Home

How bout them Yankees!? (2008)

Posted By: J Geoff

How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/19/08 05:06 PM


This is a continuation of How bout them Yankees!?...

...they still suck! ohwell
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/19/08 05:12 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

This is a continuation of How bout them Yankees!?...

...they still suck! ohwell


The sucking sound has begun to reach South Jersey. The biggest payroll. What a farce that is. Baseball players should get paid like golfers - current performance. If golfers don't earn, they go back to the minors (the Nationwide Tour, or the Hooters Tour, or whatever Tour) and have to qualify again. Giambi should go back to the minors.
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/20/08 12:11 PM

You can tell how bad they suck by the way the Yankee fans don't post. But wait....
answer #1
It is early yet.
answer #2
Just wait till the fall...they will be there like every other year.
Answer #3
They still have more rings then Boston!
Answer #4
They need better pitching.These guys are so young.
Answer#5
If Joe Torre was here, we would be on top

and the best answer so far
Answer #6
The thong is in the cleaners!
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/20/08 05:22 PM

....and A-Roid is coming back tonight (and I'm a Yankee fan)
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/20/08 06:03 PM


(Hey, MC, Seg 3 of Best Ball is starting this week if you wanna join in)
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/20/08 06:41 PM

Originally Posted By: MaryCas
....and A-Roid is coming back tonight (and I'm a Yankee fan)


Not if this rain keeps up. Let it rain now, as long as the weather's good on Friday night.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/20/08 11:44 PM




Baltimore - Top of 1stSCORE
Mike Mussina pitching for New YorkBALNYY
B Roberts walked.00
M Mora grounded out to third, B Roberts to second.00
N Markakis struck out swinging.00
A Huff singled to right, B Roberts scored.10
K Millar singled to center, A Huff to second.10
L Scott safe at first on throwing error by shortstop D Jeter, A Huff to third, K Millar to second.10
R Hernandez walked, A Huff scored, K Millar to third, L Scott to second.20
A Jones doubled to deep right, K Millar, L Scott and R Hernandez scored.50
F Bynum singled to right, A Jones scored, F Bynum to second advancing on throw.60
F Bynum to third on wild pitch by M Mussina.60
B Roberts tripled to left, F Bynum scored.70
R Ohlendorf relieved M Mussina.70
M Mora grounded out to third.70
7 Runs, 5 Hits, 1 Errors


rolleyes
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 03:02 PM

Check out the GOODFELLAS reference in today's Daily News Yankee article.

Yankees hit rock bottom

Well, so much for Alex Rodriguez’s return to the Yanks sparking success for the team. As Ray Liotta said in “GoodFellas,” this is the bad time.

Just when you think the Yankees can’t sink any lower, they do. It’s like when Dylan on “Beverly Hills, 90210” would hit rock bottom every week.

It was such an awful night, what with Mike Mussina stinking up the joint and Derek Jeter getting hurt, that I couldn’t even enjoy Tom Glavine spanking the Mets!

Things are so bad for the Bombers that even Hank Steinbrenner has been rendered speechless, and had the Yankee manager upset in the postgame:

“That’s as ugly as it’s been,” manager Joe Girardi said. “I’m hoping this is rock bottom.”

I had other plans last night, so I didn’t get to see most of the game. Thank goodness for small favors.

My brother teased me that I jinxed Mussina by praising him in yesterday’s Squawk. He also said that when you pin your hopes on Mussina, they’re going to be dashed. Sad but true. And all it took was an error in the infield for Moose to get distracted and fall apart.

On the bright side, I did like what LaTroy Hawkins did last night, in retaliation for Jeter getting knocked out of the game, and at least A-Rod looks like he’s healthy again. Oh, and it looks like Derek is going to be okay. But that’s about the only good things I can say about last night’s game.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 03:11 PM

What has happened to the Yankees?

From a UK pont of view,they and the Red Sox are the only team we ever hear about!
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 03:17 PM

Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
What has happened to the Yankees?



It's just their turn to be mediocre. It's the nature of baseball . . . of sports in general. But their run was mind boggling.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 06:29 PM

OMG!! It was a horror show! It was like one of those nightmares that you can't wake up from! And that was just the first inning!

That said, hope does spring eternal for Yankee fans. As FS correctly pointed out, they have been in last place in their division every year for the past 3 that I can remember (and maybe more), and yet they always pull it out in the end. Sigh. We'll just have to keep our fingers crossed.

Gee, Hank, I guess getting rid of Joe Torre wasn't the strategy you needed, was it??
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 08:06 PM

Originally Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas
What has happened to the Yankees?

From a UK pont of view,they and the Red Sox are the only team we ever hear about!


A couple of things, Yogi. First, age is factoring in. Pettitte, Mussina, Posada, Abreu, Damon and Giambi are past their prime seasons, and don't have the talent to match their salaries. Jeter is still productive, but has lost a little something in the field perhaps, and his best seasons may have already been played.

The commitment to the young arms may work out okay, but Hughes and Kennedy haven't lived up to the hype that was poured on them. Rivera and Chamberlain have done well, but the team needs to be leading in the seventh inning to take advantage of them.

Also, the Yankees have not come close to the team chemistry that allowed them to win championships in the late 90s. The big name/big money players they reeled in with cash that only the Yankees were willing to pay, like Giambi, Mussina, Sheffield, Rodriguez and Damondidn't provide the cohesiveness that slightly less heralded players, like Brosius, Martinez, O'Neill and Williams, provided.

Finally, some of the other teams in the league improved. While it is not unusual for the Yankees to be 6 or 7 games out of first place this time of year, it is odd for them to be in last place on May 21. Reaching the top of the division when you're 7 games out is much harder to do when there are 4 teams in front of you than one.

I still expect the Yankees to contend for the division or play-offs. Four of fourteen teams advance and about 5 teams don't have a realistic chance. Their payroll alone should keep them above .500.

It's too bad that you are pretty much limited to Boston and New York as there are some very exciting and interesting teams in the league. But here too the national media focus on the Yankees and Red Sox, and to a lesser extent, the Mets. American sports coverage in general has adefinite east coast bias, and the Yankees and Sox tend to be the biggest draw.
Posted By: Mignon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/21/08 11:49 PM

Originally Posted By: fathersson
Answer #6
The thong is in the cleaners!


Would someone bring me up to speed on that one?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 05:38 AM

Jason Giambi wore a thong to help get him out of his hitting slump
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 05:56 AM

Joba begins process of joining rotation

NEW YORK -- The process for Joba Chamberlain's transition to the rotation officially began on Wednesday, but the seeds were actually planted eight months ago, two decks above the playing field at Yankee Stadium.

It was then that Yankees general manager Brian Cashman leaned over to his companion for two days, the suspended right-handed reliever, and asked a question that would soon fuel countless Big Apple bar debates: "What do you think of this bullpen thing? What do you like better?"

With 35 pitches over two scoreless innings facing the Orioles, the clock officially began on Chamberlain's metamorphosis into a big league starter, with a schedule of appearances to follow in helping get the right-hander to the proper endurance level.

"This is the timetable that we had set," Yankees manager Joe Girardi said. "It's going to take him a while to get to where he can give you 100 pitches, but this is what we had planned all along. It's our plan that we talked about over the winter and in Spring Training, and you saw the first of it tonight."

It wasn't that Chamberlain didn't relish his role as a dominant flame-thrower and game-shortener, trotting out of the bullpen and setting up for closer Mariano Rivera. If it was best for the team, Chamberlain told Cashman, he'd stay right there.

But the Yankees believe Chamberlain can and will be more than that, a valued piece of their starting rotation for years to come and perhaps their answer to the Josh Beckett-type ace the Red Sox wield. Chamberlain welcomed the challenge.

"We've seen what he's done in a short period of time as a starter at the Minor League level," Cashman said. "We see the ability that he has with the four pitches, and we want to test the theory. We need to find out, and it takes time. It's certainly going to take opportunity."

The Yankees had preset the general area of the second week of May as a time to explore a move for Chamberlain, who is 1-2 with a 2.66 ERA in 18 appearances for the Yankees, walking nine and striking out 25 around 14 hits over 20 1/3 innings.

Chamberlain will still continue to see duty in the late innings, but now it may come at different times. For example, when his pitch count bumps to 50, he could pitch innings six through eight; right now, he could pitch the seventh and eighth or, as he did Wednesday, the eighth and ninth.

"I explained to him that I believe he can be a very successful performer in the rotation, and I know he can be a very successful performer in the bullpen. It was time, really, to make him a part of that process. I needed him to tell me what was in his heart."
-- Brian Cashman

"I don't want to be specific in how or what we're trying to do," Cashman said. "I know this is New York and you don't hide anything very well on any issue. We're going to stretch him out and start preparing him, and we're going to do that at the same time as our schedule's coming up against us every day."

Though much of his big league success has come on the strength of two pitches -- a high-90s fastball and a biting slider -- Chamberlain exposed a little more of his repertoire in his second inning on Wednesday.

He started Aubrey Huff off with two changeups to open the ninth and also tossed a pair of offspeed offerings to the third batter in the inning, Luke Scott. His three strikeouts came on sliders and fastballs, though.

"It's not going to be a different Joba," Chamberlain said. "It's not like I'm transforming into a different person. The stuff in the eighth inning, you're going to see that from the first inning on. You're going to see a few more changeups, a few more curveballs and a few more two-seamers. That's about it."

The Yankees' reaction was one of anticipation. Third baseman Alex Rodriguez, who homered for a second consecutive game on Wednesday, said he was "very excited" by the decision to move Chamberlain.

"We all know how valuable and important starting pitching is, and Joba has great talent. I love it," Rodriguez said.

Chamberlain was informed of the plan by Cashman before the Yankees' game on Tuesday against Baltimore, pulled into the trainer's room out of earshot of the media, just a few yards away from his clubhouse locker.

"I explained to him that I believe he can be a very successful performer in the rotation, and I know he can be a very successful performer in the bullpen," Cashman said. "It was time, really, to make him a part of that process. I needed him to tell me what was in his heart."

The answer, Cashman learned, was that Chamberlain not only wanted an opportunity to start, but he was ready for it to happen now.

Girardi was then called in to confirm that all parties were on the same page, though word of the decision was not leaked until after Chamberlain's appearance on Wednesday.

"I'm excited about the opportunity, but first and foremost, we've got to win ballgames from here on out," Chamberlain said. "Tomorrow starts another day of getting my legs and getting back on the mound to see what happens."

The most Girardi would reveal of the plans is that Chamberlain would not pitch on Thursday against the Orioles. Chamberlain will stay with the Yankees for the immediate future and stretch out at the Major League level.

Though the club has not ruled out a Minor League assignment at some point, Chamberlain said he'd like to feel his way out in the big leagues.

"There's no better place to be than here to learn and to take your licks and to get better," Chamberlain said. "The plan is set to be that way and I'm going to continue to mix things in when I have the opportunity, and understand that I still have to go out and do my job."

Chamberlain's anticipated move to the rotation has become even more of a mysterious topic in recent weeks. Girardi may have thrown a misdirection to the press over the weekend when he hinted that Chamberlain might not even start at all in '08, setting off a hubbub.

Cashman -- caught off guard by a media horde on the field during batting practice -- downplayed those comments, saying that the Yankees continued to have a plan for Chamberlain and that it had not been altered.

The major concern of Chamberlain's development were his innings, having thrown just 88 1/3 Minor League innings last season before tossing an additional 27 2/3 -- including playoffs -- in the big leagues.

"Our plan all along has been to make him a starter," Girardi said. "There were some limitations on innings, because really he's pitched one year of professional baseball. You can't jump guys up too quickly, because it can lead to injury or it can lead to a second year where they struggle. It's what we've talked about all along internally."

Cashman said that team ownership had no part in pushing Chamberlain's plan into action, and also said that the Yankees' recent struggles -- 21-25, last in the American League East -- did not affect the timetable.

Earlier Wednesday in a telephone interview with MLB.com, Yankees co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner again pushed for Chamberlain's entry to the starting rotation.

"What I've learned over 35 years of all of this from baseball people is that you can talk all you want about bullpens, but starting pitching is what gets it done," Steinbrenner said. "If you have two great relievers in the bullpen, it doesn't do us any good."

Steinbrenner also later dropped a hint, saying, "If he can stretch out while he's in the bullpen, that's great. Would I like to see him as a starter right now? Yeah, but that's not what's happening. He just doesn't have the innings that [Phil] Hughes and [Ian] Kennedy have or had."

Soon, if the Yankees' plan proceeds as expected, Chamberlain will be able to boast that same stamina late into games. As he continues that process, Chamberlain said he expects to lean upon the Yankees' veteran starters like Andy Pettitte and Mike Mussina for helpful tidbits of advice, the same way he soaked up offerings from Rivera during their bullpen downtime.

"I'm going to be able to learn from these guys that have been there," Chamberlain said. "I've never done it, but all of these other guys have. I'm going to continue to lean on them, and I'm also in the bullpen. I need to make sure I get outs in the role I'm in."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 10:23 AM

ARod was cheated out of a home run in last night's game. He hit a ball that cleared the wall but due to a bad umpire call it was not creditted as a homer.

This is a sign of how things are going for them this year (even though they won handily last night).
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 01:40 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
ARod was cheated out of a home run in last night's game. He hit a ball that cleared the wall but due to a bad umpire call it was not creditted as a homer.

This is a sign of how things are going for them this year (even though they won handily last night).


I'd be willing to bet that in the next couple of years we will see instant replay used to review homerun calls in baseball. I only hope that it is not used to review safe/out calls on the bases.

My brother-in-law is taking my sons to the Yankee/Oriole game on Memorial Day. I may tag along.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 02:56 PM

Delgado's fair/foul pole home run the other night was the worst non-home run call I've ever seen.

Replay on home runs is essential.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/22/08 06:08 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Delgado's fair/foul pole home run the other night was the worst non-home run call I've ever seen.



Yes, when seen 42 times on replay from 16 angles of 10 cameras and the scuff marks on the ball and pole AND not to mention Joe Morgan's incessant ranting.

I would venture to guess that in live action that homerun call was very difficult for an umpire. Visually there are many objects and colors in the corner, not to mention angles. If the umpire saw the ball veer off to the foul side of the pole, he probably did not see it strike the top of the wall and the pole. He was following the flight of the ball and it clearly went into foul territory. I didn't see the A-Rod non-HR, but I would agree that replays should be used for a limited number of situations and homeruns are one. Luckily for the Mets they didn't lose by a run or two.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 02:58 AM

Hey! The Yankees won two in a row! And Cano actually was responsible for tonight's win! Has his bat FINALLY woken up??
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 04:30 AM

Not only that but Ian Kennedy actually had a decent start eek
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 07:26 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Not only that but Ian Kennedy actually had a decent start eek

That's because I dropped him from my fantasy team.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 10:35 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Not only that but Ian Kennedy actually had a decent start eek

That's because I dropped him from my fantasy team.

Thank you. smile Going to the game tonight, and can't wait!
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 10:48 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Not only that but Ian Kennedy actually had a decent start eek

That's because I dropped him from my fantasy team.

Thank you. smile Going to the game tonight, and can't wait!


Enjoy the game tonight, SB, although the Yankees plan to sit Jeter tonight to give him a rest.

(Just kidding) wink
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 10:53 AM

You're killing me, Klyd!! You're killing me!!

It's my daughter's birthday (18!) and we were going to take her out to dinner and to the game. Now I hear that parking is so bad there because of the construction, that you have to get to the game two hours early. Happy Birthday! Here's a hot dog!
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 11:15 AM

Happy Sweet 18 to Miss Junior Babe. How's mama Babe doing now that she has an 18 year old? smile
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 02:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

It's my daughter's birthday (18!) and we were going to take her out to dinner and to the game. Now I hear that parking is so bad there because of the construction, that you have to get to the game two hours early. Happy Birthday! Here's a hot dog!


I've usually parked in the big garage next to the stadium. The only problem is that you sometimes have to wait forever to get out. I can only imagine what it's like to get there now.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 03:04 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
You're killing me, Klyd!! You're killing me!!

It's my daughter's birthday (18!) and we were going to take her out to dinner and to the game. Now I hear that parking is so bad there because of the construction, that you have to get to the game two hours early. Happy Birthday! Here's a hot dog!


I didn't find that to be the case when I went there a couple of weeks ago. I arrived only an hour early and we had no problem finding a parking spot in the parking garage by the Stadium (it just cost an arm and a leg at $17).
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 03:14 PM

Oh, just park in Woodlawn and jump on the 4 train. I think suburbia is spoiling you, Miss Babe. lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 06:54 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Oh, just park in Woodlawn and jump on the 4 train. I think suburbia is spoiling you, Miss Babe. lol


No shit! lol

She's very excited about her birthday and is donning her Jeter shirt and Yankees hat as we speak.

And Mama feels OLD, Beth, that's how she feels. frown
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 07:15 PM

Did she graduate yet? That day will really hit you. Nicole had a large class, and she was the next to last person to get her diploma. And they didnt' even do it alphabetically.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 07:17 PM

Happy 18th birthday to your daughter. I'm sure you're all going to have fun. i hope you catch a foul ball.
Posted By: ginaitaliangirl

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 08:43 PM

SB, give your daughter my happy birthday wishes!! Hope she has a very special day and that you guys have a blast at the game!
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/23/08 09:49 PM

My brother in law gets a lot of tickets for all Orioles games through church because he's a deacon. He just tole me to ask Nicole if she wants go to to the August 23rd Yankee game. I wonder what her answer will be. lol I think he said he gets about 30 tickets. Their nosebleed seats, but hell for free that's good.
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/24/08 01:57 AM

Looking at the score I think it's safe to say The Babe family had an awesome time at the game tonight.
Posted By: olivant

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/24/08 02:08 AM

Remember that line from the movie Gung Ho?:

"They look like the Yankees. I hate 'em already."
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/24/08 03:15 AM

WOW! What a great game! That 5th inning was unbelievable. We had a terrific time, plus it was hat day! However, because Budweiser sponsored the hats, they wouldn't give them to the girls. You had to be 21 to get a hat!!

Our seats were field level by the right field foul pole. It felt like we were so close to Bobby Abreu that we could've counted the stripes in his uniform.

We had a terrific time! Thanks for all the good wishes. Beth, her graduation is not until the 29th, but she's having a combination 18th birthday/graduation party on the 14th. We've been referring to it as The Coronation, because she's making such a huge deal out of it.

It was really a great time all around.
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/24/08 04:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
combination 18th birthday/graduation party on the 14th. We've been referring to it as The Coronation, because she's making such a huge deal out of it.

It was really a great time all around.


Will it include a 3 tier cake with fountain? whistle
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/25/08 01:49 AM

That's only for Sweet Sixteen, silly! lol

I still have to get you a picture of that damned cake! My former nanny gets the cakes, and they are unbelievable. This year, when my younger daughter made her confirmation, the cake was in the shape of a giant bible.
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/30/08 09:53 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Beth, her graduation is not until the 29th,


How did you handle the graduation, mom? smile
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/30/08 10:04 PM

Sorry, June 29th. However, The Coronation is only two weeks away!!!!
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/30/08 10:16 PM

June 29th? Man, that's late. Graduations here are all in end of May, or 1st week of June at the latest, so I assumed.

I know, what happens when you "assume". lol

I'll leave you to your work, Madam hostess. Coronations take a lot of work.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/30/08 11:09 PM

Well Joba's gonna make his first start on Tuesday:

Joba's first start to come Tuesday

MINNEAPOLIS -- Joba Chamberlain is set to join the Yankees' rotation on Tuesday, starting against the Blue Jays at Yankee Stadium and completing his transition from the club's bullpen.

Yankees manager Joe Girardi officially announced the move on Friday prior to the team's game against the Twins in Minnesota. Chamberlain will be permitted to throw 65 to 70 pitches in the outing, his first professional start since he was converted into a dominant setup reliever and promoted to the Major Leagues last season.

"I'm excited just for the opportunity to continue to help the team win ballgames," Chamberlain said. "It's been fun continuing to extend and get lengthened out. I'm excited for the opportunity. It feels like it started about forever ago, but it came about real quick. I know I've got to continue to get better and keep getting stronger in my legs and keep throwing good bullpens."

Girardi said the Yankees set their rotation to allow Andy Pettitte to pitch on regular rest on Monday at Minnesota, setting Chamberlain up for Tuesday's start. Chamberlain is now considered a member of the five-man rotation and, in each outing, Chamberlain will add 10 to 15 pitches until he reaches the neighborhood of around 100 pitches.

"After a lot of consideration, we just thought Tuesday was best," Girardi said. "It's the way our rotation kind of shakes out."

Chamberlain is 1-2 with a 2.28 ERA in 20 relief appearances for the Yankees this season. In 23 2/3 innings, he has allowed 16 hits and six earned runs while walking 11 and striking out 30. In his last outing on Thursday, Chamberlain struck out three in 1 1/3 innings of relief at Baltimore, earning a hold in New York's 4-2 victory over the Orioles.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/31/08 04:16 AM

Originally Posted By: Beth E
I'll leave you to your work, Madam hostess. Coronations take a lot of work.


Thank God for the unlimited Bloody Marys and Mimosas being served. I'm going to need them. lol

Hey, the Yankees won tonight! I see a pattern emerging - I don't watch the game and they win.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/31/08 06:51 AM


It's WAY too soon for Jaba to be starting... this is ridiculous! F Hank and the horse he rode in on! When he ruins Jaba's career -- which he will -- then as a true Steinbrenner he'll blame someone else, right? Girardi somehow, I'm sure. This is so not right that we have to now rely on FarnsworthLESS in the 8th???? Hank fucked the team. And luckily for him, he can't get fired. ohwell

(I hope I'm wrong of course! wink )
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/31/08 07:26 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

It's WAY too soon for Jaba to be starting... this is ridiculous! F Hank and the horse he rode in on! When he ruins Jaba's career -- which he will -- then as a true Steinbrenner he'll blame someone else, right? Girardi somehow, I'm sure. This is so not right that we have to now rely on FarnsworthLESS in the 8th???? Hank fucked the team. And luckily for him, he can't get fired. ohwell

(I hope I'm wrong of course! wink )



I think you just answered your own queston. whistle

Here is my question....who's worse off at the moment, Mets or Yanks?
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/31/08 07:30 AM

Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
who's worse off at the moment, Mets or Yanks?


No difference right now... they both suck. ohwell ...but Yanks at least have infinite potential if they can get healthy...
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 05/31/08 03:37 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
who's worse off at the moment, Mets or Yanks?


No difference right now... they both suck. ohwell ...but Yanks at least have infinite potential if they can get healthy...


Yeah, I think I agree with you as well.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 06:33 AM

Can we please have somebody ELSE in their but Farnsworthless? If this is a sign of things to come now that Joba's in the rotation mad
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 11:16 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Can we please have somebody ELSE in their but Farnsworthless? If this is a sign of things to come now that Joba's in the rotation mad


Um, yes.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 02:09 PM

Moving Chamberlain to the starting rotation may cause two problems. First, the only thing the Yankees have done consistently well this season is close out games when leading in the 6th or 7th. That may be compromised without their top set up guy. Secondly, there is a possibility that Chamberlain may not get to or through the 6th or 7th innings consistently, which will increase reliance on middle relief, which isn't a strength of this team.

Chamberlain may have a good outing, but the test will be how he handles the rigors of throwing 90-100 pitches every fifth day throughout the summer. Time will tell.

By the way, this may be time for the Yankees to gain ground on Boston as the Sox are without Matsuzaka and Ortiz for a while. Problem is that TB and Toronto may stay in the race longer than they have in the past.
Posted By: goombah

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 02:20 PM

I was listening to a sports talk show yesterday on the way home from work. The Cleveland host was talking to some NY reporter about a trade rumor involving Cleveland and the Yanks. Here is the rumor: Indians trade C.C. Sabathia, Franklin Guitierrez and Astrubal Cabrera for Cano, Melky Cabrera, and Phil Hughes. We'll see if there ends up being any truth to it.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 02:33 PM

WTF? Cano AND Cabrera? Although their contribution to the team this season hasn't been spectacular, they contributed a youth and energy that I think helped turn the team around last year. We could've done this trade for Santana, and they didn't want to. Why would they want to now??
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:06 PM

The Yankees are looking hard at Brian Fuentes, the Colorado reliever, to take the set up role. With the Rockies floundering this season, they are expected to move players, and Fuentes has sparked interest from a few teams. He will be likely traded before the deadline.

By the way, the Rockies may also put Matt Holliday and Garrett Atkins on the block.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:07 PM

Originally Posted By: goombah
I was listening to a sports talk show yesterday on the way home from work. The Cleveland host was talking to some NY reporter about a trade rumor involving Cleveland and the Yanks. Here is the rumor: Indians trade C.C. Sabathia, Franklin Guitierrez and Astrubal Cabrera for Cano, Melky Cabrera, and Phil Hughes. We'll see if there ends up being any truth to it.


I agree with SB. If they didn't trade Melky or Phil for Johan Santana (who IMO is a better pitcher than C.C.) then I don't see them trading for C.C. Plus, C.C.'s a free agent at the end of the year, so why trade for him now when they could keep their players and just sign him (New York can outbid Cleveland).
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:07 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
The Yankees are looking hard at Brian Fuentes, the Colorado reliever, to take the set up role. With the Rockies floundering this season, they are expected to move players, and Fuentes has sparked interest from a few teams. He will be likely traded before the deadline.

By the way, the Rockies may also put Matt Holliday and Garrett Atkins on the block.


Now I did read about this yesterday and this is more realistic. I just wonder what they'll have to give up for Brian?
Posted By: dontomasso

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:18 PM

WHO CARES??? GO RAYS!!!!
Posted By: goombah

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: goombah
I was listening to a sports talk show yesterday on the way home from work. The Cleveland host was talking to some NY reporter about a trade rumor involving Cleveland and the Yanks. Here is the rumor: Indians trade C.C. Sabathia, Franklin Guitierrez and Astrubal Cabrera for Cano, Melky Cabrera, and Phil Hughes. We'll see if there ends up being any truth to it.


I agree with SB. If they didn't trade Melky or Phil for Johan Santana (who IMO is a better pitcher than C.C.) then I don't see them trading for C.C. Plus, C.C.'s a free agent at the end of the year, so why trade for him now when they could keep their players and just sign him (New York can outbid Cleveland).


Hey, I'm just sharing - I never said the trade would happen. I will say that I guarantee that C.C. will not sign in NY this offseason, so do not plan on him being a free agent acquisition. He hates the city and the media pressure. Sabathia is going west, probably to SF, the Dodgers, or Anaheim. But the idea of renting him is nothing that Steinbrenner has not done in the past, so it could happen.

I couldn't imagine that any of the Steinbrenner's would be content to just sit back without trying to improve before the trading deadline. NY was utterly foolish for not pulling the trigger to give up the players you mentioned for Santana, who is one of the best pitchers in MLB. Santana is better than any starting pitcher they have had on their roster in the past 10 years.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 03:58 PM

Originally Posted By: goombah
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: goombah
I was listening to a sports talk show yesterday on the way home from work. The Cleveland host was talking to some NY reporter about a trade rumor involving Cleveland and the Yanks. Here is the rumor: Indians trade C.C. Sabathia, Franklin Guitierrez and Astrubal Cabrera for Cano, Melky Cabrera, and Phil Hughes. We'll see if there ends up being any truth to it.


I agree with SB. If they didn't trade Melky or Phil for Johan Santana (who IMO is a better pitcher than C.C.) then I don't see them trading for C.C. Plus, C.C.'s a free agent at the end of the year, so why trade for him now when they could keep their players and just sign him (New York can outbid Cleveland).


Hey, I'm just sharing - I never said the trade would happen. I will say that I guarantee that C.C. will not sign in NY this offseason, so do not plan on him being a free agent acquisition. He hates the city and the media pressure. Sabathia is going west, probably to SF, the Dodgers, or Anaheim. But the idea of renting him is nothing that Steinbrenner has not done in the past, so it could happen.

I couldn't imagine that any of the Steinbrenner's would be content to just sit back without trying to improve before the trading deadline. NY was utterly foolish for not pulling the trigger to give up the players you mentioned for Santana, who is one of the best pitchers in MLB. Santana is better than any starting pitcher they have had on their roster in the past 10 years.


I think those "renting" days of the Yankees are over with this new management and with Cashman's new approach which I don't disagree with at all. This season will be a lose. I realize that. But when Hughes, Joba, and possibly Kennedy come around they could finally have a triple-threat in the rotation the likes of the 90's Braves (Smoltz, Maddox, Glavine) or early 2000's A's (Zito, Moulder, Hudson). So I'd rather hang onto those guys and see them develop and help us win for the next decade then get a quick fix to get us through just this season.

As for Santana, only time will tell with this trade but looking back, I'm glad the Yankees didn't trade for him. First there's the money AND prospects issue. Not only would the Yankees have had to trade about 3 or 4 players but they also would have had to make a $120+ 7-year commitment to this guy. Granted the Yankees can afford it but they could also use that money this offseason on other players rather than just sinking into one guy who goes out every 5 days. Also, Santana is no spring chicken. He's 29-years-old right now and by the time his contract expires he'll be 36. I believe his prime is already past and so do others as his velocity has been down since moving to New York. I think Minnesota overworked him and now unfortunately for the Mets, they could have a broken down pitcher (see Pedro Martinez). However, after the Mets historic collapse last season, they HAD to do something and on paper the Santana trade looked great for them and a number of people (including myself) picked them to represent the NL in the World Series. So far it hasn't worked out for them but it is still early and they have plenty of time to turn it around. And one more piece of fact, Phil Hughes is only 21-years of age. He hasn't even begun to reach his potential so I believe the Yankees did right by hanging onto him.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 04:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
But when Hughes, Joba, and possibly Kennedy come around they could finally have a triple-threat in the rotation the likes of the 90's Braves (Smoltz, Maddox, Glavine) or early 2000's A's (Zito, Moulder, Hudson).


I admire your optimism, but Smoltz, Glavine and Maddux are first ballot hall of famers. So far with Hughes, Kennedy and Chamberlain you have a guy, who hasn't been healthy, a guy, who hasn't shown anything in the big leagues, and a guy, who is going to start his first game tonight. I think all three will have major league careers, but wouldn't them in the claass of the three Braves. They still have some proving to do.

I actually think the Yankees should have made the deal for Santana. Pitchers of his caliber are rare and he's still young and in good shape. He can be the anchor of a staff for years. I was disappointed the Mets got him. He's 7-3 and is keeping the Mets in the race.
Posted By: goombah

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 08:35 PM

I think believing that Santana, at 29 years of age, has already peaked is wishful thinking. There is not one MLB team that would not be better by having Santana on its roster. He will be a force, barring injury (which can be said about any player), for the next 5-7 years. Granted we know he cheated, but some of Clemens' best days were in his mid-to-upper 30s. Age, particularly in baseball, is much less a factor than in football or basketball. Baseball players primes tend to be about 27-34 and can still be very good as an older player (see Schilling, Clemens, Smoltz, et al).

The three pitchers you mentioned being the cornerstones of NY's rotation is debatable. Let's see them do what Maddux, Glavine & Smoltz did for 2-3 years consistently before making that comparison. Not only were Atlanta's big 3 kicking ass in the regular season, they gained tons of playoff experience every year early in their careers. The Yankees guys are blue chip prospects, but the jury is still out whether they'll be big time starters.
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 08:37 PM

I cant wait to see Joba pitch tonight. My prediction 8 innings no runs.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/03/08 09:03 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Smitty
I cant wait to see Joba pitch tonight. My prediction 8 innings no runs.


I won't get to see the game. Unfortunately ESPN aired last night's game and not tonights! mad And Joba's on a 65-70 pitch count so I predict 5 no more than 6 innigs.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/04/08 01:04 AM

Originally Posted By: Don Smitty
I cant wait to see Joba pitch tonight. My prediction 8 innings no runs.


Well, you weren't even close.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/04/08 06:00 AM

None of us were close but it was his first start. He can only get better from here
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/04/08 11:09 AM

Perhaps, but how can they survive in the meantime? Ramirez, Hawkins? They were a disaster! Yes, they still have Mo, but without anyone to get them to the 9th, what good is it?
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 03:52 AM

The Yanks are doing some promotion now, and they're selling a video collection of their best ballplayers by position. I haven't heard who the official winners are but I'd like to weigh in with my 2¢:

1b - Lou Gehrig. A no-brainer.
2b - Tony Lazzeri. Bobby Richardson crossed my mind but I give the nod to Lazzeri based on his overall performance.
SS - Derek Jeter beats out Phil Rizzuto.
3b - ARod. He doesn't have the total years of Graig Nettles but based on his short term (with awesome numbers) Rodriquez wins out.
RF - Babe Ruth. The game's number one player.
CF - Joe DiMaggio. My toughest pick; Mantle had better numbers overall, but Joe D's stats were more intense (judged by the years he played).
LF - Dave Winfield. Another tough pick, Big Dave gets my nod over Bob Meusel.
C - Yogi Berra. Yogi wins out over Bill Dickey and Thurman Munson by virtue of his hitting prowess. He won three MVP's!
SP - Whitey Ford. Clemens was considered, but I think Ford was a true Yankee, and most of Clemens' greatest years were with other teams.
RP - Mariano Rivera.

Tough picks.

Comments?
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 07:23 AM


I'd make a fantasy team outta them! cool

...but I hope Cockcroft wouldn't so I'd have a chance... ohwell whistle
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 09:01 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
I'd make a fantasy team outta them!


Could you imagine a 3-4-5 lineup of Ruth, Gehrig and DiMaggio???
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 09:42 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
Could you imagine a 3-4-5 lineup of Ruth, Gehrig and DiMaggio???

I do... after every inning that Farnsworth(less) pitches... ohwell lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 12:26 PM

Jeter? Who is he?? whistle

I missed the game last night. Could someone please explain to me how the hell they lost to Kansas City????
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 12:29 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Could someone please explain to me how the hell they lost to Kansas City????


Simple. KC scored twice; the Yanks only once. rolleyes
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 12:31 PM

Thank you, SC, for explaining that very complex concept. Freaking Kansas City!!!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 09:32 PM

Anybody watch the game? Did they see Mr. Babe catch a foul ball? I was at my niece's stupid baby shower and totally missed it, but he sent me a text message that he caught a foul ball!

And what a game it was! Really exciting to the end.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 09:33 PM

He didn't have to go to the hospital for stitches, did he??
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 10:37 PM

No, but his hand still hurts like hell. I thought of you immediately when he sent me that text message! I can't believe I missed seeing him on TV!! It was Guillen's ball, the foul he hit right before the Grand Slam.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 10:40 PM

They'll be showing the game again at 7:00 on YES.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 10:43 PM

And we're going out for dinner tonight! Damn!!!! Oh, wait, I have a DVR. Damn! My daughter's not home to show me how to use it!!! lol
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/07/08 11:01 PM

Mr. Babe caught a foul ball? How cool. I didn't watch it, but they showed highlights on the Red Sox game. What a different game from last night.

You can't work a DVR? Heck, I still can't program a VCR. If I want to tape something it's because I'm watching it an only have to push the record button. lol
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/08/08 01:05 AM

It was destined for me to see that foul ball. I went out to the store for a few minutes and just as I got back home Guillen hit the foul ball (it was quite a rip into the stands). The camera followed the ball into the stands but it didn't stay on the crowd long enough for me to make out Mr. Babe.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/08/08 03:25 AM

Mr. Babe managed the DVR. We had to advance frame by frame in order to see him. Every other foul ball, they show the person who caught it.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/08/08 03:38 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Every other foul ball, they show the person who caught it.

That figures, right?? It's like every time I streak across the outfield, they NEVER show it on TV!! rolleyes lol
Posted By: Beth E

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/08/08 03:47 AM

I guess they figure they see enough balls.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/08/08 04:01 AM

Silly Beth! You can never see too many!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 12:24 AM

Anyone see Wang get hurt today?? We were listening to the game in the back yard today. The last I heard was that it was a sprain, but they'll know more after his MRI tomorrow. If he's out for an extended period of time, that's going to REALLY suck.
Posted By: Mignon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 12:30 AM

Did the Yanks win?
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 02:21 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Anyone see Wang get hurt today?? We were listening to the game in the back yard today. The last I heard was that it was a sprain, but they'll know more after his MRI tomorrow. If he's out for an extended period of time, that's going to REALLY suck.


The game was on and I saw him being helped off the field. He was able to put weight on the ankle. I haven't heard anything, but it didn't look like a serious injury.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 02:29 AM

Originally Posted By: Mignon
Did the Yanks win?


Yup, they swept the Astros
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 10:50 AM

They did win, Mig, but at what cost? If Wang is out for any extended period, that will really hurt them.

Klyd, on the news they are now referring to it as either a sprain or strain, whatever that means.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 02:06 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
They did win, Mig, but at what cost? If Wang is out for any extended period, that will really hurt them.

Klyd, on the news they are now referring to it as either a sprain or strain, whatever that means.


I heard on ESPN Radio this morning that he can be out for an extended period. I guess the tests today will determine the severity of the injury. The Yankees need him in the rotation.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 02:40 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
The Yankees need him in the rotation.


That may be the greatest understatement of the year.

I read in the paper that he heard a "pop" when it happened, which is not a good sign.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 07:36 PM

Wang will miss at least 6 weeks with a partially torn tendon and sprained foot. So much for my amateur diagnosis that it didn't appear serious.

It's a tough break and I imagine the Yankees will try to secure a veteran starter soon.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 08:58 PM

I'm hearing they made trade for C.C. Sabathia since he'll be a free agent at the end of the year and all predictions are that he's not going to resign with Cleveland.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/16/08 08:59 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Wang will miss at least 6 weeks with a partially torn tendon and sprained foot. So much for my amateur diagnosis that it didn't appear serious.

It's a tough break and I imagine the Yankees will try to secure a veteran starter soon.


6 weeks, 42 days, divided by 5 days between starts....maybe 8 starts....maybe 6 wins. With Boston cruisin' and the Baltimore Urinals and Toronto Blue Balls playing tough.....the bats will have to carry them.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/17/08 06:19 AM

This is saying Wang will be out until September:

Yanks ace shelved until September

NEW YORK (AP) -- Yankees ace Chien-Ming Wang is expected to be sidelined until at least September after injuring his foot running the bases, prompting club co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner to chastise the National League for playing without a designated hitter.

An examination in New York on Monday showed Wang partially tore a tendon and sprained his right foot Sunday during the Yankees' 13-0 interleague win at Houston. He will be on crutches and wear a protective boot for a minimum of six weeks, the latest blow to the team's banged-up pitching staff.

"My only message is simple. The National League needs to join the 21st century," Steinbrenner said in Tampa, Fla. "They need to grow up and join the 21st century.

"Am I mad about it? Yes," Steinbrenner added. "I've got my pitchers running the bases, and one of them gets hurt. He's going to be out. I don't like that, and it's about time they address it. That was a rule from the 1800s."

Making a rare appearance on the bases at an NL park, Wang pulled up rounding third and hobbled home on Derek Jeter's single. Wang doubled over after scoring, pointed toward his right foot and was helped off the field.

"This is always a concern of American League teams when their pitchers have to run the bases and they're not used to doing it," Steinbrenner said. "It's not just us. It's everybody. It probably should be a concern for National League owners, general managers and managers when their pitchers run the bases. Pitchers have enough to do without having to do that."

Wang is 8-2 with a 4.07 ERA in 15 starts after winning 19 games each of the last two seasons. The right-hander will join injured Yankees starters Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy on the disabled list.

New York reliever Brian Bruney has a similar injury to Wang's and it is uncertain when he will return.

Steinbrenner said for now, the Yankees probably will have to look within the organization to find a replacement in the rotation for Wang. Right-hander Dan Giese is one possibility.

Several attractive pitchers, including Cleveland ace C.C. Sabathia, could become available as the July 31 trade deadlines approaches.

The Yankees were off Monday and start a series Tuesday night at home against San Diego. Their win in Houston kept them six games behind first-place Boston in the AL East.

The sinkerballing Wang has been the most consistent Yankees starter over the last couple of years.

Mike Mussina and Andy Pettitte remain in the rotation, and Joba Chamberlain recently was converted from relieving to starting. Right-hander Darrell Rasner has been in a slump lately.

Wang was well on his way to helping the Yankees finish a three-game sweep in Houston when he was hurt. He'd pitched five strong innings, and scored during an eight-run burst in the sixth that put New York ahead 11-0.

Wang is 5-0 in seven road starts this season.

"It's a manager's worst nightmare when a pitcher's on a basepath," Yankees manager Joe Girardi said after Sunday's victory. "It's unfortunate."

After the game, Mussina summed up the problem that AL pitchers sometimes face at NL parks.

"We don't hit, we don't run the bases," Mussina said. "You get four or five at-bats a year at most, and if you happen to get on base once or twice, you never know. We run in straight lines most of the time. Turning corners, you just don't do that."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/18/08 04:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12


"It's a manager's worst nightmare when a pitcher's on a basepath," Yankees manager Joe Girardi said after Sunday's victory. "It's unfortunate."

After the game, Mussina summed up the problem that AL pitchers sometimes face at NL parks.

"We don't hit, we don't run the bases," Mussina said. "You get four or five at-bats a year at most, and if you happen to get on base once or twice, you never know. We run in straight lines most of the time. Turning corners, you just don't do that."

Source: Yankees


These quotes are hilarious. A manager's worst nightmare? I could think of scarier things than getting on base. How about not getting on base. I'm actually hard pressed to remember the last time a pitcher became disabled fron running the base path.

And Mussina's comments are ridiculous. Many of these pitchers earn millions of dollars, and are professional athletes. Yet they are only able to run in straight lines? They can't turn corners.

Wang's injury was a freak occurrence. He was jogging home. I think the comments, especially those of Hank, who chastised the entire National League for the injury, are misplaced.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/18/08 05:54 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
I think the comments, especially those of Hank, who chastised the entire National League for the injury, are misplaced.


Gee, a Steinbrenner making misplaced comments??? SHOCKING!!! rolleyes
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/18/08 06:11 PM

Since MLB might be going to the replay, maybe they should consider some rule changes for pitchers, like....when pitchers have to run to a base, or bases, they are not required to actually touch the base. Their foot must touch within 8" of the base on the inside. This will be similar to the "phantom tag" that umps award infielder. crazy
Posted By: Don Sicilia

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:14 PM

They must not have asked SB... wink

PLAYER POLL: JETER OVERRATED

By BRIAN LEWIS
New York YankeesNew York Yankees player Derek Jeter

June 20, 2008 --

Derek Jeter was voted the most overrated player in baseball in a Sports Illustrated poll of over 495 major leaguers. Not surprisingly, both the Yankees captain and his manager could not care less.

"I ain't talking about that," Jeter said after helping lead his Bombers to a 2-1 victory over the Padres, the seventh straight for the Yankees. "I ain't talking about it. You guys can have fun with it."

In the survey to be released in the June 23 issue, the Yankee shortstop got 10 percent of the vote. Teammate Alex Rodriguez was tied with Boston outfielder J.D. Drew for third with 7 percent.

But in a clear case of opinions-are-like-you-know-what, when Sports Illustrated did a survey of "Whom would you pick to build your team around" just a week earlier, Rodriguez finished first and Jeter second. Make up your minds, fellas.

"I don't really have a comment about it. I love our guys, and I'll keep them," Joe Girardi said, with a smirk that barely hid his contempt for the topic. "I'm not going to comment on it. I worry about beating the Cincinnati Reds (tonight), not what's in the papers."

The players can't claim Jeter isn't a winner, with the highest winning percentage of any active player. And yesterday the Bombers captain helped keep his team on a roll, going 2-for-3 with a walk, a stolen base and a run scored.

With the game tied 1-1 in the sixth inning, Jeter worked a full-count against starter Josh Banks and eventually singled to left-center. Then he swiped second, his fifth steal of the year, and took third on Bobby Abreu's groundout. He scored on Rodriguez' clean single to left, and it turned out to be the game-winner.

Jeter has hit safely in 16 of 18 games this month and is batting .276 with 38 runs scored. His .600 winning percentage (1,140-759-2) is the best among all players (min. 1,000 games) according to Elias Sports Bureau.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:29 PM

I heard this story too and immediately thought of SB. I didn't have the heart to post it.

I'm not surprised that Jeter and ARod made both lists. It was just a different 10% that voted. They are two players, for whom there is no middle ground of opinion. Kind of like the Yankees, Red Sox, Dallas Cowboys and Notre Dame. They evoke the most passionate responses whether you're for them or against them.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:43 PM

Most ridiculous poll ever. Derek Jeter gives 200% in every, single game he plays. The nicknames Captain Clutch and Mr. November weren't plucked from thin air. He will go down in history as one of the greatest players ever, so if that's overrated, then I must not understand the meaning of the word. Besides, they're all just jealous.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:45 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
He will go down in history as one of the greatest players ever ...


(cough) BULLSHIT (cough)
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:50 PM

OK, STOP THAT!! This is my Jeter you're talking about!! Did you see me making fun of a certain pitcher from Boston who may or may not have squirted ketchup on his sock in order to relive the ending of The Natural?? Puh-leeze.

All just jealous....
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:52 PM

C'mon, SB... get serious. One of the greatest ever??? rolleyes

Put your hormones in check and get real!!
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 08:56 PM


I'd put him on MY team - who else at shortstop? No one. tongue
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:00 PM

Sorry, but I do believe that, and hormone's have nothing to do with it. Whenever I've seen a show about the greatest plays in the history of baseball, at least two of Jeter's are always shown. He plays with his heart, and he plays consistently. He comes through when his team needs him most, and he gives it his all every single day.

That doesn't do it for you??
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:09 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
I'd put him on MY team - who else at shortstop? No one. tongue


Umm.... Hanley Ramirez. Jimmy Rollins. Jose Reyes. All better hitters and better fielders.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:10 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
I heard this story too and immediately thought of SB. I didn't have the heart to post it.

I'm not surprised that Jeter and ARod made both lists. It was just a different 10% that voted. They are two players, for whom there is no middle ground of opinion. Kind of like the Yankees, Red Sox, Dallas Cowboys and Notre Dame. They evoke the most passionate responses whether you're for them or against them.


I'm going to have to disagree with some of your statement. I agree that certain players like certain teams "evoke the most passionate responses" but why lump Jeter into that category? A-Rod, Curt Schilling, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens (now), even Pete Rose I can understand. But what has Derek Jeter even done? Why does he deserve the same treatment as these others?
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:12 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Whenever I've seen a show about the greatest plays in the history of baseball, at least two of Jeter's are always shown.


You really have to stop watching those shows produced by the Yankees. He's a mediocre fielder, at best, and only a fair hitter.

Jeter as among the best ever?? Hell, he doesn't even make the ten best Yankees' list!
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:13 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Umm.... Hanley Ramirez. Jimmy Rollins. Jose Reyes. All better hitters and better fielders.

There's a difference between day-in-and-day-out production for the benefit of the team as opposed to fastasy sports points. tongue
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:17 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
There's a difference between day-in-and-day-out production for the benefit of the team as opposed to fastasy sports points. tongue


You really gotta get out of your fantasy world. lol

Jeter is FAR from being considered among the best ever.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:17 PM


I wouldn't say among the "best ever", and never said he was, but "mediocre" fielder with a career .975 fielding percentage??????? "Fair" hitter with a career .316 batting average?? What are you talking about? confused

Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:24 PM

He had three or four big (batting) seasons, otherwise he's mediocre. To me, that totals "fair" (and he's lousy in the clutch).

His fielding is no better than the others I mentioned. He has limited range in the field and he's not a particularly fast runner.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:25 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
He had three or four big (batting) seasons, otherwise he's mediocre. To me, that totals "fair" (and he's lousy in the clutch).

His fielding is no better than the others I mentioned. He has limited range in the field and he's not a particularly fast runner.


You're right. Julio Lugo and Nomar are superior to Jeter in every way lol
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:29 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
You're right. Julio Lugo and Nomar are superior to Jeter in every way lol


Oy... look who crawled out of the woodwork.

Did I even mention the Red Sox here?? Did I "diss" your Yankees? Take your Boston-hating crap and shove it where the sun don't shine.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 09:32 PM

No, you didn't diss the Yankees but you did diss our Captain. I cannot allow that without a rebuttal
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 10:39 PM

Lousy in the clutch? Is that why they call him Captain Clutch? C'mon, SC, even YOU can't completely believe what you're shoveling.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/20/08 11:39 PM

Why do I even bother arguing against Jeter with you?

(He really ISN'T a good clutch hitter).
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 12:09 AM

As of 2006, Jeter has a career .314 postseason batting average with 17 home runs and 48 RBIs as well as reaching base in 105 of 119 postseason games. The Yankees have been to the playoffs every year since Jeter joined the team. He has a Major League Baseball record 150 career postseason hits, and also holds records for most postseason singles (108), at-bats (478), runs scored (85) and strikeouts (92).

Not a clutch hitter?? I'd hate to see what kind of records he would hold if he was.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 01:22 AM

You may be misunderstanding what a clutch hitter is, but since you want to bring numbers into this disagreement, consider this:

In the more important post season games (the League Championships and the World Series) he's batting way below his usual average (.262 in the League Championships and .302 in the World Series).

The "total" numbers you provide are in large part due to the Yankees making so many appearances in the post season (although why you'd point out all his strikeouts is unclear to me).

He doesn't produce when it's needed. A good clutch hitter does.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 03:29 AM

SC, I feel he does. He's made some of the greatest plays of his career when a game or a championship are on the line. To me, that defines "clutch".

We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 03:30 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.


Don't wait for an argument from me there.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 03:32 AM

Just saw Babe Ruth's daughter on TV. She gave the best quote I've ever heard:

The only time she ever asked for his signature was on a check.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 03:36 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Just saw Babe Ruth's daughter on TV.


Can you imagine what it'd be like to be his child? Aside from the fact that he may not have been a good father, he was one of the biggest names to come out of the 20th century. He was like a god.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 03:40 AM

That's one of my favorite lines about Babe Ruth from The Sandlot. I need Gina's memory, but it's something about Babe Ruth being more than a man, but more like a god.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 06:30 AM

Forgive me if this has been overly-discussed and I don't frequent this thread so I want to know... how do Yankee fans feel about the Steinbrenner's? Since I live on the other coast I don't hear the daily stuff that is said by them. So I always thought George was the half(if not completely) crazy one. After Hank's comments about Wang's injury while running the bases...

"My only message is simple. The National League needs to join the 21st century. They need to grow up and join the 21st century. Am I (mad) about it? Yes. I’ve got my pitchers running the bases, and one of them gets hurt. . . . I don’t like that, and it’s about time they address it. That was a rule from the 1800s."

Now I'm convinced the Yankees are in the hands of crazy people for centuries to come. Doesn't Hank realize the American League changed 100 years of tradition by adding the DH? Maybe the National League should be revolutionary and join the American league by adding the DH, and then also adding designated runners because, God forbid, any "athlete's" should injure themselves running the bases.

Hell, why not have designated fielders and designated throwers. The infield might look crowded, but God forbid the freakin' athlete's should injure themselves by doing something athletic like running the damn bases!

The Yankees drive me nuts and it's because of two things. One, they buy their way into the playoffs, and two MLB won't do anything to stop it.

Long live the Steinbrenner's and their revolutionary comments.

P.S. forgive me for the negativity, I didn't intend this message to end that way, but I love baseball so much and the Yankees symbolize everything that is "great" and evil about the sport.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 04:35 PM

Personally, I think that the George Steinbrenner was an arrogant p**ck and that, judging from his comments made over the last year or two, Hank is a chip off of the old block.

And while many accuse the Yankees of buying their way into the playoffs, while I acknowledge that they have the highest payroll in baseball (you'd have to be a complete idiot not to), the Mets have the highest payroll in the NL, and that strategy certainly hasn't worked for them.

The reason I'm a Yankees fan? I think that they are one of the most exciting teams to watch. They've often pulled off the unexpected with a terrific come-from-behind win. Just look at the 2001 postseason! Even though they ended up losing the series, it was beyond exciting. Plus, it was right after September 11th, and I believe that it gave NY something else to think about and talk about, something of a return to normalcy if you will, even if you aren't a fan.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 06:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Forgive me if this has been overly-discussed and I don't frequent this thread so I want to know... how do Yankee fans feel about the Steinbrenner's? Since I live on the other coast I don't hear the daily stuff that is said by them. So I always thought George was the half(if not completely) crazy one. After Hank's comments about Wang's injury while running the bases...

The Yankees drive me nuts and it's because of two things. One, they buy their way into the playoffs, and two MLB won't do anything to stop it.

Long live the Steinbrenner's and their revolutionary comments.

P.S. forgive me for the negativity, I didn't intend this message to end that way, but I love baseball so much and the Yankees symbolize everything that is "great" and evil about the sport.


As a Yankees fan, at times I shake my head and feel like telling George or Hank to put a sock in it (Hank more than George). However, as owners of my beloved team I love them for the simple reason they will do whatever it takes to win. Money is no object. They actually put their own money back into the franchise. How many other owners do that? Just look at the Florida Marlins, Kansas City Royals, and Baltimore Orioles as examples. They care about their team deeply and I believe they do what is in the best interest of the organization and it's fans.

As for your dislikes of the Yankees, yes they have the highest payroll in baseball but I love how everyone focuses just on them. No one had a problem when Boston bought their World Series title last year. Yet the Yankees do it and immediately there's a problem. And as SB said, what about the Mets or even the Cubs in the NL? They have some pretty high payrolls and the Cubs are at least in first place. Granted I'm happy for them because they haven't won the series in 100 years but no one's bringing up the money issue. It's none other than good ol' fashion Yankee-hating. As such, I'm tired of the Yankees getting the short end of the stick. Granted I know it's to be expected as their's no middle ground when it comes to the Yankees, you either love them or hate them. But even though the Yankees have had the highest payroll in baseball for years, how many titles have they won since 2000? Regretfully none, so what's the problem really?
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 06:36 PM

As a fan of the Marlins I respect the hell out of George Steinbrenner and can't fault him at all for doing what MLB's system lets him do.

But Hank should've kept his mouth shut on Wang's injury. If a Red Sox pitcher got injured in the same fashion I doubt he would've said anything.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 06:59 PM

As a baseball fan, I find the Steinbrenners' to be big, rude, mean drama-queens. I hate their attitudes that their money is better than other's and I think they're disgusting.

But you know what? Fuck the big-league players today! We all prostitute ourselves in some manner, and these players are getting well paid, so let them put up with the bullshit from owners like the Steinbrenners.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/21/08 07:28 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Andrew
As a fan of the Marlins I respect the hell out of George Steinbrenner and can't fault him at all for doing what MLB's system lets him do.

But Hank should've kept his mouth shut on Wang's injury. If a Red Sox pitcher got injured in the same fashion I doubt he would've said anything.


If the Marlins had the Yankee payroll, the talent gap between them and the rest of the league would be mind boggling. I don't think that there is an organization that evaluates talent and plans for the future with limited resources as well as the Marlins.

