Home

Super Bowl

Posted By: exgigirl

Super Bowl - 01/23/06 02:11 AM

Right now it looks like the Steelers and the Seahawks. Go Steelers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Mignon

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 02:32 AM

Yea go Black and Gold
Posted By: The Iceman

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 04:18 AM

Go Seahawks!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Double-J

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 04:26 AM

GO STEELERS!!! RIDE THE %&)#($&! BUS!!!
Posted By: fathersson

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 04:29 AM

I do love this part of the season, and now its the Super bowl! The parties, with the food, the commercials, the game itself. It is like another holiday.
Posted By: Just Lou

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 04:53 AM

Early line has the Steelers favored by 4. Kinda' surprises me.
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 04:59 AM

I think the Steelers will win by a Touch Down.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 06:48 AM

Let's go Steelers! Win it for Cower!!
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 10:23 AM

Posted By: Mignon

Re: Super Bowl - 01/23/06 09:36 PM

Here is lyric's to this Steeler song I've been hearing on the radio:

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl
Here we go

Cheer the Steelers, Black and the Gold
Here we go
Town of Pittsburgh's, Heart and Soul
Here we go
With Cowher power, will get the job done
This is the year will get that one for the thumb

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl

Here we go
We got Maddox, he's ready to throw
Here we go
To Ward, Antwaan, and Plaxio
Here we go
Will go to Bettis when we need a touchdown
and if you get his way hes goin to knock you around

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl

Here we go
Now the offense is ready to score
Here we go
And theres one thing we know for sure
Here we go
If we dont get it in the endzone
Will get 3 points off of Reeds big toe

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl

Here we go
We got Chad Scott, Hope, and Gildon
Here we go
Porter, Logan and Washington
Here we go
The other team aint going to gain any ground
Becuase the defense is going to bring the steel curtain down

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl

Here we go
Here we go
Here we go
Steelers, Here we go
Pittsburgh's going to the Super Bowl

HERE WE GO!!
Posted By: goombah

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 01:33 AM

I hope Worthlisberger gets knocked out the Super Bowl on his first throw, ala Carson Palmer. I've been watching pro football for more than 25 years and the Steelers are so unbelievably lucky to be there that it sickens me. Every break has gone their way in the playoffs. The only 2 teams as being as undeserving of making the Super Bowl as this year's Steelers were the '85 Patriots and the '94 Chargers. Both got spanked in the big game, which I hope will also happen to Pittsburgh.
Posted By: DonMichaelCorleone

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 01:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:
I've been watching pro football for more than 25 years
I thought you were in College or just graduated
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 12:03 PM

I've had time to calm down and think about the upcoming game now. I don't know if I can bear to watch it. But I can't not watch it. I don't think it's as late a kick off as usual. Should be around half past midnight here. Party time!

Goombah, I'd agree luck has been on our side but the last two games we've come out shooting and performing well. But our leads had increased due to turnovers falling our way. That means we get to play our syle of football and takes out the running element of the opponents. I don't know if we're going to be able to do that against Seattle but if we can it'd be a huge advantage to take Alexander out of the mix.
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 12:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Just Lou:
Early line has the Steelers favored by 4. Kinda' surprises me.
Me too. I figured Seattle as the favorite by maybe 3 or so.
Posted By: MaryCas

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 12:38 PM

Super Bowl 40 - go Stones, rock on baby. Call me when it's halftime.
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 12:52 PM

I hope the Stones don't have any "wardrobe malfunctions."

One of my favorite Stones albums is "Get Yer Ya Yas Out", a recording of their live performances at Madison Square Garden in the late 1960's.

There's a litttle chatter by Mick before a few of the songs, one where he says

"I think I just busted a button on my trousers. You wouldn't want my trousers to fall down now, would you?"
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 02:56 PM

It'll be a good game, and despite goombah's thoughts, I think the Steelers as their image of Tough Bastards defeated the #1, 2, and 3 seeds in the playoffs.....and on the road. What is lucky about that?

However, I do agree that the Seahawks still don't get any due respect. I mean, they only smacked the Panthers around like some kids beating up a kid with asthma.

Should be a good game, and hopefully our friends outside the Imperial Gates of America will watch and enjoy the wonders that is American Football...I mean besides Turi.

Now think of the following things:

*If the Seahawks win Super Bowl XL, it will be the first time that a Head Coach(Mike Holmgren) has won two Super Bowl titles with two different times. Many have gone to Super Bowls with more than one team(i.e. Don Schula), but none have ever won two with two different franchises.

