Yes that would be great Maranzano is still an enigma, He had strong connections to Chicago, but he wasn't long in the US he came after WWI.

Later ill post some additional stuff regarding Chicagos pre-Prohibition era Dutch racketeers, although Ill need some help from you regarding the Dutch names.

Regarding Capone...if you ask me there was one "small" difference between leaders like Colosimo and Torrio, and the younger ones like Capone. They all literally inherited many lucrative operations and connections from their "predecessors" or allies from the former Irish or multi-ethnic mob, mostly in a peaceful way, but the difference was that the old guys like Torrio trusted all of their so-called loyalists probably too much. For example, Colosimo was probably killed by his own loyalists, while Torrio was almost killed allegedly by other former loyalists who in turn previously betrayed him to the cops, an action which resulted with Torrio killing their leader. On the other hand, Capone already knew this and chose his loyalists carefully and eliminated everyone in quite violent style, which was used to send message to the rest of their rivals. And as you already know, during those days, besides the Italian CN and Camorra, there were numerous other clans and so someone needed to place them in line under one top administration. And so thats how Capone's (multi-ethnic) Outfit was born with the Italian brotherhood at the top, meaning the bloodbath was inevitable. According to some sources, Capone allegedly was convincing other Midwest Italian bosses to do the same thing (hence Milton Rockman in Cleveland and the Purple gang in Detroit). Thats why I always say that the Chicago group was "slightly" unique then the rest of the Italian families, since the Chi boys worked with everyone and almost "breached" the limits between the Italian brotherhood and their trusted non-Italian associates. Or as Outfit non-Ital leader Murray Humphreys once said "I remember how it used to be in the old days, with us, when Al (Capone) used to run us guys all over. We trusted each other, see?!", followed by Ferraro's legendary statement "This is all one clique"., meaning both Itals and non-Itals belonged to the same crime syndicate.

I located this supposedly AI generated sketch of Maranzano off this website.
https://mafiahistory.us/maf-who.html#M
Apparently this site is supported by Informer Magazine, which has provided some well researched information previously.
Allegedly, Maranzano was sent over to the US by Vito Cascio Ferro, and arrived in Canada and entered the the US through the northern border. There's a wide variety of possible entry dates listed from 1918 to 1925, although there's no independent corroboration of exactly when he entered.
I have also attached a video about the many inaccurate images of Maranzano.

Yes, thats not Maranzano. It was debunked by Rick and many other researchers and I think its some old singer or actor. I made the same mistake years ago.

That isn't a historical image, it is one generated by AI from the murder scene images, commissioned by Informer Magazine.
"For the July 2009 issue, Informer attempted to blend the crime scene photos and sketch into an image of the living Maranzano. But there was no method of gauging the accuracy of the result."
https://mafiahistory.us/maf-b-ny.html

The other two misidentified images of Maranzano are actually of Salvatore Messina (1), and more recently an image of German serial killer Peter Kurten (2) whom was misidentified in Piccola.

Currently i cant find the original pic and you can ask the guys and theyll also tell you that the original pic is from some singer or actor, I dont remember. I also think that the Informer guys apologized regarding the mistake, or something like that...maybe im mixing some details since it was long time ago...brw, what about D'Aquila's pic?

Don't take my word for it. Here's an episode from OC Shortz confirming that the original image I posted is an AI generated image commissioned by Informer magazine.

Shortz's video is from 3 years ago, while Im telling you what people found out more then 5 or 6 years ago when I made some of my old charts, I made a mistake by placing the so-called "AI" pic (although i think there still wasnt any AI at the time), and I was instantly corrected by other posters with the same pic but from an actual different individual, obviously not Maranzano. Ask Rick and i think he'll tell you the same thing.

I don't know "Rick". Following your point, why would Informer magazine claim to be the originator of the image, and that its accuracy isn't clear? The image doesn't really match his murder scene images either so I really wouldn't say it's an original image, but I could see where it may be a computer assisted image vaguely resembling what little we can see of his face in the murder scene. I'm trying to be as objective as possible.

Im not going against your word since Im telling you like it is. In plane words, the pic is a fraud and its "computer assisted" from an actual historical individual (again, actor or singer) with a bow tie and tux, and think there were long stairs behind him or something like that.

In 1921, one of Chicago "less known" gambling racketeers Harry Romaine aka Romain died of natural causes. Romain was quite rich mobster who belonged to the old syndicate that was ruled by Mike McDonald, Harry Varnell and John Condon, and also had close ties to both Colosimo and Torrio...

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/97400773/james_harold_romain

I just received a response from Informer Magazine. I'm not here to start shit with anybody, but facts are facts.

The only way to get a photo of him is to get in touch with his relatives Angela Domingo was/is the wife of Mariano Maranzano, Salvatore's son. Her nephew current regent of Castellammare.

The guy says that he doesnt have first clue on how Maranzano looked like and this is just a guess. The pic you posted from Maranzano doesnt have stairs behind him, its deformed and doesnt have a darker shadow on the right eye, but what about this one? This means there are two different pics floating around right? And the one Im posting it to you right now is more realistic then the previous one right?

I don't see where because the images are different, the predecessor can be determined. I'm only the messenger, Mr. Thomas Hunt, author, editor and publisher of Informer magazine is the one claiming to have created the image, not me. If you disagree, hey more power to you, it's of no consequence to me really. I'm just trying to get to the bottom of the rabbit hole so I can move on to the next one.

Same here buddy and believe me together we solved the "mystery" that there are two different pics, with one possibly being the original, followed by the "computer" version. But one question still remains, meaning whether the "original" one was also "computer assissted" with more professional and artistic skills? I personally doubt it but still...

From 1939....