful woman by the name of Carmen (Teresa Ruiz) and attempts to ask her out while risking his job. When put to an ultimatum by his boss to get back to work, he gives up his pursuit until one day he asks a fellow coworker about the young woman he saw and the coworker points him in the direction of a flyer she asked to be posted in the supermarket about the Catholic church she attends. An atheist, Stuart attends mass in order to again speak to and ask out Carmen. Being raised in a traditional and conservative household, Carmen advises him her parents would forbid her from dating anyone who denies Christ. In order to gain her parents approval rather than a religious awakening, Stuart decides to get baptized as a Catholic. Once they've begun dating, Stuart gets into a near-death accident while riding his motorcycle. After waking up from his coma and having been visiting by the blessed Virgin Mary, Stuart decides to dedicate his life to God. While not being taken seriously by anyone, Stuart uses the tenacity that made him a great boxer to fight for his right and passion to be a priest. We're being indoctrinated today to believe that "representation is important." And while I believe a lot of it is nothing more than gas lighting, it is refreshing to see the pendulum swing the other way as conservative and Christian voices have been silenced for far too long in the pop culture sphere. And yes, while I am proud and practicing Catholic and I'm happy to see my religion represented onscreen, the film as a whole doesn't work for me until the final tear jerking third act. The film at times moves at a rapid pace and it's somewhat hard to buy into Stuart as he's a foul-mouthed, womanizer. Which I fully understand is what the crew was going for to make his transition to the priesthood all the more powerful, but again, it took me longer than I would have liked to be invested in this character and story. Wahlberg does a great job with his portrayal, again, especially in the closing scenes that really pull at the audiences heartstrings. Mel Gibson and Jacki Weaver support him as his parent Bill and Kathleen respectively who have very little redeeming qualities until the end. Bill, an alcoholic who blames Stuart for the death of their other child, who passed when he was 6 and Kathleen who doesn't support her son at all and tries to talk him out of his dream on multiple occasions. While this film overall missed the mark for me, I hope these types of stories will continue to be told as their is an audience for them. Don't believe me? Look no further than THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. 5.5/10
Montana amateur boxer Stuart Long (Mark Wahlberg) has his career cut unexpectedly short due to jaw surgery. Needing to find a new way to support himself, he decides to move to LA in an attempt to break into Hollywood. However, like so many others, he goes relatively undiscovered with the exception of a few TV commercials but has to make ends meet working in the deli of a local supermarket. One day, he spots a beautiful woman by the name of Carmen (Teresa Ruiz) and attempts to ask her out while risking his job. When put to an ultimatum by his boss to get back to work, he gives up his pursuit until one day he asks a fellow coworker about the young woman he saw and the coworker points him in the direction of a flyer she asked to be posted in the supermarket about the Catholic church she attends. An atheist, Stuart attends mass in order to again speak to and ask out Carmen. Being raised in a traditional and conservative household, Carmen advises him her parents would forbid her from dating anyone who denies Christ. In order to gain her parents approval rather than a religious awakening, Stuart decides to get baptized as a Catholic. Once they've begun dating, Stuart gets into a near-death accident while riding his motorcycle. After waking up from his coma and having been visiting by the blessed Virgin Mary, Stuart decides to dedicate his life to God. While not being taken seriously by anyone, Stuart uses the tenacity that made him a great boxer to fight for his right and passion to be a priest. We're being indoctrinated today to believe that "representation is important." And while I believe a lot of it is nothing more than gas lighting, it is refreshing to see the pendulum swing the other way as conservative and Christian voices have been silenced for far too long in the pop culture sphere. And yes, while I am proud and practicing Catholic and I'm happy to see my religion represented onscreen, the film as a whole doesn't work for me until the final tear jerking third act. The film at times moves at a rapid pace and it's somewhat hard to buy into Stuart as he's a foul-mouthed, womanizer. Which I fully understand is what the crew was going for to make his transition to the priesthood all the more powerful, but again, it took me longer than I would have liked to be invested in this character and story. Wahlberg does a great job with his portrayal, again, especially in the closing scenes that really pull at the audiences heartstrings. Mel Gibson and Jacki Weaver support him as his parent Bill and Kathleen respectively who have very little redeeming qualities until the end. Bill, an alcoholic who blames Stuart for the death of their other child, who passed when he was 6 and Kathleen who doesn't support her son at all and tries to talk him out of his dream on multiple occasions. While this film overall missed the mark for me, I hope these types of stories will continue to be told as their is an audience for them. Don't believe me? Look no further than THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. 5.5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/11/22 03:16 AM
"Candy" w/ Heath Ledger & Abby Cornish....Like I said b4 in this thread...I can't break down plots like I 12 ..but they happen on addiction & r in mad love , ,but f,,cked up predicaments get them into all kinds of disturbing ailments & situations....just watch please , the great movie that it is....we (my wife actually) found it on amazon prime???...is that an actual channel?..Please find & watch..ul b happy I told u so.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/13/22 08:26 PM
BELLE DE JOUR (1967)
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/22 04:43 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BELLE DE JOUR (1967)
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
She was still stunning 16 yrs. later in "The Hunger" w/ David Bowie & Susan Sarandon.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/22 01:06 AM
THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/22 08:10 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BELLE DE JOUR (1967)
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
Severine Serizy (Catherine Deneuve) is married to a well-to-do, kindly doctor but can't be intimate with him. She has occasional sadomasochistic fantasies instead. A friend (Michel Piccoli), who seems to be a professional libertine, starts a discussion with the couple and gives her a business card from a discrete, high-end brothel. She visits and signs on as an afternoon worker (hence Belle de Jour). There she makes it with a variety of yahoos, perverts and other colorful characters, including a violent young gangster who falls for her and shoots her husband. Since Louis Bunuel directed, the film has many surreal elements, not all of which work. But, Deneuve is superb--her best-ever role--and her detached, enigmatic portrayal of Severine adds to the overall mysterious feeling. The movie is beautifully filmed, but not as stunningly beautiful as Deneuve (who still looks great from the photos I see in Paris-Match).
She was still stunning 16 yrs. later in "The Hunger" w/ David Bowie & Susan Sarandon.
Drop-dead elegant! Watched it last night. Crazy story, but I couldn't keep my eyes off Deneuve.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/22 08:22 PM
]MILLER'S CROSSING] (1990)
Tom Reagan (Gabriel Byrne) is right-hand man to Prohibition-era mob boss Leo O'Bannion (Albert Finney), who's being challenged by Johnny Caspar (Jon Polito), up-and-coming Italian gang leader. Their "rumpus" is over Bernie Bernbaum (John Turturro), a sniveling but dangerous bookie who's cheating Caspar but is protected by Leo. Tom's at odds with his boss, Leo, and he's also having an affair with Verna (Marcia Gay Hardin), who's Leo's mistress and Bernie's sister. Somehow Tom has to maneuver himself through this mess and stay alive. Right away you know that this is a Coen brothers movie--the thuggery combined with near-comical bizarre scenes and dialog, along the lines of "Barton Fink" and "The Man Who Wasn't There." I didn't much care for the plot, but the acting makes it well worth watching. Finney is magnificent--tough but often hapless when dealing with Tom and Verna. But the movie belongs to the inimitable Polito, whose Johnny Caspar is just unforgettable--the embodiment of the Coen's off-the-wall character development.
Tom Reagan (Gabriel Byrne) is right-hand man to Prohibition-era mob boss Leo O'Bannion (Albert Finney), who's being challenged by Johnny Caspar (Jon Polito), up-and-coming Italian gang leader. Their "rumpus" is over Bernie Bernbaum (John Turturro), a sniveling but dangerous bookie who's cheating Caspar but is protected by Leo. Tom's at odds with his boss, Leo, and he's also having an affair with Verna (Marcia Gay Hardin), who's Leo's mistress and Bernie's sister. Somehow Tom has to maneuver himself through this mess and stay alive. Right away you know that this is a Coen brothers movie--the thuggery combined with near-comical bizarre scenes and dialog, along the lines of "Barton Fink" and "The Man Who Wasn't There." I didn't much care for the plot, but the acting makes it well worth watching. Finney is magnificent--tough but often hapless when dealing with Tom and Verna. But the movie belongs to the inimitable Polito, whose Johnny Caspar is just unforgettable--the embodiment of the Coen's off-the-wall character development.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/22 11:21 PM
DUAL (2022)
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/22 10:08 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DUAL (2022)
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
We just saw this over the weekend…gave it a 3 out of 5 which i believe would be a 6.5 out of a 10 scale.
I really enjoyed it other than the end not really showing actual duel of Sarah and her double. I understand we were to figure out all the details of who was who at the end and other times ( dance training) even Aron Paul was tricked….that was the dupe teaching him dance. Sarah never took dance, the Dupe did.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/22 10:13 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
We gave it another 3/5 which I think equated to a 5 1/2 on your 10 scale.
Did you ever critique in 5 stars or always 10 scale?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/22 11:43 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DUAL (2022)
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
Karen Gillan stars as Sarah, a woman in her mid-20's who's recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness. With a 98% chance of death (the other 2% being a margin of error), Sarah decides to clone or duplicate herself so her family and friends can still live on with her. Although, 10 months later, after the duplicate has spent time with Sarah and is ready to live her own life, the original Sarah learns to her and her doctors surprise, she's somehow and miraculously in remission. No longer in need of her duplicate since she will in fact survive, Sarah begins the process of having her duplicate decommissioned. However, the duplicate under legal protection, petitions for a stay. A stay asks the court that her life be accepted as just as valid to live as the original Sarah's. The only legal resolution is by engaging in a dual to the death between the original Sarah and her duplicate. Once the wheels for this are in motion, both Sarah's have a year to train before their showdown. Gillan does a great job playing both roles of Sarah and the script is well written as a delicious dark-comedy. Aaron Paul stars in a minor supporting role as Trent, the original Sarah's combat trainer. A film that didn't receive a big marketing push or a lot of attention upon it's release but is a gem worth checking out. 7/10
We just saw this over the weekend…gave it a 3 out of 5 which i believe would be a 6.5 out of a 10 scale.
I really enjoyed it other than the end not really showing actual duel of Sarah and her double. I understand we were to figure out all the details of who was who at the end and other times ( dance training) even Aron Paul was tricked….that was the dupe teaching him dance. Sarah never took dance, the Dupe did.
No Sarah took the dancing lessons. Remember on her first session with Trent, he recommends she increases her cardio by dancing, etc?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/18/22 11:44 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
I've always been a Nicolas Cage fan and am so happy he's back with this shot-in-the-arm dose of awesomeness (not that he went anywhere). The film is a tongue-in-cheek homage to some of his previous work while simultaneously working as a film within a film. After deciding to retire from acting and in debt, Cage agrees to attend a birthday party for superfan Javi Gutierrez (Pedro Pascal) in Majorca, Spain for $1 million. However, he's soon approached by two CIA agents, Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) who attempt to convince Cage that Javi is an international arms dealer. Unconvinced, Cage at first agrees to assist the CIA to prove Javi's innocent by downloading sensitive material. However, when the daughter of a Spanish politician is kidnapped and the CIA believes she's hidden somewhere within Javi's compound, Cage ups the ante in order to save the girl if she is indeed being held on the premises. During this time, Cage and Javi's relationship begins to deteriorate with each looking to kill the other. This is an action-comedy that starts out wonderfully but pacing is a problem about two-thirds of the way in. The film opens ridiculously as only Nicolas Cage can do: it's funny and engaging but by the time Cage and Javi attempt to kill each other, the film comes to a screeching halt but does make up for it a bit in the final act. The comradery between Cage and Javi appears genuine both onscreen and off and even with the pacing issues, the film is still a lot of fun. This has been better than some of the other recent independent films Cage has done and if your a fan of his, you're not going to want to miss this one. 6.5/10
We gave it another 3/5 which I think equated to a 5 1/2 on your 10 scale.
Did you ever critique in 5 stars or always 10 scale?
Personally, always 5 here but on the other websites I post my reviews on, they only offer a 5 star rating.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/19/22 03:14 PM
Cool, I think I will watch the last half hour again…… someone came in when we were watching and i may have become confused.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/22 01:47 AM
NOPE
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/22 06:53 AM
THE HUNGER (1983)
Hoodlum's post of a few days ago stimulated me to write a review:
Miriam Blalock (Catherine Deneuve), a 3,000 year-old Egyptian vampire, lives in a lavish, sculpture-filled NYC mansion with her latest husband, John (David Bowie in an excellent performance). She promised him "eternal youth," but he suddenly feels himself ageing by the minute. He barges in on a clinic researching premature ageing and ageing reversal, headed by Dr. Sara Roberts (Susan Sarandon), who dismisses him as a crank. He goes back to the mansion, dies, and Miriam puts him in a box alongside her other "eternally young" previous husbands. Looking for him, Roberts rings the doorbell of the mansion, and Miriam immediately attracts her, leading to a steamy bedroom encounter and their becoming blood sisters. It all comes crashing down at the end.
This movie is all style and no substance--but what style, especially Deneuve. She's not only just as beautiful as she was in "Belle de Jour" 16 years later, she's drop-dead elegant. I watched it twice just to see her again. The gauzy. smoky scenes add a brooding quality that fits. Most of the rest doesn.t.
Hoodlum's post of a few days ago stimulated me to write a review:
Miriam Blalock (Catherine Deneuve), a 3,000 year-old Egyptian vampire, lives in a lavish, sculpture-filled NYC mansion with her latest husband, John (David Bowie in an excellent performance). She promised him "eternal youth," but he suddenly feels himself ageing by the minute. He barges in on a clinic researching premature ageing and ageing reversal, headed by Dr. Sara Roberts (Susan Sarandon), who dismisses him as a crank. He goes back to the mansion, dies, and Miriam puts him in a box alongside her other "eternally young" previous husbands. Looking for him, Roberts rings the doorbell of the mansion, and Miriam immediately attracts her, leading to a steamy bedroom encounter and their becoming blood sisters. It all comes crashing down at the end.
This movie is all style and no substance--but what style, especially Deneuve. She's not only just as beautiful as she was in "Belle de Jour" 16 years later, she's drop-dead elegant. I watched it twice just to see her again. The gauzy. smoky scenes add a brooding quality that fits. Most of the rest doesn.t.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/22 11:40 PM
THE GRAY MAN
Netflix hires on The Russo Brothers along with a star studded cast that includes Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans, Ana de Armas, and Billy Bob Thornton to push a mediocre script. The premise here is Sierra Six (Gosling) is in prison with a lengthy sentence for a murder he committed at a young age. Fitzroy (Thornton) works for the CIA and entices Six to work for them by commuting his sentence. Tasked with exterminating enemies of the state, we then pick up Six on a mission in Bangkok on New Year's. His target is a former operative like himself, Sierra Four, who's gone rogue by downloading sensitive information about their superior and is selling it to the highest bidder. Six follows through on his mission although rather than turning in the sensitive date, he keeps it in order to shed light on the shenanigans that have been going on within the agency. Attempting to tie up all loose ends, his superior enlists Lloyd Hansen (Evans), a prior Sierra himself who was kicked out for his propensity towards violence, torture, and other extreme methods. Now a civilian, Hansen isn't restricted in the ways he was prior working for the government. It was refreshing to see Evans embrace a darker role playing the psychopathic villain with his Freddie Mercury mustache and chic sense of style (even if he only apparently wears smediums the entire film). However, with him famously coming off of his Steve Rogers/Captain America role in the MCU, as an audience member it's hard to buy in to his character as he comes off as very playful but also may be holding back some. The only other character of note is young Claire Fitzroy played by Julia Butters who you may remember from Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD as sassy young actress Trudi. Outside of that, Netflix is banking on the star power to reel in audiences but yet again, once they're there, the film doesn't live up. Action scenes are plenty but jerky and convoluted. Gosling is detached, even though he secretly would do anything to prevent any harm coming to Claire. A decent film but I've seen better from everyone involved. 6/10
Netflix hires on The Russo Brothers along with a star studded cast that includes Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans, Ana de Armas, and Billy Bob Thornton to push a mediocre script. The premise here is Sierra Six (Gosling) is in prison with a lengthy sentence for a murder he committed at a young age. Fitzroy (Thornton) works for the CIA and entices Six to work for them by commuting his sentence. Tasked with exterminating enemies of the state, we then pick up Six on a mission in Bangkok on New Year's. His target is a former operative like himself, Sierra Four, who's gone rogue by downloading sensitive information about their superior and is selling it to the highest bidder. Six follows through on his mission although rather than turning in the sensitive date, he keeps it in order to shed light on the shenanigans that have been going on within the agency. Attempting to tie up all loose ends, his superior enlists Lloyd Hansen (Evans), a prior Sierra himself who was kicked out for his propensity towards violence, torture, and other extreme methods. Now a civilian, Hansen isn't restricted in the ways he was prior working for the government. It was refreshing to see Evans embrace a darker role playing the psychopathic villain with his Freddie Mercury mustache and chic sense of style (even if he only apparently wears smediums the entire film). However, with him famously coming off of his Steve Rogers/Captain America role in the MCU, as an audience member it's hard to buy in to his character as he comes off as very playful but also may be holding back some. The only other character of note is young Claire Fitzroy played by Julia Butters who you may remember from Quentin Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD as sassy young actress Trudi. Outside of that, Netflix is banking on the star power to reel in audiences but yet again, once they're there, the film doesn't live up. Action scenes are plenty but jerky and convoluted. Gosling is detached, even though he secretly would do anything to prevent any harm coming to Claire. A decent film but I've seen better from everyone involved. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/23/22 07:16 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE GRAY MAN
Netflix hires on The Russo Brothers along with a star studded cast that includes Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans, Ana de Armas, and Billy Bob Thornton to push a mediocre script.
Netflix hires on The Russo Brothers along with a star studded cast that includes Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans, Ana de Armas, and Billy Bob Thornton to push a mediocre script.
Says it all, Irishman.
Only thing really good about this movie is Gosling. He was also the only thing good about "Blade Runner 2049," where he had the same detached, almost bemused quality.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/22 02:28 AM
THE SURVIVOR
Based upon the life of Harry Haft, Ben Foster stars as the boxing Auschwitz survivor. Haft was taught how to box to the death by SS guard Dietrich Schneider, for the amusement of the guards. The winner kept their life while the loser had a bullet put through his head. The film is a character study into the traumas of war and PTSD and it's incredibly untenable what the survivors not only had to endure during the war in order to survive, but also the daily nightmares they experienced afterwards. Ben Foster has always been an underrated actor in my opinion, who turns in a passable performance as Haft, who sometimes comes off as gruff, but it's understandable with the knowledge of what he's lived through. He survives the camp to find his one true love in Leah (Dar Zuzovsky). After the war, he desperately seeks any information as to her whereabouts and even calls out soon-to-be heavyweight champion of the world Rocky Marciano (Anthony Molinari) in a desperate attempt to garner attention to his name in hopes she'll read about it. During this time he somewhat befriends/berates Miriam Wofsoniker (Vicky Kriep) who assists him with finding Leah. Years later with an empty feeling inside of him that Leah is dead, much like his family, Harry settles down and starts a family with Miriam. The subject matter is contagious for those with an infinity towards history, as a boxer who learned to fight for his life within the confines of the Auschwitz death camp, who then turns professional in the States and has the opportunity to fight Rocky Marciano. Foster comes off as a damaged man, detached much of the time but also recalls many of the horrors he's survived easily. The trauma the man has endured can never fully be appreciated and the last 15 minutes of the film will rip at your heartstrings. Seeing individuals like this pick up the pieces of their life and move on, only reinforces how trivial the problems we have in modern society today. 5.5/10
Based upon the life of Harry Haft, Ben Foster stars as the boxing Auschwitz survivor. Haft was taught how to box to the death by SS guard Dietrich Schneider, for the amusement of the guards. The winner kept their life while the loser had a bullet put through his head. The film is a character study into the traumas of war and PTSD and it's incredibly untenable what the survivors not only had to endure during the war in order to survive, but also the daily nightmares they experienced afterwards. Ben Foster has always been an underrated actor in my opinion, who turns in a passable performance as Haft, who sometimes comes off as gruff, but it's understandable with the knowledge of what he's lived through. He survives the camp to find his one true love in Leah (Dar Zuzovsky). After the war, he desperately seeks any information as to her whereabouts and even calls out soon-to-be heavyweight champion of the world Rocky Marciano (Anthony Molinari) in a desperate attempt to garner attention to his name in hopes she'll read about it. During this time he somewhat befriends/berates Miriam Wofsoniker (Vicky Kriep) who assists him with finding Leah. Years later with an empty feeling inside of him that Leah is dead, much like his family, Harry settles down and starts a family with Miriam. The subject matter is contagious for those with an infinity towards history, as a boxer who learned to fight for his life within the confines of the Auschwitz death camp, who then turns professional in the States and has the opportunity to fight Rocky Marciano. Foster comes off as a damaged man, detached much of the time but also recalls many of the horrors he's survived easily. The trauma the man has endured can never fully be appreciated and the last 15 minutes of the film will rip at your heartstrings. Seeing individuals like this pick up the pieces of their life and move on, only reinforces how trivial the problems we have in modern society today. 5.5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/22 07:36 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE SURVIVOR
Based upon the life of Harry Haft, Ben Foster stars as the boxing Auschwitz survivor. Haft was taught how to box to the death by SS guard Dietrich Schneider, for the amusement of the guards. The winner kept their life while the loser had a bullet put through his head. The film is a character study into the traumas of war and PTSD and it's incredibly untenable what the survivors not only had to endure during the war in order to survive, but also the daily nightmares they experienced afterwards. Ben Foster has always been an underrated actor in my opinion, who turns in a passable performance as Haft, who sometimes comes off as gruff, but it's understandable with the knowledge of what he's lived through. He survives the camp to find his one true love in Leah (Dar Zuzovsky). After the war, he desperately seeks any information as to her whereabouts and even calls out soon-to-be heavyweight champion of the world Rocky Marciano (Anthony Molinari) in a desperate attempt to garner attention to his name in hopes she'll read about it. During this time he somewhat befriends/berates Miriam Wofsoniker (Vicky Kriep) who assists him with finding Leah. Years later with an empty feeling inside of him that Leah is dead, much like his family, Harry settles down and starts a family with Miriam. The subject matter is contagious for those with an infinity towards history, as a boxer who learned to fight for his life within the confines of the Auschwitz death camp, who then turns professional in the States and has the opportunity to fight Rocky Marciano. Foster comes off as a damaged man, detached much of the time but also recalls many of the horrors he's survived easily. The trauma the man has endured can never fully be appreciated and the last 15 minutes of the film will rip at your heartstrings. Seeing individuals like this pick up the pieces of their life and move on, only reinforces how trivial the problems we have in modern society today. 5.5/10
Based upon the life of Harry Haft, Ben Foster stars as the boxing Auschwitz survivor. Haft was taught how to box to the death by SS guard Dietrich Schneider, for the amusement of the guards. The winner kept their life while the loser had a bullet put through his head. The film is a character study into the traumas of war and PTSD and it's incredibly untenable what the survivors not only had to endure during the war in order to survive, but also the daily nightmares they experienced afterwards. Ben Foster has always been an underrated actor in my opinion, who turns in a passable performance as Haft, who sometimes comes off as gruff, but it's understandable with the knowledge of what he's lived through. He survives the camp to find his one true love in Leah (Dar Zuzovsky). After the war, he desperately seeks any information as to her whereabouts and even calls out soon-to-be heavyweight champion of the world Rocky Marciano (Anthony Molinari) in a desperate attempt to garner attention to his name in hopes she'll read about it. During this time he somewhat befriends/berates Miriam Wofsoniker (Vicky Kriep) who assists him with finding Leah. Years later with an empty feeling inside of him that Leah is dead, much like his family, Harry settles down and starts a family with Miriam. The subject matter is contagious for those with an infinity towards history, as a boxer who learned to fight for his life within the confines of the Auschwitz death camp, who then turns professional in the States and has the opportunity to fight Rocky Marciano. Foster comes off as a damaged man, detached much of the time but also recalls many of the horrors he's survived easily. The trauma the man has endured can never fully be appreciated and the last 15 minutes of the film will rip at your heartstrings. Seeing individuals like this pick up the pieces of their life and move on, only reinforces how trivial the problems we have in modern society today. 5.5/10
Saw it....very good picture I thought...
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/24/22 07:49 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE HUNGER (1983)
Hoodlum's post of a few days ago stimulated me to write a review:
Miriam Blalock (Catherine Deneuve), a 3,000 year-old Egyptian vampire, lives in a lavish, sculpture-filled NYC mansion with her latest husband, John (David Bowie in an excellent performance). She promised him "eternal youth," but he suddenly feels himself ageing by the minute. He barges in on a clinic researching premature ageing and ageing reversal, headed by Dr. Sara Roberts (Susan Sarandon), who dismisses him as a crank. He goes back to the mansion, dies, and Miriam puts him in a box alongside her other "eternally young" previous husbands. Looking for him, Roberts rings the doorbell of the mansion, and Miriam immediately attracts her, leading to a steamy bedroom encounter and their becoming blood sisters. It all comes crashing down at the end.
This movie is all style and no substance--but what style, especially Deneuve. She's not only just as beautiful as she was in "Belle de Jour" 16 years later, she's drop-dead elegant. I watched it twice just to see her again. The gauzy. smoky scenes add a brooding quality that fits. Most of the rest doesn.t.
Hoodlum's post of a few days ago stimulated me to write a review:
Miriam Blalock (Catherine Deneuve), a 3,000 year-old Egyptian vampire, lives in a lavish, sculpture-filled NYC mansion with her latest husband, John (David Bowie in an excellent performance). She promised him "eternal youth," but he suddenly feels himself ageing by the minute. He barges in on a clinic researching premature ageing and ageing reversal, headed by Dr. Sara Roberts (Susan Sarandon), who dismisses him as a crank. He goes back to the mansion, dies, and Miriam puts him in a box alongside her other "eternally young" previous husbands. Looking for him, Roberts rings the doorbell of the mansion, and Miriam immediately attracts her, leading to a steamy bedroom encounter and their becoming blood sisters. It all comes crashing down at the end.
This movie is all style and no substance--but what style, especially Deneuve. She's not only just as beautiful as she was in "Belle de Jour" 16 years later, she's drop-dead elegant. I watched it twice just to see her again. The gauzy. smoky scenes add a brooding quality that fits. Most of the rest doesn.t.
Exactly my thoughts 2 Turnbull...Thanx 4 your expert newspaper like review..u should start a nite career as a full fledged critic..seriously.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/25/22 03:53 PM
Thanks!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/22 08:29 PM
NOT OKAY
Zoey Deutch stars as Danni Sanders, a photo editor who's trying to branch off to be a writer for the magazine she works for, Depravity. A typical Gen Zer who can't go anywhere without her phone and is constantly comparing her life against others on social media. In order to gain the attention of fellow coworker and influencer Colin (played remarkably unlikable by Dylan O'Brien), Danni fakes a trip to Paris by photoshopping herself onto Paris backgrounds. However, within minutes of one of her posts, terrorist bomb multiple sites around the city. Followers and family members believing she's in harms way, Danni becomes a fake victim of the attacks, expanding on the lie to further Colin's new found attention towards her and to transition to being a writer at work. In addition, her social media following blows up (no pun intended) and she's soon thrust into the spotlight, something with which she's privately craved for as well. A social commentary on today's social media celebrities and the lengths individuals will endure to achieve it. Danni does have a conscience and does have moments that make her pause, but ultimately, she continues to ride the gravy train until she's found out and is forced to expose herself as a fraud. The film is mildly interesting but will definitely appeal to a younger crowd. Zoey at times gives a strong performance as irredeemable Danni. However, there's A LOT of virtue signaling within this 100 minute film, especially in regards to the anti-gun agenda as Danni attends a local support group in order to get pointers on how she should be feeling and crosses paths with Rowan (Mia Isaac) who's a survivor of a school shooting (think Emma González of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School) and becomes an outspoken activist. By the end, it's looks like they took Jussie Smollett's story and just tweaked it a bit. 5/10
Zoey Deutch stars as Danni Sanders, a photo editor who's trying to branch off to be a writer for the magazine she works for, Depravity. A typical Gen Zer who can't go anywhere without her phone and is constantly comparing her life against others on social media. In order to gain the attention of fellow coworker and influencer Colin (played remarkably unlikable by Dylan O'Brien), Danni fakes a trip to Paris by photoshopping herself onto Paris backgrounds. However, within minutes of one of her posts, terrorist bomb multiple sites around the city. Followers and family members believing she's in harms way, Danni becomes a fake victim of the attacks, expanding on the lie to further Colin's new found attention towards her and to transition to being a writer at work. In addition, her social media following blows up (no pun intended) and she's soon thrust into the spotlight, something with which she's privately craved for as well. A social commentary on today's social media celebrities and the lengths individuals will endure to achieve it. Danni does have a conscience and does have moments that make her pause, but ultimately, she continues to ride the gravy train until she's found out and is forced to expose herself as a fraud. The film is mildly interesting but will definitely appeal to a younger crowd. Zoey at times gives a strong performance as irredeemable Danni. However, there's A LOT of virtue signaling within this 100 minute film, especially in regards to the anti-gun agenda as Danni attends a local support group in order to get pointers on how she should be feeling and crosses paths with Rowan (Mia Isaac) who's a survivor of a school shooting (think Emma González of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School) and becomes an outspoken activist. By the end, it's looks like they took Jussie Smollett's story and just tweaked it a bit. 5/10
Posted By: Moe_Tilden
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/22 11:08 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NOPE
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Does he ever cast white or other non-black ethnicity actors in leading roles or is the whole shoehorning actors into movies based on their race thing not reciprocal?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/30/22 01:28 AM
Originally Posted by Moe_Tilden
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NOPE
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Writer, producer, and director Jordan Peele is back with his 3rd film. He's rightfully received much praise and admiration for his first two efforts GET OUT and US. GET OUT is a masterpiece and I do need another viewing of US but after seeing it originally, I did not care for it at all and it could not hold a candle to GET OUT in my opinion. After watching NOPE, I can now unfortunately say Jordan Peele is hit-or-miss with me. While I did enjoy this more than US, it again, is nowhere near as good as GET OUT and he could be suffering from the M. Night Shyamalan effect, where his debut was so original and powerful, no other film he does will ever compare to it.
NOPE follows the Haywood family: Otis Sr. (Keith David), OJ or Otis Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya), and Emerald (Keke Palmer). The family owns a horse farm in southern California and the horses are used for TV and film. However, strange occurrences begin to happen as the horses disappear and there's a UFO in the clouds above their house. Broke and with OJ unwilling to sell the family's land, he and Emerald enlist Angel (Brandon Perea) a local Fry's Electronics employee and director Antlers Hoist (Michael Wincott) to capture footage of the UFO to sell. The story works as an original sci-fi/horror piece and reminded me somewhat of John Carpenter's THE THING. It unfolds slowly, with an opening scene that left me wondering if I walked into the wrong theater by mistake but the scene is tied in later in the film. It jumps around and is split into chapters with each title the name of a horse on the farm. It takes place over a 6-month period and during this time OJ begins to learn the habits of the aliens such as what works to avoid being attacked by them but also what's harmful to them. I'm a big fan of Daniel Kaluuya but he appears to be coasting in this film as OJ very rarely shows emotion of any kind and is just matter of fact about everything. The final encounter with the alien will leave you wondering what exactly you're watching as it's somewhat out there. A lot of undertones which audiences have come to expect from Peele but overall, I found this to just be average. 6/10
Does he ever cast white or other non-black ethnicity actors in leading roles or is the whole shoehorning actors into movies based on their race thing not reciprocal?
Non-reciprocal. Remember, white man bad so they can only be the villains.
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/22 11:49 PM
Originally Posted by mustachepete
There's a little Western subchannel called Grit TV that makes it's living off B movies and black-and-white reruns. They've pulled out all the stops this weekend for their 8 pm ET movie: Silverado on Thursday, El Dorado last night, The Magnificent 7 (Edit: sorry, it's True Grit tonight) tonight, and The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Sunday night.
Wow! They have Unforgiven tonight. It was made in the 1990s!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/05/22 12:48 AM
BULLET TRAIN
Back on assignment after a break, Brad Pitt stars as Ladybug, a snatch-and-grab guy who has the worst luck, which at times costs others their lives. His job is simple: board a Japanese bullet train, grab a briefcase containing $10 million dollars, and get off at the first stop. Sounds easy enough, except for the fact 4 assassins are also onboard and looking for the same briefcase, each with their own agenda (Joey King plays Prince, Aaron Taylor-Johnson is Tangerine, Brian Tyree Henry is his non-biological brother Lemon, and Andrew Koji as Kimura). The cast is outstanding, each holding their own and never backing down in order to sell their characters strengths. King continues to impress me with her work and this further advances her cause as she plays the damsel in distress beautifully when needing to get out of a predicament, yet is just a ruthless as the others. Tangerine and Lemon have great banter between them as English mates who grew up together, with Lemon also having an unhealthy obsession with Thomas the Tank for a man his age. A few nice cameos are peppered throughout as well that audiences are sure to enjoy. The film is action packed with some but not an abundance of humor. Having Japan on my bucket list, this film just made the itch that much worse as some of the film is shot in Tokyo in addition to California. The runtime was a little issue for me at 126 minutes as it tended to drag slightly in the second and third acts. A little disappointed I didn't enjoy it more as it's quick to capture your attention, again the cast it outstanding, but the finale was a bit bloated. It's still a fun ride though and a solid B action film. 6/10
Back on assignment after a break, Brad Pitt stars as Ladybug, a snatch-and-grab guy who has the worst luck, which at times costs others their lives. His job is simple: board a Japanese bullet train, grab a briefcase containing $10 million dollars, and get off at the first stop. Sounds easy enough, except for the fact 4 assassins are also onboard and looking for the same briefcase, each with their own agenda (Joey King plays Prince, Aaron Taylor-Johnson is Tangerine, Brian Tyree Henry is his non-biological brother Lemon, and Andrew Koji as Kimura). The cast is outstanding, each holding their own and never backing down in order to sell their characters strengths. King continues to impress me with her work and this further advances her cause as she plays the damsel in distress beautifully when needing to get out of a predicament, yet is just a ruthless as the others. Tangerine and Lemon have great banter between them as English mates who grew up together, with Lemon also having an unhealthy obsession with Thomas the Tank for a man his age. A few nice cameos are peppered throughout as well that audiences are sure to enjoy. The film is action packed with some but not an abundance of humor. Having Japan on my bucket list, this film just made the itch that much worse as some of the film is shot in Tokyo in addition to California. The runtime was a little issue for me at 126 minutes as it tended to drag slightly in the second and third acts. A little disappointed I didn't enjoy it more as it's quick to capture your attention, again the cast it outstanding, but the finale was a bit bloated. It's still a fun ride though and a solid B action film. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/22 07:15 PM
CONTACT (1i997)
Ellie Arroway (Jodi Foster), a young astrophysicist obsessed with finding signs of extra-terrestrial life, finally picks up encrypted communications traced to the star Vega. The discovery sets off a global sensation and construction of a contraption found in the Vega communique that will bring an earthling to the star. Ellie gets the nod by circuitous means, makes a quick, ambiguous stellar trip, is ridiculed because she can't prove it to the politicos, but is happy at the end. This movie is way too lengthy lat 2 1/2 hours and takes a long time to generate any excitement. But once it gets rolling, it has enough action to hold you, even though the climactic moment is a let down. It hangs on thanks to a great performance by Foster--plucky, determined, resilient but always appealing and sympathetic. The all star supporting cast includes Angela Bassett, Matthew McConaughey, David Morse, James Woods, John Hurt and Tom Skerritt.
Ellie Arroway (Jodi Foster), a young astrophysicist obsessed with finding signs of extra-terrestrial life, finally picks up encrypted communications traced to the star Vega. The discovery sets off a global sensation and construction of a contraption found in the Vega communique that will bring an earthling to the star. Ellie gets the nod by circuitous means, makes a quick, ambiguous stellar trip, is ridiculed because she can't prove it to the politicos, but is happy at the end. This movie is way too lengthy lat 2 1/2 hours and takes a long time to generate any excitement. But once it gets rolling, it has enough action to hold you, even though the climactic moment is a let down. It hangs on thanks to a great performance by Foster--plucky, determined, resilient but always appealing and sympathetic. The all star supporting cast includes Angela Bassett, Matthew McConaughey, David Morse, James Woods, John Hurt and Tom Skerritt.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/22 11:13 PM
TED K
A film about Unabomer Ted Kaczynski, Sharlto Copley plays Ted, who is a socially awkward individual, and has retreated to the isolation of Montana to "get away from society." However, he soon feels threatened by the likes of snowmobiles, motorbikes, loggers, and planes passing through or over his property. In order to be left in solitude, he confronts his trespassers by acts of vandalism or in the case of the overhead planes, targets the companies CEO's with mail bombs. Not knowing much about Kaczynski coming in to this film, the story is just as weird as the man himself; however, it doesn't work for me much. Many of the repeated actions take place: Ted's peaceful isolation is broken up by trespassers, Ted either confronts them or plans sending them a bomb to express his frustration that is only known to him, rinse, repeat. No timeline is given whatsoever during his decades long reign of terror. so it's difficult to keep up with how far Kaczynski has lost his grasp on reality. Outside of the strong performance of Copley, this film is rather forgettable, which is unfortunate, considering the subject matter. 5/10
A film about Unabomer Ted Kaczynski, Sharlto Copley plays Ted, who is a socially awkward individual, and has retreated to the isolation of Montana to "get away from society." However, he soon feels threatened by the likes of snowmobiles, motorbikes, loggers, and planes passing through or over his property. In order to be left in solitude, he confronts his trespassers by acts of vandalism or in the case of the overhead planes, targets the companies CEO's with mail bombs. Not knowing much about Kaczynski coming in to this film, the story is just as weird as the man himself; however, it doesn't work for me much. Many of the repeated actions take place: Ted's peaceful isolation is broken up by trespassers, Ted either confronts them or plans sending them a bomb to express his frustration that is only known to him, rinse, repeat. No timeline is given whatsoever during his decades long reign of terror. so it's difficult to keep up with how far Kaczynski has lost his grasp on reality. Outside of the strong performance of Copley, this film is rather forgettable, which is unfortunate, considering the subject matter. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/12/22 09:45 PM
BODIES BODIES BODIES
Set in a New York mansion reminiscent of Professor Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters, 5 rich friends and their current flings host a hurricane party. The home belongs to David's (Pete Davidson) parents so he takes charge and is a druggie, verbally abusive boyfriend to Emma (Chase Sui Wonders). Rounding out the rest of the cast are gay lovers Bee (Maria Bakalova - who is unknown to the group) and Sophie (Amandla Stenberg - a recovering addict), Alice (Rachel Sennott - a no filter blabbermouth) and Greg (Lee Pace - her fling), and solo Jordan (Myha'la Herrold). When the weather starts to turn, they huddle inside to start their Bodies Bodies Bodies game. A live-action game where 1 individual draws an X card and is considered the killer. However, the film soon turns to real life consequences as the party members begin showing up dead and the rest of the party are left to uncover who the killer is. A woke film that actually pokes fun at the stereotypes of the current generation (which is a breath of fresh air from Hollywood), and is not heavy handed or preachy in their message. At times a funny and curious who-dunnit film that has a very surprise ending. Not a genre-shifting film as SCREAM (1996) but an enjoyable and original twist. The star for me was Rachel Sennott as her range was enjoyable from start to finish. Overall this film may not appeal to everyone but I enjoyed the ride, even if at times I was frustrated with who the killer ultimately was until the big reveal. 6.5/10
Set in a New York mansion reminiscent of Professor Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters, 5 rich friends and their current flings host a hurricane party. The home belongs to David's (Pete Davidson) parents so he takes charge and is a druggie, verbally abusive boyfriend to Emma (Chase Sui Wonders). Rounding out the rest of the cast are gay lovers Bee (Maria Bakalova - who is unknown to the group) and Sophie (Amandla Stenberg - a recovering addict), Alice (Rachel Sennott - a no filter blabbermouth) and Greg (Lee Pace - her fling), and solo Jordan (Myha'la Herrold). When the weather starts to turn, they huddle inside to start their Bodies Bodies Bodies game. A live-action game where 1 individual draws an X card and is considered the killer. However, the film soon turns to real life consequences as the party members begin showing up dead and the rest of the party are left to uncover who the killer is. A woke film that actually pokes fun at the stereotypes of the current generation (which is a breath of fresh air from Hollywood), and is not heavy handed or preachy in their message. At times a funny and curious who-dunnit film that has a very surprise ending. Not a genre-shifting film as SCREAM (1996) but an enjoyable and original twist. The star for me was Rachel Sennott as her range was enjoyable from start to finish. Overall this film may not appeal to everyone but I enjoyed the ride, even if at times I was frustrated with who the killer ultimately was until the big reveal. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/12/22 10:04 PM
PREY
Set 300 years ago in 1719 in The Great Plains, the story finds young Naru (Amber Midthunder) trying to prove her hunting worth to her tribe. Unexpectedly, she's able to witness, warn, and ultimately battle the predator from another planet. Honestly, I passed on this film as the trailer did next to nothing for me. However, upon good word-of-mouth, I decided to give it a shot and I'm glad I did as this is the best entry into the Predator franchise since the sequel way back in 1990. Having garnered support from fellow Predator alums Jesse Ventura and Bill Duke, Midthunder is worthy of the praise. An action packed and gory affair, the film has ties to both the original (in the form of Billy) and it's sequel. The predator we've come to know is primitive itself in it's display and shows how's it's also advanced over the centuries. A fun ride for anyone of the franchise. 6/10
Set 300 years ago in 1719 in The Great Plains, the story finds young Naru (Amber Midthunder) trying to prove her hunting worth to her tribe. Unexpectedly, she's able to witness, warn, and ultimately battle the predator from another planet. Honestly, I passed on this film as the trailer did next to nothing for me. However, upon good word-of-mouth, I decided to give it a shot and I'm glad I did as this is the best entry into the Predator franchise since the sequel way back in 1990. Having garnered support from fellow Predator alums Jesse Ventura and Bill Duke, Midthunder is worthy of the praise. An action packed and gory affair, the film has ties to both the original (in the form of Billy) and it's sequel. The predator we've come to know is primitive itself in it's display and shows how's it's also advanced over the centuries. A fun ride for anyone of the franchise. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/14/22 10:10 PM
DAY SHIFT
Jamie Foxx plays Bud Jablonski, a faux pool cleaner who in actuality is a vampire hunter in the San Fernando Valley. Divorced and with the threat of having his 11-year-old daughter (Zion Broadnax as Paige) and ex-wife (Meagan Good as Jocelyn) transported across the country to Florida, Bud has exactly 7 days to come up with $10,000 to pay for his daughters private school tuition and braces in order for Jocelyn to stay. Hunting vampires, pulling, and selling their fangs for profit isn't as lucrative as it seems without a union membership, one in which Bud previously owned but has subsequently been removed from due to multiple union violations. In order to gain it back, he enlists the help of his friend cowboy gunslinger Big John Elliott, who is marvelously played by Snoop Dogg. A condition of his reinstatement is that he's followed at all times on the job by a fellow union member and pencil pusher, Seth (Dave Franco). This is a fun B-action film that brings nothing new to the vampire or action genre other than the main stars are black. A few whoas are spent during the action sequences as they are nicely choreographed. Outside of that, it's a fun ride that'll soon be forgotten. 5.5/10
Jamie Foxx plays Bud Jablonski, a faux pool cleaner who in actuality is a vampire hunter in the San Fernando Valley. Divorced and with the threat of having his 11-year-old daughter (Zion Broadnax as Paige) and ex-wife (Meagan Good as Jocelyn) transported across the country to Florida, Bud has exactly 7 days to come up with $10,000 to pay for his daughters private school tuition and braces in order for Jocelyn to stay. Hunting vampires, pulling, and selling their fangs for profit isn't as lucrative as it seems without a union membership, one in which Bud previously owned but has subsequently been removed from due to multiple union violations. In order to gain it back, he enlists the help of his friend cowboy gunslinger Big John Elliott, who is marvelously played by Snoop Dogg. A condition of his reinstatement is that he's followed at all times on the job by a fellow union member and pencil pusher, Seth (Dave Franco). This is a fun B-action film that brings nothing new to the vampire or action genre other than the main stars are black. A few whoas are spent during the action sequences as they are nicely choreographed. Outside of that, it's a fun ride that'll soon be forgotten. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/21/22 03:01 AM
Great reviews i12 …….thanks.
I figure if you dont place the date as you did in past it means its current and 2022
I figure if you dont place the date as you did in past it means its current and 2022
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/21/22 11:28 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Great reviews i12 …….thanks.
I figure if you dont place the date as you did in past it means its current and 2022
I figure if you dont place the date as you did in past it means its current and 2022
Correct. This thread I only post my reviews of current films either streaming or in theaters. I use the Movies/TV Random Post Whoring for older films.
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
$3 movie tickets for one day, Sat., Sept. 3, 2022 - 08/29/22 05:50 PM
Coming to a theater near you: $3 movie tickets for one day, Saturday, September 3rd, 2022
https://www.nationalcinemaday.org/
https://apnews.com/article/national-cinema-day-tickets-d97d156acb6f8189d2c423bd2bb9ec23
https://www.natoonline.org/wp-conte...Cinema-Day-Press-Release-August-2022.pdf
https://www.nationalcinemaday.org/
https:/
https://www.natoonline.org/wp-conte...
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: $3 movie tickets for one day, Sat., Sept. 3, 2022 - 09/02/22 12:39 AM
FALL
The film opens with married couple Becky (Grace Caroline Currey) and Dan Connor (Mason Gooding) who are along for a mountain climb with their friend Hunter (Virginia Gardner). Suddenly, one of Dan's cables unexpectedly gives way and he plummets to his death. The story picks up specifically 51 weeks later where Becky is still devastated by her husbands untimely death, while avoiding her concerned father (played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan) and abusing alcohol as a coping mechanism. She contemplates suicide by overdosing on pills and booze until she receives a knock on her door from Hunter, who attempts to pull Becky out of her funk by asking her to come along on her next climb (which would be Becky's first since the accident). Initially turning the offer down but reconsidering after sleeping on it, the girls travel 6-hours away to a desert to climb an abandoned 2,000-foot radio tower. They reach the summit without issue, however, Becky's last push off of the ladder loosens a bolt on it. When the women are ready to come down a 200-foot section of the ladder hurdles towards Earth. Unable to get down and without food or water, the women must figure out a way to be rescued before they succumb to the elements. The story gets moving quickly with the women wasting little time getting to the tower and with a film like this, the audience is going to experience some sweaty palms moments. However, the film does drag in certain parts while the women's friendship is dissected and secrets from the past are brought to light. The CGI is spotty in parts and there's obvious dub work as there was a lot more cursing involved. In order to gain the cherished PG-13 rating, the actresses had to voice over some of their lines. A forgettable film with a motivating message that outside of a few heart-pounding moments, falls flat (pun intended). 4.5/10
The film opens with married couple Becky (Grace Caroline Currey) and Dan Connor (Mason Gooding) who are along for a mountain climb with their friend Hunter (Virginia Gardner). Suddenly, one of Dan's cables unexpectedly gives way and he plummets to his death. The story picks up specifically 51 weeks later where Becky is still devastated by her husbands untimely death, while avoiding her concerned father (played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan) and abusing alcohol as a coping mechanism. She contemplates suicide by overdosing on pills and booze until she receives a knock on her door from Hunter, who attempts to pull Becky out of her funk by asking her to come along on her next climb (which would be Becky's first since the accident). Initially turning the offer down but reconsidering after sleeping on it, the girls travel 6-hours away to a desert to climb an abandoned 2,000-foot radio tower. They reach the summit without issue, however, Becky's last push off of the ladder loosens a bolt on it. When the women are ready to come down a 200-foot section of the ladder hurdles towards Earth. Unable to get down and without food or water, the women must figure out a way to be rescued before they succumb to the elements. The story gets moving quickly with the women wasting little time getting to the tower and with a film like this, the audience is going to experience some sweaty palms moments. However, the film does drag in certain parts while the women's friendship is dissected and secrets from the past are brought to light. The CGI is spotty in parts and there's obvious dub work as there was a lot more cursing involved. In order to gain the cherished PG-13 rating, the actresses had to voice over some of their lines. A forgettable film with a motivating message that outside of a few heart-pounding moments, falls flat (pun intended). 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: $3 movie tickets for one day, Sat., Sept. 3, 2022 - 09/03/22 08:32 PM
SAMARITAN
Sylvester Stallone is getting in on the superhero action with an original character based in the fictional city of Granite City. Stallone used to be a hero by the name of Samaritan, who's arch-villain was his twin brother, Nemesis. Both were believed to have died in a fire 20-years ago until Samaritan's teenage neighbor Sam (Javon Walton), who is a huge fan of Samaritan's, believes Stallone survived the fire and is quietly living amongst them. The present day villain to Stallone is Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), whom Sam previously and briefly worked for due to his mother's financial struggles and to keep them from being evicted from their apartment. Cyrus attempts to take over and become the new Nemesis in Granite City, promoting anarchy. Stallone's cover is finally blown when young Sam is bullied and battered by former associates of his and Stallone comes to his rescue. This is a decent B-action film that's built a very gritty and grimy world within Granite City. Although nowhere near on par with Marvel or even a DC film, I wouldn't mind a sequel to this as it is a pleasant enough ride to take. 5.5/10
Sylvester Stallone is getting in on the superhero action with an original character based in the fictional city of Granite City. Stallone used to be a hero by the name of Samaritan, who's arch-villain was his twin brother, Nemesis. Both were believed to have died in a fire 20-years ago until Samaritan's teenage neighbor Sam (Javon Walton), who is a huge fan of Samaritan's, believes Stallone survived the fire and is quietly living amongst them. The present day villain to Stallone is Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), whom Sam previously and briefly worked for due to his mother's financial struggles and to keep them from being evicted from their apartment. Cyrus attempts to take over and become the new Nemesis in Granite City, promoting anarchy. Stallone's cover is finally blown when young Sam is bullied and battered by former associates of his and Stallone comes to his rescue. This is a decent B-action film that's built a very gritty and grimy world within Granite City. Although nowhere near on par with Marvel or even a DC film, I wouldn't mind a sequel to this as it is a pleasant enough ride to take. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: $3 movie tickets for one day, Sat., Sept. 3, 2022 - 09/04/22 07:24 PM
ME TIME
Kevin Hart and Mark Wahlberg star as best friends Sonny Fisher and Huck Dembo respectively. Historically, Sonny has always participated in Huck's over-the-top birthday celebrations, until he married Maya (Regina Hall) and started a family. Maya is the breadwinner in the family as an architect, which relegates Sonny to a stay-at-home Dad. Maya brings home the bacon but the family doesn't operate without Sonny's involvement as Maya is so consumed by work, she repeatedly doesn't know basic, and at times, life-threatening details about her own children, like bringing an epipen with them on vacation in case of an emergency. While Maya has been so consumed with work, and Sonny so burdened by the day-to-day life of the family, they both agree Maya will take the children to her parents in Washington state in order to connect with them more, while Sonny will have a much deserved week to himself. During this time, he reconnects with Huck, who's last few birthdays he's missed due to raising a family. What ensues is a week-long adventure of getting back to their roots, rediscovering their bond for each other, and Sonny gaining more self-confidence. I'm not quite sure why this film has such bad reviews as I quite enjoyed it? The laughs unfortunately only come from Hart, while Wahlberg is repeatedly used as shock value. An enjoyable buddy comedy that is worth taking a flyer on. 6/10
Kevin Hart and Mark Wahlberg star as best friends Sonny Fisher and Huck Dembo respectively. Historically, Sonny has always participated in Huck's over-the-top birthday celebrations, until he married Maya (Regina Hall) and started a family. Maya is the breadwinner in the family as an architect, which relegates Sonny to a stay-at-home Dad. Maya brings home the bacon but the family doesn't operate without Sonny's involvement as Maya is so consumed by work, she repeatedly doesn't know basic, and at times, life-threatening details about her own children, like bringing an epipen with them on vacation in case of an emergency. While Maya has been so consumed with work, and Sonny so burdened by the day-to-day life of the family, they both agree Maya will take the children to her parents in Washington state in order to connect with them more, while Sonny will have a much deserved week to himself. During this time, he reconnects with Huck, who's last few birthdays he's missed due to raising a family. What ensues is a week-long adventure of getting back to their roots, rediscovering their bond for each other, and Sonny gaining more self-confidence. I'm not quite sure why this film has such bad reviews as I quite enjoyed it? The laughs unfortunately only come from Hart, while Wahlberg is repeatedly used as shock value. An enjoyable buddy comedy that is worth taking a flyer on. 6/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/07/22 06:59 AM
5/5
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/10/22 01:45 AM
BARBARIAN
Set in a rundown neighborhood in Detroit, Tess (Georgina Campbell) has an important job interview in the morning. She booked an Airbnb and is horrified to discover Keith (Bill Skarsgård) in the house upon her arrival. It could be a simple misunderstanding that the house was double booked or is there something more sinister involved? Discovering a hidden underground passage, Tess and Keith are intrigued enough to see where it leads. While this film is absolutely crazy at times, I will give props to writer/director Zach Cregger as this is most definitely an original film. A second viewing is in order as there are times where the audience cannot believe what is happening onscreen and parts may be more digestible a second time around. Also, the film has a non-linear timeline so it'll bounce around a bit but as always, come together perfectly in the end. This may not be a film for everyone, but for those horror fans or those looking for something a bit more obscure, this is worth taking a chance on. 6/10
Set in a rundown neighborhood in Detroit, Tess (Georgina Campbell) has an important job interview in the morning. She booked an Airbnb and is horrified to discover Keith (Bill Skarsgård) in the house upon her arrival. It could be a simple misunderstanding that the house was double booked or is there something more sinister involved? Discovering a hidden underground passage, Tess and Keith are intrigued enough to see where it leads. While this film is absolutely crazy at times, I will give props to writer/director Zach Cregger as this is most definitely an original film. A second viewing is in order as there are times where the audience cannot believe what is happening onscreen and parts may be more digestible a second time around. Also, the film has a non-linear timeline so it'll bounce around a bit but as always, come together perfectly in the end. This may not be a film for everyone, but for those horror fans or those looking for something a bit more obscure, this is worth taking a chance on. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/11/22 11:51 PM
PINOCCHIO (2022)
A live-action adaptation of the original source material, Tom Hanks is magnificent as Geppetto. This is the type of live-action film I wished I grew up with. Full disclosure, I am biased to the original cartoon as it was one of my favorites growing up. A few casting decisions can be called into question (I'll leave you to decide those) but Keegan-Michael Key also deserves a much deserved shout out to his all too brief rendition of Honest John. Outside of that, this follows the typical Disney formula where much of this is a shot-for-shot remake of the original cartoon while the CGI is next level! Still another exceptional experience from director Robert Zemeckis. 7/10
A live-action adaptation of the original source material, Tom Hanks is magnificent as Geppetto. This is the type of live-action film I wished I grew up with. Full disclosure, I am biased to the original cartoon as it was one of my favorites growing up. A few casting decisions can be called into question (I'll leave you to decide those) but Keegan-Michael Key also deserves a much deserved shout out to his all too brief rendition of Honest John. Outside of that, this follows the typical Disney formula where much of this is a shot-for-shot remake of the original cartoon while the CGI is next level! Still another exceptional experience from director Robert Zemeckis. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/16/22 07:07 PM
MOONAGE DAYDREAM
A David Bowie documentary, told through him with the assistance of archival footage. It spans his illustrious career and is put together magnificently by director Brett Morgen. This is an extremely well done piece of art as I'm a huge Bowie fan but didn't know much about the man himself. This, at times, allows David to bear his soul to the audience as he morphs from his early characters to his true self. An inspirational musical journey I was fortunate enough to view in Imax. If you're afforded the same, I highly recommend taking it. 8/10
A David Bowie documentary, told through him with the assistance of archival footage. It spans his illustrious career and is put together magnificently by director Brett Morgen. This is an extremely well done piece of art as I'm a huge Bowie fan but didn't know much about the man himself. This, at times, allows David to bear his soul to the audience as he morphs from his early characters to his true self. An inspirational musical journey I was fortunate enough to view in Imax. If you're afforded the same, I highly recommend taking it. 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/22 09:56 PM
PEARL
An extremely quickly released prequel to the film X that was released in March of this year, Pearl tells the story of the old woman (also played by Mia Goth in X) set in 1918. Pearl is born and raised on a Texas farm but has big aspirations to make it on the big screen as a dancer. Her father is infirmed in a vegetative state while her overbearing German mother wants her to assist the family in their day-to-day life and give up any ambitions she has outside of that. Her sister-in-law Misty (Emma Jenkins-Purro) informs Pearl of a dance audition at a local church that will tour the state for a dance recital. Believing this could lead to her big break, Pearl will not let anything stand in her way of making that audition. While this film is rated R and does have some horror elements to it, the story is more of a character study of Pearl: what makes her tick and how she came to be in X. Another strong performance by Mia Goth but the film can drag at times (with a runtime of 102 minutes) and for those hoping to see a big body count, you'll be disappointed as the number is lower than X. I preferred X over this but we'll see how MAXXXINE does when it's released. 5/10
An extremely quickly released prequel to the film X that was released in March of this year, Pearl tells the story of the old woman (also played by Mia Goth in X) set in 1918. Pearl is born and raised on a Texas farm but has big aspirations to make it on the big screen as a dancer. Her father is infirmed in a vegetative state while her overbearing German mother wants her to assist the family in their day-to-day life and give up any ambitions she has outside of that. Her sister-in-law Misty (Emma Jenkins-Purro) informs Pearl of a dance audition at a local church that will tour the state for a dance recital. Believing this could lead to her big break, Pearl will not let anything stand in her way of making that audition. While this film is rated R and does have some horror elements to it, the story is more of a character study of Pearl: what makes her tick and how she came to be in X. Another strong performance by Mia Goth but the film can drag at times (with a runtime of 102 minutes) and for those hoping to see a big body count, you'll be disappointed as the number is lower than X. I preferred X over this but we'll see how MAXXXINE does when it's released. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/22 10:26 PM
GOODNIGHT MOMMY
An American remake of the 2014 Austrian film, the story follows a mother (Naomi Watts) who shares custody with her ex-husband (Peter Hermann) of their twin boys Elias & Lucas (Cameron & Nicholas Crovetti). The boys mother at first startles them based on her appearance as she rocks a spandex face mask that covers her entire face throughout much of the film. Behaving oddly and doing things their mother normally wouldn't do, the boys soon suspect the person underneath the mask is not their mother. This is a wonderful psychological roller coaster with quite the twist ending. I did pick up on one nuance throughout the film that did turn out to be something but I won't spoil that here. This is the type of film that after you see how the story ends, you want to immediately rewatch it to see what you can pickup with your new found knowledge. I'd like to see this again soon as I thoroughly enjoyed. Free for Amazon Prime members, it's worth it! 6.5/10
An American remake of the 2014 Austrian film, the story follows a mother (Naomi Watts) who shares custody with her ex-husband (Peter Hermann) of their twin boys Elias & Lucas (Cameron & Nicholas Crovetti). The boys mother at first startles them based on her appearance as she rocks a spandex face mask that covers her entire face throughout much of the film. Behaving oddly and doing things their mother normally wouldn't do, the boys soon suspect the person underneath the mask is not their mother. This is a wonderful psychological roller coaster with quite the twist ending. I did pick up on one nuance throughout the film that did turn out to be something but I won't spoil that here. This is the type of film that after you see how the story ends, you want to immediately rewatch it to see what you can pickup with your new found knowledge. I'd like to see this again soon as I thoroughly enjoyed. Free for Amazon Prime members, it's worth it! 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/20/22 04:43 PM
AIR FORCE ONE (1997)
President James Marshall (Harrison Ford) with his wife and daughter boards Air Force One leaving Moscow, where he was appalauded for announcing a zero tolerance policy toward terrorism. Lo and behold, a gang of terrorists headed by Ivan Korshunov (Gary Oldman), posing as journalists, take over the plane and threaten to shoot one hostage each half hour if Marshall doesn't convince the Russian government to release a terrorist leader they've imprisoned. The Secret Service hustles the Prez into a pod that's ejected from the plane via parachute. But wait--Marshall climbed out and is still on the plane! After victorious hand-to-hand combat with several terrorists, shootouts with submachine guns, hanging on to an open loading ramp with one hand, and other derring-do he swore to uphold when he took his Oath of Office, the Prez prevails and the bad guy dies. Ford, a one-note actor, is two notes here (scared and exhausted), though Glenn Close is good as the Veep. Director Wolfgang Petersen knows how to make an action movie, and "Air Force One" is all action (no credibility), but it'll have you leaning into every scene.
President James Marshall (Harrison Ford) with his wife and daughter boards Air Force One leaving Moscow, where he was appalauded for announcing a zero tolerance policy toward terrorism. Lo and behold, a gang of terrorists headed by Ivan Korshunov (Gary Oldman), posing as journalists, take over the plane and threaten to shoot one hostage each half hour if Marshall doesn't convince the Russian government to release a terrorist leader they've imprisoned. The Secret Service hustles the Prez into a pod that's ejected from the plane via parachute. But wait--Marshall climbed out and is still on the plane! After victorious hand-to-hand combat with several terrorists, shootouts with submachine guns, hanging on to an open loading ramp with one hand, and other derring-do he swore to uphold when he took his Oath of Office, the Prez prevails and the bad guy dies. Ford, a one-note actor, is two notes here (scared and exhausted), though Glenn Close is good as the Veep. Director Wolfgang Petersen knows how to make an action movie, and "Air Force One" is all action (no credibility), but it'll have you leaning into every scene.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/22/22 03:34 AM
THE NAKED CITY (1948)
Lt. Dan Muldoon (Barry Fitzgerald) of NYCP's Homicide Bureau, gets a murder case--an attractive women's clothing model who, it turns out, is connected in non-linear ways to a burglary ring involving her pathologically lying boyfriend (Howard Duff, major leading man of the era, for once a bad guy), The movie is good on police methodology, presided over with charm by Muldoon. It ends with a chase across the Williamsburg Bridge, doing in one of the murder perps (Ted DeCorsia, leading heavy of the era).
Fans call this a film noir, but the dialog and some of the acting aren't crisp enough to put it anywhere in league with "Double Indemnity" or "Laura." But every exterior was shot right on the streets of NYC, which makes it well worth the price of admission. Plus, Fitzgerald, Eternal Irish Priest, does his best to portray a Homicide detective as One O'Them Elves Which Kissed the Blarney Stone--curiously effective in winning over witnesses. Definitely good.
/
Lt. Dan Muldoon (Barry Fitzgerald) of NYCP's Homicide Bureau, gets a murder case--an attractive women's clothing model who, it turns out, is connected in non-linear ways to a burglary ring involving her pathologically lying boyfriend (Howard Duff, major leading man of the era, for once a bad guy), The movie is good on police methodology, presided over with charm by Muldoon. It ends with a chase across the Williamsburg Bridge, doing in one of the murder perps (Ted DeCorsia, leading heavy of the era).
Fans call this a film noir, but the dialog and some of the acting aren't crisp enough to put it anywhere in league with "Double Indemnity" or "Laura." But every exterior was shot right on the streets of NYC, which makes it well worth the price of admission. Plus, Fitzgerald, Eternal Irish Priest, does his best to portray a Homicide detective as One O'Them Elves Which Kissed the Blarney Stone--curiously effective in winning over witnesses. Definitely good.