They're doing it the right way.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/22/08 08:29 PM

Freaking Farnsworth! What an idiot!! He tried to catch a ball with his pitching hand!!! He just walked off the mound holding his hand out in front of him like he was hurt. WTF was he thinking????? Now Mo is in.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 02:33 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
As for your dislikes of the Yankees, yes they have the highest payroll in baseball but I love how everyone focuses just on them. No one had a problem when Boston bought their World Series title last year.


I disagree. Right now people have the same negative feelings towards Boston as they do towards the Yankees. When the Red Sox finally won a championship in '04 I think most fans were happy because they were the underdogs as well as the rivals of the long hated Yankees with a long history of failing to win a World Series while the Yankees won so many.

When the Sox won again most fans were tired of it already because they were buying championships like the Yankees. In fact, with the success of the Red Sox, Celtics and Patriots most fans have had enough of that entire city, but we don't need to get into the other sports.

If the Mets and Cubs and any other high payroll team were to win other people would be just as upset, especially if they were to make the playoffs every single year.

However, I believe it's fair to say that it's tough for other high payroll teams to do as well as the Yankees because New York sucks up most of the best talent while the other teams settle for what's left. Proof is in A-Rod. Why isn't he a Cub?

The Yankees can out-pay any other team.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 02:39 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
However, I believe it's fair to say that it's tough for other high payroll teams to do as well as the Yankees because New York sucks up most of the best talent while the other teams settle for what's left. Proof is in A-Rod. Why isn't he a Cub?

The Yankees can out-pay any other team.


There's something about playing in New York, with all the media attention that goes with it. The big talent stars are looking to make mega bucks with endorsement deals that seem to go hand-in-hand with New York.

FWIW - As a Red Sox fan, I agree that a lot of their hardcore fans are somewhat disenchanted with them now (for being a "corporate" entity rather than just a baseball team). I know I am.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 02:48 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
FWIW - As a Red Sox fan, I agree that a lot of their hardcore fans are somewhat disenchanted with them now (for being a "corporate" entity rather than just a baseball team). I know I am.


Believe me, if the Giants could buy a championship I'd be the happiest fan ever. I would also get sick of it quick though if it were every year.

I wish it were a level playing field. Then teams, such as the Marlins, might be in contention each year because they are so good at evaluating young talent and bringing those players to the big league. There needs to be a set salary cap for players and the teams, like in the NBA.

But MLB won't allow it, and ESPN will continue to milk the New York/Boston angle as much as they can even though most of the country has been sick of it for years. It's sad.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 02:56 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
I wish it were a level playing field. Then teams, such as the Marlins, might be in contention each year because they are so good at evaluating young talent and bringing those players to the big league. There needs to be a set salary cap for players and the teams, like in the NBA.


Given some years I think a team like Florida will be in contention because of their minor leagues and how they bring talent up. Sadly, a few years down the road after that, some of their talented players might opt to leave them for "greener" (i.e. cash) pastures.

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
But MLB won't allow it, and ESPN will continue to milk the New York/Boston angle as much as they can even though most of the country has been sick of it for years. It's sad.


I think the rivalry is still one of sports' best and I look forward to watching them go head-to-head. With that in mind, I can't stand to see the personnel changes in the teams' lineups ... like Johnny Damon or Wade Boggs playing in pinstripes. Whatever happened to team loyalty? (I know... I know.... it's all about money now). THAT'S what is sad!!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 03:22 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
As for your dislikes of the Yankees, yes they have the highest payroll in baseball but I love how everyone focuses just on them. No one had a problem when Boston bought their World Series title last year.


I disagree. Right now people have the same negative feelings towards Boston as they do towards the Yankees. When the Red Sox finally won a championship in '04 I think most fans were happy because they were the underdogs as well as the rivals of the long hated Yankees with a long history of failing to win a World Series while the Yankees won so many.

When the Sox won again most fans were tired of it already because they were buying championships like the Yankees. In fact, with the success of the Red Sox, Celtics and Patriots most fans have had enough of that entire city, but we don't need to get into the other sports.


I agree with you that people are tired of the city of Boston constantly winning with the Celtics, Sox and Patriots. However, from where I sit, people aren't tired of the Red Sox winning. When they won the series in October all I heard about was dynasty, how great Beckett/Schilling were in October, another sweep, blah blah blah (and never once did I hear anyone bring up Boston's payroll). From my viewpoint, people are happy to see Boston win as long as it's not the Yankees (maybe it's different on the West Coast?).

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
However, I believe it's fair to say that it's tough for other high payroll teams to do as well as the Yankees because New York sucks up most of the best talent while the other teams settle for what's left. Proof is in A-Rod. Why isn't he a Cub?


I disagree with you on this point because Alex was acquired through a trade. If he's signed as a free agent then sure, the Yankees just outbid everyone else. However, in trades, other teams have the opportunity to either match or beat the Yankees offer. And remember, he was almost a Red Sox before he was a Yankee. The same thing can be said about Curt Schilling and Josh Beckett, they both were trades. The Yankees could have made a play for both. They actually did for Schilling but he took Boston due to his personal vendetta with the Yankees. I never heard the Yankees name brought up in the Beckett talks which means they totally missed their opportunity with that goose.

And yes, the Yankees do suck up a lot of the best players but how many have actually worked out for them? Just look at Carl Pavano who's been injury plagued for his 4 seasons in the Bronx. Or what about Jason Giambi who, while having a great season this year, hasn't been productive since 2006 but had horrible 2004, 2005, and 2007 seasons. Not to mention Johnny Damon last year or Hideki Matsui the past two years. And yet again I bring up the question. If the other teams are "settling" for what's left in the talent pool, it certainly hasn't kept them from winning the Series because the Yankees haven't won since 2000. So what's the problem? I understand that they spend, spend, and spend. Trade away top prospects to "rent" veterans for half a season but to what end? So they can make the postseason and lose in the first round?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 03:27 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
I wish it were a level playing field. Then teams, such as the Marlins, might be in contention each year because they are so good at evaluating young talent and bringing those players to the big league. There needs to be a set salary cap for players and the teams, like in the NBA.


Given some years I think a team like Florida will be in contention because of their minor leagues and how they bring talent up. Sadly, a few years down the road after that, some of their talented players might opt to leave them for "greener" (i.e. cash) pastures.


Yeah, probably for the next few years the Marlins will be the Oakland A's of the National League (which is a big compliment in today's baseball world).

Originally Posted By: SC
Whatever happened to team loyalty? (I know... I know.... it's all about money now). THAT'S what is sad!!


I agree, loyalty in sports is dead and it's a two-way street. The players have no loyalty to the organization and in turn the organization has no loyalty to the player (like why did Emmitt Smith not play his ENTIRE career in Dallas?). As Vince McMahon always says, "it's all about the mon-ayyyy!)
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/23/08 11:14 AM

No team has produced more major league talent through their system than the Montreal Expos, but sadly they knew there was no way to keep it. They and several other teams were essentially glorified minor league teams whose stars would leave once ripe.

It got to the point that these teams could not even draft the best amateurs available, knowing they didn't have the money to sign them.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 05:20 PM

Q: What do Derek Jeter and I have in common?

A: We both spent our 34th birthday in Pittsburgh. Jeter turns 34 today, SB.

Today also marks the 15th anniversary of the death of Hall of Fame catcher, Roy Campanella, whose career was tragically cut short by an auto accident in the late-50s.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 05:40 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
We both spent our 34th birthday in Pittsburgh.

Yeah, but 34 years apart whistle J/K wink
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 06:00 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: klydon1
We both spent our 34th birthday in Pittsburgh.

Yeah, but 34 years apart whistle J/K wink


lol

It would probably seem like 34 years. Actually, it's almost 10.

There is another major leaguer born on 6/26/1974. Do you know who it is?
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 06:15 PM


I cheated: Jason Kendall wink
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 06:44 PM

34?? That makes me feel a little bit like a dirty old lady. Not too much, just a little. Happy Birthday, Derek, on behalf of all the women who wouldn't mind giving you a little birthday love.

I have to admit that I was against making Joba a starter. I thought he should be kept as the set-up man and take over for Mo when he retires, which I'm pretty sure will be after next season. However, Joba has improved with each start, and he just may prove invaluable this season.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/26/08 08:10 PM

clap Congrats to Joba on his first win as a starter! Here's to the many more to come
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 06/29/08 12:15 AM


Johan, who? whistle grin
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 05:09 AM


ESPN came up with a hilarious mini-headline after the Yanks' assault of the Rangers after their dismal offense lately:

lol


Attached picture NYY18runs.jpg
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 06:09 AM

Yankees slugger reportedly separating from wife

NEW YORK -- Yankees slugger Alex Rodriguez and his wife have split less than three months after the birth of the couple's second daughter, according to a report in the New York Daily News.

The story on the newspaper's Web site comes amid reports linking Rodriguez to Madonna. Rodriguez refused to address the topic on three occasions Tuesday, once saying "no" when asked if he had any comment.

Yankees co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner also criticized the team's lack of hitting before an 18-7 win over the Texas Rangers on Wednesday night, suggesting "a little less outside distractions and a little more concentrating" might help the team at the plate.

The Daily News reported Wednesday night, citing an anonymous source, that Rodriguez and wife, Cynthia, have separated after having "problems" for about three months.

Cynthia Rodriguez's mother, Evangeline Scurtis, also denied a gossip Web site report that her daughter had gone on a romantic getaway with rocker Lenny Kravitz to Paris.

"She is not! I know that," Scurtis told The Daily News.

Scurtis repeatedly declined comment when asked about her daughter's relationship with Rodriguez.

The couple was married in November 2002 and has two children, Natasha Alexander and Ella Alexander, who was born April 21.

Rodriguez went 2-for-3 Wednesday night with his 17th homer of the season and also scored four times. It also was Rodriguez's 535th homer, moving him past Jimmie Foxx for 14th on the career list.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 06:36 AM


Why does this always turn into a TMZ affair? ohwell I, for one, don't give a shit about who Yanks are currently (and I use that term, perfectly) married to...


Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 07:46 PM

Yes, he got his 535th home run when the Yankees were scoring a ton of runs. Where was it the night before last, when they lost 3-2??? Jerkoff. He just can't get out of his own way.

And it would have been nice if the Yankees had spread those runs over a few games rather than scoring them all in one game.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 07:48 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

And it would have been nice if the Yankees had spread those runs over a few games rather than scoring them all in one game.


Tell me about it. A couple of weeks ago, the Phillies won 20-3 in St. Louis and then they lose 5 straight series and couldn't score runs.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 07:51 PM

It's just going to be a long summer here in NY. On the other hand, my friends who are Mets fans will finally shut up. Last summer, the gloating was unending. That is, until the postseason. grin
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 07:53 PM


This week is gonna make or break it, and I'm not very optimistic about it ohwell
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 08:05 PM

The thing is, we're not playing horribly. We're comfortably above .500. It's just that there are some teams in the AL who are playing really, really incredibly well. Tampa Bay, Boston, Oakland, LA, even Baltimore is only 1 game behind us. I would actually liked to see Toronto do better this season. I think that they have some good pitching, but it just isn't coming together for them.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/03/08 10:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I would actually liked to see Toronto do better this season.


That makes the two of us SB, although there's still hope. The Jays only have to play at like a .666 clip the rest of the season to make the playoffs. Difficult, not impossible.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:40 AM


Disgusting start to this important series. rolleyes

...and WTF Manny??? You fucking assaulted a 50-something year old man because he couldn't get your fucking retarded friends tickets to a sold out game???? Go fuck yourself!!! mad
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:43 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
...and WTF Manny??? You fucking assaulted a 50-something year old man because he couldn't get your fucking retarded friends tickets to a sold out game???? Go fuck yourself!!! mad


What's that all about??
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Don Jasani
The Jays only have to play at like a .666 clip the rest of the season to make the playoffs.


That makes sense that you would have to sell your soul to the devil in order to make the playoffs in the East. Either that or drop the "Devil" out of your name like the Rays did.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:48 AM


YES reported during tonight's broadcast that when the BoSox were in Houston, Manny went to the guy (forget his title) [Sox traveling secretary Jack McCormick] who handles tickets cuz he wanted 16 of them for a sold-out game. Players are normally just given 4. The game was sold out, and he was told he couldn't get that many tickets, so (supposedly) Manny put his hand on the guy's shoulder and pushed him to the ground!! eek OF COURSE this is being kept quiet. He should be suspended for months!!!! maybe enough time for him to grow the fuck up!!!!

[link]
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:49 AM

That's just Manny being Manny! Okay, sorry. I just hate when people say that.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 04:04 AM


And don't get me wrong... it's not me just picking on a Sox player after they kicked our ass tonight. That has nothing to do with it. There's a difference between CLASS (eg, Jeter) and CLASSLESS (eg, Ramirez). Doesn't matter what team he's on. Manny is just a classes piece of shit. Always was.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 04:10 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Originally Posted By: Don Jasani
The Jays only have to play at like a .666 clip the rest of the season to make the playoffs.


That makes sense that you would have to sell your soul to the devil in order to make the playoffs in the East. Either that or drop the "Devil" out of your name like the Rays did.


lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 05:58 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

And don't get me wrong... it's not me just picking on a Sox player after they kicked our ass tonight. That has nothing to do with it. There's a difference between CLASS (eg, Jeter) and CLASSLESS (eg, Ramirez). Doesn't matter what team he's on. Manny is just a classes piece of shit. Always was.


Same thing happened to Shawn Chacon and look what happened to him (he's in the unemployment line)
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 12:11 PM

Manny always was a piece of trash, unlike Big Papi, who seems like a totally cool guy. I mean, didn't he go after Youklis in the dugout not too long ago??
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/04/08 03:34 PM

Yes, your right SB. But again, they have an answer to that, "Manny being Manny!" smile
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/05/08 10:48 PM


WTF Rivera??? This is NOT the game to blow your first fucking save!!! Bases loaded, NO outs... 2 hit batsmen... WTF... mad

*whew!!* cool
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/06/08 01:56 PM

Easy JG, easy. Hank needs to give them a speech every day or do something outlandish like the old man.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/06/08 01:58 PM

Yeah, that's Hanky being Hanky.
Posted By: Santino Brasi

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/06/08 02:00 PM

JG will have an Aneurism at this rate
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/07/08 07:59 PM

Man arrested for beating New Yorker who wasn't a Yanks fan

FALMOUTH, Mass. (AP) -- A man was ordered held without bail Monday for allegedly beating a New York man with a baseball bat because he thought the man was a Yankees fan.

As it turned out, the New Yorker allegedly beaten in the land of the Red Sox isn't even a big baseball fan.

Police say Robert Correia, 20, and others spotted a car with New York license plates leaving a fireworks display Saturday. The group approached the car driven by William Nestor, of Northport, N.Y., and began yelling about the Yankees, according to the police report.

"When they saw the plates, they came at me," said Nestor, 29, whose family was traveling in two cars and stuck in heavy traffic after the fireworks on Cape Cod.

The police report said after Nestor confronted the group of men, Correia went to his nearby apartment in Falmouth and got an aluminum baseball bat, then struck Nestor three times.

Correia pleaded not guilty to charges of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon and malicious damage to a motor vehicle. He was ordered held without bail until a hearing Wednesday.

During Correia's arraignment Monday, his lawyer, Robert Nolan, said Correia was in his apartment when an altercation erupted between a New York man and one of Correia's friends. Correia picked up a bat and ran outside to break up the fight.

When the man charged Correia, he struck him with the bat, Nolan said.

Nestor said he's not a particularly big baseball fan and didn't know the Red Sox were playing the rival Yankees over the weekend. He was treated and released from Falmouth Hospital.

Source: SI
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/10/08 01:51 AM

Who's doing worse....Yanks or A-Rod off the field?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/10/08 06:16 AM

clap The Yanks win streak is at 4. They took the last two from Boston and just took two from the first-place Rays. Only 4 1/2 behind Boston and 6 1/2 behind Tampa
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/10/08 07:28 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
clap The Yanks win streak is at 4. They took the last two from Boston and just took two from the first-place Rays. Only 4 1/2 behind Boston and 6 1/2 behind Tampa


I'm sure Hank will take the credit, like his old man did.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/10/08 07:43 PM

No doubt, MC. Tonight they play against Pittsburgh (think it's a makeup for a rain out) and then off to Toronto. One of my coworkers planned a vacation in Toronto/Niagara Falls around their schedule, so he'll be at Saturday's game.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/11/08 01:07 PM

I heard on the radio the other day that Abreu's game-winning RBI in the 10th inning was his first game-winning RBI as a Yankee. Hard to believe. He's had a lot of big hits. ohwell
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/11/08 08:12 PM

Originally Posted By: MaryCas
I heard on the radio the other day that Abreu's game-winning RBI in the 10th inning was his first game-winning RBI as a Yankee. Hard to believe. He's had a lot of big hits. ohwell


I saw him with the Phillies beat the Giants in the bottom of the tenth with a game-ending inside the park homerun in August, 2001. He had tied the game late with a homerun too (I think).
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/12/08 07:55 PM

I'm surprised no chatter over Cashman wanting to sign the just-released First Baseman Richie Sexson, with the stats of:

BA: .218
HR: 11
RBI: 30
OBP: .315
SLG: .381

I'm sorry, but do the Yanks REALLY need another over-the-hill, strikeout machine?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/12/08 08:06 PM

It's stupid, especially since we seem to have an abundance of first basemen!

One of my friends is at the game today, so I'm glad to see that they're winning so far.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/13/08 12:12 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
It's stupid, especially since we seem to have an abundance of first basemen!

One of my friends is at the game today, so I'm glad to see that they're winning so far.


With those stats from RR re: Sexton, the Yanks should have just kept Andy Phillips.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/15/08 03:40 PM

A young Curt Schilling in the making?

Papelbon says he should close, then defers to Rivera

Confidence is a key element in a relief pitcher's mental make-up. And Boston's Jonathan Papelbon and the Yankees' Mariano Rivera, two of the game's best closers, don't lack for it.

Consider Papelbon, who on Monday suggested -- before toning down his comments -- that he should pitch the ninth in Tuesday night's All-Star Game rather than Rivera, even though the game is at Yankee Stadium.

"We've both earned that right; us, by winning the World Series and having the opportunity of having our manager there and our team being represented, and Mariano by what he's done for this role, we're in Yankee Stadium and blah, blah, blah," Papelbon said. "It's not that easy. Everybody thinks it's a cut and dry answer, but it's not."

"If I was managing the team, I would close," Papelbon said. "I'm not managing the team, so it don't matter."

But Rivera feels the same way about taking the mound for the ninth. "It's definitely tough, but we're here in Yankee Stadium. I think I should get the shot," Rivera said. "I definitely would love to. Knowing [Red Sox manager] Terry Francona, I have a feeling he'll put me there if we have the opportunity to close the game."

Francona, who is managing the AL thanks to Boston's 2007 World Series triumph, was mum when asked who would pitch the ninth. "Out of the spirit of the game and competition, and having a little bit of fun, we're not going to announce the rest of our rotation yet," Francona said.

In additional comments on Monday, Papelbon lessened the suspense, saying Rivera should get the nod.

"I'm making a statement right now, saying I don't want it, I want [Rivera] to have it. I said all that earlier, but that's the way I feel about it," Papelbon said.

"This is what I think, of course I want to close the game out. I wouldn't be Jonathan Papelbon if I didn't want to close the game out," he said. "But at the same time, there's also things within this game I have to understand and people have to understand. It doesn't always work out that way.

"I feel I owe a lot to this game and that's one of the things I owe to this game, to let an elder statesman go ahead of me."

Source: ESPN
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/16/08 05:56 AM


I knew it'd be extra innings...

AL wins again! smile
Posted By: olivant

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/17/08 01:52 AM

Are any parts of the old Yankee Stadium being incorporated into the new one?
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/17/08 05:52 AM

Originally Posted By: olivant
Are any parts of the old Yankee Stadium being incorporated into the new one?


You mean besides a mediocre clubhouse?
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/17/08 06:14 AM

Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: olivant
Are any parts of the old Yankee Stadium being incorporated into the new one?


You mean besides a mediocre clubhouse?


Let's keep the responses to people who may actually know WTF they're talking about... stick with your B- and C- and D- movies tongue wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/17/08 11:58 PM

Originally Posted By: olivant
Are any parts of the old Yankee Stadium being incorporated into the new one?


Monument park I know for sure. As for the Babe's bat outside and other statues around the stadium, I couldn't imagine them doing away with them.
Posted By: olivant

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/18/08 04:42 PM

I thought they might include some of the turf or part of a wall.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/18/08 05:12 PM

I'm not sure what will be carried over.

Part of the allure of Yankee Stadium was looking at the field and thinking, "That's where Babe Ruth stood when he walloped record breaking homers; that's the spot where Maris' 61st homer landed; that's the spot where Gehrig stood when he gave his emotional speech." None of that can be brought into the new park.

In Atlanta after the destruction of Fulton Co. Stadium, the exact spot where Aarons record breaking homer was caught, was located and a plaque was installed. I think it is on a sidewalk.
Posted By: Partagas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/19/08 08:14 PM

Question to Yank Fans aabout "The House that Ruth Built"?

My New York uncle ahs been a season ticket fam for like 500 years or so it seems. I see talk to him maybe once in a blue moon and can't remember the last time I talked to him before last week. Anyway, he said I am tired of everyone wringing their eyes out about tearing donw "Ruth's House". He said it hasn't been Ruth's House since the major overhaul in the 70's -- Now it is the "House that Lindsay Built" -- Mayor John Lindsay fame. He continued and said it never lookd the same, the integrity gone, and definitely does not feel the same. Said the Yanks might as well continued to play in Shea LOL.

So for those of you that went to games pre and post overhaul -- what do you think? Does it feel or look the same? Whose house is it smile
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/19/08 09:04 PM

The old stadium (pre-"overhaul") was better. The field was bigger to straightaway center (461') and the monuments out there were out in the open. With such a big outfield the game was played a lot differently (defensively). I remember the right field line use to be something like 296', so I guess they extended that somewhat, but it was always fun to see a short homer go down the line.

The big improvement came in the stands.... I remember getting seats in the "old" stadium that were behind posts that held up the second level. You'd miss half the game sitting behind one. lol They eliminated most of the bleacher seats (I used to sit out there with my friends because that was all we could afford in those days... I think a ticket cost about a buck).

Nobody has ever hit a home run out of the park. Mantle came within inches of doing it when he hit a shot off the right field roof (IF it was hit about a foot higher it would have cleared and probably would have travelled over 600 feet). (I heard a story once that Josh Gibson hit one out in an exhibition game).

Anyway, just knowing that the likes of Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio and Mantle ran its bases is enough to assure its place in history but it was RUTH'S house!!!
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/24/08 01:18 AM

A win today for Mike Mussina - number 13. That's great. For a lot of years the Yankees screwed him with run support. I hope he reaches 20 wins, which he never has attained. A Cy Young would be sweet too.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/24/08 01:22 AM

I hope he gets 20 too MC. He should have had it in 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2006. I know he won't win the Cy Young this year (that'll more than likely go to Cliff Lee) but I'd like to see him get 20 wins.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/24/08 03:44 AM

Watching Michael Kay interview Snoop Dogg is just about the funniest thing I've ever seen. You know, being that he's the whitest guy EVER. lol
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/24/08 01:38 PM

BTW, anyone else want to see them bring back Willie and dump Bobby "Wave 'Em Home" Meacham?

As per PeteAbe, the Yankees have had 13 runners thrown out at the plate, among the most in the game. Seven have been gunned down going from second to home, which is tied for the most. That’s on Bobby Meacham.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/24/08 03:13 PM

DJ! What is up our long lost brother?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/26/08 02:36 AM

Theeee Yankees win! The Yankeeeees wiiiiiin!!!
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/26/08 02:42 AM

Honestly?

I was rooting for SC's team tonight. smile
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/26/08 04:12 AM

Wow, what a performance by my main man Joba! His first trip to Boston and he outduels Beckett in his home park:

7 innings, 3 hits, 0 run, 1 walk, 9 strikeouts clap
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/26/08 05:39 PM

Love the Marte/Nady trade. We gave up virtually nothing except Tabata (who is underperforming and has serious attitude problems in AA) and Ohlendorf who looked like a AAAA player at best. Nady is one of the hottest hitters in the league right now, and even if he regresses to his statistical average, his fielding and insane numbers against left handers more than make up for his .280's ish average lifetime. Plus, I'll take anybody in Right Field besides Bobby Abreu. If Abreu declines arbitration next year we'll get two compensatory draft picks, which should be great. I wouldn't be surprised if Minaya picks up Abreu for the Mets.

Marte is just an added bonus, he has sick stuff and will be a nice way to keep Farnsworth out of close games (see last night). Considering we once traded him when he was a farmhand for Enrique Wilson, I'm glad we got him back as part of this deal.

Also, for those who are upset we didn't get Bay...Bay is below average outfielder defensively, and Nady is 29 and seems to (hopefully) hit his prime. Bay's price tag probably would have been Hughes - he and McClouth basically ARE the Pirates at this point. Hopefully Nady has found his niche and will be a nice Scott Brosius type as the Yankees make this second half push, and possibly someone who could be our right fielder for the next few years.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/27/08 04:35 AM

Yanks take the first 2 from Boston and look for the sweep today clap
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/27/08 07:02 PM

Please don't jinx them!!
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/27/08 08:40 PM

I guarantee the sweep tonight. In fact, I would say it is impossible for the Red Sox to win tonight.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/27/08 11:20 PM

That's just mean, Klyd! Stop trying to jinx my Yankees!!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 03:23 AM

Wow, Ponson had a bad outing. Oh well, we still took 2-of-3 from Boston in Beantown cool
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 10:33 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
I guarantee the sweep tonight. In fact, I would say it is impossible for the Red Sox to win tonight.


You did it you jinxer! But honestly, how long did any Yankee fan think Sidney Pondscum would last. He was throwing meatballs in the first two innings....then I switched to Animal Planet. But as another Meatball - I mean Meatloaf - sang, 2 outta 3 ain't bad.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 11:39 AM

I12, when are you going to learn your lesson? A bragging, boastful fan will always get the equivalent of a bitch-slap.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 12:50 PM

I think the Yankees are a lock for the playoffs. In fact, I think it's impossible to keep them out of the postseason.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 02:22 PM

OK, Klyd. Keep it up. You have obviously never faced the wrath of an angry Sicilian Yankees fan, or you would not be walking such a dangerous line.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 02:34 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
OK, Klyd. Keep it up. You have obviously never faced the wrath of an angry Sicilian Yankees fan, or you would not be walking such a dangerous line.


clap grin
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 02:35 PM

I wasn't impressed with the starting Yankees pitcher last night!!

I am possibly not alone in this opinion....?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 02:42 PM

You shouldn't be. It's Sidney Ponson.

We pulled him off the junk pile, and he has been the luckiest pitcher in the AL (as the stat showed last night, he has the best run support of any pitcher right now).

Don't get fooled by Washburn's start yesterday, he's still a #4 starter at his best. While I don't have much faith in him, Ian Kennedy has been tearing up the minor leagues, and it sounds like Rasner is going to have one last chance to prove himself before they bring Kennedy back up.

Unfortunately, because of his track record this season, Ponson is certain to get at least one more start. frown
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 04:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
You shouldn't be. It's Sidney Ponson.

Unfortunately, because of his track record this season, Ponson is certain to get at least one more start. frown


I know you mean Pondscum...,but when is Wang due back? When he does come back Fat Sid will be cut loose...if not sooner.

Good observation Yogi. Most Yankee fans groaned when they signed him, remembering his last go round. He was signed to fill the Chien Ming Wang departure to the DL. Please get better quick Wanger.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 05:46 PM

Wang's not due back until September, which translates to "rest of the season".
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 05:55 PM

Hughes and Pavano are suppose to make rehab starts this week though so help "could" be on the way
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 07:46 PM

Did you just seriously mention Pavano as possible pitching help? grin

Seriously, I bet he pulls a muscle just putting his uniform on tonight. He and Hughes will be rehab starting in Class A.

If all goes well, I'd say both of them (theoretically), with at least a start in AA and AAA (probably more for Pavano), could return in August. Hughes has never had a problem dominated MiLB pitching, but the question is whether he can regain the marks of brilliance we saw in the playoffs last year.

Hughes hasn't been right since that hamstring tweak last year. Let's hope he's used this time to diagnose what's wrong with his windup.

Also, Ian Kennedy should be back within the next week or so too. He's tearing it up in AAA, although his last MLB tour soured me on his skill level. I really see him as a trading chip at this point, but I guess you can't give up on last years MiLB pitcher of the year so quickly. We'll see what happens.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/28/08 09:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Don't get fooled by Washburn's start yesterday, he's still a #4 starter at his best.


Well, he certainly made the Blue Jay bats look silly yesterday which admittedly, hasn't been a hard thing to do this season.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/29/08 03:36 PM

Pavano??? Pavano??? I didn't know he was still around!! OMG!

And what the hell happened to Moose last night? It was a disaster. Watching that game was like watching a car accident. You don't want to look, but you can't tear your eyes away.

It's all Klyd's fault for putting his voodoo on the team.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/29/08 09:01 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

And what the hell happened to Moose last night? It was a disaster. Watching that game was like watching a car accident. You don't want to look, but you can't tear your eyes away.

It's all Klyd's fault for putting his voodoo on the team.


Moose has those moments. Klyd should just stick to the Phillies. He keeps sending those Pennsylvania vibes across the Delaware. Go back, Go back! BTW, Klyd, I shot a 90 at the Noname.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 01:11 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

And what the hell happened to Moose last night?


It made you remember that if this team is counting on Mike Mussina down the stretch, or even in their next year plans, it would be a colossal mistake. He's going to get back to the mean sooner or later. The best possible option would be to let him go after this year and getting two compensatory draft picks. With his great year this year, I suspect Mussina would be a Type A and net us some very nice draft picks.

Incidentally, to briefly give an example of how important these compensatory picks can be, we got Joba Chamberlain as a compensatory pick from Tom Gordon when we didn't resign him and he went elsewhere. wink

While I don't have a lot of faith in either right now, I'm hoping Hughes has fixed his mechanics and Kennedy regains his confidence so that we will have two more arms to add down this second half run.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 02:57 AM

Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

And what the hell happened to Moose last night? It was a disaster. Watching that game was like watching a car accident. You don't want to look, but you can't tear your eyes away.

It's all Klyd's fault for putting his voodoo on the team.


Moose has those moments. Klyd should just stick to the Phillies. He keeps sending those Pennsylvania vibes across the Delaware. Go back, Go back! BTW, Klyd, I shot a 90 at the Noname.


Great job at the Noname, MaryCas.

I may get my punishment soon if Manny Ramirez comes to Philly. Actually, I don't think it'll happen, but I'd take Manny for Burrell and Meyers. Charlie Manuel doesn't coddle guys or put up with crap, like Francona. Then again, Francona has two championships and has gotten a lot out of Ramirez, who is one of the most offensively productive and consistent players the game has ever seen. The Red Sox would be crazy to get rid of him.

That said, there is no way in hell that Mike Mussina will lose another game this season. I think the Yankees should hang on to Ponson, so Mussina is no longer the most miserable and surly person in the organization. wink

Also, how about those Angels? And now they have Texeira.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 01:31 PM

OH NO - SB, another Klydon1 curse - "there is no way in hell that Mike Mussina will lose another game this season".

Manny being Manny. What a cop out. Manny is just a nut,...who can hit. Do the Phillies really need him? or want him? He'll disrupt the chemistry (there is chemistry, isn't there?)
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 02:44 PM

Meh, I'd take Manny on the Yankees. In fact, I'd be ecstatic. Especially since he's going to ask for the moon contract wise, and I'm not sure how many teams could afford to give it to him outside of the Red Sox or Yankees.

Besides, this is probably the standard garbage it always is with the Sox/Manny. How many times in the last 3 or 4 years have we heard that Manny was "out" so to speak and was close to being traded/released? The Sox aren't dumb. They can't let him go until after the season at least, and I'd honestly be surprised if they let him go at all.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 02:54 PM

The Orioles have just been giving the Yanks fits for the last couple of years.
Posted By: Yogi Barrabbas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 03:07 PM

Klyd has only cursed the Yankees because he wants to see his Phillies succeed!

You can't blame him for that? whistle
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 03:47 PM

Some good news at least



Wang has cast removed

NEW YORK -- Yankees manager Joe Girardi laughed when he said he offered to cut pitcher Chien-Ming Wang's cast off.

The right-hander didn't take him up on the offer, but he did have his cast removed on Tuesday afternoon, and Girardi wasn't the only one smiling. Wang broke into a wide grin when asked if he was happy to have the cast off his right leg. He also had an X-ray taken, and he said the results looked good.

The Yankees ace injured his right foot running the bases during an Interleague game in Houston on June 15. He was placed on the disabled list on June 17, retroactive to June 16, with a ligament sprain and a partial tendon tear.

Wang, who now wears a black protective boot and still uses crutches, said he did not have a clear idea of when he would be able to start pitching again, and Girardi said the timeline for Wang's rehabilitation could be similar to the Spring Training process -- about six or seven weeks.

"He just got out of a cast, so, obviously, you've got to think there's somewhat of a weakness there," Girardi said. "You've got to build him up to where you feel like he's strong enough to get off a mound, and that's going to take time."

Wang was examined at New York Presbyterian on Tuesday by Dr. Justin Greisberg and will be reevaluated in one week. Wang hopes to lose the crutches and receive what he described as insoles with air to cushion his foot as he begins to walk again. His rehab will follow shortly.

New York originally hoped that Wang might be able to return as soon as Sept. 1. Girardi said on Tuesday that date may be pushed back, but he will watch Wang's rehab closely and is optimistic the Yankees could have their starter back before the end of the season.

"I still believe there's a good chance we're going to get him back in September," Girardi said. "Whether it's Sept. 1, that might be stretching a little bit. But I still think we're going to get him back."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 05:45 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Meh, I'd take Manny on the Yankees. In fact, I'd be ecstatic. Especially since he's going to ask for the moon contract wise, and I'm not sure how many teams could afford to give it to him outside of the Red Sox or Yankees.

Besides, this is probably the standard garbage it always is with the Sox/Manny. How many times in the last 3 or 4 years have we heard that Manny was "out" so to speak and was close to being traded/released? The Sox aren't dumb. They can't let him go until after the season at least, and I'd honestly be surprised if they let him go at all.


Exactly. Every year since 2003 they talk about getting rid of him, and he comes up big at the big time and carries the team. He is the Reggie Jackson of his era, only a much better pure hitter. Reggie too was frequently accused of dogging it, and he didn't get along with his teammates or management either, but he was indeed the straw that stirred the drink.

I agree that if the Sox ever let Manny go, they would deeply regret it. It would be almost as dumb as selling Babe Ruth.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 08:53 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
[quote=Double-J]Meh, I'd take Manny on the Yankees. In fact, I'd be ecstatic. Especially since he's going to ask for the moon contract wise, and I'm not sure how many teams could afford to give it to him outside of the Red Sox or Yankees.


I agree that if the Sox ever let Manny go, they would deeply regret it. It would be almost as dumb as selling Babe Ruth.



Yes! A new curse could begin. clap
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/30/08 08:57 PM



Breaking News!!!!

The Tigers have traded catcher Ivan Rodriguez to the Yankees for pitcher Kyle Farsnworth. [sic.]
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/31/08 12:42 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff


Breaking News!!!!

The Tigers have traded catcher Ivan Rodriguez to the Yankees for pitcher Kyle Farsnworth. [sic.]




You're Yankin' My Doodle! eek If that's true, there really is a God (well, I know that, but you know what I mean). Holy Freakin' Mackeral and Cow. I don't care if his better years are behind him. JG, what does that (sic) mean....it's a joke? Please don't say that.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/31/08 01:14 AM

Wow, someone else was actually stupid enough to take Farnsworthless!? clap Good riddance!
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/31/08 03:18 AM

Originally Posted By: MaryCas
JG, what does that (sic) mean....it's a joke? Please don't say that.


[sic.] means "as written" (they misspelled his name, but since it was in a quote, I kept it that way and didn't want anyone to think it was *my* blunder!) wink
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 07/31/08 01:22 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: MaryCas
JG, what does that (sic) mean....it's a joke? Please don't say that.


[sic.] means "as written" (they misspelled his name, but since it was in a quote, I kept it that way and didn't want anyone to think it was *my* blunder!) wink



If "Fars-n-worth" was a misspelling, maybe it was sub-conscious...as in Farce n' Worth-less.
Posted By: dontomasso

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/01/08 03:23 PM

The yankees need some geritol.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/01/08 08:29 PM

Originally Posted By: dontomasso
The yankees need some geritol.


Throw in a little Glucosemine and Condroitin (sp.?), and "Gimme the Balm, Tiger Balm!" panic
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/03/08 11:53 PM

Well, at least they split with the Angels. They had a great come from behind win today to be proud of. But still, that 1-0 lose a few days ago was tough
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/05/08 05:29 AM

Just what we need, Joba going down with an injury rolleyes
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/05/08 09:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Just what we need, Joba going down with an injury rolleyes


Not good at all. Just when he was beginning to hit his stride. Mussina and Pettite can't carry the starters. I guess they will have to score double digits every game.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:48 AM

If Joba's injuried for an extended period of time, pack it in because it's O-V-E-R
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:04 PM

I12, I agree with your estimation of how critical Joba is to the team; however, it's August and we're 6 1/2 games out. I think it already is O-V-E-R.
Posted By: CamillusDon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:24 PM

What happen to the die hard Yankee Fans that use to hang out here?....
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:30 PM

Hey, what does admitting the truth have to do with being a fan or not? I would rather watch the Yankees than any other team because there is always that magical possibility that somehow they manage that come from behind miracle that eludes other teams.

The difference between a die hard fan and a fickle one is that the true fan persists in watching even when they ARE losing. And that I will continue to do.
Posted By: CamillusDon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I would rather watch the Yankees than any other team because there is always that magical possibility that somehow they manage that come from behind miracle that eludes other teams.



So what ever happen to...it's not over to it is over?....
It is only the sixth of August...from what I see.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 02:54 PM

6 1/2 games in the beginning of August is not a lot, especially when you factor in the wild card race, which is just beginning. Many teams have made the playoffs from greater deficits in less time, and they didn't have the resources of the Yankees.

Tampa Bay is young and unproven, and struggles on the road. Boston has lost its best player, and several of the 14 AL teams have been out of the race two months ago.

If Chamberlain comes back soon, I think they'll have to watch him closely. He hasn't thrown a lot of innings this year and whenever big, young hard throwers develop shoulder pain, it's something to monitor.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/06/08 05:26 PM

I again gotta agree with klydon1. The Yankees can come back from 6 1/2 out on August 6th (how many games were they back at this point last year?). And if they can't win the division, then they have a shot at the wild card. All I'm saying is with Pettitte's last two starts, Rasner now moved to the bullpen, Ponson blowing up in Boston last week (followed by a great performance against Anaheim), without a dominant ace who can stop the bleeding like Joba, the Yankees just won't be able to turn this thing around. I mean, they've just lost 2 straight games to the Rangers for crying out loud!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 04:04 AM

Well Joba's on the 15-day DL and Ponson had another good outing
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 06:56 PM

Where is A-Roid on the stat sheet for BAvg. with men in scoring position. I know there was a time last year when he was 2nd to last.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 07:06 PM

Originally Posted By: MaryCas
Where is A-Roid on the stat sheet for BAvg. with men in scoring position. I know there was a time last year when he was 2nd to last.


2008 Situation Stats:

.315 AVG

.354 Bases Empty
.276 Runners On
.238 RISP
.222 RISP w/2 Outs
.143 Bases Loaded

Mr Clutch. ohwell
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 07:18 PM

And Jeter with bases loaded?? .333 this season and in 2007, his average with the bases loaded was .500, so he must be slipping. Yet some people think he's not clutch and overrated. Yeah, sure. rolleyes
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 07:50 PM

I dunno, I'd go ahead and take Alex on my team if you guys hate him that much. I get that he hasn't delivered in the post season...but no one on that team has in almost a decade.
Posted By: Ice

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 10:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
And Jeter with bases loaded?? .333 this season and in 2007, his average with the bases loaded was .500, so he must be slipping. Yet some people think he's not clutch and overrated. Yeah, sure. rolleyes


He's definitely one of the best bases-loaded and full-count hitters in the history of the game - many scouts consider these two statistics perhaps the most important for hitting.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 10:52 PM

While situational batting statistics can be used to gleam important data on whether a hitter can perform when the pressure is on, on base percentage, slugging percentage and OPS are much better indicators of a hitter's productivity and importance to the team. The number one job of a hitter is to get on base and thus prevent an out from being made. Although Jeter looks to be having a bit of an off year by his standards, his career OBP is .386, his career slugging percentage is .459 and his career OPS is .845 which are quite solid numbers.
Posted By: Ice

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/07/08 11:56 PM

You're right, of course, DJ. But I assure you that many, many scouts value what a guy does in the clutch (bases load and full count) more than any other statistic.

Performing in the clutch is what sports is all about. It's what separates a guy like Michael Jordan from Kobe Bryant and Vince Carter types - those guys might be able to show M.J-like greatness in spurts, but it's what they do in the playoffs and clutch situations that is the truest gauge of greatness, IMO.

If you need ONE crucial hit, in ONE crucial game,.. Derek Jeter is about as good as it gets. cool
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/10/08 02:40 AM

Manny wants to be a Yankee




Having successfully orchestrated his divorce from Boston and his landing in with the Dodgers, Manny Ramirez would like to make life miserable for the Red Sox during the next few seasons. According to people who have spoken to the eccentric outfielder since he was dealt to L.A. on July 31, Ramirez wants to sign a free-agent deal with the Yankees this offseason and get 19 chances a year to punish Boston. "He wants to play for the Yankees so he can get at the Red Sox," a close friend of Ramirez's told The Post.

Source: SI




I'd probably take him over Abreu next year. What do you guys think?
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/10/08 08:32 AM

then he will become just another guy who went to the Yankees and became a piece of shit. A-Rod was the greatest thing that had ever happened in baseball, and then he goes to the Yankees and becomes a chokejob-son of a bitch. plus, Manny is not that great of a guy either and that is not the Yankees' problem. their lineup should be enough already. Abreu is a HOF caliber hitter. but alright, in theory, that 3-4 punch with A-Rod and Manny could be this century version of Ruth/Gehrig.

also from SI.com - MLB investigating Manny exit

I've seen people saying that what he did in his final days in Boston is just as bad or even worse than using steroids, and that teams should give him the Bonds treatment next year. anyway, what would be of this guy if he couldn't hit?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/10/08 04:54 PM

Manny cut those dreds?? Never happen. The man is a nightmare. He's a poor team player, to make an understatement. In this season alone, he took HIMSELF out of the lineup and attacked a member of his own team in the dugout. Unless Torre can work a miracle with him this summer, I wouldn't want him.

Abreu's been an important contributor this season. I wouldn't want to see him replaced with that sloppy pain in the ass. They don't need to shell out big money for another bat. Let them invest in some pitching instead.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/10/08 07:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Manny cut those dreds?? Never happen. The man is a nightmare. He's a poor team player, to make an understatement. In this season alone, he took HIMSELF out of the lineup and attacked a member of his own team in the dugout. Unless Torre can work a miracle with him this summer, I wouldn't want him.

Abreu's been an important contributor this season. I wouldn't want to see him replaced with that sloppy pain in the ass. They don't need to shell out big money for another bat. Let them invest in some pitching instead.


Cosnidering that Cashman picked up Richie Sexson this year.....you just know that's not gonna happen unless Cashman is canned.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 01:20 AM

4 days and no posts. Why? Because they suck. 9 games out. They are closer to last place than first place.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:14 AM

They still have a shot at the wild card but if they continue to struggle as they have recently, they won't. I'm not worried about Boston this year. I think it'll be the Angels and the Cubs in the World Series and I'm pulling for Chicago!
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:09 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
They still have a shot at the wild card


No, they don't. Seriously, pack it in this year. This team not only doesn't want it, it would be ridiculous to think we could even compete right now with Boston, Tampa, or the White Sox.

Although I still find it hilarious that on most blogs and sports news, the biggest concern/complaint is that our #9 hitter is terrible. Seriously? I mean, Melky Cabrera is the entire reason this team fails? Really? Are you guys watching the same games I am?

Look at it this way. Hank's going to open up the warchest and go for Sabathia and another FA pitcher. Teixiera has already said he's going to opt for FA (he's a Boras client after all). Manny wants to come to the Yanks, as per his own lips. Hopefully Jeter rebounds a bit, Posada will be pseudo-healthy (who's an idiot now for being against the 4-year-deal? I took so much heat for wanting to let Posada go). Matsui or Damon can be moved to free up space. Abreu will be gone, hopefully declining arbitration, netting us two draft picks. Similarly, we'll offer Pudge arbitration, which he won't accept since Posada will take back the starting role. Hopefully Nady has matured into the player people hoped he'd be when he was a Mets farmhand.

Unfortunately, we still have A-Rod...I heard the best idea the other day, in regards to replacing Bobby Meachem @ third base:

"Why not replace Meachem with Madonna? She waves everybody home."

Not a bad idea.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:08 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Manny cut those dreds?? Never happen. The man is a nightmare. He's a poor team player, to make an understatement. In this season alone, he took HIMSELF out of the lineup and attacked a member of his own team in the dugout. Unless Torre can work a miracle with him this summer, I wouldn't want him.

Abreu's been an important contributor this season. I wouldn't want to see him replaced with that sloppy pain in the ass. They don't need to shell out big money for another bat. Let them invest in some pitching instead.


Manny is far from a nightmare. He's one of the top 5 hitters in the league, and future Hall of Famer. He'd be a great addition to the Bronx Zoo. I'd take him in a heartbeat, and hope Cashman does.

Give me Manny over A-Rod in a big spot at the plate any day of the week.

Incidentally, Abreu is absolute shit in the outfield, so I don't think you'd lose much. Nady is his replacement anyways. Abreu should be gone, he wants too much money and years for his age. While I wouldn't be adverse to seeing him come back, we desperately need to dump one of our DH's, and I suspect Giambi is the odd man out.

We absolutely need to shell out money for another big bat. This lineup is so vastly overrated it's not even funny. This is the worst Yankee lineup I've seen with RiSP since I can remember watching as a kid in the early 90's.

Things the Yankees need to address in the offseason:

  • A true leadoff hitter with a high OBP
  • A true #3 hitter (Nady?)
  • A decent-hitting first baseman who can play defense (Teixiera?)
  • A player to protect A-Rod in the order (Manny?)
  • Two *starting* pitchers (Sabathia and perhaps Sheets/Garland/Burnett/Wolf)
  • Retain Molina
  • Lose two from this list, preferably by trade or arbitration decline: Damon, Matsui, Giambi, Abreu
  • Retain the core of the bullpen


Example of how much better the 2009 Yankees could be simply through FA acquisitions:

Damon
Jeter
Teixiera
Manny
A-Rod
Nady
Posada
Matsui/Giambi
Cabrera

Sabathia
Wang
Chamberlain
1 of: Sheets/Garland/Burnett/Wolf
1 of: Pettitte/Mussina
Hughes

Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I'm not worried about Boston this year. I think it'll be the Angels and the Cubs in the World Series and I'm pulling for Chicago!


I thought you'd be rooting for the Mets if the Yanks were out of it? Keep your story straight.

Shit, you're going to end up making me root for the Red Sox, just to see you go bald from stress even faster. tongue

And for the record, Manny is the most feared hitter in baseball. Yes, he's a jerk. And yes, A-Rod has the numbers. But in the clutch? It's not even worth arguing about.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:24 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy

And for the record, Manny is the most feared hitter in baseball. Yes, he's a jerk. And yes, A-Rod has the numbers. But in the clutch? It's not even worth arguing about.


^ This.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Look at it this way. Hank's going to open up the warchest and go for Sabathia and another FA pitcher.


Hopefully you're right. This is what I keep thinking of. If the Yankees lose enough, Steinbrenner will do something BIG in the offseason to prevent this from happening again in 2009. I hope they go after Yu Darvish from the Japanese league who they're claiming will be the next Dice-K. But yes, just pick him or CC up along with Teixeria and K-Rod and I'll be happy for 2009 grin
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:30 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I'm not worried about Boston this year. I think it'll be the Angels and the Cubs in the World Series and I'm pulling for Chicago!


I thought you'd be rooting for the Mets if the Yanks were out of it? Keep your story straight.

Shit, you're going to end up making me root for the Red Sox, just to see you go bald from stress even faster. tongue

And for the record, Manny is the most feared hitter in baseball. Yes, he's a jerk. And yes, A-Rod has the numbers. But in the clutch? It's not even worth arguing about.


I am going for the Mets if the Yankees don't make it but the Mets have to make it first too wink And if there bullpen keeps costing them games, it'll be just as cold in Queens as it is in the Bronx. But I'd be happy to see this Chicago team lift the curse. So much was made about Boston that the White Sox were barely even noticed as 2005 World Series Champs. It's the Cubs turn now.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:32 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I'm not worried about Boston this year. I think it'll be the Angels and the Cubs in the World Series and I'm pulling for Chicago!


I thought you'd be rooting for the Mets if the Yanks were out of it? Keep your story straight.

Shit, you're going to end up making me root for the Red Sox, just to see you go bald from stress even faster. tongue

And for the record, Manny is the most feared hitter in baseball. Yes, he's a jerk. And yes, A-Rod has the numbers. But in the clutch? It's not even worth arguing about.


I am going for the Mets if the Yankees don't make it but the Mets have to make it first too wink And if there bullpen keeps costing them games, it'll be just as cold in Queens as it is in the Bronx.


First place this morning, son. smile
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:34 PM

Still a lot of baseball left and I'm sure the Philies aren't going anywhere fast. Need I bring up the Mets at this point last season? I didn't think so, and yes they're a different team but until the regular season is over and the Mets have secured a spot, then I'll breathe a sign of relief.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: Double-J
Look at it this way. Hank's going to open up the warchest and go for Sabathia and another FA pitcher.


Hopefully you're right. This is what I keep thinking of. If the Yankees lose enough, Steinbrenner will do something BIG in the offseason to prevent this from happening again in 2009. I hope they go after Yu Darvish from the Japanese league who they're claiming will be the next Dice-K. But yes, just pick him or CC up along with Teixeria and K-Rod and I'll be happy for 2009 grin


I honest to God hope they stay away from Darvish because right now he's a pipe dream, and he has said he doesn't even want to come over here. We should learn from Igawa and Irabu - Japanese pitchers that can succeed in the West are rare. Dice-K looks like the obvious exception, and he may go the way of Nomo within another 2 seasons...the league figured out Nomo fairly quickly. Japanese league pitchers just don't seem the be able to adapt to MLB hitters.

And K-Rod will not come to the Yankees, he wants to close, so he wouldn't sign with us. Meh, his delivery is a recipe for arm problems anyways, and he's building up some mileage on that frame of his. I'd be hesitant to sign him for a long-term deal beyond 3-4 years.

On the plus side, Melancon in the ML is predicted to be the next "Joba" and is the anticipated closer. He dominates the ML just like Joba, and sacrifices a little less speed (still in the mid-90's) for more control. They're babying him like it's nobodies business. Otherwise, I'm pretty happy with the bullpen as constructed. Ramirez and Veras are developing nicely into two above-average relievers, Bruney when healthy should be fine, Giese has been terrific, Robertson looks like a stud, and anything they can get from Marte is a bonus. Mo is pitching like he's 26 years old.

But yes, I agree, I think it is vital that the Yankees make a huge, perhaps unprecedented FA splash this offseason, with priorities in this order:

1.) Sabathia
2.) Manny
3.) Teixiera
4.) Sheets/Garland/Burnett/Wolf
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:39 PM

You really think they should go after Manny harder than Teixiera? Mark's not as feared a hitter (yet) but he does have the youth over Manny. Also, the guy who they should have picked up 5 years ago instead of Gary Sheffield will be a free agent (and yes, I'm talking about Vladimir Guerrero). But if the Angels win the World Series this year (which more than likely they will) I think he'll stay put
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 02:43 PM

If you watch A-Rod this year, you see why we need Manny more than Teixiera in the short-term. Yes, it's basically another albatross, but A-Rod has nobody in the lineup to protect him. You can't pass up a talent of Manny's caliber. He would give us a deadly 3-4-5 threat if Nady has finally matured; even more if Teixiera arrives.

Teixiera is a *nice* player but I don't overrate him, I think he's a very-good-but-not-upper-echelon first baseman (i.e. a step or two behind Pujols). I'd still love to have him though. Give me Teixiera over someone like an Abreu any day as my #3 hitter.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:21 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Teixiera is a *nice* player but I don't overrate him, I think he's a very-good-but-not-upper-echelon first baseman (i.e. a step or two behind Pujols). I'd still love to have him though. Give me Teixiera over someone like an Abreu any day as my #3 hitter.


I agree with this entire statement. What do you think of Vlad? I know he's had his share of injuries, but really who hasn't on the Yankee roster this year?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:42 PM

I don't think Vlad would leave LA, but I'd take him in a heartbeat. The guy hits everything. Reminds me of the scene in Mr. Baseball when Jack reaches across the plate to hit a ball when they're intentionally walking him. Vlad is sick.

I just doubt he'll leave LA, especially if the Angels go deep in the playoffs this year (which I think they will, they're hot at the right time).
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:49 PM

I just checked. Vlad, like John Lackey, is subject to a club option in 2009, which I'm sure the Angels will pick up.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:51 PM

Gotcha, wasn't aware of that, thanks.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 03:55 PM

No worries. If I knew he was hitting the market I'd be salivating. grin
Posted By: dontomasso

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:05 PM

How do those Yankees like sniffing Tampa Bay's ass?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:07 PM

Originally Posted By: dontomasso
How do those Yankees like sniffing Tampa Bay's ass?


Ask Tampa. They've been doing it for the last 10 years. They should know by now.

BTW - I forgot that the Rays have already won the World Series. I wouldn't be surprised if the injuries to Longoria and Crawford now allow Boston to snatch them up and take the division.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:27 PM

It's also funny DJ how this Rays fan comes outta the woodwork 120 games into the season lol Let's not pat them on the back too hard though, they just set a franchise record with 71 wins wink But hey, at least it's not Boston right clap
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:30 PM

Yeah, the Rays fans are pretty hilarious, but I guess we'll see how much they care once the Bucs are in full swing...besides, I still want to see whether these injuries will derail the Ray-train.

Also...our Freddie Sayz and the Bleacher Creatures > their wannabe cowbell artist and the gay heckler behind home plate.
Posted By: dontomasso

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:42 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
It's also funny DJ how this Rays fan comes outta the woodwork 120 games into the season lol Let's not pat them on the back too hard though, they just set a franchise record with 71 wins wink But hey, at least it's not Boston right clap


lol Damn straight I'm coming out of the woodwork! Boston may catch the Rays, but the Yankees will be home for the playoffs. And its a good thing. I heard their equipment manager has run out of Depends.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:45 PM

Well, thanks for keeping the seat warm for us. It must have gotten a little stale from sitting there for 11 years.