*If the Steelers prevail, not only will they finally get the elusive fifth "Thumb Ring", they will be the 3rd franchise to do so, after the Cowboys and 49ers.

*Future Hall of Famer Jerome Bettis will play in Detroit for Super Bowl XL...which also happens to be his home town. One wonders if he has the homefield advantage in his pocket for this "neutral" matchup.

*Will Bill "Sgt. Slaughter" Cowher finally win the big one, and upgrade his legacy? Who knows, a Super Bowl victory might actually make him a possible Hall of Fame candidate in the future.

*The first Super Bowl game for the Seahawks.
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 03:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
Should be a good game, and hopefully our friends outside the Imperial Gates of America will watch and enjoy the wonders that is American Football...I mean besides Turi.
You'd be surprised how many outsiders to the US will watch the game. Most of the time it's just to work out what the fuss is about and sometimes for others it's just a want to be a part of something so big. Then for the minority it's for the love of the game. I usually have a few mates round for the game but I'm thinking about holding a mini party for it.

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
*If the Steelers prevail, not only will they finally get the elusive fifth "Thumb Ring", they will be the 3rd franchise to do so, after the Cowboys and 49ers.
One for the thumb!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
*Future Hall of Famer Jerome Bettis will play in Detroit for Super Bowl XL...which also happens to be his home town. One wonders if he has the homefield advantage in his pocket for this "neutral" matchup.
It'll be ironic that the Seahawks got here through homefield advantage. The Steelers made it all the way on the road. Steeler fans go everywhere and make their presence known. The Detroit/Bus factor will also help. I can imagine this being more of a homegame to the Steelers and the Seahawks playing their first road game. Who's going to feel the role reversal the most?
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: Super Bowl - 01/24/06 09:55 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:
I hope Worthlisberger gets knocked out the Super Bowl on his first throw, ala Carson Palmer. I've been watching pro football for more than 25 years and the Steelers are so unbelievably lucky to be there that it sickens me. Every break has gone their way in the playoffs. The only 2 teams as being as undeserving of making the Super Bowl as this year's Steelers were the '85 Patriots and the '94 Chargers. Both got spanked in the big game, which I hope will also happen to Pittsburgh.
Hmm, they went through the #1, #2, and #3 and got more points that the other team, I consider that being deserving.

RRA, Pittsburgh is also the first #6 seed to go through #1, #2, and #3 and make it to the Super Bowl.

I definitley think the Steelers will win.

THE STEELERS WILL WIN.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Super Bowl - 01/29/06 09:57 AM

Why this juvenile hate at the Steelers?

Last I checked, "Luck" is alot for the Steelers, since they won several games just to get to the Super Bowl. Trust me, if this was College Football, such opinions would be acceptable I guess, but this is the NFL. You know, we actually have a playoff system, where the best teams play each other out, until only one undisputed champ remains.

Oh and ya, I pick the Steelers to win as well!
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 02:22 PM

I am shitting bricks! Though the cider is starting to calm me down. Instead of just the usual crowd I have round for NFL games I'm hosting a Superbowl bash tonight. If we win it's going to be a decent night and morning as I'll wake up and have a few breakfast beers. If we lose I'm going to be in a right lousy mood and these fellas will see the worst of me. I'll end up punching someone in the mouth.
Posted By: Don Cardi

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 02:30 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Turi Giuliano:
I'm hosting a Superbowl bash tonight.
Wat da fock mang! Chu didn't invite me mang?

Have fun my friend, enjoy the game, and please don't punch anyone in the mouth!


Don Cardi
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 02:59 PM

I would have invited all my US buddies but I figured a day like this probably better spent in the right country for it. America is the place to be for today. Just another hour until NFL Countdown begins.

Don't worry my mates will be well looked after. Been out and got a ton of hotdogs and rolls for them. Plus I got MY shopping done:

Posted By: exgigirl

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 03:15 PM

If the Steelers win, maybe we'll actually see Bill Cowher SMILE!!!!!!!! Wouldn't that be a hoot?
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 03:18 PM

Ol' Popeye does smile. Just not often.
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: Super Bowl - 02/05/06 11:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by exgigirl:
If the Steelers win, maybe we'll actually see Bill Cowher SMILE!!!!!!!! Wouldn't that be a hoot?
Here.


Now you don't have to watch the game. :p
Posted By: Don Smitty

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 02:40 AM

Seattle lost this game themselves. Pittsburg did not beat them.