/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/23/22 01:04 AM
DON'T WORRY DARLING
Set in a California desert during the 1950s, Frank (Chris Pine) creates an experimental community with the Victory Project. The audience, as well as the women in the film, know very little about the Victory Project; whereas the men know all about it. In traditional roles, the men work while the women take care of the home. Some of the women claim they don't even know how to drive but still make it into town via the local trolley. The story follows Alice (Florence Pugh) and Jack Chambers (Harry Styles), a young married couple who are mad for each other. Everything is going splendidly until one day while riding the trolley, Alice sees a plane crash down behind a mountain. With an unwillingly bus driver who refuses to drive her over to the crash site, Alice decides to investigate to see if anyone is injured or alive. In doing so, she soon learns there is something sinister behind this all-too-perfect community. This is the best I've seen Chris Pine as he is delightful as Frank, who's treated by the others as almost a godlike figure for inviting them into his community. He's the epitome of debonair: cool, calm, sophisticated, and intelligent. Pugh and Styles chemistry onscreen is steamy at times and adorable at others. I had some of the ending figured out going in to this movie but not completely, so I was still pleasantly surprised by it. The world created here is incredibly authentic and detailed, so major props to the set designers and style department. The trailers quite intrigued me so I went in to this with moderately high expectations and for the most part, it delivered. Much has been made in the press about the behind-the-scenes drama but at least the work didn't suffer. Looking forward to another viewing. 7/10
Set in a California desert during the 1950s, Frank (Chris Pine) creates an experimental community with the Victory Project. The audience, as well as the women in the film, know very little about the Victory Project; whereas the men know all about it. In traditional roles, the men work while the women take care of the home. Some of the women claim they don't even know how to drive but still make it into town via the local trolley. The story follows Alice (Florence Pugh) and Jack Chambers (Harry Styles), a young married couple who are mad for each other. Everything is going splendidly until one day while riding the trolley, Alice sees a plane crash down behind a mountain. With an unwillingly bus driver who refuses to drive her over to the crash site, Alice decides to investigate to see if anyone is injured or alive. In doing so, she soon learns there is something sinister behind this all-too-perfect community. This is the best I've seen Chris Pine as he is delightful as Frank, who's treated by the others as almost a godlike figure for inviting them into his community. He's the epitome of debonair: cool, calm, sophisticated, and intelligent. Pugh and Styles chemistry onscreen is steamy at times and adorable at others. I had some of the ending figured out going in to this movie but not completely, so I was still pleasantly surprised by it. The world created here is incredibly authentic and detailed, so major props to the set designers and style department. The trailers quite intrigued me so I went in to this with moderately high expectations and for the most part, it delivered. Much has been made in the press about the behind-the-scenes drama but at least the work didn't suffer. Looking forward to another viewing. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/22 12:02 AM
EMILY THE CRIMINAL
Aubrey Plaza stars as Emily, a young woman who works a menial job as a catering delivery driver who has a felon conviction on her record and is drowning in $70,000 worth of student loan debt. Unable to finish college due to her lack of resources following her criminal conviction, Emily has a difficult time securing gainful employment until one day, she covers a coworkers night shift so he can watch his son play baseball. As a thank you, he gives her a phone number to text that allows her to make $200 for 1 hour of work. Vague but enticing, Emily texts the number and is soon setup to perform an illegal task for cold hard cash. After her first taste of easy money, Emily continues down a destructive but lucrative path towards financial freedom. I'm always excited to see comedians expand their range and Plaza does a wonderful job as the hard as nails and jersey girl Emily. She's joined by costar Theo Rossi who plays Youcef, who is her contact for her jobs. An interesting look at a criminal enterprise that deals in credit card and other types of fraud. This film didn't receive much of a marketing campaign but I'm glad I took a flyer on it as it surpassed my expectations. 6.5/10
Aubrey Plaza stars as Emily, a young woman who works a menial job as a catering delivery driver who has a felon conviction on her record and is drowning in $70,000 worth of student loan debt. Unable to finish college due to her lack of resources following her criminal conviction, Emily has a difficult time securing gainful employment until one day, she covers a coworkers night shift so he can watch his son play baseball. As a thank you, he gives her a phone number to text that allows her to make $200 for 1 hour of work. Vague but enticing, Emily texts the number and is soon setup to perform an illegal task for cold hard cash. After her first taste of easy money, Emily continues down a destructive but lucrative path towards financial freedom. I'm always excited to see comedians expand their range and Plaza does a wonderful job as the hard as nails and jersey girl Emily. She's joined by costar Theo Rossi who plays Youcef, who is her contact for her jobs. An interesting look at a criminal enterprise that deals in credit card and other types of fraud. This film didn't receive much of a marketing campaign but I'm glad I took a flyer on it as it surpassed my expectations. 6.5/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/22 01:24 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE NAKED CITY (1948)
Lt. Dan Muldoon (Barry Fitzgerald) of NYCP's Homicide Bureau, gets a murder case--an attractive women's clothing model who, it turns out, is connected in non-linear ways to a burglary ring involving her pathologically lying boyfriend (Howard Duff, major leading man of the era, for once a bad guy), The movie is good on police methodology, presided over with charm by Muldoon. It ends with a chase across the Williamsburg Bridge, doing in one of the murder perps (Ted DeCorsia, leading heavy of the era).
Fans call this a film noir, but the dialog and some of the acting aren't crisp enough to put it anywhere in league with "Double Indemnity" or "Laura." But every exterior was shot right on the streets of NYC, which makes it well worth the price of admission. Plus, Fitzgerald, Eternal Irish Priest, does his best to portray a Homicide detective as One O'Them Elves Which Kissed the Blarney Stone--curiously effective in winning over witnesses. Definitely good.
/
Lt. Dan Muldoon (Barry Fitzgerald) of NYCP's Homicide Bureau, gets a murder case--an attractive women's clothing model who, it turns out, is connected in non-linear ways to a burglary ring involving her pathologically lying boyfriend (Howard Duff, major leading man of the era, for once a bad guy), The movie is good on police methodology, presided over with charm by Muldoon. It ends with a chase across the Williamsburg Bridge, doing in one of the murder perps (Ted DeCorsia, leading heavy of the era).
Fans call this a film noir, but the dialog and some of the acting aren't crisp enough to put it anywhere in league with "Double Indemnity" or "Laura." But every exterior was shot right on the streets of NYC, which makes it well worth the price of admission. Plus, Fitzgerald, Eternal Irish Priest, does his best to portray a Homicide detective as One O'Them Elves Which Kissed the Blarney Stone--curiously effective in winning over witnesses. Definitely good.
/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/22 11:06 PM
HOUSE OF DARKNESS
Serving as an unofficial quasi-sequel to DRACULA, Mina (Kate Bosworth) is picked up by Hap (Justin Long) at a local bar. Offering her a ride home, Hap thinks he's going to score with the beautiful young lady. However, things are not as they seem when they arrive back at her place. 2 opening shots make for a beautiful tribute to Dracula films of the past and Kate Bosworth is quite the seductive vixen playing Mina (in fact, Hap describes her as a bunny at one point during the film). Outside of those compliments, this was actually a bit of a bore. Exhaustively long scenes where the dialogue talks around in circles with very little advancement. The same happens later on in the film when Hap meets Lucy (Gia Crovatin), who gives another wonderful performance in the film, but is relegated to the same doldrums as Mina was previously. All of this builds to an ending the audience was already there within the first 5 minutes of the opening credits. Disappointing as the trailer seemed to offer more. 5/10
Serving as an unofficial quasi-sequel to DRACULA, Mina (Kate Bosworth) is picked up by Hap (Justin Long) at a local bar. Offering her a ride home, Hap thinks he's going to score with the beautiful young lady. However, things are not as they seem when they arrive back at her place. 2 opening shots make for a beautiful tribute to Dracula films of the past and Kate Bosworth is quite the seductive vixen playing Mina (in fact, Hap describes her as a bunny at one point during the film). Outside of those compliments, this was actually a bit of a bore. Exhaustively long scenes where the dialogue talks around in circles with very little advancement. The same happens later on in the film when Hap meets Lucy (Gia Crovatin), who gives another wonderful performance in the film, but is relegated to the same doldrums as Mina was previously. All of this builds to an ending the audience was already there within the first 5 minutes of the opening credits. Disappointing as the trailer seemed to offer more. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/22 11:24 PM
THE INVITATION
Evie (Nathalie Emmanuel) works for a catering company who are hired for swanky, posh New York elitist parties; however, her true passion in life is her art (ceramics to be more specific). Being an only child with no family as her mother passed away recently, her perpetual victim coworker Grace (Courtney Taylor) swipes a goodie bag from the party that houses a free DNA test kit and gives it to Evie. Feeling she has nothing to lose and everything to gain, Evie completes and submits her DNA test when in short order, she's contacted by her 2nd cousin Oliver (Hugh Skinner). He's in New York on business and is quite insistent she come back to England with him for a family wedding (all expenses paid mind you) to meet the rest of the family. Once there, Evie quickly falls for the lord of the manner Walter De Ville (Thomas Doherty) but also begins to worry about her safety. The trailer unfortunately spoils too much here as the audience already has an idea where the story goes before it has a chance to unfold. Plenty of undertones dealing with racism and sexism as basically the entire cast consists of white males outside of Nathalie of course. I imagine she wants to cash in on her post-GAME OF THRONES success and prove she can be a leading actress but this was not the project to attempt to flex those muscles on as there's very little here to work with. This is supposed to be a horror/thriller and while the gore elements are there to satisfy the horror fans, the thriller aspect is anything but as jump scares as telegraphed from a mile away. Pepper in some woke dialogue about Brits, the monarchy, and colonizers with the addition of a black female lead and you've checked a couple of boxes for those who care about those sorts of trivial matters as well. Seems that's the direction this project was interested in going rather than a quality film with any substance. 3/10
Evie (Nathalie Emmanuel) works for a catering company who are hired for swanky, posh New York elitist parties; however, her true passion in life is her art (ceramics to be more specific). Being an only child with no family as her mother passed away recently, her perpetual victim coworker Grace (Courtney Taylor) swipes a goodie bag from the party that houses a free DNA test kit and gives it to Evie. Feeling she has nothing to lose and everything to gain, Evie completes and submits her DNA test when in short order, she's contacted by her 2nd cousin Oliver (Hugh Skinner). He's in New York on business and is quite insistent she come back to England with him for a family wedding (all expenses paid mind you) to meet the rest of the family. Once there, Evie quickly falls for the lord of the manner Walter De Ville (Thomas Doherty) but also begins to worry about her safety. The trailer unfortunately spoils too much here as the audience already has an idea where the story goes before it has a chance to unfold. Plenty of undertones dealing with racism and sexism as basically the entire cast consists of white males outside of Nathalie of course. I imagine she wants to cash in on her post-GAME OF THRONES success and prove she can be a leading actress but this was not the project to attempt to flex those muscles on as there's very little here to work with. This is supposed to be a horror/thriller and while the gore elements are there to satisfy the horror fans, the thriller aspect is anything but as jump scares as telegraphed from a mile away. Pepper in some woke dialogue about Brits, the monarchy, and colonizers with the addition of a black female lead and you've checked a couple of boxes for those who care about those sorts of trivial matters as well. Seems that's the direction this project was interested in going rather than a quality film with any substance. 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/22 02:40 PM
SMILE
Sosie Bacon stars as Dr. Rose Cotter, a psychologist who witnesses a horrible suicide in her office by a new patient, Laura Weaver (Caitlin Stasey). However, the wild and incredibly hard to believe claims Laura tries to convince Rose of while alive begin to affect Rose as well. Being a professional in the field, it soon becomes obvious to those who are close to Rose she's suffering a mental breakdown. But, what Rose and Laura experienced has happened to others as well and Rose desperately attempts to uncover the key to stopping it before her time is up. I really enjoyed the trailer doesn't give away too much and I went into this as cold as I could for fear of spoilers (and I'm glad I did). This was such an incredible ride! It's the type of movie that gets underneath your skin from the beginning and festers there for the duration of the film. In my opinion, this is a breakout performance for Sosie, who delivers such an incredibly emotionally and psychically draining performance. Creepy, scary, and in some ways original (in some ways not, as cynics could easily make a comparison to a film from 2002 that I won't name for fear of drawing parallels/spoilers). Unfortunately, I'm not sure how well it'll perform at the box office as the marketing push was mediocre at best. It should live on as a cult classic if nothing else but I pray they leave it as a singular story and don't attempt to squeeze more out of the IP as horror franchises especially are known to do. Go see this film, you will not be disappointed! 8/10
Sosie Bacon stars as Dr. Rose Cotter, a psychologist who witnesses a horrible suicide in her office by a new patient, Laura Weaver (Caitlin Stasey). However, the wild and incredibly hard to believe claims Laura tries to convince Rose of while alive begin to affect Rose as well. Being a professional in the field, it soon becomes obvious to those who are close to Rose she's suffering a mental breakdown. But, what Rose and Laura experienced has happened to others as well and Rose desperately attempts to uncover the key to stopping it before her time is up. I really enjoyed the trailer doesn't give away too much and I went into this as cold as I could for fear of spoilers (and I'm glad I did). This was such an incredible ride! It's the type of movie that gets underneath your skin from the beginning and festers there for the duration of the film. In my opinion, this is a breakout performance for Sosie, who delivers such an incredibly emotionally and psychically draining performance. Creepy, scary, and in some ways original (in some ways not, as cynics could easily make a comparison to a film from 2002 that I won't name for fear of drawing parallels/spoilers). Unfortunately, I'm not sure how well it'll perform at the box office as the marketing push was mediocre at best. It should live on as a cult classic if nothing else but I pray they leave it as a singular story and don't attempt to squeeze more out of the IP as horror franchises especially are known to do. Go see this film, you will not be disappointed! 8/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/22 11:54 PM
WoW!
That’s a great bunch of reviews to go over with my Wife…. She loves your reviews.
Thank you i12
I am very interested in seeing the Beer Run movie also that is soon to release.
That’s a great bunch of reviews to go over with my Wife…. She loves your reviews.
Thank you i12
I am very interested in seeing the Beer Run movie also that is soon to release.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/01/22 03:27 AM
I dunno, Irishman...you must be living off a Trust Fund to get the time and money to see and review all those movies.,,
You do a great service for us film fans on this board,
You do a great service for us film fans on this board,
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/02/22 02:12 PM
I'm planning to go see Smile tonight!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/03/22 11:20 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
WoW!
That’s a great bunch of reviews to go over with my Wife…. She loves your reviews.
Thank you i12
I am very interested in seeing the Beer Run movie also that is soon to release.
That’s a great bunch of reviews to go over with my Wife…. She loves your reviews.
Thank you i12
I am very interested in seeing the Beer Run movie also that is soon to release.
Thanks DP, glad you and the Mrs. enjoy them! I still need to see THE GREATEST BEER RUN EVER as well and it's on my list. Just gotta find the time to squeeze it in.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/03/22 11:21 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
I dunno, Irishman...you must be living off a Trust Fund to get the time and money to see and review all those movies.,,
You do a great service for us film fans on this board,
You do a great service for us film fans on this board,
Thanks TB and I wish I had the trust fund, believe me. I have the AMC A-List that's $20 a month and allows up to 3 movies per week (or 12 per month). Great investment!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/03/22 11:23 PM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
I'm planning to go see Smile tonight!
What did you think?
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/04/22 05:18 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
I'm planning to go see Smile tonight!
What did you think?
We enjoyed it. Sosie is phenomenal
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/04/22 06:42 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
I'm planning to go see Smile tonight!
What did you think?
I very much enjoyed it. It's the type of mainstream horror I like. In the same boat as movies like Sinister, It Follows, The Conjuring 1 & 2...it's definitely derivative and heavily relies on jump scares, but there's a very effective sense of eerie dread throughout and the sound design and visuals of these movies are excellent and (especially for a mainstream horror) appropriately nightmarish. So despite not being entirely original, it's definitely effective and I'd pick it over some shlocky campy gore slasher movie any day of the week.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/05/22 12:25 AM
Glad you guys both enjoyed it and I agree with your assessment TKJ. Loved IT FOLLOWS and I felt it reminded me of that and THE RING. Looking forward to seeing it again (hopefully) soon.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/22 10:25 PM
AMSTERDAM
Writer/Director David O. Russell continues to recycle previous cast members while also gaining new ones. This new entry into his auteur is no different than his previous films as he (somehow) continuously is able to garner multiple Hollywood A-list actors for his films. This story (somewhat based upon true events) enlists the likes of Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, John David Washington, Robert De Niro, Michael Shannon, Anya Taylor-Joe, and Rami Malek. The story follows a WWI veteran doctor Burt Berendsen (Bale), WWI veteran and lawyer Harold Woodman (Washington), and nurse Valerie Voze (Robbie) on a case of mistaken identity. When their former commander of their regimen turns up dead, Berendsen is asked by the commanders daughter, Liz Meekins (Taylor Swift), to perform the autopsy as she believes something is afoul with regards to her fathers untimely passing. While revealing the results of her fathers death, Liz is suddenly killed in front of an onset of bystanders. Being made the scapegoats of the murder both Berendsen and Woodman must piece together who benefits most from the murder of their former commander in order to clear their names. Truth be told, I've never been much of a fan of David O. Russell. His films have always been mediocre to me and this is no different. He assembles an A-list cast to carry his lightweight film and this is just another iteration of it. The film states it's based upon true events but as a member of the audience, being able to decipher fact from fiction is a difficult task. And in fact, this feels more like Hollywood/liberal propaganda in its own right as anyone who disagrees with their narrative (oops, spoiler alert) is deemed an enemy. I was bored about halfway/three-quarters in and the finale is a convoluted mess with so much information being presented to the audience, I questioned who was right and who was not. Not a terrible film that is maybe worth seeking out at least once but on streaming and not in theaters. 5.5/10
Writer/Director David O. Russell continues to recycle previous cast members while also gaining new ones. This new entry into his auteur is no different than his previous films as he (somehow) continuously is able to garner multiple Hollywood A-list actors for his films. This story (somewhat based upon true events) enlists the likes of Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, John David Washington, Robert De Niro, Michael Shannon, Anya Taylor-Joe, and Rami Malek. The story follows a WWI veteran doctor Burt Berendsen (Bale), WWI veteran and lawyer Harold Woodman (Washington), and nurse Valerie Voze (Robbie) on a case of mistaken identity. When their former commander of their regimen turns up dead, Berendsen is asked by the commanders daughter, Liz Meekins (Taylor Swift), to perform the autopsy as she believes something is afoul with regards to her fathers untimely passing. While revealing the results of her fathers death, Liz is suddenly killed in front of an onset of bystanders. Being made the scapegoats of the murder both Berendsen and Woodman must piece together who benefits most from the murder of their former commander in order to clear their names. Truth be told, I've never been much of a fan of David O. Russell. His films have always been mediocre to me and this is no different. He assembles an A-list cast to carry his lightweight film and this is just another iteration of it. The film states it's based upon true events but as a member of the audience, being able to decipher fact from fiction is a difficult task. And in fact, this feels more like Hollywood/liberal propaganda in its own right as anyone who disagrees with their narrative (oops, spoiler alert) is deemed an enemy. I was bored about halfway/three-quarters in and the finale is a convoluted mess with so much information being presented to the audience, I questioned who was right and who was not. Not a terrible film that is maybe worth seeking out at least once but on streaming and not in theaters. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/22 10:43 PM
BLONDE
A fictionalized retelling of Hollywood icon Marilyn Monroe, Ana de Armas stars as the blonde bombshell. As an audience member it's difficult to separate fact from fiction and this is a difficult film to get through (but not for the reasons you think). I am perplexed at the NC-17 rating, as while there is nudity in the film, it's not gratuitous. There are some difficult scenes presented to the audience but that's the point of it: Marilyn was so used, abused, and discarded in so many ways it's difficult to watch. Another point of contention coming in was de Armas' Cuban accent. While it stood out in the trailers, with the exception of a few scenes in the film with a runtime of 2 hours and 46 minutes, I did not find it distracting at all. de Marmas delivers a borderline Oscar nominee performance and she has the looks and vulnerability down pat. Anyone who is a fan of Monroe or de Armas I recommend slivering out the time to watch this at least once as she delivers such an emotional and towering performance. 6/10
A fictionalized retelling of Hollywood icon Marilyn Monroe, Ana de Armas stars as the blonde bombshell. As an audience member it's difficult to separate fact from fiction and this is a difficult film to get through (but not for the reasons you think). I am perplexed at the NC-17 rating, as while there is nudity in the film, it's not gratuitous. There are some difficult scenes presented to the audience but that's the point of it: Marilyn was so used, abused, and discarded in so many ways it's difficult to watch. Another point of contention coming in was de Armas' Cuban accent. While it stood out in the trailers, with the exception of a few scenes in the film with a runtime of 2 hours and 46 minutes, I did not find it distracting at all. de Marmas delivers a borderline Oscar nominee performance and she has the looks and vulnerability down pat. Anyone who is a fan of Monroe or de Armas I recommend slivering out the time to watch this at least once as she delivers such an emotional and towering performance. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/22 06:51 AM
THE TWO FACES OF JANUARY (2014)
Chester Macfarland (Viggo Mortensen) and his wife, Collette (Kirsten Dunst) are vacationing in Greece when they run into Rydal (Oscar Isaac), a youthful small time grifter who uses his multiple languages to scam tourists. But Chester is a big-time stock swindler who's confronted by a private detective hired by his victims to recoup their money. They get into a scuffle, the private eye is killed, and Chester enlists Rydal to get fake passports for Collette and him, drawing Rydal ever-deeper into a desperate effort to escape. Chester's no master criminal, but Mortensen, always good, imbues him with a nasty, ruthless and dangerous persona. This movie is from a Patricia Highsmith novel, and the twisty plot does her credit (as in "The Talented Mr. Ripley"). Worthwhile.
Chester Macfarland (Viggo Mortensen) and his wife, Collette (Kirsten Dunst) are vacationing in Greece when they run into Rydal (Oscar Isaac), a youthful small time grifter who uses his multiple languages to scam tourists. But Chester is a big-time stock swindler who's confronted by a private detective hired by his victims to recoup their money. They get into a scuffle, the private eye is killed, and Chester enlists Rydal to get fake passports for Collette and him, drawing Rydal ever-deeper into a desperate effort to escape. Chester's no master criminal, but Mortensen, always good, imbues him with a nasty, ruthless and dangerous persona. This movie is from a Patricia Highsmith novel, and the twisty plot does her credit (as in "The Talented Mr. Ripley"). Worthwhile.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/22 11:07 PM
LUCKIEST GIRL ALIVE
Mile Kunis stars as Ani Fanelli, a young woman living in New York City who seems to have everything: a great job with the potential for promotion, a loving and wealthy fiancee, and the best years of her life in front of her. Until documentarian, Aaron Wickersham (Dalmar Abuzeid), reaches out to Ani about his current project which seizes to revisit her tragic past, which is the subject of his next film. Ani is a survivor of a school shooting that took place at her private school in 1999 that is loosely based on Columbine. Her perfect world begins to shatter as she's forced to confront her past and attempts to lead her current glamorized lifestyle. The story takes place both within 1999 and present day (for this setting, 2015 before the next Presidential election and plenty of Hillary fodder is here for the libs). A lot of attention is givien to anti-Second Amendment rhetoric as another survivor of this event, Dean Barton (Alex Barone), is both peddling a memoir while also pressuring Congress to enact more stringent gun-control laws. Kunis is brilliant as Ani, a woman who seems to have her life under control but with the slightest amount of push about her past, becomes unraveled. The film turns out to be much different than what is expected from the trailer, especially within the final act. 6/10
Mile Kunis stars as Ani Fanelli, a young woman living in New York City who seems to have everything: a great job with the potential for promotion, a loving and wealthy fiancee, and the best years of her life in front of her. Until documentarian, Aaron Wickersham (Dalmar Abuzeid), reaches out to Ani about his current project which seizes to revisit her tragic past, which is the subject of his next film. Ani is a survivor of a school shooting that took place at her private school in 1999 that is loosely based on Columbine. Her perfect world begins to shatter as she's forced to confront her past and attempts to lead her current glamorized lifestyle. The story takes place both within 1999 and present day (for this setting, 2015 before the next Presidential election and plenty of Hillary fodder is here for the libs). A lot of attention is givien to anti-Second Amendment rhetoric as another survivor of this event, Dean Barton (Alex Barone), is both peddling a memoir while also pressuring Congress to enact more stringent gun-control laws. Kunis is brilliant as Ani, a woman who seems to have her life under control but with the slightest amount of push about her past, becomes unraveled. The film turns out to be much different than what is expected from the trailer, especially within the final act. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/14/22 10:30 PM
HALLOWEEN ENDS
44 years in the making, HALLOWEEN ENDS is Jamie Lee Curtis' swan song to the Laurie Strode character and it's a lovely parting between her and the franchise. Picking up 4 years after the events of HALLOWEEN (2018) and HALLOWEEN KILLS, this entry into the trilogy redeems itself after the previous mediocre offering fans were given. Refusing to be paralyzed by fear any longer, Laurie lives a more active life in Haddonfield along with her granddaughter Allyson (Andi Matichak). However, Laurie seems to have moved on from her most recent encounter with Michael Myers, whereas Allyson picks up the torch of playing the traumatized survivor who finds it difficult to move past it. Both JLC and Matichak should be commended for their brilliant performances respectively. The story also introduces new comer Corey Cunningham (Rohan Campbell) who has a horrific past experience of his own and he and Allyson develop a relationship based upon their own troubled past and outcast standing within the community. Not as violent as the last entry of the franchise (although it didn't need to be) and I only had 1 major issue with the plot line but other than that, this was a satisfying finale for both this new trilogy and JLC. Overall, nothing spectacular but most certainly worth your time. 6.5/10
44 years in the making, HALLOWEEN ENDS is Jamie Lee Curtis' swan song to the Laurie Strode character and it's a lovely parting between her and the franchise. Picking up 4 years after the events of HALLOWEEN (2018) and HALLOWEEN KILLS, this entry into the trilogy redeems itself after the previous mediocre offering fans were given. Refusing to be paralyzed by fear any longer, Laurie lives a more active life in Haddonfield along with her granddaughter Allyson (Andi Matichak). However, Laurie seems to have moved on from her most recent encounter with Michael Myers, whereas Allyson picks up the torch of playing the traumatized survivor who finds it difficult to move past it. Both JLC and Matichak should be commended for their brilliant performances respectively. The story also introduces new comer Corey Cunningham (Rohan Campbell) who has a horrific past experience of his own and he and Allyson develop a relationship based upon their own troubled past and outcast standing within the community. Not as violent as the last entry of the franchise (although it didn't need to be) and I only had 1 major issue with the plot line but other than that, this was a satisfying finale for both this new trilogy and JLC. Overall, nothing spectacular but most certainly worth your time. 6.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/14/22 10:41 PM
I thought it was a massive letdown. Michael Myers is my all time favorite horror hero, but this was not a good ending. I will rewatch it at some point though lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 12:15 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I thought it was a massive letdown. Michael Myers is my all time favorite horror hero, but this was not a good ending. I will rewatch it at some point though lol
Other than the ending, what didn't you like about it?
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 08:21 AM
I wasn't entirely on board with Halloween Ends either. Then again, I hold the original Halloween in such a high regard that any of the subsequent movies in the franchise are immediately doomed to pale in comparison.
The Hellraiser reboot wasn't good either imho. None of the discomforting and surreal atmosphere of the original and it all felt very tame.
The Hellraiser reboot wasn't good either imho. None of the discomforting and surreal atmosphere of the original and it all felt very tame.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 07:09 PM
ELVIS & NIXON (2016)
This is a somewhat fictionalized account of the famous meeting between The King (Michael Shannon) and The President (Kevin Spacey). Since no record of the meeting was made (except for the iconic photo of the pair), the dialog twixt the two was embellished. But that's all to the good because Spacey is an absolute howl as Nixon. Shannon does his best to imitate Elvis, and gets some snappy comic lines and situations where his fame opens doors and shuts threats. But, apart from the hairdo and sideburns, he doesn't even look like The King. All in all, a mildly amusing film.
This is a somewhat fictionalized account of the famous meeting between The King (Michael Shannon) and The President (Kevin Spacey). Since no record of the meeting was made (except for the iconic photo of the pair), the dialog twixt the two was embellished. But that's all to the good because Spacey is an absolute howl as Nixon. Shannon does his best to imitate Elvis, and gets some snappy comic lines and situations where his fame opens doors and shuts threats. But, apart from the hairdo and sideburns, he doesn't even look like The King. All in all, a mildly amusing film.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 08:18 PM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
I wasn't entirely on board with Halloween Ends either. Then again, I hold the original Halloween in such a high regard that any of the subsequent movies in the franchise are immediately doomed to pale in comparison.
I agree with you here but compared to other sequels, this trilogy IMO was the best of the franchise and nice companions to the original. Nothing will ever beat the 1978 film.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 08:42 PM
MR. HARRIGAN'S PHONE
Based upon a short story by Stephen King, the setting takes place in Harlow, Maine and follows young Craig (Colin O'Brien) and his father (Joe Tippett). Craig having recently lost his mother and his father having lost his wife, their home feels isolated even with the two residing in it. Local billionaire Mr. Harrigan (Donald Sutherland) begins to lose his vision and requests for young Craig to read to him 3 times per week from his personal library at a rate of $5-per-hour. Fast forward 5 yeas later Craig (Jaeden Martell) is now in high school when the first iPhone is released. His father purchases him one for Christmas and after winning $3,000 via a scratch off ticket, which Mr. Harrigan gives to his 4 times a year, he decides to gift Mr. Harrigan with his own iPhone. However, one day Craig arrives as usual to read to Mr. Harrigan, only to find him dead. Lonely and just having lost one of his longest and closest friends, Craig reaches out to the recently deceased Mr. Harrigan via his iPhone. Upon his arrival in high school, Craig is soon bullied and after taking one too many attacks, leaves a voicemail on Mr. Harrigan's phone asking for the bully to get his. The eerie part is the bully soon does wind up meeting his own demise and Craig begins to question if Mr. Harrigan is really dead or alive. The premise of the story is interesting enough, taking quite a bit of the runtime to establish the relationship between Craig and Mr. Harrigan and doesn't begin to pick up until around halfway through. Even when it does, and Crag's bully shows up dead, the momentum from this sequence is soon lost before briefly picking up again towards the end and then ends on a limp note. Average at best and Sutherland's and Martell's performances are satisfactory and work well together onscreen, but nothing to wow the audience. Might be worth your time if you're really interested in the subject matter; otherwise, you're not missing much if you skip it. 5.5/10
Based upon a short story by Stephen King, the setting takes place in Harlow, Maine and follows young Craig (Colin O'Brien) and his father (Joe Tippett). Craig having recently lost his mother and his father having lost his wife, their home feels isolated even with the two residing in it. Local billionaire Mr. Harrigan (Donald Sutherland) begins to lose his vision and requests for young Craig to read to him 3 times per week from his personal library at a rate of $5-per-hour. Fast forward 5 yeas later Craig (Jaeden Martell) is now in high school when the first iPhone is released. His father purchases him one for Christmas and after winning $3,000 via a scratch off ticket, which Mr. Harrigan gives to his 4 times a year, he decides to gift Mr. Harrigan with his own iPhone. However, one day Craig arrives as usual to read to Mr. Harrigan, only to find him dead. Lonely and just having lost one of his longest and closest friends, Craig reaches out to the recently deceased Mr. Harrigan via his iPhone. Upon his arrival in high school, Craig is soon bullied and after taking one too many attacks, leaves a voicemail on Mr. Harrigan's phone asking for the bully to get his. The eerie part is the bully soon does wind up meeting his own demise and Craig begins to question if Mr. Harrigan is really dead or alive. The premise of the story is interesting enough, taking quite a bit of the runtime to establish the relationship between Craig and Mr. Harrigan and doesn't begin to pick up until around halfway through. Even when it does, and Crag's bully shows up dead, the momentum from this sequence is soon lost before briefly picking up again towards the end and then ends on a limp note. Average at best and Sutherland's and Martell's performances are satisfactory and work well together onscreen, but nothing to wow the audience. Might be worth your time if you're really interested in the subject matter; otherwise, you're not missing much if you skip it. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/15/22 08:57 PM
THE GREATEST LIE EVER SOLD: GEORGE FLOYD AND THE RISE OF BLM
The Daily Wire presents another hard-hitting documentary presented by Candace Owens concerning the life and death of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Candace presents both sides of Floyd's life by interviewing those who knew him like his roommates, Derek Chauwin's coworkers, and impartial experts to weigh in on the tragic events of that day. In addition to Floyd's death, she also explores the finances of Black Lives Matter via their most recent tax return, finding they raised $80 million. Although, the question is then raised, where has that money gone to and how much has gone back into rebuilding black communities (and the results will astonish you). It's already wildly known that Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors has already enriched herself by buying multiple mansions in predominately white neighborhoods, while also enriching her family with well paying jobs for positions they have no background, education, or experience in doing. An eye-opening revelation for sure and I applaud the efforts of Mrs. Owens and The Daily Wire for having the courage to go against the grain and to bring a new perspective and fresh set of eyes to this story that no one wants to hear outside of the MSM narrative. Another truth burger that I'm sure will leave many choking on but facts don't care about your feelings. 6.5/10
The Daily Wire presents another hard-hitting documentary presented by Candace Owens concerning the life and death of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Candace presents both sides of Floyd's life by interviewing those who knew him like his roommates, Derek Chauwin's coworkers, and impartial experts to weigh in on the tragic events of that day. In addition to Floyd's death, she also explores the finances of Black Lives Matter via their most recent tax return, finding they raised $80 million. Although, the question is then raised, where has that money gone to and how much has gone back into rebuilding black communities (and the results will astonish you). It's already wildly known that Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors has already enriched herself by buying multiple mansions in predominately white neighborhoods, while also enriching her family with well paying jobs for positions they have no background, education, or experience in doing. An eye-opening revelation for sure and I applaud the efforts of Mrs. Owens and The Daily Wire for having the courage to go against the grain and to bring a new perspective and fresh set of eyes to this story that no one wants to hear outside of the MSM narrative. Another truth burger that I'm sure will leave many choking on but facts don't care about your feelings. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/16/22 05:48 PM
THE GREATEST BEER RUN EVER
Based on true events, Zac Efron stars as Chickie Donohue, unemployed and living with his parents who sleeps all day and drinks all night. When a group of his friends from his Manhattan neighborhood all ship out to Vietnam, and with anti-war protests happening around the country, Chickie decides to bring a little Americana to his boys overseas in the form of 12 ounce cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Not being taken seriously at first as Chickie has a tendency to not follow through on things he previously said he was going to. Feeling like a mockery is being made at his expense, he psyches himself up and gets on a cargo ship to do what he said he was going to do. Being the idea is so preposterous, it's hard to decipher fact from fiction but it's still an initially interesting premise. However, once the novelty wears off the film drags and I quickly lost interest thereafter. Efron is noble in his performance but the main star for me was former WWII soldier and Irish pub owner, The Colonel (played by Bill Murray). At first the film isn't preachy in its stance on war as both sides are given opportunities to state their case. Chickie is pro-troops while his sister, Christine (Ruby Ashbourne Serkis) is anti-war. But, once Efron gets a taste of action and witnesses the horrors of war up close and personal, the film then drifts into an anti-war stance that is further promoted by war correspondent Arthur Coates (Russell Crowe) whom assists Efron during his journey. A disappointing film on director Peter Farrelly's resume as he's shown he's capable of much more. 4.5/10
Based on true events, Zac Efron stars as Chickie Donohue, unemployed and living with his parents who sleeps all day and drinks all night. When a group of his friends from his Manhattan neighborhood all ship out to Vietnam, and with anti-war protests happening around the country, Chickie decides to bring a little Americana to his boys overseas in the form of 12 ounce cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Not being taken seriously at first as Chickie has a tendency to not follow through on things he previously said he was going to. Feeling like a mockery is being made at his expense, he psyches himself up and gets on a cargo ship to do what he said he was going to do. Being the idea is so preposterous, it's hard to decipher fact from fiction but it's still an initially interesting premise. However, once the novelty wears off the film drags and I quickly lost interest thereafter. Efron is noble in his performance but the main star for me was former WWII soldier and Irish pub owner, The Colonel (played by Bill Murray). At first the film isn't preachy in its stance on war as both sides are given opportunities to state their case. Chickie is pro-troops while his sister, Christine (Ruby Ashbourne Serkis) is anti-war. But, once Efron gets a taste of action and witnesses the horrors of war up close and personal, the film then drifts into an anti-war stance that is further promoted by war correspondent Arthur Coates (Russell Crowe) whom assists Efron during his journey. A disappointing film on director Peter Farrelly's resume as he's shown he's capable of much more. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/16/22 11:23 PM
THE INFERNAL MACHINE
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/18/22 02:44 AM
The Final Credits to "The Big Short," the great film about the Housing Market Collapse in 2007-2008.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/22 12:15 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE INFERNAL MACHINE
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Wife enjoyed this she gave it 4stars
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/22 12:16 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE GREATEST BEER RUN EVER
Based on true events, Zac Efron stars as Chickie Donohue, unemployed and living with his parents who sleeps all day and drinks all night. When a group of his friends from his Manhattan neighborhood all ship out to Vietnam, and with anti-war protests happening around the country, Chickie decides to bring a little Americana to his boys overseas in the form of 12 ounce cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Not being taken seriously at first as Chickie has a tendency to not follow through on things he previously said he was going to. Feeling like a mockery is being made at his expense, he psyches himself up and gets on a cargo ship to do what he said he was going to do. Being the idea is so preposterous, it's hard to decipher fact from fiction but it's still an initially interesting premise. However, once the novelty wears off the film drags and I quickly lost interest thereafter. Efron is noble in his performance but the main star for me was former WWII soldier and Irish pub owner, The Colonel (played by Bill Murray). At first the film isn't preachy in its stance on war as both sides are given opportunities to state their case. Chickie is pro-troops while his sister, Christine (Ruby Ashbourne Serkis) is anti-war. But, once Efron gets a taste of action and witnesses the horrors of war up close and personal, the film then drifts into an anti-war stance that is further promoted by war correspondent Arthur Coates (Russell Crowe) whom assists Efron during his journey. A disappointing film on director Peter Farrelly's resume as he's shown he's capable of much more. 4.5/10
Based on true events, Zac Efron stars as Chickie Donohue, unemployed and living with his parents who sleeps all day and drinks all night. When a group of his friends from his Manhattan neighborhood all ship out to Vietnam, and with anti-war protests happening around the country, Chickie decides to bring a little Americana to his boys overseas in the form of 12 ounce cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Not being taken seriously at first as Chickie has a tendency to not follow through on things he previously said he was going to. Feeling like a mockery is being made at his expense, he psyches himself up and gets on a cargo ship to do what he said he was going to do. Being the idea is so preposterous, it's hard to decipher fact from fiction but it's still an initially interesting premise. However, once the novelty wears off the film drags and I quickly lost interest thereafter. Efron is noble in his performance but the main star for me was former WWII soldier and Irish pub owner, The Colonel (played by Bill Murray). At first the film isn't preachy in its stance on war as both sides are given opportunities to state their case. Chickie is pro-troops while his sister, Christine (Ruby Ashbourne Serkis) is anti-war. But, once Efron gets a taste of action and witnesses the horrors of war up close and personal, the film then drifts into an anti-war stance that is further promoted by war correspondent Arthur Coates (Russell Crowe) whom assists Efron during his journey. A disappointing film on director Peter Farrelly's resume as he's shown he's capable of much more. 4.5/10
I liked it a bit more than your 4.5…I’d give it 4stars
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/22 12:21 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE GREATEST LIE EVER SOLD: GEORGE FLOYD AND THE RISE OF BLM
The Daily Wire presents another hard-hitting documentary presented by Candace Owens concerning the life and death of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Candace presents both sides of Floyd's life by interviewing those who knew him like his roommates, Derek Chauwin's coworkers, and impartial experts to weigh in on the tragic events of that day. In addition to Floyd's death, she also explores the finances of Black Lives Matter via their most recent tax return, finding they raised $80 million. Although, the question is then raised, where has that money gone to and how much has gone back into rebuilding black communities (and the results will astonish you). It's already wildly known that Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors has already enriched herself by buying multiple mansions in predominately white neighborhoods, while also enriching her family with well paying jobs for positions they have no background, education, or experience in doing. An eye-opening revelation for sure and I applaud the efforts of Mrs. Owens and The Daily Wire for having the courage to go against the grain and to bring a new perspective and fresh set of eyes to this story that no one wants to hear outside of the MSM narrative. Another truth burger that I'm sure will leave many choking on but facts don't care about your feelings. 6.5/10
The Daily Wire presents another hard-hitting documentary presented by Candace Owens concerning the life and death of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Candace presents both sides of Floyd's life by interviewing those who knew him like his roommates, Derek Chauwin's coworkers, and impartial experts to weigh in on the tragic events of that day. In addition to Floyd's death, she also explores the finances of Black Lives Matter via their most recent tax return, finding they raised $80 million. Although, the question is then raised, where has that money gone to and how much has gone back into rebuilding black communities (and the results will astonish you). It's already wildly known that Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors has already enriched herself by buying multiple mansions in predominately white neighborhoods, while also enriching her family with well paying jobs for positions they have no background, education, or experience in doing. An eye-opening revelation for sure and I applaud the efforts of Mrs. Owens and The Daily Wire for having the courage to go against the grain and to bring a new perspective and fresh set of eyes to this story that no one wants to hear outside of the MSM narrative. Another truth burger that I'm sure will leave many choking on but facts don't care about your feelings. 6.5/10
I am looking forward to seeing this but it’s hard to understand how and why people let this shit happen, at least we have some people who not afraid to speak truth.
Keep ‘em coming i12….we luv your reviews
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/22 12:47 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE INFERNAL MACHINE
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Wife enjoyed this she gave it 4stars
Glad she enjoyed it! You didn't like it as much?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/22 01:01 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE INFERNAL MACHINE
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Guy Pearce stars as secluded writer Bruce Cogburn, who has a dark past. He released his one and only critically acclaimed novel entitled The Infernal Machine back in 1981; but a 17-year-old committed a mass shooting spree in Tennessee (similar to the one in Texas in 1966) and blamed the book as his inspiration (also similar to Mark David Chapman and Catcher in the Rye). Living in isolation in California without a TV, phone, and with a P.O. Box, Bruce begins to receive letters from a stranger, at first seeking assistance on their novel they are writing but then to the point of harassment as Cogburn begins to receive letters daily and once he closes his P.O. Box, at his residence. Confused how anyone is able to find him, Cogburn calls the telephone number left in the letters at first pleading with the writer to stop before growing impatient and threatening them with violence in order to make them stop. All of this leads to the dark past Cogburn has tried for the last 25 years to conceal. A devilish and delicious game of cat-and-mouse, the story quickly sucks the viewer into Cogburns paranoia as we are forced to follow along from his POV. The films holds up well with pacing and plot surprises but unfortunately, doesn't deliver on the finale (which is even alluded to by Cogburn himself when discussing writing a novel with his new pen pal). Outside of that, this is a great performance by Pearce and a movie that will need to be seeked out as it was only available via streaming but one in which I feels justify a viewing. 6.5/10
Wife enjoyed this she gave it 4stars
Glad she enjoyed it! You didn't like it as much?
I was pulled away and did not view the entire film so not fair for me to offer a rating.
Don’t think I’ll go back to it from where I left it but ya never know.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/21/22 01:34 AM
BLACK ADAM
By this point, I shouldn't be surprised DC screwed up another one of their properties, yet here we are again. Dwayne Johnson stars as the title character, a slave who was given the power of the gods before being locked away for the last 5,000 years. Having recently been freed, Black Adam now inflicts his brand of justice upon our present-day. A big theme within the film is hero vs anti-hero and which category Black Adam falls in. Coming into the film the marketing surrounding him tells us he's an anti-hero and it's very easy to see early-on why that is. In fact, the script is flipped here where the hero would normally have to vanquish the villain, here Black Adam is going up against a group of hero's by the name of the Justice Society of America (although in the film they're known simply as the Justice Society). When you have an unestablished comic book property (unestablished to a majority of the movie going audience), Dwayne Johnson as your lead, and a former James Bond (Pierce Brosnan), this should have been a homerun on paper but turned out anything but. The film rapidly opens up with a narrator whom you're attempting to keep up with and the pacing never seems to let up too much (which is not a good thing). Ever once in a while it's important for the audience to be able to catch their breath and absorb what's being presented to them. Here, there's no time for that. The film seems crammed and rushed. Once again, the film introduces us to the Justice Society comprising of Dr. Fate (Brosnan), Hawkman (Aldis Hodge), Atom Smasher (Noah Centineo), and Cyclone (Quintessa Swindell). The issue with the group is none of the characters have any depth. We know very little about them, their background, how and why they're doing what they're doing so it's hard to invest an emotional connection with any one of them, let alone all 4. Like any comic book film nowadays the writer's attempt to inject a few doses of humor to lighten the mood but those attempts were all in vain, not just by myself but the rest of the theater I saw the film with as you could hear a pin drop after the delivery of these one-liners. There's only 2 positives I walked away from this film with: the mid-credit scene plants a huge seed that fans will be salivating to grow I'm sure (and if I'm being completely honest, I would be more excited to see that play out than this film). The second was by sheer common sense that DC took Dwayne Johnson's advice and they gave Black Adam his own film and didn't attempt to shoehorn him into SHAZAM, which was at one point a possibility. While this review isn't very flattering, I didn't hate the film. In fact, I wanted to like it. I was curious and a bit excited when the lights went down and DC unfortunately didn't deliver again and this is further proof why new leadership, which is now somewhat installed, was needed. 5.5/10
By this point, I shouldn't be surprised DC screwed up another one of their properties, yet here we are again. Dwayne Johnson stars as the title character, a slave who was given the power of the gods before being locked away for the last 5,000 years. Having recently been freed, Black Adam now inflicts his brand of justice upon our present-day. A big theme within the film is hero vs anti-hero and which category Black Adam falls in. Coming into the film the marketing surrounding him tells us he's an anti-hero and it's very easy to see early-on why that is. In fact, the script is flipped here where the hero would normally have to vanquish the villain, here Black Adam is going up against a group of hero's by the name of the Justice Society of America (although in the film they're known simply as the Justice Society). When you have an unestablished comic book property (unestablished to a majority of the movie going audience), Dwayne Johnson as your lead, and a former James Bond (Pierce Brosnan), this should have been a homerun on paper but turned out anything but. The film rapidly opens up with a narrator whom you're attempting to keep up with and the pacing never seems to let up too much (which is not a good thing). Ever once in a while it's important for the audience to be able to catch their breath and absorb what's being presented to them. Here, there's no time for that. The film seems crammed and rushed. Once again, the film introduces us to the Justice Society comprising of Dr. Fate (Brosnan), Hawkman (Aldis Hodge), Atom Smasher (Noah Centineo), and Cyclone (Quintessa Swindell). The issue with the group is none of the characters have any depth. We know very little about them, their background, how and why they're doing what they're doing so it's hard to invest an emotional connection with any one of them, let alone all 4. Like any comic book film nowadays the writer's attempt to inject a few doses of humor to lighten the mood but those attempts were all in vain, not just by myself but the rest of the theater I saw the film with as you could hear a pin drop after the delivery of these one-liners. There's only 2 positives I walked away from this film with: the mid-credit scene plants a huge seed that fans will be salivating to grow I'm sure (and if I'm being completely honest, I would be more excited to see that play out than this film). The second was by sheer common sense that DC took Dwayne Johnson's advice and they gave Black Adam his own film and didn't attempt to shoehorn him into SHAZAM, which was at one point a possibility. While this review isn't very flattering, I didn't hate the film. In fact, I wanted to like it. I was curious and a bit excited when the lights went down and DC unfortunately didn't deliver again and this is further proof why new leadership, which is now somewhat installed, was needed. 5.5/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/21/22 01:53 AM
I was curious about Black Adam thanks for the review! I don't think DC will ever beat Marvel unless they get Christopher Nolan for the new Superman films.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/22 04:49 PM
CLERKS III
Dante (Brian O'Halloran) and Randal (Jeff Anderson) are back for yet another Clerks film to complete their 28-year trilogy. I never thought the original would spawn a sequel, let alone a trilogy. The sequel didn't let me down and while this didn't either, it doesn't hold up the franchise as well as the previous 2 entries. Unlike it's successors, this film scales back the jokes a little bit midway through as this is writer/director Kevin Smith's most personal film. Based upon Smith's own heart attack and near death experience, Randal suffers the same and upon surviving, is convinced by his best friend Dante to make a movie. The film is extremely meta, nostalgic, and heartfelt as scenes from both CLERKS and CLERKS II are recreated with a lot of awesome cameos along the way. My biggest grip of the film was how the story in this chapter for Becky (Rosario Dawson) was written. I understand Smith's thinking with her and Dante's storyline but I was hoping for something better and honestly, was quite surprised with the direction she would up going in. If you're a fan of the franchise and of these characters you'll want to check this out to see how it ends. It's a beautiful tribute Smith made for his friends and the fans. But again, this was my least favorite of the trilogy and felt the sequel could have been enough. Talk has been made for years about a sequel to MALLRATS and after seeing how Smith was able to go back to Clerks not once but twice, I'm more open to the Mallrats sequel now. 5.5/10
Dante (Brian O'Halloran) and Randal (Jeff Anderson) are back for yet another Clerks film to complete their 28-year trilogy. I never thought the original would spawn a sequel, let alone a trilogy. The sequel didn't let me down and while this didn't either, it doesn't hold up the franchise as well as the previous 2 entries. Unlike it's successors, this film scales back the jokes a little bit midway through as this is writer/director Kevin Smith's most personal film. Based upon Smith's own heart attack and near death experience, Randal suffers the same and upon surviving, is convinced by his best friend Dante to make a movie. The film is extremely meta, nostalgic, and heartfelt as scenes from both CLERKS and CLERKS II are recreated with a lot of awesome cameos along the way. My biggest grip of the film was how the story in this chapter for Becky (Rosario Dawson) was written. I understand Smith's thinking with her and Dante's storyline but I was hoping for something better and honestly, was quite surprised with the direction she would up going in. If you're a fan of the franchise and of these characters you'll want to check this out to see how it ends. It's a beautiful tribute Smith made for his friends and the fans. But again, this was my least favorite of the trilogy and felt the sequel could have been enough. Talk has been made for years about a sequel to MALLRATS and after seeing how Smith was able to go back to Clerks not once but twice, I'm more open to the Mallrats sequel now. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/22 08:05 PM
Irishman, are you checking out "The Peripheral" on Prime?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/22 08:41 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
Irishman, are you checking out "The Peripheral" on Prime?
I'm not. I saw the trailer and looked too much like something I'd seen recently (READY PLAYER ONE or something similar). I saw a good review on it but I'm passing. I'm more picky on my TV shows because of the time dedication.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/22 08:52 PM
THE MUNSTERS
Rob Zombie's latest is a PG family friendly affair and big screen adaptation of the popular '60s show. Having never seen the show I can't say how faithful the film is to the original source material but I will say Zombie misses again as this is a complete bore. Zombie, not producing anything worthy in my opinion in the last 15 years (since his controversial HALLOWEEN reboot), substitutes vulgar dialogue and gratuitous violence for bad jokes and wooden performances. This must have been a passion project for Zombie as again, a PG film from him must have either been the studios idea or he went for something new. If it's the latter, I applaud his efforts for expanding his range, even though this does fail miserably. Perhaps the younger audience will enjoy it more than Zombie's traditional audience? I knew the reviews weren't very positive going into it but I still wanted to view it for my own curiosity and no, this is as bad as claimed. The only positive is I didn't have to waste my time, gas, and money at the theaters to see this garbage. Hopefully Zombie's next film will put him back on track but after only 2 hits in my opinion (HALLOWEEN & THE DEVIL'S REJECTS), he no longer is receiving the benefit of the doubt from me. 3/10
Rob Zombie's latest is a PG family friendly affair and big screen adaptation of the popular '60s show. Having never seen the show I can't say how faithful the film is to the original source material but I will say Zombie misses again as this is a complete bore. Zombie, not producing anything worthy in my opinion in the last 15 years (since his controversial HALLOWEEN reboot), substitutes vulgar dialogue and gratuitous violence for bad jokes and wooden performances. This must have been a passion project for Zombie as again, a PG film from him must have either been the studios idea or he went for something new. If it's the latter, I applaud his efforts for expanding his range, even though this does fail miserably. Perhaps the younger audience will enjoy it more than Zombie's traditional audience? I knew the reviews weren't very positive going into it but I still wanted to view it for my own curiosity and no, this is as bad as claimed. The only positive is I didn't have to waste my time, gas, and money at the theaters to see this garbage. Hopefully Zombie's next film will put him back on track but after only 2 hits in my opinion (HALLOWEEN & THE DEVIL'S REJECTS), he no longer is receiving the benefit of the doubt from me. 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/22 11:17 PM
TERROR TRAIN (2022)
A remake of the cult classical 1980 film staring Jamie Lee Curtis, this remake is about a 95% straight, beat-for-beat duplicate. The differences were updated woke politics and diversity, adding shallow actress Robyn Alomar to take over for JLC, who couldn't hold a candle to the original scream queen, and a different spin on the killer. Besides bloodier kills, I'm honestly wondering why this was even remade in the first place? I'm sure a vast number of individuals haven't seen the original, let alone will see this as it's available only through Tubi. The first is cheesy, campy, and straight forward, which is one of the reasons I enjoy it so much. The remake offers no suspense when the killer's onboard and many of the characters are without morals whom I didn't find particularly interesting enough to see if they made it out alive or not. And once again, putting a minority actresses in the lead role to simply check a box was a mistake as Alomar's performance is laughable most of the time. And if they hired based on merit and not her skin color, then they need to go back to the casting couch because I'm sure there are better actresses out there who could have strung together a better performance. 4/10
A remake of the cult classical 1980 film staring Jamie Lee Curtis, this remake is about a 95% straight, beat-for-beat duplicate. The differences were updated woke politics and diversity, adding shallow actress Robyn Alomar to take over for JLC, who couldn't hold a candle to the original scream queen, and a different spin on the killer. Besides bloodier kills, I'm honestly wondering why this was even remade in the first place? I'm sure a vast number of individuals haven't seen the original, let alone will see this as it's available only through Tubi. The first is cheesy, campy, and straight forward, which is one of the reasons I enjoy it so much. The remake offers no suspense when the killer's onboard and many of the characters are without morals whom I didn't find particularly interesting enough to see if they made it out alive or not. And once again, putting a minority actresses in the lead role to simply check a box was a mistake as Alomar's performance is laughable most of the time. And if they hired based on merit and not her skin color, then they need to go back to the casting couch because I'm sure there are better actresses out there who could have strung together a better performance. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/22 12:37 AM
THE GOOD NURSE
2 Oscar winners go toe-to-toe to tell this tragic, based on true events story. Jessica Chastain stars as nurse Amy Loughren, an empathetic and well-mannered nurse who sees the humanity in her patients and goes above-and-beyond for them, even sometimes at her own risk with her supervisor. Dealing with a medical condition of her own and with her hospital's budget tighter than a pair of Chinese finger cuffs, Charlie Cullen (Eddie Redmayne) is hired to assist with the hospitals workload. Having bounced around quite a bit in his line of work (about 9 hospitals within the previous 7 years), Charlie seems too good to be true. A well attentive nurse who quickly befriends Amy and her 2 young daughters, although not everything is quite as it seems. A few patients pass under mysterious circumstances and when the police are called to investigate, Charlie becomes the chief suspect. Upon looking into his background and questioning why he's bounced around from hospital to hospital, it becomes clear the pattern of mysterious deaths at Amy's hospital have been following Charlie around everywhere he's worked. Wonderful performances by both Chastain and Redmayne playing overworked and probably underpaid nurses who work the night shift. Amy never sees her girls, who mean the world to her, due to her work schedule and is in need of a surgical procedure but is not eligible for health care benefits until she's completed her first year of work, which, when we pick her up, is still 4 grueling months away. It's an interesting story that is all the more tragic that a nurse was capable of such heinous crimes and the fact, again, this is based on a true story. Netflix actually puts out a great film (I'm not much of a fan of Netflix movies) and this is most definitely worth a view. 7.5/10
2 Oscar winners go toe-to-toe to tell this tragic, based on true events story. Jessica Chastain stars as nurse Amy Loughren, an empathetic and well-mannered nurse who sees the humanity in her patients and goes above-and-beyond for them, even sometimes at her own risk with her supervisor. Dealing with a medical condition of her own and with her hospital's budget tighter than a pair of Chinese finger cuffs, Charlie Cullen (Eddie Redmayne) is hired to assist with the hospitals workload. Having bounced around quite a bit in his line of work (about 9 hospitals within the previous 7 years), Charlie seems too good to be true. A well attentive nurse who quickly befriends Amy and her 2 young daughters, although not everything is quite as it seems. A few patients pass under mysterious circumstances and when the police are called to investigate, Charlie becomes the chief suspect. Upon looking into his background and questioning why he's bounced around from hospital to hospital, it becomes clear the pattern of mysterious deaths at Amy's hospital have been following Charlie around everywhere he's worked. Wonderful performances by both Chastain and Redmayne playing overworked and probably underpaid nurses who work the night shift. Amy never sees her girls, who mean the world to her, due to her work schedule and is in need of a surgical procedure but is not eligible for health care benefits until she's completed her first year of work, which, when we pick her up, is still 4 grueling months away. It's an interesting story that is all the more tragic that a nurse was capable of such heinous crimes and the fact, again, this is based on a true story. Netflix actually puts out a great film (I'm not much of a fan of Netflix movies) and this is most definitely worth a view. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/28/22 10:10 PM
ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT (2022)
Another remake of the classic tale which I'm sure you're already familiar with: set during World War I, 4 German friends enlist for military service to gain notoriety and respect once they've helped conquer the French and return home. Being young, naive, and believing the propaganda they've been fed, the friends believe they'll march in Paris within a matter of weeks and swiftly return home to a king's welcome. However, they soon realize war isn't as glamours as they were lead to believe, nor will a quick victory be obtained. Dealing with the physical, emotional, and psychological effects of war, the friends soon just try to survive to make it home alive. This rendition is completely in French and German which I appreciated (in fact, I believe it's submitted from Germany for consideration in the Best Foreign Film at next year's Oscars). Beautiful cinematography and sets, the story wastes little time in putting our 4 young lads right in the thick of it. With a runtime approaching 2 hours and 30 minutes, it can drag at times. If you're a fan of this story or of war films in general, this'll satisfy your itch for more of the same. 6/10
Another remake of the classic tale which I'm sure you're already familiar with: set during World War I, 4 German friends enlist for military service to gain notoriety and respect once they've helped conquer the French and return home. Being young, naive, and believing the propaganda they've been fed, the friends believe they'll march in Paris within a matter of weeks and swiftly return home to a king's welcome. However, they soon realize war isn't as glamours as they were lead to believe, nor will a quick victory be obtained. Dealing with the physical, emotional, and psychological effects of war, the friends soon just try to survive to make it home alive. This rendition is completely in French and German which I appreciated (in fact, I believe it's submitted from Germany for consideration in the Best Foreign Film at next year's Oscars). Beautiful cinematography and sets, the story wastes little time in putting our 4 young lads right in the thick of it. With a runtime approaching 2 hours and 30 minutes, it can drag at times. If you're a fan of this story or of war films in general, this'll satisfy your itch for more of the same. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/22 09:36 PM
TERRIFIER 2
Picking up 1 year after the events of the original film, the story follows Art the Clown, who now targets a family consisting of Sienna (Lauren LaVera), Johnathan (Elliott Fullam), and Barbara (Sarah Voigt) who are grieving the recent passing of their father/husband. Being a sequel within the horror genre, the body count is higher and more gory, however, I honestly preferred the original to this sequel which has been getting a lot of love upon its release. LaVera delivers a strong performance as the damaged but heroine Sienna while David Howard Thornton as Art the Clown delivers yet another brilliant performance as the mute, psychopathic killer. Another low budget gem from writer and director Damien Leone, I'm eagerly anticipating a third and possibly final entry into this franchise. 7/10
Picking up 1 year after the events of the original film, the story follows Art the Clown, who now targets a family consisting of Sienna (Lauren LaVera), Johnathan (Elliott Fullam), and Barbara (Sarah Voigt) who are grieving the recent passing of their father/husband. Being a sequel within the horror genre, the body count is higher and more gory, however, I honestly preferred the original to this sequel which has been getting a lot of love upon its release. LaVera delivers a strong performance as the damaged but heroine Sienna while David Howard Thornton as Art the Clown delivers yet another brilliant performance as the mute, psychopathic killer. Another low budget gem from writer and director Damien Leone, I'm eagerly anticipating a third and possibly final entry into this franchise. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/30/22 09:54 PM
RUN SWEETHEART RUN
This film follows pre-law intern Cherie (Ella Balinska) who unexpectedly takes over for her boss on a dinner meeting with a client, Ethan (Pilou Asbæk) after a scheduling conflict with his wedding anniversary. Upon meeting Ethan, Cherie is smitten by the well-mannered and wealthy individual. Until she's talked into coming into his place for a nightcap after a wonderful evening. After being attacked, Cherie is on the run for her life and Ethan can "smell" her and her blood, which attracts him to her. Being that Cherie has been violently and bloodily assaulted (and the fact she's on her monthly period), it doesn't take much for Ethan to "pick up her scent." This is a bait-and-switch film as it begins innocent enough before going full woke in the third act with themes of misogyny, racism, and other leftists tropes in order to gain brownie points with the audience. Not the mention the film centers around violence that isn't shown on screen in order to "protect the viewers" and not "further capitalize on male on female violence," which it obviously does. For those of us who are too well educated and immune to such virtual signaling, the film plays out as a bore with no substance other than faux victimhood. 4/10
This film follows pre-law intern Cherie (Ella Balinska) who unexpectedly takes over for her boss on a dinner meeting with a client, Ethan (Pilou Asbæk) after a scheduling conflict with his wedding anniversary. Upon meeting Ethan, Cherie is smitten by the well-mannered and wealthy individual. Until she's talked into coming into his place for a nightcap after a wonderful evening. After being attacked, Cherie is on the run for her life and Ethan can "smell" her and her blood, which attracts him to her. Being that Cherie has been violently and bloodily assaulted (and the fact she's on her monthly period), it doesn't take much for Ethan to "pick up her scent." This is a bait-and-switch film as it begins innocent enough before going full woke in the third act with themes of misogyny, racism, and other leftists tropes in order to gain brownie points with the audience. Not the mention the film centers around violence that isn't shown on screen in order to "protect the viewers" and not "further capitalize on male on female violence," which it obviously does. For those of us who are too well educated and immune to such virtual signaling, the film plays out as a bore with no substance other than faux victimhood. 4/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/31/22 03:49 AM
Who ever Slew Auntie Roo?....Shelley Winters scares an orphan brother...& sister into a lot of shit ...as she is a supposedly a magician..then they renegade as a "Hansel & Gretel"..good stuff 4 mid nite fluff...I'm sure I 12 can put into a better synopsis..