Still, it will be interesting to see what happens in the next month, Longoria and Crawford are cornerstones and out. Boston should catch them as long as their pitching stays healthy. Tampa does currently have winning records against Boston and LAA.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:55 PM

Again, I'm happy for the Rays, I have no problem with them. In fact, I think they're the only legitimate team who can knock Anaheim out of the playoffs.
Posted By: dontomasso

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 04:59 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Well, thanks for keeping the seat warm for us. It must have gotten a little stale from sitting there for 11 years.

Still, it will be interesting to see what happens in the next month, Longoria and Crawford are cornerstones and out. Boston should catch them as long as their pitching stays healthy. Tampa does currently have winning records against Boston and LAA.


I didn't keep the seat warm, I just didn't pat any attention. The only expectation they had this year was to finsh above .500, so anything better than that is a bonus. Next year was supposed to be the breakout year. I think the Yankees-Red Sox-Rays prettty much end the season playing a round robin.

As for the Sox, I may be wrong on this but I think neither team has won an away game against the other. Looks like Crawford is gone for the season, but Longoria may be able to come back.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 05:02 PM

Funny thing is, I saw Even Longoria come up through the minors sorta. I work for the Hudson Valley Renegades, which is the single-A affiliate to the Tampa Bay Rays. Josh Hamilton also played a few games for them when he started his comeback. So since they were kinda "local boys" I root for them and am happy for their success
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 06:27 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Again, I'm happy for the Rays, I have no problem with them. In fact, I think they're the only legitimate team who can knock Anaheim out of the playoffs.


I do. Maddon is a putz. That whole bullshit from Spring Training turned any positive feelings I used to have from them to instant hate. His "hard baseball" got one of our catching prospects out for the season, and then Shelly Duncan had to go and even the score, and it was the same old bullshit of "oh noes! unclean baseball" all over again.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/15/08 08:00 PM

Sexson was just released (no bid deal) but they also optioned Melky to the minors. Cody Ransom (a name I know is going to strike fear into the hearts of opposing pitchers) and Brett Gardner (aka Yankee bloggers second coming of Christ) will be coming up to replace them on the 40-man.

It's not secret I'm a big Melky fan. I hope that this team enjoys watching Johnny Damon attempt to play center. Gardner, in his brief time up with the big club, wasn't hitting any better than Melky was. He's a pinch runner at best imho.

Oh well. Not sure why I care, other than I continue to wonder why the Yankee #9 hitter is still the scapegoat for an entire team of underachievers.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:12 PM

It is kind of ironic, that after 13 straight playoff appearances, they'll more than likely miss them in the final year of Yankee Stadium. Probably not the sendoff they wanted.

FYI---11 games out in the loss column this morning, 7 in the loss in the wild card. I'm not saying they can't do it (look at the Mets last year), but realistically, probably not.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:16 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy

FYI---11 games out in the loss column this morning, 7 in the loss in the wild card. I'm not saying they can't do it (look at the Mets last year), but realistically, probably not.


Nah. If you watched last nights game vs. the Royals, it follows the old adage: bad teams find ways to lose games.

That pretty much sums up the season.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:19 PM

I can't remember the last time Mariano threw a wild pitch. Period. Let alone one that blew the game. You're right, DJ. When it rains it pours.

Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:24 PM

Look at his stats in save situations vs. non-saves. He is a totally different pitcher when he has to keep it close than when he is shutting people down in the 9th inning.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:28 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Look at his stats in save situations vs. non-saves. He is a totally different pitcher when he has to keep it close than when he is shutting people down in the 9th inning.


Well, to be fair, that's his job (the 9th inning). I mean, how much can you ask the guy for? He's at least 40 years old (although he claims to be 38 or 39), and he's still one of the top 5 closers in the game.

Speaking of missing their set up man; how many net wins has the Jaba move cost them?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/16/08 02:40 PM

Probably less than the number of wins he's earned as a starter.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/17/08 02:27 AM

...again, bad teams finding ways to lose. Horrible RiSP "production," including an 8th inning that saw the bases loaded with Nady and Cano having opportunities to put the ball in play and take a lead. Rivera blows the hold again.

"Turn the lights out, the party's over..."
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 06:08 PM

I told ya so grin




Steinbrenner willing to open wallet

It was music to the ears of free agents, and their agents. With typical Steinbrennerian certitude, new New York Yankees owner Hank Steinbrenner indicated his team is ready to open its wallet in the offseason, especially if the current downturn is not corrected and the team misses the playoffs for the first time since 1995. "We're going to win it next year," Steinbrenner said. "If we need to add a top veteran pitcher, we'll do that. We'll do whatever we need to do. Next year we'll be extremely dangerous." CC Sabathia looks like the best starter in the free-agent market that includes Derek Lowe, Brad Penny and Ben Sheets next winter, and his price appears to keep shooting up as he pitches Milwaukee toward the playoffs. Then there is Adam Dunn, who seems perfect for Yankee Stadium. Bobby Abreu's contract is up after this year, Jason Giambi is owed a $22 million option the Yankees seem unlikely to pick up, and Hideki Matsui and Johnny Damon will be in the last year of contracts in 2009. With all that left-handed power leaving, it seems like a hole Dunn could plug.

Source: SI
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 06:11 PM

You predicted that Steinbrenner would spend some money?

Irish, you really are clairvoyant. tongue lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 06:19 PM

No, I predicted he'd "open up the wallet." We all knew he was going to spend money but I predict a BIG offseason for the Yankees if they miss the postseason (almost like a blessing in disguise). Hopefully he gets what DJ and I were saying: CC, Teixiera/Manny, Sheets and I'd still love to see K-Rod if they could convince him to come and setup Mo for a few seasons.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 06:21 PM

Hey, PB, go back to your Mets thread!! tongue

Why do I get the feeling that Hank will do something very stupidly "Steinbrennerish", like shell out money for an aging superstar (see Manny) over a several year contract?? I hope that I am wrong, wrong, wrong, but I wouldn't be completely shocked.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 06:22 PM

They've poured big bucks on Giambi, Mussina, Sheffield, Randy Johnson and A-Rod and that didn't work out the way they had planned.

It's kind of odd for Steinbrenner to announce this. The world knows that the Yankees overspend and will continue to overspend, more than doubling the payrolls of most teams.

Don't forget, George had it planned that Swindal,his drunken son-in-law, was going to run the team before his own flesh and blood. I think he realized his son had some shortcomings.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 07:36 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1

Don't forget, George had it planned that Swindal,his drunken son-in-law, was going to run the team before his own flesh and blood. I think he realized his son had some shortcomings.


Let's not rewrite history. Swindal had his DWI and also had marital issues with Jennifer Steinbrenner, which is why he was "out." It wasn't like a crazy drunk was given the reigns, or that he was drunk beforehand. People make mistakes.

Similarly, the Steinbrenner brothers didn't want to take part in baseball operations. Actually, I'm glad that Hal is there, as he seems to balance Hank out.

Originally Posted By: Klydon1
They've poured big bucks on Giambi, Mussina, Sheffield, Randy Johnson and A-Rod and that didn't work out the way they had planned.


Giambi has been productive but injured. Sheffield was also productive. Johnson was also injured, but he did have a bunch of wins. A-Rod has been MVP. Out of all of them, I don't know how you can say Mussina hasn't worked out - since acquired, he has been absolutely fantastic, carrying the rotation at times.

The difference between signing guys like Sabathia and Teixiera is that a.) they are still young enough so that they will not be in a Giambi situation when they're contracts are up and b.) these players will be signed at their peaks, not after they have exhausted the 'magic'.

Manny is the only question mark. First, the Dodgers will have to decline their option years on him. Second, Manny will want a monster deal, but I say give it to him. We're cutting a whole lot of dead weight (and payroll) off of this team by waving goodbye to Giambi, 1 of Pettitte/Mussina, Pavano, trading 1 of Matsui or Damon, and Abreu. Heck, as you know, I didn't want to resign Posada either, but meh.

That alone will not only create roster space, it means there is more flexibility in the war chest. Frankly, Sabathia/Teixiera (or Burrell, frankly)/Manny is much more viable than Johnson/Giambi/Sheffield ever were simply because of their ages and current talent levels.

Adding Sabathia means we will finally have an elite pitcher (two if Joba continues to pan out), with Wang a notch below. Adding Teixiera means we've solved the problem at first base, as he's young and hits like a champ (he doesn't have to be a silver slugger). Adding Manny means we have arguably the most dangerous hitter in league in the heart of our order.

You can't tell me that the below roster wouldn't have a little more "punch" than what we've had this year:

Damon/Gardner/Christian
Jeter
Nady
Manny
A-Rod
Teixiera
Posada
Cano
Melky/Gardner/Christian

Also, another name I'd honestly be interested in as a sort of "freak" candidate is Rocco Baldelli. If he ever sorts our his medical issues - and apparently, he does have some whacked out things going on with his body - he's young enough and the Yankees have enough CF candidates where giving Baldelli a minor league contract would be low-risk high-reward.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 09:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1

Don't forget, George had it planned that Swindal,his drunken son-in-law, was going to run the team before his own flesh and blood. I think he realized his son had some shortcomings.


People make mistakes.



Wow!

Who knew that deep down DJ had the forgiving heart of a liberal? tongue lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 10:09 PM

I swear, that must be the first time that Double J's name and the word "liberal" ever appeared in the same sentence!!! wink
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/18/08 11:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J

Giambi has been productive but injured. Sheffield was also productive. Johnson was also injured, but he did have a bunch of wins. A-Rod has been MVP. Out of all of them, I don't know how you can say Mussina hasn't worked out - since acquired, he has been absolutely fantastic, carrying the rotation at times.



Giambi wasn't given a hundred million dollars merely to be productive. He was a league MVP in 1999 and drove in 120 runs with a .342 avg. for a small market team not known for offense, and signed by a team that had just won three consecutive championships that was expecting more. And since then, the Yankees haven't won a championship and Giambi hasn't sniffed an MVP. In fact midway through his contract, as Giambi hadn't sniffed .300 since his first year in the Bronx, the very guy who signed him amid all types of hype was looking for technicalities to jettison him from NY.

Sure, ARod has been an MVP. He was MVP before he came to NY. He wasn't brought in to help them get to the playoffs (or bed strippers and aging pop stars); the Yankees were more than capable of getting to the post season before he arrived. Sure, he should win MVPs in NY, surrounded by a loaded offense. What didn't work out for the Yankees is the fact that he'd be a deer in the headlights during the postseason (Hey, Scott Brosius won a WS MVP).

Mussina has had a nice career in NY, but please, re-read my post. I never said he didn't work out; I said the big dollar signings didn't work out the way they had planned. I didn't even mention Hideki Irabu, Kei Igawa and some others. My point is that this decade there has always been hype and spectacle about all of these signings and it hasn't been nearly as successful as the days of far less heralded players, like Paul O'Neill, Tino Martinez, Bernie Williams and Jim Leyritz.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/19/08 12:52 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
They've poured big bucks on Giambi, Mussina, Sheffield, Randy Johnson and A-Rod and that didn't work out the way they had planned.


Kly, I re-read, and keep getting stuck. tongue

Quote:
Giambi wasn't given a hundred million dollars merely to be productive. He was a league MVP in 1999 and drove in 120 runs with a .342 avg. for a small market team not known for offense, and signed by a team that had just won three consecutive championships that was expecting more. And since then, the Yankees haven't won a championship and Giambi hasn't sniffed an MVP. In fact midway through his contract, as Giambi hadn't sniffed .300 since his first year in the Bronx, the very guy who signed him amid all types of hype was looking for technicalities to jettison him from NY.


Giambi also hasn't been horrible either. They haven't won a championship with Mike Mussina either, but I don't think that was a bad signing. Giambi's contract was one of poor foresight, I agree, but I don't think individually that Giambi, Sheffield, Mussina, or Johnson were specifically the reasons why this team hasn't won since 2000.

Quote:
Sure, ARod has been an MVP. He was MVP before he came to NY. He wasn't brought in to help them get to the playoffs (or bed strippers and aging pop stars); the Yankees were more than capable of getting to the post season before he arrived. Sure, he should win MVPs in NY, surrounded by a loaded offense. What didn't work out for the Yankees is the fact that he'd be a deer in the headlights during the postseason (Hey, Scott Brosius won a WS MVP).


A-Rod is a class a-choker. I have no excuse, other than some guys can handle the big spotlight, and he seemingly can't. That being said, the Yankees don't even touch the playoffs last year without his monster run. He carried the team for an entire season.

Quote:
I said the big dollar signings didn't work out the way they had planned. I didn't even mention Hideki Irabu, Kei Igawa and some others. My point is that this decade there has always been hype and spectacle about all of these signings and it hasn't been nearly as successful as the days of far less heralded players, like Paul O'Neill, Tino Martinez, Bernie Williams and Jim Leyritz.


The problem is that those hype and spectacle signings were never followed through with either a better supporting cast or restocking of the farm system. Kei Igawa may be a total piece of garbage, but he didn't cost anything other than money. Those signings I don't care about so much.

The Yankee team, as composed for the last 5-7 years, has not been well-constructed. They lack a true leadoff hitter. They lack a true #3 hitter. Their cleanup hitter has stage fright. The back of the order is always mending some sort of injury. More egregiously, the pitching rotation has been woefully unaddressed, even up to this year, despite the addition of Chamberlain and (a couple of years ago) Wang, who was a total surprise.

Cutting the dead weight is key. But signing prized free agents - the three of whom I've mentioned - is only going to help bring some more composure to a team that sorely needs direction. With Sabathia, a rotation that might finally be able to compete in the AL East. With Teixiera/Burrell, a true first baseman and #3 or #5 hitter. With Manny Ramirez, the feared bat and clutch ala Reggie Jackson.

This merely complements what is a core that while good, requires the trimming of the fat. At least 5-7 starting players (pitchers and position players) need to go this offseason. They have to be replaced with better quality.

All I ask is this:

Does the addition of C.C. Sabathia help to stabilize a fragmentary Yankee rotation?

Does the addition of Mark Teixiera bring stability to a position that has been lacking both offensively and defensively for the past 3 seasons?

Does the addition of Manny Ramirez provide a significant offensive boost to a team that is anemic with RiSP?

If the answer to all these question is yes, then with the money and players coming off the books, I see no reason why these are not viable options for improving the team. If they aren't, then I'd like to hear what would be your recommendation to improve the 2009 Yankees?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 01:47 PM

So, after watching the game gift-wrapped and given to Toronto last night, I admit that I scratched my head and asked myself, "Johnny Damon in Center Field? When everyone knows that his arm is gone, gone, gone? Why was Melky Cabrera not in center field? Who made THAT decision? Where is he again?? Oh, that's right! He's been sent to the MINORS!!!!!!!!" mad
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:10 PM

Yeah, pretty much. I can't really reconcile that, other than the Yankees (and many bloggers) basically think their #9 hitter is the problem with their order.

Incidentally, A-Rod says it's time for the Yanks to start pressing...rolleyes
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:13 PM

Yeah, A-Rod has always had a grasp for the obvious. lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:16 PM

Yes, Melky is to blame that ARod and Damon are the pretty much the only batters hitting over .300 this season. Ridiculous.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:20 PM


I haven't paid much attention the past few days... are you SERIOUS??!! Melky??!!! W-T-F is going on over there??! rolleyes

I wonder what Torre's thinking about it, if anything. I mean, we still have a better record than the Dodgers, but they're only 1 game back in their division. We're freakin' 11 (6.5 Wild Card) -- in AUGUST?!!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:40 PM

I have nothing against Girardi, and I know that the Yankees have had their share of injuries and problems, but I can't help but feel that Torre would have found a way to win DESPITE the problems. He always did in the past.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 08:52 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
. . . but I can't help but feel that Torre would have found a way to win DESPITE the problems. He always did in the past.


I dunno, Babe. I love Torre, but this team is just too OLD in too many places. If they get younger (and I'm certain they will), they'll win 95 games next year with Girardi at the helm. Back to the playoffs.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 09:09 PM

Joe was a great motivator. C'mon, like the team was YOUNG last year?? Torre's talent is that he can wring a performance out of a player that they didn't think they were capable of giving.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 09:13 PM

No, they weren't young last year, which is pretty much my point. They're even older this year.

Let them get younger in the outfield next year and you'll be raising the division flag before you know it.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 09:39 PM

You mean an outfield that can actually catch and throw?? Silly man. Do you want everything??? lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/20/08 10:11 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

I haven't paid much attention the past few days... are you SERIOUS??!! Melky??!!! W-T-F is going on over there??! rolleyes

I wonder what Torre's thinking about it, if anything. I mean, we still have a better record than the Dodgers, but they're only 1 game back in their division. We're freakin' 11 (6.5 Wild Card) -- in AUGUST?!!


Let's also not try to compare the AL East with the NL West lol wink
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 12:43 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J


I was watching the ninth inning last night, and A-Rod should have been pressing last night. After three Ks he hit the blooper down the right field line, got a late break from the plate and didn't bust it until he rounded first. He was out easily.

He's a great player, one of the best in the league, but he combined poor judgment with lack of hustle in a critical point in the game.

It was a waste of good pitching.

The season isn't over yet, but NY has to make the most of the head to head games left with Boston, and they have to sweep a few series.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 01:00 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Joe was a great motivator.


I can tell by the way they've looked dead the last three years of the playoffs in a row...what a motivator. tongue
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 01:16 PM

Someone figured out the Elias sports bureau rankings...

...which is pretty nifty. That's the mathematical formula used to determine Type A or B free agents. Type A free agents require that whichever team signs that player must send two draft picks to the players former team; Type B is the same, except only 1 draft pick must go the the old club.

If Kyle Farnsworth - who still sucks as a Tiger as much as he did a Yankee - comes out to be a Type A and Pudge is a Type B, that's fucked up. tongue
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 05:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Joe was a great motivator.


I can tell by the way they've looked dead the last three years of the playoffs in a row...what a motivator. tongue


Well, at least they MADE the playoffs under Joe Torre. And won an impressive number of championships, too, if I remember correctly. And he managed to do it with injuries and no pitching.

Hmmmm...sound familiar? Except this year, they're 10 games out in the 3rd week of August.

I'm not saying that Girardi's the problem. Not at all. But perhaps those who were on the "Fire Torre" bandwagon were chanting the wrong name.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 06:11 PM

Do you honestly think that Torre could get this team in the playoffs with the injuries, poor RiSP production, and lack of quality pitching?

How can you say that they had no injuries and no pitching? I seem to remember hearing names like Key, Wells, Cone, Pettitte (in his prime), Clemens, Wetteland, Rivera, etc.

The team is just a.) old and b.) overrated. While I don't think that Girardi is the whiz "kid" some of us thought he'd be, there isn't much he can do when the heart of the order has a sub-.250 batting average with RiSP.

If I had to choose between making the playoffs and getting embarrassed in the first round (like we have under Torre now for the last 3+ years) by trading away talent for short-term fixes or not making the playoffs and then coming back with a trimmed and expanded roster next year, I'd take the latter every time.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 06:44 PM

I'm talking about the last 4 or 5 years. They lost both Clemens and Pettitte to Houston, and who did they have? They haven't had decent starting or relief pitchers in years. Wang has done a great job, but he's also been injured at some point every season. Moose has been hit or miss. And that's been the extent of it. One or two reliable starters isn't enough.

I think that both Torre and Girardi have had to play with whoever they've been given. And that SUCKS. But, as I said earlier, Torre's main talent is to squeeze a performance out of a player that he didn't even know he had in him.

If anything, I think that Cashman should have been fired last year, for the reasons that we both gave. Torre wasn't the problem, and neither is Girardi.

If the next year or two have to be rebuilding years, then so be it. Perhaps that what's needed.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 08:01 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
If anything, I think that Cashman should have been fired last year, for the reasons that we both gave. Torre wasn't the problem, and neither is Girardi.


I disagree with this statement, Cashman's not to blame. Torre, Girardi, Cashman, no one could have predicted the amount of injuries the Yankees would sustain this year or lack of offense the roster would give. If Cashman was gone, so would Phil Hughes and either Ian Kennedy or Melky Cabrera. Sure we would have Johan but let's give the deal some more time to see what was the wise course of action.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 08:06 PM

Well at least we'll get our monies worth at least one more time before his contract expires at the end of the year wink




Injury-prone Pavano to start for Yankees this weekend
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 08:55 PM

[quote=Irishman12 If Cashman was gone, so would Phil Hughes and either Ian Kennedy or Melky Cabrera. Sure we would have Johan but let's give the deal some more time to see what was the wise course of action. [/quote]

I think if the Yankees had the chance to go back in time to make the deal, they'd jump at it.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 09:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I'm talking about the last 4 or 5 years. They lost both Clemens and Pettitte to Houston, and who did they have? They haven't had decent starting or relief pitchers in years. Wang has done a great job, but he's also been injured at some point every season. Moose has been hit or miss. And that's been the extent of it. One or two reliable starters isn't enough.



Torre has also had the benefit of some absolute pure luck, ala Shawn Chacon and Aaron Small in 2005, A-Rod's surge last year, etc.

Girardi doesn't have that this year outside of Pettitte and Mussina. Wang has been hurt down the stretch, Hughes and Kennedy have been atrocious, and Joba has only been here recently.

Two reliable starters aren't enough, but you can't blame that on Girardi. Torre had the benefit of a lot of luck, and you saw the *real* Yankees when they got booted by real teams like the Angels, Tigers, and Indians.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

I think that both Torre and Girardi have had to play with whoever they've been given. And that SUCKS. But, as I said earlier, Torre's main talent is to squeeze a performance out of a player that he didn't even know he had in him.


Squeezing out performances by riding out favorites even though they were terrible (ala Miguel Cairo) and ruined the arms of pitchers again with Papa Joe's favorites (laundry list starts with Scott Proctor, Paul Quantrill, etc.). Torre can't manage a bullpen to save his life.

And for all this talk of squeezing out performances, I must be missing all this clutch awesomeness oozing out of his Bigelow Green Tea when we looked like trash against Anaheim, Detroit, and Cleveland.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

If anything, I think that Cashman should have been fired last year, for the reasons that we both gave. Torre wasn't the problem, and neither is Girardi.


Cashman is the only one who has protected the farm system, cultivated talent, and brought some sort of sensibility to deals. The best thing that happened to the Yankees in the last couple of years is Hank started drooling out of his mouth and now the Tampa group has lost control.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/21/08 10:00 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
[quote=Irishman12 If Cashman was gone, so would Phil Hughes and either Ian Kennedy or Melky Cabrera. Sure we would have Johan but let's give the deal some more time to see what was the wise course of action.


I think if the Yankees had the chance to go back in time to make the deal, they'd jump at it. [/quote]

I wish people would get the terms of the deal correct. It wasn't just Kennedy and Melky, it was:

Hughes
Kennedy
Melky
Prospect

for Santana

or

Chamberlain
Cabrera
Prospect

for Santana

or

Hughes
Kennedy
Austin Jackson

for Santana.

The question is whether Hughes ends up doing something with the Major League career. Kennedy is a wash at this point, and Melky is now in AAA because the Yankees feel the #9 hitter is what is holding them back.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/24/08 01:37 PM

Carl Pavano pitched a win for the Yankees yesterday.

In other news, hell has frozen over, Jimmy Hoffa's body was found, and Elvis really is alive.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/24/08 05:20 PM

DJ, I was thinking the same thing last night! He actually pitched moderately well. I mean, it was Baltimore, but still. I thought that Girardi was going to take him out in the 5th, but he hung in there, and they actually won.

And he didn't get injured during the game!!!!
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/25/08 01:09 PM

It kind of makes you wonder if he actually gave a shit and didn't let a sore ass keep him from pitching, what he could have been for the Yankees when they signed him to that big deal.

Alas, I think Mike Francesca has the right idea...offer him the league minimum for a 1 year deal this year and see if he takes it. lol
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/25/08 01:38 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
[quote=Irishman12 If Cashman was gone, so would Phil Hughes and either Ian Kennedy or Melky Cabrera. Sure we would have Johan but let's give the deal some more time to see what was the wise course of action.


I think if the Yankees had the chance to go back in time to make the deal, they'd jump at it.


I wish people would get the terms of the deal correct. It wasn't just Kennedy and Melky, it was:

Hughes
Kennedy
Melky
Prospect

for Santana

[/quote]

I knew Hughes was one of the guys mentioned in the trade.

As I said, if the Yankees could go back in time, they'd jump at this trade.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/25/08 07:59 PM

No they wouldn't. Hughes is still untouchable. If it had been just Kennedy and Melky, I think that would have been an instantaneous deal. Unfortunately for the Yankees, the Twins played hard ball and in the end, tried to hornswaggle the Sox and the Yanks. I would say the Twins got the short end of the deal considering three of the four players in that deal will likely never make an impact at the major league level, but the Twins are playing great baseball in spite of losing Hunter (who everyone called me retarded for saying the Yankees should sign but now regrets not signing) and Santana. In my opinion, at this point in the season, Hunter would have had a bigger impact than Santana, considering the dismal run support the Yankee offense has given pitchers.

3 a-level prospects (the "Prospect" in question was allegedly either Austin Jackson, the Yankees #1 AA outfield prospect, or Mark Melancon, the Yankees #1 AA-AAA relief prospect and planned heir apparent of Rivera) and your starting center fielder for a player asking for a $100-million plus pitcher is too much, especially when you look at what the Mets gave up in the end, which was a "nice" player in Gomez who could be an average-to-good outfielder and three no-name prospects.

Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/25/08 09:27 PM

Joe Torre
Part of Speech: verb
Etymology: Early 21st Century English, from the Italian “Joe Torre”
Definition: To beat like a rented mule
Use: Poor Scott Proctor was never the same after 2 years of getting Joe Torried.

See also: Quantrilling, Sturtzing, Proctoring
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 02:16 PM

The Sox beat the Yanks and a down here in Philly land the local paper just capsulizes the other games; the Yanks being one. BUT they did have a headline over the capsules that read "A-Rod comes up small...."
He hit into two double plays, one with the bases loaded and he whiffed in the ninth. What an expensive dud. I never liked the deal. They should have spent the money on pitchers and picked up a servicable 3rd baseman. I should've been the GM too.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 03:13 PM

[quote=MaryCas]"A-Rod comes up small...."

Was there a picture underneath that headline of Madonna looking disappointed, holding her forefinger close to her thumb? wink

Actually, there's a reason why there was no interest from any other team when A-Rod and Boras interrupted the Red Sox's World Series win and boldly proclaimed his free agency and that he was looking for $30 million a year. He's not worth it.

His BA with RISP is dismal. But he doesn't offer excuses, I'll certainly give him that.

The Yankees need the remaining games in this series. There's a big difference between trailing by 6 and trailing by 4 this late in the season.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 03:39 PM

DoublePlayRod. What a shock. And twice in one night, no less. And we have him for another 10 years. What a joy.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 04:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
DoublePlayRod.

I used to call Paul O'Neil: G.I.D.P.O'Neil grin
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 04:58 PM

My brother (a huge Yankee fan) went to the game last night. He told me the crowd REALLY let A-Rod have it last night; more than any time last year.

He said one kid, who couldn't have been more than ten years old, held a sign that said "We don't want you, Alex." And that upon seeing it, A-Rod pretty much had tears in his eyes. Man, I never really liked him, but that's just cold.

I mean, you just know the kid's father made him the sign. What the hell are we teaching our kids?
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 05:54 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy


I mean, you just know the kid's father made him the sign. What the hell are we teaching our kids?


Yeah, really. By giving his son that vile sign to hold, how does the father expect him to learn how to give the finger to the players? tongue
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 08:02 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
DoublePlayRod.

I used to call Paul O'Neil: G.I.D.P.O'Neil grin


When the Yankees were playing poorly, wasn't it also a ritual of yours to refer to a certain player as "Bernice Williams"??
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/27/08 09:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
...wasn't it also a ritual of yours to refer to a certain player as "Bernice Williams"??


Yeah -- Bernice Williams, Paula O'Neil, Tina Martinez, Alexis Rodriguez, and just thought of Ivana Rodriguez... and good ol' Michelle Pussina. lol
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 12:04 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1


His BA with RISP is dismal. But he doesn't offer excuses, I'll certainly give him that.


You should see the A-Rod apologists out in full force (see River Ave. Blues; LoHud Yankees blog; etc.) who claim RiSP is a fluky stat anyways, or that Derek Jeter is having a shitty year, or that opposing teams still have to gameplan around A-Rod because they fear his bat, or some other bullshit.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 12:05 AM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
And that upon seeing it, A-Rod pretty much had tears in his eyes.


Maybe he could use the emotion when he's at the plate whiffing at pitches out of the zone...
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 12:53 PM

Oh, that was just....awful. It was like a train wreck in slow motion, where the cars of the train just keep hitting into one another. Maybe like the one in The Fugitive.

Mr. Babe was invited to today's game, so he promises that his presence in the stands will guarantee a win. What the heck? Nothing else has worked for them this season.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 02:53 PM

It's O-V-E-R! Oh well, let's look forward to the offseason to who we'll get under the tree this Christmas wink
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 03:48 PM

Oh, yeah. Stick a fork in the Yankees.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 04:18 PM

It must have been Posada all along! Georgette Posada. tongue
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 05:56 PM

We have friends who are die-hard Mets fans. Their son, who just turned 17, is one of those obnoxious know-it-alls (not just about baseball, pretty much everything). We were watching the Mets-Yankees play last year and Posada hit a home run and I referred to him by his nickname "Georgie". The son looked at me, rolled his eyes, and said, "It's pronounced Hor-hay."

I wanted to smack the crap out of the kid.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 08:03 PM

0 for 4-Rod.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 08:39 PM

The Yankees Win!!!! The Giambino comes through!!

It's funny, but at physical therapy last night, I was talking to another patient and the therapist about the Yankees. The question was posed - If the game was on the line, who would you rather have up at bat? ARod or Giambi?

Both men said ARod. I said Giambi. It's so hard to be right all the time! lol
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 11:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Both men said ARod. I said Giambi. It's so hard to be right all the time!


As a Sox fan, Giambi is the one I'd least like to see come up with the game on the line.

Still, it's been a good couple of days.... The Sox took 2 out of 3 in their final games at the Stadium and Mrs. Obama spoke eloquently at the convention.

Life is good sometimes.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 11:45 PM

SC, it's really great to see your familiar avatar again. smile
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 11:47 PM

Thanks, klyd.... I missed your avatar too. smile
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/28/08 11:54 PM

I met 5 or 6 Sox fans this morning down at Grand Central. They were looking for the 4 train. Good think I'm not a Yankee fan. I might have put them on the 5 train out to Flatbush. whistle

Actually, they were very friendly. smile
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 12:29 AM

SC, as I told you, Mr. Babe was going to guarantee a win for the Yankees today. Actually, he called me about two hours ago, and he seemed to be slurring his words a bit. I'm sure he was drunk with victory. rolleyes
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 03:05 AM

I'm just glad they got to Papelbum! clap
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 03:14 AM

Papelbon is a darned good closer. Why would you call him that? I'm glad they won, but no reason to call him that. Plus, he looks pretty cute in a skirt. wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 03:29 AM

Because I thought it was cute when a New York paper called him that after he ran his mouth off at the All-Star game saying he and not Mariano Riveria should be the closer in the House That Ruth Built.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 03:29 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I'm just glad they got to Papelbum! clap


Yeah, you can savor that memory in October. tongue
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 05:19 AM

I will when Boston gets knocked from the playoffs, if they even make it wink Beckett could be heading to the DL and that will put a damper in their postseason push grin
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 02:08 PM

I12, I understand the whole Boston-NYY thing. I wanted the Yankees to beat them this year, as I do every year. But I wouldn't be running my mouth about Boston after the way that the Yankees have dropped the ball (pun intended). Here's a team that should be doing much better. We haven't been able to hit the side of a barn this season.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 02:15 PM

Oh what do you understand, SB?? You don't even know how to pronounce Hor hay. lol
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 02:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
The Yankees Win!!!! The Giambino comes through!!

It's funny, but at physical therapy last night, I was talking to another patient and the therapist about the Yankees. The question was posed - If the game was on the line, who would you rather have up at bat? ARod or Giambi?

Both men said ARod. I said Giambi. It's so hard to be right all the time! lol


I'm with you SB. I hope A-Hole was watching how to do it.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 02:36 PM

Hip Hip Hor Hay!!! lol
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/29/08 03:22 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I12, I understand the whole Boston-NYY thing. I wanted the Yankees to beat them this year, as I do every year. But I wouldn't be running my mouth about Boston after the way that the Yankees have dropped the ball (pun intended). Here's a team that should be doing much better. We haven't been able to hit the side of a barn this season.


I agree, SB. You are a true fan of the game and of good sportsmanship in general.

I like you, Irish. You're a nice and respectful young guy, but when it comes to sports, you still have some growing up to do. The idea that a Boston loss is as good as a Yankee win is ridiculous. Especially since, as Babe said, the Sox have owned the Yanks these last few years. So far the Sox, not the Yankees, are the team of this century. So just sit back, hope for some good off season moves, and hope for the best next year. smile
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 02:27 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I12, I understand the whole Boston-NYY thing. I wanted the Yankees to beat them this year, as I do every year. But I wouldn't be running my mouth about Boston after the way that the Yankees have dropped the ball (pun intended). Here's a team that should be doing much better. We haven't been able to hit the side of a barn this season.


Like I said, I'm not too worried about Boston this year, ESPECIALLY if they lose Beckett. Tampa's got the division and Boston only has a 2 game lead over the Twins. So, they're no "lock" yet. Personally, I think it'd be funny if they missed the playoffs and a bigger story than the Yankees missing the postseason, since they won the World Series last year and all. But even if they do make the playoffs, Anaheim owns them and would probably sweep 'em.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 03:57 AM

How is it a bigger story than the fact that the Yankees haven't won a series since 2000? ESPECIALLY since they've made the postseason every year?? Look, I don't want to run down the Yankees. They're my team. But the truth is, the BoSox have been a better team.

There's no reason that we should be doing this poorly. We've had decent starters. However, the bats haven't given them the support they deserve.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 06:58 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Personally, I think it'd be funny if they missed the playoffs and a bigger story than the Yankees missing the postseason, since they won the World Series last year and all.


I think it's funnier that the team with the biggest payroll didn't make the playoffs. The Yankees payroll is ALMOST double that of Boston's.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 01:31 PM

Well, it's not VERY funny. frown
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 03:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
How is it a bigger story than the fact that the Yankees haven't won a series since 2000? ESPECIALLY since they've made the postseason every year?? Look, I don't want to run down the Yankees. They're my team. But the truth is, the BoSox have been a better team.

There's no reason that we should be doing this poorly. We've had decent starters. However, the bats haven't given them the support they deserve.


How is it a bigger story? Well, let's see. Not even 12 months ago they swept the Colorado Rockies to win the World Series and they could miss the postseason this year with pretty much the same roster. The Yankees not winning the World Series was a story a few years ago. I don't think many picked the Yankees to win it this year because of their rotation going into the season (a lot of people picked either Boston or Detroit to win the AL). And speaking of big stories, what about the Tigers? Not even playing .500 ball with all of that talent. Talk about under-performing!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 06:15 PM

What do the shortcomings of other teams have to do with the Yankees? The Yankees have sucked this year. There are other teams that have sucked, too, but that doesn't make the Yankees suck any less.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 08:34 PM

I'm not saying the Yankees don't suck. I'm just tired of hearing how big of a story the Yankees not making the playoffs is. Yes, they've done it 13 straight years which shows their consistency in winning. But we all knew it wasn't going to go on forever. To me, the defending World Champion Boston Red Sox not making the playoffs the following year with essentially the same roster would be a bigger story
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/30/08 11:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I'm just tired of hearing how big of a story the Yankees not making the playoffs is. Yes, they've done it 13 straight years which shows their consistency in winning.


I think that's a pretty big story. And they lost again today. This is not good.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 01:30 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Personally, I think it'd be funny if they missed the playoffs and a bigger story than the Yankees missing the postseason, since they won the World Series last year and all.


I think it's funnier that the team with the biggest payroll didn't make the playoffs. The Yankees payroll is ALMOST double that of Boston's.


I think it's funnier that the team with the lowest payroll in the division is kicking both of our teams' asses.

Incidentally, 2007 Red Sox were the most expensive World Series champion team of all time.

Just saying...

(Awaits responses of "2008 Yankees - Most Expensive Team To Ever Miss Playoffs...")
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 03:09 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
I think it's funnier that the team with the lowest payroll in the division is kicking both of our teams' asses.


It ain't funny, but it's ironically true.

I won't argue against the Sox becoming something I hate... a big payroll corporate entity... I liked them a whole lot better when they were struggling (albeit with good personnel) to finally win.

I've too much "history" with them to switch allegiances, but Tampa is gonna be an exciting team to watch. (Still, I'd like to see the Sox get into the Series, and win, of course).
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 03:11 AM

Tampa was fun to watch, but since I hate Joe Maddon with a passion, I can only root for some of their players now.

If anything, I'm rooting for the Cubbies. I won't pull a Giuliani. lol
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 03:14 AM

I would LOVE to see a Red Sox/Cubs Series!
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 03:30 AM

The Red Sox have to make the playoffs first...
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 03:41 AM

Details.....

I'd still love to see it, though.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 04:54 AM

Hmm, Cubs and Twins. grin
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 02:31 PM

I'd love to see the Cubs win it all this year. I'm really pulling for them or the Mets
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 08/31/08 04:14 PM

I don't dislike the Mets, but I think that the Phillies still will surpass them as long as Rollins can put the hammer down.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/02/08 12:51 PM



^ At least Nady looks like he realizes these games are do-or-die. A-Rod and Abreu look like it's early April. rolleyes
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/02/08 01:21 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J


^ At least Nady looks like he realizes these games are do-or-die. A-Rod and Abreu look like it's early April. rolleyes


While he was playing for the Phillies and when they dumped his contract, I had always said that Bobby Abreu never really cared about winning. Larry Bowa echoed the sentiment while managing the Phillies.

Abreu used to put up really good numbers, but he never put forth the consistent effort, both at the plate and in the field, needed for a first place team. His approach to the game is terrible despite his talent.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/02/08 01:26 PM

I'm glad he'll be gone after this year. Whether or not Nady can maintain his overall performance from this year, at least he gives a shit and will be a welcome change in right field.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/03/08 01:44 AM

What is wrong with Robinson Cano? I really like the young man but he seems to rub me the "Bobby Abreu way," his lack of hustle/caring really disturbs me. This young man is only 25-years of age and could be a league batting champion. Just 2 years ago he hit .342, last year .306, and this year a BIG drop off with .268. Not only that but his defense. Could someone PLEASE show this guy how to dive for a ball? It really just burns my a$$ to see these guys with all this potential and not utilize it fully.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/03/08 01:55 AM

1-pitch JOBA! It's great to see you back clap
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/03/08 03:00 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
What is wrong with Robinson Cano? I really like the young man but he seems to rub me the "Bobby Abreu way," his lack of hustle/caring really disturbs me. This young man is only 25-years of age and could be a league batting champion. Just 2 years ago he hit .342, last year .306, and this year a BIG drop off with .268. Not only that but his defense. Could someone PLEASE show this guy how to dive for a ball? It really just burns my a$$ to see these guys with all this potential and not utilize it fully.


Cano needs someone to motivate him. He's just one of those players that could be great but needs somebody to light a fire under him. It's pretty sad, actually. Fuck, Girardi should be doing it, but he seems to be worried about how to keep A-Rod and Giambi together in mediocrity in the batting order.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/03/08 03:18 AM

Exactly my point. Yes, Larry Bowa's gone. He shouldn't need someone to motivate him. Jeter doesn't, Nady doesn't, Damon doesn't, etc.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/03/08 01:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Exactly my point. Yes, Larry Bowa's gone. He shouldn't need someone to motivate him. Jeter doesn't, Nady doesn't, Damon doesn't, etc.


Larry Bowa was the guy, who I thought should have been manager if Torre had to be replaced. I agree that motivation should come from within at this level.
I think the primary external source of motivation comes from teammates, particularly veterans.

Guys like Paul O'Neill, Tino Martinez, Bernie Williams and Scott Brosius were no hall of famers, but they came to the park every day and played hard and played to win. Jeter, Posada and otheryounger players in the mid-90s grew up in this environment. When all your teammates show up and take BP seriously, then you take it seriously; when your teammates dive for a ball or run into a wall; then you do the same.

The best I ever saw at setting the example was Pete Rose. He set the tone and work ethic of the Big Red Machine. He came to Philly and also won a championship. Mike Scmidt hit the nail on the head when he later said that Rose told him and others that the Phillie team was the most talented in the league, but couldn't be the best until they learned to be the best every inning of any game.

I'm not sure if this ties into the Cano thing, but if he sees Bobby Abreu avoid the wall and play as fly into a triple or A-Rod getting thrown out at second on a hit where he didn't go full speed, complacency might pass for acceptability.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/05/08 05:25 AM

Get rid of Rasner already! mad
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/05/08 05:34 AM

Yanks GM to consider other offers?

Brian Cashman again refused to discuss his future. While Hank and Hal Steinbrenner want the GM to return, Cashman says the situation will be resolved following the season. The Phillies will have a GM opening since Pat Gillick is retiring, and there could be vacancies in Seattle and Washington. Cashman is in the final season of a three-year deal worth $5.4 million.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/05/08 01:02 PM

I wouldn't object if Cash goes, but he won't go to Washington (it's a mess) or Seattle (funky ownership and mediocre team core). I think the Phillies would be the likely destination.

I don't know...honestly, I think that perhaps Damon Oppenheimer (if they promoted him) might be a nice candidate. They could also bring back Gene Michael.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/05/08 01:04 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1

I'm not sure if this ties into the Cano thing, but if he sees Bobby Abreu avoid the wall and play as fly into a triple or A-Rod getting thrown out at second on a hit where he didn't go full speed, complacency might pass for acceptability.


I agree with that. Cano seems to always get called a "lazy player" but to be honest, the only guy on the team who always seems to run plays out is Jeter.
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/06/08 11:24 PM

Its going to be a long off season.

ds
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/07/08 12:55 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
I agree with that. Cano seems to always get called a "lazy player" but to be honest, the only guy on the team who always seems to run plays out is Jeter.


BJ Upton is the poster boy for zoning out of games. There's a guy with Hall of Fame talent, but he needs to learn how to commit himself before he can be a great player.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/08/08 10:21 PM

Yankees scouting Japanese righty

In a sign that the Yankees could be involved in some overseas bidding this winter, Gene Michael was sent on a scouting mission to Japan, although it is unclear whether the Yankees have their eye on a particular player. That Michael was sent to Japan for the first time signifies a shift for the Yankees, who have relied on their Pacific scouts for several years. Following the disastrous signing of Kei Igawa, however, the Yankees aren't taking any chances, sending one of their most trusted talent evaluators to look at potential acquisitions. Among the potential free agents is Koji Uehara, a 33-year-old righthander who was Hideki Matsui's teammate with Yomiuri for four years before the Yankees lured Matsui to New York in 2003. Uehara, who is 109-61 with a 2.96 ERA since making his debut in 1999, has made it known he intends to pitch in the majors next season. He spent eight seasons as one of the Giants' top starters before moving into the closer role in 2007, although he is expected to be a starter in the majors. Two other players who could make the move from Japan to the U.S. are righthander Kenshin Kawakami, a righthanded starter, and Hitoki Iwase, a lefthanded reliever, both of whom play for the Chunichi Dragons.

Source: SI
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/09/08 12:47 AM

WTF are they thinking?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/09/08 03:03 AM

They're thinking it might be a good idea to send a real scout (Gene "The Stick" Michael) to Japan if they actually hope to find good players...
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/09/08 08:23 PM

The Yanks let me down big time this year. Hopefully next year they will do better.

ds
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/09/08 10:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Smitty
The Yanks let me down big time this year. Hopefully next year they will do better.

ds


Like I've been saying, this could be a blessing in disguise. A poor year will force management to go out and make some major moves which will hopefully keep the Yankees contenders for the foreseeable future
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/11/08 02:51 AM

It's been AWESOME not having Cock Schilling around all year and he just needs his 15 minutes again (as usual) rolleyes




Schilling throws brushback at N.Y.

BOSTON (AP) -- A shoulder injury has kept Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling sidelined all season, but his mouth is in good enough shape to take on New York.

Schilling blasted New York sports fans, calling them "bitter and mad and miserable" for their apparent glee over New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's season-ending knee injury.

Schilling talked about Brady's injury Tuesday during his weekly appearance on WEEI radio.

"The euphoria in New York is palpable," he said. "I mean, the Yankees suck this year. And they're bitter and mad and they're making excuses over that. And now, you know, now they got Tom going down, so, you know, New York's excited."

He later added: "They want us to be as bitter and mad and miserable and they are. And, unfortunately, it's not going to happen. The sad part is going to be when [the Patriots] beat the Jets next week."

Schilling has taken shots at New York in the past, and Tuesday acknowledged he's not a favorite there. But he said that's fine with him, recalling Boston's rally from three games back to beat New York in the 2004 AL championship series. Schilling famously forced a seventh game, pitching as blood seeped through his sock from a suture on his ankle.

"I was front row and center when their quote/unquote dynasty ended, so I'm OK with that," Schilling said.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/11/08 03:15 AM

Schilling isn't even relevant. This is his sad attempt to get airplay.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/12/08 12:54 AM

Hopefully this will help:




Plan in motion to overhaul Cano's swing

NEW YORK -- Robinson Cano hears the whispers, even if he refuses to look over his shoulder. To do so would only compound the disappointment the Yankees second baseman fights each day.

Playing through the final month of a frustrating season, Cano has been stung by criticism labeling his on-field effort as nonchalant. Yet those adjectives have been meaningless compared to the cold splash of reality Cano feels each time sees a batting average hovering in the .260s, wondering why it belongs to him.

"I don't want to say this is a bad year, but it's at least a year that I'm going to learn from and not be back in this situation again," Cano said. "This is a year that you can just say, 'OK, this is not happening again.'"

The Yankees hope so, and they are preparing steps to move in that direction. Yankees hitting coach Kevin Long plans to travel to the Dominican Republic to work with Cano in November. The work there will be extensive and represents a complete overhaul of the infielder's swing.

The promise is of a completely revamped player in advance of Spring Training. Long outlined pieces of his blueprint for Cano by eliminating excess action, while putting him in a better position to hit, squaring up more with the pitcher. Addressing Cano's strike-zone discipline is also high on the to-do list.

"You're going to see a huge difference visually," Long said. "You'll see less movement, an explosive, compact swing, and you'll probably see more home runs. I think his average will go way up and I think his walks will go way up."

Cano completed the Yankees' 10-game road trip batting .261 with 13 home runs and 61 RBIs in 143 games. His .295 on-base percentage is among baseball's lowest for regular players, and after Cano went hitless on Wednesday at Anaheim, he had not walked in his last 99 plate appearances, a sure sign that his plate discipline has gone backward.

"At a point there, it was moving in the right direction," Long said. "I'll take blame for it, but he's got to take blame for it, too. You can't go up there and continue to expand the zone and swing at pitches that you can't drive."

The Yankees were aware of the storm clouds brewing with Cano, even when New York placed a four-year, $30 million wager that the 25-year-old would continue to improve. Even if Cano wasn't going by the book mechanically, Long said, he was still able to achieve great results in the batter's box, leaving no options to do but watch and wait.

"You can't [overhaul] a guy that's had that much success," Long said. "I think he's still going to be a real good player. He's got to make some changes with the mechanics of his swing, but coming in with all the success that he'd had doing it that way, there's really not much anyone could do other than just let him go with it."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/12/08 01:14 AM

Hank Steinbrenner says Yankees made mistakes

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) -- Hank Steinbrenner is disappointed the New York Yankees could be eliminated from postseason play during Yankee Stadium's final homestand.

"We're going to have to look at what has been done wrong over the last five years, which I've had one year to try and figure out," he said Thursday at the Yankees' spring training complex. "Clearly, a lot of mistakes were made."

Hank and his brother Hal took over most of the Yankees' day-to-day operation last fall. Their father, George Steinbrenner, bought the Yankees in 1973.

"I'm going to be reviewing the entire organization," said Hank Steinbrenner, a team co-chairman along with his brother Hal.

New York opens a 10-game homestand Friday night against Tampa Bay. The Yankees, fourth in the AL East, are 8 1/2 games behind AL wild-card leader Boston with 16 games left.

"We're going to do everything we can to win next year. We're not going to wait," Steinbrenner said. "Do everything we can that makes sense. "We're going to fix what we have to fix."

New York is expected to be active in free agency. Pitchers CC Sabathia, Ben Sheets and A.J. Burnett, and first baseman Mark Teixeira are among the players whom the Yankees might be interested in signing.

Steinbrenner has already said that manager Joe Girardi will return next season, but the contract of general manager Brian Cashman ends this year and extension talks won't take place until after the season.

In addition to the GM spot, Steinbrenner is looking at setting up an advisory group, such as the one his father established before the Yankees' run of four World Series titles from 1996-2000.

"If Brian stays on as GM, that doesn't mean he won't be the No. 1 guy," Steinbrenner said. "But the fact is, the more opinions the better. I think that's probably the best way. It worked in the 90's, and it can work again."

Injuries and offensive struggles have been key factors this season, which will likely end with New York missing the playoffs for the first since 1993.

"Our offense was a major disappointment," Steinbrenner said.

The Yankees lost more than 30 combined starts due to injuries to Chien-Ming Wang (foot) and Joba Chamberlain (shoulder).

"Where would we be if we weren't down two-thirds of our top three starting pitchers?" Steinbrenner said.

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/12/08 10:12 PM

Steinbrenner says he'll call the shots from now on

If Johan Santana was a free agent this year, you can bet Hank Steinbrenner would not have taken ‘no’ for an answer.

The Yankees only have a bittersweet 16 games remaining in their lost 2008 season, but their course for ’09 is about to begin. And when it does, the co-chairman plans to be at the wheel.

“Suffice to say, there’s not going to be any more, on my part, of trying to keep everybody happy. If I want somebody, I’m going to go after him,” Steinbrenner told The Record by phone this afternoon.

Immediately after the season, Steinbrenner plans to review the entire organization. “Just as my dad would have,” he said, adding that George Steinbrenner has equally been dismayed by the Yankees’ fourth-place standing. “It’s been a very disappointing year for both of us.

“Other people might tend to look at [the Yankees] more like a business, and as long as business-wise [the club is profitable] everybody’s happy. But we don’t see it like that.”

To restore the Yankees into a World Series contender, “We’ve got major work to do, there’s no question,” Hank Steinbrenner said.
Asked if general manager Brian Cashman would continue to spearhead the baseball operation beyond his contract expiration next month, Steinbrenner said, “I think both parties still have to decide.

“I don’t think any of us expected this to happen this year,” Steinbrenner said of a 77-69 club that — barring a baseball miracle — will become the first Yankees team to miss the playoffs since 1993.

“Even besides injuries, certain players didn’t perform. Certain things didn’t get done,” Steinbrenner said. “It was somewhat the result of things that had been done over the last five years, and now I plan on fixing them.

“I’m very disappointed in this team. But at the same time, there’s no question injuries were a huge factor.”

Because of those injuries, the major league roster “might not be as difficult to fix as you’d think,” said Steinbrenner, whose chief concern is at the root level.

“The biggest mission, for myself, is making sure the farm system is stronger than it’s been the last few years,” Steinbrenner said. When it comes to prospects, “I want more.”

Within the AL East, the Yankees have seen the Red Sox replenish, and the Rays rebuild, by developing their own stars. But there’s room for a dynamic starter, and CC Sabathia could expect to receive a full-court, pinstriped press as a free agent.
Steinbrenner would not discuss names, and would not reveal if he intended to bring back his own two major free agent starters — Mike Mussina and Andy Pettitte.

The Yankees have four other free agents coming off the books this year — Bobby Abreu, Jason Giambi, Ivan Rodriguez and Carl Pavano — for a net savings of $84.25 million (not including $6.95 million in buyouts).

Potentially, the Yankees would have to replace their No. 3 hitter, fill the first base opening (possibly internally with Jorge Posada), and bolster the rotation. But money won’t be an obstacle for any player Steinbrenner desires — even with the inherent, long-term risks for a veteran pitcher.

“The Mets did it with Santana, and I came damn close to doing it with Santana,” Steinbrenner said of the trade he advocated last winter with Minnesota. “You look at it on a player-to-player basis, and you look at the market.”

The injury histories of Ben Sheets, and A.J. Burnett, two top potential free agent starters, complicate a long-term commitment. Steinbrenner believes he already has two top starters in Chien-Ming Wang and Joba Chamberlain, and was extremely complimentary of Mussina’s 17-win season at age 39.

“You look at what [Mussina] did, and if everybody else had been healthy ... you get an idea of what we could have had,” Steinbrenner said.

A part of Steinbrenner still wonders whether he should’ve insisted on Santana, too.

“[Would] Santana have made enough of a difference with all our injuries [this year]? I don’t know,” Steinbrenner said. “It certainly would have made us a lot closer.”

Source: North Jersey
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/12/08 10:24 PM

Report: Bernie to return for sendoff

NEW YORK -- Bernie Williams is coming home to Yankee Stadium, one last time.

Williams told the New York Post that he plans to be in the Bronx as part of the pre-game festivities on Sept. 21, when the Yankees and Orioles will play the final regular season game in the Stadium's rich history.

A Yankees mainstay for 16 seasons and a key component of New York's four World Series championship clubs in five years from 1996 through 2000, Williams has not been to the ballpark since the end of the 2006 season, when he went unsigned as a free agent.

"It will bring me back to my first time in 1991, when I played my first game," Williams told the Post in Friday's editions. "It will be amazing. The fans are going to be great. I'm obviously very sad to see the Stadium go -- you have a lot of great memories -- but you move on."

The Yankees have not made an official announcement on Williams' appearance. Steve Fortunato, Williams' marketing representative, said, "Right now, there's nothing to report on anything to do with Bernie for Sept. 21."

A .297 career hitter, Williams has not officially retired and had hoped to be signed to a contract for the 2007 season.

The Yankees offered only a Spring Training invitation, which Williams did not accept, believing that his performance in 2006 -- when he batted .281 with 12 home runs and 61 RBIs in 131 games -- should have warranted a guaranteed deal.

In the two years that have passed, Williams, who turns 40 on Saturday, has used his free time to pursue a musical career that sparked during his active playing days.

Williams spoke to the Post at a musical performance that benefited Robinson Cano's Foundation Fundraiser at Frankie & Johnny's Pine Restaurant in the Bronx.