DS
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:04 AM

I'm so glad Cower got his ring. Congrats 2006 SuperBowl champs Pittsburgh Steelers!
Posted By: Don Andrew

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Smitty:
Seattle lost this game themselves. Pittsburg did not beat them.

DS
Nah, Pittsburgh beat them.

Congrats Steelers!!!!

So, did Cowher clinch his HoF induction?
Posted By: Patrick

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:10 AM

This was bullshit. The refs handed this game to the Steelers.
Posted By: Don Cardi

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:20 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
This was bullshit. The refs handed this game to the Steelers.
What game did you watch?

Congratulations to all the Steelers fans.


Don Cardi
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:32 AM

I was only off by 4 points in my prediction! Hey T.G. try not to get too drunk eh brother?! Congratulations to Bill Cowher, Hines Ward, the 2006 Super Bowl Champion Pittsburgh Steelers and their fans! Spring Training is right around the corner...Are you ready for some Baseball?!
Posted By: ginaitaliangirl

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Jasani:
Spring Training is right around the corner...Are you ready for some Baseball?!
YES!

Oh...sorry. I'm just gonna..you know, step out of here. Must've gotten lost. Don't know how I found my way into this thread. Um, yeah...my apologies.

Posted By: Patrick

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Cardi:
[quote]Originally posted by Patrick:
[b] This was bullshit. The refs handed this game to the Steelers.
What game did you watch? [/b][/quote]1. They took away a Seahawks touchdown for offensive pass interference when even Al and John said there was none.
2. They called an illegal block on Hasselback when he was going for the tackle after he threw a pick.
3. They gave a touchdown to Ben when the ball clearly never made it to the goal line.
4. They tried saying that Hasselback fumbled it when it was clear that he was pushed down, but luckily it was challenged by Holmgreen.

And don't get smart with me. K thanks.
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 04:12 AM

Fooking give it up Pat and check out the 2006 Superbowl winners. Pittsburgh baby.

1, Sure I'll agree the pass interference was weak. Hardly any contact was made (and contact is allowed to be made) but the mechanics of the defender made it look like he was pushed off.
2, N/A
3, I struggled over this. The concensus in my place agreed enough had crossed the line.
4, Diving forward always proves a risk it doesn't have the safe guarantee that sliding does. The call in the end was right.

I don't give a fuck though. Steelers won and nothing can be taken away. I've got to go to work tomorrow.
Posted By: ronnierocketAGO

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 04:49 AM

Not to mention that Jerome Bettis has basically said that he's officially retired. I can pencil him for election to the Hall of Fame in 2010...
Posted By: The Iceman

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 05:09 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
This was bullshit. The refs handed this game to the Steelers.
This is probably the only time I'll ever agree with you on something.

But if it weren't for all the bad calls against the Seahawks, they still f***ed themselves by the penalty's that were good calls.
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 06:39 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Jasani:
Spring Training is right around the corner...Are you ready for some Baseball?!
As Gina said, OH YES! I can't wait to see my Yanks win their 27th World Series title (sorry man, it's still not Toronto's year). They picked up some good players but I think they'll finish 3rd in the division at best (behind boston and the AL East Champ New York Yankees)
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 06:59 AM

I disagree, while I hope that my Blue Jays win the American League East you're probably right that it isn't our year yet. However, I do think we're gonna turn some heads and we will wind up winning the A.L. Wild Card. I even told some people at my work who don't really follow Baseball all that much that if the Jays do not win at least the wildcard this year I will come to work butt naked for one week! Upon hearing this they went straight to a Mosque and started praying that the Blue Jays win the A.L. Wild Card!

Seriously though, I think we have the pitching, the bats, the defense and the confindence to win at least the Wild Card this year. The Yankees will probably win the division but we will win the wild card..
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 11:28 AM

This is usually around the time that Turi shows up (unless he's still sleeping off his hangover because the "Big Game" was on at like 2:00 in the morning over there), so I'll take this opportunity to congratulate him on his Steelers win.



It's always nice when a real fan -- not some Johnny-Come-Lately Bandwagon Jumper-Onner -- gets to bask in his team's glory, like when the Red Sox won the World Series for SC
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 11:47 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:
I've been watching pro football for more than 25 years and the Steelers are so unbelievably lucky to be there that it sickens me. Every break has gone their way in the playoffs.
Let's be fair here, goombah.

I don't follow football as closely as I do baseball or basketball so please correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a playoff game a few years ago when they took a Tom Brady fumble recovery away from the Steelers on a call that looked so ridiculous on the replay that they wound up changing the rule?