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/04/22 11:25 PM
ARMAGEDDON TIME
Set in 1980 New York City, the film follows 2 friends, Paul Graff (Banks Repeta) and Johnny Davis (Jaylin Webb). Both are troublemakers in their 6th grade class but the level of discipline exerted to both is contradictory at best by their teacher Mr. Turkeltaub (Andrew Polk). One time Paul is made to stand in front of the class for a grotesque picture he drew of Mr. Turkeltaub, whereas Johnny is made to sit on more than one occasion in the front of the class for his more profane and disrespectful outbursts towards their teacher. At the heart of this film is the message of racism and how it's nurture over nature, something that's taught rather than biological (which, I do agree with). I will applaud the efforts of the film that it's not heavy-handed in its message but the point is still made nonetheless as Paul's grandfather Aaron (Anthony Hopkins) tells him the story of how his grandparents (Paul's great-grandparents) fled Ukraine during the second World War due to the violence shown towards Jews within their local community. Yet, just 2 generations later Paul's parents Esther (Anne Hathaway) and Irving (Jeremy Strong) show the same bigotry towards African-Americans, blaming young Johnny for all of the recent trouble Paul has found himself in while all the while Paul is usually the instigator or a willing accomplice himself. In need of some good old fashioned discipline, Paul walks all over his parents, particularly his mother until the law finally catches up to him, at which point she's at her wits end. The best performance I can commend here is Anne Hathaway's Esther as it's a very familiar stereotype. Make no mistake about this, the film plays into all stereotypes typical of this time, yet begs the audience to condemn them by today's standard. A slow moving story that is at times dry. Might not be a bad idea to check it out at some point, although this can most definitely be passed upon in the theaters IMO. 6/10
Set in 1980 New York City, the film follows 2 friends, Paul Graff (Banks Repeta) and Johnny Davis (Jaylin Webb). Both are troublemakers in their 6th grade class but the level of discipline exerted to both is contradictory at best by their teacher Mr. Turkeltaub (Andrew Polk). One time Paul is made to stand in front of the class for a grotesque picture he drew of Mr. Turkeltaub, whereas Johnny is made to sit on more than one occasion in the front of the class for his more profane and disrespectful outbursts towards their teacher. At the heart of this film is the message of racism and how it's nurture over nature, something that's taught rather than biological (which, I do agree with). I will applaud the efforts of the film that it's not heavy-handed in its message but the point is still made nonetheless as Paul's grandfather Aaron (Anthony Hopkins) tells him the story of how his grandparents (Paul's great-grandparents) fled Ukraine during the second World War due to the violence shown towards Jews within their local community. Yet, just 2 generations later Paul's parents Esther (Anne Hathaway) and Irving (Jeremy Strong) show the same bigotry towards African-Americans, blaming young Johnny for all of the recent trouble Paul has found himself in while all the while Paul is usually the instigator or a willing accomplice himself. In need of some good old fashioned discipline, Paul walks all over his parents, particularly his mother until the law finally catches up to him, at which point she's at her wits end. The best performance I can commend here is Anne Hathaway's Esther as it's a very familiar stereotype. Make no mistake about this, the film plays into all stereotypes typical of this time, yet begs the audience to condemn them by today's standard. A slow moving story that is at times dry. Might not be a bad idea to check it out at some point, although this can most definitely be passed upon in the theaters IMO. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/22 10:10 PM
WEIRD: THE AL YANKOVIC STORY
Daniel Radcliffe plays the esteemed musician whom this film is based upon. However, it soon becomes obvious to the audience this film is like everything else in Yankovic's life: a parody (and we wouldn't have it any other way). Completely exaggerated and over-the-top, the film explores Al's troubled relationship with his father, his rise to platinum level recording artist, and relationship with Madonna (amongst many other topics). Evan Rachel Wood plays Madonna and her and Radcliffe have a wonderful onscreen presence, each attempting to out do the other and both deliver fantastic performances! A funny film that garners laughs, which is all Al's ever been after in his life and it's a refreshing musical biopic that doesn't follow the standard formula. 6/10
Daniel Radcliffe plays the esteemed musician whom this film is based upon. However, it soon becomes obvious to the audience this film is like everything else in Yankovic's life: a parody (and we wouldn't have it any other way). Completely exaggerated and over-the-top, the film explores Al's troubled relationship with his father, his rise to platinum level recording artist, and relationship with Madonna (amongst many other topics). Evan Rachel Wood plays Madonna and her and Radcliffe have a wonderful onscreen presence, each attempting to out do the other and both deliver fantastic performances! A funny film that garners laughs, which is all Al's ever been after in his life and it's a refreshing musical biopic that doesn't follow the standard formula. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/22 10:25 PM
SEE HOW THEY RUN
Set in 1953 in London's West End, the film centers on the murder of director Leo Kopernick (Adrien Brody), who is attempting to direct a film adaptation of Agatha Christie's THE MOUSETRAP, which is currently on stage in London and cannot begin its film adaptation until its onstage run is complete. Poking fun at the whodunnit subgenre, the film is meta in the way the original SCREAM was to horror films. A wonderful cast as is stereotypical to this subgenre featuring Brody, Sam Rockwell, Saoirse Ronan, David Oyelowo, and Ruth Wilson just to name a few. As is usually the case, when Kopernick is found dead at the theater celebrating the 100th show of the play, everyone soon becomes a suspect and has a motive for the killing. Rockwell plays Inspector Stoppard, a disconnected World War II veteran who carries a slight limp from his wartime days who sluggishly makes his way through life after a recent divorce. He's soon paired with Constable Stalker (Ronan), who is an overzealous policewoman attempting to pass her sergeants exam in a little more than a month and is assigned to be Stoppard's partner in order to gain real-world experience (since England was so progress in 1953 but I digress for the sake of the film). Everyone whom the duo interviews at one point or another soon becomes the main suspect until the only person everyone is overlooking is finally revealed to be the killer in the final act. Decent acting with no one standing out except for Ronan, who really seems entrenched in her character. A final reveal that makes sense on paper but feels boring upon its arrival. Passable as a whodunnit but nowhere near the level of Christie. 5.5/10
Set in 1953 in London's West End, the film centers on the murder of director Leo Kopernick (Adrien Brody), who is attempting to direct a film adaptation of Agatha Christie's THE MOUSETRAP, which is currently on stage in London and cannot begin its film adaptation until its onstage run is complete. Poking fun at the whodunnit subgenre, the film is meta in the way the original SCREAM was to horror films. A wonderful cast as is stereotypical to this subgenre featuring Brody, Sam Rockwell, Saoirse Ronan, David Oyelowo, and Ruth Wilson just to name a few. As is usually the case, when Kopernick is found dead at the theater celebrating the 100th show of the play, everyone soon becomes a suspect and has a motive for the killing. Rockwell plays Inspector Stoppard, a disconnected World War II veteran who carries a slight limp from his wartime days who sluggishly makes his way through life after a recent divorce. He's soon paired with Constable Stalker (Ronan), who is an overzealous policewoman attempting to pass her sergeants exam in a little more than a month and is assigned to be Stoppard's partner in order to gain real-world experience (since England was so progress in 1953 but I digress for the sake of the film). Everyone whom the duo interviews at one point or another soon becomes the main suspect until the only person everyone is overlooking is finally revealed to be the killer in the final act. Decent acting with no one standing out except for Ronan, who really seems entrenched in her character. A final reveal that makes sense on paper but feels boring upon its arrival. Passable as a whodunnit but nowhere near the level of Christie. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/07/22 05:59 AM
KANSAS CITY CONFIDENTIAL (1052)
Tim Foster (Preston Foster), former cop turned master criminal, recruits three champion-level plug-uglies (Jack Elam, Lee Van Cleef, Neville Brand) to rob a bank. They all wear masks when the meet, the better to prevent ratting-out. Joe Rolfe (John Payne), an ex-con trying to go straight as a flower van driver, becomes a patsy for the holdup. After being roughed up and then released by the cops, Rolfe is determined to get revenge (and a share of the money), even though he doesn't know the robbers or how to identify them. His path leads to a Mexican fishing resort, where they rendezvous to split up the cash. This isn't a sophisticated film noir, but it has plenty of action and many nice twists as identities are gradually found out and alliances shift. Plus, the bad-guy trio is irresisstable. Very good!
Tim Foster (Preston Foster), former cop turned master criminal, recruits three champion-level plug-uglies (Jack Elam, Lee Van Cleef, Neville Brand) to rob a bank. They all wear masks when the meet, the better to prevent ratting-out. Joe Rolfe (John Payne), an ex-con trying to go straight as a flower van driver, becomes a patsy for the holdup. After being roughed up and then released by the cops, Rolfe is determined to get revenge (and a share of the money), even though he doesn't know the robbers or how to identify them. His path leads to a Mexican fishing resort, where they rendezvous to split up the cash. This isn't a sophisticated film noir, but it has plenty of action and many nice twists as identities are gradually found out and alliances shift. Plus, the bad-guy trio is irresisstable. Very good!
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/08/22 03:51 PM
I watched Barbarian with my wife last night. Pretty decent horror flick until the third act. It's a solid 6 from me
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/09/22 12:10 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I watched Barbarian with my wife last night. Pretty decent horror flick until the third act. It's a solid 6 from me
I rewatched that and SMILE a couple of weekends ago. Didn't enjoy SMILE as much as I did the first time around (but I loved it the first time, 8 from me). BARBARIAN I enjoyed more a second time, but still about a 6 from me as well.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/10/22 02:20 AM
YES…. Barbarien was a mess at the end.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/22 02:31 AM
BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER
Following the sudden passing of Chadwick Boseman, Wakanda is in mourning for their fallen king. I know many will be curious how they take the real-life tragedy of Boseman's passing and incorporate it into the film but to be honest, not much time is spent on the reasoning. All things considered, this was probably the best Marvel could do under the circumstances and it's a fitting tribute while still moving the storyline forward. Outside of that, the premise follows Americans who have discovered vibranium on the ocean floor and look to begin extracting it. This alerts Namor, the king of an underwater empire by the name of Talokan. Being a mutant and having the ability to breath underwater, on land, and the ability to fly amongst other powers, Namor is a considerably dangerous threat to the surface people (us) and Wakanda. In order to protect his people, he must kill the scientist who created the vibranium seeking machine so his world is left undisturbed. Overall, I honestly enjoyed this more than I thought I was going to heading in to see it. Tenoch Huerta absolutely crushes it as Namor and even though his origins were changed a bit, it fits well for the story. However, I will say Marvel needs to begin scaling back on these films as this has a runtime of 2 hours and 41 minutes and it showed here, especially in the third act, which was unfortunately a chaotic mess at times bouncing from fight-to-fight. 7.5/10
Following the sudden passing of Chadwick Boseman, Wakanda is in mourning for their fallen king. I know many will be curious how they take the real-life tragedy of Boseman's passing and incorporate it into the film but to be honest, not much time is spent on the reasoning. All things considered, this was probably the best Marvel could do under the circumstances and it's a fitting tribute while still moving the storyline forward. Outside of that, the premise follows Americans who have discovered vibranium on the ocean floor and look to begin extracting it. This alerts Namor, the king of an underwater empire by the name of Talokan. Being a mutant and having the ability to breath underwater, on land, and the ability to fly amongst other powers, Namor is a considerably dangerous threat to the surface people (us) and Wakanda. In order to protect his people, he must kill the scientist who created the vibranium seeking machine so his world is left undisturbed. Overall, I honestly enjoyed this more than I thought I was going to heading in to see it. Tenoch Huerta absolutely crushes it as Namor and even though his origins were changed a bit, it fits well for the story. However, I will say Marvel needs to begin scaling back on these films as this has a runtime of 2 hours and 41 minutes and it showed here, especially in the third act, which was unfortunately a chaotic mess at times bouncing from fight-to-fight. 7.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/11/22 03:23 AM
THE FUNERAL (1996)
Johnny Tempio (Vincent Gallo), obnoxious, violent, Communist (!) youngest brother in a NYC Mafia faction, is murdered, and laid out at the home of his morose but menacing oldest brother, Ray (Christopher Walken), chief of the clan. He and overwrought, unstable middle brother Chez (Chris Penn) swear revenge on top suspect, swaggering, up-and-coming Gaspare (Benicio Del Toro), who turns out not to be the killer but dies anyway. There's little action in what fans call a "character study," but I didn't like the characters, particularly Ray, who goes on and on about God, religion and other distractions; and Chez, who's really irritating. The acting is good, especially Annabella Sciorrio, as Ray''s hard-edged, pragmatic wife, who knows where this is going to end up--and it does. Director Abel Ferrara has his fans, and they say this is one of his best efforts. Not me.
Johnny Tempio (Vincent Gallo), obnoxious, violent, Communist (!) youngest brother in a NYC Mafia faction, is murdered, and laid out at the home of his morose but menacing oldest brother, Ray (Christopher Walken), chief of the clan. He and overwrought, unstable middle brother Chez (Chris Penn) swear revenge on top suspect, swaggering, up-and-coming Gaspare (Benicio Del Toro), who turns out not to be the killer but dies anyway. There's little action in what fans call a "character study," but I didn't like the characters, particularly Ray, who goes on and on about God, religion and other distractions; and Chez, who's really irritating. The acting is good, especially Annabella Sciorrio, as Ray''s hard-edged, pragmatic wife, who knows where this is going to end up--and it does. Director Abel Ferrara has his fans, and they say this is one of his best efforts. Not me.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/15/22 08:19 PM
ALL ABOUT EVE (1950)
Mousy, stage-struck--and cunning--Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter) inveigles her way into the good graces of her idol, Margot Channing (Bette Davis), ageing Broadway superstar, and proceeds to con everyone around her until she almost takes over Margot's life, career and fiancee. It's a ruthless tale of stage competition and treachery, But it's elevated by a witty, knife-edged script by director Joseph Mankiewicz, and outstanding performances by Davis, Celeste Holm as her best friend, and George Sanders (Eternal Cynic) as a (what else?) jaded Broadway columnist. Gary Merrill is good as Davis' beau (she married him right after "Eve" was wrapped), and Hugh Marlowe is sturdy as Holm's playwright/husband. Gregory Ratoff and Marilyn Monroe do well in supporting roles. It's basically a sophisticated and talky soap opera, but it holds up.
Mousy, stage-struck--and cunning--Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter) inveigles her way into the good graces of her idol, Margot Channing (Bette Davis), ageing Broadway superstar, and proceeds to con everyone around her until she almost takes over Margot's life, career and fiancee. It's a ruthless tale of stage competition and treachery, But it's elevated by a witty, knife-edged script by director Joseph Mankiewicz, and outstanding performances by Davis, Celeste Holm as her best friend, and George Sanders (Eternal Cynic) as a (what else?) jaded Broadway columnist. Gary Merrill is good as Davis' beau (she married him right after "Eve" was wrapped), and Hugh Marlowe is sturdy as Holm's playwright/husband. Gregory Ratoff and Marilyn Monroe do well in supporting roles. It's basically a sophisticated and talky soap opera, but it holds up.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/16/22 12:42 PM
THE MENU
Set at a swanky restaurant on a remote island, THE MENU opens with young couple Tyler (Nicholas Hoult) and Margot (Anya Taylor-Joy). Tyler is an overzealous foodie who admires Chef Slowik (Ralph Fiennes) in a practically idol worshipping way, while his date Margot doesn’t seem to share or even understand his obsession. The restaurant is very exclusive, cost $1,250 per person (with only 12 guests allowed in at a time), and is a privilege for anyone to dine there. The guests are prepared six different courses over the evening, each with a thematic story that comes together at the end. With the holidays coming up, this is a very solid film to begin the season with. Hoult, Taylor-Joy, and Ralph Fiennes are all exceptional in their individual roles and the chemistry within their dynamic is *chef’s kiss*. Hoult is wonderful as the giddy, I-can’t-believe-I’m-here fan boy, Taylor-Joy as the strong and disobedient guest, while Fiennes continues to amaze with his villainry side as the highly demanding/I-won’t-accept-excuses Chef. At this point in his career it should be noted how amazing Fiennes can be as either a protagonist or antagonist. The man refuses to be typecast and I can say the same for Taylor-Joy, who continues to add another incredible performance to her already strong and budding resume. Without giving away too much, one of the film’s messages in a way reminded me of Ingmar Bergman’s THE MAGICIAN about artists and critics. A cheeky dark comedy that marvelously builds anticipation, that’ll leave you satisfied but also asking for seconds, so bring your appetite. 6.5/10
Set at a swanky restaurant on a remote island, THE MENU opens with young couple Tyler (Nicholas Hoult) and Margot (Anya Taylor-Joy). Tyler is an overzealous foodie who admires Chef Slowik (Ralph Fiennes) in a practically idol worshipping way, while his date Margot doesn’t seem to share or even understand his obsession. The restaurant is very exclusive, cost $1,250 per person (with only 12 guests allowed in at a time), and is a privilege for anyone to dine there. The guests are prepared six different courses over the evening, each with a thematic story that comes together at the end. With the holidays coming up, this is a very solid film to begin the season with. Hoult, Taylor-Joy, and Ralph Fiennes are all exceptional in their individual roles and the chemistry within their dynamic is *chef’s kiss*. Hoult is wonderful as the giddy, I-can’t-believe-I’m-here fan boy, Taylor-Joy as the strong and disobedient guest, while Fiennes continues to amaze with his villainry side as the highly demanding/I-won’t-accept-excuses Chef. At this point in his career it should be noted how amazing Fiennes can be as either a protagonist or antagonist. The man refuses to be typecast and I can say the same for Taylor-Joy, who continues to add another incredible performance to her already strong and budding resume. Without giving away too much, one of the film’s messages in a way reminded me of Ingmar Bergman’s THE MAGICIAN about artists and critics. A cheeky dark comedy that marvelously builds anticipation, that’ll leave you satisfied but also asking for seconds, so bring your appetite. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/22 02:29 AM
SHE SAID
A film about the two New York Times investigative reporters who broke the Harvey Weinstein story: Megan Twohey (Carey Mulligan) and Jodi Kantor (Zoe Kazan). Judging from the trailer I would have guessed Mulligan was the main star but the story seems to follow Kazan's character more, even though the film opens with Twohey (in yet another desperate attempt to bring up and take a personal dig at Donald Trump, who hasn't been in office for almost 2 years now). The film's story is messy and even bringing up Trump while the film is about the story of Harvey Weinstein was petty, unnecessary, and distracting to the main culprit. Dealing with a story like this that took years to investigate before ever receiving an ounce of printer toner, the highlights are what are given; however, many of the scenes are redundant of each other: one of the reporters either makes a call or personally shows up to a victims house asking her to go on the record about their own history and experience working for Harvey and Miramax. Most of the time the women give them a quick no or in some cases, think about it before declining. I was very disappointed in Mulligan as she came off an Oscar worthy performance in PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN (which I still feel to this day she deserved) for this sleeper of a film. I understand the subject matter is personal and sensitive but outside of a few violent outbursts against men, she's wasted and going through the motions. Finally and to be clear, I'm not saying what happened to these victims isn't tragic and everything Harvey Weinstein has received wasn't completely justified and warranted. I'm simply saying as a film, for me, this disappointingly didn't work. 5/10
A film about the two New York Times investigative reporters who broke the Harvey Weinstein story: Megan Twohey (Carey Mulligan) and Jodi Kantor (Zoe Kazan). Judging from the trailer I would have guessed Mulligan was the main star but the story seems to follow Kazan's character more, even though the film opens with Twohey (in yet another desperate attempt to bring up and take a personal dig at Donald Trump, who hasn't been in office for almost 2 years now). The film's story is messy and even bringing up Trump while the film is about the story of Harvey Weinstein was petty, unnecessary, and distracting to the main culprit. Dealing with a story like this that took years to investigate before ever receiving an ounce of printer toner, the highlights are what are given; however, many of the scenes are redundant of each other: one of the reporters either makes a call or personally shows up to a victims house asking her to go on the record about their own history and experience working for Harvey and Miramax. Most of the time the women give them a quick no or in some cases, think about it before declining. I was very disappointed in Mulligan as she came off an Oscar worthy performance in PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN (which I still feel to this day she deserved) for this sleeper of a film. I understand the subject matter is personal and sensitive but outside of a few violent outbursts against men, she's wasted and going through the motions. Finally and to be clear, I'm not saying what happened to these victims isn't tragic and everything Harvey Weinstein has received wasn't completely justified and warranted. I'm simply saying as a film, for me, this disappointingly didn't work. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/22 12:11 AM
THE WONDER
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/22 06:11 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE WONDER
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
I just saw the trailer 4 this pic.. i do want 2 c it..looks good , but i will keep ur review in mind I12...always helpful ur views..thanx .
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/22 06:40 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE WONDER
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
Set in Ireland, 1862, English nurse Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) is hired by an Irish village to watch and observe 11-year-old Anna O'Donnell (Kíla Lord Cassidy), who has been fasting without food for 4 months. Amazed that she's still alive, locals come to visit the girl and hold her in esteem as a miracle from God. Nurse Lib and Sister Michael (Josie Walker) rotate their watches over young Anna and are requested by the village elders who hired them, to offer their own and separate observations of Anna. Truth be told, you're invested in this story to see if the girl is faking it or not and that's a lot of what this film is based upon. However, and without spoiling anything, the ending left me dissatisfied and angry at their poking fun of religion. It seems in today's Hollywood you can love anyone or anything except God and country. Furthermore, I'm a big Florence Pugh fan but even her performance is relegated as forgettable as I clearly understand why this went straight to Netflix and opted out of a theatrical release. The trailer does its job to pique your curiosity, but the film sadly doesn't deliver on the goods. 5.5/10
I just saw the trailer 4 this pic.. i do want 2 c it..looks good , but i will keep ur review in mind I12...always helpful ur views..thanx .
As we speak.. Watching "From Here to Eternity" 4 the umpteenth time..always get something outta this flick...alot of my older relatives were in WW2 & I try 2 relate 2 that...good flick...TCM is a good channel even though they replay some flicks over & over...Montgomery Clift is @ his best..as well as Burt Lancaster..the stabbing scene between Borgnine & Clift is a nail biter 4 first time watchers...
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/19/22 10:06 PM
A CHRISTMAS STORY CHRISTMAS
39 years later we get a sequel to the timeless holiday classic, A CHRISTMAS STORY. Set in 1973, Ralphie (Peter Billingsley) has made a deal with his wife to quit his 9-5 job for the year to focus on his writing. However, if he doesn't get published before the year is over, he'll go back to the grindstone in 1974. With only 5 days before Christmas, the family makes the trip from their home on the south side of Chicago to Ralphie's old home in Hohman, Indiana where Ralphie is deputized by his mother to take over the Christmas planning. Bearing the weight of the stress of waiting to hear back from a publisher before the year's out and taking over Christmas duties, Ralphie and his wife Sandy (Erinn Hayes) do their best to navigate the pitfalls they must continually overcome until Christmas day. Let's be honest, it's nearly impossible to recreate the magic the original 1983 film accomplished as it's such a revered film, but this is a very touching sequel that stands on its own and doesn't besmirch it's predecessor. The role of Ralphie's mom has been recast from Melinda Dillon to Julie Hagerty but outside of that, everyone else has reprised there roles and there are a number of cameos. I'm confident in saying the world didn't need a sequel to A CHRISTMAS STORY as the original is ageless, but this is a worthy enough follow-up. 6/10
39 years later we get a sequel to the timeless holiday classic, A CHRISTMAS STORY. Set in 1973, Ralphie (Peter Billingsley) has made a deal with his wife to quit his 9-5 job for the year to focus on his writing. However, if he doesn't get published before the year is over, he'll go back to the grindstone in 1974. With only 5 days before Christmas, the family makes the trip from their home on the south side of Chicago to Ralphie's old home in Hohman, Indiana where Ralphie is deputized by his mother to take over the Christmas planning. Bearing the weight of the stress of waiting to hear back from a publisher before the year's out and taking over Christmas duties, Ralphie and his wife Sandy (Erinn Hayes) do their best to navigate the pitfalls they must continually overcome until Christmas day. Let's be honest, it's nearly impossible to recreate the magic the original 1983 film accomplished as it's such a revered film, but this is a very touching sequel that stands on its own and doesn't besmirch it's predecessor. The role of Ralphie's mom has been recast from Melinda Dillon to Julie Hagerty but outside of that, everyone else has reprised there roles and there are a number of cameos. I'm confident in saying the world didn't need a sequel to A CHRISTMAS STORY as the original is ageless, but this is a worthy enough follow-up. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/22 11:28 PM
BONES AND ALL
A twisted love tale set throughout the Midwest circa 1988. Taylor Russell plays Maren, an 18-year-old who must satisfy her hunger by feeding (i.e cannibalism). She attacks a classmate and her father unwillingly puts her on her own path before being found out by the authorities. Abandoned, alone, and attempting to survive on her own, she begins a journey to connect with her estranged mother. During her travels she crosses paths with both Sully (Mark Rylance) and her soon-to-be lover Lee (Timothée Chalamet), who are also both "feeders." Sully takes Maren in to train her more in her powers and set some rules amongst their community but is also unstable and very unnerving. Lee on the other hand can be short tempered when it comes to protecting the ones he loves and he's more easily comfortable to take the necessary steps needed in order to survive, while Maren is still struggling with her own acceptance of her own needs. Brilliant performances by all involved (Maren, Chalamet, and Rylance). The film hooks you in early as it's a unique but graphic take on a love story but then struggles with pacing the rest of the way and has, what I believed to be, multiple endings as the film continues when I thought it would tune out. One characters arc I thought was completed comes back later on and I understand why it's presented but still not sold on the fact that it was needed. What started out great losses steam throughout unfortunately but a different experience that is worth a look. 7/10
A twisted love tale set throughout the Midwest circa 1988. Taylor Russell plays Maren, an 18-year-old who must satisfy her hunger by feeding (i.e cannibalism). She attacks a classmate and her father unwillingly puts her on her own path before being found out by the authorities. Abandoned, alone, and attempting to survive on her own, she begins a journey to connect with her estranged mother. During her travels she crosses paths with both Sully (Mark Rylance) and her soon-to-be lover Lee (Timothée Chalamet), who are also both "feeders." Sully takes Maren in to train her more in her powers and set some rules amongst their community but is also unstable and very unnerving. Lee on the other hand can be short tempered when it comes to protecting the ones he loves and he's more easily comfortable to take the necessary steps needed in order to survive, while Maren is still struggling with her own acceptance of her own needs. Brilliant performances by all involved (Maren, Chalamet, and Rylance). The film hooks you in early as it's a unique but graphic take on a love story but then struggles with pacing the rest of the way and has, what I believed to be, multiple endings as the film continues when I thought it would tune out. One characters arc I thought was completed comes back later on and I understand why it's presented but still not sold on the fact that it was needed. What started out great losses steam throughout unfortunately but a different experience that is worth a look. 7/10
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/24/22 09:36 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BONES AND ALL
A twisted love tale set throughout the Midwest circa 1988. Taylor Russell plays Maren, an 18-year-old who must satisfy her hunger by feeding (i.e cannibalism). She attacks a classmate and her father unwillingly puts her on her own path before being found out by the authorities. Abandoned, alone, and attempting to survive on her own, she begins a journey to connect with her estranged mother. During her travels she crosses paths with both Sully (Mark Rylance) and her soon-to-be lover Lee (Timothée Chalamet), who are also both "feeders." Sully takes Maren in to train her more in her powers and set some rules amongst their community but is also unstable and very unnerving. Lee on the other hand can be short tempered when it comes to protecting the ones he loves and he's more easily comfortable to take the necessary steps needed in order to survive, while Maren is still struggling with her own acceptance of her own needs. Brilliant performances by all involved (Maren, Chalamet, and Rylance). The film hooks you in early as it's a unique but graphic take on a love story but then struggles with pacing the rest of the way and has, what I believed to be, multiple endings as the film continues when I thought it would tune out. One characters arc I thought was completed comes back later on and I understand why it's presented but still not sold on the fact that it was needed. What started out great losses steam throughout unfortunately but a different experience that is worth a look. 7/10
A twisted love tale set throughout the Midwest circa 1988. Taylor Russell plays Maren, an 18-year-old who must satisfy her hunger by feeding (i.e cannibalism). She attacks a classmate and her father unwillingly puts her on her own path before being found out by the authorities. Abandoned, alone, and attempting to survive on her own, she begins a journey to connect with her estranged mother. During her travels she crosses paths with both Sully (Mark Rylance) and her soon-to-be lover Lee (Timothée Chalamet), who are also both "feeders." Sully takes Maren in to train her more in her powers and set some rules amongst their community but is also unstable and very unnerving. Lee on the other hand can be short tempered when it comes to protecting the ones he loves and he's more easily comfortable to take the necessary steps needed in order to survive, while Maren is still struggling with her own acceptance of her own needs. Brilliant performances by all involved (Maren, Chalamet, and Rylance). The film hooks you in early as it's a unique but graphic take on a love story but then struggles with pacing the rest of the way and has, what I believed to be, multiple endings as the film continues when I thought it would tune out. One characters arc I thought was completed comes back later on and I understand why it's presented but still not sold on the fact that it was needed. What started out great losses steam throughout unfortunately but a different experience that is worth a look. 7/10
Yes...just saw it recently on firestick ...good flick...
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/28/22 12:47 AM
Watched the first two episodes of Stallone's Tulsa King. It's Stallone, so I watched it. Okay performances, but the premise is silly and unauthenric. Michael Franzese gave it a thumbs down and I agree. However, I'll still watch.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/22 02:35 AM
VIOLENT NIGHT
Connecticut, Christmas Eve: Santa Claus (David Harbour) takes a break from delivering presents only to find the luxury house he's resting in is being ambushed by a group of robbers who are attempting to steal $300 million from the vault within the house. The owner of said house is a wealthy, no BS heiress Gertrude Lightstone (played marvelously by Christmas icon Beverly D'Angelo) who believes her money is unreachable from the robbers; however, having planned this job for months, the thieves (lead brilliantly by John Leguizamo who plays "Scrooge") are always one step ahead due to their inside source. With the family held hostage, Santa finds the time in his busy schedule to still save the day and salvage Christmas. A hybrid of BAD SANTA meets DIE HARD with a touch of HOME ALONE peppered in for good measure. Foul-mouthed, gratuitous, and obscene, the film earns its R rating very early in the film. Acts 1 and 3 are worth the price of admission but the bridge between the two was a little difficult to sit through as the story comes to a loud and screeching halt. But, it was extremely entertaining watching David Harbour play a drunk and burnt out Santa Claus who has a "unique set of skills" shall we say. 6/10
Connecticut, Christmas Eve: Santa Claus (David Harbour) takes a break from delivering presents only to find the luxury house he's resting in is being ambushed by a group of robbers who are attempting to steal $300 million from the vault within the house. The owner of said house is a wealthy, no BS heiress Gertrude Lightstone (played marvelously by Christmas icon Beverly D'Angelo) who believes her money is unreachable from the robbers; however, having planned this job for months, the thieves (lead brilliantly by John Leguizamo who plays "Scrooge") are always one step ahead due to their inside source. With the family held hostage, Santa finds the time in his busy schedule to still save the day and salvage Christmas. A hybrid of BAD SANTA meets DIE HARD with a touch of HOME ALONE peppered in for good measure. Foul-mouthed, gratuitous, and obscene, the film earns its R rating very early in the film. Acts 1 and 3 are worth the price of admission but the bridge between the two was a little difficult to sit through as the story comes to a loud and screeching halt. But, it was extremely entertaining watching David Harbour play a drunk and burnt out Santa Claus who has a "unique set of skills" shall we say. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/13/22 03:14 AM
THE IPCRESS FILE (1965)
Top British scientists are being kidnapped and held for ransom by some untitled but nefarious organization. When the intelligence services ransom them, they find that the scientists have been brainwashed and are no longer useful. Rival officers from two competing spy officers use Harry Palmer (Michael Caine), a clever, insubordinate cockney Army sergeant released from jail for racketeering, as their bird dog in catching the mastermind. Palmer finds him, but gets captured and is brainwashed, too, though he manages to resist giving in totally. The movie is slow at times, but is well acted by Nigel Green and Guy Doleman, the two spy rivals dish each other in that delightfully British upper-class way. But the move belongs to Caine, who gets many great lines from this exceptionally witty, well-written script. "Ipcress" made Caine, and led to two more Harry Palmer movies based on Len Deighton novels. Intelligent, twisty movie--best of the trio.
Top British scientists are being kidnapped and held for ransom by some untitled but nefarious organization. When the intelligence services ransom them, they find that the scientists have been brainwashed and are no longer useful. Rival officers from two competing spy officers use Harry Palmer (Michael Caine), a clever, insubordinate cockney Army sergeant released from jail for racketeering, as their bird dog in catching the mastermind. Palmer finds him, but gets captured and is brainwashed, too, though he manages to resist giving in totally. The movie is slow at times, but is well acted by Nigel Green and Guy Doleman, the two spy rivals dish each other in that delightfully British upper-class way. But the move belongs to Caine, who gets many great lines from this exceptionally witty, well-written script. "Ipcress" made Caine, and led to two more Harry Palmer movies based on Len Deighton novels. Intelligent, twisty movie--best of the trio.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/22 01:53 AM
AVATAR: THE WAY OF THE WATER
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/22 02:11 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
AVATAR: THE WAY OF THE WATER
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
Thanks for this review 7/10 is not really high how did you rate the first Avatar?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/22 02:34 AM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Originally Posted by Irishman12
AVATAR: THE WAY OF THE WATER
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
13 years later we're given the sequel I'm not quite sure anyone asked for; however, I'm not willing to bet against James Cameron. AVATAR set the bar for beautiful and enticing visual effects and this raises that bar even higher. I saw this in IMAX 3D and there were times I actually felt like I was in the movie because the action is so intimate. With saying all of that and once the visual eye candy subsides, the story is mostly average and bloated. Yes, James Cameron doesn't want to hear about the runtime but you're going to hear about it. The story could and should have been trimmed as it felt at times a labor to get through. Sigourney Weaver is wonderfully incorporated back into the story after the events of the original and typical Cameron, there are moments that pull at your heartstrings. So far the reviews seem positive and the money's already rolling in and I'll continue to see further additions in the franchise but as was the case with this, do we really need more and did anyone ask for them? I will say if you plan on seeing this, spend the money and see it in IMAX 3D! 7/10
Thanks for this review 7/10 is not really high how did you rate the first Avatar?
About the same but between the two and after a first viewing, I think I liked the first one more overall. Visuals are better in the sequel, story's better in the original.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/16/22 06:16 AM
SAN QUENTIN (1946)
iI watched this movie because it stars Lawrence Tierney, one of my favorite tough guys of that era (and an off-screen tough guy, too). Here he plays Jim Roland, a reformed bad guy--product of San Quentin's "League" of model prisoners who've earned parole. The benevolent warden wants him and a current supposed model prisoner, Nick Taylor (Barton Maclane, Eternal Heavy) to go to a newspaper to be interviewed about the League, but Taylor, using a hidden gun (natch!) shoots the warden and takes off on a one-man crime spree. Roland vows to bring him in, getting help from a network of League graduates on the streets, and earning the malevolent interest of a SF detective, who wants to put him back in prison. This is a simple B movie with a fairly interesting plot and decent action. Tierney's your basic one-note actor, but when used in bad guy/tough guy roles, he's quite effective and has excellent stage presence. Not a bad film at all.
iI watched this movie because it stars Lawrence Tierney, one of my favorite tough guys of that era (and an off-screen tough guy, too). Here he plays Jim Roland, a reformed bad guy--product of San Quentin's "League" of model prisoners who've earned parole. The benevolent warden wants him and a current supposed model prisoner, Nick Taylor (Barton Maclane, Eternal Heavy) to go to a newspaper to be interviewed about the League, but Taylor, using a hidden gun (natch!) shoots the warden and takes off on a one-man crime spree. Roland vows to bring him in, getting help from a network of League graduates on the streets, and earning the malevolent interest of a SF detective, who wants to put him back in prison. This is a simple B movie with a fairly interesting plot and decent action. Tierney's your basic one-note actor, but when used in bad guy/tough guy roles, he's quite effective and has excellent stage presence. Not a bad film at all.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/20/22 12:32 AM
EMANCIPATION
Based on a true story and set in Louisiana, 1863, Lincoln has passed the Emancipation Proclamation which makes all slaves now free. Peter (Will Smith) leaves his family on the plantation in order to get to Baton Rogue to join the Union army and free his family from bondage. Rumor has it Quentin Tarantino originally wanted Smith for DJANGO UNCHAINED but Smith passed on it. Here, Smith takes on a more serious role and while his performance can easily be viewed as at least Oscar nominee worthy (but may not actually get the accolade with his recent suspension from the Academy), it appears Smith chose the wrong movie and should have taken Tarantino up on DJANGO. Outside of Smith's performance, the film feels rather light even while dealing with the subject matter. Most of it is a cat-and-mouse game between Peter who's on the run and Jim Fassel (Ben Foster) and company who are chasing him down. Director Antoine Fuqua chooses an interesting choice with the color of the film as most of it is seen in a gray, almost black-and-white filter with very little color. My expectations were higher with both Smith and Fuqua attached to the project. I'll also say despite what happened at the Oscars, I'm still a Will Smith fan and it's good to see him back onscreen. 5.5/10
Based on a true story and set in Louisiana, 1863, Lincoln has passed the Emancipation Proclamation which makes all slaves now free. Peter (Will Smith) leaves his family on the plantation in order to get to Baton Rogue to join the Union army and free his family from bondage. Rumor has it Quentin Tarantino originally wanted Smith for DJANGO UNCHAINED but Smith passed on it. Here, Smith takes on a more serious role and while his performance can easily be viewed as at least Oscar nominee worthy (but may not actually get the accolade with his recent suspension from the Academy), it appears Smith chose the wrong movie and should have taken Tarantino up on DJANGO. Outside of Smith's performance, the film feels rather light even while dealing with the subject matter. Most of it is a cat-and-mouse game between Peter who's on the run and Jim Fassel (Ben Foster) and company who are chasing him down. Director Antoine Fuqua chooses an interesting choice with the color of the film as most of it is seen in a gray, almost black-and-white filter with very little color. My expectations were higher with both Smith and Fuqua attached to the project. I'll also say despite what happened at the Oscars, I'm still a Will Smith fan and it's good to see him back onscreen. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/21/22 11:41 PM
THE WHALE
You've heard the hype surrounding Brendan Fraser and it's very much real and deserved. He puts together his absolute best performance and to say he's back would be a huge understatement! Fraser plays Charlie, an obese English teacher during his last week of life attempting to reconnect with his daughter Ellie (Sadie Sink). He's checked in and looked after by his friend Liz (Hong Chau), who also happens to be a nurse. In typical Aronofsky fashion the film is a downer (like REQUIEM FOR A DREAM level depression) but still poignant and powerful. Fraser is seen consuming food in practically every scene and his binge scenes are especially difficult to stomach as a viewer. However, underneath it all, there is a very real and powerful message of love and acceptance. Fraser will most definitely get at least an Oscar nomination but I daresay Sink and Chau are worthy as well and I have my finger crossed for Aronofsky to get a nod or possible win. 7.5/10
You've heard the hype surrounding Brendan Fraser and it's very much real and deserved. He puts together his absolute best performance and to say he's back would be a huge understatement! Fraser plays Charlie, an obese English teacher during his last week of life attempting to reconnect with his daughter Ellie (Sadie Sink). He's checked in and looked after by his friend Liz (Hong Chau), who also happens to be a nurse. In typical Aronofsky fashion the film is a downer (like REQUIEM FOR A DREAM level depression) but still poignant and powerful. Fraser is seen consuming food in practically every scene and his binge scenes are especially difficult to stomach as a viewer. However, underneath it all, there is a very real and powerful message of love and acceptance. Fraser will most definitely get at least an Oscar nomination but I daresay Sink and Chau are worthy as well and I have my finger crossed for Aronofsky to get a nod or possible win. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/22 01:12 AM
WHITNEY HOUSTON: I WANNA DANCE WITH SOMEBODY
Another forgettable biopic about a pillar within the music world. Naomi Ackie does a wonderful job portraying The Voice herself, Whitney Houston. She's supported solidly by Stanley Tucci (Clive Davis), her record manager. The look and mannerisms are down but since Whitney has such a distinct and powerful voice, Ackie is left to lip sync her singing scenes. And like a lot of films about musicians the focus is on the music while offering just a glimpse of the real individual behind-the-scenes. Although I will be honest and say I like some Whitney Houston songs but was surprised to find she was bisexual upon the early moments of the film. Another tragedy of star gone too soon, even if Houston passed at the age of 48. A decent film worth a viewing but will be forgotten about soon after. 6/10
Another forgettable biopic about a pillar within the music world. Naomi Ackie does a wonderful job portraying The Voice herself, Whitney Houston. She's supported solidly by Stanley Tucci (Clive Davis), her record manager. The look and mannerisms are down but since Whitney has such a distinct and powerful voice, Ackie is left to lip sync her singing scenes. And like a lot of films about musicians the focus is on the music while offering just a glimpse of the real individual behind-the-scenes. Although I will be honest and say I like some Whitney Houston songs but was surprised to find she was bisexual upon the early moments of the film. Another tragedy of star gone too soon, even if Houston passed at the age of 48. A decent film worth a viewing but will be forgotten about soon after. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/22 10:29 PM
GLASS ONION: A KNIVES OUT MYSTERY
Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig) is back for another murder mystery, this one set on a private Greek island owned by billionaire Miles Bron (Edward Norton). He invites his closest group of friends which makes for another name worthy advertisement with the likes of Dave Bautista, Kate Hudson, Janelle Monae, and Kathryn Hahn. Miles' birthday is what is being celebrated and he's created a clever game for all of his guests: to determine who, how, and why he's been murdered (not literally, just for the purposes of the game). However, fiction soon turns to realty as Miles' life and that of the other guests are in danger and Blanc just so happens to be on the island to assist with uncovering the truth. I will say, this film isn't as tight, sharp, or funny as its predecessor, which in my opinion, was a high bar to reach let alone surpass. This sequel had a very DEATH ON THE NILE vibe to me (which too was inferior to its original MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS) and didn't work as well as KNIVES OUT, which was set in classic style manor. In addition, the film continues to harp on the glass onion theme and I was able to guess who the killer was about halfway through, thus in a sense, ruining the film for me when the reveal was made. Still a fun little ride and I'd watch additional sequels (Lord knows Netflix paid enough for them), so I am looking forward to a third iteration with Mr. Blanc. 6.5/10
Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig) is back for another murder mystery, this one set on a private Greek island owned by billionaire Miles Bron (Edward Norton). He invites his closest group of friends which makes for another name worthy advertisement with the likes of Dave Bautista, Kate Hudson, Janelle Monae, and Kathryn Hahn. Miles' birthday is what is being celebrated and he's created a clever game for all of his guests: to determine who, how, and why he's been murdered (not literally, just for the purposes of the game). However, fiction soon turns to realty as Miles' life and that of the other guests are in danger and Blanc just so happens to be on the island to assist with uncovering the truth. I will say, this film isn't as tight, sharp, or funny as its predecessor, which in my opinion, was a high bar to reach let alone surpass. This sequel had a very DEATH ON THE NILE vibe to me (which too was inferior to its original MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS) and didn't work as well as KNIVES OUT, which was set in classic style manor. In addition, the film continues to harp on the glass onion theme and I was able to guess who the killer was about halfway through, thus in a sense, ruining the film for me when the reveal was made. Still a fun little ride and I'd watch additional sequels (Lord knows Netflix paid enough for them), so I am looking forward to a third iteration with Mr. Blanc. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/22 10:43 PM
BABYLON
Writer/Director Damien Chazelle's homage to the birth of Hollywood. Set between 1926-1932 the film follows 4 characters: Brad Pitt's Jack Conrad, who's already an onscreen legend in the industry; Margot Robbie's Nellie LaRoy and Diego Calva's Manny Torres, who are both desperately seeking to break into the industry; and Jovan Adepo's Sidney Palmer, a trumpet player who happens to land himself in Hollywood without much effort or ambition. Overall the film (especially the first 20 minutes) are a study in debauchery and excess the likes of which few films have presented onscreen. Robbie is simply spectacular as the fiery and ferocious girl from Jersey Nellie, who knows she can be a star and is forward enough to make it happen. I've got my fingers crossed she can nab an Oscar for this. However, my real criticism of the film has to do with Adepo's Sidney character. This is the worst written character of the bunch, with barely any screen time compared to his costars, with an arc that is the weakest as well. In order to pick up pacing while at the same time cutting down on the run time, his character and story could really have been disposed of as it served very little purpose in the film. Outside of that, this is a lot of fun but probably won't make a lot of money at the box office. I still endorse a viewing whether theatrically or streaming when available. 7.5/10
Writer/Director Damien Chazelle's homage to the birth of Hollywood. Set between 1926-1932 the film follows 4 characters: Brad Pitt's Jack Conrad, who's already an onscreen legend in the industry; Margot Robbie's Nellie LaRoy and Diego Calva's Manny Torres, who are both desperately seeking to break into the industry; and Jovan Adepo's Sidney Palmer, a trumpet player who happens to land himself in Hollywood without much effort or ambition. Overall the film (especially the first 20 minutes) are a study in debauchery and excess the likes of which few films have presented onscreen. Robbie is simply spectacular as the fiery and ferocious girl from Jersey Nellie, who knows she can be a star and is forward enough to make it happen. I've got my fingers crossed she can nab an Oscar for this. However, my real criticism of the film has to do with Adepo's Sidney character. This is the worst written character of the bunch, with barely any screen time compared to his costars, with an arc that is the weakest as well. In order to pick up pacing while at the same time cutting down on the run time, his character and story could really have been disposed of as it served very little purpose in the film. Outside of that, this is a lot of fun but probably won't make a lot of money at the box office. I still endorse a viewing whether theatrically or streaming when available. 7.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/22 07:25 PM
THE TRAIN (1964)
As the Allies close in on Paris in August 1944, SS Col. von Waldheim (Paul Scofield) loots the city's great paintings and commandeers a train to bring them to Germany. He drafts French trainmaster Paul Labiche (Burt Lancaster), secretly a Resistance fighter, to recruit a crew and drive the train to Germany. This brings on a brilliant, often hair-raising game of cat-and-mouse as the French pull out all the stops to prevent the train from leaving their country, while the Nazis do almost equally well in repairing the sabotage and keeping the train rolling. Scofield is thoroughly detestable as you'd expect from a movie Nazi, and Lancaster, in one of his best roles, makes a better anti-hero than McQueen ever was. Director John Frankenheimer, one of my faves, uses an excellent international cast (including Jeanne Moreau) and keeps up the action and tension almost non-stop. The train and rail scenes are stunningly realistic in glorious black-and-white. Fine movie!
As the Allies close in on Paris in August 1944, SS Col. von Waldheim (Paul Scofield) loots the city's great paintings and commandeers a train to bring them to Germany. He drafts French trainmaster Paul Labiche (Burt Lancaster), secretly a Resistance fighter, to recruit a crew and drive the train to Germany. This brings on a brilliant, often hair-raising game of cat-and-mouse as the French pull out all the stops to prevent the train from leaving their country, while the Nazis do almost equally well in repairing the sabotage and keeping the train rolling. Scofield is thoroughly detestable as you'd expect from a movie Nazi, and Lancaster, in one of his best roles, makes a better anti-hero than McQueen ever was. Director John Frankenheimer, one of my faves, uses an excellent international cast (including Jeanne Moreau) and keeps up the action and tension almost non-stop. The train and rail scenes are stunningly realistic in glorious black-and-white. Fine movie!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/22 11:20 PM
Wow, great haul of reviews for our entertainment.
My wife Mary loves all your reviews and appreciates your posting.
I just read them all to her and she is making a plan right now on which to see in what order.
She seams very excited about the Bones And All & Whale.
We both thank you and please keep them coming.
Thank you i12
Dues paid & The Mrs.
My wife Mary loves all your reviews and appreciates your posting.
I just read them all to her and she is making a plan right now on which to see in what order.
She seams very excited about the Bones And All & Whale.
We both thank you and please keep them coming.
Thank you i12
Dues paid & The Mrs.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/30/22 12:25 AM
Thanks DP. Let me know what you and the Mrs. think upon viewing them.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/31/22 03:14 AM
THE ROCKING HORSE WINNER (1949
Ten year old Paul Grahame (John Howard Davies) worries because his upper middle class household is about to go broke: his mother (Valerie Hobson) is a pathological spendthrift; his father (Hugh Sinclaire) a perpetually losing gambler. An indulgent, wealthy uncle (Ronald Squire) buys Paul a rocking horse for Christmas. Paul hears voices whispering "more money, more money" in the house, and while wildly riding the horse in a trance, conjures the winners of horse races yet to come. He enlists the family's kindly handyman (John Mills) to place bets for both; soon they're rolling in money. The uncle gets in on it, and channels some of his winnings to bail out Paul's parents, who are soon back to living high on the hog. After a long losing streak, Paul whips himself into a final frenzy and calls the winner of the Derby--but at a terrible cost. Based on a D.H. Lawrence short story, "The Rocking Horse Winner," though never an outright supernatural or horror film, maintains an eerie, disturbing air throughout. The acting is first-rate all around, and the filming uses deep-focus techniques that add to the spooky atmosphere. Brilliant job.
Ten year old Paul Grahame (John Howard Davies) worries because his upper middle class household is about to go broke: his mother (Valerie Hobson) is a pathological spendthrift; his father (Hugh Sinclaire) a perpetually losing gambler. An indulgent, wealthy uncle (Ronald Squire) buys Paul a rocking horse for Christmas. Paul hears voices whispering "more money, more money" in the house, and while wildly riding the horse in a trance, conjures the winners of horse races yet to come. He enlists the family's kindly handyman (John Mills) to place bets for both; soon they're rolling in money. The uncle gets in on it, and channels some of his winnings to bail out Paul's parents, who are soon back to living high on the hog. After a long losing streak, Paul whips himself into a final frenzy and calls the winner of the Derby--but at a terrible cost. Based on a D.H. Lawrence short story, "The Rocking Horse Winner," though never an outright supernatural or horror film, maintains an eerie, disturbing air throughout. The acting is first-rate all around, and the filming uses deep-focus techniques that add to the spooky atmosphere. Brilliant job.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/23 09:57 AM
I am not going 2 rate or do or say anything here b-cause I12 got that..except that Myrna Loy was A FOX...so edible looking......
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/23 10:00 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
I am not going 2 rate or do or say anything here b-cause I12 got that..except that Myrna Loy was A FOX...so edible looking......
(sorry... am watching The Thin man goes home..)....
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/23 07:00 PM
THE MIST (2007)
David Drayton (Thomas Jane), his Maine home damaged in a big storm, goes to a supermarket to stock up. He and the other shoppers notice lots of Army and law enforcement vehicles speeding away from the town, which is soon enveloped in a thick mist. The mist is breeding a variety of loathsome, insect- and bird-like creatures (created by an experiment gone wrong at a nearby Army research base) that gobble up and destroy anyone who ventures out of the store--the critters also break through the windows and attack those inside. The trapped shoppers put up a brave fight, but a local Bible-belter (Marcia Gay Hardin) starts preaching apocalypse, dividing the crowd and inciting violence. This movie does justice to an excellent Steven King novella of the same name, and succeeds as an imaginative horror creature-feature, a drama of heroism and weakness, and a commentary on reckless military experimentation. How they did this on a budget of only $18 million is beyond me. Jane, not the most emotive actor, does well in the lead role, and is ably supported by Harden, Andre Braugher, Toby Jones and William Sadler (Eternal Redneck). Top notch.
David Drayton (Thomas Jane), his Maine home damaged in a big storm, goes to a supermarket to stock up. He and the other shoppers notice lots of Army and law enforcement vehicles speeding away from the town, which is soon enveloped in a thick mist. The mist is breeding a variety of loathsome, insect- and bird-like creatures (created by an experiment gone wrong at a nearby Army research base) that gobble up and destroy anyone who ventures out of the store--the critters also break through the windows and attack those inside. The trapped shoppers put up a brave fight, but a local Bible-belter (Marcia Gay Hardin) starts preaching apocalypse, dividing the crowd and inciting violence. This movie does justice to an excellent Steven King novella of the same name, and succeeds as an imaginative horror creature-feature, a drama of heroism and weakness, and a commentary on reckless military experimentation. How they did this on a budget of only $18 million is beyond me. Jane, not the most emotive actor, does well in the lead role, and is ably supported by Harden, Andre Braugher, Toby Jones and William Sadler (Eternal Redneck). Top notch.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/01/23 10:43 PM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
I am not going 2 rate or do or say anything here b-cause I12 got that..except that Myrna Loy was A FOX...so edible looking......
Not familiar with her work but after Googling her, yup, she was a real looker. After watching some of these older films, I'm surprised how many of these actresses were married 3 and 4 times (especially during the 1930's-1950's as divorce was frowned upon even more so in society during that time).
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/03/23 12:15 AM
With 2022 now in our rear view mirror, below is my 2022 top ten film list in order:
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/23 05:40 AM
WHITE NOISE (2022)
This Netflix movie is about a college professor who teaches Hitler Studies at a small liberal arts school and his wife, who have a nasty bunch of kids from multiple marraiges...no, wait...it's about a train wreck that unleashes a toxic, gene-alterlng cloud that causes the entire town to evacuate...no, wait...it's about consumer obsessions in supermarkets...no, wait... This movie is based on a Don DeLillo novel of the same name that I read years ago. I don't remember what the novel was about. Now I know why I don't remember...
This Netflix movie is about a college professor who teaches Hitler Studies at a small liberal arts school and his wife, who have a nasty bunch of kids from multiple marraiges...no, wait...it's about a train wreck that unleashes a toxic, gene-alterlng cloud that causes the entire town to evacuate...no, wait...it's about consumer obsessions in supermarkets...no, wait... This movie is based on a Don DeLillo novel of the same name that I read years ago. I don't remember what the novel was about. Now I know why I don't remember...
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/23 10:57 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2022 now in our rear view mirror, below is my 2022 top ten film list in order:
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
Some good picks. The Black Phone and The Northman are also on my list for 22. In no order.
The Black Phone
The Northman
Medieval
X
The Banshees of Inisherin
The Stranger
Terrifier 2
Benediction
Official Competition
The Good Boss.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/07/23 12:20 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Originally Posted by Irishman12
With 2022 now in our rear view mirror, below is my 2022 top ten film list in order:
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
1) THE BATMAN
2) SMILE
3) THE BLACK PHONE
4) THE WHALE
5) TOP GUN: MAVERICK
6) EMILY THE CRIMINAL
7) THE MENU
8) THE NORTHMAN
9) DON'T WORRY DARLING
10) BABYLON
Some good picks. The Black Phone and The Northman are also on my list for 22. In no order.
The Black Phone
The Northman
Medieval
X
The Banshees of Inisherin
The Stranger
Terrifier 2
Benediction
Official Competition
The Good Boss.
I had never heard of TERRIRIFER 2 until I saw it at AMC and heard positive reviews about it. Before watching it I naturally had to see the original and I actually preferred that over the sequel. But both were enjoyable.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/08/23 07:35 PM
BANDIT (2022)lov
This movie is based on Canada's real-life "Flying Bandit." Robert (Josh Duhamel), a small-time crook, escapes from a Minnesota prison and heads north, where he gains a new identity, a lover (Andrea Cuthbert), and proceeds to rob 59 banks plus jewelry stores before he's caught. This movie is light and enjoyable, no violence, few profanities, and is almost a comedy because Duhamel plays Robert as an amiable rogue,(like James Garner in the all-time great "Barbarians at the Gate"), with many funny voice-overs (like Ray Liotta in "Goodfellas"). He's got charm to spare. Very entertaining.
This movie is based on Canada's real-life "Flying Bandit." Robert (Josh Duhamel), a small-time crook, escapes from a Minnesota prison and heads north, where he gains a new identity, a lover (Andrea Cuthbert), and proceeds to rob 59 banks plus jewelry stores before he's caught. This movie is light and enjoyable, no violence, few profanities, and is almost a comedy because Duhamel plays Robert as an amiable rogue,(like James Garner in the all-time great "Barbarians at the Gate"), with many funny voice-overs (like Ray Liotta in "Goodfellas"). He's got charm to spare. Very entertaining.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/10/23 11:15 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
BANDIT (2022)lov
This movie is based on Canada's real-life "Flying Bandit." Robert (Josh Duhamel), a small-time crook, escapes from a Minnesota prison and heads north, where he gains a new identity, a lover (Andrea Cuthbert), and proceeds to rob 59 banks plus jewelry stores before he's caught. This movie is light and enjoyable, no violence, few profanities, and is almost a comedy because Duhamel plays Robert as an amiable rogue,(like James Garner in the all-time great "Barbarians at the Gate"), with many funny voice-overs (like Ray Liotta in "Goodfellas"). He's got charm to spare. Very entertaining.
This movie is based on Canada's real-life "Flying Bandit." Robert (Josh Duhamel), a small-time crook, escapes from a Minnesota prison and heads north, where he gains a new identity, a lover (Andrea Cuthbert), and proceeds to rob 59 banks plus jewelry stores before he's caught. This movie is light and enjoyable, no violence, few profanities, and is almost a comedy because Duhamel plays Robert as an amiable rogue,(like James Garner in the all-time great "Barbarians at the Gate"), with many funny voice-overs (like Ray Liotta in "Goodfellas"). He's got charm to spare. Very entertaining.
This sounds great, I gotta check this out.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/17/23 03:24 AM
THE PALE BLUE EYE (2022)
In 1830, Constable Landor (Christian Bale) is drafted by the superintendent of West Point to investigate the hanging and mutilation (heart cut out) of a cadet. He isoon gains an ally in a strange, somewhat feverish cadet, Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling), who becomes his tipster, critic and sometimes conscience as Landor's own background comes to light. Though this Netflixer is long and slow at times, the acting is superb, particularly the ever-deeper bonding between Landor and Poe. The outstanding supporting cast includes Toby Jones as the Academy's doctor, Lucy Boynton and Jillian Anderson as his daughter and wife, and Robert Duvall in a cameo as a local scholar and mystic. The occult hangs over this film, and it has two surprise endings. Don't miss it.
In 1830, Constable Landor (Christian Bale) is drafted by the superintendent of West Point to investigate the hanging and mutilation (heart cut out) of a cadet. He isoon gains an ally in a strange, somewhat feverish cadet, Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling), who becomes his tipster, critic and sometimes conscience as Landor's own background comes to light. Though this Netflixer is long and slow at times, the acting is superb, particularly the ever-deeper bonding between Landor and Poe. The outstanding supporting cast includes Toby Jones as the Academy's doctor, Lucy Boynton and Jillian Anderson as his daughter and wife, and Robert Duvall in a cameo as a local scholar and mystic. The occult hangs over this film, and it has two surprise endings. Don't miss it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/23 02:31 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
THE PALE BLUE EYE (2022)
In 1830, Constable Landor (Christian Bale) is drafted by the superintendent of West Point to investigate the hanging and mutilation (heart cut out) of a cadet. He isoon gains an ally in a strange, somewhat feverish cadet, Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling), who becomes his tipster, critic and sometimes conscience as Landor's own background comes to light. Though this Netflixer is long and slow at times, the acting is superb, particularly the ever-deeper bonding between Landor and Poe. The outstanding supporting cast includes Toby Jones as the Academy's doctor, Lucy Boynton and Jillian Anderson as his daughter and wife, and Robert Duvall in a cameo as a local scholar and mystic. The occult hangs over this film, and it has two surprise endings. Don't miss it.
In 1830, Constable Landor (Christian Bale) is drafted by the superintendent of West Point to investigate the hanging and mutilation (heart cut out) of a cadet. He isoon gains an ally in a strange, somewhat feverish cadet, Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling), who becomes his tipster, critic and sometimes conscience as Landor's own background comes to light. Though this Netflixer is long and slow at times, the acting is superb, particularly the ever-deeper bonding between Landor and Poe. The outstanding supporting cast includes Toby Jones as the Academy's doctor, Lucy Boynton and Jillian Anderson as his daughter and wife, and Robert Duvall in a cameo as a local scholar and mystic. The occult hangs over this film, and it has two surprise endings. Don't miss it.
Thanks for the review TB. Still on my to watch list, just haven't had the time to get around to it yet. Glad to see you enjoyed it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/20/23 01:46 AM
MISSING
Another cheap and easy to make film the studio is hoping to cash in on. A sequel to 2018's SEARCHING that no one asked for (and the original didn't set the world on fire either). But again, this is a cheap film to make as it's told exclusively through electronics, Mac computer, iPhone, Facetime, Whatsapp, etc. so making a profit shouldn't be entirely too difficult. However, this is the opposite of SEARCHING where the teenager, in this case June (Storm Reid) is attempting to find her mother Grace (Nia Long), who went to Columbia on vacation with her boyfriend Kevin (Ken Leung). Scheduled to pick them up at LAX and the couple no showing, June becomes suspicious as she cannot contact her mother but only Kevin. In doing so she untangles a yarn of lies and deception, going as far back as 12-years ago. Much like it's predecessor the film attempts to be smarter than it is. A few threads I was able to get there before the film gets you there, which is made easier with such a limited cast. Some of the themes are not surprising as they seem to be all Hollywood is hammering out these days (very heavy-handily I might add). Not worth taking the flyer on, even when it exits theaters. 4.5/10
Another cheap and easy to make film the studio is hoping to cash in on. A sequel to 2018's SEARCHING that no one asked for (and the original didn't set the world on fire either). But again, this is a cheap film to make as it's told exclusively through electronics, Mac computer, iPhone, Facetime, Whatsapp, etc. so making a profit shouldn't be entirely too difficult. However, this is the opposite of SEARCHING where the teenager, in this case June (Storm Reid) is attempting to find her mother Grace (Nia Long), who went to Columbia on vacation with her boyfriend Kevin (Ken Leung). Scheduled to pick them up at LAX and the couple no showing, June becomes suspicious as she cannot contact her mother but only Kevin. In doing so she untangles a yarn of lies and deception, going as far back as 12-years ago. Much like it's predecessor the film attempts to be smarter than it is. A few threads I was able to get there before the film gets you there, which is made easier with such a limited cast. Some of the themes are not surprising as they seem to be all Hollywood is hammering out these days (very heavy-handily I might add). Not worth taking the flyer on, even when it exits theaters. 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/23 12:36 AM
M3GAN
Produced a co-written by James Wan, Megan is an artificial intelligence in the body of a 4' doll. She was created by Gemma (Allison Williams) who works for Funki toy company and has been tasked with introducing an economical line to their successful pet robot PurRpetual Petz. Her niece Cady (Violet McGraw) is living with her now since her parents recently died tragically in a car accident that she survived. Witnessing Cady struggling with her new situation, lonely, and with no friends, Gemma pivots from her robot pet assignment to dust off Megan, which her boss instructed her to shelve in favor of the pet line. Gemma makes a breakthrough in her technology and Megan becomes Cady's best friend who is tasked by Gemma to protect Cady. Megan takes this to the extreme as she soon begins murdering people who get in the way of her relationship with Cady. To put it simply, this film has been done before and doesn't offer anything new as Megan is basically a female Chucky, although with a PG-13 rating, this isn't a slasher film. Social commentary is provided about young users and technology, not learning social skills but being more preoccupied with electronics. The film also hits on the fact of how we as a society are (and will continue to be) over reliant on technology in our day-to-day lives and also issues a warning of how that can turn against mankind in terrible ways. The film was exactly what I thought it would be going in which was very mediocre. Nothing terrible but nothing special either. I've heard a sequel has been greenlit which I'm not surprised as this'll probably be turned into another franchise unfortunately. The only standout for me was 11-year-old Violet McGraw who plays Cady and gives a strong performance for such a young actress, dealing with the lose of her parents and the aftermath. 5/10
Produced a co-written by James Wan, Megan is an artificial intelligence in the body of a 4' doll. She was created by Gemma (Allison Williams) who works for Funki toy company and has been tasked with introducing an economical line to their successful pet robot PurRpetual Petz. Her niece Cady (Violet McGraw) is living with her now since her parents recently died tragically in a car accident that she survived. Witnessing Cady struggling with her new situation, lonely, and with no friends, Gemma pivots from her robot pet assignment to dust off Megan, which her boss instructed her to shelve in favor of the pet line. Gemma makes a breakthrough in her technology and Megan becomes Cady's best friend who is tasked by Gemma to protect Cady. Megan takes this to the extreme as she soon begins murdering people who get in the way of her relationship with Cady. To put it simply, this film has been done before and doesn't offer anything new as Megan is basically a female Chucky, although with a PG-13 rating, this isn't a slasher film. Social commentary is provided about young users and technology, not learning social skills but being more preoccupied with electronics. The film also hits on the fact of how we as a society are (and will continue to be) over reliant on technology in our day-to-day lives and also issues a warning of how that can turn against mankind in terrible ways. The film was exactly what I thought it would be going in which was very mediocre. Nothing terrible but nothing special either. I've heard a sequel has been greenlit which I'm not surprised as this'll probably be turned into another franchise unfortunately. The only standout for me was 11-year-old Violet McGraw who plays Cady and gives a strong performance for such a young actress, dealing with the lose of her parents and the aftermath. 5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/23 12:52 AM
How did you guys like The Menu? That has to be one of the oddest things I've seen. Brilliant and funny
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/25/23 01:13 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
How did you guys like The Menu? That has to be one of the oddest things I've seen. Brilliant and funny
I really enjoyed it. Saw it twice now and it made my top 10 list for 2022.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/23 10:08 PM
INFINITY POOL
Taking place in a fictional totalitarian country, writer James Foster (Alexander Skarsgård) vacations with his wife Em (Cleopatra Coleman) on the scenic island looking for inspiration for his next novel when James crosses paths with Gabi (Mia Goth), a self-professed fan, which is rare as James first novel was not well received critically or commercially. He and Em take Gabi and her husband Alban (Jalil Lespert) up on their dinner invitation and James is so intrigued by the couple (especially Gabi) he also agrees for the four of them to venture off of the private property, which tourists are forbidden to do, in order to enjoy a private picnic the following day. However, on the drive back, James accidentally hits and kills a local farmer. Panicked and unsure of what to do the four make a choice that will forever change them all. I won't spoil too much of the story but I will state how much I enjoyed this film. These are the type of original Hollywood films audiences have so desperately been seeking. I was also surprised at the number of people with me in the theater (around 20) as I thought this wouldn't get much play here in the States being a European film. In any case, Goth and Skarsgård sizzle on screen together. Goth continues to pad a recently impressive resume with the likes of PEARL, X, and now this and this may be the darkest I've seen Skarsgård go. I'm glad I took a flyer on this as it surpassed my expectations and I'm eagerly anticipating a second viewing! 7.5/10
Taking place in a fictional totalitarian country, writer James Foster (Alexander Skarsgård) vacations with his wife Em (Cleopatra Coleman) on the scenic island looking for inspiration for his next novel when James crosses paths with Gabi (Mia Goth), a self-professed fan, which is rare as James first novel was not well received critically or commercially. He and Em take Gabi and her husband Alban (Jalil Lespert) up on their dinner invitation and James is so intrigued by the couple (especially Gabi) he also agrees for the four of them to venture off of the private property, which tourists are forbidden to do, in order to enjoy a private picnic the following day. However, on the drive back, James accidentally hits and kills a local farmer. Panicked and unsure of what to do the four make a choice that will forever change them all. I won't spoil too much of the story but I will state how much I enjoyed this film. These are the type of original Hollywood films audiences have so desperately been seeking. I was also surprised at the number of people with me in the theater (around 20) as I thought this wouldn't get much play here in the States being a European film. In any case, Goth and Skarsgård sizzle on screen together. Goth continues to pad a recently impressive resume with the likes of PEARL, X, and now this and this may be the darkest I've seen Skarsgård go. I'm glad I took a flyer on this as it surpassed my expectations and I'm eagerly anticipating a second viewing! 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/23 11:15 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
M3GAN
Produced a co-written by James Wan, Megan is an artificial intelligence in the body of a 4' doll. She was created by Gemma (Allison Williams) who works for Funki toy company and has been tasked with introducing an economical line to their successful pet robot PurRpetual Petz. Her niece Cady (Violet McGraw) is living with her now since her parents recently died tragically in a car accident that she survived. Witnessing Cady struggling with her new situation, lonely, and with no friends, Gemma pivots from her robot pet assignment to dust off Megan, which her boss instructed her to shelve in favor of the pet line. Gemma makes a breakthrough in her technology and Megan becomes Cady's best friend who is tasked by Gemma to protect Cady. Megan takes this to the extreme as she soon begins murdering people who get in the way of her relationship with Cady. To put it simply, this film has been done before and doesn't offer anything new as Megan is basically a female Chucky, although with a PG-13 rating, this isn't a slasher film. Social commentary is provided about young users and technology, not learning social skills but being more preoccupied with electronics. The film also hits on the fact of how we as a society are (and will continue to be) over reliant on technology in our day-to-day lives and also issues a warning of how that can turn against mankind in terrible ways. The film was exactly what I thought it would be going in which was very mediocre. Nothing terrible but nothing special either. I've heard a sequel has been greenlit which I'm not surprised as this'll probably be turned into another franchise unfortunately. The only standout for me was 11-year-old Violet McGraw who plays Cady and gives a strong performance for such a young actress, dealing with the lose of her parents and the aftermath. 5/10
Produced a co-written by James Wan, Megan is an artificial intelligence in the body of a 4' doll. She was created by Gemma (Allison Williams) who works for Funki toy company and has been tasked with introducing an economical line to their successful pet robot PurRpetual Petz. Her niece Cady (Violet McGraw) is living with her now since her parents recently died tragically in a car accident that she survived. Witnessing Cady struggling with her new situation, lonely, and with no friends, Gemma pivots from her robot pet assignment to dust off Megan, which her boss instructed her to shelve in favor of the pet line. Gemma makes a breakthrough in her technology and Megan becomes Cady's best friend who is tasked by Gemma to protect Cady. Megan takes this to the extreme as she soon begins murdering people who get in the way of her relationship with Cady. To put it simply, this film has been done before and doesn't offer anything new as Megan is basically a female Chucky, although with a PG-13 rating, this isn't a slasher film. Social commentary is provided about young users and technology, not learning social skills but being more preoccupied with electronics. The film also hits on the fact of how we as a society are (and will continue to be) over reliant on technology in our day-to-day lives and also issues a warning of how that can turn against mankind in terrible ways. The film was exactly what I thought it would be going in which was very mediocre. Nothing terrible but nothing special either. I've heard a sequel has been greenlit which I'm not surprised as this'll probably be turned into another franchise unfortunately. The only standout for me was 11-year-old Violet McGraw who plays Cady and gives a strong performance for such a young actress, dealing with the lose of her parents and the aftermath. 5/10
My wife and I just saw this and we were excited to maybe recommend to you but of course you already seen it and did a review.