Williams was not present at the Yankee Stadium All-Star Game festivities in July, though he did make an appearance related to the MLB All-Star FanFest at the Javits Center in New York, leaving no question about his affiliation while wearing a striped Yankees polo shirt.

"I check the games once in a while," Williams said in July. "I like to check the guys that I built relationships with. I like to see them do well. I talk to Derek [Jeter] and Jorge [Posada] a lot, and Mariano [Rivera] and Joe [Torre]. I still consider myself a Yankee still. I don't think that will ever go away."

Williams was also conspicuously absent from the final Old-Timers Day at Yankee Stadium; the club explained that Williams had a long-scheduled vacation that prohibited him from attending. He told the Post that he did not want to discuss his baseball future.

"I wouldn't want to talk about that right now," Williams said. "I'm doing my music right now. I'm having a great time with my time off. I'm still training, so you never know."

The Yankees have not released details of the final plans for the Sept. 21 finale at Yankee Stadium. A source said that a memorable sendoff celebration will be held, involving many former Yankees greats and Hall of Famers.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/13/08 12:00 AM

Who honestly wouldn't have rather had Bernie available to come off the bench these last two years than fucking Wilson Betemit?

The way the Yankees handled Bernie was pretty bad. We certainly could have used him down this stretch run. It's a shame that we've lost our core and replaced it with overpriced and overhyped non-talent.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/13/08 02:00 AM

I've certainly missed Bernie. He was a great contribution to the team, and we certainly could have used him since they treated him like crap.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/13/08 10:15 PM

I agree with you both.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/18/08 10:20 PM

Here he is again, grasping for a spotlight




Manny says he doesn't deserve to be NL MVP, as Schilling calls him out

The media called Manny Ramirez's quirks "Manny being Manny." Curt Schilling sees it differently.

In an interview Wednesday on Boston radio station WEEI-AM, the injured Boston Red Sox starter took his former teammate to task, saying Manny's "level of disrespect to teammates and people was unfathomable."

Ramirez was dealt to the Los Angeles Dodgers at the trade deadline after complaining the team had tried to turn the fans against him and that the Red Sox no longer deserved him. Ramirez was in the last year of his contract, with the team holding two one-year options for $20 million each.

There were times when you had players who were on like fire duty, 'Show up tomorrow, I'm not sure if you're playing or not, we've gotta find out what [Manny] wants to do.' That's not fair to anybody.

In eight seasons in Boston, Ramirez's quirks were widely seen as harmless, or dismissed as a small price to pay for having such a gifted hitter in the lineup. But Schilling, speaking with "Big Show" host Glenn Ordway and former Red Sox players Brian Daubach and Lou Merloni, said Manny's antics disrespected his teammates.

"The guy got to dress in a locker away from the team for seven years," Schilling said. "And then [when] he's on this crusade to get out of here, all of a sudden he's in the locker room every day, voicing his displeasure without even having to play the game that night."

Manny's behavior was hardest on Red Sox manager Terry Francona, Schilling said.

"Nothing makes a guy that respects the game and respects human beings like Terry Francona feel worse than looking at a guy and saying, 'Go ahead, [mess] with me, [mess] with your teammates, I'll put you in the lineup,' and then turn around to a guy who's there every day early working his [butt] off who gets 110 at-bats a year and saying, 'You know what? Yeah, I can't put you in there tonight,'" Schilling said.

"There were times when you had players who were on like fire duty, 'Show up tomorrow, I'm not sure if you're playing or not, we've gotta find out what [Manny] wants to do.' That's not fair to anybody."

Ramirez, who hit .299 with a .529 slugging percentage and 68 RBIs in 100 games in Boston, has seen his production skyrocket since joining the Dodgers. In 44 games in L.A., he's hitting .400 (64-for-160) with a .738 slugging percentage and 44 RBIs entering Thursday's games. He's batting .330 for the season overall.

Schilling said his teammates are not angry that Ramirez's power numbers have spiked dramatically since he donned Dodgers blue.

"I wouldn't say [they're ticked], I'd probably say disappointed more than anything," Schilling said. "Because the one thing about Manny is that he was … he was very kind, and well-mannered, but there were spurts and times when you didn't know who he was. You know, he was always kind and nice for the most part, but he'd show up the next day and say, 'I'm through with this team, I want out now.'"

Perhaps it was one of those kinder moments that came through, when Ramirez demurred about talk that he should be voted the NL MVP.

"It's nice that some people think I deserve it," Ramirez said, according to the Los Angeles Times. "I'd like to win it. But I have to be realistic. Someone who was only here for two months doesn't deserve it. It should go to someone who played the six months of the season."

Ramirez also said he knows there's a chance he might never be named MVP. "I've played 16 years, I've been a pretty good player and I've never won it," he said in the Times. "It's not a big deal. I'll go on with my life."

Schilling acknowledged that it was awkward for him to speak out on Ramirez, given the fact that he has missed the entire season with an injury. "I'm the last person in the world who should be telling you who's right and who's wrong in this," he said.

"But I was a teammate, a member of this family, and I saw it … And to me, it was always those guys, the guys who played a crucial role on teams that weren't the marquee players, are the ones that were disrespected the most."

Addressing Merloni, who was a role player in Boston, he said, "Lou, you're in Seattle, and if you refused to get on a team plane, you know what they'd do? They'd give you an Air France ticket home."

Source: ESPN
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/18/08 10:33 PM

I don't like Manny, but I can't stand Schilling either, what with that whole Country Boy/John Wayne thing he tries to convey.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/18/08 10:41 PM

lol EXACTLY PB! I can't wait 'till he retires. Hopefully I'll never have to hear from him again, but I highly doubt that
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 12:31 AM

I'd take Manny in a heartbeat.

Schilling is just trying to be relevant, and unfortunately for him his team has moved on and clearly doesn't need him anymore.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 02:43 AM

Schilling usually opens his mouth and gabs a lot of shit. However, for once I agree with him. Manny may be talented, but he is arrogant and one of the worst team players ever.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 04:19 AM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I don't like Manny, but I can't stand Schilling either, what with that whole Country Boy/John Wayne thing he tries to convey.



If he were on your team, you'd love him. He's one of the best big game pitchers of our era.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 04:21 AM

Sports Illustrated has a cover story this week on Yankee Stadium. I haven't read it yet.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 01:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Manny may be talented, but he is arrogant and one of the worst team players ever.


...have you bothered to look at the NL West? Manny has basically recharged the entire Dodgers team and turned them from a bunch of Torre-led robots who were floundering into a loose clubhouse with a drive to win, and it shows as they're going into the playoffs.

I pray the Dodgers don't retain him and we can pick him up in the offseason, but the Dodgers are experiencing such a revitalized fan base that I suspect they'll try to open the warchest and keep him. I don't blame them.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 01:11 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I don't like Manny, but I can't stand Schilling either, what with that whole Country Boy/John Wayne thing he tries to convey.



If he were on your team, you'd love him. He's one of the best big game pitchers of our era.


He was. I'm pretty sure this last batch of injuries have sealed the deal on Schilling.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 01:56 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
I don't like Manny, but I can't stand Schilling either, what with that whole Country Boy/John Wayne thing he tries to convey.



If he were on your team, you'd love him. He's one of the best big game pitchers of our era.


Nah, he'd probably cry about the team's performance and we'd have to trade him to the Diamondbacks. whistle
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 03:13 PM

I don't like him. I agree that he's talented. I agree that he's a great hitter. However, he's a sloppy, arrogant bastard who would rather make it personal, and decide at the last minute whether he's going to play that day or not. That's not a good team player. And all the public pissing and moaning? Aw, poor Manny!! That mean team in Boston wanted to pay you millions and millions and put up with your whiny crap for years! Let's all have a pity party for YOU.

Shut up and play ball.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/19/08 08:56 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I don't like him. I agree that he's talented. I agree that he's a great hitter. However, he's a sloppy, arrogant bastard who would rather make it personal, and decide at the last minute whether he's going to play that day or not. That's not a good team player. And all the public pissing and moaning? Aw, poor Manny!! That mean team in Boston wanted to pay you millions and millions and put up with your whiny crap for years! Let's all have a pity party for YOU.

Shut up and play ball.


I'm pretty sure he has shut up and play ball - take a look at the change from pre- and post-Manny LA. It's pretty obvious. For not being a team player, he's energized his teammates and carried his team to the playoffs.

I tell you what - let's compare this Manny '08 vs. A-Rod '07. Both guys are going to carry their team to the playoffs. But you tell me who you'd rather have on your team: A-Rod, the hard-working, likable guy who despite his flaws off the field is considered to be a character guy, or Manny, the goof-off and lazy player who, despite on-field antics, has uplifted his team and, more importantly, is clutch?

I think I'll take the guy with the dreads, and I'll go win me some championships.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 12:24 AM

I hate to say it but you're right DJ, I'm with you
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 04:27 PM

Big Stein Will Not Make Stadium Finale

Teh sad. He must be in terrible health.

Here is George from the ASG:



He didn't look terrible at the ASG or Old Timers Day, but it's also terrible that not only will we miss George, we'll be missing the Voice of God, Bob Sheppard, as well, who still hasn't recovered from his year+ long battle with pneumonia. frown
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 04:27 PM

I realize I just used terrible a lot in the last post.

To make it slightly more humorous, substitute Charles Barkley's voice and "turrible" when you read it.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 04:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
substitute Charles Barkley's voice and "turrible" when you read it.


Haha, using that method makes just about any post funnier!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 08:21 PM

Why the hell haven't the Yankees played this well all year? Is it only now because the pressure is off??
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 08:44 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Why the hell haven't the Yankees played this well all year?


The Joe Torre curse?
The Hanky Panky Steinbrenner curse?
The Bambino curse?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 08:51 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Why the hell haven't the Yankees played this well all year?

The Bambino curse?



confused
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/20/08 09:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: SC
The Bambino curse?


confused


They screwed Babe Ruth when he retired. He was promised a management spot (not necessarily a field manager, even if that's what he wanted) but they just cut him loose.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/21/08 12:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Why the hell haven't the Yankees played this well all year? Is it only now because the pressure is off??


Injuries?
Apathetic players?
Mediocre management?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/21/08 12:20 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: SC
The Bambino curse?


confused


They screwed Babe Ruth when he retired. He was promised a management spot (not necessarily a field manager, even if that's what he wanted) but they just cut him loose.


While I agree that there should have been some sort of deal in place to keep Ruth as a Yankee alumnus pro-tempore, you don't just dump Joe McCarthy, one of the greatest Yankee managers of all-time (#7 all-time in wins, and leading Yankee manager in wins all-time, and tied with Casey Stengel in World Series wins), no matter how much Babe wanted to manage. It means something that at that time, Jacob Ruppert's attempts to reach out and find a suitor for Ruth's managerial services turned up empty except for the Braves.

If anything, it was the Boston Braves who screwed Ruth over; Ruth was supposed to have Bill Parcells-esque control over the team, and quickly discovered that he was pretty much a powerless figurehead.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/21/08 04:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Why the hell haven't the Yankees played this well all year? Is it only now because the pressure is off??


Age
Front office
Maybe that Torre guy brought something to the table

I don't blame it on injuries. Every team gets injuries, and with the financial resources of the Yankees, you should weather the storm.

I agree with the apathetic players. The tone of the season was set in the preseason when the unheralded small market Rays drilled the Yankee catcher, and the response was a complaint that you're not supposed to play all out in the Spring.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/21/08 07:05 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1

I don't blame it on injuries. Every team gets injuries, and with the financial resources of the Yankees, you should weather the storm.


Every team gets injuries, but not every team loses their 3/5ths of their starting rotation and has to start Sidney Ponson and Darrell Rasner for long terms; in contrast, I don't think the Rays had a starter on the DL the entire year. Damon has been lost sporadically through the year. Matsui gone for most of it. Posada gone for nearly all of the season.

I don't see how you can lose that much of your starting 9 and not expect problems. And I don't think that Torre would have been able to change that, imho.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:18 AM

How great was it to see Bernie Williams back in pinstripes! And some of the others! Whitey Ford, Yogi Berra, Goose Gossage, Graig Nettles, Paul O'Neill, Murcer's family, David Cone, Reggie Jackson! You could just go on and on.

What a fitting ceremony and how fitting to have Posada to catch the ceremonial pitch and Babe Ruth's daughter to throw it. Really nice.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:23 AM

I was blown away seeing David Mantle (Mickey's son) run out to center field. He runs EXACTLY like his dad did.

Quite fitting to see Babe Ruth's daughter throw old the first pitch.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:23 AM


And your boy just got a crystal bat and ball... (no further comment grin )
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:24 AM


I missed most of the ceremony, though. But I'm sure they'll replay it forever...
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:31 AM


I gotta listen to these ESPN assholes for the last home game?? ohwell
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:39 AM

It'd be fitting if someone like ARod hits the last home run in the Stadium.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:49 AM

Oh, JG, you didn't DVR it?? It was really amazing. Even if you're not a Yankee fan, if you love baseball, then you had to love that ceremony. I couldn't believe how many greats were on that field at once.

And as John Sterling said, it was the fans' chance to say goodbye to Bernie, something that they never had a chance to do.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 12:53 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

I gotta listen to these ESPN assholes for the last home game?? ohwell



At least it's not Joe Buck. rolleyes
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:36 AM

Yankees eliminated yet?
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:42 AM

It'd be ironic if Johnny Damon hit the last homer in the Stadium. The first one was hit by a former Red Sox player who moved over to the Yanks, and the same for the last homer.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:44 AM

Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Yankees eliminated yet?


Yes, from the divisional title but they're still in it (barely) for the wild card spot.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:47 AM

If the Yankees lose tonight, Boston clinches the wild card. If the Yankees win tonight, I believe it will simply be postponing the inevitable.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:56 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
It'd be ironic if Johnny Damon hit the last homer in the Stadium. The first one was hit by a former Red Sox player who moved over to the Yanks, and the same for the last homer.


Molina just killed that by scoring a 2 run home run.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 02:07 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
If the Yankees lose tonight, Boston clinches the wild card. If the Yankees win tonight, I believe it will simply be postponing the inevitable.


The last month has been postponing the inevitable...put a fork in them, they're done, and have been for awhile.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:02 AM

Man that was a really hard game to get through knowing it was the last ever in that Stadium
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:07 AM

It was a great tribute. I missed seeing Torre there, though.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:12 AM


FIRST homer hit in Yankee Stadium... The Babe
LAST homer hit in Yankee Stadium... wow, not Damon... but Jose Molina! A record that will never be broken.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
It was a great tribute. I missed seeing Torre there, though.


Joe Torre is busy getting ready for the playoffs.

Oh, that's right, the Yankees aren't.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:40 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
It was a great tribute. I missed seeing Torre there, though.


Joe Torre is busy getting ready for the playoffs.

Oh, that's right, the Yankees aren't.


Oh, of course, if the Yankees were in the NL West, they'd still be crushing the rest of the division. Hell, most of the AL could crush the "best" of the NL.

Have fun with the Rays and the Angels, Red Sox. Should be fun to watch. wink
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 04:50 AM


Must we be so petty ("your team sucks!") on the night The House That Ruth Built is no more?? Show some respect for the last great sports venue. tongue
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 05:01 AM

You just gave me an idea for a separate thread.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 05:09 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

Must we be so petty ("your team sucks!") on the night The House That Ruth Built is no more?? Show some respect for the last great sports venue. tongue



Meh, our park has seen so many playoff games, it's time we let some of the vultures have their shot at the proverbial corpse.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 05:26 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Meh, our park has seen so many playoff games, it's time we let some of the vultures have their shot at the proverbial corpse.


DING*DING*DING*

We got a winner! The funniest post of the year.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
It was a great tribute. I missed seeing Torre there, though.


Joe Torre is busy getting ready for the playoffs.

Oh, that's right, the Yankees aren't.


Oh, of course, if the Yankees were in the NL West, they'd still be crushing the rest of the division. Hell, most of the AL could crush the "best" of the NL.

Have fun with the Rays and the Angels, Red Sox. Should be fun to watch. wink


Boy, those grapes are sour. wink
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 01:55 PM

Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?

It was less than a year and a half ago, the stadium was whipped into an orgasmic frenzy when he stood arm in arm with Steinbrenner and announced that he was coming back to pitch a half season with the Yankees.

Was it the Mitchell Report? Heck, Pettitte and Giambi were featured in it and they were treated like kings.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 05:22 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?

It was less than a year and a half ago, the stadium was whipped into an orgasmic frenzy when he stood arm in arm with Steinbrenner and announced that he was coming back to pitch a half season with the Yankees.

Was it the Mitchell Report? Heck, Pettitte and Giambi were featured in it and they were treated like kings.


Petitte and Giambi have been somewhat contrite. Clemens has been the same defiant jerk he's been his whole life. I really think that's all there is to it. It's just as well; Clemens might have been a distraction on this great night.

Hell, I'm not even a Yankee fan, but I'm a New Yorker (more specifically, a Bronx guy), and a baseball fanatic. I've seen Yankee Stadium with my own eyes (be it on the Major Deegan on the way to work, or attending a couple of games a year when a good visiting team is in town), basically every day of my life. When it's no longer the first thing I see when I get south of the Cross Bronx every day, it's going to be quite a shock to my system. As it was, last night's ceremony got me very emotional.

Yankee Stadium is part of Americana; not just baseball, not just New York City. It is, pardon the cliche, truly the end of an era.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/22/08 11:39 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?


Not as conspicuous as the complete absence of both Joe Torre and Don Mattingly...
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/23/08 10:42 AM

So, hope springs eternal. Boston lost last night. The Yankees didn't play. Mathematically, it's still POSSIBLE for the Yankees to get the Wild Card. It's not PROBABLE, it's not even realistic, but it would be so exciting if it came down to those three games in Boston this weekend.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/23/08 01:14 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?


Not as conspicuous as the complete absence of both Joe Torre and Don Mattingly...


lol

They have other commitments gearing up for the postseason. Remember the postseason?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/23/08 03:59 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?


Not as conspicuous as the complete absence of both Joe Torre and Don Mattingly...


lol

They have other commitments gearing up for the postseason. Remember the postseason?


I didn't realize divorcing your drunk wife counts as the "postseason." Care to share Mattingly's key steps to preparation?
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/23/08 07:59 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: Double-J
[quote=klydon1]Anyone else think the absence of Roger Clemens - both in person and on the highlight reel- was conspicuous?


Not as conspicuous as the complete absence of both Joe Torre and Don Mattingly...


lol

They have other commitments gearing up for the postseason. Remember the postseason?


I didn't realize divorcing your drunk wife counts as the "postseason." Care to share Mattingly's key steps to preparation? [/quote]

Wow, how soon they turn on Donnie Baseball. It's funny that a reference to Stevie Swindal's drunken escapade behind the wheel at 2 AM (I didn't even mention the alleged mistress) that coincided with his divorce brought a reprimand of "everyone makes mistakes." smile

To answer your inquiry, I can not explain the steps to Mattingly's preparation to make the playoffs, but I would suppose it would resemble those of similarly situated hitting coaches in mlb.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/23/08 09:06 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1

Wow, how soon they turn on Donnie Baseball. It's funny that a reference to Stevie Swindal's drunken escapade behind the wheel at 2 AM (I didn't even mention the alleged mistress) that coincided with his divorce brought a reprimand of "everyone makes mistakes." smile

To answer your inquiry, I can not explain the steps to Mattingly's preparation to make the playoffs, but I would suppose it would resemble those of similarly situated hitting coaches in mlb.


Actually, it wasn't so much turning on Mattingly as I didn't realize he was an active hitting coach; I thought he had resigned for the year because of "family issues."
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 02:29 AM

Ah, well, and so it ends. Anyway, nice win for Moose.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 03:05 AM

There's always next year.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 03:10 AM

It's funny, as much as I don't like the Yankees, I feel weird going into the playoffs without them there.

I'm a bit speechless actually.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 03:11 AM

First time in 13 or 14 years. It IS strange.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 03:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Ah, well, and so it ends. Anyway, nice win for Moose.


He's been the only real bright spot besides Joba with Wang out. Let's hope he gets #20. He's certainly put in the effort.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 10:38 AM

Maybe he was the only bright spot for YOU, but Jeter's always a bright spot for me. grin

Seriously, they interviewed Jeter last night. This is the first time in his career that the team haven't secured a spot, and the reporter asked him how it felt. His response (and I'm paraphrasing): It sucks, but we sucked.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/24/08 01:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Maybe he was the only bright spot for YOU, but Jeter's always a bright spot for me. grin


Jeter did not have a very good year this year. I'm hoping he's not on the accelerated decline. With Posada the Albatross stuck to us for another 3 years, and Ghey-Rod for another 9, it's going to suck if the captain can't get back in the swing.

Honestly though, I think he's going to have to get with Girardi and take some Dale Carnegie courses. These guys looked like shit at times, and I'm not sure if the Jeter ala Torre approach of "awe shucks" is working anymore with this group. It's like they were waiting for the big turnaround like last year that never came. Too complacent.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/25/08 01:17 PM

I'm not sure what everyone thinks of Hank Steinbrenner, but Ray Ratto has an entertaining column. Of particular interest is his Godfather analogy.

Hank's Yankee whine tasting crowns week of absurdities
Sep. 24, 2008
By Ray Ratto
CBSSports.com Columnist
Tell Ray your opinion!



In a week that is only half over and already weirder than weird, it is hard for a body to know where to turn.


George Steinbrenner at least kept the blame inside the organization unlike son Hank. (Getty Images)
The Lane Kiffin story is now verging on the Favrian -- told and overtold. Omar Minaya's four-year extension in the face of another potential tanking is a classic what's-the-hurry tale. The rumor out of Australia that suggests that Lance Armstrong might be part of a group that may buy the organization that runs the Tour de France is either too cruelly ironic or too amusing to believe. The O.J. memorabilia trial has its own warm moments as you struggle to find a rooting interest.

But then you have the Yankees out of the playoffs, and the self-consciously overwrought reactions from the uniformed personnel. And then you have Hank Steinbrenner ... as always.

While the other Yankees complained only of psychic nausea and crippling emptiness, the team's designated gasbag decided to rail against his enemies -- namely, the existence of other teams.

In a pity party held through the auspices of Pete Abraham's Sporting News column, Steinbrenner surveyed the soot at his feet as he held forth on a number of topics near and dear to his pancreas. Like revenue sharing.

"That's a system I don't particularly like. It's a socialist system, and I don't agree with it. Does it work? It depends on your point of view. But is it right? Is it even American? I'd argue no on both of those points."

So the Yankees are out of the playoffs because of socialism. Check.

Now to the divisional structure itself.

"The biggest problem is the divisional setup in Major League Baseball. I didn't like it in the 1970s, and I hate it now. Baseball went to a multidivisional setup to create more races, rivalries and excitement. But it isn't fair. You see it this season, with plenty of people in the media pointing out that Joe Torre and the Dodgers are going to the playoffs while we're not. This is by no means a knock on Torre -- let me make that clear -- but look at the division they're in. If L.A. were in the A.L. East, it wouldn't be in the playoff discussion. The A.L. East is never weak."

So the Yankees are out of the playoffs because Major League Baseball isn't one 30-team division. Interestingly, this morning the Yankees would be tied for the eighth and final spot with Milwaukee, which presumably would be disqualified on the basis of being Milwaukee.

And then there are the playoffs, period.

"Go back to the 2006 season. St. Louis winning the World Series -- that was ridiculous. The Cardinals won their division with 83 wins -- two fewer than the Phillies, who missed the postseason. People will say the Cardinals were the best team because they won the World Series. Well, no, they weren't. They just got hot at the right time. They didn't even belong in the playoffs. And neither does a team from the N.L. West this season."

So the Yankees are out of the playoffs because the playoffs are stupid and a violation of the divine right of kings, or something like that.

Now in some places this preening "we're great because we're us" argument plays. Say, like in and around the Bronx. But in the wake of the Yankees' first non-October in 15 years, the last guy to snivel about the system is Hank Steinbrenner. I mean, he didn't like the playoff system as a teenager, and that's supposed to be a compelling reason to disband it?

Even his dad, who could complain in outer space, always found a way to delegate blame within his employee lists. As near as we can tell, Hank believes that he was first screwed by the decision to expand to San Diego, Montreal, Kansas City and Seattle in 1969.

Basically, there is an art to bitching in defeat, and Steinbrenner doesn't have it. Like many sons of privilege, he sees the world in terms of "I'm on third base, and I'm just waiting for the limo to pull up and take me home." Mark Cuban, who is often mocked for his intermittent tantrums, knows how to bitch -- thought-provoking and entertaining at the same time -- but Hank just sounds like an old guy on a park bench who wishes the Austro-Hungarian Empire had never dissolved.

This is sad in a 51-year-old man, to be nostalgic about times he barely remembered. Frankly, he'd look more dignified if he sued someone.

But he'll learn, because at some point his father will call him over and give him some pointers on how to be a sore loser. It'll be kind of like the Vito-meets-Michael-in-the-garden-to-plot-the-killing-of-the-heads-of-the-five-families scene in The Godfather. Right now, Hank is more Fredo than he is willing to admit, and bordering on outright Connie. If he keeps this up, Hal is likely to decide to be Michael, and we know how the movie ended for Fredo and Connie.

In the meantime, though, the ungrateful and disrespectful swine that is baseball goes on despite Hank Steinbrenner's earnest entreaties, and of all the hilarious nonsense so far this week, this one takes the lead at the top of the stretch. The field is crowded, though, and you never know when the Raiders might have another press conference.

Ray Ratto is a columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:11 AM

I love Hank. He says most of the shit none of the other owners are willing to say in such a PC/diplomatic era. He says the revenue sharing is crap - and in some perspectives, it is. He says the two leagues are totally unequal - they are. And he says that it's not necessarily the best team but rather the hottest team who wins the world series - also true.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:17 AM

Sorry, DJ. You're a great kid, but Hank Steinbrenner is an asshole. His father's arrogance was endearing, because it was original and it was real. Junior's is contrived and not the least bit entertaining.

The idea of Torre playing the Red Sox in the World Series (while the Yanks watch from home), is eating him alive.

Oh, the hot team winning the World Series? Well, duh! It's always been that way.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:29 AM

Hank may be an asshole, but he's OUR asshole.

Even if Torre makes it to the World Series, I don't think any of the NL teams can stand against the competition from the AL this year.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J



Even if Torre makes it to the World Series, I don't think any of the NL teams can stand against the competition from the AL this year.


Like the Cardinals two years ago? tongue
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:33 AM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Double-J



Even if Torre makes it to the World Series, I don't think any of the NL teams can stand against the competition from the AL this year.


Like the Cardinals two years ago? tongue


The Tigers did, and do, suck my left nut.

Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:35 AM

Fox Sports: A-Rod Will Be Traded Within 5 Years

We can only hope.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:37 AM

Thanks. I'll never get that two seconds of my life back.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 03:41 AM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
The idea of Torre playing the Red Sox in the World Series (while the Yanks watch from home), is eating him alive.

If wishing only made it so. His knickers are totally twisted over Torre making the playoffs. Hee!!!
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 11:15 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

If wishing only made it so. His knickers are totally twisted over Torre making the playoffs. Hee!!!


That is the exact impression I get. His comment about it not being fair that Torre and the Dodgers are going to the playoffs because their division isn't as competitive is childish, at best.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 11:39 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
His comment about it not being fair that Torre and the Dodgers are going to the playoffs because their division isn't as competitive is childish, at best.


But true.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:03 PM

I love Joe Torre a lot and have no ill feelings towards him or his success in L.A. But let's be realistic, the Dodgers are making the playoffs because of one reason and one reason ONLY: Manny Ramirez
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 12:55 PM

Let's hope Manny hits the FA market and we can snag him. He said he wanted to play in pinstripes. Let's make it happen. Trade either Damon or Matsui, and put Manny in left field.

Immediately it solves a lot of the offensive woes this team has. His defense, while below average, can't be any worse than Matsui's was with his knee problems.

I'm more concerned with our two albatrosses and how they'll play next year - Posada and A-Rod. As you know, I was vociferously against resigning Posada, and as it is signs are he may never play catcher again, which means we just inked a DH for the next 3 years. With Manny, it could help relieve stress off of A-Rod, because we know his fragile ego can't handle hitting with RiSP.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 01:04 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Let's hope Manny hits the FA market and we can snag him. He said he wanted to play in pinstripes. Let's make it happen. Trade either Damon or Matsui, and put Manny in left field.


If you do that, I'm assuming you put Nady in right? Also, we know the Yankees are going to go after CC hard but if they sign CC and Manny, you think they still go after Teixera?

I've also heard rumblings that the Mets may go after K-Rod. They need it as their bullpen has blown I believe 29 games this year (most coming as of late which is when they can afford it the least).
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 01:54 PM

Nady is going to be in right field no matter what. The Yankees will not bring Abreu back, 100%, guaranteed. He wants too many years and too much money for absolutely abhorrent defense and a questionable work ethic. He did manage to perform well on offense but I think Nady, with a full year in pinstripes, should be able to better that.

And I think the Yankees are going to unload the warchest. Clearly, they'll go hard after Sabathia, no doubt, he's their biggest target. They'll offer him substantially more money than any other team. They want him bad. If Sabathia - who really wants to play on the West Coast - does not sign, they go down a notch to Sheets and Burnett. The problem is that obviously both are injury prone and thus, don't really solve the problem of having a durable ace.

I don't think Teixiera is hitting the market in earnest. The Angels are having too much success to let him get away. Even though he will, with Boras as his agent, end up as an FA, I think the Angels are going to snag him back.

If the Angels get to the World Series this year, K-Rod will stay with Los Angeles. But I would not be surprised to see Minaya go apeshit on another Latin player and sign K-Rod for an exorbitant deal. Not only would he be someone who is not named "Billy" or "Wagner," he'll be uber-effective in the NL East.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 01:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
His comment about it not being fair that Torre and the Dodgers are going to the playoffs because their division isn't as competitive is childish, at best.


But true.


And irrelevant. And silly. And embarrassing.

When you finish third in your division, you have no business crying about not making the postseason.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/26/08 02:20 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1
His comment about it not being fair that Torre and the Dodgers are going to the playoffs because their division isn't as competitive is childish, at best.


But true.


And irrelevant. And silly. And embarrassing.

When you finish third in your division, you have no business crying about not making the postseason.


Well, I just referred to Hank as an asshole, but I'm not quite the gentleman that you are, Klyd. Still, I think we fundamentally agree on this topic. smile
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 02:53 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1

When you finish third in your division, you have no business crying about not making the postseason.


Too bad that it proves his point - the third place team in the AL East still has a better record than the division champs of the NL West...and most of the other clubs in the other league.

It's not embarrassing at all. It's great.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 03:33 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1

When you finish third in your division, you have no business crying about not making the postseason.


Too bad that it proves his point - the third place team in the AL East still has a better record than the division champs of the NL West...and most of the other clubs in the other league.

It's not embarrassing at all. It's great.


Greater than making the postseason? wink

I agree that the AL East is more talented than the NL West, but differences in talent among divisions and leagues are subject to change. The goal of winning championships is not.

By the way, I don't think the Yankees would have any success in the NL. They wouldn't have a pitching staff left if the pitchers had to run bases.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 03:40 AM

Let's watch Wang run around the bases! Oops! There goes our pitching ace - out for the season!!

Klyd, I'm a big fan of the Yankees, and I have to agree with what you've said here. The Boss was known for blasting away in the press, but he was at least honest about putting the blame on the team. Hank and Hal just seem like snotty whiny crybabies.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 04:07 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1


I agree that the AL East is more talented than the NL West, but differences in talent among divisions and leagues are subject to change. The goal of winning championships is not.


How long has there been AL dominance in interleague play? Since it began? The point is that teams in the NL are getting into the playoffs with mediocre records. He's just qualifying it for all the folks who inevitably will pull out the "Torre magic" card.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Hank and Hal just seem like snotty whiny crybabies.


Hal barely talks to the media. I'm wondering where you got this asinine impression from, considering it's obvious he's the one behind the scenes running the team.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 01:26 PM

Wow, Chris Britton sucks. I watched the final 3 outs because I knew with a Boston lost they'd be playing the Angels in the first round. Britton went 1 inning, gave up 3 hits, 3 runs, 2 walks, 1 strikeout and threw 37 pitches against Boston's B team!
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 01:33 PM

I hadda laugh.... even though the Sox were down by 11 runs, the Yanks had to get somebody warming up in the bullpen. Britton didn't look good at all.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/27/08 02:07 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: klydon1


I agree that the AL East is more talented than the NL West, but differences in talent among divisions and leagues are subject to change. The goal of winning championships is not.


How long has there been AL dominance in interleague play? Since it began? The point is that teams in the NL are getting into the playoffs with mediocre records. He's just qualifying it for all the folks who inevitably will pull out the "Torre magic" card.



I posted this in June on interleague play. As I recall, the NL had an advantage in IL play until about 2002. I can't be sure.

My only point is that Hank is so hung up on Torre that he feels the need to try to diminish the accomplishments of the Dodgers to justify his team's failure this year.

I don't have the final stats, but the AL certainly won the lion's share this year. The AL had a bigger gap between their top teams and bottom teams whereas I thought the NL had a larger middle class, if you will. smile


Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: klydon1
The team with the best interleague record this year? The Kansas City Royals at 10-3.


And the team with the worst interleague record? (First place) Philadelphia.

EDIT: I take that back... it's the Giants. Never mind.

[/Emily Latella]



A couple of other Interleague facts:

Through 2007 the AL has an advantage of 1387-1317. The NL won the head-to-head in 1997 (the first year), 1999,2002 and 2003.
Coming into this season, the Yankees have the best interleague winning pct. overall at .589, followed by the A's .582, the Marlins .565, and the Twins and Mariners at .552.
The Pirates (through 2007) have the worst interleague pct. at .377 while the Orioles have been worst in the AL at .409.
Also, after the 2007 season the best batting avg. in interleague belongs to Michael Young (.347), Thome leads in homers with 53 and Ramirez led with 139 RBIs. The overall RBI lead may have changed as Delgado finished 2007 with 138 career RBIs and ARod had 137.
Mussina led in wins with a 20-12 record and Johann Santana had the best ERA at 2.27 through '07. Rivera had a big lead in saves with 53.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/28/08 10:26 PM

Wow, congrats to Moose. 39-years-old, he finally gets 20 wins in a year and he had a 3.37 ERA all-year in the mighty AL clap Where would the Yankees have been without him this year?
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/29/08 12:02 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Where would the Yankees have been without him this year?


Fourth place.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/29/08 01:52 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Where would the Yankees have been without him this year?


Fourth place.


True, but it's ok. I'm so glad Tampa won the AL East because now Anaheim will knock Boston out of the playoffs
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/29/08 12:31 PM

Cashman wants to return to Yankees

While Brian Cashman remained mum about his future, the buzz smothering the Yankees' universe yesterday focused on the GM telling the Steinbrenner family he wants to return. An announcement could come as soon as tomorrow. "Sooner than later," Cashman said with a smile when asked about reaching a decision. Hal Steinbrenner, who wants Cashman back, hasn't made an offer. However, there are indications Cashman could tell Steinbrenner he wants to return and negotiate later. With Hank Steinbrenner fading from the picture, Hal has been in touch with Cashman more than his older brother. Cashman and Hal work very well together and Hank hasn't been involved in meetings with Hal and Cashman and his involvement has decreased.

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/30/08 11:00 PM

Yankees agree to three-year deal with GM Cashman

NEW YORK -- Brian Cashman figures he has more work to do with the New York Yankees. After a sustained run of success, he wasn't about to leave on the heels of a failed season.

Cashman is staying on as general manager of the Yankees, agreeing Tuesday to a three-year contract that runs through 2011.

"I've got a job to finish here," Cashman said in a statement. "That's the bottom line."

New York missed the playoffs this year for the first time since 1993. Cashman took over as GM in 1997 and his current deal was set to expire at the end of October.

He was expected to re-sign, especially after Yankees co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner told Cashman earlier this season that the team wanted him back. But there had been rumblings that Cashman might be interested in running another club -- perhaps one without such a vocal, hands-on ownership group.

"I consider coming off a season where we didn't reach the playoffs for the first time since 1993 as a personal challenge. I've never been one to run from a challenge, and I look forward to having the chance to go after this thing again," Cashman said. "It's an incredible opportunity and honor to hold the title of general manager for the New York Yankees. With it comes a great responsibility to ownership, the people who wear the uniform and our fan base."

He has plenty of work to do. Beset by injuries, a mediocre pitching staff and a disappointing offense, New York (89-73) finished third in the AL East this season, six games out of playoff position.

Cashman was criticized for turning down a deal that could have brought ace Johan Santana to the Yankees last winter. He chose instead to stick with a plan of valuing young players, but it backfired when pitchers Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy combined to go 0-8 and failed to stay healthy.

New York is expected to make a strong push for several stars who can become free agents, including ace CC Sabathia. First baseman Mark Teixeira and pitchers Ben Sheets, A.J. Burnett and Derek Lowe could be targets, too.

"Before we could move forward as an organization this offseason, we needed to come to a resolution on the person who would hold the important position of general manager and allow us to make another run at a 27th world championship," co-chairmen Hank and Hal Steinbrenner said in a statement. "We are thrilled that Brian has accepted to renew his commitment to this organization for at least three more years."

The Yankees could have nearly $90 million in salaries coming off the books. Mike Mussina, Andy Pettitte, Jason Giambi, Bobby Abreu and Ivan Rodriguez are unsigned for next season, and center field is an uncertainty.

"Brian has shown throughout his Yankees career that he has the dedication, integrity and know-how needed to perform -- and succeed -- in this environment," the Steinbrenner brothers said. "Having him in place allows us to begin an offseason of hard work, and we are pleased he will be working hand-in-hand with us to bring the New York Yankees back to the postseason."

A news conference was planned for Wednesday morning at Yankee Stadium.

Souce: ESPN
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 09/30/08 11:38 PM

Good news, as far as I'm concerned. Teixiera isn't leaving LA - he needs to find another option at first base. They can carry Melky in center field if the rest of the team produces - he's still a stellar defensive player. Dump either Damon or Matsui and sign Manny if he is available. Sign two of Sabathia, Burnett, and Sheets. Sign another lower tier veteran pitcher. Bring back Mussina.

It's not a hard formula. It just requires balls.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 11:22 AM

Brian Hasn't-Won-a-Thing Cashman. Maybe he'll bring in some more good pitchers like Randy Johnson or Kevin Brown. Oh yeah, and who can forget Carl Pavano and Mr. Statistic Compiler Alex Rodriguez.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 01:18 PM

He hasn't done a thing, except (just this year alone) Joba Chamberlain, Phil Hughes, Xavier Nady, Damaso Marte, etc. etc. etc.

It's amazing the quality of talent that is allowed to grace the team when Cashman actually gets control.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 02:21 PM

I'll give Cashman this, he got A-Rod from Texas and still had them pay a sizeable portion of his contract until he opted out of it last year. Plus as DJ said, Nady, Marte, etc.

Not only that but when the Diamondbacks wanted Jorge Posada included in a trade for Randy Johnson he didn't budge and still got the Big Unit. Now, how affective he was is left for interetation but the man can make good trades and usually not give up a lot in return.

Time will still tell whether holding onto Hughes, Kennedy, and Melky instead of getting Johan Santana was a wise decision or not.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 03:01 PM

It wasn't, in my opinion. But that's because of hindsight. Hughes is still going to develop into a decent pitcher (whether he'll be the ace as projected, I doubt. I think he could be a solid #3 or #2 at best, which isn't bad...he can be the next Pettitte I'd take that). Kennedy is done. The kid just does not seem to have the mental/physical capacity to convert his game from the minors. It's like he loses all faith in his stuff, dances around the corners, and then throws a meat pitch.

Melky I like a lot but I know he is not a favorite with the organization. To an extent, I think he earned the role of scapegoat for the offensive woes, but in my opinion, nobody should expect Melky to be more than a decent #9 hitter (which he is). His defense in center - something we haven't had since Bernie in his prime - balances the scales. So I'm glad we kept him.

Also, don't forget that part of the deal also included Austin Jackson, the Yankees #1 outfield prospect. If he is any good, we might see him next year; he should be playing AAA ball this season and if he stays on his current path, could really make some noise.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 03:03 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12

Not only that but when the Diamondbacks wanted Jorge Posada included in a trade for Randy Johnson he didn't budge and still got the Big Unit. Now, how affective he was is left for interetation but the man can make good trades and usually not give up a lot in return.


Even with his injuries, Randy Johnson was still a very good pitcher for this team. His wins totals were definitely something we could have used since he's been gone. And considering that one of the parts we dealt for him was Dioner Navarro - aka our former stud catching prospect who was the heir to Posada and is now on the playoff Rays - it is one of those deals where it's a shame we didn't hold onto him, imho.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 03:12 PM

How about Humberto Sanchez? You think he could make an appearance at the major league level next season? I know they used him late in the season in the bullpen but I wonder if they'll make him a starter next year?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 04:29 PM

Bullpen. He'll be a setup man. I don't think his conditioning is going to let him be much more than a reliever, in my opinion.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 05:10 PM

You think they'll permantely leave him as a reliever or they'll try to work him into a starter a la Joba?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 09:54 PM

He had Tommy John. I think they'll try to build up his arm and stamina by seeing how he deals with a reliever role. He has the body of a starter (6'6, 235+) but the problem is whether he has the conditioning and arm strength to play starter after so much time on the shelf.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 10:13 PM

Who was the dopey first baseman they got in the middle of the season. That was a great move. They had a good defensive 1st baseman in Andy Phillips and they let him go.

The problem with Cashman and the Yankee brass is that they tie themselves up with long term contracts with aging players who don't deliver. Then they waste time, money and talent trying to get rid of them, or be stuck with them.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/01/08 11:36 PM

MC, I couldn't remember his name either, perhaps because he was on the team for about 20 minutes, or so it seemed. It as Richie Sexson (or is it Sexon?). And, yes, he sucked. And what happened to Duncan, as well as Andy Phillips? And Miguel Cairo? Didn't they used to have like six first basemen, then all of a sudden it was down to Sexson (or Sexon) and Giambi??
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/02/08 12:35 AM

Wow. I can't believe people honestly think that Andy Phillips or Miggy Cairo could be good players.

Andy Phillips was let go in Spring Training because he sucks. He's a AAAA player.

Miggy Cairo sucks.

Shelly Duncan sucks.

Richie Sexson lost his swing, and now sucks.

Want to know who they shouldn't have let go?

Nick Johnson, the Yanks best position prospect since Derek Jeter and unfortunately dealt for (useless) Javier Vasquez.

Incidentally, Cashman said today that Matsui will DH, Damon will play the outfield, and they're going to get a first baseman.

Coincidentally, Giambi's option was (thankfully) not picked up.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/02/08 12:39 AM

Well, DJJ what it all comes down to, no matter who you think sucks, or I think sucks.......Cashman sucks.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/02/08 12:52 AM

How does Cashman suck? He protected the Yankee youth that would have been spent on overpriced aging hipsters. Explain to me how he sucks.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/02/08 01:07 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
He had Tommy John. I think they'll try to build up his arm and stamina by seeing how he deals with a reliever role. He has the body of a starter (6'6, 235+) but the problem is whether he has the conditioning and arm strength to play starter after so much time on the shelf.


I'm put him in the 8th inning spot to cover for Joba so he can move to the rotation (problem solved hopefully)
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/02/08 01:28 AM

The problem is already solved. Phil Coke is going to be decent and a lefty. Damaso Marte showed why they traded for him in the last month and a half - he's been lights out. And Mark Melancon, the heir apparent to Mariano Rivera, should be hitting the Majors at some point next year.

The Yankees bullpen, for the first time since the Nelson-Rivera-Wetteland years, is solid.

But of course, Brian Cashman sucks.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/03/08 08:47 PM

I advocated picking him up when Boston cut him loose. Now, who thinks he'll make a better back-end guy than Ponson or Rasner? tongue
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/03/08 10:34 PM

Ah, I'd use him as a #4 or 5 but I wouldn't care either way if we got him or not
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/03/08 10:55 PM

Lowe is a big game pitcher. He doesn't get rattled. He's one of the main reasons I picked the Dodgers over the Cubs.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/04/08 03:24 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Lowe is a big game pitcher. He doesn't get rattled. He's one of the main reasons I picked the Dodgers over the Cubs.


I really wished we picked him up when he became a FA a few years back after he was done with the Sox.

Alas, we took Johnny Damon. ohwell
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 02:45 PM

Padres have Peavy on the block, but I doubt he'll go for anything less than Hughes, Cano, and another top prospect.

Although I have also heard Ichiro and Bedard are available. Who would do Matsui, Kennedy, Igawa (they still want him, for some undetermined reason) and a prospect for that Seattle salary dump? wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 03:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Padres have Peavy on the block, but I doubt he'll go for anything less than Hughes, Cano, and another top prospect.

Although I have also heard Ichiro and Bedard are available. Who would do Matsui, Kennedy, Igawa (they still want him, for some undetermined reason) and a prospect for that Seattle salary dump? wink


In a heartbeat! I heard a rumor last night that the Red Sox may go after Peavy. The person who wrote the rumor thinks the Sox have the trade chips to make the deal happen.

Red Sox covet Padres' Peavy

If Jake Peavy does indeed become trade bait in San Diego, watch the line form out the door for his services. Peavy, 27, is precisely the type of pitcher the Red Sox covet. And considering the close relationship between GMs Theo Epstein and Kevin Towers, don't rule out the Sox. The Padres would want a Dan Haren-type deal, and the Sox have the chips to do it.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 04:06 PM

That's fine. I'd rather let Peavy go and go after Sabathia and Burnett. My problem with Peavy is that a.) he'll cost too much ala Haren b.) his home/away splits aren't very good, and c.) he's been routinely lousy in big-game situations.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 04:10 PM

I really hope CC goes to New York but the more I read about it, the more I get the feeling it's not going to happen. To me, he doesn't seem to want to go their unless the Yankees throw enough money at him to make him come. I don't know if the Yankees will want to overpay for him, it depends on how desperate they feel.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 04:21 PM

Sabathia came out recently and said he'll "play anywhere" but I agree, he wants to play on the West Coast. I'd rather see them throw big money at Manny and Texiera, and go after second tier guys like Burnett (just got done pitching an entire year healthy, so a good risk), Lowe (a nice #3 or #4 in the AL East) and possibly Sheets (higher risk than Burnett). You'll need more or less depending on whether Mussina and/or Pettitte retire.

Ideally:

Sabathia
Wang
Chamberlain
Lowe
Hughes

Less Ideally:

Wang
Burnett/Sheets
Chamberlain
Lowe
Hughes

Sort-of Ideally:

Wang
Chamberlain
Lowe
Mussina
Hughes

Not Very Ideally:

Wang
Chamberlain
Lowe
Pettitte
Hughes

Crap:

Wang
Chamberlain
Pettitte
Mussina
Hughes

I'd honestly let Dandy Andy go. He...is done. Mussina? Try to get him to come back, but Lowe is a must-have if he retires. Chamberlain and Hughes both will be in the rotation next year, no question. Wang leads. Burnett and Sheets are injury prone which means you need Lowe if you get either one of them to supplant in emergency.

Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 05:07 PM

I've read online that the Yankees should look into trading Melky or Cano. You think they should? I know losing Cano would leave a big hole for them to fill but do you think it'd be worth it to get a Brandon Webb or Rich Harden?
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 09:23 PM

Not sure why either team would deal those pitchers. You'd have to start with a package that begins with Cano, and ends with Hughes and probably two prospects for either Webb or Harden at this point.

I'd say a better deal would be, honestly, looking for a big deal that brings back Ichiro and Bedard. Primarily, it fixes our leadoff and center field issues, and gives us an ace. Seattle needs a salary dump. The problem is that Ichiro is on the wrong side of 34 and is locked in until 2012, which could mean trouble if his famous legs give out on him. Similarly, Bedard is out after his surgery until at least halfway through 2009, and he's an FA at the end of the season.

These factors could obviously influence who we send back, and since Seattle wants a salary dump, I'd say we could theoretically fleece them. I like this deal if it could be contingent on putting some extra years on the Bedard deal. Even if he is injured, he's still got electric stuff.

But to deal Cano now would be to sell low, and I think that's a mistake. Melky probably will be a bench player next year at best; the Yankees are pretty high on Brett Gardner as well so that's an interesting scenario. But I don't think Melky has much trade value.

I think, even though Cashman has alluded to possibly dealing Cano, that if the Yanks make a *big* trade this offseason, there are a few things that have to happen first. The first being that Sabathia would sign somewhere else. The second being they lose out on the Lowe and Burnett sweepstakes. The third being they secure neither Teixiera nor Manny.

In that case, then yes, I'd definitely expect to see Cano moved. The problem is the best available 2nd baseman right now on the FA list is Orlando Hudson. Ugh.

So yes, a trade for pitching or outfield help is going to create a hole in the infield, but I'd honestly expect Cano in pinstripes next year. As long as they can get 2 of Sabathia, Lowe, Burnett, or Sheets , and 1 of Teixiera or Manny, I'll be pretty happy. Those free agent splashes will help enough so that we can get a little more freedom in the lineup.

I won't like though. If I were the Yankees, Manny is my #1 target this offseason, bar none. Not only has he basically said he wants to play for the Yankees, but he's a New York guy and we know he crushes the fuck out of the ball no matter what. Use him to protect A-Rod. It instantly boosts our RiSP.

Similarly, Teixiera, though I have gone back and forth on this, is another necessity. Maybe he's not a premier player like Pujols, but he's a stellar defensive first baseman who can get you the big hit. He's also a character guy. Watch his swing - it's got a touch of Gehrig in there (although not the power). He solidifies our corner infield position that has been awry since Mattingly retired.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/06/08 09:43 PM

I agree about Manny but I still feel the Yankees #1 priority is pitching, namely CC Sabathia
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 10:33 AM

The point is that I don't think Sabathia really wants to play in New York, and thus, even if they throw a ton of money his way and he turns them down, there are still very good second tier pitchers available. However, Manny and Teixiera are keys to relieving the anemic offense we had last year.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 04:59 PM

A question for Yankee fans. A.J. Burnett or C.C. Sabathia?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 05:59 PM

CC in a heartbeat
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 06:23 PM

Why am I not surprised. I knew this wouldn't be the end:




Schilling might consider returning to Red Sox for second half of '09

BOSTON (AP) -- Curt Schilling is considering coming back next year -- for half the season.

The Boston Red Sox right-hander, who underwent season-ending shoulder surgery on June 23, said in an interview with Sporting News that he might try to pitch in 2009 under the right circumstances.

"I won't come back for a full season, that much I know. If I do decide to come back I would work to the point I was ready and somewhere around May 1 let the teams know I wanted to pitch the second half," he said.

"I'd obviously need to spend June in the minor leagues building it all back up and then hopefully come back and help a team in contention win a World Series. All of this is predicated with the fact that I am completely healthy and able to pitch like I did prior to breaking my shoulder early in 2007."

Still, Schilling said retirement is a strong possibility.

"If I had to make that decision today, yes, I'd retire," he said.

Dr. Craig Morgan, who performed the surgery, estimated a few hours after it ended that Schilling could be throwing a ball in four months and throwing from a mound within seven months, by late January.

Schilling, a six-time All-Star who turns 42 next month, is signed only for 2008 at $8 million. He didn't pitch this season and isn't happy with the way things went.

"So much happened that left a bad-to-bitter taste in my mouth that I just am not sure. So much was and has been said about me by people that have no idea what has transpired over the past 12 months, and that bothers me." he said. "What I do know is in the past 23 years I've never gone through a winter and not had specific dates where I began to get ready for camp. I am wondering if that will be a change or if like much of the rest of this, I'll hit those dates and feel no different."

Schilling is 216-146 with a 3.46 ERA and 3,116 strikeouts during his 20-year major league career. He is 11-2 in postseason play and was co-MVP of the 2001 World Series with Randy Johnson for Arizona.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 07:40 PM

CC Sabathia, and then Burnett. But both would be better.

And Schilling is irrelevant. The Red Sox are doing quite fine without him.

I'm surprised he didn't have to thrown in a token anti-Yankee comment. Meh.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/07/08 07:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
I'm surprised he didn't have to thrown in a token anti-Yankee comment. Meh.


lol Yeah, he's losing his touch wink
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 12:20 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
CC Sabathia, and then Burnett. But both would be better.

And Schilling is irrelevant. The Red Sox are doing quite fine without him.

I'm surprised he didn't have to thrown in a token anti-Yankee comment. Meh.


The payroll of the Yankees is what, 200 million dollars? Why stop at just Sabathia and Burnett? Why not just buy the Brewers and the Blue Jays and be done with it?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 01:22 AM

Because we actually wanna win tongue
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 03:09 AM

Originally Posted By: Don Jasani
Originally Posted By: Double-J
CC Sabathia, and then Burnett. But both would be better.

And Schilling is irrelevant. The Red Sox are doing quite fine without him.

I'm surprised he didn't have to thrown in a token anti-Yankee comment. Meh.


The payroll of the Yankees is what, 200 million dollars? Why stop at just Sabathia and Burnett? Why not just buy the Brewers and the Blue Jays and be done with it?


What Irish said. Why would we want to adopt two teams who somehow manage to be worse than we are? tongue
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 03:49 AM

Granted, the Indians were absolute shite this season but at least the Brewers made the playoffs no? In any case let's look at both Sabathia and Burnett.

C.C. 17 - 10 253 IP 251 K 2.70 ERA 1.12 WHIP 4.25 K/BB 8.93 K/9IP

A.J. 18 - 10 221 1/3 IP 231 K 4.07 ERA 1.34 WHIP 2.69 K/BB 9.39 K/9IP

Other than W/L which isn't the most effective or useful stat to determine the worth of a pitcher and strikeouts per 9, Sabathia has the better numbers. Sabathia is also a few years younger so yeah I'd say he has the better upside. The scary reality of the situation for non Yankee fans is that little Stein is probably gonna get both of them and a monster bat and every one else in the A.L. East is gonna be pretty much fu**ked next season. I don't see Tampa duplicating the miracle of this season, Boston, well let's just say I don't want them to win. Baltimore??? Seriously eh? That leaves the Jays and the Yanks. As you fellas probably know, our rotation is pretty much fu**ed for next season due to the injury of Shaun Marcum and the fact that A.J. is as good as gone. That leaves us with Doc, Casey Janssen (who may or may not stay in the bullpen when he fully recovers from Tommy John), D-Mac, Jesse Litsch and filler. If the bats are as shit as they were this season, the Red Sox run into some bad luck, the Rays go back to sucking ass and the Orioles remain the Orioles, the Yankees will probably win the East.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 03:55 AM

Brewers made the playoffs in the NL. As most know, I'm pretty confident the Orioles could make the playoffs in the NL.