And didn't New England go on to win it all that year?

As far as this year's Pittsburgh run goes, didn't the referees do everything in their power to give the Colts their game against the Steelers?

I'll be the last person in the world to be surprised if some day in the future there's a big scandal involving the officials betting on games, or the NFL telling the refs which team to favor on the close calls, and yeah, Seattle was the victim of a few bad ones last night, but it sure looked to me like the Steelers were the better team out on the field.
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 01:28 PM

Yes Plaw, many thanks. I'm so bloody hungover today. There's cars outside so at least my buddies didn't drive home. Apparantly I came online last night too

Lets see if I can handle another beer. (Few moments later) Oh god that's quite harsh.

I think you're on about the tuck rule controversy anyway, against the Raiders wasn't it? I get Goombah's frustrations, he's a proper sports and Cleveland fan and it's only natural for him to hate the Steelers. Man if Joey Porter wasn't Black and Gold I'd hate the guy but I love him because he is.
Posted By: goombah

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 01:34 PM

Plawrence
You are correct. That NE "tuck rule" was in 2001 vs. the Raiders. That is the last time there has been such controversy regarding officiating in the NFL playoffs. Until last night's Super Bowl that is. That's what pisses me off - officials being involved in the outcome of the game. Even the schills on ESPN this morning were talking equally about the bad officiating as they were the outcome and that should not be.

The officials didn't give the game to Pittsburgh, but they still made some unbelievably bad calls. Why I am so upset is that this is supposed to the best officials of the bunch and this is the biggest game of the year.

First bad call: The so called push-off by Darrell Jackson was the worst of the calls b/c it took away a TD and Seattle ended up getting a FG. Let's be honest, this was the equivalent of a defender putting his hands on a ball handler in basketball. The Pittsburgh defender didn't even move from the so called push off. It should have been a TD - no question.

2nd bad call: 2 plays in a row in the 2nd half Pittsburgh jumped offsides and nothing was called. On the 2nd play, the end result was Hasselback throwing the INT (I'm not implying the offside lead to the INT), and then having an even more horrible call - a chop block by the QB. Are you freaking kidding me? He dove at and tackled the guy who made the INT. It was the same f'ing thing that Roethlisberger did at the end of the Indy playoff game - namely, the QB trying to prevent the defender from trying to score.

3rd bad call: In the 4th quarter, Pittsburgh's play clock ran to zero very clearly, yet the officials still allowed Pitt to call a timeout after the clock ran out. That would have made it 3rd and long instead of 3rd and 2 or 3.

I'm not even mentioning the replay of the Roethlisberger TD b/c it was inconclusive on the replay. I don't think he got it in b/c the official's first reaction was to signal 4th down but then a second later the ref signals TD after Ben puts the ball over the line while having both knees on the ground. Having said that, I'd even let that slide b/c it was close.

The other 3 calls that I described were downright terrible. But Seattle wasted opportunities especially at the end of the first half. I expected more out of a coach who had already been to the Super Bowl twice before this game. And Holmgren had the best RB in the league and only gave it to Alexander 20 times and always took him out on 3rd down. There was no excuse for Seattle giving up those 2 big plays that resulted in TD's.
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 01:39 PM

There was another call in the first half - I swear I already forgot which team - that they called an incomplete pass after they had clearly caught the ball, turned, and started to run with it and then fumbled when he got hit.
Posted By: goombah

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 01:49 PM

I forgot about that one. That was another one where Seattle got hosed - they fumbled it out of bounds.
Posted By: plawrence

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 01:58 PM

Yeah, but I remember as it was rolling out of bounds the whistle had already blown and the defender had stopped going for the ball.
Posted By: Turi Giuliano

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 03:58 PM

Yep I ruled that one a fumble too but once seeing it go out of bounds i'm glad the call was incomplete. Over here in soccer we have a paradigm that throughout the season calls for and against, mostly penalties, are balanced. I'm going to continue to believe that.

Gil Brandt (who I don't like) rightly points out that the key play in the first quarter was the reversed Jackson TD. I was one of the first to admit the pass interference call was weak and still believe it was. I don't think there was any push, eyes were on the ball and there's no rule against feeling where your defender is. The body mechanics of the defender meant he wasn't in the right motion to follow the ball. It's a harsh call.