We scored this a bit higher for the exact reason you mentioned being the young actress did a fantastic performance.
The robots were very cool and creepy as well.
7/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/23 11:16 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
How did you guys like The Menu? That has to be one of the oddest things I've seen. Brilliant and funny
I really enjoyed The Menu, wife and her friends did not as much.
6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/29/23 10:53 PM
THE PALE BLUE EYE
1830, West Point Military Academy: a young cadet has been murdered on campus and the school has enlisted Detective Augustus Landor (Christian Bale) who himself enlists the assistance of cadet Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling) to track down the killer. Surprisingly, a lot of the cast is English-born passing for Americans and while the first 20 or so minutes of the opening are intriguing enough, the story never hooks the audience after that time. Poe plays the wordsmith poet without issue but foolishly has an unreciprocated love towards Lea (Lucy Boynton), who uses his infatuation for her to her advantage. Meanwhile, Bale seems to have mailed in this performance as he's unengaged throughout. After looking at director Scott Cooper's previous films it's no wonder I found this to be quite so unappetizing as his last effort ANTLERS was a similar disappointment. Give it to the marketing people, they interest you enough to view the film but once you've sat through it you regret it. I'll be sure to be more cautious with his films in the future. 4/10
1830, West Point Military Academy: a young cadet has been murdered on campus and the school has enlisted Detective Augustus Landor (Christian Bale) who himself enlists the assistance of cadet Edgar Allan Poe (Harry Melling) to track down the killer. Surprisingly, a lot of the cast is English-born passing for Americans and while the first 20 or so minutes of the opening are intriguing enough, the story never hooks the audience after that time. Poe plays the wordsmith poet without issue but foolishly has an unreciprocated love towards Lea (Lucy Boynton), who uses his infatuation for her to her advantage. Meanwhile, Bale seems to have mailed in this performance as he's unengaged throughout. After looking at director Scott Cooper's previous films it's no wonder I found this to be quite so unappetizing as his last effort ANTLERS was a similar disappointment. Give it to the marketing people, they interest you enough to view the film but once you've sat through it you regret it. I'll be sure to be more cautious with his films in the future. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/31/23 01:04 AM
YOU PEOPLE
Ezra (Jonah Hill) accidentally meets Amira (Lauren London) when she's lost on her way to work and he gets into her car, believing her to be his Uber driver. They soon fall in love, move in together, and 6 short months later, they're engaged. However, before the wedding, they both decide it's appropriate to meet the others family. This is where the "humor" comes in as Ezra's family is white and Jewish while Amira's is black and Muslim (I'm sure you can see where this is heading already). Plenty of sterotypes that Eddie Murphy (Amira's father Akbar) and Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Ezra's mother Shelley) are only all too happy to play in to. With actors like Murphy, Hill, and Louis-Dreyfus I was sold as I'm a fan of each of their work, however, with this being a Netflix film, I should have known better. All of the jokes do not land, are cringe worthy, and borderline offensive to the viewer. That's part of the point the film is attempting to make, however, when the jokes aren't funny and don't land, you kinda are doing nothing but digging yourself into a hole. Not to mention plenty of self-loathing and victimhood from Amira's character. In addition, Hollywood is all about representation and I'm puzzled as to why a white Jewish director wasn't selected to assist sole director Kenya Barris? I don't believe he's the appropriate person to be telling the Jewish characters story but alas, that's today's Hollywood (double standards). Pass on this as it's nothing but a huge disappointment. 5/10
Ezra (Jonah Hill) accidentally meets Amira (Lauren London) when she's lost on her way to work and he gets into her car, believing her to be his Uber driver. They soon fall in love, move in together, and 6 short months later, they're engaged. However, before the wedding, they both decide it's appropriate to meet the others family. This is where the "humor" comes in as Ezra's family is white and Jewish while Amira's is black and Muslim (I'm sure you can see where this is heading already). Plenty of sterotypes that Eddie Murphy (Amira's father Akbar) and Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Ezra's mother Shelley) are only all too happy to play in to. With actors like Murphy, Hill, and Louis-Dreyfus I was sold as I'm a fan of each of their work, however, with this being a Netflix film, I should have known better. All of the jokes do not land, are cringe worthy, and borderline offensive to the viewer. That's part of the point the film is attempting to make, however, when the jokes aren't funny and don't land, you kinda are doing nothing but digging yourself into a hole. Not to mention plenty of self-loathing and victimhood from Amira's character. In addition, Hollywood is all about representation and I'm puzzled as to why a white Jewish director wasn't selected to assist sole director Kenya Barris? I don't believe he's the appropriate person to be telling the Jewish characters story but alas, that's today's Hollywood (double standards). Pass on this as it's nothing but a huge disappointment. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/23 02:11 AM
KNOCK AT THE CABIN
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/03/23 11:36 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
KNOCK AT THE CABIN
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
Thanks for the review i12
We are going to see if we can stream it right now., may be a bit early but sometimes they load up right away in good quality
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/23 01:15 AM
PAMELA: A LOVE STORY
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/23 01:15 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
KNOCK AT THE CABIN
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
Thanks for the review i12
We are going to see if we can stream it right now., may be a bit early but sometimes they load up right away in good quality
Let us know your thoughts if you're able to view it.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/04/23 06:46 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
PAMELA: A LOVE STORY
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
One of my least favorite people in this town (although I believe she has moved, thankfully) for so many reasons. Where do we even start? Rick Solomon? Writing a book about other peoples private business? Her war with the media for doing what she's doing now?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/23 02:19 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Originally Posted by Irishman12
PAMELA: A LOVE STORY
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
A Netflix documentary about the life and career of Pamela Anderson, told by her in her own words. From growing up a shy Canadian girl to the biggest sex symbol on the planet, Pamela doesn't hold back at all. She speaks out about sexual assaults that happened to her during her youth to the infamous sex tape with Tommy Lee, Pamela decides to go on the record in an attempt to take back control of the narrative and how she's perceived. It's truly heartbreaking but at the same time, extremely hopeful and optimistic that someone as lovely as her (both on the outside but just as much on the inside) can go through so much hardship and not let it change her. In fact, if nothing else it fuels her to be a symbol of hope, strength, and perseverance. A lovely documentary that allows the viewer to spend more time with Pamela and hear first hand accounts about her life from journals she's kept over the years. 6.5/10
One of my least favorite people in this town (although I believe she has moved, thankfully) for so many reasons. Where do we even start? Rick Solomon? Writing a book about other peoples private business? Her war with the media for doing what she's doing now?
I take her side on the stolen sex tape. I don't believe it was released for publicity reasons (she was already one of the most known people in the world at that time so she didn't need any more publicity). And the violation to have something so personal and broadcast like that, I don't think you can truly appreciate it unless you've been through it (but I can only imagine). So her going after the media for it I think is somewhat justified.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/05/23 03:11 AM
ALICE, DARLING
Anna Kendricks plays Alice, a young career woman who's in a psychological and emotionally abusive relationship with Simon (Charlie Carrick). Not all forms of abuse are physical in nature and this film explores those tropes, which there's plenty of from Alice constantly pulling her own hair out, disassociated from her friends whom she's on a week-long vacation with, dropping whatever she's doing to answer his texts & phone calls, sending him pictures on demand, etc. Alice feels guilty because she lied to Simon, saying she had to go to Minnesota for a work trip when in actuality, she went on a trip with her best friends Tess (Kaniehtiio Horn) and Sophie (Wunmi Mosaku) to celebrate Tess' 40th birthday. Again, at first Alice is distant from her friends until Alice and Tess work through there issues, things return to normal until Simon unexpectedly arrives. The film is blatant and almost too over-the-top with the signs Alice is displaying that the audience and her friends can clearly see yet Alice chalks it up to "her love for Simon." I do applaud the effort to deal with such a topic that doesn't get enough attention while balancing and not making this another misogynistic, feminine, all men are pigs story. Yes, Simon is the villain and an extremely manipulative and unlikable character, which he's supposed to be; however, the film doesn't go off the rails assuming all men are Simon. Kendrick does a wonderful job with the character. 6/10
Anna Kendricks plays Alice, a young career woman who's in a psychological and emotionally abusive relationship with Simon (Charlie Carrick). Not all forms of abuse are physical in nature and this film explores those tropes, which there's plenty of from Alice constantly pulling her own hair out, disassociated from her friends whom she's on a week-long vacation with, dropping whatever she's doing to answer his texts & phone calls, sending him pictures on demand, etc. Alice feels guilty because she lied to Simon, saying she had to go to Minnesota for a work trip when in actuality, she went on a trip with her best friends Tess (Kaniehtiio Horn) and Sophie (Wunmi Mosaku) to celebrate Tess' 40th birthday. Again, at first Alice is distant from her friends until Alice and Tess work through there issues, things return to normal until Simon unexpectedly arrives. The film is blatant and almost too over-the-top with the signs Alice is displaying that the audience and her friends can clearly see yet Alice chalks it up to "her love for Simon." I do applaud the effort to deal with such a topic that doesn't get enough attention while balancing and not making this another misogynistic, feminine, all men are pigs story. Yes, Simon is the villain and an extremely manipulative and unlikable character, which he's supposed to be; however, the film doesn't go off the rails assuming all men are Simon. Kendrick does a wonderful job with the character. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/06/23 03:28 AM
THE LAST WAVE (1977)
David Burton (Richard Chamberlain), Australian tax lawyer with a happy suburban family and home, takes on a pro bono case to defend five Aboriginal people accused of getting drunk and murdering one of their tribe. The defendants won't say anyhing about the event, but one of them, Chris (David Gulpilil) reluctantly gives him some vague but menacing clues, apparently because he senses a long-ago connection. Chris and his shaman send Burton idisturbing visions and dreams, all against a background of record rain and hail storms, black rain, overflowing bathtubs--a watery hint of apocalypse to come. The plot doesn't always hold together or lead in a straight line. But the movie is all about eeriness, suspense and ever-darkening mood as Burton increasingly leaves behind his rational white world and plunges into Aboriginal mystery and power. Very effective, and well acted, especially by Gilpilil and Chamberlain.
David Burton (Richard Chamberlain), Australian tax lawyer with a happy suburban family and home, takes on a pro bono case to defend five Aboriginal people accused of getting drunk and murdering one of their tribe. The defendants won't say anyhing about the event, but one of them, Chris (David Gulpilil) reluctantly gives him some vague but menacing clues, apparently because he senses a long-ago connection. Chris and his shaman send Burton idisturbing visions and dreams, all against a background of record rain and hail storms, black rain, overflowing bathtubs--a watery hint of apocalypse to come. The plot doesn't always hold together or lead in a straight line. But the movie is all about eeriness, suspense and ever-darkening mood as Burton increasingly leaves behind his rational white world and plunges into Aboriginal mystery and power. Very effective, and well acted, especially by Gilpilil and Chamberlain.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/23 01:09 AM
CORSAGE
Set in Vienna in 1877, this is a fictional tale of aging Empress Elisabeth of Austria (Vicky Krieps) - and by aging I mean she's turning 40. However, known for her youth and beauty, she's now looked upon differently that he looks are beginning to fade away. Elisabeth is an independent and strong-willed woman, struggling to "set a good example" or "being a proper Empress" within the confines of the system and the expectations of the time. The film is average at best, told within a 1-year timeline that strings together thinly held together scenes. The only recognition I can give this film is for Vicky Krieps, who puts together another very enjoyable performance and is able to flex her linguistic abilities with displays of German (the primary language of the film), English, with a dash of French. 5.5/10
Set in Vienna in 1877, this is a fictional tale of aging Empress Elisabeth of Austria (Vicky Krieps) - and by aging I mean she's turning 40. However, known for her youth and beauty, she's now looked upon differently that he looks are beginning to fade away. Elisabeth is an independent and strong-willed woman, struggling to "set a good example" or "being a proper Empress" within the confines of the system and the expectations of the time. The film is average at best, told within a 1-year timeline that strings together thinly held together scenes. The only recognition I can give this film is for Vicky Krieps, who puts together another very enjoyable performance and is able to flex her linguistic abilities with displays of German (the primary language of the film), English, with a dash of French. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/11/23 06:24 AM
HANGOVER SQUARE (1945)
Yes, a Victorian Era film noir! George Bone (Laird Cregar), a promising classical composer in London, blacks out when exposed to loud noises and goes violent--murderous--then remembers nothing of the incidents. He seeks help from a Scotland Yard doctor (George Sanders) who assures him he's done no wrong. Then he falls for Nedda (Linda Darnell), a cheap barroom dancer and singer, who cons him into writing pop songs for her, then dumps him for a younger, better looking gigolo. He disposes of her in a gruesome way, then recovers to play piano for his new, make-or-break piano concerto. He gets another attack, and it all comes crashing down, with the concerto (written by the inimitable Bernard Herrmann) fueling the drama. This was Cregar's last film (he died of a heart attack due to excessive dieting)--an always interesting actor who gave his best here. The rest of the cast is first rate, as is the script, direction and fiilming. Really good.
Yes, a Victorian Era film noir! George Bone (Laird Cregar), a promising classical composer in London, blacks out when exposed to loud noises and goes violent--murderous--then remembers nothing of the incidents. He seeks help from a Scotland Yard doctor (George Sanders) who assures him he's done no wrong. Then he falls for Nedda (Linda Darnell), a cheap barroom dancer and singer, who cons him into writing pop songs for her, then dumps him for a younger, better looking gigolo. He disposes of her in a gruesome way, then recovers to play piano for his new, make-or-break piano concerto. He gets another attack, and it all comes crashing down, with the concerto (written by the inimitable Bernard Herrmann) fueling the drama. This was Cregar's last film (he died of a heart attack due to excessive dieting)--an always interesting actor who gave his best here. The rest of the cast is first rate, as is the script, direction and fiilming. Really good.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/17/23 01:49 AM
ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA
The third and possibly final solo Ant-Man film also kicks off Marvel's Phase Five and by now, I'm glad the little guy has his chance to shine as he is an overlooked character. The stakes are high on this film as Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), his daughter Cassie (played by newcomer Kathryn Newton), Hope Van Dyne (Evangline Lilly), and her parents Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) and Janet Van Dyne (Michelle Pfeiffer) are all transported to the Quantum Realm. Broken off into 2 factions upon their arrival (Scott/Cassie and Hope/Hank/Janet), they attempt to find each other but while doing so, learn about Janet's previous experience in the Quantum Realm, as well as cross paths with Marvel's newest big baddie Kang the Conqueror (played deliciously by Johnathan Majors). Visually the film is almost a Star Wars/Marvel crossover. A simple enough story about family and a father who'll stop at nothing to protect his daughter. Majors here is the brightest shinning star, which is quite the compliment considering the rest of the A-list talent he's sharing the screen with. He's a devil in disguise: enormously powerful but he's seductive with his soft spoken manner. I'm very much anticipating how he continues his journey through phases 5 & 6 but brilliant casting on this one. Maybe the best Ant-Man of the trilogy (honestly it's been a while since I've seen the first 2) and my only knock was the final battle between the family and Kang as a few times it became too much visually. 6.5/10
The third and possibly final solo Ant-Man film also kicks off Marvel's Phase Five and by now, I'm glad the little guy has his chance to shine as he is an overlooked character. The stakes are high on this film as Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), his daughter Cassie (played by newcomer Kathryn Newton), Hope Van Dyne (Evangline Lilly), and her parents Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) and Janet Van Dyne (Michelle Pfeiffer) are all transported to the Quantum Realm. Broken off into 2 factions upon their arrival (Scott/Cassie and Hope/Hank/Janet), they attempt to find each other but while doing so, learn about Janet's previous experience in the Quantum Realm, as well as cross paths with Marvel's newest big baddie Kang the Conqueror (played deliciously by Johnathan Majors). Visually the film is almost a Star Wars/Marvel crossover. A simple enough story about family and a father who'll stop at nothing to protect his daughter. Majors here is the brightest shinning star, which is quite the compliment considering the rest of the A-list talent he's sharing the screen with. He's a devil in disguise: enormously powerful but he's seductive with his soft spoken manner. I'm very much anticipating how he continues his journey through phases 5 & 6 but brilliant casting on this one. Maybe the best Ant-Man of the trilogy (honestly it's been a while since I've seen the first 2) and my only knock was the final battle between the family and Kang as a few times it became too much visually. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/18/23 09:33 PM
SHARPER
An Apple TV exclusive and another hit from my favorite studio, A24, SHARPER is a very fun, solid, delectable story featuring the likes of Justice Smith, Briana Middleton, Sebastian Stan, Julianne Moore, and John Lithgow. The premise is a little hard to describe in detail without giving away too much but all I'll say is it's about a group of con artists and how they connect to each other as the film progresses. The movie takes its time to establish the story and characters so be patient with it but there's plenty of surprises to keep you guessing and invested along the way. With the amount of surprises the audience is treated to, it reminded me of my first viewing of 1998's WILD THINGS. I know we're only 7 weeks into the new year but this is already in my top 5 for the year as it's been a pretty slow 2023 thus far. 7.5/10
An Apple TV exclusive and another hit from my favorite studio, A24, SHARPER is a very fun, solid, delectable story featuring the likes of Justice Smith, Briana Middleton, Sebastian Stan, Julianne Moore, and John Lithgow. The premise is a little hard to describe in detail without giving away too much but all I'll say is it's about a group of con artists and how they connect to each other as the film progresses. The movie takes its time to establish the story and characters so be patient with it but there's plenty of surprises to keep you guessing and invested along the way. With the amount of surprises the audience is treated to, it reminded me of my first viewing of 1998's WILD THINGS. I know we're only 7 weeks into the new year but this is already in my top 5 for the year as it's been a pretty slow 2023 thus far. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/23 02:23 AM
COCAINE BEAR
Loosely based on a true story in Kentucky of a bear ingesting cocaine in 1982. The film takes place in Georgia in 1985 and follows 2 different story lines amongst the characters who all cross paths with the hopped up bear: a mother (Keri Russell) with the help of Ranger Liz (Margo Martindale) and Peter (Jesse Tyler Ferguson) attempting to find Russell's daughter Dee Dee (Brooklynn Prince) and her friend Henry (Christian Convery) who are lost in the woods and on the run from the bear; a drug dealers (Ray Liotta's) son Eddie (Alden Ehrenreich) and his accomplice Daveed (O'Shea Jackson Jr.) who go hunting through the woods, attempting to recover as much of their cocaine as they can before the bear continues to hit it while being followed by a Tennessee policeman Bob (Isiah Whitlock Jr.). The film is a lot of fun and the name is enough to get anyone to pause on it for a second; however, I was slightly disappointed as most of the laughs were included in the trailer outside of a few cheapies in the film. Also, the story branches out more than necessary with an influx of characters. This should not have been this difficult as it's a straightforward story not a Shakespearian play. Regardless, the premise is so outlandish and unbelievable it's begging audiences to take a chance on it and if you do, I don't think you'll be disappointed. Rumors are a sequel is already being thought out with the story being a shark being coked up; but it'll obviously depend upon how well this is received at the box office before a sequel will be greenlit. If one is given the go ahead, I'll be there as well! 6.5/10
Loosely based on a true story in Kentucky of a bear ingesting cocaine in 1982. The film takes place in Georgia in 1985 and follows 2 different story lines amongst the characters who all cross paths with the hopped up bear: a mother (Keri Russell) with the help of Ranger Liz (Margo Martindale) and Peter (Jesse Tyler Ferguson) attempting to find Russell's daughter Dee Dee (Brooklynn Prince) and her friend Henry (Christian Convery) who are lost in the woods and on the run from the bear; a drug dealers (Ray Liotta's) son Eddie (Alden Ehrenreich) and his accomplice Daveed (O'Shea Jackson Jr.) who go hunting through the woods, attempting to recover as much of their cocaine as they can before the bear continues to hit it while being followed by a Tennessee policeman Bob (Isiah Whitlock Jr.). The film is a lot of fun and the name is enough to get anyone to pause on it for a second; however, I was slightly disappointed as most of the laughs were included in the trailer outside of a few cheapies in the film. Also, the story branches out more than necessary with an influx of characters. This should not have been this difficult as it's a straightforward story not a Shakespearian play. Regardless, the premise is so outlandish and unbelievable it's begging audiences to take a chance on it and if you do, I don't think you'll be disappointed. Rumors are a sequel is already being thought out with the story being a shark being coked up; but it'll obviously depend upon how well this is received at the box office before a sequel will be greenlit. If one is given the go ahead, I'll be there as well! 6.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/23 09:05 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
KNOCK AT THE CABIN
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
The next film on M. Night Shyamalan's resume is based on the book THE CABIN AT THE END OF THE WORLD by Paul Tremblay that finds a gay couple (Eric & Andrew) and their daughter Wen. The film opens with Wen outside collecting grasshoppers when she's approached by Leonard (Dave Bautista), who is soon followed by 3 others: Redmond (Rupert Grint), Sabrina (Nikki Amuka-Bird), and Ardiane (Abby Quinn). They inform Eric & Andrew they must make a choice to prevent the apocalypse. I won't give away too much more of the story for fear of spoiling anything, however, the choice Eric & Andrew are faced with is obvious and the film, especially for a M. Night Shyamalan is pretty straight forward and predictable. Dave Bautista is the most noteworthy as the muscle bound, soft spoken leader Leonard and young Kristein Cui who plays Wen is mature beyond her years. The performances of the actors make up for an otherwise mediocre story. This can be avoided in theaters but might be worth a shot if you're that interested in viewing it or are a Shyamalan or Bautista fan. 6/10
Thanks for the review i12
We are going to see if we can stream it right now., may be a bit early but sometimes they load up right away in good quality
We saw it last night, we enjoyed it, very creepy….. good acting.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/23 10:44 PM
Scale of 1-10, what would you give it?
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/26/23 11:19 PM
I've never enjoyed M. Night's movies. I love a good creepy movie, but he's one of those directors I tend to avoid lol. Maybe I need to give him another shot
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/27/23 12:01 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I've never enjoyed M. Night's movies. I love a good creepy movie, but he's one of those directors I tend to avoid lol. Maybe I need to give him another shot
THE VISIT turned me into a fan of his again but his last 2 movies OLD and KNOCK AT THE CABIN haven't been that great. M. Night is a director who always hinges his bets on the twist ending and if it doesn't deliver, then for me, the film's a letdown because he hedges his bets so much on the ending.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/23 01:00 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Scale of 1-10, what would you give it?
I think your 6 is solid and figure to give it the same…maybe another 1/2
6.5
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/02/23 11:11 PM
CREED III
Adonis Creed (Michael B. Jordan) is now retired, instead promoting fights rather than participating in them. That is until an old childhood friend Damian (Johnathan Majors) comes back into his life, seeking to reestablish his early and brief amateur boxing career before serving an 18-year prison sentence. I'll start off by saying each CREED film is solid and can stand on its own. Rarely do you see all 3 films maintain a consistent level of excellence but all of these films do. That's why if they decided to make a 4th, I'd be down for it again. Some of Michael B. Jordan's best work has been his portrayal of Apollo Creed's son and this is no exception. Switching gears in his career and dealing with enormous guilt over his friend's incarceration (which he somewhat had a hand in), the story between him and Damian is very rich and it's easy to feel compassion for both fighters. Whereas Majors steals the show again as his stock is quickly rising in Hollywood. Both are in peak, physical shape but Damian has this exterior innocence to him outside of the ring that suckers you in. Inside of it, he's a brawler and a very raw and unorthodox boxer, which was refreshing to see someone have a different style of fighting rather than what audiences have traditionally seen in boxing films. My only grips with the film were the end felt slightly rushed. The training montage and especially the match between Adonis and Damian left me wanting more. My other disappoint was the lack of involvement of one Rocky Balboa. Outside of that, the film packs a lot of punches and audiences will be pleased with the final results. Props to Jordan on his directorial debut as well. Better than CREED I and on par with CREED II for best in the franchise. 7.5/10
Adonis Creed (Michael B. Jordan) is now retired, instead promoting fights rather than participating in them. That is until an old childhood friend Damian (Johnathan Majors) comes back into his life, seeking to reestablish his early and brief amateur boxing career before serving an 18-year prison sentence. I'll start off by saying each CREED film is solid and can stand on its own. Rarely do you see all 3 films maintain a consistent level of excellence but all of these films do. That's why if they decided to make a 4th, I'd be down for it again. Some of Michael B. Jordan's best work has been his portrayal of Apollo Creed's son and this is no exception. Switching gears in his career and dealing with enormous guilt over his friend's incarceration (which he somewhat had a hand in), the story between him and Damian is very rich and it's easy to feel compassion for both fighters. Whereas Majors steals the show again as his stock is quickly rising in Hollywood. Both are in peak, physical shape but Damian has this exterior innocence to him outside of the ring that suckers you in. Inside of it, he's a brawler and a very raw and unorthodox boxer, which was refreshing to see someone have a different style of fighting rather than what audiences have traditionally seen in boxing films. My only grips with the film were the end felt slightly rushed. The training montage and especially the match between Adonis and Damian left me wanting more. My other disappoint was the lack of involvement of one Rocky Balboa. Outside of that, the film packs a lot of punches and audiences will be pleased with the final results. Props to Jordan on his directorial debut as well. Better than CREED I and on par with CREED II for best in the franchise. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/03/23 09:15 PM
OPERATION FORTUNE: RUSE DE GUERRE
Guy Ritchie and Jason Statham reunite for another wacky, funny, and action-packed adventure while also featuring quite the ensemble with Aubrey Plaza, Hugh Grant, Cary Elwes, and Josh Hartnett. The basic premise of the story is something gets stolen from a laboratory that can have a cataclysmic impact on the globe. It's then auctioned on the black market for the highest bidder hellbent on world destruction. What is stolen and how it works isn't revealed until midway through. However, the story isn't the reason you're watching the film, but rather the cast. Each individual chews up their respective scenes, almost dueling it out in front of the audience. Statham is the main star and balls of the operation. He has no fear, is always calm under pressure, and has a taste beyond his means. Plaza is the computer savvy tech hack who supports all of Statham's moves, and is just as valuable behind a desk as Statham is in the field. I applaud the efforts of Ritchie for making the character more than one dimensional. She's smart, funny, beautiful, and can handle a weapon. Elwes leads this team for the British government while Grant masterfully plays the villain and is the middleman between the buyers and sellers. He's also obsessed with movie star Danny Francesco (Hartnett) and that's how Elwes' team is initially introduced to Grant via Danny, who is the trojan horse in this play. Not an A film from Ritchie but it's most definitely a solid B and if you enjoy fun character studies, I don't think you'll be disappointed with this. 6.5/10
Guy Ritchie and Jason Statham reunite for another wacky, funny, and action-packed adventure while also featuring quite the ensemble with Aubrey Plaza, Hugh Grant, Cary Elwes, and Josh Hartnett. The basic premise of the story is something gets stolen from a laboratory that can have a cataclysmic impact on the globe. It's then auctioned on the black market for the highest bidder hellbent on world destruction. What is stolen and how it works isn't revealed until midway through. However, the story isn't the reason you're watching the film, but rather the cast. Each individual chews up their respective scenes, almost dueling it out in front of the audience. Statham is the main star and balls of the operation. He has no fear, is always calm under pressure, and has a taste beyond his means. Plaza is the computer savvy tech hack who supports all of Statham's moves, and is just as valuable behind a desk as Statham is in the field. I applaud the efforts of Ritchie for making the character more than one dimensional. She's smart, funny, beautiful, and can handle a weapon. Elwes leads this team for the British government while Grant masterfully plays the villain and is the middleman between the buyers and sellers. He's also obsessed with movie star Danny Francesco (Hartnett) and that's how Elwes' team is initially introduced to Grant via Danny, who is the trojan horse in this play. Not an A film from Ritchie but it's most definitely a solid B and if you enjoy fun character studies, I don't think you'll be disappointed with this. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/23 05:00 PM
WATCHER
Young married couple Julia (Maika Monroe) and Francis (Karl Glusman) move from New York to Romania when Francis is promoted at his job. Both are Romanian, however, only Francis speaks the language. This creates untenable isolation on the part of Julia, who we're told was a former actress back home but it didn't pan out. Now in a new country, not knowing the culture, customs, or language, she's at an impasse on what to do with her life. She soon begins learning Romanian but more times than not she's left drinking by herself in her apartment, waiting for Francis to come home from work. During this time there's a string of murders, with the victims being young, beautiful women. Her apartment has huge windows in the living room and bedroom and from time-to-time, she people watches. Although, one of her neighbors across the street engages in the same activity whenever she does and she becomes paranoid that he's following her and could be the perpetrator behind the recent killings. It's a psychological thriller that attempts to present itself as Hitchcockian with an obvious REAR WINDOW motif. Monroe is fantastic as the frail, fish out of water American who tries to convince her husband of her suspicions while constantly being rebuffed by him. In addition, a lot of Romanian is spoken but no subtitles are given to the audience, allowing us to experience Julia's isolation and at times, frustration for not being in the know to the circumstances around her. I've been a fan of Monroe's ever since IT FOLLOWS but outside of her performance, this isn't worth a watch. 6/10
Young married couple Julia (Maika Monroe) and Francis (Karl Glusman) move from New York to Romania when Francis is promoted at his job. Both are Romanian, however, only Francis speaks the language. This creates untenable isolation on the part of Julia, who we're told was a former actress back home but it didn't pan out. Now in a new country, not knowing the culture, customs, or language, she's at an impasse on what to do with her life. She soon begins learning Romanian but more times than not she's left drinking by herself in her apartment, waiting for Francis to come home from work. During this time there's a string of murders, with the victims being young, beautiful women. Her apartment has huge windows in the living room and bedroom and from time-to-time, she people watches. Although, one of her neighbors across the street engages in the same activity whenever she does and she becomes paranoid that he's following her and could be the perpetrator behind the recent killings. It's a psychological thriller that attempts to present itself as Hitchcockian with an obvious REAR WINDOW motif. Monroe is fantastic as the frail, fish out of water American who tries to convince her husband of her suspicions while constantly being rebuffed by him. In addition, a lot of Romanian is spoken but no subtitles are given to the audience, allowing us to experience Julia's isolation and at times, frustration for not being in the know to the circumstances around her. I've been a fan of Monroe's ever since IT FOLLOWS but outside of her performance, this isn't worth a watch. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/23 02:11 AM
SCREAM VI
The 4 survivors of SCREAM (2022) have all relocated to New York: Tara (Jenna Ortega), Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown), and Chad (Mason Gooding) to attend college while Sam (Melissa Barrera) attempts to keep an eye on her baby sister. As with any sequel, the audience knows what to expect: bigger body count, more gruesome murders, etc. and although the level of violence is turned up, I don't believe it's done in a gratuitous way. As last year's Scream followed the original, this gave off a very SCREAM 2 vibe other than just the story taking place outside of Woodsboro. Overall, I'm more satisfied with this entry than I was with last year's; however, this was the first and only Scream I was able to figure out who the killer(s) was before the halfway point (which was a let down). And my biggest grip with this is the reasoning for his/her/their killing spree as it yet again comes off light. As you can guess, the film leaves itself open to a third entry, which now will probably come in a few short years because the basic rule of any horror franchise is quantity over quality. With the exception of the opening kill scene, which has a nice and new hook to it, everything else here is again regurgitated. 7/10
The 4 survivors of SCREAM (2022) have all relocated to New York: Tara (Jenna Ortega), Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown), and Chad (Mason Gooding) to attend college while Sam (Melissa Barrera) attempts to keep an eye on her baby sister. As with any sequel, the audience knows what to expect: bigger body count, more gruesome murders, etc. and although the level of violence is turned up, I don't believe it's done in a gratuitous way. As last year's Scream followed the original, this gave off a very SCREAM 2 vibe other than just the story taking place outside of Woodsboro. Overall, I'm more satisfied with this entry than I was with last year's; however, this was the first and only Scream I was able to figure out who the killer(s) was before the halfway point (which was a let down). And my biggest grip with this is the reasoning for his/her/their killing spree as it yet again comes off light. As you can guess, the film leaves itself open to a third entry, which now will probably come in a few short years because the basic rule of any horror franchise is quantity over quality. With the exception of the opening kill scene, which has a nice and new hook to it, everything else here is again regurgitated. 7/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Master And Commander - 03/11/23 05:08 AM
Here’s a favorite of mine: Master & Commander
My favorite Russell Crowe movie ever !
https://twitter.com/darkhorizons/status/1551097462936715264
Why Are So Many Guys Obsessed With Master and Commander?
https://www.gq.com/story/master-and-commander-anniversary
My favorite Russell Crowe movie ever !
https:/
Why Are So Many Guys Obsessed With Master and Commander?
https:/
Posted By: mustachepete
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/12/23 05:11 PM
Quote
Master & Commander
Patrick O'Brian's series of 20+ novels is wonderful.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/23 01:39 AM
SHAZAM! FURY OF THE GODS
Billy Batson and his family are back for another adventure, this time squaring off with the Daughters of Atlas (Helen Mirren, Lucy Liu, and Rachel Zegler). They come in search of their fathers staff, which Billy broke in the first film. Once in possession of the staff, they'll have the power to end our world and reimagine their own. I'll be honest, I haven't seen the original SHAZAM! in a few years but I remember having a lot more fun that time around than I did with this installment. One issue I can point to is the film wasn't as funny as the first, but to be fair, the subject matter is also darker too. Maybe it's superhero fatigue or how similar Shazam is to Black Adam, who just had his film released 5 months ago, but I struggled to get into this story. In addition, there's a stark and obvious difference with the Daughters of Atlas, and I'll address the elephant in the room: age. Nothing against any actress as I'm a fan of all of them but having 77-year-old Mirren, teaming up with 54-year-old Liu, with 21-year-old Zegler feels awkward. Mirren and Liu team up for much of the film while Zegler has her own storyline (and yes, I'm fully aware that they're "gods" so age doesn't matter but onscreen, it comes across otherwise). Zachary Levi shines again as the adult Batson/Shazam, being a teenage kid in an adult body with superpowers. He's fun, animated, and childlike, he genuinely takes pride in the character and franchise. We're unsure with DC's new hierarchy where Shazam will land going forward but obviously there's more stories to be told but it'll also depend upon the box office. Unfortunately, the theater I was in wasn't very full so I'm afraid this may pull in even less than it's predecessor. 6/10
Billy Batson and his family are back for another adventure, this time squaring off with the Daughters of Atlas (Helen Mirren, Lucy Liu, and Rachel Zegler). They come in search of their fathers staff, which Billy broke in the first film. Once in possession of the staff, they'll have the power to end our world and reimagine their own. I'll be honest, I haven't seen the original SHAZAM! in a few years but I remember having a lot more fun that time around than I did with this installment. One issue I can point to is the film wasn't as funny as the first, but to be fair, the subject matter is also darker too. Maybe it's superhero fatigue or how similar Shazam is to Black Adam, who just had his film released 5 months ago, but I struggled to get into this story. In addition, there's a stark and obvious difference with the Daughters of Atlas, and I'll address the elephant in the room: age. Nothing against any actress as I'm a fan of all of them but having 77-year-old Mirren, teaming up with 54-year-old Liu, with 21-year-old Zegler feels awkward. Mirren and Liu team up for much of the film while Zegler has her own storyline (and yes, I'm fully aware that they're "gods" so age doesn't matter but onscreen, it comes across otherwise). Zachary Levi shines again as the adult Batson/Shazam, being a teenage kid in an adult body with superpowers. He's fun, animated, and childlike, he genuinely takes pride in the character and franchise. We're unsure with DC's new hierarchy where Shazam will land going forward but obviously there's more stories to be told but it'll also depend upon the box office. Unfortunately, the theater I was in wasn't very full so I'm afraid this may pull in even less than it's predecessor. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/17/23 11:27 PM
BOSTON STRANGLER
Set between the years 1962-1965 and based upon true events, the story follows reporters Loretta McLaughlin (Keira Knightley) and Jean Cole (Carrie Coon) who discovered the pattern of the killings that terrorized the city during a period of time where women were expected to tend to more domesticating duties. Unfortunately, this is a water downed version of what could have been a great movie. None of the slayings are shown onscreen, more than likely out of respect for the victims, but also because this is not that type of movie. Due to the time period, there's obviously sexism working against the women that's briefly discussed but before long the training wheels are off and the women are able to do their job with the support of their superior Jack Maclaine (Chris Cooper). However, the film seems to be a retelling of events with little tension or emotional connection with the audience. The victims screen time is minimal so they become faceless victims in a way. The premise was there, getting actors such as Knightley and Cooper on board validates it, but the execution was too safe and lukewarm. I will hand it to the marketing department for releasing it on St. Patrick's Day (points for that one). 6/10
Set between the years 1962-1965 and based upon true events, the story follows reporters Loretta McLaughlin (Keira Knightley) and Jean Cole (Carrie Coon) who discovered the pattern of the killings that terrorized the city during a period of time where women were expected to tend to more domesticating duties. Unfortunately, this is a water downed version of what could have been a great movie. None of the slayings are shown onscreen, more than likely out of respect for the victims, but also because this is not that type of movie. Due to the time period, there's obviously sexism working against the women that's briefly discussed but before long the training wheels are off and the women are able to do their job with the support of their superior Jack Maclaine (Chris Cooper). However, the film seems to be a retelling of events with little tension or emotional connection with the audience. The victims screen time is minimal so they become faceless victims in a way. The premise was there, getting actors such as Knightley and Cooper on board validates it, but the execution was too safe and lukewarm. I will hand it to the marketing department for releasing it on St. Patrick's Day (points for that one). 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/23 06:00 AM
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
I gave this iconic Kubrick movie another try to see any reason why so many see it as "profound," "artistic triumph," "Kubrick's masterpiece," etc. All I found was boredom---endless, painfully slow sequences of outer space with grand music, or heavy breathing, or...I dunno what. The "plot" falls off the edge of space, the ending is beyond ridiculous, the whole thing seems as if Kubrick, fascinated by his clever special effects (I give him that), can't let go of them, and never mind making the movie interesting for any part of two hours and nineteen minutes. Never again.
I gave this iconic Kubrick movie another try to see any reason why so many see it as "profound," "artistic triumph," "Kubrick's masterpiece," etc. All I found was boredom---endless, painfully slow sequences of outer space with grand music, or heavy breathing, or...I dunno what. The "plot" falls off the edge of space, the ending is beyond ridiculous, the whole thing seems as if Kubrick, fascinated by his clever special effects (I give him that), can't let go of them, and never mind making the movie interesting for any part of two hours and nineteen minutes. Never again.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/21/23 11:41 PM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
I gave this iconic Kubrick movie another try to see any reason why so many see it as "profound," "artistic triumph," "Kubrick's masterpiece," etc. All I found was boredom---endless, painfully slow sequences of outer space with grand music, or heavy breathing, or...I dunno what. The "plot" falls off the edge of space, the ending is beyond ridiculous, the whole thing seems as if Kubrick, fascinated by his clever special effects (I give him that), can't let go of them, and never mind making the movie interesting for any part of two hours and nineteen minutes. Never again.
I gave this iconic Kubrick movie another try to see any reason why so many see it as "profound," "artistic triumph," "Kubrick's masterpiece," etc. All I found was boredom---endless, painfully slow sequences of outer space with grand music, or heavy breathing, or...I dunno what. The "plot" falls off the edge of space, the ending is beyond ridiculous, the whole thing seems as if Kubrick, fascinated by his clever special effects (I give him that), can't let go of them, and never mind making the movie interesting for any part of two hours and nineteen minutes. Never again.
I felt the same way for a few viewings but have since warmed up to it. The effects (especially for 1968) are breathtaking. The score is amazing but I agree the story can drag in parts and the ending is difficult to make sense of. Kubrick's masterpiece to me is A CLOCKWORK ORANGE and THE SHINING.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/23 02:58 AM
Agree on "Clockwork" and "Shining," Irishman. Cannot overstate the impact both movies had when they were released, especially "Clockwork."
Posted By: Big_Tuna93
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/23 06:16 PM
My favorite Kubrick film is Full Metal Jacket followed by The Shining. I agree about 2001: A Space Odyssey. Was probably groundbreaking in 1968, but I always thought it was boring.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/23 11:56 PM
Originally Posted by Big_Tuna93
My favorite Kubrick film is Full Metal Jacket followed by The Shining. I agree about 2001: A Space Odyssey. Was probably groundbreaking in 1968, but I always thought it was boring.
I like FULL METAL JACKET until they get out of boot camp. The second half of the film in Vietnam really drops off for me.
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/23/23 02:24 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Big_Tuna93
My favorite Kubrick film is Full Metal Jacket followed by The Shining. I agree about 2001: A Space Odyssey. Was probably groundbreaking in 1968, but I always thought it was boring.
I like FULL METAL JACKET until they get out of boot camp. The second half of the film in Vietnam really drops off for me.
My thoughts exactly.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/24/23 01:08 AM
JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 4
Following the events of Chapter 3 and the unsuccessful attempts by the High Table's hired guns to kill John, the Table now tries their luck with Marquis (Bill Skarsgård) who in turn enlists former Wick alley and friend Caine (Donnie Yen) to stop John. The film has various locations around the globe but is primarily based in Paris. Plenty of head shots, fisticuffs, and muscle cars as we've come to expect from the franchise along with some breathtaking European set designs and wardrobe's. Skarsgård and Yen are more fantastic gets to add to the already impressive talents who've graced the screen with Mr. Wick. With a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes, the fight scenes are afforded to be longer. And while this franchise continues to innovate and set the bar each time out, my only gripe with the film was by the end of it, it can feel like too much of a good thing and you've already had your fill while still trying to glutton yourself on dessert after a full meal. The film was a little long and was almost the equivalent of 2 movies in 2. However, if they decide to make a fifth or a spinoff, I'll be there. 7.5/10
Following the events of Chapter 3 and the unsuccessful attempts by the High Table's hired guns to kill John, the Table now tries their luck with Marquis (Bill Skarsgård) who in turn enlists former Wick alley and friend Caine (Donnie Yen) to stop John. The film has various locations around the globe but is primarily based in Paris. Plenty of head shots, fisticuffs, and muscle cars as we've come to expect from the franchise along with some breathtaking European set designs and wardrobe's. Skarsgård and Yen are more fantastic gets to add to the already impressive talents who've graced the screen with Mr. Wick. With a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes, the fight scenes are afforded to be longer. And while this franchise continues to innovate and set the bar each time out, my only gripe with the film was by the end of it, it can feel like too much of a good thing and you've already had your fill while still trying to glutton yourself on dessert after a full meal. The film was a little long and was almost the equivalent of 2 movies in 2. However, if they decide to make a fifth or a spinoff, I'll be there. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/23 08:01 PM
EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE
When I originally saw the trailer, it had no affect on me and my level of interest was zero. However, after their big night at the Oscars, I decided to give it a shot to see what all the praise was about and I've gotta be honest, I don't understand it? I don't see what's so great about the film. Yes, it is somewhat funny with a heartwarming story that unfolds; however, about 45-60 minutes into it, I was already done. You're not supposed to say the quiet part loud but I'm going to: this won at the Oscars for one reason and one reason only, DEI. It's an average film at best that won due to weak competition or films that were overlooked that should have easily won but were snubbed for Best Picture and Best Director (and yes, I'm talking about THE WHALE and Darren Aronofsky). Within a year this film will be forgotten. Don't get me wrong, I'm extremely happy Laurie Strode won an Oscar (surprised in fact as the buzz heading in was Angela Bassett would win), as well as Ke Huy Quen who will always have a special place in my heart like so many others for Data and Short Round. Finally, isn't it cultural appropriation for Daniel Scheinert to direct basically an all Asian cast? Just asking. 5.5/10
When I originally saw the trailer, it had no affect on me and my level of interest was zero. However, after their big night at the Oscars, I decided to give it a shot to see what all the praise was about and I've gotta be honest, I don't understand it? I don't see what's so great about the film. Yes, it is somewhat funny with a heartwarming story that unfolds; however, about 45-60 minutes into it, I was already done. You're not supposed to say the quiet part loud but I'm going to: this won at the Oscars for one reason and one reason only, DEI. It's an average film at best that won due to weak competition or films that were overlooked that should have easily won but were snubbed for Best Picture and Best Director (and yes, I'm talking about THE WHALE and Darren Aronofsky). Within a year this film will be forgotten. Don't get me wrong, I'm extremely happy Laurie Strode won an Oscar (surprised in fact as the buzz heading in was Angela Bassett would win), as well as Ke Huy Quen who will always have a special place in my heart like so many others for Data and Short Round. Finally, isn't it cultural appropriation for Daniel Scheinert to direct basically an all Asian cast? Just asking. 5.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/25/23 10:22 PM
Lol I agree with you I. Some of these "big" Oscar movies are absolutely horrible. I did not get this movie at all. There was NOTHING special about it. But I am glad that Angela Bassett didn't win and Jamie Lee did get her day in the sun. Jamie should've gotten an Oscar years ago. She's fab! And always been fab.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/27/23 01:44 AM
WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/23 12:18 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
We plan on streaming soon, thanks for the review i12
? Why do you think china has banned this movie…does it have a negative reflection of anything Chinese?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/28/23 09:40 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
Yes, you read that right. Much like COCAINE BEAR, the title tells the whole story. After having grown up with the friendly animals, Christopher Robin soon ventures off to college; however, while doing so, the animals are left to fend for themselves in order to survive. This creates hardship and resentment amongst the creatures until Christopher returns one day with his soon bride-to-be. During the visit, the animals are not the sweet and cuddly friends Christopher expected to greet upon his arrival. No, the animals have returned to their basic nature and kill whatever prey comes their way in order to survive. Knowing you're not going to be graced with a GONE WITH THE WIND type of performance, the film still takes itself seriously and puts forward a fine effort. It's a fun ride to see a much different, darker, and gorier take on the classic characters. I'm sure this will not be for everyone but I appreciate the genre expansion and also look forward to future efforts by director Rhys Frake-Waterfield, as rumor has it characters such as Bambi, Mary from Mary Had A Little Lamb, Peter Pan, and a sequel to this are already being discussed! 5/10
We plan on streaming soon, thanks for the review i12
? Why do you think china has banned this movie…does it have a negative reflection of anything Chinese?
Xi Jinping is always trolled online that he looks like Winnie the Pooh so anything having to do with the character is banned in China.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/23 06:31 AM
NEWS OF THE WORLD (2020)
Capt. Jefferson Kyle Kidd (Tom Hanks), Civil War veteran,, makes a living in postwar Texas reading newpaper headlines and articles to local audiences. He agrees to return 10-year-old Johanna (Helena Zengel), raised by Kiowa Indians who killed her family, to an aunt and uncle hundreds of miles away in Castroville. She knows no English and doesn't want to go. The two make the perilous journey, encountering good people and bad, and many narrow escapes, gradually bonding along the way. The film is slow moving at times but it tells the story beautifully, with superb cinematography, and offers a happy ending without being mawkish or sappy. Hanks, always good, doesn't disappoint. Zengel doesn't talk much, but she's exceptionally expressive. Well worth watching.
Capt. Jefferson Kyle Kidd (Tom Hanks), Civil War veteran,, makes a living in postwar Texas reading newpaper headlines and articles to local audiences. He agrees to return 10-year-old Johanna (Helena Zengel), raised by Kiowa Indians who killed her family, to an aunt and uncle hundreds of miles away in Castroville. She knows no English and doesn't want to go. The two make the perilous journey, encountering good people and bad, and many narrow escapes, gradually bonding along the way. The film is slow moving at times but it tells the story beautifully, with superb cinematography, and offers a happy ending without being mawkish or sappy. Hanks, always good, doesn't disappoint. Zengel doesn't talk much, but she's exceptionally expressive. Well worth watching.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/02/23 09:28 PM
TETRIS
Taron Egerton stars as Bullet-Proof Software salesman Henk Rogers. Based in Tokyo and struggling to compete with the big boys, he's soon turned onto Tetris. Flabbergasted after just 5 minutes of playtime, he soon scours the globe in order to obtain the distribution rights for PC's, arcades, consoles, and handhelds. But, he's up against media titan Robert Maxwell (Roger Allam) who is equally looking to capitalize on the Tetris brand. Taking place in 1988, towards the end of the cold war and communism in Russia, convincing the communist to sell their game to capitalist will be no small task. The film starts out very fun and visually beautiful, turning actual pieces of film into 8-bit characters. But, once Henk realizes he needs to deal with the Russians directly rather than the middle man he had previously been dealing with in Robert Stein (Toby Jones), the film becomes quite repetitive and political. I understand the political nature due to the politics involved at the time, but again, the story seemed to be going around in circles, bringing the advancement of the story to a school zone pace. Once the issue is resolved, it's quite astonishing the deal that's reached, although, with any film based on actual events, it's always interesting and curious to see how much of what's presented is fact or fiction. 6/10
Taron Egerton stars as Bullet-Proof Software salesman Henk Rogers. Based in Tokyo and struggling to compete with the big boys, he's soon turned onto Tetris. Flabbergasted after just 5 minutes of playtime, he soon scours the globe in order to obtain the distribution rights for PC's, arcades, consoles, and handhelds. But, he's up against media titan Robert Maxwell (Roger Allam) who is equally looking to capitalize on the Tetris brand. Taking place in 1988, towards the end of the cold war and communism in Russia, convincing the communist to sell their game to capitalist will be no small task. The film starts out very fun and visually beautiful, turning actual pieces of film into 8-bit characters. But, once Henk realizes he needs to deal with the Russians directly rather than the middle man he had previously been dealing with in Robert Stein (Toby Jones), the film becomes quite repetitive and political. I understand the political nature due to the politics involved at the time, but again, the story seemed to be going around in circles, bringing the advancement of the story to a school zone pace. Once the issue is resolved, it's quite astonishing the deal that's reached, although, with any film based on actual events, it's always interesting and curious to see how much of what's presented is fact or fiction. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/03/23 01:03 AM
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/nMkV1VcP/041-DD602-5320-47-E2-80-DC-7189-AA373-FE1.jpg)
CHAMPIONS
4 1/2 - stars
I love this feel good movie, it’s one of the Best Movies released in years.
I think Woody Harrelson and the entire cast did a great job.
THIS MOVIE WILL GO DOWN AS ONE OF MY TOP 10 OF ALL TIME.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/06/23 05:55 PM
INSIDE
Art thief Nemo (Willem Dafoe) has a simple job: break into a New York City penthouse, grab a couple of pieces of art, and get out. However, the crown jewel of his heist is nowhere to be found and after the security system is activated, he's locked inside of the penthouse. The owner has gone out of the country for an undisclosed amount of time, meaning basic necessities, such as food and water (the water has been turned off) are far and few in between. Abandoned by his team on the outside who helped him get into the penthouse, Nemo must use his wits and determination in order to prevent his current circumstances from becoming his tomb. I love Willem Dafoe and the story looked interesting enough from the trailer so I gave it a try. I think most are curious to see how (or if) he can escape. The story unfolds slowly, showing how limited the resources surrounding Nemo are and how quickly he needs to get creative. No timeline is given as much like Nemo, the audience is stuck with him for the ride and we're not even afforded that luxury. The story essential boils down to the lengths individuals are willing to go through for both profit and survival, determination, and some could even read about the fragility of man (particularly in regards to nature as at times the heat in increased to over 100 degrees, before then dropping to 40). There are many consecutive scenes without dialogue, showing Nemo attempting to break out or preparing food. Dafoe's been better and this is a film even his most loyal supporters can skip. 5.5/10
Art thief Nemo (Willem Dafoe) has a simple job: break into a New York City penthouse, grab a couple of pieces of art, and get out. However, the crown jewel of his heist is nowhere to be found and after the security system is activated, he's locked inside of the penthouse. The owner has gone out of the country for an undisclosed amount of time, meaning basic necessities, such as food and water (the water has been turned off) are far and few in between. Abandoned by his team on the outside who helped him get into the penthouse, Nemo must use his wits and determination in order to prevent his current circumstances from becoming his tomb. I love Willem Dafoe and the story looked interesting enough from the trailer so I gave it a try. I think most are curious to see how (or if) he can escape. The story unfolds slowly, showing how limited the resources surrounding Nemo are and how quickly he needs to get creative. No timeline is given as much like Nemo, the audience is stuck with him for the ride and we're not even afforded that luxury. The story essential boils down to the lengths individuals are willing to go through for both profit and survival, determination, and some could even read about the fragility of man (particularly in regards to nature as at times the heat in increased to over 100 degrees, before then dropping to 40). There are many consecutive scenes without dialogue, showing Nemo attempting to break out or preparing food. Dafoe's been better and this is a film even his most loyal supporters can skip. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/07/23 06:48 PM
THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/09/23 12:45 AM
AIR
The true story of Sonny Vaccaro (Matt Damon) and his attempt to lure Michael Jordan from rivals Converse and Adidas to sign a basketball shoe contract with Nike. Set in 1984, the wardrobe's are loud, the music is chill, and the world doesn't yet know that Michael Jordan will be the greatest basketball player to ever step onto a NBA court. Surrounded by an All-Star cast featuring the likes of Ben Affleck, Chris Tucker, Jason Bateman, and Viola Davis, Damon and Afflect appear to have free rein to do what they do best: craft a great and touching story and they do just that. The story may come as a surprise to some but for those sneakerheads or Jordan obsessed fans (of which I'm a part of), broadly speaking, there's nothing new here except a few minor details. Jordan placed Nike third and wanted to sign with Adidas as he liked their tracksuits and always wore their shoes. However, in an industry changing signing, he would up going with Vaccaro and Nike. And while Michael Jordan (Damian Delano Young) is never properly shown onscreen (only the back of his head is), it's not needed. We know the man and I quite enjoyed not seeing his face as it adds to his mystic. However, while the movie is enjoyable, it's not Affleck's best. I liked it, but didn't love it and the story ran out of stream towards the end when it should have been gaining it unfortunately. Still a very enjoyable film and worthy of your time, but a little disappointed compared to the early reviews I had come across. 6.5/10
The true story of Sonny Vaccaro (Matt Damon) and his attempt to lure Michael Jordan from rivals Converse and Adidas to sign a basketball shoe contract with Nike. Set in 1984, the wardrobe's are loud, the music is chill, and the world doesn't yet know that Michael Jordan will be the greatest basketball player to ever step onto a NBA court. Surrounded by an All-Star cast featuring the likes of Ben Affleck, Chris Tucker, Jason Bateman, and Viola Davis, Damon and Afflect appear to have free rein to do what they do best: craft a great and touching story and they do just that. The story may come as a surprise to some but for those sneakerheads or Jordan obsessed fans (of which I'm a part of), broadly speaking, there's nothing new here except a few minor details. Jordan placed Nike third and wanted to sign with Adidas as he liked their tracksuits and always wore their shoes. However, in an industry changing signing, he would up going with Vaccaro and Nike. And while Michael Jordan (Damian Delano Young) is never properly shown onscreen (only the back of his head is), it's not needed. We know the man and I quite enjoyed not seeing his face as it adds to his mystic. However, while the movie is enjoyable, it's not Affleck's best. I liked it, but didn't love it and the story ran out of stream towards the end when it should have been gaining it unfortunately. Still a very enjoyable film and worthy of your time, but a little disappointed compared to the early reviews I had come across. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/14/23 01:27 AM
RENFIELD
A story that focuses on the relationship of Dracula (Nicolas Cage) & Renfield (Nicholas Hoult) from Renfield's perspective. Set in the present climate, Renfield regularly attends therapy group sessions in order to deal with his narcissistic boss. In addition, he falls for a local cop he helped rescue from assassination (Awkwafina). Honestly, the world didn't need a story about the Renfield character and this output is exactly why. The story is basic and average while there is zero onscreen chemistry between Hoult and Awkwafina. It's marketed as a horror comedy and the only part they got right was the former because this film is not the latter. The death scenes are obscenely over-the-top with bad CGI blood to go along with it. Let's be honest, the only reason you're seeing it is for Cage's Dracula, which of course he nails because he's Nicholas Cage. At times he seems to be channeling a bit of Castor Troy from FACE/OFF because he appears to be having so much fun. Unfortunately, he and his Dracula are not enough to save this. 5/10
A story that focuses on the relationship of Dracula (Nicolas Cage) & Renfield (Nicholas Hoult) from Renfield's perspective. Set in the present climate, Renfield regularly attends therapy group sessions in order to deal with his narcissistic boss. In addition, he falls for a local cop he helped rescue from assassination (Awkwafina). Honestly, the world didn't need a story about the Renfield character and this output is exactly why. The story is basic and average while there is zero onscreen chemistry between Hoult and Awkwafina. It's marketed as a horror comedy and the only part they got right was the former because this film is not the latter. The death scenes are obscenely over-the-top with bad CGI blood to go along with it. Let's be honest, the only reason you're seeing it is for Cage's Dracula, which of course he nails because he's Nicholas Cage. At times he seems to be channeling a bit of Castor Troy from FACE/OFF because he appears to be having so much fun. Unfortunately, he and his Dracula are not enough to save this. 5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/16/23 08:34 PM
CRIME WAVE (1953)
Three escapees from San Quentin (Ted de Corsia, Nedrick Young, Charles Buchinsky aka Bronson) pull off a string of two-bit robberies and murders to mislead the cops as they prepare for a big bank heist. They need Steve Lacey (Gene Nelson), a Quentin parolee living the straight life as an airplane mechanic and pilot, to fly them to Mexico. Lacey refuses, but the bad guys hold his cute wife (Phyllis Kirk), leaving her hostage in the tender care of Timothy (Eternal Lunatic) Carey. Meanwhile, ultra-hardass LAPD Lt. (Sterling Hayden), who's already onto the scheme, tries to force Lacey to rat them out. Director Andre De Toth keeps up the pace and the unbearable pressure on Lacey to build up a first-class film noir with a nice twist at the end. He assembled a choice bunch of plug-uglies and other colorful characters (Dub Taylor, Jay Novello, James Bell), working with a snappy script and giving their all, especially di Corsia, Eternal Thug with Leadership Qualities. Hayden, just about my favorite actor of that era, is perfect for his role. This movie is a little (73 minutes) gem.
Three escapees from San Quentin (Ted de Corsia, Nedrick Young, Charles Buchinsky aka Bronson) pull off a string of two-bit robberies and murders to mislead the cops as they prepare for a big bank heist. They need Steve Lacey (Gene Nelson), a Quentin parolee living the straight life as an airplane mechanic and pilot, to fly them to Mexico. Lacey refuses, but the bad guys hold his cute wife (Phyllis Kirk), leaving her hostage in the tender care of Timothy (Eternal Lunatic) Carey. Meanwhile, ultra-hardass LAPD Lt. (Sterling Hayden), who's already onto the scheme, tries to force Lacey to rat them out. Director Andre De Toth keeps up the pace and the unbearable pressure on Lacey to build up a first-class film noir with a nice twist at the end. He assembled a choice bunch of plug-uglies and other colorful characters (Dub Taylor, Jay Novello, James Bell), working with a snappy script and giving their all, especially di Corsia, Eternal Thug with Leadership Qualities. Hayden, just about my favorite actor of that era, is perfect for his role. This movie is a little (73 minutes) gem.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/23 08:39 PM
Check out Evil Dead Rise. Just a bad ass movie!! If you're an Evil Dead fan, you won't be disappointed. Horror is alive and well ladies and gentlemen!
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/23 04:40 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
Thanks Irish, to me the first Mario Bros game on the NES is the best all-time video game.
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/23 06:48 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Check out Evil Dead Rise. Just a bad ass movie!! If you're an Evil Dead fan, you won't be disappointed. Horror is alive and well ladies and gentlemen!
Yeah saw it last night. That movie slapped lol.
The original will always be my favorite, but it's unreal how good the 2013 version and this new version are.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/23 11:04 AM
Originally Posted by Hollander
to me the first Mario Bros game on the NES is the best all-time video game.
Oh hell no lol. Ain't nothing better than Vice City. Hell I can think of so many games better than Super Mario
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/23 11:06 AM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Check out Evil Dead Rise. Just a bad ass movie!! If you're an Evil Dead fan, you won't be disappointed. Horror is alive and well ladies and gentlemen!
Yeah saw it last night. That movie slapped lol.
The original will always be my favorite, but it's unreal how good the 2013 version and this new version are.
Glad you enjoyed it. I can't wait to watch it again
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/22/23 11:58 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
After the debacle of SUPER MARIO BROS. (1993), I wasn't sure if I wanted this to be animated or live action? Live action is great but you have more freedom in animation. After watching this, it didn't matter to me because I'm just SO happy they hit it out of the park. So many references and it's oozing with Easter eggs throughout. Originally I was a little upset that Luigi was the one being captured and not Peach (for original storyline accuracy's sake) but looking back, I'm glad they didn't relegate Peach to that role as Anya Taylor-Joy who voices Peach is a delight. This is easily one of my favorite video game movies as the team and studio finally got it right. It's fun, for all ages, doesn't overstay it's welcome, and left me wanting more (which I'm already eagerly anticipating a sequel). If you've ever loved any of the Mario games, you're going to love this film! 8.5/10
Thanks Irish, to me the first Mario Bros game on the NES is the best all-time video game.