Of course Sabathia has the better numbers, but he wants to play on the West Coast, which means other options have to be pursued.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 04:02 AM

Yes the NL is quite weak. I believe Sabathia said he wants to play in Califorina. That narrows it down to the Dodgers, the Angels, the Padres, the A's and the Giants. However if Steinie makes him an offer he can't refuse I'm pretty sure he'll take it.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 04:50 AM

We'll see. I still think he's going to end up out West.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 04:23 PM

McCarver: Manny is 'Despicable'

Good. Shut the fuck up, and let him come to New York so he can rake some homers.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 04:45 PM

It's been well established by many more knowledgeable than us that Tim McCarver is RETARDED. Manny will be Manny, hit some more home runs for a few more years and call it quits. Maybe he'll stay in L.A., maybe he'll come to T.O. (we don't have the money) or maybe he'll go to N.Y. and the Yankees will win the Series.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/08/08 04:53 PM

Who else thinks McCarver said it because Fox is going to cover the NLCS? tongue
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:22 PM

Regardless of why McCarver said it or where Manny will end up, what I want to know is why is Tim McCarver a highly paid colour guy when he really should just be washing dishes somewhere.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:28 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Jasani
Regardless of why McCarver said it or where Manny will end up, what I want to know is why is Tim McCarver a highly paid colour guy when he really should just be washing dishes somewhere.


He was an above average catcher. When he retired, he fell into the Mets job at just the right time (mid '80s). He was able to use that as a platform to launch his career at Fox. Plus, he's a good old boy. Fox LOVES that. Life is timing.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:39 PM

One anecdote regarding McCarver that I heard from somewhere is that in some game God knows when, him and Bob Gibson had a mound conference and you know Mc was trying to calm Gibson down. Gibson looked him in the eyes and said "All you know about pitching is that it's hard to hit."

All McCarver knows about being a colour guy is that it's hard to do. I respect the fact that he's done something to reach where he is, however he is still a terrible colour guy.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:40 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Life is timing.


Especially when using the withdrawal method. tongue
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:44 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Life is timing.


Especially when using the withdrawal method. tongue


Hey, I'm Catholic! tongue
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:49 PM

Life is balance. Timing is just managing the details and the attitude you have towards them.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Jasani
Life is balance. Timing is just managing the details and the attitude you have towards them.



Thank you, Obi-Wan. tongue lol
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:58 PM

Obi-Wan? You bein a wise guy wit me? Huh Pizzaboy? What am I some sort of fictionalized, Lucas character here to amuse (enlighten) you? Double-J, was he shakin? I worry about you PB somtimes, you might fold under questinoning.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 01:59 PM

lol

Nah. Movie buff that I am, I'm no STAR WARS geek.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/09/08 02:24 PM

Hmm. Screwed up this conversation is! lol
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/10/08 03:40 PM

lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/12/08 04:59 PM

Some rumors I heard




" The Yanks have roughly $88 million in salary potentially vanishing, and Yankees New York Yankees officials already are building toward a consensus how to use those dollars. Based on multiple interviews the initial plan looks like this:

1. Sign at least one and, preferably two, starters from among free agents CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Derek Lowe.

2. Re-sign either Mike Mussina Mike Mussina or Andy Pettitte.

3. With the rotation deepened by free agency, use pitching prospects in particular to obtain a prime-age, high-ceiling player at first or in the outfield. Then use minor trades or free agency to address other areas.

Currently, the only way the Yanks intend to chase a major positional free agent such as Manny Ramirez or Mark Teixeira is if they are shut out on pitching and have to consider building in a different way and/or the dismal economy drives down prices (which is possible)."

Source: NY Post
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/12/08 05:45 PM

Hmm.

1.) That's a given. They'll get Sabathia, unless he's hell bent on going to the West Coast, because they'll unload the warchest. Their offer will be significantly higher than any other teams.

2.) I don't think Pettitte would be welcome back unless the Yankees fail to pick up one of the available FA pitchers. Mussina would be welcome back, but I have a feeling he's going to retire.

3.) They're going to go after Teixiera. He has said in the past he wants to be closer to his home on the East Coast (he's from the Baltimore area) and he's a Boras client. He's the best first baseman available. They've gone too long with patchwork and underproduction at that position. Teixiera may not be the same tier as Pujols but he's another player that, when they become available, you have to snap up.

As far as the outfield goes, don't be surprised if they go after Pat Burrell. I've heard his name whispered a lot. Also, if the Yankees don't pick up Rocco Baldelli, I'd be floored. He's a great talent, they have solved his metabolism issue, and if he can stay healthy, is a great investment at 27 years old. But he's still a huge injury risk.

The key is that an outfield with at least Damon in left and Nady in right is at least serviceable, especially with a slick fielding Melky (the kid can bounce back) or Gardner (maybe a better choice because of his baserunning and offensive versatility). It's offensively productive, and not a total defensive liability. Personally, I'd expect them to not change much in the outfield unless, of course, they sign Manny Ramirez, which they should but I don't know if they will. If that happens, hell is going to break lose. They'll have to deal either Matsui or Damon to make room (probably Matsui but more likely Damon because of his greater trade value).

The economy isn't going to hurt the Yankees, they have the new stadium, huge ad deals, and the TV network. They're going to roll it on at least two big free agents this offseason - two of Sabathia, Teixiera, and Ramirez - and then make smaller moves elsewhere. The key is that Ramirez would be a luxury, which is why he's the least likely move. We desperately need a workhorse pitcher to complement Wang - Sabathia fits the bill. We desperately need a first baseman who can hit and field consistently - Teixiera fits the bill.

However, you sign Manny, you solve those dreaded RiSP issues of last year, and you also guarantee A-Rod won't have to be clutch (was he ever?) and will see some meatballs if they have Ramirez hitting in front of him in the order.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/12/08 08:52 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
However, you sign Manny, you solve those dreaded RiSP issues of last year, and you also guarantee A-Rod won't have to be clutch (was he ever?) and will see some meatballs if they have Ramirez hitting in front of him in the order.


That's why I wish they'd sign him, even if it was for 3 or 4 years. Also, don't forget the money the Yankees will get for auctioning off the old Yankee Stadium. PURE PROFIT right there;)
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/13/08 11:55 PM

Well, keep watching Rocco Baldelli. He just put the nail in the Red Sox's coffin in Game 3 of the ALCS. He should be the Yankees center fielder next year.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/14/08 06:32 PM

Phillies GM to Yankees?

One of the most persistent rumors that circulated among baseball officials during the season was that Pat Gillick was going to move from Philadelphia GM to Mariner president and recruit Brian Cashman to be Seattle's GM. That buzz ceased earlier this month when Cashman agreed to a three-year extension to stay. But Cashman should still find a way to work with Gillick. Because the skills that define Gillick's career - skills that should lead him to the Hall of Fame - are traits the Yankees can use even on a consultant basis. Gillick is renowned for scouting acumen, sagacity in decision-making and terrific people skills that help bridge disparate viewpoints.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/14/08 06:48 PM

Gillick and Gene Michael will make good bosom buddies.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/15/08 07:10 PM

Willie returning to Yankees?

The Yankees need a third-base coach, and Willie Randolph needs a job. So there is a chance the former Mets manager might return to The Bronx. In a move that shows the honeymoon between Joe Girardi and the Yankees is officially over, Bobby Meacham, a close friend of Girardi's, is out as third-base coach, a move that was announced yesterday. Meacham, who with bullpen coach Mike Harkey lived with Girardi in his Westchester County home during the season, was dismissed, as was special pitching instructor Rich Monteleone. Meacham was informed by GM Brian Cashman. Immediately, Randolph and Larry Bowa jumped to the top of the list as possible replacements. And there is a chance bench coach Rob Thomson could be moved to third with the Yanks hiring a veteran bench coach to assist Girardi.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/15/08 07:54 PM

Willie Randolph sucks as a third base coach. You thought Meachem was bad with waving people home? Willie is just as turrible. Make him the bench coach, and put Pena at first.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/16/08 12:34 PM

Sources: Agent says Pettitte wants to throw for Yanks in '09

As the New York Yankees began a round of scouting meetings this week to discuss the future of the team, they know that veteran left-hander Andy Pettitte intends to pitch in 2009, and his intention is to pitch for them.

Sources said on Wednesday that Pettitte's agent, Randy Hendricks, has informed the Yankees of this recently.

No contract for 2009 has been negotiated between the pitcher and the team, but he has made it clear that he wants to play for the Yankees and the Yankees have made it clear that they want Pettitte, who went 14-14 with a 4.54 ERA for New York this season. Pettitte made $16 million last season.

Pettitte, 36, has sometimes felt the pull of retirement, but late this season, as the Yankees played their final games in their home of more than eight decades, he spoke wistfully of wanting to play in the new Yankee Stadium in 2009.

Pettitte is 215-127 in his career, most of which has been played with the Yankees.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/16/08 03:09 PM

Former Yankee Tom Tresh dead at 71
By BILL MADDEN
DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER

Thursday, October 16th 2008, 4:00 AM

Tom Tresh, who burst onto the big-league scene in 1962 and won Rookie of the Year honors as a fill-in shortstop for the Yankees after Tony Kubek was called into military service, died Wednesday at his home in Venice, Fla., of a heart attack. He was 71.

The switch-hitting Tresh, who drew unfair comparisons to Mickey Mantle that he could never live up to after his standout first season in which he hit .286 with 20 homers, 93 RBI and 94 runs scored, was nevertheless a Yankee fixture in the waning years of their five-decade dynasty. In three World Series, 1962-64, he hit .277 with four homers and 13 RBI in 18 games, including a two-run homer off Sandy Koufax in the 1963 opener. In the 1962 Series against the Giants, he hit a game-winning three-run homer in Game 5 and in Game7, he made a great catch in left field to rob Willie Mays of an extra-base hit to help preserve the 1-0 clinching Yankee win.

"I got a call from his son, Greg (Wednesday) morning who told me Tommy had passed away at his home," said Johnny Blanchard, Tresh's Yankee teammate in the '60s. "He'd played golf the day before and complained about an ache in his back, but I guess he didn't think it was serious. He played a valuable role for those ballclubs of ours in the '60s and was just a terrific fellow. This is a sad day."

When Kubek returned from the Army, Tresh moved to left field, where he flanked Mantle and Roger Maris in one of the best outfields the Yankees ever had. In 1966 he hit a career high 27 homers and led the American League in sacrifice flies. He also switch-hit homers in the same game three times that year. On June 6, 1965, Tresh hit four homers in a doubleheader against the White Sox.

Tresh, whose father, Mike, was a catcher mainly with the Chicago White Sox from 1938-48, saw his career shortened after hurting his knee in spring training, 1967. Two years later, the Yankees traded him to the Detroit Tigers for outfielder Ron Woods and he retired after that season with a .245 average and 153 homers.

"Tommy was just a wonderful guy and a real plus for us," said former Yankee second baseman Bobby Richardson. "Filling in for Tony the way he did in 1962 was so important. We couldn't have won that year without him. I always felt badly for him that he was always being compared with Mickey, just because he was a switch-hitting shortstop who moved to the outfield."
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/17/08 01:04 AM

Good, they need him more as a starter clap




After meetings, Steinbrenner says Chamberlain likely to join rotation in '09

TAMPA, Fla. -- Hank Steinbrenner says Joba Chamberlain likely will return to the New York Yankees' rotation at the beginning of the 2009 season.

"The plan as of right now is Chamberlain is going to be a starter," the Yankees co-chairman said Thursday after five hours of organizational meetings at the team's spring training complex. "Everybody's pretty much in agreement with that."

Chamberlain began this year in the bullpen, joined the rotation on June 3, then was sidelined after his Aug. 4 start because of rotator cuff tendinitis that caused him to go on the disabled list. When he returned Sept. 2, he went back to the bullpen.

Also attending the meetings was co-chairman Hal Steinbrenner, team president Randy Levine, chief operating officer Lonn Trost, general manager Brian Cashman, assistant general manager Jean Afterman, vice presidents Mark Newman, Gene Michael and Felix Lopez, and advisers Reggie Jackson and Tino Martinez.

"It was a productive day," Hank Steinbrenner said. "We didn't make any decisions today. We just covered all the things we need to fix. Everything is open. We're willing to do anything that will improve us. It was more of a summary and quite a lot of discussion."

The Yankees are thought to be interested in free-agent pitchers CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Ben Sheets, and first baseman Mark Teixeira. Exploring a trade for San Diego pitcher Jake Peavy is possible.

Andy Pettitte has said he is likely to return for next season. Mike Mussina isn't sure and the Yankees think he might retire.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/18/08 01:15 AM

Yankees, Braves chasing Peavy

The Yankees are one of several teams that have had preliminary discussions with the San Diego Padres about a possible trade for 2007 National League Cy Young Award winner Jake Peavy. According to a person familiar with the substance of Thursday's organizational meetings in Tampa, Peavy was a hot topic as word has begun to circulate around baseball that the Padres are interested in shopping Peavy. The person said the Yankees had a feeling the Padres might be further down the road in discussions with other teams, such as the Atlanta Braves. And even a very strong offer might not be enough to get Peavy, since his contract includes a no-trade clause. But if the Yankees decided to make young pitchers such as Phil Hughes or Ian Kennedy available, they believe they could put together an attractive package for the Padres to at least consider.

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/18/08 01:19 AM

Yankees lay out offseason plans

Determined not miss the playoffs for a second straight season in 2009, the Yankees' top executives have decided to pursue many of the game's premier free agents, chief among them starting pitchers CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Derek Lowe, and first baseman Mark Teixeira, among others, this winter. They will also will pursue Jake Peavy, the Padres' Cy Young-winning starting pitcher who may be available via trade, and may take a look at top free-agent outfielder Manny Ramirez, as well, though the need for a corner outfielder isn't as urgent as their need for pitching and a first baseman.

While they can't sign all those pitchers, they are hoping to secure more than one of them. There is also some question in the cases of Sabathia and Burnett whether they'd want to play in New York, which may be why they will pursue so many pitchers.

Top Yankees decisionmakers, including club owners Hank and Hal Steinbrenner and general manager Brian Cashman met over the last two days in Tampa. The Yankees will have even a greater monetary advantage than usual this postseason, thanks to elevating revenues from the new Yankee Stadium and more than $80 million in expiring contracts.

The Yankees will also consider bringing back starting pitcher Andy Pettitte, who has told them he'd like to return. The Yankees will weigh Pettitte against other free agents and are believed to want to keep him on a one-year deal.

Sabathia, the top free-agent pitcher this year, has said he'd consider any team. The Yankees are expected to be the high bidder for Sabathia, who should seek a contract to beat the $137.5-million deal Johan Santana got from the Mets last winter. But Sabathia also said he'd prefer the National League and is believed to have interest in returning to his home state of California. The Brewers are also expected to make an attempt to keep him. The Mets may, too.

The Yankees' interest in Teixeira seems to make clear that longtime Yankee Jason Giambi will not be brought back. Even if the Yankees fail to sign Teixeira, they have determined they want to upgrade their defense at first base. The Angels, Orioles and perhaps the Giants and Mariners are among teams expected to show interest in Teixeira.

The Yankees also want to upgrade in center field, though there are no great free-agent options, which may lead them to pursue trades. Pitching prospects Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy presumably won't have the same untouchable status they had last winter.

The Yankees may also consider Brewers pitcher Ben Sheets as yet another free-agent alternative, but there are some concerns about his injury history. If Mike Mussina decides he want to keep pitching, the Yankees would be interested in him, as well. The Yankees also firmed up plans to keep Joba Chamberlain in the starting rotation, assuming there are no more setbacks with the talented young pitcher.

Peavy has a no-trade provision in his Padres contract so it isn't known whether he'd accept a deal to the Yankees. Burnett has the right to opt out of his Jays deal, which has another $24 million over two years remaining, and it is expected that he will do so. The Jays may try to sign him to prevent him from filing for free agency, though.

Source: SI
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/18/08 02:28 PM

I know for a fact that every so often, Alzheimer's patients are capable of a few moments of clarity. Hank Steinbrenner should really pray that with his father, that's not the case. He may just wake up one day and say to himself, Who put my pea-brained son in charge?

He just reminds me of the typical rich kid, who received no attention throughout his life, and now he's overcompensating for it. He has a definite need to be heard.

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Yankees; it's just an observation.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/18/08 03:58 PM

Hey, if he overcompensates and gets all these guys, I won't complain grin
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/18/08 06:04 PM

lol
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 12:42 PM

Joba Chamberlain Arrested for DUI

Pure genius. What a retard. rolleyes
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 02:43 PM

Yeah, I read that too on ESPN
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 04:47 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Joba Chamberlain Arrested for DUI

Pure genius. What a retard. rolleyes


Well, he is just a kid, so I kind of feel bad for him.

But you mark my words on this kid (and no, Irish, I'm not just picking on him because he's a Yankee), all of this attention is going to RUIN him. Between Hankenstein's mouth, and the constant starter vs. reliever debate, and the pressure of playing in New York City, he's going to implode.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 07:44 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Between Hankenstein's mouth, and the constant starter vs. reliever debate, and the pressure of playing in New York City, he's going to implode.


We'll see. I'm really excited to see how this kid does over the course of a 162-game season as strictly a starter
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 07:50 PM


I still think it's a huge mistake to overwork Joba as a starter... someday he'll probably be our closer.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 08:07 PM

Only time will tell with that answer. I'm not saying they should over work him with 250+ innings. I say watch his pitch count most definitely, and I think in the long haul this'll be the right decision. Besides, I heard the next Mo is already moving his way up our farm system (I forgot his name though). Also, we have Humberto Sanchez who could be our 8th inning guy if not another starter.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/19/08 09:28 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

I still think it's a huge mistake to overwork Joba as a starter...


...because it is a good idea to take someone that's been a starter his entire career and dominated and make him into a closer...

Joba is going to be a dominant starter. He's dominated every level as a starter. The Yankees bullpen is, unlike most of the team, solid. In three years, Rivera hands over the reigns. By that time, let's hope Chamberlain has won at least a Cy Young.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/20/08 03:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: J Geoff

I still think it's a huge mistake to overwork Joba as a starter...


...because it is a good idea to take someone that's been a starter his entire career and dominated and make him into a closer...



You mean like Dennis Eckersley, John Smoltz or, who's that guy with the Yanks, er, Rivera? tongue

They ALL start off as starters (for the most part).
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/20/08 03:14 PM


Then why was Torre so reluctant to use him so much? tongue
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/20/08 03:16 PM

lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/20/08 11:27 PM

Hopefully he'll come back and kick Cano square in the a$$




Bowa a Dodger or Yankee in '09?

The Yankees will have a clearer idea of who their third base coach will be later this week. That's when Larry Bowa will meet with Dodgers brass to discuss his future. Bowa, who is the Yankees' No. 1 choice to replace Bobby Meacham, recently finished the first of a two-year deal to coach third for the Dodgers. Nevertheless, Bowa has an out in the contract. Bowa, the best third base coach in baseball, was with the Yankees in 2006 and 2007 but not retained when manager Joe Torre didn't return for the 2008 season. Instead, Bowa joined Torre in Los Angeles. If Bowa decides to stay with the Dodgers, the Yankees might turn to Mike Gallego or Dale Sveum.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 04:37 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: J Geoff

I still think it's a huge mistake to overwork Joba as a starter...


...because it is a good idea to take someone that's been a starter his entire career and dominated and make him into a closer...



You mean like Dennis Eckersley, John Smoltz or, who's that guy with the Yanks, er, Rivera? tongue

They ALL start off as starters (for the most part).


Rivera was a mediocre starter. Joba has shown he can dominate at the major league level as a starter.

Smoltz was moved to the closer role due to injury/fatigue, and it was after a long career as a starter. Joba was moved to the reliever role because they needed a pitcher in the bullpen in 2007, not because of injury/fatigue.

Eckersley was a starter who declined and ended up prolonging his career as a reliever. Joba is a young pitcher who was a reliever out of necessity and is being moved back to his natural role.

Chamberlain should be a starter, especially with Rivera having career years at his age. The bullpen is fine. He belongs in the rotation.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 05:03 PM

That wasn't my point. My point was that they were all starters at one time or another.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 05:04 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Chamberlain should be a starter, especially with Rivera having career years at his age. The bullpen is fine. He belongs in the rotation.



As usual, I agree DJ. What do you think of Humberto Sanchez? Starter or bullpen? Triple-A or Majors?
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 05:08 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: Double-J
Chamberlain should be a starter, especially with Rivera having career years at his age. The bullpen is fine. He belongs in the rotation.



As usual, I agree DJ.


Big surprise. Must be something in the water upstate. tongue lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 07:06 PM

What can I say? Great minds think alike wink
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/21/08 08:26 PM

Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
That wasn't my point. My point was that they were all starters at one time or another.



You missed my point. Unlike all of those other starters - Chamberlain can dominate at either the starter or reliever at his choosing. The rest were relegated to the bullpen because of injury or ineffectiveness.

Furthermore, in my humble opinion, you take an ace starter over a closer/setup man any day of the week.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 12:29 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
That wasn't my point. My point was that they were all starters at one time or another.





Furthermore, in my humble opinion...


DJ, your opinions are a lot of things. But they're never humble. tongue lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 12:56 AM

And the award for the Grossest Understatement in a Post goes to.....Pizzaboy!
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 03:33 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
And the award for the Grossest Understatement in a Post goes to.....Pizzaboy!


How is that begging cup working for you, Ray?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 10:45 AM

Oh, I get it. You're not only bigoted against African-Americans when you post pictures of gorillas, but you insist on perpetuating a stereotype about the visually challenged as well. I'm sure that Governor Paterson would beg to differ.

And, by the way, making Joba a starter is a bad decision.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 12:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
And, by the way, making Joba a starter is a bad decision.


Can I just ask why? Do you feel our bullpen is in more shambles than DJ and I believe? If he is put in the pen, that's one less starting rotation spot filled. What do we do with that?

Again, I think Joba is more beneficial to us as a starter. We can't get a lot of use out of him in those 17-3 blow outs (but if he's starting he gives us a better chance to keep the game closer to then hand it over to the bullpen in the 6th, 7th or whatever inning)
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 01:59 PM

I think that anyone who throws as consistently hard as Joba is at true risk of burning out that arm. He's already been injured once. With Mo retiring, I think he's a perfect set up man for innings 7 and 8, and then eventually to take over as closer once Mo retires, which is only one or two seasons away. He is definitely lights out.

There is no doubt that we need starters, but I do not think that Joba is the answer. If we re-sign Moose and pick up Burnett and Sabathia (if wishing only made it so!), then we would have 4 excellent starters. I think that Hughes has potential to be consistently good at some point.

I don't think we should re-sign Pettite, but that may be inevitable. Either way, if we can pick up two new starters, and utilize Wang (although he's not without injury problems, either) and Moose, then fill out the 5th spot with either Pettite or Hughes, I think we'd have a consistent rotation.

The bullpen has improved. Unfortunately, our lack of starting pitchers who could last more than a few innings burnt out too many potentially good guys over the last few years. Let's keep our fingers crossed for 2009.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 03:51 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Oh, I get it. You're not only bigoted against African-Americans when you post pictures of gorillas, but you insist on perpetuating a stereotype about the visually challenged as well. I'm sure that Governor Paterson would beg to differ.

And, by the way, making Joba a starter is a bad decision.


You're the one who called me blind, Stevie. Maybe I should write my posts in braille for you?

And "making" Joba a starter is a pretty ignorant statement, considering he's always been a starter outside of his emergency stint in 2007.

Keep tapping that stick, sweetie! (Yes, I'm sexist as well.)
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 04:03 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I think that anyone who throws as consistently hard as Joba is at true risk of burning out that arm. He's already been injured once. With Mo retiring, I think he's a perfect set up man for innings 7 and 8, and then eventually to take over as closer once Mo retires, which is only one or two seasons away. He is definitely lights out.


It's 3 years away. Joba's throwing motion is hard, but not kinsthetically rough on his body as, say, a Dontrelle Willis or a Francisco Rodriguez.

By that logic, having Joba as a starter would improve his durability since he would not be throwing as hard over the course of 6 innings as he would as a reliever over 1 or 2.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

There is no doubt that we need starters, but I do not think that Joba is the answer. If we re-sign Moose and pick up Burnett and Sabathia (if wishing only made it so!), then we would have 4 excellent starters. I think that Hughes has potential to be consistently good at some point.


Even if we re-sign Moose he is a year-to-year player at this point, not long term. Burnett is Pavano pt. II. Sabathia would be great and exactly what we need. Hughes has only two pitches and has not shown the ability to stay healthy or pitch consistently at the major league level.

Unlike all of those above, Chamberlain actually a.) plays for us b.) plays exceptionally well and c.) is a long-term solution.

Without Joba, our rotation is Wang. That's it. Wang is the only reliable starting pitcher we have on the roster as of now besides Joba. Moving him to the pen weakens an already dismal rotation.

It's great Joba can be "lights out" but not if he's pitching in meaningless 7th and 8th innings because we have to trot out guys like Rasner and Ponson who give the game away in the early innings anyways.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

I don't think we should re-sign Pettite, but that may be inevitable. Either way, if we can pick up two new starters, and utilize Wang (although he's not without injury problems, either) and Moose, then fill out the 5th spot with either Pettite or Hughes, I think we'd have a consistent rotation.


Pettitte will be a cheap option as a back-end starter but can no longer be used as a #2. Wang's injury was a freak accident, not indicative of his previous injury history (which is relatively mild). Hughes has not shown he can pitch at the Major League level with any degree of consistency. Moose might not come back. We'll need to sign at least two pitchers to have a chance. Three, if we decide to hop on the extra chromosome toting bandwagon and move Chamberlain to the bullpen.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe

The bullpen has improved. Unfortunately, our lack of starting pitchers who could last more than a few innings burnt out too many potentially good guys over the last few years. Let's keep our fingers crossed for 2009.


So you acknowledge we have a lack of starting pitching, and thus it's logical to take arguably our most dominant starter and move him to the bullpen?

And our rotation has been shit for the last several years. People hated guys like Randy Johnson but he did get wins. There was also bad signings, and bad luck too. Of course, in hindsight, you do the Santana deal a year ago simply because the players who would have been involved are now huge question marks anyways - Hughes will likely start the season in AAA, Kennedy is a veritable bust, Melky will be a bench player, and Tabata is now on the Pirates.

Maybe I'm not optimistic as some, but we can "cross our fingers for 2009" all we want but without a serious overhaul of this team during the offseason we are going to be pretty mediocre next year.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/22/08 08:29 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I think that anyone who throws as consistently hard as Joba is at true risk of burning out that arm. He's already been injured once. With Mo retiring, I think he's a perfect set up man for innings 7 and 8, and then eventually to take over as closer once Mo retires, which is only one or two seasons away. He is definitely lights out.

There is no doubt that we need starters, but I do not think that Joba is the answer. If we re-sign Moose and pick up Burnett and Sabathia (if wishing only made it so!), then we would have 4 excellent starters. I think that Hughes has potential to be consistently good at some point.

I don't think we should re-sign Pettite, but that may be inevitable. Either way, if we can pick up two new starters, and utilize Wang (although he's not without injury problems, either) and Moose, then fill out the 5th spot with either Pettite or Hughes, I think we'd have a consistent rotation.

The bullpen has improved. Unfortunately, our lack of starting pitchers who could last more than a few innings burnt out too many potentially good guys over the last few years. Let's keep our fingers crossed for 2009.


I understand where you're coming from now and that's a legitimate concern. I hope he doesn't burn himself out either but so far he looked good starting (I think that August injury was just a freak thing).

But again, my concern is with the rotation. Wang is (as of now) our ace. Say we do just what you said and sign CC and Burnett, that's 3 spots filled. Moose I think is going to retire and I agree, we shouldn't sign Pettitte. However, on the same token, we should learn from our mistakes last year and not rush Hughes (have him start at Triple-A and earn a roster spot). If we do that, then we only have 3 starters and still need 2 more. Again, that's why I think Joba has to start.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/23/08 12:48 AM

Lowe leaving out Yankees?

Rumors of a Derek Lowe-to-Yankees move this offseason started before the Dodgers were even eliminated from the playoffs. However, a recent article in The Boston Globe suggests Derek Lowe has the Boston Red Sox atop his list of places of interest. Lowe played with the Red Sox in the past, leaving in 2004 for the now expired contract in Los Angeles. The Boston Globe has this to say: Lowe told this reporter that while money is important, he wants to go to a quality organization committed to winning, and no organization, in his mind, fits that description better than Boston. Apparently Los Angeles is not entirely out of the question either, as Lowe will meet once again with Joe Torre to discuss a future role with the club.

Source: SI
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/23/08 01:05 AM

Irish, I do understand our need for starting pitchers, but I think that, long term, it would be a mistake to have Joba be a starter. One season or two? I don't know. Maybe if we have no other choice, but I still think it's a mistake for him, which would ultimately be a tragedy for the team.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/23/08 05:15 PM

The same way it would be a mistake to start Josh Beckett, Jake Peavy, or Brandon Webb?

After all, they might get hurt...
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/30/08 06:00 PM

Yankees will pursue Manny

Manny Ramirez doesn't fit the Yankees' desire to get younger and more athletic, but several industry sources believe the Yankees will make a serious push for the free agent to play right field next year. Though GM Brian Cashman says the top offseason priority is starting pitching, he did not rule out interest in the 36-year-old Ramirez.

Source: SI
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/30/08 06:18 PM

Just curious, Irish. How would you feel about Manny in pinstripes?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/30/08 07:01 PM

Hey, if he can produce the numbers he did in L.A. and protect A-Rod in the lineup, absolutely. On the field presence, yes, clubhouse/off the field, that's the real question.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/31/08 12:10 PM

The Yankees are interested in an aging prima donna?? What will happen next???

You definitely can't argue with Manny's talent. He's great. It's that simple. It's his attitude that is a whole 'nother story, and I can't picture him fitting in well with the rest of the team, but who knows?? Maybe he'll be so happy to be playing with Johnny Damon again that we'll just have a giant group hug before every game.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/31/08 05:39 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Yankees will pursue Manny

Manny Ramirez doesn't fit the Yankees' desire to get younger and more athletic, but several industry sources believe the Yankees will make a serious push for the free agent to play right field next year. Though GM Brian Cashman says the top offseason priority is starting pitching, he did not rule out interest in the 36-year-old Ramirez.

Source: SI


I love the hot stove. You might as well say that "Several teams in baseball are interested in several free agents this offseason."

I heard Kennedy for Willy Taveras. God help us all if these writers were in charge.

Thankfully, Cashman plays *true* deals close to the vest (see: Abreu-Lidle deal, Nady-Marte, etc.) so just remember 99% of the hot stove speculation (ex. Cano, Hughes, and Jackson for Peavy) is crap.
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/31/08 05:44 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
On the field presence, yes, clubhouse/off the field, that's the real question.


For all the shit Manny gets regarding his attitude, he still is knocking the piss out of the ball even when he's "causing trouble."
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 10/31/08 07:08 PM

Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/01/08 12:57 AM

Originally Posted By: Double-J


lol Nice DJ
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/03/08 09:12 PM

Yankees Sign Reliever Sergio Mitre to Minor League Deal

Analysis: Shoring up the bullpen, ala Octavio Dotel circa 2007. He had Tommy John surgery and won't be available until around/after the All-Star break. However, he has good strikeout numbers as a reliever. You can never have too many bullpen arms.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/04/08 03:32 PM

Here's some good news




Peavy adds Yankees, Angels to trade list

DANA POINT, Calif. -- Although five National League teams still top star Padres pitcher Jake Peavy's pre-approved list for trades, general manager Kevin Towers revealed Monday evening that the Angels and Yankees have recently been added to the list of desired teams, bringing the list to seven and giving the American League some representation.

Towers said that the five NL teams -- the Braves, Cubs, Dodgers, Cardinals and Astros -- remain Peavy's preferred destinations, but Towers said Peavy also expressed a willingness to consider the Angels and Yankees should it be impossible for Towers to find an equitable deal with one of the NL clubs he likes.

Peavy's agent, Barry Axelrod, said in a recent interview with SI.com that his client has some good feelings about the Yankees. "What kid doesn't grow up dreaming of wearing the pinstripes?'' Axelrod said. Yet, for geographic reasons the Yankees remain below the five NL teams on Peavy's list, and perhaps also the Angels, who have a distinct advantage in that they are the nearest team to Peavy's new home in San Diego.

According to Towers, Peavy has put the teams in some sort of order. But the GM declined to reveal that order.

Towers has done a lot of talking to the Braves, but without a deal in sight, is beginning to talk to the other NL teams now, and doesn't rule out the Dodgers based on their intra-division rivalry. "The Dodgers are high on his list, so I plan on talking to them,'' Towers said.

The price tag will be high, no matter who's inquiring, Towers said. "Whoever we talk to is going to have to pay a lot,'' Towers said.

The Padres are embarking on a rebuilding program, and Peavy was surprised to learn his team wants to explore trade possibilities for its ace less than a year after signing him to a three-year, $53 million extension. Peavy's no-trade clause for this year and next protects him but complicates the trade talks. Axelrod said in the recent interview that they will request a new no-trade clause in exchange for approving a trade, and might also request financial considerations, depending upon the acquiring team and the geography involved.

Towers also said the Padres probably will exercise outfielder Brian Giles' $9 million option by Saturday's deadline and are trying to work out an agreement to keep closer Trevor Hoffman.

Source: SI
Posted By: Double-J

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/04/08 06:33 PM

Peavy's home/away splits are disturbing. Considering it will probably take at least Cano and Hughes to get him, I'd rather pass and get Sabathia for just money.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/04/08 06:44 PM

Originally Posted By: Double-J
Peavy's home/away splits are disturbing. Considering it will probably take at least Cano and Hughes to get him, I'd rather pass and get Sabathia for just money.


I didn't know that. There was always something about Peavy that I didn't like. I never got the sense that he was among the elite pitchers though many disagree. Still, pitching is a prized commodity and he will games. He'll find a home.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/06/08 10:32 PM


Mussina earns seventh Gold Glove - Congrats, Moose!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/08/08 06:30 PM

This is good news




Sabathia seeks Jeter's counsel

Derek Jeter wouldn't call it recruiting, but the Yankee captain said Friday night that he has spoken this offseason to CC Sabathia, perhaps the Yanks' most vital free agent target. "He's asked questions about us," Jeter said on the red carpet before the annual fund-raising dinner for Joe Torre's Safe at Home Foundation at Chelsea Piers. "But I'll leave it at that. A private conversation that you have with someone is private. If he wants to talk about it, I'll give him the opportunity to do it first." Jeter said he did not have a ready "sales pitch" about the Yanks for Sabathia, the terrific lefty and this winter's top pitching free agent. Jeter was coy about who called whom, but it sounded like Sabathia called him. "I don't ever try to sell New York," Jeter said.

Source: SI
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/14/08 12:39 AM


Yanks acquire Swisher from White Sox

Quote:
Swisher, 27, came to New York in exchange for utility infielder Wilson Betemit and Minor League pitchers Jeff Marquez and Jhonny Nunez. The Yankees also received Minor League reliever Kanekoa Texeira from the White Sox.

Swisher, whom Cashman called an "average" defensive center fielder, is not likely to see much time there next year. He will instead play first base and fill in at the corner outfield positions, where the Yankees consider Swisher a "plus defender."

Cashman was the first to admit the risk of acquiring a player who hit .219 overall last season and .197 from the left side, though he pointed to past seasons for justification. In 2007, Swisher hit .262 with 22 homers, following a career year that saw him hit .262 with 35 home runs in 2005. He has also averaged 93 walks over the past three seasons.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/18/08 09:10 PM

Burnett set to receive offer from Yanks

NEW YORK -- While the Yankees wait for an answer from CC Sabathia, the organization will move forward on at least one more free-agent pitching front, reportedly preparing an offer for right-hander A.J. Burnett.

The New York Post reported on Tuesday that the Yankees are building an offer -- perhaps a five-year deal in the neighborhood of $80 million -- to present to Burnett, who became a free agent when he opted out of his contract with the Blue Jays on Thursday.

The Yankees promised to aggressively target starting pitching this offseason, smarting from their first dark postseason since 1993. New York opened the free-agent period by promising to make Sabathia baseball's best-compensated pitcher, offering a six-year contract worth approximately $140 million on Friday; co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner said that the Yankees would also tender offers to Burnett and Derek Lowe.

Burnett also has potential suitors in the Braves and Orioles, and he will likely command a four- or five-year deal worth between $15-18 million annually. The Blue Jays have interest in retaining Burnett, and they are believed to be preparing a four-year offer worth an estimated $54 million, though general manager J.P. Ricciardi maintains that Toronto has yet to present an offer to the pitcher.

Burnett will turn 32 in January, having gone 18-10 with a 4.07 ERA for the Blue Jays this past season. He led the American League with 34 starts and 231 strikeouts, fanning 9.39 batters per nine innings.

The Post also reported that the Yankees remain interested in re-signing left-hander Andy Pettitte, but not at the $16 million price tag he earned in each of the past two seasons, and they continue to believe that Mike Mussina will retire. New York is reportedly also not considered a player in a potential trade for Padres ace Jake Peavy at this time.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 03:12 AM

Source: Mussina to retire after 18-year career
By Jayson Stark
ESPN.com

As expected, New York Yankees pitcher Mike Mussina has decided to retire, according to a baseball source with knowledge of the situation. Mussina informed the Yankees last week he would give them a decision by the end of this week.

Mussina, who turns 40 next month, spent the last eight seasons with the Yankees after pitching for the Baltimore Orioles for the first 10 years of his career. His 270 wins rank second among all active right-handers, behind only Greg Maddux. In the final start of his career, he pitched six shutout innings against the Boston Red Sox to finish off the first 20-win season of his career.

According to the Elias Sports Bureau, he's just the fifth pitcher since 1900 to win 20 games or more in the final season of his career -- and the first since Sandy Koufax in 1967. He's the only pitcher in that group to win his 20th game in his final start.

The Yankees had indicated they were interested in bringing Mussina back if he wanted to keep pitching. But they had also suggested they might need to wait to see if they could accomplish their goal of signing at least two other free-agent starters this season -- an indication they weren't counting on Mussina to return from the beginning.

His retirement was first reported by Foxsports.com.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 02:09 PM

It was nice that he was able to win 20 for the first time in his career. He was a very good pitcher, and will get some Hall of Fame consideration. He's a central Pennsylvania boy, but was probably one of the most miserable people to play baseball in the past 20 years. Anyhow, after a bad 2007 season and a less than promising start to 2008, he turned things around dramatically to finish his career in an outstanding way.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 02:31 PM

My favorite headline to see was "The Moose is Loose" after he pitched a particularly good game. He'll be missed.

Now the pressure is really on the Steinbrenners to get some starting pitching.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 06:16 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
He's a central Pennsylvania boy, but was probably one of the most miserable people to play baseball in the past 20 years.


I'm just curious. Why do you say that?
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 11:03 PM

Mussina is a sure shot hall of famer in my mind. 270 wins is nothing to laugh about.

ds
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 11:12 PM

Sure shot Hall of Famer? I'm not so sure about that. I'd say he's borderline.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/20/08 11:23 PM

Originally Posted By: Just Lou
Sure shot Hall of Famer? I'm not so sure about that. I'd say he's borderline.


I agree. I wouldn't say he's a shoe-in.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/21/08 04:40 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: klydon1
He's a central Pennsylvania boy, but was probably one of the most miserable people to play baseball in the past 20 years.


I'm just curious. Why do you say that?


He had a caustic rapport with the press early in his career, and was basically aloof with teammates. A lot of people in the Williamsport area where he is from have described him as nasty and antisocial.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/21/08 04:48 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: Just Lou
Sure shot Hall of Famer? I'm not so sure about that. I'd say he's borderline.


I agree. I wouldn't say he's a shoe-in.


He's borderline, but 270 wins is a lot in his era. His winning pct. is extremely good, and he had several outstanding postseason starts earlier in his career. He did play on quite a few winning teams though, but he was a big contributor. The 20 win season helps him a lot because I think some voters would have passed over him for never winning the Cy Young AND never winning 20. I bet he slips in eventually. I couldn't argue against him.

I would like to see Bert Blyleven get in first though.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/21/08 12:18 PM

Mussina's first couple of years with Yankees were tough for him - he seemed to get little offensive support and he would lose low scoring games. If I recall correctly with Baltimore he led the league in strikeouts once or more.

As far as HOF.....I don't believe in the criteria. It's all about compiling statistics, which, if you're good and healthy can be achieved. If you take the word "fame", it can be achieved without compiling statistics. Take a player who has an outstanding five year run; leads the league in many categories and carries his team. Year six he gets hurt and his career fads. For those five years he earned fame.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/21/08 10:11 PM

Mussina liked to think of himself as an academic athlete and took great pains to disassociate himself from the "jock" image.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/22/08 03:40 PM

Yankees may pass on Burnett if he wants a 5th year
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 11/28/08 08:48 PM

GO YANKEES!!!!!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/05/08 02:32 PM

Finally an article I agree with





Theo's good, but so is Cashman


Brian Cashman has had a tough start to his winter, for no other reason than he hasn’t been able to convince CC Sabathia to sign despite offering him more money than any pitcher has ever been offered.

Then again, if you were to grade general managers based on their activity this winter, only Jim Hendry of the Cubs would have a passing grade based on the Ryan Dempster signing. Beyond that, not one prominent player has signed, so the jury is out on everybody.

I’ve heard several people in recent weeks and months declare that Cashman is being outdone by Theo Epstein in a major way. I realize that the Red Sox have won two titles since 2004 while Cashman’s team hasn’t won a title since 2000, but I’m missing the part where Theo is redefining what it means to be a GM.

Have some of Boston’s moves worked out well? Absolutely. But it takes no more skill to bid $51.1 million on Daisuke Matsuzaka (then pay him another $50 million or so) than it does to offer Sabathia $140 million.

Coco Crisp and Julio Lugo were two of Theo’s acquisitions that were believed to be tremendous moves when they were made, yet both proved to be huge disappointments. But when you win, those things are forgotten - as well they should be.

Theo made a great trade for Josh Beckett and Mike Lowell, but he did give up Hanley Ramirez in that trade, and some argue that Ramirez is already a top-5 player in the majors and could top that list at some point.

The Yankees haven’t had a player like Ramirez to deal away. If they did, they may have made a move for Beckett at that time, though they still wouldn’t have been able to take Lowell and his $18 million in a deal because they already had A-Rod at third base. They could have gotten Santana for a package led by Phil Hughes, but Cashman opted not to for many reasons, most notably that he feels Hughes will be a front-line starter soon enough.

Cashman has made several moves in recent years that backfired, namely Carl Pavano, Kei Igawa and to some extent, Randy Johnson. But to say he’s destroyed this team is a gross misrepresentation.

Where would the Yankees be without Chien-Ming Wang, Robinson Cano or Joba Chamberlain? Say what you will about Johnny Damon, but he’s given the Yankees the leadoff hitter they expected to get when they signed him three years ago. Everybody screamed that the Yankees were crazy to bring Mike Mussina back in 2008 and he won 20 games. Doesn’t Cashman get some credit for not dumping Mussina after his subpar 2007?

Yes, Cashman inherited Derek Jeter, Mariano Rivera and Jorge Posada, but there isn’t another player on the roster that was there when he took over as GM in 1998, and yet the Yankees made the postseason every year of his reign until last season.

His trades - particularly the midseason deals for guys like Bobby Abreu and Xavier Nady - have worked out well. The jury is still out on the prospects he got back for Johnson and Gary Sheffield, but simply ridding his team of those two guys when he did was more than enough to qualify those as moderate successes.

Have the Yankees drafted well? Not particularly. Chamberlain is a star in the making, while Hughes is still just 22 and could become a big-time pitcher, too. Austin Jackson is seen as the center fielder of the future and there are some other players at the lower levels (some were drafted, others signed as international free agents) that could make an impact down the road.

Cashman is the lead man on all baseball operations, but he’s not the guy that has scouted the players, so the blame can’t fall entirely on his shoulders. Just the same, Theo isn’t out scouting players for the Red Sox, so the credit for guys like Dustin Pedroia, Justin Masterson, Kevin Youkilis, Jonathan Papelbon and Jon Lester goes to the Red Sox scouts more than to the GM.

Clearly the Red Sox have had more success in the past five years than the Yankees, but to say that it’s purely the result of the general managers and their moves is naïve. The 2008 Yankees were largely the same team as the 2007 team that made the playoffs, but players simply didn’t perform as well. It happens. Anyone remember the 2006 Red Sox? Had Boston given up on Theo after the Sox missed the playoffs that year, would that have been the right move?

I know many fans disagree, but Cashman is a solid GM who has a vision to reshape this team as its stars get older. Last year was a rebuilding year of sorts, and they still won 89 games. If it becomes an annual occurrence, he’ll pay for it with his job. But after hearing fans scream and shout for years that the Yankees need to get younger, more athletic and get the payroll below $200 million, it amazes me that people aren’t willing to go through what it takes to get there. Luckily, Cashman is, and the Yankees should be better for it in the long run.

Update: Several astute Red Sox fans have e-mailed me in the past few hours to remind me that Theo wasn’t the GM when the Beckett deal was made, as that was during his short hiatus.

It has been well-documented that Theo was still involved behind the scenes, though technically he may not have been the GM at the time of the trade. Still, I find it hard to believe that he didn’t at least give his input to the deal. I think the Beckett deal turned out remarkably well for the Red Sox, even if they had to give up Ramirez. I’m guessing there’s not a Sox fan out there that would trade the 2007 World Series for Ramirez, no matter how good he turns out to be.

If Theo had nothing to do with the deal, that simply takes a plus away from his résumé. I still believe that even if he wasn’t the one to ultimately pull the trigger, he deserves some of the credit for it.

Source: NY Daily New
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/09/08 02:25 AM

Yankees going full throttle after Burnett

With prized left-hander CC Sabathia fielding offers from other clubs, the Yankees are also engaging in a full pursuit of free-agent right-hander A.J. Burnett, according to reports.

The Yankees, who long have been said to be in pursuit of Burnett, are said to be willing to go beyond the reported four-year, $60 million offer the Braves have put forth, according to reports on ESPN.com and SI.com.

The ESPN report said agent Darek Braunecker and partner Mark Rodgers arrived in Las Vegas on Monday afternoon and are expected to begin full-scale meetings with clubs regarding Burnett starting on Tuesday.

Burnett, who will turn 32 in January, is considered, along with Derek Lowe, another target of the Yankees, among the top right-handed starters on the market. Burnett set career highs in wins and innings pitched in 2008, going 18-10 with a 4.41 ERA in 221 1/3 innings for the Blue Jays.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/09/08 02:14 PM

Yanks expected to make offer to Sheets

Though the Yankees are still very much at the center of the talks with free-agent left-hander CC Sabathia, they may be preparing to make a run at another ace -- Ben Sheets.

The Yankees met with Sheets on Monday at the Winter Meetings in Las Vegas, and the New York Daily News reported that according to a source, they will offer the right-hander a multiyear deal, believed to be for two years and about $30 million dollars. The offer is expected to be made before the Meetings wrap up on Thursday.

Sheets is 86-83 in his career with a 3.73 ERA, but has missed significant time due to injury in four of his eight seasons in the Major Leagues, all with the Milwaukee Brewers. Sheets missed the 2008 National League Division Series after suffering a muscle tear in his elbow near the end of the regular season.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 12:42 PM

I just heard on ESPN that the New York Post is reporting that CC Sabathia has agreed to his 6-year, $140 million deal and WILL BE a New York Yankee! cool
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 02:12 PM

Sources: Yankees, Sabathia near deal

LAS VEGAS -- The New York Yankees were "very close" to a preliminary agreement with CC Sabathia on Wednesday morning, following an in-person meeting between Yankees GM Brian Cashman and Sabathia in California, a baseball source with knowledge of the deal told ESPN.com.

Sources told ESPN The Magazine's Buster Olney the deal offered by the Yankees is now worth $160 million over seven years -- the most money ever paid a pitcher in major league history. The team had originally offered six years and $140 million.

While a deal is not yet done, a source told ESPN.com's Jayson Stark there are "zero major road blocks" that would prevent the Yankees from reaching agreement with Sabathia.

The New York Post first reported Wednesday that Sabathia, the prize of this year's free-agent class, had decided to go with the Yankees after fielding offers from a number of teams.

Sabathia had been courted by the Milwaukee Brewers, the San Francisco Giants and the Boston Red Sox. The Los Angeles Dodgers said that Sabathia, who lives in California, had expressed interest in playing there, too, although the team did not publicly make him an offer.

But in the end, it was clear that no other team was going to come close to what the Yankees offered. That was despite varying signals from the Dodgers -- owner Frank McCourt reached out to Sabathia personally -- as well as the Giants, who had talked about meeting with Sabathia this weekend, and the Los Angeles Angels.

The Yankees had extended their six-year, $140-million offer to Sabathia nearly a month ago and were beginning to get nervous that he simply didn't want to pitch in New York.

But two days of face-to-face meetings with the Yankees in Las Vegas, followed by Cashman's session Tuesday night with Sabathia and his wife Amber in California, sealed this deal for Sabathia.

"He's now excited about becoming a Yankee," a source told Olney.

To the Yankees, Sabathia was more than just the No. 1 prize on the free-agent market. He was the centerpiece of their entire offseason game plan. They went into the winter determined to add Sabathia and two other free-agent starters.

They have also aggressively pursued A.J. Burnett, Derek Lowe and Ben Sheets, and have made a one-year, $10-million offer to retain Andy Pettitte. So a rotation of Sabathia, Joba Chamberlain, Chien-Ming Wang and those two free-agent starters to be named later puts the Yankees in prime position to return to the postseason for the first time in two years.

But without Sabathia, that rotation would have had a whole different look. And had the Yankees not been able to land him, they might have shifted philosophies and made a major play for the biggest bats on the market, Mark Teixeira and Manny Ramirez.

In fact, the Yankees had begun to send signals that if Sabathia didn't accept their offer soon, they were ready to pull it off the table and move on. But all that became a moot point late Tuesday night, when Cashman was able to satisfy the Sabathias that they could play and live happily in New York.

Sabathia, who was dealt by the Cleveland Indians to the Brewers before last season's trade deadline, went 11-2 with a 1.65 ERA in Milwaukee, carrying the Brewers into their first playoff appearance since 1982.

He has a career record of 117-73 and a 3.66 ERA in eight big league seasons, mostly with the Indians. He won the American League Cy Young Award in 2007, going 19-7 with a 3.21 ERA as the Indians reached the AL Championship Series that season.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 02:17 PM

Report: Yanks set to ink Sabathia

LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Yankees general manager Brian Cashman left the winter meetings Tuesday and traveled to the San Francisco area to meet with CC Sabathia.

The New York Post reported on its Web site early Wednesday morning that Sabathia has agreed to sign with the Yankees. No other details were available.

New York made a six-year offer to Sabathia on Nov. 14 and met with him on Sunday and Monday. Cashman's daily briefing with reporters was canceled by the team Tuesday, with spokesman Jason Zillo saying, "Brian is off hotel property and unavailable for the rest of the evening."

Cashman's trip to California was disclosed by a baseball official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the team didn't say where the GM had gone. Cashman traveled after being invited by Sabathia, the official said.

While waiting for Sabathia to decide whether he wants to pitch in New York, the Yankees pushed ahead with talks involving A.J. Burnett and Ben Sheets

Yankees manager Joe Girardi doesn't think Sabathia is reticent to pitch in New York, where failure leads to harsh criticism.

"He's been in the American League long enough to know what New York is about," he said. "And CC's personality, I think, would work very well here. He's a guy that wants the ball every fifth day. He's a standup guy, he's a very honest young man. So I think his personality will be great."

Sabathia is from California, and Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti said Monday that Sabathia told him he wants to join Los Angeles.

"He's, obviously, the pearl right now," former Yankees and current Dodgers manager Joe Torre said.

New York spoke Tuesday with the agents for Burnett, saying it was prepared to exceed what the Yankees believe is the offer he received from Atlanta, a guaranteed four-year deal worth about $60 million. They also met Monday with Sheets and were examining his medical records.

"When you look at his numbers, they stack up against anyone," Girardi said. "I think injuries have kind of kept him out of that (top) class, but when he's on the mound, he's dynamite."

Burnett, Sheets and Derek Lowe, who also interests the Yankees, likely will wait until after Sabathia to make their decisions.

"I'm not sure who is going to be the first big name to go, but I think once someone goes, you'll see it maybe pick up a little bit," Girardi said.

After being slowed by injuries during his first two seasons in Toronto, Burnett was 3-1 with a 1.64 ERA in five starts against the Yankees last season.

"I know he pitches well every time I've seen him in New York, so that makes me believe that he would be OK," Girardi said.

Source: SI
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 07:54 PM


Sweet. I just hope his time in NY doesn't screw up his career. whistle
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 08:01 PM

$161 million? Not bad. ...Except for the fact he obviously doesn't want to be in New York, and it cost the Yankees about $60 million dollars more than the 2nd highest offer to get him to reconsider! lol
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 08:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I just heard on ESPN that the New York Post is reporting that CC Sabathia has agreed to his 6-year, $140 million deal and WILL BE a New York Yankee!


That's a $161 million. lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 08:51 PM

Originally Posted By: Just Lou
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I just heard on ESPN that the New York Post is reporting that CC Sabathia has agreed to his 6-year, $140 million deal and WILL BE a New York Yankee!


That's a $161 million. lol


Yeah, I read that after the fact. I also read that Sabathia has an opt-out claus after 3 years so he may not be saying too long in New York if he doesn't like it.

But you knew the Yankees were going to overpay. Sabathia had all the cards. He knew the Yankees had money, needed an ace, desperately needed to fill a rotation, and he was the best starting pitcher on the market.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 09:13 PM

I don't know. If I guy so badly doesn't want to play in a town that he was willing to leave $40 million dollars on the table to play somewhere else, I have to question if it's worth giving him all that and another $20+ million on top of it.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 10:07 PM

Ve vill overpay and ve vill be happy about it!

C'mon, Lou, you're just jealous because the Mets don't have the highest paid pitcher in baseball any more. tongue
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/10/08 11:07 PM

as obvious as it is for the Yankees to buy the top free agent on the market, I got really surprised with this one. I really believed he would go to California. now let "his time in NY screw up his career" as the trend suggests.

signing Mark Teixeira for an even bigger contract would be much better. seven years is too much for a pitcher.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 01:18 AM

Originally Posted By: Tony Mosrite
as obvious as it is for the Yankees to buy the top free agent on the market, I got really surprised with this one. I really believed he would go to California. now let "his time in NY screw up his career" as the trend suggests.


He really had no choice when the Yankees are offering $60 million more than everyone else.. He tried everything he could, including making it known publicly that we wanted to play on the west coast and the NL, preferably the Dodgers.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 01:52 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe


C'mon, Lou, you're just jealous because the Mets don't have the highest paid pitcher in baseball any more. tongue


nah. You can have the $160 million, 300+ lb (250 lbs my ass), pitcher that doesn't want to play for you. wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 02:25 PM

Report: Yanks to deal for Cameron

The New York Yankees are set to trade Melky Cabrera to the Milwaukee Brewers for Mike Cameron, according to two major league sources, the New York Daily News reported.

