IvyLeague, you're not going to actually dignify this with a response, are you?
You know, I don't know how many times I can address this same issue over and over again before my just throw up my hands and give up.
I have doen research. In my opinion they have faded, and are on way out. It is natural course of events. I would not call Chicago smaller, maybe in numbers, maybe not. However in labor rackets and gambling they are seemingly bigger than any New York Family, in my opinion.
What exactly have you been researching?
Back in 2007, around the time of the "Family Secrets" case in Chicago, the feds said the Outfit had 28 made members and a little over 100 associates.
By comparison, the Colombos, the smallest family in New York, has a little over 100 made members and approximately 500 associates. In other words, their total manpower is 4 times the size of the Outfit.
There's been relatively little in the way of labor rackets in Chicago in recent years. Several Outfit guys were booted from the Laborers Union in the late 1990's and early 2000's. And the report on the Teamsters, during the RISE investigation, showed primarily residual, limited mob influence.
By comparison, there have continued to be one labor racketeering case after another in New York. Compared to New York, Chicago and other remaining families have only a fraction of the union activity.
Gambling? Again, no comparison. The Outfit has bookmaking and video poker rackets. But the NY families do as well and their operations are much bigger and more widespread. The Outfit has had nothing close to even some of the gambling operations the smaller NY families have.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The modern day Outfit, the Outfit of 2012, is much more comparable to the New England, New Jersey, and Philadelphia families than any of the NY families.