Posted By: ibbi
Instead of Godfather 4... - 10/27/02 05:09 PM
personally i don't think that they should make another film to add to the trilogy because that will ruin it. a trilogy should never be expanded on. i think that if something has to be done then it should be a whole new trilogy to stand alone (like star wars).
1.this could either be set after godfather 3 with vincent and possibly some sons of his own and their story set over a trilogy.
2.or you could have a trilogy of prequels set before godfather 1 showing the families rise to power in america, this way you could use deniro again.
3.you could have a trilogy of films to plug the gaps.
part1-set between deniro's final scene in part 2 and the first scene of part 1-showing families rise to power.
part 2-set between part 1 and 2 showing how the family settle in nevada and how clemenza dies and expand more on michaels relationship with roth.
part3-set between 2 and 3 showing families move to legitimacy, tom's death and emergence of joey zaza.
this would be most difficult as all original actors would have to be replaced.
1.this could either be set after godfather 3 with vincent and possibly some sons of his own and their story set over a trilogy.
2.or you could have a trilogy of prequels set before godfather 1 showing the families rise to power in america, this way you could use deniro again.
3.you could have a trilogy of films to plug the gaps.
part1-set between deniro's final scene in part 2 and the first scene of part 1-showing families rise to power.
part 2-set between part 1 and 2 showing how the family settle in nevada and how clemenza dies and expand more on michaels relationship with roth.
part3-set between 2 and 3 showing families move to legitimacy, tom's death and emergence of joey zaza.
this would be most difficult as all original actors would have to be replaced.