The acquisition of Cameron would give the Yankees a veteran center fielder to hold the position until prospect Austin Jackson is ready for the big leagues.

Cabrera had been seen as the Yankees' center fielder of the future. But he hit .249 with eight home runs and 37 RBIs in 129 games last season before being demoted to Triple A in mid-August.

Cameron hit .243 with 25 HRs and 70 RBIs in 120 games last season in Milwaukee. He missed the first 25 games of the season due to a suspension for violating baseball's banned substances policy.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 06:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Just Lou

nah. You can have the $160 million, 300+ lb (250 lbs my ass), pitcher that doesn't want to play for you. wink


Yeah, I really never get into the Mets versus Yanks thing. As most of you know, I do my best to root for the Yanks at any time they're not playing the Mets. But I will agree with Lou here. The guy has come out and pretty much said that he's only coming here for the money, that he doesn't really like New York, blah, blah, blah. Hardly a ringing endorsement of his new city.

Plus, a guy his size and weight can really break down at any time. Remember Luis Tiant, Mo Vaughn, John Kruk, et. al. And please, don't come back at me with Babe Ruth. Different time, different mindset. He played when men truly were men.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 07:32 PM

I loved Mo Vaughn. It was so cool to see the TV cameras have to pull back to get all of him in the shot!!

I think CC did exactly what he's supposed to do - get the most money he could out of a team that he knew was willing to pay it. Good for him.

Hey, I'm jealous of the Mets - they've got one of the greatest pitchers and now they have one of the great closers, too. Sorry, but I was never a Wagner fan. Talk about arrogant!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 07:43 PM

Talks on Cameron-Cabrera deal stall

LAS VEGAS -- A proposed swap of center fielders between the Yankees and Brewers was on hold Thursday because of financial issues, and an official for one of the clubs said it probably would not be completed before Milwaukee's contingent left the Winter Meetings.

The framework for the deal was set six weeks ago at the General Managers Meetings in California: The Yankees would upgrade with Gold Glove-winner Mike Cameron, who turns 36 next month and is a free agent again after the 2009 season, and the Brewers would get an affordable left-handed bat in 24-year-old switch-hitter Melky Cabrera.

The Brewers could also seek Yankees pitching if the deal were expanded to include other players, but the sticking point Thursday was the money involved. Cameron is due $10 million in 2009 while Cabrera is just entering his arbitration years, and the Yankees are asking the Brewers to pick up some of Cameron's salary. After losing the CC Sabathia sweepstakes, the Brewers balked at that request.

One Milwaukee official characterized talks as only "delayed," and expected them to pick up later. But progress was not likely on Thursday because Yankees GM Brian Cashman left the Bellagio on Thursday morning to travel back to New York. Doug Melvin's Brewers contingent was scheduled to leave later in the day.

The Brewers would be downgrading defensively from Cameron with Cabrera, but they are confident that he would work in center field. He's coming off a poor year that included a demotion to the Yankees' Triple-A club, and Cabrera finished the year hitting .249 with a .301 on-base percentage, eight home runs and 37 RBIs.

Cameron missed the first month of Milwaukee's season because of a suspension, but contributed 25 home runs, 70 RBIs and 17 stolen bases. He also led the Brewers with 142 strikeouts while hitting .243.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/11/08 09:21 PM

why are they so dumb?

they do every little thing the exact opposite way that I'd do. I know I must be the dumb one but they don't look so hot either.

they'll miss the playoffs next year again with that team. they really need another bat and signing a fat pitcher who threw 500 innings the last 2 seasons for 7 years is not the answer.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 03:11 PM

So what do you guys think? Is getting Mike Cameron and giving up on Melky a good idea. I hear they're doing it because Cameron can become a free agent after the 2009 season and the Yankees are betting Austin Jackson will be major-league ready for the 2010 season.




Cameron-Cabrera trade nearly done

LAS VEGAS -- Before leaving the Winter Meetings, Brewers general manager Doug Melvin said there is a "strong possibility" that he will swap center fielders with the Yankees, perhaps as early as Friday.

The framework for the deal was set six weeks ago at the General Managers Meetings in California: The Yankees would upgrade with Gold Glove-winner Mike Cameron, who turns 36 next month and is a free agent again after the 2009 season, and the Brewers would get an affordable left-handed bat in 24-year-old switch-hitter Melky Cabrera, who is just entering his arbitration years.

Melvin wouldn't say whether the deal might be expanded to include other players, but it appears that the financial hurdles have been resolved. The Brewers, who lost the CC Sabathia sweepstakes to the Yankees, rebuffed New York's request to pick up part of Cameron's $10 million salary, and after a chat between Melvin and Yankees GM Brian Cashman on Thursday, while Cashman was going through airport security, Melvin said the financial hold-up was, "not a problem now."

The deal could change over the next 24 hours to include more players, perhaps some Yankees pitching. Travel plans kept the trade from moving forward on Thursday; Cashman flew to Texas to meet with free-agent southpaw Andy Pettitte.

Melvin planned to touch base again Friday. Moving Cameron's salary could free the Brewers to be more active in free agency, and Melvin said Thursday that he is engaged with a tier of veteran pitchers including Randy Johnson, Jamie Moyer, John Smoltz and Randy Wolf, though Wolf's asking price may still be too high. It's also possible that Ben Sheets could come back to the Brewers if he does not find a suitable deal elsewhere.

Cabrera is coming off a poor year that included a demotion to the Yankees' Triple-A club, and he finished the year hitting .249 with a .301 on-base percentage, eight home runs and 37 RBIs.

Cameron missed the first month of Milwaukee's season because of a suspension, but contributed 25 home runs, 70 RBIs and 17 stolen bases. He also led the Brewers with 142 strikeouts while hitting .243.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 04:06 PM

Cameron will drive you crazy. He'll strike out at the worst possible times. I believe last year he K'ed something like 140 times in 400 or so at bats. You'll love his glove, but offensively he stinks. He's one of those players that hits solo HR's when you're winning or losing by 6 runs, but K's with men on base in a tie game.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 04:18 PM

I just can't believe it's taking so long. They just gave Fort Knox to guy a guy who doesn't even want to play here, now they're nickel and diming a true veteran center fielder?. confused confused

And Lou, honestly, outside of Beltran, how many centerfielders hit consistently year after year? The Yanks should pay the money and run; it's not like they don't have it.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 04:57 PM

I just don't like Cameron as a player. I can't blame the Yankees for not wanting to spend $10 million a year on a guy that will hit .240, and strike out 140+ times. ...And give up a young player to get him too.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 05:30 PM


I don't like this deal -- I like El Leche's youth and potential. He may only hit 8 HR's a year, but in previous years was batting in the .280 range (Cameron is a career .250 hitter), though like Cameron Melky wasn't great with RISP. I don't know anything about Austin Jackson, but what if he isn't ready for 2010? Or a bust in 2010? At least Melky has room to grow -- he wasn't that bad... he had a .986-1.000 fielding percentage at CF while with the Yanks -- no worse than Cameron.

Besides HR's & RBI's, their stats aren't that different. Is giving up youth and salary for 1 year worth it? I don't know...
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 11:49 PM

Add another to the list tongue




Burnett reaches agreement with Yanks

ATLANTA -- A.J. Burnett entered the free-agent market with a "buyer beware" tag and exited it counting the riches the Yankees will provide him over the course of the next five years.

Furthering their massive rotation-reconstruction process, the Yankees have won the bidding for Burnett. Major League Baseball sources confirmed late Friday afternoon that the 31-year-old right-hander has agreed to a deal reportedly worth $82.5 million over five years. The Yankees had not confirmed that an agreement has been reached.

Before the deal becomes official, Burnett will need to pass a physical and the two parties will have to iron out some terms of the offer.

While luring both CC Sabathia and Burnett to The Bronx in a span of three days, the Yankees have significantly upgraded their starting rotation with a pair of hurlers whom many consider to have been the most appealing options on the free-agent market. They've done so at a combined cost of approximately $243.5 million.

After landing Sabathia on Wednesday, the Yankees began their aggressive pursuit of Burnett and immediately erased the belief that the Braves would eventually win the bidding for the 31-year-old veteran hurler, who notched a career-high 18 wins and led the American League with 231 strikeouts this past season.

While the rotation-reconstruction process has gone smoothly for the Yankees, the same can't be said in reference to the Braves, who were believed to be willing to provide Burnett with a five-year, $80 million offer.

Over the course of the past two months, the Braves have proven unsuccessful in their determined efforts to bring Jake Peavy and Burnett to Atlanta to serve as their ace. They now find themselves looking at a thinner free-agent market that is now highlighted by Derek Lowe, who may find himself as Yankees general manager Brian Cashman's next primary target.

Motivated by the fact that his club missed the playoffs for the first time since 1993, Cashman has cornered the top available free-agent starters. With Sabathia he gained the top prize, and with Burnett he appears to have landed what might be the most profitable gamble.

During his eight full Major League seasons, Burnett has completed 200 innings just three times, totaled as many as 30 starts just twice and made 10 trips to the disabled list.

Whenever money has been on the horizon, Burnett has found a way to be both healthy and productive. Of the three seasons during which Burnett completed 200 innings, one preceded his first arbitration-eligible season and the other two came when he had an opportunity to test the free-agent market during the ensuing offseason.

Still with electric stuff that some have compared to that of John Smoltz during his younger days, Burnett drew tremendous interest from both the Yankees and Braves, ironically a pair of teams that just said goodbye to Carl Pavano and Mike Hampton, a pair of pitchers who are resident experts of life on the disabled list.

Burnett's agent, Darek Braunecker, says that his client is as healthy as he's been since undergoing Tommy John elbow reconstruction surgery in 2003. Statistically, it's currently hard to argue with this assessment.

While making a career-high 34 starts for the Blue Jays this past season, Burnett went 18-10 with a 4.07 ERA. Fueling the interest that he gained this offseason was the fact that he went 9-2 with a 2.72 ERA and 113 strikeouts in his 15 starts after the All-Star break.

Souce: Yankees
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/12/08 11:57 PM

lol

Pitch well for 3 months, get $82 million from the Yankees. wink
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/13/08 01:07 AM


Even as a Yankee fan, I'm often embarrassed by how much $ they're willing to spend for anyone they want... to maybe make it to the post season. whistle
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/13/08 01:49 AM

I never thought a whole lot of Cameron, other than he was an above average hitter.but I never thought much of Melky Cabrera either. I agree with Lou that in clutch situations where pitchers are more careful, he doesn't usually come through, and his homeruns don't usually come in big situations. During the playoffs when the Phillies played the Brewers, I was more relaxed when he was batting than most others on the team. I don't think he's hit close to .300 in his career.

Is he really going to get $10 million? I think he got only $6 million last year, and he's certainly on the decline. He'll be 36 this season.

I haven't heard of the prospect
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/13/08 02:29 AM

I am definitely a Melky fan. He took a lot of heat last season, and I certainly don't think he deserved it. I see no reason why he can't contribute plenty in the years ahead. If we're not going to get someone who can add something both defensively and offensively, then we shouldn't bother. Melky's glove was never the problem.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/13/08 04:22 AM

I wish I wasn't a loyalist or I'd jump ship and be a Yankees fan right now. I hate the Yankees because I'm jealous they can buy whoever they want. I wouldn't mind if everyone hated my team though, so you lifetime Yankee fans are lucky.

Stoopid Ethics.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/14/08 06:24 PM

Good new as far as I'm concerned:




YANKS TO GO AFTER MANNY, TEIXEIRA

According to several baseball officials, the Yankees New York Yankees remain in the Mark Teixeira hunt. But the same connected voices insist if the Yankees don't land the switch-hitting first baseman, they will turn their money toward controversial slugger Manny Ramirez.

"If they can't get Teixeira, they are right there on Manny," an official with knowledge of the Yankees' plan said yesterday.

The attention being paid to bolster the lineup that lost Bobby Abreu Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi Jason Giambi doesn't mean the Yankees are out of the pitching business. They remain engaged with Andy Pettitte, Derek Lowe and Ben Sheets. Eventually, the Yankees believe Pettitte will take their $10 million offer.

Only fools count out the Yankees when it comes to free agents. Nevertheless, Teixeira has eight-year offers for $160 million from the Angels and Nationals. The Red Sox are wary of eight years but aren't shy of six for $150. Having already spent $243.5 million for CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett, the Yankees may not want to go that high (or for that many years) for Teixeira.

If they pass on Teixeira, the Yankees will try and bolster a sagging lineup with Ramirez, one of the greatest run producers in baseball history. And to clear some money, they might entertain offers for outfielder Xavier Nady, who made $3.35 million last year, is arbitration eligible and a free agent after the 2009 season.

"Hank (Steinbrenner) wants him, but he isn't alone in the organization," a source said of Ramirez. "They need somebody to protect Alex (Rodriguez)."

The Yankees are likely to offer Ramirez, 37 in May, a three-year deal in the $20 million range, though agent Scott Boras reportedly is seeking a five-year deal for the future Hall of Fame lock.

Because the signings of Sabathia (seven years for $161 million) and A.J. Burnett (five years for $82.5 million) leave $48.5 million of the $88 million that came off the Yankees' payroll, there is plenty of glue left for more additions.

Ramirez carried the Dodgers into the playoffs with his bat, producing a .396 batting average, 17 homers and 53 RBIs for the Dodgers in 53 games after getting banished from Boston. Combined, he batted .332 with 37 homers and 121 RBIs. Ramirez forced his way out of Boston with boorish behavior that included shoving 64-year-old traveling secretary Jack McCormick to the ground.

Another option would be to obtain right-handed hitting outfielder Jermaine Dye, 35 next month, from the White Sox.

"He's available, but they aren't going to give him away," said a source with knowledge of Chicago's plan to get younger.

Dye has the Yankees among the six teams for which he can veto a trade, and it's not likely the Yankees would give him an extension (or pick up a $12 million option for 2010) to waive the no-trade clause.

Source: New York Post
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/15/08 03:16 AM

Yanks improve rotation, keep young talent

The winter obsession last year was Johan Santana -- and the Yankees or the Red Sox could have had him. They could have traded for the accomplished left-hander who was about to turn 29. But what folks in both front offices decided was that the double-barreled cost was prohibitive.

On the front end, both teams would have been required to surrender their top pitching prospects -- for the Red Sox, that was Jon Lester, and for the Yankees, that was Phil Hughes -- and then they would have to pay Santana like he was a free agent. It was such an extraordinary price that even some folks in the Mets' organization wondered, after getting Santana, whether it was the right thing to do.

The argument that several executives made with the Red Sox and Yankees was that if you were patient -- patient -- then you might have a shot at a pitcher much like Santana in CC Sabathia, and the cost would only have one layer. Sure, you'd have to give him a huge contract, but you wouldn't have to give up top prospects along the way.

So the Yankees, in the end, were patient and got Sabathia, and the pundits who are saying that the team has blown up its plan for player development are simply not paying attention. In fact, the signings of Sabathia and A.J. Burnett are absolutely in keeping with the refocus on the farm system.

Because the Yankees waited to pursue Sabathia, rather than deal for Santana, they still have Hughes and Ian Kennedy and Austin Jackson and all the players mentioned in the Santana talks, and as the pitching talent pool has increased at the major league level, there is now more time for those youngsters to develop. It actually has been more than a decade since the Yankees have had as much minor league talent stacked up as they do now.

Yes, they will sacrifice draft picks in landing Sabathia and Burnett. But keep in mind that the Yankees will have picks in the first and second round of the draft in 2009 because of players unsigned in 2008; it's not as if they are being shut down.

The Yankees spun themselves into a hole in the past decade partly by acquiring and relying on aging pitchers (Kevin Brown, Randy Johnson) at premium prices. Now, when the free-agent machinations are over and the new Yankee Stadium opens, this is what the Yankees' rotation will look like:

1. Sabathia, 28 years old
2. Burnett, 32
3. Chien-Ming Wang, 29
4. Andy Pettitte, 36; or Ben Sheets, 30; or Derek Lowe, 35
5. Joba Chamberlain, 23

Compare that rotation with the Yankees' rotation in the year of their epic playoff collapse against the Red Sox:

1. Mike Mussina, 35
2. Javier Vazquez, 27
3. Jon Lieber, 34
4. Brown, 39
5. Jose Contreras, 32

The Yankees' rotation will be much younger next season, and it has a chance to be the strongest it has been since 1998, when Pettitte, David Cone, David Wells and Orlando Hernandez filled out the top four spots, in front of Hideki Irabu.

Marlins president David Samson ripped the Yankees this week for what he portrayed as wild spending, but apparently he doesn't realize that the team's payroll is going to go down by around 10 percent. The Yankees had about $85 million in expiring contracts, and for next season, so far they've spent $23 million on Sabathia and $15 million on Burnett, and they'll spend on another veteran pitcher and probably acquire Mike Cameron; it's possible the Yankees' payroll for next season will be about $180 million to $190 million.

So to review: The Yankees will be younger, cheaper and deeper, and maybe better.

Who knows if all of that will be good enough to win the AL East? Burnett is an enormous risk, nobody knows if Chamberlain can stay healthy, and the Yankees don't know whether Jorge Posada can be an everyday catcher, and they don't know if Alex Rodriguez will be the monster of 2007 or the guy who seems to disappear in big spots.

The Red Sox are years ahead of the Yankees in their player development and have their pipeline of talent already flowing into the big leagues, and by the end of this week, they may land the best position player, Mark Teixeira (some executives strongly believe the bidding will, in fact, end up around $200 million). The Rays have a chance to be as good or perhaps even better, because it appears they will wind up with a solid veteran hitter, and David Price will step into the rotation in 2009.

In the fall of 2005, Yankees general manager Brian Cashman mapped out a course for the organization to begin building a powerhouse that combines player development and the power of the dollar, a model that looks an awful lot like what we've been seeing from the Red Sox over the past three seasons. The Yankees continue to move closer to achieving that goal.

Nick Cafardo wonders if the Yankees are poised for a fall like the one the Tigers had last year. Mike Lupica has a much different opinion than my own on the Yankees' pursuit of Sabathia and Burnett.

Heard this: Sabathia will arrive in New York on Monday.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/15/08 03:20 AM

The only plus I see in Manny is that he's a great clutch hitter, and he would be quite motivated against Boston. Although you can't argue with his numbers, he's still an arrogant and obnoxious piece of crap. Although he was on his best behavior in LA, I can't see him getting along well with Girardi in the long run.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/15/08 10:39 PM

Thank you Johnny Damon grin




Johnny Damon advised Burnett to pick New York over Boston

As if Red Sox fans needed another reason to hate Johnny Damon.

The New York Daily News reported today that Damon did a heavy selling job on A.J. Burnett in attempting to convince the free-agent pitcher to join the Yankees. As part of his sales pitch, he reportedly compared New York with Boston, which was also pursuing Burnett . ... and it doesn't sound as if he said many kind things about the Red Sox.

The Daily News quoted a Yankee official as saying: "Johnny talked to A.J. about New York, the differences between New York and Boston, how he views it. Johnny couldn't be happier here, and he communicated those thoughts to A.J."

Alex Rodriguez also helped recruit Burnett to New York.

Source: Pro Jo
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/15/08 11:59 PM

I don't think it was Johnny Damon that persuaded Burnett. It was Hank's wallet.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/17/08 05:30 PM

Yankees could shift focus to Manny

Having already bolstered their rotation with the signings of free-agent starters CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett, the Yankees may spare no expense to give Alex Rodriguez a superstar partner in the lineup.
The New York Daily News cites a baseball official in its Wednesday editions who says that the Yankees view mercurial free-agent slugger Manny Ramirez as a perfect complement to Rodriguez, much the way Ramirez and David Ortiz terrorized pitchers for the Red Sox. The official believes that the Yankees are "going hard" to sign Ramirez, to the point that they could offer him a three-year deal worth $22-25 million annually.

Two other officials indicate to the News that the Yankees would jump in right away on Ramirez, preferring to watch the market develop in the hopes they could sign him for two years rather than three.

The News also cites a source close to the Yankees, who says that general manager Brian Cashman is lukewarm on Ramirez, but that the front office in general, including Hal and Hank Steinbrenner, is bullish on the left fielder.

Ramirez is widely considered to be among the two most coveted free-agent, along with fellow Scott Boras client Mark Teixeira. Given that Teixeira will be just 29 years old in May and is a Gold Glove-caliber first baseman, he will likely command a longer contract than Ramirez, who is 36. Therefore, it could be that Ramirez and Boras will wait for Teixeira to pick a team, allowing them to negotiate with teams who missed on Teixeira and need a fallback option.

If Teixeira picks the Angels, then the Orioles and Nationals -- who were hoping to land the Maryland native -- may decide not to bid on Ramirez, to whom they have no ties. Considering that Boston is not an option for Ramirez, the Yankees would only have to outbid the Dodgers for the slugger's services.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/17/08 07:03 PM

I heard this on the radio this morning. The numbers I heard were three years and $75 million. Considering his age, I don't know if the Yankees should even go three years, but Manny is a tough bird from NYC, so why not?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/17/08 07:08 PM

If they don't get Tiexiera, which I don't believe they will, they need to get Manny. They need another bat, especially to help out Alex.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/17/08 07:08 PM


Are we even gonna recognize this team as "The Yankees" this year?
This is looking more and more like a fantasy baseball team. whistle
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/17/08 07:14 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

Are we even gonna recognize this team as "The Yankees" this year?
This is looking more and more like a fantasy baseball team. whistle



As long as they win the fantasy league, right? tongue
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/18/08 09:32 PM

Brewers: Cameron-Yankees trade dead

Tired of waiting for the Yankees to make a move, the Brewers killed the proposed deal for Mike Cameron Wednesday, leaving a gaping hole in center field in the Bronx. Could that hole be filled indirectly by Manny Ramirez? Only time will tell. Milwaukee general manager Doug Melvin said Wednesday that he had yanked the Cameron deal off the negotiating table, ending the week-long saga that had led most to believe the veteran center fielder would be sent to the Bronx in exchange for Melky Cabrera and Kei Igawa. "I haven't heard from Brian Cashman and I haven't called them," Melvin told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "I'm very happy having Mike Cameron with our ballclub." Acquiring Cameron would have locked three veterans into the starting outfield spots, but now the Yankees have the flexibility to shift Johnny Damon back to center if they were to sign Ramirez.

Source: SI
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/18/08 10:44 PM

I didn't realize that Igawa was part of that trade. I'm surprised they didn't jump at the chance to dump that boat anchor.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/19/08 01:30 AM

Yeah, I didn't realize he was part of the deal either
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/19/08 05:31 AM


Great. So now how the F are we gonna get rid of him?? ohwell

lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/19/08 02:27 PM

I'll believe it when he signs with a team not named the Red Sox




Henry: Red Sox outbid on Teixeira

Thursday afternoon it looked as if the Boston Red Sox had taken strides toward completing a deal for first baseman Mark Teixeira, major league sources told ESPN.com.

But by Thursday night, Red Sox owner John Henry had sent an email to The Associated Press saying they had been outbid for Teixeira and "are not going to be a factor" in acquiring him.

"We met with Mr. Teixeira and were very much impressed with him," Henry told the Associated Press. "After hearing about his other offers, however, it seems clear that we are not going to be a factor."

Henry's reference to the "other offers" leaves open the possibility he is calling the bluff of agent Scott Boras, who has been known to inflate the value of offers and the number of suitors pursuing his client. Boras represented former Red Sox center fielder Johnny Damon, who signed with the New York Yankees in 2005 after the Boston brass apparently refused to believe that the offer from their archrivals was real.

Teixeira hit .308 with 33 homers and 121 RBIs last season, including .358 with 13 homers and 43 RBIs in 54 games with the Angels.

Henry and general manager Theo Epstein traveled to Texas to meet with Teixeira and Boras, an official with another team said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because his team wasn't involved in the talks but had knowledge of them. Henry said earlier in the evening that the Red Sox were "no closer" to signing Teixeira.

Red Sox president Larry Lucchino declined comment when reached on his cell phone.

The Los Angeles Angels, who obtained Teixeira from the Atlanta Braves in July, said last week they made an eight-year offer. Several media outlets put Boston's offer at eight years and $184 million. A person in the industry said on the condition of anonymity that figure "was not close."

Teixeira also has been pursued by the Baltimore Orioles and Washington Nationals, and met before the winter meetings with Yankees general manager Brian Cashman. Officials of the Orioles and Angels said Boras had not been in contact with them on Thursday.

Henry had expressed concern about a contract of eight years or more.

"We all have limits," he wrote the AP on Wednesday. "Eight years is a very long time in baseball and everywhere else."

He also said the amount the team is willing to spend on a free agent "depends on both" the economy and the player being sought.

"Baseball as a whole has not yet been hit by the financial crisis, but it will," Henry said. "The degree is in question and won't be answered for a while."

Boras has told teams in recent days that he's "getting close" to resolution in Teixeira's negotiations, and Teixeira was quoted this week as saying he hoped for a conclusion by Christmas. A rival executive involved in the negotiations believes that a Red Sox deal with Teixeira will fall in the range of eight years, for a salary of about $22 million a year.

Teixeira, who turns 29 next April, has been among the most consistent hitters in the majors in recent years, thriving when he was traded to contenders twice in consecutive years -- first, in 2007, to the Braves, and then in 2008, to the Angels. Teixeira batted .358 in 54 games for the Angels, with 13 homers and 43 RBIs. When the Angels met the Red Sox in the postseason, Teixeira batted .467 with four walks in four games.

If the Red Sox complete the negotiations for Teixeira, they presumably would shift Kevin Youkilis -- who finished third in the AL MVP voting in 2008 -- to third base, and look to deal veteran third baseman Mike Lowell, who is under contract through 2 010. The Red Sox have gauged the market enough to know that they can find a suitable deal for Lowell, if necessary. Boston may decide to keep Lowell into spring training, until they get a read on how effective Ortiz will be going into this season.

The Red Sox became increasingly concerned about the quality of the middle of their lineup through the 2008 season, as David Ortiz struggled to come back from a wrist injury and after Manny Ramirez was traded.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/21/08 02:02 PM

Pettitte's return to Yankees 'inevitable'

NEW YORK -- Andy Pettitte wants to call the gleaming new ballpark in the Bronx his home, and the Yankees want him in their rotation for the 2009 season. The only holdup is a dollar figure for the free-agent left-hander.

Though Pettitte and the Yankees have been locked in a salary stalemate for weeks, industry sources believe that the two sides will eventually settle on a contract to bring Pettitte back for one more year in pinstripes, completing the Yankees' five-man rotation.

Citing "a source with knowledge of the pitcher's intentions," FOXSports.com reported Friday that it was "virtually inevitable" that the two sides would eventually finalize a one-year agreement. At this point, though, no deal is believed to be imminent.

"Andy's a free agent, and the one thing I've been consistent in saying is that we'd like to have Andy back," Yankees general manager Brian Cashman said this week. "I know he'd like to come back. That's set up for maybe a positive end result. It doesn't guarantee it."

The Yankees have offered Pettitte a one-year, $10 million contract, a significant decrease in salary from the $16 million the veteran left-hander made in each of the last two seasons.

Pettitte's representatives, Randy and Alan Hendricks, have discouraged Pettitte from accepting such a large pay cut after turning in a 14-win season for New York in 2008. Pettitte was 14-14 with a 4.54 ERA in 33 starts for the Yankees, but tailed off in the second half, finishing 2-7 with a 6.23 ERA in 11 starts after July 31.

Yankees manager Joe Girardi said that he has spoken recently with Pettitte, and has consistently relayed that he wants him to pitch at the new Yankee Stadium in 2009.

Girardi believes that Pettitte's veteran presence and history of winning in New York make him the perfect option to round out the Yankees' pitching staff, which was bolstered by adding CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett to the returning duo of Chien-Ming Wang and Joba Chamberlain.

"He's still excited about coming back, and they continue to talk to him," Girardi said. "Obviously it takes time. These things don't happen overnight. He was very excited about the additions and he wants to be here."

No other clubs are known to be seriously courting Pettitte, and the Yankees have backed away from their earlier interest in options like Derek Lowe and Ben Sheets, believing that Pettitte will eventually be in the fold.

Pettitte's brief flirtation with the Red Sox was thought to have been overblown, and the Astros -- the only other club Pettitte has played for in his 14-year career -- are not expected to be a factor at this time.

One intriguing option for Pettitte might have been the Dodgers, which would have returned him to the National League and reunited him with Joe Torre. Though Torre confirmed at the Winter Meetings that he had spoke with Pettitte in November, it was the manager's prediction that Pettitte would eventually return to the Yankees.

"I know he'd like to be here, and I know we'd like to have him here," Cashman said. "Sometimes things take longer. It doesn't mean they're going to happen. He's been a tremendous Yankee and I've got all the respect in the world for him."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 08:37 PM

so it seems that the Yankees are on the verge of signing Mark Teixeira.

if history has taught us anything, is that Tex will become a chokejob-son-of-a-bitch. by the way, have you heard that Madonna is cheating A-Rod in Brazil?? with a guy named Jesus Luz, which means Jesus "Light"! lol lol
Posted By: Don Sicilia

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 08:53 PM

And the fantasy team building continues...
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 09:30 PM

Theserecent signings send a message throughout the league:

Our farm system stinks.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 10:47 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
These recent signings send a message throughout the league:

Our farm system stinks.


WHAT??? eek Whatever makes you think that? That the only player we brought up in recent years that has made any sort of splash is Melky. No, wait, he turned out to be good in center field, but unable to hit the side of a barn. OK, Hughes. OOPS, had a great first outing, and then choked, and then pitched well, and then choked, and then pitched well, okay, you get it. Oh, wait a minute, KENNEDY! Oh, forget it, he just choked.

Thank God for Joba Chamberlain (whose arm we will soon burn out by making him a starter) and Robinson Cano! And we can always brag about Mariano Rivera!
Posted By: Don Sicilia

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 10:59 PM

You can't forget about your man, Derek Jeter... wink

Speaking of Jeter...



"I wonder what to get SB for Christmas..."

Merry Christmas!
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/23/08 11:04 PM

Well, I was going to mention my man DJ, but I didn't want to sound like he's the only player I ever talk about. Plus, he came up through their farm system like 12 years ago. I don't think he counts any more!

And ever since he started saying that he bought his Ford Edge in blazing copper, I've lost a little respect for Mr. Jeter. He sure is pretty, though. Thanks for the picture! I can always count on you to remember who I want in my stockings. I mean WHAT I WANT IN MY STOCKING!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 01:40 AM

WOW! I just walked in from work and heard this news. I'm honestly surprised they signed him. CC and AJ I expected (was a little surprised with both) but Mark was an EXCELLENT Christmas surprise. I really expected him to sign with Boston and to get Manny
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 01:41 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: klydon1
These recent signings send a message throughout the league:

Our farm system stinks.


WHAT??? eek Whatever makes you think that? That the only player we brought up in recent years that has made any sort of splash is Melky. No, wait, he turned out to be good in center field, but unable to hit the side of a barn. OK, Hughes. OOPS, had a great first outing, and then choked, and then pitched well, and then choked, and then pitched well, okay, you get it. Oh, wait a minute, KENNEDY! Oh, forget it, he just choked.

Thank God for Joba Chamberlain (whose arm we will soon burn out by making him a starter) and Robinson Cano! And we can always brag about Mariano Rivera!


Don't forget about our former ace (that title's reserved for CC now) Chien-Ming Wang
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:40 AM

You're right. I totally forgot about Wang. I can't believe that the Yankees just re-signed him for only $5 million.

Wang is really underestimated as a pitcher, perhaps because he's missed a part of each season due to injuries. And last year his on-the-road performance certainly improved.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:45 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
You're right. I totally forgot about Wang. I can't believe that the Yankees just re-signed him for only $5 million.


Well they resigned him for that amount only because he was eligible for arbitration I believe.

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Wang is really underestimated as a pitcher, perhaps because he's missed a part of each season due to injuries. And last year his on-the-road performance certainly improved.


I agree with you and I think Wang's underestimated or in my opinion, underrated simply because he doesn't have dominate/overpowering stuff. When I think of an ace or one of the truly great pitchers of the game, I think of Johan Santana, Roy Halladay, CC Sabathia, Josh Beckett (when healthy), etc. These guys have nasty and at times powerful stuff. Wang doesn't. He is a GREAT sinker ball pitcher, which is his bread and butter but that's why I suspect he's overlooked so often (possibly because he's depending too much on his defense to turn the double play). Wang's not typically a strikeout pitcher, which the rest of these guys are.
Posted By: Mignon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I totally forgot about Wang.


How can you forget about a wang? tongue
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:53 AM

You're right, Irish. He's the steak and the other pitchers are the sizzle. He's not flashy, so he doesn't get the attention. But he's won a heck of a lot of games for the Yankees.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:58 AM

The Teixiera signing by the Yankees is further proof of the sport of baseball slowly dying. Not only should MLB be blamed for letting this happen, but I'm also starting to dislike Yankee fans who aren't completely embarrassed by their own team. How can anyone be proud of the Yankees? I understand if your heart lives and dies with the logo because you've been a fan your whole life, but what continues to happen over and over again in baseball is really obscene.

Baseball is the sport I love the most. I could give up all other sports but not this. And to see this happen is breaking my heart.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 04:56 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
The Teixiera signing by the Yankees is further proof of the sport of baseball slowly dying. Not only should MLB be blamed for letting this happen, but I'm also starting to dislike Yankee fans who aren't completely embarrassed by their own team. How can anyone be proud of the Yankees? I understand if your heart lives and dies with the logo because you've been a fan your whole life, but what continues to happen over and over again in baseball is really obscene.

Baseball is the sport I love the most. I could give up all other sports but not this. And to see this happen is breaking my heart.


Blibble, I agree almost to the word with what you so perfectly expressed. With that in mind, I love baseball. Sure, it's slow to watch on tv, but to me it's pure theater on a field.

Maybe I should say I loved baseball. I've been a Red Sox fan for over 40 years and I must admit I don't like what they've become in the last few years - they've become mini-Yankees.

This whole giant payroll thing has ruined the game. I will no longer go to a major league game (unless I'm given free tickets blush ).
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 12:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
You're right, Irish. He's the steak and the other pitchers are the sizzle. He's not flashy, so he doesn't get the attention. But he's won a heck of a lot of games for the Yankees.


That's all I care about. I don't care how it does it, as long as he does it. I believe before he was injuried last year, he had the most wins among any MLB pitcher over the previous 2 or 3 seasons.

He may never win a Cy Young but I can see him winning 20 games easily. Before last season, he won 19 games both in 2006 and 2007.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 01:10 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
The Teixiera signing by the Yankees is further proof of the sport of baseball slowly dying. Not only should MLB be blamed for letting this happen, but I'm also starting to dislike Yankee fans who aren't completely embarrassed by their own team. How can anyone be proud of the Yankees? I understand if your heart lives and dies with the logo because you've been a fan your whole life, but what continues to happen over and over again in baseball is really obscene.

Baseball is the sport I love the most. I could give up all other sports but not this. And to see this happen is breaking my heart.


A couple of things Blibble. I can't argue that what the Yankees have done this offseason is CRAZY (almost half a billion dollars on 3 players). However, as a fan, I'm nothing but pleased. Hopefully this will return the Yankees to greatness. As a fan, it's a reassuring sigh of relief that the owners and organization are committed to winning. They and the Detroit Tigers just got slapped with the luxury tax this year ($26.9 million for the Yankees). That's almost an entire team's payroll. And what will these teams do who complain about the Yankees spending yet will accept a hand out. POCKET THE CASH! Yes, I understand no other team can financially compete with the Yankees and if they win in 2009 people will scream that they "bought" their championship but as I've said over and over again on this board, what other team cares that much about winning that they are willing to go to these lengths? My hat truly goes off to Hal/Hank Steinbrenner, Brian Cashman and everyone else who made it possible to sign these 3 gentlemen. Even I was surprised when they signed Mark (I thought for sure he was going to Boston but yet again, over a few million dollars he's now a Yankee instead of a Red Sox - hello Alex Rodriguez and Johnny Damon).

Secondly, I read this article from the New York Post that I agree with. Next year the Yankees probably would have went hard after Matt Holliday (remember, they passed on Carlos Beltran for Randy Johnson and settled for Johnny Damon the following season a few years ago). They aren't willing to make the same mistake again. Instead of waiting for a year to sign an inferior talent in Holliday as the writer suggests (he's not as well defensively or offensively), the Yankees chose to spend the money now rather than later (which they would have in any case). Mark my words though, Matt Holliday will be a Red Sox either in July before the trade deadline or next offseason. And I do agree, baseball is my favorite sport and this is my favorite time of the year. For whatever reason, baseball is the only offseason I religiously follow.

Finally, have no fear. Sooner or later (probably the former), MLB will have a salary cap. I think with the Yankees spending this offseason, people will be SCREAMING for it to happen now.
Posted By: goombah

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 02:58 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
The Teixiera signing by the Yankees is further proof of the sport of baseball slowly dying. Not only should MLB be blamed for letting this happen, but I'm also starting to dislike Yankee fans who aren't completely embarrassed by their own team. How can anyone be proud of the Yankees? I understand if your heart lives and dies with the logo because you've been a fan your whole life, but what continues to happen over and over again in baseball is really obscene.

Baseball is the sport I love the most. I could give up all other sports but not this. And to see this happen is breaking my heart.


Blibble, I agree almost to the word with what you so perfectly expressed. With that in mind, I love baseball. Sure, it's slow to watch on tv, but to me it's pure theater on a field.

Maybe I should say I loved baseball. I've been a Red Sox fan for over 40 years and I must admit I don't like what they've become in the last few years - they've become mini-Yankees.

This whole giant payroll thing has ruined the game. I will no longer go to a major league game (unless I'm given free tickets blush ).


What Bud Selig has reduced MLB to is an abomination. Whether Selig or the fans of the few MLB teams with money realize it or not, they are alienating 75% of the fans of other teams. MLB should adopt the non-guaranteed contract format used the NFL. The only thing guaranteed for the NFL is the signing bonus. Signing 8 year deals in baseball is plain dumb.

That said, the Yankees will rue the day they signed Sabathia. Steinbrenner once called Dave Winfield "Mr. May," which was a shot at how Winfield played poorly in the postseason. The torch for that moniker is about to be passed. Sabathia has sucked when it mattered most: 1) the end of 2005 season when the Indians needed one win to gain the wild card, 2) 2007 ALCS he folded like a cheap tent twice under the pressure of a big game, 3) and the 2008 NLDS horrific performance with Milwaukee. In fact, the two postseason wins CC enjoyed were due entirely to his offense's output: in 2001 ALDS, Cleveland scored 17 runs and in the 2007 ALDS, they scored 12. He could not handle pressure in two mid-market towns (Cleve & Mil). He sure as hell will not handle it in the Big Apple. Not only that, but the guy will be on the wrong side of 30 by the time the contract is up and his ballooning weight will be a factor in his performance.

CC Sabathia will the pitching equivalent of a complete postseason choker as A-Rod is on the offensive side of the coin.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 03:09 PM

Originally Posted By: goombah
3) and the 2008 NLDS horrific performance with Milwaukee.


Let's also not forget that before that playoff game he pitched like 2 or 3 games on 3 days rest EACH. He was dead tired but still got the team into the playoffs.
Posted By: goombah

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 04:01 PM

I would be shocked if it was 2 days rest. I have never heard of such short rest for a starter in the modern era. However, many a player has pitched on short rest and thrived under the spotlight (Randy Johnson, Schilling, Clemens, etc).

CC is a good regular season pitcher and definitely helps any team. But he always trys to do too much and cannot shake his nerves when the stakes are higher.
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/24/08 05:26 PM

I agree with Blibble and SC that this is a joke already. but on the other hand, that's the baseball we're all used to. with the great Rays and Red Sox teams and the Yankees still full of holes (even after all the signings), the Bombers were about to become losers and then it would be another sport. Blibble raised an interesting point that the best thing for baseball would be the Yankees and Red Sox to win the World Series 10 years in a row because then people would do something about the spending, but maybe that's one of the cool things about the game: the underdog stories. the Yankees love to do bad personnel decisions and they're a long shot away from domination right now.

and even if the Red Sox became the mini-Yankees, much of their success comes from great work by their front office. they spend much, much better money than the Yankees. they let one of the best players slip away (Hanley Ramirez) and still put together a World Series champion team.

the NY Post article that Irish brought up is very interesting. I hadn't figured it all out but smart baseball people did. putting together a good team demands seeing the big picture and what the articles says is true. if the Yankees didn't sign Teixeira now, they'd have to sign a lesser version the next year and people would complain anyway.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/25/08 03:17 PM

Another Yankee article I agree with




Yankees Defend Spending as Almost a Public Service

Do not hold your breath if you are expecting the Yankees to feel apologetic about all the money they are spending. After the team’s third major off-season signing, the Yankees’ president, Randy Levine, surveyed the criticism of the club and said, in effect, that a really good Yankee team is beneficial to baseball.

“The philosophy of George Steinbrenner, which has been continued by Hal and Hank, is that the Yankees are a sacred trust to their fans and they believe in continually reinvesting in the team rather than reinvesting in themselves,” Levine said Wednesday in reference to the team’s principal owner and his two sons. “We follow all the rules of baseball, we pay millions of dollars to other teams and we are essential to the revenues generated by Major League Baseball and its networks and other entities.”

In signing C. C. Sabathia and A. J. Burnett to big free-agent contracts and reaching agreement with Mark Teixeira on an eight-year, $180 million deal, the Yankees have now spent far more money this off-season than the other 29 major league teams combined. For those keeping score, it is $423.5 million to $296.6 million. That kind of discrepancy is too much for some commentators and for the Milwaukee Brewers’ owner, Mark Attanasio, who on Tuesday resurrected the idea of a salary cap as a way of reining in the Yankees.

Levine will have none of it. He said that the Yankees, by spending substantially on players, were making sure they remained a top asset in the sport.

“We are usually in the top of road attendance and we get some of the highest television ratings, both when we play national games and when we visit other teams,” he said. He said if the Yankees’ new stadium, which will be ready for the 2009 season, allows the team’s revenue to increase, then “so will the revenues of the rest of the game.”

Levine added: “We are sensitive to the economic times and our fans. We believe it is good for the franchise and good for the fans to put the best product possible on the field, and that is what we strive to do.”

Levine singled out the criticism that he said some ESPN’s commentators had directed at Yankee spending and said he wondered why they were not criticizing their own network for reinvesting in its product by outbidding Fox by millions of dollars to acquire the rights to the Bowl Championship Series.

No apologies, and a little feistiness. And less than two months until spring training.

Source: New York Times
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/25/08 03:31 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Another Yankee article I agree with


What a shock...
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/25/08 04:00 PM

Well you have to understand. Basically outside the New York area, these stories and feelings are not widely shared. I hate to consistently hear Yankee bashing. It's comforting at times when someone writes or reports on a positive article/story.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/25/08 07:51 PM

Baseball has been called the national pastime, but it's time has passed. Football has replaced it as the most popular sport in America. You can cite many reasons; lack of salary cap, the Yankees exhorbitant spending, the unions, too many night games, kids don't play it in sandlots like they used to, etc. The Yankees say they are within the rules and give money to the other franchises - all business related. What about the sport? competition? Baseball has become like all sports in America; it's about the money and the entertainment.

The Yankees can buy all these glitzy puzzle pieces, but when you put them together they don't fit. Players are paid on their past performance. It doesn't guarantee they will perform tomorrow. Good Luck Yankees.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/28/08 11:14 PM

Yankees still option for Manny?

Manny Ramirez is next up for Scott Boras. By Mark Teixeira signing with the Yankees, it likely eliminated Ramirez from going there, though the drama of Ramirez vs. the Red Sox and the ratings bonanza that would mean for YES (let alone NESN) is still tugging a tad at the purse strings of some members the Yankees' brass. The Nationals and Angels, who bid for Teixeira, were two teams Ramirez also seemed suited for, but they have indicated they're no longer in the market for him. The other team in the Teixeira hunt, the Orioles, has not said anything about Ramirez, who has hit well at Camden Yards (.314 with 18 homers, 24 doubles, and 76 RBIs in 338 at-bats). The Dodgers remain a viable option, as they've already offered Ramirez two years at $45 million with an option year that could make the deal worth $60 million.

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 12/29/08 09:49 PM

Did Red Sox botch Teixeira negotiations?

Any suggestion that the Red Sox could not (and can not) compete for free agents with New York is utter nonsense because the Sox have signed free agents in the past. With Mark Teixeira, the Sox were not nearly as aggressive. The bottom line is that other teams (excluding the Yankees) were in the same neighborhood, which allowed Teixeira to drag out the process. Had the Sox come out of the gate with, say, an eight-year offer for $184 million, maybe they could have gotten the deal done. Maybe it would have taken $192 million. But if the Sox came out strong -- very strong -- and gave Teixeira a short window to accept, their chances might have been better. If Teixeira then had balked, the Sox would have had their answer: Teixeira never wanted to come here. Instead, the Sox left the door open for the Yankees to swoop in, which created an array of issues. Most notably, by the time Teixeira made his decision, CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett both had signed with New York, making the Yankees a more attractive destination; earlier on, that was not the case. By allowing the process to drag, the Sox enhanced New York's position.

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/03/09 12:38 PM

I was thinking about it the other day: I think the Yankees should still try to get Manny Ramirez. They should try to trade Matsui and Igawa, to a West Coast team preferably (the Giants or Mariners perhaps) and just get back prospects. That way Damon can handle left field and Manny can DH. Can you imagine a lineup like:

1) Damon - LF
2) Jeter - SS
3) Rodriguez - 3B
4) Ramirez - DH
5) Teixeira - 1B
6) Posada - C
7) Nady - RF
8) Cano - 2B
9) Gardiner/Cabrera - CF
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/03/09 04:07 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I was thinking about it the other day: I think the Yankees should still try to get Manny Ramirez.


What a difference a few years make. A few years in which the Yankees didn't do too well in the post-season.

Originally Posted By: Irishman12 (from 2005)
I agree! I don't want Manny (he's such a punk and classless individual). I wouldn't do it either. Why's he want out so bad? I don't buy "privacy issues." Let's face it, he wants out from Ortiz's shadow.


Irishman, you're a ho.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/03/09 05:18 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I was thinking about it the other day: I think the Yankees should still try to get Manny Ramirez. They should try to trade Matsui and Igawa, to a West Coast team preferably (the Giants or Mariners perhaps) and just get back prospects. That way Damon can handle left field and Manny can DH. Can you imagine a lineup like:

1) Damon - LF
2) Jeter - SS
3) Rodriguez - 3B
4) Ramirez - DH
5) Teixeira - 1B
6) Posada - C
7) Nady - RF
8) Cano - 2B
9) Gardiner/Cabrera - CF


Too many old men with bloated egos and salaries to match. Yankees won't do any better than last year.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/06/09 11:20 AM

Teixeria's press conference is scheduled for today (probably around noon or 1PM EST)
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/07/09 07:36 PM

I agree Mr. Steinbrenner!




Hal Steinbrenner to Brewers: Mind your own business

On the same day the New York Yankees unveiled their latest star, they defended themselves against recent industry grousing about their big spending. Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio suggested baseball needed a salary cap to rein in the Bombers. "I feel that this organization does a lot for the industry as a whole, between the merchandising we sell, the tickets we sell, the licensing," said co-chairman Hal Steinbrenner. "If some of the owners are upset that we're trying to invest in our team, which we do for the fans, then I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. "We had money come off the payroll, so we had money to spend, whether people like it or not." Added team president Randy Levine: "It's sour grapes. If the Brewers had gotten CC Sabathia for $130 million, I don't think anybody would've been complaining."

Source: SI
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/08/09 01:59 AM

Yankees fielding offers for Nady, Swisher

The Yankees are fielding trade offers for corner outfielders Xavier Nady and Nick Swisher. There's been some speculation they might consider trading Hideki Matsui, too, but he has a full no-trade clause and is coming off knee surgery, so there's really no way to trade him.

A logjam at the corners was created when the Yankees surprised a lot of folks and signed Mark Teixeira to an eight-year, $180 million contract. Swisher previously had been penciled in as the Yankees' first baseman but now becomes part of a crowded mix of accomplished corner outfielders. Swisher is a versatile player and can play some center field, as well. Some National League teams may be interested. However, Nady's trade value is higher after a better offensive season, so he may be just as likely to be dealt. Nady, acquired by the Yankees in a midseason trade with the Pirates, combined to hit .305 with 25 home runs and 97 RBIs for the year, while Swisher finished at .219 with 24 home runs and 69 RBIs for the White Sox before being dealt to the Yankees after the season.

Johnny Damon isn't in the trade mix, as the Yankees need him to be their leadoff hitter and part of a center field rotation. The other in-house candidates for center field are Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner.

Source: SI
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/08/09 05:50 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I agree Mr. Steinbrenner!


Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/08/09 09:49 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I agree Mr. Steinbrenner!


Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/08/09 11:01 PM

lol

I bet Hank hears, "I agree, Mr. Steinbrenner," a hundred times a day.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/08/09 11:59 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
I agree Mr. Steinbrenner!




No, not a$$ kissing. It's just refreshing to hear someone else stand up and say, I'm a Yankee, I'm proud of it and I don't make any apologies for it. I get tired of reading the same old tired rhetoric about how the Yankees are destroying baseball, NOW MLB needs a salary cap, the Yankees "buy" championships, etc.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/09/09 02:15 AM

Hey, I'm a Yankees fan, but I have to agree with a lot of that griping! lol
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 12:37 AM

More sour grapes




Pavano: Yankees didn't support me

Carl Pavano admitted, "I failed for four years in New York," but he also suggested Friday that more support during his terrible tenure as a Yankee would have helped. While Pavano said he didn't hold "any grudges," he also noted, "When you're down, you expect your organization to pick you up, not kick you when you're down. I've had to pick myself up quite a few times the last four years," according to a report on mlb.com. Overall, New York is "a great place to play," Pavano said. "There's no reason for me to focus on what happened to me, because that's all behind me. I'm not holding any grudges. You just keep moving forward." Yankees GM Brian Cashman declined comment on Pavano's remarks.

Source: SI
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:06 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
More sour grapes


All your sour grapes make for a lousy whine.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:20 AM

Yeah, that's why I only break it out on special occasions. My specialty is Chartreuse wink
Posted By: Mignon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:24 AM

Here's a bag to put the whine in Irish. J/K lol
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
...he also suggested Friday that more support during his terrible tenure as a Yankee would have helped. While Pavano said he didn't hold "any grudges," he also noted, "When you're down, you expect your organization to pick you up, not kick you when you're down..." Source: SI


Support you? Gee, poor Pavano. He was really kicked when he was down, receiving those millions of dollars for doing NOTHING!!!! mad
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:46 AM

Yankees' spending spree a joy
Yankees should be praised for having 1 goal: World title


Read no further if you visit this space craving a rant against the New York Yankees and their off-season spending spree. In an economy that is tanking and threatens to get worse, they represent everything you want in a sports ownership but can't have.

You can't have it because the Yankees are unique, they know so, and they operate accordingly. They are building a new ballpark, thus creating jobs, and will charge up to $2,500 for the best seats because demand shall equal or surpass supply.

At a time when other franchises retrench and common folk squirrel away savings in shoe boxes, the Yankees buy CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Mark Teixeira for something like $423 million because that's the way it's done in the Bronx.

The Yankees break no rules, unlike fellow New Yorker Bernard Madoff (allegedly), and violate no trust with their fans, who expect management to try, regardless of a recession that many seers remind rhymes with depression.

Whether the Yankees also create a diversion from the current mind-set of fear-mongering is arguable, but at the very least, they aren't crying poor and protecting their nest egg. All the Yankees care about is winning the World Series, a badge that has eluded them since 2000.

Call it brazen if you must, but compare the Yankees with the Pittsburgh Pirates, who seduced their public into believing that tax dollars for a modern stadium will mean a contending team. Well, the building is in place, but the Pirates have not posted even a .500 mark since 1992, a major league record for consumer fraud. Where are those revenue-sharing checks, written by the Yankees and cashed by the Pirates, going?

Closer to home, Mark Attanasio, chairman of the Milwaukee Brewers, sees the Yankees reloading and decrees that baseball must have a salary cap or perish. Owners who preceded him upon the advent of free agency also predicted doom, not imagining that in 2008, the game would become an industry worth $6 billion.

Pitted against America's strongest union, which only increases its leverage when the Yankees so handsomely reward card-carrying members, Attanasio's wish stands as much chance of fruition as Miller Park's sausage race has of snagging an Emmy.

Even the NFL is taking the easy way out by joining and perpetuating panic. A colossus by every definition, the nation's most prosperous league has laid off mid-level employees while fast-forwarding plans for what no doubt will be another costly Super Bowl halftime orgy.

This is arrogant and irresponsible behavior, but as Commissioner Roger Goodell intoned, "I would like to be able to report that we are immune from the troubles around us, but we are not." Perhaps he refers to expensive court cases, such as the $28 million judgment against the players' association and in favor of retirees entitled to funds for broken bones and broken lives. Locally, the mood is not so dire. The Cubs are for sale but are not pinching pennies. You can call them a lot of things, but not cheap. The Blackhawks are off the charts. They have doubled their attendance at the United Center, then doubled that for a day at Wrigley Field. As management reinvests principal, fans reinvest interest. Economics 101.

The Yankees are more hated than ever, but what Hank Steinbrenner does will warm the cockles of father George's wallet. The Yankees' mantra is, regardless of the real world, what they can least afford is not to win. Shop until it hurts. Bravo.

Source: Chicago Tribune
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Mignon
Here's a bag to put the whine in Irish. J/K lol


lol That's cute Mig, thanks
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 01:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
...he also suggested Friday that more support during his terrible tenure as a Yankee would have helped. While Pavano said he didn't hold "any grudges," he also noted, "When you're down, you expect your organization to pick you up, not kick you when you're down..." Source: SI


Support you? Gee, poor Pavano. He was really kicked when he was down, receiving those millions of dollars for doing NOTHING!!!! mad


Or how about when he was in a car accident, hurt his ribs and didn't tell the Yankees? That's why they "kicked him while he was down." You've gotta tell your team your injured, not try and play Superman. But not only that, it was just a string of bad luck/misfortune. Really, for 4 years and $39 million he only made 26 starts. What do you expect, in New York no less? That was basically $1.5 million-per-start (hardly worth the money, wouldn't you say?)
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/11/09 08:02 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
New York is "a great place to play," Pavano said.

How the hell would he know??? rolleyes
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/18/09 09:51 PM

More sour grapes? So just what are his thoughts on the Yankees period from 1996-2000 when they won 4 World Series in 5 years with guys from their farm system such as Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, Mariano Riveria, Andy Pettitte, Bernie Williams, etc?




