I'm not a huge fan of the guy's work as a few I know, but I generally like the guy's movies. Besides, what other top-major filmmaker that a huge corporate entity like Disney is willing to give huge gobs of cash to do really slow directing that really takes its time?
Also, UNBREAKABLE wasn't a bomb. It broke(har har) about $248 million around the globe(and thats not including the VHS/DVD and PPV markets), same with VILLAGE. Point is, as long as M. Night Shymalamadingdong(
) makes money, Disney will fund the guy to make his movies.
In other words, the guy's movies could have been better I agree, but they are still worth my time. More so than I have gotten from the likes of Renny Harlin and Michael Bay in the last decade or so.
EDIT - I agree with Busta, except that Shymalan is not the next Hitchcock or Spielberg(remember that f*cking stupid NEWSWEEK cover when SIGNS came out? "The Next Spielberg?" :rolleyes: ). He is only the next Shymalan and thats it. Its like in the late 70's when filmmakers like John Carpenter(subject of my upcoming Tribute) and Brian DePalma were likened as the next Hitchcock by many critics or PR reps. However, most filmmakers may share similar "-esque" qualities that show their "tip of influence", yet they are still their own unique individual autuer moviemakers.