Sundays aren't the same from now on. I usually tape the probowl and watch it the next day. You'll know I'm getting desperate when I join a fantasy B Ball game. At least the AFL has started. Can't we set up a game for that? Go Rattlers!
Posted By: Irishman12

Re: Super Bowl - 02/06/06 07:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Jasani:
I disagree, while I hope that my Blue Jays win the American League East you're probably right that it isn't our year yet. However, I do think we're gonna turn some heads and we will wind up winning the A.L. Wild Card. I even told some people at my work who don't really follow Baseball all that much that if the Jays do not win at least the wildcard this year I will come to work butt naked for one week! Upon hearing this they went straight to a Mosque and started praying that the Blue Jays win the A.L. Wild Card!

Seriously though, I think we have the pitching, the bats, the defense and the confindence to win at least the Wild Card this year. The Yankees will probably win the division but we will win the wild card..
I gotta disagree with you. As much as I hate to say it and as much as I would love to see Toronto win the Wild Card, Boston will. They have a better rotation and better hitters with Ortiz, Ramirez, Nixon, etc. Plus, AJ Burnett still has to prove himself in the AL like Pavano still does and I wouldn't be surprised if both he and BJ Ryan are complete busts.
Posted By: Silvio

Re: Super Bowl - 02/07/06 12:06 AM

Im a Seattle native, and I can say that we lost the game with dropped passes and some bad coaching at the end. Keep in mind through this post, I said we lost it for our selves.

NOW TO THE FUCKING REFS

first of all, I think its ridiculous to have a 5 year offical as the head ref for the superbowl

As a Seahawks fan Ive seen us lose TWO regular season games in the last 3 years on COMPLETELY STUPID errors. Not judgement calls (pass interference, etc), but stupid errors. In the first, Baltimore was given a 4th timeout when we couldve taken a knee to win a big road game, cost us a first round bye week. That shouldve been remedied. On the second, Keyshawn Johnson had a Touchdown for a win when he had a foot out by about 10 inches, and we couldnt challenge, bc it was supposed to go to the booth. ALSO LETS NOT FORGET THAT VINNIE TESTAVERTE GETTING A TD WHEN HE WAS A FUCKING YARD SHORT WAS THE PLAY USED AS THE BIG ARGUEMENT FOR COACHES CHALLENGES IN GAMES. That shit kept us out of the playoffs that year, and cost Dennis Erickson his job.


I love instant replay, and with the exception of Polemalus pick in the Colts game, Ive never seen a HORRIBLE call after its been challenged, but I think SOMETHING needs to be changed

SOLUTION 1
Penalties should be challangeable, and likewise you should be able to challenge obvious blunders. Also, not that we wouldve won last night, but the Steelers SHOULD NOT have gotten that fucking timeout that he called an obvious second off the clock. I dont wanna bitch about the judgement calls, but that was complete fucking ignorance to whats going on by the crew.
If these rules applied too, we also couldve challenged Hasselbecks interception 1) where he "blocked" someone beneath the shins on a tackle 2) and the OBVIOUS offsides on the Steelers on that play that wasnt called

It wont ruin the flow of the game to fucking let coaches challenge on other plays, because theyd still have the same number of challenges


or

SOLUTION 2
Let the coach throw the flag more times (perhaps 5 or 7 times), and the booth can determine if the game is worth stopping to challenge it, then normal timeout/challenge rules apply.


The rules have gotten way too fucking complex, which isnt a problem, as long as you use equally complex technology to keep it in line. I think everyone agrees that challenges are a good thing, and there should be more of it when necessary
Posted By: goombah

Re: Super Bowl - 02/07/06 01:22 AM

Silvio

You echoed my sentiments except that I don't have a rooting interest for Seattle but do have a loathing for Pittsburgh.

Your point about the Testerverde non TD a few years ago is understood. But all the other bad calls over the past 15 years all have the same thing in common: none were in the Super Bowl. And this wasn't a single bad call in the Super Bowl, it was several bad calls or no-calls. There is NO excuse to have such 2nd rate officiating in a game that 50+ million people watch.

I'm sorry, but I heard some Pittsburgh defenders say "well look what we went through with the officiating in Indy." I don't buy that logic at all b/c two wrongs don't make a right. Pittsburgh still won the Indy game, but it was 1 bad call in that game that went against Pittsburgh. There were some other non-calls that went in Pitt's favor vs. Indy. If the shoe were on the other foot, Pittsburgh would still be crying on camera about the officiating.

I respect Holmgren for not publicly lashing out at the refs today. What I don't understand is how and why he kept quiet on the sidelines during the actual game. I would have been going ballistic if I was the head coach in a title game.
*************************

I'm looking back at past Super Bowl winners since 1980. I don't see a weaker winner over the past 26 years than this year's Steelers. And I'm not old enough to have seen every Super Bowl, but they may rank the worst of all 40, I just can't say for sure.