Rice blames Boss, Yanks on never winning a Series

The complaint is not a new one. With the Yankees spending nearly half a billion dollars on three players this offseason - CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Mark Teixeira - it is hardly a surprise that the Steinbrenner family again is being blamed for squashing any remaining bits of baseball's alleged competitive balance.

And it's not just the salary-cap chorus that was heard coming from the owners' meetings this past week in Paradise Valley. With mind-numbing contracts still being handed out in the Bronx despite a flat-lining economy, such talk was to be expected.

It's debatable whether the Yankees' practice of buying the sport's premier players is actually bad for baseball. What they pay in luxury tax is helping to keep other owners rich in Kansas City and Pittsburgh, though those teams remain perennial bottom-feeders.

But it was interesting to hear Jim Rice, finally elected to the Hall of Fame after a 15-year wait, blame George Steinbrenner's checkbook for The Curse of the Bambino. When asked about Boston's failure to win a World Series during his career - 1975 to 1989 - up to the Bambino-busting 2004 season, Rice pointed directly to the Bronx.

"During that time, Steinbrenner spent more money than the Red Sox," Rice said. "He had more free agents. So when you get the best free agents, and you get the superstars from other ballclubs, that's what made you have a better team. The more money you can spend, the better you should get."

Rice does have reason to be bitter. From his post in the shadow of the Green Monster, he saw the Yankees buy Catfish Hunter, Reggie Jackson, Goose Gossage, Tommy John, Luis Tiant, Dave Winfield, Rickey Henderson and Don Gullett.

Even now, Rice remains annoyed by the Yankees' habit of throwing money at their problems. Not surprisingly, he lauds Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein for doing things the right way. "If you look at the Red Sox now, you see them bringing guys up in the organization," he said. "That's why Theo has been the person he's been over the last couple of years. He'll bring young kids up and stay within the organization.

"The Yankees haven't won in the last eight years. What do they do? They go out and buy high-priced players in the hope to get back the winning percentage they had 10 years ago."

Obviously, Rice still bleeds Sox red, but he does have the facts on his side. Since the 2000 World Series, the Yankees have gone to the bank repeatedly for Mike Mussina ($88.5 million), Jason Giambi ($120 million), Carl Pavano ($40 million), Jose Contreras ($32 million), Johnny Damon ($52 million) and Kei Igawa ($20 million) - just to name some notable signings.

That list does not include the renegotiated $275-million contract for Alex Rodriguez or the salary-dump trades that enabled them to get Randy Johnson ($31 million) and Kevin Brown ($31.4 million).

Now, after passing on Johan Santana and stressing a youth movement that flopped last season, the Yankees have returned to the megabuck spending that Rice remembers so well.

Whatever outrage the Sabathia-Burnett-Teixeira axis has generated around the league, any salary-cap showdown between the owners and the Players Association is going to have to wait until after the 2011 season, when the collective-bargaining agreement expires. Major League Baseball remains the only sport among the Big Four without a salary cap. Even if the nation's economy rebounds by then, this dark period is not likely to be forgotten, and the impact won't be known until this season gets under way.

"I think there's a lot of owners that would like to have [a salary cap] right now," A's managing partner Lew Wolff told MLB.com at the meetings in Arizona.

Until then, Steinbrenner still will be Steinbrenner - be it George or Hal. Whether 2009 will resemble 1977, '78 or '98 remains to be seen.

Source: News Day
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/20/09 08:00 PM

Baseball doesn't need a salary cap to stop Yankees

Hidden beneath the Hot Stove League, an integral part of baseball's charm, is the Hot Air Society. You've heard from them lately, lamenting the Yankees' absurd financial outlay and calling for a salary cap. Sometimes you wonder if becoming a multi-millionaire makes a person totally blind.

If you have any faith in A's owner Lew Wolff - that is, if you figure he'll eventually come to his senses and drop the Fremont pipe dream - you had to be disappointed in his recent remarks. "I think there's a lot of owners who would like to have a salary cap right now," he said. "Parity is what we're looking for. I think it's pretty good now, but it could be better."

Two things: Pretty good? And no, it could not be better.

Here comes another Hot Air fellow, Brewers owner Mark Attanasio: "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them."

Reminder: The Yankees' 2009 payroll might wind up being less than last year's $222 million, a figure that brought nothing but derisive laughter in Tampa. The Rays not only competed with the Yankees on $43 million, they went to the World Series.

That's just one example, though. This decade has given us the very essence of baseball parity. Recalling the seven World Series matchups prior to Rays-Phillies, we find Boston over Colorado, St. Louis over Detroit, White Sox over Houston, Boston over St. Louis, Florida over the Yankees, Anaheim over the Giants and Arizona over the Yankees.

In other words, seven different winners in eight years, and only three teams even appearing twice over that span. Do we see the Yankees winning any of those World Series? And who says they win it all this year because they added CC Sabathia, an all-around great guy who might eventually succumb to arm stress, and Mark Teixeira, a fine hitter who has never earned any serious MVP consideration?

Listen, it's fun to complain about the Yankees if you take the proper tone. Take Detroit manager Jim Leyland, master of dry humor: "Hey, it stands to reason that if you go into a store with $500 and I go in with $100, you're gonna come out with cashmere while I get one of those itchy tweed things."

But let's not hear owners - people who, ostensibly, built a fortune through smarts and good sense - crying, "Oh, somebody save me from my mistakes." Teams fail because of their own stupidity and ill-advised transactions, not because they're short on cash. What the Rays pulled off was no miracle, nor was it an aberration. That was just a flat-out superior team, built on dimes, nickels and guile.

Admit this about the Yankees: If you don't admire or respect them, you hate them. No sitting on the fence with these guys. That's a terrific thing, too. The Yankees are great for baseball, just as the Red Sox and Cubs enrich the landscape. They generate passion across the country, they provide compelling theater, and thanks to baseball's revenue-sharing plan, they put money in everyone's pockets.

If the NBA's salary cap is so wonderful, why do only five or six teams stand a chance of winning the title each year? Over the past 10 years in baseball, 15 teams - half, in other words - have played in the World Series. And aside from salary caps being contrary to every basic tenet of competitive American business, the NBA version collapses sadly under its own complexity.

For one thing, nobody can figure it out. I've heard extremely knowledgeable NBA writers say they hesitate to make an on-deadline call about salary-cap issues, for fear they didn't do enough research and screwed it up. The common fan doesn't have a prayer of understanding it, nor would he care to, after some of the nonsense that takes place.

To make the Jason Kidd-to-Dallas deal work last year, the Mavericks had to re-sign Keith Van Horn, who was living in retirement with no intention on coming back, and send his contract to New Jersey (I think only his hat made the trip). Just the other day, a column on the Sports Illustrated Web site noted that "the Cavaliers possess two enormously attractive (trade) assets in swingman Wally Szczerbiak and forward Ben Wallace." You're thinking, what? Then you realize it's not about their talent, but their soon-to-be-expiring contracts.

NBA trades are all about expiring contracts. You're not trading for help, you're getting people you can't wait to unload. "Hey, did you see the guys we acquired to put in next summer's trash can?" The chemistry-tortured Detroit Pistons would probably do well to unload Rasheed Wallace before the February 19 deadline, but wait - if they keep him until summer, they clear some cap space. Come to think of it, the NBA is just barely being played in real time. In our minds, we're already well into 2010, when LeBron James, Chris Bosh, Steve Nash, Dwyane Wade and several more top free agents have chosen new teams.

(And by the way, over the past 30 years, while 20 major-league teams have won it all, only nine have prevailed in the NBA. Another interesting stat: In 62 years of NBA championships, only 28 coaches have won.)

These whining baseball owners should realize what a salary cap really means: that you have to spend a certain amount of money. Considering the game's runaway success - a trend that just might survive the economic crisis - it would hardly be a paltry figure. If you find it an oppressive burden, you wind up signing pricey veterans just to stay around the minimum.

While Wolff and the boys stop to realize how baseball has prospered, we can all be thankful for the players' union. This will be a hot issue when the next collective bargaining agreement is hammered out after the 2011 season, and the union will have a choice: Take the NBA route or continue matching parity with golden-age growth. Easy call.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/21/09 05:26 PM

I heard on the news that they signed Melky to a one year contract. A contract was given to someone else, but I didn't hear who it was.
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/21/09 09:51 PM

The yankees should try and trade Melky I believe. They do not need him in the line up or the outfield. Maybe they can get something for him.

ds
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 01:21 AM

Melky's a good center-fielder with some actual great moments. His problem is when he gets behind the plate. If he can work with the batting coaches in the spring, hopefully he'll do better this season.

Oh, and the other player was Nady. Definitely glad to see him back.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 02:05 AM

Yes, SB, they signed both Nady and Cabrera to avoid salary arbitration for both (Nady's still a free agent at the end of the season though)
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 04:17 AM

I've been hearing a lot of rumors here involving the Yankees outfielders. The Giants seem to have shown interest in Nady or Swisher.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 11:25 AM

Yeah, and the Yankees should have interest in Lincecum wink
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 04:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Yeah, and the Yankees should have interest in Lincecum wink


You don't want him, he's overrated tongue
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/22/09 09:54 PM

Na, I'll stick with him. We'll trade you Nady, Swisher, Melky, Igawa AND Matsui wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/24/09 05:19 PM

If the Yankees can't get Pettitte, I'd like to see them go after Sheets for a one-year deal




Yanks remain in the mix for Pettitte

Luring back Andy Pettitte still remains a possibility for the Yankees.

The New Jersey Record is reporting the Yankees are still having discussions with Pettitte. The question remains if the veteran left-hander will accept a one-year, $10.5 million deal. There is a belief that Pettitte will pass on the offer.

The Yankees also remain in the mix for Ben Sheets. If neither Pettitte nor Sheets signs, New York appears ready to go into Spring Training with Phil Hughes vying for the fifth-starter spot with Alfredo Aceves, Ian Kennedy and Jason Johnson, a non-roster invitee.

In 2008, Pettitte was 14-14 with a 4.54 ERA in 33 starts. The veteran has logged at least 200 innings in four straight seasons, and five of his last six.

Source: Yankees
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 05:23 PM

After reading what Joe Torre said about the Yankees, I was sure there would be some comments on here.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 05:52 PM

Torre tore A-Rod a new A-hole.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 08:30 PM


Reports: Torre takes swings at Yankees in new book
Quote:
Jan 25, 11:05 pm EST

NEW YORK (AP)—Joe Torre takes some harsh swings at Alex Rodriguez, Brian Cashman and the New York Yankees in a book due out early next month, according to New York newspaper reports.

“The Yankee Years” reveals that Rodriguez was called “A-Fraud” by his teammates and the star slugger developed an obsession with shortstop Derek Jeter, the New York Post and the Daily News reported Sunday.

Torre, who managed the Yankees from 1996-2007 before taking over the Los Angeles Dodgers last season, also says he was betrayed by Cashman, New York’s longtime general manager, the Daily News reported on its Web site.

Torre had a hot-and-cold relationship with Yankees ownership, including George Steinbrenner, but Cashman was thought to be a consistent ally.

At the annual New York baseball writers’ dinner Sunday night, Cashman told reporters that Torre called him earlier in the day.

“I woke up today and saw the newspapers and I was surprised. My first reaction is to wait to hear or see what’s in the book,” Cashman was quoted as saying on Newsday’s Web site, adding that he was “comfortable” with his relationship with Torre. “I’m glad Joe gave me a call from Hawaii. It certainly made me feel better about what I was reading today.”

The book, co-authored by Sports Illustrated’s Tom Verducci, is due out Feb. 3 and is being published by Doubleday. It is not a first-person account but instead a third-person narrative by Verducci based on dozens of interviews with Yankees players and employees, ESPN.com reported, citing an unidentified source.

In the book, Torre also says Steinbrenner learned the manager had prostate cancer (during spring training 1999) before Torre even had a chance to inform him.

Torre guided the Yankees to the postseason in all 12 years as manager and won four World Series titles from 1996-2000. But he was offered a one-year contract with a pay cut after the 2007 season, following New York’s third straight first-round playoff exit.

Torre turned down the proposal, saying he felt insulted by the offer of bonuses based on postseason performance. He soon agreed to a three-year contract with the Dodgers and led them to the NL championship series last year before they were eliminated by the Philadelphia Phillies, who went on to win the World Series.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 08:40 PM

No editorial comment?

C'mon... as a Yankee fan, you MUST have some opinion on this book and Torre.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 09:06 PM


How can I -- or anyone -- have an opinion on a book we haven't read yet? Who do I look like, Irishman?? tongue wink
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 11:05 PM


Pettitte holding onto his pinstripes
Veteran left-hander signs incentive-laden, one-year deal
(base salary of $5.5 million, with innings-pitched and days-on-the-roster incentives that could raise the value of the contract to $12 million)

Cool, I guess -- a true Yankee. He's always fun to watch in big games, but I hope he improves a bit on last year (14-14 with a 4.54 ERA in 33 starts)
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/26/09 11:32 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

Pettitte holding onto his pinstripes
Veteran left-hander signs incentive-laden, one-year deal
(base salary of $5.5 million, with innings-pitched and days-on-the-roster incentives that could raise the value of the contract to $12 million)

Cool, I guess -- a true Yankee. He's always fun to watch in big games, but I hope he improves a bit on last year (14-14 with a 4.54 ERA in 33 starts)


He is a true Yankee, but I don't think we'll see an improved version. He's not at the stage of his career when you get better. Plus, he's off the banned, performance enhancing substances now. He'll eat some innings and win some games.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 01:49 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
No editorial comment?

C'mon... as a Yankee fan, you MUST have some opinion on this book and Torre.


Read this brief interview with Tom Verducci
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 02:03 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
No editorial comment?

C'mon... as a Yankee fan, you MUST have some opinion on this book and Torre.


Why would Yankee fans need to think for themselves when they have a million writers doing it for them?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 02:42 AM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

Pettitte holding onto his pinstripes
Veteran left-hander signs incentive-laden, one-year deal
(base salary of $5.5 million, with innings-pitched and days-on-the-roster incentives that could raise the value of the contract to $12 million)

Cool, I guess -- a true Yankee. He's always fun to watch in big games, but I hope he improves a bit on last year (14-14 with a 4.54 ERA in 33 starts)


So, from top to bottom, do the Yankees boast the best rotation in baseball?

1) CC Sabathia
2) AJ Burnett
3) Chien-Ming Wang
4) Andy Pettitte
5) Joba Chamberlain
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 04:35 PM

IF (and I say IF because I haven't read the book) he trashes any of the team or its management, then I will lose a lot of respect for Joe Torre. Yes, they treated him like crap after he handed over annual championships. However, he also made millions from them and from the endorsements that came with being one of the most famous names in baseball. If he was that unhappy, he should have walked away 10 years ago.

As for Pettite, he's a pig. A true Yankee? Is that why he went to Texas in his prime?? Or was he so unable to think for himself that he just followed that other pig Clemens wherever he went? I saw no reason to bring him back.

I will give Andy this - I heard him say on TV last night that he's NEVER heard any member of the Yankees call Alex "A-Fraud". I have no love for ARod, but writing that, true or not, is just completely and totally without class.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 04:55 PM

Good point about Torre, SB. As much as I would love to hear some dirt on the Yankees it doesn't seem like Torre to do this kind of thing, and he shouldn't. It must be Los Angeles getting to him.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/27/09 05:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Good point about Torre, SB. As much as I would love to hear some dirt on the Yankees it doesn't seem like Torre to do this kind of thing, and he shouldn't. It must be Los Angeles getting to him.


Manny Ramirez is wearing off on Torre?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/28/09 12:14 AM

Originally Posted By: SC
No editorial comment?

C'mon... as a Yankee fan, you MUST have some opinion on this book and Torre.


More for ya

Torre's co-author tries to clear air on radio

In the wake of the controversy over his soon-to-be released book, "The Yankee Years," Tom Verducci took to the airwaves yesterday to clarify misconceptions about his collaboration with Joe Torre.

Verducci, a Sports Illustrated writer who co-authored the book with the former Yankees manager, appeared on "The Dan Patrick Show" and WFAN's "Mike'd Up" with Mike Francesa after a story in Sunday's New York Post portrayed Torre as bitter toward Yankees brass and linked him to scathing remarks about Alex Rodriguez and A-Rod's relationship with captain Derek Jeter.

Among the more scintillating revelations, as reported by the Post, were that Rodriguez was called "A-Fraud" by teammates and had a "Single White Female"-like obsession with Jeter.

"It's funny that in the original story that came out in the New York Post, they supposedly had the book, [but] there's not a single citation of the book," Verducci told Patrick, adding that those remarks were taken out of context and inaccurately attributed to Torre.

"Joe Torre certainly wasn't name-calling, certainly didn't use the phrase 'A-Fraud' or 'Single White Female.' That's why it's important to know it is a third-person narrative."

Verducci, a former Newsday sportswriter, said the Post story contained factual errors regarding his book. "Well, they had Torre calling players prima donnas," he said. "He never does that. C'mon."

Verducci said Torre never trashes Rodriguez in the book but did say Torre saw him as someone with more "individual-driven motivation" that was different from players he had managed on four Yankees championship teams.

"No, he doesn't rip him, but he talks about how Alex came with a very different perspective, that Alex liked the attention, he craved the attention," Verducci said.

He did say, however, that while doing reporting for the book, he found that Rodriguez often was the subject of inside jokes in the clubhouse.

"Within the window of his first year in New York ... even his close friends were saying Alex tried too hard to fit into New York, to be all things to all people instead of just being himself," Verducci told Francesa about the "A-Fraud" and "Single White Female" references. "The fact of the matter is the reference is to an inside joke among teammates during his first year in New York when he tried too hard to fit in."

That shouldn't surprise anyone who has followed Rodriguez's five seasons with the Yankees, Verducci said.

"Is it shocking that Alex Rodriguez has had a tough time fitting into the Yankees' clubhouse? I don't think so. Is it shocking that Alex and Derek Jeter have issues that have affected people in that clubhouse?" Verducci asked. "I don't think that's shocking."

Verducci and Torre also co-wrote "Chasing The Dream: My Lifelong Journey to the World Series," published in 1997, the year after the Yankees won their first championship since 1978.

Source: News Day
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/28/09 01:24 AM

Is there any way that this story was leaked out to generate pre-publishment interest in a book during a slow economy??
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/28/09 02:04 AM

Absolutely. And it seems to have worked. This has been "the news" item for the past 24+ hours.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/28/09 02:28 AM

Torre cannot hide behind author

Some of the Yankees who found themselves on the receiving end of Joe Torre's seething scowl called it "The Stare" -- his face tight, his mouth frozen into a horizontal line, his dark eyes seemingly blackened by a slight inward tilt of his eyebrows. The Stare was reserved for capital offenses, for missing signs, for awful decisions.

Reporters sometimes got The Stare as well, most often when they asked questions Torre deemed to be driven by a quest for sensationalism, and the manager would chastise them bluntly, the way a fourth-grade teacher speaks to a wayward pupil. When I covered the team for The New York Times, he expressed particular distaste for ESPN, especially after Roger Clemens' beaning of Mike Piazza and the subsequent bat-throwing incident, because he felt the network replayed the ugliness over and over only to sell its programming.

In an honest moment today, Torre would aim The Scowl again -- into a mirror. Because this time, Torre is guilty of fostering and feeding on sensationalism, at the expense of former colleagues.

It is Tom Verducci who wrote the actual words of the book, and over the past two days, Verducci has worked to underscore this point and to note that the fragments about Alex Rodriguez, Brian Cashman and the Steinbrenners are just tiny pieces of a book of almost 500 pages. The voice is third person, not Torre's, as it was the first time Torre and Verducci collaborated. A lot of the words are based on Verducci's reporting.

But here's the problem with that: It's Joe Torre's book. His name is on it. He got paid for it. He had a chance to read every word, every sentence, every paragraph. He had to approve every passage.

He had the choice, for example, whether to include this, from page 245:

Back in 2004, at first Rodriguez did his best to try and fit into the Yankee culture -- his cloying, B Grade actor best. He slathered on the polish. People in the clubhouse, including teammates and support personnel were calling him "A-Fraud" behind his back.

And it was Torre's choice, ultimately, to include this, from page 252:

In his own way, Rodriguez was fascinated with [Derek] Jeter, as if trying to figure out what it was about Jeter that could have bought him so much goodwill. The inside joke in the clubhouse was that Rodriguez' pre-occupation with Jeter recalled the 1992 film, "Single White Female," in which a woman becomes obsessed with her roommate to the point of dressing like her.

And it was Torre who approved the words in the excerpt released Monday -- after Torre had assured Cashman on the phone Sunday that they were friends and always would be friends.

Only much later did Torre start to put the picture together of what had happened to his working relationship with Cashman. The personal falling-out they had in 2006 spring training over philosophical issues, Cashman's decision not to bring back longtime center fielder Bernie Williams when his contract expired in 2006, his submission of odd lineup suggestions based on stats, his lack of regard for Ron Guidry as a pitching coach, his detachment from the "they" who were making an offer to Torre, his failure to offer any comment or support in the meeting that decided Torre's future, his failure to personally relay Torre's proposal to find a way to reach an agreement to the Steinbrenners … "I thought Cash was an ally, I really did," Torre says.

Those passages were based on Verducci's reporting. They were written by Verducci.

But it's Torre's book. And within the pages of this book with Torre's name on it, some former colleagues are demeaned, and that was his choice.

Verducci said in a radio interview on WFAN on Monday that all this is not really new, that everybody has known for years that Rodriguez has had difficulty assimilating with the Yankees' veterans.

Here's what's new about it: The stories are in a book authored by Joe Torre.

This is hardly a new concept. The fact that former first lady Nancy Reagan could be difficult was hardly a new concept, but when Ronald Reagan's former chief of staff, Don Regan, published a book detailing that, well, it became a very big deal. The suggestion that the run-up to the Iraq war included misinformation was something posed by many reporters -- but it became something very different when posited in a book by former White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

The book is in Torre's name. Says right there on the cover. By Joe Torre and Tom Verducci.

In the four seasons Torre managed Rodriguez, he would never have come out in the dugout for his daily session with reporters and revealed that teammates called Rodriguez "A-Fraud," and if any reporter had asked him whether it was true that teammates compared A-Rod to the character in the movie "Single White Female," they would have gotten The Stare.

But he has gone beyond his own code of conduct with his book. In spring 2003, David Wells and a ghostwriter published a book, "Perfect I'm Not: Boomer on Beer, Brawls, Backaches and Baseball," and Torre was furious, angry that Wells had aired some of the Yankees' dirty laundry in the pages. Wells tried to distance himself from some of the words in the book, saying they belonged to the writer, but the Yankees' manager would not accept that. After a meeting with the pitcher, Torre said this to reporters:

"We talked to him about a lot of things today. I just sensed he was bothered by it. Not by what we said, but by how it came out. How much of it is actually what he said and how much isn't exactly what he said, I don't know.

"But there's no question: It has his name on it, and he has to be accountable for it."

Torre, Cashman and George Steinbrenner held Wells accountable -- in the end, he was fined $100,000 by the organization.

Now it is Torre's responsibility to be fully accountable for the words in the book that has his name on it, and he must stand behind those words.

If he hides behind Verducci and the suggestion that the ugly anecdotes aren't his, the explanation will have echoes of "I didn't knowingly take steroids." If he embraces the words as his own, he also should acknowledge he has been, at the very least, extraordinarily hypocritical.

Source: ESPN
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/28/09 04:25 PM

Quote:
Now it is Torre's responsibility to be fully accountable for the words in the book that has his name on it, and he must stand behind those words.


I don't think I've seen Torre NOT stand behind these words. Has anybody else?

and YES is is all hype to sell this book.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/29/09 12:07 AM

BOWA BACKS TORRE, DEFENDS A-ROD

Don't believe everything you read.

That what Larry Bowa thinks about the way Alex Rodriguez is being portrayed in the fallout from Joe Torre's book, "The Yankee Years."

Rodriguez reportedly was referred to as "A-Fraud" by teammates, but Bowa reiterated to WFAN today that, if so, it was only in jest.

"This stuff about Alex not being liked in the clubhouse is so, so overblown," Bowa told hosts Joe Benigno and Evan Roberts. "He's well liked in that clubhouse."

Maybe even by Derek Jeter.

"They talk to each other, they mingle with each other, they may not go out to dinner with each other," Bowa said of the superstars' relationship.

Bowa, with the Yankees in 2006-07, said Rodriguez's admiration of Jeter's four World Series rings creates an unhealthy focus on getting one himself.

"Alex is obsessed with winning a World Series," Bowa said. "It might be detrimental to him, he's so obsessed with it."

Seemingly running for president of A-Rod's fan club, Bowa, a 40-year baseball veteran who played with Pete Rose and Mike Schmidt, called Rodriguez "the most prepared player I've ever seen," and defended his postseason disappointments.

"It's hard to judge a guy with 11, 12, 13 at-bats," Bowa said. "Let him get deep into the playoffs when you get 40 at-bats."

One could argue the Yankees New York Yankees didn't get deeper into the playoffs because of Rodriguez's performance. He batted .133, .071 and .267 in first-round losses in 2005, '06 and '07. He did hit .320 over two playoff rounds (50 at-bats) in 2004, but went 2-for-17 as the Red Sox won the final four games of the ALCS after trailing 3-0.

Rodriguez is a hot topic in January because of Torre's book, co-authored with Tom Verducci and scheduled to be released Feb. 3.

Bowa, who was with Torre on the Dodgers last season, said he hasn't read the book, but "I do know that what I've heard doesn't sound like Joe Torre . . . at all."

"Joe's got great credibility, and if a little bit of this is gonna take it away, then so be it," Bowa said. "I don't think Joe did this to rip anybody.

Even when he goes in the back room, he doesn't rip people. He just doesn't do it."

Bowa said he never noticed resentment from Torre toward the Yankees' low-ball offer of a one-year contract prior to last season, but said Torre's glaring omission from the closing ceremony at Yankee Stadium had to bother his boss.

"In my opinion, the thing that hurt Joe -- and he won't ever admit this -- is the last day at Yankee Stadium," Bowa said. "The non-recognition. I think that did bother him."

Source: New York Post
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/29/09 04:57 AM

So this book isn't out yet, right? Why is everyone attacking and defending people? Everyone needs to wait and see what's actually in the book first. This seems like a chance for Bowa and whoever to get their name in the news, when all they are doing is helping promote this book.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/29/09 01:47 PM

The book's due out February 3rd
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/29/09 06:47 PM

Yanks mulling disparagement clause

NEW YORK -- In the wake of the information in Joe Torre's yet-to-be-released book, the Yankees are considering a "non-disparagement" clause in future player and managerial contracts to prevent similar situations in the future.

The clause would ensure that future books are "positive in tone" and "do not breach the sanctity of our clubhouse," an unnamed Yankees official told Newsday in its Thursday editions.

Torre's book, "The Yankee Years," reveals that Yankees teammates called third baseman Alex Rodriguez "A-Fraud" in the clubhouse, and that he was viewed as having a "Single White Female" obsession with Derek Jeter. Torre also directly criticizes several players, including Carl Pavano and Gary Sheffield.

The Yankees have never before included a confidentiality agreement in the contract of a player or manager.

"Up to now, we have always operated our employer-employee relationships on a basis of trust," the Yankees official told Newsday. "But we never expected what we got from Joe. We may have to get a little tougher on this issue."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/29/09 07:18 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Yanks mulling disparagement clause

The clause would ensure that future books are "positive in tone" and "do not breach the sanctity of our clubhouse," an unnamed Yankees official told Newsday in its Thursday editions.


"But we never expected what we got from Joe. We may have to get a little tougher on this issue."




Maybe Joe never expected what he got from you either! lol
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/30/09 03:05 AM

Wait, the Yanks haven't done this before, not even after BALL FOUR?

Jeez, some people fucking never learn.

As for Torre...I dont remember anyone at BB.Net pissing at Phil Jackson's book which trashed Kobe (though he ended up coaching him again afterwards).

Still, Torre's story about A-Rod and the coffee is hilarious.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 01/31/09 01:27 AM

I found this shirt online and may buy it

Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/04/09 04:20 PM

A friend and his wife are going to a Torre book-signing in NJ tonight, and offered to give me a ride. I've been thinking about it, but I truly think I'm going to turn them down.

I was always a huge fan, but this book has really caused me to lose respect for him. I saw him interviewed and he said that the remarks about ARod "were not mean-spirited"! REALLY? You can tell yourself that all you want, Joe, but they were.

And even if you don't personally like ARod, why dig up all that BS about the Jeter-ARod thing, since it's often been reported that Jeter was like a son to you? Why would you bring his name into it, saying ARod was like a stalker? When all of that seemed to be going away, let's throw it back into the media eye??
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/04/09 04:57 PM

I'd go. I plan on reading the book when I find the time.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/04/09 05:26 PM

Doesn't matter. It's sold out.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/05/09 12:12 AM

I agree with this article




Chamberlain Needs to Start

New York Yankees young hurler Joba Chamberlain should be used as a starter in 2009. At least until it is proven that Chamberlain cannot handle the work load.

It is not rocket science. The more innings a pitcher logs, the more valuable he is to his team.

Now that the Yankees have officially brought back Andy Pettitte on a one-year deal, though, the Joba Debate has again hit the front burner. Some fans and writers theorize that the addition of Pettitte – combined with the depth of Phil Hughes and Alfredo Aceves – opens up the gates for Chamberlain to move back into a relief role, where he has been dominant bridging the gap to Mariano Rivera.

Not so fast.

New York general manager Brian Cashman informed Chamberlain in November that he will begin the year in a starting role, where he can add the most value to his club. The flame-throwing right-hander, outside of his brilliant run pitching high-leverage situations for the Yankees in 2007, has been a starter for most of his life, from his days as a prep/collegiate pitcher in Nebraska to his time in the minors.

There are certainly concerns about whether Chamberlain can remain durable pitching more than 150 innings. At such a young age, it is best that the Yankees be conservative with such a rare talent; hence the Joba Rules. Those in the relief camp cite this as key factor in their argument, saying that he is more likely to remain healthy pitching in the bullpen, where there will be less of a toll on his arm. He also has the make-up to close, they say, and is a potential successor to Rivera.

Certainly Chamberlain proved himself to be a worthy future closing candidate in 2007, when he posted a 0.38 ERA, 1,192 ERA+, 1.82 FIP (fielding independent pitching) and 0.750 WHIP in 24.0 innings. The youngster quickly became a Yankee fan favorite, as the fans were enthralled by his demeanor, mid-90s heat, intensity and tremendous success. He did what any team wants out of a reliever – avoid home runs and walks while missing bats; he struck out 12.75 hitters per nine innings, with 34 Ks against only six walks.

While there are legitimate injury concerns, why not give Chamberlain the chance to prove that he can handle the workload? A pitcher with his talent could emerge as an elite front-line arm, adding depth to a pitching staff that is already among the best in the league. Even an average starter adds more value over the course of a regular season than a plus relief man, which is really the main thing to consider here.

Chamberlain has a chance to be special even at this stage. Although it was a small sample size, he was effective taking the hill in the early innings in 2008. In 12 starts, he struck out 74 against 25 walks while posting a 2.76 ERA in 65.1 innings. Overall, he was again a dominant force in Pinstripes, producing rates of 10.58 K/9 and 0.45 HR/9 in 42 total appearances combined between both roles. The 23-year-old right-hander finished the year with a 2.60 ERA, 171 ERA+ and 2.65 FIP mark.

While injuries held him back, Chamberlain was lights-out when he was on the hill. His stuff is just off the charts. The 6-foot-2, 230-pounder threw his fastball 62.3 percent of the time in 2008, averaging 95.0 MPH on the radar gun. He mixed in a slider (avg velocity: 85.1) 25.2 percent of the time and also flashed a curveball and changeup. While he certainly would throw with more velocity in short bursts (97.0 MPH avg fastball MPH as a reliever in 2007), he has shown the ability to sit in the low-to-mid-90s for multiple innings.

What GM would not give a pitcher with that stuff a chance to start if they can handle the duty? Sure, the Yankees have some other options, with less depth in its relief corps. However, the American League East is a division that may end up being decided by which is team is least affected by injuries, especially when it comes to starting pitching. It is unlikely that every pitcher penciled in the New York five will avoid going to a DL at some point. Whether it is the injury-prone A.J. Burnett or even Chamberlain, an arm will go down. It is a numbers game, though. Having more options prepares the Yanks better for any potential injury situation. Aceves is not exactly a sure thing to replicate his success, either, and there is no telling what New York will get from talented-but-inexperienced Hughes.

Plus, Chamberlain is good enough to emerge as one of the best starters on the roster as he continues to get more seasoning at the Major League level. One good thing about the return of Pettitte and the other free-agent signings, though, is that Chamberlain will not need to be. He can be put in a four or five spot, potentially missing a few starts here or there to limit his innings. If he does indeed get injured, he can always go back to relieving, regaining his title as the successor to Rivera.

In the meantime, the Yankees have the opportunity to see if they have something special in Chamberlain. Thus, there is no rush.

Most relievers are relievers for a reason: they could not cut it in a starting role, either due to arm trouble or ineffectiveness. The verdict is still out on whether Chamberlain falls into that category. The Yankees are doing the right thing.

Source: Dugout Central
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/05/09 04:14 PM

I don't. He needs to be a reliever and then take over for Mo in 2010.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/05/09 06:21 PM

Jim Donaldson -- Player for player, the Yankees are better than Boston

So I’m reading Joe McDonald’s position-by-position analysis of the Red Sox in Wednesday’s paper––call me old school, but, although I write on a computer, when it comes time to read, I still love to sit at the kitchen table, or curl up the couch, with a real newspaper – and what occurs to me, as I run through the lineup, is that the Yankees, position-by-position, are better.

And, lest we forget, the Tampa Bay Rays won both the AL East and the ALCS – beating the Sox in seven games, as Boston fans will painfully recall––and they have just about everybody who’s anybody back.

Which doesn’t seem to bode well for the boys from Beantown.

Joey took a look at the Red Sox. Here’s my take on how the Sox look, compared to their archrivals, the Bombers from the Bronx:

FIRST BASE

Kevin Youkilis is a very good player. Mark Teixeira is better.

SECOND BASE

Not even close here. Dustin Pedroia is the A.L. MVP. Robinson Cano is Robinson Cano.

SHORTSTOP

The Yankees have Derek Jeter. The Red Sox have Julio Lugo and Jed Lowrie. More, in this case, indeed is less.

THIRD BASE

I like Mike Lowell much, much better than Alex Rodriguez. As a person, that is. As a ballplayer, A-Rod is much the best, especially with Lowell coming off hip surgery at the age of 35.

OUTFIELD

Will the real Jacoby Ellsbury please stand up? Is he the budding superstar who helped spark the Sox to a World Series title in ’07, or is he the solid but hardly spectacular young player who batted .245 in June and .247 in July? J.D. Drew is a heck of player, when he’s healthy. When he’s not, local hero Rocco Baldelli, who’s had serious health problems of his own, will take over in right field. Left fielder Jason Bay hit .293 after coming to Boston from Pittsburgh at the trading deadline, then batted .341, with three homers, in 11 postseason games for the Sox. As long he’s not compared to Manny Ramirez – remember him? – Bay measures up pretty well against most players.

As for the Yankees, Johnny Damon – remember him? – hit .303 last year and will start in left field. Center field is up for grabs between Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner. Xavier Nady seems likely to be in right, although Nick Swisher is in the picture there, too. Overall, if everybody performs up to expectations, I’d take Boston’s outfield over New York’s, but the difference isn’t huge.

DESIGNATED HITTER

David Ortiz played a career-low 109 games last year, and his power clearly was affected by his aching wrist. His weight and conditioning could prove to be an issue, especially at age 33. In New York, expect Hideki Matsui to be the DH, at least early in the season. Matsui, like Ortiz, is coming off an injury that limited him to 93 games (he hit .294 with 9 homers and 45 RBI), and he’ll be 35 in June. If both are healthy, I prefer Big Papi.

CATCHER

Pardon me if the soap-opera signing saga of Jason Varitek didn’t seem like the key to the pennant for the Sox. While his contributions to the handling of the pitching staff are considerable, he has become an automatic out in the batting order, particularly from the left side, where he hit .201 last year. Jose Molina, with hopefully (from a Yankees’ standpoint) Jorge Posada returning sooner, rather than later, gives New York a decided edge behind the plate. Posada also can DH, which you can bet Varitek won’t be doing.

STARTING ROTATION

Joey’s right – the Red Sox do have starting depth aplenty. And talent, too. The thing is, the Yankees have more of both. Looking at the lefties at the top of the rotation, there’s nothing not to like about Jon Lester. But, if they could afford him, any team in the league would take New York’s expensive offseason acquisition, C.C. Sabathia, over Lester –– at least for 2009, if not necessarily the long-term. The Yanks also spent big bucks to acquire A.J. Burnett. But he’s no Josh Beckett. As for Daisuke Matsuzaka and Chien-Ming Wang, I’ll call that a wash. It also should be noted that having those two guys as third starters (although Wang, not Burnett, may turn out to be No. 2 in New York) is a key reason the Yanks and the Sox are two of the best teams in baseball. In the old-vet category, give me Andy Pettitte over Tim Wakefield. Are Clay Buchholz and Michael Bowden better than Ian Kennedy and Phil Hughes? We’ll see. Do the Sox move Justin Masterson into a starting role? Do the Yankees move Joba Chamberlain back to the bullpen? We’ll see about that, too. Having Brad Penny ready, and John Smoltz recuperating in the wings, are plusses for the Sox, but, as I see it, the Yanks get the nod here.

BULLPEN

The Red Sox rate the edge in the ‘pen. In the all-important closer role, Mariano Rivera is a dead-lock future Hall of Famer. But Jonathan Papelbon, who still has to perform over the long haul if he’s to get to Cooperstown, is better right now. Masterson could be masterful as Boston’s setup man. Hideki Okajima can be counted on to get lefties out, and the hope is that Manny Delcarmen will continue to improve. Having newcomers Takashi Saito and Ramon Ramirez in the mix, along with Javier Lopez, is a plus. As for the Yankees, they’ve got Damaso Marte, Brian Bruney, Jose Veras, Edwar Ramirez and David Robertson. Which is why the Red Sox get the thumbs-up here.

MANAGER

I’ll take Terry Francona, thank you very much, over Joe Girardi. If famous author Joe Torre was still in the Yankees’ dugout, this would be a much tougher call.

OVERALL

The pitching staffs are comparable, but the Yankees pack more punch in their batting order, especially in the bottom third. That ability to pound away, day after day, will put them atop the A.L. East at the end of the day –– or season.

Source: Pro Jo
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/05/09 06:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
I don't. He needs to be a reliever and then take over for Mo in 2010.


Like the article said. I'd give him a shot at being a starter. If it doesn't work out, he can always move back to the bullpen. Papelbum was a starter and he moved to reliever (just like Mo). Give him a shot first and take it from there. The worst that can happen is he succeeds.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/05/09 11:24 PM

And who do you suggest becomes the closer after this season? I'm sure that Mo will retire. He really only wanted to pitch in the new stadium, so I doubt he'll go another season.

As Yankee fans, we have been spoiled. Mo will go down in baseball history as one of the greatest closers ever in the game.

You can have all the great starters that you want, but without someone reliable in the last few innings, you're screwed (just ask Santana). They need to start grooming someone to take over for Mo in 2010, and, IMO, Joba is the best prospect for that.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/06/09 01:59 AM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
And who do you suggest becomes the closer after this season? I'm sure that Mo will retire. He really only wanted to pitch in the new stadium, so I doubt he'll go another season.

They need to start grooming someone to take over for Mo in 2010, and, IMO, Joba is the best prospect for that.


They are. I forgot the kids name but he's in the minors. He's a year or two away. Sorry I forgot his name. If DJ were around he'd know.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/06/09 05:58 AM

I agree with SB, you have Joba who is proven in that sort of role. There are always badass' in the minors on their way up, but once they get here it's impossible to predict how they will handle the pressure against full rosters of guys who were also badass' on their way up. Especially in the pressure-filled situation of the closers role. Yankee fans have definitely been spoiled with Rivera, so don't think it's so easy to replace him.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/06/09 11:27 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Yankee fans have definitely been spoiled with Rivera, so don't think it's so easy to replace him.


Trust me, we had Kyle Farnsworth for a few years. I know that ALL too well
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/06/09 03:08 PM

We have enough starters for now, really, really talented starters. Leave Joba out of the rotation, have him be Mo's set-up man, and go from there. I think Joba has the kind of arm that will burn out with a steady diet of 7 innings.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/06/09 09:56 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
We have enough starters for now, really, really talented starters. Leave Joba out of the rotation, have him be Mo's set-up man, and go from there. I think Joba has the kind of arm that will burn out with a steady diet of 7 innings.


We do have really really talented starters but some are injury prone (see Burnett and Pettitte). Let's not forget Wang's coming off of an injury. I'm not gonna say if but rather when a Yankees starter goes down, what are they gonna do? Go with Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy who were COMPLETE disasters last year?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 03:55 AM

Hughes will be OK. Kennedy, probably not so much. However, if you've got a starting rotation of Sabathia, Wang, Burnett, Pettitte and Hughes, I think that will do nicely. Then have Joba for Innings 7 and/or 8 and Mo for 9.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 02:10 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Hughes will be OK. Kennedy, probably not so much. However, if you've got a starting rotation of Sabathia, Wang, Burnett, Pettitte and Hughes, I think that will do nicely. Then have Joba for Innings 7 and/or 8 and Mo for 9.


I REALLY hope Hughes will be ok. But he's only showed 2 signs of that to me (his no-hitter in Texas and against the Indians in the playoffs when he came in for relief for Roger Clemens).

As for our bullpen, it's really not that bad. Have you forgotten Brian Bruney and Phil Coke already? Here are their numbers compared to Joba's from just the bullpen:

Brian Bruney
32 games, 34.1 IP, 18 hits, 7 runs, 7 ER, 2 HR, 16 BB, 33 SO, 3-0 with 1 SV and a 1.84 ERA

Joba Chamberlain
30 games, 35 IP, 27 hits, 9 runs, 9 ER, 1 HR, 14 BB, 44 SO, 1-2 with 0 SV and a 2.31 ERA

Phil Coke
12 games, 14.2 IP, 8 hits, 1 run, 1 ER, 0 HR, 2 BB, 14 SO, 1-0 with 0 SV and a 0.61 ERA

The biggest discrepancy between Joba's and Bruney's numbers are Joba has more strikeouts but Bruney has a lower ERA in 2 more games but almost an inning of work less.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 05:22 PM

Sources tell SI Alex Rodriguez tested positive for steroids in 2003

In 2003, when he won the American League home run title and the AL Most Valuable Player award as a shortstop for the Texas Rangers, Alex Rodriguez tested positive for two anabolic steroids, four sources have independently told Sports Illustrated.

Rodriguez's name appears on a list of 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball's '03 survey testing, SI's sources say. As part of a joint agreement with the MLB Players Association, the testing was conducted to determine if it was necessary to impose mandatory random drug testing across the major leagues in 2004.

When approached by an SI reporter on Thursday at a gym in Miami, Rodriguez declined to discuss his 2003 test results. "You'll have to talk to the union," said Rodriguez, the Yankees' third baseman since his trade to New York in February 2004. When asked if there was an explanation for his positive test, he said, "I'm not saying anything."

Phone messages left by SI for players' union executive director Donald Fehr were not returned.

Though MLB's drug policy has expressly prohibited the use of steroids without a valid prescription since 1991, there were no penalties for a positive test in 2003. The results of that year's survey testing of 1,198 players were meant to be anonymous under the agreement between the commissioner's office and the players association. Rodriguez's testing information was found, however, after federal agents, armed with search warrants, seized the '03 test results from Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., of Long Beach, Calif., one of two labs used by MLB in connection with that year's survey testing. The seizure took place in April 2004 as part of the government's investigation into 10 major league players linked to the BALCO scandal -- though Rodriguez himself has never been connected to BALCO.

The list of the 104 players whose urine samples tested positive is under seal in California. However, two sources familiar with the evidence that the government has gathered in its investigation of steroid use in baseball and two other sources with knowledge of the testing results have told Sports Illustrated that Rodriguez is one of the 104 players identified as having tested positive, in his case for testosterone and an anabolic steroid known by the brand name Primobolan. All four sources spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the evidence.

Primobolan, which is also known by the chemical name methenolone, is an injected or orally administered drug that is more expensive than most steroids. (A 12-week cycle can cost $500.) It improves strength and maintains lean muscle with minimal bulk development, according to steroid experts, and has relatively few side effects. Kirk Radomski, the former New York Mets clubhouse employee who in 2007 pleaded guilty to illegal distribution of steroids to numerous major league players, described in his recent book, Bases Loaded: The Inside Story of the Steroid Era in Baseball by the Central Figure in the Mitchell Report, how players increasingly turned to drugs such as Primobolan in 2003, in part to avoid detection in testing. Primobolan is detectable for a shorter period of time than the steroid previously favored by players, Deca-Durabolin. According to a search of FDA records, Primobolan is not an approved prescription drug in the United States, nor was it in 2003. (Testosterone can be taken legally with an appropriate medical prescription.)

Rodriguez finished the 2003 season by winning his third straight league home run title (with 47) and the first of his three MVP awards.

Because more than 5% of big leaguers had tested positive in 2003, baseball instituted a mandatory random-testing program, with penalties, in '04. According to the 2007 Mitchell Report on steroid use in baseball, in September 2004, Gene Orza, the chief operating officer of the players' union, violated an agreement with MLB by tipping off a player (not named in the report) about an upcoming, supposedly unannounced drug test. Three major league players who spoke to SI said that Rodriguez was also tipped by Orza in early September 2004 that he would be tested later that month. Rodriguez declined to respond on Thursday when asked about the warning Orza provided him.

When Orza was asked on Friday in the union's New York City office about the tipping allegations, he told a reporter, "I'm not interested in discussing this information with you."

Anticipating that the 33-year-old Rodriguez, who has 553 career home runs, could become the game's alltime home run king, the Yankees signed him in November 2007 to a 10-year, incentive-laden deal that could be worth as much as $305 million. Rodriguez is reportedly guaranteed $275 million and could receive a $6 million bonus each time he ties one of the four players at the top of the list: Willie Mays (660), Babe Ruth (714), Hank Aaron (755) and Barry Bonds (762), and an additional $6 million for passing Bonds. In order to receive the incentive money, the contract reportedly requires Rodriguez to make extra promotional appearances and sign memorabilia for the Yankees as part of a marketing plan surrounding his pursuit of Bonds's record. Two sources familiar with Rodriguez's contract told SI that there is no language about steroids in the contract that would put Rodriguez at risk of losing money.

Arguments before an 11-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena are ongoing between government prosecutors and the players' association over the government's seizure of the test results from the Long Beach lab. The agents who collected the material had a search warrant only for the results for the 10 BALCO-linked players. Attorneys from the union argue that the government is entitled only to the results for those players, not the entire list. If the court sides with the union, federal authorities may be barred from using the positive survey test results of non-BALCO players such as Rodriguez in their ongoing investigations.

Source: SI
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 06:29 PM


2003... "anonymous" survey... If he hasn't tested positive since, who really cares after 5-6 years? And how long does it take to wrap this shit up already?? ohwell
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 07:15 PM

I'm sure you've heard the new rumblings about the Clemens trial as well (his DNA is on some of the evidence handed over from Macnamee). I wonder how his and Bonds trials will play out.

Although, one of the first things I thought to myself about this A-Rod/steroids thing is that more credibility has to be given to Jose Canseco now.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 07:19 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Although, one of the first things I thought to myself about this A-Rod/steroids thing is that more credibility has to be given to Jose Canseco now.


Canseco is a greedy attention-seeking rat. But his book was probably the best thing for the sport of baseball.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 07:31 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Although, one of the first things I thought to myself about this A-Rod/steroids thing is that more credibility has to be given to Jose Canseco now.


Canseco is a greedy attention-seeking rat. But his book was probably the best thing for the sport of baseball.


Very true. But that doesn't make his statements any less factual.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/07/09 11:10 PM

This puts A-Rod's apparent use of steroids in the same time period as Bonds' apparent use. Will we need to get another asterisk ready?
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 12:55 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Although, one of the first things I thought to myself about this A-Rod/steroids thing is that more credibility has to be given to Jose Canseco now.


Canseco is a greedy attention-seeking rat. But his book was probably the best thing for the sport of baseball.


Very true. But that doesn't make his statements any less factual.


That's what I meant. The guy is scum, but it took a rat to improve the sport.

Klydon, I remember when Bonds and every other player was getting busted for steroids, everyone defended A-Rod saying he was pure and a special player. Even saying that steroids would actually hurt his body type rolleyes But he and anyone else who played during the steroid era should have an asterisk just for playing during that time. It's sad.

Not to say A-Rod isn't the best, but Bonds was the best also, before he ballooned up.
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 02:58 PM

that's the kind of news that really makes me mad. not at A-Rod but at everything being the fool innocent fan who loves the game. we are the ones who keep this fuckin' shit going on and what do we get? we get to see those millionaires screw up the only thing that was sacred and fun, the sport of baseball. I hope we can just keep going on and on until the time when this will be just another "era" in the history of the game just like the dead ball era, the hitting-friendly 20's era, the pitcher friendly 60' era and so and so. of course it's a big stain in the history of the game but what can we do?

everybody who played in this era is under suspicion and the only thing that I can think is that Sports Illustrated will release the same boring "breaking news" claiming that Pujols took steroids too when they run out of news between Superbowl and the start of baseball in 2010. the millionaires have screwed up soccer too, which is my favorite sport, and they have screwed up basketball, and the Olympics and music and cinema and even the economy now. and let's face it, they've screwed up baseball too.

what do I care about Bonds' case? he has already stained the record books that we kept through a hundred years, and now we have to try to explain outsiders why the all time HR leader can't find a job one year removed from his record breaking homer.

Bonds isn't the only one, of course, but he's the only one who stained the record books like that. time will say he was the first one. but the fans who love the game and who keep this fuckin' shit going on have to get a scapegoat just to release the anger that these guys bring up, and Bonds is the perfect one. an overall piece of shit who doesn't even care what we think. he's got all the million dollars he'll ever need and he feels like breaking all MLB HR records was just his job. and A-Rod is the next one on the 'hated list'. he's just like all the other players in the steroid era who took steroids but he gets to be hated for being the best one.

that's what I'm saying, we fans need someone to throw our frustration at, and who better than A-Rod? he's the one who fooled us with his 40/40 "skills" at SS, he's the one with a 200 million dollars contract and he's the one who's a choker which contributes a lot to the perception that he's another piece of shit. anyway, I can't wait for baseball!
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 07:24 PM

clap Nice Rant TM. I agree with everything you said, especially the last line. In spite of being pissed at what has happened to this sport:

Originally Posted By: Tony Mosrite
anyway, I can't wait for baseball!


grin
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 07:31 PM

Nice post TM.

I have two words for Alex: A-Hole!

Is that one word or two?
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 07:47 PM

well i kinda saw this coming since every big hitter is found out about steroids (except for sosa lol) one thing for damn sure for the sake of the game make maris the single season home run leader again, and make hank aaron the leading home run leader...and for bonds just make him an side note as well as anybody else who breaks any of these records and caught with steroids in there veins.
Posted By: Don Sicilia

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 08:48 PM

Nice post, TM. Fantasy baseball on my mind when I heard about A-Rod... "Hmmm... No wonder he was the #1 pick for so long..." wink

All kidding aside, this news is a little sad, not because I particularly liked A-Rod, but because I held out some hope that one of these guys will be clean. Nobody is above suspect now. The sucker in me thought it was possible.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 09:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Sicilia
...I held out some hope that one of these guys will be clean. Nobody is above suspect now. The sucker in me thought it was possible.


Jeter is!!!
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 09:21 PM

One guy who I think never did steroids was Jeff Kent, who just retired (best second baseman ever?). He was very public about how he hated people who did steroids because it made it more difficult for him to keep his job. Knowing how outspoken and brutally honest he always is, I tend to believe him. I think it was a big reason why he and Bonds always fought.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 09:25 PM

Another Met who became a Hall of Famer AFTER leaving Queens, a la Nolan Ryan.

Not a nice guy, but a GREAT second baseman.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 09:32 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
One guy who I think never did steroids was Jeff Kent, who just retired (best second baseman ever?).


Slow down cowboy. Best ever? Not even close. wink
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 10:15 PM

Who else?
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 10:15 PM

ryan sandberg is the best 2nd basemman...but kent is on the list though
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 10:31 PM

Code:
  
                    From  To Yrs   G    AB    R    H   2B  3B  HR  RBI  BB   SO    BA   OBP   SLG   SB   CS OPS+ 
Ryne Sandberg       1981-1997 16 2164  8385 1318 2386 403  76 282 1061  761 1260  .285  .344  .452  344 107  114
Jeff Kent           1992-2008 17 2298  8498 1320 2461 560  47 377 1518  801 1522  .290  .356  .500   94  60  122
 
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/08/09 11:53 PM

umm... defensively sandberg is better...kent has him beat in offense lol
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:00 AM

That's why I said it as a question. I'm not saying Kent is the best ever, but it's arguable. With the media East Coast bias I think Kent was usually overlooked, or shrugged off as having a few years better than he should be. If he played for the Yankees his whole career he would be in the talks for best ever, although his personality would have hurt him in New York. He's no Jeter. But since he spent most of his career in the west, he was commonly overlook during the first half of his career, at least.

And sorry if Yankee fans feel like this thread has been hijacked. But we are all baseball fans and talking about stuff like this is what makes the sport great. I hope you agree smile
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:11 AM

First, if you're counting being able to play the position, Kent was a below average fielder at best. Offensively, he is not on the same planet as Rogers Hornsby, who I consider the best ever. Off the top of my head, Sandberg, Joe Morgan, Roberto Alomar, Jackie Robinson, and maybe even Craig Biggio would rank higher than Kent too. I'm sure there are some other players from before 1950 that have better numbers than Kent too.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:19 AM

I found this site which ranks Kent #12. I never heard of the player ranked #1.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:52 AM

i heard of eddie collins idk how though maybe from "Eight Men Out" (great movie) but yea if your not in pinstrips most likely nobody will not recorgonize you...sad to say though since alot of players are overlooked.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:57 AM

JL, why do you say he was "below average" with the glove? I'm not saying he was anywhere near the best with the glove, but definitely not below average. And his offense more than made up for whatever deficiency he had with his defense.

Would you agree he is the best hitting second baseman?

EDIT: to quote that site that ranks him #12 they said this about his defense: "A mediocre defensive player when he came into the league, Kent worked on his fielding and became adequate with the glove at second"
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 01:01 AM

He was definitely below average, especially early in his career. He had zero range, and was terrible turning a DP. And he's not even close to be the best hitting 2B. Look at Hornsby's numbers. He's considered the greatest right handed batter ever at any position.