My favorite is Mike Tyson's Punch-Out for the NES. Really hope they make that into a movie next but I know it'll just be Punch-Out and not Mike Tyson's. I think they should pony up the money and include Mike!
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/23 05:49 PM
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/wygMBPnT/IMG-1036.jpg)
It covers a story of addiction after a life changing car accident.
And if that was not bad enough, it gets worse.
3 stars
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/23 07:20 PM
Which comedies do you guys love? I think I'll watch something funny tonight
Posted By: hoodlum
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/23/23 09:05 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Which comedies do you guys love? I think I'll watch something funny tonight
All these yrs. later , TRADING PLACES always still get's a belly laugh from me..among many others...
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/23 08:52 AM
Originally Posted by hoodlum
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Which comedies do you guys love? I think I'll watch something funny tonight
All these yrs. later , TRADING PLACES always still get's a belly laugh from me..among many others...
Been awhile since I saw Trading Places. Yeah, it's definitely one of the more funnier comedies of the '80s. I thought Jamie Lee was kinda hot during that era lol
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/23 08:20 PM
The Big Lebowski never fails to crack me up.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/24/23 08:56 PM
Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
The Big Lebowski never fails to crack me up.
One of the best. Loved Goodman's intensity
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/23 01:21 AM
BIG GEORGE FOREMAN: THE MIRACULOUS STORY OF THE ONCE AND FUTURE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLD
Yes, just like Big George himself, the title reflects the larger-than-life man and his story. A biopic about the former 2-time heavyweight champion of the world and his call to ministry later in life. Khris Davis stars as George and does a wonderful job embodying him. He has the size and physical appearance but also his gentleness as well. Forest Whitaker is the only name most audiences will be firmly with to lend some respectability to the project. Whitaker plays Doc Broadus, a former superior of his in the job corps who is the one who introduces George to the sport, before being his trainer as well. Like any biopic, this film hits the highs and lows, from his fight against Muhammad Ali (Sullivan Jones) to Michael Moorer (Charles Brewer Jr.) on his comeback bid. However, the film is just as much about George's faith as it is about his boxing as he walked away from the ring while still in his prime in order to minister. It's a well-done, heartfelt, and inspirational film that in today's oversensitive and hyper-politicized climate, we could use more of. 6/10
Yes, just like Big George himself, the title reflects the larger-than-life man and his story. A biopic about the former 2-time heavyweight champion of the world and his call to ministry later in life. Khris Davis stars as George and does a wonderful job embodying him. He has the size and physical appearance but also his gentleness as well. Forest Whitaker is the only name most audiences will be firmly with to lend some respectability to the project. Whitaker plays Doc Broadus, a former superior of his in the job corps who is the one who introduces George to the sport, before being his trainer as well. Like any biopic, this film hits the highs and lows, from his fight against Muhammad Ali (Sullivan Jones) to Michael Moorer (Charles Brewer Jr.) on his comeback bid. However, the film is just as much about George's faith as it is about his boxing as he walked away from the ring while still in his prime in order to minister. It's a well-done, heartfelt, and inspirational film that in today's oversensitive and hyper-politicized climate, we could use more of. 6/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/28/23 02:11 AM
No one hit harder than Big George
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/23 04:20 PM
Great review i12
Thanks, will try to catch that this rainy weekend.
Right now streaming The new Scream
Thanks, will try to catch that this rainy weekend.
Right now streaming The new Scream
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/29/23 04:24 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SCREAM VI
The 4 survivors of SCREAM (2022) have all relocated to New York: Tara (Jenna Ortega), Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown), and Chad (Mason Gooding) to attend college while Sam (Melissa Barrera) attempts to keep an eye on her baby sister. As with any sequel, the audience knows what to expect: bigger body count, more gruesome murders, etc. and although the level of violence is turned up, I don't believe it's done in a gratuitous way. As last year's Scream followed the original, this gave off a very SCREAM 2 vibe other than just the story taking place outside of Woodsboro. Overall, I'm more satisfied with this entry than I was with last year's; however, this was the first and only Scream I was able to figure out who the killer(s) was before the halfway point (which was a let down). And my biggest grip with this is the reasoning for his/her/their killing spree as it yet again comes off light. As you can guess, the film leaves itself open to a third entry, which now will probably come in a few short years because the basic rule of any horror franchise is quantity over quality. With the exception of the opening kill scene, which has a nice and new hook to it, everything else here is again regurgitated. 7/10
The 4 survivors of SCREAM (2022) have all relocated to New York: Tara (Jenna Ortega), Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown), and Chad (Mason Gooding) to attend college while Sam (Melissa Barrera) attempts to keep an eye on her baby sister. As with any sequel, the audience knows what to expect: bigger body count, more gruesome murders, etc. and although the level of violence is turned up, I don't believe it's done in a gratuitous way. As last year's Scream followed the original, this gave off a very SCREAM 2 vibe other than just the story taking place outside of Woodsboro. Overall, I'm more satisfied with this entry than I was with last year's; however, this was the first and only Scream I was able to figure out who the killer(s) was before the halfway point (which was a let down). And my biggest grip with this is the reasoning for his/her/their killing spree as it yet again comes off light. As you can guess, the film leaves itself open to a third entry, which now will probably come in a few short years because the basic rule of any horror franchise is quantity over quality. With the exception of the opening kill scene, which has a nice and new hook to it, everything else here is again regurgitated. 7/10
Wow, a 7.
We are watching now and enjoying, looks like they did a good job on this one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/05/23 01:33 AM
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 3
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/07/23 12:25 AM
HOW TO BLOW UP A PIPELINE
8 environmental activists from various parts of the country (California, Oregon, North Dakota, and Texas) meet in West Texas in order to, as the title suggests, blow up a pipeline. They believe the only way to get attention to their cause (fighting climate change and protecting the environment) is to make a statement with their actions as opposed to their words. I'll start out by stating I was impressed and a little shocked actually the film was not preachy in any sense. The writers and characters don't mock individuals or audience members who do not believe in their cause (so the film is very watchable from that perspective). It's told with the group meeting up to carry out their mission, while their backstory and how they came to find themselves in this situation, told through various flashbacks. Also, the film had a wide range of actors from various backgrounds so again, it's not another "white man bad/oppressor" even though the word oppressor does sneak its way in at one point. A decent enough story that had me curious from the original trailer but overall, doesn't do anything to move the needle. Seemed more of a voyeur type film. 6/10
8 environmental activists from various parts of the country (California, Oregon, North Dakota, and Texas) meet in West Texas in order to, as the title suggests, blow up a pipeline. They believe the only way to get attention to their cause (fighting climate change and protecting the environment) is to make a statement with their actions as opposed to their words. I'll start out by stating I was impressed and a little shocked actually the film was not preachy in any sense. The writers and characters don't mock individuals or audience members who do not believe in their cause (so the film is very watchable from that perspective). It's told with the group meeting up to carry out their mission, while their backstory and how they came to find themselves in this situation, told through various flashbacks. Also, the film had a wide range of actors from various backgrounds so again, it's not another "white man bad/oppressor" even though the word oppressor does sneak its way in at one point. A decent enough story that had me curious from the original trailer but overall, doesn't do anything to move the needle. Seemed more of a voyeur type film. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/12/23 01:46 AM
BLACKBERRY
Yes, the phone everyone had before the iPhone. I never owned one myself and didn't know too much about the company, other than they're no longer around. The film chronicles the rise and fall of the empire and stars Glenn Howerton as co-CEO Jim Balsillie, Jay Baruchel as fellow co-CEO/co-founder Mike Lazaridis, and Matt Johnson as co-founder Douglas Fregin. The film opens with Mike & Doug pitching their product (then called Phone Link) to Jim. Being preoccupied with another deal he himself is trying to close, Jim blows off the 2 entrepreneurs. However, when Jim is unable to close his deal and is out of a job, he decides to go in with the partners for 50% of the company with Jim being the salesman and Mike & Doug being the techs. The relationship worked well until the networks they were on weren't able to keep up with the amount of Blackberry users data they were consuming. This was their first issue and then Apple came into the marketplace and we all know what happened from there. Glenn Howerton and Jay Baruchel both deserve the most credit for making this film as enjoyable as it was. Howerton is the constant, fiery, takes a lot of risks, alpha male; wheres Baruchel is the painfully shy, unsure of himself, socially awkward but technically genius partner. And while the film didn't drag for me, for those who may find it so, Howerton has enough fire in his belly to keep you awake, engaged, and entertained. 6.5/10
Yes, the phone everyone had before the iPhone. I never owned one myself and didn't know too much about the company, other than they're no longer around. The film chronicles the rise and fall of the empire and stars Glenn Howerton as co-CEO Jim Balsillie, Jay Baruchel as fellow co-CEO/co-founder Mike Lazaridis, and Matt Johnson as co-founder Douglas Fregin. The film opens with Mike & Doug pitching their product (then called Phone Link) to Jim. Being preoccupied with another deal he himself is trying to close, Jim blows off the 2 entrepreneurs. However, when Jim is unable to close his deal and is out of a job, he decides to go in with the partners for 50% of the company with Jim being the salesman and Mike & Doug being the techs. The relationship worked well until the networks they were on weren't able to keep up with the amount of Blackberry users data they were consuming. This was their first issue and then Apple came into the marketplace and we all know what happened from there. Glenn Howerton and Jay Baruchel both deserve the most credit for making this film as enjoyable as it was. Howerton is the constant, fiery, takes a lot of risks, alpha male; wheres Baruchel is the painfully shy, unsure of himself, socially awkward but technically genius partner. And while the film didn't drag for me, for those who may find it so, Howerton has enough fire in his belly to keep you awake, engaged, and entertained. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/13/23 08:24 PM
PAINT
Playing a mock copy of Bob Ross, Owen Wilson stars as Carl Nargle, PBS's #1 show in the Burlington, Vermont area. Carl is the talk of the town until one day, a competitor Ambrosia (Ciara Renée) is hired on to assist with the slumping ratings outside of Carl's 1-hour show, Paint. The 2 couldn't be anymore different as Carl is stuck in the past with his rotary telephones, Bob Ross fro, and paints only naturistic pictures; while Ambrosia is an openly gay painter, unapologetically still living with her parents, and has more of a variety with her work. The film is somewhat funny but is more in the tone of a NAPOLEON DYNAMITE/NACHO LIBRE type of humor (awkward at times humor). I could see this having the makings of a cult classic one day but outside of a few jokes and a touching story of how Carl never got over the love of his life Katherine (Michaela Watkins), who works at the station with him, there isn't a lot here and probably not worth many people's time. 6/10
Playing a mock copy of Bob Ross, Owen Wilson stars as Carl Nargle, PBS's #1 show in the Burlington, Vermont area. Carl is the talk of the town until one day, a competitor Ambrosia (Ciara Renée) is hired on to assist with the slumping ratings outside of Carl's 1-hour show, Paint. The 2 couldn't be anymore different as Carl is stuck in the past with his rotary telephones, Bob Ross fro, and paints only naturistic pictures; while Ambrosia is an openly gay painter, unapologetically still living with her parents, and has more of a variety with her work. The film is somewhat funny but is more in the tone of a NAPOLEON DYNAMITE/NACHO LIBRE type of humor (awkward at times humor). I could see this having the makings of a cult classic one day but outside of a few jokes and a touching story of how Carl never got over the love of his life Katherine (Michaela Watkins), who works at the station with him, there isn't a lot here and probably not worth many people's time. 6/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/14/23 03:56 AM
All The President's Men was on the Movies! TV Network tonight.
![[Linked Image]](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52896361545_d6711f3cd4_o.jpg)
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/17/23 11:36 PM
TO CATCH A KILLER
Baltimore police officer Eleanor Falco (Shailene Woodley) is hired on as a liaison between the BPD and the FBI after a very brief introduction to the head of the FBI task force in charge of the case, Geoffrey Lammark (Ben Mendelsohn). The case follows a lone sniper who kills 29 random individuals on New Year's Eve, using the fireworks as cover to shield his gunfire. The trailer for this looked decent enough and with Woodley & Mendelsohn onboard, it also gives the film some cred. However, the execution left me wanting more. While the story is very intriguing as the killer leaves no evidence of any kind behind, it never broke past the barrier from good to great and I can't quite put my finger on it. The film is most certainly watchable and does keep the audience guessing from time to time. I guess anytime any momentum was built up, it was quickly dissipated but another scene that didn't capitalize on the previous one. Woodley does a fine job here but was surprised at how stereotypical they made Eleanor to be from time-to-time as she's made to carry a crying baby out of an interview so Mendelsohn could finish it and another time she's coming around a coffee tray around the office for everyone. 6/10
Baltimore police officer Eleanor Falco (Shailene Woodley) is hired on as a liaison between the BPD and the FBI after a very brief introduction to the head of the FBI task force in charge of the case, Geoffrey Lammark (Ben Mendelsohn). The case follows a lone sniper who kills 29 random individuals on New Year's Eve, using the fireworks as cover to shield his gunfire. The trailer for this looked decent enough and with Woodley & Mendelsohn onboard, it also gives the film some cred. However, the execution left me wanting more. While the story is very intriguing as the killer leaves no evidence of any kind behind, it never broke past the barrier from good to great and I can't quite put my finger on it. The film is most certainly watchable and does keep the audience guessing from time to time. I guess anytime any momentum was built up, it was quickly dissipated but another scene that didn't capitalize on the previous one. Woodley does a fine job here but was surprised at how stereotypical they made Eleanor to be from time-to-time as she's made to carry a crying baby out of an interview so Mendelsohn could finish it and another time she's coming around a coffee tray around the office for everyone. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:00 AM
THE COVENANT
Jake Gyllenhaal stars as Master Sergeant John Kinley. He's a hard-nosed Sergeant, who while trying to keep his men alive in Afghanistan, can at times come off as a prick as well. In need of a new interpreter after his previous one is killed, John enlists Ahmed (Dar Salim) a mechanic and translator, who hates the Taliban because they killed his son. Ahmed is as strong willed as John and as such, they butt heads from time-to-time (however, Ahmed's instincts are always right, even when smoking out another interpreter's instructions to take a certain road that's prepped for an ambush of the team). However, when one of their routine missions 3 hours away from base goes awry, John is momentarily taken hostage by the Taliban: that is until Ahmed intervenes and kills all of the hostiles. He then drags John back to the base, again, a 3 hour drive by car. At this point, the film should have been renamed DON'T F*CK WITH THE INTERPRETER as Ahmed is nothing short of a bad ass! There's an intense and gripping chase scene that precludes this when John and Ahmed are attempting to flee the area after John's squad has been killed. This is one of Guy Ritchie's best films and his cinematography is a bit more formal due to the subject matter but he still experiments with a few shots that are nicely executed. Gyllenhaal is masterful as the Master Sergeant who, after being rescued and sent back home, must return to Afghanistan in order to rescue Ahmed from the Taliban, who's now on their most wanted list for saving John's life. 7.5/10
Jake Gyllenhaal stars as Master Sergeant John Kinley. He's a hard-nosed Sergeant, who while trying to keep his men alive in Afghanistan, can at times come off as a prick as well. In need of a new interpreter after his previous one is killed, John enlists Ahmed (Dar Salim) a mechanic and translator, who hates the Taliban because they killed his son. Ahmed is as strong willed as John and as such, they butt heads from time-to-time (however, Ahmed's instincts are always right, even when smoking out another interpreter's instructions to take a certain road that's prepped for an ambush of the team). However, when one of their routine missions 3 hours away from base goes awry, John is momentarily taken hostage by the Taliban: that is until Ahmed intervenes and kills all of the hostiles. He then drags John back to the base, again, a 3 hour drive by car. At this point, the film should have been renamed DON'T F*CK WITH THE INTERPRETER as Ahmed is nothing short of a bad ass! There's an intense and gripping chase scene that precludes this when John and Ahmed are attempting to flee the area after John's squad has been killed. This is one of Guy Ritchie's best films and his cinematography is a bit more formal due to the subject matter but he still experiments with a few shots that are nicely executed. Gyllenhaal is masterful as the Master Sergeant who, after being rescued and sent back home, must return to Afghanistan in order to rescue Ahmed from the Taliban, who's now on their most wanted list for saving John's life. 7.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:09 AM
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:18 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Thanks Gia and no, I have not seen LOVE SURVIVOR. I think it was recommended to me a few years ago but I never got around to seeing it.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:25 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Thanks Gia and no, I have not seen LOVE SURVIVOR. I think it was recommended to me a few years ago but I never got around to seeing it.
Oh man if you enjoyed The Covenant and you enjoy movies of that nature then PLEASE see Lone Survivor!! I would be quite surprised if you didn't like that one. I still think about it from time to time. It's based on the United States Navy SEALs counter-insurgent mission Operation Red Wings
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:28 AM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Thanks Gia and no, I have not seen LOVE SURVIVOR. I think it was recommended to me a few years ago but I never got around to seeing it.
Oh man if you enjoyed The Covenant and you enjoy movies of that nature then PLEASE see Lone Survivor!! I would be quite surprised if you didn't like that one. I still think about it from time to time. It's based on the United States Navy SEALs counter-insurgent mission Operation Red Wings
Based on true events or no?
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 12:37 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Thanks Gia and no, I have not seen LOVE SURVIVOR. I think it was recommended to me a few years ago but I never got around to seeing it.
Oh man if you enjoyed The Covenant and you enjoy movies of that nature then PLEASE see Lone Survivor!! I would be quite surprised if you didn't like that one. I still think about it from time to time. It's based on the United States Navy SEALs counter-insurgent mission Operation Red Wings
Based on true events or no?
Based on absolutely true events. I'm sure Hollywood took some dramatic license while making this movie, but the main story is true.
Let me know if you see it. I'd love to see your review about that one.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 01:02 AM
Thanks Gia. Will have to add it to the list. Will post my review when I'm able to catch it.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/20/23 06:47 PM
Jacir….. very good movie. Gives great insight to what incredible difficulties good immigrants with good intentions face in their lives.
3/12 stars
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/y3YJk2PV/IMG-1047.jpg)
3/12 stars
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/21/23 08:35 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Giacalone
I really enjoyed The Covenant, Irish. Good review. Did you see Lone Survivor? That's one of my favorite movies
Thanks Gia and no, I have not seen LOVE SURVIVOR. I think it was recommended to me a few years ago but I never got around to seeing it.
Oh man if you enjoyed The Covenant and you enjoy movies of that nature then PLEASE see Lone Survivor!! I would be quite surprised if you didn't like that one. I still think about it from time to time. It's based on the United States Navy SEALs counter-insurgent mission Operation Red Wings
Watched LONE SURVIVOR today Gia. Check out my review in the other thread.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/26/23 06:37 AM
"A MAN CALLED OTTO" (2020)
In ths latest entry into the Grumpy Olld Man franchise, Tom Hanks plays Otto Anderson, ageing widower, suicidal, who spends his days patrolling the one street of his development, shouting at people who don't display their parking passes, pointing fingers and generally being a pain in the ass. A pregnant Hispanic woman and her inept husband move in across thou ystreet and keep asking for Otto's help, which he gives, grudgingly, but they gradually awaken his better alngels, finally leading to his rejoining the human race. This movie is broad, to say the least, but the wince-y scenes don't drag the movie down because Hanks is just so damned good at what he does. Just when you expect the worst, he gives you a reason to want to like him, and stick with the film. Very good.
In ths latest entry into the Grumpy Olld Man franchise, Tom Hanks plays Otto Anderson, ageing widower, suicidal, who spends his days patrolling the one street of his development, shouting at people who don't display their parking passes, pointing fingers and generally being a pain in the ass. A pregnant Hispanic woman and her inept husband move in across thou ystreet and keep asking for Otto's help, which he gives, grudgingly, but they gradually awaken his better alngels, finally leading to his rejoining the human race. This movie is broad, to say the least, but the wince-y scenes don't drag the movie down because Hanks is just so damned good at what he does. Just when you expect the worst, he gives you a reason to want to like him, and stick with the film. Very good.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/28/23 02:14 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
"A MAN CALLED OTTO" (2020)
In ths latest entry into the Grumpy Olld Man franchise, Tom Hanks plays Otto Anderson, ageing widower, suicidal, who spends his days patrolling the one street of his development, shouting at people who don't display their parking passes, pointing fingers and generally being a pain in the ass. A pregnant Hispanic woman and her inept husband move in across thou ystreet and keep asking for Otto's help, which he gives, grudgingly, but they gradually awaken his better alngels, finally leading to his rejoining the human race. This movie is broad, to say the least, but the wince-y scenes don't drag the movie down because Hanks is just so damned good at what he does. Just when you expect the worst, he gives you a reason to want to like him, and stick with the film. Very good.
In ths latest entry into the Grumpy Olld Man franchise, Tom Hanks plays Otto Anderson, ageing widower, suicidal, who spends his days patrolling the one street of his development, shouting at people who don't display their parking passes, pointing fingers and generally being a pain in the ass. A pregnant Hispanic woman and her inept husband move in across thou ystreet and keep asking for Otto's help, which he gives, grudgingly, but they gradually awaken his better alngels, finally leading to his rejoining the human race. This movie is broad, to say the least, but the wince-y scenes don't drag the movie down because Hanks is just so damned good at what he does. Just when you expect the worst, he gives you a reason to want to like him, and stick with the film. Very good.
Yes , very good flick T.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 05/29/23 12:04 AM
BLOOD & GOLD
Germany, Spring 1945: the war is nearing it's conclusion and private Heinrich (Robert Maaser) abandons his post in order to be reunited with his daughter, whom he's never met as he's been fighting since the war began 6 years prior. Captured by his peers, he's left hanging from a branch for treason until local farmer Elsa (Marie Hacke) finds and cuts him down before it's too late. Heinrich's former company proceeds to the next town in order to steal 31 gold bars that are believed to have been left behind by a Jewish family before being sent away to a concentration camp. However, when his company goes back to Elsa's farm in order to obtain supplies, they realize Henrich is not dead as he wages a war upon them. The film feels very much like Quentin Tarantino's INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS, without the overly stylized violence and deaths. The film tells a serious story yet losses a lot of momentum towards its conclusion. From the trailer I was expecting something along the lines of QT or an exploitation film from yester years but this is neither of those. Still a decent film but just know what you're getting into before hand. 6/10
Germany, Spring 1945: the war is nearing it's conclusion and private Heinrich (Robert Maaser) abandons his post in order to be reunited with his daughter, whom he's never met as he's been fighting since the war began 6 years prior. Captured by his peers, he's left hanging from a branch for treason until local farmer Elsa (Marie Hacke) finds and cuts him down before it's too late. Heinrich's former company proceeds to the next town in order to steal 31 gold bars that are believed to have been left behind by a Jewish family before being sent away to a concentration camp. However, when his company goes back to Elsa's farm in order to obtain supplies, they realize Henrich is not dead as he wages a war upon them. The film feels very much like Quentin Tarantino's INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS, without the overly stylized violence and deaths. The film tells a serious story yet losses a lot of momentum towards its conclusion. From the trailer I was expecting something along the lines of QT or an exploitation film from yester years but this is neither of those. Still a decent film but just know what you're getting into before hand. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/02/23 02:00 AM
SPIDER-MAN: ACROSS THE SPIDER-VERSE
Miles Morales follows up his hit 2018 debut with a story that's being played out across all comic film storylines nowadays (DR. STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS, this film, and right on it's heels just 2 short weeks away, THE FLASH). The premise is simple enough, Spider-man exists across other dimensions but when Miles attempts to save someone who is meant to die, he puts all other universes in peril. The animation is still top notch and at times it looks like a living, breathing, comic book. New Spider-men are, at times, exhaustively introduced (whereas the first film only had 5 others to keep up with). And while many of them are only cameo's who serve as Easter eggs for the diehards, or have a one-liner, it became a little much. In addition, the story at times starts and stops too much, like a teenager getting behind the wheel of a car for the first time, too heavy on the gas immediately followed up with too heavy on the brake. The story leaves with a cliffhanger, nicely setting up SPIDER-MAN: BEYOND THE SPIDER-VERSE to be released in March 2024. Despite these flaws, this is still a film worth checking out, especially if you enjoyed the previous installment. I just preferred that to this sequel. 6.5/10
Miles Morales follows up his hit 2018 debut with a story that's being played out across all comic film storylines nowadays (DR. STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS, this film, and right on it's heels just 2 short weeks away, THE FLASH). The premise is simple enough, Spider-man exists across other dimensions but when Miles attempts to save someone who is meant to die, he puts all other universes in peril. The animation is still top notch and at times it looks like a living, breathing, comic book. New Spider-men are, at times, exhaustively introduced (whereas the first film only had 5 others to keep up with). And while many of them are only cameo's who serve as Easter eggs for the diehards, or have a one-liner, it became a little much. In addition, the story at times starts and stops too much, like a teenager getting behind the wheel of a car for the first time, too heavy on the gas immediately followed up with too heavy on the brake. The story leaves with a cliffhanger, nicely setting up SPIDER-MAN: BEYOND THE SPIDER-VERSE to be released in March 2024. Despite these flaws, this is still a film worth checking out, especially if you enjoyed the previous installment. I just preferred that to this sequel. 6.5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/06/23 08:06 PM
I watched Once Upon A Time In The West last night, so you get to hear this....
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/09/23 01:35 AM
TRANSFORMERS: RISE OF THE BEASTS
Set in 1994 New York, the Transformers join forces with the Maximals to take on a planet eating entity known as Unicron to both save Earth, as well as their home planet. Attempting to reboot the franchise, this film isn't as bloated as some of the previous Michael Bay entries from earlier in the franchise. Anthony Ramos stars as Noah Diaz, a former service member who was dishonorably discharged when he left the service to tend to his ailing younger brother. Unable to find steady employment as a result, Noah turns to car jacking until his first attempt is a Porsche that just so happens to be Mirage. From there, he's entrenched with the robots on their quest to stop Unicron's most trusted henchman Scourge and Unicron himself. With the exception of the very first Transformers movie, these have all unfortunately been the same to me: fantastic CGI but a thin story that barely keeps me engaged throughout the runtime and this film is no exception. Unless you're here strictly for the eye candy, you're going to be disappointed. The story attempts to pull at the audiences heartstrings with the sick younger brother of our star Noah, but he's teamed up with Elena (Dominique Fishback), who's an archeological intern at a museum who knows more than her boss yet receives none of the credit for her knowledge. The pair of her and Noah don't work and honestly, Fishback appears to be a fish out of water here as she brings very little to the table during her screen time. A nice cliffhanger at the end that will definitely pique the audiences interest. Let's just hope they can execute (if we even get that far and this movie is positively received both critically and financially). 6/10
Set in 1994 New York, the Transformers join forces with the Maximals to take on a planet eating entity known as Unicron to both save Earth, as well as their home planet. Attempting to reboot the franchise, this film isn't as bloated as some of the previous Michael Bay entries from earlier in the franchise. Anthony Ramos stars as Noah Diaz, a former service member who was dishonorably discharged when he left the service to tend to his ailing younger brother. Unable to find steady employment as a result, Noah turns to car jacking until his first attempt is a Porsche that just so happens to be Mirage. From there, he's entrenched with the robots on their quest to stop Unicron's most trusted henchman Scourge and Unicron himself. With the exception of the very first Transformers movie, these have all unfortunately been the same to me: fantastic CGI but a thin story that barely keeps me engaged throughout the runtime and this film is no exception. Unless you're here strictly for the eye candy, you're going to be disappointed. The story attempts to pull at the audiences heartstrings with the sick younger brother of our star Noah, but he's teamed up with Elena (Dominique Fishback), who's an archeological intern at a museum who knows more than her boss yet receives none of the credit for her knowledge. The pair of her and Noah don't work and honestly, Fishback appears to be a fish out of water here as she brings very little to the table during her screen time. A nice cliffhanger at the end that will definitely pique the audiences interest. Let's just hope they can execute (if we even get that far and this movie is positively received both critically and financially). 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/11/23 09:32 PM
MASTER GARDENER
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/14/23 11:53 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MASTER GARDENER
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
Wife is looking forward to this , I’m sure i will catch it with her and post back on it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/15/23 12:00 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MASTER GARDENER
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
Wife is looking forward to this , I’m sure i will catch it with her and post back on it.
Be curious what you and the Mrs. think of it DP.
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/16/23 06:51 AM
I just watched Sisu and that was a fun ride, if you through out some of the logical principles you can enjoy the movie. The actors do a good job, not to just get a paycheck, you know as in flat like so many movies that have come out. You are pretty much engage throughout the whole movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/17/23 12:03 AM
THE FLASH
This film finally sees the light of day to the general public! Ezra Miller stars as Barry Allen, the speedster who lost both his mother and father due to the same tragic accident (his mother was murdered and his father was framed for it). In an attempt to save his parents, Barry stumbles upon his ability to travel into other universes; however, as we have always been warned, changing events of the past will always necessitate with future events being altered as well (aka The Butterfly Effect). I'll begin by saying I'm glad Warner Bros. decided to release this film and didn't can it as it was an enjoyable ride. Some of the jokes fell flat but there's plenty of Easter eggs and geek moments that make up for it. In addition, the film brings Michael Keaton back as Batman who has a very sizeable role here which was refreshing. Not just the 1 or 2 scene cameos. It also introduces a new Supergirl (Sasha Calle) and the return of Michael Shannon as General Zod. Both Supergirl and Zod are relegated to the third act and don't have much screen time but this film has a lot of heart and pulls at the audiences heartstrings a few times throughout. However, some of the build up in the story seemed to be going in circles and was quite repetitive. Not withstanding, the film is a solid entry for DC, one of their best offerings and if the powers that be green light a sequel, I'd very much be interested. Just go in with tempered expectations. A good movie? Yes. A great movie? Somewhat debatable. One of the best superhero movies of all-time? Hype. 7/10
This film finally sees the light of day to the general public! Ezra Miller stars as Barry Allen, the speedster who lost both his mother and father due to the same tragic accident (his mother was murdered and his father was framed for it). In an attempt to save his parents, Barry stumbles upon his ability to travel into other universes; however, as we have always been warned, changing events of the past will always necessitate with future events being altered as well (aka The Butterfly Effect). I'll begin by saying I'm glad Warner Bros. decided to release this film and didn't can it as it was an enjoyable ride. Some of the jokes fell flat but there's plenty of Easter eggs and geek moments that make up for it. In addition, the film brings Michael Keaton back as Batman who has a very sizeable role here which was refreshing. Not just the 1 or 2 scene cameos. It also introduces a new Supergirl (Sasha Calle) and the return of Michael Shannon as General Zod. Both Supergirl and Zod are relegated to the third act and don't have much screen time but this film has a lot of heart and pulls at the audiences heartstrings a few times throughout. However, some of the build up in the story seemed to be going in circles and was quite repetitive. Not withstanding, the film is a solid entry for DC, one of their best offerings and if the powers that be green light a sequel, I'd very much be interested. Just go in with tempered expectations. A good movie? Yes. A great movie? Somewhat debatable. One of the best superhero movies of all-time? Hype. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/23 06:06 PM
NO HARD FEELINGS
Maddie Barker (Jennifer Lawrence) agrees to date 19-year-old Percy Becker (Andrew Barth Feldman) before he heads off to college. Maddie, in need of a car after hers was impounded, takes Percy's parents up on their Craigslist ad which promised a car in exchange for dating their son and getting him out of his shell before he heads off to Princeton. What insures for the rest of the film is plenty of Maddie throwing herself at Percy, who's too sheltered to notice and at other times, too shy to respond. Lawrence and Feldman play well together with Maddie being the older, more mature, and experienced, trying to get Percy into bed. I give a tip of the hat to Feldman as he plays the socially awkward teenage quite well. Fortunately, there's laughs to go around as this isn't a movie where all of the funny parts are in the trailer and there's nothing left once your inside of the theater. Not worth venturing out to the theaters to see but you could find worse ways to spend 103 minutes once it's available to stream. 6/10
Maddie Barker (Jennifer Lawrence) agrees to date 19-year-old Percy Becker (Andrew Barth Feldman) before he heads off to college. Maddie, in need of a car after hers was impounded, takes Percy's parents up on their Craigslist ad which promised a car in exchange for dating their son and getting him out of his shell before he heads off to Princeton. What insures for the rest of the film is plenty of Maddie throwing herself at Percy, who's too sheltered to notice and at other times, too shy to respond. Lawrence and Feldman play well together with Maddie being the older, more mature, and experienced, trying to get Percy into bed. I give a tip of the hat to Feldman as he plays the socially awkward teenage quite well. Fortunately, there's laughs to go around as this isn't a movie where all of the funny parts are in the trailer and there's nothing left once your inside of the theater. Not worth venturing out to the theaters to see but you could find worse ways to spend 103 minutes once it's available to stream. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/23/23 06:15 PM
THE BLACKENING
8 friends who haven't been all together in 10 years, rent a house in the woods to reconnect over the Juneteenth holiday. However, before their bags are even unpacked, there's a killer on the loose looking to make them his next victims. The film sadly relies (lazily I might add) to white people jokes, which accounts for about three-quarters of jokes told throughout the film. However, these are front loaded into the film so once you get past them, it's most easily digestible. In addition to playing on the trope of black people never survive horror movies, this looks to rewrite that narrative. The film does a nice job of being both horror and comedy, never being too campy or too much of a spoof; but rather seemed to take the subject matter more seriously. Unfortunately, the reveal of who the killer(s) wasn't much of a surprise as it's quite predictable yet they still do manage to thrown in a twist before all's said and done. The only stand out I can take the time to credit is Jermaine Fowler as Clifton: a smart, yet unsterotypical character who has some of the best jokes. Overall though, the film is very average and nothing to write home about. 5/10
8 friends who haven't been all together in 10 years, rent a house in the woods to reconnect over the Juneteenth holiday. However, before their bags are even unpacked, there's a killer on the loose looking to make them his next victims. The film sadly relies (lazily I might add) to white people jokes, which accounts for about three-quarters of jokes told throughout the film. However, these are front loaded into the film so once you get past them, it's most easily digestible. In addition to playing on the trope of black people never survive horror movies, this looks to rewrite that narrative. The film does a nice job of being both horror and comedy, never being too campy or too much of a spoof; but rather seemed to take the subject matter more seriously. Unfortunately, the reveal of who the killer(s) wasn't much of a surprise as it's quite predictable yet they still do manage to thrown in a twist before all's said and done. The only stand out I can take the time to credit is Jermaine Fowler as Clifton: a smart, yet unsterotypical character who has some of the best jokes. Overall though, the film is very average and nothing to write home about. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/23 12:11 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MASTER GARDENER
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
Wife is looking forward to this , I’m sure i will catch it with her and post back on it.
Be curious what you and the Mrs. think of it DP.
We saw it today, i scored this a bit higher, I’m a 7.5 wife agrees with your score.
We both love the performance of every actor..
We both thought the scene shots were very good and writing really well done.
This makes the story line easy to follow and believable, people like this do exist and may sometimes come together.
Good flick.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/23 12:25 AM
FLAMIN' HOT
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 06/26/23 12:30 AM
SANCTUARY
Christopher Abbott (Hal) engages in and attempts to end a dominatrix/submissive relationship with Rebecca (Margaret Qualley). Hal's father, who was the head of a $185 million dollar hotel empire, recently dies and leaves the business in Hal's hands. However, after a final session with his mistress, Hal can't break free from Rebecca's string of lies. A decent enough film that allows both characters to express their own individual desires, even if at times, they are completely making them up in order to serve their own purposes. Nothing out of the ordinary here but keep your eyes on Rebecca as she has more to lose than Hal. 6/10
Christopher Abbott (Hal) engages in and attempts to end a dominatrix/submissive relationship with Rebecca (Margaret Qualley). Hal's father, who was the head of a $185 million dollar hotel empire, recently dies and leaves the business in Hal's hands. However, after a final session with his mistress, Hal can't break free from Rebecca's string of lies. A decent enough film that allows both characters to express their own individual desires, even if at times, they are completely making them up in order to serve their own purposes. Nothing out of the ordinary here but keep your eyes on Rebecca as she has more to lose than Hal. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/23 12:33 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
MASTER GARDENER
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
From writer/director Paul Schrader, Joel Edgerton stars as Narvel Roth, a gardener who works at Gracewood Gardens which is owned by Norma Haverhill (Sigourney Weaver). However, when Norma's sister dies, her grandniece Myra (Quintessa Swindell) comes to live with her and become an apprentice under Narvel. But, Narvel has a dark past that catches up with him as he grows further away from Norma and closer to young Myra. At times, this film gave me vibes of Nicolas Winding Refn's DRIVE, where Narvel looks to protect a young and vulnerable woman by taking the law into his own hands without fear of repercussions (although without as good of a soundtrack). Norma and Narvel have a complicated and at times, fraught relationship. There scenes together are a pleasure to watch as they seem to want to outdo the other. I was also impressed with Swindell who plays the troubled young woman, allowing herself to be vulnerable and for a moment, a victim yet finding her strength before all's said and done. The film is tight and watchable, although like so many others, tries to be more than what it is. 6/10
Wife is looking forward to this , I’m sure i will catch it with her and post back on it.
Be curious what you and the Mrs. think of it DP.
We saw it today, i scored this a bit higher, I’m a 7.5 wife agrees with your score.
We both love the performance of every actor..
We both thought the scene shots were very good and writing really well done.
This makes the story line easy to follow and believable, people like this do exist and may sometimes come together.
Good flick.
I think I am going to watch this again, I rarely rewatch movies I saw so recent but I think the movie has a very intriguing lure to it and think I know the exact scenes that could have been done better. Will follow up on which of those scenes I am thinking of.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/23 12:36 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
FLAMIN' HOT
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
We scored this a bit higher, a real feel good flick amd yes, it is refreshing to see the cream rise to the top.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/23 12:39 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
FLAMIN' HOT
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
The true life story of Richard Montañez (Jesse Garcia), who works as a janitor at Frito Lays and whose entrepreneurial spirit inspires the inclusion (and explosion) of the Latino market.The story is inspirational but yet can't help itself to exclude the racist environment Richard was living in at the time. So while all white men are bad, they still gave him his shot and transformed his entire life. Average performances from all involved, this is a straight forward (and somewhat wanna-be gangster) film. Although at the end of the day, as the old saying goes, it's good to see the cream rise to the top. 5.5/10
We scored this a bit higher, a real feel good flick amd yes, it is refreshing to see the cream rise to the top.
What would you and the Mrs. score it DP?
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/23 12:40 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO HARD FEELINGS
Maddie Barker (Jennifer Lawrence) agrees to date 19-year-old Percy Becker (Andrew Barth Feldman) before he heads off to college. Maddie, in need of a car after hers was impounded, takes Percy's parents up on their Craigslist ad which promised a car in exchange for dating their son and getting him out of his shell before he heads off to Princeton. What insures for the rest of the film is plenty of Maddie throwing herself at Percy, who's too sheltered to notice and at other times, too shy to respond. Lawrence and Feldman play well together with Maddie being the older, more mature, and experienced, trying to get Percy into bed. I give a tip of the hat to Feldman as he plays the socially awkward teenage quite well. Fortunately, there's laughs to go around as this isn't a movie where all of the funny parts are in the trailer and there's nothing left once your inside of the theater. Not worth venturing out to the theaters to see but you could find worse ways to spend 103 minutes once it's available to stream. 6/10
Maddie Barker (Jennifer Lawrence) agrees to date 19-year-old Percy Becker (Andrew Barth Feldman) before he heads off to college. Maddie, in need of a car after hers was impounded, takes Percy's parents up on their Craigslist ad which promised a car in exchange for dating their son and getting him out of his shell before he heads off to Princeton. What insures for the rest of the film is plenty of Maddie throwing herself at Percy, who's too sheltered to notice and at other times, too shy to respond. Lawrence and Feldman play well together with Maddie being the older, more mature, and experienced, trying to get Percy into bed. I give a tip of the hat to Feldman as he plays the socially awkward teenage quite well. Fortunately, there's laughs to go around as this isn't a movie where all of the funny parts are in the trailer and there's nothing left once your inside of the theater. Not worth venturing out to the theaters to see but you could find worse ways to spend 103 minutes once it's available to stream. 6/10
We are gunna give this one a view.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/15/23 12:42 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SANCTUARY
Christopher Abbott (Hal) engages in and attempts to end a dominatrix/submissive relationship with Rebecca (Margaret Qualley). Hal's father, who was the head of a $185 million dollar hotel empire, recently dies and leaves the business in Hal's hands. However, after a final session with his mistress, Hal can't break free from Rebecca's string of lies. A decent enough film that allows both characters to express their own individual desires, even if at times, they are completely making them up in order to serve their own purposes. Nothing out of the ordinary here but keep your eyes on Rebecca as she has more to lose than Hal. 6/10
Christopher Abbott (Hal) engages in and attempts to end a dominatrix/submissive relationship with Rebecca (Margaret Qualley). Hal's father, who was the head of a $185 million dollar hotel empire, recently dies and leaves the business in Hal's hands. However, after a final session with his mistress, Hal can't break free from Rebecca's string of lies. A decent enough film that allows both characters to express their own individual desires, even if at times, they are completely making them up in order to serve their own purposes. Nothing out of the ordinary here but keep your eyes on Rebecca as she has more to lose than Hal. 6/10
Thank i
We are going to check this one out also but plan on passing on the blackening
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/23 05:43 PM
@Irishman
Will you go to Oppenheimer? Looking forward to that one!
Will you go to Oppenheimer? Looking forward to that one!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/16/23 09:17 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
@Irishman
Will you go to Oppenheimer? Looking forward to that one!
Will you go to Oppenheimer? Looking forward to that one!
Yes sir, seeing that on Thursday and BARBIE on Friday. Still haven't caught INDIANA JONES, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, or COBWEBS yet but I plan to this weekend. Was on vacation for a few weeks and didn't see anything so I'm playing catch up now.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/23 01:09 AM
NIce amigo enjoy them.
Cillian Murphy is one of my favorite actors. The cast went also on strike.
Cillian Murphy is one of my favorite actors. The cast went also on strike.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/17/23 01:44 AM
Thanks, I'll post my reviews after watching them.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/23 11:02 PM
OPPENHEIMER
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/23 11:12 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
OPPENHEIMER
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
Thank you Irish, cast is amazing also big fan of Emily Blunt. I know you are pretty conservative with grades so I take a 7.5 as a top film.
3 hours was it not too long?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/23 11:12 PM
COBWEB
Peter, an 8-year-old boy, begins hearing a knocking noise from within his bedroom walls at night. Terrified of what it could be and like any child would, he enlists the help of his parents Carol (Lizzy Caplan) & Mark (Antony Starr) only to be rebuffed that it's all in his head. After a while, the knock behind the wall begins talking to Peter, asking his assistance to get them out of where they are and in doing so, angering his parents who continuously tell him there's nothing there. Once Peter starts befriending the voice, he begins to wonder if his parents don't want to believe him in order to keep a dark secret from their past? The film starts out well enough like any spooky/ghost story would: set around Halloween, a creepy old house, wonderful decaying sets, etc. Visually the film kept my interest but the story moved along a little slowly, which is surprising being that it's only 88 minutes long. But, once it got to the third act and the payoff of what was behind his wall, it takes a HARD left turn that I was not prepared for. I'll give the film a lot of credit in being original and taking a risk, however, not all risks work and this is one of those instances. Peter's parents, Caplan & Starr, are the only worthy note I can write in this review about the film. Otherwise, the third act plays out like a trainwreck, one in which you're not even curious about viewing in order to see the carnage. Hard pass on this for anyone contemplating seeing it. 5/10
Peter, an 8-year-old boy, begins hearing a knocking noise from within his bedroom walls at night. Terrified of what it could be and like any child would, he enlists the help of his parents Carol (Lizzy Caplan) & Mark (Antony Starr) only to be rebuffed that it's all in his head. After a while, the knock behind the wall begins talking to Peter, asking his assistance to get them out of where they are and in doing so, angering his parents who continuously tell him there's nothing there. Once Peter starts befriending the voice, he begins to wonder if his parents don't want to believe him in order to keep a dark secret from their past? The film starts out well enough like any spooky/ghost story would: set around Halloween, a creepy old house, wonderful decaying sets, etc. Visually the film kept my interest but the story moved along a little slowly, which is surprising being that it's only 88 minutes long. But, once it got to the third act and the payoff of what was behind his wall, it takes a HARD left turn that I was not prepared for. I'll give the film a lot of credit in being original and taking a risk, however, not all risks work and this is one of those instances. Peter's parents, Caplan & Starr, are the only worthy note I can write in this review about the film. Otherwise, the third act plays out like a trainwreck, one in which you're not even curious about viewing in order to see the carnage. Hard pass on this for anyone contemplating seeing it. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/23 11:26 PM
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - DEAD RECKONING PART ONE
Ethan Hunt and the gang are back at it again, this time in order to track down a key of which it unlocks, nobody knows as well as an AI program known as the entity. Of course, like any good spy movie the fate of the world hangs in the balance where failing is not an option for our heroes. A most respectable cast has been gathered for this entry besides regulars Tom Cruise, Rebecca Ferguson, Ving Rhames, and Simon Pegg newcomers Hayley Atwell, Vanessa Kirby, Esai Morales, Pom Klemeentieff, and Shea Whigham round out the roster. Another solid film for the franchise, although not as good as FALLOUT in my opinion and my reasoning is because I felt like they were holding back at times, building up this film to conclude with Part Two (whereas previous films went all out due to their individual film storytelling). Don't get me wrong, there's still plenty of action and a fantastic train sequence that director Christopher McQuarrie personally wanted to put in. But the story and runtime feel a little bloated at times and I'm a bit nervous about the runtime of Part Two if they needed to take this much time to tell this part of the story. Esai Morales is wonderful as the baddie: cool, confident, and always has a devilish smile that says even if I don't get you right now, I will very soon. Atwell is also a great addition as she's a huge part of this story and the action seems to come naturally to her (probably didn't hurt playing in the MCU prior to this). This is the type of big budget, summer action movies audiences are used to and enjoy seeing on the big screen. 61-year-old Tom Cruise still has it. After last summer's behemoth TOP GUN: MAVERICK and now this, it proves he can still put asses in the seats. 7.5/10
Ethan Hunt and the gang are back at it again, this time in order to track down a key of which it unlocks, nobody knows as well as an AI program known as the entity. Of course, like any good spy movie the fate of the world hangs in the balance where failing is not an option for our heroes. A most respectable cast has been gathered for this entry besides regulars Tom Cruise, Rebecca Ferguson, Ving Rhames, and Simon Pegg newcomers Hayley Atwell, Vanessa Kirby, Esai Morales, Pom Klemeentieff, and Shea Whigham round out the roster. Another solid film for the franchise, although not as good as FALLOUT in my opinion and my reasoning is because I felt like they were holding back at times, building up this film to conclude with Part Two (whereas previous films went all out due to their individual film storytelling). Don't get me wrong, there's still plenty of action and a fantastic train sequence that director Christopher McQuarrie personally wanted to put in. But the story and runtime feel a little bloated at times and I'm a bit nervous about the runtime of Part Two if they needed to take this much time to tell this part of the story. Esai Morales is wonderful as the baddie: cool, confident, and always has a devilish smile that says even if I don't get you right now, I will very soon. Atwell is also a great addition as she's a huge part of this story and the action seems to come naturally to her (probably didn't hurt playing in the MCU prior to this). This is the type of big budget, summer action movies audiences are used to and enjoy seeing on the big screen. 61-year-old Tom Cruise still has it. After last summer's behemoth TOP GUN: MAVERICK and now this, it proves he can still put asses in the seats. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/21/23 11:29 PM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Originally Posted by Irishman12
OPPENHEIMER
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
A biography about the father of the atomic bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimber (Cillian Murphy). The film is just as much about how the atomic bomb came to be but also the repercussions once it was released upon the world. Bouncing back-and-forth between timelines (color for present/past events and black-and-white for future events). The film boasts an impressive all-star cast with many established names (and some Oscar winners as well) who are at times mere bit players such as Oscar winners Rami Malek and Gary Oldman. This just proves the willingness in which actors want to collaborate with director Christopher Nolan. While the runtime clocks in at 3 hours on the nose, the story moves rapidly and never lets up. Nolan crams a lot into the film and does a good job telling his story and I didn't feel much, if anything, was left out. I will point out that Robert Downey Jr. was initially one of the bit players I described earlier as Lewis Strauss; however, towards the end of the film he's given a lot more screentime and really makes the most of it. Besides quite possibly Murphy's best performance, RDJ really shined in his limited screentime. Nolan's best picture in my opinion since 2012's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. 7.5/10
Thank you Irish, cast is amazing also big fan of Emily Blunt. I know you are pretty conservative with grades so I take a 7.5 as a top film.
3 hours was it not too long?
Not at all. Could it have been trimmed down a little? Sure, but it doesn't feel like 3 hours compared to others films that I've watched. Worth seeing if you're a fan of anyone in the cast or Nolan.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/23 02:51 PM
HYPNOTIC
Ben Affleck plays Austin police detective Danny Rouke, a grieving father who's daughter went missing 4 years prior. He attempts to capture Lev Dellrayne (William Fichtner) a hypnotic who can influence people to carry out his wishes within seconds of making eye contact with them. A hypnotic differs from telepathy in that telepathy deals with individuals who can only control someones mind while hypnotics can control their mind and actions. This appears to be director Robert Rodriguez's attempt at a Christopher Nolan style INCEPTION, and although not exactly the same, the use of fake worlds and images gave me that feeling throughout. The film also gives off a minimum wage or bare bones vibe although I'm sure with Affleck's salary alone that's not the case. A few RR easter eggs make their way on screen (such as the name of the BBQ restaurant as well as frequent Rodriguez collaborator Jeff Fahey). Unfortunately, the film attempts to be smarter than it is and isn't executed well in its delivery. I wasn't invested much in the characters and as such, the payoffs in the third act didn't have the same effect on me I'm sure Rodriguez was hoping they would. I still like Rodriguez as a director and his work and I'll continue to see future projects until I'm proven wrong. This project was unfortunately a miss for him and everyone involved. 5.5/10
Ben Affleck plays Austin police detective Danny Rouke, a grieving father who's daughter went missing 4 years prior. He attempts to capture Lev Dellrayne (William Fichtner) a hypnotic who can influence people to carry out his wishes within seconds of making eye contact with them. A hypnotic differs from telepathy in that telepathy deals with individuals who can only control someones mind while hypnotics can control their mind and actions. This appears to be director Robert Rodriguez's attempt at a Christopher Nolan style INCEPTION, and although not exactly the same, the use of fake worlds and images gave me that feeling throughout. The film also gives off a minimum wage or bare bones vibe although I'm sure with Affleck's salary alone that's not the case. A few RR easter eggs make their way on screen (such as the name of the BBQ restaurant as well as frequent Rodriguez collaborator Jeff Fahey). Unfortunately, the film attempts to be smarter than it is and isn't executed well in its delivery. I wasn't invested much in the characters and as such, the payoffs in the third act didn't have the same effect on me I'm sure Rodriguez was hoping they would. I still like Rodriguez as a director and his work and I'll continue to see future projects until I'm proven wrong. This project was unfortunately a miss for him and everyone involved. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/22/23 08:44 PM
BARBIE
A live-action film based upon the iconic doll, Margot Robbie stars as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Ken. The film opens with Barbie living her best life, until one day she notices changes going on with her: she becomes flat-footed, begins to think about death, experiences anxiety and the like. In order to correct the problem, she leaves Barbieland for the real world. Ken tags along, exposing them to the complete opposite of Barbieland where men have the power and not women. The acting was fine with Robbie and Gosling being great choices for starring and the set designs deserve a shout out as well. My main issue with the film was the heavy handedness and overly preachy tone from writer/director Greta Gerwig and writer Noah Baumbach. They said the quiet part out loud as this is completely a sexist and misandrist film. They must have set a record for the amount of times the word patriarch was used in a single film. Each actor must have had a quota to say it so many times the film should have been called BARBIE: ATTACK OF THE PATRIARCHY. Men are portrayed as bumbling idiots who only desire power and need the attention of women in order to survive. I thought Hollywood had gone "all inclusive" the last few years but Greta, WarnerBros and company must have missed that memo as this is anything but inclusive. The story is weak because Greta and Noah choose to pick and feast on long hanging fruit, revealing the limitations of their craft. Be better! 4/10
A live-action film based upon the iconic doll, Margot Robbie stars as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Ken. The film opens with Barbie living her best life, until one day she notices changes going on with her: she becomes flat-footed, begins to think about death, experiences anxiety and the like. In order to correct the problem, she leaves Barbieland for the real world. Ken tags along, exposing them to the complete opposite of Barbieland where men have the power and not women. The acting was fine with Robbie and Gosling being great choices for starring and the set designs deserve a shout out as well. My main issue with the film was the heavy handedness and overly preachy tone from writer/director Greta Gerwig and writer Noah Baumbach. They said the quiet part out loud as this is completely a sexist and misandrist film. They must have set a record for the amount of times the word patriarch was used in a single film. Each actor must have had a quota to say it so many times the film should have been called BARBIE: ATTACK OF THE PATRIARCHY. Men are portrayed as bumbling idiots who only desire power and need the attention of women in order to survive. I thought Hollywood had gone "all inclusive" the last few years but Greta, WarnerBros and company must have missed that memo as this is anything but inclusive. The story is weak because Greta and Noah choose to pick and feast on long hanging fruit, revealing the limitations of their craft. Be better! 4/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/23 06:49 AM
The Extraordinary End to the Nazi Nuclear Program - Finding Heisenberg
Gen. Groves put together a Task Force known as the ALSOS Mission.
Lt. Col. Boris Pash was appointed to lead the task force as they searched in occupied Europe for Nuclear sites and Nuclear scientists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOvCYrHnJAc
Gen. Groves put together a Task Force known as the ALSOS Mission.
Lt. Col. Boris Pash was appointed to lead the task force as they searched in occupied Europe for Nuclear sites and Nuclear scientists.
https:/
Posted By: ralphie_cifaretto
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/27/23 11:45 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
BARBIE
A live-action film based upon the iconic doll, Margot Robbie stars as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Ken. The film opens with Barbie living her best life, until one day she notices changes going on with her: she becomes flat-footed, begins to think about death, experiences anxiety and the like. In order to correct the problem, she leaves Barbieland for the real world. Ken tags along, exposing them to the complete opposite of Barbieland where men have the power and not women. The acting was fine with Robbie and Gosling being great choices for starring and the set designs deserve a shout out as well. My main issue with the film was the heavy handedness and overly preachy tone from writer/director Greta Gerwig and writer Noah Baumbach. They said the quiet part out loud as this is completely a sexist and misandrist film. They must have set a record for the amount of times the word patriarch was used in a single film. Each actor must have had a quota to say it so many times the film should have been called BARBIE: ATTACK OF THE PATRIARCHY. Men are portrayed as bumbling idiots who only desire power and need the attention of women in order to survive. I thought Hollywood had gone "all inclusive" the last few years but Greta, WarnerBros and company must have missed that memo as this is anything but inclusive. The story is weak because Greta and Noah choose to pick and feast on long hanging fruit, revealing the limitations of their craft. Be better! 4/10
A live-action film based upon the iconic doll, Margot Robbie stars as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Ken. The film opens with Barbie living her best life, until one day she notices changes going on with her: she becomes flat-footed, begins to think about death, experiences anxiety and the like. In order to correct the problem, she leaves Barbieland for the real world. Ken tags along, exposing them to the complete opposite of Barbieland where men have the power and not women. The acting was fine with Robbie and Gosling being great choices for starring and the set designs deserve a shout out as well. My main issue with the film was the heavy handedness and overly preachy tone from writer/director Greta Gerwig and writer Noah Baumbach. They said the quiet part out loud as this is completely a sexist and misandrist film. They must have set a record for the amount of times the word patriarch was used in a single film. Each actor must have had a quota to say it so many times the film should have been called BARBIE: ATTACK OF THE PATRIARCHY. Men are portrayed as bumbling idiots who only desire power and need the attention of women in order to survive. I thought Hollywood had gone "all inclusive" the last few years but Greta, WarnerBros and company must have missed that memo as this is anything but inclusive. The story is weak because Greta and Noah choose to pick and feast on long hanging fruit, revealing the limitations of their craft. Be better! 4/10
Now I have to see this fucking movie hahahah. Great review btw
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/23 10:54 PM
BEAU IS AFRAID
Writer/Director Ari Aster's first foray outside of horror involves Beau (Joaquin Phoenix) a man who suffers from anxiety, learns about the sudden passing of his mother. He must then make the long journey in order to bury her as her dying wish was for her not to be buried until Beau was present. A mildly funny film with some dark bits to it. Phoenix, in his first major role since winning his Oscar, is once again absolutely terrific as Beau. His presence and Asters are what got me to sit through this 3 hour journey and I'm glad that I did. It's something different, something original that was enjoyable up until the third act (which takes a decisively different approach to the story). This is the type of film that's better digested upon a second viewing. As much as I'd like to see Aster stick to horror (although I'm guessing he doesn't want to be typecast), I'm curious what he'll present to us next? 7/10
Writer/Director Ari Aster's first foray outside of horror involves Beau (Joaquin Phoenix) a man who suffers from anxiety, learns about the sudden passing of his mother. He must then make the long journey in order to bury her as her dying wish was for her not to be buried until Beau was present. A mildly funny film with some dark bits to it. Phoenix, in his first major role since winning his Oscar, is once again absolutely terrific as Beau. His presence and Asters are what got me to sit through this 3 hour journey and I'm glad that I did. It's something different, something original that was enjoyable up until the third act (which takes a decisively different approach to the story). This is the type of film that's better digested upon a second viewing. As much as I'd like to see Aster stick to horror (although I'm guessing he doesn't want to be typecast), I'm curious what he'll present to us next? 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/28/23 11:06 PM
INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY
The latest installment (and final for Harrison Ford) involves his chase of Archimedes Dial of Destiny. The film wonderfully opens in 1944 Germany before the present day of 1969. I must applaud the de-aging technology as it rather added to the film rather than distracting or taking away from it. Ford wonderfully embraces the Indy character one final time. I must say I had my reservations about this after 2008's INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL. But rest assured, this does the character justice that felt more of a hybrid between RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and THE LAST CRUSADE. James Mangold's efforts should be applauded as he slide into the directors chair marvelously (which are big shoes to fill after Steven Spielberg was responsible for the previous entries). Phoebe Waller-Bridge was likewise delightful as Indy's Goddaughter Helena. If online rumors are to be believed, she may take the franchise going forward and I'd be OK with that over Indy's son Mutt. This was probably the most appropriate way to send off such an iconic franchise. 7.5/10
The latest installment (and final for Harrison Ford) involves his chase of Archimedes Dial of Destiny. The film wonderfully opens in 1944 Germany before the present day of 1969. I must applaud the de-aging technology as it rather added to the film rather than distracting or taking away from it. Ford wonderfully embraces the Indy character one final time. I must say I had my reservations about this after 2008's INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL. But rest assured, this does the character justice that felt more of a hybrid between RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and THE LAST CRUSADE. James Mangold's efforts should be applauded as he slide into the directors chair marvelously (which are big shoes to fill after Steven Spielberg was responsible for the previous entries). Phoebe Waller-Bridge was likewise delightful as Indy's Goddaughter Helena. If online rumors are to be believed, she may take the franchise going forward and I'd be OK with that over Indy's son Mutt. This was probably the most appropriate way to send off such an iconic franchise. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/23 08:58 PM
THE BEANIE BUBBLE
This film tells the story of the rise and fall of the beanie baby empire run by co-founder Ty Wagner (Zach Galifianakis). However, the story isn't just about him but the 3 women who helped shape the company into the behemoth it eventually became in co-founder Robbie (Elizabeth Banks), Ty's right hand assistant Maya (Geraldine Viswanathan), and Ty's fiance Sheila (Sarah Snook). Living through the 90's, I grew up with the beanie baby crazy but never did follow along about how the company crumbled. This provides an insightful behind-the-scenes story about that time involving these 4 characters. Terrific performances all around, although Galifianakis and Viswanathan make the movie even more special in my opinion. The story appears to show the collapse could have been avoided had Ty heeded Maya's always spot on advice about the future. But, when you're making $1 billion profit in a single year back in the 1990s, I suppose you start to believe your own hype. For anyone else who doesn't know the story of what happened or are just looking for a solid film, this is worth watching. 7/10
This film tells the story of the rise and fall of the beanie baby empire run by co-founder Ty Wagner (Zach Galifianakis). However, the story isn't just about him but the 3 women who helped shape the company into the behemoth it eventually became in co-founder Robbie (Elizabeth Banks), Ty's right hand assistant Maya (Geraldine Viswanathan), and Ty's fiance Sheila (Sarah Snook). Living through the 90's, I grew up with the beanie baby crazy but never did follow along about how the company crumbled. This provides an insightful behind-the-scenes story about that time involving these 4 characters. Terrific performances all around, although Galifianakis and Viswanathan make the movie even more special in my opinion. The story appears to show the collapse could have been avoided had Ty heeded Maya's always spot on advice about the future. But, when you're making $1 billion profit in a single year back in the 1990s, I suppose you start to believe your own hype. For anyone else who doesn't know the story of what happened or are just looking for a solid film, this is worth watching. 7/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/29/23 11:35 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY
The latest installment (and final for Harrison Ford) involves his chase of Archimedes Dial of Destiny. The film wonderfully opens in 1944 Germany before the present day of 1969. I must applaud the de-aging technology as it rather added to the film rather than distracting or taking away from it. Ford wonderfully embraces the Indy character one final time. I must say I had my reservations about this after 2008's INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL. But rest assured, this does the character justice that felt more of a hybrid between RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and THE LAST CRUSADE. James Mangold's efforts should be applauded as he slide into the directors chair marvelously (which are big shoes to fill after Steven Spielberg was responsible for the previous entries). Phoebe Waller-Bridge was likewise delightful as Indy's Goddaughter Helena. If online rumors are to be believed, she may take the franchise going forward and I'd be OK with that over Indy's son Mutt. This was probably the most appropriate way to send off such an iconic franchise. 7.5/10
The latest installment (and final for Harrison Ford) involves his chase of Archimedes Dial of Destiny. The film wonderfully opens in 1944 Germany before the present day of 1969. I must applaud the de-aging technology as it rather added to the film rather than distracting or taking away from it. Ford wonderfully embraces the Indy character one final time. I must say I had my reservations about this after 2008's INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL. But rest assured, this does the character justice that felt more of a hybrid between RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and THE LAST CRUSADE. James Mangold's efforts should be applauded as he slide into the directors chair marvelously (which are big shoes to fill after Steven Spielberg was responsible for the previous entries). Phoebe Waller-Bridge was likewise delightful as Indy's Goddaughter Helena. If online rumors are to be believed, she may take the franchise going forward and I'd be OK with that over Indy's son Mutt. This was probably the most appropriate way to send off such an iconic franchise. 7.5/10
GREAT they deserve it ! I always loved Harrison big time actor !