Every winner since then had at least 1 undeniable, amazing attribute about the team during the game - the defense of Chicago, Baltimore, and Tampa Bay. The offensive prowess of San Francisco, Dallas, Green Bay, and St. Louis. There were teams that won in the last minute or on the last play - St. Louis, SF, New England (twice), and the NYG. This year's Steelers had nothing special about its play in the Super Bowl except a gadget play.
Posted By: Silvio

Re: Super Bowl - 02/07/06 01:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by goombah:

Your point about the Testerverde non TD a few years ago is understood. But all the other bad calls over the past 15 years all have the same thing in common: none were in the Super Bowl. And this wasn't a single bad call in the Super Bowl, it was several bad calls or no-calls. There is NO excuse to have such 2nd rate officiating in a game that 50+ million people watch.


I respect Holmgren for not publicly lashing out at the refs today. What I don't understand is how and why he kept quiet on the sidelines during the actual game. I would have been going ballistic if I was the head coach in a title game.
*************************
I know, flaws in the regular season could be big flaws in the Super Bowl however. I dont feel like the reason the officials sucked was because this was a more important game, I think they just sucked. We have more then enough technology to account for horseshit like we saw yesterday, and the fact that a coach can only use it twice at risk of a timeout when the REFS are the ones fucking up is absurd.

Coaches Challenges are a great thing, and there are several other places they should be useable, namely on penalties, and obvious no calls (like Pitt being well offsides on Hasselbecks pick and the fucking missed false start near the end) that should have been made. Let the coaches challenge most/all the complete fuck ups, not just a few of them.

I hate complaining about officails. I really do. But its just really necessary in the NFL. Between the Super Bowl, Polemalus pick taken away, and Steve Smiths td punt return against the Hawks where flags were picked up for no apperent reason (when they WERE thrown for an obvious reason....maybe the NFL just wanted their beloved overrated Delhome in the big one again) Im fucking fed up. The NFL needs to fix their ways. What a terrible month of playoff football
Posted By: Don Jasani

Re: Super Bowl - 02/07/06 02:46 AM

Irish, yes we will have to disagree here but I don't believe that A.J. Burnett and B.J. Ryan will be busts, I realize that you didn't say that they necessarily will be busts but I am almost certain that they won't. The only thing I fear though, is that there are now enormous expectations that are being placed on the shoulders of these two young men. It's almost as if if Burnett does not win 25 games and strike out 300 batters and Ryan does not get 50 saves and have an E.R.A under 1.25 they will be considered failures. What adds to the expectations up here is the fact that we have not reached the Playoffs since 1993 (our second and last World Series year) and Torontonians are starting to get a bit antsy..

Although I think that you're desire to see the Blue Jays in the Playoffs and the RedSox out stems more from your hatred of the BoSox than your admiration for the Jays I'll take it. In any case a Blue Jay vs. Yankee Playoff series would be extremely exciting and might set attendence records for a non World Series series.
Posted By: goombah

Re: Super Bowl - 02/07/06 10:30 PM

Check out what ESPN poll results thought of the officiating in the Super Bowl.
Posted By: Silvio

Re: Super Bowl - 02/08/06 06:02 AM

That says it, considering that about 65-70% told Sportsnation they were ROOTING for the Steelers awhile back

The discovery that the ref who made the call against Darrel Jackson was born and raised in Pittsburgh didnt make me any happier either. What a crock of shit

There is absolutely no redemption either. Mariners, Sonics, Seahawks have all have good teams no and then, but no rings since the year before Magic Johnson got drafted into the NBA. So long. One now couldve justified all the waiting.

Its really unbearable. Id watch tv a few years back and see Red Sox fans crying about their team. Boo fucking hoo you guys had a basketball dynasty there, and were right in the middle of a football one.

I havent seen my city win anything (and dont say WNBA, id rather find a $5 dollar bill on the ground, thats how little I care about that leauge) in my whole fucking life

When the Sonics made it in 1996, that was just bad luck. 72-10 Bulls, what can you do. We played them well, perhaps gave the best effort of any of the 5 teams they beat in the Finals. I was disappointed, but what I am feeling now is NOWHERE near that.

We could have beaten them. Not saying it WOULD have turned out that way, but the refs sure made it impossible.

Fuck this
© 2024 GangsterBB.NET