EDIT: OK, I'll give you "Adequate" later in his career.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 01:13 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
but yea if your not in pinstrips most likely nobody will not recorgonize you


What a crock. Are you referring to just second basemen or any other player in the league not on the Yankees?
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 01:26 AM

well...not second baseman since the only good one i can remember that played was soriono before he got traded (correct me if there was somebody else that played 2nd for the yankees) but yea over the years people will recogonize yankee players over others...i may be wrong though, but i know if you menton mantell alot of people will know that name but if you menton ted williams a few or none will know who that is or what team he even played for. this is what i encounter at times...
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 02:17 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
well...not second baseman since the only good one i can remember that played was soriono before he got traded (correct me if there was somebody else that played 2nd for the yankees) but yea over the years people will recogonize yankee players over others...i may be wrong though, but i know if you menton mantell alot of people will know that name but if you menton ted williams a few or none will know who that is or what team he even played for. this is what i encounter at times...


So your criticizing the Yankees for having some of the greats to play the game be in their uniform? Sure they had the Babe but so did Boston. Yes they had DiMaggio, Mantle, Ford, Munson, Berra, and countless others.

But what about Ken Griffey Jr? Pete Rose? Sandy Koufax? Hank Aaron? Willie Mays? Barry Bonds? Cy Young? I think you see my point. I somewhat understand and agree with what you said (because a lot of the greats have been Yankees) but please don't say that no one else not in a Yankees uniform doesn't get recognized.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 02:24 AM

im not critizing the team or the players (i would though critize the media though)but yea i get your point...actually with mays and koufax (i might be wrong with koufax) played in new york while there teams were still there.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:20 AM

My 2¢ -

Eddie Collins is generally regarded as the best second baseman of all-time. He didn't have the batting average of Hornsby (but only Ty Cobb beat him) BUT he was considered a much better fielder and his .333 average wasn't too shabby.

He was before my time, so I can't add anything personal, but the best second baseman I ever saw was Joe Morgan. Good hit and field and a tough player. Honorable mention goes to Nellie Fox (White Sox of the 50s/early 60s).

There's no doubt in my mind that a decent player on the Yankees gets much more recognition than a decent player on any other team. It's more than just playing in New York City .... Mets players get good national recognition BUT less than Yankees players do. I suppose it has to do with the Yankee "tradition" of having big name stars.

FWIW - Koufax and Mays DID play in NYC at the same time but Koufax was not an effective pitcher when he pitched in Brooklyn. When we had three teams here, the 50s were a magical time in NYC. There would be ongoing, endless arguments over which team had the best centerfielder... Mantle, Mays or Snider. I always felt that Duke Snider was the best at that time and his stats certainly back up my thoughts (at least partially).
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:27 AM

I don't know how I don't know who Eddie Collins was. ohwell
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:30 AM

yea that what i mean, and good thing i got koufax right with being in new york. also too yea i see the duke being the best centerfielder at that time with mayes behind him...mantle would have been behind duke or hell in front of duke if he didnt had that injury.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:40 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
also too yea i see the duke being the best centerfielder at that time with mayes behind him...mantle would have been behind duke or hell in front of duke if he didnt had that injury.


True baseball royalty:

Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:46 AM

the only thing that can compete against that and beat it is the duo of ruth and gerhig...
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:50 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
the only thing that can compete against that and beat it is the duo of ruth and gerhig...


Well, add to the mix Joe DiMaggio.... for one year (1951) he, Mantle, Mays and Snider all played outfield for a New York team. That'll NEVER be matched again!!
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 03:56 AM

okay okay i forgot about might joe...one thing for sure though i wish baseball was like that now...i mean with the players playing just for the heck of it, and not for fame or money.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 04:53 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
okay okay i forgot about might joe...one thing for sure though i wish baseball was like that now...i mean with the players playing just for the heck of it, and not for fame or money.


And that brings this conversation full circle back to A-Rod. If it wasn't for money, he wouldn't have gone to Texas.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 05:17 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
]

And that brings this conversation full circle back to A-Rod. If it wasn't for money, he wouldn't have gone to Texas.


Back then, every one ASSumed he was going to the Mets because he was a Mets fan growing up in NY, and supposedly his dream was to play for them. They even started calling him "Shea-Rod" in Seattle. When Boras started negotiating with the Mets, he asked for: the use of a private jet for road trips, personal office space usually reserved for managers and executives, a personal tent to sell A-Rod merchandise, and more billboard advertising space than crosstown Yankee shortstop Derek Jeter. The Mets ended negotiations right there.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 05:19 AM

lol Good for the Mets. That's ridiculous.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 12:29 PM

I'm a little late to the secondbaseen discussion.

Jeff Kent, like Craig Biggio, sometimes gets overlooked in the greatest at their position arguments. Kent is the only 2B to have: 8 100 RBI seasons, 9 seasons with 60+ extra base hits and a .500 career slugging percentage since Hornsby. He also, of course, hit more homers than any 2B ever to play. While his defensive skills weren't among the elite, he was the most prolific guy at his position. He was overshadowed by Bonds in SF, played on multiple teams and was never well liked by peolple (probably forjust reason), but I think he belongs in the Hall.

That said, the best at that position that I ever saw was Joe Morgan, a big part of the Big Red Machine. His defense was outstanding; he was a great hitter with power, who stole bases with the best of them in the best base stealing era of the game. He had a very good on base % too.

While it is true that playing for the New York teams, particularly the Yankees, generally tends to overrate your talents, there is one Yankee in history that probably doesn't get the credit he deserves, and that's 2B Joe Gordon, who gets lost in the discussion of Yankee greats.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 07:36 PM

A-Rod admits, regrets use of PEDs
ESPN.com

His voice shaking at times, Alex Rodriguez met head-on allegations that he tested positive for steroids six years ago, telling ESPN on Monday that he did take performance-enhancing drugs while playing for the Texas Rangers during a three-year period beginning in 2001.

"When I arrived in Texas in 2001, I felt an enormous amount of pressure. I needed to perform, and perform at a high level every day," Rodriguez told ESPN's Peter Gammons in an interview in Miami Beach, Fla. "Back then, [baseball] was a different culture. It was very loose. I was young, I was stupid, I was naïve. I wanted to prove to everyone I was worth being one of the greatest players of all time.

"I did take a banned substance. For that, I'm very sorry and deeply regretful."

Rodriguez's admission comes 48 hours after Sports Illustrated reported that Rodriguez was on a list of 104 players who tested positive for banned substances in 2003, the year when Major League Baseball conducted survey tests to see if mandatory, random drug-testing was needed in the sport.

Sources who know about the testing results told SI that Rodriguez tested positive for testosterone and Primobolan, an anabolic steroid. In his ESPN interview, Rodriguez said he did not know exactly which substance or substances he had taken. In 2003, there were no penalties for a positive result.

"I am sorry for my Texas years," the New York Yankees third baseman said. "I apologize to the fans of Texas."

Rodriguez, who joined the Yankees for the 2004 season after a trade from Texas, said "all my years in New York have been clean." He also said it felt good to be honest about what he's done in the past.

"The more honest we can all be, the quicker we can get baseball [back] to where it needs to be," he said.

Rodriguez said he was told by Gene Orza, the chief operating officer of the MLB Players' Association, that he might, or might not, have tested positive in the 2003 survey. A source told ESPN on Saturday that Rodriguez knew he had failed the test.

"I had never heard anything since," he said. "Whatever I was experimenting with in Texas might have been OK."

Rodriguez also said of his 2007 interview with Katie Couric on "60 Minutes," when he denied ever using steroids, that "at the time, I wasn't being truthful with myself. How could I be truthful with Katie Couric or CBS?"
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 09:52 PM

well at least he admitted it unlike bonds, but still though he should get suspended as others in the report last year had the book thrown at them.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 10:07 PM

There were no mandatory suspensions for steroid use back then.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 10:26 PM

damn it...well idk he may have leaned his lesson or will learn his lesson when the media and public judge him...i just cant stand anybody that cheats it just ruins the game, and i also hate it that peolpe think that players should take steroids just to make the game more entertaining.
Posted By: Mignon

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/09/09 10:29 PM

Take some of his and others millions away from them when they get popped on a drug test and they will learn real quick.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 01:52 AM

now that would be great right there dont fine them 10,000 or 100,000 since its junk change to them, and also too i guess there is 103 names that were found with steroids in 2003...its not said if there going to release the names or not.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 02:05 PM

As someone pointed out, at least he has admitted it. That doesn't diminish what he did, or lessen the guilt of the 103 others.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 02:50 PM

I hope they don't release the names of the other offenders, and it was actually unfair to release A-Rod's name (are the tabloids calling him A-Roid yet?). There was a negotiated agreement through the labor union that the tests would be anonymous and destroyed, and would be used to survey the scope of steroid use. Otherwise, the union would not have consented to this study. I understand that the federal government subpoenaed the tests, but the tests should not have been there to be subpoenaed.

Anyway, A-Rod admitted to three years of steroid use. I don't know whether he used it before or after the periods, to which he is admitting, but I'm not going to waste a lot of time thinking about it. His numbers in the end will be shrouded in mystery and doubt, like some of his colleagues.

What is curious is his response to Gammons' question of whether the steroid use improved his performance. A-Rod gave a vague answer, but he had to perceive a quantifiable enhancement in performance because he used it for three years, knowing that his reputation would take a big hit if it was revealed. He also knew that the use of the substance posed a health risk. Why would he or anyone run these risks for years if the substance's benefits were dubious?

I had to chuckle when he was explaining his use because of the heat in Texas. Maybe superstars are more susceptible to heat stroke than the rest of us.

Also, Derek Jeter is looking better and better. I remember A-Rod's Esquire article about 10 years ago that was dripping with jealousy and bitterness over the success and popularity of #2, and this is just another reason why he isn't as beloved as the Yankee captain.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 03:16 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Also, Derek Jeter is looking better and better. I remember A-Rod's Esquire article about 10 years ago that was dripping with jealousy and bitterness over the success and popularity of #2, and this is just another reason why he isn't as beloved as the Yankee captain.


Derek Jeter? Who is he?? whistle

Well, this certainly has taken the headlines away from Torre and his book!!! And, yes, I've seen A-Roid in a few headlines. This was my personal favorite:

With steroids revelation, Rodriguez goes from A-Fraud to A-Roid
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 03:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
As someone pointed out, at least he has admitted it.


Yes, he did. I'll give him that. But he really had no choice, did he? I mean, they had him dead to rights on this thing.

I thought the NY tabloids would have been a little kinder to him today for his admission, but they're killing him again. And they're absolutely right in doing so.

Pressure to be the best?

Boo-fucking-hoo. When you're the highest paid player in the land and your agent turns makes it clear that wherever you go, you're bigger than the team, you better fucking deal with it.

It's too hot in Texas? Good catch, Klyd! It's no hotter than Mexico or Africa, countries that produce long distance marathon winners year after year. Nolan Ryan was from Texas wasn't he? Jeez, so many great players came out of Texas, those remarks are just RIDICULOUS.

The Yanks don't need this. The last thing they want is to have anything take away from their history making opening day at the new stadium this year. All of the Yankee greats will be there. Picture them all standing on the third base line. A great day. Yogi's there. All of them are there. And the great Yankees who have left this planet are all there in spirtit.

Then there's A-Rod. Fans holding signs that say CHEAT. LIAR. A-FRAUD. A-ROID. A-HOLE. And on and on and on. I actually feel like his presence is going to diminish that great day.

As for his records and the Hall of Fame? Hey, no Pete rose, no Barry Bonds, no Mark McGuire, no Raphael Palmeiro . . . sorry, no A-Rod.

Believing this guy might have been this good without cheating and then finding out he's a fraud is tantamount to finding out that Babe Ruth corked his bat. I feel like a jerk, because although I'm not a Yankee fan, as a baseball fan it was nice to think that there were at least a couple of guys who hit all those home runs legitimately over the last ten years or so.

When I think of this era, the only unscathed home run hitters I can think of are probably Jeff Kent and Mike Piazza, and their numbers were nowhere near any of these guys.

But at least they were legit.
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 03:32 PM

They broke the games and the fans trust once again, but what else is new? It is all good, if 103 of them were doing it right?
WE will just keep that to ourselves right....

It is getting to be a way of life in the world. Just look around and see why everything is crashing down around us.
No one has any trust in anything or anyone. People almost expect to hear about another screwing every time they turn on that new big screen TV. There are no standards to be upheld.

Don't worry about pretty boy A-rod. He already has his $$$ and that shame he is showing to the public right now will wash off in the next shower he takes with some Barbie Doll Babe.

Nothing will ever happen to him that really matters. The storm will blow over and life will go on. His lifestyle will not change and his fans will make some lame excuse or lame comment that makes it all seem unimportant.

The only words you will see or hear are from people who get paid to fill the pages or fill the hours of their papers or programs up. They will beat it to death until you are sick of hearing it, and then it will mean nothing to anyone. Because that what we do time and time again.

Is that A-rod having a couple of drinks with Pete Rose over there?...
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/10/09 04:13 PM

that's EXACTLY the feeling that I get. exactly the words you said in your 2nd paragraph. thank God I've been able to "forget" this. fuck A-Rod. SI.com has gone from 'favorite website' to 'don't even check in there' because there aren't any news about baseball anymore.

now, who are the guys that are supposed to be clean? I want somebody to like!
I've heard about Kent and Piazza, and I believe Curt Schilling is clean too. he has always been one of my favorite players and I just found a quote from him that said something like "I can't slap my teammates in their butts after they had a great game because it hurts them. That's where they stick in the needles with steroids."

either he's the biggest liar in the world or he's really clean. I've heard about Ken Griffey Jr. and Frank Thomas too. it seems that the best players now will be those who had big injuries and real bad off-years so we know they didn't take PEDs. it's really sad. Pete Rose looks better and better as time goes on.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/11/09 07:57 PM

Sour grapes




Sabathia saddled with an aging zoo

You can't help but wonder what CC Sabathia thinks of all this. He knew he was signing with a corporate bully, tossing money into the air like confetti, but he had no idea the Yankees' so-called Bronx Zoo would escalate into full-scale chaos so quickly.

For one thing, the Yankees' so-called powerhouse is hardly that. This is an old and terribly vulnerable team, starting with Derek Jeter, who turns 35 this summer and continues a gradual decline so evident, the stat guys are calling him the worst defensive shortstop in the American League.

The aging catcher, Jorge Posada, is trying to recover from shoulder surgery. So is Mariano Rivera, the storied but 39-year-old closer. Hideki Matsui is coming off his second major knee surgery in two years. Center field, the position with all that Yankees history, has become a grim struggle between Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner.

Nobody knows what to expect from Johnny Damon, Nick Swisher or Robinson Cano - or, for that matter, A.J. Burnett and Andy Pettitte in the rotation. There's no help coming from a farm system that hasn't produced an impact position player since Jeter - 14 years ago. Alex Rodriguez, who has a rather fragile psyche anyway, will find that curiosity and skepticism accompany his every at-bat, now that 156 of his career home runs are officially tarnished.

It's a good thing the Yanks picked up Sabathia and Mark Teixeira for $28.2 billion, or whatever it was, because this is one flawed outfit. And that's just on the field. The A-Rod circus and the residue of Joe Torre's book should make for some really fun times around the clubhouse, and that's a situation Joe Girardi, a manager who likes things nice and simple, won't be able to handle.

And to think, Sabathia's life would have been so much simpler if he'd signed with the Giants. Don't give me this nonsense about "he had to do it" because of the money. He was either going to be an insanely rich Yankee or a ridiculously rich Giant. There are athletes who know the difference, who have settled for less in the name of lifestyle and common sense. CC just might wish he'd joined them.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/11/09 08:08 PM

Wow. I didn't realize Jeter was 35 already. Damn. Time goes by so fast.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/11/09 10:32 PM

you know i like the idea of pete rose being inducted in the hall then any of these damn cheaters...
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 01:24 AM

I heard a local radio talk show host say an interesting thing about Pete Rose. He said he thinks Rose deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, but because he is such a jerk, he should be inducted the year after he dies so that he doesn't get any of the fame, or make money from it. Not sure I agree with it, but I can see him going into the Hall of Fame after he dies.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 02:23 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
I heard a local radio talk show host say an interesting thing about Pete Rose. He said he thinks Rose deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, but because he is such a jerk, he should be inducted the year after he dies so that he doesn't get any of the fame, or make money from it. Not sure I agree with it, but I can see him going into the Hall of Fame after he dies.


Every July during inductions, Pete Rose would spend the weekend in Cooperstown. Induction weekend in Cooperstown finds many of the Hall of Famers making appearances to sell merchandise and autographs. Rose has - at least he did during the 90s- his own Hall in Cooperstown, and the lines for him were always the longest. His popularity infuriated Johnny Bench and Bob Feller. Mike Scmidt and Reggie Jackson have been Rose's best advocates in the HoF, but if his induction were left to the members of the HoF, it is safe to say he would never get in, nor would many others.

I had Pete Rose sign a photo for me and my sons about 8 years ago. He would love to put HoF at the end of his signature, but for now settles with adding "4256." I would like to see him inducted even though what he did was a baseball mortal sin.

Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 03:14 AM

so, betting on the game and throwing games is considered a mortal sin then what does HGH and steroids consider as?
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 04:27 AM

That's the tricky part for Rose. What he did was a "mortal sin" as a manager. I've heard that one of the rules for HoF voters is character and what the person has done to improve the image of the sport, so I understand why he's not in the Hall now. But as a player he was one of the greatest hitters and played as hard as anybody. It's sad to think that if he had just retired instead of becoming a manager, then he'd probably be in the the HoF.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 02:05 PM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
so, betting on the game and throwing games is considered a mortal sin then what does HGH and steroids consider as?


A serious blow to the sport, but not to the extent of players and coaches betting on and fixing games.

Also, I don't want to suggest that Rose fixed games. But for a manager to bet on baseball, especially a game, in which his own team is playing, is shockingly reprehensible. Gambling is the only thing that came close to destroying professional baseball.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 02:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
But as a player he was one of the greatest hitters and played as hard as anybody. It's sad to think that if he had just retired instead of becoming a manager, then he'd probably be in the the HoF.


Rose is the only player I've ever seen, for whom I can't find a comparison. For all the other greats there are easy comparisons: Clemens and Randy Johnson; Gwynn and Carew;Brett and Boggs; Carlton and Seaver.

But Rose stood apart. He played many games at three infield positions and the corner outfield spots. He played everything to the max regardless of the time of year or score of the game, and he was unbelievably clutch. If he were reinstated and elected to the Hall, I'd certainly be there to see it.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/12/09 11:29 PM

Joba: Yankees are AL East's best

Joba Chamberlain thinks the team to beat in the AL East this season is the Yankees, though that should come as no surprise. "We're always the team to beat, and we have that in our minds from the get-go," Chamberlain said yesterday. "With the year the Rays had, people are going to look at it that they're the team to beat. But . . . we're always going to be the hunted just because of who we are and . . . we always go with the mindset that we are the best and that's the way you have to play."

Source: Fan Nation
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/13/09 12:07 AM

there far from the best in the east...i still see tampa bay as the lead as well as red sox...out of all the teams in the AL i would consider red sox at the top. also i found this on cnn regarding bud selig and his reaction to a-roid.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/12/A-rod.steroids/index.html

Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/13/09 02:59 AM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
But as a player he was one of the greatest hitters and played as hard as anybody. It's sad to think that if he had just retired instead of becoming a manager, then he'd probably be in the the HoF.


Rose is the only player I've ever seen, for whom I can't find a comparison. For all the other greats there are easy comparisons: Clemens and Randy Johnson; Gwynn and Carew;Brett and Boggs; Carlton and Seaver.

But Rose stood apart. He played many games at three infield positions and the corner outfield spots. He played everything to the max regardless of the time of year or score of the game, and he was unbelievably clutch. If he were reinstated and elected to the Hall, I'd certainly be there to see it.


Too bad his judgement wasn't on par with his baseball performance. Great baseball players are often times not so great at managing their personal lives.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/13/09 03:11 AM

is there even anybody who personal life screwed up there professional play (without those who used steroids)
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/17/09 07:31 PM

The local tv stations carried ARod's news conference live (it just finished). I missed the beginning of it, but from what I saw, it appeared he answered all the questions honestly.

He was asked if the Texas years' stats should stand (the years in which he admitted steroid use) and his answer was that it wasn't up to him to decide. He was quick to point out that his best years (when he was very young and 2007) were done without steroid use.

He just wants to put this all behind him and wants to get on with his career and life.

Dunno if he won over any fans, but at least he spoke his mind.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/17/09 08:45 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
The local tv stations carried ARod's news conference live (it just finished). I missed the beginning of it, but from what I saw, it appeared he answered all the questions honestly.

He was asked if the Texas years' stats should stand (the years in which he admitted steroid use) and his answer was that it wasn't up to him to decide. He was quick to point out that his best years (when he was very young and 2007) were done without steroid use.

He just wants to put this all behind him and wants to get on with his career and life.

Dunno if he won over any fans, but at least he spoke his mind.


Time will probably soften the impact of it. I wasn't buying the "young and stupid" lines though. By his own admission his steroid use lasted for three seasons - who knows if it was longer. This was a systematic, conscious, ongoing decision that he undertook. Also, probably more than any other player in the game, he had access to physicians, trainers and professionals around the clock. He had a strict exercise and dietary regiment, so it is incredible that he would inject himself with the "supplements" that he would get with his "cousin" and not know what was in it. I think he was disengenuous, but I don't know if I care that much any more. I think he got some advice from a team of publicists

I think, however, that when his career ends, there will be a cloud of doubt over his place in history. Jamie Moyer and Roy Oswalt ripped his credibility.
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/18/09 02:58 PM

I think he hurt himself more than he helped himself yesterday. The media (at least the New York tabloids) will NOT let up on him. They're killing him again today.

Of all the boneheaded mistakes A-Hole has made over the years in terms of public relations, and he's made TONS, here's the biggest: In calling that writer from Sports Illustrated a stalker, he attacked one of "their own." Their own, of course, being the media. As much as the media collectively grates on me at times, you have to give them this: They stick together. And I respect the Hell out of them for it. I guess it's my Union mentality, but it's refreshing to see that some people still stick by each other on the job today. Like they've been saying for five hundred years: The pen is mightier than the sword.

As far as A-Hole. He's almost 34 years old and he still doesn't get it, which, let's face it, means he's never gonna get it. The guy might still go down as the most talented player ever, but he's still an asshole. His neediness is off-putting, and his life choices are just too much to deal with, especially in the biggest media market in the world.

What a putz.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/18/09 10:45 PM

well as of right now a-rod has more creadbilty over bonds and big mac combined...i really hope he isnt lying...but if he is and its found out that he been doing this longer then he should forever have an * near his stats/records.
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/18/09 11:35 PM

and why would you believe him? I'm surprised that someone can believe he only took steroids during that span in Texas.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/18/09 11:45 PM

Ok guys, this is totally not a gag. I haven't checked my voicemail on my cell phone in a few days. I checked today coming home from work and I had 3 voicemails. They were all from Talent Plus (a human resources consulting firm) who were calling on behalf of the New York Yankees. A little while ago I had applied for a position with the Yankees entitled Guest Relations Ambassador. Below is a brief description of the position:

This position is responsible for anticipating needs of guests and executing all requests in a timely fashion. Primary outcomes will include creating an environment and executing service that is second to none, seeking opportunities to create memories by anticipating needs, exceeding expectations and building relationships.

Knowledge/Skills:
 Customer and Personal Service — Knowledge of principles and processes for providing customer and personal services. This includes customer needs assessment, meeting quality standards for services, and evaluation of customer satisfaction.
 Public Safety and Security — Knowledge of relevant equipment, policies, procedures, and strategies to promote effective local, state, or national security operations for the protection of people, data, property, and institutions.
 Active Listening — Giving full attention to what other people are saying, taking time to understand the points being made, asking questions as appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times.
 Coordination — Adjusting actions in relation to others' actions.
 Social Perceptiveness — Being aware of others' reactions and understanding why they react as they do.
 Critical Thinking — Using logic and reasoning to identify the strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions or approaches to problems.
 Service Orientation — Actively looking for ways to help people.

Talents:
 Dependability — Job requires being reliable, responsible, and dependable, and fulfilling obligations.
 Concern for Others — Job requires being sensitive to others' needs and feelings and being understanding and helpful on the job.
 Integrity — Job requires being honest and ethical.
 Attention to Detail — Job requires being careful about detail and thorough in completing work tasks.
 Independence — Job requires developing one's own ways of doing things, guiding oneself with little or no supervision, and depending on oneself to get things done.
 Social Orientation — Job requires preferring to work with others rather than alone, and being personally connected with others on the job.
 Adaptability/Flexibility — Job requires being open to change (positive or negative) and to considerable variety in the workplace.
 Initiative — Job requires a willingness to take on responsibilities and challenges.

Deliverables:
 The ability to tell when something is wrong or is likely to go wrong and providing assistance.
 The ability to apply general rules to specific problems to produce answers that make sense.
 Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations.
 Monitor activities to ensure adherence to rules and safety procedures, or arrange for the removal of unruly patrons.
 Keep informed of shut-down and emergency evacuation procedures.
 Announce or describe ballpark attractions to patrons to encourage customers to participate in games and other entertainment.
 Working directly with the public. This includes serving customers inside and outside of the ballpark and receiving clients or guests.
 Providing personal assistance, medical attention, emotional support, or other personal care to others.

It's just a phone interview but if I do well on it, hopefully it'll work its way into a live interview. I don't know if anyone here is the praying kind but if you are, I would definitely appreciate any and all prayers/positive thoughts. As I'm sure many of you can attest to, working for the New York Yankees would be an absolutely DREAM JOB to me. Unfortunately, the position is only seasonal but if I can get my foot into the door with the Yankees, I'll take it!
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 12:11 AM

Hey, they hired George Costanza, so obviously they don't set the bar very high.

Just kidding. Good luck, son.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 12:45 AM

Thanks man. I've got my fingers crossed!
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 12:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
As I'm sure many of you can attest to, working for the New York Yankees would be an absolutely DREAM JOB to me. Unfortunately, the position is only seasonal but if I can get my foot into the door with the Yankees, I'll take it!


Isn't that what ARod said four years ago?

Good luck.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 02:38 AM

Thanks SC. I'll keep you posted when I hear something back. The interview isn't until next Wednesday.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 02:44 AM

Good luck, Irish. I hope you get it. I know you'd love the job and bring a lot of enthusiasm to it.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 03:01 AM

Thanks klydon1. I REALLY hope I get it.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 03:40 AM

well i wont be surprised if he been doing it longer then what he is saying...idk though a-rod isn't with a good bunch of people since alot of his former teammates in the yanks took steroids...and idk was pudge in texas while a-rod was there?
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 01:25 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
A little while ago I had applied for a position with the Yankees entitled Guest Relations Ambassador.


Sounds Great Irish! Good Luck. The best part of being an usher in the new place will be that you can see all the games for free. AND of course you will let everyone here wet their beaks a bit and get good seats at no cost to us! grin
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 03:04 PM

Irish, I wish you the best of luck. And I will offer one rosary in exchange for Derek Jeter's autograph!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 03:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Irish, I wish you the best of luck. And I will offer one rosary in exchange for Derek Jeter's autograph!


LoL. I'll see what I can't do.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 05:17 PM

Jeter, by the way, has the ability always to say and do the right thing at the right time. His responses to the A-Rod situation neither excused or alienated A-Rod, but at the same time were substantive and avoided the meaningless cliches. He was adamant that people not judge the entire era as the Steroid Era, and maintained that most players have been performing without performance enhancing drugs. Jeter and A-Rod are a lot like Kennedy and Nixon. One exudes and inspires confidence and optimism, and the other can't seem to escape a dark cloud of doubt and scandal.

Damon, while a nice and interesting guy, gave me my laugh for the day when he said what A-Rod did wasn't the worst thing he could do. when asked what was worse, he seriously replied, "Murdering someone." I'm sure he's getting a lot of clubhouse ribbing for that line.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 07:29 PM

This is an old and terribly vulnerable team, starting with Derek Jeter, who turns 35 this summer and continues a gradual decline so evident, the stat guys are calling him the worst defensive shortstop in the American League.

I am so sick of hearing crap like this. The man has always acted with class, given 100% to this sport and his team, and plays his heart out at every game. Sour grapes indeed.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 09:33 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Derek Jeter, who turns 35 this summer and continues a gradual decline so evident, the stat guys are calling him the worst defensive shortstop in the American League.


We should all be so lucky to have such a gradual decline.

I agree with you, SB, that the criticism gets tiring. There was a time when I thought that he didn't deserve the praise he gets, but what he has given to that team can't be defined by numbers - and the numbers are pretty darn good.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/19/09 11:02 PM

out of everybody on the current yankees i have respect for him...he loves the game which is rare to find since like i said before players want the green in there pocket.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/20/09 04:10 PM

I saw that Bernie Williams is working out with the team in Tampa. He's going to play in the WBC. Glad to see him with the Yankees again, even if it's short-lived. I hope that they offer him some sort of coaching position.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/20/09 10:08 PM

i thought he retired?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/21/09 01:01 AM

Not by choice - nobody offered him a contract!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/21/09 01:53 AM

Wow, pretty scary stuff




Damon, Nady affected by scandal

TAMPA, Fla. -- Yankees outfielders Johnny Damon and Xavier Nady are reportedly among those affected by the continuing Stanford Financial Group scandal.

Damon and Nady told FOXSports.com on Friday that their finances have been frozen because of money they have with a Stanford company, including them in the alleged $8 billion fraud scheme involving billionaire financier Robert Allen Stanford.

"I can't pay bills right now," Damon told the site. "That started on Tuesday. I had to pay a trainer for working out during the offseason. I told him, 'Just hold on for a little bit, and hopefully, all this stuff gets resolved.'"

On Monday, the Securities and Exchange Commission froze all assets of Stanford International Bank, Stanford Group Co. and Stanford Capital Management.

"I'm affected in some ways; I have the same [advisor] as Johnny," Nady said. "He said I didn't have money with Stanford [investments]. But all my credit-card accounts are frozen right now because of that situation. I'm trying to get an apartment in New York. I can't put a credit card down to hold it."

Agent Scott Boras, who represents both players, told FOXSports.com that his clients have no reason to worry about losing money. Damon is due $13 million this year from the Yankees, while Nady is set to earn $6.55 million.

"Our personal-management auditors have looked into the financial elements of it," Boras said. "None of our clients is in any financial jeopardy."

Both Damon and Nady were told by their financial advisors that the matter could be resolved within a few days, according to the report.

Asked by FOXSports.com if the situation makes him nervous, Damon said it does.

"I'm not sure if the banks we owe mortgages would understand our money's frozen, start putting penalties on stuff," Damon said. "The whole financial world is all messed up right now. Hopefully, they will go on a case-by-case basis. I'm not sure the mortgage is going to be paid this month. But hopefully, it's only a couple of days."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: Joker

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/21/09 02:46 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Derek Jeter, who turns 35 this summer and continues a gradual decline so evident, the stat guys are calling him the worst defensive shortstop in the American League.


We should all be so lucky to have such a gradual decline.

I agree with you, SB, that the criticism gets tiring. There was a time when I thought that he didn't deserve the praise he gets, but what he has given to that team can't be defined by numbers - and the numbers are pretty darn good.


He has more heart than any yankee ive seen in my 14 years watching the team. His range has fell off i agree but there isnt anyone right now id rather have at shortstop, his timely hitting and effort are unmatched.

I only wonder how much longer #2 can stay at short. The posistion is very demanding and over time can take a toll. I think he would be well suited to play centerfield or second in 3 years or so.
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/23/09 10:20 PM

i wont be surprised with the state of the yankees with steroids and all that he would retire u know...i mean really he has to be fucking tired of his team mates being caught and maybe reflecting a bad image on him and the team.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/24/09 01:58 AM

I think this was a great idea. Especially after that whole A-Rod/steroid distraction.




Yankees ditch bats for pool cues

TAMPA, Fla. -- Joe Girardi was about 10 years old when billiards taught him an important lesson in controlling his temper. Throwing a pool cue into a piece of drywall did not produce favorable results once Dad found out.

Three decades later and a long way from that Illinois basement, Girardi used 8-ball for another purpose. The Yankees manager called off a team workout and organized a field trip to a local billiards hall Monday, part of an exercise to help his club build relationships.

"I've never been on a team that's done something like this before, but I often wondered why," Girardi said. "There's a lot of other sports that do these types of things. We can get away from the park and enjoy each other off the field and get to know each other."

After veterans like Derek Jeter and Jorge Posada signed off on the idea last week, Girardi announced the news early Monday morning, addressing players after they completed workouts in the batting cages, bullpen and weight room.

With smiles circling the room, players were told to change back into their street clothes and board the buses waiting beyond the left-field fence at George M. Steinbrenner Field, which remained shuttered for the afternoon.

"It's all about really getting together," Posada said. "If I was a young man coming on this trip, it's something that you don't see often. You can hang out with the veterans and be away from the field.

"Hopefully, we start some relationships here and get going. We've got a lot of young guys, and we need to be on the same page. I think this is going to help us."

Instead of fielding drills and live batting practice, Girardi sent his players into a two-on-two tournament -- the "Annual World Championship of Pool," the scoresheet announced -- with players chalking their sticks for a NCAA-style bracket.

"Today is one of those days that, as a ballplayer, you'll never forget," Johnny Damon said. "I don't think any team has ever really done this. It says a lot about Joe. He knows we've been working hard and he rewarded us."

Mariano Rivera was the afternoon's big champion, winning twice -- once with Phil Coke and once with Andy Pettitte. The pairing of Rivera and Pettitte defeated the tandem of Nick Swisher and Hideki Matsui in the final tournament.

"It looked like [Rivera] was pretty good -- he definitely had that closer mentality, even playing pool," Damon said.

Girardi and the club's coaches were to remain separate, competing in their own tournament. The winners of the players tournament were rewarded with restaurant gift certificates, and other members of the team played cards, darts and dominos before lunch.

"It makes you relax and realize that we can have fun off the field," said Mark Teixeira, who said it was the most fun day of Spring Training in his career. "Once we get on the field, it's business, but we can build some relationships as well.

"Usually during the season, you get to hang out with guys, because we're always on the same bus or the same plane -- our schedules are identical. In Spring Training, you don't go on trips together, the pitchers have different schedules than the hitters and the hitters are in different groups, so there might be a couple guys you don't get to know at all."

The idea hit Girardi in the early days of Spring Training, realizing that camp runs longer this year because of the World Baseball Classic and a day of respite might be welcome before exhibition games begin.

It would also be a good way for Girardi to better familiarize himself with the team.

"I think every year you're here as a manager, you want to have more knowledge about your players and their personalities," Girardi said. "You want to feel closer to your players. You want to bring a group together. It's important that a group is united when they leave Spring Training."

Looking for an event that could not be impacted by weather, Girardi originally considered renting out a bowling alley, but the idea of having his pitchers whipping 12-pound balls down the lanes dissuaded him.

The Yankees found a billiard hall that could accommodate a large group, and Girardi told the Yankees to book it for a few hours. The tournament was expected to last about 2 1/2 hours -- until lunch -- but Girardi acknowledged it might take longer, with no real pool sharks known to be on the roster.

One by one, the 64 players in camp walked through the concrete corridors, many of them grinning at the unexpected twist to their day. Swisher cranked Bobby McFerrin's "Don't Worry, Be Happy" on his portable iPod player, CC Sabathia chuckled and Teixeira waved goodbye to reporters, saying, "Field trip!"

It has been a spring of some distraction for the Yankees, highlighted by Alex Rodriguez's 33-minute news conference on Tuesday to address his past use of performance-enhancing drugs. That event, held at Steinbrenner Field, was attended by more than 150 media members and many of Rodriguez's teammates.

With that and other news items sometimes obscuring actual baseball, Posada said that there would be no negative to stepping away for one afternoon and enjoying the day. The Yankees will go through a full workout on Tuesday before beginning exhibition games on Wednesday against the Blue Jays at 1:05 p.m. ET in Dunedin, Fla.

"I think it's a matter of understanding where Joe is coming from," Posada said. "We want to have a fun camp. When it's time to play, it's serious. But when it's time to have fun like this, we're going to have fun together."

Source: Yankees
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/24/09 03:18 AM

that will help relations...lets see how much it will help though.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/24/09 02:35 PM

Derek Jeter, Poor Defender: Myth or Fact?

For reasons beyond my understanding it has become popular throughout baseball’s modern statistical community to question the fielding abilities of the New York Yankees’ perennial All-Star and three-time Gold Glove winner (2004-06) Derek Jeter.

In early 2008 the New York Post ran an article entitled “Study Claims Jeter Is Worst Fielding Shortstop In Baseball.” The article cited a study by the University of Pennsylvania which was unveiled at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in (get this) Boston. In November of 2008 the Post ran yet another article about Jeter’s fielding abilities. This time a panel of so-called experts, including Red Sox Executive Bill James, voted Jeter 22nd among Big League shortstops. James himself referred to Jeter as “the least effective defensive player in the major leagues, at any position.”

James pointed to a Baseball Info Solutions’ (BIS) study of film as his reasoning for Jeter’s questionable ranking saying, “they [BIS] watched film of every major-league game, and had recorded every ball off the bat by the direction in which it was hit, the type of hit and how hard the ball was hit. They analyzed the outcomes to determine who was best at turning hit balls into outs.”

As I became ever more curious about Jeter’s somewhat surprising defensive short-comings I decided to do some number crunching of my own. I decided to pick apart the box scores to determine what impact, positive or negative, Jeter’s fielding abilities had on the Yankees over the years. I looked at games in which Jeter had made an error and determined (from the play-by-play accounts) whether that error led to the Yankees’ opponents scoring a run(s) and/or winning the game. I then weighed the cost of his errors against the positives of his hitting in those games.

For his career Derek Jeter’s errors break down like this (with DPT being double plays turned):

Year Errors Runs on E DPT Batting
1995 2 1 2 2-7 RBI
1996 22 18 10 17-67 2 HR, 13 RBI, 16 R
1997 18 14 12 15-73 3 HR, 17 RBI, 13 R
1998 9 1 10 23-48 2 HR, 6 RBI, 13 R
1999 14 9 9 20-58 3 HR, 11 RBI, 10 R
2000 24 10 10 33-92 3 HR, 11 RBI, 22 R
2001 15 9 6 14-58 2 HR, 11 RBI, 10 R
2002 14 9 3 16-56 3 HR, 7 RBI, 11 R
2003 14 8 7 21-60 HR, 11 RBI, 14 R
2004 13 6 5 9-52 HR, 5 RBI, 4 R
2005 15 8 10 21-59 2 HR, 4 RBI, 9 R
2006 15 7 10 19-64 3 HR, 15 RBI, 7 R
2007 18 14 11 16-60 HR, 7 RBI, 7 R
2008 12 10 10 16-50 3 RBI, 5 R
Total 205 114 115 .301, 26 HR, 121 RBI, 141 R

Out of the 192 games in which Jeter has committed an error he cost his team a victory in exactly 10 of those games.

Two of those games came in 1996 (7/18 and 9/3), three in 1997 (5/5, 5/9, 5/27), one in 1999 (8/19), one in 2000 (6/27), one in 2007 (6/2) and two last season (5/20 and 7/3). The Yankees not only made the playoffs but won the World Series in 1996, 1999 and 2000, so we can assume that those errors are forgiven and forgotten. The Bronx Bombers missed the playoffs by two games in 2007 and six games in 2008. Despite costing his team these games, Jeter did not single-handedly keep the Yankees from playing in October.

However, the 1997 season is a different story. That summer stands out as Jeter cost his team three contests during a season in which the Yanks missed the post season by only two games.

On May 5th, 1997 Jeter booted a ball in the ninth inning allowing the Minnesota Twins to take a 9-5 lead heading into the bottom of the frame. Doing all that he could to make amends Jeter belted a 3-run homer in the bottom of the 9th but it wasn’t enough as the Yanks lost by one, 9-8. Four days later against Kansas City Jeter’s batting heroics would be overshadowed again. After belting a 2-run homer in the seventh inning to give the home squad a 5-3 lead Jeff Nelson gave up a game-tying homer in the eighth. Finally, in the top of the 12th Jeter committed the error which would cost the Yankees the game as they lost 7-5.

Then, on the 27th of May a Jeter error opened the floodgates on a 5-run Baltimore fifth inning from which the Yankees could not recover. Jeter’s errors cost his team those three games, but it should be noted that all of them occurred in May and, no matter what anyone may say; pennant races are not won and lost in May.

Regardless of the conclusions of any individual study, scientific or otherwise, there is no question that Derek Jeter is nothing less than a solid defender. For anyone to even infer that he may be the worst fielder in all of baseball is simply ridiculous. Truth be told, the current version of Derek Jeter is flashing better leather than the 23-year-old kid who made those costly errors in 1997.

In 2008 Jeter made fewer errors than all but one American League shortstop (Gold Glove winner Michael Young). Yuniesky Betancourt made 21 errors and swung a very average stick. I have yet to see one article proclaiming Betancourt the “least effective” defensive player in the game. Perhaps that’s because articles and studies about Yuniesky Betancourt are about as interesting as an Andy Warhol flick. Derek Jeter’s celebrity is enormous. I can’t think of another shortstop in the big leagues that makes commercials and dates movie stars. Is there a better way to get people talking about your study or newspaper article than to discount the abilities of one of the most recognizable athletes on the planet?

There are plenty of questionable fielders in the big leagues who hold down jobs because they swing a big stick. Ryan Howard made 19 errors at first base last season (tied for the most at that position in the NL since 2001). Clearly this is overlooked when you can drive in 146 runs and lead your team to the playoffs. Hanley Ramirez led the Majors in errors by a shortstop last season (22) and is averaging 24 mishaps per year since 2006. However, when you average 26 home runs, 69 runs batted in, 123 runs scored and 45 stolen bases over that same stretch your errors tend to be overlooked.

Mike Piazza, Jeff Kent and Manny Ramirez have been considered butchers at their positions for years. Still, they all managed to keep their jobs just long enough to produce Hall of Fame careers. Perhaps it had something to do with two factors. First, their perception of bad fielding was always much worse than the reality and second, these guys could flat-out hit. Great offense will always make up for a player’s defensive shortcomings. Players such as the few mentioned above will always have a job whether they can field or not because their offensive run production will forever outweigh the many runs they give up during a poor defensive moment. I don’t care if every computer on the planet says Derek Jeter can’t field a lick; it won’t matter in the least because the man can flat out hit.

In fact, I’ll even go as far to say that fielding a superb defensive player who can’t hit is much more detrimental to a team. Case-in-point: Mark Belanger. Now, I know what you’re thinking. Yes, those Orioles teams he and Brooks Robinson anchored defensively were very successful during the 1970s. Four World Series trips in a decade is nothing to sneeze at. However, when you come away with only one title you have to wonder if Baltimore would have been better off having a player who hit higher than .164 with one extra base hit in their 22 Series games.

Belanger (an 8-time Gold Glove winner) also committed 5 errors and turned only 7 double plays in his World Series visits. In 32 Series games Derek Jeter and his minimally effective glove committed only 3 errors while turning 17 double plays. For good measure Jeter hit .308 in those 32 contests while belting 3 homers, driving in 8 and scoring 27 times.

The point is, unless you want to sound like you have been smoking the finest opium China has to offer, no one should refer to Derek Jeter as the worst at anything baseball related. His accolades speak for themselves. My guess is Derek Jeter could probably care less what Bill James or the University of Pennsylvania has to say about his defense. In all honesty, what do you think Bill James and the Boston Red Sox would rather do on a daily basis, platoon Julio Lugo, Jed Lowrie and Alex Cora or pencil in Derek Sanderson Jeter on the lineup card?

Source: Dugout Central
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 03:59 PM

Well to give everyone a quick update, I had my phone interview today with Talent Plus. They said it'd take about a hour but it wound up being 45 minutes. It was an unusual interview for me because she said it was structured and she'd be asking me a series of questions that I couldn't ask her the meaning of. I just needed to best decide for myself what each question meant and answered it to the best of my ability.

But again, overall I think it went well. I made her laugh a few times. She said I'd be hearing back directly from the New York Yankees whether good or bad but she couldn't give me a time frame. So, thanks for all the prayers and well wishes. All we can do now is wait. I'll keep you updated when I hear back from them.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 04:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Derek Jeter, Poor Defender: Myth or Fact?



I'm sure I don't see Jeter as much as most since I'm not a Yankee fan, but from what I've seen and heard from others is that Jeter's biggest problem is his range has diminished dramatically over the last few years.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 04:35 PM

Irish, I'll keep my fingers crossed for you!
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 04:42 PM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Well to give everyone a quick update, I had my phone interview today with Talent Plus. They said it'd take about a hour but it wound up being 45 minutes. It was an unusual interview for me because she said it was structured and she'd be asking me a series of questions that I couldn't ask her the meaning of. I just needed to best decide for myself what each question meant and answered it to the best of my ability.

But again, overall I think it went well. I made her laugh a few times. She said I'd be hearing back directly from the New York Yankees whether good or bad but she couldn't give me a time frame. So, thanks for all the prayers and well wishes. All we can do now is wait. I'll keep you updated when I hear back from them.


Good luck Irish! We might nickname you Costanza in no time wink
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 05:22 PM

LoL, thanks guys.
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 05:43 PM


Originally Posted By: Irishman12
best decide for myself what each question meant and answered it to the best of my ability.

Out of curiosity, any examples?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 07:10 PM

What does the term "flow" mean to me and provide examples of it in my life
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 08:01 PM


That must be hard in an interview. I could probably write 1000 words on it, but to come up with it on the spot, verbally and coherently -- I can't imagine...
Posted By: Tony Mosrite

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 08:07 PM

oh my God. that is a hairy question lol anyway good luck irish. don't even tell us what the hell you answered...

Originally Posted By: Just Lou
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Derek Jeter, Poor Defender: Myth or Fact?



(...) what I've seen and heard from others is that Jeter's biggest problem is his range has diminished dramatically over the last few years.


of course people brought that up at the original site of the article - dugoutcentral.com. the main point is that Jeter does not commit a lot of errors because he does not even get to many balls that an average SS would. "Converting batted balls hit into play into outs is what matters, and he is not very good at it relative to the rest of shortstops in the league".

"It is not about errors, but the amount of plays a defender makes. His range is poor and he does not get to a lot of balls that go through as base hits that would be converted into an out by an average or slightly below average shortstop"

"They (scouts) call him Past-A-Diving Jeter because he is always on his back after balls an average shortstop would get to without diving go in for base knocks"
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 02/25/09 08:29 PM

Originally Posted By: J Geoff

That must be hard in an interview. I could probably write 1000 words on it, but to come up with it on the spot, verbally and coherently -- I can't imagine...


It was. I had a 4 page sheet with common interview questions (about 50 total) and went over them a few times but many of these questions I had never heard before. They'd ask you a question and if you said yes (which you would of course), you'd have to provide an example and it's hard to do on the spot as you said.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 05:19 PM

A-Rod: Out 10 weeks with hip surgery.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 06:59 PM

Well, at least it happened early in the season, and not in September or October. Oh, wait, it's ARod!! He's never helped in the postseason anyway!
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 10:07 PM

lol...he wont be a yankee in two years...hell maybe next year he will be on a different team.
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 10:14 PM

The local news just had a "tease" story (before a commercial) saying that he may not need surgery. No details yet.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 11:27 PM

The Yankees say "they're exploring all options" including rest. A-Rod's brother says he's having surgery Monday.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/05/09 11:36 PM

Originally Posted By: SC
The local news just had a "tease" story (before a commercial) saying that he may not need surgery. No details yet.


I heard he could be out for up to 4 months now (possibly the season if it's bad enough)
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/08/09 03:18 PM

TAMPA, Fla. -- Alex Rodriguez will have arthroscopic hip surgery Monday and is expected to miss six to nine weeks. The Yankees slugger will need further surgery after the season.

The diagnosis by Dr. Marc Philippon on Sunday was yet another jolt to Rodriguez during a tumultuous month in which the three-time AL MVP admitted using steroids from 2001-03 while with Texas.

Philippon spoke from Vail, Colo., on a conference call with Yankees general manager Brian Cashman. Philippon, a noted hip specialist, will perform the procedure. Also on the call was team physician Chris Ahmad.

The decision eliminates the option of Rodriguez treating the injury with rest and rehab and playing through the season without surgery. This operation will not completely correct the hip. More aggressive surgery would have sidelined Rodriguez three to four months.

"The surgery that will just repair the labrum tear right now would shorten his rehab," Cashman said. "Then following the conclusion of the season going in and repair the remaining aspects that need to be repaired."

Rodriguez has a torn labrum and a cyst in his right hip. The cyst was drained Wednesday, and he had additional tests Friday to test the hip's strength and flexibility.

His hip had been fine until he experienced stiffness during spring training this year. The injury forced the 12-time All-Star to skip the World Baseball Classic, where he was to play for the Dominican Republic.

Philippon attributed the labrum tear to the rotational stress that Rodriguez -- "a very strong hitter, strong batter" -- places on his hip.

"Because of all the test findings, analysis, the function of Alex, I feel it's in his best interest to have his labrum repaired, remove part of his impingement and therefore stabilize his labrum," he said. "The goal here is to allow Alex to rehab rapidly in a safe manner."

Rodriguez is in the second season of a record $275 million, 10-year contract. Now, New York must try replace its third baseman and cleanup hitter, placing further responsibility in the batting order on new first baseman Mark Teixeira.

The leading candidate from the organization to take over at third base would be Cody Ransom, a 33-year-old who has a .251 average and 24 RBIs in 183 at-bats in six major league seasons.

Last year, Rodriguez was sidelined from April 28 to May 20 because of a strained right quadriceps -- his fifth career trip to the disabled list. An MRI exam at that time showed what Cashman called an "irregularity" in the right hip.

Rodriguez's 138 games last season were his fewest since 1999, when he tore cartilage in his left knee during a spring training agility drill March 30. He played in the first two games of that season with Seattle, then was put on the disabled list April 7 and missed 32 games until he returned May 14.

Since joining the Yankees before the 2004 season, Rodriguez has averaged 42 homers and 123 RBIs to go with a .303 average.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/23/09 08:55 PM

Curt Schilling retires
Posted By: fathersson

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/23/09 09:28 PM

Eat your heart out Irish...THREE RINGS!

By the way, what happened to your usher Job?
Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 12:26 AM

i bet that he will be back at mid season just like clemons...to which team idk maybe cubs or rays.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 02:53 AM

I don't think Schilling will come back as there aren't any more bullets in the gun. Start the countdown to Cooperstown.
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 04:04 AM

I'm afraid he will come back in the media somehow and we'll never hear the end of his theories and accusations.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 10:34 AM

Originally Posted By: Blibbleblabble
I'm afraid he will come back in the media somehow and we'll never hear the end of his theories and accusations.


Unfortunately, I believe that you're right
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 10:49 AM

And this belongs in the Yankees thread why???
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/24/09 10:15 PM

Because we've posted other Curt Schilling material here before and I felt this was the best news from him that I've ever heard grin
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/25/09 04:57 PM

As a displaced Yankee fan I need a little TV advice. Two years ago when I moved to South Jersey, I subscribed to Direct TV. Comcast is the local cable carrier. They offered me a "Sports" package for $12, which included YES (and a bunch of other sports channels). I was elated! This was July. For the month I saw 3 games. They blacked out the rest. I cancelled the service.

Now, with the new stadium and optimism high, I inquired again. There appears to be no blackout, unless CBS, NBC, ABC or FOX carry the game. It's the same Sports package as two years ago. Do you think they are yankin' my doodle again, like two years ago? Anyone else have this experience?
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/25/09 05:45 PM

No, MC. We switched to FIOS from Cablevision last year and didn't have a problem. YES is included in our rate.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/25/09 06:43 PM

My best advice to you, Mary Cas, is to drop the Yankees like a hot potato, become a Phillie fan, hold your head high, and watch all the games on Comcast Sports in South Jersey.
Posted By: Sicilian Babe

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/25/09 08:45 PM

Originally Posted By: klydon1
My best advice to you, Mary Cas, is to drop the Yankees like a hot potato, become a Phillie fan, hold your head high, and watch all the games on Comcast Sports in South Jersey.


Blasphemer!!!
Posted By: Don Cardi

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/25/09 09:57 PM

Now I know why SB loves President Obama so much :








It's almost uncanny!
Posted By: Blibbleblabble

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/26/09 03:19 AM

I'll bet all half black/half white people look the same to you. tongue

Posted By: BAM_233

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/26/09 03:28 AM

why bother watching the yankees...i mean really its not like they are going to the playoffs or anything.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/26/09 10:18 AM

Originally Posted By: BAM_233
why bother watching the yankees...i mean really its not like they are going to the playoffs or anything.


No you're right. They're just going to win the World Series
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/26/09 12:49 PM

Originally Posted By: Don Cardi
Now I know why SB loves President Obama so much :








It's almost uncanny!


One spent 2007 and 2008 going after Bush, and the other is President of the United States. blush
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/27/09 04:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
Originally Posted By: klydon1
My best advice to you, Mary Cas, is to drop the Yankees like a hot potato, become a Phillie fan, hold your head high, and watch all the games on Comcast Sports in South Jersey.


Blasphemer!!!


Double Blasphemer you Stealer fan. What no Pirates? Are you a team straddler? And BAM too! Don't be hijackin' the Yankee thread! grin

Besides, what team creates more soap operas than the Yankees?
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/31/09 08:27 PM

I heard back from the Yankees today. I did not get the job
Posted By: pizzaboy

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/31/09 08:30 PM

Sorry, kid.

It's probably just as well. It sounds like it was a glorified usher's job anyway. It'd be a lot of fun until the novelty wore off, but probably not a lot of room for advancement.

Hang tough with the bank!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/31/09 08:49 PM

Thanks PB
Posted By: J Geoff

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/31/09 11:14 PM


Yeah, I12... sorry to hear it! frown

BTW, please start all new on-topic thoughts in the 2009 Yankees thread...
Posted By: SC

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 03/31/09 11:44 PM

That's too bad, Irishman. I know you must be disappointed but at least you'll never kick yourself for not applying.
Posted By: klydon1

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 04/01/09 12:26 AM

Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: BAM_233
why bother watching the yankees...i mean really its not like they are going to the playoffs or anything.


No you're right. They're just going to win the World Series


Hold your head up, Irish. I'm sure that there were many applicants, probably few of whom will bring the enthusiasm to the job that you would have.. Passing up on you was the biggest mistake the Yankees made since signing Carl Pavano. ohwell

Hey, if you don't mind slumming it, go apply with the Mets. grin
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: How bout them Yankees!? (2008) - 04/01/09 02:31 AM

LoL, thanks guys. I do feel relieved now to at least know. Like Tom Petty said, the waiting is the hardest part.
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET