Posted By: JustMe
A question about revenge. - 02/26/06 04:36 PM
I've recently watched a TV program about Luciano.
What struck me:
That prosecutor(forgot his name) who put him in jail, then became governor, and after all Lucky's collaboration in WWII signed his deportation to Sicily, appears to be his main enemy. But, Luciano went there without any attempt to have his revenge. Then, of course, in America they didn't follow old codes strictly. But as far as Dickie tells us, avenging your enemies is a matter of respect, if you refrain from vendetta, you will not be respected.
However, after coming to Sicily, he settled there very well, and the way he lived selling heroin makes it seem that he had enough respect from Sicilian families.
My question is: why the fact that his wrongs remained unavenged, did not affect the respect he got? Was it because of his connections/money that were useful, or was this question already theoretical even in Sicily?
What struck me:
That prosecutor(forgot his name) who put him in jail, then became governor, and after all Lucky's collaboration in WWII signed his deportation to Sicily, appears to be his main enemy. But, Luciano went there without any attempt to have his revenge. Then, of course, in America they didn't follow old codes strictly. But as far as Dickie tells us, avenging your enemies is a matter of respect, if you refrain from vendetta, you will not be respected.
However, after coming to Sicily, he settled there very well, and the way he lived selling heroin makes it seem that he had enough respect from Sicilian families.
My question is: why the fact that his wrongs remained unavenged, did not affect the respect he got? Was it because of his connections/money that were useful, or was this question already theoretical even in Sicily?