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 07/31/23 12:03 AM
SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL
Set in Las Vegas, The Driver (Joel Kinnaman) heads to the hospital for his wife's birth (their second child). However, upon arriving at the hospital parking garage, he's held at gunpoint by The Passenger (Nicolas Cage). Keep in mind Kinnaman is not a taxi or Uber/Lyft driver. He's just a regular guy who is held hostage while Cage asks him to drive the hour to Boulder City. The story then takes a cat-and-mouse approach while the backstory slowly unfolds. Cage has been knocking it out of the park recently with his independent films but sadly, this is one of his few misses. The story is thin and doesn't do much to keep the audience engaged. Cage is his usual brilliant and eccentric self while Kinnaman finds himself a new a role. Typically the alpha male in any room due to his domineering physical features, he's relegated to a more humble, nervous, and quiet character so I applaud his range. But again, outside of the actor's performances, the film does little in terms of the story and the big reveal in the final act isn't really big at all but more of a meh reveal. As a Cage fan I sat through this but I warn others, while this isn't terrible, it's not that great either. 6/10
Set in Las Vegas, The Driver (Joel Kinnaman) heads to the hospital for his wife's birth (their second child). However, upon arriving at the hospital parking garage, he's held at gunpoint by The Passenger (Nicolas Cage). Keep in mind Kinnaman is not a taxi or Uber/Lyft driver. He's just a regular guy who is held hostage while Cage asks him to drive the hour to Boulder City. The story then takes a cat-and-mouse approach while the backstory slowly unfolds. Cage has been knocking it out of the park recently with his independent films but sadly, this is one of his few misses. The story is thin and doesn't do much to keep the audience engaged. Cage is his usual brilliant and eccentric self while Kinnaman finds himself a new a role. Typically the alpha male in any room due to his domineering physical features, he's relegated to a more humble, nervous, and quiet character so I applaud his range. But again, outside of the actor's performances, the film does little in terms of the story and the big reveal in the final act isn't really big at all but more of a meh reveal. As a Cage fan I sat through this but I warn others, while this isn't terrible, it's not that great either. 6/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/03/23 10:24 AM
Finally watched Cocaine Bear lol, and it's astonishingly ridiculous! Entertaining, but you'll only appreciate it if you accept its massive stupidity
6/10
6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/04/23 12:37 AM
THE MEG 2: THE TRENCH
5 years after the release of the original, Jason Statham and company are back (with the notable exception of Suyin (Bingbing Li)). Similar to last time, the researchers are on a exploration below the thermocline, when they encounter not 1, not 2, but 3 Megalodons. They return to the surface through the thermocline, following our cast out. Once they're at the surface, all hell breaks loose. If you enjoyed the first film as I did, you'll enjoy this as well as the film holds up well as a worthy sequel. The second act in particular was my favorite. It all takes place in the trench with some beautiful visuals and the story really begins to pickup then. Overall, you know what you're signing up for and this is an enjoyable popcorn summer flick. 6/10
5 years after the release of the original, Jason Statham and company are back (with the notable exception of Suyin (Bingbing Li)). Similar to last time, the researchers are on a exploration below the thermocline, when they encounter not 1, not 2, but 3 Megalodons. They return to the surface through the thermocline, following our cast out. Once they're at the surface, all hell breaks loose. If you enjoyed the first film as I did, you'll enjoy this as well as the film holds up well as a worthy sequel. The second act in particular was my favorite. It all takes place in the trench with some beautiful visuals and the story really begins to pickup then. Overall, you know what you're signing up for and this is an enjoyable popcorn summer flick. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/05/23 07:53 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE MEG 2: THE TRENCH
5 years after the release of the original, Jason Statham and company are back (with the notable exception of Suyin (Bingbing Li)). Similar to last time, the researchers are on a exploration below the thermocline, when they encounter not 1, not 2, but 3 Megalodons. They return to the surface through the thermocline, following our cast out. Once they're at the surface, all hell breaks loose. If you enjoyed the first film as I did, you'll enjoy this as well as the film holds up well as a worthy sequel. The second act in particular was my favorite. It all takes place in the trench with some beautiful visuals and the story really begins to pickup then. Overall, you know what you're signing up for and this is an enjoyable popcorn summer flick. 6/10
5 years after the release of the original, Jason Statham and company are back (with the notable exception of Suyin (Bingbing Li)). Similar to last time, the researchers are on a exploration below the thermocline, when they encounter not 1, not 2, but 3 Megalodons. They return to the surface through the thermocline, following our cast out. Once they're at the surface, all hell breaks loose. If you enjoyed the first film as I did, you'll enjoy this as well as the film holds up well as a worthy sequel. The second act in particular was my favorite. It all takes place in the trench with some beautiful visuals and the story really begins to pickup then. Overall, you know what you're signing up for and this is an enjoyable popcorn summer flick. 6/10
Thank you for your review i12, just read it to the Wife. we hope to see it tomorrow
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/05/23 08:59 PM
Let me know what you think if you do DP
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/06/23 11:29 PM
KANDAHAR
After blowing up a nuclear facility in Iran, CIA black op Tom Harris (Gerard Butler) and his translator Mohammad (Navid Negahban) must get to Kandahar, which is 400 miles from their current location, in order to be safely extracted to safety. Based upon the premise alone, you'd consider this film to have a lot of suspense and action but sadly, that is not the case. There are in fact action scenes but they are few and far in between. The story moves at a snails pace, picking up the action every so many pages of the script; which as an audience member, lends to my lack of interest going forward as this roller coaster ride unfortunately does little to hold my attention. All involved (including Butler) seem to drown in the weak script as nobody stands out as noteworthy. 5/10
After blowing up a nuclear facility in Iran, CIA black op Tom Harris (Gerard Butler) and his translator Mohammad (Navid Negahban) must get to Kandahar, which is 400 miles from their current location, in order to be safely extracted to safety. Based upon the premise alone, you'd consider this film to have a lot of suspense and action but sadly, that is not the case. There are in fact action scenes but they are few and far in between. The story moves at a snails pace, picking up the action every so many pages of the script; which as an audience member, lends to my lack of interest going forward as this roller coaster ride unfortunately does little to hold my attention. All involved (including Butler) seem to drown in the weak script as nobody stands out as noteworthy. 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/23 01:19 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 3
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
Loved this, did you happen to see the Holiday special they filed with this?
It was really funny and will be a regular watch, every year.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/07/23 11:26 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 3
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
The band's back together for one final ride, this time in search of The High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji) who created Rocket in order to save Rocket's life. Vol. 3 follows the same formula we've grown accustomed to from director James Gunn & Marvel: sweet soundtrack, banter throughout, and a film with a lot of heart. This was a beautiful goodbye from Gunn and the cast to these characters and Marvel and it was very nicely executed. This is hands down the best Marvel release since 2021's SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME, but yet again I have to take issue with the runtime. Recently Marvel has been pushing the runtimes more and more with their releases but for my money they begin to overstay their welcome after the 2 hours and 10 to 2 hours and 15 minute mark (this comes in at 2 hours and 30 minutes even). Another grip I had with the film was the portrayal of Adam Warlock by Will Poulter. I very much enjoy the actor but his character comes off incredibly weak. Yes, he's incredibly powerful but the man behind those powers is a mama's boy and could have come off so much stronger (but that might be dipping into the "toxic masculinity" waters according to some). Overall, this is a very satisfying conclusion to the trilogy and I'm curious what the future holds for any or all of these characters. 7/10
Loved this, did you happen to see the Holiday special they filed with this?
It was really funny and will be a regular watch, every year.
Yes I did. I remember it being pretty fun. I do like the short one offs like that that they make every once in a while.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/13/23 10:34 PM
HEART OF STONE
Gal Gadot starts as Rachel Stone, a member of The Charter (a shadow peacekeeping agency) who's infiltrated MI-6 and who's current status is that of the "always stays in the van" tech support member of the group. While on a mission in Portugal, Stone's cover is blown in order to save her MI-6 members from assassination by a group of mercenaries. Although, the real story begins to take place as it was a ruse in order to flush Stone out in order to steal her organization's most valuable asset, The Heart, which can control any electronic device. We're talking stock markets, financial institutions, government defense systems, etc. Stone must track down and stop those who are after her, her organization, and The Heart. The film played somewhat like a female Bond film, with a brilliant opening parachute scene filmed at the Glacier Hotel Grawand in Senales, Italy that felt very much like the Piz Gloria Revolving Restaurant in Switzerland from ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE. Throughout there were additional shots, including a motorcycle chase scene, that had a somewhat Bondesque quality to them. Gadot has proven time and again she is more than capable of handling a franchise as well as the hard action and this is just another example of that. She's joined by my first time being introduced to Alia Bhatt, who plays 22-year-old computer hacker Keya Dhawan. She's an orphan who was rescued from obscurity and trained to benefit her beneficiary. Although, Keya has a conscience and there's more to her than meets the eye. She typically works in Hindi films but I hope this can be her springboard towards more English language work. This was a very enjoyable ride that I can see having a franchise built around because as soon as the credits rolled, I was already ready for the sequel. Finally, instead of some of the recent talk about recasting the new James Bond as a female, I've always been of the opinion to create your own franchise. Stop standing on the shoulders of others and create something new, something original, something that's your own and I believe this film did just that. 7/10
Gal Gadot starts as Rachel Stone, a member of The Charter (a shadow peacekeeping agency) who's infiltrated MI-6 and who's current status is that of the "always stays in the van" tech support member of the group. While on a mission in Portugal, Stone's cover is blown in order to save her MI-6 members from assassination by a group of mercenaries. Although, the real story begins to take place as it was a ruse in order to flush Stone out in order to steal her organization's most valuable asset, The Heart, which can control any electronic device. We're talking stock markets, financial institutions, government defense systems, etc. Stone must track down and stop those who are after her, her organization, and The Heart. The film played somewhat like a female Bond film, with a brilliant opening parachute scene filmed at the Glacier Hotel Grawand in Senales, Italy that felt very much like the Piz Gloria Revolving Restaurant in Switzerland from ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE. Throughout there were additional shots, including a motorcycle chase scene, that had a somewhat Bondesque quality to them. Gadot has proven time and again she is more than capable of handling a franchise as well as the hard action and this is just another example of that. She's joined by my first time being introduced to Alia Bhatt, who plays 22-year-old computer hacker Keya Dhawan. She's an orphan who was rescued from obscurity and trained to benefit her beneficiary. Although, Keya has a conscience and there's more to her than meets the eye. She typically works in Hindi films but I hope this can be her springboard towards more English language work. This was a very enjoyable ride that I can see having a franchise built around because as soon as the credits rolled, I was already ready for the sequel. Finally, instead of some of the recent talk about recasting the new James Bond as a female, I've always been of the opinion to create your own franchise. Stop standing on the shoulders of others and create something new, something original, something that's your own and I believe this film did just that. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/18/23 01:01 AM
BLUE BEETLE
Recent college graduate Jaime Reyes (Xolo Maridueña) returns home, only to find his family is about to be evicted due to the landlord tripling their rent. Getting a job with his sister Milagro (Belissa Escobedo) as a housekeeper for Victoria Kord (Susan Sarandon), Jaime and Milagro soon find themselves unemployed when Jaime interjects himself into a verbal altercation between Victoria and her niece Jenny (Bruna Marquezine). Grateful for Jaime's attempt to diffuse the situation, Jenny offers him employment in another capacity at Kord Industries (think of it as DC's Stark Industries). However, once Jaime arrives, he's quickly given a box from Jenny and told not to open it and to guard it with his life. Of course, once he gets home and shows it to his family, they open it and an ancient piece of alien technology (the Blue Beetle) chooses and attaches itself to Jaime, turning him into the superhero. I honestly didn't know anything about this character, nor had I even heard of him prior to the film being announced. But, with it being a comic book property, I gave it a shot and it's a fun ride. There were moments where Jaime felt like a crossover between Peter Parker and Tony Stark: a 22-year-old young adult given a technologically advanced suit and inadvertently becoming a super hero. It follows the same formula as every comic book movie nowadays and while the fatigue is starting to set in on me, this was a refreshing new entry. Family is at the core of the story, it's funny, has some great performances by Xolo, Bruna, and George Lopez, who I'm usually not the biggest fan of his work but he won me over in his role as Uncle Rudy. Supposedly this is the first entry in the rebooted DCEU and while it wasn't a homerun, it's still found solid footing. 6.5/10
Recent college graduate Jaime Reyes (Xolo Maridueña) returns home, only to find his family is about to be evicted due to the landlord tripling their rent. Getting a job with his sister Milagro (Belissa Escobedo) as a housekeeper for Victoria Kord (Susan Sarandon), Jaime and Milagro soon find themselves unemployed when Jaime interjects himself into a verbal altercation between Victoria and her niece Jenny (Bruna Marquezine). Grateful for Jaime's attempt to diffuse the situation, Jenny offers him employment in another capacity at Kord Industries (think of it as DC's Stark Industries). However, once Jaime arrives, he's quickly given a box from Jenny and told not to open it and to guard it with his life. Of course, once he gets home and shows it to his family, they open it and an ancient piece of alien technology (the Blue Beetle) chooses and attaches itself to Jaime, turning him into the superhero. I honestly didn't know anything about this character, nor had I even heard of him prior to the film being announced. But, with it being a comic book property, I gave it a shot and it's a fun ride. There were moments where Jaime felt like a crossover between Peter Parker and Tony Stark: a 22-year-old young adult given a technologically advanced suit and inadvertently becoming a super hero. It follows the same formula as every comic book movie nowadays and while the fatigue is starting to set in on me, this was a refreshing new entry. Family is at the core of the story, it's funny, has some great performances by Xolo, Bruna, and George Lopez, who I'm usually not the biggest fan of his work but he won me over in his role as Uncle Rudy. Supposedly this is the first entry in the rebooted DCEU and while it wasn't a homerun, it's still found solid footing. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/19/23 12:01 AM
STRAYS
Will Ferrell (Reggie), Jamie Foxx (Bug), Isla Fisher (Maggie), and Randall Park (Hunter) star as 4 stray dogs who go on a journey, assisting Reggie at getting revenge against his owner Doug (Will Forte) who abandoned him. Unfortunately, like many comedies today, the best parts were already spoiled for you in the trailers. If you're an animal/dog lover the dogs will melt your heart while occasionally make you chuckle to "hear" dogs speak so profanely but don't get suckered in: the laugh out loud laughs are far and few and the rest are reserved for mere smirks or chuckles. Disappointing as the trailer had more promise. 5.5/10
Will Ferrell (Reggie), Jamie Foxx (Bug), Isla Fisher (Maggie), and Randall Park (Hunter) star as 4 stray dogs who go on a journey, assisting Reggie at getting revenge against his owner Doug (Will Forte) who abandoned him. Unfortunately, like many comedies today, the best parts were already spoiled for you in the trailers. If you're an animal/dog lover the dogs will melt your heart while occasionally make you chuckle to "hear" dogs speak so profanely but don't get suckered in: the laugh out loud laughs are far and few and the rest are reserved for mere smirks or chuckles. Disappointing as the trailer had more promise. 5.5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/21/23 07:24 PM
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/23 12:57 AM
GRAN TURISMO
Based on the video game and true story of Jann Mardenborough (Archie Madekwe) a gamer who gets the opportunity of a lifetime to become a real racer upon winning a contest setup by Gran Turismo and Nissan. Constantly being misunderstood and not supported by his father (Djimon Hounsou), Jann grows up with a passion for racing, having spent thousands of hours playing Gran Turismo. When the opportunity is given to him to prove himself for the chance of a lifetime, Jann stops at nothing and rearranges his entire life to prove himself: not only to his family but to himself as well. A very inspirational, compassionate, and moving story that hits harder knowing it's based on actual events. In addition, Orlando Bloom stars as Danny Moore, the Nissan marketing executive who created the idea of the contest and David Harbour as Jack Salter, a mechanic and former racer who has nothing but contempt for the gamers and does everything in his power to wash them all out. I applaud director Neill Blomkamp as this is a very fun and at times, thrilling ride, putting the audience in the car while simultaneously in the control of the action. After watching this, I had a feeling this did for racing what TOP GUN did for flying. 6.5/10
Based on the video game and true story of Jann Mardenborough (Archie Madekwe) a gamer who gets the opportunity of a lifetime to become a real racer upon winning a contest setup by Gran Turismo and Nissan. Constantly being misunderstood and not supported by his father (Djimon Hounsou), Jann grows up with a passion for racing, having spent thousands of hours playing Gran Turismo. When the opportunity is given to him to prove himself for the chance of a lifetime, Jann stops at nothing and rearranges his entire life to prove himself: not only to his family but to himself as well. A very inspirational, compassionate, and moving story that hits harder knowing it's based on actual events. In addition, Orlando Bloom stars as Danny Moore, the Nissan marketing executive who created the idea of the contest and David Harbour as Jack Salter, a mechanic and former racer who has nothing but contempt for the gamers and does everything in his power to wash them all out. I applaud director Neill Blomkamp as this is a very fun and at times, thrilling ride, putting the audience in the car while simultaneously in the control of the action. After watching this, I had a feeling this did for racing what TOP GUN did for flying. 6.5/10
Posted By: U talkin' da me ??
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/26/23 03:46 AM
What is the main difference between Dolby cinema vs IMAX??
https://tvwallmounting.ca/dolby-cinema-vs-imax-laser-which-is-better/
https:/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/29/23 11:17 PM
THE BOOGEYMAN
Shortly after losing their wife/mother, the remaining members of the Harper family are grieving. The father, Will (Chris Messina) throws himself into his work as a therapist, having difficulty coming to terms with what happened and in the process, emotionally isolating himself from his daughters Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) & Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair). Sadie wears her emotions on her sleeves and is obviously having the most difficulty with their new normal. It doesn't help that she's in high school and while her peers attempt to be supportive, they wind up treating her as a fragile piece of glass that's almost ready to break. Which leads us to young Sawyer, who first begins to see and become preyed upon by a monster that's living in their house. As a therapist, Will at first doesn't believe his daughters which brings them closer together while at the same time, separating them further from their father. The monster only attacks children although it's not clear from the story at what age is the cut off as after it attacks Sawyer, it then begins attacking Sadie as well. Based on a short story by Stephen King, this film relies entirely on jump scares as light is this monsters kryptonite. The design and visuals of the monster were unique but overall, for me, since this didn't scare, there wasn't much here. A pretty average movie that I didn't feel was worth the time of money at the theaters and sadly, was proven right. 5.5/10
Shortly after losing their wife/mother, the remaining members of the Harper family are grieving. The father, Will (Chris Messina) throws himself into his work as a therapist, having difficulty coming to terms with what happened and in the process, emotionally isolating himself from his daughters Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) & Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair). Sadie wears her emotions on her sleeves and is obviously having the most difficulty with their new normal. It doesn't help that she's in high school and while her peers attempt to be supportive, they wind up treating her as a fragile piece of glass that's almost ready to break. Which leads us to young Sawyer, who first begins to see and become preyed upon by a monster that's living in their house. As a therapist, Will at first doesn't believe his daughters which brings them closer together while at the same time, separating them further from their father. The monster only attacks children although it's not clear from the story at what age is the cut off as after it attacks Sawyer, it then begins attacking Sadie as well. Based on a short story by Stephen King, this film relies entirely on jump scares as light is this monsters kryptonite. The design and visuals of the monster were unique but overall, for me, since this didn't scare, there wasn't much here. A pretty average movie that I didn't feel was worth the time of money at the theaters and sadly, was proven right. 5.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/30/23 12:06 AM
Originally Posted by U talkin' da me ??
What is the main difference between Dolby cinema vs IMAX??
https://tvwallmounting.ca/dolby-cinema-vs-imax-laser-which-is-better/
https:/
Very interesting, thanks for the share.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 08/30/23 10:47 PM
THE LAST VOYAGE OF THE DEMETER
Based upon a single chapter from the Dracula novel, the film tells the story of Dracula sailing from Carpathia to England and how he wipes out the entire crew upon their arrival. Honestly the trailers did little for me as well as the story. I never read the novel but even based upon the minutia amount of screen time these events have been given in almost any interpretation of the novel, I didn't think there was a story here. I'm happy to report I was wrong in that initial assessment as the film does an enjoyable job of spacing out the attacks, doesn't seem repetitive, and was able to flesh out a 2 hour movie on a single chapter. I applaud the special effects and makeup as the character is terrifying to view but is also in a lot of frames, viewable but unfocused, giving the audience a heads up of what's to come while at the same time, having them strain for a better look. My only grip was the change of the storyline at the end but otherwise, again, this pleasantly surprised me and was better than expected! 6/10
Based upon a single chapter from the Dracula novel, the film tells the story of Dracula sailing from Carpathia to England and how he wipes out the entire crew upon their arrival. Honestly the trailers did little for me as well as the story. I never read the novel but even based upon the minutia amount of screen time these events have been given in almost any interpretation of the novel, I didn't think there was a story here. I'm happy to report I was wrong in that initial assessment as the film does an enjoyable job of spacing out the attacks, doesn't seem repetitive, and was able to flesh out a 2 hour movie on a single chapter. I applaud the special effects and makeup as the character is terrifying to view but is also in a lot of frames, viewable but unfocused, giving the audience a heads up of what's to come while at the same time, having them strain for a better look. My only grip was the change of the storyline at the end but otherwise, again, this pleasantly surprised me and was better than expected! 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/01/23 12:21 AM
THE EQUALIZER 3
In his third and, probably unfortunately final turn, Denzel Washington returns as Robert McCall, a man who's tries to right the wrongs of his past but assisting those in the present. Taking place in a small Italian town (Altamonte), McCall is passing through after a mission in nearby Sicily. However, he's wounded and can't make it past Altamonte until he recuperates. While recuperating, McCall grows to enjoy the peace and camaraderie amongst the townspeople; that is until the local mafia shows up and begins shaking down business owners. Once fully healed, McCall sets his sites on these new targets. Unfortunately, this and the previous entry didn't have as much action or killings as the original installment did. That was like THE PUNISHER or going back to Denzel's old days with MAN ON FIRE: a scorched earth approach to revenge. Whereas the last 2 films were slower in pace with not as much action but the kill scenes still make the audience oh and ah. With saying that, I would still be down for a fourth installment as I have not grown tired of Denzel's charismatic take on the character. Nor have I grown tired of watching his so easily dispose of his enemies. If worse comes to worse, maybe the rumors can turn into reality where his son, John David Washington, could star in a prequel. 6.5/10
In his third and, probably unfortunately final turn, Denzel Washington returns as Robert McCall, a man who's tries to right the wrongs of his past but assisting those in the present. Taking place in a small Italian town (Altamonte), McCall is passing through after a mission in nearby Sicily. However, he's wounded and can't make it past Altamonte until he recuperates. While recuperating, McCall grows to enjoy the peace and camaraderie amongst the townspeople; that is until the local mafia shows up and begins shaking down business owners. Once fully healed, McCall sets his sites on these new targets. Unfortunately, this and the previous entry didn't have as much action or killings as the original installment did. That was like THE PUNISHER or going back to Denzel's old days with MAN ON FIRE: a scorched earth approach to revenge. Whereas the last 2 films were slower in pace with not as much action but the kill scenes still make the audience oh and ah. With saying that, I would still be down for a fourth installment as I have not grown tired of Denzel's charismatic take on the character. Nor have I grown tired of watching his so easily dispose of his enemies. If worse comes to worse, maybe the rumors can turn into reality where his son, John David Washington, could star in a prequel. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/02/23 04:53 PM
INSIDIOUS: THE RED DOOR
Picking up 9 years after the events of INSIDIOUS 2, Josh (Patrick Wilson) and Renai (Rose Byrne) are divorced and their oldest son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) is off to college. John and Dalton's relationship is anything but harmonious. Dalton is studying to become an artist and while participating in a class exercise with his professor, she unknowingly and unintentionally reconnects him with The Further. Similarly and unaware, Josh becomes reconnected with The Further as well. At the heart of this story is family, particularly the bond between a father and his son. As a suspense/horror film, this didn't translate well. Very little scares along the way, a few flashbacks but three-quarters of the film are Josh and Dalton trying to remember what happened to them 9 years ago and then once they finally unlock the red door, are faced with their past. A slow build up to a nonchalant third act that was a bore to get through. Hopefully this can be the end for the franchise. 4/10
Picking up 9 years after the events of INSIDIOUS 2, Josh (Patrick Wilson) and Renai (Rose Byrne) are divorced and their oldest son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) is off to college. John and Dalton's relationship is anything but harmonious. Dalton is studying to become an artist and while participating in a class exercise with his professor, she unknowingly and unintentionally reconnects him with The Further. Similarly and unaware, Josh becomes reconnected with The Further as well. At the heart of this story is family, particularly the bond between a father and his son. As a suspense/horror film, this didn't translate well. Very little scares along the way, a few flashbacks but three-quarters of the film are Josh and Dalton trying to remember what happened to them 9 years ago and then once they finally unlock the red door, are faced with their past. A slow build up to a nonchalant third act that was a bore to get through. Hopefully this can be the end for the franchise. 4/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/03/23 08:11 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE BOOGEYMAN
Shortly after losing their wife/mother, the remaining members of the Harper family are grieving. The father, Will (Chris Messina) throws himself into his work as a therapist, having difficulty coming to terms with what happened and in the process, emotionally isolating himself from his daughters Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) & Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair). Sadie wears her emotions on her sleeves and is obviously having the most difficulty with their new normal. It doesn't help that she's in high school and while her peers attempt to be supportive, they wind up treating her as a fragile piece of glass that's almost ready to break. Which leads us to young Sawyer, who first begins to see and become preyed upon by a monster that's living in their house. As a therapist, Will at first doesn't believe his daughters which brings them closer together while at the same time, separating them further from their father. The monster only attacks children although it's not clear from the story at what age is the cut off as after it attacks Sawyer, it then begins attacking Sadie as well. Based on a short story by Stephen King, this film relies entirely on jump scares as light is this monsters kryptonite. The design and visuals of the monster were unique but overall, for me, since this didn't scare, there wasn't much here. A pretty average movie that I didn't feel was worth the time of money at the theaters and sadly, was proven right. 5.5/10
Shortly after losing their wife/mother, the remaining members of the Harper family are grieving. The father, Will (Chris Messina) throws himself into his work as a therapist, having difficulty coming to terms with what happened and in the process, emotionally isolating himself from his daughters Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) & Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair). Sadie wears her emotions on her sleeves and is obviously having the most difficulty with their new normal. It doesn't help that she's in high school and while her peers attempt to be supportive, they wind up treating her as a fragile piece of glass that's almost ready to break. Which leads us to young Sawyer, who first begins to see and become preyed upon by a monster that's living in their house. As a therapist, Will at first doesn't believe his daughters which brings them closer together while at the same time, separating them further from their father. The monster only attacks children although it's not clear from the story at what age is the cut off as after it attacks Sawyer, it then begins attacking Sadie as well. Based on a short story by Stephen King, this film relies entirely on jump scares as light is this monsters kryptonite. The design and visuals of the monster were unique but overall, for me, since this didn't scare, there wasn't much here. A pretty average movie that I didn't feel was worth the time of money at the theaters and sadly, was proven right. 5.5/10
Great review, agree with your score, we just watched it and now watchin COBWEB
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/08/23 12:48 AM
THE NUN II
Taking place in France 4 years after its predecessor, Valak returns to terrorize a girls school and Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) is called back to once again battle the demon. As with any film within THE CONJURING universe, jump scares are the currency and that's exactly what's relied upon heavily here. There's a few but otherwise, nothing too unsettling here. Bonnie Aarons is given more screen time as The Nun, which is refreshing being that her characters name is reflected in the title and felt she didn't get enough screen time during her first spinoff. Taissa is once again wonderful as Sister Irene and I still love the fact that she and her older sister Vera are connected within this universe; however, for my money, the heavyweights of this universe are the three CONJURING films as each and every spinoff has been mid at best and unfortunately, this is no exception. I will compliment the story as it did a better job at holding my attention this time around but again, this and none of the spinoffs can pack the same punch from credits to credits like the trilogy. 6/10
Taking place in France 4 years after its predecessor, Valak returns to terrorize a girls school and Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) is called back to once again battle the demon. As with any film within THE CONJURING universe, jump scares are the currency and that's exactly what's relied upon heavily here. There's a few but otherwise, nothing too unsettling here. Bonnie Aarons is given more screen time as The Nun, which is refreshing being that her characters name is reflected in the title and felt she didn't get enough screen time during her first spinoff. Taissa is once again wonderful as Sister Irene and I still love the fact that she and her older sister Vera are connected within this universe; however, for my money, the heavyweights of this universe are the three CONJURING films as each and every spinoff has been mid at best and unfortunately, this is no exception. I will compliment the story as it did a better job at holding my attention this time around but again, this and none of the spinoffs can pack the same punch from credits to credits like the trilogy. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/17/23 01:24 AM
A HAUNTING IN VENICE
Kenneth Branagh returns as Hercule Poirot, now semiretired living in Italy. The films quickly begins with an old friend Ariadne Oliver (Tina Fey) inviting him to a seance, attempting to discredit the medium Mrs. Reynolds (Michelle Yeoh). However, he soon learns of the tragic history that's befallen at the site of the seance and patrons soon begin to die as well. I've always enjoyed these films as they continually keep you guessing as well as engaged in the story. Taking place on Halloween, this is by far the scariest of the trilogy and as of this writing, has the highest rated score on IMDB so hopefully that'll lead us to a fourth installment, pending the box office receipts of course. Another star studded cast is provided although outside of a handful a main stars, many of the others are probably unfamiliar to the general public. And by this I mean outside of Branagh, Yeo, Fey, and Kelly Reilly. This is also the first time this story has been featured on the big screen, which was a nice reprieve from the previous two installments as I came into it fresh with no idea of how it ends. I was surprised at how it all unfolded and again, while none of these films are exceptionally memorable, they're fun, tight films that keep you entertained and guessing. And isn't that what it's really all about? 6/10
Kenneth Branagh returns as Hercule Poirot, now semiretired living in Italy. The films quickly begins with an old friend Ariadne Oliver (Tina Fey) inviting him to a seance, attempting to discredit the medium Mrs. Reynolds (Michelle Yeoh). However, he soon learns of the tragic history that's befallen at the site of the seance and patrons soon begin to die as well. I've always enjoyed these films as they continually keep you guessing as well as engaged in the story. Taking place on Halloween, this is by far the scariest of the trilogy and as of this writing, has the highest rated score on IMDB so hopefully that'll lead us to a fourth installment, pending the box office receipts of course. Another star studded cast is provided although outside of a handful a main stars, many of the others are probably unfamiliar to the general public. And by this I mean outside of Branagh, Yeo, Fey, and Kelly Reilly. This is also the first time this story has been featured on the big screen, which was a nice reprieve from the previous two installments as I came into it fresh with no idea of how it ends. I was surprised at how it all unfolded and again, while none of these films are exceptionally memorable, they're fun, tight films that keep you entertained and guessing. And isn't that what it's really all about? 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/18/23 01:22 AM
TALK TO ME
An embalmed hand that allows those who hold it and utter the specific words to visit the dead, a group of Australian teenagers treat the experience as a drug; however, for Mia (Sophie Wilde), the experience is more of a connection with her recently deceased mom. It's all fun and games for the youts, until the chickens come home to roast and prey upon those who have spoken to the dead. A psychological thriller that doesn't do much to pass the time and I'm honestly surprised and bewildered how this film was able to manage the box office receipts that it did as I found it to be a bit of a bore. Nothing outstanding or outlandish to keep my attention for the duration and I'm honestly disappointed with the end result. This film is very much a meh so I'm unsure how and why others thought it was better than it actually was? 5/10
An embalmed hand that allows those who hold it and utter the specific words to visit the dead, a group of Australian teenagers treat the experience as a drug; however, for Mia (Sophie Wilde), the experience is more of a connection with her recently deceased mom. It's all fun and games for the youts, until the chickens come home to roast and prey upon those who have spoken to the dead. A psychological thriller that doesn't do much to pass the time and I'm honestly surprised and bewildered how this film was able to manage the box office receipts that it did as I found it to be a bit of a bore. Nothing outstanding or outlandish to keep my attention for the duration and I'm honestly disappointed with the end result. This film is very much a meh so I'm unsure how and why others thought it was better than it actually was? 5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/24/23 06:04 PM
I will check these last three out.
Great reviews i12, thanks.
Great reviews i12, thanks.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/23 12:06 AM
DUMB MONEY
While Wall Street bets short on Game Stop stock, investment broker Keith Gill (Paul Dano) bets against the odds and plays the investors at their own game. What truly is a David vs Goliath story plays out in real time, and exposes how corrupt and manipulative the stock market is. Paul Dano is wonderful as the cat loving, basement dwelling, average Joe who initially invests in this stock and is able to garner follows via his YouTube channel. However, once the proverbial sh*t hits the fan, the market manipulates itself in order to self-preserve. Unfortunately for everyone involved, it shows how those who have the means win, while those who don't, do not. Overall, a very telling and worth while story worth checking out. 7/10
While Wall Street bets short on Game Stop stock, investment broker Keith Gill (Paul Dano) bets against the odds and plays the investors at their own game. What truly is a David vs Goliath story plays out in real time, and exposes how corrupt and manipulative the stock market is. Paul Dano is wonderful as the cat loving, basement dwelling, average Joe who initially invests in this stock and is able to garner follows via his YouTube channel. However, once the proverbial sh*t hits the fan, the market manipulates itself in order to self-preserve. Unfortunately for everyone involved, it shows how those who have the means win, while those who don't, do not. Overall, a very telling and worth while story worth checking out. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/25/23 12:18 AM
NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/23 08:02 PM
SAW X
Tobin Bell returns as John Kramer as well as Shawnee Smith as Amanda Young. Taking place between the events of SAW and SAW II the story finds John with only months to live. He is lead to believe a doctor in Mexico who's performing an untested procedure to remove cancer can cure him as well. But unfortunately for the doctor and his team, the operation isn't successful and they become the next players in John's games. This entry into the Saw franchise goes against the grain in many different ways: it has the longest run time at 118 minutes, the games don't take place until the third act which allows the story and characters plenty of breathing room to flesh out the story, and it is some ways makes John and Amanda the heroes of the story. It was a nice change of pace to see the story build for the first half of the film, although the gore hounds who paid to see blood might not enjoy it quite as much. The games don't appear to be as elaborate either compared to other entries, however, this can be chalked up to John finding his rhythm for lack of a better term as again, this is at the beginning of John's "work" and he got better as he progressed in later films. It's always good to see John and Amanda back together again and if this does well enough and if they wish to continue to make another involving John's relationship with a certain detective, I'd be up for that as well. 6/10
Tobin Bell returns as John Kramer as well as Shawnee Smith as Amanda Young. Taking place between the events of SAW and SAW II the story finds John with only months to live. He is lead to believe a doctor in Mexico who's performing an untested procedure to remove cancer can cure him as well. But unfortunately for the doctor and his team, the operation isn't successful and they become the next players in John's games. This entry into the Saw franchise goes against the grain in many different ways: it has the longest run time at 118 minutes, the games don't take place until the third act which allows the story and characters plenty of breathing room to flesh out the story, and it is some ways makes John and Amanda the heroes of the story. It was a nice change of pace to see the story build for the first half of the film, although the gore hounds who paid to see blood might not enjoy it quite as much. The games don't appear to be as elaborate either compared to other entries, however, this can be chalked up to John finding his rhythm for lack of a better term as again, this is at the beginning of John's "work" and he got better as he progressed in later films. It's always good to see John and Amanda back together again and if this does well enough and if they wish to continue to make another involving John's relationship with a certain detective, I'd be up for that as well. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 09/30/23 08:02 PM
THE CREATOR
The year is 2065 and 1 million people are died is Los Angeles after a nuclear explosion. Humans/America are at war with Artificial Intelligence, blaming them for the launch of the nuke and are at war with New Asia (present day Asia) where a large population is still living amongst humans. America is dedicated to eradicating the earth of them and use their main military weapon, NOMAD, to find and destroy them (NOMAD is an aerial station that can scan areas for AI's and humans and launch missiles with pinpoint precise for their targets). Visually, this film is stunning and the main reason I gave the film such a high score. I love the world director Gareth Edwards has created: it's stylish, innovative, and breathtaking. I found the story to be mid as it's very heavy handed with attempting to play on the audiences sympathy. It doesn't so much as pull on your heart strings as it does to yank on them, so once you see through this, you're only left with the beautiful images on screen. However, props for the originality of the story and for bringing something new to the sci-fi genre that's worth having a discussion about. 7/10
The year is 2065 and 1 million people are died is Los Angeles after a nuclear explosion. Humans/America are at war with Artificial Intelligence, blaming them for the launch of the nuke and are at war with New Asia (present day Asia) where a large population is still living amongst humans. America is dedicated to eradicating the earth of them and use their main military weapon, NOMAD, to find and destroy them (NOMAD is an aerial station that can scan areas for AI's and humans and launch missiles with pinpoint precise for their targets). Visually, this film is stunning and the main reason I gave the film such a high score. I love the world director Gareth Edwards has created: it's stylish, innovative, and breathtaking. I found the story to be mid as it's very heavy handed with attempting to play on the audiences sympathy. It doesn't so much as pull on your heart strings as it does to yank on them, so once you see through this, you're only left with the beautiful images on screen. However, props for the originality of the story and for bringing something new to the sci-fi genre that's worth having a discussion about. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/02/23 12:36 AM
REPTILE
Will Grady (Justin Timberlake) stars as a real-estate agent, who discovers the dead body of his partner Summer (Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz) at one of their properties. Tom Nichols (Benicio Del Toro), an honest cop who previously had a crooked partner, is assigned the case and stops at nothing to solve it. The only thing he loves more than being a cop is his wife Judy (Alicia Silverstone). A slow burner of a thriller, the story unfolds sometimes at a snails pace. And while the audience (or at least me) guessed the final outcome early on, the film overstays itself by continuing this song-and-dance operata with the audience. A very well selected and balanced cast featuring the likes of Del Toro, Silvertone, Timerlake, Eric Bogosian, Michael Pitt, and Karl Glusman. This could have been wrapped up a little quicker and my score would have increased had it been tighter. Still a film worthy of your time. 6.5/10
Will Grady (Justin Timberlake) stars as a real-estate agent, who discovers the dead body of his partner Summer (Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz) at one of their properties. Tom Nichols (Benicio Del Toro), an honest cop who previously had a crooked partner, is assigned the case and stops at nothing to solve it. The only thing he loves more than being a cop is his wife Judy (Alicia Silverstone). A slow burner of a thriller, the story unfolds sometimes at a snails pace. And while the audience (or at least me) guessed the final outcome early on, the film overstays itself by continuing this song-and-dance operata with the audience. A very well selected and balanced cast featuring the likes of Del Toro, Silvertone, Timerlake, Eric Bogosian, Michael Pitt, and Karl Glusman. This could have been wrapped up a little quicker and my score would have increased had it been tighter. Still a film worthy of your time. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/06/23 10:37 PM
SOUND OF FREEDOM
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/06/23 10:51 PM
TOTALLY KILLER
Originally set in 1987, a killer dubbed the Sweet 16 killer as he kills his victims who've recently turned 16 and stabs them each 16 times, reemerges 35 years after his initial killings. Pam Hughes (Julie Bowen), the mother of our star Jamie Hughes, played marvelously by Kiernan Shipka, is murdered in our present day. In order to save her mother Jamie travels back in time in a time machine built by her best friend Amelia (Kelcey Mawema) in order to stop the killer before he even begins back in 1987. The film then turns pure comedy as it places a 2023 progressive/woke teen square in Regan's America. Fans of 80's films will see the exquisite attention to detail for the time period and while it pokes fun at it, it doesn't come across as preachy, moral superiority, or higher-than-thou drivel audiences now are made to swallow about films from yesteryear. It is rather quite funny and has a stable supporting cast, all of which this is my first introduction to. For fans of horror, comedy, or 80's films, this is worth checking out as it's a very enjoyable ride. Finally a Prime movie I enjoyed! 7/10
Originally set in 1987, a killer dubbed the Sweet 16 killer as he kills his victims who've recently turned 16 and stabs them each 16 times, reemerges 35 years after his initial killings. Pam Hughes (Julie Bowen), the mother of our star Jamie Hughes, played marvelously by Kiernan Shipka, is murdered in our present day. In order to save her mother Jamie travels back in time in a time machine built by her best friend Amelia (Kelcey Mawema) in order to stop the killer before he even begins back in 1987. The film then turns pure comedy as it places a 2023 progressive/woke teen square in Regan's America. Fans of 80's films will see the exquisite attention to detail for the time period and while it pokes fun at it, it doesn't come across as preachy, moral superiority, or higher-than-thou drivel audiences now are made to swallow about films from yesteryear. It is rather quite funny and has a stable supporting cast, all of which this is my first introduction to. For fans of horror, comedy, or 80's films, this is worth checking out as it's a very enjoyable ride. Finally a Prime movie I enjoyed! 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/07/23 05:40 PM
FAIR PLAY
Luke (Alden Ehrenreich) and Emily (Phoebe Dynevor) are coworkers at the same hedge fund in New York City. They're madly in love, live together, and have recently become engaged. However, there's two problems with this picture: one, they're breaking company policy with their relationship and two, a promotion is available and both covet the position. At first Emily overhears some work gossip and informs Luke that he'll be the one to receive the promotion. But, when Emily receives a call at 2am from her boss Campbell (Eddie Marsan) she instead is given the promotion. The rest of the film is a deconstruction of their relationship with Luke's inability to handle being passed over for his fiance and his either knowingly or subconsciously sabotaging their relationship. From that point forward Luke plays the villain while Emily goes above and beyond to not allow this to interfere with their future marriage plans. The story is intriguing enough to pass the time, both Ehrenreich and Dynevor play their roles with so much passion and emotion. You believe them at all times, whether it's as passionate lovers or at each others throats. The girlboss crowd will love it but others can find it enjoyable too. 6.5/10
Luke (Alden Ehrenreich) and Emily (Phoebe Dynevor) are coworkers at the same hedge fund in New York City. They're madly in love, live together, and have recently become engaged. However, there's two problems with this picture: one, they're breaking company policy with their relationship and two, a promotion is available and both covet the position. At first Emily overhears some work gossip and informs Luke that he'll be the one to receive the promotion. But, when Emily receives a call at 2am from her boss Campbell (Eddie Marsan) she instead is given the promotion. The rest of the film is a deconstruction of their relationship with Luke's inability to handle being passed over for his fiance and his either knowingly or subconsciously sabotaging their relationship. From that point forward Luke plays the villain while Emily goes above and beyond to not allow this to interfere with their future marriage plans. The story is intriguing enough to pass the time, both Ehrenreich and Dynevor play their roles with so much passion and emotion. You believe them at all times, whether it's as passionate lovers or at each others throats. The girlboss crowd will love it but others can find it enjoyable too. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/08/23 10:29 PM
THE MEAN ONE
In the same vein as recent release WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY, THE MEAN ONE is a horror take on the timeless Christmas classic Dr. Seuss' How The Grinch Stole Christmas. Taking place in Newville, the film opens with young Cindy confronting The Grinch about why he's stealing their Christmas until her mother arrives and attacks the Grinch in an effort to get him to leave; however, Cindy's life is forever changed when the Grinch fights back and kills her mother. Still suffering the effects of that night, 20 years later Cindy returns to Newville in order to confront her demons and move past it, until a certain green creator continues his murderous rampage. Audiences know going into this they're not expecting THE GODFATHER but rather a fun, B-type movie that's a new and fun take on an existing classic and that's exactly what this film delivers. It's a low budget film that proves that with its sometimes eye sore CGI and rapid cuts that tend to be a little annoying but overall, it's still a fun way to kill 93 minutes. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would and I'm hoping more of these children classics receive the horror treatment. 6/10
In the same vein as recent release WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY, THE MEAN ONE is a horror take on the timeless Christmas classic Dr. Seuss' How The Grinch Stole Christmas. Taking place in Newville, the film opens with young Cindy confronting The Grinch about why he's stealing their Christmas until her mother arrives and attacks the Grinch in an effort to get him to leave; however, Cindy's life is forever changed when the Grinch fights back and kills her mother. Still suffering the effects of that night, 20 years later Cindy returns to Newville in order to confront her demons and move past it, until a certain green creator continues his murderous rampage. Audiences know going into this they're not expecting THE GODFATHER but rather a fun, B-type movie that's a new and fun take on an existing classic and that's exactly what this film delivers. It's a low budget film that proves that with its sometimes eye sore CGI and rapid cuts that tend to be a little annoying but overall, it's still a fun way to kill 93 minutes. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would and I'm hoping more of these children classics receive the horror treatment. 6/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/23 07:16 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SOUND OF FREEDOM
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
Thanks for the review i12
We were able to view this last night and while being shocked and horrified to see a portrayal of the evils we know prey on children and the world we also were amazed at this was a true story of real people. Seeing the real people at the end was interesting.
That guy and his team are real Hero’s.
We gave it 4 out of 5 stars
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/09/23 11:28 PM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SOUND OF FREEDOM
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
The unfortunate true story of former Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard (Jim Caviezel), who rescues a young boy being trafficked for sex at the US/Mexico border. However, once he reunites the boy with his father, Ballard learns about his sister who's still being trafficked. The difficult part is, she could be anywhere in the world and as a federal agent attempting to rescue her abroad, his resources are rather limited as the US government doesn't want to get into an international conflict about this with opposing countries. Throughout the film, Tim must make many difficult decisions such as the time he's losing with his own 6 children, his career, and his safety. I've been a fan of Caviezel's but more so recently as it's become quite apparent he chooses roles he's most passionate about and I couldn't think of a more contemporary issue to shine a spotlight on than child sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood didn't embrace this film like they should have (dealing with the subject matter) until it started to make noise at the box office; and even then it was rather mute compared to some of the other blockbusters in recent memory. I'm glad moviegoers voted with their wallets and let their voices be heard that we want more of this type of content. A difficult film to sit through but truly powerful and highly recommended. 7.5/10
Thanks for the review i12
We were able to view this last night and while being shocked and horrified to see a portrayal of the evils we know prey on children and the world we also were amazed at this was a true story of real people. Seeing the real people at the end was interesting.
That guy and his team are real Hero’s.
We gave it 4 out of 5 stars
It's a hard film to watch at times but an important film nonetheless. Glad you enjoyed it as well.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/23 12:57 AM
THE KILL ROOM
Reuniting frequent Tarantino collaborators, THE KILL ROOM finds Uma Thurman as Patrice, an art gallery owner with an Adderall addiction, who is slowly losing her standing within the art community as well as her gallery. Samuel L. Jackson stars as Gordon, the owner of a Jewish bakery across the river from Patrice's gallery in New Jersey. They both have a problem and believe they can help the other person out. Recently, Gordon's money launderer got busted, so he's looking to clean his cash, while Patrice could use the increase in cash flow at her gallery under the guise of selling art. Joe Manganiello stars as The Bagman, a hitman for Gordon's operation and the name he uses as an artist who has to create the paintings Patrice must sell in order to launder Gordon's money. The script is thin and I'm sure the studio and producers were banking on Thurman and Jackson's names alone to bring in audiences (and hey, it worked on me). It's a fun little story with nothing really standing out. I'm a fan of both Thurman and Jackson so their performances didn't disappoint and it was fun seeing Uma's daughter Maya, do battle with her mother for a few scenes. This is the type of film you watch on an international flight when you want to check out something you've never seen before. 5.5/10
Reuniting frequent Tarantino collaborators, THE KILL ROOM finds Uma Thurman as Patrice, an art gallery owner with an Adderall addiction, who is slowly losing her standing within the art community as well as her gallery. Samuel L. Jackson stars as Gordon, the owner of a Jewish bakery across the river from Patrice's gallery in New Jersey. They both have a problem and believe they can help the other person out. Recently, Gordon's money launderer got busted, so he's looking to clean his cash, while Patrice could use the increase in cash flow at her gallery under the guise of selling art. Joe Manganiello stars as The Bagman, a hitman for Gordon's operation and the name he uses as an artist who has to create the paintings Patrice must sell in order to launder Gordon's money. The script is thin and I'm sure the studio and producers were banking on Thurman and Jackson's names alone to bring in audiences (and hey, it worked on me). It's a fun little story with nothing really standing out. I'm a fan of both Thurman and Jackson so their performances didn't disappoint and it was fun seeing Uma's daughter Maya, do battle with her mother for a few scenes. This is the type of film you watch on an international flight when you want to check out something you've never seen before. 5.5/10
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/13/23 03:00 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SAW X
Tobin Bell returns as John Kramer as well as Shawnee Smith as Amanda Young. Taking place between the events of SAW and SAW II the story finds John with only months to live. He is lead to believe a doctor in Mexico who's performing an untested procedure to remove cancer can cure him as well. But unfortunately for the doctor and his team, the operation isn't successful and they become the next players in John's games. This entry into the Saw franchise goes against the grain in many different ways: it has the longest run time at 118 minutes, the games don't take place until the third act which allows the story and characters plenty of breathing room to flesh out the story, and it is some ways makes John and Amanda the heroes of the story. It was a nice change of pace to see the story build for the first half of the film, although the gore hounds who paid to see blood might not enjoy it quite as much. The games don't appear to be as elaborate either compared to other entries, however, this can be chalked up to John finding his rhythm for lack of a better term as again, this is at the beginning of John's "work" and he got better as he progressed in later films. It's always good to see John and Amanda back together again and if this does well enough and if they wish to continue to make another involving John's relationship with a certain detective, I'd be up for that as well. 6/10
Tobin Bell returns as John Kramer as well as Shawnee Smith as Amanda Young. Taking place between the events of SAW and SAW II the story finds John with only months to live. He is lead to believe a doctor in Mexico who's performing an untested procedure to remove cancer can cure him as well. But unfortunately for the doctor and his team, the operation isn't successful and they become the next players in John's games. This entry into the Saw franchise goes against the grain in many different ways: it has the longest run time at 118 minutes, the games don't take place until the third act which allows the story and characters plenty of breathing room to flesh out the story, and it is some ways makes John and Amanda the heroes of the story. It was a nice change of pace to see the story build for the first half of the film, although the gore hounds who paid to see blood might not enjoy it quite as much. The games don't appear to be as elaborate either compared to other entries, however, this can be chalked up to John finding his rhythm for lack of a better term as again, this is at the beginning of John's "work" and he got better as he progressed in later films. It's always good to see John and Amanda back together again and if this does well enough and if they wish to continue to make another involving John's relationship with a certain detective, I'd be up for that as well. 6/10
Not gonna lie, that "bone marrow" scene was one of the most disgusting things in a mainstream horror movie in a long time tho lol
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/20/23 11:27 PM
KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON
The story tells the true story of the massacre of the Osage people. Osage are a Native American people in Oklahoma who struck it rich when oil was found upon their land. Years later, the wolves come through in an attempt to swindle some of that money for themselves: those specifically being William Hale (Robert De Niro) and his nephew Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio). Ernest returns to his uncle after fighting in World War I and attempts to reassimilate to civilian life as a taxi driver, when he meets and drives home Mollie (Lily Gladstone). The two soon hit it off, get married, and start a family. But everything is not as it seems as even by his own confession, Ernest loves nothing more in this world than money and the audience rides shotgun as a voyeur to the coming tragedy to Mollie and her people for their money. Another Scorsese masterpiece and while I didn't overly love the film, I did enjoy it. My interest in the story ran hot and cold at times but the cast and Scorsese's mastery kept me entertained throughout. And yes, while the runtime is clocked at 3 hours and 26 minutes, 10 minutes of that is reserved for the credits, so for those who can't sit an extra 16 minutes longer than the recent Marvel movies, spare me. The pacing is on point while the story and film never seem to drag. I can easily see all of De Niro, DiCaprio, Gladstone, and Scorsese walk away with at least Oscar nominations. 8/10
The story tells the true story of the massacre of the Osage people. Osage are a Native American people in Oklahoma who struck it rich when oil was found upon their land. Years later, the wolves come through in an attempt to swindle some of that money for themselves: those specifically being William Hale (Robert De Niro) and his nephew Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio). Ernest returns to his uncle after fighting in World War I and attempts to reassimilate to civilian life as a taxi driver, when he meets and drives home Mollie (Lily Gladstone). The two soon hit it off, get married, and start a family. But everything is not as it seems as even by his own confession, Ernest loves nothing more in this world than money and the audience rides shotgun as a voyeur to the coming tragedy to Mollie and her people for their money. Another Scorsese masterpiece and while I didn't overly love the film, I did enjoy it. My interest in the story ran hot and cold at times but the cast and Scorsese's mastery kept me entertained throughout. And yes, while the runtime is clocked at 3 hours and 26 minutes, 10 minutes of that is reserved for the credits, so for those who can't sit an extra 16 minutes longer than the recent Marvel movies, spare me. The pacing is on point while the story and film never seem to drag. I can easily see all of De Niro, DiCaprio, Gladstone, and Scorsese walk away with at least Oscar nominations. 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/22/23 07:18 PM
OLD DADS
Comedian Bill Burr makes his directorial debut with his Netflix exclusive film OLD DADS, which he stars in alongside Bobby Cannavale and Bokeem Woodbine. The 3 friends started a business together called Trifecta Classics in 2000, which is a vintage sports jersey line. They sold out but are staying on as employees; however, their new boss is 28-year-out generation alpha Aspen Bell (Miles Robbins) who has a zero tolerance policy for anyone who doesn't fit into the overly sensitive 2023 PC standards. In addition, early in the film Burr gets into a profanity verbal altercation with his son's private school principal Dr. Lois Schmieckel-Turner (Rachael Harris). Dr. L as she's referred to in the film, has a lot of power when it comes to recommendations for the next school their child Nate (Dash McCloud) will attend so he is pleaded by his wife Leah (Katie Aselton) to make amends with Dr. L. Much like Burrs standup, most of the film is him clashing with the youth of today in a funny, not heavy-handed or "holier than thou" approach. Just his observations in a very funny way. I've started to get into more of Burrs work with the help of a friend within this last year and I'm glad I did as I might not have seeked out this hidden gem otherwise. Burrs smart quips and deadpan expressions never grow tire and he's supported hilariously as well by both Cannavale and Bokeem. I hope this film finds a large audience on Netflix as it honestly surpassed my expectations and I would love to see this group of actors back together again soon for another hilarious adventure. 7.5/10
Comedian Bill Burr makes his directorial debut with his Netflix exclusive film OLD DADS, which he stars in alongside Bobby Cannavale and Bokeem Woodbine. The 3 friends started a business together called Trifecta Classics in 2000, which is a vintage sports jersey line. They sold out but are staying on as employees; however, their new boss is 28-year-out generation alpha Aspen Bell (Miles Robbins) who has a zero tolerance policy for anyone who doesn't fit into the overly sensitive 2023 PC standards. In addition, early in the film Burr gets into a profanity verbal altercation with his son's private school principal Dr. Lois Schmieckel-Turner (Rachael Harris). Dr. L as she's referred to in the film, has a lot of power when it comes to recommendations for the next school their child Nate (Dash McCloud) will attend so he is pleaded by his wife Leah (Katie Aselton) to make amends with Dr. L. Much like Burrs standup, most of the film is him clashing with the youth of today in a funny, not heavy-handed or "holier than thou" approach. Just his observations in a very funny way. I've started to get into more of Burrs work with the help of a friend within this last year and I'm glad I did as I might not have seeked out this hidden gem otherwise. Burrs smart quips and deadpan expressions never grow tire and he's supported hilariously as well by both Cannavale and Bokeem. I hope this film finds a large audience on Netflix as it honestly surpassed my expectations and I would love to see this group of actors back together again soon for another hilarious adventure. 7.5/10
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/23 12:02 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
While we mostly agree with your reviews and scores, we do not on this one.
Wife and I enjoyed it being inthralled in the possibilities of confronting aliens.
Creepy and solidly eventful.
This movie is almost realistic to what an alien encounter or after life guilty repentance could be like.
Dever did a great piece of work here.
We score this a 7 on your scale.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/23 12:34 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
While we mostly agree with your reviews and scores, we do not on this one.
Wife and I enjoyed it being inthralled in the possibilities of confronting aliens.
Creepy and solidly eventful.
This movie is almost realistic to what an alien encounter or after life guilty repentance could be like.
Dever did a great piece of work here.
We score this a 7 on your scale.
The aliens have shown there is no punishment other than what is in your own mind.
You make your own reality. Your reality has a time stamp and do what you want in it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/23/23 01:00 AM
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
While we mostly agree with your reviews and scores, we do not on this one.
Wife and I enjoyed it being inthralled in the possibilities of confronting aliens.
Creepy and solidly eventful.
This movie is almost realistic to what an alien encounter or after life guilty repentance could be like.
Dever did a great piece of work here.
We score this a 7 on your scale.
The aliens have shown there is no punishment other than what is in your own mind.
You make your own reality. Your reality has a time stamp and do what you want in it.
I'm glad you and the Mrs. enjoyed it DP. I always encourage film discussions. My reviews have and will always be about my own experiences and I'm glad you two had a different one.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/25/23 01:04 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by DuesPaid
Originally Posted by Irishman12
NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
Kaitlyn Dever stars as Brynn, an ostracized member of her local community, who soon experiences UFO encounters and attempted abductions. The meat of the character and the trauma/baggage she's carrying isn't revealed until the bitter end, but by then it's too late. The audience isn't invested enough in her and unfortunately, Kaitlyn Dever is capable of so much more. Regrettable, she's handed a weak script and is asked to turn water into wine, which, even by her own capabilities, she's unable to do. The story is limp, offering not a lot of dialogue so most of Kaitlyn's performance is nonverbal. And while that's not a problem for this actress, it isn't enough to keep the audience engaged. 3/10
While we mostly agree with your reviews and scores, we do not on this one.
Wife and I enjoyed it being inthralled in the possibilities of confronting aliens.
Creepy and solidly eventful.
This movie is almost realistic to what an alien encounter or after life guilty repentance could be like.
Dever did a great piece of work here.
We score this a 7 on your scale.
The aliens have shown there is no punishment other than what is in your own mind.
You make your own reality. Your reality has a time stamp and do what you want in it.
I'm glad you and the Mrs. enjoyed it DP. I always encourage film discussions. My reviews have and will always be about my own experiences and I'm glad you two had a different one.
Thank you Sir…..keep ‘em coming and we will always follow up, we love your reviews.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/27/23 04:08 AM
Old Dads 6/10
A few good laughs, tackles the right issues, but it never got good for me. Been a fan of Burr's for over 10 years, but I felt he lacked energy here. Almost like he wasn't sure how to play that character or didn't believe in his own film. He can act, so I personally feel like it was the latter. Moreover, what caused this film to metamorphose into a domestic drama that emphasizes the wife's role as the wisest character? That being said, this movie is still better than 90% of the trash that's made these days.
A few good laughs, tackles the right issues, but it never got good for me. Been a fan of Burr's for over 10 years, but I felt he lacked energy here. Almost like he wasn't sure how to play that character or didn't believe in his own film. He can act, so I personally feel like it was the latter. Moreover, what caused this film to metamorphose into a domestic drama that emphasizes the wife's role as the wisest character? That being said, this movie is still better than 90% of the trash that's made these days.
Posted By: DuesPaid
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/27/23 10:53 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Old Dads 6/10
A few good laughs, tackles the right issues, but it never got good for me. Been a fan of Burr's for over 10 years, but I felt he lacked energy here. Almost like he wasn't sure how to play that character or didn't believe in his own film. He can act, so I personally feel like it was the latter. Moreover, what caused this film to metamorphose into a domestic drama that emphasizes the wife's role as the wisest character? That being said, this movie is still better than 90% of the trash that's made these days.
A few good laughs, tackles the right issues, but it never got good for me. Been a fan of Burr's for over 10 years, but I felt he lacked energy here. Almost like he wasn't sure how to play that character or didn't believe in his own film. He can act, so I personally feel like it was the latter. Moreover, what caused this film to metamorphose into a domestic drama that emphasizes the wife's role as the wisest character? That being said, this movie is still better than 90% of the trash that's made these days.
I’ll check it out,
Thanks for the review.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/23 10:45 PM
PAIN HUSTLERS
Loosely based on the true story of disgraced pharmaceutical company Insys Therapeutics and their drug Subsys, which was a fast acting pain relief spray for cancer patients. However, it contained fentanyl and before long and in an attempt to increase profits, founder John Kapoor, pushed for the drug to be used to treat more minor pain such as migraines, causing patients to get addicted and overdose from the drug. The main players Liza Drake (Emily Blunt), a single and financially struggling mother who's daughter suffers from seizures. Pete Brenner (Chris Evans) her boss who if you probably went by some peoples definition of the phrase "toxic masculinity" his picture would show up and Andy Garcia as Dr. Neel who runs the company is and based upon Kapoor. A decent enough film that plays it safe and if you've ever seen any film about pharmaceutical abuse and false advertising, you're not missing much here as it's basically the same. A big pharma company that's on its deathbed misleads doctors and patients on the results of a single study, push their product while getting said patients addicted, who some then in turn overdose and die. The government comes down on the company and those mainly responsible receive a fine and lite prison sentence. Wash and repeat. Blunt, Evans, and Garcia especially are solid in their respective roles but again, there's nothing to write home about here. 6/10
Loosely based on the true story of disgraced pharmaceutical company Insys Therapeutics and their drug Subsys, which was a fast acting pain relief spray for cancer patients. However, it contained fentanyl and before long and in an attempt to increase profits, founder John Kapoor, pushed for the drug to be used to treat more minor pain such as migraines, causing patients to get addicted and overdose from the drug. The main players Liza Drake (Emily Blunt), a single and financially struggling mother who's daughter suffers from seizures. Pete Brenner (Chris Evans) her boss who if you probably went by some peoples definition of the phrase "toxic masculinity" his picture would show up and Andy Garcia as Dr. Neel who runs the company is and based upon Kapoor. A decent enough film that plays it safe and if you've ever seen any film about pharmaceutical abuse and false advertising, you're not missing much here as it's basically the same. A big pharma company that's on its deathbed misleads doctors and patients on the results of a single study, push their product while getting said patients addicted, who some then in turn overdose and die. The government comes down on the company and those mainly responsible receive a fine and lite prison sentence. Wash and repeat. Blunt, Evans, and Garcia especially are solid in their respective roles but again, there's nothing to write home about here. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 10/29/23 10:56 PM
FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY'S
Based upon the video game of the same name, the film finds young Mike (Josh Hutcherson) unemployed while taking care of his much younger sister Abby (Piper Rubio). Struggling to make ends meet and being threatened to be taken to court by his Aunt Jane (Mary Stuart Masterson) for custody, Mike agrees to accept a security gig working nights at abandoned restaurant Freddy Fazbear's Pizza. While the building is on its last legs the owner can't quite seem to part with it yet but it's an easy gig as Mike only needs to keep people out. Although, the animatronic characters come to life and attempt to kill Mike and Abby. The film isn't much of a horror story and actually moves along rather sluggishly. Mike's character is fleshed out plenty, with a deep backstory into why he originally got into security work, the pressures of caretaking for his sister, and his inability to move past an incident from his own youth that's left him permanently and emotionally scared. This plays more of a psychological horror film that a slasher and while not technically the same, I'd still prefer Nicolas Cage's WILLY'S WONDERLAND over this if you're looking for characters locked overnight in an abandoned restaurant, fending off killer robotic animals. 5/10
Based upon the video game of the same name, the film finds young Mike (Josh Hutcherson) unemployed while taking care of his much younger sister Abby (Piper Rubio). Struggling to make ends meet and being threatened to be taken to court by his Aunt Jane (Mary Stuart Masterson) for custody, Mike agrees to accept a security gig working nights at abandoned restaurant Freddy Fazbear's Pizza. While the building is on its last legs the owner can't quite seem to part with it yet but it's an easy gig as Mike only needs to keep people out. Although, the animatronic characters come to life and attempt to kill Mike and Abby. The film isn't much of a horror story and actually moves along rather sluggishly. Mike's character is fleshed out plenty, with a deep backstory into why he originally got into security work, the pressures of caretaking for his sister, and his inability to move past an incident from his own youth that's left him permanently and emotionally scared. This plays more of a psychological horror film that a slasher and while not technically the same, I'd still prefer Nicolas Cage's WILLY'S WONDERLAND over this if you're looking for characters locked overnight in an abandoned restaurant, fending off killer robotic animals. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/23 01:20 AM
PRISCILLA
A film about the power couple from Priscilla's POV, Cailee Spaeny and Jacob Elordi star in this beautifully shot film from director Sofia Coppola. The film begins with 15-year-old Priscilla being courted by Elvis while they're both in West Germany in 1959. From there it details her moving into Graceland with him, their marriage and child (Lisa Marie). I'm not sure how much of the story is fact or fiction but it is based upon Priscilla's novel, ELVIS & ME. She's also an executive producer so I'm sure she would have made her opinions known if she felt the film was being disrespectful to Elvis in anyway as the film depicts a rather strong bond between the two. It also paints Elvis as unstable at times. Prone to anger and outbursts before quickly apologizing (the pills may have played a role in that as well). However, I was quite impressed with both 25-year-old Spaeny and 26-year-old Elordi's performance. They're both terrific and have great chemistry together. Keep in mind, this is not the Austin Butler version of Elvis. He's very subdued outside of his anger fits and his accent isn't as strong either but the performance is still enjoyable. I would endorse a viewing in theaters if you're even the slightest bit curious on this one. I'm looking forward to another viewing again myself! 7/10
A film about the power couple from Priscilla's POV, Cailee Spaeny and Jacob Elordi star in this beautifully shot film from director Sofia Coppola. The film begins with 15-year-old Priscilla being courted by Elvis while they're both in West Germany in 1959. From there it details her moving into Graceland with him, their marriage and child (Lisa Marie). I'm not sure how much of the story is fact or fiction but it is based upon Priscilla's novel, ELVIS & ME. She's also an executive producer so I'm sure she would have made her opinions known if she felt the film was being disrespectful to Elvis in anyway as the film depicts a rather strong bond between the two. It also paints Elvis as unstable at times. Prone to anger and outbursts before quickly apologizing (the pills may have played a role in that as well). However, I was quite impressed with both 25-year-old Spaeny and 26-year-old Elordi's performance. They're both terrific and have great chemistry together. Keep in mind, this is not the Austin Butler version of Elvis. He's very subdued outside of his anger fits and his accent isn't as strong either but the performance is still enjoyable. I would endorse a viewing in theaters if you're even the slightest bit curious on this one. I'm looking forward to another viewing again myself! 7/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/03/23 10:59 PM
Curse of the Demon, a black and white production from the Fifties. Surprisingly, Rotten Tomatoes had it rate in the 90s. What's cool about it is the demon. It appears out of a small cloud of smoke which gets bigger and bigger until the whole demon is there and you don't stand a chance. It's called forth by an ancient script that a professor finds. A customary formula for such genre, but the demon is worth watching it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/05/23 11:32 PM
THE EXORCIST: BELIEVER
Universal's attempt to reboot another franchise after mixed results from their HALLOWEEN trilogy finds two girls, who go missing for 3 days, and return to their parents possessed. Unable to find any answers to assist to better their children, the parents agree to have an exorcism conducted on the pair. The story is dull, weak, and non-engaging. It appears the studio was more concerned with DEI points rather than a quality film and it shows in the results, taking an established franchise and attempting to shove the politics of today into viewers faces. The people spoke with their wallets (or lack their of) and this film has bombed at the box office. I've heard plans for future installments have already been altered since Universal coughed up $400 million for the rights so we'll see where they go from here but definitely not off to a great start. Hopefully, other studios will learn the lesson Universal is painfully enduring now, but, I doubt it. 4/10
Universal's attempt to reboot another franchise after mixed results from their HALLOWEEN trilogy finds two girls, who go missing for 3 days, and return to their parents possessed. Unable to find any answers to assist to better their children, the parents agree to have an exorcism conducted on the pair. The story is dull, weak, and non-engaging. It appears the studio was more concerned with DEI points rather than a quality film and it shows in the results, taking an established franchise and attempting to shove the politics of today into viewers faces. The people spoke with their wallets (or lack their of) and this film has bombed at the box office. I've heard plans for future installments have already been altered since Universal coughed up $400 million for the rights so we'll see where they go from here but definitely not off to a great start. Hopefully, other studios will learn the lesson Universal is painfully enduring now, but, I doubt it. 4/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/06/23 03:26 AM
LE SAMOURI (1967)
Jef Costello (Alain Delon), a coldly calculating hired killer, gets a contract to whack a nightclub owner. Several witnesses see him leaving the crime scene, and he's swept up in a police dragnet.. He's not worried--he prearranged an alibi with his call girl lover, and a pianist at the club who saw him leaving inexplicably denies that he's the perp. But the boss cop (Francois Perrier), is all over him like white on rice. Life gets further complicated for Jef when the people who hired him for the killing try to kill him because he'd been arrested, leading him to simultaneously trying to dodge the cops and to find out who's behind the contract on him. Then his would-be killers about-face and give him another contract.
Films-noir famously don't waste dialog. There's practically none here, but Delon carries it off with body language and personal style. Director Jean-Pierre Melville brilliantly uses long, seemingly boring scenes (corridors in police HQ, Delon on Metros and in his smudged, one-room apartment) to create constant tension and show how Jef must constantly be in control of his ever-deteriorating physical safety. Real French Existential stuff. Well done!
Jef Costello (Alain Delon), a coldly calculating hired killer, gets a contract to whack a nightclub owner. Several witnesses see him leaving the crime scene, and he's swept up in a police dragnet.. He's not worried--he prearranged an alibi with his call girl lover, and a pianist at the club who saw him leaving inexplicably denies that he's the perp. But the boss cop (Francois Perrier), is all over him like white on rice. Life gets further complicated for Jef when the people who hired him for the killing try to kill him because he'd been arrested, leading him to simultaneously trying to dodge the cops and to find out who's behind the contract on him. Then his would-be killers about-face and give him another contract.
Films-noir famously don't waste dialog. There's practically none here, but Delon carries it off with body language and personal style. Director Jean-Pierre Melville brilliantly uses long, seemingly boring scenes (corridors in police HQ, Delon on Metros and in his smudged, one-room apartment) to create constant tension and show how Jef must constantly be in control of his ever-deteriorating physical safety. Real French Existential stuff. Well done!
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/10/23 02:19 AM
THE MARVELS
A sequel to 2019's CAPTAIN MARVEL, THE MARVELS teams Carol Danvers (Brie Larson) with Marvel TV stars Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris) and Kamala Khan (Iman Vellani) who team up to take on Dar-Benn (Zawe Ashton), the gender swapped version of Ronan the Accuser because, you know, it's 2023 and girl power. For anyone who hasn't kept up or seen the Marvel TV shows featuring Monica and Kamala, they're going to be lost on who these characters are. The runtime clocks in at 1 hour 45 minutes but the film still at times feels unbalanced and the story clunky. The characters are hollow and not fleshed out while the story is thin and meek. This seemed more like a filler movie for Marvel but building towards what, I have no idea? The homage at the end was a cheap rip-off, even within Marvels own property and my favorite part was the mid-credit scene (so that should tell you everything you need to know right there). 5.5/10
A sequel to 2019's CAPTAIN MARVEL, THE MARVELS teams Carol Danvers (Brie Larson) with Marvel TV stars Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris) and Kamala Khan (Iman Vellani) who team up to take on Dar-Benn (Zawe Ashton), the gender swapped version of Ronan the Accuser because, you know, it's 2023 and girl power. For anyone who hasn't kept up or seen the Marvel TV shows featuring Monica and Kamala, they're going to be lost on who these characters are. The runtime clocks in at 1 hour 45 minutes but the film still at times feels unbalanced and the story clunky. The characters are hollow and not fleshed out while the story is thin and meek. This seemed more like a filler movie for Marvel but building towards what, I have no idea? The homage at the end was a cheap rip-off, even within Marvels own property and my favorite part was the mid-credit scene (so that should tell you everything you need to know right there). 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/23 01:29 AM
THE HUNGER GAMES: THE BALLAD OF SONGBIRDS & SNAKES
A prequel to the existing franchise finds Coriolanus Snow (Tom Blyth) mentoring District 12 tribute Lucy Gray Baird (Rachel Zegler) during the 10th annual Hunger Games. For The Capital, viewership of the games is down and the possibility of discontinuing the games has been put out. In an effort to salvage the games, young Coriolanus is tasked with assisting Lucy Gray in order to attract viewers back to the games, thus ensuring his place to receive a scholarship at the university he can simply not afford due to lack of finances. The film does a wonderful job of balancing both the games and the after effects of both characters. While the runtime of 2 hours and 37 minutes might scare some folks off, the film feels like 2 parts into 1. My only gripe with the film is the constant singing of Lucy Gray. Although, having never read the source material, I'm more inclined to after watching the film. This surpassed my expectations and if this opens up additional installments for the franchise, consider me onboard! 8/10
A prequel to the existing franchise finds Coriolanus Snow (Tom Blyth) mentoring District 12 tribute Lucy Gray Baird (Rachel Zegler) during the 10th annual Hunger Games. For The Capital, viewership of the games is down and the possibility of discontinuing the games has been put out. In an effort to salvage the games, young Coriolanus is tasked with assisting Lucy Gray in order to attract viewers back to the games, thus ensuring his place to receive a scholarship at the university he can simply not afford due to lack of finances. The film does a wonderful job of balancing both the games and the after effects of both characters. While the runtime of 2 hours and 37 minutes might scare some folks off, the film feels like 2 parts into 1. My only gripe with the film is the constant singing of Lucy Gray. Although, having never read the source material, I'm more inclined to after watching the film. This surpassed my expectations and if this opens up additional installments for the franchise, consider me onboard! 8/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/23 01:35 AM
THANKSGIVING
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/23 01:52 AM
THE HOLDOVERS
Massachusetts 1970, professor Paul Hunman (Paul Giamatti) is stuck babysitting 5 students at a private school over the winter break. Having a reputation as a harsh disciplinary, the students push back at ever instance in order to gain their independence as well as salvage whatever they can from their 2 week winter break. The films plays beautifully as an homage to films of the period. From the intro titles to the scene transitions, this really feels like a film made at anytime other than 2023. Giamatti is at the top of his game as the cantankerous, Jim Beam drinking teacher that I dare say this role is Oscar nomination worthy. Equally entertaining is his young student Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), who challenges his teacher and is the complete opposite from him. The pair make for a dynamic duo, often feeding off of each others banter. Unfortunately, the film appeared funny in the previews as there weren't many laugh out loud moments during the film other than the occasional chuckle. Still a film worth seeing, just perhaps not in the theaters. 6/10
Massachusetts 1970, professor Paul Hunman (Paul Giamatti) is stuck babysitting 5 students at a private school over the winter break. Having a reputation as a harsh disciplinary, the students push back at ever instance in order to gain their independence as well as salvage whatever they can from their 2 week winter break. The films plays beautifully as an homage to films of the period. From the intro titles to the scene transitions, this really feels like a film made at anytime other than 2023. Giamatti is at the top of his game as the cantankerous, Jim Beam drinking teacher that I dare say this role is Oscar nomination worthy. Equally entertaining is his young student Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), who challenges his teacher and is the complete opposite from him. The pair make for a dynamic duo, often feeding off of each others banter. Unfortunately, the film appeared funny in the previews as there weren't many laugh out loud moments during the film other than the occasional chuckle. Still a film worth seeing, just perhaps not in the theaters. 6/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/23 08:47 AM
Originally Posted by Turnbull
LE SAMOURI (1967)
Jef Costello (Alain Delon), a coldly calculating hired killer, gets a contract to whack a nightclub owner. Several witnesses see him leaving the crime scene, and he's swept up in a police dragnet.. He's not worried--he prearranged an alibi with his call girl lover, and a pianist at the club who saw him leaving inexplicably denies that he's the perp. But the boss cop (Francois Perrier), is all over him like white on rice. Life gets further complicated for Jef when the people who hired him for the killing try to kill him because he'd been arrested, leading him to simultaneously trying to dodge the cops and to find out who's behind the contract on him. Then his would-be killers about-face and give him another contract.
Films-noir famously don't waste dialog. There's practically none here, but Delon carries it off with body language and personal style. Director Jean-Pierre Melville brilliantly uses long, seemingly boring scenes (corridors in police HQ, Delon on Metros and in his smudged, one-room apartment) to create constant tension and show how Jef must constantly be in control of his ever-deteriorating physical safety. Real French Existential stuff. Well done!
Jef Costello (Alain Delon), a coldly calculating hired killer, gets a contract to whack a nightclub owner. Several witnesses see him leaving the crime scene, and he's swept up in a police dragnet.. He's not worried--he prearranged an alibi with his call girl lover, and a pianist at the club who saw him leaving inexplicably denies that he's the perp. But the boss cop (Francois Perrier), is all over him like white on rice. Life gets further complicated for Jef when the people who hired him for the killing try to kill him because he'd been arrested, leading him to simultaneously trying to dodge the cops and to find out who's behind the contract on him. Then his would-be killers about-face and give him another contract.
Films-noir famously don't waste dialog. There's practically none here, but Delon carries it off with body language and personal style. Director Jean-Pierre Melville brilliantly uses long, seemingly boring scenes (corridors in police HQ, Delon on Metros and in his smudged, one-room apartment) to create constant tension and show how Jef must constantly be in control of his ever-deteriorating physical safety. Real French Existential stuff. Well done!
Delon is a bad ass lol and Melville's films were a source of inspiration for filmmakers such as Quentin Tarantino and John Woo.
Have you watched Tony Arzenta, Turnbull? Stylish Italian revenge film with another tailor-made role for Alain Delon, just don't mess with him.
https:/
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/18/23 07:23 PM
THE KILLER
Michael Fassbender stars as the unnamed killer in David Fincher's latest. The film opens with Fassbender on assignment in Paris when he fails in his task of eliminating his target. Fearing he's compromised, he returns to his safe house in the Dominican Republic. However, upon arrival, he finds his friend/girlfriend clinging to her life. Fassbender promises this will never happen again and sets out for vengeance on the very people who hired him. I loved Fassbenders performance here: he's stoic, non-emotional, steady, calm whether he's carrying out an assignment or he's killing those who've wronged him, his demeanor never changes. As for Fincher, he's one of my favorite directors and while I enjoyed the film, sadly, it's not his best work. I wasn't bored with it but I could see how others would decry it's pacing. 6.5/10
Michael Fassbender stars as the unnamed killer in David Fincher's latest. The film opens with Fassbender on assignment in Paris when he fails in his task of eliminating his target. Fearing he's compromised, he returns to his safe house in the Dominican Republic. However, upon arrival, he finds his friend/girlfriend clinging to her life. Fassbender promises this will never happen again and sets out for vengeance on the very people who hired him. I loved Fassbenders performance here: he's stoic, non-emotional, steady, calm whether he's carrying out an assignment or he's killing those who've wronged him, his demeanor never changes. As for Fincher, he's one of my favorite directors and while I enjoyed the film, sadly, it's not his best work. I wasn't bored with it but I could see how others would decry it's pacing. 6.5/10
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/20/23 02:55 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THANKSGIVING
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
It is a good one I would not rank it so high. I wonder what will be pulled out of the over on Thanksgiving.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/21/23 12:23 AM
Originally Posted by Giacomo_Vacari
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THANKSGIVING
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
16 years after the fake trailer debuted in GRINDHOUSE, Eli Roth finally makes good on the feature film. Taking place in Plymouth, Massachusetts where Thanksgiving "is an institution there," a killer in a John Carver mask terrorizes the small town. An homage to the horror films Roth grew up on from the opening John Carpenter/Halloween/Michael Myers shot, this film delivers the goods for any diehard horror fan. The cast features a group of up-and-coming youngsters akin to the original SCREAM cast, I was hoping Eli would not disappoint with this endeavor and he did not! I enjoyed this more than I expected and it's probably my favorite movie of the year alongside THE SUPER MARIO BROS. MOVIE. The only negative I can give the film is the reveal of the killer/killers as it felt a little light but I had so much fun getting to the reveal that I'm able to overlook it. I can't wait to see this again! 9/10
It is a good one I would not rank it so high. I wonder what will be pulled out of the over on Thanksgiving.
What didn't you like about it and what would you rate it?
Posted By: Giacomo_Vacari
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/21/23 07:33 AM
I would rate it 8. One reason is it pays too much hommage to other horror movies with the POV so the surprise is not a surprise except for the casual viewer. Another reason is that too many of the main cast survived. A couple of other minor reasons, but overall Roth does a good job on the movie.
Posted By: Big_Tuna93
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/22/23 01:52 PM
Just saw Napoleon. Far from the best movie ever, but I enjoyed. Joquain Pheonix is great in it, and some of the battle scenes are really cool, especially in the theatre. Kept me entertained the whole 2.5 hours. 7/10.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/22/23 11:41 PM
NAPOLEON
Ridley Scott brings another historical epic to the screen, this time with Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby telling the tale of Napoleon & Josephine Bonaparte. The film tells both stories of Napoleon's achievements on the battlefield as well as his volatile and unstable relationship with Josephine. My take from the film is the relationship is more central to the story than the battles. Both Phoenix and Kirby shine in their respective roles, each taking turns at being the domineering figure in the relationship at any one time. Phoenix in particular plays the role with little emotion; having either an overconfident case of his sh*t doesn't stink or an apparent apathy, he's wonderful as Napoleon. A historical film being told in 2 hours and 38 minutes, it hits the highlights of his life. However, knowing Scott and his pension for extended/director's cuts (even hearing a rumor that a 4-hour version could soon be made available), I'm curious to see more from this story as I was quite entertained throughout, but sadly, this version left me wanting more. 6.5/10
Ridley Scott brings another historical epic to the screen, this time with Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby telling the tale of Napoleon & Josephine Bonaparte. The film tells both stories of Napoleon's achievements on the battlefield as well as his volatile and unstable relationship with Josephine. My take from the film is the relationship is more central to the story than the battles. Both Phoenix and Kirby shine in their respective roles, each taking turns at being the domineering figure in the relationship at any one time. Phoenix in particular plays the role with little emotion; having either an overconfident case of his sh*t doesn't stink or an apparent apathy, he's wonderful as Napoleon. A historical film being told in 2 hours and 38 minutes, it hits the highlights of his life. However, knowing Scott and his pension for extended/director's cuts (even hearing a rumor that a 4-hour version could soon be made available), I'm curious to see more from this story as I was quite entertained throughout, but sadly, this version left me wanting more. 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/23 02:47 AM
"RUSTIN" (2023)
This Netflix film illuminates Bayard Rustin, an often overlooked civil rights activist and main organizer of the famous 1963 March on Washington. It's very good on exposing the often vicious rifts in the movement, especially the opposition to the march by the NAACP and its head, Roy Wilkins (Chris Rock), and the perfidy of Rep. Adam Clayton Powell (Jeffrey Wright). Rustin (played forcefully by Coleman Domingo) gets support only from one leader, A. Philip Randolph (Glynn Turman), and later, reluctantly, from M.L. King (Ami Ameen). Rustin was an ex-Communist and was gay, big handicaps in that uptight era, but he soldiered on with incredible energy and leadership, ultimately marshaling an army of enthusiastic white and black youngsters to bring off the March. The acting is uniformly excellent and the pace never lets up. The gay angle is overplayed, but the drama's the driving force. Pretty good.
This Netflix film illuminates Bayard Rustin, an often overlooked civil rights activist and main organizer of the famous 1963 March on Washington. It's very good on exposing the often vicious rifts in the movement, especially the opposition to the march by the NAACP and its head, Roy Wilkins (Chris Rock), and the perfidy of Rep. Adam Clayton Powell (Jeffrey Wright). Rustin (played forcefully by Coleman Domingo) gets support only from one leader, A. Philip Randolph (Glynn Turman), and later, reluctantly, from M.L. King (Ami Ameen). Rustin was an ex-Communist and was gay, big handicaps in that uptight era, but he soldiered on with incredible energy and leadership, ultimately marshaling an army of enthusiastic white and black youngsters to bring off the March. The acting is uniformly excellent and the pace never lets up. The gay angle is overplayed, but the drama's the driving force. Pretty good.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/23 03:29 AM
"THE BEATLES: LET IT BE" (1969)
This movie should have been subtitled "McCartney hires three surly sidemen to play on his album" It was his idea to film them in the studio making the record of the same name, not long before they broke up--and the tension shows, big time. None of the other three look at the camera, leaving it all to Paul and his wistful glances. Ono sits on a chair, a dark and (except for Lennon) ignored presence. McCartney nastily hectors Harrison on his playing--ugly. The mood lightens a bit when ace keyboard player Billy Preston shows up (apparently at Harrison's invitation). A few bright moments: McCartney's overarching musicianship--he could have been a concert pianist; Starr, the most overlooked and belittled Moptop, effortlessly laying down just the right drum tracks without direction from Uncle Paulie; Lennon and Ono waltzing gracefully around the studio while Harrison records "I Me Mine." The famous rooftop concert (a great idea) shows why (as McCartney said) "We were always a pretty good little rock 'n roll band." But they had clearly come to the end of that long and winding road.
This movie should have been subtitled "McCartney hires three surly sidemen to play on his album" It was his idea to film them in the studio making the record of the same name, not long before they broke up--and the tension shows, big time. None of the other three look at the camera, leaving it all to Paul and his wistful glances. Ono sits on a chair, a dark and (except for Lennon) ignored presence. McCartney nastily hectors Harrison on his playing--ugly. The mood lightens a bit when ace keyboard player Billy Preston shows up (apparently at Harrison's invitation). A few bright moments: McCartney's overarching musicianship--he could have been a concert pianist; Starr, the most overlooked and belittled Moptop, effortlessly laying down just the right drum tracks without direction from Uncle Paulie; Lennon and Ono waltzing gracefully around the studio while Harrison records "I Me Mine." The famous rooftop concert (a great idea) shows why (as McCartney said) "We were always a pretty good little rock 'n roll band." But they had clearly come to the end of that long and winding road.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/23/23 03:31 AM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Have you watched Tony Arzenta, Turnbull? Stylish Italian revenge film with another tailor-made role for Alain Delon, just don't mess with him.
I just downloaded it, and will watch it soon. Thanks for the recommendation, Hollander.
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 11/25/23 03:19 AM
"OPPENHEIMER" (2023)
This is a gigantic movie (3 hours), superbly filmed and well acted. It tells an important story...but not very well. It has three, nonlinear components: Oppie's life loosely put together, his security hearing (1954 and the Senate conformation hearing of his nemesis, Lewis Strauss (1958). All of this is told in irritating, piecemeal jump-cuts, with no supporting context, not even a caption or crawl to tell you what, where or when it's happening. Ditto a parade of characters who are important to the narrative, but who are largely unidentified and unexplained. Unless you've read the Kai Bird/Martin Sherwin Pulitzer-winning "American Prometheus" on which the movie is based, or are well versed in physics and the details of the Manhattan Project, there is no way you can put together the narrative in any rational way that makes sense of this important man and his travails. Cillian Murphy no doubt will win an Oscar for his portrayal of Oppie--he's suitably skinny but has one expression (popping eyes and morose demeanor) and mostly whispers his lines. Matt Damon is ok as Gen. Leslie Groves, the commandant of the project, but he doesn't even come close to matching Brian Dennehy's brilliant portrayal in "Day One," a much better account of the Manhattan Project. The greatly acclaimed sound track simply amps up the noise of explosions and foot-stampings to mega-decibels--no doubt to wake up slumbering viewers.
This is a gigantic movie (3 hours), superbly filmed and well acted. It tells an important story...but not very well. It has three, nonlinear components: Oppie's life loosely put together, his security hearing (1954 and the Senate conformation hearing of his nemesis, Lewis Strauss (1958). All of this is told in irritating, piecemeal jump-cuts, with no supporting context, not even a caption or crawl to tell you what, where or when it's happening. Ditto a parade of characters who are important to the narrative, but who are largely unidentified and unexplained. Unless you've read the Kai Bird/Martin Sherwin Pulitzer-winning "American Prometheus" on which the movie is based, or are well versed in physics and the details of the Manhattan Project, there is no way you can put together the narrative in any rational way that makes sense of this important man and his travails. Cillian Murphy no doubt will win an Oscar for his portrayal of Oppie--he's suitably skinny but has one expression (popping eyes and morose demeanor) and mostly whispers his lines. Matt Damon is ok as Gen. Leslie Groves, the commandant of the project, but he doesn't even come close to matching Brian Dennehy's brilliant portrayal in "Day One," a much better account of the Manhattan Project. The greatly acclaimed sound track simply amps up the noise of explosions and foot-stampings to mega-decibels--no doubt to wake up slumbering viewers.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/23 12:17 AM
EXPEND4BLES
9 years after the last installment, we catch up with the team and a new line of recruits, attempting to, yet again, save the world from complete annihilation. Personally, I'm not a fan of franchises with 4 installments. I feel it's going back to the well one too many times and the output that's put onscreen here, reinforces that idea. The script is extremely weak, a new team is quickly assembled, who we don't get invested in, and a twist between acts 2 & 3 that's completely predictable. Overall, this franchise has never done much for me. Sure it's great seeing an ensemble of action stars team up but I wouldn't consider any of the films in the franchise great. Hopefully this'll be the last time going around the block with the team. 4/10
9 years after the last installment, we catch up with the team and a new line of recruits, attempting to, yet again, save the world from complete annihilation. Personally, I'm not a fan of franchises with 4 installments. I feel it's going back to the well one too many times and the output that's put onscreen here, reinforces that idea. The script is extremely weak, a new team is quickly assembled, who we don't get invested in, and a twist between acts 2 & 3 that's completely predictable. Overall, this franchise has never done much for me. Sure it's great seeing an ensemble of action stars team up but I wouldn't consider any of the films in the franchise great. Hopefully this'll be the last time going around the block with the team. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/23 12:29 AM
SILENT NIGHT
John Woo is back in Hollywood after a 20 year hiatus and he brings us a holiday film featuring Joel Kinnaman as Godlock, a grieving father who goes after the gang who accidentally killed his son. Godlock works as an electrician or welder, chases down the car driving the individuals responsible for his sons death, and in the process gets shot in the throat. Left for dead, Godlock survives his injuries and plans for a year to hunt down and punish the player's involved. While I do like the fact the film has very little dialogue (and I do mean very little - maybe 5 lines are said throughout the runtime). So it was a nice feature as more of our communication is conveyed non-verbally as opposed to verbally. My issues with the film are the pacing. The story is told out of order so you're putting the pieces together the whole time but it takes more time than I would have cared for for Godlock to begin his rampage. Secondly, I wasn't wowed visually like I usually am in a John Woo film. Yes there's some cool, over-the-top death scenes but this sadly didn't feel like Woo's best effort unfortunately. Finally, being a civilian, Godlock learns how to fight with a knife and shoot via YouTube vidoes which I found to be a little bit of a cop out. If he had some background in fighting or guns, it's more plausible. But an average guy going on a killing spree like this with only online videos, that's a bit of a stretch for me. 5.5/10
John Woo is back in Hollywood after a 20 year hiatus and he brings us a holiday film featuring Joel Kinnaman as Godlock, a grieving father who goes after the gang who accidentally killed his son. Godlock works as an electrician or welder, chases down the car driving the individuals responsible for his sons death, and in the process gets shot in the throat. Left for dead, Godlock survives his injuries and plans for a year to hunt down and punish the player's involved. While I do like the fact the film has very little dialogue (and I do mean very little - maybe 5 lines are said throughout the runtime). So it was a nice feature as more of our communication is conveyed non-verbally as opposed to verbally. My issues with the film are the pacing. The story is told out of order so you're putting the pieces together the whole time but it takes more time than I would have cared for for Godlock to begin his rampage. Secondly, I wasn't wowed visually like I usually am in a John Woo film. Yes there's some cool, over-the-top death scenes but this sadly didn't feel like Woo's best effort unfortunately. Finally, being a civilian, Godlock learns how to fight with a knife and shoot via YouTube vidoes which I found to be a little bit of a cop out. If he had some background in fighting or guns, it's more plausible. But an average guy going on a killing spree like this with only online videos, that's a bit of a stretch for me. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/02/23 12:36 AM
MAY DECEMBER
Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore star in this Netflix film about Gracie (Moore) a convicted criminal who at the age of 36, married and with 2 children, had an affair with a 7th grader Joe (Charles Melton), who years later after she's released from prison, becomes her husband. Portman plays Elizabeth, a Hollywood actress who's conducting research on the family for an upcoming movie that's being made about their life. Portman and Moore are both wonderful here, going toe-to-toe with each other at times. Portman, the out-of-towner Hollywood actress, attempting to briefly fit into small town America Georgia. Although her intentions are not always known and at times, there seems to be something sinister or self-fulfilling going on under the surface. Moore plays the at times, fragile housewife, who is typically so pleasant and accommodating towards her guest. Although by the end of the film, the shift in her attitude has changed. The premise is interesting and I'll give a nod to the score as well as it felt at times to have a "made for TV movie" feel to it, but not in a bad way. 6.5/10
Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore star in this Netflix film about Gracie (Moore) a convicted criminal who at the age of 36, married and with 2 children, had an affair with a 7th grader Joe (Charles Melton), who years later after she's released from prison, becomes her husband. Portman plays Elizabeth, a Hollywood actress who's conducting research on the family for an upcoming movie that's being made about their life. Portman and Moore are both wonderful here, going toe-to-toe with each other at times. Portman, the out-of-towner Hollywood actress, attempting to briefly fit into small town America Georgia. Although her intentions are not always known and at times, there seems to be something sinister or self-fulfilling going on under the surface. Moore plays the at times, fragile housewife, who is typically so pleasant and accommodating towards her guest. Although by the end of the film, the shift in her attitude has changed. The premise is interesting and I'll give a nod to the score as well as it felt at times to have a "made for TV movie" feel to it, but not in a bad way. 6.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/03/23 02:02 AM
THE NAKED ALIBI (1954h
California police commander Joe Conroy (Sterling Hayden) sets his sights on Al Willis (Gene Barry), a seemingly respectable, church-going family man with anger management issues, as the prime suspecst in the killing of three cops. After roughing up Willis, Conroy is fired for "police brutalitiy," but he keeps after Willis, following him to a border town where he leads a double life: head of a hijacking ring and keeper of Marianna (Gloria Grahame), his mistress. Willis gets violent with her, sending her into Conroy's arms. They try to bring him back to his hometown for justice but the cops are after Conroy as well. Bullets fly at the end. Crime Does Not Pay. Despite the title having nothing to do with the movie, script holes and low budget, this is still a trim little film noir. I will watch anything with Hayden, who satisfies here as both his usual tough guy, and vulnerable after being rolled by a border town heavy and being kind to Marianna. Grahame gives a good performance--her hard edge tempered by fear of Willis. Barry is memorable. He's usually a one-note actor but he makes a very convincing violent and resourceful bad guy--wouldn't want to run up against him anywhere. Good watch.
California police commander Joe Conroy (Sterling Hayden) sets his sights on Al Willis (Gene Barry), a seemingly respectable, church-going family man with anger management issues, as the prime suspecst in the killing of three cops. After roughing up Willis, Conroy is fired for "police brutalitiy," but he keeps after Willis, following him to a border town where he leads a double life: head of a hijacking ring and keeper of Marianna (Gloria Grahame), his mistress. Willis gets violent with her, sending her into Conroy's arms. They try to bring him back to his hometown for justice but the cops are after Conroy as well. Bullets fly at the end. Crime Does Not Pay. Despite the title having nothing to do with the movie, script holes and low budget, this is still a trim little film noir. I will watch anything with Hayden, who satisfies here as both his usual tough guy, and vulnerable after being rolled by a border town heavy and being kind to Marianna. Grahame gives a good performance--her hard edge tempered by fear of Willis. Barry is memorable. He's usually a one-note actor but he makes a very convincing violent and resourceful bad guy--wouldn't want to run up against him anywhere. Good watch.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/23 02:14 AM
IT'S A WONDERFUL KNIFE
A horror take on the Christmas classic IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE, finds young Winnie Carruthers (Jane Widdop) who stops the Angel Killer of Angel Falls, Henry Waters (Justin Long) during his murderous rampage. One year later, having been rejected by her dream college, her best friend was murdered a year prior, and her family seemingly favoring her brother over her, Winnie wishes she never existed. Once granted her wish, she attempts to again stop the Angel Killer in her parallel universe that she finds herself in. Shudder checks all the boxes here as all of their DEI requirements are met within the first 15-20 minutes of the film but once those loud voices are snuffed with their virtue signaling, the story can finally get down to brass tacks. A decent, yet predictable retelling of the timeless classic. The only shining star is Justin Long, who regrettable, at this stage in his career, is recently relegated to these types of roles. He's the main take away from this with his totally fake, overly compassionate, false teeth wearing a$$ business developer/mayor of the town. The rest of the crew and story is struggling with the finite pieces of story their left to scrounge over. Not a bad way to spend 2 hours if you have nothing else you're in the mood to watch of if you want to try something new this Christmas season. 5/10
A horror take on the Christmas classic IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE, finds young Winnie Carruthers (Jane Widdop) who stops the Angel Killer of Angel Falls, Henry Waters (Justin Long) during his murderous rampage. One year later, having been rejected by her dream college, her best friend was murdered a year prior, and her family seemingly favoring her brother over her, Winnie wishes she never existed. Once granted her wish, she attempts to again stop the Angel Killer in her parallel universe that she finds herself in. Shudder checks all the boxes here as all of their DEI requirements are met within the first 15-20 minutes of the film but once those loud voices are snuffed with their virtue signaling, the story can finally get down to brass tacks. A decent, yet predictable retelling of the timeless classic. The only shining star is Justin Long, who regrettable, at this stage in his career, is recently relegated to these types of roles. He's the main take away from this with his totally fake, overly compassionate, false teeth wearing a$$ business developer/mayor of the town. The rest of the crew and story is struggling with the finite pieces of story their left to scrounge over. Not a bad way to spend 2 hours if you have nothing else you're in the mood to watch of if you want to try something new this Christmas season. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/05/23 02:31 AM
LADY BALLERS
Former 3-time men's state basketball champion head coach Rob Gibson (Jeremy Boreing), 15-years later reenlists his championship team to regather to form the first ever 5 "woman" transgender team to compete in international competition. The Daily Wire has another hit on their hands with the release of their latest film that pokes fun at transathletes. Yes, this is most definitely going to enrage the feminist and leftists but please keep in mind that it's art and satire. The entire Daily Wire team is here in some form or fashion but the stars for me are both Matt Walsh (Kris Dilby) and Michael Knowles (Drake Diamond). I applaud the Daily Wire for having the only stones to call out the toxic culture we live in today, to put their money where their mouth is, and to call it out: both literally and figuratively. It's nice to have balance in entertainment rather than only one sides perspective (right Hollywood?). I know many who have never even seen the film will condemn it but for those with an open-enough mind, I implore you to view it for yourself and reach your own conclusion, rather than having someone's faux thoughts and feelings spoon fed to you. 6/10
Former 3-time men's state basketball champion head coach Rob Gibson (Jeremy Boreing), 15-years later reenlists his championship team to regather to form the first ever 5 "woman" transgender team to compete in international competition. The Daily Wire has another hit on their hands with the release of their latest film that pokes fun at transathletes. Yes, this is most definitely going to enrage the feminist and leftists but please keep in mind that it's art and satire. The entire Daily Wire team is here in some form or fashion but the stars for me are both Matt Walsh (Kris Dilby) and Michael Knowles (Drake Diamond). I applaud the Daily Wire for having the only stones to call out the toxic culture we live in today, to put their money where their mouth is, and to call it out: both literally and figuratively. It's nice to have balance in entertainment rather than only one sides perspective (right Hollywood?). I know many who have never even seen the film will condemn it but for those with an open-enough mind, I implore you to view it for yourself and reach your own conclusion, rather than having someone's faux thoughts and feelings spoon fed to you. 6/10
Posted By: JCrusher
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/14/23 09:38 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
LADY BALLERS
Former 3-time men's state basketball champion head coach Rob Gibson (Jeremy Boreing), 15-years later reenlists his championship team to regather to form the first ever 5 "woman" transgender team to compete in international competition. The Daily Wire has another hit on their hands with the release of their latest film that pokes fun at transathletes. Yes, this is most definitely going to enrage the feminist and leftists but please keep in mind that it's art and satire. The entire Daily Wire team is here in some form or fashion but the stars for me are both Matt Walsh (Kris Dilby) and Michael Knowles (Drake Diamond). I applaud the Daily Wire for having the only stones to call out the toxic culture we live in today, to put their money where their mouth is, and to call it out: both literally and figuratively. It's nice to have balance in entertainment rather than only one sides perspective (right Hollywood?). I know many who have never even seen the film will condemn it but for those with an open-enough mind, I implore you to view it for yourself and reach your own conclusion, rather than having someone's faux thoughts and feelings spoon fed to you. 6/10
Former 3-time men's state basketball champion head coach Rob Gibson (Jeremy Boreing), 15-years later reenlists his championship team to regather to form the first ever 5 "woman" transgender team to compete in international competition. The Daily Wire has another hit on their hands with the release of their latest film that pokes fun at transathletes. Yes, this is most definitely going to enrage the feminist and leftists but please keep in mind that it's art and satire. The entire Daily Wire team is here in some form or fashion but the stars for me are both Matt Walsh (Kris Dilby) and Michael Knowles (Drake Diamond). I applaud the Daily Wire for having the only stones to call out the toxic culture we live in today, to put their money where their mouth is, and to call it out: both literally and figuratively. It's nice to have balance in entertainment rather than only one sides perspective (right Hollywood?). I know many who have never even seen the film will condemn it but for those with an open-enough mind, I implore you to view it for yourself and reach your own conclusion, rather than having someone's faux thoughts and feelings spoon fed to you. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/15/23 01:08 AM
WONKA
A prequel to WILLY WONKA & THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY and CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY, Timothée Chalamet stars as the young, down on his luck Wonka. Having been a seaman for the previous 7-years, Willy docks in an undisclosed location (although by the signage it appears to be either Germany, Austria, or some other German speaking country) to make his dreams come true of opening his own chocolate shop. However, he's soon tricked into a 10-year servitude that he attempts to free himself (and his fellow captures) from sooner-rather-than later by selling his chocolate as a street vendor. However, the local "chocolate cartel" (made up of 3 companies) is not in favor of Willy disrupting their market and try to prevent him from selling chocolate in their town. To begin with, I'll answer the question many probably have: yes, Chalamet is a passable Wonka and doesn't sully the image Gene Wilder so fondly left behind. My expectations for this were in the "meh" range and this still disappointed. The film starts out with promise, sucking the viewer in early but by the second and most definitely by the third act, the story and pacing of the film lost most of the steam it had built up. Keeping in step with the previous films, this is a musical but the number of tunes is kept to a minimum. Even though he got some backlash from the trailer Hugh Grant is delightful as the Oompa-Loompa. Overall, the film begins decent enough but about midway through, strays off pace and never recovers. Not a great entry into the Roald Dahl/Willy Wonka franchise and most definitely something you can wait to stream. 5/10
A prequel to WILLY WONKA & THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY and CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY, Timothée Chalamet stars as the young, down on his luck Wonka. Having been a seaman for the previous 7-years, Willy docks in an undisclosed location (although by the signage it appears to be either Germany, Austria, or some other German speaking country) to make his dreams come true of opening his own chocolate shop. However, he's soon tricked into a 10-year servitude that he attempts to free himself (and his fellow captures) from sooner-rather-than later by selling his chocolate as a street vendor. However, the local "chocolate cartel" (made up of 3 companies) is not in favor of Willy disrupting their market and try to prevent him from selling chocolate in their town. To begin with, I'll answer the question many probably have: yes, Chalamet is a passable Wonka and doesn't sully the image Gene Wilder so fondly left behind. My expectations for this were in the "meh" range and this still disappointed. The film starts out with promise, sucking the viewer in early but by the second and most definitely by the third act, the story and pacing of the film lost most of the steam it had built up. Keeping in step with the previous films, this is a musical but the number of tunes is kept to a minimum. Even though he got some backlash from the trailer Hugh Grant is delightful as the Oompa-Loompa. Overall, the film begins decent enough but about midway through, strays off pace and never recovers. Not a great entry into the Roald Dahl/Willy Wonka franchise and most definitely something you can wait to stream. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/23 06:24 PM
FERRARI
Set during the 1957 Mille Miglia (a 1,000 mile race across Italy), the story unfolds between Enzo Ferrari's (Adam Driver) crumbling empire, his strained relationship with his wife Laura (Penelope Cruz), and his mistress Lina Lardi (Shailene Woodley) who shares a child with Ferrari. Ferrari needs to win the Mille Miglia to help his company remain solvent while also balancing out his personal life between the 2 aforementioned ladies. The film took a little bit for me to get into and I'll be honest, I'm not the biggest Michael Mann fan (he's hit-or-miss for my tastes) and this was average. The racing scenes were probably my favorite for the sheer noise of the machines as well as the cinematography. However, the story does slow down in parts (no pun intended) when he's with Laura or Lina. A couple of casting choices I question too are Woodley as Ferrari's mistress as well as Patrick Dempsey who plays Piero Taruffi, a driver on Ferrari's team. They unfortunately stand out but not for the right reasons. 6/10
Set during the 1957 Mille Miglia (a 1,000 mile race across Italy), the story unfolds between Enzo Ferrari's (Adam Driver) crumbling empire, his strained relationship with his wife Laura (Penelope Cruz), and his mistress Lina Lardi (Shailene Woodley) who shares a child with Ferrari. Ferrari needs to win the Mille Miglia to help his company remain solvent while also balancing out his personal life between the 2 aforementioned ladies. The film took a little bit for me to get into and I'll be honest, I'm not the biggest Michael Mann fan (he's hit-or-miss for my tastes) and this was average. The racing scenes were probably my favorite for the sheer noise of the machines as well as the cinematography. However, the story does slow down in parts (no pun intended) when he's with Laura or Lina. A couple of casting choices I question too are Woodley as Ferrari's mistress as well as Patrick Dempsey who plays Piero Taruffi, a driver on Ferrari's team. They unfortunately stand out but not for the right reasons. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/23 06:37 PM
THE IRON CLAW
Based on the true events of the Von Erich family, the story follows brothers Kevin (Zac Efron), David (Harris Dickinson), Kerry (Jeremy Allen White), and Michael (Stanley Simons) following in the footsteps of their father Fritz (Holt McCallany) into the world of professional wrestling. The film follows the boys wrestling out of the Sportatorium in Dallas during the early-to-mid 1980's. Other famous wrestlers are briefly shown as well such as Harley Race, The Fabulous Freebirds, and of course "The Nature Boy" Ric Flair. Being a wrestling fan, I knew some of the backstory about the family but even those who aren't familiar with the story can still appreciate this as it's a very solid, respectful, and ultimately tragic tale for what happened to this family. Efron gives the best and strongest performance of his career and while I'd personally give him a vote for an Oscar nomination and the film as a whole as well as director Sean Durkin, I'm sure it'll be overlooked for most if not all nominations unfortunately. This isn't the type of film the Academy typically votes for, which is a shame because it's a great film. I'll also mention McCallany gives one of his best performances as well as the domineering father Fritz. I look forward to seeing this again and hopefully soon! 7.5/10
Based on the true events of the Von Erich family, the story follows brothers Kevin (Zac Efron), David (Harris Dickinson), Kerry (Jeremy Allen White), and Michael (Stanley Simons) following in the footsteps of their father Fritz (Holt McCallany) into the world of professional wrestling. The film follows the boys wrestling out of the Sportatorium in Dallas during the early-to-mid 1980's. Other famous wrestlers are briefly shown as well such as Harley Race, The Fabulous Freebirds, and of course "The Nature Boy" Ric Flair. Being a wrestling fan, I knew some of the backstory about the family but even those who aren't familiar with the story can still appreciate this as it's a very solid, respectful, and ultimately tragic tale for what happened to this family. Efron gives the best and strongest performance of his career and while I'd personally give him a vote for an Oscar nomination and the film as a whole as well as director Sean Durkin, I'm sure it'll be overlooked for most if not all nominations unfortunately. This isn't the type of film the Academy typically votes for, which is a shame because it's a great film. I'll also mention McCallany gives one of his best performances as well as the domineering father Fritz. I look forward to seeing this again and hopefully soon! 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/22/23 06:48 PM
AQUAMAN AND THE LOST KINGDOM
5 years after the success of AQUAMAN, most of the cast returns for round 2 such as Jason Mamoa, Amber Heard, Patrick Wilson, Nicole Kidman, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, and Dolph Lundren amongst others. This time Black Manta (Abdul-Mateen II) is searching for ancient technology that could make him more powerful than Aquaman (Mamoa). In order to stop him, Aquaman enlists the help of his brother King Orm (Wilson) and must break him out of prison in order to do so. Believe the negative press and reviews you've heard about this film as they're true. The film, story, and editing are all a mess. Scenes appear to be spliced together to hurry along the story. Heard's part is obviously severely reduced as she's seen more than heard from. Even Mamoa who seemed to have more fun the first time around, doesn't appear to have the same level of energy or intensity. About halfway through I was done with the film and it became a chore to sit through the rest of it. I recommend wholeheartedly to pass on this in the theaters and perhaps even doing so once it's available on Max. 5/10
5 years after the success of AQUAMAN, most of the cast returns for round 2 such as Jason Mamoa, Amber Heard, Patrick Wilson, Nicole Kidman, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, and Dolph Lundren amongst others. This time Black Manta (Abdul-Mateen II) is searching for ancient technology that could make him more powerful than Aquaman (Mamoa). In order to stop him, Aquaman enlists the help of his brother King Orm (Wilson) and must break him out of prison in order to do so. Believe the negative press and reviews you've heard about this film as they're true. The film, story, and editing are all a mess. Scenes appear to be spliced together to hurry along the story. Heard's part is obviously severely reduced as she's seen more than heard from. Even Mamoa who seemed to have more fun the first time around, doesn't appear to have the same level of energy or intensity. About halfway through I was done with the film and it became a chore to sit through the rest of it. I recommend wholeheartedly to pass on this in the theaters and perhaps even doing so once it's available on Max. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/23/23 10:02 PM
ANYONE BUT YOU
After a brief and spontaneous meeting that turned sour the following morning Ben (Glen Powell) and Bea (Sydney Sweeney) run into each other again at a destination wedding in Australia. Both are still bitter about how their initial first date ended and while they attempt not to ruin the wedding, their animosity towards each other is too much and they wind up doing just that. However, Ben's old fling Margaret (Charlee Fraser) is also at the wedding as well as Bea's ex-fiance Jonathan (Darren Barnet). In order to get Bea's parents off of her back about rekindling her relationship with Jonathan as well as assist Ben in making Margaret jealous of what she no longer has, the two agree to fake a romantic relationship during the trip. However, being a romantic comedy, I'm sure you can guess how it ends. In saying that, I'm not a fan of romantic comedies at all (they're just not my genre). But this is enjoyable as it's not overly sappy or mushy, has quite a few laughs throughout, and Powell/Sweeney make a good onscreen couple. I wasn't expecting much going into this, figured I'd give it a shot before another movie I was seeing, and I'm glad I caught it as it exceeded my expectations. 6/10
After a brief and spontaneous meeting that turned sour the following morning Ben (Glen Powell) and Bea (Sydney Sweeney) run into each other again at a destination wedding in Australia. Both are still bitter about how their initial first date ended and while they attempt not to ruin the wedding, their animosity towards each other is too much and they wind up doing just that. However, Ben's old fling Margaret (Charlee Fraser) is also at the wedding as well as Bea's ex-fiance Jonathan (Darren Barnet). In order to get Bea's parents off of her back about rekindling her relationship with Jonathan as well as assist Ben in making Margaret jealous of what she no longer has, the two agree to fake a romantic relationship during the trip. However, being a romantic comedy, I'm sure you can guess how it ends. In saying that, I'm not a fan of romantic comedies at all (they're just not my genre). But this is enjoyable as it's not overly sappy or mushy, has quite a few laughs throughout, and Powell/Sweeney make a good onscreen couple. I wasn't expecting much going into this, figured I'd give it a shot before another movie I was seeing, and I'm glad I caught it as it exceeded my expectations. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/23 01:05 AM
POOR THINGS
A loosely based tale of Frankenstein by director Yorgos Lanthimos, Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe) creates Bella (Emma Stone), in his words "an experiment." Bella committed suicide and Godwin brings her back to life. Bella then ventures out on her own with the aid of lawyer Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo) to experience the world before coming back home to marry Godwin's assistant and student Max McCandles (Ramy Youssef). If you're a fan of Yorgos, this is more of the same of his previous work and it's quite enjoyable. A little dark comedy but still a film with one of his most powerful messages. The main theme of the film is misogyny and a woman's place within "polite society" during this time period. It's obvious Godwin and Duncan both want to control Bella for different reasons. Godwin for scientific purposes while Duncan wants her for her physical attributes solely. Beautiful set designs, an awkward score, and an absolute powerful performance by Emma Stone (one of the finest of her career I daresay) this is a very enjoyable film. However, by the end it did seem to run a bit long and I didn't enjoy it as much as I was hoping going in to it. Still worth seeking out if for nothing more than to see Stone and Ruffalo onscreen together as they are dynamic! 6.5/10
A loosely based tale of Frankenstein by director Yorgos Lanthimos, Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe) creates Bella (Emma Stone), in his words "an experiment." Bella committed suicide and Godwin brings her back to life. Bella then ventures out on her own with the aid of lawyer Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo) to experience the world before coming back home to marry Godwin's assistant and student Max McCandles (Ramy Youssef). If you're a fan of Yorgos, this is more of the same of his previous work and it's quite enjoyable. A little dark comedy but still a film with one of his most powerful messages. The main theme of the film is misogyny and a woman's place within "polite society" during this time period. It's obvious Godwin and Duncan both want to control Bella for different reasons. Godwin for scientific purposes while Duncan wants her for her physical attributes solely. Beautiful set designs, an awkward score, and an absolute powerful performance by Emma Stone (one of the finest of her career I daresay) this is a very enjoyable film. However, by the end it did seem to run a bit long and I didn't enjoy it as much as I was hoping going in to it. Still worth seeking out if for nothing more than to see Stone and Ruffalo onscreen together as they are dynamic! 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/23 01:15 AM
SALTBURN
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/24/23 02:46 AM
MAESTRO (2023)
I don't know what to make of this Netflix movie. It's mostly about bisexual Leonard Bernstein"s (Bradley Cooper) tumultuous marriage to long-suffering actress Felicia Montealegre (Corey Mulligan)--and not much about his music. Cooper, who directed and was co-writer and producer, is incredibly intense and almost wildly joyous. His conducting scenes are mesmerizing. But much of the first part of the film (shot in B&W) is boring--a struggle to stay with it. What kept me going was Corey Mulligan as Felicia, a superb combination of tension, patience and frustration. She's memorable. The rest of the movie isn't. Watch it for the performances and the color filming. But don't expect a convincing storyline.
I don't know what to make of this Netflix movie. It's mostly about bisexual Leonard Bernstein"s (Bradley Cooper) tumultuous marriage to long-suffering actress Felicia Montealegre (Corey Mulligan)--and not much about his music. Cooper, who directed and was co-writer and producer, is incredibly intense and almost wildly joyous. His conducting scenes are mesmerizing. But much of the first part of the film (shot in B&W) is boring--a struggle to stay with it. What kept me going was Corey Mulligan as Felicia, a superb combination of tension, patience and frustration. She's memorable. The rest of the movie isn't. Watch it for the performances and the color filming. But don't expect a convincing storyline.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/23 06:46 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SALTBURN
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Very interesting review Irish. Thank you. I want to see this now
I'm also a big fan of Rosamund Pike
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/25/23 06:16 PM
Originally Posted by Giacalone
Originally Posted by Irishman12
SALTBURN
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Barry Keoghan stars as Oxford scholarship student Oliver Quick, an outcast who barely has one friend at school before befriending the wealthy and popular Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi). Oliver tells Felix he wishes not to go home for the summer as his parents both battle with mental issues (his mother) and addiction (his father). As a friendly gesture, Felix invites Oliver to his family's estate (Saltburn) for the summer. Once there, Oliver quickly gets a taste of high society and it becomes his addiction that leads to dire consequences for everyone else. Director Emerald Fennell follows up her still underrated IMO 2020 film PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN with another fantastic film! The trailer looked decent enough to me and once it dropped on Amazon Prime, I decided to give it a whirl and I'm glad I did. Keoghan strings together a masterful performance as Oliver with an outstanding supporting cast the likes of Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, and Carey Mulligan. The film takes a dark twist before it's all said and done and while most of what's revealed isn't a huge surprise, it's still a nice touch and I appreciated the story having the balls to see it through. Historically I've never been impressed with Prime movies but this is one I recommend seeing. 7/10
Very interesting review Irish. Thank you. I want to see this now
I'm also a big fan of Rosamund Pike
Let me know what you think if you watch it.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/27/23 11:54 PM
REBEL MOON: PART ONE - A CHILD OF FIRE
A story director Zack Snyder pitched to Lucasfilm as a possible Star Wars project takes its inspiration from the original Star Wars film (A NEW HOPE), which finds a poor colony whose economy is built solely on farming and crops. They're soon threatened with starvation in order to feed the soldiers of the government. In an attempt to save her people Kora (Sofia Boutella) travels to other planets in order to round up fighters to fight back against the government. The story's been seen before and while it's predictable, Snyder continues to build out lavish and beautiful worlds and this is no exception. Much like my review of THE CREATOR, I enjoyed this film more for it's aesthetic and visual features than I did for it's story or acting. Like most Snyder films, I'll be looking forward to a director's cut or at least the R-rated version of the film as well as Part Two that'll drop in April of 2024. 7/10
A story director Zack Snyder pitched to Lucasfilm as a possible Star Wars project takes its inspiration from the original Star Wars film (A NEW HOPE), which finds a poor colony whose economy is built solely on farming and crops. They're soon threatened with starvation in order to feed the soldiers of the government. In an attempt to save her people Kora (Sofia Boutella) travels to other planets in order to round up fighters to fight back against the government. The story's been seen before and while it's predictable, Snyder continues to build out lavish and beautiful worlds and this is no exception. Much like my review of THE CREATOR, I enjoyed this film more for it's aesthetic and visual features than I did for it's story or acting. Like most Snyder films, I'll be looking forward to a director's cut or at least the R-rated version of the film as well as Part Two that'll drop in April of 2024. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/23 01:47 AM
MAESTRO
Set between the 1940's and 1970's, the film follows conductor-composer Leonard Bernstein (Bradley Cooper) and his relationship with his wife, actress Felicia Montealegre Cohn Bernstein (Carey Mulligan). However, the film also explores Bernsteins other sexual appetites with men, during a period where such indiscretions were considered "scandalous." A little noise was made before the films release about Cooper's makeup as Bernstein but after seeing photos of the real Bernstein and his own family giving the film (and makeup) their blessing, the "story" was much to do about nothing. Cooper and Mulligan give terrific performances and both could be rewarded by the Academy with nominations (Cooper with a possible win and Mulligan who I still believe to be an underrated actress). Although, when all's said and done, outside of the performances of the two lead actors, the film is rather a bore. Looking past their performances, there isn't much here. 6.5/10
Set between the 1940's and 1970's, the film follows conductor-composer Leonard Bernstein (Bradley Cooper) and his relationship with his wife, actress Felicia Montealegre Cohn Bernstein (Carey Mulligan). However, the film also explores Bernsteins other sexual appetites with men, during a period where such indiscretions were considered "scandalous." A little noise was made before the films release about Cooper's makeup as Bernstein but after seeing photos of the real Bernstein and his own family giving the film (and makeup) their blessing, the "story" was much to do about nothing. Cooper and Mulligan give terrific performances and both could be rewarded by the Academy with nominations (Cooper with a possible win and Mulligan who I still believe to be an underrated actress). Although, when all's said and done, outside of the performances of the two lead actors, the film is rather a bore. Looking past their performances, there isn't much here. 6.5/10
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 12/29/23 05:56 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
THE HOLDOVERS
Massachusetts 1970, professor Paul Hunman (Paul Giamatti) is stuck babysitting 5 students at a private school over the winter break. Having a reputation as a harsh disciplinary, the students push back at ever instance in order to gain their independence as well as salvage whatever they can from their 2 week winter break. The films plays beautifully as an homage to films of the period. From the intro titles to the scene transitions, this really feels like a film made at anytime other than 2023. Giamatti is at the top of his game as the cantankerous, Jim Beam drinking teacher that I dare say this role is Oscar nomination worthy. Equally entertaining is his young student Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), who challenges his teacher and is the complete opposite from him. The pair make for a dynamic duo, often feeding off of each others banter. Unfortunately, the film appeared funny in the previews as there weren't many laugh out loud moments during the film other than the occasional chuckle. Still a film worth seeing, just perhaps not in the theaters. 6/10
Massachusetts 1970, professor Paul Hunman (Paul Giamatti) is stuck babysitting 5 students at a private school over the winter break. Having a reputation as a harsh disciplinary, the students push back at ever instance in order to gain their independence as well as salvage whatever they can from their 2 week winter break. The films plays beautifully as an homage to films of the period. From the intro titles to the scene transitions, this really feels like a film made at anytime other than 2023. Giamatti is at the top of his game as the cantankerous, Jim Beam drinking teacher that I dare say this role is Oscar nomination worthy. Equally entertaining is his young student Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), who challenges his teacher and is the complete opposite from him. The pair make for a dynamic duo, often feeding off of each others banter. Unfortunately, the film appeared funny in the previews as there weren't many laugh out loud moments during the film other than the occasional chuckle. Still a film worth seeing, just perhaps not in the theaters. 6/10
I wish you had enjoyed this one a little more. To me, it was beautiful in so many different ways. The homage to '70s films was done just right, but I feel they captured the authenticity of the era just as well. It felt as though Alexander Payne had built a time machine for us. Maybe I am a little biased, but I've been a big fan of Payne since Sideways. I think he makes the most human movies. That stuff is not for everyone, but as someone who has both struggled and achieved great success, I can relate to a lot of the elements Payne likes to explore. 8/10 from me
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/06/24 12:31 AM
EILEEN
Set during the 1960s in Massachusetts, Eileen (Thomasin McKenzie) is a young and quiet 24-year-old who works at the local juvenile detention center for young boys. She soon becomes infatuated with the center's new psychologist Rebecca (Anne Hathaway), who recently moved from New York. Rebecca is everything Eileen is not but hopes to be: attractive, confident, and pleasurable to be around. The two soon hit it off and are even social outside of work, going to the local bar for dancing and drinks. However, I thought I knew where the story was headed until the midway point when the story takes a very interesting and harsh turn when a bombshell realization is revealed to the audience. From then on, it almost seems like a different film and has hints of a noir from that point forward. McKenzie and Hathaway are dynamic together as a ying-and-yang tag team and after finishing, I really enjoyed the split in the movie and again, the different feels the two parts have. This had a quiet release but I enjoyed this more than expected and I'd enjoy a second viewing again soon. 7.5/10
Set during the 1960s in Massachusetts, Eileen (Thomasin McKenzie) is a young and quiet 24-year-old who works at the local juvenile detention center for young boys. She soon becomes infatuated with the center's new psychologist Rebecca (Anne Hathaway), who recently moved from New York. Rebecca is everything Eileen is not but hopes to be: attractive, confident, and pleasurable to be around. The two soon hit it off and are even social outside of work, going to the local bar for dancing and drinks. However, I thought I knew where the story was headed until the midway point when the story takes a very interesting and harsh turn when a bombshell realization is revealed to the audience. From then on, it almost seems like a different film and has hints of a noir from that point forward. McKenzie and Hathaway are dynamic together as a ying-and-yang tag team and after finishing, I really enjoyed the split in the movie and again, the different feels the two parts have. This had a quiet release but I enjoyed this more than expected and I'd enjoy a second viewing again soon. 7.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/08/24 12:47 AM
SOCIETY OF THE SNOW
Based on the true story of the Uruguayan rugby team that crashed in the Andes and their story of survival. First, I'll start by saying it's a better film than the Hollywood version we got 30 years ago (ALIVE). Secondly, I appreciated the film was in Spanish as opposed to English as I feel it gives the film more authenticity to hear the native language than was spoken. Third, the film was more grounded, gritter, and paid more respect to the individuals who both died and survived than its predecessor. However, and not at all to belittle the trauma and tragedy those people went through, but speaking purely in terms as a film, I struggled to get through it. The film seemed at times to move at a snails pace and at times, I found it difficult to stay engaged (it just wasn't my cup of tea). I don't believe much more can be said without being disrespectful. 5.5/10
Based on the true story of the Uruguayan rugby team that crashed in the Andes and their story of survival. First, I'll start by saying it's a better film than the Hollywood version we got 30 years ago (ALIVE). Secondly, I appreciated the film was in Spanish as opposed to English as I feel it gives the film more authenticity to hear the native language than was spoken. Third, the film was more grounded, gritter, and paid more respect to the individuals who both died and survived than its predecessor. However, and not at all to belittle the trauma and tragedy those people went through, but speaking purely in terms as a film, I struggled to get through it. The film seemed at times to move at a snails pace and at times, I found it difficult to stay engaged (it just wasn't my cup of tea). I don't believe much more can be said without being disrespectful. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/12/24 02:25 AM
THE BEEKEEPER
Jason Statham stars as Adam Clay, a beekeeper who befriends Eloise Parker (Phylicia Rashad); however, one day Eloise is scammed out of her life savings by unknowingly downloading malware onto her computer. The guilt of her mistake is too much for her and she takes her own life. Adam takes it upon himself to find those responsible to take revenge and for all of the other victims this organization has scammed. I personally enjoy Statham's films and there's only a few people who could have stared in this that I would have taken them up on to see in theaters as the trailer left me feeling mid about it. However, I did enjoy it more than I thought I would and if the box office numbers are favorable, I could see at least a sequel come out of this. A few strange additions in the cast came along for the ride in Jeremy Irons and Josh Hutcherson. Both are enjoyable with Hutcherson having more freedom with his rich, spoiled brat character. Not necessarily a film that needs to be seen in theaters but for fans of Statham, it's worth a shot at some point. 6/10
Jason Statham stars as Adam Clay, a beekeeper who befriends Eloise Parker (Phylicia Rashad); however, one day Eloise is scammed out of her life savings by unknowingly downloading malware onto her computer. The guilt of her mistake is too much for her and she takes her own life. Adam takes it upon himself to find those responsible to take revenge and for all of the other victims this organization has scammed. I personally enjoy Statham's films and there's only a few people who could have stared in this that I would have taken them up on to see in theaters as the trailer left me feeling mid about it. However, I did enjoy it more than I thought I would and if the box office numbers are favorable, I could see at least a sequel come out of this. A few strange additions in the cast came along for the ride in Jeremy Irons and Josh Hutcherson. Both are enjoyable with Hutcherson having more freedom with his rich, spoiled brat character. Not necessarily a film that needs to be seen in theaters but for fans of Statham, it's worth a shot at some point. 6/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/16/24 06:46 AM
THE SNIPER (1952)
Edward Miller (Arthur Franz), abused by his mother, hates women, and takes it out on women by stalking and killing them with a folding sniper rifle he keeps in a briefcase. Pretty soon he's terrorizing San Francisco--when he's not terrorizing himself with guilt.The cops, led by Lt. Frank Kafka (Adolphe Menjou) are baffled, but they get help from a police psychiatrist (Richard Kiley), who susses out the killer's motives, impressing Kafka enough to stop the usual dragnets and focus on the killer's mental makeup. This gets a bit preachy at times, but it's still a taut film noir, with generally crisp dialog and outstanding photography on San Francisco streets and excellent deep-focus shots on the interiors. Menjou, usually an effete type, is very good as a hard-boiled detective open to listening to new ideas. (Menjou, a rabid anti-communist, when asked why he agreed to work with communist director Edward Dymytryk, replied: "I'm a whore.") Marie Windsor, my Favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Fifties, stands out again but, briefly, alas--she's the first victim. Very good.
Edward Miller (Arthur Franz), abused by his mother, hates women, and takes it out on women by stalking and killing them with a folding sniper rifle he keeps in a briefcase. Pretty soon he's terrorizing San Francisco--when he's not terrorizing himself with guilt.The cops, led by Lt. Frank Kafka (Adolphe Menjou) are baffled, but they get help from a police psychiatrist (Richard Kiley), who susses out the killer's motives, impressing Kafka enough to stop the usual dragnets and focus on the killer's mental makeup. This gets a bit preachy at times, but it's still a taut film noir, with generally crisp dialog and outstanding photography on San Francisco streets and excellent deep-focus shots on the interiors. Menjou, usually an effete type, is very good as a hard-boiled detective open to listening to new ideas. (Menjou, a rabid anti-communist, when asked why he agreed to work with communist director Edward Dymytryk, replied: "I'm a whore.") Marie Windsor, my Favorite Femme Fatale of the Fabulous Fifties, stands out again but, briefly, alas--she's the first victim. Very good.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/18/24 11:34 PM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
FERRARI
Set during the 1957 Mille Miglia (a 1,000 mile race across Italy), the story unfolds between Enzo Ferrari's (Adam Driver) crumbling empire, his strained relationship with his wife Laura (Penelope Cruz), and his mistress Lina Lardi (Shailene Woodley) who shares a child with Ferrari. Ferrari needs to win the Mille Miglia to help his company remain solvent while also balancing out his personal life between the 2 aforementioned ladies. The film took a little bit for me to get into and I'll be honest, I'm not the biggest Michael Mann fan (he's hit-or-miss for my tastes) and this was average. The racing scenes were probably my favorite for the sheer noise of the machines as well as the cinematography. However, the story does slow down in parts (no pun intended) when he's with Laura or Lina. A couple of casting choices I question too are Woodley as Ferrari's mistress as well as Patrick Dempsey who plays Piero Taruffi, a driver on Ferrari's team. They unfortunately stand out but not for the right reasons. 6/10
Set during the 1957 Mille Miglia (a 1,000 mile race across Italy), the story unfolds between Enzo Ferrari's (Adam Driver) crumbling empire, his strained relationship with his wife Laura (Penelope Cruz), and his mistress Lina Lardi (Shailene Woodley) who shares a child with Ferrari. Ferrari needs to win the Mille Miglia to help his company remain solvent while also balancing out his personal life between the 2 aforementioned ladies. The film took a little bit for me to get into and I'll be honest, I'm not the biggest Michael Mann fan (he's hit-or-miss for my tastes) and this was average. The racing scenes were probably my favorite for the sheer noise of the machines as well as the cinematography. However, the story does slow down in parts (no pun intended) when he's with Laura or Lina. A couple of casting choices I question too are Woodley as Ferrari's mistress as well as Patrick Dempsey who plays Piero Taruffi, a driver on Ferrari's team. They unfortunately stand out but not for the right reasons. 6/10
Thanks I'm a big Mann fan and grew up adoring Ferrari and other Italian supercars.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/24 12:21 AM
You seen it yet H or no?
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/24 12:53 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
You seen it yet H or no?
Only some clips on a dutch program tonight. From Sunday January 21 in 51 cinemas in Netherlands. We are always a little behind you guys.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/24 01:10 AM
Be curious what you think once you see it.
Posted By: Giacalone
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/24 01:15 AM
I love Mann, but I felt Ferrari was way too slow for my taste. I was a bit surprised because the story is pretty good, but Mann somehow managed to disappoint me
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/19/24 04:30 PM
FOUNDERS DAY
Set in an unknown small town with a mayoral race quickly approaching, a masked killer goes on a killing spree, seemingly with no pattern to which victims are chosen. A film that as far as I'm concerned received next to no marketing push. I'd never even heard of the film or seen a trailer until I stumbled onto the AMC app to see what was playing and watched the trailer there. For a low budget film, it doesn't come across as such. I wasn't familiar with any of the actors but that's not always a bad thing. I chose to roll the dice on this since nothing else looked interesting to me that opened this weekend and for the most part, I'm glad I did. I enjoyed the film for the first three-quarters until the final reveal, which was predictable about halfway through. Up to that point, I thought it was a pretty solid independent horror film but then there was a "second ending" that tried to outsmart the audience and it soured the ending of the story for me. It tried to be too smart for its own good and I wasn't buying into it. Other than that, average all around and if you can get past the fact the killer uses a gavel (which is typically a small instrument) as a murder weapon, you'll still have a fun time. 5.5/10
Set in an unknown small town with a mayoral race quickly approaching, a masked killer goes on a killing spree, seemingly with no pattern to which victims are chosen. A film that as far as I'm concerned received next to no marketing push. I'd never even heard of the film or seen a trailer until I stumbled onto the AMC app to see what was playing and watched the trailer there. For a low budget film, it doesn't come across as such. I wasn't familiar with any of the actors but that's not always a bad thing. I chose to roll the dice on this since nothing else looked interesting to me that opened this weekend and for the most part, I'm glad I did. I enjoyed the film for the first three-quarters until the final reveal, which was predictable about halfway through. Up to that point, I thought it was a pretty solid independent horror film but then there was a "second ending" that tried to outsmart the audience and it soured the ending of the story for me. It tried to be too smart for its own good and I wasn't buying into it. Other than that, average all around and if you can get past the fact the killer uses a gavel (which is typically a small instrument) as a murder weapon, you'll still have a fun time. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/27/24 12:59 AM
NIGHT SWIM
Ray Waller (Wyatt Russell) is a former MLB player, rehabbing from an undisclosed injury when he and his family: wife Eve (Kerry Condon) and children Izzy (Amélie Hoeferle) and Gavin (Gavin Warren), move into a home in the Twin Cities. Having moved around so much due to Ray's playing career and constantly being traded, he and Eve finally want to lay down roots somewhere and settle on a house that's a steal at the asking price and comes with an inground swimming pool. However, the pool holds a deadly secret the Waller's must attempt to solve before it's too late. The film opened in theaters a couple of weeks ago and already received a VOD drop, which is not a good sign. After watching the film, the lackluster box office receipts are justified. The film is neither scary or even suspenseful for that matter. The premise is original and while I applaud the efforts, the execution, let alone building an entire film around the pool and its backstory come across as dull. Nothing exceptional from the cast or crew. Blumhouse and Atomic Monster are very streaky and hit-and-miss. This is most definitely a miss but again, I do continue to appreciate the effort and originality they continue to put out, rather than lazily reboot or give an existing IP another unasked for sequel. 5/10
Ray Waller (Wyatt Russell) is a former MLB player, rehabbing from an undisclosed injury when he and his family: wife Eve (Kerry Condon) and children Izzy (Amélie Hoeferle) and Gavin (Gavin Warren), move into a home in the Twin Cities. Having moved around so much due to Ray's playing career and constantly being traded, he and Eve finally want to lay down roots somewhere and settle on a house that's a steal at the asking price and comes with an inground swimming pool. However, the pool holds a deadly secret the Waller's must attempt to solve before it's too late. The film opened in theaters a couple of weeks ago and already received a VOD drop, which is not a good sign. After watching the film, the lackluster box office receipts are justified. The film is neither scary or even suspenseful for that matter. The premise is original and while I applaud the efforts, the execution, let alone building an entire film around the pool and its backstory come across as dull. Nothing exceptional from the cast or crew. Blumhouse and Atomic Monster are very streaky and hit-and-miss. This is most definitely a miss but again, I do continue to appreciate the effort and originality they continue to put out, rather than lazily reboot or give an existing IP another unasked for sequel. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/24 01:38 AM
MILLER'S GIRL
At a small Tennessee high school, 18-year-old student Cairo (Jenna Ortega) takes an English class taught by Johnathan Miller (Martin Freeman) at the behest of her friend Winnie (Gideon Adlon). Cairo is an exceedingly bright student, far outpacing her contemporaries as Mr. Miller takes a shine to her: both for her intellect as well as her passion for reading, even reading his first and only book which was panned by reviewers and has shaken his confidence so that he hasn't written anything since. Meanwhile, it appears his alcoholic wife is the bread winner of the family, constantly with a glass in her hand while she's always working in practically ever scene she's in. Perhaps feeling a bit ignored by her as well as a promising and seductive student who happens to seriously be into him, the two begin an inappropriate relationship filled with sexual tension, until Miller breaks it off after a mid-term Cairo writes and submits to Miller, who deems it too inappropriate and requests she write another. Cairo, feeling rejected and vengeful, seeks to ruin Mr. Miller's life both professionally as well as personally. This film didn't receive a huge marketing push behind it but I did come across the trailer and felt it looked interesting enough to take a gamble on and I'm somewhat glad I did. Going into it I was reminded of Alicia Silverstone and THE CRUSH from 30 years ago, however, Cairo's and Mr. Miller's relationship is more consensual as opposed to having a young, psychotic neighbor obsess over you. Ortega is the star here as she gives a wonderful and empowering performance as the at times vulnerable yet wise beyond her years Cairo. Her and Freeman play well together as despite the age gap, they have chemistry onscreen. A decent enough movie to catch if you come across it outside of theaters with an somewhat intellectually stimulating script. 6/10
At a small Tennessee high school, 18-year-old student Cairo (Jenna Ortega) takes an English class taught by Johnathan Miller (Martin Freeman) at the behest of her friend Winnie (Gideon Adlon). Cairo is an exceedingly bright student, far outpacing her contemporaries as Mr. Miller takes a shine to her: both for her intellect as well as her passion for reading, even reading his first and only book which was panned by reviewers and has shaken his confidence so that he hasn't written anything since. Meanwhile, it appears his alcoholic wife is the bread winner of the family, constantly with a glass in her hand while she's always working in practically ever scene she's in. Perhaps feeling a bit ignored by her as well as a promising and seductive student who happens to seriously be into him, the two begin an inappropriate relationship filled with sexual tension, until Miller breaks it off after a mid-term Cairo writes and submits to Miller, who deems it too inappropriate and requests she write another. Cairo, feeling rejected and vengeful, seeks to ruin Mr. Miller's life both professionally as well as personally. This film didn't receive a huge marketing push behind it but I did come across the trailer and felt it looked interesting enough to take a gamble on and I'm somewhat glad I did. Going into it I was reminded of Alicia Silverstone and THE CRUSH from 30 years ago, however, Cairo's and Mr. Miller's relationship is more consensual as opposed to having a young, psychotic neighbor obsess over you. Ortega is the star here as she gives a wonderful and empowering performance as the at times vulnerable yet wise beyond her years Cairo. Her and Freeman play well together as despite the age gap, they have chemistry onscreen. A decent enough movie to catch if you come across it outside of theaters with an somewhat intellectually stimulating script. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 01/28/24 11:30 PM
THE BOYS IN THE BOAT
The true story about the University of Washington's junior varsity rowing team who defied the odds by not only beating their counterpart collegiate athletes but also went to Berlin during the 1936 Olympics to compete for a gold medal. For the time period, the film shows the socioeconomic struggles the team has to endure to survive, both on and off the water. Rowing is considered more of an East Coast sport where the likes of Yale and Harvard not only have monetary advantages but have also been engaged in the sport longer, as it's part of that cultural more than it is on the West Coast. The film follows Callum Turner as Joe Rantz, a college student studying engineering who was orphaned at the age of 14 and lives in an abandoned and dilapidated car off campus. In need of money to continue his education as he's behind on his tuition, he and his best friend Roger Morris (Sam Strike) join the team in hopes of making it but not for the reasons you'd think. They're promised housing and a job upon selection. The film simultaneously features a love story between Joe and Joyce Simdars (Hadley Robinson), who Joe has had a crush on since the 4th grade. Overall, this is a play-it-safe, paint-by-numbers sports underdog story we've seen numerous times. Nothing new or exceptional stands out except Robinson's Joyce, who has a lot of spunk and chases Joe around more than he does her. I will also applaud director George Clooney and MGM for resisting the urge to cater to the small but vocal crowd who were trashing this film from the trailer alone due to a lack of "diversity." Clooney obviously went with historical accuracy and facts over feelings and I wish more in Hollywood would follow that example. 5.5/10
The true story about the University of Washington's junior varsity rowing team who defied the odds by not only beating their counterpart collegiate athletes but also went to Berlin during the 1936 Olympics to compete for a gold medal. For the time period, the film shows the socioeconomic struggles the team has to endure to survive, both on and off the water. Rowing is considered more of an East Coast sport where the likes of Yale and Harvard not only have monetary advantages but have also been engaged in the sport longer, as it's part of that cultural more than it is on the West Coast. The film follows Callum Turner as Joe Rantz, a college student studying engineering who was orphaned at the age of 14 and lives in an abandoned and dilapidated car off campus. In need of money to continue his education as he's behind on his tuition, he and his best friend Roger Morris (Sam Strike) join the team in hopes of making it but not for the reasons you'd think. They're promised housing and a job upon selection. The film simultaneously features a love story between Joe and Joyce Simdars (Hadley Robinson), who Joe has had a crush on since the 4th grade. Overall, this is a play-it-safe, paint-by-numbers sports underdog story we've seen numerous times. Nothing new or exceptional stands out except Robinson's Joyce, who has a lot of spunk and chases Joe around more than he does her. I will also applaud director George Clooney and MGM for resisting the urge to cater to the small but vocal crowd who were trashing this film from the trailer alone due to a lack of "diversity." Clooney obviously went with historical accuracy and facts over feelings and I wish more in Hollywood would follow that example. 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/24 12:24 AM
ARGYLLE
Elly Conway (Bryce Dallas Howard) is the very successful author of the spy genre Argylle series. She's written four books and while finalizing her fifth, she's unexpectedly swept up into a real life espionage plot to kidnap her for fear of giving away a secret organization known as The Division, which is run by Director Ritter (Bryan Cranston). Spy Aidan Wilde (Sam Rockwell) is her trusted ally, who assists her in gathering evidence to expose this clandestine operation. Personally, director Matthew Vaughn had a solid start out of the gate on his resume (including such films as KICK-ASS, X-MEN: FIRST CLASS, and KINGSMAN: SECRET SERVICE) but now his last 3 outings (KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE, THE KING'S MAN, and now ARGYLLE) have been mid to less than satisfying. He's able to round up an impressive cast and I appreciate the soundtrack to the film, but my biggest gripe with the movie was the constant twist and turns. At first it's surprising and an a-ha moment for the audience. However, by the end of the film, it's relied upon too often and I'm beginning to question anything for the duration as who knows how many more of these moments I'll have to endure? The fight scenes are well choreographed and entertaining (who knew both Howard and Rockwell had the chops to pull them off?). The hair and costume design for Argylle (Henry Cavill) was awful (an Ivan Drago haircut with a stiff, velvet sports coat), but Cavill has enough bravado to still pull it off. Toss in roles by John Cena as Argylle's right hand man Wyatt and Dua Lipa as Lagrange (another spy Argylle is tracking down) who play out Elly's fictional Argylle novel characters and gives the audience a more balanced onscreen chemistry than the Conway/Wilde relationship. And yes, I'm fully aware that's supposed to be the basis of their relationship (doesn't mean it was enjoyable though). 5.5/10
Elly Conway (Bryce Dallas Howard) is the very successful author of the spy genre Argylle series. She's written four books and while finalizing her fifth, she's unexpectedly swept up into a real life espionage plot to kidnap her for fear of giving away a secret organization known as The Division, which is run by Director Ritter (Bryan Cranston). Spy Aidan Wilde (Sam Rockwell) is her trusted ally, who assists her in gathering evidence to expose this clandestine operation. Personally, director Matthew Vaughn had a solid start out of the gate on his resume (including such films as KICK-ASS, X-MEN: FIRST CLASS, and KINGSMAN: SECRET SERVICE) but now his last 3 outings (KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE, THE KING'S MAN, and now ARGYLLE) have been mid to less than satisfying. He's able to round up an impressive cast and I appreciate the soundtrack to the film, but my biggest gripe with the movie was the constant twist and turns. At first it's surprising and an a-ha moment for the audience. However, by the end of the film, it's relied upon too often and I'm beginning to question anything for the duration as who knows how many more of these moments I'll have to endure? The fight scenes are well choreographed and entertaining (who knew both Howard and Rockwell had the chops to pull them off?). The hair and costume design for Argylle (Henry Cavill) was awful (an Ivan Drago haircut with a stiff, velvet sports coat), but Cavill has enough bravado to still pull it off. Toss in roles by John Cena as Argylle's right hand man Wyatt and Dua Lipa as Lagrange (another spy Argylle is tracking down) who play out Elly's fictional Argylle novel characters and gives the audience a more balanced onscreen chemistry than the Conway/Wilde relationship. And yes, I'm fully aware that's supposed to be the basis of their relationship (doesn't mean it was enjoyable though). 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/24 12:35 AM
AFTER DEATH
A documentary about people who have experienced the afterlife after their own brush with death. Interviews are conducted by both survivors from their encounters as well as medical experts. The survivors describe their experiences in either Heaven or Hell, depending upon whichever destination they were going to. A truly powerful and moving documentary that will reinforce those with beliefs and will hopefully encourage those who are non-believers to reevaluate their own. With the shape of the world we live in today, more people need to see this documentary as I cannot recommend it enough! 10/10
A documentary about people who have experienced the afterlife after their own brush with death. Interviews are conducted by both survivors from their encounters as well as medical experts. The survivors describe their experiences in either Heaven or Hell, depending upon whichever destination they were going to. A truly powerful and moving documentary that will reinforce those with beliefs and will hopefully encourage those who are non-believers to reevaluate their own. With the shape of the world we live in today, more people need to see this documentary as I cannot recommend it enough! 10/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/10/24 07:26 PM
I.S.S.
The International Space Station, a cooperation between the US and Russia after the end of the Cold War, houses 6 astronauts (3 Americans and 3 Russians). Everyone's getting along until war between the two countries breaks out on Earth and both teams are given orders by their respective governments to take control of the ISS by any means necessary. The story is interesting enough and is supposed to play as a psychological thriller/suspense but it's anything but. Yes, 6 people are trapped in a confined space with half of those individuals wanting to kill the other 3; however, the pacing is slow and doesn't lead to much suspense, even during the scenes in which they interact with each other. Usually getting a VOD release so soon after a theatrical release is a bad sign (see NIGHT SWIM as another example) and after watching this, I can see why. Barely average at best. 5/10
The International Space Station, a cooperation between the US and Russia after the end of the Cold War, houses 6 astronauts (3 Americans and 3 Russians). Everyone's getting along until war between the two countries breaks out on Earth and both teams are given orders by their respective governments to take control of the ISS by any means necessary. The story is interesting enough and is supposed to play as a psychological thriller/suspense but it's anything but. Yes, 6 people are trapped in a confined space with half of those individuals wanting to kill the other 3; however, the pacing is slow and doesn't lead to much suspense, even during the scenes in which they interact with each other. Usually getting a VOD release so soon after a theatrical release is a bad sign (see NIGHT SWIM as another example) and after watching this, I can see why. Barely average at best. 5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/24 12:04 AM
THE END WE START FROM
Jodie Comer stars as woman (yes, that's actually how she's credited in the film) who is about to give birth when London begins to flood. Unable to stay in her home she soon leaves in search of safety when she's then rushed to the hospital to give birth to her son Zeb. Once there, she meets with her husband R (Joel Fry) and they make their way to R's parents house in the country. Soon she gets separated from R and must find her way back home with only her baby, with no mood of transportation and limited food supplies. I've gotta be honest, I found the film to be a bore. I'm sure this will play well with the feminist as Comer is the "girl boss" mom who rightly puts her newborn son's needs ahead of her own in every and any way possible. Her husband R, is completely weak, fragile, and folds at the first sign of trouble and can't even protect his wife or newborn son. After which, the film follows Comer on her journey back home, coming across allies such as AB (Benedict Cumberbatch) who recently has lost someone close to him and provides food and shelter as well as O (Katherine Waterston), who is in the same situation as Comer with a newborn. Trailer looked meh and my advice would be to avoid this. 5/10
Jodie Comer stars as woman (yes, that's actually how she's credited in the film) who is about to give birth when London begins to flood. Unable to stay in her home she soon leaves in search of safety when she's then rushed to the hospital to give birth to her son Zeb. Once there, she meets with her husband R (Joel Fry) and they make their way to R's parents house in the country. Soon she gets separated from R and must find her way back home with only her baby, with no mood of transportation and limited food supplies. I've gotta be honest, I found the film to be a bore. I'm sure this will play well with the feminist as Comer is the "girl boss" mom who rightly puts her newborn son's needs ahead of her own in every and any way possible. Her husband R, is completely weak, fragile, and folds at the first sign of trouble and can't even protect his wife or newborn son. After which, the film follows Comer on her journey back home, coming across allies such as AB (Benedict Cumberbatch) who recently has lost someone close to him and provides food and shelter as well as O (Katherine Waterston), who is in the same situation as Comer with a newborn. Trailer looked meh and my advice would be to avoid this. 5/10
Posted By: olivant
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/12/24 07:38 PM
Does anyone intend to go see Godzilla minus One?
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/24 12:02 AM
No, I don't.
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/13/24 12:31 AM
Originally Posted by olivant
Does anyone intend to go see Godzilla minus One?
I'm a fan of the Japanese stuff, Netflix has a lot of great anime. So I will check it out, not sure if I go watch it on the big screen but that I should probably do.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/16/24 01:18 AM
MADAME WEB
New York paramedic Cassandra Webb (Dakota Johnson) gains clairvoyant powers after surviving a near death experience. Shortly thereafter, she begins having visions of 3 girls whom she's briefly had runins with before: Julia Cornwall (Sydney Sweeney), Anya Corazon (Isabela Merced), and Mattie Franklin (Celeste O'Connor). In all of her visions they're all killed by Ezekiel Sims (Tahar Rahim), who has visions himself of his death at the hands of Cornwall, Corazon, and Franklin. His plan is to kill them before they have the opportunity to kill him. I went into this expecting the worst because Sony's Spider-Man Universe has now trained us to expect that; however, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed this. I was hearing a lot of negative press going into it but I'm glad it's been better than most of what Sony has offered up to this point. The film does have its faults: the writers could have done a better job at explaining how exactly Cassie gains her powers during her brush with death. In addition, for two-thirds of the film, the only power Cassie has is seeing the future, meaning the rest of the time in order to save the girls from Ezekiel, she's literally just pushing them out of harms way and running away from him. I'm sure this won't do well financially at the box office nor will a sequel be green lit but it does give me some optimism heading into KRAVEN THE HUNTER later this year. 6/10
New York paramedic Cassandra Webb (Dakota Johnson) gains clairvoyant powers after surviving a near death experience. Shortly thereafter, she begins having visions of 3 girls whom she's briefly had runins with before: Julia Cornwall (Sydney Sweeney), Anya Corazon (Isabela Merced), and Mattie Franklin (Celeste O'Connor). In all of her visions they're all killed by Ezekiel Sims (Tahar Rahim), who has visions himself of his death at the hands of Cornwall, Corazon, and Franklin. His plan is to kill them before they have the opportunity to kill him. I went into this expecting the worst because Sony's Spider-Man Universe has now trained us to expect that; however, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed this. I was hearing a lot of negative press going into it but I'm glad it's been better than most of what Sony has offered up to this point. The film does have its faults: the writers could have done a better job at explaining how exactly Cassie gains her powers during her brush with death. In addition, for two-thirds of the film, the only power Cassie has is seeing the future, meaning the rest of the time in order to save the girls from Ezekiel, she's literally just pushing them out of harms way and running away from him. I'm sure this won't do well financially at the box office nor will a sequel be green lit but it does give me some optimism heading into KRAVEN THE HUNTER later this year. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/23/24 01:49 AM
DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS
Marian (Geraldine Viswanathan) isn't feeling her life in Philadelphia anymore and decides to move to Tallahassee. Her friend Jamie (Margaret Qualley) now homeless after getting the boot from her ex, talks Marian into tagging along on the road trip in order for the both of them to figure their lives out. They take a drive-away car (a discounted rental type car they drive to where the owner needs it delivered) from Curlie (Bill Camp); however, Curlie unexpectedly mistakes the women for two criminals who have a sensitive package in the trunk needing to be delivered to Tallahassee. The criminals soon set off in search of the women and their goods. Honestly, the film being written and directed by Ethan Cohen and starring Qualley is what got me in the theaters but after watching it, felt it was a bait-and-switch. The trailer barely hints at the lesbian themes that are unavoidable to the viewer once the lights go out. It's very heavy-handed and while it wasn't so much of a put off for me in terms of the story, it's just so ingrained in the film and one dimensional for the story. It plays as an 84 minute advertisement/apology film for lesbians circa 1999, which is the time period of the story for some strange reason. Qualley is very over-the-top as Jamie and Viswanathan is the more well-spoken, closet for lack of a better term counterpart to her yang. The only redeeming feature of this film is Bill Camp's monotone delivering Curlie who sadly, isn't in the film nearly long enough to make this tolerable. A terrible film by a director who's seen so much success. 4/10
Marian (Geraldine Viswanathan) isn't feeling her life in Philadelphia anymore and decides to move to Tallahassee. Her friend Jamie (Margaret Qualley) now homeless after getting the boot from her ex, talks Marian into tagging along on the road trip in order for the both of them to figure their lives out. They take a drive-away car (a discounted rental type car they drive to where the owner needs it delivered) from Curlie (Bill Camp); however, Curlie unexpectedly mistakes the women for two criminals who have a sensitive package in the trunk needing to be delivered to Tallahassee. The criminals soon set off in search of the women and their goods. Honestly, the film being written and directed by Ethan Cohen and starring Qualley is what got me in the theaters but after watching it, felt it was a bait-and-switch. The trailer barely hints at the lesbian themes that are unavoidable to the viewer once the lights go out. It's very heavy-handed and while it wasn't so much of a put off for me in terms of the story, it's just so ingrained in the film and one dimensional for the story. It plays as an 84 minute advertisement/apology film for lesbians circa 1999, which is the time period of the story for some strange reason. Qualley is very over-the-top as Jamie and Viswanathan is the more well-spoken, closet for lack of a better term counterpart to her yang. The only redeeming feature of this film is Bill Camp's monotone delivering Curlie who sadly, isn't in the film nearly long enough to make this tolerable. A terrible film by a director who's seen so much success. 4/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/24 09:48 PM
THE ZONE OF INTEREST
Trying to find Paradise surrounded by Hell. Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss (Christian Friedel) and his family have all the amenities they need directly next to the deadliest concentration camp. The film explores the family rather than the atrocities that were carried out as nothing is displayed onscreen, merely suggested off. It studies the complete lack of apathy towards others, materialism, and of course politics. I'd never heard of or seen a trailer to this prior to it being nominated at this years Oscars. It looked decent enough from the trailer but after viewing it, I felt somewhat indifferent about it. Dealing with the subject matter, surprisingly nothing about it moved me from the performances to the story. In addition, a lot of the story is told through actions rather than relying on mundane dialogue, which again, if you're not engaged in the film, you're just watching a bunch of actors move around. 6/10
Trying to find Paradise surrounded by Hell. Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss (Christian Friedel) and his family have all the amenities they need directly next to the deadliest concentration camp. The film explores the family rather than the atrocities that were carried out as nothing is displayed onscreen, merely suggested off. It studies the complete lack of apathy towards others, materialism, and of course politics. I'd never heard of or seen a trailer to this prior to it being nominated at this years Oscars. It looked decent enough from the trailer but after viewing it, I felt somewhat indifferent about it. Dealing with the subject matter, surprisingly nothing about it moved me from the performances to the story. In addition, a lot of the story is told through actions rather than relying on mundane dialogue, which again, if you're not engaged in the film, you're just watching a bunch of actors move around. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/24/24 10:04 PM
ANATOMY OF A FALL
Writers Sandra Voyter (Sandra Hüller) and Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis) are an unhappily married couple with a blind teenage son Daniel (Milo Machado-Graner). Daniel leaves for a walk with his dog and returns to find his father dead from a third story floor from their home. As the police arrive, Sandra becomes the only suspect of what happened to Samuel. However, Sandra doesn't make the case against her any easier on herself by lying to the police early on. The passing of Samuel is the catalyst for the story but becomes secondary by the end, which left me with an unsatisfied feeling once the credits rolled. Infidelity, betrayal, and guilt are all examined particularly with respect to Sandra and Samuel and how each of them are completely opposite from the other. Daniel is left to sort things out at a young age, having just lost his father and his sight when he was 4-years-old as well as the dynamic of his relationship with his mother. Hüller has flashes of a strong performance and has a lot to be proud of having been apart of 2 films that have been nominated at this year's Oscars. 6/10
Writers Sandra Voyter (Sandra Hüller) and Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis) are an unhappily married couple with a blind teenage son Daniel (Milo Machado-Graner). Daniel leaves for a walk with his dog and returns to find his father dead from a third story floor from their home. As the police arrive, Sandra becomes the only suspect of what happened to Samuel. However, Sandra doesn't make the case against her any easier on herself by lying to the police early on. The passing of Samuel is the catalyst for the story but becomes secondary by the end, which left me with an unsatisfied feeling once the credits rolled. Infidelity, betrayal, and guilt are all examined particularly with respect to Sandra and Samuel and how each of them are completely opposite from the other. Daniel is left to sort things out at a young age, having just lost his father and his sight when he was 4-years-old as well as the dynamic of his relationship with his mother. Hüller has flashes of a strong performance and has a lot to be proud of having been apart of 2 films that have been nominated at this year's Oscars. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 02/25/24 11:14 PM
ONE LIFE
Based on true events, Anthony Hopkins plays Nicholas Winton, an English banker who is compelled to assist with evacuating the children of Czechoslovakia before the Nazi invasion of their country. A harrowing tale of families being separated, many never to be reunited even after the war and Winton carries that guilt similar to Oskar Schindler at the end of SCHINDLER'S LIST. The story is somewhat reminiscent of SCHINDLER'S LIST but on a smaller scale. The first half of the film follows a young Winton, this time played by Johnny Flynn and his team as they scour England for resources (monetary, governmental to help assist in getting the children processed, as well as finding foster homes for them in England). The second half focuses on the time period where the film begins, which is in 1987. Overall, the film is heart-wrenching but also inspirational, showing what one determined man can do and how selfless acts can change generations and the world. 6/10
Based on true events, Anthony Hopkins plays Nicholas Winton, an English banker who is compelled to assist with evacuating the children of Czechoslovakia before the Nazi invasion of their country. A harrowing tale of families being separated, many never to be reunited even after the war and Winton carries that guilt similar to Oskar Schindler at the end of SCHINDLER'S LIST. The story is somewhat reminiscent of SCHINDLER'S LIST but on a smaller scale. The first half of the film follows a young Winton, this time played by Johnny Flynn and his team as they scour England for resources (monetary, governmental to help assist in getting the children processed, as well as finding foster homes for them in England). The second half focuses on the time period where the film begins, which is in 1987. Overall, the film is heart-wrenching but also inspirational, showing what one determined man can do and how selfless acts can change generations and the world. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/01/24 07:45 PM
DUNE: PART TWO
Finally, 3 years after Part One was released we have the second and concluding chapter. We pick up right where we left off, following Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) and his mother Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) amongst the Fremen in their quest to rid their planet of the Harkonnens and overthrow the Emperor (Christopher Walken). An even more star studded cast has been assembled with the likes of Walken, Florence Pugh as the Emperor's daughter Princess Irulan, Austin Butler as Feyd-Rautha (cousin to Dave Bautista's Beast Rabban and nephew to Stellan Skarsgård's Baron Harkonnen), and Léa Seydoux as Lady Margot Fenring. This chapter is much heavier in the religious and political themes. Having recently come across a quote from director Denis Villeneuve in which he explains Paul is not a hero but rather a warning, through that lens, it seems the story is poking fun at religion (which, considering it's 2024 is not a shock as you can be anything in this world you wish to be except white, male, Christian, or patriotic). Despite that flaw, Chalamet and Ferguson both turn in the best performances as strong and at times ferocious leaders. Butler nips as their heels as well on this list but unfortunately, his screen time is rather limited but his presence is felt throughout. Another actor who did wonderful with her, again unfortunately limited role, is Florence Pugh: she's intelligent and displays leadership qualities. Visually this film is stunning from a set piece, costume, and cinematography aspect (in particular the black and white gladiator fight scene featuring Butler that would make Ridley Scott proud). This is the type of film to pay the extra money on to see in IMAX. Looking forward to another screening! 8/10
Finally, 3 years after Part One was released we have the second and concluding chapter. We pick up right where we left off, following Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) and his mother Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) amongst the Fremen in their quest to rid their planet of the Harkonnens and overthrow the Emperor (Christopher Walken). An even more star studded cast has been assembled with the likes of Walken, Florence Pugh as the Emperor's daughter Princess Irulan, Austin Butler as Feyd-Rautha (cousin to Dave Bautista's Beast Rabban and nephew to Stellan Skarsgård's Baron Harkonnen), and Léa Seydoux as Lady Margot Fenring. This chapter is much heavier in the religious and political themes. Having recently come across a quote from director Denis Villeneuve in which he explains Paul is not a hero but rather a warning, through that lens, it seems the story is poking fun at religion (which, considering it's 2024 is not a shock as you can be anything in this world you wish to be except white, male, Christian, or patriotic). Despite that flaw, Chalamet and Ferguson both turn in the best performances as strong and at times ferocious leaders. Butler nips as their heels as well on this list but unfortunately, his screen time is rather limited but his presence is felt throughout. Another actor who did wonderful with her, again unfortunately limited role, is Florence Pugh: she's intelligent and displays leadership qualities. Visually this film is stunning from a set piece, costume, and cinematography aspect (in particular the black and white gladiator fight scene featuring Butler that would make Ridley Scott proud). This is the type of film to pay the extra money on to see in IMAX. Looking forward to another screening! 8/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/04/24 02:15 AM
Thanks for the Dune review Irish Part one was great but I have to see it again.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/05/24 12:47 AM
Originally Posted by Hollander
Thanks for the Dune review Irish Part one was great but I have to see it again.
No problem H. I rewatched Part One before seeing Part Two as a refresher as I hadn't seen it since it was released back in 2021. Both solid films and I look forward to watching them closer together when Part Two streams. You going to see Part Two in the theaters or wait?
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/06/24 12:49 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
Originally Posted by Hollander
Thanks for the Dune review Irish Part one was great but I have to see it again.
No problem H. I rewatched Part One before seeing Part Two as a refresher as I hadn't seen it since it was released back in 2021. Both solid films and I look forward to watching them closer together when Part Two streams. You going to see Part Two in the theaters or wait?
It's playing in Pathé since last week maybe I go !
Pathé is a chain of cinemas in the Netherlands.The company is part of the French cinema group Pathé Cinémas . This company, founded in 1896, has 101 cinemas with 1,117 screens spread across France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Tunisia and Switzerland. In the Netherlands, Pathé has 30 cinemas.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/07/24 12:38 AM
How much is a ticket over there?
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/07/24 05:29 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
How much is a ticket over there?
About 11 euro and up (3D, IMAX, Dolby Cinema, 4DX, ScreenX)
This subscription is also popular
UNLIMITED GOLD
€32 PER MONTH
Unlimited trips to the cinema!
Without surcharge to 3D, IMAX, Dolby Cinema, 4DX, ScreenX and special rooms
25% discount on Drinks & Bites
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/10/24 09:48 PM
We have something similar to that here called AMC A-List (that's what I have). I can see up to 3 movies a week (12 per month), any format, and I can see the same movie multiple times if I want. Not sure if it offers any discounts on food and drinks though as I usually never get them.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/24 01:06 AM
LOVE LIES BLEEDING
Set in New Mexico, 1989 this story follows Lou (Kristen Stewart) a manager at a local gym who meets and falls in love with Jackie (Katy O'Brian), a drifter who's passing through town on her way to a body building competition in Las Vegas. Once the couple hit it off, Jackie intends to stay awhile since she's got a few weeks to go before the competition. She (unknowingly) gets a job at a gun range owned by Lou's estranged father Lou Sr. (Ed Harris), who is mixed up in other various activities as an additional source of income. Thrown in as a secondary story is Lou's sister Beth (Jena Malone) who gets beat on by her husband JJ (Dave Franco) who she just can't seem to leave. JJ and Lou loathe each other and Lou only stays around to protect her sister, otherwise, she'd be as free to hit the open road as Jackie is. The story plays well enough, engaging and entertaining, although there's a part or two that had me raise my eyebrows but outside of that, this was a solid little film. Great performances by the main trio of Stewart, O'Brian, and Harris with Harris leading the way with his incredibly intimidating demeanor even though at times, he has very little dialogue. Definitely one of his better roles and maybe his best turn yet as a villain. This film didn't receive a huge marketing push but you could do a lot worse than this. Maybe not worth theater prices but worth a viewing at some point in the future. 6.5/10
Set in New Mexico, 1989 this story follows Lou (Kristen Stewart) a manager at a local gym who meets and falls in love with Jackie (Katy O'Brian), a drifter who's passing through town on her way to a body building competition in Las Vegas. Once the couple hit it off, Jackie intends to stay awhile since she's got a few weeks to go before the competition. She (unknowingly) gets a job at a gun range owned by Lou's estranged father Lou Sr. (Ed Harris), who is mixed up in other various activities as an additional source of income. Thrown in as a secondary story is Lou's sister Beth (Jena Malone) who gets beat on by her husband JJ (Dave Franco) who she just can't seem to leave. JJ and Lou loathe each other and Lou only stays around to protect her sister, otherwise, she'd be as free to hit the open road as Jackie is. The story plays well enough, engaging and entertaining, although there's a part or two that had me raise my eyebrows but outside of that, this was a solid little film. Great performances by the main trio of Stewart, O'Brian, and Harris with Harris leading the way with his incredibly intimidating demeanor even though at times, he has very little dialogue. Definitely one of his better roles and maybe his best turn yet as a villain. This film didn't receive a huge marketing push but you could do a lot worse than this. Maybe not worth theater prices but worth a viewing at some point in the future. 6.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/15/24 10:58 PM
DAMSEL
Millie Bobby Brown stars as Elodie, a young woman who's forced into marriage by her father to a wealthy prince, Prince Henry (Nick Robinson), in exchange for gold as their country is barren, starving, and having difficulty staying warm during this particular winter. However, what Elodie does not know until it's too late is that she's being groomed as a sacrifice for a ritual that keeps a monster satisfied and at bay, while Prince Henry's family continues to rule in peace and prosperity. The story is a safe, paint-by-numbers with the exception of the gender swap of Elodie rescuing herself rather than the handsome prince. Although Brown does give a strong performance she's unfortunately slightly overshadowed by Queen Isabelle (Robin Wright), who chews up the scenery in every scene she's in. I gave the story a 6 but with the wonderful special FX, I bumped it up slightly as director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and his team do a wonderful job at creating this new fantasy world. I enjoyed it so much, I actually wouldn't mind revisiting for a prequel telling the backstory of the monster. 6.5/10
Millie Bobby Brown stars as Elodie, a young woman who's forced into marriage by her father to a wealthy prince, Prince Henry (Nick Robinson), in exchange for gold as their country is barren, starving, and having difficulty staying warm during this particular winter. However, what Elodie does not know until it's too late is that she's being groomed as a sacrifice for a ritual that keeps a monster satisfied and at bay, while Prince Henry's family continues to rule in peace and prosperity. The story is a safe, paint-by-numbers with the exception of the gender swap of Elodie rescuing herself rather than the handsome prince. Although Brown does give a strong performance she's unfortunately slightly overshadowed by Queen Isabelle (Robin Wright), who chews up the scenery in every scene she's in. I gave the story a 6 but with the wonderful special FX, I bumped it up slightly as director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and his team do a wonderful job at creating this new fantasy world. I enjoyed it so much, I actually wouldn't mind revisiting for a prequel telling the backstory of the monster. 6.5/10
Posted By: Hollander
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/16/24 12:00 AM
Originally Posted by Irishman12
DAMSEL
Millie Bobby Brown stars as Elodie, a young woman who's forced into marriage by her father to a wealthy prince, Prince Henry (Nick Robinson), in exchange for gold as their country is barren, starving, and having difficulty staying warm during this particular winter. However, what Elodie does not know until it's too late is that she's being groomed as a sacrifice for a ritual that keeps a monster satisfied and at bay, while Prince Henry's family continues to rule in peace and prosperity. The story is a safe, paint-by-numbers with the exception of the gender swap of Elodie rescuing herself rather than the handsome prince. Although Brown does give a strong performance she's unfortunately slightly overshadowed by Queen Isabelle (Robin Wright), who chews up the scenery in every scene she's in. I gave the story a 6 but with the wonderful special FX, I bumped it up slightly as director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and his team do a wonderful job at creating this new fantasy world. I enjoyed it so much, I actually wouldn't mind revisiting for a prequel telling the backstory of the monster. 6.5/10
Millie Bobby Brown stars as Elodie, a young woman who's forced into marriage by her father to a wealthy prince, Prince Henry (Nick Robinson), in exchange for gold as their country is barren, starving, and having difficulty staying warm during this particular winter. However, what Elodie does not know until it's too late is that she's being groomed as a sacrifice for a ritual that keeps a monster satisfied and at bay, while Prince Henry's family continues to rule in peace and prosperity. The story is a safe, paint-by-numbers with the exception of the gender swap of Elodie rescuing herself rather than the handsome prince. Although Brown does give a strong performance she's unfortunately slightly overshadowed by Queen Isabelle (Robin Wright), who chews up the scenery in every scene she's in. I gave the story a 6 but with the wonderful special FX, I bumped it up slightly as director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and his team do a wonderful job at creating this new fantasy world. I enjoyed it so much, I actually wouldn't mind revisiting for a prequel telling the backstory of the monster. 6.5/10
I also watched it tonight haha, I really liked it your review is accurate imo. One of the better Netflix movies. A prequel about the dragon is a nice idea !
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/16/24 08:44 PM
Thanks H, glad you enjoyed it and the movie.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/19/24 01:48 AM
RICKY STANICKY
Childhood friends Dean (Zac Efron), JT (Andrew Santino), and Wes (Jermaine Fowler) create a fictional friend to take the fall for them for a Halloween prank gone wrong when they're teenagers. It works and since then, the 3 continue to use the story and name Ricky Stanicky to get out of any situations that are less than desirable for them. It's actually not a bad idea and the 3 have a solid system in place as they have 1 centralized book for writing down the many lies they've told over the years in order to not get caught in said lies. However, as JT's about to become a father and the family has a bris, JT's mother-in-law grows impatient and demands to see Ricky as she's beginning to grow suspicious about his authenticity. The 3 bump into Rod Rimestead (John Cena) in Atlantic City. Rod's a stage performer, actor, an alcoholic who's down on his luck and could use the money and the company. However, Rod/Ricky hits it off famously with everyone at the party, including the prying mother-in-law and now the guys are having difficulty getting Rod/Ricky out of their lives for good. Again, the story works, has some funny moments, and has a heartfelt message at the end of the day. Cena by far shines as Rod, with his outlandish personality as Ricky who's given a lot of freedom to make the character unique, which he succeeds in. Worth a watch for Prime members. 6/10
Childhood friends Dean (Zac Efron), JT (Andrew Santino), and Wes (Jermaine Fowler) create a fictional friend to take the fall for them for a Halloween prank gone wrong when they're teenagers. It works and since then, the 3 continue to use the story and name Ricky Stanicky to get out of any situations that are less than desirable for them. It's actually not a bad idea and the 3 have a solid system in place as they have 1 centralized book for writing down the many lies they've told over the years in order to not get caught in said lies. However, as JT's about to become a father and the family has a bris, JT's mother-in-law grows impatient and demands to see Ricky as she's beginning to grow suspicious about his authenticity. The 3 bump into Rod Rimestead (John Cena) in Atlantic City. Rod's a stage performer, actor, an alcoholic who's down on his luck and could use the money and the company. However, Rod/Ricky hits it off famously with everyone at the party, including the prying mother-in-law and now the guys are having difficulty getting Rod/Ricky out of their lives for good. Again, the story works, has some funny moments, and has a heartfelt message at the end of the day. Cena by far shines as Rod, with his outlandish personality as Ricky who's given a lot of freedom to make the character unique, which he succeeds in. Worth a watch for Prime members. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/24 08:49 PM
GHOSTBUSTERS: FROZEN EMPIRE
Following the events of AFTERLIFE, the Spengler family has moved from Oklahoma and now resides in the Ghostbusters old firehouse in New York City. After an opening scene ghost chase through New York, the team is on thin ice from the mayor's office, who just so happens to be Walter Peck (William Atherton) formerly of the EPA from the original film. In order to appease the mayor for the time being, young Phoebe (Mckenna Grace) has to be sidelined due to her being a minor at only 15 years old. The new team, with the help of the veterans, must battle a new biblical god in the form of Garraka, who kills people with the "death chill," which basically means individuals are literally scared to death. The first film did a better job at balancing out the stories between the family members but now that their stories are so entwined, Finn Wolfhard who plays Trevor really seems to be buried here as young Phoebe takes the lead. In addition a lot of attention is also given to Kumail Nanjiani who plays Nadeem and does have an integral part to play in the overall arc of the story. Overall, it's still a fun ride but didn't seem to capture the fun or nostalgia of AFTERLIFE. Some of the jokes fall flat, unfortunately Bill Murphy is barely seen amongst the original team, and the story seems to stop and go throughout. 6/10
Following the events of AFTERLIFE, the Spengler family has moved from Oklahoma and now resides in the Ghostbusters old firehouse in New York City. After an opening scene ghost chase through New York, the team is on thin ice from the mayor's office, who just so happens to be Walter Peck (William Atherton) formerly of the EPA from the original film. In order to appease the mayor for the time being, young Phoebe (Mckenna Grace) has to be sidelined due to her being a minor at only 15 years old. The new team, with the help of the veterans, must battle a new biblical god in the form of Garraka, who kills people with the "death chill," which basically means individuals are literally scared to death. The first film did a better job at balancing out the stories between the family members but now that their stories are so entwined, Finn Wolfhard who plays Trevor really seems to be buried here as young Phoebe takes the lead. In addition a lot of attention is also given to Kumail Nanjiani who plays Nadeem and does have an integral part to play in the overall arc of the story. Overall, it's still a fun ride but didn't seem to capture the fun or nostalgia of AFTERLIFE. Some of the jokes fall flat, unfortunately Bill Murphy is barely seen amongst the original team, and the story seems to stop and go throughout. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/24 09:08 PM
IMMACULATE
Sister Cecelia (Sydney Sweeney) an American nun who is assigned to a convent in Italy when we first meet her. Upon after her arrival, she takes her vows but during the after party, blacks out. Shortly thereafter she discovers that she is pregnant. The convent authorities, believing the young nun must have broken her newly made vows (more preciously, the vow of chastity) grill Sister Cecelia and have her examined by a doctor; but the nun pleads her innocence and the doctor confirms her hymen is still intact and she is still a virgin, meaning the child inside of her is a miracle. From then on, Sister Cecelia is held in high regard by the convent, believing God chose her to deliver this miracle baby; although, she soon grows to suspect the convent of ulterior motives for the child. The film plays a lot like ROSEMARY'S BABY except not for the way in which you may be thinking. Sweeney gives a very strong performance as the young, piety nun in a foreign land who doesn't always know what's going on around her due to the language barrier. And although I vehemently and fundamentally disagree with the underlying political theme of the film, judging it solely as a film, it's solid. Word around the campfire is Sweeney had to do MADAME WEB in order to get this film made and my two cents is it was worth it. While MADAME WEB wasn't a great film (were you honestly expecting anything better from Sony's Spider-Man universe?), this makes up for it. 7/10
Sister Cecelia (Sydney Sweeney) an American nun who is assigned to a convent in Italy when we first meet her. Upon after her arrival, she takes her vows but during the after party, blacks out. Shortly thereafter she discovers that she is pregnant. The convent authorities, believing the young nun must have broken her newly made vows (more preciously, the vow of chastity) grill Sister Cecelia and have her examined by a doctor; but the nun pleads her innocence and the doctor confirms her hymen is still intact and she is still a virgin, meaning the child inside of her is a miracle. From then on, Sister Cecelia is held in high regard by the convent, believing God chose her to deliver this miracle baby; although, she soon grows to suspect the convent of ulterior motives for the child. The film plays a lot like ROSEMARY'S BABY except not for the way in which you may be thinking. Sweeney gives a very strong performance as the young, piety nun in a foreign land who doesn't always know what's going on around her due to the language barrier. And although I vehemently and fundamentally disagree with the underlying political theme of the film, judging it solely as a film, it's solid. Word around the campfire is Sweeney had to do MADAME WEB in order to get this film made and my two cents is it was worth it. While MADAME WEB wasn't a great film (were you honestly expecting anything better from Sony's Spider-Man universe?), this makes up for it. 7/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/22/24 09:19 PM
ROAD HOUSE
A remake of the 1989 classic follows the same formula, just in a different town. Former MMA fighter Dalton (Jake Gyllenhaal) is recruited by Frankie (Jessica Williams) to help her clean up her rowdy bar in the Florida Keys. Dalton does just that but in doing so, interferes in the local business dealings of the very wealthy Ben Brandt (Billy Magnussen) and as such, must pay the consequences of his actions. The film bills this as Connor McGregor's introduction to the silver screen and he's honestly the one thing worth watching as his over-the-top, I don't give a f*ck about you, henceman Knox. McGregor may even be playing a little bit of himself just seriously amplified. Gyllenhaal comes across as too nice of a guy, always smiling and not letting things rattle him. Patrick Swayze did a better job with the character IMO. While Dalton is an honorable man, who never looks for trouble and tries to do the right thing, Swayze made it look cooler and added more mystery to the character. For an action film, I was pretty bored with this about 45 minutes to an hour in. Outside of McGregor's acting chops, I will tip my hat for the phenomenal shape both he and Gyllenhaal got themselves into for this film. Another unnecessary remake that no one asked for and should have been left alone. Very disappointing! 4.5/10
A remake of the 1989 classic follows the same formula, just in a different town. Former MMA fighter Dalton (Jake Gyllenhaal) is recruited by Frankie (Jessica Williams) to help her clean up her rowdy bar in the Florida Keys. Dalton does just that but in doing so, interferes in the local business dealings of the very wealthy Ben Brandt (Billy Magnussen) and as such, must pay the consequences of his actions. The film bills this as Connor McGregor's introduction to the silver screen and he's honestly the one thing worth watching as his over-the-top, I don't give a f*ck about you, henceman Knox. McGregor may even be playing a little bit of himself just seriously amplified. Gyllenhaal comes across as too nice of a guy, always smiling and not letting things rattle him. Patrick Swayze did a better job with the character IMO. While Dalton is an honorable man, who never looks for trouble and tries to do the right thing, Swayze made it look cooler and added more mystery to the character. For an action film, I was pretty bored with this about 45 minutes to an hour in. Outside of McGregor's acting chops, I will tip my hat for the phenomenal shape both he and Gyllenhaal got themselves into for this film. Another unnecessary remake that no one asked for and should have been left alone. Very disappointing! 4.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/24 01:49 AM
MEAN GIRLS (2024)
A musical remake of the 2004 film finds Cady Heron (Angourie Rice) fresh off the plane from Kenya and home schooled for her entire life, trying to adapt to life at North Shore High School. She befriends Queen B Regina George (Reneé Rapp) and her fellow clique members Karen Shetty (Avantika) and Gretchen Wieners (Bebe Wood). Both Tina Fey and Tim Meadows reprise their roles as Ms. Norbury and Mr. Duvall. Outside of the songs, the film follows the exact same beats as the original. I knew this was a musical heading into it and while the songs were thankfully short, I still wasn't a fan and thought the singing and dancing to be unnecessary. In addition, the new group of young women across the board fail to compare to the originals: Lindsay Lohan, Rachel McAdams, Lacey Chabert, and Amanda Seyfried. Once again Hollywood tries and fails to resurrect a classic for a new generation when they should have left well enough alone. Finally, and I couldn't help but notice that Cady's father (who was played by Neil Flynn in the original), is completely written out of this story without any explanation. Curious choice and I'm wondering why? 6/10
A musical remake of the 2004 film finds Cady Heron (Angourie Rice) fresh off the plane from Kenya and home schooled for her entire life, trying to adapt to life at North Shore High School. She befriends Queen B Regina George (Reneé Rapp) and her fellow clique members Karen Shetty (Avantika) and Gretchen Wieners (Bebe Wood). Both Tina Fey and Tim Meadows reprise their roles as Ms. Norbury and Mr. Duvall. Outside of the songs, the film follows the exact same beats as the original. I knew this was a musical heading into it and while the songs were thankfully short, I still wasn't a fan and thought the singing and dancing to be unnecessary. In addition, the new group of young women across the board fail to compare to the originals: Lindsay Lohan, Rachel McAdams, Lacey Chabert, and Amanda Seyfried. Once again Hollywood tries and fails to resurrect a classic for a new generation when they should have left well enough alone. Finally, and I couldn't help but notice that Cady's father (who was played by Neil Flynn in the original), is completely written out of this story without any explanation. Curious choice and I'm wondering why? 6/10
Posted By: TheKillingJoke
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 03/31/24 03:04 PM
Road House was absolutely godawful. Jake Gyllenhaal is a superb actor, but this is just not the kind of role that's a good fit for him. Connor McGregor was indeed the best thing about it; not because he's great at acting, but his hammy over the top performance actually suits this type of movie.
Dune: Part Two on the other hand is absolutely amazing. And I'm usually not much of a blockbuster fan.
Dune: Part Two on the other hand is absolutely amazing. And I'm usually not much of a blockbuster fan.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/05/24 09:20 PM
MONKEY MAN
Dev Patel stars as Bobby (a fake name he uses in the movie, we don't know his real name), a low wage worker at a fancy club by day and a terrible fighter by night. As a young boy, his mother is killed before him and from that day on, he swears revenge. We've all seen and heard the story before and this film does little to add to that narrative. While I was excited to see Patel branch into action films, don't believe the marketing machine that put together the trailers as this is not on the level of a JOHN WICK film (although that's what they're trying to sell you on). The scenes where Patel fights regularly after his daytime job are slow and not exciting; whereas there's only 2 major action sequences: 1 about halfway through and the final big battle. Outside of that, it's all backstory, flashbacks, a little bit of training so Patel can find his strength and defeat those who've wronged them. I've give the marketing people a hand for selling the film as exciting but I left the theater feeling anything but. This is not the film you think it is. 6/10
Dev Patel stars as Bobby (a fake name he uses in the movie, we don't know his real name), a low wage worker at a fancy club by day and a terrible fighter by night. As a young boy, his mother is killed before him and from that day on, he swears revenge. We've all seen and heard the story before and this film does little to add to that narrative. While I was excited to see Patel branch into action films, don't believe the marketing machine that put together the trailers as this is not on the level of a JOHN WICK film (although that's what they're trying to sell you on). The scenes where Patel fights regularly after his daytime job are slow and not exciting; whereas there's only 2 major action sequences: 1 about halfway through and the final big battle. Outside of that, it's all backstory, flashbacks, a little bit of training so Patel can find his strength and defeat those who've wronged them. I've give the marketing people a hand for selling the film as exciting but I left the theater feeling anything but. This is not the film you think it is. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/05/24 09:34 PM
THE FIRST OMEN
A prequel to the original 1976 film follows Margaret (Nell Tiger Free) a nun from Massachusetts who comes to Italy to take her vows to become a nun. Although while at the convent, she suspects their may be something more at play, particularly with a young girl who has trouble fitting in with her peers, Carlita (Nicole Sorace). In some respects, the film has some of the same beats as the original such as someone who puts the main character on the path that something isn't right and only they can seek out the answers. In the original it was photographer Jennings played by David Warner and here it's defrocked priest Father Brennan (Ralph Ineson). In addition, the same shocking scene of someone hanging themselves for the child, saying "it's all for you" is redone. Whether these were homages or simply parts of the story that were borrowed from the original, I'm not quite sure? In saying this, the story feels somewhat similar. My expectations for this were somewhat low as the trailer didn't do much to gain my interest but I took a chance on it and it wasn't as bad as I was expecting it to be. It also does tie in rather nicely with the original towards the end. Although, and I know it wasn't planned but rather coincidental, but this also plays very similarly to the recent IMMACULATE release starring Sydney Sweeney. Between the two I prefer IMMACULATE but the same underlying political statement is still made and I shouldn't be surprised at this point. We're coming up on the 2 year anniversary of Roe V. Wade being overturned and as such, writers have had time to write scripts in protest of it and those have recently been turned into films by these latest 2 examples. They're still not going to convince me with their rhetoric and wish they're take the Disney approach: stick to storytelling rather than preaching. 6/10
A prequel to the original 1976 film follows Margaret (Nell Tiger Free) a nun from Massachusetts who comes to Italy to take her vows to become a nun. Although while at the convent, she suspects their may be something more at play, particularly with a young girl who has trouble fitting in with her peers, Carlita (Nicole Sorace). In some respects, the film has some of the same beats as the original such as someone who puts the main character on the path that something isn't right and only they can seek out the answers. In the original it was photographer Jennings played by David Warner and here it's defrocked priest Father Brennan (Ralph Ineson). In addition, the same shocking scene of someone hanging themselves for the child, saying "it's all for you" is redone. Whether these were homages or simply parts of the story that were borrowed from the original, I'm not quite sure? In saying this, the story feels somewhat similar. My expectations for this were somewhat low as the trailer didn't do much to gain my interest but I took a chance on it and it wasn't as bad as I was expecting it to be. It also does tie in rather nicely with the original towards the end. Although, and I know it wasn't planned but rather coincidental, but this also plays very similarly to the recent IMMACULATE release starring Sydney Sweeney. Between the two I prefer IMMACULATE but the same underlying political statement is still made and I shouldn't be surprised at this point. We're coming up on the 2 year anniversary of Roe V. Wade being overturned and as such, writers have had time to write scripts in protest of it and those have recently been turned into films by these latest 2 examples. They're still not going to convince me with their rhetoric and wish they're take the Disney approach: stick to storytelling rather than preaching. 6/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/12/24 01:43 AM
CIVIL WAR
America's at war with itself, the union against the Western Forces (made up of Texas and California). The reasoning for this highly unlikely alliance is to not single out any one party as well as show what we're capable of once we put our differences aside. The story follows 4 journalists: Lee (Kirsten Dunst), Joel (Wagner Moura), Jessie (Cailee Spaeny), and Sammy (Stephen McKinley Henderson) on their way to Washington D.C. (well, technically 3 as Sammy is only hitching a ride on his way to Charlottesville to see the fighting on the front lines). Joel wants to interview the President upon his arrival while Lee is a seasoned wartime photographer who takes young Jessie under her wing as Lee is someone whom he looks up to and aspires to be. Surprisingly, I was a little bored with the film. Jessie's character arc held my interest the most, followed by Lee, who was the team leader throughout. Some scenes are built for shock value which had very little effect on me. I'll again give the film credit as while it's dealing with a sensitive issue during these overly sensitive times, it doesn't take sides. The story focuses on us as Americans, not which party we affiliate with, which is effective in that regard as we're obviously stronger together than divided. 5.5/10
America's at war with itself, the union against the Western Forces (made up of Texas and California). The reasoning for this highly unlikely alliance is to not single out any one party as well as show what we're capable of once we put our differences aside. The story follows 4 journalists: Lee (Kirsten Dunst), Joel (Wagner Moura), Jessie (Cailee Spaeny), and Sammy (Stephen McKinley Henderson) on their way to Washington D.C. (well, technically 3 as Sammy is only hitching a ride on his way to Charlottesville to see the fighting on the front lines). Joel wants to interview the President upon his arrival while Lee is a seasoned wartime photographer who takes young Jessie under her wing as Lee is someone whom he looks up to and aspires to be. Surprisingly, I was a little bored with the film. Jessie's character arc held my interest the most, followed by Lee, who was the team leader throughout. Some scenes are built for shock value which had very little effect on me. I'll again give the film credit as while it's dealing with a sensitive issue during these overly sensitive times, it doesn't take sides. The story focuses on us as Americans, not which party we affiliate with, which is effective in that regard as we're obviously stronger together than divided. 5.5/10
Posted By: Turnbull
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/18/24 06:15 PM
JOHNNY GUITAR (1954)
Leonard Maltin calls this "the kinky Western" and he's not wrong. Tough cookie Vienna (Joan Crawford) runs a saloon/gambling den on the outskirts of a town that's about to get a railroad station that'll bring her lots of business. She hires Johnny Guitar (Sterling Hayden), a former lover and a retired gunslinger, to entertain. But the local cattle baron, McIver (Ward Bond) shows up with the sheriff and a mob, demanding that she clear out in 24 hours. Vienna backs them off with her trusty six-shooter, but hell-in-skirts Emma (Mercedes McCambridge) puts the spine back in the mob--seems she and Vienna once were rivals for the Dancin' Kid (Scott Brady), leader of a desperado gang. All leads to a war, a fire, plenty of shooting, and a showdown between the two women, who are a sight to behold--they make the men look like wimps. Crawford is excellent--strangely decked out in black shirt and pants, but with those flashing eyes and perfect diction. McCambridge is a tornado of energetic hate (she and Crawford had a real feud on the set). Hayden is subtly restrained and humorous. Cast includes John Carradine and Ernest Borgnine, and a pack of familiar Western faces. Director Nicholas Ray brings all this bizarre stuff together in the first feminist Western. Fascinating.
Leonard Maltin calls this "the kinky Western" and he's not wrong. Tough cookie Vienna (Joan Crawford) runs a saloon/gambling den on the outskirts of a town that's about to get a railroad station that'll bring her lots of business. She hires Johnny Guitar (Sterling Hayden), a former lover and a retired gunslinger, to entertain. But the local cattle baron, McIver (Ward Bond) shows up with the sheriff and a mob, demanding that she clear out in 24 hours. Vienna backs them off with her trusty six-shooter, but hell-in-skirts Emma (Mercedes McCambridge) puts the spine back in the mob--seems she and Vienna once were rivals for the Dancin' Kid (Scott Brady), leader of a desperado gang. All leads to a war, a fire, plenty of shooting, and a showdown between the two women, who are a sight to behold--they make the men look like wimps. Crawford is excellent--strangely decked out in black shirt and pants, but with those flashing eyes and perfect diction. McCambridge is a tornado of energetic hate (she and Crawford had a real feud on the set). Hayden is subtly restrained and humorous. Cast includes John Carradine and Ernest Borgnine, and a pack of familiar Western faces. Director Nicholas Ray brings all this bizarre stuff together in the first feminist Western. Fascinating.
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/19/24 11:14 PM
THE MINISTRY OF UNGENTLEMANLY WARFARE
Based upon the true story of the first, and what later became known as Black Ops missions, a group of 7 (primarily British with a Swed added) attempt to sink Nazi U-boats in Nazi controlled waters in an effort to allow resources to enter Great Britain via the Atlantic Ocean. Henry Cavill stars as the teams leader Gus March-Phillips, who rumor has it was an inspiration for the James Bond character that Ian Fleming would write soon after (Fleming is actually a real character is this film BTW). Cavill comes across as much more looney and unhinged in the trailer but those are only passing moments throughout the film. He's much more polished than what's advertised. And while I have nothing against the cast as they were all enjoyable, I am going to call out both the casting director as well as director Guy Ritchie. This film is based on true events and pictures of the real life people whom these actors are playing are featured during the closing credits. As such, I find it to be a great disservice to them, their memory, and their families that some have been DEI-washed in order to gain brownie points within a small sector of society. If this story wasn't based on real events I wouldn't have such an issue with it. But again, for the fact it's based upon real people and their real experiences, it's shameful. If the shoe were on the other foot where white actors were taking minority roles, people would be yelling "whitewashing." Well, allow me to hold them to the same standard. I like Guy Ritchie and even though some of his latest efforts have been a little more uneven in terms of quality (this being boringly average), he should have known better and done a better job at preserving the memory of these individuals who risked capture by the British and torture and death by the Nazis. Be better Guy Ritchie! 5.5/10
Based upon the true story of the first, and what later became known as Black Ops missions, a group of 7 (primarily British with a Swed added) attempt to sink Nazi U-boats in Nazi controlled waters in an effort to allow resources to enter Great Britain via the Atlantic Ocean. Henry Cavill stars as the teams leader Gus March-Phillips, who rumor has it was an inspiration for the James Bond character that Ian Fleming would write soon after (Fleming is actually a real character is this film BTW). Cavill comes across as much more looney and unhinged in the trailer but those are only passing moments throughout the film. He's much more polished than what's advertised. And while I have nothing against the cast as they were all enjoyable, I am going to call out both the casting director as well as director Guy Ritchie. This film is based on true events and pictures of the real life people whom these actors are playing are featured during the closing credits. As such, I find it to be a great disservice to them, their memory, and their families that some have been DEI-washed in order to gain brownie points within a small sector of society. If this story wasn't based on real events I wouldn't have such an issue with it. But again, for the fact it's based upon real people and their real experiences, it's shameful. If the shoe were on the other foot where white actors were taking minority roles, people would be yelling "whitewashing." Well, allow me to hold them to the same standard. I like Guy Ritchie and even though some of his latest efforts have been a little more uneven in terms of quality (this being boringly average), he should have known better and done a better job at preserving the memory of these individuals who risked capture by the British and torture and death by the Nazis. Be better Guy Ritchie! 5.5/10
Posted By: Irishman12
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion, Part III - 04/21/24 01:38 AM
LATE NIGHT WITH THE DEVIL
Halloween Night, 1977, New York City: late night host Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) invites a sordid group of guests onto the show in order to boost his sinking ratings. The featured guests are a psychic, a skeptical former magician, a parapsychologist author and her subject. The film plays out as an unearthed, original recording of the show, with the commercial breaks taking the audience backstage to see what transpired during breaks. I was rather impressed with Dastmalchian as he's usually a supporting actor but really finds his stride as the likeable host who's doing battle with Johnny Carson for viewership. In addition, he's recently experienced tragedy himself, having lost his wife and this show seems to be the last thing keeping him going. I hope he continues to find leading work as again, he's impressive in this. Also, this was my first introduction to Carmichael Haig who hams it up as the skeptical former magician, critiquing all of the guests gifts as nothing more than mere parlor tricks, the consummate cynic. He's enjoyable with his over-the-top, know-it-all attitude. I had heard good things about this and I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. I've never liked anything put out by Shudder but this is easily the best they've released IMO. 6.5/10
Halloween Night, 1977, New York City: late night host Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) invites a sordid group of guests onto the show in order to boost his sinking ratings. The featured guests are a psychic, a skeptical former magician, a parapsychologist author and her subject. The film plays out as an unearthed, original recording of the show, with the commercial breaks taking the audience backstage to see what transpired during breaks. I was rather impressed with Dastmalchian as he's usually a supporting actor but really finds his stride as the likeable host who's doing battle with Johnny Carson for viewership. In addition, he's recently experienced tragedy himself, having lost his wife and this show seems to be the last thing keeping him going. I hope he continues to find leading work as again, he's impressive in this. Also, this was my first introduction to Carmichael Haig who hams it up as the skeptical former magician, critiquing all of the guests gifts as nothing more than mere parlor tricks, the consummate cynic. He's enjoyable with his over-the-top, know-it-all attitude. I had heard good things about this and I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. I've never liked anything put out by Shudder but this is easily the best they've released IMO. 6.5/10